Surgical timing for open fractures: Middle of the night or the light of day, which fractures, what time?

Association of sociodemographic characteristics with the timeliness of surgery for patients with open tibial fractures

BACKGROUND

The American College of Surgeons recommends operative debridement of open tibial fractures within 24 h of presentation. It is unknown what the compliance rates are with this recommendation and what factors contribute to delays to operation.

METHODS

To determine the characteristics associated with delays to operation for open tibial fractures, we conducted a retrospective cohort study utilizing American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program data from 2017 to 2021. Individuals aged 18 and older presenting to a trauma center with an open tibial fracture were included. Associations were determined with a hierarchal regression model nesting patients within facilities.

RESULTS

Of the 24,102 patients presenting to 491 trauma centers, 66.3 % identified as White, 21.7 % as Black, 1.5 % as Asian, 1.1 % as American Indian, and 10.6 % as Other race. In total, 15.8 % identified as Hispanic. Patients were most often men (75.9 %) and privately insured (47.6 %). The median time to OR was 10.2 h (IQR 4.4-17.7) with 84.6 % receiving surgery within 24 h. In adjusted analyses, Black and American Indian patients had 5.5 % (CI 1.3 %-9.9 %) and 17.8 % (CI 2.2 %-35.8 %) longer wait times, respectively, and a decreased odds of receiving surgery within 24 h (AOR 0.85, CI 0.8-0.9; AOR 0.69, CI 0.5-0.9) when compared to White patients. Female patients had 6.5 % (CI 3.0 %-10.2 %) longer wait times than men. Patients with Medicaid had 5.5 % (CI 1.2 %-9.9 %) longer wait times than those with private insurance. Greater time to OR was associated with increasing age (p < 0.001), increasing injury severity (p < 0.001), and the presence of altered mentation (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

We identified longer wait times to operative irrigation and debridement of open tibial fractures for Black and American Indian patients, women, and those with Medicaid. The implementation of health equity focused quality metrics may be necessary to achieve equity in trauma care.

Impact of Surgical Timing on Fracture Healing in Tibial Shaft Injuries: A Comparative Review of Intramedullary Nailing Techniques

Tibial shaft fractures are a prevalent and challenging orthopedic injury, often resulting from high-energy trauma. Optimal management of these fractures is crucial to prevent complications such as nonunion, malunion, and prolonged functional impairment. Intramedullary nailing (IMN) is widely regarded as the gold standard for treating these injuries due to its ability to provide stable fixation, preserve soft tissues, and enable early mobilization. However, the timing of surgical intervention remains a topic of ongoing debate. Early surgical intervention, defined as surgery within 24-48 hours of injury, is advocated for its potential to reduce hospital stay, facilitate early mobilization, and decrease the risk of secondary complications such as compartment syndrome. Conversely, delayed intervention allows for patient stabilization and reduction of soft tissue swelling, potentially lowering the risk of infection and other complications. This comprehensive review aims to evaluate the impact of surgical timing on fracture healing outcomes in tibial shaft fractures treated with IMN. It explores the benefits and limitations of early versus delayed surgery, emphasizing their influence on union rates, healing time, and complication rates. Furthermore, the review examines different IMN techniques, including reamed versus unreamed and static versus dynamic nailing, to determine their role in optimizing fracture healing. By synthesizing current evidence, this review provides critical insights into the optimal timing and technique for IMN in tibial shaft fractures, ultimately aiming to guide clinical decision-making and improve patient outcomes. Future research should focus on randomized controlled trials to establish standardized surgical timing and technique selection guidelines in this patient population.

Comparison of Early Versus Late Debridement Outcomes in the Management of Open Distal Radius Fractures

PURPOSE

The optimal timing for surgical treatment of open distal radius fractures remains an area of debate. The purpose of this study was to examine the outcomes of open distal radius fractures treated surgically before or after 24 hours.

METHODS

A multicenter retrospective review was performed on all open distal radius fractures treated over 11 years. Patient demographics, injury mechanism, and initial treatment were recorded. Fracture severity was graded by the Gustilo-Anderson classification. Comparisons were made between those treated surgically within and after 24 hours. Outcomes examined included infection, revision surgery, osteomyelitis, and nonunion.

RESULTS

A total of 230 cases met the inclusion criteria. The cohorts of early and delayed surgical intervention were similar with regard to preoperative demographics. The most common mechanism of injury was motor vehicle accident. Approximately 40% of cases were graded as type I, 40% as type II, and 20% as type III. Mean time to debridement in the group treated after 24 hours was 5 days. A mean postoperative follow-up of greater than 6 months was obtained in both cohorts. Similar outcomes were found between cohorts with respect to postoperative infection, revision surgery, osteomyelitis, and nonunion.

CONCLUSIONS

Similar outcomes with regards to infection, revision, osteomyelitis, and nonunion were found between open distal radius fractures treated emergently versus those managed in a delayed fashion. Patient- and injury-specific factors are important in dictating care.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic IIB.

Prevention and treatment of osteomyelitis after open tibia fractures

Infection and chronic post-traumatic osteomyelitis of the tibia after open fracture are complex problems that cause significant morbidity and threaten the viability of a limb. Therefore, it is of utmost importance for the orthopaedic surgeon to understand both patient and treatment factors that modify the risk of developing these disastrous complications. Infection risk is largely based on severity of open injury in addition to inherent patient factors. Orthopaedic surgeons can work to mitigate this risk with prompt antibiotic administration, thorough and complete debridement, expedient fracture stabilization, and early wound closure. In the case osteomyelitis does occur, the surgeon should use a systematic multidisciplinary approach for eradication.

Impacts of COVID-19 pandemic on pediatric fractures: a 4-year evaluation of epidemiology and delayed treatment from prepandemic to pandemic period at a tertiary referral hospital

Background

Definitive fracture surgery should be performed as soon as the patient's condition allows. However, there may be some delays in the treatment during a pandemic.

Objective

This study aimed to investigate and compare the epidemiology and delays in pediatric fracture management during the pandemic and prepandemic periods in terms of how many cases were delayed, how long were the delays, and the causes for the delays of fracture treatment.

Methods

This comparative-retrospective study was conducted in a tertiary referral hospital in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. The authors included all patients who presented to the hospital from 1 December 2019 to 30 November 2021 (pandemic group period) and from 1 December 2017 to 30 November 2019 (prepandemic group period). The collected data included: patients' age and sex, fractured bone, fracture type, concurrent fracture, hospital stay duration, treatment, need for multidisciplinary treatment, interval from arrival to treatment, and reasons for delayed surgical treatment. The data were obtained from the patients' medical records.

Results

Results showed a decrease in the pediatric fracture cases during the 2 years pandemic period compared to the prepandemic period (75 vs. 135 cases). There was no significant difference in the evaluated parameters of demographic, fractured bone and type, hospital stay duration, treatment, other department involvement, and delayed surgical treatment for the fracture. The most common reason for the definitive surgical management delay was the need for medical condition improvements (n=63, 79.7%) and it was significantly associated with the need for multidisciplinary treatment approach (22.83 in isolated orthopedic cases vs. 87.5% in multidisciplinary cases; P=0.000).

Conclusion

There was a decrease in the pediatric fracture cases during the 2-year pandemic period compared to the prepandemic period. The delay in definitive surgical management was mainly due to the need for the medical condition improvements and it was associated with the need for a multidisciplinary treatment approach.

Predictive factors for fracture-related infection in open tibial fractures in a Sub-Saharan African setting

INTRODUCTION

The management of open tibial fractures (OTF) is challenging in low and middle-income countries (LMICs) where appropriate human resources and infrastructure (including equipment, implants and surgical supplies) are not readily available and medical care is not readily accessible. OTF are not rarely associated with a subsequent fracture-related infection (FRI), which is one of the most devastating and difficult to cure complications in orthopaedic trauma care. The aim of this study was to determine the rate and the predictive factors of FRI in OTF in a limited-resource setting of sub-Saharan Africa.

METHODS

Patients with OTF who underwent surgery from July 2015 to December 2020 and followed-up for at least 12 months in a tertiary care teaching hospital in Yaoundé (Cameroon) were retrospectively investigated. Diagnosis of FRI was based on the confirmatory criteria of the International FRI Consensus definition. All patients with bone infections, occurring at any time point during follow-up, were included. Logistic regression was used to determine the predictive factors for FRI.

RESULTS

One hundred and five patients with OTF were studied. With a mean follow-up period of 29.5 ± 16.6 months, 33 patients (31.4%) presented with FRI. Gustilo-Anderson type of OTF, compliance with antibiotics, blood transfusion, time to first washing of the wounds and method of bone fixation were factors associated with the occurrence of FRI. In multivariable logistic regression, 6-hours delay to first washing of the wounds (OR=8.07, 95% CI: 1.43-45.31, p = 0.01), and compliance with antibiotics (OR=11.33, 95%CI: 1.11-115.6, p = 0.04) were the only independent predictors of FRI.

CONCLUSION

The overall rate of FRI in open tibial fracture is still high in the sub-Saharan African context. For similar low-resources settings, this study supports the recommendations (1) to perform a very early washing-dressing-splinting of OTF on admission of the patient, (2) to administer antibiotics early, and (3) to perform surgery as soon as reasonably possible, once appropriate personnel, equipment, implants and surgical supplies are available.

Pediatric Medial Malleolus Reconstruction and Cartilage Preservation Using Iliac Crest Bone Graft After Ankle Trauma: A Case Report

CASE

This case report describes cartilage preservation and medial malleolus reconstruction using tricortical iliac crest autograft in a pediatric patient who sustained an ankle injury resulting in near-complete medial malleolus bone loss.

CONCLUSION

Medial malleolar bone loss precluding open reduction and internal fixation is a challenging surgical problem, and there are few studies describing treatment. Our case report adds to the literature because our described technique resulted in a successful outcome for this patient.

Bioengineering Approaches to Fight against Orthopedic Biomaterials Related-Infections

One of the most serious complications following the implantation of orthopedic biomaterials is the development of infection. Orthopedic implant-related infections do not only entail clinical problems and patient suffering, but also cause a burden on healthcare care systems. Additionally, the ageing of the world population, in particular in developed countries, has led to an increase in the population above 60 years. This is a significantly vulnerable population segment insofar as biomaterials use is concerned. Implanted materials are highly susceptible to bacterial and fungal colonization and the consequent infection. These microorganisms are often opportunistic, taking advantage of the weakening of the body defenses at the implant surface–tissue interface to attach to tissues or implant surfaces, instigating biofilm formation and subsequent development of infection. The establishment of biofilm leads to tissue destruction, systemic dissemination of the pathogen, and dysfunction of the implant/bone joint, leading to implant failure. Moreover, the contaminated implant can be a reservoir for infection of the surrounding tissue where microorganisms are protected. Therefore, the biofilm increases the pathogenesis of infection since that structure offers protection against host defenses and antimicrobial therapies. Additionally, the rapid emergence of bacterial strains resistant to antibiotics prompted the development of new alternative approaches to prevent and control implant-related infections. Several concepts and approaches have been developed to obtain biomaterials endowed with anti-infective properties. In this review, several anti-infective strategies based on biomaterial engineering are described and discussed in terms of design and fabrication, mechanisms of action, benefits, and drawbacks for preventing and treating orthopaedic biomaterials-related infections.

Management of Complex Upper Extremity Trauma with Associated Vascular Injury

Introduction Combined soft tissue and vascular injuries of the upper extremity pose several challenges at once to the plastic surgeon. Many decisions have to be taken urgently that will influence the salvage or amputation of the affected extremity. The aim of this article was to provide an evidence-based outline for the management of such injuries. Learning objectives of this article are as follows: (1) approach to a patient with upper extremity composite tissue and vascular injury presenting to the emergency, (2) decision-making as to when to salvage and when to go for amputation of the traumatized upper extremity, (3) role of imaging in emergency situation, (4) role of fasciotomy, (5) intraoperative sequencing of steps, and (6) options for vascular reconstruction and the flaps used for coverage. After reading this article, the reader should have a clear understanding of the management of vascular injury in a patient with composite defects of upper extremity.

Prior use of antibiotics and immunosuppression are risk factors for fracture-related infection during the COVID-19 pandemic period: a Brazilian prospective cohort study

Background

Little is known about the role of COVID-19 pandemic period on the epidemiology of fracture-related infection (FRI). The present study summarizes the changes in the prevalence, microbiology, and risk factors of FRI during this period.

Methods

A prospective single-center cohort study assessed in the setting of COVID-19 pandemic (2020–2021), clinical, microbiological aspects, and independent risk factors (RF) of FRI. RFs were estimated by bivariate and multivariable analyses using prevalence ratio (PR) with significance at P < 0.05. Kaplan–Meier analysis was performed to evaluate treatment outcomes.

Results

Overall, 132 patients were analyzed, with patients with age over 65 years accounting 65.1%. FRI was diagnosed in 21(15.9%) patients. Independent RFs for FRI were recent and preoperative use of systemic antibiotics (PR: 7.0, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 2.2 – 22.4, p = 0.001) and cancer (PR: 9.8, 95% CI: 2.0 – 48.8, p = 0.005). Cultures yielded Gram-negative bacteria in 77.8%, 33.3% were MDR.

Conclusions

We found higher rates of FRI, predominating in the elderly with closed femoral fractures during the COVID-19 pandemic. Prior use of antibiotics and immunosuppression conditions were independent factor for FRI. Our outcomes provide evidence to avoid the empirical use of antibiotics prior to surgery for fracture stabilization.

Elbow arthroplasty is safe for the management of simple open distal humeral fractures

BACKGROUND

Elbow arthroplasty (EA) is an established technique for the treatment of select distal humeral fractures, yet little data exists regarding the safety and outcome of EA in the presence of an open distal humeral fracture where the risk of periprosthetic infection is an even greater concern. We hypothesized that EA does not carry an increased risk of infection or other postoperative complications when performed for simple open distal humeral fractures.

METHODS

Seventeen patients underwent total EA (n = 9) or hemiarthroplasty (n = 8) for an open distal humeral fracture. The open fracture component was classified according to the Orthopaedic Trauma Society system as "simple" or "complex." Outcome measures collected included the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), range of motion, complications, and reoperations. Patients who underwent primary débridement and implantation were compared with those who underwent preliminary débridement procedures and subsequent staged arthroplasty. A systematic review of the existing literature was performed to analyze other reported cases and contextualize our findings.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up was 46 months (range, 12-138 months). All fractures were multifragmentary and intra-articular. Sixteen patients had a "simple" open fracture and 1 had a "complex" fracture. The overall mean MEPS was 83 (range, 30-100; standard deviation ± 17), with a mean flexion-extension arc of 96°. Patients who underwent primary débridement and implantation demonstrated a higher mean flexion arc (116° vs. 79°, P = .02) than those who underwent staged arthroplasty. The mean MEPS was not significantly different between the groups (90 vs. 78, P = .12). Complications included asymptomatic ulna component loosening (n = 1), joint instability (n = 1), and symptomatic heterotopic ossification (n = 3). There were no deep or superficial infections recorded.

CONCLUSION

EA is safe and effective when performed for simple open distal humeral fractures. Primary débridement and implantation may offer functional benefits over a staged approach.

A Reevaluation of the Risk of Infection Based on Time to Debridement in Open Fractures: Results of the GOLIATH Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies and Limited Trial Data

BACKGROUND

Open fractures are one of the leading causes of disability worldwide. The threshold time to debridement that reduces the infection rate is unclear.

METHODS

We searched all available databases to identify observational studies and randomized trials related to open fracture care. We then conducted an extensive meta-analysis of the observational studies, using raw and adjusted estimates, to determine if there was an association between the timing of initial debridement and infection.

RESULTS

We identified 84 studies (18,239 patients) for the primary analysis. In unadjusted analyses comparing various "late" time thresholds for debridement versus "early" thresholds, there was an association between timing of debridement and surgical site infection (odds ratio [OR] = 1.29, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.11 to 1.49, p < 0.001, I2 = 30%, 84 studies, n = 18,239). For debridement performed between 12 and 24 hours versus earlier than 12 hours, the OR was higher in tibial fractures (OR = 1.37, 95% CI = 1.00 to 1.87, p = 0.05, I2 = 19%, 12 studies, n = 2,065), and even more so in Gustilo type-IIIB tibial fractures (OR = 1.46, 95% CI = 1.13 to 1.89, p = 0.004, I2 = 23%, 12 studies, n = 1,255). An analysis of Gustilo type-III fractures showed a progressive increase in the risk of infection with time. Critical time thresholds included 12 hours (OR = 1.51, 95% CI = 1.28 to 1.78, p < 0.001, I2 = 0%, 16 studies, n = 3,502) and 24 hours (OR = 2.17, 95% CI = 1.73 to 2.72, p < 0.001, I2 = 0%, 29 studies, n = 5,214).

CONCLUSIONS

High-grade open fractures demonstrated an increased risk of infection with progressive delay to debridement.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level IV. See Instruction for Authors for a complete description of the levels of evidence.