Time to Reflect and Take Action on Health Disparities and Health Inequities

Telemedicine and public health–pearls and pitfalls

We hereby comment on the interesting systematic review by Grewal et al where they have provided an overall picture of the current status of available tele-health programs in the United States with emphasis on the Amazon Clinic. Their analysis is an appreciable effort in discovering the features available and features lacking in these tele-health programs. The concept of tele-health originated to curtail the need for physical attendance of patients at health clinics, and has been beneficial during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. We implore that the pearls and pitfalls of these programs have to be understood by policymakers prior to forming a consensus regarding the availability, accessibility and affordability of these programs as methods of healthcare delivery. Unrestricted proliferation of tele-health programs in their current form may pose threats to patient and provider safety and medicolegal liability. However, patients and providers must work together to improve them to meet their expectations and enable them to provide the best care for the ailing public.

Neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage predicts extended length of stay and nonhome discharge but not readmissions or reoperations after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Socioeconomic disadvantage has been associated with worse outcomes across various surgical disciplines. However, the impact of neighborhood-level disadvantage on outcomes after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) remains poorly studied.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the association of neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage, as measured by Area Deprivation Index (ADI), with patient demographics, lengths of stay, discharge dispositions, and 90-day reoperation and readmission rates following ACDF.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Prospective cohort study of consecutive patients undergoing primary ACDF at a tertiary academic medical center from October 2018 to October 2020.

PATIENT SAMPLE

About 395 patients with primary ACDF were included. Patients were assigned ADI scores based on home zip codes and categorized into quartiles: low (≤25), mild (26-50), moderate (51-75), and severe (76-100) disadvantage.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Length of stay >3 days, nonhome discharge, 90-day readmissions, and 90-day reoperations. Demographics, comorbidities, and procedural details were also collected.

METHODS

Univariate and multivariate analyses compared outcomes across ADI quartiles. Multivariate logistic regression evaluated the impact of ADI on outcomes while controlling for other factors.

RESULTS

Compared to the low deprivation group, patients with severe deprivation were younger, more likely to be black, unmarried, uninsured, and current smokers (all p<.001). Higher ADI quartile independently predicted extended length of stay (OR 2.09, 95% CI 1.34-3.41, p<.001) and nonhome discharge (OR 1.83, 95% CI 1.17-3.01, p=.011). No significant differences were found in 90-day readmissions or reoperations based on ADI.

CONCLUSIONS

Greater neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage is independently associated with prolonged hospitalization and lower likelihood of home discharge after ACDF. These findings highlight the importance of considering social determinants of health in risk stratification and care optimization for patients undergoing spine surgery.

Evaluating the Reliability and Robustness of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities in Cardiometabolic Disease in NHANES, NHIS, and BRFSS (2015-2021)

BACKGROUND

The United States uses the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), and National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey to monitor disease trends and inform clinical care/prevention research. These 3 surveys share similar national estimates. However, the consistency of each survey's estimates by race has not been examined. Here, we compare prevalence estimates and disparities in cardiometabolic diseases across 5 aggregated racial and ethnic groups.

METHODS

We examined the age- and fully-adjusted prevalence of cardiovascular disease and diabetes among non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic, non-Hispanic Asian, and "Other" race respondents aged 30 years or older. Cardiovascular disease included self-reported physician diagnosis of heart attack, stroke, and coronary heart disease.

RESULTS

Although overall national population estimates were similar, there was heterogeneity in estimates by survey. For heart attack and diabetes, each racial group had a higher prevalence in BRFSS than NHIS (eg, Heart Attack: Hispanic BRFSS: 3.4% [95% CI, 3.2-3.6], NHIS: 2.0% [95% CI, 1.8, 2.2]; non-Hispanic Black BRFSS: 3.8% [95% CI, 3.6, 3.9]; NHIS: 3.0% [95% CI, 2.7, 3.2]). Non-Hispanic Asian people had the lowest general cardiovascular disease prevalence across all 3 data sets (NHIS: 5.9%, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey: 5.3%, BRFSS: 6.9%), while Other/multi-racial respondents had the highest prevalence (NHIS: 9.9%, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey: 13.1%, BRFSS: 10.7%). However, the magnitude of these differences across data sets was small.

CONCLUSIONS

Prevalence estimates for heart attack and diabetes were heterogeneous by race across surveys. These results highlight the importance of improving the representation of racially minoritized groups within national surveys to produce more precise estimates.

Ask, Acknowledge, Ascend: Addressing Mistrust as a Strategy to Address Disparities in Orthopaedic Ambulatory Care

Advances in minimally invasive surgical techniques, robotics, anesthesia techniques, and recovery protocols have been instrumental in shifting orthopaedic surgical care from the hospital-based operating room to ambulatory surgical centers. Outpatient surgical services are thought to offer a lower-cost model of care, reduced out-of-pocket expenses, more predictable scheduling, faster recovery times, convenience, and lower risk of nosocomial infections. With these known advantages, it is critical to examine whether this safer environment is accessible to all. Racial/ethnic and gender disparities have been well-documented in the inpatient orthopaedic environment and concern has been raised that the shift toward outpatient surgery could widen disparities and access to care. This article describes ongoing disparities in ambulatory orthopaedic surgery for racialized minorities, women, and people with obesity. Having experienced these disparities, many lack trust in health care providers and the health system. Approaches for addressing this mistrust to create meaningful patient-centered care are described.

Equity in Digital Mental Health Interventions in the United States: Where to Next?

Health care technologies have the ability to bridge or hinder equitable care. Advocates of digital mental health interventions (DMHIs) report that such technologies are poised to reduce the documented gross health care inequities that have plagued generations of people seeking care in the United States. This is due to a multitude of factors such as their potential to revolutionize access; mitigate logistical barriers to in-person mental health care; and leverage patient inputs to formulate tailored, responsive, and personalized experiences. Although we agree with the potential of DMHIs to advance health equity, we articulate several steps essential to mobilize and sustain meaningful forward progression in this endeavor, reflecting on decades of research and learnings drawn from multiple fields of expertise and real-world experience. First, DMHI manufacturers must build diversity, equity, inclusion, and belonging (DEIB) processes into the full spectrum of product evolution itself (eg, product design, evidence generation) as well as into the fabric of internal company practices (eg, talent recruitment, communication principles, and advisory boards). Second, awareness of the DEIB efforts-or lack thereof-in DMHI research trials is needed to refine and optimize future study design for inclusivity as well as proactively address potential barriers to doing so. Trials should incorporate thoughtful, inclusive, and creative approaches to recruitment, enrollment, and measurement of social determinants of health and self-identity, as well as a prioritization of planned and exploratory analyses examining outcomes across various groups of people. Third, mental health care advocacy, research funding policies, and local and federal legislation can advance these pursuits, with directives from the US Preventive Services Taskforce, National Institutes of Health, and Food and Drug Administration applied as poignant examples. For products with artificial intelligence/machine learning, maintaining a "human in the loop" as well as prespecified and adaptive analytic frameworks to monitor and remediate potential algorithmic bias can reduce the risk of increasing inequity. Last, but certainly not least, is a call for partnership and transparency within and across ecosystems (academic, industry, payer, provider, regulatory agencies, and value-based care organizations) to reliably build health equity into real-world DMHI product deployments and evidence-generation strategies. All these considerations should also extend into the context of an equity-informed commercial strategy for DMHI manufacturers and health care organizations alike. The potential to advance health equity in innovation with DMHI is apparent. We advocate the field's thoughtful and evergreen advancement in inclusivity, thereby redefining the mental health care experience for this generation and those to come.

A Patient-Centered Conceptual Model of AYA Cancer Survivorship Care Informed by a Qualitative Interview Study

Purpose: Conceptual models provide frameworks to illustrate relationships among patient-, provider-, system-, and community-level factors that inform care delivery and research. Existing models of cancer survivorship care focus largely on pediatric or adult populations whose needs differ from adolescents and young adults (AYAs). We developed a patient-centered conceptual model of AYA survivorship care. Methods: We conducted a narrative literature review of current conceptual and theoretical models of care. We engaged AYA cancer survivors (n = 25) in semi-structured one-hour telephone interviews. Most participants were in their 20s and 30s, and the majority (84%) were women. Recruitment was stratified by age and time since cancer diagnosis. We conducted a thematic analysis of interview transcripts to identify themes that exemplified patient-centered care. Results: Most participants identified as white and female. Leukemia and breast cancer were the most common cancer types. Main themes included the need for (1) care coordination, (2) ongoing mental health support, (3) connection to AYA peer support, (4) support during fertility preservation efforts, (5) support with financial burden, (6) support for quality of life, (7) information about and support with side effects and late effects, and (8) attention to the unique needs of young adults. Conclusions: We present a patient-centered conceptual model of AYA survivorship care needs that can inform future cancer care delivery and research.

Nurses' perception about their role in reducing health inequalities in community contexts

OBJECTIVE

to understand nurses' perception about their role in reducing health inequalities in community contexts.

METHOD

a qualitative study with a phenomenological approach addressed from Heidegger's Interpretive Theory and the health inequality settings. A total of 18 in-depth interviews were conducted with nurses working in health institutions devoted to community interventions. The following five-phase process was adopted for the qualitative data analysis: Accumulation; Disassembling; Reassembling; Interpretation; and Conclusion.

RESULTS

four main topics that nurses mobilize to mitigate health inequalities in community settings were identified, namely: Competences to create, operationalize, monitor and assess health policies; Leadership and management for health and care processes at the individual and collective levels; Professionals that devise care strategies; and Care approach based on characteristics of the territory.

CONCLUSION

nurses perceive that their role contributes significantly to reducing health inequalities in community settings based on the creation, operationalization, monitoring and assessment of health policies. From the sociocultural, economic and political characteristics of the territory, they prioritize actions in disadvantaged human groups in order to improve access, opportunities, continuity and quality in health.

How do we treat our male and female patients? - A primer on gender-based health care inequities

Health is a fundamental human right, yet disparities in healthcare, based on gender, persist for women. These inequities stem from a patriarchal society that has regarded men as the default standard, leading to women being treated merely as smaller men. Contributing to these disparities are the gender stereotypes that pervade our society. Women possess differences in anatomy, physiology, psychology and social experience than men. To achieve health equity, it is vital to understand and be open to consider and evaluate these aspects in each individual patient. This requires an understanding of our own biases and a commitment to valuing diversity in both patient and caregiver. Improving equity and diversity throughout all aspects of the medical system will be necessary to provide optimal patient care for all.

Preventing Health Disparities during COVID through Perinatal Home Screening as Black Authoritative Knowledge

During COVID-19 epidemic, health protocols limited face-to-face perinatal visits and increased reliance on telehealth. To prevent increased health disparities among BIPOC pregnant patients in health-underserved areas, we used a pre-post survey design to pilot a study assessing (1) feasibility of transferring technology including a blood pressure (BP) cuff (BPC) and a home screening tool, (2) providers' and patients' acceptance and use of technology, and (3) benefits and challenges of using the technology. Specific objectives included (1) increasing contact points between patients and perinatal providers; (2) decreasing barriers to reporting and treating maternal hypertension, stress/depression, and intimate partner violence (IPV)/domestic violence (DV); and (3) bundling to normalize and facilitate mental, emotional, and social health monitoring alongside BP screening. Findings confirm this model is feasible. Patients and providers used this bundling model to improve antenatal screening under COVID quarantine restrictions. More broadly, home-monitoring improved antenatal telehealth communication, provider diagnostics, referral and treatment, and bolstered patient autonomy through authoritative knowledge. Implementation challenges included provider resistance, disagreement with lower than ACOG BP values to initiate clinical contact and fear of service over-utilization, and patient and provider confusion about tool symbols due to limited training. We hypothesize that routinized pathologization and projection of crisis onto BIPOC people, bodies, and communities, especially around reproduction and continuity, may contribute to persistent racial/ethnic health disparities. Further research is needed to examine whether authoritative knowledge increases use of critical and timely perinatal services by strengthening embodied knowledge of marginalized patients and, thus, their autonomy and self-efficacy to enact self-care and self-advocacy.

Gender equality challenges in orthopaedic surgery: a systematic review

PURPOSE

Several studies have examined gender-equality challenges and ways to improve women's representation and management. Orthopaedic surgeons and patients are less gender equitable than them of other surgical disciplines. This systematic review summarizes these findings and highlights orthopaedic surgery gender inequality.

METHODS

Search of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases was carried out to extract human studies investigating the gender gap in orthopaedics, trying to highlight the equality challenges orthopaedic surgery faces. Studies incorporating patients with comorbidities in which gender is a proven risk factor, and pregnant women were excluded.

RESULTS

This systematic review included 59 studies involving 692,435 people (mean females/males ratio: 4.44), spanning the years 1987-2023. Regarding the targeted population, 35 (59.32%) studies focused on patients, while 24 (40.68%) on physicians. Orthopaedic surgery is described as an unfriendly career field for women as surgeons or sports leading physicians while women are generally under represented in the academic field of orthopaedics. Regarding patients, female gender consists both a risk and prognostic factor influencing the prevalence of degenerative disease and the outcome of the operative treatment in reconstructive orthopaedics. Female gender is a risk factor for multiple sports injuries and influences the pathogenetic mechanisms resulting in ACL reconstruction. Regarding spine surgery, women are less likely to have surgery suggested, and such suggestion underlines severe disease's progression.

CONCLUSIONS

Gender differences affect orthopaedic patient-physician-healthcare system interactions. Recognizing biases and their patterns is useful to improve the actual situation. By preventing those an unbiased, tolerant, and egalitarian workplace for physicians and a healthcare system that provides the best treatment to patients could be created.

Health equity: A concept analysis

BACKGROUND

Although health equity is critically important for healthcare delivery, there are inconsistencies in its definitions or lack of definitions.

PURPOSE

Develop a comprehensive understanding of health equity to guide nursing practice and healthcare policy.

METHOD

Walker and Avant's concept analysis method was used to establish defining attributes, antecedents, consequences, and empirical referents of health equity.

FINDINGS

Health equity defining attributes are grounded in ethical principles, the absence of unfair and avoidable differences, and fair and just opportunities to attain a person's full health potential. Health equity antecedents are categorized into environmental; financial or economic; law, politics, and policy; societal and structural; research; and digital and technology.

DISCUSSION

Health equity's antecedents are useful to distinguish health disparities from health outcomes resulting from individual preferences. To achieve health equity, organizations need to focus on addressing the antecedents.

Teleoncology: Novel Approaches for Improving Cancer Care in North America

Due to widespread healthcare workforce shortages, many patients living in remote and rural North America currently have reduced access to various medical specialists. These shortages, coupled with the aging North American population, highlight the need to transform contemporary healthcare delivery systems. The exchange of medical information via telecommunication technology, known as telemedicine, offers promising solutions to address the medical needs of an aging population and the increased demand for specialty medical services. This progressive movement has also improved access to quality health care by mitigating the current shortage of trained subspecialists. Minimizing the effects of these shortages is particularly urgent in the care of cancer patients, many of whom require regular follow-up and close monitoring. Cancer patients living in remote areas of North America have reduced access to specialized care and, thus, have unacceptably high mortality and morbidity rates. Teleoncology, or the use of telemedicine to provide oncology services remotely, has the ability to improve access to high-quality care and assist in alleviating the burden of some of the severe adverse events associated with cancer. In this review, the authors describe how recent advances in teleoncology can reduce healthcare disparities and improve future cancer care in North America.

Pharmacogenomics and health disparities, are we helping?

Pharmacogenomics has been at the forefront of precision medicine during the last few decades. Precision medicine carries the potential of improving health outcomes at both the individual as well as population levels. To harness the benefits of its initiatives, careful dissection of existing health disparities as they relate to precision medicine is of paramount importance. Attempting to address the existing disparities at the early stages of design and implementation of these efforts is the only guarantee of a successful just outcome. In this review, we glance at a few determinants of existing health disparities as they intersect with pharmacogenomics research and implementation. In our opinion, highlighting these disparities is imperative for the purpose of researching meaningful solutions. Failing to identify, and hence address, these disparities in the context of the current and future precision medicine initiatives would leave an already strained health system, even more inundated with inequality.