US Guidelines That Empower Women to Prevent HIV With Preexposure Prophylaxis

Access to PrEP and other sexual health services for cisgender women in the United States: a review of state policy and Medicaid expansion

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has the potential to prevent new HIV infections, but it is unclear how state policies governing sexual and reproductive health services (SRH) impact access for cisgender women. The objective of this review is to identify barriers to PrEP access for cisgender women in the United States. Using the CDC Atlas Program, 20 states with the highest HIV incidence among cisgender women were included in this analysis. Through a search conducted in May-July 2022 of CDC, PrEPWatch.org, and other State Department and Insurance websites, Medicaid expansion status, pharmacist PrEP prescribing laws, financial support programs, and Traditional Medicaid coverage of PrEP, HIV testing, and emergency contraception were reviewed. Of the included states, nearly half did not expand Medicaid at the state level. Emergency contraception and HIV testing was covered under Traditional Medicaid for almost all included states, but insurance stipulations and eligibility requirements remain. Although PrEP is covered under all Traditional Medicaid plans, six states require pre-authorization. Three states have HIV testing mandates, four allow pharmacists to prescribe PrEP and six have financial support programs to cover the cost of PrEP. Medicaid expansion, pre-authorization requirements for PrEP prescriptions and emergency contraception, and limitations on pharmacist prescribing abilities were identified as barriers to SRH access for cisgender women. Medicaid expansion should be prioritized as an approach to expanding access to HIV prevention services at the state level.

Development of a predictive model for identifying women vulnerable to HIV in Chicago

INTRODUCTION

Researchers in the United States have created several models to predict persons most at risk for HIV. Many of these predictive models use data from all persons newly diagnosed with HIV, the majority of whom are men, and specifically men who have sex with men (MSM). Consequently, risk factors identified by these models are biased toward features that apply only to men or capture sexual behaviours of MSM. We sought to create a predictive model for women using cohort data from two major hospitals in Chicago with large opt-out HIV screening programs.

METHODS

We matched 48 newly diagnosed women to 192 HIV-negative women based on number of previous encounters at University of Chicago or Rush University hospitals. We examined data for each woman for the two years prior to either their HIV diagnosis or their last encounter. We assessed risk factors including demographic characteristics and clinical diagnoses taken from patient electronic medical records (EMR) using odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. We created a multivariable logistic regression model and measured predictive power with the area under the curve (AUC). In the multivariable model, age group, race, and ethnicity were included a priori due to increased risk for HIV among specific demographic groups.

RESULTS

The following clinical diagnoses were significant at the bivariate level and were included in the model: pregnancy (OR 1.96 (1.00, 3.84)), hepatitis C (OR 5.73 (1.24, 26.51)), substance use (OR 3.12 (1.12, 8.65)) and sexually transmitted infections (STIs) chlamydia, gonorrhoea, or syphilis. We also a priori included demographic factors that are associated with HIV. Our final model had an AUC of 0.74 and included healthcare site, age group, race, ethnicity, pregnancy, hepatitis C, substance use, and STI diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Our predictive model showed acceptable discrimination between those who were and were not newly diagnosed with HIV. We identified risk factors such as recent pregnancy, recent hepatitis C diagnosis, and substance use in addition to the traditionally used recent STI diagnosis that can be incorporated by health systems to detect women who are vulnerable to HIV and would benefit from preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP).

Barriers to accessing pre-exposure prophylaxis among women experiencing intimate partner violence in the United States: a systematic literature review

Women experiencing intimate partner violence (IPV) are at increased risk of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection but have limited uptake of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). We systematically reviewed the existing evidence for the association between IPV and PrEP use, and barriers to accessing PrEP among women with a history of IPV in the United States. A keyword search of PubMed, CINAHL, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science for relevant articles within the United States from 2012 to 2022 yielded 133 articles, of which 15 were ultimately included in the analysis. A qualitative synthesis of evidence suggests that the association between IPV and PrEP awareness, PrEP acceptability, PrEP use, and HIV risk perception was contingent on the mediating or moderating effects of women's relationship status, social network characteristics, and the timing and types of IPV. Controlling partners' reactions and a lack of independent decision-making in the abusive relationship were salient barriers. The methodological quality of qualitative studies was high; however, there were important risks of bias among quantitative and mixed-method studies. Additional studies are needed to understand barriers to PrEP use among women with IPV in more diverse settings and to provide rigorous evidence for developing targeted HIV prevention strategies for them.

Cultivating PEARL (Promoting Empowerment and Risk Reduction): Formative Research for a PrEP Intervention Among Female Sex Workers in Baltimore, Maryland

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is a vital component of comprehensive HIV prevention among female sex workers (FSW). There are limited PrEP interventions targeting FSW in the U.S., who have high HIV risk. Formative research was conducted to inform PEARL (Promoting Empowerment And Risk Reduction), a PrEP intervention for FSW in Baltimore, MD, including a community forum, key informant interviews with providers, and focus group discussions with FSW. FSW and providers acknowledged challenges to building rapport and establishing continuity in care settings. FSW reported low PrEP awareness, with high interest once aware. FSW and providers reported uptake barriers including perceived financial issues, lack of PrEP awareness, and mistrust of the pharmaceutical industry. Concerns were raised about substance use and daily PrEP adherence. Developing a tailored PrEP intervention for FSW necessitates multiple perspectives (e.g. FSW, service providers). Resumen La profilaxis preexposición (PrEP) es un componente vital de la prevención integral del VIH para las trabajadoras sexuales (TSF). En los Estados Unidos, hay pocas intervenciones de PrEP dirigidas a las TSF, quienes experiencian un riesgo elevado de contraer el VIH. Se realizó una investigación formativa para informar a PEARL (Promoción del empoderamiento y la reducción de riesgos), una intervención de PrEP para TSF en Baltimore, MD-la cual incluyó un foro comunitario, entrevistas con proveedores de servicios a las TSF y discusiones entre grupos focales de TSF. TSF y proveedores de servicio reconocieron los retos de mantener buenas relaciones y establecer continuidad en los servicios de salud. TSF exhibieron conocimiento limitado sobre la PrEP, pero expresaron gran interés en la PrEP después de estar informadas. TSF y los proveedores de servicios hablaron de barreras aceptando a la PrEP, incluyendo problemas financieros percibidos, falta de conocimiento sobre la PrEP y desconfianza en la industria farmacéutica. Se expresaron preocupaciones sobre el uso de sustancias y la adherencia diaria a la PrEP. El desarrollo de una intervención de PrEP personalizada para TSF requiere varias perspectivas (por ejemplo, TSF, proveedores de servicios).

Predictors of Anticipated PrEP Stigma among Women with Self-Reported Problematic Substance Use: Implications for Engaging Women in the PrEP Care Continuum

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is an effective HIV prevention method, but it has been underutilized by women. Anticipated stigma regarding use of PrEP is a contributing factor in the underutilization of this prevention strategy. The current study explored the relationships among PrEP stigma, sex risk (i.e., inconsistent condom use, condomless sex with persons of unknown serostatus, or sex in exchange for money or drugs), substance use, attitudes toward HIV testing, and medical mistrust. Participants were 106 primarily ethnic-minority women who reported recent substance use and agreed to participate in a study exploring HIV prevention attitudes. Within this sample, the majority of participants had one or more CDC-defined PrEP indications. Findings indicate that medical mistrust was associated with perceived PrEP stereotypes and HIV testing attitudes. These results provide some insight into reasons for low PrEP uptake among women at risk for HIV. Implications for HIV prevention with women are discussed.

Reducing HIV Risk Behaviors Among Black Women Living With and Without HIV/AIDS in the U.S.: A Systematic Review

This systematic review provides an examination of the status of HIV/AIDS prevention interventions for Black, heterosexual women in the U.S. from 2012 to 2019. Using PRISMA guidelines, 28 interventions were identified. Over half of the interventions were: conducted in the southern region of the U.S.; evaluated using a randomized controlled trial; focused on adults; used a group-based intervention delivery; were behaviorally focused and theoretically driven. None included biomedical strategies of PrEP, nPEP, and TasP. Few interventions included adolescent or aging Black women; none included their sex/romantic partners. Future studies dedicated to addressing the specific needs of subpopulations of Black, heterosexual women may provide opportunities to expand and/or tailor current and future HIV/AIDS prevention interventions, including offering participants with options to choose which, and the level of involvement, of their sex/romantic partner(s) in their sexual health decision-making. While strides to improve HIV prevention efforts with Black, heterosexual women have occurred, more is needed.

"Yes, I'm interested in taking PrEP!": PrEP interest among women respondents to the European community-based survey "Flash! PrEP in Europe"

The World Health Organization recommends pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for all populations at substantial risk of HIV infection, including women. However, data regarding PrEP interest among women is lacking, particularly in Europe. Factors associated with interest in using PrEP were assessed among women respondents to the Flash! PrEP in Europe (FPIE) survey. This community-based cross-sectional study, conducted in 12 European countries, aimed to assess PrEP knowledge and interest. "High objective risk" (HOR) was assessed using established risk criteria following EACS and CDC guidelines. Factors associated with interest in using PrEP were assessed in univariable and multivariable logistic regression models. Among 678 women, 12.5% (n = 85) were considered at HOR, 46.8% (n = 317) indicated prior PrEP knowledge and 18.0% (n = 122) reported interest in using PrEP. Among women at HOR, 40.0% (n = 34) were interested in PrEP. Factors significantly associated with PrEP interest in the final multivariable model were: younger age (18-29 years) (aOR 1.91[95CI: 1.07; 3.41]), bad self-perceived financial status (1.84[1.09; 3.11]), migrant status (south to north) (2.87[1.05; 7.89]), single or dating relationship status (1.93[1.23; 3.03]), sexual abuse history (1.86[1.17; 2.97]), "rather high"/ "high" self-perceived HIV risk (3.21[1.32; 7.81]), and HOR (2.49[1.42; 4.35]). These results show that women at HOR and those who perceived themselves to be at high risk are interested in using PrEP. There is a critical need for targeted information and improved access to PrEP to increase uptake of this HIV prevention tool to meet PrEP interest among women.

The PEARL study: a prospective two-group pilot PrEP promotion intervention for cisgender female sex workers living in Baltimore, MD, U.S

HIV remains elevated among female sex workers (FSW) globally, with a number of structural (e.g., poverty, access to care) factors driving these persistently high rates. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), a user-controlled prevention method, is a promising means of empowering vulnerable populations to protect themselves and enhance agency. Yet there is a dearth of PrEP research and interventions targeting cisgender women in the United States, and even fewer aimed to reach FSW. We developed and implemented a multifaceted PrEP pilot intervention, the Promoting Empowerment And Risk Reduction (PEARL) study, to meet this gap. This paper describes the development process and nature of a community-informed intervention for tenofovir/emticitrabine (TDF/FTC) pre-exposure prophylaxis engagement among street-based cisgender FSW in Baltimore, Maryland, U.S. In the course of the study's implementation, structural, programmatic, and medical barriers have already posed significant barriers to full engagement. PEARL implemented a number of strategies in an effort to counter barriers and facilitate increased success of PrEP uptake and maintenance. The study will provide critical insights into the nature of intervention components that could help FSW to initiate PrEP and reduce PrEP care cascade gaps.

Current US Guidelines for Prescribing HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Disqualify Many Women Who Are at Risk and Motivated to Use PrEP

BACKGROUND

US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention clinical guidelines for HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) are widely used to assess patients' PrEP eligibility. The guidelines include 2 versions of criteria-guidance summary criteria and recommended indications criteria-that diverge in a potentially critical way for heterosexually active women: Both require women's knowledge of their own risk behavior, but the recommended indications also require women's knowledge of their partners' HIV risk or recognition of a potentially asymptomatic sexually transmitted infection. This study examined women's PrEP eligibility according to these 2 different versions of criteria across risk and motivation categories.

SETTING/METHODS

HIV-negative women (n = 679) recently engaged in care at Connecticut Planned Parenthood centers were surveyed online in 2017. The survey assessed PrEP eligibility by both versions of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria, HIV risk indicators, PrEP motivation indicators, and sociodemographic characteristics.

RESULTS

Participants were mostly non-Hispanic white (33.9%) or black (35.8%) and had low income (<$30,000/year; 58.3%). Overall, 82.3% were eligible for PrEP by guidance summary criteria vs. 1.5% by recommended indications criteria. Women disqualified by recommended indications criteria included those reporting condomless sex with HIV-positive or serostatus-unknown male partners (n = 27, 11.1% eligible); 1 or more recent sexually transmitted infection(s) (n = 53, 3.8% eligible); multiple sex partners (n = 168, 3.0% eligible); intended PrEP use (n = 211, 2.8% eligible); and high self-perceived risk (n = 5, 0.0% eligible).

CONCLUSION

Current guidelines disqualify many women who could benefit from PrEP and may lead to discrepant assessments of eligibility. Guideline reform is needed to improve clarity and increase women's PrEP access and consequent HIV protection.

Correlations of HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis Indications and Uptake, Chicago, Illinois, 2015-2018

Objectives. To examine gaps in identification of preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) candidates, uptake, and use of PrEP by populations most likely to seroconvert.Methods. At a federally qualified health center in Chicago, Illinois, we used electronic medical records, prescription data, and our best approximation of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention PrEP guidelines to determine how many patients were indicated for PrEP relative to HIV diagnoses (indication:HIV), how many were on PrEP relative to indications (PrEP:indication), and how many were on PrEP relative to HIV diagnoses (PrEP:HIV). We compared these ratios across age, gender and orientation, race/ethnicity, and insurance.Results. Overall, there were 32 indications per incident diagnosis and 16 patients on PrEP per incident diagnosis. In adjusted models, Whites had higher indication:HIV and PrEP:HIV ratios compared with Blacks, men who have sex with men had higher indication:HIV and PrEP:HIV ratios compared with transwomen but lower PrEP:indication ratios, and uninsured patients had higher indication:HIV but lower PrEP:indication and PrEP:HIV ratios compared with those with insurance.Conclusions. PrEP use, relative to HIV diagnoses, differs by important patient characteristics. While improved guidelines will address some of the disparity, better approaches for determining PrEP candidates and more normalized patient-provider communication are needed to ensure better PrEP access to all individuals at high risk for HIV.

Brief Report: PrEP Eligibility Among At-Risk Women in the Southern United States: Associated Factors, Awareness, and Acceptability

BACKGROUND

Among women in the United States, non-Latina black women in the South have disproportionately high rates of new HIV infections but low use of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). Effective strategies to identify factors associated with PrEP eligibility could facilitate improved screening, offering, and uptake of PrEP among US women at risk of HIV.

SETTING AND METHODS

We applied 2014 CDC criteria for PrEP use to at-risk HIV-negative women enrolled in the Southern US sites (Atlanta, Chapel Hill, Birmingham/Jackson, Miami) of the Women's Interagency HIV Study from 2014 to 2015 to estimate PrEP eligibility and assess PrEP knowledge and acceptability. Factors associated with PrEP eligibility were assessed using multivariable models.

RESULTS

Among 225 women, 72 (32%) were PrEP-eligible; the most common PrEP indicator was condomless sex. The majority of PrEP-eligible women (88%) reported willingness to consider PrEP. Only 24 (11%) PrEP-eligible women had previously heard of PrEP, and only 1 reported previous use. Education level less than high school [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 2.56; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.22 to 5.37], history of sexual violence (aOR 4.52; 95% CI: 1.52 to 17.76), and medium to high self-perception of HIV risk (aOR 6.76; 95% CI: 3.26 to 14.05) were significantly associated with PrEP eligibility in adjusted models.

CONCLUSIONS

Extremely low PrEP awareness and use despite a high proportion of eligibility and acceptability signify a critical need to enhance PrEP education and delivery for women in this region. Supplementing CDC eligibility criteria with questions about history of sexual violence and HIV risk self-assessment may enhance PrEP screening and uptake among US women.

Brief Report: Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Awareness and Use Among Cisgender Women at a Sexually Transmitted Disease Clinic

BACKGROUND

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is highly effective in preventing HIV transmission. Cisgender women (cis-women) constitute only a small proportion of PrEP users in the United States despite accounting for 19% of new HIV infections in 2016.

SETTING

The Rhode Island Sexually Transmitted Diseases (STD) Clinic from 2013 to 2016.

METHODS

We report on the demographic and behavioral characteristics of all HIV-negative, cis-women who presented to the Clinic and of those who met Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) indications for PrEP. In a logistic regression analysis, we evaluated PrEP awareness among cis-women by year and demographic characteristics. We compared PrEP awareness among cis-women with PrEP awareness among cisgender men who have sex with men and among cisgender men who inject drugs presenting to the Clinic.

RESULTS

Among 1431 HIV-negative cis-women, 84 (5.8%) met CDC indications for PrEP. PrEP awareness was significantly lower among Hispanic/Latina cis-women [11.0%; adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 0.46, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.31 to 0.66] and non-Hispanic black cis-women (13.8%; AOR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.39 to 0.89) relative to non-Hispanic white cis-women (20.7%). Men who have sex with men had significantly greater PrEP awareness (60.3%; AOR: 5.85, 95% CI: 3.35 to 10.23) than cis-women (22.9%). Only one woman reported PrEP use.

CONCLUSIONS

Two-thirds of HIV-negative cis-women presenting for HIV/sexually transmitted disease testing and meeting CDC indications for PrEP were unaware of PrEP, and only one woman reported ever using PrEP. There is a critical need for public health professionals and health care providers to increase PrEP awareness and use among cis-women at risk for HIV.

US Guideline Criteria for Human Immunodeficiency Virus Preexposure Prophylaxis: Clinical Considerations and Caveats

Clinical guidelines for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) developed by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have been instrumental in the implementation of PrEP in medical practices throughout the country. However, the eligibility criteria contained within may inadvertently limit PrEP access for some patients. We describe the following key considerations and caveats related to these criteria: promotion of a selective vs universal approach to sexual health education involving PrEP; misalignment between criteria stated in the table and text boxes; problematic categorization and confounding of sexual orientation, gender identity, and risk behavior; underemphasis of network/community-level drivers of HIV transmission; oversimplification of serodiscordant risk; and lack of clarity surrounding the relevance of condoms to PrEP eligibility. We offer concrete recommendations to address the identified issues and strengthen future iterations of the guidelines, applying these recommendations in an alternative table of "criteria."

Interpersonal and structural factors associated with receptive syringe-sharing among a prospective cohort of female sex workers who inject drugs

AIMS

To determine the interpersonal and structural factors associated with receptive syringe sharing (RSS) among female sex workers who inject drugs (FSW-IDU), a group at high risk of HIV/hepatitis C virus (HCV) acquisition.

DESIGN

Sex workers And Police Promoting Health In Risky Environments (SAPPHIRE) study, a prospective cohort study.

SETTING

Baltimore, MD, USA PARTICIPANTS: One hundred and eighty FSW-IDU; mean age = 33 years, 77.1% white and 62.9% in a relationship/married.

MEASUREMENTS

Surveys were conducted between April 2016 and February 2018. The main outcome was recent RSS (past 3 months). In addition to socio-demographic characteristics and drug use behaviors, we assessed factors at the interpersonal level, including injection practices, intimate partner and client drug use and exposure to violence. Structural-level factors included methods of syringe access.

FINDINGS

Nearly all FSW-IDU used heroin (97.1%) or crack cocaine (89.7%). Recent RSS was reported by 18.3%. Syringes were accessed from needle exchange programs (64.6%), pharmacies (29.7%), street sellers (30.3%) or personal networks (29.1%). Some FSW-IDU had clients or intimate partners who injected drugs (26.3 and 26.9%, respectively). Longitudinal factors independently associated with RSS in the multi-level mixed-effects model were recent client violence [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 2.17, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.09-4.33], having an intimate partner who injected drugs (aOR = 2.18, 95% CI = 0.98-4.85), being injected by others (aOR = 4.95, 95% CI = 2.42-10.10) and obtaining syringes from a street seller (aOR = 1.88, 95% CI = 0.94-3.78) or from a member of their personal network (aOR = 4.43, 95% CI = 2.21-8.90).

CONCLUSIONS

Client violence, intimate partner injection drug use, being injected by others and obtaining syringes from personal connections appear to increase parenteral HIV/HCV risk among female sex workers who inject drugs.