Practice Patterns of Physicians and Nurse Practitioners in Primary Care

Continuous glucose monitoring among nurse practitioners in primary care: Characteristics associated with prescribing and resources needed to support use

BACKGROUND

Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) can improve health for people with diabetes but is limited in primary care (PC). Nurse Practitioners (NPs) in PC can improve diabetes management through CGM, but NPs' interest in CGM and support needed are unclear.

PURPOSE

We describe behaviors and attitudes related to CGM for diabetes management among NPs in PC.

METHODOLOGY

This cross-sectional web-based survey of NPs practicing in PC settings used descriptive statistics to describe CGM experience and identify resources to support prescribing. We used multivariable regression to explore characteristics predicting prescribing and confidence using CGM for diabetes.

RESULTS

Nurse practitioners in hospital-owned settings were twice as likely to have prescribed CGM (odds ratio [OR] = 2.320, 95% CI [1.097, 4.903]; p = .002) than private practice; those in academic medical centers were less likely (OR = 0.098, 95% CI [0.012, 0.799]; p = .002). Past prescribing was associated with favorability toward future prescribing (coef. = 0.7284, SE = 0.1255, p < .001) and confidence using CGM to manage diabetes (type 1: coef. = 3.57, SE = 0.51, p < .001; type 2: coef. = 3.49, SE = 0.51, p < .001). Resources to prescribe CGM included consultation with an endocrinologist (62%), educational website (61%), and endocrinological e-consultations (59%).

CONCLUSIONS

Nurse practitioners are open to prescribing CGM and can improve diabetes management and health outcomes for PC patients.

IMPLICATIONS

Research should explore mechanisms behind associations with CGM experience and attitudes. Efforts to advance CGM should include educational websites and endocrinology consultations for NPs in PC.

Provision of evaluation and management visits by nurse practitioners and physician assistants in the USA from 2013 to 2019: cross-sectional time series study

OBJECTIVE

To examine the proportion of healthcare visits are delivered by nurse practitioners and physician assistants versus physicians and how this has changed over time and by clinical setting, diagnosis, and patient demographics.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional time series study.

SETTING

National data from the traditional Medicare insurance program in the USA.

PARTICIPANTS

Of people using Medicare (ie, those older than 65 years, permanently disabled, and people with end stage renal disease), a 20% random sample was taken.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The proportion of physician, nurse practitioner, and physician assistant visits in the outpatient and skilled nursing facility settings delivered by physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants, and how this proportion varies by type of visit and diagnosis.

RESULTS

From 1 January 2013 to 31 December 2019, 276 million visits were included in the sample. The proportion of all visits delivered by nurse practitioners and physician assistants in a year increased from 14.0% (95% confidence interval 14.0% to 14.0%) to 25.6% (25.6% to 25.6%). In 2019, the proportion of visits delivered by a nurse practitioner or physician assistant varied across conditions, ranging from 13.2% for eye disorders and 20.4% for hypertension to 36.7% for anxiety disorders and 41.5% for respiratory infections. Among all patients with at least one visit in 2019, 41.9% had one or more nurse practitioner or physician assistant visits. Compared with patients who had no visits from a nurse practitioner or physician assistant, the likelihood of receiving any care was greatest among patients who were lower income (2.9% greater), rural residents (19.7%), and disabled (5.6%).

CONCLUSION

The proportion of visits delivered by nurse practitioners and physician assistants in the USA is increasing rapidly and now accounts for a quarter of all healthcare visits.

Impact of Beliefs About Local Physician Supply and Self-Rated Health on Willingness to See a Nurse Practitioner During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Web-Based Survey and Experiment

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic overburdened primary care clinicians. For nurse practitioners (NPs) to alleviate the burden, the public must be willing to see an NP over a physician. Those with poor health tended to continue seeking care during the pandemic, suggesting that they may be willing to see an NP.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to evaluate the public's willingness to see an NP for primary care and how this may be associated with their beliefs about the local supply of physicians and self-rated health. Two studies were conducted: (1) a survey to identify correlations and (2) an experiment to assess how willingness is dependent on information about the local supply of physicians.

METHODS

The survey and experiment were conducted digitally in April and December 2020, respectively. Participants were US adults recruited from Amazon's Mechanical Turk platform. The key independent variables were self-rated health, which was a dichotomized 5-point scale (excellent, very good, good vs fair, and poor), and beliefs about local physician supply. The survey measured beliefs about local physician supply, while the experiment manipulated beliefs by altering information the participants read about the local supply of physicians. Willingness to see an NP was assessed in 2 ways. First as an overall preference over a physician and the second as a preference given 2 clinically significant scenarios in which participants imagined they were experiencing either coughing or a headache (presentation order randomized). Multiple regressions and ANOVAs were used to assess how beliefs about the local physician supply and self-rated health were associated with overall willingness to see an NP. Bivariate probits simultaneously estimated willingness to see an NP in the 2 clinically significant scenarios.

RESULTS

The survey showed that concerns about physician supply were associated with lower willingness to see an NP among respondents with comparatively better health but a greater willingness among respondents with comparatively worse health. The experiment suggests that only the latter is causal. For the 2 clinically significant scenarios, these patterns appeared for the coughing scenario in the survey and the headache scenario in the experiment.

CONCLUSIONS

US adults with comparatively worse self-rated health become more willing to see an NP for primary care when they hear information that raises their concerns about the local physician supply. The differences between the survey and experiment results may be useful for interpreting findings from future studies. Findings may aid in managing finite health care resources during public health crises and crafting successful messaging by NP advocacy groups. Efforts to address nursing shortages will also be needed.

Changes in Barriers That Cause Unmet Healthcare Needs in the Life Cycle of Adulthood and Their Policy Implications: A Need-Selection Model Analysis of the Korea Health Panel Survey Data

Using 68,930 observations selected from 16,535 adults in the Korea Health Panel Survey (2014-2018), this study explored healthcare barriers that prevent people from meeting their healthcare needs most severely during adulthood, and the characteristics that are highly associated with the barrier. This study derived two outcome variables: a dichotomous outcome variable on whether an individual has experienced healthcare needs, and a quadchotomous outcome variable on how an individual's healthcare needs ended. An analysis was conducted using a multivariable panel multinomial probit model with sample selection. The results showed that the main cause of unmet healthcare needs was not financial difficulties but non-financial barriers, which were time constraints up to a certain age and the lack of caring and support after that age. People with functional limitations were at a high risk of experiencing unmet healthcare needs due to a lack of caring and support. To reduce unmet healthcare needs in South Korea, the government should focus on lowering non-financial barriers to healthcare, including time constraints and lack of caring and support. It seems urgent to strengthen the foundation of "primary care", which is exceptionally scarce now, and to expand it to "community-based integrated care" and "people-centered care".

Frequency Of Indirect Billing To Medicare For Nurse Practitioner And Physician Assistant Office Visits

Nurse practitioners (NPs) and physician assistants (PAs) represent a growing share of the health care workforce, but much of the care they provide cannot be observed in claims data because of indirect (or "incident to") billing, a practice in which visits provided by an NP or PA are billed by a supervising physician. If NPs and PAs bill directly for a visit, Medicare and many private payers pay 85 percent of what is paid to a physician for the same service. Some policy makers have proposed eliminating indirect billing, but the possible impact of such a change is unknown. Using a novel approach that relies on prescriptions to identify indirectly billed visits, we estimated that the number of all NP or PA visits in fee-for-service Medicare data billed indirectly was 10.9 million in 2010 and 30.6 million in 2018. Indirect billing was more common in states with laws restricting NPs' scope of practice. Eliminating indirect billing would have saved Medicare roughly $194 million in 2018, with the greatest decrease in revenue seen among smaller primary care practices, which are more likely to use this form of billing.

Characteristics Associated With Financial or Non-financial Barriers to Healthcare in a Universal Health Insurance System: A Longitudinal Analysis of Korea Health Panel Survey Data

While many studies have explored the financial barriers to healthcare, there is little evidence regarding the non-financial barriers to healthcare. This study identified characteristics associated with financial and non-financial barriers to healthcare and quantified the effects of these characteristics in South Korea, using a nationally representative longitudinal survey dataset. Overall, 68,930 observations of 16,535 individuals aged 19 years and above were sampled from Korea Health Panel survey data (2014-2018). From self-reported information about respondents' experiences of unmet healthcare needs, a trichotomous dependent variable-no barrier, non-financial barrier, and financial barrier-was derived. Sociodemographics, physical and health conditions were included as explanatory variables. The average adjusted probability (AAP) of experiencing each barrier was predicted using multivariable and panel multinomial logistic regression analyses. According to the results, the percentage of people experiencing non-financial barriers was much higher than that of people experiencing financial barriers in 2018 (9.6 vs. 2.5%). Women showed higher AAPs of experiencing both non-financial (9.9 vs. 8.3%) and financial barriers (3.6 vs. 2.5%) than men. Men living in the Seoul metropolitan area showed higher AAPs of experiencing non-financial (8.7 vs. 8.0%) and financial barriers (3.4 vs. 2.1%) than those living outside it. Household income showed no significant associations in the AAP of experiencing a non-financial barrier. People with a functional limitation exhibited a higher AAP of experiencing a non-financial barrier, for both men (17.8 vs. 7.8%) and women (17.4 vs. 9.0%), than those without it. In conclusion, people in South Korea, like those in most European countries, fail to meet their healthcare needs more often due to non-financial barriers than financial barriers. In addition, the characteristics associated with non-financial barriers to healthcare differed from those associated with financial barriers. This finding suggests that although financial barriers may be minimised through various policies, a considerable degree of unmet healthcare needs and disparity among individuals is very likely to persist due to non-financial barriers. Therefore, current universal health insurance systems need targeted policy instruments to minimise non-financial barriers to healthcare to ensure effective universal health coverage.

The effect of nurse practitioner scope of practice laws on primary care delivery

Nurse practitioners (NPs) are an increasingly integral part of the primary care workforce. NPs' authority to practice without physician oversight is regulated by state-level scope of practice (SOP) restrictions. To the extent that SOP restrictions prevent NPs from practicing to their full abilities and capacity, they could create inefficiencies and restrict access to health care. In this paper, I study what happens at primary care practices when states relax their SOP laws. Using a novel dataset of claims and electronic health records paired with a difference-in-differences research design, I quantify the effects of relaxing SOP laws on: (1) NPs' autonomy in their day-to-day jobs; (2) total workload and patient allocation between NPs and physicians; and (3) the provision of low-value services at primary care practices. I find some evidence that NPs practice more autonomously following SOP changes, but I find no evidence that relaxing SOP laws changes the volume nor allocation of patients to NPs, nor the provision of low-value services. Given the lower reimbursement that NPs typically receive, these findings suggest that allowing NPs to practice without physician oversight could reduce health care spending, without harming patients.

The effect of Medicaid expansion on Medicaid participation, payer mix, and labor supply in primary care

Evidence of increased health care utilization associated with the Medicaid expansion suggests that clinicians increased capacity to meet demand. However, little is known about the mechanism underlying this response. Using a novel source of all-payer data, we quantified clinicians' response to the Medicaid expansion - examining whether and how they changed their Medicaid participation decisions, payer mix, and overall labor supply. Primary care clinicians in expansion states provided an average of 49 additional appointments per year (a 21% relative increase) for patients insured by Medicaid, compared to clinicians in non-expansion states - with new-patient visits representing half (25 appointments) of this overall increase. Clinicians did not increase their labor supply to accommodate these additional appointments. They instead offset the 1.7 percentage point average increase in Medicaid payer mix with an equivalent reduction in commercial payer mix. However, this reduction in commercial patient share represented only a 2.8% relative decrease, with commercially insured patients still comprising the majority of the average clinician's patient panel. Subsample analyses revealed a larger increase in care for Medicaid patients among clinicians with high Medicaid participation preceding the eligibility expansion.

Care received by patients from nurse practitioners and physicians in U.S. primary care settings

OBJECTIVE

Nurse practitioners (NPs) and physicians serve in both usual source of care (USC) and supplement roles to each other in the provision of primary care to patients. Yet little is known about the care that patients receive from providers in these roles. This study examined the care individuals received when NPs and physicians served in USC and supplemental roles.

DATA SOURCES

Pooled data from the Household Component of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey 2002-2013.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional, secondary data analysis using propensity score matching and multinomial logistic regression.

DATA COLLECTION

Data were collected from a national subsample of households.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Regardless of provider role, patients reported receiving more therapeutic or preventive care from NPs but more diagnostic care and biomedical treatments from physicians. Patients reported having similar diagnoses when seen by NPs and physicians serving in USC roles, but different diagnoses when NPs and physicians served in supplemental roles.

CONCLUSIONS

NPs and physicians providing different care when serving in the same role. Findings can inform policy-makers as they develop policies for serving patients and utilizing the relevant expertise of NPs and physicians.