1
|
Duncanson E, Davies CE, Muthuramalingam S, Johns E, McColm K, Hempstalk M, Tasevski Z, Gray NA, McDonald SP. Patient Perspectives of Center-Specific Reporting in Kidney Failure Care: An Australian Qualitative Study. Kidney Int Rep 2024; 9:843-852. [PMID: 38765598 PMCID: PMC11101730 DOI: 10.1016/j.ekir.2024.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2023] [Revised: 12/13/2023] [Accepted: 01/02/2024] [Indexed: 05/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Public reporting of quality of care indicators in healthcare is intended to inform consumer decision-making; however, people may be unaware that such information exists, or it may not capture their priorities. The aim of this study was to understand the views of people with kidney disease about public reporting of dialysis and transplant center outcomes. Methods This qualitative study involved 27 patients with lived experience of kidney disease in Australia who participated in 11 online focus groups between August and December 2022. Transcripts were analyzed thematically. Results Patients from all Australian states and territories participated, with 22 (81%) having a functioning kidney transplant and 22 (81%) having current or previous experience of dialysis. Five themes were identified as follows: (i) surrendering to the health system, (ii) the complexity of quality, (iii) benefits for patient care and experience, (iv) concerned about risks and unintended consequences, and (v) optimizing the impact of data. Conclusion Patients desire choice among kidney services but perceive this as rarely possible in the Australian context. Health professionals are trusted to make decisions about appropriate centers. Public reporting of center outcomes may induce fear and a loss of balanced perspective; however, it was supported by all participants and represents an opportunity for self-advocacy and informed decision-making. Strategies to mitigate potential risks include availability of trusted clinicians and community members to aid in data interpretation, providing context about centers and patients, and framing statistics to promote positivity and hope.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Duncanson
- Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry, South Australia Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Christopher E. Davies
- Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry, South Australia Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Adelaide Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Shyamsundar Muthuramalingam
- Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry, South Australia Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Effie Johns
- Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry, South Australia Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Kate McColm
- Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry, South Australia Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Matty Hempstalk
- Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry, South Australia Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Transplant Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Zoran Tasevski
- Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry, South Australia Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Nicholas A. Gray
- Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry, South Australia Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Renal Unit, Sunshine Coast University Hospital, Birtinya, Queensland, Australia
- School of Health, University of Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, Queensland, Australia
| | - Stephen P. McDonald
- Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry, South Australia Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Adelaide Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Anderson N. Commentary: Cross-cultural validation of the Portuguese version of the Dialysis Symptom Index for haemodialysis patients. J Res Nurs 2024; 29:62-64. [PMID: 38495328 PMCID: PMC10939019 DOI: 10.1177/17449871231225439] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/19/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola Anderson
- Nicola Anderson, Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, England B15 2TT, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Terwee CB, van der Willik EM, van Breda F, van Jaarsveld BC, van de Putte M, Jetten IW, Dekker FW, Meuleman Y, van Ittersum FJ. Responsiveness and minimal important change of seven PROMIS computerized adaptive tests (CAT) in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2023; 7:35. [PMID: 37016107 PMCID: PMC10073363 DOI: 10.1186/s41687-023-00574-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2022] [Accepted: 03/11/2023] [Indexed: 04/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) has the potential to harmonize the measurement of health-related quality of life (HRQL) across medical conditions. We evaluated responsiveness and minimal important change (MIC) of seven Dutch-Flemish PROMIS computerized adaptive tests (CAT) in Dutch patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD). METHODS CKD patients (eGFR < 30 ml/min.1.73m2) completed at baseline and after 6 months seven PROMIS CATs (assessing physical function, pain interference, fatigue, sleep disturbance, anxiety, depression, and ability to participate in social roles and activities), Short Form Health Survey 12 (SF-12), PROMIS Pain Intensity single item, Dialysis Symptom Index (DSI), and Global Rating Scales (GRS) of change. Responsiveness was assessed by testing predefined hypotheses about expected correlations among measures, area under the ROC Curve, and effect sizes. MIC was determined with predictive modelling. RESULTS 207 patients were included; 186 (90%) completed the follow-up. Most results were in accordance with expectations (70-91% of hypotheses confirmed), with some exceptions for PROMIS Anxiety and Ability to Participate (60% and 42% of hypotheses confirmed, respectively). For PROMIS Anxiety and Depression correlations with the GRS were too low (0.04 and 0.20, respectively) to calculate a MIC. MIC values, representing minimal important deterioration, ranged from 0.4 to 2.5 T-score points for the other domains. CONCLUSION We found sufficient responsiveness of PROMIS CATs Physical Function, Fatigue, Sleep Disturbance, and Depression. The results for PROMIS CATs Pain Interference were almost sufficient, but some results for Anxiety and Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities were not as expected. Reported MIC values should be interpreted with caution because most patients did not change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline B Terwee
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit, P.O. box 7057, Amsterdam, 1007 MB, the Netherlands.
- Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Methodology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Esmee M van der Willik
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit, P.O. box 7057, Amsterdam, 1007 MB, the Netherlands
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Fenna van Breda
- Department of Nephrology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Brigit C van Jaarsveld
- Department of Nephrology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marlon van de Putte
- Department of Nephrology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Isabelle W Jetten
- Department of Nephrology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Friedo W Dekker
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Yvette Meuleman
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Frans J van Ittersum
- Department of Nephrology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sipma WS, de Jong MFC, Meuleman Y, Hemmelder MH, Ahaus KCTB. Facing the challenges of PROM implementation in Dutch dialysis care: Patients' and professionals' perspectives. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0285822. [PMID: 37186606 PMCID: PMC10184911 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285822] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2021] [Accepted: 05/02/2023] [Indexed: 05/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) are increasingly used in routine clinical practice to facilitate patients in sharing and discussing health-related topics with their clinician. This study focuses on the implementation experiences of healthcare professionals and patients during the early implementation phase of the newly developed Dutch set of dialysis PROMs and aims to understand the process of early implementation of PROMs from the users' perspectives. METHODS This is a qualitative study among healthcare professionals (physicians and nursing staff: n = 13) and patients (n = 14) of which 12 were receiving haemodialysis and 2 peritoneal dialysis. Semi-structured interviews were used to understand the barriers and facilitators that both professionals and patients encounter when starting to implement PROMs. RESULTS The early PROM implementation process is influenced by a variety of factors that we divided into barriers and facilitators. We identified four barriers: patient´s indifference to PROMs, scepticism on the benefits of aggregated PROM data, the limited treatment options open to doctors and organizational issues such as mergers, organizational problems and renovations. We also describe four facilitators: professional involvement and patient support, a growing understanding of the use of PROMs during the implementation, quick gains from using PROMs such as receiving instant feedback and a clear ambition on patient care such as a shared view on patient involvement and management support. CONCLUSIONS In this qualitative study carried out during the early implementation phase of the Dutch dialysis PROM set, we found that patients did not yet consider the PROM set to be a useful additional tool to share information with their doctor. This was despite the professionals' primary reason for using PROMs being to improve patient-doctor communication. Furthermore, the perceived lack of intervention options was frustrating for some of the professionals. We found that nurses could be important enablers of further implementation because of their intensive relationship with dialysis patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wim S Sipma
- Department of Health Services Management & Organisation, Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Margriet F C de Jong
- Department of Nephrology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Yvette Meuleman
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Marc H Hemmelder
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- CARIM school for cardiovascular research, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Kees C T B Ahaus
- Department of Health Services Management & Organisation, Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Key considerations to reduce or address respondent burden in patient-reported outcome (PRO) data collection. Nat Commun 2022; 13:6026. [PMID: 36224187 PMCID: PMC9556436 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-33826-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2022] [Accepted: 10/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are used in clinical trials to provide evidence of the benefits and risks of interventions from a patient perspective and to inform regulatory decisions and health policy. The collection of PROs in routine practice can facilitate monitoring of patient symptoms; identification of unmet needs; prioritisation and/or tailoring of treatment to the needs of individual patients and inform value-based healthcare initiatives. However, respondent burden needs to be carefully considered and addressed to avoid high rates of missing data and poor reporting of PRO results, which may lead to poor quality data for regulatory decision making and/or clinical care. The collection of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) may capture patients’ assessments of their health status. Here authors highlight PRO-specific issues that should be considered to minimise respondent burden in clinical trials and routine care.
Collapse
|
6
|
Vanholder R, Conway PT, Gallego D, Scheres E, Wieringa F. The European Kidney Health Alliance (EKHA) and the Decade of the KidneyTM. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2022; 38:1113-1122. [PMID: 35790139 DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfac211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The European Kidney Health Alliance (EKHA) is an advocacy organization that defends the case of the kidney patients and the nephrological community at the level of the European Union (EU), and from there, top to bottom, also at the national level of the EU member states and the EU-associated countries. The Decade of the KidneyTM is a global initiative launched by the American Association of Kidney Patients (AAKP) to create greater awareness and organize patient demands for long overdue innovation in kidney care. This article describes the medical and patient burden of kidney disease, the history of EKHA, its major activities and tools for policy action and the need for innovation. We then describe the Decade of the KidneyTM initiative, the rationale why EKHA joined this activity to emanate parallel action at the European side, the novel professionalized structure of EKHA, and its immediate targets. The final aim is to align all major stakeholders for an action plan on kidney disease comparable to Europe's successful Beating Cancer Plan, with the additional intent that the EKHA model is applied also by the respective national kidney-related societies to create a broad mobilization at all levels. The ultimate aims are that the EU considers chronic kidney disease (CKD) as a major health and health-economic problem, to consequently have CKD included as a key health research target by the European Commission, and to improve quality of life and outcomes for all kidney patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raymond Vanholder
- European Kidney Health Alliance (EKHA), Brussels, Belgium.,Nephrology Section, Department of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Paul T Conway
- Policy and Global Affairs, American Association of Kidney Patients (AAKP), Washington, DC, US
| | - Daniel Gallego
- European Kidney Patient's Federation (EKPF), Vienna, Austria
| | - Eveline Scheres
- European Kidney Health Alliance (EKHA), Brussels, Belgium.,Buiten de Lijnen, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Fokko Wieringa
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Medical Center Utrecht (UMCU), Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Department of Autonomous Therapeutics, Imec, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lukewich J, Martin-Misener R, Norful AA, Poitras ME, Bryant-Lukosius D, Asghari S, Marshall EG, Mathews M, Swab M, Ryan D, Tranmer J. Effectiveness of registered nurses on patient outcomes in primary care: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res 2022; 22:740. [PMID: 35659215 PMCID: PMC9166606 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-07866-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2021] [Accepted: 03/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Globally, registered nurses (RNs) are increasingly working in primary care interdisciplinary teams. Although existing literature provides some information about the contributions of RNs towards outcomes of care, further evidence on RN workforce contributions, specifically towards patient-level outcomes, is needed. This study synthesized evidence regarding the effectiveness of RNs on patient outcomes in primary care. Methods A systematic review was conducted in accordance with Joanna Briggs Institute methodology. A comprehensive search of databases (CINAHL, MEDLINE Complete, PsycINFO, Embase) was performed using applicable subject headings and keywords. Additional literature was identified through grey literature searches (ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, MedNar, Google Scholar, websites, reference lists of included articles). Quantitative studies measuring the effectiveness of a RN-led intervention (i.e., any care/activity performed by a primary care RN) that reported related outcomes were included. Articles were screened independently by two researchers and assessed for bias using the Integrated Quality Criteria for Review of Multiple Study Designs tool. A narrative synthesis was undertaken due to the heterogeneity in study designs, RN-led interventions, and outcome measures across included studies. Results Forty-six patient outcomes were identified across 23 studies. Outcomes were categorized in accordance with the PaRIS Conceptual Framework (patient-reported experience measures, patient-reported outcome measures, health behaviours) and an additional category added by the research team (biomarkers). Primary care RN-led interventions resulted in improvements within each outcome category, specifically with respect to weight loss, pelvic floor muscle strength and endurance, blood pressure and glycemic control, exercise self-efficacy, social activity, improved diet and physical activity levels, and reduced tobacco use. Patients reported high levels of satisfaction with RN-led care. Conclusions This review provides evidence regarding the effectiveness of RNs on patient outcomes in primary care, specifically with respect to satisfaction, enablement, quality of life, self-efficacy, and improvements in health behaviours. Ongoing evaluation that accounts for primary care RNs’ unique scope of practice and emphasizes the patient experience is necessary to optimize the delivery of patient-centered primary care. Protocol registration ID PROSPERO: International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews. 2018. ID=CRD42 018090767. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-07866-x.
Collapse
|
8
|
Sobels E, Best M, Chadban S, Pais R. End Stage Kidney Disease Patient Experiences of Renal Supportive Care in an Australian Teaching Hospital - A Qualitative Study. J Pain Symptom Manage 2022; 63:737-746. [PMID: 34954064 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.12.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2021] [Revised: 11/26/2021] [Accepted: 12/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Renal Supportive Care Services (RSCS) were introduced in Australia to provide patient-centred care with a focus on better symptom management and improved quality of life in end stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients managed with or without dialysis. While RSCS have demonstrated clinical benefits with reduced length of hospital stay and symptom burden, there is a gap in understanding the experience of patients referred to RSCS. OBJECTIVES To identify patient attitudes, beliefs, and perspectives on the RSCS. METHODS Qualitative interviews were conducted with 20 participants from both dialysis and conservative treatment pathways. Transcripts were then thematically analysed and primary themes identified, which were reviewed with a stakeholder group that included doctors, nurses and allied health staff to provide triangulation. RESULTS Patients perceived the RSCS as a provider of multidisciplinary, holistic and patient-centred care that, in addition, helped to ensure prognostic awareness and timely end-of-life care planning. This contributed to an overall sense of patient empowerment with healthcare decisions. This study identified three major themes: (1) Expectations of care; (2) Experience of care; and (3) Understanding patient needs. CONCLUSION The study found that RSCS support patient-centred and family-orientated initiatives in decision making and control over healthcare management. This is empowering for patients. Additional patient values, needs and wants from the RSCS were also identified and these could be addressed to improve the patient experience. Our findings support the ongoing use of RSCS to improve the experience of ESKD patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eloise Sobels
- Central Clinical School (E.S.), University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Megan Best
- Department of Palliative Medicine (M.B., R.P.), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia; Institute for Ethics and Society (M.B.), University of Notre Dame Australia, Sydney, Australia
| | - Steve Chadban
- Department of Renal Medicine (S.C., R.P.), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia; Kidney Node, Charles Perkins Centre (S.C.), University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Riona Pais
- Department of Palliative Medicine (M.B., R.P.), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia; Department of Renal Medicine (S.C., R.P.), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hawkins J, Wellsted D, Corps C, Fluck R, Gair R, Hall N, Busby A, Rider B, Farrington K, Sharma S, van der Veer SN. OUP accepted manuscript. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2022; 37:1507-1519. [PMID: 35138389 PMCID: PMC9317163 DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfac030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Methods Results Conclusions
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - David Wellsted
- Centre for Health Services and Clinical Research, School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
| | - Claire Corps
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, St James’ University Teaching Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Richard Fluck
- Department of Renal Medicine, Royal Derby Hospital, Derby, UK
| | | | - Natalie Hall
- Centre for Health Services and Clinical Research, School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
| | - Amanda Busby
- Centre for Health Services and Clinical Research, School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
| | - Beth Rider
- Centre for Health Services and Clinical Research, School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
| | - Ken Farrington
- Centre for Health Services and Clinical Research, School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
- Lister Hospital, East and North Hertfordshire NHS Trust, Stevenage, UK
| | - Shivani Sharma
- Centre for Health Services and Clinical Research, School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
| | - Sabine N van der Veer
- Centre for Health Informatics, Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Science, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Villegas L, Amaral S. Patient-Reported Outcomes in Children With Chronic Kidney Disease. Semin Nephrol 2021; 41:476-484. [PMID: 34916009 DOI: 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2021.09.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are quantitative assessments of a patient's perspective on their health and are derived directly from the patient, as opposed to clinician interpretation. PROs can serve as unique tools to improve health care providers' understanding of the patient's daily lived experience and highlight salient domains that are specific to children with chronic kidney disease (CKD). As such, PROs fill an important gap in achieving optimal health and well-being for children with CKD. However, several knowledge gaps remain in the implementation of PROs within both the clinical and research realms. This review provides a broad overview of PRO development, implementation for children with CKD, and highlights future directions and challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonela Villegas
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.
| | - Sandra Amaral
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA; Division of Epidemiology, Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Yu H, Yu Q, Nie Y, Xu W, Pu Y, Dai W, Wei X, Shi Q. Data Quality of Longitudinally Collected Patient-Reported Outcomes After Thoracic Surgery: Comparison of Paper- and Web-Based Assessments. J Med Internet Res 2021; 23:e28915. [PMID: 34751657 PMCID: PMC8663677 DOI: 10.2196/28915] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2021] [Revised: 05/21/2021] [Accepted: 10/03/2021] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background High-frequency patient-reported outcome (PRO) assessments are used to measure patients' symptoms after surgery for surgical research; however, the quality of those longitudinal PRO data has seldom been discussed. Objective The aim of this study was to determine data quality-influencing factors and to profile error trajectories of data longitudinally collected via paper-and-pencil (P&P) or web-based assessment (electronic PRO [ePRO]) after thoracic surgery. Methods We extracted longitudinal PRO data with 678 patients scheduled for lung surgery from an observational study (n=512) and a randomized clinical trial (n=166) on the evaluation of different perioperative care strategies. PROs were assessed by the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory Lung Cancer Module and single-item Quality of Life Scale before surgery and then daily after surgery until discharge or up to 14 days of hospitalization. Patient compliance and data error were identified and compared between P&P and ePRO. Generalized estimating equations model and 2-piecewise model were used to describe trajectories of error incidence over time and to identify the risk factors. Results Among 678 patients, 629 with at least 2 PRO assessments, 440 completed 3347 P&P assessments and 189 completed 1291 ePRO assessments. In total, 49.4% of patients had at least one error, including (1) missing items (64.69%, 1070/1654), (2) modifications without signatures (27.99%, 463/1654), (3) selection of multiple options (3.02%, 50/1654), (4) missing patient signatures (2.54%, 42/1654), (5) missing researcher signatures (1.45%, 24/1654), and (6) missing completion dates (0.30%, 5/1654). Patients who completed ePRO had fewer errors than those who completed P&P assessments (ePRO: 30.2% [57/189] vs. P&P: 57.7% [254/440]; P<.001). Compared with ePRO patients, those using P&P were older, less educated, and sicker. Common risk factors of having errors were a lower education level (P&P: odds ratio [OR] 1.39, 95% CI 1.20-1.62; P<.001; ePRO: OR 1.82, 95% CI 1.22-2.72; P=.003), treated in a provincial hospital (P&P: OR 3.34, 95% CI 2.10-5.33; P<.001; ePRO: OR 4.73, 95% CI 2.18-10.25; P<.001), and with severe disease (P&P: OR 1.63, 95% CI 1.33-1.99; P<.001; ePRO: OR 2.70, 95% CI 1.53-4.75; P<.001). Errors peaked on postoperative day (POD) 1 for P&P, and on POD 2 for ePRO. Conclusions It is possible to improve data quality of longitudinally collected PRO through ePRO, compared with P&P. However, ePRO-related sampling bias needs to be considered when designing clinical research using longitudinal PROs as major outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hongfan Yu
- School of Public Health and Management, Chongqing Medical University, Chonqqing, China
| | - Qingsong Yu
- School of Public Health and Management, Chongqing Medical University, Chonqqing, China
| | - Yuxian Nie
- State Key Laboratory of Ultrasound in Medicine and Engineering, College of Biomedical Engineering, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Wei Xu
- School of Public Health and Management, Chongqing Medical University, Chonqqing, China
| | - Yang Pu
- School of Public Health and Management, Chongqing Medical University, Chonqqing, China
| | - Wei Dai
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Xing Wei
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Qiuling Shi
- School of Public Health and Management, Chongqing Medical University, Chonqqing, China.,State Key Laboratory of Ultrasound in Medicine and Engineering, College of Biomedical Engineering, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.,Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
de Jong Y, van der Willik EM, Milders J, Meuleman Y, Morton RL, Dekker FW, van Diepen M. Person centred care provision and care planning in chronic kidney disease: which outcomes matter? A systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies : Care planning in CKD: which outcomes matter? BMC Nephrol 2021; 22:309. [PMID: 34517825 PMCID: PMC8438879 DOI: 10.1186/s12882-021-02489-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2021] [Accepted: 07/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE Explore priorities related to outcomes and barriers of adults with chronic kidney disease (CKD) regarding person centred care and care planning. STUDY DESIGN Systematic review of qualitative studies. SEARCH STRATEGY & SOURCES In July 2018 six bibliographic databases, and reference lists of included articles were searched for qualitative studies that included adults with CKD stages 1-5, not on dialysis or conservative management, without a previous kidney transplantation. ANALYTICAL APPROACH Three independent reviewers extracted and inductively coded data using thematic synthesis. Reporting quality was assessed using the COREQ and the review reported according to PRISMA and ENTREQ statements. RESULTS Forty-six studies involving 1493 participants were eligible. The period after diagnosis of CKD is characterized by feelings of uncertainty, social isolation, financial burden, resentment and fear of the unknown. Patients show interest in ways to return to normality and remain in control of their health in order to avoid further deterioration of kidney function. However, necessary information is often unavailable or incomprehensible. Although patients and healthcare professionals share the predominant interest of whether or not dialysis or transplantation is necessary, patients value many more outcomes that are often unrecognized by their healthcare professionals. We identified 4 themes with 6 subthemes that summarize these findings: 'pursuing normality and control' ('pursuing normality'; 'a search for knowledge'); 'prioritizing outcomes' ('reaching kidney failure'; 'experienced health'; 'social life'; 'work and economic productivity'); 'predicting the future'; and 'realising what matters'. Reporting quality was moderate for most included studies. LIMITATIONS Exclusion of non-English articles. CONCLUSIONS The realisation that patients' priorities do not match those of the healthcare professionals, in combination with the prognostic ambiguity, confirms fatalistic perceptions of not being in control when living with CKD. These insights may contribute to greater understanding of patients' perspectives and a more person-centred approach in healthcare prioritization and care planning within CKD care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ype de Jong
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Albinusdreef 2, 2333, ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands.
- Department of Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | - Esmee M van der Willik
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Albinusdreef 2, 2333, ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Jet Milders
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Albinusdreef 2, 2333, ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Yvette Meuleman
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Albinusdreef 2, 2333, ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Rachael L Morton
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Friedo W Dekker
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Albinusdreef 2, 2333, ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Merel van Diepen
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Albinusdreef 2, 2333, ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Moisi MI, Bungau SG, Vesa CM, Diaconu CC, Behl T, Stoicescu M, Toma MM, Bustea C, Sava C, Popescu MI. Framing Cause-Effect Relationship of Acute Coronary Syndrome in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11:diagnostics11081518. [PMID: 34441451 PMCID: PMC8391570 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11081518] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2021] [Revised: 08/15/2021] [Accepted: 08/16/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The main causes of death in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are of cardiovascular nature. The interaction between traditional cardiovascular risk factors (CVRF) and non-traditional risk factors (RF) triggers various complex pathophysiological mechanisms that will lead to accelerated atherosclerosis in the context of decreased renal function. In terms of mortality, CKD should be considered equivalent to ischemic coronary artery disease (CAD) and properly monitored. Vascular calcification, endothelial dysfunction, oxidative stress, anemia, and inflammatory syndrome represents the main uremic RF triggered by accumulation of the uremic toxins in CKD subjects. Proteinuria that appears due to kidney function decline may initiate an inflammatory status and alteration of the coagulation—fibrinolysis systems, favorizing acute coronary syndromes (ACS) occurrence. All these factors represent potential targets for future therapy that may improve CKD patient’s survival and prevention of CV events. Once installed, the CAD in CKD population is associated with negative outcome and increased mortality rate, that is the reason why discovering the complex pathophysiological connections between the two conditions and a proper control of the uremic RF are crucial and may represent the solutions for influencing the prognostic. Exclusion of CKD subjects from the important trials dealing with ACS and improper use of the therapeutical options because of the declined kidney functioned are issues that need to be surpassed. New ongoing trials with CKD subjects and platelets reactivity studies offers new perspectives for a better clinical approach and the expected results will clarify many aspects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mădălina Ioana Moisi
- Department of Preclinical Disciplines, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Oradea, 410073 Oradea, Romania; (M.I.M.); (C.B.)
| | - Simona Gabriela Bungau
- Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Oradea, 410028 Oradea, Romania;
- Doctoral School of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, University of Oradea, 410087 Oradea, Romania
- Correspondence: (S.B.); (C.M.V)
| | - Cosmin Mihai Vesa
- Department of Preclinical Disciplines, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Oradea, 410073 Oradea, Romania; (M.I.M.); (C.B.)
- Correspondence: (S.B.); (C.M.V)
| | - Camelia Cristina Diaconu
- Department 5, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania;
- Department of Internal Medicine, Clinical Emergency Hospital of Bucharest, 105402 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Tapan Behl
- Department of Pharmacology, Chitkara College of Pharmacy, Chitkara University, Punjab 140401, India;
| | - Manuela Stoicescu
- Department of Medical Disciplines, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Oradea, 410073 Oradea, Romania; (M.S.); (C.S.); (M.I.P.)
| | - Mirela Mărioara Toma
- Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Oradea, 410028 Oradea, Romania;
- Doctoral School of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, University of Oradea, 410087 Oradea, Romania
| | - Cristiana Bustea
- Department of Preclinical Disciplines, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Oradea, 410073 Oradea, Romania; (M.I.M.); (C.B.)
| | - Cristian Sava
- Department of Medical Disciplines, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Oradea, 410073 Oradea, Romania; (M.S.); (C.S.); (M.I.P.)
| | - Mircea Ioachim Popescu
- Doctoral School of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, University of Oradea, 410087 Oradea, Romania
- Department of Medical Disciplines, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Oradea, 410073 Oradea, Romania; (M.S.); (C.S.); (M.I.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Schick-Makaroff K, Levay A, Thompson S, Flynn R, Sawatzky R, Thummapol O, Klarenbach S, Karimi-Dehkordi M, Greenhalgh J. An Evidence-Based Theory About PRO Use in Kidney Care: A Realist Synthesis. PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2021; 15:21-38. [PMID: 34109571 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-021-00530-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is international interest on the use of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in nephrology. OBJECTIVES Our objectives were to develop a kidney-specific program theory about use of PROs in nephrology that may enhance person-centered care, both at individual and aggregated levels of care, and to test and refine this theory through a systematic review of the empirical literature. Together, these objectives articulate what works or does not work, for whom, and why. METHODS Realist synthesis methodology guided the electronic database and gray literature searches (in January 2017 and October 2018), screening, and extraction conducted independently by three reviewers. Sources included all nephrology patients and/or practitioners. Through a process of extraction and synthesis, each included source was examined to assess how contexts may trigger mechanisms to influence specific outcomes. RESULTS After screening 19,961 references, 84 theoretical and 34 empirical sources were used. PROs are proposed to be useful for providing nephrology care through three types of use. The first type is use of individual-level PRO data at point of care, receiving the majority of theoretical and empirical explorations. Clinician use to support person-centered care, and patient use to support patient engagement, are purported to improve satisfaction, health, and quality of life. Contextual factors specific to the kidney care setting that may influence the use of PRO data include the complexity of kidney disease symptom burden, symptoms that may be stigmatized, comorbidities, and time or administrative constraints in dialysis settings. Electronic collection of PROs may facilitate PRO use given these contexts. The second type is use of aggregated PRO data at point of care, including public reporting of PROs to inform decisions at point of care and improve quality of care, and use of PROs for treatment decisions. The third type is use of aggregated PRO data by organizations, including publicly available PRO data to compare centers. In single-payer systems, regular collection of PROs by dialysis centers can be achieved through economic incentives. Both the second and third types of PRO use include pressures that may trigger quality improvement processes. CONCLUSION The current state of the evidence is primarily theoretical. There is pressing need for empirical research to improve the evidence-base of PRO use at individual and aggregated levels of nephrology care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kara Schick-Makaroff
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Third Floor, Edmonton Clinica Health Academy, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
| | - Adrienne Levay
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Third Floor, Edmonton Clinica Health Academy, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Stephanie Thompson
- Division of Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Rachel Flynn
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Third Floor, Edmonton Clinica Health Academy, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Richard Sawatzky
- School of Nursing, Trinity Western University, Langley, BC, Canada.,Centre for Health Evaluation & Outcome Sciences, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, Canada.,Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Onouma Thummapol
- Faculty of Nursing Science, Assumption University of Thailand, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Scott Klarenbach
- Division of Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Mehri Karimi-Dehkordi
- Departments of Medicine and Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Aiyegbusi OL, Nair D, Peipert JD, Schick-Makaroff K, Mucsi I. A narrative review of current evidence supporting the implementation of electronic patient-reported outcome measures in the management of chronic diseases. Ther Adv Chronic Dis 2021; 12:20406223211015958. [PMID: 34104376 PMCID: PMC8150668 DOI: 10.1177/20406223211015958] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2020] [Accepted: 04/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
An application of telemedicine of growing interest and relevance is the use of personal computers and mobile devices to collect patient-reported outcomes (PROs). PROs are self-reports of patients' health status without interpretation by anyone else. The tools developed to assess PROs are known as patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs). The technological innovations that have led to an increased ownership of electronic devices have also facilitated the development of electronic PROMs (ePROMs). ePROMs are a conduit for telemedicine in the care of patients with chronic diseases. Various studies have demonstrated that the use of ePROMs in routine clinical practice is both acceptable and feasible with patients increasingly expressing a preference for an electronic mode of administration. There is increasing evidence that the use of electronic patient-reported outcome (ePROMs) could have significant impacts on outcomes valued by patients, healthcare providers and researchers. Whilst the development and implementation of these systems may be initially costly and resource-intensive, patient preferences and existing evidence to support their implementation suggests the need for continued research prioritisation in this area. This narrative review summarises and discusses evidence of the impact of ePROMs on clinical parameters and outcomes relevant to chronic diseases. We also explore recently published literature regarding issues that may influence the robust implementation of ePROMs for routine clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olalekan Lee Aiyegbusi
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Applied Research Centre, West Midlands, UK
| | - Devika Nair
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA Vanderbilt O’Brien Center for Kidney Disease, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - John Devin Peipert
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Istvan Mucsi
- Multiorgan Transplant Program, University Health Network and Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Hawkins J, Smeeton N, Busby A, Wellsted D, Rider B, Jones J, Steenkamp R, Stannard C, Gair R, van der Veer SN, Corps C, Farrington K. Contributions of treatment centre and patient characteristics to patient-reported experience of haemodialysis: a national cross-sectional study. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e044984. [PMID: 33853800 PMCID: PMC8054084 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044984] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To examine the relative importance of patient and centre level factors in determining self-reported experience of care in patients with advanced kidney disease treated by maintenance haemodialysis (HD). DESIGN Analysis of data from a cross sectional national survey; the UK Renal Registry (UKRR) national Kidney patient-reported experience measure (PREM) survey (2018). Centre-level data were obtained from the UKRR report (2018). SETTING National survey of patients with advanced kidney disease receiving treatment with maintenance HD in UK renal centres in 2018. PARTICIPANTS The Kidney PREM was distributed to all UK renal centres by the UKRR in May 2018. Each centre invited patients receiving outpatient treatment for kidney disease to complete the PREM. These included patients with chronic kidney disease, those receiving dialysis-both HD and peritoneal dialysis, and those with a functioning kidney transplant. There were no formal inclusion/exclusion criteria. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The Kidney PREM has 38 questions in 13 subscales. Responses were captured using a 7-point Likert scale (never 1, always 7). The primary outcome of interest was the mean PREM score calculated across all questions. Multilevel modelling was used to determine the proportion of variation of the mean PREM score across centres due to patient-related and centre-related factors. RESULTS There were records for 8253 HD patients (61% men, 77% white) from 69 renal centres (9-710 patients per centre). There was significant variation in mean PREM score across centres (5.35-6.53). In the multivariable analysis there was some variation in relation to both patient- and centre-level factors but these contributed little to explaining the overall variation. However, multilevel modelling showed that the overwhelming proportion of the explained variance (45%) was explained by variation between centres (40%), only a small proportion of which is identified by measured factors. Only 5% of the variation was related to patient-level factors. CONCLUSIONS Centre rather than patient characteristics determine the experience of care of patients receiving HD. Further work is required to define the characteristics of the treating centre which determine patient experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janine Hawkins
- Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
| | - Nigel Smeeton
- Health and Social Work, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
| | - Amanda Busby
- Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
| | - David Wellsted
- Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
| | - Beth Rider
- Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
| | - Julia Jones
- Health and Social Work, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
| | | | | | - Rachel Gair
- UK Renal Registry, Renal Association, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Claire Corps
- St James's University Teaching Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Ken Farrington
- Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
- Renal Unit, Lister Hospital, Stevenage, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Farragher JF, Zhang J, Harrison TG, Ravani P, Elliott MJ, Hemmelgarn B. The Association Between Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate and Hospitalization for Fatigue: A Population-Based Cohort Study. Can J Kidney Health Dis 2021; 8:20543581211001224. [PMID: 33796323 PMCID: PMC7970172 DOI: 10.1177/20543581211001224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2021] [Accepted: 01/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Fatigue is a pervasive symptom among patients with chronic kidney disease
(CKD) that is associated with several adverse outcomes, but the incidence of
hospitalization for fatigue is unknown. Objective: To explore the association between estimated glomerular filtration rate
(eGFR) and incidence of hospitalization for fatigue. Design: Population-based retrospective cohort study using a provincial administrative
dataset. Setting: Alberta, Canada. Patients: People above age 18 who had at least 1 outpatient serum creatinine
measurement taken in Alberta between January 1, 2009, and December 31,
2016. Measurements: The first outpatient serum creatinine was used to estimate GFR.
Hospitalization for fatigue was identified using International
Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) code R53.x. Methods: Patients were stratified by CKD category based on their index eGFR. We used
negative binomial regression to determine if there was an increased
incidence of hospitalization for fatigue by declining kidney function
(reference eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73m2). Estimates were stratified by
age, and adjusted for age, sex, socioeconomic status, and comorbidity. Results: The study cohort consisted of 2 823 270 adults, with a mean age of 46.1 years
and median follow-up duration of 6.0 years; 5 422 hospitalizations for
fatigue occurred over 14 703 914 person-years of follow-up. Adjusted rates
of hospitalization for fatigue increased with decreasing kidney function,
across all age strata. The highest rates were seen in adults on dialysis
(adjusted incident rate ratios 24.47, 6.66, and 3.13 for those aged 18 to
64, 65 to 74, and 75+, respectively, compared with eGFR ≥ 60
mL/min/1.73m2). Limitations: Fatigue hospitalization codes have not been validated; reference group
limited to adults with at least 1 outpatient serum creatinine measurement;
remaining potential for residual confounding. Conclusions: Declining kidney function was associated with increased incidence of
hospitalization for fatigue. Further research into ways to address fatigue
in the CKD population is warranted. Trial Registration: Not applicable (not a clinical trial).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janine F Farragher
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Jianguo Zhang
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Tyrone G Harrison
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, AB, Canada.,Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Pietro Ravani
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, AB, Canada.,O'Brien Institute for Public Health, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Meghan J Elliott
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, AB, Canada.,Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Brenda Hemmelgarn
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, AB, Canada.,Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, AB, Canada.,O'Brien Institute for Public Health, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, AB, Canada.,Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
van der Veer SN, Couchoud C, Morton RL. The role of kidney registries in expediting large-scale collection of patient-reported outcome measures for people with chronic kidney disease. Clin Kidney J 2021; 14:1495-1503. [PMID: 34276974 PMCID: PMC8280932 DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfab061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
In this issue of Clinical Kidney Journal, Van der Willik et al. report findings from a pilot study where they introduced collection of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) into routine kidney care in Dutch dialysis centres. It is comparable to a registry-led PROMs initiative in Sweden, published in Clinical Kidney Journal in 2020. Both studies reported low average PROMs response rates with substantial between-centre variation, and both identified suboptimal patient and staff engagement as a key barrier to implementing PROMs in routine care for people with chronic kidney disease (CKD). This suggests that national kidney registries could be well placed to facilitate large-scale collection of PROMs data, but that they may require additional guidance on how to do this successfully. In this editorial, we discuss the current state-of-play of PROMs collection by kidney registries and provide an overview of what is (un)known about the feasibility and effectiveness of PROMs in CKD and other conditions. We anticipate that the fast-growing evidence base on whether, and how, PROMs can be of value in CKD settings will expedite registry-based PROMs collection, which will ultimately lead to more valuable and person-centred services and to enhanced health and well-being of people with CKD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabine N van der Veer
- Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences, Centre for Health Informatics, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Cecile Couchoud
- REIN Registry, Agence de la Biomédecine, Saint Denis La Plaine, France
| | - Rachael L Morton
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Imaging-based patient-reported outcomes (PROs) database: How we do it. Skeletal Radiol 2021; 50:469-474. [PMID: 32945932 PMCID: PMC7811985 DOI: 10.1007/s00256-020-03602-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2020] [Revised: 09/05/2020] [Accepted: 09/08/2020] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) provide an essential understanding of the impact a condition or treatment has on a patient, while complementing other, more traditional outcomes information like survival and time to symptom resolution. PROs have become increasingly important in medicine with the push toward patient-centered care. The creation of a PROs database within an institution or practice provides a way to collect, understand, and use this kind of patient feedback to inform quality improvement and develop the evidence base for medical decision-making and on a larger scale could potentially help determine national standards of care and treatment guidelines. This paper provides a first-hand account of our experience setting up an imaging-based PROs database at our institution and is organized into steps the reader can follow for creating a PROs database of their own. Given the limited use of PROs within both diagnostic and interventional radiology, we hope our paper stimulates a new interest among radiologists who may have never considered outcomes work in the past.
Collapse
|
20
|
Abstract
Rationale & Objective Most patients with kidney failure receive hemodialysis 3 times per week in a facility. More frequent and longer duration dialysis prescriptions improve a number of key outcome measures. These prescriptions are best suited to self-care and home regimens. The Quanta SC+ hemodialysis system is a novel device with demonstrated ease of use for patients and health care practitioners through human factors testing. The primary objective of this study is to report the efficacy and safety of the SC+ system using conventional hemodialysis prescriptions. Study Design Nonrandomized observational study. Setting & Participants Prevalent hemodialysis patients in 4 sites in the United Kingdom were recruited to switch from their current device to the SC+ system with no other changes to their prescription. Interventions SC+ hemodialysis system. Outcomes Efficacy data were collected in terms of dialysis adequacy, urea reduction ratios, and net fluid removal accuracy. Results 60 patients were enrolled in the study, resulting in 1,333 evaluable treatments. The threshold single-pool Kt/V of 1.2 was exceeded in 96.6% of treatments in patients receiving 3-times-weekly regimens, whereas the threshold standard Kt/V of 2.1 was exceeded in 94% of treatments and 97.6% of treatments in patients without significant residual kidney function. Ultrafiltration accuracy was determined by measuring net fluid removal and validated to be within acceptable limits. The adverse event profile during treatment was typical of hemodialysis. There were no serious adverse events. Limitations Few patients on high-frequency treatment regimens were enrolled. Conclusions The SC+ system delivers safe and effective hemodialysis across a range of patients and dialysis prescriptions. It is one of the smallest systems available and has validated usability for patients to perform self-care safely with minimal training. This device may encourage patients to feel empowered to take on home hemodialysis, unlocking beneficial clinical and patient-reported outcomes associated with these modalities.
Collapse
|
21
|
Development and assessment of a verbal response scale for the Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS) in a low-literacy, non-western population. Qual Life Res 2020; 30:613-628. [DOI: 10.1007/s11136-020-02640-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
|
22
|
Gabbard J, McLouth CJ, Brenes G, Claudel S, Ongchuan S, Burkart J, Pajewski N, Callahan KE, Williamson JD, Murea M. Rapid Electronic Capturing of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Older Adults With End-Stage Renal Disease: A Feasibility Study. Am J Hosp Palliat Care 2020; 38:432-440. [PMID: 32935548 DOI: 10.1177/1049909120954805] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) have a high burden of physical and psychological symptoms. Many remain unrecognized for long periods of time, particularly in older adults. The best strategy to monitor patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) has not been identified. OBJECTIVE To assess the feasibility of implementing an iPad-based symptom assessment tool in older adults with ESRD on hemodialysis (HD). METHODS We designed an iPad application-delivery system for collecting electronic PROMs (ePROMs). Patient's ≥60 years of age with ESRD on HD were recruited from a single outpatient dialysis unit. Feasibility was evaluated based on recruitment, retention, and the system usability score (SUS). Assessments were completed at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months after enrollment. ANOVA was used to assess longitudinal symptom variability. RESULTS Twenty-two patients (49% recruitment rate) were enrolled, with an 82% retention at 6 months. Mean age was 69.4 years (SD 6.6), 63.6% were female, and 81.8% were African American. Participants reported minimal difficulty in using the app, with an overall SUS score of 77.6. There were no significant relationships between demographic characteristics (age, race, or education) and SUS. Baseline SF-12 physical score and SF-12 mental score were 40.4 (SD 9.1) and 33.9 (SD 6.7), respectively. No significant changes were seen in longitudinal ePROMs of pain, depression, or anxiety; but was seen in the dialysis symptom index. CONCLUSION In older patients with ESRD, collection of iPad-based ePROMs is feasible. This process can overcome inefficiencies associated with paper questionnaires and enable systematic monitoring of symptom burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Gabbard
- Section on Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, 12279Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.,Center for Health Care Innovation, 12279Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Christopher J McLouth
- Department of Behavioral Science, 12252University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Gretchen Brenes
- Section on Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, 12279Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Sophie Claudel
- Section on Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, 12279Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Samantha Ongchuan
- Section on Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, 12279Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - John Burkart
- Section on Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, 12279Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Nicholas Pajewski
- Center for Health Care Innovation, 12279Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.,Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, 12279Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Kathryn E Callahan
- Section on Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, 12279Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.,Center for Health Care Innovation, 12279Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Jeff D Williamson
- Section on Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, 12279Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.,Center for Health Care Innovation, 12279Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Mariana Murea
- Section on Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, 12279Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Cirillo L, Toccafondi A, Cutruzzulà R, Miraglia Raineri A, Pernazza M, Fiasella S, Dattolo P. Association between Satisfaction with Dialysis Treatment and Quality of Life: A Cross-Sectional Study. Blood Purif 2020; 50:188-195. [PMID: 32846414 DOI: 10.1159/000509787] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2020] [Accepted: 06/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION CKD is associated with a reduction of patients' health-related quality of life. Considering the time spent in dialysis, satisfaction with care is essential for patients QOL. OBJECTIVE Since the possible association between satisfaction with the dialysis care and QOL has never been studied, in this study, we explore this plausible link. METHODS One hundred three patients on hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) filled-in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and patient-reported experience measures (PREMs). QOL was assessed by Kidney Disease Quality of Life-36 and satisfaction by Choices for Healthy Outcomes in Caring for End-Stage Renal Disease (CHOICE) questionnaire. The analysis was conducted on patient-level, considering for single patient sociodemographic characteristics and presence of depression/anxiety. One-way ANOVA was used to compare QOL mean scores for patients who answered "excellent" and for those who answered "other ratings" in CHOICE questionnaire and the Pearson χ2 test to compare the patients' characteristics between these 2 groups of patients. RESULTS The analysis showed a significant positive association between PREM and PROM scores for 8 out of 23 CHOICE items. Six of them were related to the figure of nephrologist, 1 to dialysis access site, and 1 to the social worker support. Significant association (p < 0.05) were between frequency of seeing nephrologist and physical component plus mental component, accuracy of information from nephrologist and burden of disease, accuracy of instructions from nephrologist and burden of disease, coordination between nephrologist and other physicians plus mental component, attention to cleanliness of access site and mental component, amount of dialysis information from staff and burden of disease, information from staff when choosing between HD or PD and physical component plus burden of disease, and ease of seeing social worker and burden of disease. CONCLUSIONS The study provides support for the relationship between the care satisfaction and QOL, highlighting the central role of the nephrologist-patient communication in the QOL of dialysis patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luigi Cirillo
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, SMA Hospital, Bagno a Ripoli, Florence, Italy
| | | | - Roberta Cutruzzulà
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, SMA Hospital, Bagno a Ripoli, Florence, Italy
| | | | - Matteo Pernazza
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, SMA Hospital, Bagno a Ripoli, Florence, Italy
| | - Susanna Fiasella
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, SMA Hospital, Bagno a Ripoli, Florence, Italy
| | - Pietro Dattolo
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, SMA Hospital, Bagno a Ripoli, Florence, Italy,
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Wembenyui C, Douglas C, Bonner A. Validation of the Australian version of the Chronic Kidney Disease Self-Management instrument. Int J Nurs Pract 2020; 27:e12857. [PMID: 32614488 DOI: 10.1111/ijn.12857] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2019] [Revised: 04/13/2020] [Accepted: 04/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
AIM The aim of this study is to evaluate the validity and reliability of the modified Chronic Kidney Disease Self-Management instrument in an English-speaking population. BACKGROUND There is growing evidence that self-management behaviours can improve outcomes for people with chronic kidney disease. However, there are few suitable instruments available. DESIGN The study was cross sectional, with a test-retest protocol. METHOD Adults with chronic kidney disease attending a primary health care between June and December 2015 completed the Chronic Kidney Disease Self-Management instrument. Construct validity was determined using exploratory factor analysis, internal consistency and test-retest reliability using Cronbach's α and intraclass correlation. For convergent validity, the relationships between knowledge, self-efficacy and self-management were investigated. RESULTS The Australian version of the Chronic Kidney Disease Self-Management instrument has 17 items grouped into four factors: self-integration, seeking social support, adherence to lifestyle modification and problem solving. The instrument demonstrated good reliability. Self-efficacy was positively correlated with self-management scores, although there was no correlation between chronic kidney disease knowledge and self-management. CONCLUSIONS The Australian version of the Chronic Kidney Disease Self-Management instrument was found to be a valid and reliable patient-reported outcome measure. It can be used in clinical practice to support self-management, as well as future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Colette Wembenyui
- Kidney Health Service, Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,QUT School of Nursing, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Clint Douglas
- Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,NHMRC Chronic Kidney Disease Centre of Research Excellence, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Ann Bonner
- Kidney Health Service, Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,QUT School of Nursing, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Patient and clinician opinions of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) in the management of patients with rare diseases: a qualitative study. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2020; 18:177. [PMID: 32522194 PMCID: PMC7288678 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-020-01438-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2019] [Accepted: 06/05/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Rare diseases may be life-threatening or chronically debilitating conditions. Patient care needs are often complex and challenging to coordinate and deliver effectively. Rare diseases and their clinical management may therefore substantially impact on patients’ health-related quality of life (HRQOL). The use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) may complement clinical assessments by elucidating patients’ perspectives on their health status and care priorities. This study explored the opinions of patients and clinicians on the use of PROMs in the management of patients with rare diseases in routine clinical practice. Methods A total of 15 semi-structured one-to-one interviews were conducted with four patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC); five renal transplant recipients; and six PSC doctors from University Hospitals Birmingham (UHB) NHS Foundation Trust. A focus group session was also conducted with 10 clinical staff members (doctors, nurses and other allied health professionals from UHB). The suitability and acceptability of the Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire (CLDQ) and the Short Form 12 (SF12) were assessed by patients with PSC and their doctors while the Paediatric quality of life inventory Transplant Module (PedsQL-TM) and the EuroQoL-5 dimensions (EQ. 5D) were evaluated by the renal transplant recipients and their doctors. The discussions were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Coding of the transcripts was done using the Nvivo 11 Plus software. Thematic analysis was conducted to identify the main themes and subthemes. Results Four themes were identified, namely: (i) potential benefits of PROMs in the management of rare diseases; (ii) views on selected questionnaires; (iii) practical considerations for implementation; and (iv) potential facilitators and barriers of implementation. Patients and clinicians suggested that the use of ePROMs may facilitate patient-centred care by promoting patient-clinician communication, highlighting aspects of HRQOL that are important to patients and encouraging patient involvement in their care. They also felt that the disease-specific CLDQ and PedsQL-TM were more relevant than the generic SF12 and EQ-5D. Conclusions Patients with rare diseases often experience impaired HRQOL. The use of an ePROM system may enhance the routine management of patients with rare diseases.
Collapse
|
26
|
Fleishman TT, Dreiher J, Shvartzman P. Patient-reported outcomes in maintenance hemodialysis: a cross-sectional, multicenter study. Qual Life Res 2020; 29:2345-2354. [DOI: 10.1007/s11136-020-02508-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/16/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|
27
|
Aiyegbusi OL. Key methodological considerations for usability testing of electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) systems. Qual Life Res 2020; 29:325-333. [PMID: 31691202 PMCID: PMC6994506 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-019-02329-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/03/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Recent advances in information technology and improved access to the internet have led to a rapid increase in the adoption and ownership of electronic devices such as touch screen smartphones and tablet computers. This has also led to a renewed interest in the field of digital health also referred to as telehealth or electronic health (eHealth). There is now a drive to collect these PROs electronically using ePRO systems. METHOD However, the user interfaces of ePRO systems need to be adequately assessed to ensure they are not only fit for purpose but also acceptable to patients who are the end users. Usability testing is a technique that involves the testing of systems, products or websites with participants drawn from the target population. Usability testing can assist ePRO developers in the evaluation of ePRO user interface. The complexity of ePRO systems; stage of development; metrics to measure; and the use of scenarios, moderators and appropriate sample sizes are key methodological issues to consider when planning usability tests. CONCLUSION The findings from usability testing may facilitate the improvement of ePRO systems making them more usable and acceptable to end users. This may in turn improve the adoption of ePRO systems post-implementation. This article highlights the key methodological issues to consider and address when planning usability testing of ePRO systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olalekan Lee Aiyegbusi
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcome Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Comparison of longitudinal quality of life outcomes in preemptive and dialyzed patients on waiting list for kidney transplantation. Qual Life Res 2019; 29:959-970. [PMID: 31784856 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-019-02372-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/19/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The waiting list period for kidney transplantation can be lengthy and associated with a deteriorated health-related quality of life (HRQoL). It might also be experienced differently depending on the experience of renal replacement therapy (preemptive or dialyzed patients), and the type of dialysis. The main objective of this study is to measure and compare HRQoL changes in preemptive, hemodialysis (HD), and peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients during the waiting list period for kidney transplantation. METHODS A sample of adult patients on kidney transplant waiting list from three French University Hospital centers was recruited. HRQoL was measured using the SF-36 and a specific questionnaire (ReTransQol), which were collected every 6 months before transplantation in preemptive, HD, and PD patients. Mixed-effects models taking into account time and possible confounding factors were used to compare HRQoL changes between the three groups. RESULTS Preemptive (n = 230), HD (n = 177), and PD patients (n = 39) were enrolled. The renal replacement therapy modalities, time (time on waiting list and age at registration), and gender were associated with HRQoL changes. The HD and PD patients had a significantly lower perceived HRQoL on Role Physical, Social Functioning, and Role Emotional dimensions than the preemptive patients, with lower scores for PD compared to HD patients. The HRQoL scores of all patients were lower compared to the French general population for all dimensions. CONCLUSIONS A better understanding of pre-transplantation patients' experience can help improving patient care with adapted educational programs and psychological support depending on the type of renal replacement therapy.
Collapse
|
29
|
Schick-Makaroff K, Tate K, Molzahn A. Use of Electronic Patient Reported Outcomes in Clinical Nephrology Practice: A Qualitative Pilot Study. Can J Kidney Health Dis 2019; 6:2054358119879451. [PMID: 31632681 PMCID: PMC6769209 DOI: 10.1177/2054358119879451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2019] [Accepted: 08/14/2019] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) in clinical practice can offer clinicians important information about the impact of illness on patients and their quality of life. Electronic reporting of patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) provide quick access of this information to the health care team. Although this type of information is acknowledged to be critical to not only improving the quality of care but also involving patients in care planning, little is known about how ePRO reports can be used in nephrology clinics to enhance person-centered care. Objective The purpose of this research was to examine how ePROs were used in home dialysis clinics. Design A pilot qualitative research design was employed. Setting The study was conducted in 2 home dialysis clinics over 6 months. Patients A total of 99 home dialysis patients and 12 nurses participated in the study. Measurements Patients completed 2 ePROs (the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System revised for renal patients and Kidney Disease Quality of Life-36) prior to their clinic appointment, and results were given to their health care providers. Nurses saw patients first, along with ePRO data. Patients and nurses consented to having their clinic interactions observed and audio recorded (n = 169). Methods Summative content analysis was used to synthesize the data. Results The ePRO data were used to discuss 24 specific issues (brought up a total of 456 times over 165 interactions), most frequently: itchiness (n = 55), appetite (n = 51), problems with sleeping (n = 50), tiredness (n = 46), and shortness of breath (n = 45) as well as overall patient health and the general effects of kidney disease on the patient's daily life. The issues that most often prompted a change in care plan, referral to another health care professional, or further assessment included itching (n = 23), depression (n = 18), tiredness (n = 13), sleeping (n = 12), anxiety (n = 11), and disease interfering with daily life (n = 7). Limitations Limitations include the duration of follow-up (6 months), the restriction to 2 home dialysis clinics, and the potential for the Hawthorne effect due to observation. Conclusions Use of these ePROs in the home dialysis clinics provided useful information that guided focused assessments and augmented standard assessments to support person-centered care. Further studies are warranted to identify whether this practice offers benefits over usual care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kaitlyn Tate
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Anita Molzahn
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Field M, Khawaja AZ, Ellis J, Nieto T, Hodson J, Inston N. The vascular access questionnaire: a single centre UK experience. BMC Nephrol 2019; 20:299. [PMID: 31382916 PMCID: PMC6683579 DOI: 10.1186/s12882-019-1493-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2019] [Accepted: 07/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Haemodialysis is capable of prolonging life in patients with end stage renal disease, however this therapy comes with significant negative impact on quality of life. For patients requiring haemodialysis, the need for an adequately functioning vascular access (VA) is an everyday concern. The Vascular Access Questionnaire (VAQ) provides a mechanism for identifying and scoring factors in haemodialysis that impact on patients’ quality of life and perception of their therapy. Methods Between April 2017–18 the VAQ was administered to prevalent haemodialysis patients at 10 units in the West Midlands via structured interviews. Results 749 of 920 potentially eligible patients completed the survey. The mean VAQ score was seen to improve significantly with age (7.7 in < 55 vs. 3.8 in 75+) and the duration of access (8.9 if less than 1 month old vs. 5.0 at a year). Better average scores were demonstrated for Arteriovenous fistulas (AVF) than other modalities (AVF 5.1 vs. AVG (arteriovenous grafts) 7.2 vs. CVC (central venous catheter) 6.6). There was no significant difference in scores between fistulas on non-dominant or dominant arms, with both having a mean of 5.2 (p = 0.341). Conclusions Overall, better satisfaction scores were seen in AVF. The presence of an AVF on the non-dominant arm was not a concern for the majority of patients and did not affect the VAQ score. A number of factors were identified that can influence VAQ satisfaction score. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12882-019-1493-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Field
- Department of Renal Transplantation and Vascular Access Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK.
| | - A Z Khawaja
- Department of Renal Transplantation and Vascular Access Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK
| | - J Ellis
- Department of Renal Transplantation and Vascular Access Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK
| | - T Nieto
- Department of Renal Transplantation and Vascular Access Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK
| | - J Hodson
- Institute of Translational Medicine, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
| | - N Inston
- Department of Renal Transplantation and Vascular Access Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Pagels AA, Stendahl M, Evans M. Patient-reported outcome measures as a new application in the Swedish Renal Registry: health-related quality of life through RAND-36. Clin Kidney J 2019; 13:442-449. [PMID: 32699625 PMCID: PMC7367131 DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfz084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2019] [Accepted: 06/02/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Although patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are gaining increased interest in developing health care quality and are a useful tool in person-centered care, their use in routine care is still limited. The aim of this study is to describe the implementation and initial results of PROMs via the Swedish Renal Registry (SRR) on a national level. Methods After testing and piloting the electronic PROM application, nationwide measures were carried out in 2017 for completing the RAND-36 questionnaire online or by paper in a wide range of chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients (Stages 3–5, dialysis and transplantation) through the SRR. Cross-sectional results during the first year were analyzed by descriptive statistics and stratified by treatment modality. Results A total of 1378 patients from 26 of 68 renal units (39%) completed the questionnaire. The response rate for all participating hemodialysis units was 38.9%. The CKD patients had an impaired health profile compared with a Swedish general population, especially regarding physical functions and assessed general health (GH). Transplanted patients had the highest scores, whereas patients on dialysis treatment had the lowest scores. The youngest age group assessed their physical function higher and experienced fewer physical limitations and less bodily pain than the other age groups but assessed their GH and vitality (VT) relatively low. The oldest age group demonstrated the lowest health profile but rated their mental health higher than the other age groups. The older the patient, the smaller the difference compared with persons of the same age in the general population. Conclusions Nationwide, routine collection of PROMs is feasible in Sweden. However, greater emphasis is needed on motivating clinical staff to embrace the tool and its possibilities in executing person-centered care. CKD patients demonstrate impaired health-related quality of life, especially regarding limitations related to physical problems, GH and VT/energy/fatigue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Agneta A Pagels
- Department of Endocrinology & Nephrology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.,Swedish Renal Registry, Jönköping County Hospital, Jönköping, Sweden
| | - Maria Stendahl
- Swedish Renal Registry, Jönköping County Hospital, Jönköping, Sweden.,Department of Medicine, Ryhov County Hospital, Jönköping, Sweden
| | - Marie Evans
- Department of Endocrinology & Nephrology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.,Swedish Renal Registry, Jönköping County Hospital, Jönköping, Sweden.,Department of Clinical Sciences, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institute, Renal Unit, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Field M, Tullett K, Khawaja A, Jones R, Inston NG. Quality improvement in vascular access: The role of patient-reported outcome measures. J Vasc Access 2019; 21:19-25. [DOI: 10.1177/1129729819845624] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Quality improvement initiatives should be aimed to enhance clinical outcomes, service delivery and quality of life for patients. For patients reliant on haemodialysis, vascular access is a lifeline. Survival differences relating to the type of vascular access are evident and many initiatives have focussed on increasing absolute rates of arteriovenous fistulas and/or decreasing central venous catheter use. While these have achieved some success quantitatively, the qualitative effects are less obvious. The aims of this review article are to explore the concepts of quality of care in vascular access. There is a paucity of studies into the effects of vascular access on the quality of life of dialysis patients, and where studies have been performed, generalised patient-reported outcome measures have been used. To facilitate the implementation of quality improvement programmes specifically for vascular access requires suitable tools. While existing patient-reported outcome measures may be applicable to vascular access, it is likely that these will require further evaluation, and the development of vascular access–specific patient-reported outcome measures may be required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melanie Field
- Department of Renal Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Karen Tullett
- Department of Renal Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Aurangzaib Khawaja
- Department of Interventional Radiology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Robert Jones
- Department of Renal Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Nicholas G Inston
- Department of Interventional Radiology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Aiyegbusi OL, Kyte D, Cockwell P, Marshall T, Dutton M, Walmsley-Allen N, Slade A, McMullan C, Calvert M. Patient and Clinician Perspectives on Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in the Management of Advanced CKD: A Qualitative Study. Am J Kidney Dis 2019; 74:167-178. [PMID: 31003865 DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.02.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2018] [Accepted: 02/06/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE Chronic kidney disease (CKD) can substantially affect patients' health-related quality of life. Electronic patient-reported outcome measures (ePROMs) may capture symptoms and health-related quality of life and assist in the management of CKD. This study explored patient and clinician views on the use of a renal ePROM system. STUDY DESIGN Qualitative study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS 12 patients with stage 4 or 5 CKD (non-dialysis dependent); 22 clinicians (6 CKD community nurses, 1 clinical psychologist, 10 nephrologists, 3 specialist registrars, and 2 renal surgeons) in the United Kingdom. ANALYTICAL APPROACH Semi-structured interviews and focus group discussion during which patients received paper versions of the Kidney Disease Quality of Life-36 and the Integrated Patient Outcome Scale-Renal to exemplify the type of content that could be included in an ePROM. Thematic analysis of interview transcripts. RESULTS 4 themes were identified: (1) general opinions of PROMs, (2) potential benefits and applications of an ePROM system, (3) practical considerations for the implementation of ePROMs, and (4) concerns, barriers, and facilitators. Patients were willing to complete ePROMs on a regular basis as part of their care despite clinician concerns about patient burden. Patients assessed the questionnaires favorably. Clinicians suggested that the extent of adoption of renal ePROM systems in routine clinical settings should be based on evidence of significant impact on patient outcomes. Clinicians were concerned that an ePROM system may raise patient expectations to unrealistic levels and expose clinicians to the risk for litigation. Patients and clinicians identified potential benefits and highlighted issues and concerns that need to be addressed to ensure the successful implementation of the renal ePROM system. LIMITATIONS Transferability of the findings may be limited because only English-speaking participants were recruited to the study. CONCLUSIONS A renal ePROM system may play a supportive role in the routine clinical management of patients with advanced CKD if the concerns of clinicians and patients can be sufficiently addressed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olalekan Lee Aiyegbusi
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
| | - Derek Kyte
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom; NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals, Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust and University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Paul Cockwell
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Department of Renal Medicine, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Tom Marshall
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Mary Dutton
- Department of Renal Medicine, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Natalie Walmsley-Allen
- Department of Renal Medicine, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Anita Slade
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Christel McMullan
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Melanie Calvert
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Anderson NE, Calvert M, Cockwell P, Dutton M, Aiyegbusi OL, Kyte D. Using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to promote quality of care in the management of patients with established kidney disease requiring treatment with haemodialysis in the UK (PROM-HD): a qualitative study protocol. BMJ Open 2018; 8:e021532. [PMID: 30373779 PMCID: PMC6224733 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021532] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patients undergoing haemodialysis (HD) for end-stage kidney disease often report a poor quality of life (QoL) and identify that improving QoL has a higher priority for them than improvements in long-term survival. Research suggests that regular collection and usage of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in patients with chronic conditions may reduce hospitalisation, improve QoL and overall survival. In the UK, despite increased use within research settings, PROMs have not been introduced into the routine clinical care for patients undergoing HD.We report the protocol for 'Using patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) to promote quality of care in the management of patients with established kidney disease requiring treatment with haemodialysis in the UK-PROM-HD'. The study aim is to investigate the methodological basis for the use of routine PROMs assessment, particularly using electronic formats (ePROMs) within clinical and research settings, to maximise the potential of PROM use in the management of the care of this patient group. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The project will use qualitative methodology to explore, by thematic analysis, the views, perceptions and experiences of patients receiving HD and members of the HD multidisciplinary team regarding the collection and use of PROMs in routine clinical care, particularly ePROMs. This will involve interviews with up to 30 patients or until saturation is achieved and three focus group sessions with approximately 18 members of the clinical team delivering care to this patient group, which will be interpreted broadly to include both professional and non-professional staff.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola Elzabeth Anderson
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Department of Renal Medicine, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Melanie Calvert
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Paul Cockwell
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Department of Renal Medicine, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Mary Dutton
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Department of Renal Medicine, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Derek Kyte
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Aiyegbusi OL, Kyte D, Cockwell P, Marshall T, Dutton M, Walmsley-Allen N, Auti R, Calvert M. Development and usability testing of an electronic patient-reported outcome measure (ePROM) system for patients with advanced chronic kidney disease. Comput Biol Med 2018; 101:120-127. [DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2018.08.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2018] [Revised: 08/06/2018] [Accepted: 08/09/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
|
36
|
Abstract
In a Persepctive, Richard Fluck and Maarten Taal discuss the potential value of implementing multidisciplinary care programs for chronic kidney disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard J. Fluck
- Department of Renal Medicine, Royal Derby Hospital, Derby, United Kingdom
| | - Maarten W. Taal
- Department of Renal Medicine, Royal Derby Hospital, Derby, United Kingdom
- Centre for Kidney Research and Innovation, Division of Medical Sciences and Graduate Entry Medicine, University of Nottingham, Derby, United Kingdom
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|