Role of non-HLA antibodies in organ transplantation

Autoantibodies from patients with kidney allograft vasculopathy stimulate a proinflammatory switch in endothelial cells and monocytes mediated via GPCR-directed PAR1-TNF-α signaling

Non-HLA-directed regulatory autoantibodies (RABs) are known to target G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) and thereby contribute to kidney transplant vasculopathy and failure. However, the detailed underlying signaling mechanisms in human microvascular endothelial cells (HMECs) and immune cells need to be clarified in more detail. In this study, we compared the immune stimulatory effects and concomitant intracellular and extracellular signaling mechanisms of immunoglobulin G (IgG)-fractions from kidney transplant patients with allograft vasculopathy (KTx-IgG), to that from patients without vasculopathy, or matched healthy controls (Con-IgG). We found that KTx-IgG from patients with vasculopathy, but not KTx-IgG from patients without vasculopathy or Con-IgG, elicits HMEC activation and subsequent upregulation and secretion of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) from HMECs, which was amplified in the presence of the protease-activated thrombin receptor 1 (PAR1) activator thrombin, but could be omitted by selectively blocking the PAR1 receptor. The amount and activity of the TNF-α secreted by HMECs stimulated with KTx-IgG from patients with vasculopathy was sufficient to induce subsequent THP-1 monocytic cell activation. Furthermore, AP-1/c-FOS, was identified as crucial transcription factor complex controlling the KTx-IgG-induced endothelial TNF-α synthesis, and mircoRNA-let-7f-5p as a regulatory element in modulating the underlying signaling cascade. In conclusion, exposure of HMECs to KTx-IgG from patients with allograft vasculopathy, but not KTx-IgG from patients without vasculopathy or healthy Con-IgG, triggers signaling through the PAR1-AP-1/c-FOS-miRNA-let7-axis, to control TNF-α gene transcription and TNF-α-induced monocyte activation. These observations offer a greater mechanistic understanding of endothelial cells and subsequent immune cell activation in the clinical setting of transplant vasculopathy that can eventually lead to transplant failure, irrespective of alloantigen-directed responses.

Autoantibodies targeting G protein-coupled receptors: An evolving history in autoimmunity. Report of the 4th international symposium

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) are involved in various physiological and pathophysiological processes. Functional autoantibodies targeting GPCRs have been associated with multiple disease manifestations in this context. Here we summarize and discuss the relevant findings and concepts presented in the biennial International Meeting on autoantibodies targeting GPCRs (the 4th Symposium), held in Lübeck, Germany, 15-16 September 2022. The symposium focused on the current knowledge of these autoantibodies' role in various diseases, such as cardiovascular, renal, infectious (COVID-19), and autoimmune diseases (e.g., systemic sclerosis and systemic lupus erythematosus). Beyond their association with disease phenotypes, intense research related to the mechanistic action of these autoantibodies on immune regulation and pathogenesis has been developed, underscoring the role of autoantibodies targeting GPCRs on disease outcomes and etiopathogenesis. The observation repeatedly highlighted that autoantibodies targeting GPCRs could also be present in healthy individuals, suggesting that anti-GPCR autoantibodies play a physiologic role in modeling the course of diseases. Since numerous therapies targeting GPCRs have been developed, including small molecules and monoclonal antibodies designed for treating cancer, infections, metabolic disorders, or inflammatory conditions, anti-GPCR autoantibodies themselves can serve as therapeutic targets to reduce patients' morbidity and mortality, representing a new area for the development of novel therapeutic interventions.

Non-HLA Antibodies in Hand Transplant Recipients Are Connected to Multiple Acute Rejection Episodes and Endothelial Activation

The role of anti-HLA antibodies in transplant rejection is well-known but the injury associated with non-HLA antibodies is now widely discussed. The aim of our study was to investigate a role of non-HLA antibodies in hand allografts rejection. The study was performed on six patients after hand transplantation. The control group consisted of: 12 kidney transplant recipients and 12 healthy volunteers. The following non-HLA antibodies were tested: antibody against angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R-Ab), antibody against endothelin-1 type-A-receptor (ETAR-Ab), antibody against protease-activated receptor 1 (PAR-1-Ab) and anti-VEGF-A antibody (VEGF-A-Ab). Chosen proinflammatory cytokines (Il-1, IL-6, IFNγ) were used to evaluate the post-transplant humoral response. Laboratory markers of endothelial activation (VEGF, sICAM, vWF) were used to assess potential vasculopathy. The patient with the highest number of acute rejections had both positive non-HLA antibodies: AT1R-Ab and ETAR-Ab. The same patient had the highest VEGF-A-Ab and very high PAR1-Ab. All patients after hand transplantation had high levels of laboratory markers of endothelial activation. The existence of non-HLA antibodies together with multiple acute rejections observed in patient after hand transplantation should stimulate to look for potential role of non-HLA antibodies in humoral injury in vascular composite allotransplantation.

Effect of anti-angiotensin II type-1 receptor antibodies on the outcomes of kidney transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Anti-angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibodies (AT1R-Abs) have been recognized as non-HLA antibodies associated with allograft rejection and poor allograft outcomes after kidney transplantation. The aim of this study was to assess the risk anti-AT1R-Abs pose for rejection and graft loss among kidney transplant populations.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library databases for relevant articles published from inception until June 2021 to identify all studies concerning the role AT1R-Abs play in the clinical outcome after kidney transplantation. Two reviewers independently identified studies, abstracted outcome data, and assessed the quality of the studies. The meta-analysis was summarized using the fixed-effects models or random-effects models, according to heterogeneity. The major outcomes included delayed graft function, acute rejection, graft loss, or patient death after transplantation.

RESULTS

Twenty-one eligible studies involving a total of 4,023 kidney transplantation recipients were included in the evaluation to identified. Meta-analysis results showed that the AT1R-Ab positive kidney transplant (KT) group had a greater incidence of antibody-mediated rejection (RR = 1.94, 95%CI: 1.61-2.33, P < 0.00001) and graft loss (RR = 2.37, 95%CI: 1.50-3.75, P = 0.0002) than did the AT1R-Abs negative KT group. There was no significant statistical difference in delayed graft function rate, T-cell mediated rejection, mixed rejection, acute cellular rejection, acute rejection, and patient death rate between AT1R-Ab positive KT and AT1R-Ab negative KT groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study shows that the presence of anti-AT1R-Abs was associated with a significantly higher risk of antibody-mediated rejection and graft loss in kidney transplantation. Future studies are still needed to evaluate the importance of routine anti-AT1R monitoring and therapeutic targeting. These results shows that assessment of anti-AT1R-Abs would be helpful in determining immunologic risk and susceptibility to immunologic events for recipients.

Non-HLA antibodies targeting angiotensin II type 1 receptors and endothelin-1 type A receptors impair endothelial repair via a β2-arrestin link to the mTOR pathway

Functional non-HLA antibodies (antibodies to non-human leukocyte antigens) targeting the G protein-coupled receptors angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) and endothelin-1 type A receptor (ETAR) are implicated in the pathogenesis of transplant vasculopathy. While ERK signaling (a regulator of cell growth) may represent a general cellular response to agonist stimulation, the molecular link between receptor stimulation and development of vascular obliteration has not been fully established. Here we hypothesize involvement of the versatile adaptor proteins, β-arrestins, and the major regulator of cell growth, PI3K/mTOR signaling, in impaired endothelial repair. To test this, human microvascular endothelial cells were treated with AT1R/ETAR antibodies isolated from patients with kidney transplant vasculopathy. These antibodies activated both mTOR complexes via AT1R and ETAR in a PI3K-dependent and ERK-independent manner. The mTOR inhibitor, rapamycin, completely abolished activation of mTORC1 and mTORC2 after long-term treatment with receptor antibodies. Imaging studies revealed that β2- but not β1-arrestin was recruited to ETAR in response to ET1 and patient antibodies but not with antibodies isolated from healthy individuals. Silencing of β2-arrestin by siRNA transfection significantly reduced ERK1/2 and mTORC2 activation. Non-HLA antibodies impaired endothelial repair by AT1R- and ETAR-induced mTORC2 signaling. Thus, we provide evidence that functional AT1R/ETAR antibodies induce ERK1/2 and mTOR signaling involving β2-arrestin in human microvascular endothelium. Hence, our data may provide a translational rational for mTOR inhibitors in combination with receptor blockers in patients with non-HLA receptor recognizing antibodies.

Endothelin A Receptors Expressed in Glomeruli of Renal Transplant Patients May Be Associated with Antibody-Mediated Rejection

BACKGROUND

Non-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) anti-endothelin A receptor antibodies are presented as being potentially important, but the expression of the endothelin A receptor in glomeruli (ETA receptor (g+)) has not yet been described. We decided to evaluate the presence and relevance of the ETA receptor in for-cause renal transplant biopsies. The aim of our study was to evaluate the immunoreactivity of the ETA receptor and its significance in patients who underwent a renal transplant biopsy due to the deterioration of transplant function, with detailed characterization of staining in glomeruli.

METHODS

The immunohistochemical expression of ETA receptor (ETAR) was analyzed in renal transplant biopsies. Microscopic evaluation was performed on paraffin sections in glomeruli. The analysis was performed using a two-step scale (0: lack of ETAR expression; 1: the presence of ETAR expression-mild to moderate immunoreactivity).

RESULTS

We analyzed 149 patients who underwent renal allograft biopsy after renal transplantation. Positive staining of ETA receptors in glomeruli (ETA receptor (g+)) was noticed in 13/149 (8.7%) patients. Five of these 13 (38.5%) patients with ETA receptor (g+) developed antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), while 13 of the remaining 136 (9.5%) ETA receptor (g-) patients developed AMR (p = 0.0022). Graft loss was noticed in all but one ETA receptor (g+) patient with AMR (4/5; 80%), but only in 2/13 (15%) ETA receptor (g-) patients with AMR (p = 0.009) during the first year after biopsy.

CONCLUSIONS

The expression of endothelin A receptors in glomeruli seems to be a potentially important feature in the diagnosis of damage during antibody-mediated rejection. It may help to identify patients at a higher risk of allograft rejection and injury.

Non-HLA Abs in Solid Organ Transplantation

The role of anti-HLA antibodies in solid organ rejection is well established and these antibodies are routinely monitored both in patients in the waiting list and in the post-transplant setting. More recently, the presence of other antibodies directed towards non-HLA antigens, or the so-called minor histocompatibility antigens, has drawn the attention of the transplant community; however, their possible involvement in the graft outcome remains uncertain. These antibodies have been described to possibly have a role in rejection and allograft failure. This review focuses on the most studied non-HLA antibodies and their association with different clinical outcomes considered in solid organ transplantation with the aim of clarifying their clinical implication and potential relevance for routine testing.

The Biological and Clinical Relevance of G Protein-Coupled Receptors to the Outcomes of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Systematized Review

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) remains the only curative treatment for several malignant and non-malignant diseases at the cost of serious treatment-related toxicities (TRTs). Recent research on extending the benefits of HSCT to more patients and indications has focused on limiting TRTs and improving immunological effects following proper mobilization and engraftment. Increasing numbers of studies report associations between HSCT outcomes and the expression or the manipulation of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). This large family of cell surface receptors is involved in various human diseases. With ever-better knowledge of their crystal structures and signaling dynamics, GPCRs are already the targets for one third of the current therapeutic arsenal. The present paper assesses the current status of animal and human research on GPCRs in the context of selected HSCT outcomes via a systematized survey and analysis of the literature.

Xenoreactive antibodies and latent fibrin formation in VAD and cardiac transplant recipients can confound the detection and measurement of anti-AT1R antibodies

Autoantibodies to the angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) are thought to be important in antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), especially in the absence of anti-HLA antibodies. We used a variety of methods to examine the specificity of a commercially available kit designed to quantitate anti-AT1R antibodies. We found that fibrin formation in serum samples from patients awaiting cardiac transplantation with ventricular assist devices (VADs) can produce falsely elevated anti-AT1R values. In addition, absorption studies with a variety of cell lines with or without expression of human AT1R, and those that express xenoantigens, suggest that many of the antibodies detected in the AT1R test system are heterophilic and have reactivity to xenoantigens. Furthermore, we provide data that show that reactivity to the sialic acid Neu5Gc is a common finding among samples that are highest in anti-AT1R levels. We conclude that a common laboratory method for quantitation of anti-AT1R antibodies is nonspecific and overestimates the frequency of true positives. A reevaluation of the role that anti-AT1R antibodies play in allograft function and patient outcomes is warranted.

Role of Anti-MICA Antibodies in Graft Survival of Renal Transplant Recipients of India

INTRODUCTION

The MIC (MHC class I chain-related) genes are a group of nonclassical MHC genes, located in the MHC class 1 region of chromosome 6. The aim of the present study was to find the prevalence of MHC class 1 chain-related (MICA) alloantibodies in patients undergoing live-related donor renal transplantation and its role in short-term graft survival. The role of blood transfusion in the formation of these antibodies was also studied.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Pretransplant samples of patients undergoing renal allograft transplantation were tested for anti-MICA antibodies. Association of various demographics, HLA-A + B + DRB1 mismatches, anti-HLA antibody screen, and anti-MICA antibodies was assessed using Pearson's chi-square test.

RESULTS

Out of 646 serum samples, 94 (14.6%) were positive and 552 (85.4%) were negative for anti-MICA antibodies. Patients with anti-MICA antibody had a graft survival 89.3% as compared to 94.7% in patients without anti-MICA antibody (P < 0.05). The hazard ratio for all patients was 3.0701 (P < 0.05). Out of the 340 patients with no HLA antibodies, the presence of anti-MICA antibodies without any HLA antibodies (n = 43) was associated with poor outcome in the patients (hazard ratio of 2.768, P < 0.05). The presence of MICA antibodies with HLA antibodies did not decrease the graft survival (hazards ratio of 1.3750, P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Preformed MICA antibodies independently increase the risk of kidney rejection and therefore recommend that guidelines should be formed for mandatory testing of these antibodies prior to renal transplant.

Alloimmune-induced intragraft lymphoid neogenesis promotes B-cell tolerance breakdown that accelerates chronic rejection

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) has emerged as a leading cause of allograft loss in solid organ transplantation. A better understanding of AMR immunopathology is a prerequisite to improve its management.

RECENT FINDINGS

The prevalent dogma considers that AMR is the consequence of a thymo-dependent B-cell response against donor-specific polymorphic antigens (mainly mismatched human leukocyte antigen molecules).Nevertheless, antibodies directed against nonpolymorphic antigens expressed by the graft are also generated during chronic rejection and can contribute to allograft destruction. This implies that a breakdown of self-tolerance occurs during chronic rejection. Accumulating evidence suggests that this event occurs inside the ectopic 'tertiary' lymphoid tissue that develops within rejected allografts.Thus, AMR should be viewed as a complex interplay between allo- and autoimmune humoral responses.

SUMMARY

The interplay between allo- and autoimmune humoral responses in chronic rejection highlights several unmet medical issues like better diagnosis tools are needed to screen recipients for nonhuman leukocyte antigen alloantibodies and autoantibodies, therapeutic strategies shall aim at blocking the response against alloantigens but also the breakdown of self-tolerance that occurs within tertiary lymphoid tissue.

Longitudinal assessment of HLA and MIC-A antibodies in uneventful pregnancies and pregnancies complicated by preeclampsia or gestational diabetes

The significance of antibodies directed against paternal epitopes in the context of obstetric disorders is discussed controversially. In this study anti-HLA and anti-MIC-A antibodies were analysed in sera of women with uneventful pregnancy (n = 101), preeclampsia (PE, n = 55) and gestational diabetes (GDM, n = 36) using antigen specific microbeads. While two thirds of the women with uneventful pregnancy or GDM were HLA and MIC-A antibody positive in gestational week 11 to 13 with a modest increase towards the end of pregnancy, women with PE showed an inverse kinetic: 90% were HLA antibody positive in gestational week 11 to 13 and only 10% showed HLA reactivities at the end of the pregnancy. HLA antibody binding strength was more pronounced in gestational week 14 to 17 in patients with PE compared to women with uneventful pregnancy (maximum median fluorescence intensity of the highest ranked positive bead 7403, IQR 2193–7938 vs. 1093, IQR 395–5689; p = 0.04) and was able to predict PE with an AUC of 0.80 (95% CI 0.67–0.93; p = 0.002). Our data suggest a pathophysiological involvement of HLA antibodies in PE. HLA antibody quantification in early pregnancy may provide a useful tool to increase diagnostic awareness in women prone to develop PE.

Antigenicity of Bovine Pericardium Determined by a Novel Immunoproteomic Approach

Despite bovine pericardium (BP) being the primary biomaterial used in heart valve bioprostheses, recipient graft-specific immune responses remain a significant cause of graft failure. Consequently, tissue antigenicity remains the principal barrier for expanding use of such biomaterials in clinical practice. We hypothesize that our understanding of BP antigenicity can be improved by application of a combined affinity chromatography shotgun immunoproteomic approach to identify antigens that have previously been overlooked. Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analysis of affinity chromatography purified antigens resulted in identification of 133 antigens. Most importantly, antigens were identified from all subcellular locations, including 18 integral membrane protein antigens. Critically, isoforms of several protein families were found to be antigenic suggesting the possibility that shared epitope domains may exist. Furthermore, proteins associated with immune, coagulation, and inflammatory pathways were over-represented, suggesting that these biological processes play a key role in antigenicity. This study brings to light important determinants of antigenicity in a clinically relevant xenogeneic biomaterial (i.e. BP) and further validates a rapid, high-throughput method for immunoproteomic antigen identification.

Acute kidney transplant rejection mediated by angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibodies in a pediatric hyperimmune patient

BACKGROUND

Several cases of severe antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) secondary to antibodies against the angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R-Ab) have been described with variable outcome.

CASE-DIAGNOSIS/TREATMENT

We report the case of a 13-year-old boy whose first kidney transplant failed due to steroid-resistant acute cellular rejection, with the subsequent development of sensitization. He received a second kidney transplant which was complicated by early humoral rejection, with weakly positive staining for the complement degradation product C4d. Test results were negative for donor-specific antibodies against human leukocyte antigens (HLA-DSA) and MHC class I-related chain A (MICA) but positive for AT1R-Ab. Retrospective testing of the sera collected during the first kidney transplant was also positive for AT1R-Ab. We therefore hypothesized that the failure of the first transplant was secondary to the same cause. Losartan was immediately introduced into the therapeutic regimen, and the patient showed an excellent clinical and histological recovery.

CONCLUSIONS

Testing for AT1R-Ab in any hypertensive patient with acute rejection who tests negative or weakly positive for C4d and negative for HLA-DSA and who is refractory to therapy is highly advisable. Pre-transplant AT1R-Ab may be indicative of the outcome in patients whose first transplant failed. Prompt initiation of treatment with losartan-immediately after transplantation in patients with pre-existing AT1R-Ab-should be encouraged.

Exome Sequencing and Prediction of Long-Term Kidney Allograft Function

Current strategies to improve graft outcome following kidney transplantation consider information at the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) loci. Cell surface antigens, in addition to HLA, may serve as the stimuli as well as the targets for the anti-allograft immune response and influence long-term graft outcomes. We therefore performed exome sequencing of DNA from kidney graft recipients and their living donors and estimated all possible cell surface antigens mismatches for a given donor/recipient pair by computing the number of amino acid mismatches in trans-membrane proteins. We designated this tally as the allogenomics mismatch score (AMS). We examined the association between the AMS and post-transplant estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) using mixed models, considering transplants from three independent cohorts (a total of 53 donor-recipient pairs, 106 exomes, and 239 eGFR measurements). We found that the AMS has a significant effect on eGFR (mixed model, effect size across the entire range of the score: -19.4 [-37.7, -1.1], P = 0.0042, χ2 = 8.1919, d.f. = 1) that is independent of the HLA-A, B, DR matching, donor age, and time post-transplantation. The AMS effect is consistent across the three independent cohorts studied and similar to the strong effect size of donor age. Taken together, these results show that the AMS, a novel tool to quantify amino acid mismatches in trans-membrane proteins in individual donor/recipient pair, is a strong, robust predictor of long-term graft function in kidney transplant recipients.

The impact of Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor antibodies on morbidity and mortality in Heart Mate II supported recipients

AIMS

One of the proposed limitations of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) therapy is high degree of sensitization. Apart from human leukocyte antigen (HLA), antibodies against Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor (AT1R) have been associated with adverse outcomes. The purpose of this study was to compare complications and survival of anti - AT1R positive versus negative Heart Mate II (HMII) recipients.

METHODS

Altogether 96 patients received HMII at our institution between 2008 and 2012. These were stratified into three groups: antibody positive before implantation (AT1R+), antibody conversion during support (AT1R-/+) and patients who remained antibody negative (AT1R-). Survival, major on-device adverse events and post-transplant rejections were assessed with Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests.

RESULTS

Two year on-device and overall survival was 78 ± 12% and 75 ± 10% in AT1R-, 60 ± 23% and 60 ± 15% in AT1R+ and 92 ± 6% and 87 ± 5% in AT1R-/+ group (P = 0.409, P = 0.185). Freedom from major adverse event at two years for AT1R-, AT1R+ and AT1R-/+ was 49 ± 14%, 53 ± 16% and 41 ± 11% (P = 0.875). Freedom from rejection was 63 ± 17% in patients who were both anti-AT1R and HLA negative and 65 ± 13% in those who were antibody positive (P = 0.788).

CONCLUSION

Patients who were anti-AT1R antibody positive had similar on-device survival and rate of complications in comparison to those who were antibody negative. In transplanted patients, there were no differences in the overall survival and rejection between the groups.

Acute Cellular Rejection and C4d Positivity in Heart Transplantation : A Manifestation of Asymptomatic Antibody-Mediated Rejection?

OBJECTIVES

The role of routine C4d staining in endomyocardial biopsy specimens is uncertain. The implications of a diagnosis of acute cellular rejection (ACR) with a positive C4d with or without any evidence of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) are unclear. This study sought to evaluate a distinct phenotype of ACR+/C4d+ in AMR- patients.

METHODS

Data on C4d, ACR, and AMR were collected. Donor-specific antibody (DSA), panel-reactive antibody (PRA), flow crossmatch, and data on ACR and AMR episodes were also reviewed.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients were followed. Group I with C4d+ biopsy specimens was compared with group II with C4d- biopsy specimens. ACR greater than 1R was higher in group I compared with group II (50% vs 7.4%; P = .01). Clinical suspicion of AMR, positive retrospective crossmatches, and detection of de novo DSA were also higher in group I.

CONCLUSIONS

Our result indicate that C4d and ACR positivity in posttransplant patients may be a harbinger of a subclinical form of asymptomatic AMR.

Angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibody precipitating acute vascular rejection in kidney transplantation

Atypical non HLA antibodies are increasingly recognised as causes of immunological injury in allotransplantation. In this report we describe a non HLA sensitized male renal allograft recipient who developed acute vascular rejection on a "for cause" biopsy (Banff v2, g2, ptc 3) at day 4 post first renal allograft in the presence of elevated angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibodies (AT1R-Ab level 14.1). The acute rejection was treated with pulse corticosteroid therapy, anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG × 6), plasma exchange (1.5 plasma volume replacement x6) and oral candesartan. Serum creatinine improved and follow up biopsy confirmed resolution of rejection following treatment. AT1R-Ab should be considered when rejection is diagnosed in the absence of HLA antibodies.

The impact of angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibodies on post-heart transplantation outcome in Heart Mate II bridged recipients

OBJECTIVES

Antibodies targeting angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) have been associated with malignant hypertension, autoimmune diseases and acute rejection and graft loss in solid organ transplantation. The aim of our study was to assess the impact of anti-AT1R antibodies on survival and incidence of acute cellular rejection (ACR) and pathology antibody-mediated rejection (pAMR) in a population of heart transplant recipients who were bridged to transplantation with a durable mechanical assist device Heart Mate II.

METHODS

Sera of 69 consecutive heart transplant recipients transplanted between October 2008 and August 2014 were tested for the presence of angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibodies before Heart Mate II device implantation and at the time of transplantation. Overall survival and post-transplant rejection-free survival were compared between antibody-negative and antibody-positive recipients using Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests.

RESULTS

Anti-AT1R antibodies were present in 8 patients (11.6%) before Heart Mate II implantation. During the left ventricular assist device (LVAD) bridging, 44 patients (63.8%) who were initially anti-AT1R antibody-negative became positive, leaving 17 (24.6%) anti-AT1R antibody-negative patients at the time of transplantation for all comparisons. One- and 5-year survival was 88 ± 8 and 76 ± 10% for anti-AT1R antibody-negative and 87 ± 5 and 81 ± 7% for anti-AT1R antibody-positive patients, respectively (P = 0.582). Freedom from ACR at 1 year was 68 ± 12% for anti-AT1R-negative and 75 ± 6% for anti-AT1R-positive recipients (P = 0.218). None of the anti-AT1R-negative patients developed AMR 1 year post-transplantation, whereas freedom from pAMR in anti-AT1R-positive recipients was 98 ± 2% (P = 0.198).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data showed no difference in the overall post-heart transplant survival and freedom from acute cellular and antibody-mediated rejection between anti-AT1R-negative and anti-AT1R-positive recipients. Further research is needed to assess the role of anti-AT1R antibodies in the risk stratification of LVAD-bridged recipients on the post-heart transplantation outcomes.

Investigation of Serum Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Antibodies at the Time of Renal Allograft Rejection

BACKGROUND

Angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) is responsible for cardiovascular effects mediated by angiotensin II. This study aimed to investigate the impact of antibodies directed against AT1R (anti-AT1R) in renal allograft rejection.

METHODS

We evaluated 53 patients who had biopsy-proven rejection including antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) (N=22), T-cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) (N=29), and mixed AMR and TCMR (N=2). Donor specific HLA antibodies (DSA) and anti-AT1Rs were simultaneously determined.

RESULTS

Anti-AT1Rs were detected in 9.4% (5/53) of rejection patients (one with acute AMR, two with chronic active AMR, one with acute TCMR, and one with mixed acute AMR & TCMR). HLA antibodies and DSA were detected in 75.5% (40/53) and 49.1% (26/53) of patients, respectively. There was no significant difference in transplant characteristics between anti-AT1R(+) and anti-AT1R(-) patients except for the association of HLA class-I DSA(+) and anti-AT1R(+). Four of five anti-AT1R(+) patients had DSA and were also found to have AMR. A single anti-AT1R(+)/DSA(-) patient developed acute TCMR. Detection rates of DSA, HLA antibodies, or anti-AT1R were not different between AMR and TCMR. However, DSA(+)/anti-AT1R(+) was more frequently found in AMR than in TCMR (P=0.036). Patients with anti-AT1R showed a greater tendency to develop high-grade rejection as Banff IIA/IIB or AMR.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of anti-AT1R was significantly associated with HLA class-I DSA in renal allograft rejection patients. Both anti-AT1R and DSA positivity was associated with AMR in patients with renal allograft rejection.

Acute and chronic antibody-mediated rejection in pediatric kidney transplantation

Acute antibody-mediated rejection is a diagnostic challenge in renal transplantation medicine. However, it is an important diagnosis to make, since chronic antibody-mediated rejection (CAMR) is the main cause of long-term graft loss. Antibody-mediated rejection is diagnosed by detecting donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) in the blood in combination with observing typical histomorphological signs in kidney biopsy, as described in the Banff classification. Therapy is based on the removal of DSAs by administering intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIGs), plasmapheresis, or immunoadsorption. Reoccurrence of antibodies is diminished by the use of rituximab, increased immunosuppression, and in some cases additional experimental substances. A combination of these techniques has been shown to be successful in the majority of cases of acute and chronic antibody-mediated rejection. Routine DSA monitoring is warranted for early detection of antibody-mediated rejection.

Indicators of treatment responsiveness to rituximab and plasmapheresis in antibody-mediated rejection after kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

Treatment of patients with antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) after kidney transplantation by rituximab and plasmapheresis is ambiguous. Because of its unknown efficiency and serious side effects, biomarkers, which are predictive for responsiveness to this treatment in AMR patients, are required.

METHODS

Twenty renal transplant patients were included in this retrospective study. Selection was based on Renal Index Biopsies, classified according to Banff within 3 months before treatment. Patients were categorized into responders (R) and nonresponders (NR) depending on whether they returned to dialysis within 6 months after initiation of rituximab treatment. Clinical, histopathologic (Banff classification) and serologic parameters were compared between both groups by t test, Mann-Whitney U test, or likelihood ratio chi-square test.

RESULTS

In comparisons between the groups, the R group showed a 1.5-fold higher level of estimated glomerular filtration rate and a fourfold lower level of proteinuria. By contrast, there were no differences in the histologic scores for chronic transplant lesions between the groups. The t and i scores were higher in NRs, whereas Banff-C4d scores of peritubular capillaries were increased in the Rs. Transplant biopsies in the Rs exhibited more CD138+ cell infiltrates. Serologic determination of human leukocyte antigen antibodies showed higher positivity for human leukocyte antigen class II donor-specific antibodies in the R group. No significant differences in other clinical criteria were found.

CONCLUSION

Increased proteinuria, decreased graft function, and a higher grade of tubulitis and inflammation in AMR are negative predictors for responsiveness to rituximab therapy. Rituximab therapy therefore should be initiated in an early phase of AMR.

Association of early kidney allograft failure with preformed IgA antibodies to β2-glycoprotein I

In the current immunosuppressive therapy era, vessel thrombosis is the most common cause of early graft loss after renal transplantation. The prevalence of IgA anti-β2-glycoprotein I antibodies (IgA-aB2GPI-ab) in patients on dialysis is elevated (>30%), and these antibodies correlate with mortality and cardiovascular morbidity. To evaluate the effect of IgA-aB2GPI-ab in patients with transplants, we followed all patients transplanted from 2000 to 2002 in the Hospital 12 de Octubre prospectively for 10 years. Presence of IgA-aB2GPI-ab in pretransplant serum was examined retrospectively. Of 269 patients, 89 patients were positive for IgA-aB2GPI-ab (33%; group 1), and the remaining patients were negative (67%; group 2). Graft loss at 6 months post-transplant was significantly higher in group 1 (10 of 89 versus 3 of 180 patients in group 2; P=0.002). The most frequent cause of graft loss was thrombosis of the vessels, which was observed only in group 1 (8 of 10 versus 0 of 3 patients in group 2; P=0.04). Multivariate analysis showed that the presence of IgA-aB2GPI-ab was an independent risk factor for early graft loss (P=0.04) and delayed graft function (P=0.04). There were no significant differences regarding patient survival between the two groups. Graft survival was similar in both groups after 6 months. In conclusion, patients with pretransplant IgA-aB2GPI-ab have a high risk of early graft loss caused by thrombosis and a high risk of delayed graft function. Therefore, pretransplant IgA-aB2GPI-ab may have a detrimental effect on early clinical outcomes after renal transplantation.

Cytomegalovirus-responsive γδ T cells: novel effector cells in antibody-mediated kidney allograft microcirculation lesions

Human cytomegalovirus infection in transplant recipients has been associated with adverse renal allograft outcome and with a large γδ T-cell response, but whether both mechanisms are connected is unknown. We previously showed that most expanded circulating cytomegalovirus-responsive γδ T cells express the Fcγ-receptor CD16, suggesting that γδ T cells may participate in allograft lesions mediated by donor-specific antibodies through antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity. Here, we show that cytomegalovirus-specific CD16(pos) γδ T cells can perform antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity against stromal cells coated with donor-specific antibodies in vitro. In vivo, graft-infiltrating γδ T cells localized in close contact with endothelial cells only in patients who experienced cytomegalovirus infection and were more frequent within peritubular capillaries and glomeruli from antibody-mediated acute rejections than within those from T cell-mediated acute rejections. Finally, a persistently increased percentage of circulating cytomegalovirus-induced γδ T cells correlated inversely with the 1-year eGFR only in kidney recipients with donor-specific antibodies. Collectively, these data support the conclusion that cytomegalovirus-induced γδ T cells are involved in, and may serve as a clinical biomarker of, antibody-mediated lesions of kidney transplants. Moreover, these findings offer a new physiopathologic link between cytomegalovirus infection and allograft dysfunction in recipients with donor-specific antibodies.

Harmful effect of preformed anti-MICA antibodies on renal allograft evolution in early posttransplantation period

BACKGROUND

Pretransplantation anti-major histocompatibility complex class I chain-related molecule A (MICA) sensitization is an uncommon event and its role on kidney graft evolution is not completely defined.

METHODS

A retrospective study of patients transplanted between 2005 and 2011 in our center (n=727) was performed. Recipients were classified in four groups, according either to multiplexed flow cytometry-recorded anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) and anti-MICA antibodies or to percent panel-reactive antibody (PRA; by complement-dependent cytotoxicity) and anti-MICA antibodies.

RESULTS

In the total cohort, 52 (7.15%) patients had preformed anti-MICA antibodies, and these were not related with anti-HLA, previous transplantations, or recipient female sex (potential pregnancies). Kaplan-Meier curves showed global allograft survival differences (P=0.042) mostly due to pronounced decrease in PRA+MICA+ group early after transplantation. Biopsy-proven allograft rejection rate increased after month 12 in PRA+MICA- group and was higher early after transplantation in PRA+MICA+ group (P=0.033). In paired comparisons, rejection incidence was superior in PRA+MICA- versus PRA-MICA- patients (17% vs. 7%; P=0.007) at 24 months, confirming the widely reported deleterious effect of PRA+ status, but at 3 months rejection was higher in PRA+MICA+ versus PRA-MICA- patients (14% vs. 2%; P=0.009). Among patients categorized according anti-HLA and anti-MICA antibodies, the most striking difference in rejection was observed at 3 months (8% in HLA-MICA+ vs. 2% in HLA-MICA- patients; P=0.032). In the multivariate analysis, HLA-MICA+ status at 3 months independently conferred the highest risk for rejection (odds ratio, 5.07; P=0.049).

CONCLUSIONS

Pretransplantation sensitization against MICA and HLA are independent events. Preformed anti-MICA antibodies independently increase risk for kidney rejection and enhance the deleterious effect of PRA+ status early after transplantation.

Angiotensin receptor agonistic autoantibodies and hypertension: preeclampsia and beyond

Hypertensive disorders are life-threatening diseases with high morbidity and mortality, affecting billions of individuals worldwide. A multitude of underlying conditions may contribute to hypertension, thus the need for a plethora of treatment options to identify the approach that best meets the needs of individual patients. A growing body of evidence indicates that (1) autoantibodies that bind to and activate the major angiotensin II type I (AT₁) receptor exist in the circulation of patients with hypertensive disorders, (2) these autoantibodies contribute to disease pathophysiology, (3) antibody titers correlate to the severity of the disease, and (4) efforts to block or remove these pathogenic autoantibodies have therapeutic potential. These autoantibodies, termed AT₁ agonistic autoantibodies have been extensively characterized in preeclampsia, a life-threatening hypertensive condition of pregnancy. As reviewed here, these autoantibodies cause symptoms of preeclampsia when injected into pregnant mice. Somewhat surprisingly, these auto antibodies also appear in 3 animal models of preeclampsia. However, the occurrence of AT₁ agonistic autoantibodies is not restricted to pregnancy. These autoantibodies are prevalent among kidney transplant recipients who develop severe transplant rejection and malignant hypertension during the first week after transplantation. AT₁ agonistic autoantibodies are also highly abundant among a group of patients with essential hypertension that are refractory to standard therapy. More recently these autoantibodies have been seen in patients with the autoimmune disease, systemic sclerosis. These 3 examples extend the clinical impact of AT₁ agonistic autoantibodies beyond pregnancy. Research reviewed here raises the intriguing possibility that preeclampsia and other hypertensive conditions are autoimmune diseases characterized by the presence of pathogenic autoantibodies that activate the major angiotensin receptor, AT₁. These pathogenic autoantibodies could serve as presymptomatic biomarkers and therapeutic targets, thereby providing improved medical management for these conditions.

Transplantation of the sensitized patient: histocompatibility testing

A component necessary for successful transplantation of the sensitized patient is timely and high quality support from the histocompatibility laboratory that helps guide selection of the best route to transplantation and the clinical care of the patient. Responsibilities of the laboratory include risk assessment, HLA typing, and accurate antibody characterization.

Chronic renal allograft damage after transplantation: what are the reasons, what can we do?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Chronic renal allograft damage is one of the main problems after kidney transplantation. This review enumerates causes, describes available therapeutic options, and discusses options of the future.

RECENT FINDINGS

Alloantigen-dependent and alloantigen-independent factors are responsible for allograft damage. Prevention of renal allograft damage starts with interventions that occur surrounding the explantation in cadaveric organs. These include the use of dopamine or machine perfusion systems.Followed by the critical phase of ischemia/reperfusion injury, the LCN2/lipocalin-2, HAVCR1, and p38 MAPK pathway are new players involved in that process. Innate immunity plays a part, too. Cold ischemia time is associated with genes of apoptosis. Nondonor-specific antibodies like antihuman leukocyte antibodies-Ia or angiotensin type 1 receptor may also play a role. Recent research indicates that genetic polymorphism like the Ficolin-2 Ala258Ser polymorphism and the mannose-binding lectin-2 polymorphism are involved in that process. New therapeutic options are rare and in the future. However, there is some evidence that drugs interfering with metalloproteinases, sexual hormones like dihydroandrosterone, and mesenchymal stem cell therapy may be of importance.

SUMMARY

Taken together, although the understanding of chronic rejection has improved, the available therapeutic options remain scarce.