Using High-Impact HIV Prevention to Achieve the National HIV/AIDS Strategic Goals in Miami-Dade County, Florida: A Case Study

Project PrIDE in Context: Evolution of Evaluation in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Multi-Jurisdictional HIV Prevention Demonstration Projects

Over the past decade, CDC has been implementing a high-impact prevention (HIP) approach to HIV, directing funds towards activities with the greatest likelihood of reducing new infections and disparities. Corresponding to this shift, the Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention (DHAP) began funding a series of multi-site demonstration projects to provide extra support and evaluative capacity to select health departments to initiate new HIP programming, with the intention of ascertaining and sharing lessons with other health departments. In this paper, we provide context for the PrEP, Implementation, Data2Care, Evaluation (PrIDE) evaluation by describing the evolution of evaluation goals and activities across three prior demonstration projects, highlighting four areas of change: 1) integrated evaluation and program implementation; 2) local program evaluation in addition to cross-site performance monitoring; 3) prescriptive allocation of resources to support local program evaluation; and 4) expansion beyond single site program evaluation to identify effective cross-site programmatic strategies. Together, these changes reflect our own learning about achieving the greatest contribution from multi-site projects and set the stage for unique aspects of program evaluation within PrIDE. We describe these features, concluding with lessons learned from this most recent approach to structuring and supporting evaluation within CDC DHAP's health department demonstration projects.

The First 40 Years of AIDS: Promising Programs, Limited Success

HIV-prevention program planning, implementation, and evaluation began in the United States shortly after reports of a mysterious, apparently acquired, immune deficiency syndrome appeared in summer 1981. In San Francisco, New York City, and elsewhere, members of LGBT communities responded by providing accurate information, giving support, and raising money. During the first decade of the AIDS pandemic (1981–1990), social and behavioral scientists contributed by designing theory-based and practical interventions, combining interventions into programs, and measuring impact on behavior change and HIV incidence. In the second decade (1991–2000), federal, state, and local agencies and organizations played a more prominent role in establishing policies and procedures, funding research and programs, and determining the direction of intervention efforts. In the third decade (2001–2010), biomedical interventions were prioritized over behavioral interventions and have dominated attempts in the fourth decade (2011–2020) to integrate biomedical, behavioral, and structural interventions into coherent, efficient, and cost-effective programs to end AIDS.

The Association Between the Social Determinants of Health and HIV Control in Miami-Dade County ZIP Codes, 2017

BACKGROUND

There were 28,055 people living with HIV (PLWH) in Miami-Dade County (MDC) in 2017; 40.1% was either out of care or was not virally suppressed (uncontrolled HIV). The purpose of this study was to determine the association between the social determinants of health (SDOH) and the number of persons with uncontrolled HIV in MDC.

SETTING

This cross-sectional study included PLWH 15 and older with uncontrolled HIV in MDC, 2017. Data on PLWH's viral load, age, gender, mode of HIV transmission, and race/ethnicity were aggregated to the ZIP code level. All five SDOH per HealthyPeople 2020 were represented: economic stability, education, social and community context, health and healthcare, and neighborhood and built environment.

METHODS

Descriptive analyses on all study variables and a principal component analysis on the SDOH variables were performed. To account for overdispersion, multivariate negative binomial regressions were run while controlling for confounders and testing for significant interactions.

RESULTS

The results of the regression analysis indicated that an increase in Factor 1 (economic stability, education, and health and healthcare determinants) was associated with a statistically significant increase in the number of PLWH with uncontrolled HIV. Additionally, we found a significant interaction between Factor 1 and White race. Among persons of low socioeconomic status, White race is associated with a reduction in PLWH with uncontrolled HIV.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that reducing poverty and increasing education and rates of health insurance should result in significant reductions in PLWH with uncontrolled HIV. These results have the potential to influence future policy, interventions for retention, adherence, and continuity of care to improve suppression rates in MDC.

Project PrIDE in context: Evolution of evaluation in the centers for disease control and prevention's multi-jurisdictional HIV prevention demonstration projects

Over the past decade, CDC has been implementing a high-impact prevention (HIP) approach to HIV, directing funds towards activities with the greatest likelihood of reducing new infections and disparities. Corresponding to this shift, the Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention (DHAP) began funding a series of multi-site demonstration projects to provide extra support and evaluative capacity to select health departments to initiate new HIP programming, with the intention of ascertaining and sharing lessons with other health departments. In this paper, we provide context for the PrEP, Implementation, Data2Care, Evaluation (PrIDE) evaluation by describing the evolution of evaluation goals and activities across three prior demonstration projects, highlighting four areas of change: 1) integrated evaluation and program implementation; 2) local program evaluation in addition to cross-site performance monitoring; 3) prescriptive allocation of resources to support local program evaluation; and 4) expansion beyond single site program evaluation to identify effective cross-site programmatic strategies. Together, these changes reflect our own learning about achieving the greatest contribution from multi-site projects and set the stage for unique aspects of program evaluation within PrIDE. We describe these features, concluding with lessons learned from this most recent approach to structuring and supporting evaluation within CDC DHAP's health department demonstration projects.

Developing a Scale to Measure Interprofessional Collaboration in HIV Prevention and Care: Implications for Research on Patient Access and Retention in the HIV Continuum of Care

To adapt and validate a scale for measuring interprofessional collaboration in HIV prevention and care (IPC-HIV), primary survey data were collected (2012-2017) from 577 HIV service providers in 60 organizations in New York, New Jersey, and Michigan. Cross-sectional training data were used to develop the IPC-HIV scale. The model was validated by fitting the five-factor confirmatory factor-analysis model to a 30-item set. The scale measures five domains with reliable alpha coefficients: Interdependence, Professional Activities, Flexibility, Collective Ownership, and Reflection on Process. Correlations between subscales were significant (p < .05). The strongest correlation was between Reflection on Process and Collective Ownership subscale scores. Mean scores ranged lfrom 4.070 to 4.880, with the highest score for Flexibility across all locations. IPC-HIV is valid and reliable among HIV-prevention and care workers, and is recommended for examining the effect of IPC on patient access to HIV testing and primary care.

Construct validation: coping with HIV/AIDS in Primary Health Care

OBJECTIVE

To validate the construct and measure the trustworthiness of a questionnaire aimed at assessing HIV/AIDS coping actions developed by health professionals in Primary Health Care.

METHOD

A methodological study carried out with 397 primary health care professionals in two municipalities in the Northeast region of Brazil. The construct validity was developed by the exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, and the reliability analyzed by the reliability and reproducibility.

RESULTS

The validation determined six factors retention that composed the six domains of the questionnaire. Internal consistency was 0.91 and quality of the confirmatory analysis adjustment was 0.998 for Goodness of Fit Index. The domains presented Kappa values between 0.833 and 0.997.

CONCLUSIONS

The final questionnaire was composed of 18 items and presented feasibility of application, and potential to evaluate actions for HIV/AIDS control in Primary Health Care.

Interprofessional Collaboration and On-the-Job Training Improve Access to HIV Testing, HIV Primary Care, and Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP)

The HIV Continuum of Care is a global priority, yet vulnerable patients face access/retention challenges. Research is missing on the role social and public health service providers can play to help these patients. Using structural equation modeling, we examined the effects of interprofessional collaboration (IPC) and on-the-job training on the frequency of linkages to HIV testing, HIV primary care, and on pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) psychoeducation. The sample included 285 New York City providers of social and public health services from 34 agencies. Forty-eight percent of providers had not offered PrEP psychoeducation and linked fewer than five patients to HIV testing and primary care per week. However, in multivariate analysis higher IPC was associated with more linkages and frequent psychoeducation. After adjusting for IPC, linkage training was associated with more frequent services. The influence of specific factors highlights areas for interventions and policies to improve access to the HIV Continuum of Care.

Policy Interventions Shaping HIV Prevention: Providers' Active Role in the HIV Continuum of Care

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Diffusion of Effective Behavioral Interventions project has disseminated HIV behavioral interventions (EBIs) across the United States since the 1990s. In 2011, the CDC launched the High-Impact HIV Prevention (HIP) project, providing EBIs plus high-impact services (HIV testing, primary care, and support services). Providers (nurses, social workers, educators) are unable to consistently make linkages; thus, numerous at-risk individuals are not benefitting from HIP. Research on providers' roles in the HIV Continuum of Care-linking clients to HIV testing, primary care, and support services-is lacking. This article helps fill this gap with evidence that providers exposed to EBIs, whose agencies offer EBIs, more frequently link clients to high-impact services. This is based on diffusion of innovations theory, where individuals in social networks influence one another's adoption of innovations. We hypothesize that providers are exposed to EBIs via training, reading and hearing about EBIs, and/or discussing EBIs with colleagues. We used cross-sectional data from 379 providers from 36 agencies in New York City. We used multilevel ordinal logistic regression models to test associations between provider exposure to EBIs (agency provides EBIs) and frequency of linkages to high-impact services. Providers exposed to greater numbers of EBIs more frequently link clients to HIV, hepatitis C (HEP-C), and sexually transmitted infections testing; to primary care; and to drug treatment and mental health services. Providers link clients most frequently to primary care and HIV testing and least frequently to HEP-C testing and syringe exchange. Findings suggest a dose effect, with exposure to more EBIs resulting in more linkages. Findings show a staged, evidence-based prevention approach that includes exposure to EBIs, leading to providers linking clients to high-impact services. There needs to be emphasis on inspiring providers to engage with high-impact services at the elevated levels needed to end the epidemic.

Improving Linkage, Retention, and Reengagement in HIV Care in 12 Metropolitan Areas

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention developed the Enhanced Comprehensive HIV Prevention Planning (ECHPP) project to support 12 health departments' improvement of their HIV prevention and care portfolios in response to new national guidelines. We systematically analyzed 3 years of progress reports to learn how grantees put into practice local intervention strategies intended to link people to, and keep them in, HIV care. All grantees initiated seven activities to support these strategies: (1) improve surveillance data systems, (2) revise staffing duties and infrastructures, (3) update policies and procedures, (4) establish or strengthen partnerships, (5) identify persons not in care, (6) train personnel, and (7) create ways to overcome obstacles to receiving care. Factors supporting ECHPP grantee successes were thorough planning, attention to detail, and strong collaboration among health department units, and between the health department and external stakeholders. Other jurisdictions may consider adopting similar strategies when planning and enhancing HIV linkage, retention, and reengagement efforts in their areas. ECHPP experiences, lessons learned, and best practices may be relevant when applying new public health policies that affect community and health care practices jurisdiction-wide.

Shifting Resources and Focus to Meet the Goals of the National HIV/AIDS Strategy: The Enhanced Comprehensive HIV Prevention Planning Project, 2010-2013

In September 2010, CDC launched the Enhanced Comprehensive HIV Prevention Planning (ECHPP) project to shift HIV-related activities to meet goals of the 2010 National HIV/AIDS Strategy (NHAS). Twelve health departments in cities with high AIDS burden participated. These 12 grantees submitted plans detailing jurisdiction-level goals, strategies, and objectives for HIV prevention and care activities. We reviewed plans to identify themes in the planning process and initial implementation. Planning themes included data integration, broad engagement of partners, and resource allocation modeling. Implementation themes included organizational change, building partnerships, enhancing data use, developing protocols and policies, and providing training and technical assistance for new and expanded activities. Pilot programs also allowed grantees to assess the feasibility of large-scale implementation. These findings indicate that health departments in areas hardest hit by HIV are shifting their HIV prevention and care programs to increase local impact. Examples from ECHPP will be of interest to other health departments as they work toward meeting the NHAS goals.