Racial disparities in pediatric otolaryngology: current state and future hope

Effect of an Outbound Scheduling Team on the Timeliness of Scheduling Referrals to Pediatric Otolaryngology

OBJECTIVE

Families preferring to receive care in a language-other-than-English have disparities in access to care. We studied the effect of implementing an ambulatory outbound scheduling team on the timeliness of scheduling referrals to pediatric otolaryngology. We hypothesized this intervention could increase access to care.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort analysis.

SETTING

Tertiary care academic center.

METHODS

Data were abstracted from the hospital's enterprise database for patients referred to Otolaryngology over 3 years (October 2019-August 2022; 7675 referrals). An outbound scheduling team was created April 2021 and tasked with calling out to schedule referrals within one business day of receipt. Referral lag was compared across patient cohorts before and after the scheduling intervention. Log-transformed linear regression models were used to assess the impact of the scheduling intervention on referral lag for language cohorts.

RESULTS

The median preintervention referral lag was 6 days (interquartile range [IQR] 2-18), which was reduced to 1 day postintervention (IQR 0-5; P < .001). Preintervention language-other-than-English families had a median referral lag of 8 days (IQR 2-23), which was 1.27 times higher than for patients speaking English (P < .001). With implementation of the scheduling intervention, language-other-than-English families were scheduled in a median of 1 day (IQR 0-6), and the disparity in timeliness of scheduling was eliminated (P = .131). Postintervention, referral lag was reduced by 58% in the English and 64% in the language other than English cohorts.

CONCLUSION

Implementation of an outbound ambulatory scheduling process reduces referral lag for all patients and eliminated a disparity in referral lag for language-other-than-English families.

Socioeconomic and racial disparities in revisits, indication, and readmission or reoperation in pediatric tonsillectomy

INTRODUCTION

Pediatric tonsillectomy is a frequent otolaryngologic procedure. This study aimed to characterize disparities in post-tonsillectomy revisits, including emergency department evaluation, readmission, or reoperation as well as indication for revisit.

METHODS

Cases of inpatient and ambulatory pediatric tonsillectomy in New York and Florida in 2016 constituted the analytic sample. Patients were extracted from the State Ambulatory Surgery Databases (SASD) and State Inpatient Databases (SID) and linked to the SID and State Emergency Department Database (SEDD) and SASD. Outcomes include 3 types of revisits within 30 days: ED visits, hospital readmissions, and reoperation. Indication for revisit was also analyzed. Multivariable analysis determined the association of each outcome with gender, age, race/ethnicity, primary payer, urbanicity, and zip code median household income quartile. The Holm Bonferroni test was used to correct for multiple hypothesis testing.

RESULTS

15,264 pediatric tonsillectomies were included. The revisit rate was 6.77% (N = 1,034, 49.1% female; 6 years median age [interquartile range: 5]). The 30-day ED revisit rate was 4.85%, readmission rate was 1.27%, and reoperation rate was 0.65%. On multivariate analysis, Latinx patients (OR = 3.042, 95% CI = 1.393-6.803) and those who identify as other race/ethnicity (OR = 6.116, 95% CI = 1.989-19.245) have greater odds of requiring inpatient care for indications including pain, dehydration, nausea, and vomiting compared to white patients. No significant differences in tier of care for the management of post-tonsillectomy hemorrhage were identified.

CONCLUSION

Disparities in pediatric post-tonsillectomy ED presentation, readmission and reoperation demonstrate opportunities to improve patient safety and equity.

Do Racial and Ethnic Disparities Exist in Intensity of Intracranial Pressure-Directed Therapies and Outcomes Following Pediatric Severe Traumatic Brain Injury?

INTRODUCTION

Studies suggest disparities in outcomes in minoritized children after severe traumatic brain injury. We aimed to evaluate for disparities in intracranial pressure-directed therapies and outcomes after pediatric severe traumatic brain injury.

METHODS

We conducted a secondary analysis of the Approaches and Decisions for Acute Pediatric TBI (ADAPT) Trial, which enrolled pediatric severe traumatic brain injury patients (Glasgow Coma Scale score  ≤8) with an intracranial pressure monitor from 2014 to 2018. Patients admitted outside of the United States were excluded. Patients were categorized by race and ethnicity (Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black, non-Hispanic White, and "Other"). We evaluated outcomes by assessing mortality and 3-month Glasgow Outcome Score-Extended for Pediatrics. Our analysis involved parametric and nonparametric testing.

MAIN RESULTS

A total of 671 children were analyzed. Significant associations included older age in non-Hispanic White patients (P < .001), more surgical evacuations in "Other" (P < .001), and differences in discharge location (P = .040). The "other" cohort received hyperventilation less frequently (P = .046), although clinical status during Paco2 measurement was not known. There were no other significant differences in intracranial pressure-directed therapies. Hispanic ethnicity was associated with lower mortality (P = .004) but did not differ in unfavorable outcome (P = .810). Glasgow Outcome Score-Extended for Pediatrics was less likely to be collected for non-Hispanic Black patients (69%; P = .011).

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis suggests a general lack of disparities in intracranial pressure-directed therapies and outcomes in children after severe traumatic brain injury. Lower mortality in Hispanic patients without a concurrent decrease in unfavorable outcomes, and lower availability of Glasgow Outcome Score-Extended for Pediatrics score for non-Hispanic Black patients merit further investigation.

Geospatial evaluation of access to otolaryngology care in the United States

Objectives

This county-level epidemiological study evaluated the travel distance to the nearest otolaryngologist for continental US communities and identified socioeconomic differences between low- and high-access regions.

Methods

Geospatial analysis of publicly available 2015-2022 NPI records was combined with US census data to identify geospatial gaps in otolaryngologist distribution. Moran's index geospatial clustering in distance to the nearest county with an otolaryngologist was used as the core metric for differential access determination. Univariate logistic analysis was conducted between low- and high-access counties for 20 socioeconomic and demographic variables.

Results

Nationally, the average person was 22 miles from an otolaryngologist. 444 counties were identified as geospatially "low access" with increased travel distance in the Midwest, Great Planes, and Nevada with a median of 47 miles. 1231 counties in the Eastern United States and Western Coast were identified as "high access" with a 3-mile median travel distance. Areas of low access to otolaryngological care had smaller median populations (12,963 vs. 558,306), had smaller percent Black and Asian populations (2% vs. 11%, 1% vs. 5%, respectively), had a greater percent American Indian population (2% vs. 1%), were less densely populated (8 vs. 907 people per square mile), had fewer percent college graduates (20% vs. 34%), and fewer otolaryngologists per county (median: 0.01-20).

Conclusion

These findings highlight disparity in otolaryngology care in the United States and the need for otolaryngology funding initiatives in the Midwest and Great Plains regions.

Level of Evidence

Level 3.

Disparities in the Presentation and Management of Pediatric Retropharyngeal Abscess

OBJECTIVES

Differences in management and outcomes of otolaryngologic diseases may reflect inequities driven by social determinants of health. This study aimed to investigate disparities in presentation and outcomes of retropharyngeal abscess (RPA) among 231 pediatric patients.

METHODS

Medical records were searched for pediatric patients with RPA from 2010 to 2021. Charts were reviewed for demographics, clinical features, and treatment decisions. Area deprivation index (ADI) scores for patient zip codes were determined. Chi-square analysis independent samples t-test, and regression analyses were used to investigate associations between variables.

RESULTS

Among patients presenting for RPA, Black patients were less likely to undergo surgical management than non-Black patients (53.2% vs. 71.6%, p = 0.009). Black patients had a lower rate of treatment with antibiotics prior to hospital admission (19.4% vs. 54.4%, p < 0.001). Among patients who received surgery, Black patients had higher cross-sectional abscess area on CT (6.4 ± 8.4 cm2  > vs. 3.8 ± 3.3 cm2 , p = 0.014), longer length of stay (5.4 ± 3.3 days vs. 3.2 ± 1.5, p < 0.001), and longer time between admission and surgery (2.3 ± 2.1 vs. 0.83 ± 1.1, p < 0.001). Increased ADI was correlated with increased rate of trismus.

CONCLUSIONS

Lower rates of pre-admission antibiotics and larger abscess area on CT imaging among Black patients may suggest disparities in access to primary care, resulting in presentation to tertiary care at later stages of disease and higher rates of medical management trial prior to surgical intervention.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 (retrospective cohort study) Laryngoscope, 134:1907-1912, 2024.

Racial and ethnic inequities in the quality of paediatric care in the USA: a review of quantitative evidence

Racial and ethnic inequities in paediatric care have received increased research attention over the past two decades, particularly in the past 5 years, alongside an increased societal focus on racism. In this Series paper, the first in a two-part Series focused on racism and child health in the USA, we summarise evidence on racial and ethnic inequities in the quality of paediatric care. We review studies published between Jan 1, 2017 and July 31, 2022, that are adjusted for or stratified by insurance status to account for group differences in access, and we exclude studies in which differences in access are probably driven by patient preferences or the appropriateness of intervention. Overall, the literature reveals widespread patterns of inequitable treatment across paediatric specialties, including neonatology, primary care, emergency medicine, inpatient and critical care, surgery, developmental disabilities, mental health care, endocrinology, and palliative care. The identified studies indicate that children from minoritised racial and ethnic groups received poorer health-care services relative to non-Hispanic White children, with most studies drawing on data from multiple sites, and accounting for indicators of family socioeconomic position and clinical characteristics (eg, comorbidities or condition severity). The studies discussed a range of potential causes for the observed disparities, including implicit biases and differences in site of care or clinician characteristics. We outline priorities for future research to better understand and address paediatric treatment inequities and implications for practice and policy. Policy changes within and beyond the health-care system, discussed further in the second paper of this Series, are essential to address the root causes of treatment inequities and to promote equitable and excellent health for all children.

Healthcare Disparities in Otolaryngology

Purpose of Review

The purpose of this review is to summarize some of the recent research studies on healthcare disparities across various subspecialties within otolaryngology. This review also highlights the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on disparities and proposes potential interventions to mitigate disparities.

Recent Findings

Significant healthcare disparities in care and treatment outcomes have been reported across all areas of otolaryngology. Notable differences in survival, disease recurrence, and overall mortality have been noted based on race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status (SES), insurance status, etc. This is most well-researched in head and neck cancer (HNC) within otolaryngology.

Summary

Healthcare disparities have been identified by numerous research studies within otolaryngology for many vulnerable groups that include racial and ethnic minority groups, low-income populations, and individuals from rural areas among many others. These populations continue to experience suboptimal access to timely, quality otolaryngologic care that exacerbate disparities in health outcomes.

Sociodemographic disparities in pediatric cochlear implantation outcomes: A systematic review

OBJECTIVES

To determine the impact of sociodemographic factors on post-operative performance outcomes among PCI recipients across the world.

METHODS

A qualitative systematic review of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase was undertaken for studies analyzing the association of sociodemographic factors with measures of PCI outcomes published before July 18, 2021. Study quality assessment tools from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) were used to assess for risk of bias.

RESULTS

Out of 887 unique abstracts initially retrieved, 45 papers were included in the final qualitative systematic review. Sociodemographic disparities in PCI outcomes from 4702 PCI recipients were studied in 19 countries, with 14 studies conducted in the United States of America, published within the years of 1999 to 2021. Parental education and socioeconomic status (e.g. income) were the most investigated disparities in PCI outcomes with 24 and 17 identified studies, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Socioeconomic status was a consistently reported determinant of PCI outcomes in the USA and elsewhere, and parental education, the most reported disparity, consistently impacted outcomes in countries outside the USA. This study is limited by our inability to perform a meta-analysis given the lack of standardization across measures of sociodemographic variables and assessment measures for PCI outcomes. Future studies should address the literature gap on racial and ethnic disparities among PCI outcomes and use standardized measures for sociodemographic variables and PCI outcomes to facilitate meta-analyses on the topic. Targeting the mechanisms of these disparities may mitigate the impact of the sociodemographic factors on PCI outcomes.