Evaluation and treatment of isolated maxillary sinus disease

Evaluation of maxillary sinus changes following molar distalization using clear aligners: A three-dimensional study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of molar distalization with clear aligners (CAs) on maxillary sinus parameters and its proximity to the root apices of maxillary molars using Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT).

METHODS

The study involved pre- and post-treatment CBCT images of 27 adult patients. MIMICS 21.0 software was used to measure maxillary sinus volume and surface area, while Invivo Dental 6.0 program was used to measure the sinus diameters and proximity of the maxillary molar root apices to the sinus floor.

RESULTS

Post-treatment, there was a marked increase in the average volume and surface area of the maxillary sinus on both sides; however, changes in dimensions were not statistically significant. Sinus proximity to the root apices of the maxillary molars showed statistically significant differences, particularly on the left side for all roots. Gender and age impacted the outcomes, with males and younger individuals showing more pronounced changes. No significant differences were observed between the left and right sinuses in all parameters.

CONCLUSION

Molar distalization with CAs increases maxillary sinus parameters, more notably in younger and male patients. All molar teeth roots moved toward the sinus, particularly the mesiobuccal root of the maxillary second molar protruded to the sinus.

A Retrospective Analysis of Clinicopathological Features in 117 Isolated Maxillary Sinus Pathologies in a Tertiary Care Hospital

Diagnosis of maxillary sinus pathologies is challenging. Herewith we describe the clinicopathological features in isolated maxillary sinus lesions in tertiary care hospital in Goa, India. The retrospective study included patients treated between 2017 and 2022, of all age groups and gender, who underwent either a biopsy or surgery, providing a histopathological diagnosis. Of the 117 pathologies, 88 (75.2%) were non-neoplastic. The overall frequency of pathologies were polyp in 40.2%, fungal lesions (18.8%), malignancy (13.7%), chronic rhinosinusitis (11.9%) and inverted papilloma (10.3%). There were 71 men (60.7%) and 46 women (39.3%). There were 10 patients (8.5%) below 20 years of age, of which 8 patients (80%) had non-neoplastic pathology. Common comorbidities were diabetes and hypertension, while symptoms were nasal blockage (75.2%), nasal discharge (47%) and ocular redness (16.2%). Each pathology was evaluated for demography, side of lesion, comorbidity, and symptoms. Most isolated maxillary sinus pathologies were benign lesions. However, a strong clinical suspicion and histopathological confirmation is needed for all lesions in all age groups due to a risk of malignancy.

Simultaneous endoscopic endonasal sinus surgery and sinus augmentation with immediate implant placement: A retrospective clinical study of 23 patients

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of simultaneous endoscopic endonasal sinus surgery and sinus augmentation with immediate implant placement.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study patients (n = 23) were partially or completely edentulous in the posterior maxilla and required maxillary sinus augmentation. All included patients had a sinus pathology confirmed clinically and radiographically. The technique of simultaneous endoscopic endonasal sinus surgery and sinus augmentation was used in 15 patients, with eight endonasal sinus surgery procedures being performed 2-3 months before sinus augmentation. Where possible, implants were placed during the same surgical procedure (with a ridge bone height of at least 4 mm).

RESULTS

There were no any major intraoperative complications. Implants placed in the reconstructed areas were shown to integrate normally, and postoperative occlusal function and aesthetics were favorable. Of the 95 implants placed in these 23 patients, two failed to osseointegrate.

CONCLUSION

The method of simultaneous endoscopic endonasal sinus surgery and sinus augmentation with immediate implant placement leads to a reduction in postoperative complications, significantly shortening the rehabilitation period for patients with maxillary sinus diseases and insufficient bone tissue.

Literature review. Noninvasive fungal rhinosinusitis

Fungus ball (FB) of the paranasal sinuses has a distinctive clinicopathological presentation. The disease occurs more frequently in elderly patients and has a female preponderance. Classically, it involves only one paranasal sinus in more than 90% of the cases, most commonly the maxillary sinus. Imaging characteristics (calcifications and / or erosion of the inner wall of the sinus visible on CT) and histopathological ones (luminal aggregation of fungal hyphae) confirm the diagnosis.

Allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS) usually occurs in younger, immunocompetent patients, with a history of atopy, including allergic rhinitis and / or asthma, or a long clinical picture of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), refractory to antibiotic treatment. Nasal polyps (NP) are present in almost all patients, while extra-sinusal complications are described only in some of them. Usually, there is involvement of several sinuses, as well as bilateral damage. The definitive diagnosis is confirmed only by examining surgical specimens - the characteristic appearance of eosinophilic mucin is the most reliable indicator of AFRS.

Evaluation of the Prevalence of Maxillary Sinuses Abnormalities through Spiral Computed Tomography (CT)

Introduction Maxillary sinus disease is common and numerous disorders can affect this anatomical area. Abnormalities can be classified as: non-neoplastic, neoplastic benign, and neoplastic malignant.

Objective Evaluate through CT the prevalence of diseases in maxillary sinuses, using the Radiology Department's database of a hospital in São Paulo city.

Methods The sample consisted of 762 facial CT scans that we divided into three groups: Group A (12–19 years old); Group B (20–49 years old); Group C (above 50 years old); and male or female. We considered the following pathological processes: I - Mucoperiosteal Thickening; II - Chronic Sinusitis; III - Chronic Odontogenic Sinusitis; IV - Rhinosinusitis; V - Polypoid Lesions; VI - Bone Lesions; VII - Neoplasms; VIII - Antrolith; IX - Foreign Bodies; X - Oroantral Fistula.

Results Our study found that 305 exams (40.02%) were normal and 457 exams (59.97%) were abnormal. We found the following disease frequencies: focal mucoperiosteal thickening (21.25%); polypoid lesions (10.76%); chronic sinusitis (7.48%); chronic odontogenic sinusitis (2.29%); neoplasms (2.03%); rhinosinusitis (1.77%); bone lesions, foreign bodies and oroantral fistula in 0.65%; 0.13% and 0.06% respectively. There was no significant difference between male and female, and Groups A, B, or C when relating the frequencies of abnormalities found. There was no significant difference between male and female and the age group for the side of the altered maxillary sinus.

Conclusion We observed a high prevalence of sinus maxillary diseases. Mucoperiosteal thickening; acute, chronic, and odontogenic sinusitis; polypoid lesions and neoplasms have high prevalence in maxillary sinuses. Thus, facial CT exam was effective for the evaluation of diseases in maxillary sinuses.

Maxillary sinus volume in patients with impacted canines

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the maxillary sinus volumes in unilaterally impacted canine patients and to compare the volumetric changes that occur after the eruption of canines to the dental arch using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Pre- (T0) and posttreatment (T1) CBCT records of 30 patients were used to calculate maxillary sinus volumes between the impacted and erupted canine sides. The InVivoDental 5.0 program was used to measure the volume of the maxillary sinuses. The distance from impacted canine cusp tip to the target point on the palatal plane was also measured.

RESULTS

Right maxillary sinus volume was statistically significantly smaller compared to that of the left maxillary sinus when the canine was impacted on the right side at T0. According to the T1 measurements there was no significant difference between the mean volumes of the impaction side and the contralateral side. The distance from the canine tip to its target point on the palatal plane were 17.17 mm, and the distance from the tip to the target point was 15.14 mm for the left- and right-side impacted canines, respectively, and there was a significant difference between the mean amount of change of both sides of maxillary sinuses after treatment of impacted canines.

CONCLUSIONS

Orthodontic treatment of impacted canines created a significant increase in maxillary sinus volume when the impacted canines were closer with respect to the maxillary sinus.