1
|
Kaplan HG, Dowdell AK, Berry AB, Shimol RB, Robinson FL, Carney CA, Piening BD. Multi-omic profiling of simultaneous ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2024; 205:451-464. [PMID: 38523186 PMCID: PMC11101558 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-024-07270-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2023] [Accepted: 01/24/2024] [Indexed: 03/26/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The progression of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) to invasive breast carcinoma (IBC) in humans is highly variable. To better understand the relationship between them, we performed a multi-omic characterization of co-occurring DCIS and IBC lesions in a cohort of individuals. METHODS Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue samples from 50 patients with co-occurring DCIS and IBC lesions were subjected to DNA-seq and whole transcriptome RNA-seq. Paired DCIS and IBC multi-omics profiles were then interrogated for DNA mutations, gene expression profiles and pathway analysis. RESULTS Most small variants and copy number variations were shared between co-occurring DCIS and IBC lesions, with IBC exhibiting on average a higher degree of additional mutations. However, 36% of co-occurring lesions shared no common mutations and 49% shared no common copy number variations. The most frequent genomic variants in both DCIS and IBC were PIK3CA, TP53, KMT2C, MAP3K1, GATA3 and SF3B1, with KMT2C being more frequent in DCIS and TP53 and MAP3K1 more frequent in IBC, though the numbers are too small for definitive conclusions. The most frequent copy number variations were seen in MCL1, CKSB1 and ERBB2. ERBB2 changes were not seen in IBC unless present in the corresponding DCIS. Transcriptional profiles were highly distinct between DCIS and IBC, with DCIS exhibiting upregulation of immune-related signatures, while IBC showed significant overexpression in genes and pathways associated with cell division and proliferation. Interestingly, DCIS and IBC exhibited significant differential expression of different components of extracellular matrix (ECM) formation and regulation, with DCIS showing overexpression of ECM-membrane interaction components while IBC showed upregulation of genes associated with fibronectin and invadopodia. CONCLUSION While most co-occurring DCIS and IBC were mutationally similar and suggestive of a common clonal progenitor, transcriptionally the lesions are highly distinct, with IBC expressing key pathways that facilitate invasion and proliferation. These results are suggestive of additional levels of regulation, epigenetic or other, that facilitate the acquisition of invasive properties during tumor evolution.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Humans
- Female
- Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/genetics
- Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/pathology
- Breast Neoplasms/genetics
- Breast Neoplasms/pathology
- Mutation
- DNA Copy Number Variations
- Gene Expression Profiling/methods
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/genetics
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/pathology
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/metabolism
- Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics
- Middle Aged
- Neoplasm Invasiveness
- Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic
- Transcriptome
- Aged
- Adult
- Genomics/methods
- Multiomics
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henry G Kaplan
- Swedish Cancer Institute, 1221 Madison St., Suite 920, Seattle, WA, 98104, USA.
| | - Alexa K Dowdell
- Earle A. Chiles Research Institute, Providence Health, Portland, OR, 97213, USA
| | - Anna B Berry
- Swedish Cancer Institute, 1221 Madison St., Suite 920, Seattle, WA, 98104, USA
| | - Racheli Ben Shimol
- Earle A. Chiles Research Institute, Providence Health, Portland, OR, 97213, USA
| | - Fred L Robinson
- Earle A. Chiles Research Institute, Providence Health, Portland, OR, 97213, USA
| | | | - Brian D Piening
- Earle A. Chiles Research Institute, Providence Health, Portland, OR, 97213, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Prognostic significance of microinvasion with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2023; 197:245-254. [PMID: 36427119 PMCID: PMC9823049 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-022-06800-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2022] [Accepted: 11/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) associated with invasive carcinoma ≤ 1 mm in size is defined as DCIS with microinvasion (DCIS/microinvasion) rather than as invasive breast carcinoma. The number of patients with microinvasion accounts for < 1% of all breast cancer in published studies. As the numbers are limited, the prognostic significance of DCIS/microinvasion has not been clearly elucidated. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the survival differences between patients with DCIS/microinvasion and those with pure DCIS. METHODS A meta-analysis following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology was performed. We searched three electronic databases (MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE) and included observational studies published in English that contained survival details of patients with either DCIS or DCIS/microinvasion. RESULTS This study identified 26 studies that described the clinicopathological characteristics of patients in both the DCIS and DCIS/microinvasion groups. Survival differences were evaluated in 10 of 26 studies. Disease-free survival and loco-regional recurrence-free survival were significantly shorter in patients with DCIS/microinvasion than in those with DCIS (Hazard ratio, 1.52; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-2.08; p = 0.01 and hazard ratio, 2.53; 95% confidence interval, 1.45-4.41; p = 0.001, respectively). Both overall survival and distant metastasis-free survival tended to be shorter in patients with DCIS/microinvasion than in patients with DCIS (Hazard ratio, 1.63; 95% CI, 0.63-4.23; p = 0.31 and hazard ratio, 1.85; 95% confidence interval, 0.74-4.66; p = 0.19, respectively) but the difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION Our meta-analysis suggests that DCIS/microinvasion may display more aggressive biological and clinical behavior than pure DCIS, highlighting the potential need for closer follow-up and consideration of adjuvant treatment strategies in DCIS patients with microinvasive disease.
Collapse
|
3
|
Casasent AK, Almekinders MM, Mulder C, Bhattacharjee P, Collyar D, Thompson AM, Jonkers J, Lips EH, van Rheenen J, Hwang ES, Nik-Zainal S, Navin NE, Wesseling J. Learning to distinguish progressive and non-progressive ductal carcinoma in situ. Nat Rev Cancer 2022; 22:663-678. [PMID: 36261705 DOI: 10.1038/s41568-022-00512-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/07/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a non-invasive breast neoplasia that accounts for 25% of all screen-detected breast cancers diagnosed annually. Neoplastic cells in DCIS are confined to the ductal system of the breast, although they can escape and progress to invasive breast cancer in a subset of patients. A key concern of DCIS is overtreatment, as most patients screened for DCIS and in whom DCIS is diagnosed will not go on to exhibit symptoms or die of breast cancer, even if left untreated. However, differentiating low-risk, indolent DCIS from potentially progressive DCIS remains challenging. In this Review, we summarize our current knowledge of DCIS and explore open questions about the basic biology of DCIS, including those regarding how genomic events in neoplastic cells and the surrounding microenvironment contribute to the progression of DCIS to invasive breast cancer. Further, we discuss what information will be needed to prevent overtreatment of indolent DCIS lesions without compromising adequate treatment for high-risk patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna K Casasent
- Department of Genetics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Charlotta Mulder
- Division of Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Jos Jonkers
- Division of Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Esther H Lips
- Division of Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Jacco van Rheenen
- Division of Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Serena Nik-Zainal
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Nicholas E Navin
- Department of Genetics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Bioinformatics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jelle Wesseling
- Division of Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Liu Y, Jin Z, Yu X, Zheng A, Jin F, Wang X. An insight into the invasion of breast ductal carcinoma in situ based on clinical, pathological and hematological data. PeerJ 2022; 10:e13966. [PMID: 36065403 PMCID: PMC9440660 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.13966] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2022] [Accepted: 08/08/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) has become a non-negligible part of breast cancers owing to the greatly increased incidence. While its natural history was not fully elucidated, which is the reason for current controversies in clinical treatment. Exploration of this issue from a clinical perspective is meaningful. Methods Medical records of 389 patients diagnosed with DCIS or DCIS with invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) were reviewed. All of them received appropriate medical care in our center. All 324 patients in training cohort were divided into invasion and non-invasion groups based on pathology. Differences in DCIS immunohistochemical markers and hematological indicators between them were analyzed. In the invasion group, differences between DCIS and matched IDC were compared to explore changes in the tumor heterogeneity during invasion. Conclusions are validated in the validation cohort of 65 patients. Results Patients in invasion and non-invasion groups were balanced in baseline characteristics and no statistically significant differences were noticed for DCIS immunohistochemical markers. For hematological indicators, high expression of platelet >291.50) (odds ratio, 2.46; CI [1.35-4.46]; p = 0.003) and SII (>347.20) (odds ratio, 2.54; CI [1.56-4.12]; p < 0.001) were established as independent predictors for invasion by logistic analysis and were validated in the validation cohort. Ki-67 of IDC was significantly higher than that of matched DCIS (p < 0.001). HER2 expression and histological grade of DCIS were separately linearly related to those of IDC. Conclusion The change in hematological indicators is an independent predictor for invasion and can be incorporated into the treatment decision-making process for DCIS. Invasion tumor cells exhibit a stronger proliferative capacity compared with the in-situ ones. There are linear relationships in HER2 expression and histological grades between DCIS and matched IDC. DCIS subclones with different histological grades will develop into invasive carcinomas separately.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yanbiao Liu
- Department of Breast Surgery, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China
| | - Zining Jin
- Department of Breast Surgery, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China
| | - Xinmiao Yu
- Department of Breast Surgery, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China
| | - Ang Zheng
- Department of Breast Surgery, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China
| | - Feng Jin
- Department of Breast Surgery, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China
| | - Xu Wang
- Department of Breast Surgery, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Yang L, Shen M, Qiu Y, Tang T, Bu H. Molecular subtyping reveals uniqueness of prognosis in breast ductal carcinoma in situ patients with lumpectomy. Breast 2022; 64:1-6. [PMID: 35462343 PMCID: PMC9039875 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2022.03.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2022] [Revised: 03/20/2022] [Accepted: 03/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Background We aimed to analyse the discrepancy in clinical features and prognosis between molecular subtypes in primary ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) patients with lumpectomy. Methods Primary DCIS patients were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registries database from 2010 to 2017. Based on immunohistochemistry markers of hormone receptor (HR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2), enrolled DCIS cases were divided into four molecular subtypes, HR-HER2-, HR-HER2+, HR + HER2+, and HR + HER2-. Clinical features and prognosis were compared between molecular subtypes. Radiotherapy (RT) effects on prognosis were also analysed in each molecular subtype. Results A total of 5,628 DCIS cases were retrospectively enrolled in this study. HR-HER2-, HR-HER2+, HR+HER2+, and HR+HER2- are 299 (5.3%), 498 (8.8%), 1,086 (19.3%), and 3,745 (66.5%), respectively. HR + HER2- cases have smaller tumor size (72.6%, P < 0.001) and lower grade (23.5%, P < 0.001). Comedo necrosis is more frequent in HR-HER2- (24.4%, P < 0.001) and HR-HER2+ DCIS cases (24.3%, P < 0.001). In univariate analyses, HR-HER2+ cases have significantly higher ipsilateral breast event (IBE) recurrence than HR+HER2- cases (P = 0.010). HR-HER2- cases show higher disease-specific mortality than HR+HER2+ cases (P = 0.021). In high-risk DCIS cases, RT reduces the absolute 5-year IBE incidence by 1.3%, 0.7%, 1.9%, and 2.6%, respectively in HR-HER2-, HR-HER2+, HR+HER2+, and HR+HER2- cases, respectively. Conclusion In this population-based study, DCIS cases have diverse clinical and prognostic features for different molecular subtypes. Adjusting treatment strategies according to DCIS molecular subtypes is worth advancing. HR-HER2+ DCIS shows the highest proportion of high-risk cases. HR + HER2- DCIS shows lowest proportion of high-risk cases. HR-HER2+ DCIS shows high risk of IBE recurrence. The DSmortality has no differences among four molecular subtypes. RT lowered the probability of IBE incidence in high-risk cases for each molecular subtype of DCIS.
Collapse
|
6
|
Morrissey RL, Thompson AM, Lozano G. Is loss of p53 a driver of ductal carcinoma in situ progression? Br J Cancer 2022; 127:1744-1754. [PMID: 35764786 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-022-01885-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2022] [Revised: 05/17/2022] [Accepted: 06/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a non-obligate precursor of invasive carcinoma. Multiple studies have shown that DCIS lesions typically possess a driver mutation associated with cancer development. Mutation in the TP53 tumour suppressor gene is present in 15-30% of pure DCIS lesions and in ~30% of invasive breast cancers. Mutations in TP53 are significantly associated with high-grade DCIS, the most likely form of DCIS to progress to invasive carcinoma. In this review, we summarise published evidence on the prevalence of mutant TP53 in DCIS (including all DCIS subtypes), discuss the availability of mouse models for the study of DCIS and highlight the need for functional studies of the role of TP53 in the development of DCIS and progression from DCIS to invasive disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rhiannon L Morrissey
- Genetics and Epigenetics Program at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX, USA.,Department of Genetics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Alastair M Thompson
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Guillermina Lozano
- Genetics and Epigenetics Program at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX, USA. .,Department of Genetics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Grimm LJ, Rahbar H, Abdelmalak M, Hall AH, Ryser MD. Ductal Carcinoma in Situ: State-of-the-Art Review. Radiology 2021; 302:246-255. [PMID: 34931856 PMCID: PMC8805655 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.211839] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a nonobligate precursor of invasive cancer, and its detection, diagnosis, and management are controversial. DCIS incidence grew with the expansion of screening mammography programs in the 1980s and 1990s, and DCIS is viewed as a major driver of overdiagnosis and overtreatment. For pathologists, the diagnosis and classification of DCIS is challenging due to undersampling and interobserver variability. Understanding the progression from normal breast tissue to DCIS and, ultimately, to invasive cancer is limited by a paucity of natural history data with multiple proposed evolutionary models of DCIS initiation and progression. Although radiologists are familiar with the classic presentation of DCIS as asymptomatic calcifications at mammography, the expanded pool of modalities, advanced imaging techniques, and image analytics have identified multiple potential biomarkers of histopathologic characteristics and prognosis. Finally, there is growing interest in the nonsurgical management of DCIS, including active surveillance, to reduce overtreatment and provide patients with more personalized management options. However, current biomarkers are not adept at enabling identification of occult invasive disease at biopsy or accurately predicting the risk of progression to invasive disease. Several active surveillance trials are ongoing and are expected to better identify women with low-risk DCIS who may avoid surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lars J. Grimm
- From the Departments of Radiology (L.J.G.), Pathology (M.A., A.H.H.), and Population Health Sciences (M.D.R.), Duke University, 2301 Erwin Rd, Box 3808, Durham, NC 27710; and Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash (H.R.)
| | - Habib Rahbar
- From the Departments of Radiology (L.J.G.), Pathology (M.A., A.H.H.), and Population Health Sciences (M.D.R.), Duke University, 2301 Erwin Rd, Box 3808, Durham, NC 27710; and Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash (H.R.)
| | - Monica Abdelmalak
- From the Departments of Radiology (L.J.G.), Pathology (M.A., A.H.H.), and Population Health Sciences (M.D.R.), Duke University, 2301 Erwin Rd, Box 3808, Durham, NC 27710; and Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash (H.R.)
| | - Allison H. Hall
- From the Departments of Radiology (L.J.G.), Pathology (M.A., A.H.H.), and Population Health Sciences (M.D.R.), Duke University, 2301 Erwin Rd, Box 3808, Durham, NC 27710; and Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash (H.R.)
| | - Marc D. Ryser
- From the Departments of Radiology (L.J.G.), Pathology (M.A., A.H.H.), and Population Health Sciences (M.D.R.), Duke University, 2301 Erwin Rd, Box 3808, Durham, NC 27710; and Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash (H.R.)
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Van Bockstal MR, Libbrecht L, Galant C. The 5-Year Paradigm in DCIS of the Breast: Unexpected Lessons From the NSABP B-43 Trial. J Clin Oncol 2021; 39:3409-3410. [PMID: 34473527 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.00968] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Mieke R Van Bockstal
- Mieke R. Van Bockstal, MD, PhD, Department of Pathology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc Bruxelles, Woluwé-Saint-Lambert, Belgium, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; Louis Libbrecht, MD, PhD, Department of Pathology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc Bruxelles, Woluwé-Saint-Lambert, Belgium, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium, Department of Pathology, AZ Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium; and Christine Galant, MD, PhD, Department of Pathology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc Bruxelles, Woluwé-Saint-Lambert, Belgium, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Louis Libbrecht
- Mieke R. Van Bockstal, MD, PhD, Department of Pathology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc Bruxelles, Woluwé-Saint-Lambert, Belgium, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; Louis Libbrecht, MD, PhD, Department of Pathology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc Bruxelles, Woluwé-Saint-Lambert, Belgium, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium, Department of Pathology, AZ Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium; and Christine Galant, MD, PhD, Department of Pathology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc Bruxelles, Woluwé-Saint-Lambert, Belgium, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Christine Galant
- Mieke R. Van Bockstal, MD, PhD, Department of Pathology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc Bruxelles, Woluwé-Saint-Lambert, Belgium, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; Louis Libbrecht, MD, PhD, Department of Pathology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc Bruxelles, Woluwé-Saint-Lambert, Belgium, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium, Department of Pathology, AZ Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium; and Christine Galant, MD, PhD, Department of Pathology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc Bruxelles, Woluwé-Saint-Lambert, Belgium, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Thorat MA, Levey PM, Jones JL, Pinder SE, Bundred NJ, Fentiman IS, Cuzick J. Prognostic and Predictive Value of HER2 Expression in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: Results from the UK/ANZ DCIS Randomized Trial. Clin Cancer Res 2021; 27:5317-5324. [PMID: 34380636 PMCID: PMC7612534 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-21-1239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2021] [Revised: 05/23/2021] [Accepted: 07/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE HER2 is overexpressed more frequently in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) than in invasive breast cancer but its prognostic significance and predictive role for radiotherapy has not been clearly established. We investigated the prognostic and predictive value of HER2 overexpression in DCIS. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN HER2 expression was evaluated by IHC using the HercepTest™ in samples from UK/ANZ DCIS trial participants (n = 755) with IHC 3+ expression categorized as HER2 positive for primary analyses. Sensitivity analyses included HER2 categorization as negative (IHC 0,1+), equivocal (IHC 2+), and positive (IHC 3+) and analyses restricted to a nested case-control component where 181 cases (with recurrence) were matched to 362 controls by treatment arm and age. RESULTS Two-hundred and forty-five (34.4%) of evaluable 713 samples [181 ipsilateral breast events (IBE)] were HER2 positive. HER2 overexpression was associated with significantly increased risk of IBE [HR = 2.29; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.64-3.14; P < 0.0001] and in situ IBE (DCIS-IBE; HR = 2.90; 95% CI, 1.91-4.40; P < 0.0001), but not of invasive IBE (I-IBE; HR = 1.40; 95% CI, 0.81-2.42; P = 0.23; Pheterogeneity = 0.04). Inclusion of HER2 significantly improved [Δχ2 (1d.f.) 12.25; P = 0.0005] a prognostic model of clinicopathological and treatment variables, HER2 being an independent predictor of IBE (multivariate HR = 1.91; 95% CI, 1.33-2.76; P = 0.0004). Radiotherapy benefit in preventing DCIS-IBE was significantly greater (Pheterogeneity = 0.04) in HER2-positive DCIS (HR = 0.16; 95% CI, 0.07-0.41) compared with HER2-negative DCIS (HR = 0.58; 95% CI, 0.28-1.19). CONCLUSIONS HER2 overexpression is associated with significantly increased risk of in situ recurrence and is also predictive of radiotherapy benefit, with greater reductions in in situ but not invasive recurrences in HER2-positive DCIS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mangesh A. Thorat
- Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
- School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
- Breast Services, Guy's Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Pauline M. Levey
- Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - J. Louise Jones
- Barts Cancer Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sarah E. Pinder
- School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Pathology, Guy's Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nigel J. Bundred
- Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Wythenshawe, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Ian S. Fentiman
- School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jack Cuzick
- Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Wu L, Zhao Y, Lin P, Qin H, Liu Y, Wan D, Li X, He Y, Yang H. Preoperative ultrasound radiomics analysis for expression of multiple molecular biomarkers in mass type of breast ductal carcinoma in situ. BMC Med Imaging 2021; 21:84. [PMID: 34001017 PMCID: PMC8130392 DOI: 10.1186/s12880-021-00610-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2020] [Accepted: 04/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The molecular biomarkers of breast ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) have important guiding significance for individualized precision treatment. This study was intended to explore the significance of radiomics based on ultrasound images to predict the expression of molecular biomarkers of mass type of DCIS. METHODS 116 patients with mass type of DCIS were included in this retrospective study. The radiomics features were extracted based on ultrasound images. According to the ratio of 7:3, the data sets of molecular biomarkers were split into training set and test set. The radiomics models were developed to predict the expression of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), Ki67, p16, and p53 by using combination of multiple feature selection and classifiers. The predictive performance of the models were evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating curve. RESULTS The investigators extracted 5234 radiomics features from ultrasound images. 12, 23, 41, 51, 31 and 23 features were important for constructing the models. The radiomics scores were significantly (P < 0.05) in each molecular marker expression of mass type of DCIS. The radiomics models showed predictive performance with AUC greater than 0.7 in the training set and test set: ER (0.94 and 0.84), PR (0.90 and 0.78), HER2 (0.94 and 0.74), Ki67 (0.95 and 0.86), p16 (0.96 and 0.78), and p53 (0.95 and 0.74), respectively. CONCLUSION Ultrasonic-based radiomics analysis provided a noninvasive preoperative method for predicting the expression of molecular markers of mass type of DCIS with good accuracy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linyong Wu
- Department of Medical Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, 530021, People's Republic of China
| | - Yujia Zhao
- Department of Medical Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, 530021, People's Republic of China
| | - Peng Lin
- Department of Medical Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, 530021, People's Republic of China
| | - Hui Qin
- Department of Medical Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, 530021, People's Republic of China
| | - Yichen Liu
- Department of Medical Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, 530021, People's Republic of China
| | - Da Wan
- Department of Medical Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, 530021, People's Republic of China
| | - Xin Li
- GE Healthcare, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - Yun He
- Department of Medical Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, 530021, People's Republic of China.
| | - Hong Yang
- Department of Medical Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, 530021, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Strell C, Folkvaljon D, Holmberg E, Schiza A, Thurfjell V, Karlsson P, Bergh J, Bremer T, Akslen LA, Wärnberg F, Östman A. High PDGFRb Expression Predicts Resistance to Radiotherapy in DCIS within the SweDCIS Randomized Trial. Clin Cancer Res 2021; 27:3469-3477. [PMID: 33952629 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-20-4300] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2020] [Revised: 02/15/2021] [Accepted: 03/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study analyzes the potential of stromal platelet-derived growth factor receptor-beta (PDGFRb) expression as biomarker for radiotherapy (RT) benefit on ipsilateral breast events (IBE) in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Improved identification of DCIS patients refractory to adjuvant whole-breast RT is needed. Predictive biomarker studies in DCIS have focused on tumor cell features rather than the tumor-associated stroma, despite growing evidence of its influence on therapy efficiency. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Samples from the Swedish randomized radiotherapy DCIS trial (SweDCIS) were subjected to IHC analysis for stromal PDGFRb expression. IBE incidence at 10 years after breast-conserving surgery was the primary endpoint. Interactions between marker and treatment were analyzed. RESULTS PDGFRb score was predictive for RT benefit with regard to IBE (P interaction = 0.002 and P interaction = 0.008 adjusted multivariably). Patients of the PDGFRblow group had a strong benefit from RT regarding IBE risk [HR, 0.23; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.12-0.45; P < 0.001] with an absolute risk reduction of 21% (cumulative risk 7% vs. 28%) at 10 years. No significant risk reduction by RT was observed for patients of the PDGFRbhigh group (HR, 0.83; 0.51-1.34; P = 0.444; cumulative risk 22% vs. 25%). The RT response-predictive effect of stromal PDGFRb was equally strong in analyses for in situ and invasive IBE when analyzed separately (in situ IBE: P = 0.029; invasive IBE: P = 0.044). CONCLUSIONS Results suggest high stromal PDGFRb expression as a novel biomarker identifying DCIS patients who are refractory to standard whole-breast adjuvant RT. The data imply previously unrecognized fibroblast-mediated modulation of radiosensitivity of DCIS, which should be further explored from mechanistic and targeting perspectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carina Strell
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Dick Folkvaljon
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Erik Holmberg
- Department of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Aglaia Schiza
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Viktoria Thurfjell
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Per Karlsson
- Department of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Jonas Bergh
- Karolinska Institutet and Breast Cancer Section, Cancer Theme, Karolinska University Hospital, Department of Oncology and Pathology, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Public Health, Oxford University, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | | | - Lars A Akslen
- Centre for Cancer Biomarkers CCBIO, Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Fredrik Wärnberg
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.,Department of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Arne Östman
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. .,Centre for Cancer Biomarkers CCBIO, Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
van Seijen M, Jóźwiak K, Pinder SE, Hall A, Krishnamurthy S, Thomas JSJ, Collins LC, Bijron J, Bart J, Cohen D, Ng W, Bouybayoune I, Stobart H, Hudecek J, Schaapveld M, Thompson A, Lips EH, Wesseling J. Variability in grading of ductal carcinoma in situ among an international group of pathologists. J Pathol Clin Res 2021; 7:233-242. [PMID: 33620141 PMCID: PMC8073001 DOI: 10.1002/cjp2.201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2020] [Revised: 12/11/2020] [Accepted: 01/08/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
The prognostic value of cytonuclear grade in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is debated, partly due to high interobserver variability and the use of multiple guidelines. The aim of this study was to evaluate interobserver agreement in grading DCIS between Dutch, British, and American pathologists. Haematoxylin and eosin-stained slides of 425 women with primary DCIS were independently reviewed by nine breast pathologists based in the Netherlands, the UK, and the USA. Chance-corrected kappa (κma ) for association between pathologists was calculated based on a generalised linear mixed model using the ordinal package in R. Overall κma for grade of DCIS (low, intermediate, or high) was estimated to be 0.50 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.44-0.56), indicating a moderate association between pathologists. When the model was adjusted for national guidelines, the association for grade did not change (κma = 0.53; 95% CI 0.48-0.57); subgroup analysis for pathologists using the UK pathology guidelines only had significantly higher association (κma = 0.58; 95% CI 0.56-0.61). To assess if concordance of grading relates to the expression of the oestrogen receptor (ER) and HER2, archived immunohistochemistry was analysed on a subgroup (n = 106). This showed that non-high grade according to the majority opinion was associated with ER positivity and HER2 negativity (100 and 89% of non-high grade cases, respectively). In conclusion, DCIS grade showed only moderate association using whole slide images scored by nine breast pathologists. As therapeutic decisions and inclusion in ongoing clinical trials are guided by DCIS grade, there is a pressing need to reduce interobserver variability in grading. ER and HER2 might be supportive to prevent the accidental and unwanted inclusion of high-grade DCIS in such trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maartje van Seijen
- Division of Molecular PathologyThe Netherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Katarzyna Jóźwiak
- Division of Molecular PathologyThe Netherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Institute of Biostatistics and Registry ResearchBrandenburg Medical School Theodor FontaneNeuruppinGermany
| | - Sarah E Pinder
- Comprehensive Cancer Centre at Guy's Hospital, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical SciencesKings College LondonLondonUK
- Department of Cellular PathologyGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust LondonLondonUK
| | - Allison Hall
- Department of PathologyDuke University Medical CenterDurhamNCUSA
| | - Savitri Krishnamurthy
- Department of PathologyThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTXUSA
| | | | - Laura C Collins
- Department of PathologyBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical SchoolBostonMAUSA
| | - Jonathan Bijron
- Department of PathologyMartini HospitalGroningenThe Netherlands
| | - Joost Bart
- Department of PathologyIsala HospitalZwolleThe Netherlands
- Department of PathologyUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands
| | - Danielle Cohen
- Department of PathologyLeiden University Medical CenterLeidenThe Netherlands
| | - Wen Ng
- Department of Cellular PathologyGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust LondonLondonUK
| | - Ihssane Bouybayoune
- Comprehensive Cancer Centre at Guy's Hospital, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical SciencesKings College LondonLondonUK
| | | | - Jan Hudecek
- Department of Research ITThe Netherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Michael Schaapveld
- Department of Psychosocial Research and EpidemiologyThe Netherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Alastair Thompson
- Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer CenterBaylor College of MedicineHoustonTXUSA
| | - Esther H Lips
- Division of Molecular PathologyThe Netherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Jelle Wesseling
- Division of Molecular PathologyThe Netherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Department of PathologyIsala HospitalZwolleThe Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Bergholtz H, Lien TG, Swanson DM, Frigessi A, Daidone MG, Tost J, Wärnberg F, Sørlie T. Contrasting DCIS and invasive breast cancer by subtype suggests basal-like DCIS as distinct lesions. NPJ Breast Cancer 2020; 6:26. [PMID: 32577501 PMCID: PMC7299965 DOI: 10.1038/s41523-020-0167-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2019] [Accepted: 05/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a non-invasive type of breast cancer with highly variable potential of becoming invasive and affecting mortality. Currently, many patients with DCIS are overtreated due to the lack of specific biomarkers that distinguish low risk lesions from those with a higher risk of progression. In this study, we analyzed 57 pure DCIS and 313 invasive breast cancers (IBC) from different patients. Three levels of genomic data were obtained; gene expression, DNA methylation, and DNA copy number. We performed subtype stratified analyses and identified key differences between DCIS and IBC that suggest subtype specific progression. Prominent differences were found in tumors of the basal-like subtype: Basal-like DCIS were less proliferative and showed a higher degree of differentiation than basal-like IBC. Also, core basal tumors (characterized by high correlation to the basal-like centroid) were not identified amongst DCIS as opposed to IBC. At the copy number level, basal-like DCIS exhibited fewer copy number aberrations compared with basal-like IBC. An intriguing finding through analysis of the methylome was hypermethylation of multiple protocadherin genes in basal-like IBC compared with basal-like DCIS and normal tissue, possibly caused by long range epigenetic silencing. This points to silencing of cell adhesion-related genes specifically in IBC of the basal-like subtype. Our work confirms that subtype stratification is essential when studying progression from DCIS to IBC, and we provide evidence that basal-like DCIS show less aggressive characteristics and question the assumption that basal-like DCIS is a direct precursor of basal-like invasive breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helga Bergholtz
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Tonje G Lien
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - David M Swanson
- Oslo Centre for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Arnoldo Frigessi
- Oslo Centre for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Biostatistics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Maria Grazia Daidone
- Department of Applied Research and Technical development, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Jörg Tost
- Laboratory for Epigenetics and Environment, Centre National de Recherche en Génomique Humaine, CEA-Institut de Biologie Francois Jacob, Evry, France
| | - Fredrik Wärnberg
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.,Department of Surgery, Uppsala Academic Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Therese Sørlie
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Omics Integration Analyses Reveal the Early Evolution of Malignancy in Breast Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12061460. [PMID: 32512721 PMCID: PMC7352609 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12061460] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2020] [Revised: 05/29/2020] [Accepted: 05/31/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The majority of cancer evolution studies involve individual-based approaches that neglect the population dynamics necessary to build a global picture of cancer evolution for each cancer type. Here, we conducted a population-based study in breast cancer to understand the timing of malignancy evolution and its correlation to the genetic evolution of pathological stages. In an omics integrative approach, we integrated gene expression and genomic aberration data for pre-invasive (ductal carcinoma in situ; DCIS, early-stage) and post-invasive (invasive ductal carcinoma; IDC, late-stage) samples and investigated the evolutionary role of further genetic changes in later stages compared to the early ones. We found that single gene alterations (SGAs) and copy-number alterations (CNAs) work together in forward and backward evolution manners to fine-tune the signaling pathways operating in tumors. Analyses of the integrated point mutation and gene expression data showed that (i) our proposed fine-tuning concept is also applicable to metastasis, and (ii) metastases sometimes diverge from the primary tumor at the DCIS stage. Our results indicated that the malignant potency of breast tumors is constant over the pre- and post-invasive pathological stages. Indeed, further genetic alterations in later stages do not establish de novo malignancy routes; however, they serve to fine-tune antecedent signaling pathways.
Collapse
|
15
|
Van Bockstal MR, Agahozo MC, van Marion R, Atmodimedjo PN, Sleddens HFBM, Dinjens WNM, Visser LL, Lips EH, Wesseling J, van Deurzen CHM. Somatic mutations and copy number variations in breast cancers with heterogeneous HER2 amplification. Mol Oncol 2020; 14:671-685. [PMID: 32058674 PMCID: PMC7138394 DOI: 10.1002/1878-0261.12650] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2019] [Revised: 01/13/2020] [Accepted: 02/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Intratumour heterogeneity fuels carcinogenesis and allows circumventing specific targeted therapies. HER2 gene amplification is associated with poor outcome in invasive breast cancer. Heterogeneous HER2 amplification has been described in 5–41% of breast cancers. Here, we investigated the genetic differences between HER2‐positive and HER2‐negative admixed breast cancer components. We performed an in‐depth analysis to explore the potential heterogeneity in the somatic mutational landscape of each individual tumour component. Formalin‐fixed, paraffin‐embedded breast cancer tissue of ten patients with at least one HER2‐negative and at least one HER2‐positive component was microdissected. Targeted next‐generation sequencing was performed using a customized 53‐gene panel. Somatic mutations and copy number variations were analysed. Overall, the tumours showed a heterogeneous distribution of 12 deletions, 9 insertions, 32 missense variants and 7 nonsense variants in 26 different genes, which are (likely) pathogenic. Three splice site alterations were identified. One patient had an EGFR copy number gain restricted to a HER2‐negative in situ component, resulting in EGFR protein overexpression. Two patients had FGFR1 copy number gains in at least one tumour component. Two patients had an 8q24 gain in at least one tumour component, resulting in a copy number increase in MYC and PVT1. One patient had a CCND1 copy number gain restricted to a HER2‐negative tumour component. No common alternative drivers were identified in the HER2‐negative tumour components. This series of 10 breast cancers with heterogeneous HER2 gene amplification illustrates that HER2 positivity is not an unconditional prerequisite for the maintenance of tumour growth. Many other molecular aberrations are likely to act as alternative or collaborative drivers. This study demonstrates that breast carcinogenesis is a dynamically evolving process characterized by a versatile somatic mutational profile, of which some genetic aberrations will be crucial for cancer progression, and others will be mere ‘passenger’ molecular anomalies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Ronald van Marion
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Peggy N Atmodimedjo
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hein F B M Sleddens
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Winand N M Dinjens
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lindy L Visser
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Esther H Lips
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jelle Wesseling
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Dano H, Galant C, Coyette M, Van Bockstal MR. Histiocytoid Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast: Not All Intraductal Foamy Cells Are Macrophages! Int J Surg Pathol 2019; 27:872-875. [PMID: 31328646 DOI: 10.1177/1066896919864635] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
With the advent of screening mammography, the incidence of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) has increased. DCIS accounts for around 20% of breast cancers diagnosed at present. The histiocytoid variant of clear cell DCIS is a rare subtype of DCIS, characterized by epithelial cells with a clear and foamy cytoplasm. Histiocytoid DCIS serves as a potential diagnostic pitfall, since it can be easily mistaken for intraductal collections of foamy macrophages. In this article, we report a particular case of biphasic DCIS, characterized by an extensive histiocytoid-type clear cell component and a conventional "non-clear" cell component. Both components presented with HER2 protein overexpression. We discuss the diagnostic challenge and differential diagnosis of clear cell DCIS, as well as the role of HER2 overexpression in DCIS pathogenesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hélène Dano
- Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Christine Galant
- Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium.,Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Maude Coyette
- Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Mieke R Van Bockstal
- Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium.,Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.,Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|