Transdermal Buprenorphine, Opioid Rotation to Sublingual Buprenorphine, and the Avoidance of Precipitated Withdrawal: A Review of the Literature and Demonstration in Three Chronic Pain Patients Treated With Butrans

Efficacy of transdermal buprenorphine patch for managing withdrawal symptoms in patients with cancer physically dependent on prescription opioids

BACKGROUND

The physical dependence on prescription opioids among cancer survivors remains an under-investigated area, with a scarcity of well-designed prospective studies.

METHODS

This single-arm, phase-2 clinical trial in Korea assessed the efficacy and safety of a transdermal buprenorphine patch (TBP) in managing physical dependence on prescription opioids in cancer survivors, as confirmed through the DSM-5 criteria or psychiatric consultation for opioid withdrawal. This study involved a 4-phase treatment protocol of screening, induction/stabilization, discontinuation, and monitoring. The primary outcome was the rate of successful opioid discontinuation, as measured by a negative urine-drug screening at 8 weeks. Key secondary outcomes included the resumption of prescribed opioids, changes in both the Clinical Opioid Withdrawal Scale (COWS) and morphine equivalent daily dose (MEDD), and assessments related to the psychological and physiological aspects of dependence and safety.

RESULTS

Thirty-one participants were enrolled. In the intention-to-treat population, the success rate of opioid discontinuation was 58%, with only 2 participants experiencing a resumption of prescribed opioids. Significant reductions were observed in MEDD, which decreased from 98 to 26 mg/day (P < .001), and COWS scores, which decreased from 5.5 to 2.8 (P < .001). Desire to use opioids reduced from 7.0 to 3.0 on a 10-point numeric rating scale (P < .001). Toxicities related to TBP were mild and manageable, without severe precipitated withdrawal symptoms.

CONCLUSION

TBP may be considered as an alternative therapeutic option in cancer survivors physically dependent on prescription opioids, especially where sublingual formulations are unavailable.

Buprenorphine for Pain: A Narrative Review and Practical Applications

Chronic noncancer pain affects about 20% of US adults and can significantly affect function and quality of life. Current guidelines recommend multimodal pain control. Despite risks associated with long-term opioid therapy, opioids are commonly prescribed. Buprenorphine is a partial opioid agonist with an improved safety profile compared to full agonists. Some formulations are approved for chronic pain and others for opioid use disorder. Buprenorphine is an option for patients who use chronic daily opioids for pain. This review summarizes the literature on buprenorphine's efficacy and safety for chronic pain and provides recommendations to generalists on initiation, titration, and monitoring of buprenorphine-based pain treatment. We also discuss a communication approach when considering buprenorphine for pain.

Low-dose Initiation of Buprenorphine/naloxone for the Management of Chronic Non-cancer Pain in Patients on Long-term Opioid Therapy: A Case Series

Background

Buprenorphine may provide superior analgesia to full opioid agonist therapy and reverse the effects of opioid-induced hyperalgesia, while having a favorable safety profile and fewer adverse effects, in chronic non-cancer pain treatment. Low-dose initiation of buprenorphine is a useful strategy for patients on long-term opioid therapy because it avoids the need for moderate opioid withdrawal required for traditional buprenorphine initiations. However, there are few published reports of low-dose initiation regimens in the setting of chronic pain.

Aims

The aim of the study was to describe a case series of individuals living with chronic pain who were transitioned from long-term full opioid agonist therapy onto sublingual buprenorphine/naloxone using low-dose initiation regimens.

Methods

This study is a retrospective case series that included all patients who received care at an outpatient chronic pain clinic and were scheduled for low-dose initiation of buprenorphine/naloxone between March 2020 and December 2022. Data were collected through a retrospective review of electronic medical records and results were analyzed using descriptive statistics.

Results

Eighteen patients underwent transitions from their baseline opioids onto buprenorphine/naloxone using a low-dose initiation regimen. Of those patients, 17 successfully completed the initiation (94.44%), 12 experienced adverse effects during the initiation (66.67%), with only one patient requiring treatment discontinuation, and all adverse effects resolved once maintenance doses of buprenorphine/naloxone were established. The mean Clinical Global Impression-Improvement score after initiation was 2 (1-5).

Conclusion

Low-dose initiation is an effective approach to transition patients with chronic non-cancer pain from long-term opioid therapy to buprenorphine/naloxone without major complications or worsening pain.

Survey of Buprenorphine Low-dose Regimens Used by Healthcare Institutions

BACKGROUND

Buprenorphine microdosing ("low-dosing") allows for initiation of buprenorphine without requiring patients to endure withdrawal. Case studies suggest its favorable utility as an alternative to conventional buprenorphine induction. However, published regimens vary in duration, dosage forms used, and timing of full opioid agonist discontinuation.

METHODS

This cross-sectional survey study sought to determine how buprenorphine low-dosing is approached by medical institutions across the United States. The primary end point was characterization of inpatient buprenorphine low-dosing regimens. Situations and types of patients in which low-dosing is used and obstacles to institutional protocol development were also collected. An online survey was disseminated through professional pharmacy organizations and personal contacts. Responses were collected over 4 weeks.

RESULTS

Twenty-three unique protocols were collected from 25 institutions. Most protocols used buccal (8 protocols) or transdermal (8 protocols) buprenorphine as first doses before transitioning to sublingual buprenorphine. The most common starting doses were buprenorphine 20 μg/h transdermal, 150 μg buccal, and 0.5 mg sublingual. Patients unable to tolerate conventional buprenorphine induction or those who potentially used fentanyl nonmedically were most likely to be prescribed low-dosing. The most common obstacle to developing an internal low-dosing protocol was lack of existing consensus guidelines.

CONCLUSIONS

Similar to published regimens, internal protocols are variable. Buccal first doses may be used more commonly in practice based on survey results, while transdermal first doses are more commonly reported in publications. More research is needed to determine whether differences in starting formulations impact safety and efficacy of buprenorphine low-dosing in the inpatient setting.

Low Dose Buprenorphine Initiation: A Guide for the Inpatient Clinician

Low dose buprenorphine initiation (LDBI) is a dosing strategy used to transition patients from full opioid agonists to buprenorphine. The purpose of LDBI is to circumvent obstacles associated with disruption in analgesia, precipitated withdrawal, and prerequisite opioid withdrawal prior to initiating buprenorphine, as not all patients are able to tolerate physical withdrawal symptoms recommended by national guidelines. No literature exists directly comparing traditional buprenorphine initiation to LDBI. Until information on long-term outcomes is available, these dosing strategies should be reserved for patients unable to tolerate traditional buprenorphine initiation. Available published research suggests LDBI strategies will allow some patients to successfully transition to buprenorphine with minimal or no symptoms of withdrawal. Ensuring access to pharmacotherapy during hospital admission is a crucial time for potential intervention and should be considered when appropriate. This narrative review discusses the background of LDBI strategies as well as practical clinical and operational considerations for the inpatient clinician.

48-hour Induction of Transdermal Buprenorphine to Sublingual Buprenorphine/Naloxone: The IPPAS Method

Buprenorphine is an effective medication for the treatment of opioid use disorder. However, the traditional method of buprenorphine induction requires a period of abstinence and the development of at least moderate withdrawal, which can be barriers in starting treatment. We present the case of a hospitalized patient with opioid use disorder using unregulated fentanyl, who underwent a transdermal buprenorphine induction over 48 hours to initiate sublingual buprenorphine/naloxone on the third day. The patient experienced minimal levels of withdrawal and did not experience precipitated withdrawal. The ease of use of this novel induction method over previously published induction protocols can greatly improve the accessibility of buprenorphine for patients and healthcare staff.

Development of an intravenous low-dose buprenorphine initiation protocol

BACKGROUND

Buprenorphine is a life-saving treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD). Low-dose initiation (LDI) is an emerging buprenorphine initiation strategy that circumvents barriers associated with standard initiation. This study aims to describe tolerability and completion of LDI using intravenous (IV) buprenorphine and to define dosing protocols in a cohort of patients hospitalized in an urban academic hospital.

METHODS

Data was collected via retrospective chart review for IV buprenorphine LDI cases initiated between September 1, 2020 and February 28, 2021. Cases were excluded if diagnostic criteria for OUD was not met, Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale (COWS) scores were not recorded, or sublingual (SL) buprenorphine was given within 24 h before IV buprenorphine. Completion of LDI and COWS data were assessed for all cases. Cases were categorized based on adherence to a dosing strategy and LDI indication, including OUD and acute pain, non-prescribed fentanyl exposure, and transition from methadone.

RESULTS

Seventy-two cases were identified, and thirteen cases were excluded, leaving 59 cases in the population. Of these cases, 72.9% (43/59) tolerated LDI, and 91.5% (54/59) completed buprenorphine initiation. Forty-four (44/59, 75%) cases were adherent. Median duration of LDI within the adherent group was 23.7 h (IQR 22.8-27.0), 37.1 h (IQR 36.2-40.9), and 48.8 h (IQR 47.0-52.4) for the "rapid," "moderate," and "slow" dosing strategies, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

IV buprenorphine LDI was tolerated and completed in a majority of patients. Dosing protocols allowed for rapid transition to sublingual buprenorphine. Acute pain or recent methadone or fentanyl exposure may inform IV LDI dosing strategy selection.

Outpatient Microdose Induction with Transdermal Buprenorphine: A Case Series

Transdermal buprenorphine is FDA approved for chronic severe pain but has an increasing amount of data supporting its use to transition patients from full opioid agonists to sublingual buprenorphine via a microdose strategy. The literature has primarily focused on patients with a pain diagnosis or who have been prescribed opioids in inpatient units. This case series reviews the use of transdermal buprenorphine to transition patients from methadone and illicit opioids to sublingual buprenorphine. The authors identified seven patients from an outpatient opiate treatment program who received the transdermal buprenorphine protocol. All patients were prescribed methadone and used illicit heroin prior to and during the transition. Five patients (71.4%) successfully completed the transition to sublingual buprenorphine, with all five patients reporting no or mild withdrawal symptoms. These findings suggest that transdermal buprenorphine is a potentially safe and effective microdose induction method for patients who use illicit substances in an outpatient setting.

Buprenorphine initiation strategies for opioid use disorder and pain management: A systematic review

Buprenorphine possesses many unique attributes that make it a practical agent for adults and adolescents with opioid use disorder (OUD) and/or acute or chronic pain. Sublingual buprenorphine has been the standard of care for treating OUD, but its use in pain management is not as clearly defined. Current practice guidelines recommend a period of mild‐to‐moderate withdrawal from opioids before transitioning to buprenorphine due to its ability to displace full agonists from the μ‐opioid receptor. However, this strategy can lead to negative physical and psychological outcomes for patients. Novel initiation strategies suggest that concomitant administration of small doses of buprenorphine with opioids can avoid the unwanted withdrawal associated with buprenorphine initiation. We aim to systematically review the buprenorphine initiation strategies that have emerged in the last decade. Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Databases were searched for relevant literature. Studies were included if they were published in the English language and described the transition to buprenorphine from opioids. Data were collected from each study and synthesized using descriptive statistics. This review included 7 observational studies, 1 feasibility study, and 39 case reports/series which included 924 patients. The strategies utilized between the literature included traditional initiation (47.9%), microdosing with various buprenorphine formulations (16%), and miscellaneous methods (36.1%). Traditional initiation and microdosing initiation were compared in the data synthesis and analysis; miscellaneous methods were omitted given the high variability between methods. Overall, 95.6% of patients in the traditional initiation group and 96% of patients in the microdosing group successfully rotated to sublingual buprenorphine. Initiation regimens can vary widely depending on patient‐specific factors and buprenorphine formulation. A variety of buprenorphine transition strategies are published in the literature, many of which were effective for patients with OUD, pain, or both.

Transdermal buprenorphine for in-hospital transition from full agonist opioids to sublingual buprenorphine: a retrospective observational cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Patients with opioid use disorder may have difficulty transitioning from full-agonist opioids to sublingual buprenorphine due to the risk of precipitated opioid withdrawal. Novel strategies have been developed to facilitate this transition, including the use of micro-dosing with transdermal buprenorphine. We began using a transdermal buprenorphine transition strategy at our hospital in 2019.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective observational cohort study of patients treated with transdermal buprenorphine to facilitate transition from full-agonist opioids (prescribed or recreational) while hospitalized between January 2019 and December 2020. Patients were excluded if transdermal buprenorphine was given for pain, if they did not receive at least one dose of sublingual buprenorphine while hospitalized, or if their clinical course precluded analysis of their tolerance of the transition protocol. Data on the doses and timing of medications, symptoms during transition, and hospital outcomes were abstracted from the electronic medical record.

RESULTS

We identified 41 cases that satisfied inclusion and exclusion criteria. Thirty-five cases involved a transition from medically indicated opioids; of these, 8 cases involved a transition from methadone. Six cases involved a transition from illicit opioids used prior to hospital presentation. For patient transitioning from medically indicated opioids, the median milligram morphine equivalent (MME) on the day prior to transdermal buprenorphine application was 63.8 (range 0-900, IQR 153.8) and the median MME on the day of transdermal buprenorphine application was 34.5 (range 0-600, IQR 65.3). The median initial dose of sublingual buprenorphine administered was 8 mg (range 2-8mg, IQR 6mg), the median total first-day dose was 16mg (range 2-24mg, IQR 16mg), and the median total daily dose on the last day of follow-up was 16mg (range 2-24mg, IQR 16mg). In 38 cases, patients completed the transition to sublingual buprenorphine and were still taking buprenorphine at the time they left the hospital. The transition protocol was fairly well-tolerated, with 59% of cases tolerating it well and 32% tolerating it fairly.

DISCUSSION

Our findings suggest that the use of transdermal buprenorphine to facilitate transition to sublingual buprenorphine is generally well-tolerated, and may be helpful in hospitalized patients. We identified several areas for improvement in future practice by reviewing the clinical courses of patients who tolerated transition poorly. Limitations of the study include its retrospective chart review design, the lack of a standardized transition protocol during the study period, and the lack of standardized data in the medical record regarding patients' tolerance of the transition protocol. Future research should include prospective studies using a standardized protocol and structured, pre-planned assessments of opioid withdrawal during the transition period.

CONCLUSION

The use of transdermal buprenorphine to facilitate induction of sublingual buprenorphine therapy in hospitalized patients with OUD was generally well-tolerated in this single-center retrospective observational study. Further prospective research is needed to demonstrate efficacy and optimize treatment protocols.

Buprenorphine Microdosing for the Pain and Palliative Care Clinician

Buprenorphine (BUP) can be a safe and effective alternative to traditional opioids for many patients with chronic pain. For patients on higher doses of opioids, rotation to BUP is complicated by the requirement of an opioid-free interval or withdrawal during the transition. Microdosing inductions, in which BUP is gradually titrated, while full agonist opioids are continued, are a viable alternative to traditional inductions. The objective of this article is to review the current literature on BUP microdosing induction, with a focus on patients using opioids for pain. A literature review of the PubMed database was performed in the United States on articles published from inception to May 2021. A total of 34 publications were included. The most commonly utilized microdosing strategy involved administering divided doses of sublingual (SL) products marketed for opioid use disorder treatment, with 25 (73.5%) articles reporting use of partial SL tablets or films (ranging from 1/8 to 1/2 of a 2 mg product) at some point during the induction. Transdermal patches, low-dose SL BUP available in Europe, intravenous BUP, and buccal BUP have also been used. Beyond the products used, the speed of the microinduction, setting, final BUP dosing, and management of concomitant full agonists vary widely in the literature. Microdosing regimens should be individualized based on local guidelines and patient-specific factors. Further studies comparing the safety and efficacy of different protocols are warranted.

Low Dose Initiation of Buprenorphine: A Narrative Review and Practical Approach

Low dose buprenorphine initiation, is an alternative method of initiating buprenorphine in which the starting dose is very low and gradually increased to therapeutic levels over a period of days. This method takes advantage of slow displacement of the full opioid agonist from mu-opioid receptors, avoiding the need for a person with opioid use disorder to experience opioid withdrawal symptoms before initiating buprenorphine, while also minimizing the risk of precipitated opioid withdrawal. With this initiation method, full opioid agonists can be continued as buprenorphine is initiated, expanding the population to which buprenorphine can be offered. To date, the literature on low dose initiation is primarily case-based but rapidly growing. While evidence emerges, guidance for the use of low dose initiation is clearly desired and urgently needed in the context of an increasingly risky and contaminated opioid drug supply, particularly with high potency synthetic opioids, driving overdose deaths. Despite limited evidence, several principles to guide low dose initiation have been identified including: (1) choosing the appropriate clinical situation, (2) initiating at a low buprenorphine dose, (3) titrating the buprenorphine dose gradually, (4) continuing the full opioid agonist even if it is nonmedical, (5) communicating clearly with frequent monitoring, (6) pausing or delaying buprenorphine dose changes if opioid withdrawal symptoms occur, and (7) prioritizing care coordination. We review a practical approach to low dose initiation in hospital-based and outpatient settings guided by the current evidence.

Treating Chronic Pain with Buprenorphine-The Practical Guide

OPINION STATEMENT

Buprenorphine has unique and favorable pharmacological properties that make it useful in a variety of clinical scenarios. It has been recommended to consider buprenorphine first-line opioid for chronic pain, especially in the elderly as it may be associated with less cognitive impairment, falls, sexual dysfunction, and sarcopenia when compared with schedule II opioids. It may be useful in patients with comorbid substance use disorder or non-medical opioid use, as there is less risk of misuse, euphoria and it may improve mood. When used to treat opioid use disorder, the training and waiver was recently waived for licensed practitioners with a DEA and any provider may prescribe buprenorphine. For many reasons outlined in this article, the popularity of using buprenorphine for analgesia continues to grow and a practitioner should consider this as an excellent and safe option for chronic pain.

Initiating buprenorphine to treat opioid use disorder without prerequisite withdrawal: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Opioid withdrawal symptoms prior to buprenorphine initiation may be intolerable and as a result, alternative strategies have emerged. We aim to systematically review the efficacy and safety of buprenorphine initiation that aims to omit prerequisite withdrawal.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic literature search of MEDLINE and CENTRAL from 1996 through April 10, 2020, augmented with searches in Google Scholar and www.clinicaltrials.gov . A study was included if it was in patients with substance use disorder or chronic pain that were taking a full mu opioid agonist and transitioning to buprenorphine without preceding withdrawal, and reported withdrawal during initiation as an outcome. Two investigators independently screened citations and articles for inclusion, collected data using a standardized data collection tool, and assessed study risk of bias.

RESULTS

We included 15 case reports/series, reporting 24 unique cases, in our qualitative synthesis. No controlled studies were identified. Microdosing and bridging with a buprenorphine patch were the most common strategies reported. Transition to buprenorphine with complete cessation of opioid agonists was achieved in 87.5% (n = 21) of cases. Withdrawal during initiation occurred in 58.3% (n = 14) of cases, two of which were at least moderate in severity.

CONCLUSION

Buprenorphine initiation strategies that omit prerequisite withdrawal have emerged. Low quality evidence from case reports suggests withdrawal during initiation is common but most often mild in severity. There is an unmet need for controlled studies to inform their efficacy and safety compared with traditional strategies, including outcomes during initiation and in the long-term.

Rapid Induction Therapy for Opioid-Use Disorder Using Buprenorphine Transdermal Patch: A Case Series

INTRODUCTION

Opioid dependency is a major epidemiologic problem with profound morbidity and mortality. Despite the availability of effective treatments, there are often overwhelming barriers to those treatments.

CASE PRESENTATIONS

We present a case series involving a novel approach to the induction phase of buprenorphine or buprenorphine-naloxone therapy using transdermal buprenorphine. This approach has been demonstrated in inpatient settings but has not been widely explored in the outpatient setting. We demonstrated that a range of patients, from the highly medically complex to relatively straightforward cases, benefited from this approach.

DISCUSSION

We believe that this approach can be used in a wide range of patients to transition from opioid use to buprenorphine therapy without the patient having to experience withdrawal or wait to start treatment. This should reduce the risk of lack of return for follow-up as well as decrease the dropout rate caused by patients being unable to tolerate withdrawal symptoms.

The Pharmacology of Buprenorphine Microinduction for Opioid Use Disorder

Although expanding the availability of buprenorphine—a first-line pharmacotherapy for opioid-use disorder (OUD)—has increased the capacity of healthcare systems to offer treatment, starting this medication is fraught with significant barriers. Standard induction regimens require persons with OUD to taper and discontinue full opioid agonists and experience opioid withdrawal prior to the first dose of buprenorphine. Further, emerging evidence indicates that precipitated withdrawal during induction may impact long-term treatment outcomes. Microinduction is a novel approach that, by harnessing buprenorphine’s unique pharmacological profile, may allow circumventing the needed for prolonged opioid tapers, and reduce the risk of precipitated withdrawal—holding promise to enhance treatment access. In this review, we examine the pharmacological basis for microinduction and appraise the evidence of this approach to improve clinical outcomes among persons with OUD. First, we highlight the potential dose-dependent effects of buprenorphine on two key neuroadaptations at the mu-opioid receptor (MOR)—resensitization and upregulation. We then focus on how microinduction may reverse these chronic MOR neuroadaptations, allowing the maintenance of an adequate opioid tone, and thereby potentially circumventing opioid withdrawal. Second, we describe the clinical evidence available, derived from observational reports and open-label studies, examining the potential efficacy of microinduction. Despite significant heterogeneity—exemplified by variable buprenorphine formulations, daily doses, and schedules of administration—these data provide preliminary support for the feasibility of microinduction. Finally, we provide new mechanistic, methodological, and clinical insights to guide future translational research, as well as randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials in this compelling agenda of pharmacotherapy development.

Case Report: Buprenorphine Induction Using Transdermal Buprenorphine in a Veteran With Opioid Use Disorder and Psychosis, Managing Precipitated Withdrawal

Buprenorphine induction can lead to precipitated opioid withdrawal, even when using novel techniques such as transdermal buprenorphine. Involuntary limb movements are a distressing symptom of precipitated withdrawal that can be difficult to treat. We report a case of a military veteran transitioning from methadone to buprenorphine for the treatment of opioid use disorder (OUD) using small doses of transdermal buprenorphine. Herein, we review the literature associated with opioid withdrawal-related restlessness. Despite the known risk of concurrent benzodiazepine and buprenorphine administration, including decreased respiratory rate and death, we present a clinical presentation in which this medication combination may be necessary while under medical supervision. We suggest a stepwise algorithm for pharmacotherapy in patients experiencing involuntary limb movements associated with precipitated withdrawal. To safeguard the success of medication-assisted treatment (MAT) for opioid addiction, clinicians should be aware of potential clinical challenges when managing precipitated opioid withdrawal in patients with complex psychiatric comorbidities.

Remote buprenorphine-naloxone initiation as an essential service for people with chronic pain and opioid dependence during the COVID-19 pandemic: Case reports, clinical pathways, and implications for the future

Many health care professions have reacted swiftly to the COVID-19 pandemic. In-person care has been ramped down and telemedicine/telehealth has been thrust to the forefront of clinical care. For people living with chronic pain and often concomitantly dealing with opioid-related issues, this is a time of great stress. With population-wide movements to shelter in place, people living with pain are more isolated, more stressed, and more vulnerable to mental health concerns like depression and anxiety that can increase pain-related suffering. This article presents two case reports of patients struggling with chronic pain and opioid dependence in which a telemedicine-based buprenorphine-naloxone conversion was chosen as a treatment option by two Canadian programs: The Transitional Pain Service at the Toronto General Hospital in Toronto, Ontario, and The Opioid Deprescribing Program in Calgary, Alberta. Both cases presented highlight the use of telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic and suggest that there will be substantial need for these services well beyond the apex of the crisis. A buprenorphine-naloxone home induction protocol is presented and we provide insight into important lessons learned regarding the appropriate selection of patients with chronic pain struggling with opioid use disorder for buprenorphine-naloxone conversion. The provision of health care during the COVID-19 pandemic has rapidly forced practitioners to evolve novel health care practices, and these changes will have long-term implications.

Understanding Buprenorphine for Use in Chronic Pain: Expert Opinion

OBJECTIVE

An expert panel convened to reach a consensus on common misconceptions surrounding buprenorphine, a Schedule III partial µ-opioid receptor agonist indicated for chronic pain. The panel also provided clinical recommendations on the appropriate use of buprenorphine and conversion strategies for switching to buprenorphine from a full µ-opioid receptor agonist for chronic pain management.

METHODS

The consensus panel met on March 25, 2019, to discuss relevant literature and provide recommendations on interpreting buprenorphine as a partial µ-opioid receptor agonist, prescribing buprenorphine before some Schedule II, III, or IV options, perioperative/trauma management of patients taking buprenorphine, and converting patients from a full µ-opioid receptor agonist to buprenorphine.

RESULTS

The panel recommended that buprenorphine's classification as a partial µ-opioid receptor agonist not be clinically translated to mean partial analgesic efficacy. The panel also recommended that buprenorphine be considered before some Schedule II, III, or IV opioids in patients with a favorable risk/benefit profile on the basis of metabolic factors, abuse potential, and tolerability and that buprenorphine be continued during the perioperative/trauma period. In addition, switching patients from a full µ-opioid receptor agonist to buprenorphine should be considered with no weaning period at starting doses that are based on the previous opioid dose.

CONCLUSIONS

These recommendations provide a framework for clinicians to address most clinical scenarios regarding buprenorphine use. The overall consensus of the panel was that buprenorphine is a unique Schedule III opioid with favorable pharmacologic properties and a safety profile that may be desirable for chronic pain management.

Opioid use disorder in pregnancy

The number of pregnant people affected by the opioid epidemic in the United States continues to rise. The following key aspects of opioid use disorder in pregnancy are explored through the progression of a pregnancy via a patient case: treatment options, treatment decisions, substance use screening, dosing modifications, and other aspects of peripartum care. Many factors affect opioid use disorder treatment choices during pregnancy; however, when a pregnant person is medically eligible for a therapy and multiple options are available locally, the ultimate decision regarding treatment selection should be left up to the patient and strong support services provided. This approach to treatment results in optimal maternal and neonatal outcomes and long-term maternal engagement and retention in care.

Case Series: Limited Opioid Withdrawal With Use of Transdermal Buprenorphine to Bridge to Sublingual Buprenorphine in Hospitalized Patients

BACKGROUND

Prerequisite opioid withdrawal symptoms prior to buprenorphine induction are unacceptable to many patients. We assessed whether transdermal buprenorphine minimized withdrawal while bridging to sublingual therapy among hospital inpatients.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of (n = 23) inpatients with opioid use disorder or opioid dependence due to chronic pain.

RESULTS

Of 23 inpatients, 65% transitioned without symptoms, while 35% experienced mild withdrawal. Ninety-six percent completed planned hospitalizations, with 83% engaged in treatment 4 weeks post-discharge.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

Bridging to sublingual therapy with transdermal buprenorphine patches was feasible without withdrawal symptoms.

SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE

This strategy may facilitate buprenorphine therapy in hospital inpatients. (Am J Addict 2019;00:1-4).

Buprenorphine/naloxone induction for treatment of acute on chronic pain using a micro-dosing regimen: A case report

Background: Due to its unique pharmacologic properties, efficacy as an analgesic, and role as a first-line medication for the treatment of opioid use disorder, sublingual buprenorphine has emerged as a treatment for patients with concurrent chronic pain and opioid use disorders. One challenge to utilizing buprenorphine is that precipitated opioid withdrawal can result if this medication is initiated in the presence of other opiates with lesser binding affinities. Micro-dosing induction regimens utilize a slower titration to avoid the need for a period of abstinence from other opiates and decrease the risk of precipitated withdrawal.

Aims: The aim of this article is to present a case where a standardized micro-dosing induction regimen was used to transition a patient from other opiate analgesia to a sublingual formulation of buprenorphine/naloxone.

Methods: This case took place on an inpatient neurosurgical unit of a Canadian tertiary-care city hospital. Written informed consent was collected prior to a detailed chart review.

Results: Here we present a case of a postoperative neurosurgical inpatient who was referred to our team for pain management in the context of chronic pain and a past history of opioid use disorder. She was successfully transitioned to buprenorphine/naloxone, replacing all other opioid analgesia, without a period of opioid withdrawal using a micro-dosing induction regimen.

Conclusions: Sublingual buprenorphine/naloxone can be safe and effective for treatment of chronic pain, particularly for those with past or current opioid use disorder. Micro-dosing provides a preferable induction strategy for patients who are not able to tolerate the requirement for moderate opioid withdrawal prior to initiation with existing regimens.

What Parenteral Opioids to Use in Face of Shortages of Morphine, Hydromorphone, and Fentanyl

Parenteral potent opioid availability is becoming an issue in acute pain management. Two opioids, nalbuphine and buprenorphine, are available which can be substituted for hydromorphone, fentanyl, and morphine. There are advantages and disadvantages in using these 2 opioids which are discussed, and potential dosing strategies are outlined.