Hepatitis C and neutropenia:

Clinical Practice Guidelines of the Russian Society for the Study of the Liver, the Russian Gastroenterological Association, the National Scientific Society of Infectious Disease Specialists for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis C

Аim:diagnosis and treatment algorithms in the clinical recommendations intended for general practitioners, gastroenterologists, infectious disease specialists, hepatologists on the of chronic hepatitis C are presented.

Summary.Chronic viral hepatitis C is a socially significant infection, the incidence of which in the Russian Federation remains significantly high. Over the past 10 years, great progress has been made in the treatment of hepatitis C — direct acting antiviral drugs have appeared. The spectrum of their effectiveness allows to achieve a sustained virological response in more than 90 % of cases, even in groups that were not previously considered even as candidates for therapy or were difficult to treat — patients receiving renal replacement therapy, after liver transplantation (or other organs), at the stage of decompensated liver cirrhosis, HIV co-infected, etc. Interferons are excluded from the recommendations due to their low effectiveness and a wide range of adverse events. The indications for the treatment have been expanded, namely, the fact of confirmation of viral replication. The terms of dispensary observation of patients without cirrhosis of the liver have been reduced (up to 12 weeks after the end of therapy). Also, these recommendations present approaches to active screening of hepatitis in risk groups, preventive and rehabilitation measures after the end of treatment.

Conclusion.Great success has been achieved in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C. In most cases, eradication of viral HCV infection is a real task even in patients at the stage of cirrhosis of the liver, with impaired renal function, HIV co-infection, after solid organs transplantation.

Direct acting antiviral therapy rescues neutrophil dysfunction and reduces hemolysis in hepatitis C infection

Chronic hepatitis C virus infection is characterized by multiple extra-hepatic manifestations. Innate immune dysfunction and hemolysis are symptoms which might be associated with each other. We investigated the impact of direct acting antivirals on neutrophil function and its connection to hemolysis. In this prospective study, 85 patients with or without cirrhosis and 21 healthy controls were included. Patients' blood samples were taken at baseline, at the end of therapy and at follow-up 12 weeks after end of therapy. Neutrophil phagocytosis, oxidative burst, and hemolysis parameters were studied. Multivariate analysis was performed to decipher the relationship between hemolysis and neutrophil function. Ex vivo cross-incubation experiments with neutrophils and serum fractions were done. Impaired neutrophil phagocytosis and mild hemolysis were observed in patients with and without cirrhosis. A proteome approach revealed different expression of hemolysis-related serum proteins in patients and controls. Direct acting antiviral therapy restored neutrophil function irrespective of severity of liver disease, achievement of sustained virologic response or type of drug and reduced hemolysis. Treatment with ribavirin delayed the improvement of neutrophil function. Statistical analysis revealed associations of haptoglobin with neutrophil phagocytic capacity. Neutrophil dysfunction could be transferred to healthy cells by incubation with patients' serum fractions (>30 kDa) ex vivo. Neutrophil dysfunction and hemolysis represent extrahepatic manifestations of chronic hepatitis C virus infection and simultaneously improve during direct acting antiviral therapy independently of therapy-related liver function recovery. Therefore, large-scale treatment would not only drive viral eradication but also improve patients' immune system and may reduce susceptibility to infections.

Age-related prevalence and clinical significance of neutropenia - isolated or combined with other cytopenias: Real world data from 373 820 primary care individuals

Neutropenia (NP), that is, an absolute blood neutrophil count (ANC) <1.5 g/L, accompanies various diseases. However, the clinical significance of NP, detected in routine complete blood cell counts (CBC) in primary care, is poorly characterized. Here, from a primary care resource with ANCs from >370 000 individuals, we identified and followed neutropenic subjects for the next 4 years for novel ICD-10 based diagnoses of viral infections and hematological malignancies (ie, previously identified major outcomes in NP individuals) in Danish nationwide health registers. Risk estimates were assessed for children/adolescents (1-18 years) and adults (19-90 years) in relation to NP severity, and for isolated NP, bi- or pancytopenias. We found that NP was observed in 4.9% of children and in 1.9% of adults. The lower the ANC, the likelier was a diagnosis of viral infections or hematological malignancies established during the ensuing 4 years. Among neutropenic children, unspecified viral infections predominated, followed by mononucleosis (with other cytopenias in only 7% and 25% of the cases, respectively). All NP children with acute leukemia presented with bi- or pancytopenia from start of follow-up. In NP adults, hepatitis, followed by HIV, were the most common infections, and acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs) the predominating hematological malignancies. Adult NP patients, subsequently diagnosed with hepatitis, HIV or AML, MDS, were bi- or pancytopenic in 42%, 47%, 90% and 91% of cases, respectively. Thus, presence of NP in even one CBC may be the first sign of a latent viral or hematological disorder requiring careful follow-up.

Congenital Cytomegalovirus and Autoimmune Neutropenia: Cause or Coincidence?

BACKGROUND

Congenital cytomegalovirus (CCMV) accounts for high rates of infant morbidity and mortality. Neutropenia is a common finding in CCMV infection, of which the age of presentation overlaps with autoimmune neutropenia (AIN). AIN represents one of the most common forms of chronic neutropenia in childhood.

METHODS

A literature search exploring biologic associations between CCMV and AIN was conducted: PubMed (MEDLINE), Ovid and Web of Science. We further describe 2 cases of concurrent CCMV and AIN. Both cases were confirmed with the indirect granulocyte immunofluorescence test and alternative etiologies for neutropenia excluded.

RESULTS

Our 2 patients represent confirmed cases of AIN in infants with CCMV. One patient demonstrated neutropenia while undergoing treatment with Valganciclovir, while the other was never treated. With interruption of Valganciclovir in infant A, neutrophil counts (ANC) did not improve and upon resumption of treatment ANC remained static.

CONCLUSIONS

Further studies examining a possible biologic link between CCMV and AIN are advocated for. We encourage clinicians to actively consider AIN in the differential diagnosis of all infants with CCMV presenting with neutropenia.

A population pharmacodynamic model characterizing neutropenia associated with pegylated interferon alpha 2-a therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C viral infection

Neutropenia is a hematologic disorder commonly reported in patients with chronic hepatitis C viral (HCV) infection. The objective of the present analysis is to describe the change in neutrophil count resulting from peglated interferon alpha 2-a (PEG-IFN α-2a) therapy in HCV-infected patients. A population pharmacodynamic model will be developed. We also plan to identify patient characteristics that contribute to the development of PEG-IFN α-2a-induced neutropenia in hepatitis C patients. A population pharmacodynamic modeling approach was applied to a cohort of patients (n = 292) with chronic HCV infection. Modeling was performed using NONMEM 6. Data was obtained from two phases III studies sponsored by Hoffmann-La Roche. Covariate screening was applied to evaluate various demographic and clinical characteristics as possible predictors of pharmacodynamic parameter during model development. A total of 4517 neutrophil counts from 292 subjects were analyzed by the proposed population pharmacodynamic model. A constant residual error model was used to the log-transformed neutrophil count. Platelet baseline count and uric acid level were identified as predictors of neutrophil pharmacodynamic model. Increased baseline platelet count is expected to result in higher neutrophil baseline. A higher neutrophil baseline is also expected in patients with increased uric acid level. In conclusion, a mechanistic pharmacodynamic model was developed. The effect of various covariates was included in the model. This allows the prediction of neutrophil count following antiviral therapy in patients with hepatitis C infection. Clinical studies: NV15942 and NV15801.

Prevalence and clinical significance of neutropenia discovered in routine complete blood cell counts: a longitudinal study

BACKGROUND

Neutropenia, defined as an absolute blood neutrophil count (ANC) <1.5 G L(-1) , may accompany a variety of diseases. However, the clinical significance of neutropenia detected in a routine complete blood cell count is poorly understood.

METHODS

Using a primary care resource, comprising more than 370 000 individuals, we assessed the association with a number of previously recognized conditions as well as all-cause mortality in the 4 years following the identification of neutropenia. By matching laboratory data with Danish nationwide health registers, risk estimates were assessed.

RESULTS

Neutropenia was observed in approximately 1% of all individuals and was associated dose dependently with viral infections, haematological malignancies (but not autoimmune disorders or solid cancers) and mortality. Neutropenia was particularly associated with HIV, acute leukaemias and myelodysplastic syndromes. Odds ratios [95% confidence interval (CI)] for viral infections were 2.32 (1.84-2.91), 2.80 (2.20-3.57) and 4.77 (3.22-7.07) for subnormal (≥1.5-1.8 G L(-1) ), mild (≥1.0-1.5 G L(-1) ) and moderate-severe (≥0.0-1.0 G L(-1) ) neutropenic individuals, respectively (all P < 0.001). Likewise, odds ratios (95% CI) for haematological malignancies were 3.23 (2.35-4.45), 8.69 (6.58-11.47) and 46.03 (33.98-62.35 ), for the same neutropenia levels, respectively (all P < 0.001). Thus, the lower the ANC, the greater the likelihood of these diseases. The relative risk estimates observed for severe neutropenia corresponded to absolute risks of haematological malignancies and mortality from any cause of 40% and >50%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Neutropenia is an ominous sign necessitating careful follow-up. The risk estimates presented here support focusing attention to viral diseases and haematological malignancies when neutropenia is observed.

How we diagnose and treat neutropenia in adults

Neutropenias (NPs), being acute and often transient, or chronic, range from life-threatening conditions with very low absolute neutrophil blood counts (ANC) to disorders characterized by only mild NP and of no obvious significance for health. Many are caused by genetic variations/mutations, e.g. the benign familial NP and the chronic severe NPs (e.g. Kostmann disease). Some of the latter are associated with various bodily malformations. Many of the mild-to-moderate NPs are signs of underlying disorders that need specialized treatments (e.g. HIV, hepatitis, autoimmune disorders, the large granular lymphocyte syndrome). We provide here means for the evaluation of a previously unknown NP, suggest a triage and treatments.

Big spleens and hypersplenism: fix it or forget it?

Hypersplenism is a common manifestation of portal hypertension in the cirrhotic. More than half of cirrhotics will have low platelet counts, but neutropenia is much less common. Despite being common in the cirrhotic population, the presence of hypersplenism is of little clinical consequence. The presence of hypersplenism suggests more advanced liver disease and an increase in risk of complications, but there is no data showing that correcting the hypersplenism improves patient survival. In most series, the most common indications for treating the hypersplenism is to increase platelet and white blood cell counts to allow for use of drugs that suppress the bone marrow such as interferon alpha and chemotherapeutic agents. There are several approaches used to treat hypersplenism. Portosystemic shunts are of questionable benefit. Splenectomy, either open or laparoscopically, is the most effective but is associated with a significant risk of portal vein thrombosis. Partial splenic artery embolization and radiofrequency ablation are effective methods for treating hypersplenism, but counts tend to fall back to baseline long-term. Pharmacological agents are also effective in increasing platelet counts. Development of direct acting antivirals against hepatitis C will eliminate the most common indication for treatment. We lack controlled trials designed to determine if treating the hypersplenism has benefits other than raising the platelet and white blood cell counts. In the absence of such studies, hypersplenism in most patients should be considered a laboratory abnormality and not treated, in other words forget it.