Transthoracic echocardiography in pediatric intensive care: impact on medical and surgical management

Evolution and Impact of a Diagnostic Point-of-Care Ultrasound Program in a PICU

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the impact of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) use on clinicians within a PICU and to assess infrastructural elements of our POCUS program development.

DESIGN

Retrospective observational study.

SETTING

Large academic, noncardiac PICU in the United States.

SUBJECTS

Patients in a PICU who had diagnostic POCUS performed.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2022, 7201 diagnostic POCUS studies were ordered; 1930 (26.8%) had a quality assurance (QA) record generated in an independent POCUS QA database. The cardiac domain was most frequently imaged (81.0% of ordered studies, 81.2% of reviewed studies). POCUS images changed clinician understanding of pathophysiology in 563 of 1930 cases (29.2%); when this occurred, management was changed in 318 of 563 cases (56.5%). Cardiac POCUS studies altered clinician suspected pathophysiology in 30.1% of cases (472/1568), compared with 21.5% (91/362) in noncardiac studies ( p = 0.06). Among cases where POCUS changed clinician understanding, management changed more often following cardiac than noncardiac POCUS ( p = 0.02). Clinicians identified a need for cardiology consultation or complete echocardiograms in 294 of 1568 cardiac POCUS studies (18.8%). Orders for POCUS imaging increased by 94.9%, and revenue increased by 159.4%, from initial to final study year. QA database use by both clinicians and reviewers decreased annually as QA processes evolved in the setting of technologic growth and unit expansion.

CONCLUSIONS

Diagnostic POCUS imaging in the PICU frequently yields information that alters diagnosis and changes management. As PICU POCUS use increased, QA processes evolved resulting in decreased use of our initial QA database. Modifications to QA processes are likely necessary as clinical contexts change over time.

A Review on the Impact of Bedside Echocardiography in Managing Critically Ill Children in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit

Over the past three decades, a variety of non-invasive hemodynamic devices have been developed. However, none of the existing methods, such as transthoracic echocardiography, esophageal Doppler ultrasound, plethysmography, thoracic impedancemetry, or sublingual capnography, fully embody the ideal characteristics of reliability, reproducibility, rapid response, ease of use, comprehensive safety, affordability, and continuous monitoring capacity. Among these, echocardiography stands out as a particularly effective approach, meeting many of these criteria due to its widespread availability, relative ease of use, and critical role in detecting anatomical abnormalities and basic changes in myocardial function. It is frequently used in pediatric intensive care units to assess the structure and function of the heart muscle. The effectiveness of echocardiography in pediatric critical care is also constrained by the need for high-quality imaging and accurate interpretation. Currently, there is a notable lack of literature on the application of echocardiography in pediatric critical care. This study seeks to evaluate the existing scientific evidence regarding the effectiveness of echocardiography as a tool for monitoring hemodynamics in pediatric critical care settings.

Impact of Bedside Echocardiography in the Management of Critically Ill Pediatric Patients in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: A Cross-Sectional Study

Background Managing critically ill pediatric patients is a challenging responsibility that necessitates effective prioritization and time management. It is important not only to assess the condition of the patient on a continuous and real-time basis but also to assess in a way that will provide vital clues that may help in diagnosis and treatment. Our study aims to investigate the association between echocardiography and clinical systemic examination, to find the association between cardiac dysfunction and pediatric outcomes, and to identify the indications and necessity of echocardiography assessments and therapeutic interventions for patients in the pediatric intensive care unit. Methods This cross-sectional study was conducted in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) of the pediatrics department at Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, India. All critically ill pediatric patients admitted to the PICU underwent echocardiography. The study primarily focused on the indications for echocardiography, the association between systolic and diastolic dysfunction and patient outcomes, and the therapeutic interventions implemented based on the echocardiographic findings.  Results The study analyzed 139 subjects aged from one month to 204 months, with the majority in the one- to five-year age group, followed by the 10-15-year age group. Cardiac anomalies were identified in 39 out of 139 cases, and cardiac murmurs were present in 27 cases with an almost equal gender distribution in the infantile age group. Dyspnea, edema, and hepatomegaly were the most common indications for echocardiography. Lasix was the most commonly used antifailure drug used in heart diseases. Sixteen individuals had systolic dysfunction, and eight had diastolic dysfunction, with a mortality rate of 62%. There was a significant association between systolic and diastolic dysfunction and mortality. Conclusion Echocardiography is a valuable asset within the PICU, providing critical insights into cardiac function and hemodynamics. By guiding clinical decision-making, it plays a pivotal role in optimizing care strategies, ultimately leading to improved outcomes for pediatric patients admitted with cardiac conditions. Overall, the study emphasizes the complex nature of pediatric cardiac conditions and the necessity for individualized treatment approaches based on distinct diagnoses and clinical indications.

Management Changes After Echocardiography Are Associated With Improved Outcomes in Critically Ill Children

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate management changes and outcomes in critically ill children after formal echocardiography.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2020.

SETTING

Tertiary care children's hospital.

PATIENTS

Patients from 1 to 18 years who had formal echocardiography within 72 hours of ICU admission and who were intubated and on vasoactive infusions at the time of the study. Patients were stratified into two cardiac function groups: 1) near-normal cardiac function and 2) depressed cardiac function.

METHODS

Clinical variables were abstracted from the electronic medical record and placed in time sequence relative to echocardiography. Vasoactive and fluid management strategies in place before echocardiography were associated with markers of tissue perfusion and volume overload. Management changes after echocardiography were characterized and associated with outcomes.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Among patients eventually found to have depressed cardiac function, the use of vasoconstrictors was associated with worse lactate clearance and oxygen extraction ratio. Use of vasoconstrictors in this cohort was also associated with a more liberal fluid management strategy, evidence of increased lung water, and a worse Sp o2 /F io2 . An echocardiogram demonstrated depressed cardiac function was likely to be followed by management changes that favored inotropes and more conservative fluid administration. Patients with depressed cardiac function who were switched to inotropes were more likely to be extubated and to wean off vasoactive support compared with those patients who remained on vasoconstrictors.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with depressed cardiac function, alterations in management strategy after echocardiography are associated with shortened duration of intensive care interventions.

Point-of-Care Ultrasound in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit

Ultrasonography has been widely used in medicine for decades but often by specific users such as cardiologists, obstetricians, and radiologists. In the last several years, the use of this imaging modality has moved to the bedside, with clinicians performing and interpreting focused point of care ultrasonography to aid in immediate assessment and management of their patients. The growth of point of care ultrasonography has been facilitated by advancement in ultrasound-related technology and emerging studies and protocols demonstrating its utility in clinical practice. However, considerable challenges remain before this modality can be adopted across the spectrum of disciplines, primarily as it relates to training, competency, and standardization of usage. This review outlines the history, current state, challenges and the future direction of point of care ultrasonography specifically in the field of pediatric critical care medicine.

Establishing a risk assessment framework for point-of-care ultrasound

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) refers to the use of portable ultrasound (US) applications at the bedside, performed directly by the treating physician, for either diagnostic or procedure guidance purposes. It is being rapidly adopted by traditionally non-imaging medical specialties across the globe. Recent international evidence-based guidelines on POCUS for critically ill neonates and children were issued by the POCUS Working Group of the European Society of Pediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care (ESPNIC). Currently there are no standardized national or international guidelines for its implementation into clinical practice or even the training curriculum to monitor quality assurance. Further, there are no definitions or methods of POCUS competency measurement across its varied clinical applications.

CONCLUSION

The Hippocratic Oath suggests medical providers do no harm to their patients. In our continued quest to uphold this value, providers seeking solutions to clinical problems must often weigh the benefit of an intervention with the risk of harm to the patient. Technologies to guide diagnosis and medical management present unique considerations when assessing possible risk to the patient. Frequently risk extends beyond the patient and impacts providers and the institutions in which they practice. POCUS is an emerging technology increasingly incorporated in the care of children across varied clinical specialties. Concerns have been raised by clinical colleagues and regulatory agencies regarding appropriate POCUS use and oversight. We present a framework for assessing the risk of POCUS use in pediatrics and suggest methods of mitigating risk to optimize safety and outcomes for patients, providers, and institutions.

WHAT IS KNOWN

• The use POCUS by traditionally non-imaging pediatric specialty physicians for both diagnostic and procedural guidance is rapidly increasing. • Although there are international guidelines for its indications, currently there is no standardized guidance on its implementation in clinical practice.

WHAT IS NEW

• Although standards for pediatric specialty-specific POCUS curriculum and training to competency have not been defined, POCUS is likely to be most successfully incorporated in clinical care when programmatic infrastructural elements are present. • Risk assessment is a forward-thinking process and requires an imprecise calculus that integrates considerations of the technology, the provider, and the context in which medical care is delivered. Medicolegal considerations vary across countries and frequently change, requiring providers and institutions to understand local regulatory requirements and legal frameworks to mitigate the potential risks of POCUS.

The Impact of Focused Cardiac Ultrasound Performed by Pediatric Intensivists: A Prospective Study

OBJECTIVES

Focused cardiac ultrasound is an echocardiographic method used by medical intensivists for fast and reliable hemodynamic assessment. Prospective studies and guidelines have defined its role in adult critical care. Data regarding its use in pediatric critical care are scarce. This is the first prospective study that aims to evaluate its impact in this setting.

METHODS

This is a single-center prospective study performed in a tertiary referral hospital pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). For a period of 6 months, when performing an echocardiogram, pediatric intensivists filled out a questionnaire that included the patient's clinical data and indication for the examination. The intensivists had to record both the clinical impression regarding that indication and therapeutic plan before and after the echocardiogram. All the patients with an echocardiogram performed by the pediatric intensive care unit medical staff were included.

RESULTS

There were 80 echocardiograms performed on 35 patients during the study period. The most common patient diagnostic groups were respiratory infections (38%, n = 30) and septic shock (21%, n = 17). The main indication for the examination was assessment of intravascular volume status and left ventricular systolic function. After the echocardiogram, the clinical impression was maintained in 49% (n = 39) and changed in 44% (n = 35). There were new findings unrelated to the initial evaluation in 7% (n = 6). The planned treatment was maintained in 55% (n = 44) and changed in 45% (n = 36).

CONCLUSIONS

The echocardiogram changed the clinical impression and therapeutic plan in almost half of the patients. These data show the value of focused cardiac ultrasound as a diagnostic and hemodynamic monitoring tool in pediatric intensive care and emphasize the importance of a rigorous training program.

A Call to Action for the Pediatric Critical Care Community

Healthcare regulatory bodies have escalated concerns regarding the use of point-of-care ultrasound by nonradiology and noncardiology physicians. A recently published PCCMPerspective identified that data do not support many of these concerns and addressed common misconceptions associated with point-of-care ultrasound use in the critical care setting. Indeed, the global point-of-care ultrasound community and specifically the pediatric critical care community have the opportunity to be leaders in demonstrating how to translate new skills and technologies to the bedside in a safe and effective manner. We seek to extend the conversation and propose next steps in supporting integration of point-of-care ultrasound in pediatric critical care practice.

Integrating Focused Cardiac Ultrasound Into Pediatric Septic Shock Assessment

OBJECTIVES

To assess focused cardiac ultrasound impact on clinician hemodynamic characterization of patients with suspected septic shock as well as expert-generated focused cardiac ultrasound algorithm performance.

DESIGN

Retrospective, observational study.

SETTING

Single-center, noncardiac PICU.

PATIENTS

Less than 18 years old receiving focused cardiac ultrasound study within 72 hours of sepsis pathway initiation from January 2014 to December 2016.

INTERVENTIONS

Hemodynamics of patients with suspected septic shock were characterized as fluid responsive, myocardial dysfunction, obstructive physiology, and/or reduced systemic vascular resistance by a bedside clinician before and immediately following focused cardiac ultrasound performance. The clinician's post-focused cardiac ultrasound hemodynamic assessments were compared with an expert-derived focused cardiac ultrasound algorithmic hemodynamic interpretation. Subsequent clinical management was assessed for alignment with focused cardiac ultrasound characterization and association with patient outcomes.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Seventy-one patients with suspected septic shock (median, 4.7 yr; interquartile range, 1.6-8.1) received clinician performed focused cardiac ultrasound study within 72 hours of sepsis pathway initiation (median, 2.1 hr; interquartile range, -1.5 to 11.8 hr). Two patients did not have pre-focused cardiac ultrasound and 23 patients did not have post-focused cardiac ultrasound hemodynamic characterization by clinicians resulting in exclusion from related analyses. Post-focused cardiac ultrasound clinician hemodynamic characterization differed from pre-focused cardiac ultrasound characterization in 67% of patients (31/46). There was substantial concordance between clinician's post-focused cardiac ultrasound and algorithm hemodynamic characterization (33/48; κ = 0.66; CI, 0.51-0.80). Fluid responsive (κ = 0.62; CI, 0.40-0.84), obstructive physiology (к = 0.87; CI, 0.64-1.00), and myocardial dysfunction (1.00; CI, 1.00-1.00) demonstrated substantial to perfect concordance. Management within 4 hours of focused cardiac ultrasound aligned with algorithm characterization in 53 of 71 patients (75%). Patients with aligned management were less likely to have a complicated course (14/52, 27%) compared with misaligned management (8/19, 42%; p = 0.25).

CONCLUSIONS

Incorporation of focused cardiac ultrasound in the evaluation of patients with suspected septic shock frequently changed a clinician's characterization of hemodynamics. An expert-developed algorithm had substantial concordance with a clinician's post-focused cardiac ultrasound hemodynamic characterization. Management aligned with algorithm characterization may improve outcomes in children with suspected septic shock.

American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine expert panel recommendations on point-of-care ultrasound education and training for regional anesthesiologists and pain physicians-part I: clinical indications

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is a critical skill for all regional anesthesiologists and pain physicians to help diagnose relevant complications related to routine practice and guide perioperative management. In an effort to inform the regional anesthesia and pain community as well as address a need for structured education and training, the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA) commissioned this narrative review to provide recommendations for POCUS. The guidelines were written by content and educational experts and approved by the Guidelines Committee and the Board of Directors of the ASRA. In part I of this two-part series, clinical indications for POCUS in the perioperative and chronic pain setting are described. The clinical review addresses airway ultrasound, lung ultrasound, gastric ultrasound, the focus assessment with sonography for trauma examination and focused cardiac ultrasound for the regional anesthesiologist and pain physician. It also provides foundational knowledge regarding ultrasound physics, discusses the impact of handheld devices and finally, offers insight into the role of POCUS in the pediatric population.

Perioperative Point-of-Care Ultrasound in Children

Anesthesiologists and other acute care physicians perform and interpret portable ultrasonography-point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS)-at a child's bedside, in the perioperative period. In addition to the established procedural use for central line and nerve block placement, POCUS is being used to guide critical clinical decisions in real-time. Diagnostic point-of-care applications most relevant to the pediatric anesthesiologist include lung ultrasound for assessment of endotracheal tube size and position, pneumothorax, pleural effusion, pneumonia, and atelectasis; cardiac ultrasound for global cardiac function and hydration status, and gastric ultrasound for aspiration risk stratification. This article reviews and discusses select literature regarding the use of various applications of point-of-care ultrasonography in the perioperative period.

Point-of-care ultrasound for the pediatric regional anesthesiologist and pain specialist: a technique review

Point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS) has been well described for adult perioperative patients; however, the literature on children remains limited. Regional anesthesiologists have gained interest in expanding their clinical repertoire of PoCUS from regional anesthesia to increasing numbers of applications. This manuscript reviews and highlights emerging PoCUS applications that may improve the quality and safety of pediatric care.

In infants and children, lung and airway PoCUS can be used to identify esophageal intubation, size airway devices such as endotracheal tubes, and rule in or out a pulmonary etiology for clinical decompensation. Gastric ultrasound can be used to stratify aspiration risk when nil-per-os compliance and gastric emptying are uncertain. Cardiac PoCUS imaging is useful to triage causes of undifferentiated hypotension or tachycardia and to determine reversible causes of cardiac arrest. Cardiac PoCUS can assess for pericardial effusion, gross ventricular systolic function, cardiac volume and filling, and gross valvular pathology. When PoCUS is used, a more rapid institution of problem-specific therapy with improved patient outcomes is demonstrated in the pediatric emergency medicine and critical care literature.

Overall, PoCUS saves time, expedites the differential diagnosis, and helps direct therapy when used in infants and children. PoCUS is low risk and should be readily accessible to pediatric anesthesiologists in the operating room.

Unanticipated critical findings on echocardiography in septic patients

BACKGROUND

Echocardiography is increasingly performed among septic patients as a routine part of evaluation and management in the intensive care unit (ICU). The rate of unanticipated critical findings (e.g., severe left or right ventricular dysfunction or pericardial tamponade) on such echocardiograms is unknown. We evaluated a retrospective cohort of septic ICU patients in whom transthoracic echocardiography was performed as a routine part of sepsis management. In addition to identifying critical findings, we defined whether each critical finding was anticipated, and whether the clinical team responded to the critical finding. The primary outcome was rate of unanticipated critical findings, which we hypothesized would occur in fewer than 5% of patients. We also performed an exploratory analysis of the association between unanticipated critical finding and mortality, controlling for severity of illness.

RESULTS

We studied 393 patients. Unanticipated critical findings were identified in 5% (95% CI 3-7%) of patients (n = 20). Among the 20 patients with unanticipated critical findings, a response to the unanticipated critical finding was identified in 12 (60%) patients. An unanticipated critical finding was not significantly associated with 28-day mortality when controlling for admission APACHE II (p = 0.27).

CONCLUSIONS

Unanticipated critical findings on echocardiograms in septic ICU patients are uncommon. The potential therapeutic relevance of echocardiography to sepsis is more likely related to hemodynamic management than to traditional cardiac diagnoses. Research studies that employ blinded echocardiograms in septic patients may anticipate unblinding for critical findings approximately 1 in every 20 echocardiograms.

Perioperative point of care ultrasound in pediatric anesthesiology: a case series highlighting real-time intraoperative diagnosis and alteration of management augmenting physical examination

Use of diagnostic point of care ultrasound, has come to the forefront of interest within anesthesiology. Much data on the use of point of care ultrasound in emergency medicine and critical care medicine for diagnosis and treatment in acute situations exists. While use of point of care ultrasound has become more prevalent in anesthesia practice, documentation of its use and especially alteration in management based on real-time ultrasound findings in the perioperative period remains scarce. This case series discusses six pediatric patients in which real-time intra-operative use of point of care ultrasound resulted in alteration of management.

Clinical impact and efficacy of bedside echocardiography on patient management in pediatric intensive care units (PICUs): A prospective study

Objective:

To determine the indication and necessity of echocardiographic assessment and therapeutic interventions in critically ill children.

Methods:

A total of 140 children, including 75 mechanically ventilated (MV) and 65 spontaneously breathing (SB) children, who were admitted consecutively from March to August 2013 were evaluated prospectively. Data regarding the indication for echocardiography and therapeutic approaches used were documented. For evaluating disease severity, the Pediatric Risk of Mortality Score III (PRISM) was ascertained. The correlation between PRISM score and the requirement of echocardiographic evaluations were analyzed.

Results:

Patients ages were between 45 days to 18 years. The male-to-female ratio was 1.33. In 35.4% patients who underwent echocardiographic evaluation, no definitive alteration occurred in treatment approach, whereas in the remaining 64.6% patients, decisive or supplemental information was gathered. Echocardiography was indicated in 88% MV children and 46.2% SB children. Echocardiographic evaluation was necessary in MV children and there was a positive correlation between the PRISM score and the requirement of echocardiographic assessment (p<0.001).

Conclusion:

Echocardiographic evaluation is an invaluable tool especially in MV children and the requirement of echocardiographic assessment increases according to clinical severity. Basic training for intensivists in this procedure is crucial and needs to be improved and supported in critically ill.

Assessment of limited chest x-ray technique in postcardiac surgery management

Objectives:

The objective of this study is to investigate the safety of elimination of chest radiography in the postcardiac surgery Intensive Care Unit (ICU).

Methods and Design:

We compared patients in two different groups of routine CXR (RCXR) and limited CXR (LCXR) and their diagnostic and therapeutic outcome in a University hospital-based single center from 2014 to 2016. 3 CXR in the RCXR group and 1 CXR in the limited group was performed, in addition to on-demand criteria.

Measurement and Main Results:

A total of 978 samples were acceptable for analysis which 55.21% of RCXR and 59.50% of LCXR were male patients. In total, 523 abnormalities in RCXR group and 154 occasions in LCXR group resulted in 26.73% diagnostic efficacy for RCXRs and 28.57% for LCXR. From 1956 CXR that was taken in RCXR group, 72 occasions required intervention (3.68%) and 84 cases out of 539 (15.58%) LCXR needed an action to therapy. This means a 14.40% in RCXRs’ abnormalities and 56.00% of LCXRs’ abnormalities were accompanied with some interventions.

Conclusions:

Abolishing routine CXR in the ICUs would not be harmful for the patients, and it can be managed based on their clinical status and other safer imaging techniques.

Hemodynamic Bedside Ultrasound Image Quality and Interpretation After Implementation of a Training Curriculum for Pediatric Critical Care Medicine Providers

OBJECTIVE

Bedside ultrasound for hemodynamic evaluation in critically ill children is increasingly recognized as an important skill for pediatric critical care medicine providers. Our institution implemented a training curriculum leading to institutional credentialing for pediatric critical care providers in nonprocedural bedside ultrasound core applications. We hypothesized that hemodynamic studies performed or supervised by credentialed providers (credentialed providers group) have better image quality and greater accuracy in interpretation than studies performed by non-credentialed providers without supervision (non-credentialed providers group).

DESIGN

Retrospective descriptive study.

SETTING

Single-center tertiary non-cardiac 55-bed PICU in a children's hospital.

PATIENTS

Patients from October 2013 to January 2015, with hemodynamic bedside ultrasound performed and interpreted by pediatric critical care providers exposed to bedside ultrasound training.

INTERVENTIONS

A cardiologist blinded to performer scored hemodynamic bedside ultrasound image quality for five core cardiac views (excellent = 3, good = 2, fair = 1, unacceptable = 0; median = quality score) and interpretation within 5 hemodynamic domains (agreement = 3, minor disagreement = 2, major disagreement = 1; median = interpretation score), as well as a global assessment of interpretation.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Eighty-one studies (45 in the credentialed providers group and 36 in the non-credentialed providers group) were evaluated. There was no statistically significant difference in quality score between groups (median: 1.4 [interquartile range: 0.8-1.8] vs median: 1.2 [interquartile range: 0.75-1.6]; p = 0.14]. Studies in the credentialed providers group had higher interpretation score than those in the non-credentialed providers group (median: 3 [interquartile range: 2.5-3) vs median: 2.67 [interquartile range: 2.25-3]; p = 0.04). Major disagreement between critical care provider and cardiology review occurred in 25 of 283 hemodynamic domains assessed (8.8%), with no statistically significant difference between credentialed providers and non-credentialed providers groups (6.1% vs 11.9%; p = 0.12).

CONCLUSION

Hemodynamic bedside ultrasound performed or supervised by credentialed pediatric critical care providers had more accurate interpretation than studies performed by unsupervised non-credentialed providers. A rigorous pediatric critical care medicine bedside ultrasound credentialing program can train intensivists to attain adequate images and interpret those images appropriately.

Postoperative care of the adult with congenital heart disease

An increasing number of children with congenital heart disease survive to adulthood, but many adults require surgical intervention and can present complex management challenges in the perioperative period. This review will address common considerations that surgeons, anesthesiologists, and intensivists are likely to face in caring for this growing population.

Echocardiography in PICU: when the heart sees what is invisible to the eye

OBJECTIVE

Echocardiography has become an indispensable bedside diagnostic tool in the realm of pediatric intensive care units (PICU). It has proven to be an influential factor in the formula of clinical decision-making. This study aimed to delineate the impact of echocardiography on the management of critically ill pediatric patients in the PICU at Sultan Qaboos University Hospital, Oman.

METHOD

This was a retrospective cohort study conducted in a five-bed PICU. Patients admitted to the PICU from January of 2011 to December of 2012 were reviewed. Those who have undergone bedside echocardiography during their ICU stay were recruited. Electronic patient record was used as data source.

RESULTS

Over a-24-month period, 424 patients were admitted in this PICU. One hundred and one clinically indicated transthoracic echocardiograms were performed. 81.8% of these presented new findings (n=82) that significantly impacted the clinical decision of patient management, namely, alteration in drug therapy and procedure, whereas no difference in the management was yielded in the remaining 17.8% of the studied cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Echocardiography had a significant impact on the management of PICU patients. Such salutary effect was consequently reflected on the outcome. Pediatric intensivists are encouraged to acquire such bedside skill.