1
|
Clark EC, Baidoobonso S, Phillips KAM, Noonan LL, Bakker J, Burnett T, Stoby K, Dobbins M. Mobilizing community-driven health promotion through community granting programs: a rapid systematic review. BMC Public Health 2024; 24:932. [PMID: 38561718 PMCID: PMC10983705 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-18443-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2023] [Accepted: 03/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Effective health promotion responds to the unique needs of communities. Community granting programs that fund community-driven health promotion initiatives are a potential mechanism to meet those unique needs. While numerous community health-focused programs are available, the various strategies used by granting programs to foster engagement, administer grants and support awardees have not been systematically evaluated. This rapid systematic review explores the administration of community granting programs and how various program components impact process and population health outcomes. METHODS A systematic search was conducted across three databases: Medline, SocINDEX, and Political Science Database. Single reviewers completed screening, consistent with a rapid review protocol. Studies describing or evaluating community granting programs for health or public health initiatives were included. Data regarding program characteristics were extracted and studies were evaluated for quality. A convergent integrated approach was used to analyze quantitative and qualitative findings. RESULTS Thirty-five community granting programs, described in 36 studies, were included. Most were descriptive reports or qualitative studies conducted in the USA. Program support for grant awardees included technical assistance, workshops and training, program websites, and networking facilitation. While most programs reported on process outcomes, few reported on community or health outcomes; such outcomes were positive when reported. Programs reported that many funded projects were likely sustainable beyond program funding, due to the development of awardee skills, new partnerships, and securing additional funding. From the perspectives of program staff and awardees, facilitators included the technical assistance and workshops provided by the programs, networking amongst awardees, and the involvement of community members. Barriers included short timelines to develop proposals and allocate funds. CONCLUSIONS This review provides a comprehensive overview of health-related community granting programs. Grant awardees benefit from technical assistance, workshops, and networking with other awardees. Project sustainability is enhanced by the development of new community partnerships and grant-writing training for awardees. Community granting programs can be a valuable strategy to drive community health, with several key elements that enhance community mobilization. REGISTRATION PROSPERO #CRD42023399364.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily C Clark
- National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools, McMaster University, McMaster Innovation Park, 175 Longwood Rd S, Suite 210a, Hamilton, ON, L8P 0A1, Canada
| | - Shamara Baidoobonso
- Department of Health and Wellness, Government of Prince Edward Island, Chief Public Health Office, 16 Fitzroy St, Charlottetown, PE, C1A 7N8, Canada
| | - Karen A M Phillips
- Department of Health and Wellness, Government of Prince Edward Island, Chief Public Health Office, 16 Fitzroy St, Charlottetown, PE, C1A 7N8, Canada
| | - Laura Lee Noonan
- Department of Health and Wellness, Government of Prince Edward Island, Chief Public Health Office, 16 Fitzroy St, Charlottetown, PE, C1A 7N8, Canada
| | - Jiselle Bakker
- Department of Health and Wellness, Government of Prince Edward Island, Chief Public Health Office, 16 Fitzroy St, Charlottetown, PE, C1A 7N8, Canada
| | - Trish Burnett
- National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools, McMaster University, McMaster Innovation Park, 175 Longwood Rd S, Suite 210a, Hamilton, ON, L8P 0A1, Canada
| | - Karlene Stoby
- National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools, McMaster University, McMaster Innovation Park, 175 Longwood Rd S, Suite 210a, Hamilton, ON, L8P 0A1, Canada
| | - Maureen Dobbins
- National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools, McMaster University, McMaster Innovation Park, 175 Longwood Rd S, Suite 210a, Hamilton, ON, L8P 0A1, Canada.
- School of Nursing, McMaster University, Health Sciences Centre 2J20, 1280 Main St W, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wangen M, Escoffery C, Fernandez ME, Friedman DB, Hannon P, Ko LK, Maxwell AE, Petagna C, Risendal B, Rohweder C, Leeman J. Twenty years of capacity building across the cancer prevention and control research network. Cancer Causes Control 2023; 34:45-56. [PMID: 37067700 PMCID: PMC10106885 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-023-01690-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2022] [Accepted: 03/29/2023] [Indexed: 04/18/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To improve population health, community members need capacity (i.e., knowledge, skills, and tools) to select and implement evidence-based interventions (EBIs) to fit the needs of their local settings. Since 2002, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has funded the national Cancer Prevention and Control Research Network (CPCRN) to accelerate the implementation of cancer prevention and control EBIs in communities. The CPCRN has developed multiple strategies to build community members' capacity to implement EBIs. This paper describes the history of CPCRN's experience developing and lessons learned through the use of five capacity-building strategies: (1) mini-grant programs, (2) training, (3) online tools, (4) evidence academies, and (5) evaluation support for partners' capacity-building initiatives. METHODS We conducted a narrative review of peer-reviewed publications and grey literature reports on CPCRN capacity-building activities. Guided by the Interactive Systems Framework, we developed histories, case studies, and lessons learned for each strategy. Lessons were organized into themes. RESULTS Three themes emerged: the importance of (1) community-engagement prior to and during implementation of capacity-building strategies, (2) establishing and sustaining partnerships, and (3) co-learning at the levels of centers, networks, and beyond. CONCLUSION CPCRN activities have increased the ability of community organizations to compete for external funds to support implementation, increased the use of evidence in real-world settings, and promoted the broad-scale implementation of cancer control interventions across more than eight states. Lessons from this narrative review highlight the value of long-term thematic networks and provide useful guidance to other research networks and future capacity-building efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary Wangen
- Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
| | - Cam Escoffery
- Rollins School of Public Health, Department of Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Maria E Fernandez
- School of Public Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Health Promotion and Behavioral Sciences, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Daniela B Friedman
- Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, University of South Carolina, Arnold School of Public Health, Columbia, SC, USA
| | - Peggy Hannon
- School of Public Health, Health Promotion Research Center, The University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Linda K Ko
- School of Public Health, Health Promotion Research Center, The University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Annette E Maxwell
- Los Angeles, Fielding School of Public Health and Jonsson, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Health Policy and Management, The University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Courtney Petagna
- Rollins School of Public Health, Department of Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Betsy Risendal
- Colorado School of Public Health, Department of Community & Behavioral Health, The University of Colorado Denver Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Catherine Rohweder
- Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Jennifer Leeman
- School of Nursing, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bilenduke E, Dwyer AJ, Staples ES, Kilbourn K, Valverde PA, Fernández ME, Risendal BC. A practical method for integrating community priorities in planning and implementing cancer control programs. Cancer Causes Control 2023; 34:113-123. [PMID: 37069456 PMCID: PMC10110487 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-023-01688-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2022] [Accepted: 03/20/2023] [Indexed: 04/19/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Community engagement is essential in effective public health programs. This paper illustrates the methods used to engage community in the development of a multi-level implementation intervention to address cancer disparities related to hereditary cancer syndromes. METHODS Implementation Mapping (IM), was used to guide the co-creation of an intervention. Key partners were recruited to a 13-member statewide community advisory board (CAB) representing healthcare and community-based organizations. As part of a needs assessment, a 3-round modified Delphi method with the CAB was used to identify implementation outcomes to use in later steps of IM. An anonymous online survey of a validated community engagement measure assessed CAB members' satisfaction with the process. RESULTS Using a modified Delphi method as part of the needs assessment of IM, the CAB identified three broad categories of strategies: Changing infrastructure using patient navigation; training and educating patients, navigators and providers; and supporting clinicians in case identification and management. Self-reported satisfaction with the IM and Delphi process was high. CONCLUSIONS Implementation Mapping facilitated the use of available evidence, new data, and community engagement to identify strategies to improve the delivery of programs to reduce hereditary cancer disparities. The modified Delphi method was easy to administer in a virtual environment and may be a useful for others in community-engaged research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Bilenduke
- Department of Psychology, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO, USA.
| | - Andrea J Dwyer
- Department of Community and Behavioral Health, School of Public Health, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Elsa S Staples
- Department of Community and Behavioral Health, School of Public Health, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Kristin Kilbourn
- Department of Psychology, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Patricia A Valverde
- Department of Community and Behavioral Health, School of Public Health, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Maria E Fernández
- Center for Health Promotion and Prevention Research, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston School of Public Health, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Betsy C Risendal
- Department of Community and Behavioral Health, School of Public Health, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Brunson A, Troy C, Noblet S, Hebert JR, Friedman DB. Insights from Research Network Collaborators on How to Reach Rural Communities with Cancer Prevention and Control Programs. COMMUNITY HEALTH EQUITY RESEARCH & POLICY 2023; 44:43-53. [PMID: 37724031 DOI: 10.1177/0272684x211065318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/20/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This paper examines community leaders' and researchers' recommendations for reaching rural communities in a southeastern U.S. state with cancer prevention and control programming. RESEARCH DESIGN A qualitative inquiry of a grant network's research and community councils was conducted to explore members' opinions on how to engage rural communities and obtain input on how to recruit rural organizations for a mini-grants program. STUDY SAMPLE AND DATA COLLECTION Telephone/virtual interviews were conducted with all 13 council members. Responses were analyzed using thematic analysis and findings were examined within the context of system-centric and patient-centric dimensions. RESULTS Council members discussed limited education, lack of insurance, low socioeconomic status, health care avoidance, and transportation as barriers to cancer prevention and control. They recommended reaching rural populations by partnering with community and faith-based organizations, use of targeted multi-media, and tailored cancer education trainings. CONCLUSIONS Findings are used for guiding outreach with rural communities and recruitment of rural organizations for a cancer-focused mini-grants initiative.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley Brunson
- College of Arts and Sciences, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA
- Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, University of South Carolina, Arnold School of Public Health, Columbia, SC, USA
| | - Catherine Troy
- College of Arts and Sciences, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA
- Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, University of South Carolina, Arnold School of Public Health, Columbia, SC, USA
- South Carolina Honors College, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA
| | - Samuel Noblet
- Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, University of South Carolina, Arnold School of Public Health, Columbia, SC, USA
- South Carolina Cancer Prevention and Control Research Network (Prevention Research Center), University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA
| | - James R Hebert
- South Carolina Cancer Prevention and Control Research Network (Prevention Research Center), University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA
- Statewide Cancer Prevention and Control Program, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of South Carolina, Arnold School of Public Health, Columbia, SC, USA
| | - Daniela B Friedman
- Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, University of South Carolina, Arnold School of Public Health, Columbia, SC, USA
- South Carolina Cancer Prevention and Control Research Network (Prevention Research Center), University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA
- Office for the Study of Aging, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mathias W, Nichols KA, Golden-Wright J, Fairman CM, Felder TM, Workman L, Wickersham KE, Flicker KJ, Sheng J, Noblet SB, Adams SA, Eberth JM, Heiney SP, Wilcox S, Hébert JR, Friedman DB. Implementation During a Pandemic: Findings, Successes, and Lessons Learned from Community Grantees. JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER EDUCATION 2023; 38:957-962. [PMID: 36056185 PMCID: PMC9439940 DOI: 10.1007/s13187-022-02213-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/14/2022] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
Funding communities through mini-grant programs builds community capacity by fostering leadership among community members, developing expertise in implementing evidence-based practices, and increasing trust in partnerships. The South Carolina Cancer Prevention and Control Research Network (SC-CPCRN) implemented the Community Health Intervention Program (CHIP) mini-grants initiative to address cancer-related health disparities among high-risk populations in rural areas of the state. One community-based organization and one faith-based organization were funded during the most recent call for proposals. The organizations implemented National Cancer Institute evidence-based strategies and programs focused on health and cancer screenings and physical activity and promotion of walking trails. Despite the potential for the COVID-19 pandemic to serve as a major barrier to implementation, grantees successfully recruited and engaged community members in evidence-based activities. These initiatives added material benefits to their local communities, including promotion of walking outdoors where it is less likely to contract the virus when socially distanced and provision of COVID-19 testing and vaccines along with other health and cancer screenings. Future mini-grants programs will benefit from learning from current grantees' flexibility in program implementation during a pandemic as well as their intentional approach to modifying program aspects as needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wilhelmenia Mathias
- Health and Wellness Ministry, Trinity Baptist Church, Columbia, SC 29204, USA
| | | | - Jewel Golden-Wright
- Health and Wellness Ministry, Trinity Baptist Church, Columbia, SC 29204, USA
| | - Ciaran M Fairman
- Department of Exercise Science, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA
| | - Tisha M Felder
- College of Nursing, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA
| | - Lauren Workman
- Department of Health Services Policy and Management & Center for Applied Research Evaluation, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA
| | - Karen E Wickersham
- College of Nursing, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA
| | - Kimberly J Flicker
- Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior & Office for the Study of Aging, University of South Carolina, Arnold School of Public Health, Columbia, SC 29208, USA
| | - Jingxi Sheng
- College of Nursing, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA
| | - Samuel B Noblet
- Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA
| | - Swann Arp Adams
- College of Nursing, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics & Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.
| | - Jan M Eberth
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Rural and Minority Health Research Center & Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA
| | - Sue P Heiney
- College of Nursing, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA
| | - Sara Wilcox
- Department of Exercise Science and Prevention Research Center, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA
| | - James R Hébert
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics & Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA
| | - Daniela B Friedman
- Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior & Office for the Study of Aging, University of South Carolina, Arnold School of Public Health, Columbia, SC 29208, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Golden CA, Hill JL, Heelan KA, Bartee RT, Abbey BM, Malmkar A, Estabrooks PA. A Dissemination Strategy to Identify Communities Ready to Implement a Pediatric Weight Management Intervention in Medically Underserved Areas. Prev Chronic Dis 2021; 18:E10. [PMID: 33571083 PMCID: PMC7879964 DOI: 10.5888/pcd18.200248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose and Objectives We developed a competitive application process to test the feasibility of a fund and contract dissemination strategy to identify and engage communities that demonstrated the necessary resources and motivation to adopt, implement, and sustain a pediatric weight management intervention, Building Healthy Families, in rural and micropolitan (<50,000 residents) communities in Nebraska. Intervention Approach From April through December 2019, a community advisory board with representation from rural and micropolitan clinical, public health, education, and recreational organizations collaboratively developed a request for applications, as a fund and contract dissemination strategy, to encourage community adoption of Building Healthy Families. Evaluation Methods Quantitative assessments included determining the distribution of requests for applications, evaluating organizational readiness to change assessment (ORCA) ratings (on a scale of 1 to 5, from strongly disagree to strongly agree that the organization is ready to change), and reviewing community advisory board member ratings of applications. We gathered qualitative data from community narratives provided in response to the request for applications and community advisory board reviews of the applications. Results The request for applications was distributed to all 93 counties in Nebraska. Of the 8 communities that submitted a letter of intent, 7 submitted a community narrative. Across the 8 communities, 31 ORCAs were completed by the organizational decision makers (n = 15) and staff members (n = 16) who would be responsible for screening, recruiting, or implementing the intervention. Overall mean ORCA scores varied by ratings of evidence (4.1–4.6), context (4.2–4.9), and facilitation (4.3–4.8), indicating a high degree of readiness. Community advisory board ratings of applications ranged from 2.3 to 3.4 of 4 points. Qualitative data indicated that lower community narrative scores were primarily caused by weak implementation and sustainability plans. Implications for Public Health Findings provide guidance for translating pediatric weight management programs in medically underserved geographic areas by maximizing the probability of successful adoption and implementation through a fund and contract dissemination strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caitlin A Golden
- University of Nebraska Medical Center, 984365 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198-4365.
| | - Jennie L Hill
- University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska
| | - Kate A Heelan
- University of Nebraska at Kearney, Kearney, Nebraska
| | - R Todd Bartee
- University of Nebraska at Kearney, Kearney, Nebraska
| | - Bryce M Abbey
- University of Nebraska at Kearney, Kearney, Nebraska
| | - Ali Malmkar
- University of Nebraska at Kearney, Kearney, Nebraska
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pearson M, Lebow-Skelley E, Whitaker L, Young L, Warren CB, Williamson D, Kegler MC. Implementation of a Community Grant Program to Address Community-Driven Environmental Health Concerns. LOCAL ENVIRONMENT 2020; 25:830-848. [PMID: 33343220 PMCID: PMC7742917 DOI: 10.1080/13549839.2020.1843419] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2019] [Accepted: 10/21/2020] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Community-engaged approaches to research can increase trust, enhance the relevance and use of research, address issues of equity and justice, and increase community knowledge and capacity. The HERCULES Exposome Research Center sought to engage local Atlanta communities to learn about and address their self-identified environmental health concerns. To do this, HERCULES and their stakeholder partners collaboratively developed a community grant program. The program was evaluated using mixed qualitative methods that included document review and semi-structured interviews. This paper presents the development, implementation, and evaluation of the grant program. HERCULES awarded one-year grants of $2,500 to 12 organizations within the Atlanta region, for a total 13 grants and $32,500 in funding. Grantees reported accomplishments related to community knowledge, awareness, and engagement in addition to material accomplishments. All grantees planned to sustain their programs, and some received additional funding to do so. Some grantees remained actively involved with HERCULES beyond the grant program. The HERCULES Community Grant Program was able to increase awareness of HERCULES among applicant communities, establish or enhance relationships with community-based organizations, and identify local environmental health concerns while providing tangible results for grantees and the communities they serve. Mini-grant programs are a feasible approach to address community environmental health and establish new relationships. This model may benefit others who aim to establish community-academic relationships while addressing community health concerns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melanie Pearson
- Gangarosa Department of Environmental Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Rd NE, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Erin Lebow-Skelley
- Department of Behavioral, Social, and Health Education Sciences, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Rd NE, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Laura Whitaker
- Department of Behavioral, Social, and Health Education Sciences, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Lynne Young
- HERCULES Stakeholder Advisory Board, Pathways to Sustainability, Duluth, GA, USA
| | | | - Dana Williamson
- Department of Behavioural Sciences and Health Education, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Michelle C Kegler
- Department of Behavioral, Social, and Health Education Sciences, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Multidisciplinary Team Reviews of Drug Overdose Deaths and the Use of Minigrants to Advance Recommendations: A Statewide Pilot in Rhode Island. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH MANAGEMENT AND PRACTICE 2019; 26:236-242. [PMID: 31688739 DOI: 10.1097/phh.0000000000001081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Rhode Island has been significantly impacted by the opioid epidemic, ranking 11th in unintentional drug overdose rates in the United States in 2017. Illicit fentanyl was involved in the majority of these deaths. PROGRAM To enhance surveillance of this epidemic, the RI Department of Health piloted in-depth, multidisciplinary, and multiagency team reviews of drug overdose deaths. The goals were to identify gaps in policies and programming and develop recommendations to prevent future deaths. Time-sensitive minigrants were offered to nonprofit organizations as a novel way to further the recommendations put forth from these reviews. IMPLEMENTATION Legal agreements between select state agencies and institutions enabled broad team representation and the sharing of information during each meeting. Reviews, revolving around a common theme, were conducted for up to 10 deaths each quarter. Recommendations for prevention were generated by the team and summarized in a report to the Governor's Overdose Prevention and Intervention Task Force and the public within 1 month of each meeting. Announcements of minigrant opportunities and funding to advance the community-specific recommendations were paired with each meeting. EVALUATION From November 2016 through May 2018, the pilot team convened 7 times, generated 78 recommendations, and distributed 31 minigrants. Early process evaluations of these grants have shown positive impact within local environments. Following the pilot phase, state legislation for these reviews was passed in June 2018. DISCUSSION The RI Department of Health was able to successfully pilot a multidisciplinary review process for overdose deaths and has recently institutionalized this process through legislation. The successful implementation of many of the team's community-oriented recommendations, supported through a minigrant process, highlights the impact that small financial investments can have to address the opioid epidemic and may be a model for other jurisdictions seeking to advance recommendations from these types of reviews.
Collapse
|
9
|
Friedman DB, Adams SA, Brandt HM, Heiney SP, Hébert JR, Ureda JR, Seel JS, Schrock CS, Mathias W, Clark-Armstead V, Dees RV, Oliver RP. Rise Up, Get Tested, and Live: an Arts-Based Colorectal Cancer Educational Program in a Faith-Based Setting. JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER EDUCATION 2019; 34:550-555. [PMID: 29492800 PMCID: PMC6113121 DOI: 10.1007/s13187-018-1340-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
Engaging community members in efforts to reduce cancer-related health disparities through community mini-grant programs has been shown to have meaningful impact. A predominantly African-American church in South Carolina was awarded a community mini-grant to increase awareness about colorectal cancer (CRC) screening among disproportionally high-risk African-American communities through culturally appropriate arts-based cancer education. The church's pastor, health and wellness ministry, and drama ministry created a theatrical production called Rise Up, Get Tested, and Live. Over 100 attendees viewed the play. A pre/post-test evaluation design assessed the effectiveness of the production in increasing participants' knowledge about CRC and examined their intentions to be screened. Results showed increased knowledge about CRC, increased awareness and understanding about the importance of CRC screening, and favorable intentions about CRC screening. Findings suggest that arts-based cancer education may be an effective tool for the dissemination of information about CRC screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniela B Friedman
- Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior & Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA.
| | - Swann Arp Adams
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics & Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Arnold School of Public Health and the College of Nursing, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA
| | - Heather M Brandt
- Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior & Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA
| | - Sue P Heiney
- College of Nursing, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA
| | - James R Hébert
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics & Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA
| | - John R Ureda
- Insights Consulting, Inc., Columbia, SC, 29205, USA
| | - Jessica S Seel
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA
| | - Courtney S Schrock
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA
| | - Wilhelmenia Mathias
- Health and Wellness Ministry, Trinity Baptist Church, Columbia, SC, 29204, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
A Collaborative Model for Facilitating the Delivery of Smoking Cessation Treatments to Cancer Patients: Results From Three Oncology Practices in South Carolina. J Smok Cessat 2018. [DOI: 10.1017/jsc.2018.23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Continued smoking by cancer patients causes adverse cancer treatment outcomes, but few patients receive evidence-based smoking cessation as a standard of care.Aim: To evaluate practical strategies to promote wide-scale dissemination and implementation of evidence-based tobacco cessation services within state cancer centers.Methods: A Collaborative Learning Model (CLM) for Quality Improvement was evaluated with three community oncology practices to identify barriers and facilitate practice change to deliver evidence-based smoking cessation treatments to cancer patients using standardized assessments and referrals to statewide smoking cessation resources. Patients were enrolled and tracked through an automated data system and received follow-up cessation support post-enrollment. Monthly quantitative reports and qualitative data gathered through interviews and collaborative learning sessions were used to evaluate meaningful quality improvement changes in each cancer center.Results: Baseline practice evaluation for the CLM identified the lack of tobacco use documentation, awareness of cessation guidelines, and awareness of services for patients as common barriers. Implementation of a structured assessment and referral process demonstrated that of 1,632 newly registered cancer patients,1,581 (97%) were screened for tobacco use. Among those screened, 283 (18%) were found to be tobacco users. Of identified tobacco users, 207 (73%) were advised to quit. Referral of new patients who reported using tobacco to an evidence-based cessation program increased from 0% at baseline across all three cancer centers to 64% (range = 30%–89%) during the project period.Conclusions: Implementation of quality improvement learning collaborative models can dramatically improve delivery of guideline-based tobacco cessation treatments to cancer patients.
Collapse
|
11
|
Ribisl KM, Fernandez ME, Friedman DB, Hannon PA, Leeman J, Moore A, Olson L, Ory M, Risendal B, Sheble L, Taylor VM, Williams RS, Weiner BJ. Impact of the Cancer Prevention and Control Research Network: Accelerating the Translation of Research Into Practice. Am J Prev Med 2017; 52:S233-S240. [PMID: 28215371 PMCID: PMC5812747 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.08.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2016] [Revised: 07/29/2016] [Accepted: 08/18/2016] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
The Cancer Prevention and Control Research Network (CPCRN) is a thematic network dedicated to accelerating the adoption of evidence-based cancer prevention and control practices in communities by advancing dissemination and implementation science. Funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute, CPCRN has operated at two levels: Each participating network center conducts research projects with primarily local partners as well as multicenter collaborative research projects with state and national partners. Through multicenter collaboration, thematic networks leverage the expertise, resources, and partnerships of participating centers to conduct research projects collectively that might not be feasible individually. Although multicenter collaboration is often advocated, it is challenging to promote and assess. Using bibliometric network analysis and other graphical methods, this paper describes CPCRN's multicenter publication progression from 2004 to 2014. Searching PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science in 2014 identified 249 peer-reviewed CPCRN publications involving two or more centers out of 6,534 total. The research and public health impact of these multicenter collaborative projects initiated by CPCRN during that 10-year period were then examined. CPCRN established numerous workgroups around topics such as: 2-1-1, training and technical assistance, colorectal cancer control, federally qualified health centers, cancer survivorship, and human papillomavirus. This paper discusses the challenges that arise in promoting multicenter collaboration and the strategies that CPCRN uses to address those challenges. The lessons learned should broadly interest those seeking to promote multisite collaboration to address public health problems, such as cancer prevention and control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kurt M Ribisl
- Department of Health Behavior, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
| | - Maria E Fernandez
- Department of Health Promotion and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas
| | - Daniela B Friedman
- Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina
| | - Peggy A Hannon
- Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Jennifer Leeman
- Department of Health Care Environments, University of North Carolina School of Nursing, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Alexis Moore
- Department of Health Behavior, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Lindsay Olson
- Department of Health Behavior, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Marcia Ory
- Department of Health Promotion and Community Health Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas
| | - Betsy Risendal
- Department of Community and Behavioral Health, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, Colorado
| | - Laura Sheble
- Department of Social Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Vicky M Taylor
- Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Rebecca S Williams
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Bryan J Weiner
- Department of Health Policy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Jacob Arriola KR, Hermstad A, St. Clair Flemming S, Honeycutt S, Carvalho ML, Cherry ST, Davis T, Frazier S, Liang L, Escoffery C, Kegler MC. Promoting Policy and Environmental Change in Faith-Based Organizations. Health Promot Pract 2015; 17:146-55. [DOI: 10.1177/1524839915613027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
High rates of heart disease, cancer, and stroke exist in rural South Georgia where the Emory Prevention Research Center’s Cancer Prevention and Control Research Network provided mini-grant funding to six churches to implement policy and environmental change to promote healthy eating and physical activity. This study sought to determine whether perceptions of the health promotion environment changed over time and whether perceived environmental change was associated with healthy behavior at church and in general. This study used a single-group pre–post design with 1-year follow-up. Parishioners ( N = 258) completed self-administered questionnaires assessing perceptions of the church health promotion environment relative to healthy eating and physical activity, eating behavior and intention to use physical activity facilities at church, and eating and physical activity behaviors generally. Results indicate that perceived improvements in church nutrition environments were most strongly associated with decreases in unhealthy food consumed and stronger intentions to use physical activity resources at church ( ps ≤ .05). Perceived changes in the physical activity environment were unrelated to church or general behavior. Findings suggest that church environments may play an important role in supporting healthy eating and physical activity at church; however, whether the influence of the church environment extends to other settings is unknown.
Collapse
|