“Seedling” mesenchymal tumors (gastrointestinal stromal tumors and leiomyomas) are common incidental tumors of the esophagogastric junction. Am J Surg Pathol. 2007;31:1629-1635. [PMID: 18059218 DOI: 10.1097/pas.0b013e31806ab2c3]

Characteristics of gastrointestinal stromal tumors associated to other tumors: Características de los tumores del estroma gastrointestinal asociados a otras neoplasias

INTRODUCTION

Our aim is to analyze the differences between sporadic gastrointestinal stromal tumors and those associated with other tumors.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study including patients with diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors operated at our center. Patients were divided into two groups, according to whether or not they had associated other tumors, both synchronously and metachronously. Disease free survival and overall survival were calculated for both groups.

RESULTS

96 patients were included, 60 (62.5%) were male, with a median age of 66.8 (35-84). An association with other tumors was found in 33 cases (34.3%); 12 were synchronous (36.3%) and 21 metachronous (63.7%). The presence of mutations in associated tumors was 70% and in non-associated tumors 75%. Associated tumors were classified as low risk tumors based on Fletcher's stratification scale (p = 0.001) as they usually were smaller in size and had less than ≤5 mitosis per 50 HPF compared to non-associated tumors. When analyzing overall survival, there were statistically significant differences (p = 0,035) between both groups.

CONCLUSION

The relatively high proportion of gastrointestinal stromal tumors cases with associated tumors suggests the need to carry out a study to rule out presence of a second neoplasm and a long-term follow-up should be carried out in order to diagnose a possible second neoplasm. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors associated with other tumors have usually low risk of recurrence with a good long-term prognosis.

The Feasibility and Safety of the Clip-and-Snare Method with a Prelooping Technique for Gastric Submucosal Tumors Removal: A Single-Center Experience (with Video)

AIM

This study compared the efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) combined with clip-and-snare method and a prelooping technique (CSM-PLT) with ESD alone for the treatment of gastric submucosal tumors (gSMTs).

METHODS

We retrospectively enrolled a matched group of 86 patients who received ESD combined with CSM-PLT or ESD alone from July 2010 to July 2020. The primary outcomes included complete resection, en bloc resection, and R0 resection.

RESULTS

Eighty-six patients with gSMTs were enrolled in ESD combined with CSM-PLT group and ESD group, respectively. There were no significant differences in gender, age, tumor size, tumor location, and tumor origin between the two groups. The complete resection, en bloc resection, and R0 resection rates were comparable between two groups (P=1, P=0.31, and P=0.25, respectively). There were no significant differences in terms of hospital stays, hospitalization cost, postoperative complications, and residual rate (P=0.42, P=0.74, P=0.65, and P=1, respectively) between the two groups. However, the ESD combined with CSM-PLT was associated with a shorter procedure duration and fewer intraoperative complications (P < 0.001 and P=0.024, respectively). In addition, the incidence of intraoperative bleeding in ESD combined with CSM-PLT group was significantly lower than that in ESD group (P=0.04).

CONCLUSION

Both ESD combined with CSM-PLT and ESD were effective and safe modalities for the treatment of gSMTs. However, ESD combined with CSM-PLT was associated with a shorter procedure duration and fewer intraoperative complications.

Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors and the General Surgeon

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are rare malignancies of the gastrointestinal tract but are the most common sarcoma. This review covers aspects of the care of patients with GIST relevant to surgeons. In particular, management of sub-2 cm GISTs, the utility of neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy for primary GISTs, and indications for surgery in the setting of metastatic disease are discussed.

Treatment of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GISTs): A Focus on Younger Patients

Simple Summary

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal neoplasms of the gastrointestinal tract. GISTs mainly develop in older adults, and the median age of diagnosis is 60–65 years. The incidence of GISTs in young adult patients, defined as adults before 40, is less than 10%. The frequency and type of molecular abnormalities in this group of patients are different from those in older patients. In this publication, we focus on the specificity of GISTs in young people and the principles of therapeutic management and management of the side effects of treatment.

Abstract

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) originate from Cajal’s cells and are the most common mesenchymal neoplasms of the gastrointestinal tract. GISTs in young adults, i.e., patients before the age of 40, are rare and differ from those in older patients and GISTs in children in terms of the molecular and clinical features, including the location and type of mutations. They often harbor other molecular abnormalities than KIT and PDGFRA mutations (wild-type GISTs). The general principles of therapeutic management in young patients are the same as in the elderly. Considering some differences in molecular abnormalities, molecular testing should be the standard procedure to allow appropriate systemic therapy if needed. The optimal treatment strategy should be established by a multidisciplinary team experienced in sarcoma treatment. The impact of treatment on the quality of life and daily activities, including the impact on work, pregnancy, and fertility, in this patient population should be especially taken into consideration.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) arising in uncommon locations: clinicopathologic features and risk assessment of esophageal, colonic, and appendiceal GISTs

Risk stratification of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) is based on experience with tumors of the stomach, small bowel, and rectum, which are far more common than GISTs of other sites. In this study from 47 institutions, we analyzed GISTs of the esophagus (n = 102), colon (n = 136), and appendix (n = 27) for their size, mitotic rate, morphology, and outcome to determine which criteria predict their behavior. Esophageal GISTs were small (median: 2.5 cm) with spindle cell morphology and a low mitotic rate (mean: 3.6/5 mm²). Twelve (12%) tumors progressed, including 11 with a mitotic rate >5/5 mm² and one large (6.8 cm) GIST with a mitotic rate of 2/5 mm². Colonic GISTs were smaller (median: 1.4 cm) and presented with abdominal pain or bleeding in 29% of cases. Most (92%) were composed of spindle cells with a mean mitotic rate of 4.6/5 mm². Sixteen (12%) tumors progressed: 14 had mitotic rates >5/5 mm², and two were >5.0 cm with a mitotic rate <5/5 mm². All but one appendiceal GIST measured <2.0 cm. These tumors were composed of spindle cells with low mitotic rates (<5/5 mm²), and none progressed. Our results suggest that progression risk among esophageal and colonic GISTs is associated with increased mitotic activity (>5/5 mm²) and size >5.0 cm. These findings support the use of size and mitotic rate for prognostication of GISTs in these locations, similar to tumors of the stomach, small bowel, and rectum.

Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GISTs) as Incidental Findings in Gynecological Surgery

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract that may be diagnosed incidentally as a part of intra-abdominal surgery for other diseases. This is a single center review to document the incidental finding of GIST at surgery for gynecological malignancies during a 10-yr period. Sixteen cases of incidental GISTs were identified in women ranging in age from 39 to 82 yr. GISTs presented as incidental secondary lesions in women undergoing surgery for other indications, typically primary debulking surgery for tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma. The GIST was located in the stomach wall in 9 cases. Other sites were cecum, omentum, and mesentery. Diagnosis of GIST was supported by immunohistochemistry in all cases and by molecular studies in 3 cases. Seventy-five percent of cases were micro-GISTs, measuring <2 cm in diameter and, where Miettinen and Lasota criteria could be applied, fitted into "no risk," "very low risk" or "low risk" prognostic groups. Seventy-five percent of women for whom survival data was available, showed disease-free survival at follow-up. The 2 women who died had concurrent high stage or high-grade gynecological malignancy at initial diagnosis.

Recent Progress and Challenges in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

Simple Summary

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) are potentially malignant tumors and require evidence-based surgical and/or medical treatment. Laparoscopy has similar safety and prognostic outcomes to those of laparotomy and is currently a standard procedure for localized GISTs. However, surgery for gastric GISTs less than 2 cm may be re-evaluated due to the indolent nature of the GIST and other competing risks among GIST patients. A work-up with endoscopy and endoscopic ultrasonography as well as endoscopic or percutaneous biopsy is important for the preoperative diagnosis of GISTs. Medical treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors is the mainstay for recurrent/metastatic GISTs. The activity of an individual drug is well correlated with gene alterations, and, in the era of precision medicine, cancer genome profiling should be considered before medical treatment.

Abstract

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most frequent malignant mesenchymal tumors in the gastrointestinal tract. The clinical incidence of GISTs is estimated 10/million/year; however, the true incidence is complicated by frequent findings of tiny GISTs, of which the natural history is unknown. The initial work-up with endoscopy and endoscopic ultrasonography plays important roles in the differential diagnosis of GISTs. Surgery is the only modality for the permanent cure of localized GISTs. In terms of safety and prognostic outcomes, laparoscopy is similar to laparotomy for GIST treatment, including tumors larger than 5 cm. GIST progression is driven by mutations in KIT or PDGFRA or by other rare gene alterations, all of which are mutually exclusive. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are the standard therapy for metastatic/recurrent GISTs. Molecular alterations are the most reliable biomarkers for TKIs and for other drugs, such as NTRK inhibitors. The pathological and genetic diagnosis prior to treatment has been challenging; however, a newly developed endoscopic device may be useful for diagnosis. In the era of precision medicine, cancer genome profiling by targeted gene panel analysis may enable potential targeted therapy even for GISTs without KIT or PDGFRA mutations.

Efficacy of Endoscopic Ultrasound Elastography in Differential Diagnosis of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Versus Gastrointestinal Leiomyoma

BACKGROUND The diagnostic efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) elastography for alimentary tract diseases remains uncertain. The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of EUS elastography in differential diagnosis between the 2 most common subepithelium tumors of the digestive tract - gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) and gastrointestinal leiomyomas (GILs) - which cannot be differentiated by conventional EUS imaging. MATERIAL AND METHODS Electronic records were retrospectively reviewed from Jan 2015 to Jul 2019. Patients accepting EUS elastography with histopathological diagnosis of GISTs or GILs were included. The images of EUS elastography were analyzed by hue histogram in Photoshop. Hue values of RGB, R, G, and B channels of each group were acquired. We used the t test, ROC curve analysis, and binary logistic regression analysis for data post-processing. RESULTS We included 47 patients with GISTs and 14 with GILs. The mean±standard deviations (SD) of hue values were 20.25±0.72, -0.79±0.78, 20.79±1.68, 39.72±1.30 for GISTs and 20.80±0.46, 1.80±1.05, 28.39±2.15, and 31.95±2.60 for GILs of RGB, R, G, and B channels, respectively. The t test showed statistically significant differences in mean hue values between GISTs and GILs in B and G channels, but not in RGB and R channels. The area under the ROC curve combining B and G values was 0.723. Binary logistic regression analysis suggested no statistically significant difference in ability to differentiate between GISTs and GILs with B and G values (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS There was insufficient evidence to support the application of quantitative EUS elastography for differential diagnosis of GISTs and GILs in this study.

Preoperatively diagnosed gastric collision tumor with mixed adenocarcinoma and gastrointestinal stromal tumor: a case report and literature review

Reports of gastric collision tumors, comprising adenocarcinoma and gastrointestinal stromal tumor, are extremely rare. Here, we report the case of a 68-year-old male who was diagnosed with a lower-body, moderately differentiated, tubular-type adenocarcinoma and submucosal tumor and underwent an elective D2 distal gastrectomy. The tumor cells of the gastrointestinal stromal tumor were positive for H-caldesmon and CD117, weakly positive for smooth muscle actin and DOG-1, and negative for desmin, S-100 protein, CD31, and AE1/AE3. The tumor had grown into a mixed form of adenocarcinoma and gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Thus, we report the first case of a preoperatively diagnosed collision tumor in the stomach consisting of adenocarcinoma and gastrointestinal stromal tumor.

Smooth muscle tumors of the gastrointestinal tract: an analysis of prognostic features in 407 cases

Smooth muscle tumors represent the second most common mural mesenchymal neoplasm in the gastrointestinal tract, but established criteria for prognostic assessment of these tumors are lacking. A large cohort of surgically resected intramural gastrointestinal smooth muscle tumors from 31 institutions was analyzed to identify potential prognostic features. Pathologic features were assessed by expert gastrointestinal and/or soft tissue pathologists at each center. Immunohistochemical confirmation was required. A total of 407 cases from the esophagus (n = 97, 24%), stomach (n = 180, 44%), small bowel (n = 74, 18%), and colorectum (n = 56, 14%) were identified. Patients ranged in age from 19 to 92 years (mean 55 years), with a slight female predominance (57%). Mean tumor size was 5.4 cm, with the largest tumor measuring 29 cm. Disease progression following surgery, defined as local recurrence, metastasis, or disease-related death, occurred in 56 patients (14%). Colorectal tumors were most likely to progress, followed by small bowel and gastric tumors. None of the esophageal tumors in this series progressed. Receiver operator characteristic analysis identified optimal cutoffs of 9.8 cm and 3 mitoses/5 mm² for discriminating between progressive and non-progressive tumors. Histologic features strongly associated with progression by univariate analysis included moderate-to-severe atypia, high cellularity, abnormal differentiation (defined as differentiation not closely resembling that of normal smooth muscle), tumor necrosis, mucosal ulceration, lamina propria involvement, and serosal involvement (P < 0.0001 for all features). Age, sex, and margin status were not significantly associated with progression (P = 0.23, 0.82, and 0.07, respectively). A risk assessment table was created based on tumor site, size, and mitotic count, and Kaplan-Meier plots of progression-free survival for each subgroup revealed progression-based tiers. Based on our findings, it appears that nonesophageal gastrointestinal smooth muscle tumors measuring >10 cm and/or showing ≥3 mitoses/5 mm² may behave aggressively, and therefore close clinical follow-up is recommended in these cases.

Which size is the best cutoff for primary small gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor?

Background

The biological behavior of primary small gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor (gGIST) is indolent. The cutoff size categorizing small gGIST continues to be controversial. To date, there is no consensus regarding whether it should be 1 cm, 2 cm, or another size. We aimed to find a new cutoff size.

Methods

Retrospective clinicopathological and prognosis data of patients with small gGIST from January 1998 to January 2015 were collected among five medical centers in southern China. Tumor size was divided into two groups: <1 cm (Mirco group) and 1-2 cm (Small group). We compared the clinicopathological index and prognosis between these two groups and identified a new cutoff size to define small gGIST.

Results

During this 18-year period, there were 276 patients with primary small gGIST treated at these five medical centers. The range of tumor size was 0.2-2.0 cm. The median tumor size was 1.0 cm. The range of the mitotic count was 0-70/50 high power fields (HPFs) with counts ≤5/50 HPFs in 259 patients (93.8%), 5< counts ≤10/50 HPFs in 7 patients (2.5%), and counts >10/50 HPFs in 10 patients (3.6%). The median follow-up time was 38 months (3-156 months). The 5-year overall survival rate was 98.7% in the entire group. Using Pearson correlation analysis, there was a positive correlation between the mitotic count and tumor size as a continuous variable (r=0.164, P=0.006). There were 137 patients in the Micro group and 139 cases in the Small group. In the Micro group, mitotic counts were ≤5/50 HPFs in 134 patients, 5< counts ≤10/50 HPFs in 0 patients, and counts >10/50 HPFs in 3 patients; mitotic counts in the Small group were counts ≤5/50 HPFs in 125 patients, 5< counts ≤10/50 HPFs in 7 patients, >10/50 HPFs in 7 patients. There was a statistically significant difference between these two groups (P=0.002); the Small group had more intermediate/high-risk cases. Using the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC curve), we observed that 1.15 cm was the new cutoff size to separate low-risk cases and intermediate/high-risk cases (AUC =0.707, P=0.004, sensitivity =0.824, 1-specificity =0.429).

Conclusions

Primary small gGIST has a good prognosis; gGIST <1 cm can be regarded as benign tumors that only requires endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) follow-up. The proportion of potential intermediate/high-risk disease is high for patients with 1-2 cm gGIST. These patients should be treated with caution and the tumors should be resected if necessary. These results indicate that 1.15 cm may be the new cutoff size to separate small gGIST from large gGIST, but further studies are needed for verification.

Mutational inactivation of mTORC1 repressor gene DEPDC5 in human gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common human sarcoma and are initiated by activating mutations in the KIT or PDGFRA receptor tyrosine kinases. Chromosome 22q deletions are well-recognized frequent abnormalities in GISTs, occurring in ∼50% of GISTs. These deletions are thought to contribute to the pathogenesis of this disease via currently unidentified tumor suppressor mechanisms. Using whole exome sequencing, we report recurrent genomic inactivated DEPDC5 gene mutations in GISTs (16.4%, 9 of 55 patients). The demonstration of clonal DEPDC5 inactivation mutations in longitudinal specimens and in multiple metastases from individual patients suggests that these mutations have tumorigenic roles in GIST progression. DEPDC5 inactivation promotes GIST tumor growth in vitro and in nude mice. DEPDC5 reduces cell proliferation through the mTORC1-signaling pathway and subsequently induces cell-cycle arrest. Furthermore, DEPDC5 modulates the sensitivity of GIST to KIT inhibitors, and the combination therapy with mTOR inhibitor and KIT inhibitor may work better in GIST patients with DEPDC5 inactivation. These findings of recurrent genomic alterations, together with functional data, validate the DEPDC5 as a bona fide tumor suppressor contributing to GIST progression and a biologically relevant target of the frequent chromosome 22q deletions.

Endoscopic full thickness resection versus submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection for removal of submucosal tumors: a review article

Submucosal tumors (SMT) are protuberant lesions with intact mucosa that have a wide differential. These lesions may be removed by standard polypectomy, endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), or surgically. However, in lesions that arise from the muscularis propria, full thickness resection is recommended. This can be completed using either endoscopic full thickness resection (EFTR) or submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (STER). EFTR can be accomplished by completing a full thickness resection followed by defect closure or by securing gastrointestinal wall patency before resection. STER is an option that first creates a mucosal dissection proximal to the lesion to allow a submucosal tunnel to be created. Using this tunnel, the lesion may be resected. When comparing STER to EFTR, there was no significant difference when evaluating tumor size, operation time, rate of complications, or en bloc resection rate. However, suture time, amount of clips used, and overall hospital stay were decreased in STER. With these differences, EFTR may be more efficacious in certain parts of the gastrointestinal tract where a submucosal tunnel is harder to accomplish.

Large incidental gastrointestinal stromal tumors in a patient presenting with acutely symptomatic nephrolithiasis: A case report

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are rare mesenchymal neoplasms, representing approximately 1%-2% of all primary gastrointestinal malignancies. Incidental GISTs are often less than 1 cm when discovered and have been reported predominantly in obese patients undergoing surgery for other medical indications. We present the rare case of a large incidental GIST in a nonobese patient with acutely symptomatic nephrolithiasis. Large GISTs may be treated with neoadjuvant imatinib mesylate to reduce tumor size prior to surgery, though some tumors may experience little change in size despite effective treatment. Treatment response for GISTs can be monitored via imaging studies, such as computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging, but computed tomography is generally preferred over magnetic resonance imaging.

Clinicopathological features and prognosis of 276 cases of primary small (≤ 2 cm) gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a multicenter data review

BACKGROUND

Till present, there are still controversies over the epidemiology, pathological features, types of surgical treatment, and prognoses of primary small gastric GISTs (gGISTs).

METHODS

From January 1998 to January 2015, patients with primary small gGIST admitted from four high-volume medical centers of the Southern China were enrolled and their data were analyzed to evaluate their clinicopathological features, treatment and prognostic factors to provide evidence-based medical experience for clinical practice.

RESULTS

A total of 276 primary small gGIST cases over a period of 18 years were investigated and had a median age of 60 years (range 27-91 years old). Regarding the tumor sites, 24 (8.7%) cases were in the cardia of the stomach, 107 (38.8%) in the fundus, 117 (42.4%) in the gastric body, and 28 (10.1%) in the gastric antrum. Eleven patients (4.0%) underwent a preoperative biopsy. A total of 137 (49.6%), 75 (27.2%), and 64 (23.2%) patients underwent laparoscopic, open resection, and endoscopic resection, respectively. Sixty-four patients (23.2%) had local endoscopic resection, 172 (62.3%) had wedge resection, 7 (2.5%) had proximal gastrectomy, 19 (6.9%) had distal gastrectomy, and 14 (5.1%) had total gastrectomy. Mitotic counts were ≤ 5/50, (5-10)/50, and > 10/50 per HPF in 259 (93.8%), 7 (2.5%), and 10 (3.6%) cases, respectively. There were 259 cases (97.1%) of spindle cell type, 7 (2.5%) epithelial cell types and one case (0.4%) of mixed type. Immunohistochemistry showed 74.6% (206/276), 98.2% (271/276), and 97.4% (269/276) of the patients had co-expression of CD34+, CD117+, and DOG-1+, respectively. Thirty-nine patients underwent genetic testing (39/276, 14.1%). Three patients (1.1%) had positive resection margin. Five high-risk patients received follow-up treatment with imatinib with a median follow-up time of 38 months (range 3-156 months). The overall 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates were 100%, 99.6%, and 99.1%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Though the incidence of primary small gGISTs increased per annum, the overall survival prognoses were high. Surgery or endoscopic resection was the primary mode of treatment. Pathological features of primary small gGISTs were similar to large gGISTs, and to achieve a timely surgical intervention, the identification of intermediate- and high-risk cases should be a future focus of study.

Clinicopathologic features and outcomes of gastrointestinal stromal tumors arising from the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction

Background

Our aim was to characterize the clinicopathological features and outcomes of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) arising from the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) and describe the survival of patients treated at our institution as well as from a national hospital-based registry.

Methods

Twenty-eight cases were identified using the Mayo Clinic Cancer Registry from 1997 to 2016, and 1,010 cases from the National Cancer Database (NCDB) between 2004 and 2014, with analysis of TNM staging, histopathological features, mitotic index, immunohistochemical studies, and KIT mutational analysis.

Results

At Mayo Clinic, the tumors ranged in size from 0.3-13 cm (mean 5.40 cm). IHC results were: CD117 (KIT) in 100% (23/23 cases) and DOG1 in 100% (6/6), followed by CD34 (85.7%, 12/14), smooth muscle actin (27.8%, 5/18), desmin (18.2%, 2/11), and S-100 protein (13.3%, 2/15). Mutational analysis (performed in 10 cases) showed KIT exon 11 mutations in 8 cases; KIT mutation was not identified in 2 cases (presumed wild-type). Two-thirds of patients underwent surgery, of which 70% had an esophagectomy. Fourteen patients received adjuvant imatinib mesylate. Five patients had liver metastases at the time of diagnosis; none had lymph node metastases. A total of 38.9% of cases had recurrent or metastatic disease. Complete clinical follow-up was available for 10 patients (median follow-up duration 31.5 months; range, 10-145 months): one (male) had a local recurrence at the anastomotic site and one (female) suffered a liver metastasis; the others were either disease-free or had stable disease at the time of last follow-up. There was a significant association seen among metastatic disease and mitotic count >5/50 high-powered field (HPF) (P=0.016), with median mitotic rate 90/50 HPF (range, 7-500) for metastatic tumors versus 6/50 HPF (range, 0-100) for non-metastatic tumors. For metastatic disease, median tumor size was 7.3 cm (range, 1-66 cm) compared to 4.8 cm (range, 0.02-71 cm) for non-metastatic disease, which was also statistically significant (P≤0.0001). Two hundred and fifty-eight NCDB cases were risk stratified using the Joensuu criteria. Among 89 low risk category tumors, only 2 (2.2%) were ultimately metastatic. A total of 10.9% (15/138) of high risk category tumors were metastatic. The median overall survival (OS) from the time of diagnosis for the Mayo Clinic cohort was 129.5 months (95% CI, 55.7-not reached), with 5-year OS 85.7%. Median OS for the NCDB cohort was 135.95 months (95% CI, 104.08-not reached) with 5-year OS 68.2%. Superior OS was seen in females (HR 0.67, 95% CI, 0.49-0.89, P=0.006).

Conclusions

Among esophageal and GEJ GISTs, metastatic disease was associated with increased mitotic count and increased tumor size. Men were found to have inferior OS. The Joensuu risk criteria were validated for risk stratification of esophageal and GEJ GISTs.

Inhibition of stromal-interacting molecule 1-mediated store-operated Ca2+ entry as a novel strategy for the treatment of acquired imatinib-resistant gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Imatinib has revolutionized the treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST); however, primary and secondary resistance to imatinib is still a major cause of treatment failure. Multiple mechanisms are involved in this progression. In the present study, we reported a novel mechanism for the acquired resistance to imatinib, which was induced by enhanced Ca²⁺ influx via stromal‐interacting molecule 1 (STIM1)‐mediated store‐operated Ca²⁺ entry (SOCE). We found that the STIM1 expression level was related to the acquired resistance to imatinib in our studied cohort. The function of STIM1 in imatinib‐resistant GIST cells was also confirmed both in vivo and in vitro. The results showed that STIM1 overexpression contributed to SOCE and drug response in imatinib‐sensitive GIST cells. Blockage of SOCE by STIM1 knockdown suppressed the proliferation of imatinib‐resistant GIST cell lines and xenografts. In addition, STIM1‐mediated SOCE exerted an antiapoptotic effect via the MEK/ERK pathway. The results from this study provide a basis for further research into potential novel therapeutic strategies in acquired imatinib‐resistant GIST.

Current clinical management of gastrointestinal stromal tumor

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common malignant subepithelial lesions (SELs) of the gastrointestinal tract. They originate from the interstitial cells of Cajal located within the muscle layer and are characterized by over-expression of the tyrosine kinase receptor KIT. Pathologically, diagnosis of a GIST relies on morphology and immunohistochemistry [KIT and/or discovered on gastrointestinal stromal tumor 1 (DOG1) is generally positive]. The prognosis of this disease is associated with the tumor size and mitotic index. The standard treatment of a GIST without metastasis is surgical resection. A GIST with metastasis is usually only treated by tyrosine kinase inhibitors without radical cure; thus, early diagnosis is the only way to improve its prognosis. However, a GIST is usually detected as a SEL during endoscopy, and many benign and malignant conditions may manifest as SELs. Conventional endoscopic biopsy is difficult for tumors without ulceration. Most SELs have therefore been managed without a histological diagnosis. However, a favorable prognosis of a GIST is associated with early histological diagnosis and R0 resection. Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and EUS-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) are critical for an accurate diagnosis of SELs. EUS-FNA is safe and effective in enabling an early histological diagnosis and adequate treatment. This review outlines the current evidence for the diagnosis and management of GISTs, with an emphasis on early management of small SELs.

Minimally Invasive, Organ-preserving Surgery for Large Submucosal Tumors in the Abdominal Esophagus

BACKGROUND

Surgical resection of submucosal tumors (SMTs) in the abdominal esophagus is not standardized. Enucleation may be a minimally invasive option, whereas its oncological validity is not very clear. Moreover, how to treat the esophageal wall defect after enucleation and necessity of additional antireflux procedure are also undetermined.

METHODS

In 13 patients with a SMT originating the abdominal esophagus laparoscopic enucleation was performed with preserving the integrity of submucosa. When the muscular layer defect was <4 cm it was directly closed by suturing, whereas it was left open in case the defect was larger. Fundoplication was added when the esophagus was dissected posteriorly or the myotomy was not closed.

RESULTS

Tumors were resected en-bloc without rupture in all cases. In 5 patients myotomy was closed, whereas in the remaining 8 it was left open. In 11 patients fundoplication was added (Toupet in 5 and Dor in 6). The patients developed neither regurgitation nor stenosis postoperatively. The histopathologic findings revealed leiomyoma in 9 patients, whereas the other 4 were miscellaneous. The average tumor size was 5.5 cm (range, 2.8 to 8.8). Microscopically surgical margin was negative in all cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic enucleation of SMTs in the abdominal esophagus seems to be safe, reproducible operation enabling preservation of function of the lower esophagus and esophagogastric junction. Even when the muscular defect is not approximated additional fundoplication can minimize the risk of postoperative reflux disease.

A promising Forcep Strip Method for gastrointestinal subepithelial tumors originating from the muscularis propria

BACKGROUND

Subepithelial tumors (SETs) originating from the muscularis propria layer are unlikely to be resected completely and safely. We developed the Forcep Strip Method (FSM) for the resection of SETs in the stomach.

AIMS

This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of the FSM.

METHODS

Endoscopic SET resection using electrical forceps was performed in 11 consecutive patients with clinical indications for lesion removal. Following injection around the tumor, the adjacent mucosa or submucosa was grasped with the hot forceps and pulled away to form a "tent". The tumor was dissected from the muscularis propria layer and carefully removed using coagulating forceps.

RESULTS

The FSM was successful in 10 of the 11 patients in the series; one patient required surgery due to respiratory depression during the procedure. The complete resection rate was 100% and no major complications including bleeding and perforation occurred. Mean procedure time was 39.3 ± 14.7 min, mean hospitalization time was 5.0 ± 1.2 days, and mean tumor size was 17.1 ± 4.7 mm.

CONCLUSION

FSM was found to be an easy, safe, and effective procedure for the treatment of gastric SETs originating from the muscularis propria layer.

Asian consensus guidelines for gastrointestinal stromal tumor: what is the same and what is different from global guidelines

There are some disparities between the clinical practice and profiles of cancer in Asia and those in Europe & North America. In Asia, surgical oncologists still have a major role in the multidisciplinary therapy of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), whereas medical oncologists hold this status in the West. Although the incidence of clinical GIST is considered similar between the two areas, small gastric GISTs are more frequently treated by surgery in East Asia compared with Europe & North America. The diagnosis and treatment of small submucosal tumors (SMTs), including GIST, is important in Asian clinical practice guidelines for GIST. Most items of Asian and Western GIST guidelines are very similar. There are slight differences between the two guidelines in the degree of recommendation, which may come from disparities of clinical practice and available medicines. Importantly, most clinical evidence in the GIST guidelines has been established by clinical trials conducted in Western countries, and the number of clinical trials is still limited in Asia, suggesting that Asian GIST patients may have limited access to investigational drugs after standard therapy. Finally, both Asian and Western GIST guidelines are well-harmonized in some parts, and their contents may reflect the medical circumstances of each region.

Clinical and pathological features of "small" GIST (≤2 cm). What is their prognostic value?

INTRODUCTION

Small GIST (<2 cm) are tumors whose biological behavior is benign and frequently involutes. Despite their increasing incidence, few studies have addressed the characteristics of these GIST. The aim of this work is to clarify the management of this entity.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

The characteristics of ≤2 cm GIST were initially described, and then compared with those >2 cm. This series comprises 104 patients and they were divided according to tumor size in 4 groups: tumors which are ≤2 cm (group 1, G1), >2 and ≤ 5 cm (G2), >5 and ≤ 10 cm (G3) and >10 cm (G4).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Most of small GIST were asymptomatic and incidental, and were located in the stomach. There is an association between patients with associated tumors and asymptomatic GIST. A high overall mortality rate of up to 40% is observed being disease-specific mortality 4.5%. The disease-specific mortality increases proportionally with size. The overall survival (OS) at 5 years are lower for both <2 cm (61%) and >10 cm (53%) than the rest (85-91%). When analyzing the impact of tumor association on <2 cm GIST, we observed that the OS of patients with non-associated tumors was much higher than in the associated ones (90% vs 32% at 5 years, respectively), while no differences were observed in the disease specific survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Small GIST are tumors that are very often incidentally discovered in the course of complementary examinations. Its prognosis is very good, but it depends on the associated tumor.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the esophagus: current issues of diagnosis, surgery and drug therapy

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) often arise in the stomach and small intestine, while esophageal GISTs are rare. Due to their rarity, clinicopathological data on esophageal GISTs are extremely limited, and this results in a lack of clear recommendations concerning optimal surgical management for esophageal GISTs. It is difficult to distinguish esophageal GIST from leiomyoma, the most frequent esophageal mesenchymal tumor, prior to resection, because the two types of tumors appear similar on computed tomography (CT), endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET). Fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) under EUS enables definitive diagnosis, but it is often avoided because scarring could make enucleation more difficult and increase the risk of tumor dissemination by capsule destruction. Esophageal segmental and wedge resections are not usually performed due to the anatomical peculiarity of the esophagus, and the surgical options are limited to the highly invasive esophagectomy or the much less invasive surgical tumor enucleation. The decision as to which surgical procedure should be performed for esophageal GISTs is still under debate. Tumor enucleation may be permitted for smaller tumors, and esophagectomy may be recommended for larger GISTs or high-risk tumors with a high mitotic rate. The purpose of neoadjuvant imatinib administration is downsizing of the GIST to reduce the extent of resection and to reduce the risk of intraoperative complications, including tumor rupture. The efficacy of neoadjuvant/adjuvant imatinib therapy for esophageal GISTs is poorly understood, because the reports are limited to case reports or case series with small numbers. More clinicopathological data and clinical trials for esophageal GIST are expected.

Genetic progression in gastrointestinal stromal tumors: mechanisms and molecular interventions

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common sarcomas in humans. Constitutively activating mutations in the KIT or PDGFRA receptor tyrosine kinases are the initiating oncogenic events. Most metastatic GISTs respond dramatically to therapies with KIT/PDGFRA inhibitors. Asymptomatic and mitotically-inactive KIT/PDGFRA-mutant "microGISTs" are found in one third of adults, but most of these small tumors never progress to malignancy, underscoring that a progression of oncogenic mutations is required. Recent studies have identified key genomic abnormalities in GIST progression. Novel insights into the genetic progression of GISTs are shedding new light on therapeutic innovations.

Diagnostic and treatment strategy for small gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are considered to be potentially malignant mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. Clinically relevant GISTs are rare; however, subclinical GISTs (mini‐GISTs) (1‐2 cm) and pathologic GISTs (micro‐GISTs) (<1 cm) are frequently reported. Most mini‐GISTs and almost all micro‐GISTs of the stomach may exhibit benign clinical behavior, and only mini‐GISTs with high‐risk features may progress. For this review, a provisional algorithm was used to propose diagnostic and treatment strategies for patients with small GISTs. Because surgery is the only potentially curative treatment, in its application for small GISTs, the principles of sarcoma surgery should be maintained, and cost effectiveness should be considered. Indications for surgery include GISTs measuring ≥2 cm, symptomatic GISTs, and mini‐GISTs with high‐risk features (irregular borders, cystic spaces, ulceration, echogenic foci, internal heterogeneity, and tumor progression during follow‐up); however, a preoperative pathologic diagnosis is infrequently obtained. For small intestinal and colorectal GISTs, surgery is indicated irrespective of size because of their greater malignant potential. Otherwise, mini‐GISTs without high‐risk features, micro‐GISTs, and small submucosal tumors measuring <5 cm without high‐risk features may be followed by periodical endoscopic ultrasonography. Although surgical approaches and operative methods are selected according to tumor size, location, growth pattern, and surgical teams, laparoscopic surgery has produced similar oncologic outcomes and is less invasiveness compared with open surgery. After resection, pathologic examination for diagnosis and risk assessment is mandatory, and genotyping is also recommended for high‐risk GISTs. Endoscopic resection techniques, although feasible, are not routinely indicated for most mini‐GISTs or micro‐GISTs. Cancer 2016;122:3110–8. © 2016 The Authors. Cancer published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Cancer Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are potentially malignant, and endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine‐needle aspiration may play a major role in the diagnosis of small GISTs and submucosal tumors. Surgery is indicated for all intestinal GISTs and for small gastric GISTs in patients who have symptoms and/or high‐risk features.

[Additional primary malignancies in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Proposal for a new classification]

Additional primary malignancies in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is not only common but of growing interest in the scientific literature. This association is of great importance in terms of clinical challenge, diagnosis and therapy as well as for the prognosis impact it implies. In the published series there is a tendency to group these patients to determine the specific and distinguishable characteristics of GIST associated with other malignancies. On the other hand, there is no general consensus or unified classification. This classification would be of great interest, as it would unify criteria, agree groups to compare different series and demonstrate whether the aetiology underlying both tumours and the GIST's own characteristics really vary according to the type in question. We undertook a medical literature review and proposed a new classification for patients with GIST associated with other tumours.

Population-Based Epidemiology and Mortality of Small Malignant Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors in the USA

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) have significant variability in size and malignant behavior. Our current understanding is limited to pathological analyses, autopsy studies, and small case series. The aim of the current study is to define the risk factors, incidence, and mortality rates of GIST <2 cm in the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database.

METHODS

Patients with histologically confirmed malignant GIST <2 cm were studied from 2001 to 2011. GIST was defined by GI tumor site codes and GIST-specific histology codes.

RESULTS

We identified 378 patients with GIST <2 cm. The average age at diagnosis was 64.0 years with equal sex distribution. The most common tumor location was the stomach (62.2 %), followed by the small intestine (23.3 %), colon (5.6 %), and rectum (3.4 %). Most patients had localized disease (79.4 %), but 11.4 % had regional/distant metastatic disease. The annual incidence rate was 4.2 per 10,000,000 (10M). This was the highest among Blacks (7.6 per 10M). Among patients with GIST and no additional cancers, the 5-year GIST-specific mortality was 12.9 %. Moreover, there was a significantly increased 5-year GIST-specific mortality in those patients who had regionally advanced (34.0 %) or metastatic GIST (34.3 %), as compared to those patients with localized GIST (5.6 %).

CONCLUSIONS

This study represents the first population-based analysis of malignant GIST <2 cm. While quite rare, these tumors have an underappreciated disease-specific mortality. Further studies are needed to define the underlying reasons for the identified racial differences, to develop novel risk assessment schema for patients with these small tumors, and to determine appropriate indications for resection and/or medical therapy.

Resection of liver metastases in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors in the imatinib era: A nationwide retrospective study

INTRODUCTION

Liver metastases are common in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). In the absence of randomized controlled clinical trials, the effectiveness of surgery as a treatment modality is unclear. This study identifies safety and outcome in a nationwide study of all patients who underwent resection of liver metastases from GIST.

METHODS

Patients were included using the national registry of histo- and cytopathology (PALGA) of the Netherlands from 1999. Kaplan Meier survival analysis was used for calculating survival outcome. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were carried out for the assessment of potential prognostic factors.

RESULTS

A total of 48 patients (29 male, 19 female) with a median age of 58 (range 28-81) years were identified. Preoperative and postoperative tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy was given to 30 (63%) and 36 (75%) patients, respectively. A minor liver resection was performed in 32 patients, 16 patients underwent major liver resection. Median follow-up was 27 (range 1-146) months. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 28 (range 1-121) months. One-, three-, and five-year PFS was 93%, 67%, and 59% respectively. Median overall survival (OS) was 90 (range 1-146) months from surgery. The one-, three-, and five-year OS was 93%, 80%, and 76% respectively. R0 resection was the only independent significant prognostic factor for DFS and OS at multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

Resection of liver metastases in GIST patients combined with imatinib may be associated with prolonged overall survival when a complete resection is achieved.

Clinicopathological features and prognosis of small gastrointestinal stromal tumors outside the stomach

The aim of the present study was to assess the clinicopathological features and prognostic factors of primary small gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) outside the stomach. The clinical data, clinicopathological features and prognostic factors of 20 patients with a pathologically-confirmed diagnosis of non-gastric GIST that were treated at Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute between July 2006 and December 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. In total, 15 patients were male and 5 were female, with a median age of 58 years (range, 44–82 years). A change in bowel habits was the original symptom of rectal small GISTs in 6 out of 8 patients, while patients with small GISTs in other locations demonstrated no overt symptoms and the lesions were detected by systematic examinations of other diseases or abdominal surgical procedures performed on other organs. In total, 19 patients out of the total 20 patients underwent surgery, and 1 patient with rectal GIST received continuous oral imatinib mesylate (400 mg once a day) instead of undergoing surgery. The mean diameter of tumors was 1.55±0.54 cm (range, 0.3–2.0 cm) and the median was 1.70 cm. The pathomorphology of the lesions was mainly spindle cell, and immunohistochemistry revealed the expression rate of cluster of differentiation (CD)117, CD34 and discovered on GIST-1 were 85, 80 and 70%. According to the mitosis index, small rectal GISTs were more frequent compared with other positions (P<0.05), while the frequency of small GISTs >1 cm in size was not significantly different from the frequency of small GISTs ≤1 cm in size (P=0.995). All 20 patients were followed up, with a median follow-up duration of 49.5 months (range, 10.5–94.4 months). At the end of the follow-up period, tumor recurrence occurred in 5 patients and 1 patient succumbed following progression. According to the analysis of the tumor sites, the RFS time of patients with small rectal GISTs was significantly different than the RFS time in patients with small GISTs in other positions. The clinical symptoms of non-gastric small GISTs were not evident and were challenging to detect. Small GISTs, regardless of size, possessed malignant potential and once detected, GISTs should be surgically resected. Lesions located in the rectum demonstrated an increased degree of malignancy and were more likely to recur. The tumor size and Ki67 index could not be considered as prognostic factors of non-gastric small GISTs.

Diagnosis and surgical treatment of esophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumors

AIM: To retrospectively evaluate our experience with the diagnosis and surgical resection of esophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs).

METHODS: Between January 2003 and August 2014, five esophageal GIST cases were admitted to our hospital. In this study, the hospital records, surgery outcomes, tumor recurrence and survival of these patients were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS: The median age of the patients was 45.6 years (range: 12-62 years). Three patients presented with dysphagia, and one patient presented with chest discomfort. The remaining patient was asymptomatic. Four patients were diagnosed with esophageal GISTs by a preoperative endoscopic biopsy. Three patients underwent esophagectomy, and two patients underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. The mean operating time was 116 min (range: 95-148 min), and the mean blood loss was 176 mL (range: 30-300 mL). All tumors were completely resected. The mean length of postoperative hospital stay was 8.4 d (range: 6-12 d). All patients recovered and were discharged successfully. The median postoperative follow-up duration was 48 mo (range: 29-72 mo). One patient was diagnosed with recurrence, one patient was lost to follow-up, and three patients were asymptomatic and are currently being managed with close radiologic and clinical follow-up.

CONCLUSION: Surgery is the standard, effective and successful treatment for esophageal GISTs. Long-term follow-up is required to monitor recurrence and metastasis.

Esophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumor: is tumoral enucleation a viable therapeutic option?

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective was to evaluate the feasibility of surgical enucleation of esophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (E-GISTs). Secondary objectives evaluated (i) the impact of tumor enucleation on oncological outcomes, (ii) the effect of pretherapeutic biopsy on the feasibility of E-GIST enucleation, and (iii) the impact of mucosal ulceration on outcome.

BACKGROUND

E-GISTs are very rare tumors and esophageal resection has been the recommended approach. The feasibility and impact on outcomes of tumor enucleation are unknown.

METHODS

Through a large national multicenter retrospective study, 19 patients with E-GISTs were identified between 2001 and 2010. Patients who underwent either enucleation or esophagectomy were compared.

RESULTS

Of over 19 patients identified with E-GISTs, curative treatment was surgical for 16 patients, with enucleation in 8 and esophagectomy in 8. In the enucleation group, median tumoral diameter was 40 mm (18-65 mm), without any mucosal ulceration, preoperative capsular ruptures, or incomplete resections. In the esophagectomy group, the median tumoral diameter was 85 mm (55-250 mm), with mucosal ulceration in 4 patients, preoperative capsular rupture in 1, and no incomplete resections. Severe postoperative complication rates were 50% and 25% in the esophagectomy and enucleation groups, respectively, with 2 postoperative deaths after esophagectomy. After a median follow-up of 6.4 years, 2 recurrences were observed after esophagectomy versus 0 after enucleation. Endoscopic biopsies did not expose patients to complications or local recurrence after enucleation. Endoscopic mucosal ulceration was associated with more aggressive tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

E-GIST enucleation seems safe for tumors of less than 65 mm in diameter.

[C-KIT in gastrointestinal stromal tumors and associated malignancies: A Study in a population with genetic isolation]

INTRODUCTION

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) are the most common mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. Numerous studies have reported the association between GIST and other neoplasms.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate the possible association between GIST and other tumors in a genetically isolated population.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted of patients with GIST between 2002 and 2009 at our center. Epidemiological, pathological and family data in patients with GIST alone (group A) were compared with those in patients with GIST associated with other neoplasms (group B). A possible common genetic mechanism was investigated between GIST and associated malignancies by testing the detection of the immunohistochemical marker, CD117, in all tumors.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients with GIST were identified, 10 in group A (45%) and 12 in group B (55%). In group B, the associated tumor was malignant in 6 patients (50%) and benign in another 6 (50%). Of the 22 patients with GIST, 8 (36%) had a family history of malignancies. Of these 8 patients, 7 (87.5%) were in group B (p=0.03) and 3 (37.5%) showed the same pathological type of neoplasm as their relatives. All GIST were positive for CD117 whereas associated malignancies were negative for this marker.

CONCLUSION

We did not find immunohistochemical positivity for CD117 in malignancies associated with GIST. Given the special characteristics of the study population, the association between GIST and associated malignancies may be incidental.

Clinical course of gastrointestinal stromal tumor diagnosed by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) are the most common mesenchymal tumor of the gastrointestinal tract. However, little is known about the clinical presentation of GIST, especially small lesions. The purpose of the present study was to clarify the efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for the diagnosis of GIST and to determine its clinical course.

METHODS

Pathological and clinical records of GIST extracted from our institutional database between 1996 and 2012 were reviewed. All GIST cases were diagnosed pathologically by surgical specimen or EUS-FNA. To examine the efficacy of EUS-FNA for the diagnosis of GIST, the pathological findings of EUS-FNA were compared with the surgical findings from resected cases. Next, to clarify the clinical presentation of GIST, imaging findings and changes in tumor size over time were evaluated in follow up.

RESULTS

Of 84 cases of GIST, 67 were resected surgically after EUS-FNA; tumor size was <20 mm in 19 patients, and ≥20 mm in 48 patients. For the diagnosis of small GIST<20 mm, sensitivity and positive predictive value of EUS-FNA were 81.3% and 100%, respectively. A total of 27 patients with GIST was follow up for more than 1 year. Tumor size increased significantly during follow up. However, generalized linear analysis showed that there was no significant relationship between tumor size and follow up period.

CONCLUSIONS

The present results showed that even small GIST can be correctly identified by EUS-FNA. Moreover, size of small GIST increased significantly during follow up.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor: 15-years' experience in a single center

Background

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is known for its wide variability in biological behaviors and it is difficult to predict its malignant potential. The aim of this study is to explore the characteristics and prognostic factors of GIST.

Methods

Clinical and pathological data of 497 GIST patients in our center between 1997 and 2012 were reviewed.

Results

Patients were categorized into very low-, low-, intermediate- and high-risk groups according to modified National Institutes of Health (NIH) consensus classification system. Among the 401 patients untreated with imatinib mesylate (IM), 5-year overall survival (OS) in very low-, low-, intermediate- and high-risk groups was 100%, 100%, 89.6% and 65.9%; and 5-year relapse-free survival (RFS) was 100%, 98.1%, 90.9% and 44.5%, respectively. Univariate analysis revealed that sex, tumor size, mitotic rate, risk grade, CD34 expression, and adjacent involvement were predictors of OS or RFS. COX hazard proportional model (Forward LR) showed that large tumor size, high mitotic rate, and high risk grade were independent risk factors to OS, whereas high mitotic rate, high risk grade and adjacent organ involvement were independent risk factors to RFS. The intermediate-high risk patients who received IM adjuvant therapy (n = 87) had better 5-year OS and RFS than those who did not (n = 188) (94.9% vs. 72.1; 82.3% vs. 56.3%, respectively). Similarly, advanced GIST patients underwent IM therapy (n = 45) had better 3-year OS and 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) than those who didn’t (n = 42) (75.6% vs. 6.8%; 87.6% vs. 12.4%, respectively).

Conclusions

Very low- and low-risk GISTs can be treated with surgery alone. Large tumor size, high mitotic rate, high risk grade, and adjacent organ involvement contribute to the poor outcome. IM therapy significantly improves the survival of intermediate-high risk or advanced GIST patients.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2482-14-93) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

State of the Art in the Treatment of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most frequently diagnosed mesenchymal neoplasms of the gastrointestinal tract. Despite their biological and clinical heterogeneity, the majority of these tumors are positive for the receptor tyrosine kinase KIT and are driven by KIT- or platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (PDGFRA)-activating mutations. There are still uncertainties regarding their clinical and molecular characterization and the optimal treatment regimens, making it difficult to establish a universal treatment algorithm for these tumors.

SUMMARY

From a clinical perspective, the main difference between GISTs and other gastrointestinal neoplasms is that the benign or malignant behavior of GISTs cannot be predicted from histopathology, but instead relies on empirically established scoring systems. Clinical data suggest that malignant potential may be an inherent quality of some GISTs rather than a feature acquired by the tumor during disease progression. Thus, some patients may require prolonged anti-tumor treatment even after complete surgical removal of the tumor.

KEY MESSAGE

Although GISTs are the most frequently occurring mesenchymal neoplasms in the gastrointestinal tract, no universal treatment algorithms exist. This paper reviews the current evidence that guides the management of GISTs.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

The management of localized GISTs involves the use of surgical resection, with the inclusion of preoperative tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment for locally advanced, primarily unresectable tumors and for resectable cases requiring extensive surgery. Imatinib is also indicated as adjuvant therapy after complete surgical removal of GISTs with a high estimated risk of recurrence unless specific mutations conferring imatinib resistance are present. The optimal duration of adjuvant treatment is still controversial. For patients with metastatic imatinib-sensitive GISTs, imatinib constitutes the first-line standard treatment. Molecular characterization of the tumor (with respect to the PDGFRA and KIT genes) is mandatory prior to imatinib therapy. Sunitinib and regorafenib are established as alternative treatments for patients demonstrating generalized disease progression on imatinib. New tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as ponatinib and crenolanib as well as drugs targeting alternative pathways are currently under investigation. Surgery and locally ablative treatments may be indicated in some metastatic patients.

From the radiologic pathology archives: esophageal neoplasms: radiologic-pathologic correlation

Esophageal neoplasms have a wide spectrum of clinical features, pathologic findings, and imaging manifestations. Leiomyomas are the most common benign esophageal neoplasm, typically appearing as smoothly marginated intramural masses. Fibrovascular polyps arise in the cervical esophagus, gradually elongating as they are pulled inferiorly by esophageal peristalsis. Granular cell tumors are generally incidental small intramural masses with an appearance similar to that of leiomyomas. Malignant esophageal neoplasms are a common cause of cancer mortality, particularly squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and adenocarcinoma. Both of these tumors occur in older men, most often appearing as irregular infiltrative lesions at barium examination, with evidence of tumor spread beyond the esophagus at cross-sectional imaging. Adenocarcinoma arises from Barrett esophagus and is much more likely than SCC to involve the gastroesophageal junction. Esophageal involvement by lymphoma is usually secondary to tumor spread from the stomach or mediastinum. Spindle cell carcinoma is a biphasic malignancy with carcinomatous and sarcomatous elements that forms a bulky polypoid intraluminal mass. Neuroendocrine carcinoma is an aggressive neoplasm that may be hypervascular and is usually associated with metastatic disease at presentation. Understanding the imaging appearances and pathologic bases of esophageal neoplasms is essential for their detection, differential diagnosis, staging, and treatment planning.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumour

Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) are mesenchymal neoplasms that arise in the gastrointestinal tract, usually in the stomach or the small intestine and rarely elsewhere in the abdomen. They can occur at any age, the median age being 60-65 years, and typically cause bleeding, anaemia, and pain. GISTs have variable malignant potential, ranging from small lesions with a benign behaviour to fatal sarcomas. Most tumours stain positively for the mast/stem cell growth factor receptor KIT and anoctamin 1 and harbour a kinase-activating mutation in either KIT or PDGFRA. Tumours without such mutations could have alterations in genes of the succinate dehydrogenase complex or in BRAF, or rarely RAS family genes. About 60% of patients are cured by surgery. Adjuvant treatment with imatinib is recommended for patients with a substantial risk of recurrence, if the tumour has an imatinib-sensitive mutation. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors substantially improve survival in advanced disease, but secondary drug resistance is common.

Submucosal tumors: comprehensive guide for the diagnosis and therapy of gastrointestinal submucosal tumors

Small submucosal tumors (SMT) without symptoms are frequently found by endoscopic and radiological examinations. To find proper diagnostic measures and therapeutic indications for histologically undiagnosed SMT, we reviewed published articles in PubMed between 1990 and March 2013 using the key words 'submucosal tumor' and the name of a specific disease. SMT is observed in a wide range of gastrointestinal (GI) diseases and conditions, including compression by extra-GI organs and lesions, congenital tumors, inflammation, and benign as well as malignant neoplastic lesions. In the diagnosis of diseases and decision-making for therapy, endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) may play a key role. Symptomatic SMT and SMT histologically diagnosed as malignant or potentially malignant tumors such as gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) should be treated by surgery. SMT >5 cm, SMT increasing in size and those with'high-risk features' including irregular border, heterogeneous internal echo such as anechoic area, and heterogeneous enhancement by contrast media may also be removed by surgery. Laparoscopic approach is feasible for gastric GIST <5 cm and this is considered less invasive than the open approach. Emerging techniques using flexible endoscopes appear less invasive, but require further evidence and are still under clinical study. Correct diagnosis of SMT is challenging; however, EUS and EUS-FNA are useful in the histological diagnosis and clinical decision-making. In the future, minimally invasive approaches may be a mainstream of surgical treatment for small SMT.

KIT gene mutation analysis in solid tumours: biology, clincial applications and trends in diagnostic reporting

Gain-of-function mutations involving c-kit protein, a cell-surface transmembrane receptor for stem cell factor, have been identified as a key oncogenic driver in a variety of solid tumours. Coupled with the development of tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as imatinib, c-kit has emerged as a viable drug target in what seems to be a validated therapeutic concept. This review will focus on gastrointestinal stromal tumours and melanomas, two types of solid tumours most closely associated with KIT gene mutations. The biology of KIT mutations in both conditions, as well as the value of KIT mutation testing in predicting disease and treatment outcomes are discussed. Since initial response to imatinib is largely influenced by mutation status, genotyping these tumours serves to facilitate personalised oncology. We also summarise our experience with diagnostic reporting of KIT mutation analysis over a period of 3 years, and briefly survey future developments in treatment, which indeed look very promising.

Gastric carcinoma with osteoclast-like giant cells coexisting with gastrointestinal spindle cell tumor

Reactive multinucleated osteoclast-like giant cells (OGCs) have been described in a variety of neoplasms but rarely in gastric carcinomas. Reported herein is a case of an 81-year-old Caucasian male presented with upper abdominal pain and dysphagia. Esophagogastroscopy revealed an ulcerative mass and a specimen of subtotal gastrectomy and lower esophagectomy was sent for histologic examination. At the gastroesophageal junction an exophytic tumor, measured 2.2 cm in greatest diameter, was observed. Sections from the tumor showed gastric adenocarcinoma, stage pT1bpN0. Diffusely among the neoplastic cells multinucleated giant cells, resembling osteoclasts, were observed, which were positive for CD68, lysozyme, and vimentin and negative for AE1/AE3, CK8/18, hHCG, and LMP1. Moreover, in a random section from the gastric fundus, a spindle cell lesion, sized 0.6 cm, was revealed, which was positive for CD117 and CD34 antigens and was diagnosed as gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). The presence of OGCs is an uncommon finding in gastric carcinomas and by analogy to breast and pancreatic carcinomas it could characterize a rare distinct morphological variant of gastric adenocarcinoma. Due to the limited number of the reported cases, the prognostic value of OGCs is under discussion. Furthermore, pathologists should be aware that incidental GIST may accompany any tumor.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumor of the gastrointestinal tract. Soon after GIST was recognized as a tumor driven by a KIT or platelet-derived growth factor receptor mutation, it became the first solid tumor target for tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapies. More recently, alternative molecular mechanisms for GIST pathogenesis have been discovered. These are related to deficiencies in the succinate dehydrogenase complex, NF1-gene alterations in connection with neurofibromatosis type 1 tumor syndrome, and mutational activation of the BRAF oncogene in very rare cases.

The impact of incidental gastrointestinal stromal tumours on patients undergoing resection of upper gastrointestinal neoplasms

BACKGROUND

Emerging data suggest asymptomatic gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) of the upper gastrointestinal (UGI) tract are not uncommon. We sought to determine their incidence in patients undergoing resection for UGI neoplasms and their impact on surgical and adjuvant treatment.

METHODS

We accessed a database prospectively listing all patients undergoing resection of non-GIST neoplasms of the stomach and esophagus at a single university centre over a 4.5-year period and reviewed pathology reports for the presence of synchronous GISTs in the UGI tract. We compared patient demographic and tumour characteristics, operative procedures and postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS

In all, 207 patients undergoing gastrectomy or esophagectomy for non- GIST neoplasms were included. We identified 15 synchronous GISTs in the UGI tract of 11 (5.3%) patients (1 preoperatively, 4 intraoperatively and 10 on final pathology), with an average age of 67 years. Most patients were men. Additional resections were required for GISTs identified pre- or intraoperatively. Final pathology revealed completely resected c-kit positive tumours of an average size of 0.5 (range 0.1-4.0) cm with low or very low risk of malignant potential. No patients received adjuvant therapy for the GISTs. After a median follow-up of 11 (range 2-36) months, 5 patients died from their primary cancer, 3 were alive with primary cancer recurrence, and 3 were alive without disease. No patients experienced GIST recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Incidentally finding a synchronous GIST during resection of UGI neoplasms is not uncommon; it may alter surgical treatment but is unlikely to impact longterm survival.