Differences in pain location, intensity, and quality by pain pattern in outpatients with cancer

Promise of Composite Pain Index as a single pain outcome for sickle cell disease across the lifespan

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to validate a Composite Pain Index (CPI) as a single pain outcome measure for sickle cell disease (SCD) across the lifespan from 8 years of age.

PROCEDURE

This prospective, cross-sectional study included 55 participants with SCD who completed the PAINReportIt tool and Adolescent Pediatric Pain Tool (APPT) in random order during outpatient visits to derive respective CPI scores for comparison.

RESULTS

Of the 55 participants with SCD, 46 (84%) had HgbSS, eight (15%) HgbSC, and one (2%) HgbSβ0+. The mean age of all participants was 17.5 ± 2.6 years, and 28 (51%) were female, 52 (95%) were Black, 42 (98%) were non-Hispanic, and 39 (71%) had a ninth grade or higher education. Correlation analyses between the APPT and PAINReportIt revealed positive associations for the number of pain sites (r = .57, p < .001), pain intensity (r = .46, p < .001), pain quality (r = .74, p < .001), and pain pattern (r = .34, p = .01). Patients' mean CPI scores derived from the PAINReportIt was slightly higher than the APPT; 34.2 (SD = 14.7) and 30.0 (SD = 19.0), respectively. Regression analyses showed that the APPT CPI significantly predicted the PAINReportIt CPI (B = .497, t(53) = 6.051, p < .001). This finding holds true even when accounting for the order of measurement or patient's age.

CONCLUSION

The initial validation of CPI as a single pain outcome measure represents a significant advancement in pain assessment for SCD. Further validation is warranted for the CPI as a measure is for both clinicians and researchers to enable longitudinal pain assessment from age 8 years across the lifespan as children age into adult care.

Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Nurses' Cancer Pain Management Competency Scale

BACKGROUND

The Nurses' Cancer Pain Management Competency Scale (NCPMCS) is a tool to explore nurses' competencies and subjective experiences in cancer pain management, and to help nurses understand their current shortcomings in cancer pain management. The scale, currently available only in English and translated into Chinese for wider adoption abroad, provides a tool for Chinese nurses to assess their level of cancer pain management. Furthermore, based on the scale's specific score, they can evaluate their lack of understanding about cancer pain management, advance research into this area, and enhance their capacity to control cancer pain while providing patient care.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to translate and localize the new scale, and to measure its reliability and validity. The study was also to provide a way to quickly and accurately measure the competency of cancer pain management among nursing staff in China.

METHODS

The Bristling translation approach was used to translate, translate back, and culturally modify the English version of the cancer pain management competency scale for nurses to create the Chinese version. A convenience sample was used for the study, 220 clinical nurses from three Grade III hospitals in Zhengzhou, Henan Province, China, were chosen by convenience sampling. The Chinese version of the scale was used for this investigation.

RESULTS

The Cancer Pain Management Competency Scale for Nurses has 14 items over 4 dimensions in its Chinese form. From the exploratory factor analysis, four common components were recovered; the cumulative variance rate was 81.994%, the scale's Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.902, and the Cronbach's α coefficient for each dimension ranged from 0.800 to 0.938. Retest reliability was 0.915, scale content validity was 0.865, and Spearman-Brown's broken half reliability was 0.808.

CONCLUSION

Nurses' cancer pain management competency in clinics can be assessed using the Chinese version of the Nurses' Cancer Pain Management Competency Scale, which has strong validity and reliability.

Sociodemographic and Clinical Characteristics Associated With Worst Pain Intensity Among Cancer Patients

AIMS

Patients with cancer have pain due to their cancer, the cancer treatment and other causes, and the pain intensity varies considerably between individuals. Additional research is needed to understand the factors associated with worst pain intensity. Our study aim was to determine the association between worst pain intensity and sociodemographics and cancerspecific factors among patients with cancer.

DESIGN

A total of 1,280 patients with cancer recruited from multiple cancer centers over 25 years in the United States were asked to complete a questionnaire that collected respondents' demographic, chronic pain, and cancer-specific information.

SETTINGS

Worst, least, and current pain intensities were captured using a modified McGill Pain Questionnaire (pain intensity measured on 0-10 scale). A generalized linear regression analysis was utilized to assess the associations between significant bivariate predictors and worst pain intensity scores.Our study sample was non-Hispanic White (64.5%), non-Hispanic Black (28.3%), and Hispanic (7.2%). On average, participants were 59.4 (standard deviation = 14.4) years old. The average worst pain intensity score was 6.6 (standard deviation = 2.50). After controlling for selected covariates, being Hispanic (β = 0.6859), previous toothache pain (β = 0.0960), headache pain (β = 0.0549), and stomachache pain (β = 0.0577) were positively associated with worse cancer pain. Notably, year of enrollment was not statistically associated with pain.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study sample was non-Hispanic White (64.5%), non-Hispanic Black (28.3%), and Hispanic (7.2%). On average, participants were 59.4 (standard deviation = 14.4) years old. The average worst pain intensity score was 6.6 (standard deviation = 2.50). After controlling for selected covariates, being Hispanic (β = 0.6859), previous toothache pain (β = 0.0960), headache pain (β = 0.0549), and stomachache pain (β = 0.0577) were positively associated with worse cancer pain. Notably, year of enrollment was not statistically associated with pain. Findings identified being Hispanic and having previous severe toothache, stomachache, and headache pain as significant predictors of worst pain intensity among patients with cancer. After controlling for selected covariates, we did not note statistical differences in worst pain during a 25-year period. Therefore,studies focused on improving the management of pain among patients with cancer should target interventions for those with Hispanic heritage and those with past history of severe common pain.

Multidimensional Pain Characteristics in Older Adults with Chronic Venous Leg Ulcers

Objective: Pain affects wound healing, treatment, and quality of life because it has significant impacts on physical, psychological, and social well-being. Despite the fact that more than half of chronic venous leg ulcer (CVLU) patients experience mild-to-moderate pain, the multidimensional characteristics of CVLU pain are not well documented. The objective of this study was to describe the multidimensional pain characteristics, including the sensory, affective, cognitive, and behavioral dimensions, of CVLU before debridement. Approach: Participants (N = 40) were recruited from a wound clinic. We conducted a descriptive analysis of clinical data, including pain, wound, and demographic characteristics, collected at the first visit. Results: The mean age of participants was 70.8 ± 9.1 years, 22 (55%) participants were female, and 35 (87.5%) were white. Participants reported mean current pain intensity (2.9 ± 2.7), least (1.2 ± 2.2) and worst (4.8 ± 3.4) pain intensity in 24 h, and tolerable pain level (4.9 ± 2.64) on a 0-10 scale. They described pain as periodic (66.7%, n = 26) with multiple pain quality descriptors (5.4 ± 2.9). Their past pain treatments provided some pain relief (65%, n = 25). For 68% (n = 27), their pain was the same as they expected. Nearly all had a tendency not to tell others about their pain (95%, n = 38). Innovation: This study is the first to describe the multidimensional pain characteristics of patients with CVLU as measured with PAINReportIt. Conclusion: Patients with CVLU reported willingness to tolerate a relatively high level of pain and experience the level of pain they anticipate. Multidimensional pain assessment will assist clinicians to select individualized therapies to manage pain and improve quality of life for these patients.

S100B single nucleotide polymorphisms exhibit sex-specific associations with chronic pain in sickle cell disease in a largely African-American cohort

BACKGROUND

Pain in sickle cell disease (SCD) is severe and multifaceted resulting in significant differences in its frequency and intensity among individuals. In this study, we examined the influence of S100B gene single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) on acute and chronic pain variability in SCD.

METHODS

Composite pain index (CPI) scores captured chronic pain. Painful crisis related emergency care utilization recorded acute pain incidence. Genotyping was performed using MassARRAY iPLEX platform.

RESULTS

Regression analysis revealed associations of increased CPI with rs9722 A allele in additive (p = 0.005) and dominant (p = 0.005) models. Rs1051169 G allele on the other hand was associated with decreased CPI in additive (p = 0.001), and dominant (p = 0.005) models. Sex-specific analysis found that these associations were significant in females but not males in this cohort. Linkage analysis identified two haploblocks. Block 1 (rs9983698-rs9722) haplotype T-A was associated with increased CPI (p = 0.002) while block 2 (rs1051169-rs11911834) haplotype G-G was associated with decreased CPI (p = 0.001). Both haplotypic associations were only significant in females. No association of S100B SNPs with utilization reached statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

S100B SNPs and haplotypes are associated with chronic pain in female, but not male, patients with SCD, implicating a potential role of S100B polymorphism in SCD pain heterogeneity in a sex-dependent manner.

Thermal and mechanical quantitative sensory testing values among healthy African American adults

PURPOSE

Only a few studies have reported quantitative sensory testing (QST) reference values for healthy African Americans, and those studies are limited in sample size and age of participants. The study purpose was to characterize QST values in healthy, pain-free African American adults and older adults whose prior pain experiences and psychological status were also measured. We examined the QST values for differences by sex, age, and body test site.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A cross-sectional sample of 124 pain-free African American adults (age 18-69 years, 49% female) completed demographic and self-reported pain, fatigue and psychosocial measures. QST was performed to obtain thermal and mechanical responses and associated pain intensity levels.

RESULTS

We found thermal detection values at the anterior forearm were (29.2 °C±1.6) for cool detection (CD) and (34.5 °C±1.2) for warm detection (WD). At that site the sample had cold pain threshold (CPTh) (26.3 °C±5.0), heat pain threshold (HPTh) (37.8 °C±3.6), and mechanical pain thresholds (MPTH) (16.7±22.2 grams of force, gF). There was a significant between sex difference for WD, with women being more sensitive (q=0.027). Lower body sites were less sensitive than upper body sites across all thermal modalities (q<0.003), but not for the mechanical modality.

CONCLUSION

The QST values from this protocol at the anterior forearm indicate that the healthy African American adults had average thermal pain thresholds close to the temperature of adaptation and average MPTh under 20 gF. Differences in responses to thermal and mechanical stimuli for upper verses lower body were consistent with prior research.

Assessing cancer pain-the first step toward improving patients' quality of life

PURPOSE

Numerous studies on cancer patients have shown that cancer pain still remains underestimated, poorly assessed, and under-treated. Pain relief should be considered as early as possible within personalized care and as an integral part of quality healthcare in many countries. Nevertheless, personalized care is still insufficiently taken into consideration, partly due to improper or incomplete assessment of cancer pain. The objective of this article is to propose a practical approach to this complex assessment, as the first step to improving patients' quality of life.

METHODS

Critical reflection based on literature analysis and clinical practice.

RESULTS

Assessment of cancer pain means evaluating the pain intensity over time, the dimensions of pain (sensory-discriminative, cognitive, emotional, and behavioral), the pathophysiological nature of pain (neuropathic, nociceptive, and nociplastic), the etiology, and the patient's perception (diffuse, localized, global). Cancer patients may have simple or multiple forms of pain (mixed, overlapped, combined, and associated). Furthermore, with the use of new specific therapies, the symptomatology of pain is also changing, and certain cancers are becoming chronic. Thus, cancer pain is an archetype of multimorphic pain, and its dynamic assessments (regular and repeated) require a multimodal and targeted approach in order to offer personalized pain management. Multimodal pain treatment must be adapted to the elements that disrupt cancer pain, to the patient's cancer and to the specific treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

The dynamic assessments of pain demand the simplest, and the most complete possible procedure, to avoid feasibility problems or self-/hetero-assessment excesses that might lead to less precise and less reliable results. Multimodal and interdisciplinary approaches are being developed, making it possible to optimize cancer pain management.

Sensory pain characteristics of vulvodynia and their association with nociceptive and neuropathic pain: an online survey pilot study

Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text.

Objectives:

To evaluate self-reported sensory pain scores of women with generalized vulvodynia (GV) and provoked vestibulodynia (PVD), characterize pain phenotypes, and assess feasibility of using the Internet for recruitment and data collection among women with vulvodynia.

Methods:

Descriptive online survey. Data collected using an online survey accessed via a link on the National Vulvodynia Association web site. Convenience sample, 60 women aged 18 to 45 years (mean = 32.7 ± 5.5); 50 white, 2 black/African American, 4 Hispanic/Latino, and 4 Native American/Alaskan Native, diagnosed with vulvodynia, not in menopause. Pain assessment and medication modules from PAINReportlt.

Results:

Women with GV (n = 35) compared to PVD (n = 25). Estimated mean pain sites (2.5 ± 1.4 vs 2.2 ± 1.0, P = 0.31), mean current pain (8.7 ± 1.4 vs 5.5 ± 4.0, P = 0.0008), worst pain (8.1 ± 1.8 vs 6.1 ± 3.6, P = 0.02), and least pain in the past 24 hours (4.4 ± 1.8 vs 2.0 ± 2.0, P < 0.0001). Average pain intensity (7.1 ± 1.2 vs 4.6 ± 2.9, P = 0.0003) on a scale of 0 to 10, mean number of neuropathic words (8.3 ± 3.6 vs 7.7 ± 5.0), and mean number of nociceptive words (6.9 ± 4 vs 7.5 ± 4.4). Nineteen (54%) women with GV compared to 9 (38%) with PVD were not satisfied with pain levels.

Conclusion:

Women with GV reported severe pain, whereas those with PVD reported moderate to severe pain. Pain quality descriptors may aid a clinician's decisions about whether to prescribe adjuvant drugs vs opioids to women with vulvodynia.

Glucocorticoid receptor single nucleotide polymorphisms are associated with acute crisis pain in sickle cell disease

AIM

Pain in sickle cell disease patients is heterogeneous and genetic polymorphisms may predispose an individual to varied vulnerability to painful events. We studied the association of SNPs in the glucocorticoid receptor gene (NR3C1) with pain in sickle cell disease.

METHOD

Acute pain was scored as the number of utilizations due to crisis pain in a 12-month period. Chronic pain was calculated as the Composite Pain Index score.

RESULTS & CONCLUSION

rs33389 T allele (IRR = 1.53, p = 0.014 additive; IRR = 1.64, p = 0.011 recessive), rs2963155 G allele (IRR = 1.80, p < 0.001 additive; IRR = 2.25, p = 0.021 dominant; IRR = 2.07, p < 0.001 recessive) and rs9324918 C allele (IRR = 1.43, p = 0.021 additive) were associated with higher utilization rates, indicating the potential contribution of NR3C1 polymorphisms to acute pain heterogeneity in sickle cell disease.

Transient receptor potential polymorphism and haplotype associate with crisis pain in sickle cell disease

AIM

Episodes of acute pain crisis contribute to considerable morbidity and mortality in sickle cell disease (SCD). Incomprehensive understanding of the underlying pain heterogeneity results in inadequate pain management. The transient receptor potential (TRP) family of voltage-gated ion channels acts as sensory transducers of diverse noxious stimuli. We performed an association study of polymorphisms in candidate genes TRPV1 and TRPA1 with pain in SCD patients.

METHODS

Utilization rate, in other words, number of emergency department/acute care center admissions over 12 months as a result of pain crisis, served as a marker for acute pain.

RESULTS & CONCLUSION

We identified that rs920829 (incident rate ratio = 1.44, p = 0.027 additive; IRR=1.68, p=0.008 recessive models of negative binomial regression) and the CGAGG haplotype of TRPA1 (odds ratio = 0.218, p = 0.009) were significantly associated with utilization rate, suggesting that TRPA1 gene polymorphisms may influence acute pain crisis in SCD.

Differences in Sensory Pain, Expectation, and Satisfaction Reported by Outpatients with Cancer or Sickle Cell Disease

BACKGROUND

Patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) report pain scores that appear greater than those reported in a meta-analysis for patients with cancer, but statistical comparisons of the pain scores from both populations have not been published.

AIMS

The goal of the study described here was to compare pain outcomes reported by outpatients with cancer or SCD.

DESIGN

Descriptive comparative study.

SETTING

Outpatient oncology or sickle cell clinics.

SUBJECTS

The participants were outpatients (N = 415) from three studies: (1) 106 patients with SCD, 93% African-American (referent group); (2) 140 patients with cancer, 90% Caucasian (race discordant); (3) 169 patients with cancer, 20% Caucasian, 65% African-American (race concordant).

METHODS

Patients completed the PAINReportIt including pain location, quality, pattern, intensity, expectation, satisfaction, and demographic questions. Analyses included the χ² test, analysis of variance, and regression.

RESULTS

Outpatients with SCD reported more pain location sites than the race-discordant (p < .001) and race-concordant (p < .001) cancer groups; higher pain quality than the race-discordant (p < .001) and race-concordant (p < .001) groups; and greater pain pattern scores than the race-discordant (p < .001) and race-concordant (p < .001) groups. The race-concordant group reported higher worst pain intensity than the SCD (p < .001) and race-discordant (p = .002) groups. The three groups did not differ significantly on pain expectation (p = .06). Regarding satisfaction with pain level, there was a significant difference between the race-concordant and SCD (p = .006) groups, but not between the race-discordant and SCD (p = .12) groups or between the race-discordant and race-concordant (p = .49) groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Outpatients with SCD reported three of four sensory pain parameters that were greater than those reported by outpatients with cancer. A better understanding of these differences is pertinent to improving pain outcomes.

IL1A rs1800587 associates with chronic noncrisis pain in sickle cell disease

AIM

Pain is prevalent in sickle cell disease (SCD) patients who display great heterogeneity in pain severity and frequency. Hypothesizing that inflammatory factors are involved in the pathogenesis of SCD pain, we focused on the IL1A C/T polymorphism rs1800587 that is an SNP located in a cis-transcriptional regulatory region.

METHODS

We genotyped IL1A rs1800587 and performed association studies with phenotype data obtained by a multidimensional pain assessment tool using the PAINReportIt^® Questionnaire.

RESULTS

Each T allele was associated with a 3.9 increase in composite pain index score (p = 0.04) as determined by multiple linear regression.

CONCLUSION

IL1A rs1800587 may influence chronic pain in SCD.

Dopamine D3 receptor Ser9Gly and catechol-o-methyltransferase Val158Met polymorphisms and acute pain in sickle cell disease

BACKGROUND

Pain in sickle cell disease (SCD) is characterized by episodes of acute pain, primarily responsible for acute health care utilization, and persistent chronic pain. Pain severity and frequency vary significantly among patients with SCD. In this study, we investigated the possible contribution of monoamine gene polymorphisms to pain variation.

METHODS

Adult subjects with SCD completed PAINReportIt, a computerized McGill Pain Questionnaire, from which we calculated the Composite Pain Index. Utilization data were obtained from the medical record and biweekly telephone calls for 12 months. Utilization is defined as admissions to the emergency department and/or the acute care center resulting from a sickle cell pain crisis. We performed genotyping for catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) Val158Met (rs4680) and dopamine D3 receptor (DRD3) Ser9Gly (rs6280) polymorphisms, which were analyzed for associations with pain phenotypes.

RESULTS

Binary logistic models revealed that DRD3 Ser9Gly heterozygote patients were more likely not to have an acute pain crisis (odds ratio [OR] [95% confidence interval {CI}], 4.37 [1.39-22.89]; P = 0.020), which remained so when demographic variables were considered (OR [95% CI], 4.53 [1.41-28.58]; P = 0.016). COMT Val158Met Met allele showed lower probability for zero utilization (OR [95% CI], 0.32 [0.12-0.83]; P = 0.020) than the Val allele. In the negative binomial regression analysis, subjects with COMT Met/Met genotype had utilization incident rate ratio (95% CI) of 2.20 (1.21-3.99) over those with Val/Val (P = 0.010).

CONCLUSIONS

These exploratory findings suggest that DRD3 Ser9Gly and COMT Val158Met may contribute to pain heterogeneity in SCD, as suggested by the different rates of acute pain crisis. Specifically, SCD patients with the DRD3 homozygote genotypes, COMT 158 Met allele or Met/Met genotype, are more likely to have acute care utilization, an indicator of acute pain. These results, however, will need to be further examined in future large prospective studies.

Satisfied or not satisfied: pain experiences of patients with sickle cell disease

AIMS

To examine the relationship between pain and satisfaction in patients with sickle cell disease.

BACKGROUND

Frequency and severity of unrelieved sickle cell pain are positively associated with mortality. Yet, information is scarce on whether sickle cell patients are satisfied with their pain level.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional, correlational analysis of baseline data from a randomized clinical trial.

METHODS

A randomized sample of adult outpatients was recruited between February 2007-March 2011. Patients completed the PAINReportIt(®) , containing measures of pain, satisfaction and socio-demographics. We analysed data using Kendall's rank correlations, analysis of variance, Tukey-Kramer post hoc tests, Fisher's tests and proportional odds logistic regression.

RESULTS

There were statistically significant correlations between pain outcomes and satisfaction with pain level, but average pain intensity more strongly discriminated groups based on satisfaction with pain level. Among pain variables bivariately associated with patient satisfaction with pain level, only pain expectation maintained its significant relationship with satisfaction with pain level when average pain intensity was controlled. A smaller percentage of our sickle cell patients reported moderate to severe pain intensity (28%) or high composite pain index (39%), while reporting being satisfied with pain their level than reported in earlier studies using different measures and populations (70-94%).

CONCLUSION

Satisfaction with pain level was an unambiguous measure of patient satisfaction and a promising indicator of pain that did not show the paradoxical relationship between satisfaction and pain seen with past measures.

Composite Pain Index: Reliability, Validity, and Sensitivity of a Patient-Reported Outcome for Research

OBJECTIVE

A single score that represents the multidimensionality of pain would be an innovation for patient-reported outcomes. Our aim was to determine the reliability, validity, and sensitivity of the Composite Pain Index (CPI).

DESIGN

Methodological analysis of data from a randomized controlled, pretest/post-test education-based intervention study.

SETTING

The study was conducted in outpatient oncology clinics.

SUBJECTS

The 176 subjects had pain, were 52 ± 12.5 years on average, 63% were female, and 46% had stage IV cancers.

METHODS

We generated the CPI from pain location, intensity, quality, and pattern scores measured with an electronic version of Melzack's McGill Pain Questionnaire.

RESULTS

The internal consistency values for the individual scores comprising the CPI were adequate (0.71 baseline, 0.69 post-test). Principal components analysis extracted one factor with an eigenvalue of 2.17 with explained variance of 54% at baseline and replicated the one factor with an eigenvalue of 2.11 at post-test. The factor loadings for location, intensity, quality, and pattern were 0.65, 0.71, 0.85, and 0.71, respectively (baseline), and 0.59, 0.81, 0.84, and 0.63, respectively (post-test). The CPI was sensitive to an education intervention effect.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings support the CPI as a score that integrates the multidimensional pain experience in people with cancer. It could be used as a patient-reported outcome measure to quantify the complexity of pain in clinical research and population studies of cancer pain and studied for relevance in other pain populations.

Pain: a descriptive study in patients with cancer

Ninety percent of patients with advanced cancer are reported to experience pain at some time during the course of their illness. This pain usually is improperly evaluated because it varies by patient and is difficult to control. Pain often cannot be conceptualized because of the individual nature of patient experience; however, patterns of pain occur in those suffering from similar conditions. This secondary analysis was conducted to examine the characteristics of pain in individuals with advanced cancer. The sample consisted of 717 patients with cancer who were receiving hospice home care in the southeastern United States. An understanding of the total pain experience, including type of pain and pain location, is important for addressing pain in patients with cancer in hospice care. More effective strategies are needed for pain management in this patient population. In addition, steps need to be taken to ensure that hospice care is understood by and made available to minorities.

Breast Cancer EDGE Task Force Outcomes: Clinical Measures of Pain

BACKGROUND

Pain is one of the most commonly reported impairments after breast cancer treatment affecting anywhere from 16-73% of breast cancer survivors Despite the high reported incidence of pain from cancer and its treatments, the ability to evaluate cancer pain continues to be difficult due to the complexity of the disease and the subjective experience of pain. The Oncology Section Breast Cancer EDGE Task Force was created to evaluate the evidence behind clinical outcome measures of pain in women diagnosed with breast cancer.

METHODS

The authors systematically reviewed the literature for pain outcome measures published in the research involving women diagnosed with breast cancer. The goal was to examine the reported psychometric properties that are reported in the literature in order to determine clinical utility.

RESULTS

Visual Analog Scale, Numeric Rating Scale, Pressure Pain Threshold, McGill Pain Questionnaire, McGill Pain Questionnaire - Short Form, Brief Pain Inventory and Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form were highly recommended by the Task Force. The Task Force was unable to recommend two measures for use in the breast cancer population at the present time.

CONCLUSIONS

A variety of outcome measures were used to measure pain in women diagnosed with breast cancer. When assessing pain in women with breast cancer, researchers and clinicians need to determine whether a unidimensional or multidimensional tool is most appropriate as well as whether the tool has strong psychometric properties.