Fit-For-Purpose PD-L1 Biomarker Testing For Patient Selection in Immuno-Oncology: Guidelines For Clinical Laboratories From the Canadian Association of Pathologists-Association Canadienne Des Pathologistes (CAP-ACP)

PD-L1 Expression and Its Modulating Factors in Anaplastic Thyroid Carcinoma: A Multi-institutional Study

Anti-PD immunotherapy is currently under investigation in anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (ATC). Tumor cell surface PD-L1 expression is considered predictive of therapeutic response. Although papillary thyroid carcinoma has been widely studied for PD-L1 expression, there are limited data on ATC. In this retrospective multi-institutional study involving 9 centers across Asia, 179 ATCs were assessed for PD-L1 expression using the SP263 (Ventana) clone. A tumor proportion score (TPS) ≥1% was required to consider a case PD-L1-positive. PD-L1 expression was compared with the histological patterns, the type of specimen (small or large), tumor molecular profile ( BRAF V600E and TERT promoter mutation status), and patient outcome. PD-L1 expression in any co-existent differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC) was evaluated separately and compared with ATC. Most ATCs (73.2%) were PD-L1-positive. The median TPS among positive cases was 36% (IQR 11% to 75%; range 1% to 99%). A high expression (TPS ≥ 50%) was noted in 30.7%. PD-L1-negative cases were more likely to be small specimens ( P =0.01). A negative result on small samples, hence, may not preclude expression elsewhere. ATCs having epithelioid and pleomorphic histological patterns were more likely to be PD-L1-positive with higher TPS than sarcomatoid ( P <0.01). DTCs were more frequently negative and had lower TPS than ATC ( P <0.01). Such PD-L1 conversion from DTC-negative to ATC-positive was documented in 71% of cases with co-existent DTC. BRAF V600E, but not TERT promoter mutations, correlated significantly with PD-L1-positivity rate ( P =0.039), reinforcing the potential of combining anti-PD and anti-BRAF V600E drugs. PD-L1 expression, however, did not impact the patient outcome.

Further knowledge and developments in resistance mechanisms to immune checkpoint inhibitors

The past decade has witnessed a revolution in cancer treatment, shifting from conventional drugs (chemotherapies) towards targeted molecular therapies and immune-based therapies, in particular immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). These immunotherapies release the host's immune system against the tumor and have shown unprecedented durable remission for patients with cancers that were thought incurable, such as metastatic melanoma, metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC), microsatellite instability (MSI) high colorectal cancer and late stages of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, about 80% of the patients fail to respond to these immunotherapies and are therefore left with other less effective and potentially toxic treatments. Identifying and understanding the mechanisms that enable cancerous cells to adapt to and eventually overcome therapy can help circumvent resistance and improve treatment. In this review, we describe the recent discoveries on the onco-immunological processes which govern the tumor microenvironment and their impact on the resistance to PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint blockade.

Pathologic assessment of hepatocellular carcinoma in the era of immunotherapy: a narrative review

Background and Objective

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based therapy has achieved impressive success in various cancer types. Several ICIs have been unprecedentedly approved as the treatment regimens for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in recent decade. Meanwhile, numerous clinical trials are being performed to exploit more ICIs into initially unresectable HCC and postoperative HCC to expectantly induce adequate tumor downstaging for further resection or implement adjuvant treatment for relapse-free survival, respectively. In this review, we aim to summarize some pragmatic histomorphologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular pathologic parameters which promisingly indicate the response of neoadjuvant/conversion ICI-related therapy and predict the efficacy of adjuvant/therapeutic ICI-related therapy for HCC.

Methods

We searched PubMed using the terms hepatocellular carcinoma, immunotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitor, immune checkpoint blockade, conversion therapy, neoadjuvant therapy, adjuvant therapy, biomarker, pathologic evaluation, pathologic assessment till February 2023.

Key Content and Findings

Although there is no consensus regarding the pathologic evaluation of relevant HCC specimens, it is encouraging that a few of studies have concentrated on this field, and moreover, the methods and parameters noted on other cancer types are also worthy of reference. For the pathologic assessment of HCC specimens underwent immunotherapy, a suitable sampling scheme, identifying immunotherapy-related pathologic response, and quantification of pathologic response rate should be emphasized. For the patients of HCC who are scheduled to receive immunotherapy, tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte, intratumoral tertiary lymphoid structure, programmed cell death ligand 1, Wnt/β-catenin, microsatellite instability and mismatch repair, tumor mutational burden and tumor neoantigen, as well as some other signaling pathways are the potential predictive biomarkers of treatment response of ICI.

Conclusions

The management of HCC in the era of immunotherapy arises a brand-new pathological challenge that is to provide an immunotherapy-related diagnostic report. Albeit many related researches are preclinical or insufficient, they may tremendously alter the immunotherapy strategy of HCC in future.

Comparison of PD-L1 IHC 22C3 PharmDx Combined Positive Score (CPS) in Primary Versus Metastatic Nodal Squamous Cell Carcinomas of the Head and Neck: Is There a Significant Difference?

PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx is an FDA-approved companion test to select patients for anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy. In head and neck squamous cell carcinoma PD-L1 expression is determined using a Combined Positive Score (CPS), which evaluates expression in tumor cells and tumor-associated leukocytes. We hypothesized that in nodal metastasis, the CPS should be higher given their inherent higher proportion of leukocytes. A significant difference in CPS between sites would mean that the tissue chosen for PD-L1 testing would impact patient eligibility for therapy. Currently, guidelines about which tissue should be tested do not exist. PD-L1 22C3 IHC was performed in the primary and nodal metastases of 35 head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, and a CPS was generated by 3 pathologists. Mean CPS was higher at the primary than the nodal metastasis: 47.2 versus 42.2; however, the difference was not statistically significant: P=0.259 . By therapeutic groups: negative (CPS <1), low (CPS 1-19) and high (CPS≥20), low-expression was more common in the primary: 40 vs. 26%, and high-expression in the nodal metastasis: 74 vs. 60% but this difference was not statistically significant: P=0.180. Stratified by positive versus negative (CPS <1 vs. ≥1), there were no differences between sites. Interobserver agreement for CPS among the 3 raters was slight for both sites: ƙ = 0.117 and 0.025, fair if stratified by therapeutic group: ƙ = 0.371 and 0.318, and near perfect if stratified as negative versus positive: ƙ = 0.652 and 1. There were no statistically significant differences in CPS between primary and nodal metastases independent of how the CPS was stratified.

Lessons Learned, Challenges Taken, and Actions Made for "Precision" Immunohistochemistry. Analysis and Perspectives From the NordiQC Proficiency Testing Program

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) has for decades been an integrated method within pathology applied to gain diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive information. However, the multimodality of the analytical phase of IHC is a challenge to ensure the reproducibility of IHC, which has been documented by external quality assessment (EQA) programs for many biomarkers. More than 600 laboratories participate in the Nordic immunohistochemical Quality Control EQA program for IHC. In the period, 2017-2021, 65 different biomarkers were assessed and a total of 31,967 results were evaluated. An overall pass rate of 79% was obtained being an improvement compared with 71% for the period, 2003-2015. The pass rates for established predictive biomarkers (estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2) for breast carcinoma were most successful showing mean pass rates of 89% to 92%. Diagnostic IHC biomarkers as PAX8, SOX10, and different cytokeratins showed a wide spectrum of pass rates ranging from 37% to 95%, mean level of 75%, and attributed to central parameters as access to sensitive and specific antibodies but also related to purpose of the IHC test and validation performed accordingly to this. Seven new diagnostic biomarkers were introduced, and all showed inferior pass rates compared with the average level for diagnostic biomarkers emphasizing the challenge to optimize, validate, and implement new IHC biomarkers. Nordic immunohistochemical Quality Control operates by "Fit-For-Purpose" EQA principles and for programmed death-ligand 1, 2 segments are offered aligned to the "3-dimensional" approach-bridging diagnostic tests, drugs to be offered, and diseases addressed. Mean pass rates of 65% and 79% was obtained in the 2 segments for programmed death-ligand 1.

Programmed death ligand 1 expression in diffuse large B cell lymphoma: correlation with clinicopathological prognostic factors

BACKGROUND

The prognostic value of the level of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) is still debatable. This study examined the effect of the level of PD-L1 expression on the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL).

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue blocks of one hundred de novo DLBCL patients diagnosed from 2013 to 2016. PD-L1 expression was defined by a modified Combined-Positive Score (CPS) and their medical records were reviewed to collect their clinical, laboratory and radiological data, treatment, and outcome.

RESULTS

The included patients were aged from 23 to 85 years and treated by rituximab- cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, oncovin, prednisone (R-CHOP); 49% were males; 85% of the cases were presented at Ann Arbor stages III, IV; 33% of patients were seropositive for HCV and 87% of cases were presented with intermediate and high IPI. All included cases expressed PD-L1 using modified CPS. 27% of patients showed low PD-L1 expression (≥ 5% to < 50% of total tumor cellularity) while 73% of patients showed high PD-L1expression (≥ 50% of total tumor cellularity). High PD-L1 expression is statistically correlated with advanced stage (p 0.01), high IPI score (p 0.017), high incidence of stationary and progressive disease (p 0.002) and high incidence of relapse (p value 0.01). Five-year disease-free survival (DFS) was 29% for patients with high PD-L1 expression compared with 84.8% for patients with low PD-L1 expression (p 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that high PD-L1 expression in DLBCL is associated with aggressive clinicopathological features and a decreased response to R-CHOP. The level of PD-L1 expression could be an independent predictor of DFS of DLBCL. More research is mandatory to standardize the cutoff value and scoring methods.

[New update to the guidelines on testing predictive biomarkers in non-small-cell lung cancer: a National Consensus of the Spanish Society of Pathology and the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology]

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) presents the greatest number of identified therapeutic targets, some of which have therapeutic utility. Currently, detecting EGFR, BRAF, KRAS and MET mutations, ALK, ROS1, NTRK and RET translocations, and PD-L1 expression in these patients is considered essential. The use of next-generation sequencing (NGS) facilitates precise molecular diagnosis and allows the detection of other emerging mutations, such as the HER2 mutation and predictive biomarkers for immunotherapy responses. In this consensus, a group of experts in the diagnosis and treatment of NSCLC selected by the Spanish Society of Pathology (SEAP) and the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) have evaluated currently available information and propose a series of recommendations to optimize the detection and use of biomarkers in daily clinical practice.

PD-L1 testing by immunohistochemistry in immuno-oncology

Immunotherapy, based on immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting the Programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) and/or Programmed Death Receptor 1 (PD-1), has substantially improved the outcomes of patients with various cancers. However, only ~30% of patients benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors. Tumor PD-L1 expression, assessed by immunohistochemistry, is the most widely validated and used predictive biomarker to guide the selection of patients for immune checkpoint inhibitors. PD-L1 assessment may be challenging due to the necessity for different companion diagnostic assays for required specific immune checkpoint inhibitors and a relatively high level of inter-assay variability in terms of performance and cutoff levels. In this review, we discuss the role of PD-L1 immunohistochemistry as a predictive test in immunotherapy (immuno-oncology), highlight the complexity of the PD-L1 testing landscape, discuss various preanalytical, analytical and clinical issues that are associated with PD-L1 assays, and provide some insights into optimization of PD-L1 as a predictive biomarker in immuno-oncology.

Immunohistochemical Study of Bladder Cancer Molecular Subtypes and Their Association with PD-L1 Expression

The significant heterogeneity in clinical outcomes among patients with bladder cancer has highlighted the existence of different biological subtypes of muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) and non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Meanwhile, immune checkpoint proteins and their interference with tumor-related immune-evasive strategies has led to the development of several immunotherapeutic drugs targeting programmed death-1 (PD-1) or programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1). However, the lack of any known biomarker that could predict responses to immunotherapy has led to a more agnostic therapeutic approach. Here, we present a study conducted in 77 bladder cancer (BC) patients (n = 77), ranging from stages pTa to pT2. Tumor specimens were resected via transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) and consistuted of 24 low-grade (LG) and 53 high-grade (HG) tumors. Patients' tumors were then categorized into molecular subtypes, via immunohistochemistry (CK5/6 and GATA3). Furthermore, all tumor specimens were stained with anti-PD-L1 and demonstrated significant correlations with basal immunophenotype, stage pT2 and HG tumors. As such, we attempted to stratify patients into groups of likely-responders and likely-not-responders to immunotherapy with anti-PD-L1, based on their molecular phenotype. Finally, in acknowledging the fact that there is a universal lack of biomarkers associated with predicting BC response to immunotherapeutic drugs, we tested all tumors for deficiency of mismatch repair proteins (MMR).

New update to the guidelines on testing predictive biomarkers in non-small-cell lung cancer: a National Consensus of the Spanish Society of Pathology and the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) presents the greatest number of identified therapeutic targets, some of which have therapeutic utility. Currently, detecting EGFR, BRAF, KRAS and MET mutations, ALK, ROS1, NTRK and RET translocations, and PD-L1 expression in these patients is considered essential. The use of next-generation sequencing facilitates precise molecular diagnosis and allows the detection of other emerging mutations, such as the HER2 mutation and predictive biomarkers for immunotherapy responses. In this consensus, a group of experts in the diagnosis and treatment of NSCLC selected by the Spanish Society of Pathology and the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology have evaluated currently available information and propose a series of recommendations to optimize the detection and use of biomarkers in daily clinical practice.

Handling and standardization of EBUS needle aspiration in NSCLC patients: The value of the cell block, a monoinstitutional experience

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer is the main cause of cancer-related death worldwide, and 85% of all lung tumors are non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC). More than 60% of all lung tumors are diagnosed at an advanced stage, leading to poor prognosis. Given the growing demand for NSCLC profiling for selection of the most appropriate therapy, the acquisition of adequate tumor samples has become increasingly crucial, mostly in advanced NSCLC patients due to old age and/or comorbidities. Being a mini-invasive sampling technique, endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) represents a valuable alternative to traditional transthoracic or surgical sampling in these patients, and perfoming cell block (CB) could be crucial to maximize the potential biological information. The aim of this study is to describe a monoinstitutional interprofessional experience in handling EBUS-TBNA and CB in 464 patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected all the consecutive CBs obtained from EBUS TBNA performed between 2014 and 2021 on the lung lesions or mediastinal lymph nodes. All the CBs were handled in a standardized method.

RESULTS

A total of 95.5% (448/464 samples) of adequacy for site and 92.6% (430/464) of adequacy for diagnosis were observed. Moreover, in the adenocarcinoma histotype, ALK, ROS1 and tumor proportion score (TPS) PD-L1 assessment by IHC was possible in 96% (140/146) of cases, and molecular profile was obtained in 93.8% (137/146) of cases. In the squamous cell carcinoma histotype, TPS PD-L1 assessment was possible in 81% (13/16) of cases. All four CB results obtained from carcinoma NOS were adequate for ALK, ROS1 and PD-L1 assessment and molecular profiling. All 39 metastatic samples from extra-pulmonary primary were adequate for immunohistochemical characterization and molecular profiling. Finally, reporting of the tumor sample adequacy to the clinicians took a median time of about 30 h (range: 24-80 h).

CONCLUSION

Careful cytological smear management together with the handling and standardization of CB obtained from EBUS-TBNA could represent an effective method to increase the adequacy of the tumor specimen for both diagnosis and molecular profile.

Atlas of PD-L1 for Pathologists: Indications, Scores, Diagnostic Platforms and Reporting Systems

Background. Innovative drugs targeting the PD1/PD-L1 axis have opened promising scenarios in modern cancer therapy. Plenty of assays and scoring systems have been developed for the evaluation of PD-L1 immunohistochemical expression, so far considered the most reliable therapeutic predictive marker. Methods. By gathering the opinion of acknowledged experts in dedicated fields of pathology, we sought to update the currently available evidence on PD-L1 assessment in various types of tumors. Results. Robust data were progressively collected for several anatomic districts and leading international agencies to approve specific protocols: among these, TPS with 22C3, SP142 and SP263 clones in lung cancer; IC with SP142 antibody in breast, lung and urothelial tumors; and CPS with 22C3/SP263 assays in head and neck and urothelial carcinomas. On the other hand, for other malignancies, such as gastroenteric neoplasms, immunotherapy has been only recently introduced, often for particular histotypes, so specific guidelines are still lacking. Conclusions. PD-L1 immunohistochemical scoring is currently the basis for allowing many cancer patients to receive properly targeted therapies. While protocols supported by proven data are already available for many tumors, dedicated studies and clinical trials focusing on harmonization of the topic in other still only partially explored fields are surely yet advisable.

A digital assay for programmed death-ligand 1 (22C3) quantification combined with immune cell recognition algorithms in non-small cell lung cancer

PD-L1 (22C3) checkpoint inhibitor therapy represents a mainstay of modern cancer immunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In vitro diagnostic (IVD) PD-L1 antibody staining is widely used to predict clinical intervention efficacy. However, pathologist interpretation of this assay is cumbersome and variable, resulting in poor positive predictive value concerning patient therapy response. To address this, we developed a digital assay (DA) termed Tissue Insight (TI) 22C3 NSCLC, for the quantification of PD-L1 in NSCLC tissues, including digital recognition of macrophages and lymphocytes. We completed clinical validation of this digital image analysis solution in 66 NSCLC patient samples, followed by concordance studies (comparison of PD-L1 manual and digital scores) in an additional 99 patient samples. We then combined this DA with three distinct immune cell recognition algorithms for detecting tissue macrophages, alveolar macrophages, and lymphocytes to aid in sample interpretation. Our PD-L1 (22C3) DA was successfully validated and had a scoring agreement (digital to manual) higher than the inter-pathologist scoring. Furthermore, the number of algorithm-identified immune cells showed significant correlation when compared with those identified by immunohistochemistry in serial sections stained by double immunofluorescence. Here, we demonstrated that TI 22C3 NSCLC DA yields comparable results to pathologist interpretation while eliminating the intra- and inter-pathologist variability associated with manual scoring while providing characterization of the immune microenvironment, which can aid in clinical treatment decisions.

PD-L1 Testing in Urothelial Carcinoma: Analysis of a Series of 1401 Cases Using Both the 22C3 and SP142 Assays

Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) drugs are a novel, effective treatment for advanced urothelial carcinoma. Worldwide, several different ICB drugs are approved, each developed and clinically validated with a specific PD-L1 compound diagnostic assay. As a result, PD-L1 testing workflows in routine practice are complex: requiring multiple assays across two platforms, with each assay having a different method of interpretation. Our service tested 1,401 urothelial carcinoma cases for PD-L1 expression, using both the 22C3 PharmDx assay (required prior to Pembrolizumab therapy) and SP142 assay (required prior to Atezolizumab therapy). Of the 1,401 cases tested, 621 cases (44%) were tested with both the 22C3 PharmDx and SP142 assays, 492 cases (35%) with 22C3 PharmDx only, and 288 cases (21%) with SP142 only. Each assay was used and interpreted according to the manufacturer’s guidelines. The rate of positivity we observed was 26% with the 22C3 assay and 31% with the SP142 assay, similar to the pre-licensing studies for both drugs. The discrepancy observed between the assays was 11%, which reinforces the requirement for utilisation of the correct assay for each agent, and limits potential cross-utility of assays. This aspect must be considered when setting up a PD-L1 testing strategy in laboratories where both Pembrolizumab and Atezolizumab are available for the treatment of urothelial carcinoma but also has broader implications for testing of other cancers where multiple ICB drugs and their respective assays are approved.

Targeting immune checkpoints in gynecologic cancer: updates & perspectives for pathologists

Checkpoint inhibitor-based immunotherapy is increasingly used in the treatment of gynecologic cancers, and most often targets the PD-1/PD-L1 axis. Pathologists should be familiar with the biomarkers required to determine candidacy for these treatments based on existing FDA approvals, including mismatch repair protein immunohistochemistry, microsatellite instability testing, tumor mutation burden testing, and PD-L1 immunohistochemistry. This review summarizes the rationale behind these treatments and their associated biomarkers and delivers guidance on how to utilize and readout these tests. It also introduces additional biomarkers which may provide information regarding immunotherapeutic vulnerability in the future such as neoantigen load; POLE mutation status; and immunohistochemical expression of immunosuppressive checkpoints like LAG-3, TIM-3, TIGIT, and VISTA; immune-activating checkpoints such as CD27, CD40, CD134, and CD137; enzymes such as IDO-1 and adenosine-related compounds; and MHC class I.

Emerging Biomarkers in Thyroid Practice and Research

Simple Summary

Tumor biomarkers are molecules at genetic or protein level, or certain evaluable characteristics. These help in perfecting patient management. Over the past decade, advanced and more sensitive techniques have led to the identification of many new biomarkers in the field of oncology. A knowledge of the recent developments is essential for their application to clinical practice, and furthering research. This review provides a comprehensive account of such various markers identified in thyroid carcinoma, the most common endocrine malignancy. While some of these have been brought into use in routine patient management, others are novel and need more research before clinical application.

Abstract

Thyroid cancer is the most common endocrine malignancy. Recent developments in molecular biological techniques have led to a better understanding of the pathogenesis and clinical behavior of thyroid neoplasms. This has culminated in the updating of thyroid tumor classification, including the re-categorization of existing and introduction of new entities. In this review, we discuss various molecular biomarkers possessing diagnostic, prognostic, predictive and therapeutic roles in thyroid cancer. A comprehensive account of epigenetic dysregulation, including DNA methylation, the function of various microRNAs and long non-coding RNAs, germline mutations determining familial occurrence of medullary and non-medullary thyroid carcinoma, and single nucleotide polymorphisms predisposed to thyroid tumorigenesis has been provided. In addition to novel immunohistochemical markers, including those for neuroendocrine differentiation, and next-generation immunohistochemistry (BRAF V600E, RAS, TRK, and ALK), the relevance of well-established markers, such as Ki-67, in current clinical practice has also been discussed. A tumor microenvironment (PD-L1, CD markers) and its influence in predicting responses to immunotherapy in thyroid cancer and the expanding arena of techniques, including liquid biopsy based on circulating nucleic acids and plasma-derived exosomes as a non-invasive technique for patient management, are also summarized.

Immunoexpression of PD-L1 and PD-1 and Its Clinicopathological Correlation in Urothelial Carcinomas

Introduction  Urothelial carcinomas are the most common types of bladder tumors that have recently shown a changing trend in treatment protocols with the introduction and approval of immune checkpoint inhibitors. The most important immune checkpoint lies with the PD-1–PD-L1 axis. Although multiple drugs have been approved, there is uncertainty about patient selection criteria and diagnostic assays. Recent studies related to the laboratory-developed tests have opened up the horizon of PD-1 and PD-L1 immunohistochemistry even at resource-constrained laboratories. We propose to study these immunohistochemistry markers in our laboratory using newer clones.

Materials and Methods  We selected 116 consecutive cases of transurethral bladder tumor resection from our laboratory archive and applied PD-1 and PD-L1 immunohistochemistry. The study was approved by the institution's ethics committee.

Results  We found high expression of PD-1 and PD-L1 in urothelial carcinoma even with different cut-offs of PD-L1. Muscle invasion, lamina invasion, and grade of carcinoma had a statistically significant effect on the expression; however, age and sex did not affect the expression.

Conclusion  Based on our current study, we can conclude that the clones used in our study show high expression in urothelial carcinoma and can aid in patient selection and treatment protocol, irrespective of age and sex.

Interassay and interobserver comparability study of four programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) immunohistochemistry assays in triple-negative breast cancer

Different immunohistochemical programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) assays and scorings have been reported to yield variable results in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). We compared the analytical concordance and reproducibility of four clinically relevant PD-L1 assays assessing immune cell (IC) score, tumor proportion score (TPS), and combined positive score (CPS) in TNBC. Primary TNBC resection specimens (n = 104) were stained for PD-L1 using VENTANA SP142, VENTANA SP263, DAKO 22C3, and DAKO 28–8. PD-L1 expression was scored according to guidelines on virtual whole slide images by four trained readers.

The mean PD-L1 positivity at IC-score ≥1% and CPS ≥1 ranged between 53% and 75% with the highest positivity for SP263 and comparable levels for 22C3, 28–8, and SP142. Inter-assay agreement was good between 28–8 and 22C3 across all scores and cut-offs (kappa 0.68–0.74) and for both assays with SP142 at IC-score ≥1% and CPS ≥1 (kappa 0.61–0.67). The agreement between SP263 and all other assays was substantially lower for all scores. Inter-reader agreement for each assay was good to excellent for IC-score ≥1% (kappa 0.73–0.78) and CPS ≥1 (kappa 0.68–0.74), fair to good for CPS ≥10 (kappa 0.52–0.67) and TPS ≥1% (kappa 0.53–0.72). The percentage of overlapping cases in the positive/negative category was >90% between IC-score ≥1% and CPS ≥1 but below when comparing IC-score ≥1% with CPS ≥10. We demonstrate an overall good inter-reader agreement for all PD-L1 assays in TNBC along with assay specific differences in positivity and concordances, which may aid to select the right test strategy in routine diagnostics.

•

Different PD-L1 IHC assays and scorings may show variable results in TNBC.

•

Overall good assay concordance between SP142, 22C3, and 28–8 at IC-score 1%.

•

Overall good assay concordance between SP142, 22C3, and 28–8 at CPS 1.

•

SP142 is less optimal for CPS assessment at higher cut-offs.

•

SP263 assay is not interchangeable with the other three PD-L1 assays.

Refining patient selection for breast cancer immunotherapy: beyond PD-L1

Therapies that modulate immune response to cancer, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors, began an intense development a few years ago; however, in breast cancer (BC), the results have been relatively disappointing so far. Finding biomarkers for better selection of BC patients for various immunotherapies remains a significant unmet medical need. At present, only tumour tissue programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and mismatch repair deficiency status are approved as theranostic biomarkers for programmed cell death-1 (PD-1)/PD-L1 inhibitors in BC. However, due to the complexity of tumour microenvironment (TME) and cancer response to immunomodulators, none of them is a perfect selector. Therefore, an intense quest is ongoing for complementary tumour- or host-related predictive biomarkers in breast immuno-oncology. Among the upcoming biomarkers, quantity, immunophenotype and spatial distribution of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes and other TME cells as well as immune gene signatures emerge as most promising and are being increasingly tested in clinical trials. Biomarkers or strategies allowing dynamic assessment of BC response to immunotherapy, such as circulating/exosomal PD-L1, quantity of white/immune blood cell subpopulations and molecular imaging are particularly suitable for immunotreatment monitoring. Finally, host-related factors, such as microbiome and lifestyle, should also be taken into account when planning integration of immunomodulating therapies into BC management. As none of the biomarkers taken separately is accurate enough, the solution could come from composite biomarkers, which would combine clinical, molecular and immunological features of the disease, possibly powered by artificial intelligence.

•

At present, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are the only approved immunotherapy drugs in BC.

•

Tumour PD-L1 and microsatellite status are current companion biomarkers for ICIs in BC; however, these need improvement.

•

Evaluation of tumour immune contexture and the dynamics of circulating immune cell counts are promising novel approaches.

•

Development of noninvasive monitoring and composite biomarkers will facilitate cancer immunotherapy, including in BC.

PD-L1 Expression in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Data from a Referral Center in Spain

Anti-programmed cell death (PD1)/ligand-1 (PD-L1) checkpoint inhibitors have improved the survival of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Additionally, PD-L1 has emerged as a predictive biomarker of response. Our goal was to examine the histological features of all PD-L1 cases of NSCLC analyzed in our center between 2017 and 2020, as well as to correlate the expression values of the same patient in different tested samples. PD-L1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) was carried out on 1279 external and internal samples: 482 negative (tumor proportion score, TPS < 1%; 37.7%), 444 low-expression (TPS 1–49%; 34.7%) and 353 high-expression (TPS ≥ 50%; 27.6%). Similar results were observed with samples from our institution (N = 816). Significant differences were observed with respect to tumor histological type (p = 0.004); squamous carcinoma was positive in a higher proportion of cases than other histological types. There were also differences between PD-L1 expression and the type of sample analyzed (surgical, biopsy, cytology; p < 0.001), with a higher frequency of negative cytology. In addition, there were cases with more than one PD-L1 determination, showing heterogeneity. Our results show strong correlation with the literature data and reveal heterogeneity between tumors and samples from the same patient, which could affect eligibility for treatment with immunotherapy.

Simultaneous Determination of a Novel PD-L1 Inhibitor, IMMH-010, and Its Active Metabolite, YPD-29B, in Rat Biological Matrices by Polarity-Switching Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry: Application to ADME Studies

IMMH-010 is a prodrug of YPD-29B, which is a novel PD-L1 inhibitor. A specific and sensitive LC-MS/MS method with polarity switching was developed and validated for the simultaneous determination of IMMH-010 and YPD-29B in rat plasma, liver, brain, urine and fecal samples. Method validation was investigated to demonstrate the lower limit of quantification linearity, precision and accuracy, matrix effect and recovery, stability and dilution reliability for IMMH-010 and YPD-29B. This validated method was successfully applied to investigate the pharmacokinetics, tissue distribution, and excretion of IMMH-010 and YPD-29B in rats. After oral administration of IMMH-010 maleate to rats, IMMH-010 was rapidly and extensively converted to the active metabolite YPD-29B. The areas under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of IMMH-010 and YPD-29B were proportional to the dose in the range of 10-100 mg/kg. IMMH-010 was primarily distributed in the adrenal gland, lymph nodes, heart, liver and spleen. YPD-29B was mainly observed in the liver, lymph, kidney, and lung. Approximately 28.81% of the IMMH-010 dose was recovered in the urine and feces within 72 h, including unchanged IMMH-010 (7.99%) and YPD-29B (20.82%). The results of this study may be useful as a reference for further development of IMMH-010 and PD-L1 inhibitors. Clinical Trial Registration: [https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04343859?term=IMMH-010&draw=2&rank=1], identifier [NCT04343859]."

PD-L1 and beyond: Immuno-oncology in cytopathology

Over the past decade, immunotherapy has emerged as one of the most promising cancer treatments. Several monoclonal antibodies targeting the programmed death 1 (PD-1)/ programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) pathway have been integrated into standard-of-care treatments for a wide range of cancer types. Although all the available PD-L1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) assays have been developed on formalin-fixed histological specimens, a growing body of research has recently suggested the feasibility of PD-L1 testing on cytological samples. Although promising results have been reported, several important issues still need to be addressed. Among these are pre-analytical issues, cyto-hystological correlation, and inter-observer agreement. This review will briefly summarise the knowledge gaps and future directions of cytopathology in the immuno-oncology scenario.

Use of cucurbitacins for lung cancer research and therapy

As the main substance in some traditional Chinese medicines, cucurbitacins have been used to treat hepatitis for decades in China. Currently, the use of cucurbitacins against cancer and other diseases has achieved towering popularity among researchers worldwide, as detailed in this review with summarized tables. Numerous studies have reported the potential tumor-killing activities of cucurbitacins in multiple aspects of human malignancies. Continuous research on its anticancer activity mechanisms also brings a glimmer of light to the treatment of patients with lung cancer. In line with the promising roles of cucurbitacins against cancer, through various molecular signaling pathways, it is justifiable to propose the use of cucurbitacins as a potential mainline chemotherapy before the onset and after the diagnosis of lung cancers. Here, this article mainly summarized the findings about the biological functions and underlying mechanisms of cucurbitacins on lung cancer pathogenesis and treatment. In addition, we also discussed the safety and efficacy of their application for further research and even clinical practice.

Assessment of HER2 using the 2018 ASCO/CAP guideline update for invasive breast cancer: a critical look at cases classified as HER2 2+ by immunohistochemistry

In 2018, the American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists revised the criteria for HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) equivocal (2+) classification in their updated guideline. We reviewed invasive breast cancer specimens originally classified as equivocal (2+) under the 2018 guideline that underwent HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) testing from August 2018 to August 2019 at our Canadian reference hospital to investigate cases with ambiguous staining patterns between the 1+ and 2+ definitions. Demographics, pathologic features, and pre-analytic conditions were recorded. The H&E and corresponding HER2 IHC slides were reviewed to confirm tumor type and grade, and classify as HER2 indeterminate, 0, 1+, 2+, or "Intermediate" (staining features between the 1+ and 2+ classifications). FISH testing was performed on 289 cases and 273 met inclusion criteria. The FISH-amplified rate was 12.1%. Upon IHC review, 44.7% (122/273) of cases were reclassified as Intermediate. These cases had incomplete staining with moderate intensity (43/122, 35.3%) and/or <10% complete weak or moderate staining (102/122, 83.6%). Intermediate cases had a significantly lower frequency of amplified FISH results than 2+ cases (p < 0.0001), with only four (3.3%) FISH positive and two (1.6%) FISH heterogeneous. Our study highlights the ambiguity in the current guideline for classifying some HER2 IHC patterns. As the rate of gene amplification in these cases was low (4.9%), we recommend adhering to the 2018 HER2 2+ criteria for reflex FISH testing. However, cases with <10% moderate complete staining and certain heterogeneous patterns warrant special consideration. Further descriptive clarification of 1+ criteria is needed.

PD-L1 Testing and Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: A Multicenter Study on the Diagnostic Reproducibility of Different Protocols

Simple Summary

The introduction of therapies with immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting the programmed cell death protein 1 and its ligand (PD-L1) axis in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma prompted the need of reliable bio-selectors to stratify patients that would benefit from these treatments. The assessment of PD-L1 expression through immunohistochemistry represents the most widely used method to perform this task, being recently approved by regulatory authorities. However, borrowing from previous experiences in lung cancer, the heterogeneity of antibodies and platforms used in the routine clinical practice requires a strict multi-institutional harmonization effort. In this setting, the present study is aimed to assess the performances of different PD-L1 staining protocols and the inter-observer reliability for its interpretation.

Abstract

Immune checkpoint inhibitors for blocking the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) axis are now available for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC) in relapsing and/or metastatic settings. In this work, we compared the resulting combined positive score (CPS) of PD-L1 using alternative methods adopted in routine clinical practice and determined the level of diagnostic agreement and inter-observer reliability in this setting. The study applied 5 different protocols on 40 tissue microarrays from HNSCC. The error rate of the individual protocols ranged from a minimum of 7% to a maximum of 21%, the sensitivity from 79% to 96%, and the specificity from 50% to 100%. In the intermediate group (1 ≤ CPS < 20), the majority of errors consisted of an underestimation of PD-L1 expression. In strong expressors, 5 out of 14 samples (36%) were correctly evaluated by all the protocols, but no protocol was able to correctly identify all the “strong expressors”. The overall inter-observer agreement in PD-L1 CPS reached 87%. The inter-observer reliability was moderate, with an ICC of 0.774 (95% CI (0.651; 0.871)). In conclusion, our study showed moderate interobserver reliability among different protocols. In order to improve the performances, adequate specific training to evaluate PD-L1 by CPS in the HNSCC setting should be coordinated.

Molecular testing and targeted therapy for non-small cell lung cancer: Current status and perspectives

Molecular testing has become a mandatory component of the non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) management. The detection of EGFR, BRAF and MET mutations as well as the analysis of ALK, ROS1, RET and NTRK translocations have already been incorporated in the NSCLC diagnostic standards, and the inhibitors of these kinases are in routine clinical use. There are emerging biomarkers, e.g., KRAS G12C substitutions and HER2 activating alterations, which are likely to enter NSCLC guidelines upon the approval of the corresponding drugs. In addition to genetic examination, NSCLCs are usually subjected to the analysis of PD-L1 protein expression in order to direct the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Comprehensive NSCLC testing for multiple predictive markers requires the analysis of distinct biological molecules (DNA, RNA, proteins) and, therefore, the involvement of different analytical platforms (PCR, DNA sequencing, immunohistochemistry, FISH). There are ongoing efforts aimed at the integration of multiple NSCLC molecular assays into a single diagnostic pipeline.

PD-L1 testing in urothelial bladder cancer: essentials of clinical practice

PURPOSE

While immunotherapy has become an increasingly attractive strategy in patients with urothelial bladder cancer, the need for a biomarker to identify patients whose cancer is the most likely to respond has never been more crucial. This review systematically evaluates evidence regarding PD-L1 as a predictive biomarker of response to anti-PD(L)1 monoclonal antibodies in patients with urothelial bladder carcinoma, and discusses its current limits in routine clinical practice.

METHODS

We performed a critical review of PubMed/Medline according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement. Prospective clinical trials evaluating anti-PD(L)1 monoclonal antibodies in urothelial bladder carcinoma together with retrospective studies evaluating PD-L1 expression in patients with bladder cancer were included.

RESULTS

Evidence data related to PD-L1 as a predictive biomarker of response to immune checkpoint blockade monotherapy across clinical trials are detailed in this review. The different companion diagnostic assays, and the methods for PD-L1 scoring in urothelial bladder carcinoma are reported. Additionally, the issues related to the implementation of PD-L1 testing in clinical practice are discussed.

CONCLUSIONS

PD-(L)1 monoclonal antibodies atezolizumab and pembrolizumab are restricted to patients with PD-L1 positive status in the first-line setting in patients with advanced or metastatic urothelial bladder carcinoma who are ineligible to cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Importantly, the use of anti-PD(L)1 mAb in the other clinical settings is not based on PD-L1 status, but rather on patients' clinical characteristics. Further identification of biomarkers with high negative predictive value will also be of utmost importance to identify patients who may not respond to such immunotherapies.

Comparability of laboratory-developed and commercial PD-L1 assays in non-small cell lung carcinoma

PD-L1 expression in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is predictive of response to treatment with PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors. Different inhibitors have been developed with different PD-L1 assays, which use different PD-1 antibody clones on different immunohistochemistry platforms. Depending on instrument and reagent availability, laboratory-developed tests with cross-platform use of PD-L1 antibodies may have practical benefits over commercial assays. The 22C3 pharmDx Assay (referred to as 22C3 DAKO), the VENTANA PD-L1 SP263 Assay (referred to as SP263 VENTANA) and a lab-developed test using the 22C3 antibody on the VENTANA BenchMark ULTRA IHC/ISH system (referred to as 22C3 VENTANA) were performed on whole sections of 85 NSCLC surgical resections. All sections were independently scored by three pathologists using tumor proportion scores. Correlation coefficients for continuous scores in pairwise comparisons between assays ranged from 0.976 to 0.978. When using a 1% positivity threshold (dichotomous scores), the 22C3 DAKO assay and 22C3 VENTANA assays showed the greatest agreement (93% agreement, κ = 0.86, 95% CI 0.75-0.97), and the 22C3 DAKO and SP263 VENTANA assays tended to show slightly less agreement (84% agreement, κ = 0.66, 95% CI 0.50-0.82). When using a 50% positivity threshold (dichotomous scores), all pairwise comparisons showed similar agreement (96-99% agreement, κ = 0.89-0.97). Overall, there was no significant difference between assays at 1% or 50% thresholds (P = .77). These data are consistent with potential interchangeability of these assays, which may widen the scope of PD-L1 assays available to laboratories and reduce logistical barriers to testing.

Antiprogrammed cell death protein 1 immunotherapy for angiosarcoma with high programmed death-ligand 1 expression: a case report

Background: Angiosarcoma (AS) is a rare malignancy originating from lymphatic or vascular endothelial cells. Prognosis of the disease is usually dismal and there is no effective treatment. Immunotherapy has been proved to be effective for various cancer types. Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression is generally recognized as a biomarker for the prediction of response to anti-PD-(L)1 immunotherapies. Methods & results: Here, we discuss a single case by highlighting the treatment of the antiprogrammed cell death protein 1 drug pembrolizumab with high PD-L1 expression. CT scan demonstrated a confirmed size reduction of some lesions compared with original lesions, which indicates the possible clinical benefit. Conclusion: We speculate that early anti-PD-1 treatment may be a promising strategy for angiosarcoma patients with high PD-L1 expression.

Implementation of PD-L1 22C3 IHC pharmDxTM in Cell Block Preparations of Lung Cancer: Concordance with Surgical Resections and Technical Validation of CytoLyt® Prefixation

BACKGROUND

Programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) is used as biomarker for pembrolizumab therapy in advanced stage lung cancer patients. However, data permitting direct performance comparison between cytology and surgical specimen types are limited since both specimens from a single tumor site are infrequently available. In addition, alcohol fixation used with cytology specimens requires technical validation of the PD-L1 IHC assay before clinical use. We here report our experience with implementation of the PD-L1 22C3 IHC pharmDxTM assay for cytologic samples at a large tertiary cancer center.

STUDY DESIGN

Archival formalin-fixed (FF), paraffin-embedded cell blocks (CBs) and subsequent lung tumor resections (LTRs) from the same anatomical site were used for a direct comparison of PD-L1 tumor proportion scores (TPSs). TPS values were independently determined by one surgical lung pathologist and two cytopathologists blinded to the specimen pairs. An interim analysis was performed to facilitate the pooling of expertise among observers. After PD-L1 22C3 IHC pharmDxTM implementation for FF cytology specimens, dual-processed samples were used for a prospective technical validation of CytoLyt® prefixation (CF). Digital image analysis was performed for a subset of dual-processed specimens.

RESULTS

Eighty-one CBs and LTRs were included for comparison of the specimen types. PD-L1 assessment in CBs had an accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 88.9/72.8, 66.7/73.5, 95.2/72.3, 80.0/65.8, and 90.9/79.1% for the ≥50/≥1% cutoff, respectively. The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.84 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.76, 0.90), and it improved after interim analysis (before: 0.79 and after: 0.92). The overall concordance between CF and FF for the categories defined by the ≥50/≥1% cutoff values was 90.4% (95% CI: 79.0, 96.8). Similar assay performance was confirmed by digital analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

PD-L1 22C3 IHC pharmDxTM shows good reliability if used with CB preparations. CF does not impact assay results significantly. Clinical validation with outcome data is needed, and digital methods of assessment should be further investigated.

The path to a better biomarker: application of a risk management framework for the implementation of PD-L1 and TILs as immuno-oncology biomarkers in breast cancer clinical trials and daily practice

Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies targeting PD-1/PD-L1 are now the standard of care in oncology across several hematologic and solid tumor types, including triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). Patients with metastatic or locally advanced TNBC with PD-L1 expression on immune cells occupying ≥1% of tumor area demonstrated survival benefit with the addition of atezolizumab to nab-paclitaxel. However, concerns regarding variability between immunohistochemical PD-L1 assay performance and inter-reader reproducibility have been raised. High tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) have also been associated with response to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in patients with breast cancer (BC). TILs can be easily assessed on hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides and have shown reliable inter-reader reproducibility. As an established prognostic factor in early stage TNBC, TILs are soon anticipated to be reported in daily practice in many pathology laboratories worldwide. Because TILs and PD-L1 are parts of an immunological spectrum in BC, we propose the systematic implementation of combined PD-L1 and TIL analyses as a more comprehensive immuno-oncological biomarker for patient selection for PD-1/PD-L1 inhibition-based therapy in patients with BC. Although practical and regulatory considerations differ by jurisdiction, the pathology community has the responsibility to patients to implement assays that lead to optimal patient selection. We propose herewith a risk-management framework that may help mitigate the risks of suboptimal patient selection for immuno-therapeutic approaches in clinical trials and daily practice based on combined TILs/PD-L1 assessment in BC. © 2020 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.