Inclusion of the colon in intestinal transplantation

Endoscopic Surveillance of the Intestinal Allograft: Recommendations From the Intestinal Rehabilitation and Transplant Association Working Group

Intestinal transplant (ITx) rejection lacks a reliable noninvasive biomarker and rejection surveillance relies on serial endoscopies and mucosal biopsies followed by histologic assessment. Endoscopic biopsies are also essential for identifying other ITx-related complications such as infectious, allergic, and inflammatory graft enteritis as well as post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease or graft versus host disease. In spite of its central role in ITx, published guidelines on endoscopy and biopsy are lacking and significant variability between centers in terms of timing and technical performance exists. Therefore, an international expert group convened and discussed several aspects related to the surveillance endoscopy after ITx with the aim to summarize and standardize its practice. This article summarizes these considerations on endoscopic ITx monitoring and highlights practices of surveillance and for-cause endoscopy, biopsy techniques, pathologic evaluation, potential risks and complications, outsourcing, and less-invasive monitoring techniques.

Nutrition care for the adult post-intestinal transplant patient

Intestinal transplantation has emerged as an accepted treatment choice for individuals experiencing irreversible intestinal failure. This treatment is particularly relevant for those who are not candidates or have poor response to autologous gut reconstruction or trophic hormone therapy, and who can no longer be sustained on parenteral nutrition. One of the main goals of transplant is to eliminate the need for parenteral support and its associated complications, while safely restoring complete nutrition autonomy. An intestinal transplant is a complex process that goes beyond merely replacing the intestines to provide nourishment and ceasing parenteral support. It requires an integrated management approach in the pretransplant and posttransplant setting, and high-quality nutrition treatment is one of the cornerstones leading to favorable outcomes and long-term management. Since the outset of intestinal transplant in the early 2000s, there is observed improvement of achieving nutrition autonomy sooner in the initial posttransplant phase; however, the development of nutrition complications in the chronic posttransplant period remains a long-term risk. This review delineates the decision-making process and clinical protocols used to nutritionally manage and monitor pre- and post-intestine transplant patients.

The impact of colonic allograft inclusion on intestinal transplantation outcomes: Results from UNOS/OPTN database analysis

BACKGROUND

Outcomes of intestinal transplantation with colon allograft (ICTx) remain controversial. We aimed to assess the outcomes of ICTx in comparison to intestinal transplantation without colon (ITx) using the UNOS/OPTN registry database.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 2612 patients who received primary intestinal transplants from 1998 to 2020. The rates of acute rejection (AR) within 6 months after transplant were compared between ICTx and ITx. Risk factors of 6-month AR were examined using logistic regression model by era. Furthermore, conditional graft survival was analyzed to determine long-term outcomes of ICTx.

RESULTS

Of 2612 recipients, 506 (19.4%) received ICTx. Graft and patient survival in ICTx recipients were comparable to those in ITx recipients. White ICTx recipients had a higher incidence of AR within 6 months compared to ITx during the entire study period (p = .002), colonic inclusion did not increase the risk of 6-month AR in the past decade. ICTx recipients who experienced 6-month AR had worse graft and patient survival compared to those who did not (p <.001 and p = .004, respectively). Among patients who did not develop 6-month AR, Cox proportional hazard model analysis revealed that colonic inclusion was independently associated with improved conditional graft survival.

CONCLUSIONS

In the recent transplant era, colonic inclusion is no longer associated with a heightened risk of 6-month AR and may provide better long-term survival compared to ITx when AR is absent. Risk adjustment for rejection and proper immunosuppressive therapy are crucial to maximize the benefits of colonic inclusion.

Intestinal and Multivisceral Transplantation: Indications and Surgical Techniques

Intestinal transplantation and multivisceral transplantation are technically challenging and complex procedures mainly performed on patients with irreversible and non-medically manageable end-stage intestinal failure. Increasingly, other organs besides small intestines are included in the allograft for which the terms "composite intestinal transplantation" and "multivisceral transplantation" are used. Commonly, complex vascular reconstructions are used for these procedures. Knowledge of surgical anatomy hence is essential for accurate interpretation of postoperative imaging in these patients. This article reviews the indications and most common surgical techniques for intestinal and multivisceral transplantations.

Small bowel transplant - novel indications and recent progress

INTRODUCTION

Advances in the management of intestinal failure have led to a reduction in the number of intestinal transplants. The number of bowel transplants has been mainly stable even though a slight increase has been observed in the last 5 years.

AREAS COVERED

Standard indication includes patients with a reasonable life expectancy. Recent progress can be deduced by the increased number of intestine transplants in adults: this is due to the continuous improvement of 1-year graft survival worldwide (without differences in 3- and 5-year) associated with better abdominal wall closure techniques. This review aims to provide an update on new indications and changes in trends of pediatric and adult intestine transplantation. This analysis, which stretches through the past 5 years, is based on a collection of related manuscripts from PubMed.

EXPERT COMMENTARY

Intestinal transplants should be solely intended for a group of individuals for whom indications for transplantation are clear and both medical and surgical rehabilitations have failed. Nevertheless, many protocols developed over the years have not yet solved the key question represented by the over-immunosuppression. Novel indications and recent progress in the bowel transplant field, minimal yet consistent, represent a pathway to be followed.

The Microbiome and Metabolomic Profile of the Transplanted Intestine with Long-Term Function

We analyzed the fecal microbiome by deep sequencing of the 16S ribosomal genes and the metabolomic profiles of 43 intestinal transplant recipients to identify biomarkers of graft function. Stool samples were collected from 23 patients with stable graft function five years or longer after transplant, 15 stable recipients one-year post-transplant and four recipients with refractory rejection and graft loss within one-year post-transplant. Lactobacillus and Streptococcus species were predominant in patients with stable graft function both in the short and long term, with a microbiome profile consistent with the general population. Conversely, Enterococcus species were predominant in patients with refractory rejection as compared to the general population, indicating profound dysbiosis in the context of graft dysfunction. Metabolomic analysis demonstrated significant differences between the three groups, with several metabolites in rejecting recipients clustering as a distinct set. Our study suggests that the bacterial microbiome profile of stable intestinal transplants is similar to the general population, supporting further application of this non-invasive approach to identify biomarkers of intestinal graft function.

Surgical Treatment of Short Bowel Syndrome—The Past, the Present and the Future, a Descriptive Review of the Literature

Short bowel syndrome (SBS) is a devastating disorder with both short- and long-term implications for patients. Unfortunately, the prevalence of SBS has doubled over the past 40 years. Broadly speaking, the etiology of SBS can be categorized as congenital or secondary, the latter typically due to extensive small bowel resection following diseases of the small intestine, e.g., necrotizing enterocolitis, Hirschsprung’s disease or intestinal atresia. As of yet, no cure exists, thus, conservative treatment, primarily parenteral nutrition (PN), is the first-line therapy. In some cases, weaning from PN is not possible and operative therapy is required. The invention of the longitudinal intestinal lengthening and tailoring (LILT or Bianchi) procedure in 1980 was a major step forward in patient care and spawned further techniques that continue to improve lives for patients with severe SBS (e.g., double barrel enteroplasty, serial transverse enteroplasty, etc.). With this review, we aim to provide an overview of the clinical implications of SBS, common conservative therapies and the development of operative techniques over the past six decades. We also provide a short outlook on the future of operative techniques, specifically with respect to regenerative medicine.

Graft Versus Host Disease After Intestinal Transplantation: A Single-center Experience

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Background.

Graft versus host disease (GVHD) is an uncommon but highly morbid complication of intestinal transplantation (ITx). In this study, we reviewed our 17-y experience with GVHD focusing on factors predicting GVHD occurrence and survival.

Methods.

Retrospective review of 271 patients who received 1 or more ITx since program inception in 2003 with survival analysis using Cox proportional hazard modeling.

Results.

Of 271 patients, 28 developed GHVD 34 (18–66) d after ITx presenting with rash or rash with fever in 26, rectosigmoid disease in 1, and hemolysis in 1; other sites, mainly rectosigmoid colon, were involved in 13. Initial skin biopsy demonstrated classic findings in 6, compatible findings in 14, and no abnormalities in 2. Additional sites of GVHD later emerged in 14. Of the 28 patients, 16 died largely from sepsis, the only independent hazard for death (hazard ratio [HR], 37.4181; P = 0.0008). Significant (P < 0.0500) independent hazards for occurrence of GVHD in adults were pre-ITx functional intestinal failure (IF) (HR, 15.2448) and non-IF diagnosis (HR, 20.9952) and early post-ITx sirolimus therapy (HR, 0.0956); independent hazards in children were non-IF diagnosis (HR, 4.3990), retransplantation (HR, 4.6401), donor:recipient age ratio (HR, 7.3190), and graft colon omission (HR, 0.1886). Variant transplant operation was not an independent GVHD hazard.

Conclusions.

Initial diagnosis of GVHD after ITx remains largely clinical, supported but not often confirmed by skin biopsy. Although GVHD risk is mainly recipient-driven, changes in donor selection and immunosuppression practice may reduce incidence and improve survival.

Factors Associated With 5- and 10-Year Survival After Intestinal Transplantation in Infants and Children

OBJECTIVES

Intestinal transplantation is an option for permanent intestinal failure with parenteral nutrition intolerance. We sought to determine long-term intestinal graft survival in pediatric patients at our center and to identify factors influencing survival.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of 86 patients transplanted between 2003 and 2013, targeting potential explanatory variables related to demographics, perioperative factors, and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

Intestinal graft survival was 71% and 65% after 5 and 10 years, respectively. Five-year graft survival was attained in 79% of patients with a history of anatomic intestinal failure compared with 45% with functional intestinal failure (P = 0.0055). Compared with nonsurvival, 5-year graft survival was also associated with reduced incidences of graft-versus-host disease (2% vs 16%, P = 0.0237), post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (3% vs 24%, P = 0.0067), and de novo donor-specific antibodies (19% vs 57%, P = 0.0451) plus a lower donor-recipient weight ratio (median 0.727 vs 0.923, P = 0.0316). Factors not associated with 5-year intestinal graft survival included graft rejection of any severity and inclusion of a liver graft. Factors associated with graft survival at 10 years were similar to those at 5 years.

CONCLUSIONS

In our experience, outcomes in pediatric intestinal transplantation have improved substantially for anatomic but not functional intestinal failure. Graft survival depends on avoidance of severe infectious and immunological complications including GVHD, whereas inclusion of a liver graft provides no obvious survival benefit. Reduced success with functional intestinal failure may reflect inherently increased susceptibility to complications in this group.

Beyond 10 years, with or without an intestinal graft: Present and future?

Long-term outcomes in children undergoing intestinal transplantation remain unclear. Seventy-one children underwent intestinal transplantation in our center from 1989 to 2007. We report on 10-year posttransplant outcomes with (group 1, n = 26) and without (group 2, n = 9) a functional graft. Ten-year patient and graft survival rates were 53% and 36%, respectively. Most patients were studying or working, one third having psychiatric disorders. All patients in group 1 were weaned off parenteral nutrition with mostly normal physical growth and subnormal energy absorption. Graft histology from 15 late biopsies showed minimal abnormality. However, micronutrient deficiencies and fat malabsorption were frequent; biliary complications occurred in 4 patients among the 17 who underwent liver transplantation; median renal clearance was 87 mL/min/1.73 m² . Four patients in group 1 experienced late acute rejection. Among the 9 patients in group 2, 4 died after 10 years and 2 developed significant liver fibrosis. Liver transplantation and the use of a 3-drug regimen including sirolimus or mycophenolate mofetil were associated with improved graft survival. Therefore, intestinal transplantation may enable a satisfactory digestive function in the long term. The prognosis of graft removal without retransplantation is better than expected. Regular monitoring of micronutrients, early psychological assessment, and use of sirolimus are recommended.

Including colon in intestinal transplantation: a focus on post-transplant renal function - a retrospective study

Intestinal transplant recipients experience a high rate of renal complications secondary to dehydration due to increased ostomy output. It is hypothesized that inclusion of donor colon in the intestinal allograft may improve renal function in patients without functional native colon by improving fluid absorption. A single-center retrospective study of intestinal transplant recipients compared outcomes of patients receiving en bloc colon as part an intestinal allograft (ICTx), and those not receiving colon (CCNTx), as well as a control group of intestinal transplant recipients with functional native colon (ITx). Forty-seven patients (ICTx n = 17, CCNTx n = 15, ITx n = 15) were studied. One-year post-transplant renal function, as measured by change in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) from baseline, was superior in ICTx (mean delta-GFR of -1.31 and delta-BUN of -1.46) compared to CCNTx (-6.54 and 17.54, P = 0.05 and P = 0.17, respectively) and similar to the ITx controls (0.55 and 2.09). Recipients of donor colon experienced a higher rate of ileostomy reversal when compared to CCNTx (62.5% vs. 20%, P = 0.0008), which was similar to the ITx controls (60%). These findings support the inclusion of en bloc donor colon in the intestinal allograft for recipients without functional native colon.

Long-term survival in visceral transplant recipients in the new era: A single-center experience

There is a paucity of data on long-term outcomes following visceral transplantation in the contemporary era. This is a single-center retrospective analysis of all visceral allograft recipients who underwent transplant between November 2003 and December 2013 with at least 3-year follow-up data. Clinical data from a prospectively maintained database were used to assess outcomes including patient and graft survival. Of 174 recipients, 90 were adults and 84 were pediatric patients. Types of visceral transplants were isolated intestinal transplant (56.3%), combined liver-intestinal transplant (25.3%), multivisceral transplant (16.1%), and modified multivisceral transplant (2.3%). Three-, 5-, and 10-year overall patient survival was 69.5%, 66%, and 63%, respectively, while 3-, 5-, and 10-year overall graft survival was 67%, 62%, and 61%, respectively. In multivariable analysis, significant predictors of survival included pediatric recipient (P = .001), donor/recipient weight ratio <0.9 (P = .008), no episodes of severe acute rejection (P = .021), cold ischemia time <8 hours (P = .014), and shorter hospital stay (P = .0001). In conclusion, visceral transplantation remains a good option for treatment of end-stage intestinal failure with parenteral nutritional complications. Proper graft selection, shorter cold ischemia time, and improvement of immunosuppression regimens could significantly improve the long-term survival.

Short bowel syndrome in children and adults: from rehabilitation to transplantation

Short bowel syndrome (SBS) is a dramatic clinical condition in both children and adults; the residual bowel length is not sufficient to avoid intestinal failure, with subsequent malnutrition and growth retardation, and intravenous support is required to provide the nutrients normally coming from the intestine. Apart from the primary disease, the medical status can be worsened by complications of intestinal failure: if there are irreversible, the prognosis is poor unless a successful intestinal rehabilitation is achieved. Areas covered: The rescue of the remnant small bowel requires a multidisciplinary expertise to achieve digestive autonomy. The use of intestinal trophic factors has shown encouraging results in improving the intestinal adaptation process. Whenever the residual bowel length is inadequate, in a well-selected population weaning parenteral nutrition (PN) off could be attempted by surgery through lengthening procedures. A further subset of patients, with total and irreversible intestinal failure and severe complications on PN, may have an indication to intestinal transplantation. This procedure is still affected by poor long-term results. Expert commentary: Novel approaches developed through a multidisciplinary team work, such as manipulation of microbiota or tissue bioengineering, should be added to current therapies to treat successfully SBS.

Adult Intestinal Transplantation

Adult intestinal transplantation differs significantly from pediatric intestinal transplantation. While indications have remained largely consistent since 2000, indications for adults have expanded over the last two decades to include motility disorders and desmoid tumors. Graft type in adult recipients depends on the distinct anatomic characteristics of the adult recipient. Colonic inclusion, while initially speculated to portend unfavorable outcomes due to complex host-bacterial interactions has increased over the past two decades with superior graft survival and improved patient quality of life. Overall, outcomes have steadily improved. For adult intestinal transplant candidates, intestinal transplantation remains a mainstay therapy for complicated intestinal failure and is a promising option for other life threatening and debilitating conditions.

Pediatric Intestinal Transplantation

Pediatric intestinal transplantation has moved from the theoretic to an actual therapy for children with irreversible intestinal failure who are suffering from complications of total parenteral nutrition. Owing to significant advancement in the management of intestinal failure and prevention of parenteral nutrition-related complications that have led to reduction in incidence of parenteral nutrition-associated liver disease and have improved intestinal adaptation, the indications for intestinal transplantation are evolving. Long-term outcomes have improved, but challenges in long-term graft function owing to chronic rejection and immunosuppressant-related complications remain the major opportunities for improvement.

Pediatric intestinal transplantation

The field of intestinal transplantation has experienced dramatic growth since the first reported cases 3 decades ago. Improvements in operative technique, donor assessment and immunosuppressive protocols have afforded children who suffer from life-threatening complications of intestinal failure a chance at long-term survival. As experience has grown, newer diseases, with more systemic manifestations have arisen as potential indications for transplant. After discussing the historical developments of intestinal transplant as a backdrop, this review focuses on the specific pre-operative indications for transplant as well as the great success that intestinal rehabilitation has witnessed over the past decade. A detailed discussion of evolution of immunosuppressive strategies is followed a general review of the common infectious complications experienced by children after intestinal transplant as well as the current long- and short-term results, including a section on new research on the quality of life in this challenging population of patients.

Intestinal transplantation in children: current status

Intestinal transplantation (IT) is the least common form of organ transplantation; however, it has shown exceptional growth and improvement in graft survival rates over the past two decades mainly due to better outcomes achieved during the first year of transplantation (76 % at 1 year), due to improvement in surgical techniques and the development of better immunosupressive therapies as we understand more about the relationship between the recipient and host immune system. There are still ongoing issues with chronic rejection and long-term survival. Intestinal transplantation is still an acceptable therapy for patients with intestinal failure (IF), but it is generally reserved for patients who develop severe and life-threatening complications despite standard therapies, or those who are not able to maintain a good quality of life. The purpose of this review is to describe the current status, indications, outcomes and advances in the field of intestinal transplantation.

Intestinal transplantation

Intestinal transplantation has now emerged as a lifesaving therapeutic option and standard of care for patients with irreversible intestinal failure. Improvement in survival over the years has justified expansion of the indications for intestinal transplantation beyond the original indications approved by Center for Medicare and Medicaid services. Management of patients with intestinal failure is complex and requires a multidisciplinary approach to accurately select candidates who would benefit from rehabilitation versus transplantation. Significant strides have been made in patient and graft survival with several advancements in the perioperative management through timely referral, improved patient selection, refinement in the surgical techniques and better understanding of the immunopathology of intestinal transplantation. The therapeutic efficacy of the procedure is well evident from continuous improvements in functional status, quality of life and cost-effectiveness of the procedure. This current review summarizes various aspects including current practices and evidence based recommendations of intestinal transplantation.

The Surgical Approach to Short Bowel Syndrome - Autologous Reconstruction versus Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Short bowel syndrome (SBS) is a state of malabsorption resulting from massive small bowel resection leading to parenteral nutrition (PN) dependency. Considerable advances have been achieved in the medical and surgical management of SBS over the last few decades.

METHODS

This review discusses in detail the surgical approach to SBS.

RESULTS

Widespread use of PN enables long-term survival in patients with intestinal failure but at the cost of PN-associated life-threatening complications including catheter-associated blood stream infection, venous thrombosis, and liver disease. The goal of management of intestinal failure due to SBS is to enable enteral autonomy and wean PN by means of a multi-disciplinary approach. Availability of modified enteral feeding formulas have simplified nutrition supplementation in SBS patients. Similarly, advances in the medical field have made medications like growth hormone and glucagon-like peptide (GLP2) available to improve water and nutrient absorption as well as to enable achieving enteral autonomy. Autologous gastrointestinal reconstruction (AGIR) includes various techniques which manipulate the bowel surgically to facilitate the bowel adaptation process and restoration of enteral nutrition. Ultimately, intestinal transplantation can serve as the last option for the cure of intestinal failure when selectively applied.

CONCLUSION

SBS continues to be a challenging medical problem. Best patient outcomes can be achieved through an individualized plan, using various AGIR techniques to complement each other, and intestinal transplantation as a last resort for cure. Maximum benefit and improved outcomes can be achieved by caring for SBS patients at highly specialized intestinal rehabilitation centers.

Surgical rehabilitation of short and dysmotile intestine in children and adults

AIMS

This is a descriptive study aiming to compare outcomes of intestinal rehabilitation surgery among pediatric and adult intestinal failure (IF) patients with either primary intestinal motility disorders or short bowel syndrome (SBS) treated by our nationwide program.

METHODS

Medical records of IF patients (n = 31, 71% children) having undergone autologous intestinal reconstructions (AIR) (n = 25), intestinal transplantation (ITx) (n = 5), or being listed for ITx (n = 2) between 1994 and 2014 were reviewed.

RESULTS

At surgery, median age was 3.4 (interquartile range, 1.0-22.1) in SBS (n = 22) and 16.5 (3.2-26.7) years in dysmotility patients (n = 9) who received median 60% and 83% of energy requirement parenterally, respectively. Median small bowel length was shorter in SBS than dysmotility patients (34 versus 157 cm, p < 0.001). Following AIR, none of the dysmotility patients achieved permanent intestinal autonomy, whereas 68% of SBS patients weaned off parenteral nutrition (PN) (p = 0.022) and none required listing for ITx. Five dysmotility patients who underwent ITx achieved intestinal autonomy. Regarding both AIR and ITx procedures, no significant difference in PN weaning was observed between the two subgroups. At last follow-up, 3.3 (0.6-8.0) years postoperatively, median plasma bilirubin was 6 (4-16) µmol/l, while liver biopsy showed fibrosis (Metavir stage 1-2) in 50% and cholestasis in 8%. Proportion of PN energy requirement had reduced significantly (p = 0.043) among PN-dependent SBS (n = 7) but not among dysmotility patients (n = 5). Overall survival was 90%.

CONCLUSION

AIR surgery was beneficial among selected SBS patients, whereas in intestinal dysmotility disorders, permanent PN weaning was only achieved by ITx.

Intestinal transplant registry report: global activity and trends

The Registry has gathered information on intestine transplantation (IT) since 1985. During this time, individual centers have reported progress but small case volumes potentially limit the generalizability of this information. The present study was undertaken to examine recent global IT activity. Activity was assessed with descriptive statistics, Kaplan-Meier survival curves and a multiple variable analysis. Eighty-two programs reported 2887 transplants in 2699 patients. Regional practices and outcomes are now similar worldwide. Current actuarial patient survival rates are 76%, 56% and 43% at 1, 5 and 10 years, respectively. Rates of graft loss beyond 1 year have not improved. Grafts that included a colon segment had better function. Waiting at home for IT, the use of induction immune-suppression therapy, inclusion of a liver component and maintenance therapy with rapamycin were associated with better graft survival. Outcomes of IT have modestly improved over the past decade. Case volumes have recently declined. Identifying the root reasons for late graft loss is difficult due to the low case volumes at most centers. The high participation rate in the Registry provides unique opportunities to study these issues.

The current state of intestine transplantation: indications, techniques, outcomes and challenges

Intestine transplantation is the least common form of organ transplantation in the United States and often deemed one of the most difficult. Patient and graft survival have historically trailed well behind other organ transplants. Over the past 5-10 years registry reports and single center series have demonstrated improvements to patient survival after intestinal transplantation that now match patient survival for those without life-threatening complications on parenteral nutrition. For various reasons including improvements in medical care of patients with intestinal failure and difficulty accessing transplant care, the actual number of intestine transplants has declined by 25% over the past 6 years. In light of the small numbers of intestine transplants, many physicians and the lay public are often unaware that this is a therapeutic option. The aim of this review is to describe the current indications, outcomes and advances in the field of intestine transplantation and to explore concerns over future access to this important and life-saving therapy.

Intestinal transplantation: a review

Parenteral nutrition is a life-saving therapy for patients with intestinal failure. Intestinal transplantation is now recognized as a treatment for patients who develop complications of parenteral nutrition and in whom attempts at intestinal rehabilitation have failed. Patients with parenteral nutrition related liver disease will require a liver graft typically part of a multivisceral transplant. Isolated intestinal transplants are more commonly performed in adults while multivisceral transplants are most commonly performed in infants. Isolated intestinal transplants have the best short-term outcome, with over 80 % survival at 1 year. Patients requiring multivisceral transplants have a high rate of attrition with a 1 year survival less than 70 %. Prognostic factors for a poor outcome include patient hospitalization at the time of transplant and donor age greater than 40 years while systemic sepsis and acute rejection are the major determinant of early postoperative outcome. For patients surviving the first year the outcome of transplantation of the liver in addition to intestine affords some survival advantage though long-term outcome does not yet match other abdominal organs. Outcomes for intestinal retransplantation are poor as a result of immunology and patient debility. Overall intestinal transplantation continues to develop and is a clear indication with cost and quality of life advantages in patients with intestinal failure that do not remain stable on parenteral nutrition.

Progress in abdominal organ transplantation

The excellent results of vascularized organ transplantation have resulted in an increasing number of end-stage organ failure patients seeking such treatment. The results of organ transplantation depend on a number of factors – the quality of the donor (and an organ), living vs. deceased donation, magnitude of ischemic injury (and its prevention), and recipient-dependent factors. Ischemia/reperfusion injury in organ transplantation is a multifactorial process, which may lead to delayed graft function. In addition, surgical and preservation techniques, type of immunosuppressive regimens, complications after transplantation and post-transplant management may also have a significant impact on short- and long-term results of transplantation. In this paper we describe advances in transplantation in recent years, with particular emphasis on kidney, liver, intestines, whole pancreas and pancreatic islets.