1
|
Heidenreich A, Paffenholz P, Pfister D. Regionalization of Testis Cancer Care-Is It Necessary? Urol Clin North Am 2024; 51:421-427. [PMID: 38925744 DOI: 10.1016/j.ucl.2024.03.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/28/2024]
Abstract
Testicular germ cell tumors are rare genitourinary malignancies, but they represent the most common malignancies in men aged 15 to 30 years. Whereas the initial steps of management such as staging imaging studies, inguinal orchiectomy, and tumor marker can be performed elsewhere, the surgical and cytotoxic therapy needs to be done at reference centers. Regionalization of testis care has been shown to result in superior oncological outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Axel Heidenreich
- Department of Urology, Uro-Oncology, Robot-Assisted and Specialized Urologic Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, Cologne 50937, Germany; Department of Urology, Medical University Vienna, Austria.
| | - Pia Paffenholz
- Department of Urology, Uro-Oncology, Robot-Assisted and Specialized Urologic Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, Cologne 50937, Germany
| | - David Pfister
- Department of Urology, Uro-Oncology, Robot-Assisted and Specialized Urologic Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, Cologne 50937, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abe H, Sumitani M, Matsui H, Inoue R, Fushimi K, Uchida K, Yasunaga H. Association between hospital palliative care team intervention volume and patient outcomes. Int J Clin Oncol 2024:10.1007/s10147-024-02574-4. [PMID: 38913218 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-024-02574-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2024] [Accepted: 06/19/2024] [Indexed: 06/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The benefits of palliative care in patients with advanced cancer are well established. However, the effect of the skills of the palliative care team (PCT) on patient outcomes remains unclear. Our aim was to evaluate the association between hospital PCT intervention volume and patient outcomes in patients with cancer. METHODS A retrospective cohort study was conducted using a nationwide inpatient database in Japan. Patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy and PCT intervention from 2015 to 2020 were included. The outcomes were incidence of hyperactive delirium within 30 days of admission, mortality within 30 days of admission, and decline in activities of daily living (ADL) at discharge. The exposure of interest was hospital PCT intervention volume (annual number of new PCT interventions in a hospital), which was categorized into low-, intermediate-, and high-volume groups according to tertiles. Multivariate logistic regression and restricted cubic-spline regression were conducted. RESULTS Of 29,076 patients, 1495 (5.1%), 562 (1.9%), and 3026 (10.4%) developed delirium, mortality, and decline in ADL, respectively. Compared with the low hospital PCT intervention volume group (1-103 cases/year, n = 9712), the intermediate (104-195, n = 9664) and high (196-679, n = 9700) volume groups showed significant association with lower odds ratios of 30-day delirium (odds ratio, 0.79 [95% confidence interval, 0.69-0.91] and 0.80 [0.69-0.93], respectively), 30-day mortality (0.73 [0.60-0.90] and 0.59 [0.46-0.75], respectively), and decline in ADL (0.77 [0.70-0.84] and 0.52 [0.47-0.58], respectively). CONCLUSION Hospital PCT intervention volume is inversely associated with the odds ratios of delirium, mortality, and decline in ADL among hospitalized patients with cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroaki Abe
- Department of Pain and Palliative Medicine, The University of Tokyo Hospital, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan
| | - Masahiko Sumitani
- Department of Pain and Palliative Medicine, The University of Tokyo Hospital, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
| | - Hiroki Matsui
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, School of Public Health, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Reo Inoue
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Relief Center, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kiyohide Fushimi
- Department of Health Policy and Informatics, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kanji Uchida
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Relief Center, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hideo Yasunaga
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, School of Public Health, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Manzella A, Kheng M, Chao J, Laird AM, Beninato T. Association of Medicaid expansion with access to thyroidectomy for benign disease at high-volume centers. Surgery 2024:S0039-6060(24)00228-9. [PMID: 38762382 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2023] [Revised: 03/27/2024] [Accepted: 04/01/2024] [Indexed: 05/20/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Insurance-based disparities in access to thyroidectomy are well established. Patients undergoing thyroidectomy by high-volume surgeons have fewer complications and better postoperative outcomes. The aim of this study is to evaluate the association of Medicaid expansion with access to high-volume centers for thyroidectomy for benign disease. METHODS The Vizient Clinical Data Base was queried for adult operations for benign thyroid disease from 2010 to 2019. Centers were sorted by volume into quartiles. Difference-in-difference analysis evaluated changes in insurance populations in expansion and non-expansion states after Medicaid expansion. Odds of patients undergoing operations in the 4 volume quartiles after stratifying by insurance and Medicaid expansion status were calculated. RESULTS A total of 82,602 patients underwent operations at 364 centers. Expansion states increased Medicaid coverage in all volume quartiles compared to non-expansion states after Medicaid expansion (Q1, +4.87%, Q2, +5.35%, Q3, +8.57%, Q4, +4.62%, P < .002 for all). After Medicaid expansion, Medicaid patients had higher odds of undergoing operation at lower volume hospitals compared to the highest volume centers in both expansion states (Q1, ref, Q2, 1.82, Q3, 1.76, Q4, 1.67, P < .001) and non-expansion states (Q1, ref, Q2, 1.54, Q3, 2.04, Q4, 1.44, P < .001). Privately insured patients were most likely to undergo their operation at the highest volume centers in all states (E: Q1, ref, Q2, 0.78, Q3, 0.74, Q4, 0.66, P < .001; NE: Q1, ref, Q2, 0.89, Q3, 0.58, Q4, 0.85, P < .001). CONCLUSION Medicaid expansion increased Medicaid coverage in expansion states, but Medicaid patients in both expansion and non-expansion states were less likely to be operated on at the highest volume centers compared to privately insured patients. Persistent barriers to accessing high-volume care still exists for Medicaid patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Manzella
- Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ.
| | - Marin Kheng
- Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - Joshua Chao
- Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - Amanda M Laird
- Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - Toni Beninato
- Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ. https://twitter.com/BeninatoToni
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Takamura Y, Tominaga T, Nonaka T, Oishi K, Noda K, Hashimoto S, Shiraishi T, Ono R, Hisanaga M, Takeshita H, Ishii M, Fukuoka H, To K, Tanaka K, Sawai T, Nagayasu T. Impact of institutional volume on short- and long-term outcomes after laparoscopic colectomy. Asian J Endosc Surg 2024; 17:e13295. [PMID: 38414043 DOI: 10.1111/ases.13295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2024] [Revised: 02/08/2024] [Accepted: 02/12/2024] [Indexed: 02/29/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The impact of institutional volume on postoperative outcomes after laparoscopic colectomy is still being debated. This study aimed to investigate whether differences in postoperative outcomes of laparoscopic colon resection exist between high- and low-volume centers. METHODS Data were reviewed for 1360 patients who underwent laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer between 2016 and 2022. Patients were divided according to whether they were treated at a high-volume center (≥100 colorectal surgeries annually; n = 947) or a low-volume center (<100 colorectal surgeries annually; n = 413). Propensity score matching was applied to balance covariates and minimize selection biases that could affect outcomes. Finally, 406 patients from each group were matched. RESULTS After matching, patients from high-volume centers showed a higher number of retrieved lymph nodes (19 vs. 17, p < .001) and more frequent involvement of expert surgeons (98.3% vs. 88.4%, p < .001). Postoperative complication rates were similar between groups (p = .488). No significant differences between high- and low-volume centers were seen in relapse-free survival (88.8% each, p = .716) or overall survival (85.7% vs. 82.8%, p = .480). CONCLUSION The present study suggests that in appropriately educated organizations, relatively safe procedures and good prognosis may be obtained for laparoscopic colectomy cases, regardless of institutional volume.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuma Takamura
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Science, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Tetsuro Tominaga
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Science, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Takashi Nonaka
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Science, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Kaido Oishi
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Science, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Keisuke Noda
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Science, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Shintaro Hashimoto
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Science, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Toshio Shiraishi
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Science, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Rika Ono
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Science, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Makoto Hisanaga
- Department of Surgery, Sasebo City General Hospital, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Takeshita
- Department of Surgery, National Hospital Organization Nagasaki Medical Center, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Mitsutoshi Ishii
- Department of Surgery, Isahaya General Hospital, Nagasaki, Japan
| | | | - Kazuo To
- Department of Surgery, Ureshino Medical Center, Saga, Japan
| | - Kenji Tanaka
- Department of Surgery, Saiseikai Nagasaki Hospital, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Terumitsu Sawai
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Science, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Takeshi Nagayasu
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Science, Nagasaki, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Khan MMM, Munir MM, Woldesenbet S, Endo Y, Rawicz-Pruszyński K, Katayama E, Ejaz A, Cloyd J, Dilhoff M, Pawlik TM. Association of surgeon-patient sex concordance with postoperative outcomes following complex cancer surgery. J Surg Oncol 2024; 129:489-498. [PMID: 37990862 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27527] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2023] [Revised: 10/21/2023] [Accepted: 10/28/2023] [Indexed: 11/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Sex concordance may impact the therapeutic relationship and provider-patient interactions. We sought to define the association of surgeon-patient sex concordance on postoperative patient outcomes following complex cancer surgery. METHODS Patients who underwent surgery for lung, breast, hepato-pancreato-biliary, or colorectal cancer between 2014 and 2020 were identified from the Medicare Standard Analytic Files. The impact of surgeon-patient sex concordance or discordance on achieving an optimal postoperative textbook outcome (TO) was assessed using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS Among 495 628 patients, 241 938 (48.8%) patients were sex concordant with their surgeon while 253 690 (51.2%) patients were sex discordant. Sex discordance between surgeon and patient was associated with a decreased likelihood to achieve a postoperative TO (odds ratio [OR]: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.93-0.97; p < 0.001). Sex discordance was associated with a higher risk of complications (OR: 1.05, 95% CI: 1.03-1.07; p < 0.001) and 90-day mortality (OR: 1.05, 95% CI: 1.01-1.09; p = 0.011). Of note, male patients treated by female surgeons (OR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.93-0.99; p = 0.017) had a similar lower likelihood to achieve a TO as female patients treated by male surgeons (OR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.86-0.93; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Sex discordance was associated with a reduced likelihood of achieving an "optimal" postoperative course following complex cancer surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammad Muntazir Mehdi Khan
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Muhammad M Munir
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Selamawit Woldesenbet
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Yutaka Endo
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Karol Rawicz-Pruszyński
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland
| | - Erryk Katayama
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Aslam Ejaz
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Jordan Cloyd
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Mary Dilhoff
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Timothy M Pawlik
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Grönroos-Korhonen MT, Koskenvuo LE, Mentula PJ, Nykänen TP, Koskensalo SK, Leppäniemi AK, Sallinen VJ. Impact of hospital volume on failure to rescue for complications requiring reoperation after elective colorectal surgery: multicentre propensity score-matched cohort study. BJS Open 2024; 8:zrae025. [PMID: 38597158 PMCID: PMC11004787 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2023] [Accepted: 11/07/2023] [Indexed: 04/11/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND It has previously been reported that there are similar reoperation rates after elective colorectal surgery but higher failure-to-rescue (FTR) rates in low-volume hospitals (LVHs) versus high-volume hospitals (HVHs). This study assessed the effect of hospital volume on reoperation rate and FTR after reoperation following elective colorectal surgery in a matched cohort. METHODS Population-based retrospective multicentre cohort study of adult patients undergoing reoperation for a complication after an elective, non-centralized colorectal operation between 2006 and 2017 in 11 hospitals. Hospitals were divided into either HVHs (3 hospitals, median ≥126 resections per year) or LVHs (8 hospitals, <126 resections per year). Patients were propensity score-matched (PSM) for baseline characteristics as well as indication and type of elective surgery. Primary outcome was FTR. RESULTS A total of 6428 and 3020 elective colorectal resections were carried out in HVHs and LVHs, of which 217 (3.4%) and 165 (5.5%) underwent reoperation (P < 0.001), respectively. After PSM, 142 patients undergoing reoperation remained in both HVH and LVH groups for final analyses. FTR rate was 7.7% in HVHs and 10.6% in LVHs (P = 0.410). The median Comprehensive Complication Index was 21.8 in HVHs and 29.6 in LVHs (P = 0.045). There was no difference in median ICU-free days, length of stay, the risk for permanent ostomy or overall survival between the groups. CONCLUSION The reoperation rate and postoperative complication burden was higher in LVHs with no significant difference in FTR compared with HVHs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie T Grönroos-Korhonen
- Gastroenterological Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
- Gastroenterological Surgery, Päijät-Häme Central Hospital, Lahti, Finland
| | - Laura E Koskenvuo
- Gastroenterological Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Panu J Mentula
- Gastroenterological Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Taina P Nykänen
- Gastroenterological Surgery, Hyvinkää Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Selja K Koskensalo
- Gastroenterological Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Ari K Leppäniemi
- Gastroenterological Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Ville J Sallinen
- Gastroenterological Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
- Transplantation and Liver Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ambrosini F, Mantica G, Marchi G, Vecchio E, Col B, Gaia Genova L, Trani G, Ferrari A, Terrone C. Impact of Assistant Experience on Perioperative Outcomes of Simple and Radical Laparoscopic Nephrectomy: Does It Really Matter? MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2023; 60:45. [PMID: 38256306 PMCID: PMC10820043 DOI: 10.3390/medicina60010045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2023] [Revised: 12/14/2023] [Accepted: 12/25/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2024]
Abstract
Background and Objectives: While systematic reviews highlight the advantages of laparoscopic nephrectomy over traditional open surgery, the impact of an assistant's experience on surgical outcomes remains unclear. This study aims to evaluate whether the level of assistant expertise influences laparoscopic nephrectomy outcomes. Materials and Methods: Retrospective data from our institutional database were analyzed for patients who underwent laparoscopic nephrectomy between January 2018 and December 2022. Procedures were performed by a highly experienced surgeon, including postgraduate year (PGY)-3 to PGY-5 residents as assistants. Senior-level assistants had completed at least 10 procedures. Patient characteristics, surgical outcomes, and postoperative details were collected. Multivariable linear and logistic regression models were performed to test the effect of assistant experience (low vs. high) on estimated blood loss (EBL), length of stay (LOS), operative time (OT), and postoperative complications. Results: 105 patients were included, where 53% had highly experienced assistants and 47% had less experienced ones. Low assistant experience and higher BMI predicted longer operative time (OT), confirmed by multivariable regression (β = 40.5, confidence interval [CI] 18.7-62.3, p < 0.001). Assistant experience did not significantly affect EBL or LOS after adjusting for covariates (β = -14.2, CI -91.8-63.3, p = 0.7 and β = -0.83, CI -2.7-1.02, p = 0.4, respectively). There was no correlation between assistant experience and postoperative complications. Conclusions: Assistant experience does not significantly impact complications, EBL, and LOS in laparoscopic nephrectomy. Surgeries with less experienced assistants had longer OT, but the overall clinical impact seems limited. Trainee involvement remains safe, guided by experienced surgeons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca Ambrosini
- IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genova, Italy; (F.A.); (G.M.); (E.V.); (B.C.); (L.G.G.); (G.T.); (A.F.); (C.T.)
- Department of Surgical and Diagnostic Integrated Sciences (DISC), University of Genova, 16131 Genova, Italy
| | - Guglielmo Mantica
- IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genova, Italy; (F.A.); (G.M.); (E.V.); (B.C.); (L.G.G.); (G.T.); (A.F.); (C.T.)
- Department of Surgical and Diagnostic Integrated Sciences (DISC), University of Genova, 16131 Genova, Italy
| | - Giovanni Marchi
- IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genova, Italy; (F.A.); (G.M.); (E.V.); (B.C.); (L.G.G.); (G.T.); (A.F.); (C.T.)
- Department of Surgical and Diagnostic Integrated Sciences (DISC), University of Genova, 16131 Genova, Italy
| | - Enrico Vecchio
- IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genova, Italy; (F.A.); (G.M.); (E.V.); (B.C.); (L.G.G.); (G.T.); (A.F.); (C.T.)
- Department of Surgical and Diagnostic Integrated Sciences (DISC), University of Genova, 16131 Genova, Italy
| | - Benedetta Col
- IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genova, Italy; (F.A.); (G.M.); (E.V.); (B.C.); (L.G.G.); (G.T.); (A.F.); (C.T.)
- Department of Surgical and Diagnostic Integrated Sciences (DISC), University of Genova, 16131 Genova, Italy
| | - Luca Gaia Genova
- IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genova, Italy; (F.A.); (G.M.); (E.V.); (B.C.); (L.G.G.); (G.T.); (A.F.); (C.T.)
- Department of Surgical and Diagnostic Integrated Sciences (DISC), University of Genova, 16131 Genova, Italy
| | - Giorgia Trani
- IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genova, Italy; (F.A.); (G.M.); (E.V.); (B.C.); (L.G.G.); (G.T.); (A.F.); (C.T.)
- Department of Surgical and Diagnostic Integrated Sciences (DISC), University of Genova, 16131 Genova, Italy
| | - Arianna Ferrari
- IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genova, Italy; (F.A.); (G.M.); (E.V.); (B.C.); (L.G.G.); (G.T.); (A.F.); (C.T.)
- Department of Surgical and Diagnostic Integrated Sciences (DISC), University of Genova, 16131 Genova, Italy
| | - Carlo Terrone
- IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genova, Italy; (F.A.); (G.M.); (E.V.); (B.C.); (L.G.G.); (G.T.); (A.F.); (C.T.)
- Department of Surgical and Diagnostic Integrated Sciences (DISC), University of Genova, 16131 Genova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Pecoraro A, Roussel E, Amparore D, Mari A, Grosso AA, Checcucci E, Montorsi F, Larcher A, Van Poppel H, Porpiglia F, Capitanio U, Minervini A, Albersen M, Serni S, Campi R. New-onset Chronic Kidney Disease After Surgery for Localised Renal Masses in Patients with Two Kidneys and Preserved Renal Function: A Contemporary Multicentre Study. EUR UROL SUPPL 2023; 52:100-108. [PMID: 37284048 PMCID: PMC10240519 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2023.04.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/18/2023] [Indexed: 06/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background There is a lack of evidence on acute kidney injury (AKI) and new-onset chronic kidney disease (CKD) after surgery for localised renal masses (LRMs) in patients with two kidneys and preserved baseline renal function. Objective To evaluate the prevalence and risk of AKI and new-onset clinically significant CKD (csCKD) in patients with a single renal mass and preserved renal function after being treated with partial (PN) or radical (RN) nephrectomy. Design setting and participants We queried our prospectively maintained databases to identify patients with a preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of ≥60 ml/min/1.73 m2 and a normal contralateral kidney who underwent PN or RN for a single LRM (cT1-T2N0M0) between January 2015 and December 2021 at four high-volume academic institutions. Intervention PN or RN. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis The outcomes of this study were AKI at hospital discharge and the risk of new-onset csCKD, defined as eGFR <45 ml/min/1.73 m2, during the follow-up. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to examine csCKD-free survival according to tumour complexity. A Multivariable logistic regression analysis assessed the predictors of AKI, while a multivariable Cox regression analysis assessed the predictors of csCKD. Sensitivity analyses were performed in patients who underwent PN. Results and limitations Overall, 2469/3076 (80%) patients met the inclusion criteria. At hospital discharge, 371/2469 (15%) developed AKI (8.7% vs 14% vs 31% in patients with low- vs intermediate- vs high-complexity tumours, p < 0.001). At the multivariable analysis, body mass index, history of hypertension, tumour complexity, and RN significantly predicted the occurrence of AKI. Among 1389 (56%) patients with complete follow-up data, 80 events of csCKD were recorded. The estimated csCKD-free survival rates were 97%, 93% and 86% at 12, 36, and 60 mo, respectively, with significant differences between patients with high- versus low-complexity and high- versus intermediate-complexity tumours (p = 0.014 and p = 0.038, respectively). At the Cox regression analysis, age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index, preoperative eGFR, tumour complexity, and RN significantly predicted the risk of csCKD during the follow-up. The results were similar in the PN cohort. The main limitation of the study was the lack of data on eGFR trajectories within the 1st year after surgery and on long-term functional outcomes. Conclusions The risk of AKI and de novo csCKD in elective patients with an LRM and preserved baseline renal function is not clinically negligible, especially in those with higher-complexity tumours. While baseline nonmodifiable patient/tumour-related characteristics modulate this risk, PN should be prioritised over RN to maximise nephron preservation if oncological outcomes are not jeopardised. Patient summary In this study, we evaluated how many patients with a localised renal mass and two functioning kidneys, who were candidates for surgery at four referral European centres, experienced acute kidney injury at hospital discharge and significant renal functional impairment during the follow-up. We found that the risk of acute kidney injury and clinically significant chronic kidney disease in this patient population is not negligible, and was associated with specific baseline patient comorbidities, preoperative renal function, tumour anatomical complexity, and surgery-related factors, in particular the performance of radical nephrectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessio Pecoraro
- Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Eduard Roussel
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Renal Cancer Working Group, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Daniele Amparore
- Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Renal Cancer Working Group, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, San Luigi Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Andrea Mari
- Unit of Urological Oncologic Minimally Invasive Robotic Surgery and Andrology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Antonio Andrea Grosso
- Unit of Urological Oncologic Minimally Invasive Robotic Surgery and Andrology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Enrico Checcucci
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, San Luigi Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
- University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Larcher
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
- University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Francesco Porpiglia
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, San Luigi Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Umberto Capitanio
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
- University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Minervini
- Unit of Urological Oncologic Minimally Invasive Robotic Surgery and Andrology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Maarten Albersen
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Sergio Serni
- Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Riccardo Campi
- Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Renal Cancer Working Group, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Grobet‐Jeandin E, Pinar U, Parra J, Vaessen C, Chartier‐Kastler E, Seisen T, Rouprêt M. Medico‐economic impact of onco‐urological robot‐assisted minimally invasive surgery in a high‐volume centre. Int J Med Robot 2022; 18:e2462. [DOI: 10.1002/rcs.2462] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2022] [Revised: 09/03/2022] [Accepted: 09/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Elisabeth Grobet‐Jeandin
- Sorbonne University GRC 5 Predictive Onco‐Urology APHP Pitié‐Salpêtrière Hôpital Urology Paris France
- Division of Urology Geneva University Hospitals Geneva Switzerland
| | - Ugo Pinar
- Sorbonne University GRC 5 Predictive Onco‐Urology APHP Pitié‐Salpêtrière Hôpital Urology Paris France
| | - Jérôme Parra
- Sorbonne University GRC 5 Predictive Onco‐Urology APHP Pitié‐Salpêtrière Hôpital Urology Paris France
| | - Christophe Vaessen
- Sorbonne University GRC 5 Predictive Onco‐Urology APHP Pitié‐Salpêtrière Hôpital Urology Paris France
| | - Emmanuel Chartier‐Kastler
- Sorbonne University GRC 5 Predictive Onco‐Urology APHP Pitié‐Salpêtrière Hôpital Urology Paris France
| | - Thomas Seisen
- Sorbonne University GRC 5 Predictive Onco‐Urology APHP Pitié‐Salpêtrière Hôpital Urology Paris France
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Sorbonne University GRC 5 Predictive Onco‐Urology APHP Pitié‐Salpêtrière Hôpital Urology Paris France
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Busetto GM, D’Agostino D, Colicchia M, Palmer K, Artibani W, Antonelli A, Bianchi L, Bocciardi A, Brunocilla E, Carini M, Carrieri G, Cormio L, Falagario UG, De Berardinis E, Sciarra A, Leonardo C, Del Giudice F, Maggi M, de Cobelli O, Ferro M, Musi G, Ercolino A, Di Maida F, Gallina A, Introini C, Mearini E, Cochetti G, Minervini A, Montorsi F, Schiavina R, Serni S, Simeone C, Parma P, Serao A, Mangano MS, Pomara G, Ditonno P, Simonato A, Romagnoli D, Crestani A, Porreca A. Robot-Assisted, Laparoscopic, and Open Radical Cystectomy: Pre-Operative Data of 1400 Patients From The Italian Radical Cystectomy Registry. Front Oncol 2022; 12:895460. [PMID: 35600337 PMCID: PMC9117739 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.895460] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2022] [Accepted: 04/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction The Italian Radical Cystectomy Registry (RIC) is an observational prospective study aiming to understand clinical variables and patient characteristics associated with short- and long-term outcomes among bladder cancer (BC) patients undergoing radical cystectomy (RC). Moreover, it compares the effectiveness of three RC techniques - open, robotic, and laparoscopic. Methods From 2017 to 2020, 1400 patients were enrolled at one of the 28 centers across Italy. Patient characteristics, as well as preoperative, postoperative, and follow-up (3, 6, 12, and 24 months) clinical variables and outcomes were collected. Results Preoperatively, it was found that patients undergoing robotic procedures were younger (p<.001) and more likely to have undergone preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy (p<.001) and BCG instillation (p<.001). Hypertension was the most common comorbidity among all patients (55%), and overall, patients undergoing open and laparoscopic RC had a higher Charlson Comorbidities Index (CCI) compared to robotic RC (p<.001). Finally, laparoscopic patients had a lower G-stage classification (p=.003) and open patients had a higher ASA score (p<.001). Conclusion The present study summarizes the characteristic of patients included in the RIC. Future results will provide invaluable information about outcomes among BC patients undergoing RC. This will inform physicians about the best techniques and course of care based on patient clinical factors and characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gian Maria Busetto
- Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, University of Foggia, Policlinico Riuniti, Foggia, Italy
- *Correspondence: Gian Maria Busetto,
| | | | | | - Katie Palmer
- Department of Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, University Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Walter Artibani
- Department of Urology, Policlinico Abano Terme, Abano Terme, Italy
| | - Alessandro Antonelli
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata (A.O.U.I.), Verona, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Bianchi
- Department of Urology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | | | | | - Marco Carini
- Department of Urology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | | | - Luigi Cormio
- Department of Urology, Villa Salus Clinic, Mestre, Italy
| | | | - Ettore De Berardinis
- Department of Maternal-Child and Urological Sciences, Sapienza Rome University, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Sciarra
- Department of Maternal-Child and Urological Sciences, Sapienza Rome University, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Costantino Leonardo
- Department of Maternal-Child and Urological Sciences, Sapienza Rome University, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Del Giudice
- Department of Maternal-Child and Urological Sciences, Sapienza Rome University, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Martina Maggi
- Department of Maternal-Child and Urological Sciences, Sapienza Rome University, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Ottavio de Cobelli
- Department of Urology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Matteo Ferro
- Department of Urology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Gennaro Musi
- Department of Urology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Amelio Ercolino
- Department of Urology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | | | - Andrea Gallina
- Department of Urology, San Raffaele Hospital and Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Ettore Mearini
- Department of Urology, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | | | | | - Francesco Montorsi
- Department of Urology, San Raffaele Hospital and Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Sergio Serni
- Department of Urology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Claudio Simeone
- Department of Urology, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Paolo Parma
- Department of Urology, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale (ASST) Mantova, Mantova, Italy
| | - Armando Serao
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera di Alessandria, Alessandria, Italy
| | | | - Giorgio Pomara
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy
| | - Pasquale Ditonno
- Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Alchiede Simonato
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, Section of Urology, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | | | - Alessandro Crestani
- Oncological Urology, Veneto Institute of Oncology (IOV) – Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Padua, Italy
| | - Angelo Porreca
- Oncological Urology, Veneto Institute of Oncology (IOV) – Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Padua, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Mermier M, Baron P, Roumiguie M, Bajeot AS, Pignot G, Lannes F, Ploussard G, Gasmi A, Bensalah K, Perrot O, Rouprêt M, Bruyere F, Pradere B, Verhoest G. Predictive factors of early postoperative complications after robot-assisted radical cystectomy for urothelial bladder carcinoma. J Endourol 2021; 36:634-640. [PMID: 34931545 DOI: 10.1089/end.2021.0617] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To identify protective and risk factors of early postoperative complications after robot-assisted radical cystectomy for urothelial bladder carcinoma. METHODS Data of all robot-assisted cystectomy performed in six french centers between February 2010 and December 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. All robot-assisted radical cystectomy for bladder cancer (muscle-invasive and high-risk or BCG-resistant non muscle-invasive bladder cancer) were included. Perioperative outcomes and early postoperative complications (in the first 30 days) were collected. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify factors associated to early postoperative complications. RESULTS 270 patients were included. The overall incidence of early postoperative complications after robot-assisted radical cystectomy was 52.2% (27% of major complications). Most frequent complications were infectious complications (24.4%) and paralytic ileus (15.6%). Anticoagulant therapy (OR=2.909, 95%CI 1.003 to 8.432) and uretero-enteric anastomosis type Wallace II (OR=4.4, 95%CI 1.435 to 13.489) were associated with a higher rate of overall complications. Complete intracorporeal derivation was a protective factor (OR=0.399, 95%CI 0.222 to 0.718). Tabacco consumption, anticoagulant therapy, uretero-enteric anastomosis type Wallace II were associated with a higher rate of minor complications (OR=2.01, 95%CI 1.079 to 3.744; OR=2.495, 95%CI 1.022 to 6.089; OR=3.836, 95%CI 1.384 to 10.63 respectively). Opioid-Free Anaesthesia was associated with a lower rate of infectious complications (OR=0.148, 95%CI 0.034 to 0.644). CONCLUSION Early postoperative complications rate after robot-assisted radical cystectomy for urothelial bladder carcinoma is high. Encouraging complete intracorporeal diversion and promoting Opioid-Free Anaesthesia seem to reduce postoperative complications in the first 30 days. Prospective studies are needed to provide a high level of evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie Mermier
- CHU Rennes, 36684, 2 rue Henri Le Guilloux, Rennes, France, 35000;
| | | | - Mathieu Roumiguie
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, 36760, urology, Toulouse, Midi-Pyrénées, France;
| | | | | | | | - Guillaume Ploussard
- Clinique Capio La Croix du Sud, 538719, Quint-Fonsegrives, Occitanie, France;
| | | | - Karim Bensalah
- Rennes University Hospital (France), Urology, 2 rue Henri Le Guillou, Rennes, France, 35000;
| | | | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Pitié-Salpêtrière Academic Hospital, Department of Urology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Pierre and Marie Curie Medical School, Paris 6 University, Paris, France;
| | - Franck Bruyere
- CHRU Tours, 26928, urology, 2 bd Tonnellé, Tours, France, 37044;
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- CHU Tours, Department of urology, 2 boulevard tonnellé, Tours, France, 37000;
| | - Gregory Verhoest
- RENNES Univeristy Hospital, Urology, Henri Le Guillou St, RENNES, France, 35033;
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Impact of surgical approach and resection technique on the risk of Trifecta Failure after partial nephrectomy for highly complex renal masses. Eur J Surg Oncol 2021; 48:687-693. [PMID: 34862095 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.11.126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2021] [Revised: 11/11/2021] [Accepted: 11/21/2021] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We aimed to compare the outcomes of open vs robotic partial nephrectomy (PN), focusing on predictors of Trifecta failure in patients with highly complex renal masses. PATIENTS AND METHODS We queried the prospectively collected database from the SIB International Consortium, including 507 consecutive patients with cT1-2N0M0 renal masses treated at 16 high-volume referral centres, to select those with highly complex (PADUA score ≥10) tumors undergoing PN. RT was classified as enucleation, enucleoresection or resection according to the SIB score. Trifecta was defined as achievement of negative surgical margins, no acute kidney injury and no Clavien-Dindo grade ≥2 postoperative surgical complications. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to assess independent predictors of Trifecta failure. RESULTS 113 patients were included. Patients undergoing open PN (n = 47, 41.6%) and robotic PN (n = 66, 58.4%) were comparable in baseline characteristics. RT was classified as enucleation, enucleoresection and resection in 46.9%, 34.0% and 19.1% of open PN, and in 50.0%, 40.9% and 9.1% of robotic PN (p = 0.28). Trifecta was achieved in significantly more patients after robotic PN (69.7% vs. 42.6%, p = 0.004). On multivariable analysis, surgical approach (open vs robotic, OR: 2.62; 95%CI: 1.11-6.15, p = 0.027) and tumor complexity (OR for each additional unit of the PADUA score: 2.27; 95%CI: 1.27-4.06, p = 0.006) were significant predictors of Trifecta failure, while RT was not. The study is limited by lack of randomization; as such, selection bias and confounding cannot be entirely ruled out. CONCLUSIONS Tumor complexity and surgical approach were independent predictors of Trifecta failure after PN for highly complex renal masses.
Collapse
|
13
|
Aldawoodi NN, Muncey AR, Serdiuk AA, Miller MD, Hanna MM, Laborde JM, Garcia Getting RE. A Retrospective Analysis of Patients Undergoing Telemedicine Evaluation in the PreAnesthesia Testing Clinic at H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center. Cancer Control 2021; 28:10732748211044347. [PMID: 34644199 PMCID: PMC8521730 DOI: 10.1177/10732748211044347] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Telemedicine for preanesthesia evaluation can decrease access disparities by minimizing commuting, time off work, and lifestyle disruptions from frequent medical visits. We report our experience with the first 120 patients undergoing telemedicine preanesthesia evaluation at Moffitt Cancer Center. Methods This is a retrospective analysis of 120 patients seen via telemedicine for preanesthesia evaluation compared with an in-person cohort meeting telemedicine criteria had it been available. Telemedicine was conducted from our clinic to a patient’s remote location using video conferencing. Clinic criteria were revised to create a tier of eligible patients based on published guidelines and anesthesiologist consensus. Results Day-of-surgery cancellation rate was 1.67% in the telemedicine versus 0% in the in-person cohort. The two telemedicine group cancellations were unrelated to medical workup, and cancellation rate between the groups was not statistically significant (P = .49). Median round trip distance and time saved by the telemedicine group was 80 miles [range 4; 1180] and 121 minutes [range 16; 1034]. Using the federal mileage rate, the median cost savings was $46 [range $2.30; 678.50] per patient. Patients were similar in gender and race in both groups (P = .23 and .75, respectively), but the in-person cohort was older and had higher American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification (P = .0003). Conclusions Telemedicine preanesthesia evaluation results in time, distance, and financial savings without increased day-of-surgery cancellations. This is useful in cancer patients who travel significant distances to specialty centers and have a high frequency of health care visits. American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status classification and age differences between cohorts indicate possible patient or provider selection bias. Randomized controlled trials will aid in further exploring this technology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Mark M Hanna
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Campi R, Marchioni M, Bertolo R, Erdem S, Kara O, Pavan N, Amparore D. Robotic surgery for renal cell carcinoma with inferior vena cava thrombosis: balancing feasibility and safety toward individualized decision-making. Minerva Urol Nephrol 2021; 73:544-548. [PMID: 34494415 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-6051.21.04606-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Riccardo Campi
- Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, University of Florence, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy.,Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Michele Marchioni
- Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, Laboratory of Biostatistics, University "G. D'Annunzio" Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.,Department of Urology, SS Annunziata Hospital, "G. D'Annunzio" University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy
| | | | - Selcuk Erdem
- Division of Urologic Oncology, Department of Urology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Onder Kara
- School of Medicine, Department of Urology, University of Kocaeli, Kocaeli, Turkey
| | - Nicola Pavan
- Clinic of Urology, Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Science, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Daniele Amparore
- School of Medicine, Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy -
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Basourakos SP, Lewicki P, Punjani N, Arenas-Gallo C, Gaffney C, Fantus RJ, Al Awamlh BAH, Schlegel PN, Brannigan RE, Shoag JE, Halpern JA. Practice patterns of vasal reconstruction in a large United States cohort. Andrologia 2021; 53:e14228. [PMID: 34459018 DOI: 10.1111/and.14228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2021] [Accepted: 08/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
We aimed to characterise diverse practice patterns for vasal reconstruction and to determine whether surgeon volume is associated with vasoepididymostomy performance at the time of reconstruction. We identified adult men who underwent vasal reconstruction from 2000 to 2020 in Premier Healthcare Database and determined patient, surgeon, cost and hospital characteristics for each procedure. We identified 3,494 men who underwent either vasovasostomy-alone (N = 2,595, 74.3%) or any-vasoepididymostomy (N = 899, 25.7%). The majority of providers (N = 487, 88.1%) performed only-vasovasostomy, 10 (1.8%) providers performed only-vasoepididymostomy and 56 (10.1%) providers performed both. Median total hospital charge of vasoepididymostomy was significantly higher than vasovasostomy ($39,163, interquartile range [IQR]$11,854-53,614 and $17,201, IQR$10,904-29,986, respectively). On multivariable regression, men who underwent procedures at nonacademic centres (OR 2.71, 95% CI 2.12-3.49) with higher volume surgeons (OR 11.60, 95% CI 8.65-16.00) were more likely to undergo vasoepididymostomy. Furthermore, men who underwent vasoepididymostomy were more likely to self-pay (OR 2.35, 95% CI 1.83-3.04, p < .001) and more likely had procedures in the Midwest or West region (OR 2.22, 95% CI 1.66-2.96 and OR 2.11, 95% CI 1.61-2.76, respectively; p < .001). High-volume providers have increased odds of performing vasoepididymostomy at the time of reconstruction but at a significantly higher cost. These data suggest possibly centralising reconstructive procedures among high-volume providers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Spyridon P Basourakos
- Department of Urology, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Patrick Lewicki
- Department of Urology, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Nahid Punjani
- Department of Urology, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Camilo Arenas-Gallo
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Christopher Gaffney
- Department of Urology, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Richard J Fantus
- Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | | | - Peter N Schlegel
- Department of Urology, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Robert E Brannigan
- Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Jonathan E Shoag
- Department of Urology, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.,Department of Urology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Joshua A Halpern
- Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Sharma RK, Lee J, Liou R, McManus C, Lee JA, Kuo JH. Optimal surgeon-volume threshold for neck dissections in the setting of primary thyroid malignancies. Surgery 2021; 171:172-176. [PMID: 34266647 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.04.046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2021] [Accepted: 04/11/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although the surgeon-volume relationship is well documented for thyroidectomy, less is known about central neck and lateral neck dissections. The aim of this study was to evaluate and determine the surgeon-volume threshold for central neck and lateral neck dissections for thyroid cancer. METHODS A retrospective analysis of patients with thyroid malignancies who received a central or lateral neck dissection in the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System was performed (2007-2017). Demographic variables included age, sex, race, and a Charlson Comorbidity Score. Thirty-day complications were identified using International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes for central neck, lateral neck, and other surgical complications. Optimal surgeon-volume threshold was estimated using a change-point logistic regression. Using the identified threshold, surgeons were then classified to low versus high volume surgeons. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to examine the effect of high-volume status on outcomes. RESULTS In total, 3,808 patients who underwent neck dissections (3,485 central neck dissections and 977 lateral neck dissections) were analyzed. Surgeon-volume threshold to distinguish high volume surgeons for central neck dissections and lateral neck dissections was 7.0 (95% bootstrap confidence interval 1.3-7.5) and 3.3 (1.2-4.8) neck dissections/year, respectively. For central neck dissection, high volume surgeons were associated with a lower rate of vocal cord paralysis (odds ratio 0.45 [0.24-0.82]), hypocalcemia (0.31 [0.14-0.65]), and all-cause complications (0.42 [0.29-0.59]). For lateral neck dissection, high volume surgeons were associated with a lower odds all-cause complications (0.42 [0.23-0.74]) but not lateral neck specific complications (0.18 [0.01-1.07]). CONCLUSION A threshold of 7.0 central neck dissections and 3.3 lateral neck dissections for thyroid cancer per year improves outcomes. Guidelines for training and centralization of care can be guided by these results to reduce complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rahul K Sharma
- Division of Endocrine Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY. https://twitter.com/RKSharma0407
| | - Jihui Lee
- Division of Biostatistics, Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Rachel Liou
- Division of Endocrine Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Catherine McManus
- Division of Endocrine Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - James A Lee
- Division of Endocrine Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Jennifer H Kuo
- Division of Endocrine Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Muncey AR, Patel SY, Whelan CJ, Ackerman RS, Gatenby RA. The Intersection of Regional Anesthesia and Cancer Progression: A Theoretical Framework. Cancer Control 2021; 27:1073274820965575. [PMID: 33070618 PMCID: PMC7791454 DOI: 10.1177/1073274820965575] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
The surgical stress and inflammatory response and volatile anesthetic
agents have been shown to promote tumor metastasis in animal and
in-vitro studies. Regional neuraxial anesthesia protects against these
effects by decreasing the surgical stress and inflammatory response
and associated changes in immune function in animals. However,
evidence of a similar effect in humans remains equivocal due to the
high variability and retrospective nature of clinical studies and
difficulty in directly comparing regional versus general anesthesia in
humans. We propose a theoretical framework to address the question of
regional anesthesia as protective against metastasis. This theoretical construct views the immune system, circulating tumor
cells, micrometastases, and inflammatory mediators as distinct
populations in a highly connected system. In ecological theory, highly
connected populations demonstrate more resilience to local
perturbations but are prone to system-wide shifts compared with their
poorly connected counterparts. Neuraxial anesthesia transforms the
otherwise system-wide perturbations of the surgical stress and
inflammatory response and volatile anesthesia into a comparatively
local perturbation to which the system is more resilient. We propose
this framework for experimental and mathematical models to help
determine the impact of anesthetic choice on recurrence and metastasis
and create therapeutic strategies to improve cancer outcomes after
surgery.
Collapse
|
18
|
Wainger JJ, Cheaib JG, Patel HD, Huang MM, Biles MJ, Metcalf MR, Canner JK, Singla N, Trock BJ, Allaf ME, Pierorazio P. Volume-outcome relationships for kidney cancer may be driven by disparities and patient risk. Urol Oncol 2021; 39:439.e1-439.e8. [PMID: 34078583 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.04.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2020] [Revised: 04/04/2021] [Accepted: 04/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Provider and hospital factors influence healthcare quality, but data are lacking to assess their impact on renal cancer surgery. We aimed to assess factors related to surgeon and hospital volume and study their impact on 30-day outcomes after radical nephrectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS Renal surgery data were abstracted from Maryland's Health Service Cost Review Commission from 2000 to 2018. Patients ≤18 years old, without a diagnosis of renal cancer, and concurrently receiving another major surgery were excluded. Volume categories were derived from the mean annual cases distribution. Multivariable logistic and linear regression models assessed the association of volume on length of stay, intensive care days, cost, 30-day mortality, readmission, and complications. RESULTS 7,950 surgeries, completed by 573 surgeons at 48 hospitals, were included. Demographic, surgical, and admission characteristics differed between groups. Radical nephrectomies performed by low volume surgeons demonstrated increased post-operative complication frequency, mortality frequency, length of stay, and days spent in intensive care relative to other groups. However, after logistic regression adjusting for clinical risk and socioeconomic factors, only increased length of stay and ICU days remained associated with lower surgeon volume. Similarly, after adjusted logistic regression, hospital volume was not associated with the studied outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Surgeons and hospitals differ in regards to patient demographic and clinical factors. Barriers exist regarding access to high-volume care, and thus some volume-outcome trends may be driven predominantly by disparities and case mix.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia J Wainger
- The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
| | - Joseph G Cheaib
- The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Hiten D Patel
- The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Mitchell M Huang
- The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Michael J Biles
- The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Meredith R Metcalf
- The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Joseph K Canner
- Johns Hopkins Surgery Center for Outcomes Research, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Nirmish Singla
- The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Bruce J Trock
- The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Mohamad E Allaf
- The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Phillip Pierorazio
- The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Campi R, Sessa F, Rivetti A, Pecoraro A, Barzaghi P, Morselli S, Polverino P, Nicoletti R, Li Marzi V, Spatafora P, Sebastianelli A, Gacci M, Vignolini G, Serni S. Case Report: Optimizing Pre- and Intraoperative Planning With Hyperaccuracy Three-Dimensional Virtual Models for a Challenging Case of Robotic Partial Nephrectomy for Two Complex Renal Masses in a Horseshoe Kidney. Front Surg 2021; 8:665328. [PMID: 34136528 PMCID: PMC8200488 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.665328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2021] [Accepted: 04/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: To report a case of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) for two highly complex renal tumors in a patient with a Horseshoe kidney (HSK), focusing on the utility of hyperaccuracy three-dimensional (HA3D) virtual models for accurate preoperative and intraoperative planning of the procedure. Methods: A 74-year-old Caucasian male patient was referred to our Unit for incidental detection of two complex renal masses in the left portion of a HSK. The 50 × 55 mm, larger, predominantly exophytic renal mass was located at the middle-lower pole of the left-sided kidney (PADUA score 9). The 16 × 17 mm, smaller, hilar renal mass was located at the middle-higher pole of the left-sided kidney (PADUA score 9). Contrast-enhanced CT scan images in DICOM format were processed using a dedicated software to achieve a HA3D virtual reconstructions. RAPN was performed by a highly experienced surgeon using the da Vinci Si robotic platform with a three-arm configuration. A selective delayed clamping strategy was adopted for resection of the larger renal mass while a clampless strategy was adopted for the smaller renal mass. An enucleative resection strategy was pursued for both tumors. Results: The overall operative time was 150 min, with a warm ischemia time of 21 min. No intraoperative or postoperative complications were recorded. Final resection technique according to the SIB score was pure enucleation for both masses. At histopathological analysis, both renal masses were clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) (stage pT1bNxMx and pT3aNxMx for the larger and smaller mass, respectively). At a follow-up of 7 months, there was no evidence of local or systemic recurrence. Conclusions: Surgical management of complex renal masses in patients with HSKs is challenging and decision-making is highly nuanced. To optimize postoperative outcomes, proper surgical experience and careful preoperative planning are key. In this regard, 3D models can play a crucial role to refine patient counseling, surgical decision-making, and pre- and intraoperative planning during RAPN, tailoring surgical strategies and techniques according to the single patient's anatomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riccardo Campi
- Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.,Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Francesco Sessa
- Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.,Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Anna Rivetti
- Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Alessio Pecoraro
- Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Paolo Barzaghi
- Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Simone Morselli
- Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Paolo Polverino
- Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Rossella Nicoletti
- Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Li Marzi
- Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Pietro Spatafora
- Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Arcangelo Sebastianelli
- Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Mauro Gacci
- Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Graziano Vignolini
- Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Sergio Serni
- Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.,Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Sugimoto K, Tabuchi T, Okawa S, Morishima T, Koyama S, Nakayama M, Nishimura K, Miyashiro I. Hospital volume and postoperative survival for three urological cancers: Prostate, kidney, and bladder. Int J Urol 2021; 28:799-805. [PMID: 34050559 DOI: 10.1111/iju.14573] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2020] [Accepted: 03/16/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine the association between hospital volume and postoperative 5-year survival for patients with prostate, kidney, and bladder cancer. METHOD Using Osaka Cancer Registry data, we identified 9285 patients who were diagnosed as having prostate, kidney, or bladder cancer and who underwent surgery between 2007 and 2011 in Osaka, Japan. The surgical hospital volume of each hospital was calculated and then divided into quartiles (high, medium, low, very low). We estimated the hazard ratios of hospital volume (quartiles) for 5-year survival using Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS For all three cancer sites, the mortality hazard of hospitals with the lowest hospital volume was significantly higher than that of hospitals with the highest volume. The difference in adjusted 5-year survival rates between hospitals with the highest and lowest hospital volume was 3.6% for prostate cancer, 6.6% for kidney cancer, and 13.3% for bladder cancer. CONCLUSION Hospital surgical volume seems to affect 5-year survival for patients with urological cancers, especially kidney and bladder cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kazuma Sugimoto
- Department of Urology, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takahiro Tabuchi
- Cancer Control Center, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Sumiyo Okawa
- Cancer Control Center, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | | | - Shihoko Koyama
- Cancer Control Center, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Masashi Nakayama
- Department of Urology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kazuo Nishimura
- Department of Urology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Isao Miyashiro
- Cancer Control Center, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Waldbillig F, Nientiedt M, Kowalewski KF, Grüne B, von Hardenberg J, Nuhn P, Michel MS, Kriegmair MC. The Comprehensive Complication Index for Advanced Monitoring of Complications Following Endoscopic Surgery of the Lower Urinary Tract. J Endourol 2021; 35:490-496. [PMID: 33222525 DOI: 10.1089/end.2020.0825] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) for reporting complications in lower urinary tract transurethral procedures and compare it with the Clavien-Dindo classification (CDC). Materials and Methods: A total of 450 consecutive patients were included into the analyses [150 each of transurethral resection of bladder tumors (TURBT), transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), and transurethral enucleation of the prostate using Tm:YAG, (ThuLEP)]. Complications were assessed according to the modified CDC. The CCI was calculated using a freely accessible online tool. Descriptive statistics and correlation analyses were applied to quantify operational differences and length of stay (LOS) between CDC and CCI. Sample size calculations for hypothetical clinical trials were contrasted for CDC and CCI application. Results: Overall n = 150 patients with complications (33.3%) within the first 60 days after operation were identified. Of these, n = 125 (83.4%) were minor complications up to CDC grade IIIa. Of patients with complications, n = 57 patients (12.6%) experienced more than one complication. Here, the cumulative CCI led to an upgrade of at least one CDC grade in 33 patients. Hence, in 22.0% of cases, the highest CDC grade underestimated the degree of complications. CCI showed higher correlation with LOS compared with CDC (all r > 0.2, all p-values ≤0.0001). Using CCI instead of CDC for sample calculation resulted in a strong reduction of the required number of patients for all three interventions (percentage of patient number decrease: -93.2% for TURBT, -71.8% for TURP, and -81.1% for ThuLEP). Conclusion: The CCI gives a more precise interpretation of the postinterventional complications of TURBT, TURP, and ThuLEP. CCI application may reduce the required sample size for clinical trials and will relieve their recruitment in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frank Waldbillig
- Department of Urology and Urosurgery, University Medical Centre Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Malin Nientiedt
- Department of Urology and Urosurgery, University Medical Centre Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Karl-Friedrich Kowalewski
- Department of Urology and Urosurgery, University Medical Centre Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Britta Grüne
- Department of Urology and Urosurgery, University Medical Centre Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Jost von Hardenberg
- Department of Urology and Urosurgery, University Medical Centre Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Philipp Nuhn
- Department of Urology and Urosurgery, University Medical Centre Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Maurice Stephan Michel
- Department of Urology and Urosurgery, University Medical Centre Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Maximilian C Kriegmair
- Department of Urology and Urosurgery, University Medical Centre Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Serni S, Pecoraro A, Sessa F, Gemma L, Greco I, Barzaghi P, Grosso AA, Corti F, Mormile N, Spatafora P, Caroassai S, Berni A, Gacci M, Giancane S, Tuccio A, Sebastianelli A, Li Marzi V, Vignolini G, Campi R. Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Living Donor Nephrectomy: The University of Florence Technique. Front Surg 2021; 7:588215. [PMID: 33521044 PMCID: PMC7844329 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2020.588215] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2020] [Accepted: 12/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: To provide a step-by-step overview of the University of Florence technique for robotic living donor nephrectomy (LDN), focusing on its technical nuances and perioperative outcomes. Methods: A dedicated robotic LDN program at our Institution was codified in 2012. Data from patients undergoing robotic LDN from 2012 to 2019 were prospectively collected. All robotic LDNs were performed by a highly experienced surgeon, using the da Vinci Si robotic platform in a three-arm configuration. In this report we provide a detailed overview of our surgical technique for robotic LDN. The main objective of the study was to evaluate the technical feasibility and safety of the technique, including perioperative surgical complications rate and mid-term functional outcomes. Results: Overall, 36 patients undergoing robotic LDNs were included in the study. Of these, 28 (78%) were left LDNs. Median (IQR) donor pre-operative eGFR was 88 (75.6–90) ml/min/1.73 m2. In all cases, robotic LDN was completed without need of conversion. The median (IQR) overall operative time was 230 (195–258) min, while the median console time was 133 (IQR 117-166) min. The median (IQR) warm ischemia time was 175 (140–255) s. No intraoperative adverse events or 90-d major surgical complications were recorded. At a median (IQR) follow-up of 24 months (IQR 11-46), median (IQR) eGFR patients undergoing in living donor nephrectomy was 57.4 (47.9; 63.9) ml/min/1.73 m2. Conclusions: In our experience, robotic LDN is technically feasible and safe. The use of robotic surgery for LDN may provide distinct advantages for surgeons while ensuring optimal donors' perioperative and functional outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sergio Serni
- Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.,Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Alessio Pecoraro
- Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Francesco Sessa
- Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.,Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Luca Gemma
- Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Isabella Greco
- Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Paolo Barzaghi
- Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Antonio Andrea Grosso
- Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Francesco Corti
- Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Nicola Mormile
- Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Pietro Spatafora
- Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Simone Caroassai
- Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Alessandro Berni
- Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Mauro Gacci
- Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Saverio Giancane
- Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Agostino Tuccio
- Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Arcangelo Sebastianelli
- Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Li Marzi
- Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Graziano Vignolini
- Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Riccardo Campi
- Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.,Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Campi R, Sessa F, Corti F, Carrion DM, Mari A, Amparore D, Mir MC, Fiori C, Papalia R, Kutikov A, Volpe A, Capitanio U, Pierorazio PM, Scarpa RM, Porpiglia F, Minervini A, Serni S, Esperto F. Triggers for delayed intervention in patients with small renal masses undergoing active surveillance: a systematic review. MINERVA UROL NEFROL 2021; 72:389-407. [PMID: 32734748 DOI: 10.23736/s0393-2249.20.03870-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patients with small renal masses (SRM) can be exposed to overdiagnosis and overtreatment. As such, active surveillance (AS) is recommended by all Guidelines for selected patients. However, it remains underutilized. One key reason is the lack of consensus on the factors prompting delayed intervention (DI). Herein we provide an updated overview of the triggers for DI in patients with SRMs initially undergoing AS. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A systematic review of the English-language literature was performed according to the PRISMA statement recommendations using the MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Web of Science databases. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Overall, 10 prospective studies including 1870 patients were included. Median patient age ranged between 64 and 75 years, while median tumor size between 1.7 cm to 2.3 cm. The proportion of cystic SRMs ranged from 0% to 30%. Baseline renal tumor biopsy was performed in 7-45.2% of patients. Among these, malignant histology was found in 28.5%-83.3% of cases. Overall, the median growth rate of SRMs ranged between 0.10 and 0.27 cm/year. The proportion of patients undergoing DI ranged between 7% and 44%, after a median AS period of 12-27 months. The most commonly performed type of DI was surgery. Of resected SRMs, 0% to 30% were benign. The actual triggers for DI were either tumor-related (renal mass growth, stage progression, development of local complications/symptoms) or patient-related (patient preference, improved medical conditions, or qualification for other surgical procedures). At a median follow-up of 21.7 - 57-6 months, the proportion of patients experiencing metastatic disease, cancer-specific and other-cause mortality was 0-3.1%, 0-4% and 0-45.6%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The available evidence shows that both tumor-related and patient-related factors are ultimate triggers for DI in patients with SRMs undergoing AS. However, the level of evidence is still low and further research is needed to individualize AS strategies according to both tumor biology and patient-related characteristics and values.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riccardo Campi
- Department of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy - .,Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy - .,European Society of Residents in Urology (ESRU), Arnhem, the Netherlands -
| | - Francesco Sessa
- Department of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.,Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Francesco Corti
- Department of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Diego M Carrion
- European Society of Residents in Urology (ESRU), Arnhem, the Netherlands.,Department of Urology, La Paz University Hospital, Autonomous University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Andrea Mari
- Department of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.,Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Daniele Amparore
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, San Luigi Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Maria C Mir
- Department of Urology, Fundacion Instituto Valenciano Oncologia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Cristian Fiori
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, San Luigi Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Rocco Papalia
- Department of Urology, Campus Bio-Medico University, Rome, Italy
| | - Alexander Kutikov
- Division of Urology and Urologic Oncology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Alessandro Volpe
- Department of Urology, University of Eastern Piedmont, Maggiore della Carità Hospital, Novara, Italy
| | - Umberto Capitanio
- Division of Experimental Oncology, Unit of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Phillip M Pierorazio
- Department of Urology, The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Roberto M Scarpa
- Department of Urology, Campus Bio-Medico University, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Porpiglia
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, San Luigi Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Andrea Minervini
- Department of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.,Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Sergio Serni
- Department of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.,Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Francesco Esperto
- European Society of Residents in Urology (ESRU), Arnhem, the Netherlands.,Department of Urology, Campus Bio-Medico University, Rome, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Sterling J, Rivera-Núñez Z, Patel HV, Farber NJ, Kim S, Radadia KD, Modi PK, Goyal S, Parikh R, Weiss RE, Kim IY, Elsamra SE, Jang TL, Singer EA. Factors Associated With Receipt of Partial Nephrectomy or Minimally Invasive Surgery for Patients With Clinical T1a and T1b Renal Masses: Implications for Regionalization of Care. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2020; 18:e643-e650. [PMID: 32389458 PMCID: PMC7502425 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2020.03.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2020] [Revised: 03/14/2020] [Accepted: 03/16/2020] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To identify factors associated with receipt of partial nephrectomy (PN) and minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in patients with clinical T1 renal cell carcinoma (RCC) using the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB). METHODS We queried the NCDB from 2010 to 2014 identifying patients treated surgically for cT1a-bN0M0 RCC. Logistic regression was used to examine associations between socioeconomic, clinical, and treatment factors, and receipt of MIS or PN within the T1 patient population. RESULTS Our cohort included 69,694 patients (cT1a, n = 44,043; cT1b, n = 25,651). For cT1a tumors, 70% of patients received PN and 65% underwent MIS. For cT1b tumors, 32% of patients received PN and 62% underwent MIS. cT1a and cT1b patients with household income < $62,000, without private insurance, and treated outside academic centers were less likely to receive MIS or PN. cT1a patients traveling > 31 miles were more likely to undergo MIS. For both cT1a/b, the farther a patient traveled for treatment, the more likely a PN was performed. CONCLUSION Data showed an increase in utilization of MIS and PN from 2010 to 2014. However, patients in the lowest socioeconomic groups were less likely to travel and were more likely to receive more invasive treatments. On the basis of these findings, additional research is needed into how regionalization of RCC surgery affects treatment disparities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua Sterling
- Section of Urologic Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - Zorimar Rivera-Núñez
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Rutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, NJ
| | - Hiren V Patel
- Section of Urologic Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - Nicholas J Farber
- Section of Urologic Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - Sinae Kim
- Division of Biometrics, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - Kushan D Radadia
- Section of Urologic Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - Parth K Modi
- Section of Urologic Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - Sharad Goyal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - Rahul Parikh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - Robert E Weiss
- Section of Urologic Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - Isaac Y Kim
- Section of Urologic Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - Sammy E Elsamra
- Section of Urologic Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - Thomas L Jang
- Section of Urologic Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - Eric A Singer
- Section of Urologic Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Kowalewski KF, Müller D, Mühlbauer J, Hendrie JD, Worst TS, Wessels F, Walach MT, von Hardenberg J, Nuhn P, Honeck P, Michel MS, Kriegmair MC. The comprehensive complication index (CCI): proposal of a new reporting standard for complications in major urological surgery. World J Urol 2020; 39:1631-1639. [PMID: 32813094 PMCID: PMC8166677 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-020-03356-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2020] [Accepted: 07/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The comprehensive complication index (CCI) is a new tool for reporting the cumulative burden of postoperative complications on a continuous scale. This study validates the CCI for urological surgery and its benefits over the Clavien-Dindo-Classification (Clavien). MATERIAL AND METHODS Data from a prospectively maintained data base of all consecutive patients at a university care-center was analyzed. Complications after radical cystectomy (RC), radical prostatectomy (RP), and partial nephrectomy (PN) were classified using the CCI and Clavien system. Differences in complications between the CCI and the Clavien were assessed and correlation analyses performed. Sample size calculations for hypothetical clinical trials were compared between CCI and Clavien to evaluate whether the CCI would reduce the number of required patients in a clinical trial. RESULTS 682 patients (172 RC, 297 RP, 213 PN) were analyzed. Overall, 9.4-46.6% of patients had > 1 complication cumulatively assessed with the CCI resulting in an upgrading in the Clavien classification for 2.4-32.4% of patients. Therefore, scores between the systems differed for RC: CCI (mean ± standard deviation) 26.3 ± 20.8 vs. Clavien 20.4 ± 16.7, p < 0.001; PN: CCI 8.4 ± 14.7 vs. Clavien 7.0 ± 11.8, p < 0.001 and RP: CCI 5.8 ± 11.7 vs. Clavien 5.3 ± 10.6, p = 0.102. The CCI was more accurate in predicting LOS after RC than Clavien (p < 0.001). Sample size calculations based in the CCI (for future hypothetical trials) resulted in a reduction of required patients for all procedures (- 25% RC, - 74% PN, - 80% RP). CONCLUSION The CCI is more accurate to assess surgical complications and reduces required sample sizes that will facilitate the conduction of clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K F Kowalewski
- Department of Urology and Urological Surgery, University Medical Center Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany.
| | - D Müller
- Department of Urology and Urological Surgery, University Medical Center Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
| | - J Mühlbauer
- Department of Urology and Urological Surgery, University Medical Center Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
| | - J D Hendrie
- Department of Internal Medicine, Prisma Health, 701 Grove Road, Greenville, SC, 29605, USA
| | - T S Worst
- Department of Urology and Urological Surgery, University Medical Center Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
| | - F Wessels
- Department of Urology and Urological Surgery, University Medical Center Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
| | - M T Walach
- Department of Urology and Urological Surgery, University Medical Center Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
| | - J von Hardenberg
- Department of Urology and Urological Surgery, University Medical Center Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
| | - P Nuhn
- Department of Urology and Urological Surgery, University Medical Center Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
| | - P Honeck
- Department of Urology and Urological Surgery, University Medical Center Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
| | - M S Michel
- Department of Urology and Urological Surgery, University Medical Center Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
| | - M C Kriegmair
- Department of Urology and Urological Surgery, University Medical Center Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Liu Z, Tang S, Tian X, Zhao X, Hong P, Zhang Q, Li L, Zhang L, Zhang S, Wang G, Zhang H, Liu C, Zhu G, Ma L. Laparoscopic conversion to open surgery in radical nephrectomy and tumor thrombectomy: causal analysis, clinical characteristics, and treatment strategies. BMC Surg 2020; 20:185. [PMID: 32792015 PMCID: PMC7430843 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-020-00845-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2020] [Accepted: 08/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background We aimed to explore the causal analysis, clinical characteristics and treatment strategies of laparoscopic conversion to open approach (LCTOA) in radical nephrectomy and tumor thrombectomy. Methods We included all patients with Mayo level I–III renal tumors with inferior vena cava (IVC) tumor thrombus who underwent laparoscopic radical nephrectomy and tumor thrombectomy as the first choice from May 2015 to July 2019. Results There were 70 cases of renal tumor with IVC tumor thrombus treated with a laparoscopic approach as the first choice; 31 Mayo level I, 30 Mayo level II, and 9 Mayo level III. A completely laparoscopic approach was performed in 51 cases (72.9%), and 19 cases (27.1%) underwent active or passive LCTOA. The LCTOA group had higher median preoperative serum creatinine (110.0 μmol/L vs 92.0 μmol/L; P = 0.026), longer postoperative hospital stay (9 days vs 7 days; P = 0.008), longer median operation time (374 min vs 311 min; P = 0.017), higher median intraoperative hemorrhage volume (1300 vs 600 ml; P = 0.020), and higher proportion of male patients (94.7% vs 66.7%; P = 0.016) vs the completely laparoscopic group, respectively. Although preoperative serum creatinine and gender were risk factors in the univariate analysis, multivariate analysis revealed no independent risk factors for LCTOA. We divided the reasons for LCTOA into active conversion and passive conversion; 4 (21.1%) cases underwent active conversion, and 15 (78.9%) underwent passive conversion. Most of the patients undergoing passive conversion had multiple concurrent risk factors, among which perirenal adhesion (30.9%), organ invasion (16.4%), and IVC adhesion (25.5%) were the most common. Fourteen (73.7%) cases underwent renal treatment, and 5 (26.3%) cases underwent tumor thrombus treatment. Conclusions The LCTOA group had a higher median preoperative serum creatinine concentration, longer hospital stay, longer median operation time, and higher median intraoperative hemorrhage volume. However, none of the predictors in our study was an independent risk factor for LCTOA. Perirenal adhesion, organ invasion, and IVC adhesion were the most common causes of LCTOA. Considering the limitations of this study, studies with large sample sizes are required to validate our conclusions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhuo Liu
- Department of Urology, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Rd, Haidian District, Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Shiying Tang
- Department of Urology, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Rd, Haidian District, Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Xiaojun Tian
- Department of Urology, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Rd, Haidian District, Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Xun Zhao
- Department of Urology, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Rd, Haidian District, Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Peng Hong
- Department of Urology, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Rd, Haidian District, Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Qiming Zhang
- Department of Urology, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Rd, Haidian District, Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Liwei Li
- Ultrasound diagnosis Department of Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, 100083, China
| | - Li Zhang
- Ultrasound diagnosis Department of Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, 100083, China
| | - Shudong Zhang
- Department of Urology, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Rd, Haidian District, Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Guoliang Wang
- Department of Urology, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Rd, Haidian District, Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Hongxian Zhang
- Department of Urology, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Rd, Haidian District, Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Cheng Liu
- Department of Urology, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Rd, Haidian District, Beijing, P.R. China
| | - Guodong Zhu
- Department of Urology, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Rd, Haidian District, Beijing, P.R. China.
| | - Lulin Ma
- Department of Urology, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Rd, Haidian District, Beijing, P.R. China.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia is associated with better survival than desflurane anesthesia in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0230290. [PMID: 32182262 PMCID: PMC7077845 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230290] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2019] [Accepted: 02/25/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Previous researches have shown that anesthetic techniques may influence the patients’ outcomes after cancer surgery. Here, we studied the relationship between the type of anesthetic techniques and patients’ outcomes following elective robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study of patients who received elective, robot-assisted radical prostatectomy between January 2008 and December 2018. Patients were grouped according to the anesthesia they received, namely desflurane or propofol. A Kaplan–Meier analysis was conducted, and survival curves were presented from the date of surgery to death. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression models were used to compare hazard ratios for death after propensity matching. Subgroup analyses were performed for tumor-node-metastasis stage and disease progression. The primary outcome was overall survival, and the secondary outcome was postoperative biochemical recurrence. Results A total of 365 patients (24 deaths, 7.0%) under desflurane anesthesia, and 266 patients (2 deaths, 1.0%) under propofol anesthesia were included. The all-cause mortality rate was significantly lower in the propofol anesthesia than in the desflurane anesthesia during follow-up (P = 0.001). Two hundred sixty-four patients remained in each group after propensity matching. The propofol anesthesia was associated with improved overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.11; 95% confidence interval, 0.03–0.48; P = 0.003) in the matched analysis. Subgroup analyses showed that patients under propofol anesthesia had less postoperative biochemical recurrence than those under desflurane (hazard ratio, 0.20; 95% confidence interval, 0.05–0.91; P = 0.038) in the matched analysis. Conclusions Propofol anesthesia was associated with improved overall survival in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy compared with desflurane anesthesia. In addition, patients under propofol anesthesia had less postoperative biochemical recurrence.
Collapse
|
28
|
Morbidity, perioperative outcomes and complications of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in kidney transplant patients: A French multicentre study. Urol Oncol 2020; 38:599.e15-599.e21. [PMID: 31948931 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2019.12.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2019] [Revised: 10/25/2019] [Accepted: 12/19/2019] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Evaluate the safety, feasibility and efficiency of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in kidney transplant recipients, performed in high-volume French referral centres, and describe intra- and postoperative, oncological and functional outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS A multicentre study was conducted on prospective RARP databases from 5 centres between 2008 and 2017. We retrospectively identified a first group (G1) of transplant patients. The following data were collected: age, body mass index, prostate-specific antigen, ISUP score, TNM stage, stratification according to d'Amico, renal function, renal disease, time between renal transplant and prostate cancer (PCa), operating time, bleeding, pre- and postoperative complications (according to Clavien). Group 1 data were matched with a second group (G2) of nontransplanted PTRA patients. RESULTS A total of 321 patients were included (G1 N = 39 and G2 N = 282). The median operating time was 180 minutes (interquartile range 125-227) for G1 and 150 minutes (120-180) in G2 (P = 0.0623) and the median bleeding volume was 150 mL (150-400) and 250 mL (175-400), respectively (P = 0.1826). No grafts were damaged by RARP. Postoperative complication rate was significantly higher in G1: 51.2% vs. G2: 8.2% with a majority of minor complications (41%) according to Clavien Dindo (P < 0.001). Pathological assessment was as follows in G1: T2 = 28 (71.8%), T3 = 11 (28.2%), and G2: T2 = 206 (73.3%), T3 = 75 (26.7%) (P = 0.77). Postoperative ISUP scores were mainly grade 1: G1 = 14 (35.9%) vs. 99 (35.2%) in G2 and grade 2: respectively 18 (46.1%) 94 (33.5%). The rate of positive surgical margins was comparable in both groups: 13.2% for transplant patients vs. 18.1% (P = 0.65). Renal function was not significantly different at one year (P = 0.07). The median follow-up was 47.9 months (42.3; 52.5). CONCLUSION RARP is conceivable to treat localized prostate cancer in kidney transplant recipients. This procedure does not appear to have any negative impact on graft renal function and cancer prognosis.
Collapse
|
29
|
Lenfant L, Campi R, Parra J, Graffeille V, Masson-Lecomte A, Vordos D, de La Taille A, Roumiguie M, Lesourd M, Taksin L, Misraï V, Granger B, Ploussard G, Vaessen C, Verhoest G, Rouprêt M. Robotic versus open radical cystectomy throughout the learning phase: insights from a real-life multicenter study. World J Urol 2019; 38:1951-1958. [PMID: 31720765 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-019-02998-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2019] [Accepted: 10/24/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) has been shown to be non-inferior to open radical cystectomy (ORC) for the treatment of bladder cancer (BC). However, most data on RARC come from high-volume surgeons at high-volume centers. The objective of the study was to compare perioperative and mid-term oncologic outcomes of RARC versus ORC in a real-life cohort of patients treated by surgeons starting their experience with RARC. MATERIALS AND METHODS Data were prospectively collected from consecutive patients undergoing RARC and ORC at five referral Centers between 2010 and 2016 by five surgeons (one per center) with no prior experience in RARC. Patients with high-risk non-muscle-invasive or organ-confined muscle-invasive (T2N0M0) bladder cancer were considered for RARC. The main study endpoints were perioperative outcomes, postoperative surgical complications, and mid-term oncologic outcomes. RESULTS Overall, 124 and 118 patients underwent RARC and ORC, respectively. Baseline patients' and tumors' characteristics were comparable between the two groups. Yet, the proportion of patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy was significantly higher in the RARC cohort. Median operative time was significantly higher, while median EBL, LOH, and transfusion rates were significantly lower after RARC. Median number of lymph nodes removed was significantly higher after RARC. All other histopathological outcomes, as well as the rate of early (< 30 days) and late postoperative complications, were comparable to ORC. At a median follow-up of 2 years, 29 (23%) and 41 (35%) patients developed disease recurrence (p = 0.05), while 20 (16%) and 37 (31%) died of bladder cancer (p = 0.005) after RARC and ORC, respectively. CONCLUSIONS With proper patient selection, RARC was non-inferior to ORC throughout the surgeons' learning phase. Yet, the observed differences in oncologic outcomes suggest selection bias toward adoption of RARC for patients with more favorable disease characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louis Lenfant
- Sorbonne University, Hopital Pitié Salpétrière, Urology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France
| | - Riccardo Campi
- Sorbonne University, Hopital Pitié Salpétrière, Urology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France.,Department of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Jérôme Parra
- Sorbonne University, Hopital Pitié Salpétrière, Urology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France
| | - Vivien Graffeille
- Department of Urology, Pontchaillou Hospital, CHU RENNES, Rennes, France
| | - Alexandra Masson-Lecomte
- Department of Urology, Henri Mondor Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) CHU Mondor, Faculté de Médecine, Créteil, France
| | - Dimitri Vordos
- Department of Urology, Henri Mondor Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) CHU Mondor, Faculté de Médecine, Créteil, France
| | - Alexandre de La Taille
- Department of Urology, Henri Mondor Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) CHU Mondor, Faculté de Médecine, Créteil, France
| | - Mathieu Roumiguie
- Department of Urology, Andrology and Renal Transplantation, CHU Rangueil, Paul-Sabatier University, 1, av J Pouilhès, 31059, Toulouse Cedex, France
| | - Marine Lesourd
- Department of Urology, Andrology and Renal Transplantation, CHU Rangueil, Paul-Sabatier University, 1, av J Pouilhès, 31059, Toulouse Cedex, France
| | - Lionel Taksin
- Hôpital privé d'Antony, 1 rue Velpeau, 92160, Antony, France
| | - Vincent Misraï
- Clinique Pasteur, 45 Avenue de Lombez, 31300, Toulouse, France
| | - Benjamin Granger
- Department of Biostatistics, Groupe Hospitalo-Universitaire EST, Faculté de Médecine Pierre et Marie Curie, Pitié-Salpétrière Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), University Paris Sorbonne, Paris, France
| | | | - Christophe Vaessen
- Sorbonne University, Hopital Pitié Salpétrière, Urology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France
| | - Gregory Verhoest
- Department of Urology, Pontchaillou Hospital, CHU RENNES, Rennes, France
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Sorbonne University, Hopital Pitié Salpétrière, Urology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Dagenais J, Bertolo R, Garisto J, Maurice MJ, Mouracade P, Kara O, Chavali J, Li J, Nelson R, Fergany A, Abouassaly R, Kaouk JH. Variability in Partial Nephrectomy Outcomes: Does Your Surgeon Matter? Eur Urol 2019; 75:628-634. [DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.10.046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2018] [Accepted: 10/19/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
31
|
Wissing MD, Santos F, Zakaria AS, O'Flaherty A, Tanguay S, Kassouf W, Aprikian AG. Short- and long-term survival has improved after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in Québec during the years 2000-2015. J Surg Oncol 2019; 119:1135-1144. [PMID: 30919984 DOI: 10.1002/jso.25456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2019] [Revised: 02/21/2019] [Accepted: 03/03/2019] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES We evaluated the short- and long-term outcome in bladder cancer (BC) patients treated with radical cystectomy (RC) in Québec (Canada). METHODS Data were collected from provincial registries on all BC patients who underwent RC in Québec province in 2000-2015. Outcomes were hospitalization rates and survival. Survival analyses were conducted using log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS In total, 4450 patients were included in our analysis. RC was increasingly conducted by higher-volume surgeons in larger, higher-volume, academic hospitals. Comparing patients treated in 2010-2015 to 2000-2009, recently treated patients had shorter postoperative hospital stays (absolute difference, 0.9 days, P < 0.001) but also a higher readmission rate (25.0% vs 21.1% in the 30 days following discharge, P = 0.003). Overall (5-year rates 50.9% vs 42.7%, P < 0.001) and BC-specific survival (61.3% vs 55.5%, P < 0.001) had significantly improved. In multivariable analyses, overall survival was significantly better in recently treated patients (hazard ratio [HR], 0.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.60-0.73), younger patients (HR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.14-1.19), patients residing closer to the hospital (HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.01-1.06), and patients treated by high-volume surgeons (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.82-0.94). CONCLUSIONS Survival in BC patients after RC has improved in recent years. Other predictors for survival are younger age, shorter distance between patients' residences and hospitals, and higher surgeon's RC loads.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michel D Wissing
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Québec, Canada.,Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada
| | - Fabiano Santos
- Division of Technology and Innovation, International Development Research Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ahmed S Zakaria
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Québec, Canada
| | - Ana O'Flaherty
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Québec, Canada
| | - Simon Tanguay
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Québec, Canada
| | - Wassim Kassouf
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Québec, Canada
| | - Armen G Aprikian
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Québec, Canada.,Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Rossanese M, Subba E, Giannarini G, Inferrera A, Ficarra V. Open radical cystectomy: lessons from the British Association of Urological Surgeons (BAUS) registry. Transl Androl Urol 2018; 7:745-748. [PMID: 30211067 PMCID: PMC6127551 DOI: 10.21037/tau.2018.06.18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Marta Rossanese
- Department of Human and Paediatric Pathology "Gaetano Barresi", Urologic Section, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Enrica Subba
- Department of Human and Paediatric Pathology "Gaetano Barresi", Urologic Section, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Gianluca Giannarini
- Urology Unit, Academic Medical Centre "Santa Maria della Misericordia", Udine, Italy
| | - Antonino Inferrera
- Department of Human and Paediatric Pathology "Gaetano Barresi", Urologic Section, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Ficarra
- Department of Human and Paediatric Pathology "Gaetano Barresi", Urologic Section, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Heidenreich A. [Limits of surgery in uro-oncology]. Urologe A 2018; 57:1058-1068. [PMID: 30043291 DOI: 10.1007/s00120-018-0735-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
The limits of cancer surgery in uro-oncology are characterized by a carefully weighed risk of surgical feasibility and oncological necessity. The limits of uro-oncological cancer surgery do not represent fixed dogmas but ideally these more or less cognitive boundaries move based on new scientific findings, improved imaging modalities, optimized surgical techniques and perioperative care. The limits of cancer surgery are defined by patient-specific parameters, the biological aggressiveness of the tumor itself, the skills and expertise of the surgeon, and adequate perioperative care of the patient. Dependent on the origin of the cancers of the upper and lower urogenital tract, the specific particularities of each individual cancer in terms of prognosis need to be known, taking into consideration the newest molecular insights and modern multimodality treatment regimes. Only the consideration of the above mentioned basics will allow the best decision to be made with the patient concerning the optimal individual treatment. The current article highlights general parameters of the patient, tumor and surgeon which might define the limits of cancer surgery in uro-oncology. In addition, specific clinical scenarios are discussed with regard to surgery limits in cancer of the kidney, the prostate and the testis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Heidenreich
- Klinik für Urologie, Uro-Onkologie, roboter-assistierte und spezielle urologische Chirurgie, Uniklinik Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland. .,Klinik für Urologie, Medizinische Universität Wien, Wien, Österreich.
| |
Collapse
|