Impact on the Clinical Outcome of Prostate Cancer by the 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology Modified Gleason Grading System

Cribriform versus Intraductal: How to Determine the Difference

Over the years, our understanding of cribriform and intraductal prostate cancer (PCa) has evolved significantly, leading to substantial changes in their classification and clinical management. This review discusses the histopathological disparities between intraductal and cribriform PCa from a diagnostic perspective, aiming to aid pathologists in achieving accurate diagnoses. Furthermore, it discusses the ongoing debate surrounding the different recommendations between ISUP and GUPS, which pose challenges for practicing pathologists and complicates consensus among them. Recent studies have shown promising results in integrating these pathological features into clinical decision-making tools, improving predictions of PCa recurrence, cancer spread, and mortality. Future research efforts should focus on further unraveling the biological backgrounds of these entities and their implications for clinical management to ultimately improve PCa patient outcomes.

Grade group system and plasma androgen receptor status in the first line treatment for metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer

In localized prostate cancer (PCa), Grade Group (GG) and Gleason Score (GS) have a well-established prognostic role. In metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), the prognostic role of GS and GG is less defined. In first-line treatment of mCRPC, androgen receptor (AR)-directed drugs (abiraterone acetate, enzalutamide) and docetaxel represent the referring options. There is no evidence that the GS/GG systems can add information to guide the choice between AR-directed drugs and docetaxel in the first-line setting of mCRPC. Nowadays there are no validated biomarkers, which define patients who may benefit or not from hormonal treatments or chemotherapy. Androgen receptor (AR) copy number variations (CNV) are predictive factors of poor response to abiraterone and enzalutamide. There are no available data about the association between AR CNV and GG. In this retrospective study, we analysed the association of the highest GG score with AR CNV and their impact on the clinical outcome of AR-directed drugs and docetaxel as first-line therapy for mCRPC patients. Patients benefit from docetaxel, abiraterone or enzalutamide regardless the GG. However, the presence of GG5 and AR CNV gain identifies a subgroup of patients with poor prognosis, which could benefit from front-line docetaxel instead of AR-directed drugs.

Temporal changes in cause-specific death in men with localised prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy: a population-based, nationwide study

Background and Objective

Changes in diagnostic work‐up, histopathological assessment, and treatment of men with prostate cancer during the last 20 years have affected the prognosis. The objective was to investigate the risk of prostate cancer death in men with clinically localised prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy in Sweden in 2000–2010.

Methods

Population‐based, nationwide, study on men with clinically localised prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy in the period 2000–2010. Cox regression analyses were used to assess differences in risk of prostate cancer death according to calendar period for diagnosis and stratified on risk category.

Results

The study included 19 330 men with a median follow‐up of 12.4 years. Men diagnosed in 2007–2008 and 2009–2010 had a significantly lower risk of prostate cancer death compared to men diagnosed in 2000–2002. The reduced risk of prostate cancer death was restricted to men with intermediate‐risk prostate cancer with no differences observed in men with low‐ or high‐risk prostate cancer.

Conclusion

During the study period, the risk of prostate cancer death decreased in the total population of men with localised prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy. The decrease was restricted to men with intermediate‐risk prostate cancer.

Exploration on Gleason score variation trend of patients with prostate carcinoma from 1996 to 2019: a retrospective single center study

Background

Gleason score (GS) is one of the stronger prognostic factors and is integral to the management of prostate carcinoma. Subsequent modifications, recommended by the International Society of Urological Pathology in 2005 and 2014, enabled accurate prediction of prognosis. The present study investigated GS variation trend of patients with prostate carcinoma from 1996 to 2019 and offered an overview of GS changes with age, specimen type, histopathological type and serum prostate specific antigen (PSA).

Methods

One thousand three hundred and seventy-six patients, admitted to Peking University People's Hospital in 1996 to 2019, were divided into 1996 to 2006, 2007 to 2015 and 2016 to 2019 groups. Data, including demographic characteristics, GS, primary and secondary grade and percentage of primary and secondary grade of each group, were collected and analyzed. The population distribution and average of GS was evaluated, after segmented and stratified by age, type of specimen, histopathological type and PSA.

Results

The average of age and PSA of each cohort had no obvious change. The average of total GS fluctuated among three cohorts with statistically significant differences. The distribution of age and PSA did not differ among cohorts. The distribution of total and primary GS shifted, with more patients detected as total GS higher than 6 (86.1%), and more primary grade higher than 3 (56.7%) in 2016-2019. After segmented and stratified by age, specimen type, histological type and PSA, the population percentage of GS over 6 was significantly higher in 2016-2019 than 1996-2006 and 2007-2015 in patients aged younger than 80 years (age <60, 89.6%, age 60-69, 82.0%, age 70-79, 87.7%). Patients, aged below 80 years in 2016-2019, were detected with higher total GS.

Conclusions

In the present study, GS in patients with prostate carcinoma showed a upward trend. Primary grade, age, serum PSA and specimen type were the main reasons for GS changing while secondary grade, tissue types and diagnostic criteria influenced less.

Prostate cancer with cribriform pattern: Exclusion criterion for active surveillance?

INTRODUCTION

Following the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology meeting, a rapidly growing body of evidence by several researchers has been demonstrating a poor prognosis in association with cribriform morphology. The aim of our study was to describe the presence of cribriform foci in specimens of radical prostatectomies and to evaluate whether demographic and clinical characteristics are associated with the presence of cribriform pattern.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This cohort study was based on 70 radical retropubic prostatectomies specimens collected between 2012 and 2016 and evaluated for the association of the cribriform pattern with age, prostate-specific antigen at surgery day, Gleason on biopsy, Gleason after radical prostatectomy, extracapsular extension, vesicles invasion, margins, multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, and post-operative radiotherapy. Results; From the univariable analysis, biochemical prostatespecific antigen recurrence (p = 0.001), extracapsular extension (p = 0.003), pre-operative prostate-specific antigen (p = 0.017), vesicles invasion, (p = 0.038) and post-operative radiotherapy (p < 0.001) showed an association with the presence of cribriform pattern. There was also a significant difference of cribriform pattern and Gleason 7 in needle biopsy (p = 0.020) and cribriform pattern and Gleason 8 or 9 in radical prostatectomy specimen (p = 0.036).

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, the increase in preoperative prostate-specific antigen had a high association with cribriform pattern. Further evidence is needed to discriminate preoperative prostate specific antigen values that might potentially be associated with the presence of cribriform pattern. Raising our knowledge about the cribriform pattern can be an excellent opportunity to correctly identify and treat patients who will eventually die from prostate cancer, sparing treatment in those who will not.

Survival outcomes of low prostate-specific antigen levels and T stages in patients with high-grade prostate cancer: a population-matched study

Objective: To evaluate the prostate cancer-specific survival (PCSS) of low T stages or low prostate-specific antigens (PSA) levels in men with high-grade prostate cancer.

Materials and Methods: Patients with non-metastatic prostate cancer (T1-4N0M0) and Gleason score 8-10 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database from 2004-2010 were identified. These men were stratified by T stages (T1, T2, T3a, T3b-4) and PSA levels (<4.0 ng/ml, 4.0-10.0 ng/ml, 10.1-20.0 ng/ml, >20.0 ng/ml). Propensity-score matching (PSM) was conducted to balance the covariates. Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariable Cox regressions were performed to analyze the PCSS in different T stage or PSA levels groups.

Results: A total of 33231 patients aging 69(62~76) years were identified. The overall cohort results showed that the PCSS of T1 group was significantly worse than that of T2 and T3a groups [T2 HR: 0.62(0.57~0.67); T3 HR: 0.70(0.63~0.77)]. There were no significant difference between T2 and T3a groups [T2 HR: 0.98 (0.91~1.05)]. The PSA <4.0 ng/ml group had significantly worse PCSS than PSA 4.0-10.0 ng/ml [PSA 4.0-10.0 ng/ml HR: 0.77(0.68~0.88)]. PSM methods were implemented in the comparison of T1 vs T2, T1 vs T3a, T2 vs T3a. and PSA< 4.0 ng/ml vs PSA 4.0-10.0 ng/ml, The results in these matched cohorts showed that T1 group was associated with significantly worse PCSS than T2 group [T1 HR: 1.31(1.20~1.44)] and T3a group [T1 HR: 1.33(1.16~1.52)]. There were no significant differences between T2 and T3a groups [T3a HR: 1.14(0.99~1.32)]. The PCSS of patients with PSA< 4.0 ng/ml was significantly worse that these with PSA 4.0-10.0 ng/ml in the matched cohort [PSA< 4.0 ng/ml HR: 1.3(1.08~1.56)].

Conclusions: For patients with high-grade PCa, the PCSS of patients seems to be worse in the T1 stage than those in T2 and T3a stages. Patients with PSA <4.0 ng/ml appears to have poorer prognosis than those with PSA 4.0-10.0 ng/ml.

Effect of Androgen Deprivation on Long-term Outcomes of Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer Stratified as Favorable or Unfavorable: A Secondary Analysis of the RTOG 9408 Randomized Clinical Trial

This secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial examines the effect of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) during radiotherapy in patients who were classified as having either favorable intermediate-risk or unfavorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer.

External validation of the Gleason grade group system in Argentinian patients that underwent surgery for prostate cancer

Introduction

The aim of this article was to evaluate the effectiveness of the Gleason grade groups (GGG) system on a group of Argentinian patients with prostate cancer (PC) who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP).

Material and methods

We retrospectively studied 262 patients who underwent RP between 1996 and 2014. To determine the performance and validity of the GGG system, a Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariate analysis with Cox proportional method were performed to evaluate biochemical recurrence, distance metastases and specific cancer mortality. The area under the curve (AUC) was calculated to compare new groups of degrees of the GGG system with the classical scheme of stratification into 3 groups.

Results

The median follow-up was 84 months. As the groups ascend, there is less confined organ disease (p <0.001) and greater extraprostatic extension (p <0.001), greater invasion of seminal vesicles (p <0.001) and greater lymph node involvement (p <0.001). The biochemical recurrence-free survival at 5 years was 68%, 55%, 22%, 9%, 0% of the 1–5 groups, respectively. Ten-years cancer-specific survival was 96%, 95%, 78%, 64%, 25% for group 1–5, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, the GGG system is presented as the only independent predictor of biochemical recurrence and specific cancer mortality. The AUC indicates that the GGG system has a higher prognostic discrimination compared to the classic 3-group system (6, 7, ≥8).

Conclusions

The International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) GGG system is an independent predictor of biochemical recurrence and mortality from prostate cancer in patients treated with RP. The classification into 5 groups shows greater discrimination in the prognosis than the traditional Gleason classification.

Overall, specific, and metastasis-free survival of Afro-Caribbean men with pathological Gleason 6 prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Several studies in the Caucasian population have shown that patients with Gleason 6 prostate cancer, based on surgical specimens, have low or no risk of metastasis. However, there is no data for men of African ancestry. The objective of this study was to estimate the overall, specific, and metastasis-free survival (MFS) of patients with a Gleason 6 score, based on the surgical specimen.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a monocentric retrospective study that included 723 consecutive patients treated by radical prostatectomy between 1 January 1 2000 and 31 March 2018, with a Gleason score of 6 based on the surgical specimen. Specific survival (SS) was defined as the time elapsed between surgery and death attributed to prostate cancer. Overall survival was defined as the time elapsed between surgery and death from all causes. The causes of death were verified in the medical records. Survival analyses without biochemical recurrence (BCR) and without salvage treatment were performed according to the Kaplan-Meier method. The Cox model was used for univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

In total, 691 patients were included because 32 were excluded for missing data. Overall 5- and 10-year survival was 94.2% and 87.1%, respectively. SS and MFS were 100%, with a median follow-up of 8.5 years. The BCR rate was 16.5%, with a median time to BCR of 5.1 years. The frequency of salvage treatment was 13.0%, with a median time to surgery of 7.3 years. In univariate analysis, PSA, pathological stage, seminal vesicle invasion, positive margins, and lymph node dissection were significantly associated with an increased risk of BCR and salvage treatment, but only PSA and positive margins were significantly associated by multivariate analysis.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION

No metastasis or disease-specific deaths were observed for men with Gleason score ≤6 prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy, in particular, men of African ancestry.

Reduced cancer-specific survival of low prostate-specific antigen in high-grade prostate cancer: A population-based retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the survival outcomes of different prostate-specific antigens (PSA) levels in men with high-grade prostate cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From 2004 to 2015 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, men diagnosed with clinically localized prostate cancer and a Gleason score (GS) 8-10 were identified. Patients were divided into the PSA levels <4.0 ng/ml, 4.0-10.0 ng/ml, 10.1-20.0 ng/ml, and >20.0 ng/ml groups. Multivariable Cox regressions and Kaplan-Meier analysis were adopted to analyze the prostate cancer-specific survival (PCSS).

RESULTS

59,336 men with a median age of 70 (63-76) years with a GS 8-10 were included. The PCSS of patients with a PSA <4.0 ng/ml was significantly worse than that of patients with a PSA 4.0-10.0 ng/ml [hazard ratio (HR): 1.43 (1.28-1.58)], but was better than that of patients with a PSA 10.1-20.0 ng/ml [HR: 1.18 (1.06-1.31)]. After stratifying patients by GS, the differences between patients with a PSA <4.0 ng/ml and a PSA 4.0-10.0 ng/ml were only significant in those with a GS 9 and 10 [GS 9 HR: 1.49 (1.28-1.72); GS 10 HR: 1.42 (1.12-1.8)], but not in those with a GS 8 [HR: 1.04 (0.95-1.14)]. Moreover, the PCSS of patients with a PSA <4.0 ng/ml and a PSA 10.0-20.0 ng/ml were similar in patients with GS 9 and 10 diseases [GS 9: HR: 1.06 (0.91-1.23); GS 10: HR: 1.13 (0.89-1.44)].

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with a PSA <4.0 ng/ml had poorer PCSS than patients with a PSA 4.0-10.0 ng/ml. Similar PCSS was found in patients whose PSA levels were 10.1-20.0 ng/ml in patients with GS 9-10 prostate cancer.

The value of endothelin receptor type B promoter methylation as a biomarker for the risk assessment and diagnosis of prostate cancer: A meta-analysis

Previous researches have demonstrated that the methylation status of the EDNRB promoter was associated with the prostate cancer (PCa), but these conclusions remained controversial. Thus, the aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the association between EDNRB promoter methylation and the PCa. According to the PRISMA statement, the Web of Science, PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were retrieved. The ORs and 95 % CIs were analyzed to evaluate the associations between EDNRB promoter methylation and the risk and clinical features of PCa. Heterogeneity among the included studies was estimated by I² statistic and Q test. Publication bias and sensitivity analysis were utilized to test the robustness of our outcomes. In addition, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were calculated to assess the diagnostic value of EDNRB methylation for PCa. Ultimately, 11 eligible studies were included. Under the random-effects model, the pooled OR shown that the frequency of EDNRB methylation was substantially higher in cases compared with controls (OR = 5.42, 95 % CI = 1.98-14.88, P = 0.001). The similar results were also found by the data from TCGA database. Subgroup analysis according to the methylation detection method showed that the heterogeneity in quantitative methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (qMSP) group was insignificant (I² = 0.0 %, P = 0.669). Moreover, the pooled sensitivity for all-inclusive studies was 0.55 (95 % CI: 0.26-0.81), and the pooled specificity was 0.93 (95 % CI: 0.55-0.99). The methylation of EDNRB promoter might increase the risk of PCa. Meanwhile, EDNRB promoter methylation test combined with PSA testing and/or other biomarkers could be promising diagnostic biomarkers for more accurate detection of PCa.

Weighted Gleason Grade Group (WGGG): A new prostate cancer biopsy reporting system with prognostic potential

INTRODUCTION

Presently, prostate biopsy (PBx) results report the highest Gleason Grade Group (GGG) as a single metric that gauges the overall clinical aggressiveness of cancer and dictates treatment. We hypothesized a PBx showing multiple cores of cancer with more volume cancer per core would represent more aggressive disease. We propose the Weighted Gleason Grade Group (WGGG), a novel scoring system that synthesizes all histopathologic data and cancer volume into a single numeric value representing the entire PBx, allowing for improved prediction of adverse pathology and risk of biochemical recurrence (BCR) following radical prostatectomy (RP).

METHODS

We studied 171 men who underwent RP after standard PBx. The WGGG was calculated by summing each positive core using the formula: GGG + (GGG x %Ca/core). RP pathology was evaluated for extraprostatic extension (EPE), positive surgical margins (PSM), seminal vesicle invasion (SVI), and lymph node involvement (LNI), and patients were followed for BCR. We compared GGG vs. WGGG receiver operating characteristic curves for each outcome, and determined the predictive capability of GGG and WGGG to identify patients with BCR. Categorized WGGG groups were created based on risk of BCR using classification and regression tree analysis. We then sought to externally validate WGGG in a cohort of 389 patients in a separate institutional dataset.

RESULTS

In the development cohort, area under the curves (AUCs) for the WGGG vs. GGG were significantly higher for predicting EPE (0.784 vs. 0.690, P = 0.002), SVI (AUC 0.823 vs. 0.721, P = .014), LNI (AUC 0.862 vs. 0.823, P = 0.039), and PSM (AUC 0.638 vs. 0.575, P = 0.031. Analysis of the validation cohort showed similar findings for EPE (AUC 0.764 vs. 0.729, P = 0.13), SVI (AUC 0.819 vs. 0.749, P = 0.01), LNI (AUC 0.939 vs. 0.867, P = 0.02), and PSM (AUC 0.624 vs. 0.547, P = 0.04). Patients with WGGG >30 (high-risk group) demonstrated ∼50% failure at 2 years in both cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

The WGGG, by providing a metric reflecting the entirety of the PBx, is more informative than conventional single GGG alone in identifying adverse pathologic outcomes and risk of BCR following RP. This superior discriminatory capability has been achieved without any consideration of other commonly available clinical disease characteristics.

Grading of prostate cancer: a work in progress

Grading of prostate cancer has evolved substantially over time, not least because of major changes in diagnostic approach and concomitant shifts from late- to early-stage detection since the adoption of PSA testing from the late 1980s. After the conception of the architecture-based nine-tier Gleason grading system more than 50 years ago, several changes were made in order to increase its prognostic impact, to reduce interobserver variation and to improve concordance between prostate needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy grading. This eventually resulted in the current five-tier grading system, with a much more detailed description of the individual architectural patterns constituting the remaining three Gleason patterns (i.e. grades 3-5). Nevertheless, there is room for improvement. For instance, distinction of common grade 4 subpatterns such as ill-formed and fused glands from the grade 3 pattern is challenging, blurring the division between low-risk patients who could be eligible for deferred therapy and those who need curative therapy. The last few years have witnessed the publication of several studies on the prognostic impact of individual architectural subpatterns showing that, in particular, the cribriform pattern exceeded the prognostic impact of other grade 4 subpatterns. This review provides an overview of the changes in prostate cancer grading over time and provides a thorough description of the various Gleason subpatterns, the current evidence of their prognostic impact and areas of contention. Potential practical ways for improvements of the current grading system are also put forward.

Updates on Grading and Staging of Prostate Cancer

Since its development between 1966 and 1977, the Gleason grading system has remained one of the most important prognostic indicators in prostatic acinar adenocarcinoma. The grading system was first majorly revised in 2005 and again in 2014. With the publication of the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM staging manual in 2018, the classification of prostate cancer and its reporting have further evolved and are now included as part of staging criteria. This article reflects the aspects that are most influential on daily practice. A brief summary of 3 ancillary commercially available genomic tests is also provided.

Prostate Cancers Detected by Magnetic Resonance Imaging–Targeted Biopsies Have a Higher Percentage of Gleason Pattern 4 Component and Are Less Likely to Be Upgraded in Radical Prostatectomies

Context.—

In Gleason score (GS) 7 prostate cancers, the quantity of Gleason pattern 4 (GP 4) is an important prognostic factor and influences treatment decisions. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)–targeted biopsy has been increasingly used in clinical practice.

Objective.—

To investigate whether MRI-targeted biopsy may detect GS 7 prostate cancer with greater GP 4 quantity, and whether it improves biopsy/radical prostatectomy GS concordance.

Design.—

A total of 243 patients with paired standard and MRI-targeted biopsies with cancer in either standard or targeted or both were studied, 65 of whom had subsequent radical prostatectomy. The biopsy findings, including GS and tumor volume, were correlated with the radical prostatectomy findings.

Results.—

More prostate cancers detected by MRI-targeted biopsy were GS 7 or higher. Mean GP 4 percentage in GS 7 cancers was 31.0% ± 29.3% by MRI-targeted biopsy versus 25.1% ± 29.5% by standard biopsy. A total of 122 of 218 (56.0%) and 96 of 217 (44.2%) prostate cancers diagnosed on targeted biopsy and standard biopsy, respectively, had a GP 4 of 10% or greater (P = .01). Gleason upgrading was seen in 12 of 59 cases (20.3%) from MRI-targeted biopsy and in 24 of 57 cases (42.1%) from standard biopsy (P = .01). Gleason upgrading correlated with the biopsy cancer volume inversely and GP 4 of 30% or less in standard biopsy. Such correlation was not found in MRI-targeted biopsy.

Conclusions.—

Magnetic resonance imaging–targeted biopsy may detect more aggressive prostate cancers and reduce the risk of Gleason upgrading in radical prostatectomy. This study supports a potential role for MRI-targeted biopsy in the workup of prostate cancer and inclusion of percentage of GP 4 in prostate biopsy reports.

Prostate cancer grading in 2018: limitations, implementations, cribriform morphology, and biological markers

The Gleason grading system is among the most important prognostic factors in patients with prostate cancer. From the 2005 to the 2014 consensus conferences, organized by the International Society of Urological Pathology, the morphologic criteria for the identification of the Gleason patterns were redefined, thus resulting in the shrinkage of the Gleason pattern 3. This led to the expansion of the Gleason pattern 4. The newly proposed grade group system reduces the Gleason scores of prostate cancer to the lowest number, each associated with a unique behavior from the prognostic point of view. The advantage is that the simplified system with five groups allows for a more accurate stratification of the patients in comparison with the Gleason system. Cribriform, fused, ill-defined and glomeruloid glands are part of the histologic spectrum of the Gleason pattern 4. Cribriform morphology has a prognosis that is worse in comparison with the other non-cribriform Gleason 4 patterns. One of the major implications of the cribriform growth is that it precludes a patient from choosing active surveillance.

The present and future of prostate cancer histopathology

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The present review describes recent changes in the histologic grading of prostatic adenocarcinoma and emerging data suggesting areas for further grade optimization.

RECENT FINDINGS

The grading of prostatic adenocarcinoma has evolved over time, and optimization for active surveillance management has been one major driving force. Recent changes include adoption of the Grade Group system, which stratifies patients into one of five prognostic groups. Although it provides clearer labels for patient understanding and defines a more homogenous low-risk group (i.e. Grade Group 1 of 5), emerging data suggest that further prognostic stratification may be achieved by incorporating other histologic findings. The impact of 'cribriform histology' and intraductal carcinoma as aggressive features of prostate cancer has gained significant recognition. Furthermore, quantifying the fraction of each individual Gleason pattern component may also add prognostic stratification. In addition to Gleason score and Grade Group, some institutions now identify and report high-risk histologic patterns (e.g. 'cribriform histology') and the percentage of Gleason pattern 4 on biopsies. While early in adoption, these additional features are being used to further stratify patients beyond the Grade Group system, particularly for patients with Grade Group 2 carcinomas. These histologic findings will likely be incorporated into future modifications of the grading system to further optimize patient stratification and ensure reporting consistency.

SUMMARY

The histologic evaluation of prostatic adenocarcinoma provides strong prognostic information for clinical management. The recent Grade Group system offers many improvements, but further optimization based on specific histologic patterns may evolve.

Utility of Pathology Imagebase for standardisation of prostate cancer grading

AIMS

Despite efforts to standardise grading of prostate cancer, even among experts there is still a considerable variation in grading practices. In this study we describe the use of Pathology Imagebase, a novel reference image library, for setting an international standard in prostate cancer grading.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) recently launched a reference image database supervised by experts. A panel of 24 international experts in prostate pathology reviewed independently microphotographs of 90 cases of prostate needle biopsies with cancer. A linear weighted kappa of 0.67 (95% confidence interval = 0.62-0.72) and consensus was reached in 50 cases. The interobserver weighted kappa varied from 0.48 to 0.89. The highest level of agreement was seen for Gleason score (GS) 3 + 3 = 6 (ISUP grade 1), while higher grades and particularly GS 4 + 3 = 7 (ISUP grade 3) showed considerable disagreement. Once a two-thirds majority was reached, images were moved automatically into a public database available for all ISUP members at www.isupweb.org. Non-members are able to access a limited number of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

It is anticipated that the database will assist pathologists to calibrate their grading and, hence, decrease interobserver variability. It will also help to identify instances where definitions of grades need to be clarified.

Impact of Pathology Review for Decision Therapy in Localized Prostate Cancer

Background

The Gleason score is an essential tool in the decision to treat localized prostate cancer. However, experienced pathologists can classify Gleason score differently than do low-volume pathologists, and this may affect the treatment decision. This study sought to assess the impact of pathology review of external biopsy specimens from 23 men with a recent diagnosis of localized prostate cancer.

Methods

All external biopsy specimens were reviewed at our pathology department. Data were retrospectively collected from scanned charts.

Results

The median patient age was 63 years (range: 46-74 years). All patients had a Karnofsky performance score of 90% to 100%. The median prostate-specific antigen level was 23.6 ng/dL (range: 1.04-13.6 ng/dL). Among the 23 reviews, the Gleason score changed for 8 (35%) patients: 7 upgraded and 1 downgraded. The new Gleason score affected the treatment decision in 5 of 8 cases (62.5%).

Conclusions

This study demonstrates the need for pathology review in patients with localized prostate cancer before treatment because Gleason score can change in more than one-third of patients and can affect treatment decision in almost two-thirds of recategorized patients.

Impact of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System, Version 2, on MRI Diagnosis for Extracapsular Extension of Prostate Cancer

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to validate the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System, version 2 (PI-RADSv2), in assessing extracapsular extension (ECE), compared with PI-RADS, version 1 (PI-RADSv1).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 210 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer underwent MRI and radical prostatectomy. Two readers independently interpreted the MR images. In PI-RADSv1, 5-point ECE risk scoring was used. In PI-RADSv2, ECE criteria included morphologic features and a tumor-capsule contact length (CL) greater than 10 mm. The diagnostic performance of each PI-RADS version and the cutoff CL were evaluated.

RESULTS

ECE was found in 56 patients (26.7%). In PI-RADSv1, maximal accuracy was achieved with a risk score of 3 or greater. At this threshold, positive findings on PI-RADSv1 and PI-RADSv2 were identified in 21.0-34.3% and 49.0-51.4% of patients, respectively. Compared with PI-RADSv1, PI-RADSv2 had higher negative predictive values (84.9-89.1% vs 96.3-97.1%, respectively; p = 0.003 and 0.021, for each reader). PI-RADSv1 and PI-RADSv2 had positive predictive values of 56.9-70.5% and 49.1-50.5%, respectively (p = 0.025 and 0.300, respectively). Interobserver kappa values for PI-RADSv1 and PI-RADSv2 were 0.511 and 0.781, respectively. The best cutoff CL was greater than 10 mm among patients without morphologic features of ECE. For patients positive for ECE on the basis of PI-RADSv2 but not PI-RADSv1, 73.3-74.1% of prostate cancer cases with a biopsy Gleason score of 7 or less and 35.7-44.4% of cases with a biopsy Gleason score of 8 or higher were overstaged.

CONCLUSION

PI-RADSv2 reduces understaging and improves interobserver agreement in ECE assessment. However, overstaging is a concern, and the biopsy Gleason score may have a complementary role in reducing overstaging.

SOCS3 Immunohistochemical Expression Seems to Support the 2005 and 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Modified Gleason Grading System

BACKGROUND

In the 2014, The International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus conference update the grading of prostate, last revised in 2005. In this study we evaluate the SOCS3 immunohistochemical protein expression in different Gleason prostatic adenocarcinoma: classical Gleason grade 3, classical Gleason grade 3 upgraded to Gleason grade 4 according to the ISUP modifications and classical and modified Gleason grade 4. The major conclusions were: (i) Cribriform glands should be assigned a Gleason pattern 4, regardless of morphology; (ii) Glomeruloid glands should be assigned a Gleason pattern 4, regardless of morphology; (iii) Grading of mucinous carcinoma of the prostate should be based on its underlying growth pattern rather than all as pattern 4; and (iv) Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate without invasive carcinoma should not assigned Gleason grade and a comment about aggressive carcinoma probably associated should be made. In a recent report we analyzed the methylathion status of cytokine signaling (SOCS) proteins 3 (SOCS3) gene and the consequences of promoter hypermethylation on mRNA and protein expression in a collection of prostate cancer and benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) and for the first time we demonstrated that a hypermethylation of SOCS3 with a significant reduction of its mRNA and protein expression identifies a subgroup of prostate cancer with a more aggressive behavior. Moreover we demonstrated that the immunohystochemical analysis of SOCS3 protein expression in prostatic cancer biopsies may provide a useful and easier method than SOCS3 methylation analysis to individuate in cancer with intermediate-high grade Gleason score a subgroup of prostate cancer with a more aggressive behavior.

METHODS

A total of 148 radical prostatectomy with diagnosis of prostatic acinar adenocarcinoma were stratified into three different categories on the basis of Gleason grade: (i) Twenty-six prostatic adenocarcinoma with classical and modified Gleason grade 3; (ii) Fifty seven prostatic adenocarcinoma with classical Gleason grade 3 upgraded to Gleason grade 4 by 2005 and 2014 ISUP Consensus Conference; and (iii) Sixty five prostatic adenocarcinoma with classical and modified Gleason grade 4. Immunohistochemical analysis for SOCS3 was performed and SOCS3 staining intensity were evaluated by two pathologists in three different ways on the basis of the intensity of cytoplasmatic staining: positive (intense cytoplasmatic staining in more than 50% of neoplastic cells) (+), negative (absence of cytoplasmatic staining in more than 50% of neoplastic cells) (-), weakly positive (weak cytoplasmatic staining in more than 50% of neoplastic cells (+/-).

RESULTS

In the group of prostatic adenocarcinoma Gleason grade 3 we found that SOCS3 positivity (+) were observed in 19 out of 26 cases (73.1%); in 5 out of 26 prostatic adenocarcinoma the neoplastic glands showed weak intensity SOCS3 staining (+/-) (19.2%), while in only two cases we found SOCS-3 negativity (-) (7.7%); in the group of cases with prostatic adenocarcinoma with Gleason grade 4, 16 out 65 cases (24.6%) showed SOCS3 positivity (+); 18 out 65 cases (27.7%) SOCS3 weakly positive (+/-), and in 31 cases (47.7%) SOCS3 negative staining (-) were observed. Interestingly, the group of prostatic adenocarcinoma with histological Gleason 3 pattern upgraded to Gleason 4 pattern according to the 2005 and 2014 ISUP modified grading system, showed SOCS3 positivity (+) in 16 out of 57 cases (28%), in 16 out 57 cases (28%) a weakly positive for SOCS3 (+/-) were observed, while 25 cases (44%) showed negative SOCS3 staining (-).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study we demonstrated a significant association of SOCS3 positivity (+) with prostatic carcinoma classical Gleason pattern 3 (P < 0.0001), while SOCS3 negative pattern (-) or SOCS3 weakly positive pattern (+/-) were associated to prostatic carcinomas with Gleason pattern 3 upgraded to Gleason pattern 4 (P = 0.0002) and with classical Gleason pattern 4. The significant difference of SOCS3 immunohistochemical expression between classical Gleason grade 3 and Gleason grade 4 upgraded to grade 4 seems to support the definitions and the modifications of Gleason grade 4 of the 2005 and the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP). The hypoexpression of SOCS3 protein in glomeruloid glands could support the hypothesis that from molecular point of view this growth pattern could be different from classical Gleason pattern 3 and biologically more closely to Gleason pattern 4, confirming the conclusions of the 2014 ISUP Conference assigning a Gleason pattern 4 to glomeruloid glands regardless of morphology. Prostate 77: 597-603, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

The prognostic significance of the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading system for prostate cancer

The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) modified Gleason grading system was further amended in 2014 with the establishment of grade groupings (ISUP grading). This study examined the predictive value of ISUP grading, comparing results with recognised prognostic parameters.Of 3700 men undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) reported at Aquesta Pathology between 2008 and 2013, 2079 also had a positive needle biopsy available for review. We examined the association between needle biopsy 2014 ISUP grade and 2005 modified Gleason score, tumour volume, pathological stage of the subsequent RP tumour, as well as biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS). The median age was 62 (range 32-79 years). Median serum prostate specific antigen was 5.9 (range 0.4-69 ng/mL). For needle biopsies, 280 (13.5%), 1031 (49.6%), 366 (17.6%), 77 (3.7%) and 325 (15.6%) were 2014 ISUP grades 1-5, respectively. Needle biopsy 2014 ISUP grade showed a significant association with RP tumour volume (p < 0.001), TNM pT and N stage (p < 0.001) and BRFS (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis using Cox proportional hazards regression model showed serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) at the time of diagnosis and ISUP grade >2 to be significantly associated with BRFS.This study provides evidence of the prognostic significance of ISUP grading for thin core needle biopsy of prostate.

Independent surgical validation of the new prostate cancer grade-grouping system

OBJECTIVE

To report the independent prognostic impact of the new prostate cancer grade-grouping system in a large external validation cohort of patients treated with radical prostatectomy (RP).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 1994 and 2013, 3 694 consecutive men were treated with RP at a single institution. To investigate the performance of and validate the grade-grouping system, biochemical recurrence-free survival (bRFS) rates were assessed using Kaplan-Meier tests, Cox-regression modelling, and discriminatory comparison analyses. Separate analyses were performed based on biopsy and RP grade.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 52.7 months. The 5-year actuarial bRFS for biopsy grade groups 1-5 were 94.2%, 89.2%, 73.1%, 63.1%, and 54.7%, respectively (P < 0.001). Similarly, the 5-year actuarial bRFS based on RP grade groups was 96.1%, 93.0%, 74.0%, 64.4%, and 49.9% for grade groups 1-5, respectively (P < 0.001). The adjusted hazard ratios for bRFS relative to biopsy grade group 1 were 1.98, 4.20, 5.57, and 9.32 for groups 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively (P < 0.001), and for RP grade groups were 2.09, 5.27, 5.86, and 10.42 (P < 0.001). The five-grade-group system had a higher prognostic discrimination compared with the commonly used three-tier system (Gleason score 6 vs 7 vs 8-10).

CONCLUSIONS

In an independent surgical cohort, we have validated the prognostic benefit of the new prostate cancer grade-grouping system for bRFS, and shown that the benefit is maintained after adjusting for important clinicopathological variables. The greater predictive accuracy of the new system will improve risk stratification in the clinical setting and aid in patient counselling.

The Quantitative Criteria Based on the Fractal Dimensions, Entropy, and Lacunarity for the Spatial Distribution of Cancer Cell Nuclei Enable Identification of Low or High Aggressive Prostate Carcinomas

Background: Tumor grading, PSA concentration, and stage determine a risk of prostate cancer patients with accuracy of about 70%. An approach based on the fractal geometrical model was proposed to eliminate subjectivity from the evaluation of tumor aggressiveness and to improve the prediction. This study was undertaken to validate classes of equivalence for the spatial distribution of cancer cell nuclei in a larger, independent set of prostate carcinomas.

Methods: The global fractal capacity D₀, information D₁ and correlation D₂ dimension, the local fractal dimension (LFD) and the local connected fractal dimension (LCFD), Shannon entropy H and lacunarity λ were measured using computer algorithms in digitalized images of both the reference set (n = 60) and the test set (n = 208) of prostate carcinomas.

Results: Prostate carcinomas were re-stratified into seven classes of equivalence. The cut-off D₀-values 1.5450, 1.5820, 1.6270, 1.6490, 1.6980, 1.7640 defined the classes from C1 to C7, respectively. The other measures but the D₁ failed to define the same classes of equivalence. The pairs (D₀, LFD), (D₀, H), (D₀, λ), (D₁, LFD), (D₁, H), (D₁, λ) characterized the spatial distribution of cancer cell nuclei in each class. The co-application of those measures enabled the subordination of prostate carcinomas to one out of three clusters associated with different tumor aggressiveness. For D₀ < 1.5820, LFD < 1.3, LCFD > 1.5, H < 0.7, and λ > 0.8, the class C1 or C2 contains low complexity low aggressive carcinomas exclusively. For D₀ > 1.6980, LFD > 1.7644, LCFD > 1.7051, H > 0.9, and λ < 0.7, the class C6 or C7 contains high complexity high aggressive carcinomas.

Conclusions: The cut-off D₀-values defining the classes of equivalence were validated in this study. The cluster analysis suggested that the number of the subjective Gleason grades and the number of the objective classes of equivalence could be decreased from seven to three without a loss of clinically relevant information. Two novel quantitative criteria based on the complexity and the diversity measures enabled the identification of low or high aggressive prostate carcinomas and should be verified in the future multicenter, randomized studies.

The evolving Gleason grading system

The Gleason grading system for prostate adenocarcinoma has evolved from its original scheme established in the 1960s-1970s, to a significantly modified system after two major consensus meetings conducted by the International Society of Urologic Pathology (ISUP) in 2005 and 2014, respectively. The Gleason grading system has been incorporated into the WHO classification of prostate cancer, the AJCC/UICC staging system, and the NCCN guidelines as one of the key factors in treatment decision. Both pathologists and clinicians need to fully understand the principles and practice of this grading system. We here briefly review the historical aspects of the original scheme and the recent developments of Gleason grading system, focusing on major changes over the years that resulted in the modern Gleason grading system, which has led to a new "Grade Group" system proposed by the 2014 ISUP consensus, and adopted by the 2016 WHO classification of tumours of the prostate.

Developing a model for forecasting Gleason score ≥7 in potential prostate cancer patients to reduce unnecessary prostate biopsies

PURPOSE

The diagnosis of Gleason score (GS) ≥7 with distinction from GS < 7 remains a difficult problem instructing clinical decisions. Moreover, the present wide application of prostate biopsy to increase prostate cancer detection rate might cause unnecessary and excessive examination or treatment. Therefore, a risk assessment model for forecasting GS ≥ 7 in potential prostate cancer patients was established to reduce unnecessary prostate biopsies.

METHODS

Patients (n = 981; September 2009 to January 2013) who underwent trans-rectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided core prostate biopsy were retrospectively evaluated in the first stage of the study. Age, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), free PSA (fPSA), the free/total PSA ratio (f/t), prostate volume (PV), PSA density (PSAD), digital rectal examination (DRE) findings (texture, nodules) and B-ultrasound detection results (normal or abnormal, presence of hypoechoic mass or microcalcification) were considered as potential predictive factors. After multiple logistic regression analysis, independent variables used to build a nomogram were selected using a backward elimination selection procedure. Then, a model to forecast GS ≥ 7 was designed for potential prostate cancer patients. In the second stage of the study, 410 cases (January 2013 to March 2015) were subsequently evaluated using our model for prostate biopsies, and the outcomes of biopsies were compared between the two stages.

RESULTS

PSA, DRE texture, DRE nodules and B-ultrasound results were finally brought into our nomogram; a obviously greater area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was obtained for the model than utilizing PSA, fPSA or PSAD alone (0.831 vs. 0.803, 0.770, 0.780 separately). We thereafter sought the best cutoff value in the ROC curve at 0.87, which provided sensitivity as high as 90%. Meanwhile, the specificity was 45.8%, which was much higher than the specificity of PSA, fPSA and PSAD at the same sensitivity level (37.7, 24.6 and 35.2%, respectively). In the first stage, the detection rate of GS ≥ 7 in the high-risk group was significantly higher than in the low-risk group (80.3 vs. 35.0%, p < 0.001). Furthermore, in the second stage, with the application of the new model associated with our former models, the rate of GS ≥ 7 was improved from 71.0 (697/981) to 79.2% (267/337) (p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

The model for forecasting GS ≥ 7 is effective, which could reduce unnecessary prostate biopsies without delaying patients' diagnoses and treatments.

Outcomes of Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer with minimal amounts (<6%) vs ≥6% of Gleason pattern 4 tissue in needle biopsy specimens

OBJECTIVE

The International Society of Urological Pathology Gleason grading system was modified in 2005. Since the modified system was introduced, many cancers that previously would have been categorized as Gleason score (GS) 6 are now categorized as GS 7 based on biopsy specimens that only contain minimal amounts (<6%) of Gleason pattern (GP) 4 tissue. However, the clinical significance of observing <6% of GP 4 tissue in biopsies of GS 7 prostate cancer has not been studied.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This study was based on needle biopsy specimens that were categorized as GS 6 or GS 7 and were obtained from patients who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) with available follow-up data. We assessed the quantity of GP 4 tissue in biopsy specimens of GS 7 prostate cancer. Further, we evaluated the correlation between the quantity of GP 4 tissue and disease progression after RP.

RESULTS

GP 4 comprising 26-49% of the specimen, GS 4+3 and percentage of total core tissue scored as positive were significant and independent predictors of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) failure after RP, as assessed using a multivariate Cox regression model that included the quantity of GP 4 in the prostate biopsy specimen, preoperative PSA, perineural invasion, clinical stage, number of positive cores, and percentage of core tissue scored as positive. Cases with GS 3+3 and cases in which the observed GP 4 area was <6% did not differ significantly in terms of biochemical PSA recurrence (BPR) status. In contrast, cases with 6-25% GP 4 tissue, 26-49% GP 4 tissue, and GS 4+3 showed more frequent BPR than cases with GS 3+3.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that the quantity of GP 4 tissue in GS 7 cancer has clinical significance. However, there is a need for larger studies of the clinical significance of biopsy specimens that include <6% GP 4 tissue. We should reconsider whether the amount of GP 4 should be included in standart pathology reports.

Does Gleason score at initial diagnosis predict efficacy of abiraterone acetate therapy in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer? An analysis of abiraterone acetate phase III trials

BACKGROUND

The usefulness of Gleason score (<8 or ≥8) at initial diagnosis as a predictive marker of response to abiraterone acetate (AA) plus prednisone in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) was explored retrospectively.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Initial diagnosis Gleason score was obtained in 1048 of 1195 (COU-AA-301, post-docetaxel) and 996 of 1088 (COU-AA-302, chemotherapy-naïve) patients treated with AA 1 g plus prednisone 5 mg twice daily by mouth or placebo plus prednisone. Efficacy end points included radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) and overall survival (OS). Distributions and medians were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method and hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) by Cox model.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics were similar across studies and treatment groups. Regardless of Gleason score, AA treatment significantly improved rPFS in post-docetaxel [Gleason score <8: median, 6.4 versus 5.5 months (HR = 0.70; 95% CI 0.56-0.86), P = 0.0009 and Gleason score ≥8: median, 5.6 versus 2.9 months (HR = 0.58; 95% CI 0.48-0.72), P < 0.0001] and chemotherapy-naïve patients [Gleason score <8: median, 16.5 versus 8.2 months (HR = 0.50; 95% CI 0.40-0.62), P < 0.0001 and Gleason score ≥8: median, 13.8 versus 8.2 months (HR = 0.61; 95% CI 0.49-0.76), P < 0.0001]. Clinical benefit of AA treatment was also observed for OS, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response, objective response and time to PSA progression across studies and Gleason score subgroups.

CONCLUSION

OS and rPFS trends demonstrate AA treatment benefit in patients with pre- or post-chemotherapy mCRPC regardless of Gleason score at initial diagnosis. The initial diagnostic Gleason score in patients with mCRPC should not be considered in the decision to treat with AA, as tumour metastases may no longer reflect the histology at the time of diagnosis.

CLINICAL TRIALS NUMBER

COU-AA-301 (NCT00638690); COU-AA-302 (NCT00887198).

The Significance of Accurate Determination of Gleason Score for Therapeutic Options and Prognosis of Prostate Cancer

The Gleason score (GS) to date remains one of the most reliable prognostic predictors in prostate cancer (PCa). However, the majority of studies supporting its prognostic relevance were performed prior to its modification by the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) in 2005. Furthermore, the combination of Gleason grading and nuclear/nucleolar subgrading (Helpap score) has been shown to essentially improve grading concordance between biopsy and radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens. This prompted us to investigate the modified GS and combigrading (Gleason/Helpap score) in association with clinicopathological features, biochemical recurrence (BCR), and survival. Core needle biopsies and corresponding RP specimens from 580 patients diagnosed with PCa between 2005 and 2010 were evaluated. According to the modified GS, the comparison between biopsy and RP samples resulted in an upgrading from GS 6 to GS 7a and GS 7b in 65% and 19%, respectively. Combigrading further resulted in an upgrading from low grade (GS 6/2a) to intermediate grade PCa (GS 6/2b) in 11.1% and from intermediate grade (GS 6/2b) to high grade PCa (GS 7b/2b) in 22.6%. Overall, well-differentiated PCa (GS 6/2a) was detected in 2.8% of RP specimens, while intermediate grade (GS 6/2b and GS 7a/2b) and high grade cancers (≥ GS 7b) accounted for 39.5% and 57.4% of cases, respectively. At a mean follow-up of 3.9 years, BCR was observed in 17.6% of patients with intermediate (9.8%) or high grade PCa (30.2%), while PSA relapse did not occur in GS 6/2a PCa. In conclusion, adding nuclear/nucleolar subgrading to the modified GS allowed for a more accurate distinction between low and intermediate grade PCa, therefore offering a valuable tool for the identification of patients eligible for active surveillance (AS).

Gleason 6 Prostate Cancer: Translating Biology into Population Health

PURPOSE

Gleason 6 (3+3) is the most commonly diagnosed prostate cancer among men with prostate specific antigen screening, the most histologically well differentiated and is associated with the most favorable prognosis. Despite its prevalence, considerable debate exists regarding the genetic features, clinical significance, natural history, metastatic potential and optimal management.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Members of the Young Urologic Oncologists in the Society of Urologic Oncology cooperated in a comprehensive search of the peer reviewed English medical literature on Gleason 6 prostate cancer, specifically focusing on the history of the Gleason scoring system, histological features, clinical characteristics, practice patterns and outcomes.

RESULTS

The Gleason scoring system was devised in the early 1960s, widely adopted by 1987 and revised in 2005 with a more restrictive definition of Gleason 6 disease. There is near consensus that Gleason 6 meets pathological definitions of cancer, but controversy about whether it meets commonly accepted molecular and genetic criteria of cancer. Multiple clinical series suggest that the metastatic potential of contemporary Gleason 6 disease is negligible but not zero. Population based studies in the U.S. suggest that more than 90% of men newly diagnosed with prostate cancer undergo treatment and are exposed to the risk of morbidity for a cancer unlikely to cause symptoms or decrease life expectancy. Efforts have been proposed to minimize the number of men diagnosed with or treated for Gleason 6 prostate cancer. These include modifications to prostate specific antigen based screening strategies such as targeting high risk populations, decreasing the frequency of screening, recommending screening cessation, incorporating remaining life expectancy estimates, using shared decision making and novel biomarkers, and eliminating prostate specific antigen screening entirely. Large nonrandomized and randomized studies have shown that active surveillance is an effective management strategy for men with Gleason 6 disease. Active surveillance dramatically reduces the number of men undergoing treatment without apparent compromise of cancer related outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The definition and clinical relevance of Gleason 6 prostate cancer have changed substantially since its introduction nearly 50 years ago. A high proportion of screen detected cancers are Gleason 6 and the metastatic potential is negligible. Dramatically reducing the diagnosis and treatment of Gleason 6 disease is likely to have a favorable impact on the net benefit of prostate cancer screening.

Review by urological pathologists improves the accuracy of Gleason grading by general pathologists

Backgrounds

Urologists use biopsy Gleason scores for patient counseling, prognosis prediction, and decision making. The accuracy of Gleason grading is very important. However, the variability of Gleason grading between general pathologists cannot be overlooked. Here we evaluate the discrepancy in the Gleason grading between 2 urologic pathologists and general pathologists as well as improvement in the accuracy of Gleason grading by general pathologists as a result of review by urologic pathologists.

Methods

The subjects enrolled in the study were 755 patients who underwent prostate needle biopsy at affiliate hospitals of Nara Medical University over a period of 2 years. The biopsy samples were diagnosed by general pathologists. All biopsy samples were sent to Nara Medical University where they were diagnosed by 2 urologic pathologists. The results were then returned to the general pathologists. We compared the diagnostic accuracy of the general pathologists with that of the urologic pathologists for the parameters of no malignancy, atypical small acinar proliferation, high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and Gleason score (6, 3 + 4, 4 + 3 and 8–10). We then evaluated the concordance rate between the general and urologic pathologists for each of four consecutive 6-month periods.

Results

The overall concordance rate of urologic pathologists and general pathologists in the first, second, third and last 6-month periods was 71.8 % (140/198), 79.8 % (168/225), 89.7 % (166/185) and 89.9 % (133/148), respectively. The concordance rate of the Gleason score between urologic pathologists and general pathologists in the first, second, third and last 6-month periods was 47.5 %(38/80), 62.6 %(57/91),76.9 %(50/65) and 78.7 %(48/61), respectively, and the kappa value was 0.55, 0.68, 0.81 and 0.84, respectively. The concordance rate improved significantly over the course of each period (P = 0.04).

Conclusion

The concordance rate of the Gleason grading between the general pathologists and the urologic pathologists was 47.5 %. However, improvement of the concordance rate as a result of review by the urological pathologist could be seen.

Evolution of the patient characteristics of candidates for radical prostatectomy and the results obtained with the technique

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the oncological profile and risk of biochemical recurrence of patients with prostate cancer who underwent radical prostatectomy based on the time period in which the patients were operated. To evaluate the differences in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) at diagnosis of patients with or without biochemical recurrence based on these time periods.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Observation carried forward study of a cohort of 972 radical prostatectomies performed during 3 time periods (1994-2000, 2001-2006, 2007-2011). The importance of PSA at diagnosis on the time periods and on biochemical recurrence was assessed using a generalized linear model. The independent predictive behavior of biochemical recurrence was analyzed using Cox regression.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 38 (16-76) months. PSA levels at diagnosis were higher in the period 1994-2000 (12.97ng/mL, P<.001). Seventy-two percent of the patients from the period 2007-2011 were diagnosed as clinical stage T1c (P<.001), compared with 55% from the period 1994-2000. The percentage of extracapsular extension in the specimen decreased from 27% to 18% from the period 1994-2000 to the period 2007-2011 (p<.001). The percentage of patients with biochemical recurrence went from 38% to 14% from the first to the third period (P>.001). The difference between PSA levels at diagnosis for the patients with or without biochemical recurrence was independent of the period (P=.84). The period during which surgery was performed was not an independent predictive factor for biochemical recurrence (P=.09).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients from the 2007-2011 period had less extracapsular disease in the radical prostatectomy. The period was not an independent predictive factor for biochemical recurrence.

Current practice in handling and reporting prostate needle biopsies: results of a Turkish survey

BACKGROUND

In 2005 ISUP (International Society of Urological Pathology) consensus revised the Gleason grading system.

METHOD

We conducted a web based national survey of the members of Uropathology Working Group (WG) and general pathologists (NWP) to investigate the current practice in reporting prostate needle biopsies.

RESULTS

The revised system was well known and applied by the respondents. In pattern analysis major difference was detected in reporting medium sized, regular cribriform glands. In both group this pattern was reported as Gleason Pattern (GP) 3 by at least 50% of the repliers, the rest reported this pattern as GP 4. Gleason Score (GS) 2-4 was not reported by the WG. In NWP GS 2-4 was reported by 25% either frequently of infrequently. Any amount of secondary higher grade was included in GS by 92.5% of WG and 70% of NWP (p<0.05). Five percent cut off was requested for the lower secondary grade by 71.4% of WG but 64% of NWP. (p<0.05) Tertiary pattern was reported by 64.5% of WG and 34% of NWP (p<0.05). Individual GS was assigned for each core by 46.4% of WG and 26.5% of NWP (p<0.05). When measuring the extend of cancer, most included the benign tissue between cancer foci in the same core. Fat invasion was interpreted as extraprostatic invasion by 85.7% of WG and 55.9%of NWP (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

This study showed the specific points where the educational efforts should be focused to have a better and standardized practice pattern of pathologists when reporting prostate biopsies.

Gleason Upgrading with Time in a Large Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance Cohort

PURPOSE

We report the percentage of patients on active surveillance who had disease pathologically upgraded and factors that predict for upgrading on surveillance biopsies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients in our active surveillance database with at least 1 repeat prostate biopsy were included. Histological upgrading was defined as any increase in primary or secondary Gleason grade on repeat biopsy. Multivariate analysis was used to determine baseline and dynamic factors associated with Gleason upgrading. This information was used to develop a nomogram to predict for upgrading or treatment in patients electing for active surveillance.

RESULTS

Of 862 patients in our cohort 592 had 2 or more biopsies. Median followup was 6.4 years. Of the patients 20% were intermediate risk, 0.3% were high risk and all others were low risk. During active surveillance 31.3% of cases were upgraded. On multivariate analysis clinical stage T2, higher prostate specific antigen and higher percentage of cores involved with disease at the time of diagnosis predicted for upgrading. A total of 27 cases (15% of those upgraded) were Gleason 8 or higher at upgrading, and 62% of all 114 upgraded cases went on to have active treatment. The nomogram incorporated clinical stage, age, prostate specific antigen, core positivity and Gleason score. The concordance index was 0.61.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large re-biopsy cohort with medium-term followup, most cases have not been pathologically upgraded to date. A model predicting for upgrading or radical treatment was developed which could be useful in counseling patients considering active surveillance for prostate cancer.

Does cumulative prostate cancer length (CCL) in prostate biopsies improve prediction of clinically insignificant cancer at radical prostatectomy in patients eligible for active surveillance?

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate if cumulative prostate cancer length (CCL) on prostate needle biopsy divided by the number of biopsy cores (CCL/core) could improve prediction of insignificant cancer on radical prostatectomy (RP) in patients with prostate cancer eligible for active surveillance (AS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients diagnosed with prostate cancer on extended (≥10 cores) biopsy with an initial prostate-specific antigen (iPSA) level of <15 ng/mL, clinical stage (cT) ≤ 2a, and highest biopsy Gleason score 3 + 3 = 6 or 3 + 4 = 7 with <3 positive cores who underwent RP were included in the study. The CCL/core and presence of insignificant cancer (organ-confined, volume <0.5 mL, Gleason score at RP ≤6) were recorded. pT2 prostate cancer with RP Gleason score ≤3 + 4 = 7 and volume <0.5 mL were categorised as low-tumour-volume organ-confined disease (LV-OCD).

RESULTS

In all, 221 patients met the inclusion criteria: the mean age was 59 years and the median iPSA level was 4.5 ng/mL. The clinical stage was cT1 in 86% of patients; biopsy Gleason score was 3 + 3 = 6 in 67% (group 1) and 3 + 4 = 7 in 33% of patients (group 2). The maximum percentage of biopsy core involvement was <50 in 85%; the median CCL/core was 0.15 mm. Insignificant cancer was found in 27% and LV-OCD in 44% of patients. Group 2 was associated with higher number of positive cores, maximum percentage core involvement, total prostate cancer length, and CCL/core. Group 1 was more likely to have insignificant cancer (39%) or LV-OCD (54%) than group 2 (3% and 23%, respectively). Group 2 had significantly higher RP Gleason score and pathological stage. Univariate analysis of group 1 showed that the iPSA level, maximum percentage core involvement, prostate cancer length, and CCL/core were all significantly associated with insignificant cancer and LV-OCD. For group 2, the number of positive cores (1 vs 2) was also significantly associated with LV-OCD. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, maximum percentage core involvement of <50, and number of positive cores (1 vs 2) were independent predictors of insignificant cancer in group 1; biopsy Gleason score, maximum percentage core involvement of <50 and prostate cancer length of <3 mm or CCL/core of <0.2 mm were all independent predictors of LV-OCD in the whole population. The maximum percentage of core involvement of <50 and prostate cancer length of <3 mm or CCL/core of <0.2 mm were also independent predictors of LV-OCD in group 1 patients.

CONCLUSION

In patients eligible for AS, a CCL/core of <0.20 mm was significantly associated with insignificant cancer and LV-OCD. However, when parameters of cancer burden were considered, CCL/core did not independently add any additional value for predicting insignificant cancer in patients with biopsy Gleason score 6. The CCL/core was an independent predictor of LV-OCD in the whole population and in group 1 patients, although the model including prostate cancer length showed slightly higher area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.

Overview of benign and malignant prostatic disease in Pakistani patients: a clinical and histopathological perspective

BACKGROUND

To present the overall clinical and histological perspective of benign and malignant prostatic disease as seen in our practice in the Section of Histopathology, Department of Pathology and Microbiology, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All consecutive prostate specimens (transurethral resection or TUR, enucleation, needle biopsies) received between July 1, 2012 and December 31, 2012 were included in the study.

RESULTS

Of the total of 785 cases, 621 (79.1%) were TUR specimens, 80 (10.2%) enucleation specimens, and 84 (10.7%) needle biopsies. Some 595 (75.8%) were benign, while 190 (24.2%) were malignant. Mean weight of BPH specimens was 19 grams and 43 grams for TUR and enucleation specimens respectively. Almost 67% of adenocarcinomas were detected on TUR or enucleation specimens. Of the above cases, 41.7% were clinically benign while 58.3% were clinically malignant. The average volume of carcinoma in all cases ranged between 60 to 65%. The average number of cores involved in needle biopsies was 5. In general, higher Gleason scores were seen in TUR/enucleation specimens than in needle biopsies. Overall, in all types of specimens, commonest Gleason score was 7, seen in 74 (38.9%) cases, followed by Gleason score 9 seen in 47 (24.7%) cases. Out of the 63 needle biopsies with carcinoma, radical prostatectomy was performed in 16 cases (25.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is extremely common and constitutes the bulk of prostate specimens. TMajority of prostatic carcinomas are still diagnosed on TUR or enucleation specimens. These included both clinically benign and clinically malignant cases. The volume of carcinoma in these specimens was quite high indicating extensive disease. Gleason scores were also generally high compared with scores from needle biopsies. Commonest Gleason score in all type of specimens was 7. Pathologic staging was possible in very few cases since radical prostatectomies are rarely performed.

The critical role of the pathologist in determining eligibility for active surveillance as a management option in patients with prostate cancer: consensus statement with recommendations supported by the College of American Pathologists, International Society of Urological Pathology, Association of Directors of Anatomic and Surgical Pathology, the New Zealand Society of Pathologists, and the Prostate Cancer Foundation

CONTEXT

Prostate cancer remains a significant public health problem. Recent publications of randomized trials and the US Preventive Services Task Force recommendations have drawn attention to overtreatment of localized, low-risk prostate cancer. Active surveillance, in which patients undergo regular visits with serum prostate-specific antigen tests and repeat prostate biopsies, rather than aggressive treatment with curative intent, may address overtreatment of low-risk prostate cancer. It is apparent that a greater awareness of the critical role of pathologists in determining eligibility for active surveillance is needed.

OBJECTIVES

To review the state of current knowledge about the role of active surveillance in the management of prostate cancer and to provide a multidisciplinary report focusing on pathologic parameters important to the successful identification of patients likely to succeed with active surveillance, to determine the role of molecular tests in increasing the safety of active surveillance, and to provide future directions.

DESIGN

Systematic review of literature on active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer, pathologic parameters important for appropriate stratification, and issues regarding interobserver reproducibility. Expert panels were created to delineate the fundamental questions confronting the clinical and pathologic aspects of management of men on active surveillance.

RESULTS

Expert panelists identified pathologic parameters important for management and the related diagnostic and reporting issues. Consensus recommendations were generated where appropriate.

CONCLUSIONS

Active surveillance is an important management option for men with low-risk prostate cancer. Vital to this process is the critical role pathologic parameters have in identifying appropriate candidates for active surveillance. These findings need to be reproducible and consistently reported by surgical pathologists with accurate pathology reporting.

A DNA hypermethylation profile reveals new potential biomarkers for prostate cancer diagnosis and prognosis

BACKGROUND

DNA hypermethylation has emerged as a novel molecular biomarker for the evaluation of prostate cancer diagnosis and prognosis. Defining the specific gene hypermethylation profile for prostate cancer could involve groups of genes that specifically discriminate patients with indolent and aggressive tumors.

METHODS

Genome-wide methylation analysis was performed on 83 tumor and 10 normal prostate samples using the GoldenGate Methylation Cancer Panel I (Illumina, Inc.). All clinical stages of disease were considered.

RESULTS

We found 41 genes hypermethylated in more than 20% of the tumors analyzed (P < 0.01). Of these, we newly identified GSTM2 and PENK as being genes that are hypermethylated in prostate cancer and that were simultaneously methylated in 40.9% of the tumors analyzed. We also identified panels of genes that are more frequently methylated in tumor samples with clinico-pathological indicators of poor prognosis: a high Gleason score, elevated Ki-67, and advanced disease. Of these, we found simultaneous hypermethylation of CFTR and HTR1B to be common in patients with a high Gleason score and high Ki-67 levels; this might indicate the population at higher risk of therapeutic failure. The DNA hypermethylation profile was associated with cancer-specific mortality (log-rank test, P = 0.007) and biochemical recurrence-free survival (log-rank test, P = 0.0008).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings strongly indicate that epigenetic silencing of GSTM2 and PENK is a common event in prostate cancer that could be used as a molecular marker for prostate cancer diagnosis. In addition, simultaneous HTR1B and CFTR hypermethylation could help discriminate aggressive from indolent prostate tumors.

The association of the cribriform pattern with outcome for prostatic adenocarcinomas

With the revision of the Gleason system at the 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology Consensus Conference, there was consensus that most cribriform glands should be classified as pattern 4. There is now increased understanding that invasive cribriform carcinoma is a relatively aggressive disease. This study was based on 233 radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens collected at the Department of Pathology, Umraniye Education and Research Hospital, from 2006 to 2013. We assessed the cribriform foci associated with the more definitive patterns 3, 4, and 5 elsewhere on the RP specimens and evaluated the association of the presence of cribriform pattern (CP) with biochemical prostate-specific antigen recurrence (BPR). In Cox regression model, taking into account the Gleason score (GS), pathologic stage, surgical margin (SM) status, presence of a CP, and preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA), a positive SM, and the presence of a CP were independent predictors of BPR after RP. We observed BPR more frequently in GS 3+3 cases with a CP than in those without a CP (p=0.008). There was no significant difference in BPR status for cases with GS 3+4, 4+3, 4+5, and 5+4 when the patients were stratified by the presence of a CP. On the basis of these data, we suggest that the classification of CP into Gleason pattern 4 has value in predicting BPR status after RP. However, as many of these modifications are empirical and supported by only a few studies, long-term follow-up studies with clinical endpoints are necessary to validate these recommendations.

How our practice of histopathology, especially tumour pathology has changed in the last two decades: reflections from a major referral center in Pakistan

Continued advances in the field of histo-pathology (and cyto-pathology) over the past two decades have resulted in dramatic changes in the manner in which these disciplines are now practiced. This is especially true in the setting of a large university hospital where the role of pathologists as clinicians (diagnosticians), undergraduate and postgraduate educators, and researchers has evolved considerably. The world around us has changed significantly during this period bringing about a considerable change in our lifestyles and the way we live. This is the world of the internet and the world-wide web, the world of Google and Wikipedia, of Youtube and Facebook where anyone can obtain any information one desires at the push of a button. The practice of histo (and cyto) pathology has also evolved in line with these changes. For those practicing this discipline in a poor, developing country these changes have been breathtaking. This is an attempt to document these changes as experienced by histo (and cyto) pathologists practicing in the biggest center for Histopathology in Pakistan, a developing country in South Asia with a large (180 million) and ever growing population. The Section of Histopathology, Department of Pathology and Microbiology at the Aga Khan University Hospital (AKUH) in Karachi, Pakistan's largest city has since its inception in the mid-1980s transformed the way histopathology is practiced in Pakistan by incorporating modern methods and rescuing histopathology in Pakistan from the primitive and outdated groove in which it was stuck for decades. It set histopathology in Pakistan firmly on the path of modernity and change which are essential for better patient management and care through accurate and complete diagnosis and more recently prognostic and predictive information as well.