Sodium/glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors in chronic kidney disease and heart failure: ready for prime time in patients without diabetes

The efficacy and safety of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with non-diabetic chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

In recent years, increasing evidence has shown that sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) drugs have potential renoprotective effects in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). However, the renal protective effect of SGLT2i in non-diabetic nephropathy patients has not been extensively demonstrated. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to evaluate the renal protective effect and safety of SGLT2i in non-diabetic nephropathy patients.

METHODS

we searched for relevant clinically randomised controlled trials and analyzed the effects of SGLT2i on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), urinary albumin/creatinine ratio (UACR), and systolic blood pressure (SBP) and the incidence of adverse events in patients with non-diabetic nephropathy.

RESULTS

We collated and analysed clinical data from six groups of patients with nondiabetic nephropathy. It was found that the SGLT2i significantly delayed the decline in eGFR [MD = 1.35 ml/min/1.73 m2, 95% CI 0.84, 1.86), P < 0.0001]. Furthermore, the SGLT2i significantly reduced UACR [MD =  - 24.47% l, 95% CI (- 38.9, -10.04), P = 0.0009], and showed a greater decrease in SBP [MD =  - 4.13 mmHg, 95% CI (- 7.49, - 0.77), P = 0.02]. There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between dapagliflozin/empagliflozin and the control group [OR = 1.14, 95% CI (0.88, 1.47), P = 0.33].

CONCLUSION

This study shows that SGLT2i help to delay the progression of non-diabetic kidney disease. Therefore, SGLT2i may contribute to the general treatment of nondiabetic nephropathy.

Cardiovascular disease management in Australian adults with type 2 diabetes: insights from the CAPTURE study

BACKGROUND

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a well-recognised cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factor, and recent guidelines for the management of T2D include consideration of CVD risk.

AIM

To assess whether contemporary clinical management of Australians with T2D is in accord with recent national and international guidelines.

METHODS

This Australia-specific analysis of the CAPTURE study, a non-interventional, cross-sectional study included adults diagnosed with T2D ≥180 days prior to providing informed consent and visiting primary or specialist care. Main outcome measures were the use of blood glucose-lowering medications (BGLMs), BGLMs with proven cardiovascular benefits and other CVD medications, stratified by CVD status and care setting.

RESULTS

Of 824 Australian participants in the CAPTURE sample, 332 (40.3%) had CVD. Oral BGLMs were used by 83.9% of all participants, most commonly metformin (76.0%), dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (28.8%), sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2is; 21.8%) and sulfonylureas (21.7%). Insulin was used by 29.2% of participants. BGLMs with proven CV benefit were used by 22.6%; glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) were less commonly used than SGLT2is in all CVD groups, but these drug classes were more often prescribed in specialist than primary care (SGLT2is 25.4 vs 20.7%, GLP-1 RAs 3.2 vs 0.8% respectively). Use of non-BGLMs for CVD risk reduction appeared consistent with guidelines.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of BGLMs with CVD benefits appears low in Australia, irrespective of CVD status. This likely reflects the delay in translation of clinical evidence into contemporary care and prescribing restrictions.

Effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors on cardiac structural and electrical remodeling: from myocardial cytology to cardiodiabetology

Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have changed the clinical landscape of diabetes mellitus (DM) therapy through their favourable effects on cardiovascular outcomes. Notably, the use of SGLT2i has been linked to cardiovascular benefits regardless of DM status, while their pleiotropic actions remain to be fully elucidated. What we do know is that SGLT2i exert beneficial effects even at the level of the myocardial cell, and that these are linked to an improvement in the energy substrate, resulting in less inflammation and fibrosis. SGLT2i ameliorate myocardial extracellular matrix remodeling, cardiomyocyte stiffness and concentric hypertrophy, achieving beneficial remodeling of the left ventricle with significant implications for the pathogenesis and outcome of heart failure. Most studies show a significant improvement in markers of diastolic dysfunction along with a reduction in left ventricular hypertrophy. In addition to these effects there is electrophysiological remodeling, which explains initial data suggesting that SGLT2i have an antiarrhythmic action against both atrial and ventricular arrhythmias. However, future studies need to clarify not only the exact mechanisms of this beneficial functional, structural, and electrophysiological cardiac remodeling, but also its magnitude, and to determine whether this is a class or a drug effect.