1
|
Rawashdeh B, Arpali E, Al Abdallat H, Cooper M, Dunn T. Four Decades of Research Productivity and Hot Spots in Pancreas Transplantation. Prog Transplant 2024; 34:119-129. [PMID: 39196572 DOI: 10.1177/15269248241268719] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/29/2024]
Abstract
Background: The field of pancreas transplantation has undergone transformative phases, progressing from its promising inception in 1966 to becoming a standard treatment for patients with insulin-dependent diabetes. This bibliometric analysis explores the progression of pancreas transplantation research over a period of four decades, mapping milestones, contributors, and emerging trends. Methods: Our bibliometric analysis utilizes the comprehensive Scopus database, which includes publication titles, author information, affiliations, abstracts, keywords, and journal details. The search strategy was centered on research related to pancreas and pancreas-kidney transplantation. The analysis encompasses the time frame spanning from 1983 to 2023, with the data extraction taking place on October 7th, 2023. Results: The analysis of 4,897 articles uncovered unique trends in the field of pancreas transplantation research. The years 1989, 1996, and 2021 saw significant increases in the number of publications, which corresponded to the responses to clinical challenges and advancements. Contributions by authors from the United States of America were the most numerous, with 1,905 publications and 49,949 citations. The research topics were highlighted by keywords such as "graft survival," "graft rejection," and" Immunosuppressive treatment." Conclusion: The fluctuations in publication trends that have been identified indicate dynamic reactions to changing priorities and challenges. Although it has limitations, this analysis provides valuable insights for researchers, clinicians, and policymakers who are dealing with the complex field of pancreas transplantation literature. Further bibliometric research may advance our knowledge and direct future initiatives in this developing field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Badi Rawashdeh
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States
| | - Emre Arpali
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States
| | - Haneen Al Abdallat
- Faculty of Medicine, School of Medicine-The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Matthew Cooper
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States
| | - Ty Dunn
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ullah A, Trostler M, Abuelkasem E, Planinsic R. Perioperative management of isolated pancreas and simultaneous pancreas kidney transplantation. BJA Educ 2023; 23:488-494. [PMID: 38009136 PMCID: PMC10667613 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjae.2023.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/23/2023] [Indexed: 11/28/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- A.P. Ullah
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - M.S. Trostler
- Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - E. Abuelkasem
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - R.M. Planinsic
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Martin D, Alberti P, Demartines N, Phillips M, Casey J, Sutherland A. Whole-Organ Pancreas and Islets Transplantations in UK: An Overview and Future Directions. J Clin Med 2023; 12:3245. [PMID: 37176684 PMCID: PMC10179530 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12093245] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2023] [Revised: 04/19/2023] [Accepted: 04/29/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Whole-organ pancreas and islets transplantations are two therapeutic options to treat type 1 diabetic patients resistant to optimised medical treatment in whom severe complications develop. Selection of the best option for β-cell replacement depends on several factors such as kidney function, patient comorbidities, and treatment goals. For a patient with end-stage kidney disease, the treatment of choice is often a simultaneous transplant of the pancreas and kidney (SPK). However, it remains a major surgical procedure in patients with multiple comorbidities and therefore it is important to select those who will benefit from it. Additionally, in view of the organ shortage, new strategies to improve outcomes and reduce immune reactions have been developed, including dynamic organ perfusion technologies, pancreas bioengineering, and stem cell therapies. The purpose of this article is to review the indications, surgical techniques, outcomes, and future directions of whole-organ pancreas and islets transplantations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Martin
- Department of Visceral Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital CHUV, University of Lausanne (UNIL), 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland;
- Edinburgh Transplant Centre, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH16 4SA, UK (M.P.); (J.C.); (A.S.)
| | - Piero Alberti
- Edinburgh Transplant Centre, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH16 4SA, UK (M.P.); (J.C.); (A.S.)
| | - Nicolas Demartines
- Department of Visceral Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital CHUV, University of Lausanne (UNIL), 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland;
| | - Melanie Phillips
- Edinburgh Transplant Centre, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH16 4SA, UK (M.P.); (J.C.); (A.S.)
| | - John Casey
- Edinburgh Transplant Centre, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH16 4SA, UK (M.P.); (J.C.); (A.S.)
| | - Andrew Sutherland
- Edinburgh Transplant Centre, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH16 4SA, UK (M.P.); (J.C.); (A.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ventura-Aguiar P, Cabello M, Beneyto I, Navarro Cabello D, Tabernero G, Alonso A, Ruiz JC, Llorente S. Patient and graft survival in pancreas transplant recipients: The EFISPAN study. Nefrologia 2023; 43:133-143. [PMID: 36494288 DOI: 10.1016/j.nefroe.2022.11.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2021] [Accepted: 09/15/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Graft outcomes in pancreas transplantation have improved in recent decades, but data are mainly derived from registries or prospective single-centre studies. This large epidemiological study was undertaken to investigate the impact of clinical and demographic factors on graft and patient survival in pancreas transplant recipients in Spain, and to provide robust, country-wide, practice-based data to complement registry findings. PATIENTS AND METHODS We conducted a retrospective, longitudinal, epidemiological study to assess risk factors impacting patient and graft survival in pancreas transplant recipients in eight centres in Spain. All patients transplanted between 1 January 2008 and 31 December 2012 were included; data were collected until 31 December 2015. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for all time-to-event analyses, including patient survival, graft survival, acute rejection, and BPAR. For graft survival analysis, in cases of death with functioning graft, patients were censored without any event on the date of death. For acute rejection and BPAR, patients were censored without any event on the date of death or graft loss. Univariable and multivariable analyses (Cox proportional hazards model) were conducted to assess the association between baseline clinical and demographic characteristics and patient/graft survival. RESULTS Data were included for 241 (80.1%) simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplants, 56 (18.6%) pancreas-after-kidney transplants and 4 (1.3%) pancreas transplants alone. Mean±standard deviation time from diagnosis until transplantation was 26.1±7.5 years. Nineteen patients died, mainly due to infections (n=10); the remaining 282 patients (93.7%) survived from transplantation until the end of the study. Among 55 patients (18.3%) with pancreas graft loss, the main reasons were vascular thrombosis (n=19), chronic rejection (n=10), acute rejection (n=6) and death with a functioning graft (n=5). The overall rate of vascular-related death was 1.3% at 5 years post transplant. Univariable analysis showed that patient age and weight, donor age, previous kidney transplantation, previous cardiovascular events and need for insulin more than 48h post transplantation were significantly associated with pancreas graft survival. Of these, in multivariable analyses pancreas graft survival was inferior in patients who had received a previous kidney transplant prior to pancreas transplantation (log-rank test, p=0.0002). Glucose metabolism, renal function and cardiovascular risk factors were generally stable following transplantation. CONCLUSIONS The results of this multicentre study highlight the excellent patient and graft outcomes following pancreas transplantation, with a notably low incidence of cardiovascular events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pedro Ventura-Aguiar
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Mercedes Cabello
- Department of Nephrology, Hospital Regional Universitario de Malaga, Málaga, Spain
| | - Isabel Beneyto
- Department of Nephrology, Hospital La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | | | - Guadalupe Tabernero
- Department of Nephrology, Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
| | - Angel Alonso
- Department of Nephrology, Hospital Universitario de A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain
| | - Juan Carlos Ruiz
- Department of Nephrology, Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, University of Cantabria, IDIVAL, Santander, Spain
| | - Santiago Llorente
- Department of Nephrology, Hospital Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ventura-Aguiar P, Cabello M, Beneyto I, Navarro Cabello D, Tabernero G, Alonso A, Ruiz JC, Llorente S. Patient and graft survival in pancreas transplant recipients: The EFISPAN study. Nefrologia 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.nefro.2021.09.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
|
6
|
Yoon CH, Choi HJ, Kim MK. Corneal xenotransplantation: Where are we standing? Prog Retin Eye Res 2021; 80:100876. [PMID: 32755676 PMCID: PMC7396149 DOI: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2020.100876] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2020] [Revised: 05/23/2020] [Accepted: 06/04/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
The search for alternatives to allotransplants is driven by the shortage of corneal donors and is demanding because of the limitations of the alternatives. Indeed, current progress in genetically engineered (GE) pigs, the introduction of gene-editing technology by clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-Cas9, and advanced immunosuppressants have made xenotransplantation a possible option for a human trial. Porcine corneal xenotransplantation is considered applicable because the eye is regarded as an immune-privileged site. Furthermore, recent non-human primate studies have shown long-term survival of porcine xenotransplants in keratoplasty. Herein, corneal immune privilege is briefly introduced, and xenogeneic reactions are compared with allogeneic reactions in corneal transplantation. This review describes the current knowledge on special issues of xenotransplantation, xenogeneic rejection mechanisms, current immunosuppressive regimens of corneal xenotransplantation, preclinical efficacy and safety data of corneal xenotransplantation, and updates of the regulatory framework to conduct a clinical trial on corneal xenotransplantation. We also discuss barriers that might prevent xenotransplantation from becoming common practice, such as ethical dilemmas, public concerns on xenotransplantation, and the possible risk of xenozoonosis. Given that the legal definition of decellularized porcine cornea (DPC) lies somewhere between a medical device and a xenotransplant, the preclinical efficacy and clinical trial data using DPC are included. The review finally provides perspectives on the current standpoint of corneal xenotransplantation in the fields of regenerative medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chang Ho Yoon
- Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Laboratory of Ocular Regenerative Medicine and Immunology, Seoul Artificial Eye Center, Seoul National University Hospital Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyuk Jin Choi
- Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Laboratory of Ocular Regenerative Medicine and Immunology, Seoul Artificial Eye Center, Seoul National University Hospital Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University Hospital Healthcare System Gangnam Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Mee Kum Kim
- Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Laboratory of Ocular Regenerative Medicine and Immunology, Seoul Artificial Eye Center, Seoul National University Hospital Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
mTOR Inhibitor in Combination with Cyclosporine as Primary Maintenance Immunosuppression in Combined Kidney/Pancreas Transplant Recipients. CURRENT TRANSPLANTATION REPORTS 2019. [DOI: 10.1007/s40472-019-00246-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
8
|
Li X, Meng Q, Zhang L. The Fate of Allogeneic Pancreatic Islets following Intraportal Transplantation: Challenges and Solutions. J Immunol Res 2018; 2018:2424586. [PMID: 30345316 PMCID: PMC6174795 DOI: 10.1155/2018/2424586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2018] [Accepted: 08/27/2018] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic islet transplantation as a therapeutic option for type 1 diabetes mellitus is gaining widespread attention because this approach can restore physiological insulin secretion, minimize the risk of hypoglycemic unawareness, and reduce the risk of death due to severe hypoglycemia. However, there are many obstacles contributing to the early mass loss of the islets and progressive islet loss in the late stages of clinical islet transplantation, including hypoxia injury, instant blood-mediated inflammatory reactions, inflammatory cytokines, immune rejection, metabolic exhaustion, and immunosuppression-related toxicity that is detrimental to the islet allograft. Here, we discuss the fate of intrahepatic islets infused through the portal vein and propose potential interventions to promote islet allograft survival and improve long-term graft function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xinyu Li
- Department of General Surgery, The 2nd Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, 246 Xuefu Road, Harbin, 150086 Heilongjiang Province, China
| | - Qiang Meng
- Department of General Surgery, The 2nd Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, 246 Xuefu Road, Harbin, 150086 Heilongjiang Province, China
| | - Lei Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, The 2nd Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, 246 Xuefu Road, Harbin, 150086 Heilongjiang Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Thölking G, Gerth HU, Schuette-Nuetgen K, Reuter S. Influence of tacrolimus metabolism rate on renal function after solid organ transplantation. World J Transplant 2017; 7:26-33. [PMID: 28280692 PMCID: PMC5324025 DOI: 10.5500/wjt.v7.i1.26] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2016] [Revised: 11/22/2016] [Accepted: 01/14/2017] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
The calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) tacrolimus (TAC) is an integral part of the immunosuppressive regimen after solid organ transplantation. Although TAC is very effective in prevention of acute rejection episodes, its highly variable pharmacokinetic and narrow therapeutic window require frequent monitoring of drug levels and dose adjustments. TAC can cause CNI nephrotoxicity even at low blood trough levels (4-6 ng/mL). Thus, other factors besides the TAC trough level might contribute to CNI-related kidney injury. Unfortunately, TAC pharmacokinetic is determined by a whole bunch of parameters. However, for daily clinical routine a simple application strategy is needed. To address this problem, we and others have evaluated a simple calculation method in which the TAC blood trough concentration (C) is divided by the daily dose (D). Fast TAC metabolism (C/D ratio < 1.05) was identified as a potential risk factor for an inferior kidney function after transplantation. In this regard, we recently showed a strong association between fast TAC metabolism and CNI nephrotoxicity as well as BKV infection. Therefore, the TAC C/D ratio may assist transplant clinicians in a simple way to individualize the immunosuppressive regimen.
Collapse
|
10
|
Burrack AL, Martinov T, Fife BT. T Cell-Mediated Beta Cell Destruction: Autoimmunity and Alloimmunity in the Context of Type 1 Diabetes. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2017; 8:343. [PMID: 29259578 PMCID: PMC5723426 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2017.00343] [Citation(s) in RCA: 183] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2017] [Accepted: 11/21/2017] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Type 1 diabetes (T1D) results from destruction of pancreatic beta cells by T cells of the immune system. Despite improvements in insulin analogs and continuous blood glucose level monitoring, there is no cure for T1D, and some individuals develop life-threatening complications. Pancreas and islet transplantation have been attractive therapeutic approaches; however, transplants containing insulin-producing cells are vulnerable to both recurrent autoimmunity and conventional allograft rejection. Current immune suppression treatments subdue the immune system, but not without complications. Ideally a successful approach would target only the destructive immune cells and leave the remaining immune system intact to fight foreign pathogens. This review discusses the autoimmune diabetes disease process, diabetic complications that warrant a transplant, and alloimmunity. First, we describe the current understanding of autoimmune destruction of beta cells including the roles of CD4 and CD8 T cells and several possibilities for antigen-specific tolerance induction. Second, we outline diabetic complications necessitating beta cell replacement. Third, we discuss transplant recognition, potential sources for beta cell replacement, and tolerance-promoting therapies under development. We hypothesize that a better understanding of autoreactive T cell targets during disease pathogenesis and alloimmunity following transplant destruction could enhance attempts to re-establish tolerance to beta cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam L. Burrack
- Department of Medicine, Center for Immunology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | - Tijana Martinov
- Department of Medicine, Center for Immunology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | - Brian T. Fife
- Department of Medicine, Center for Immunology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, United States
- *Correspondence: Brian T. Fife,
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Fernandes-Silva G, Ivani de Paula M, Rangel ÉB. mTOR inhibitors in pancreas transplant: adverse effects and drug-drug interactions. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 2016; 13:367-385. [DOI: 10.1080/17425255.2017.1239708] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriel Fernandes-Silva
- Universidade Federal de São Paulo/Hospital do Rim e Hipertensão, Nephrology Department, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Mayara Ivani de Paula
- Universidade Federal de São Paulo/Hospital do Rim e Hipertensão, Nephrology Department, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Érika B. Rangel
- Universidade Federal de São Paulo/Hospital do Rim e Hipertensão, Nephrology Department, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
- Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Fousteri G, Jofra T, Di Fonte R, Battaglia M. Combination of an Antigen-Specific Therapy and an Immunomodulatory Treatment to Simultaneous Block Recurrent Autoimmunity and Alloreactivity in Non-Obese Diabetic Mice. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0127631. [PMID: 26080071 PMCID: PMC4469694 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127631] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2015] [Accepted: 04/16/2015] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Restoration of endogenous insulin production by islet transplantation is considered a curative option for patients with type 1 diabetes. However, recurrent autoimmunity and alloreactivity cause graft rejection hindering successful transplantation. Here we tested whether transplant tolerance to allogeneic islets could be achieved in non-obese diabetic (NOD) mice by simultaneously tackling autoimmunity via antigen-specific immunization, and alloreactivity via granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) and rapamycin (RAPA) treatment. Immunization with insB9-23 peptide alone or in combination with two islet peptides (IGRP206-214 and GAD524-543) in incomplete Freund’s adjuvant (IFA) were tested for promoting syngeneic pancreatic islet engraftment in spontaneously diabetic NOD mice. Treatment with G-CSF/RAPA alone or in combination with insB9-23/IFA was examined for promoting allogeneic islet engraftment in the same mouse model. InsB9-23/IFA immunization significantly prolonged syngeneic pancreatic islet survival in NOD mice by a mechanism that necessitated the presence of CD4+CD25+ T regulatory (Treg) cells, while combination of three islet epitopes was less efficacious in controlling recurrent autoimmunity. G-CSF/RAPA treatment was unable to reverse T1D or control recurrent autoimmunity but significantly prolonged islet allograft survival in NOD mice. Blockade of interleukin-10 (IL-10) during G-CSF/RAPA treatment resulted in allograft rejection suggesting that IL-10-producing cells were fundamental to achieve transplant tolerance. G-CSF/RAPA treatment combined with insB9-23/IFA did not further increase the survival of allogeneic islets. Thus, insB9-23/IFA immunization controls recurrent autoimmunity and G-CSF/RAPA treatment limits alloreactivity, however their combination does not further promote allogeneic pancreatic islet engraftment in NOD mice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgia Fousteri
- Diabetes Research Institute (DRI), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 58, Milan, Italy
- * E-mail: (GF); (MB)
| | - Tatiana Jofra
- Diabetes Research Institute (DRI), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 58, Milan, Italy
| | - Roberta Di Fonte
- Diabetes Research Institute (DRI), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 58, Milan, Italy
| | - Manuela Battaglia
- Diabetes Research Institute (DRI), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 58, Milan, Italy
- * E-mail: (GF); (MB)
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Salvadori M, Bertoni E. What's new in clinical solid organ transplantation by 2013. World J Transplant 2014; 4:243-66. [PMID: 25540734 PMCID: PMC4274595 DOI: 10.5500/wjt.v4.i4.243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2014] [Revised: 07/11/2014] [Accepted: 07/27/2014] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Innovative and exciting advances in the clinical science in solid organ transplantation continuously realize as the results of studies, clinical trials, international conferences, consensus conferences, new technologies and discoveries. This review will address to the full spectrum of news in transplantation, that verified by 2013. The key areas covered are the transplantation activity, with particular regards to the donors, the news for solid organs such as kidney, pancreas, liver, heart and lung, the news in immunosuppressive therapies, the news in the field of tolerance and some of the main complications following transplantation as infections and cancers. The period of time covered by the study starts from the international meetings held in 2012, whose results were published in 2013, up to the 2013 meetings, conferences and consensus published in the first months of 2014. In particular for every organ, the trends in numbers and survival have been reviewed as well as the most relevant problems such as organ preservation, ischemia reperfusion injuries, and rejections with particular regards to the antibody mediated rejection that involves all solid organs. The new drugs and strategies applied in organ transplantation have been divided into new way of using old drugs or strategies and drugs new not yet on the market, but on phase Ito III of clinical studies and trials.
Collapse
|
14
|
Stratta RJ, Farney AC, Rogers J, Orlando G. Immunosuppression for pancreas transplantation with an emphasis on antibody induction strategies: review and perspective. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 2014; 10:117-32. [PMID: 24236648 DOI: 10.1586/1744666x.2014.853616] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
A review of recent literature was performed to identify trends and evaluate outcomes with respect to immunosuppression in pancreas transplantation (PTX). In the past decade, the majority of PTXs were performed with depleting antibody induction, particularly in the setting of either calcineurin inhibitor minimization, corticosteroid withdrawal or both. Maintenance immunosuppression consisted of predominantly tacrolimus (TAC)/mycophenolatemofetil, TAC/mycophenolic acid or TAC/sirolimus with or without corticosteroids. Depending on PTX category, donor and recipient risk factors, case mix and immunosuppressive regimen, the 1-year incidence of acute rejection has decreased to 5-20%. Current 1-year rates of immunological pancreas graft loss range between 1.8 and 6%. Depleting antibody induction and either TAC/mycophenolatemofetil or TAC/sirolimus maintenance therapy with early steroid withdrawal have become the mainstay of immunosuppression in PTX. However, the development of non-nephrotoxic, nondiabetogenic, and nongastrointestinal toxic regimens is highly desirable to improve quality of life in all solid organ transplant recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert J Stratta
- Department of General Surgery, Section of Transplantation, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Medical Center Blvd., Winston-Salem, NC27157, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Mittal S, Page SL, Friend PJ, Sharples EJ, Fuggle SV. De novo donor-specific HLA antibodies: biomarkers of pancreas transplant failure. Am J Transplant 2014; 14:1664-71. [PMID: 24866735 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.12750] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2013] [Revised: 03/18/2014] [Accepted: 03/19/2014] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
This study assesses the role of posttransplant HLA antibody monitoring in the surveillance of pancreas transplant recipients. Four hundred thirty-three pancreas transplants were performed at the Oxford Transplant Centre 2006-2011 (317 simultaneous pancreas kidney [SPK] and 116 isolated pancreas [IP]). HLA antibody monitoring was performed at 0, 6 and 12 months and annually and during clinical events. There was no association between pancreas graft failure and recipient or donor characteristics. Posttransplant antibody status, available for 354 (81.8%) of recipients, demonstrated that 141 (39.8%) developed de novo HLA antibodies, of which 52 (36.9%) were de novo donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSA) (34 SPK, 18 IP). The development of antibodies to donor HLA, but not to nondonor HLA, was significantly associated with poorer graft outcomes, with 1- and 3-year graft survival inferior in SPK recipients (85.2% vs. 93.5%; 71.8% vs. 90.3%, respectively; log-rank p = 0.002), and particularly in IP recipients (50.0% vs. 82.9%; 16.7 vs. 79.4%, respectively; log-rank p = 0.001). In a multivariate analysis, development of de novo DSA emerged as a strong independent predictor of pancreas graft failure (hazard ratio 4.66, p < 0.001). This is the largest study to examine de novo HLA antibodies following pancreas transplantation and clearly defines a high-risk group in need of specific intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Mittal
- Oxford Transplant Centre, Oxford, UK; Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Mikhalski D, Coulic V, Bilibin D, Novikov V, Delrée P. Back to the Reinnervation of the Pancreas After Transplantation? (Experimental Study on Dogs, Cats, and Rats). Transplant Proc 2014; 46:2010-8. [DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2014.06.052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|