Non-HLA antibodies in transplantation: when do they matter?

Improved Graft Function following Desensitization of Anti-AT1R and Autoantibodies in a Heart Transplant Recipient Negative for Donor-Specific Antibodies with Antibody-Mediated Rejection: A Case Report

HLA donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) pre and post transplant increase the risk of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) and lead to poor graft survival. Increasing data exist to support the involvement of non-HLA antibodies in triggering an immunological response. The development of non-HLA antibodies specific for AT1R is associated with poor clinical outcomes in orthotopic heart transplant recipients. This case presents an investigation of non-HLA antibodies in a 56-year-old female heart transplant recipient diagnosed with AMR in the absence of DSAs.

Anti-GSTT1 antibodies and Null genotype correlate with histological changes of antibody mediated rejection in kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

The presence of anti-Glutathione S-transferase T1 (GSTT1) antibodies (abs) has been hypothesized as a pathogenic contributor in antibody-mediated rejection (AMR).

METHODS

We aimed to evaluate the relationship between genetic variants of GSTT1, anti-GSTT1 abs and AMR in a cohort of 87 kidney transplant (KTx) patients using Immucor's non-HLA Luminex assay. Patients were classified according to biopsy-proven AMR and HLA-DSA status: AMR with positive anti-HLA-DSAs (AMR/DSA+, n = 29), AMR but no detectable anti-HLA-DSAs (AMR/DSA-, n = 28) and control patients with stable allograft function and no evidence of rejection (n = 30).

RESULTS

At an MFI cut-off of 3000, the overall prevalence of anti-GSTT1 abs was 18.3%. The proportion of patients with anti-GSTT1 abs was higher in the AMR/DSA- group (25%), compared to the control (13.3%) and AMR/DSA+ group (3.4%) (p = 0.06). Among patients with anti-GSTT1 abs, the MFI was higher in AMR/DSA- and GSTT1-Null patients. Of 81 patients who underwent GSTT1 genotyping, 19.8% were homozygotes for the null allele (GSTT1-Null). GSTT1-Null status in the transplant recipients was associated with the development of anti-GSTT1 abs (OR, 4.49; 95%CI, 1.2-16.7). In addition, GSTT1-Null genotype (OR 26.01; 95%CI, 1.63-404) and anti-GSTT1 ab positivity (OR 14.8; 95%CI, 1.1-190) were associated with AMR. Within AMR/DSA- patients, the presence of anti-GSTT1 abs didn't confer a higher risk of failure within the study observation period.

CONCLUSION

The presence of anti-GSTT1 abs and GSTT1-Null genotype is associated with AMR, but do not appear to lead to accelerated graft injury in this cohort of early allograft injury changes, with a limited period of follow-up.

Loss of anti-AT1R reactivity in ELISA post-adsorption - False reactivity or interference in the assay?

Autoantibodies to Angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) are associated with detrimental outcomes in organ transplants. However, reports showed that adsorption with latex beads reduced positive anti-AT1R antibodies, suggesting possible false reactivity. To investigate this conundrum, we studied 11 samples positive for AT1R antibodies with an ELISA kit before and after adsorption. Adsorption significantly reduced the measurable level of AT1R antibodies (28.3 ± 9.8 vs. 6.3 ± 3.0 U/ml, p < 0.001). AT1R antibodies were lower when post-adsorption serum was added back at 1:1 ratio to the neat serum compared to the diluent control (8.6 ± 4.2 vs. 18.1 ± 10.3 U/ml, p = 0.02). Sham adsorption with the buffer from Adsorb Out™ kit without beads also suppressed the detection of anti-AT1R antibodies (32.7 ± 9.1 vs. 8.1 ± 3.9 U/ml, p < 0.001). Thus, rather than actively removing nonspecific antibodies by the beads, the adsorption process introduces soluble factors that interfere with the detection of anti-AT1R antibodies with the ELISA kit.

Assessment and management of allosensitization following heart transplant in adults

Immunological injury to the allograft, specifically by antibodies to de novo donor specific human leukocyte antigen (dnDSA) and antibody mediated injury and rejection are the major limitations to graft survival after heart transplantation (HT). As such, our approach to allosensitization remains limited by the inability of contemporaneous immunoassays to unravel pathogenic potential of dnDSA. Additionally, the role of dnDSA is continuously evaluated with emerging methods to detect rejection. Moreover, the timing and frequency of dnDSA monitoring for early detection and risk mitigation as well as management of dnDSA remain challenging. A strategic approach to dnDSA employs diagnostic assays to determine relevant antibodies in conjunction with clinical presentation and injury/rejection of allograft to tailor therapeutics. In this review, we aim to outline contemporary knowledge involving detection, monitoring and management of dnDSA after HT. Subsequently, we propose a diagnostic and therapeutic approach that may mitigate morbidity and mortality while balancing adverse reactions from pharmacotherapy.

Non-HLA Antibodies and Their Role in Highly Sensitized Patients

BACKGROUND

The role of non-HLA antibody is gaining special attention in solid-organ transplantation and in highly sensitized (HS) patients because of its potential involvement in graft loss (GL) and/or antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR). The identification of non-HLA antibodies while listed may provide deeper information about the increased immunologic risk prior to transplant. We aimed to identify non-HLA antibodies pretransplant that could involve GL in HS patients.

METHODS

Nineteen pretransplant samples from HS patients who underwent transplant at the Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital were studied for both HLA antibodies and a panel of 39 non-HLA antigens analyzed based on Luminex platform.

RESULTS

Eleven patient (57.9%) maintained the graft (KT group), whereas 8 (42.1%) had a GL within a median of 30 days. The median fluorescent intensity (MFI) of the 39 non-HLA antigens were compared within the groups, obtaining a statistically significant differences in protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor type N (P < .04) with a MFI mean of 1408 vs 4931 for KT and GL groups, respectively. However, no significant differences were observed in non-HLA MFI between ABMR and non-ABMR KT recipients.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of non-HLA antibodies in HS is high. The levels of anti-protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor type N before transplant could indicate a potential risk of GL, although longitudinal studies with large number of cases are needed to define anti-non-HLA profiles of risk of ABMR.

B-cell response in solid organ transplantation

The transcriptional regulation of B-cell response to antigen stimulation is complex and involves an intricate network of dynamic signals from cytokines and transcription factors propagated from T-cell interaction. Long-term alloimmunity, in the setting of organ transplantation, is dependent on this B-cell response, which does not appear to be halted by current immunosuppressive regimens which are targeted at T cells. There is emerging evidence that shows that B cells have a diverse response to solid organ transplantation that extends beyond plasma cell antibody production. In this review, we discuss the mechanistic pathways of B-cell activation and differentiation as they relate to the transcriptional regulation of germinal center B cells, plasma cells, and memory B cells in the setting of solid organ transplantation.

Renal Endothelial Cytotoxicity Assay to Diagnose and Monitor Renal Transplant Recipients for Anti-Endothelial Antibodies

Tissue-specific nonhuman leukocyte antigen (HLA) antigens can play crucial roles in allograft immunity and have been shown to trigger humoral responses leading to rejection of HLA-matched kidney allografts. Interest in the role of endothelial-specific antigens has grown over the past years, and several case reports have been described in which antibodies reacting with endothelial cells (ECs) are associated with rejection. Such antibodies escape the detection in conventional crossmatch tests as they do not react with lymphocytes. However, due to the heterogeneity of endothelial cells from different vascular beds, it remains difficult to draw organ-specific conclusions from studies describing endothelial crossmatch assays. We present a case of a 69-year-old male patient whose kidney allograft was rejected as hyperacute, despite the absence of pretransplant HLA-specific antibodies. To place findings from previous studies in a kidney-related context, we performed crossmatch assays with primary renal endothelial cells. The patient's serum was reactive with primary renal ECs, demonstrated by antibody binding and complement-dependent cytotoxicity. Antibodies from this patient did not react with lymphocytes nor were HLA donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) found. Two years later, the patient successfully received a second kidney transplant after treatment with rituximab and plasmapheresis before and after transplantation. We demonstrated that the removal of antibodies against non-HLA EC-specific molecules can be monitored using a primary renal EC crossmatch test, possibly contributing to a successful transplantation outcome.

Antigen and Cell-Based Assays for the Detection of Non-HLA Antibodies

To date, human leukocyte antigens (HLA) have been the major focus in the approach to acute and chronic antibody-mediated rejection (AMBR) in solid-organ transplantation. However, evidence from the clinic and published studies has shown that non-HLA antibodies, particularly anti-endothelial cell antibodies (AECAs), are found either in the context of AMBR or synergistically in the presence of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA). Numerous studies have explored the influence of AECAs on clinical outcomes, yet the determination of the exact clinical relevance of non-HLA antibodies in organ transplantation is not fully established. This is due to highly heterogeneous study designs including differences in testing methods and outcome measures. Efforts to develop reliable and sensitive diagnostic non-HLA antibody tests are continuously made. This is essential considering the technical difficulties of non-HLA antibody assays and the large variation in reported incidences of antibodies. In addition, it is important to take donor specificity into account in order to draw clinically relevant conclusions from non-HLA antibody assays. Here, we provide an overview of non-HLA solid-phase and cell-based crossmatch assays for use in solid-organ transplantation that are currently available, either in a research setting or commercially.

Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Antibody-mediated Rejection Following Orthotopic Heart Transplant: A Single-center Experience

BACKGROUND

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) following orthotopic heart transplant (OHT) causes significant morbidity and mortality. There are limited data on antibodies to the angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibody (AT1R-Ab) causing rejection following OHT.

METHODS

This is a retrospective, single-center study that presents our 2-y experience with a series of 11 patients with evidence of nonspecific graft dysfunction and pathologic levels of AT1R-Ab. The clinical outcomes and treatments were compared to a group of 10 patients, also with evidence of nonspecific graft dysfunction, but who had nonsignificant AT1R-Ab titers.

RESULTS

The mean age of the AT1R-Ab cohort was 52% and 73% were bridged to transplant with an left ventricular assist device. The average left ventricular ejection fraction at presentation was 45%, and most were not on an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB). Endomyocardial biopsies in those with elevated AT1R-Ab levels frequently showed reactive endothelium/endocardium without C4d or intravascular CD68 staining. Ten patients (91%) were started on an ARB. Other therapies included plasmapheresis and IVIg (64%), with 4 patients also receiving rituximab. Most patients had symptom improvement, but minimal change in graft function at an average 6 mo of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The role of AT1R-Ab-mediated rejection in OHT recipients remains poorly understood. More than half of patients at our center who presented with graft dysfunction in the absence of acute cellular rejection or AMR were found to have elevated AT1R-Ab titers. Empiric AMR treatment in conjunction with ARB therapy may improve patient outcomes. Future studies are needed to better define the optimal treatment modalities for ATR1-Ab-mediated AMR.

Murine Cytomegalovirus-induced Complement-fixing Antibodies Deposit in Murine Renal Allografts During Acute Rejection

BACKGROUND

Human cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is associated with renal allograft dysfunction and loss, particularly in combination with acute rejection. Emerging literature suggests that non-HLA antibodies may contribute to antibody-mediated rejection, but pathogen-induced antibodies have not been investigated in this context. This study examines the presence of CMV-induced antibodies in murine CMV (MCMV)-infected renal allografts during acute rejection.

METHODS

Intragraft immunoglobulin G (IgG) and complement C3 immunostaining were compared among allogeneic MCMV D-/R-, D+/R-, and D+/R+ renal transplants. Intragraft antibody deposition was examined in B cell-deficient recipients treated with MCMV immune sera. Antibody binding and complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) of D-/R- and D+/R+ sera against infected renal tubular epithelial cells (TECs) were measured in vitro. IgG immunostaining was performed in D+/R+ allografts and native kidneys and in D+/R- allografts treated with ganciclovir to inhibit viral replication.

RESULTS

D+/R- and D+/R+ transplants had more abundant IgG and C3 deposition compared with D-/R- recipients. Greater IgG deposition was associated with more severe allograft injury in B cell-deficient recipients treated with MCMV immune sera compared with nonimmune sera. D+/R+ sera induced greater CDC of infected TECs compared with D-/R- sera. Native kidneys had lower IgG deposition compared with allografts, despite similar organ viral loads. Ganciclovir-treated allografts had reduced IgG deposition compared with untreated allografts.

CONCLUSIONS

In this murine model, complement-fixing antibodies can deposit into MCMV-infected renal allografts, are associated with allograft damage, and can induce CDC of MCMV-infected renal TECs. The allogeneic response and viral replication may also contribute to intragraft antibody deposition.

A Comprehensive Overview of the Clinical Relevance and Treatment Options for Antibody-mediated Rejection Associated With Non-HLA Antibodies

Although solid organ transplant results have improved significantly in recent decades, a pivotal cause of impaired long-term outcome is the development of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), a condition characterized by the presence of donor-specific antibodies to HLA or non-HLA antigens. Highly HLA-sensitized recipients are treated with desensitization protocols to rescue the transplantation. These and other therapies are also applied for the treatment of AMR. Therapeutic protocols include removal of antibodies, depletion of plasma and B cells, inhibition of the complement cascade, and suppression of the T-cell-dependent antibody response. As mounting evidence illustrates the importance of non-HLA antibodies in transplant outcome, there is a need to evaluate the efficacy of treatment protocols on non-HLA antibody levels and graft function. Many reviews have been recently published that provide an overview of the literature describing the association of non-HLA antibodies with rejection in transplantation, whereas an overview of the treatment options for non-HLA AMR is still lacking. In this review, we will therefore provide such an overview. Most reports showed positive effects of non-HLA antibody clearance on graft function. However, monitoring non-HLA antibody levels after treatment along with standardization of therapies is needed to optimally treat solid organ transplant recipients.

A 2020 Banff Antibody-mediatedInjury Working Group examination of international practices for diagnosing antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplantation - a cohort study

The Banff antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) classification is vulnerable to misinterpretation, but the reasons are unclear. To better understand this vulnerability, we evaluated how ABMR is diagnosed in practice. To do this, the Banff Antibody-Mediated Injury Workgroup electronically surveyed an international cohort of nephrologists/surgeons (n = 133) and renal pathologists (n = 99). Most providers (97%) responded that they use the Banff ABMR classification at least sometimes, but DSA information is often not readily available. Only 41.1% (55/133) of nephrologists/surgeons and 19.2% (19/99) of pathologists reported that they always have DSA results when the biopsy is available. Additionally, only 19.6% (26/133) of nephrologists/surgeons responded that non-HLA antibody or molecular transcripts are obtained when ABMR histologic features are present but DSA is undetected. Several respondents agreed that histologic features concerning for ABMR in the absence of DSA and/or C4d are not well accounted for in the current classification [31.3% (31/99) pathologists and 37.6% (50/133) nephrologist/surgeons]. The Banff ABMR classification appears widely accepted, but efforts to improve the accessibility of DSA information for the multidisciplinary care team are needed. Further clarity is also needed in Banff ABMR nomenclature to account for the spectrum of ABMR and for histologic features suspicious for ABMR when DSA is absent.

Early effects of first-line treatment with anti-interleukin-6 receptor antibody tocilizumab for chronic active antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Chronic active antibody-mediated rejection (cAMR) is a major determinant of late allograft failure. Rituximab/immunoglobulins (IVIg) + plasma exchange (PLEX) showed controversial results in cAMR treatment. Tocilizumab (TCZ), a humanized anti-interleukin 6 receptor antibody, has been recently used as rescue therapy in patients non-responsive to rituximab/IVIg/PLEX with favorable outcomes. Whether TCZ acts "per se" or requires a priming effect from previous treatments is currently unknown.

METHODS

Fifteen patients with cAMR were treated with TCZ as a first-line therapy and followed for a median time of 20.7 months.

RESULTS

Despite the majority of patients experiencing advanced transplant glomerulopathy (TG) at diagnosis (60% with cg3), glomerular filtration rate and proteinuria stabilized during the follow-up, with a significant reduction in donor-specific antibodies. Protocol biopsies after 6 months demonstrated significant amelioration of microvascular inflammation and no TG, C4d deposition, or IF/TA progression. Gene-expression and immunofluorescence analysis showed upregulation of three genes (TJP-1, AKR1C3, and CASK) involved in podocyte, mesangial, and tubular restoration.

CONCLUSION

Tocilizumab adopted as a first-line approach in cAMR was associated with early serological and histological improvements and functional stabilization even in advanced TG, suggesting a role for the use of TCZ alone with the avoidance of unnecessary previous immunosuppressants.

Successful A2 to B Deceased Donor Kidney Transplant after Desensitization for High-Strength Non-HLA Antibody Made Possible by Utilizing a Hepatitis C Positive Donor

Desensitization using plasma exchange can remove harmful antibodies prior to transplantation and mitigate risks for hyperacute and severe early acute antibody-mediated rejection. Traditionally, the use of plasma exchange requires a living donor so that the timing of treatments relative to transplant can be planned. Non-HLA antibody is increasingly recognized as capable of causing antibody-mediated renal allograft rejection and has been associated with decreased graft longevity. Our patient had high-strength non-HLA antibody deemed prohibitive to transplantation without desensitization, but no living donors. As the patient was eligible to receive an A2 ABO blood group organ and was willing to accept a hepatitis C positive donor kidney, this afforded a high probability of receiving an offer within a short enough time frame to attempt empiric desensitization in anticipation of a deceased donor transplant. Fifteen plasma exchange treatments were performed before the patient received an organ offer, and the patient was successfully transplanted. Hepatitis C infection was treated posttransplant. No episodes of rejection were observed. At one-year posttransplant, the patient maintains good graft function. In this case, willingness to consider nontraditional donor organs enabled us to mimic living donor desensitization using a deceased donor.

Antibodies against Angiotensin II Type 1 and Endothelin A Receptors: Relevance and pathogenicity

Antibodies against two G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs), angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) and endothelin A receptor (ETAR) are among a growing number of autoantibodies that are found to be associated with allograft dysfunction. AT1R antibodies (AT1Rabs) and ETAR antibodies (ETARabs) have been shown to activate their target receptors and affect signaling pathways. Multiple single center reports have shown an association between presence of these antibodies and acute or chronic rejection and graft loss in kidney, heart, liver, lung and composite tissue transplantations. However, the characteristics of patients that are most likely to develop adverse outcomes, the phenotypes associated with graft damage solely due to these antibodies, and the antibody titer required to cause dysfunction are areas that remain controversial. This review compiles existing knowledge on the effect of antibodies against GPCRs in other diseases in order to bridge the gap in knowledge within transplantation biology. Future areas for research are highlighted and include the need for functional assays and treatment protocols for transplant patients who present with AT1Rabs and ETARabs. Understanding how antibodies that activate GPCRs influence transplantation outcome will have direct clinical implications for preemptive evaluation of transplant candidates as well as the post-transplant care of organ recipients.

Sensitization to endothelial cell antigens: Unraveling the cause or effect paradox

Anti-endothelial cell antibodies (AECAs) have been correlated with increased acute and chronic rejection across all organ types and early graft dysfunction in kidney and heart transplantation. Nevertheless, the lack of appropriate tools and clear criteria for defining injurious versus non-injurious AECAs prohibits their routine inclusion in clinical risk assessments and diagnostic algorithms for antibody mediated injury. Clinical characterization of AECAs is complicated due to the wide range of polymorphic and non-polymorphic antigens expressed across different vascular tissues and the diverse array of specificities observed between individuals. This complexity is also reflected in the broad spectrum of reported injury phenotypes. AECAs detected at time of allograft dysfunction may represent biomarkers of past vascular injury or active contributors to a current rejection process. New tools within the fields of proteomics, genomics, bioinformatics, and imaging are currently being validated and hold great promise for unraveling the AECA paradox.

Pre-transplant Screening for Non-HLA Antibodies: Who should be Tested?

Retrospective studies of angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibodies (AT1R-Ab) and anti-endothelial cell antibodies (AECA) have linked these antibodies to allograft injury. Because rising healthcare costs dictate judicious use of laboratory testing, we sought to define characteristics of kidney transplant recipients who may benefit from screening for non-HLA antibodies. Kidney recipients transplanted between 2011 and 2016 at Johns Hopkins, were evaluated for AT1R-Ab and AECA. Pre-transplant antibody levels were compared to clinical and biopsy indications of graft dysfunction. Biopsies were graded using the Banff' 2009-2013 criteria. AT1R-Ab and AECA were detected using ELISA and endothelial cell crossmatches, respectively. AT1R-Ab levels were higher in patients who were positive for AECAs. Re-transplanted patients (p < 0.0001), males (p = 0.008) and those with FSGS (p = 0.04) and younger (p = 0.04) at time of transplantation were more likely to be positive for AT1R-Ab prior to transplantation. Recipients who were positive for AT1R-Ab prior to transplantation had increases in serum creatinine within 3 months post-transplantation (p < 0.0001) and developed abnormal biopsies earlier than did AT1R-Ab negative patients (126 days versus 368 days respectively; p = 0.02). Defining a clinical protocol to identify and preemptively treat patients at risk for acute rejection with detectable non-HLA antibodies is an important objective for the transplant community.