Effectiveness of the Dual Dispatch to Cardiac Arrest Policy in Houston, Texas

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survival when CPR is initiated by first responders

BACKGROUND

In most patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is initiated by first responders (non-transporting firefighters or police) or emergency medical service (EMS) personnel. Whether survival outcomes differ when CPR is initiated by first responders vs. EMS is unclear.

METHODS

Within the CARES registry, we identified 162,896 adult patients with a non-traumatic OHCA in whom CPR was initiated by first responders or EMS during 2013-2021. Using multivariable hierarchical logistic regression to adjust for demographics, cardiac arrest characteristics and time to first CPR, we compared rates of survival to hospital admission and to discharge in patients with CPR initiated by first responders and EMS.

RESULTS

CPR was initiated by first responders in 70,889 (43.5%) and by EMS in 92,007 (56.5%) patients. Time to first CPR was shorter when first responders initiated CPR (median: 8.0 [5.0-13.0] vs. 10.0 minutes [IQR: 6.0-14.0]; standardized difference 16.1%). The likelihood of survival to hospital admission was similar when CPR was initiated by first responders (27.1% [first responders] vs. 26.8% [EMS]; adjusted OR: 0.98 [0.96, 1.01], P = 0.15) whereas survival rates to discharge were higher with CPR initiated by first responders (9.4% [first responders] vs. 7.7% [EMS]; adjusted OR: 1.17 [1.02, 1.21], P < 0.001). After adjustment for time to first CPR, rates of survival to discharge were similar between the first responder and EMS groups (adjusted OR: 1.04 [1.00-1.08]; P = 0.07).

CONCLUSIONS

CPR initiated by first responders for OHCA is associated with higher overall survival rates and higher survival was largely mediated by earlier response times.

The number and level of first-contact emergency medical services crew and clinical outcomes in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with dual dispatch response

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the association between the number and level of emergency medical technicians (EMTs) in the first-contact emergency medical services (EMS) unit and the clinical outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) with a dual dispatch response.

METHODS

Adult nontraumatic EMS-treated OHCAs between 2015 and 2018 in a nationwide database, were enrolled. The main exposure was the number and certification level of first-contact EMS crew: three versus two members, proportion of EMT intermediate level (EMT-I) over 50% versus under or equal to 50%. Good neurologic recovery was selected as the primary outcome. Multilevel multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to calculate adjusted odds ratios and confidence intervals.

RESULTS

A total of 26,867 patients were enrolled and analyzed. Good neurologic recovery was different across the study groups: 5.4% in the two-member crews, 7.2% in the three-member crews, 5.9% in the low EMT-I proportion crews, and 6.8% in the high EMT-I proportion crews. In the main analysis, statistically significant differences for favorable outcomes were found between the three-member and two-member crews, and the high EMT-I proportion and low EMT-I proportion crews; for good neurologic recovery, adjusted odds ratios (95% confidence interval) were 1.23 (1.06-1.43) for three-member crews, and 1.28 (1.17-1.40) for a high EMT-I proportion.

CONCLUSION

The higher number and level of first-contact EMS crew was associated with better neurologic recovery in adult nontraumatic OHCA with a dual-dispatched EMS response.

Improving community-based first response to out of hospital cardiac arrest (FirstCPR): protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is associated with poor survival outcomes, but prompt bystander action can more than double survival rates. Being trained, confident and willing-to-perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) are known predictors of bystander action. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of a community organisation targeted multicomponent education and training initiative on being willing to respond to OHCAs. The study employs a novel approach to reaching community members via social and cultural groups, and the intervention aims to address commonly cited barriers to training including lack of availability, time and costs.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

FirstCPR is a cluster randomised trial that will be conducted across 200 community groups in urban and regional Australia. It will target community groups where CPR training is not usual. Community groups (clusters) will be stratified by region, size and organisation type, and then randomly assigned to either immediately receive the intervention programme, comprising digital and in-person education and training opportunities about CPR and OHCA over 12 months, or a delayed programme implementation. The primary outcome is self-reported 'training and willingness-to-perform CPR' at 12 months. It will be assessed through surveys of group members that consent in intervention versus control groups and administered prior to control groups receiving the intervention. The primary analysis will follow intention-to-treat principles, use log binomial regression accounting for baseline covariates and be conducted at the individual level, while accounting for clustering within communities. Focus groups and interviews will be conducted to examine barriers and enablers to implementation and costs will also be examined.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval was obtained from The University of Sydney. Findings from this study will be disseminated via presentations at scientific conferences, publications in peer-reviewed journals, scientific and lay reports.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ACTRN12621000367842.

The Association of Fire or Police First Responder Initiated Interventions with Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest Survival

OBJECTIVE

Fire and police first responders are often the first to arrive in medical emergencies and provide basic life support services until specialized personnel arrive. This study aims to evaluate rates of fire or police first responder-initiated cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and automated external defibrillator (AED) use, as well as their associated impact on out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) outcomes.

METHODS

We completed a secondary data analysis of the MI-CARES registry from 2014 to 2019. We reported rates of CPR initiation and AED use by fire or police first responders. Multilevel modeling was utilized to evaluate the relationship between fire/police first responder-initiated interventions and outcomes of interest: ROSC upon emergency department arrival, survival to hospital discharge, and good neurologic outcome.

RESULTS

Our cohort included 25,067 OHCA incidents. We found fire or police first responders initiated CPR in 31.8% of OHCA events and AED use in 6.1% of OHCA events. Likelihood of sustained ROSC on ED arrival after CPR initiated by a fire/police first responder was not statistically different as compared to EMS initiated CPR (aOR 1.01, CI 0.93-1.11). However, fire/police first responder interventions were associated with significantly higher odds of survival to hospital discharge and survival with good neurologic outcome (aOR 1.25, 95% CI 1.08-1.45 and aOR 1.40, 95% CI 1.18-1.65, respectively). Similar associations were see when examining fire or police initiated AED use.

CONCLUSIONS

Fire or police first responders may be an underutilized, potentially powerful mechanism for improving OHCA survival. Future studies should investigate barriers and opportunities for increasing first responder interventions by these groups in OHCA.

A review on initiatives for the management of daily medical emergencies prior to the arrival of emergency medical services

Emergency services worldwide face increasing cost pressure that potentially limits their existing resources. In many countries, emergency services also face the issues of staff shortage-creating extra challenges and constraints, especially during crisis times such as the COVID-19 pandemic-as well as long distances to sparsely populated areas resulting in longer response times. To overcome these issues and potentially reduce consequences of daily (medical) emergencies, several countries, such as Sweden, Germany, and the Netherlands, have started initiatives using new types of human resources as well as equipment, which have not been part of the existing emergency systems before. These resources are employed in response to medical emergency cases if they can arrive earlier than emergency medical services (EMS). A good number of studies have investigated the use of these new types of resources in EMS systems, from medical, technical, and logistical perspectives as their study domains. Several review papers in the literature exist that focus on one or several of these new types of resources. However, to the best of our knowledge, no review paper that comprehensively considers all new types of resources in emergency medical response systems exists. We try to fill this gap by presenting a broad literature review of the studies focused on the different new types of resources, which are used prior to the arrival of EMS. Our objective is to present an application-based and methodological overview of these papers, to provide insights to this important field and to bring it to the attention of researchers as well as emergency managers and administrators.

[Ethics of resuscitation and end of life decisions]

These European Resuscitation Council Ethics guidelines provide evidence-based recommendations for the ethical, routine practice of resuscitation and end-of-life care of adults and children. The guideline primarily focus on major ethical practice interventions (i.e. advance directives, advance care planning, and shared decision making), decision making regarding resuscitation, education, and research. These areas are tightly related to the application of the principles of bioethics in the practice of resuscitation and end-of-life care.

European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Ethics of resuscitation and end of life decisions

These European Resuscitation Council Ethics guidelines provide evidence-based recommendations for the ethical, routine practice of resuscitation and end-of-life care of adults and children. The guideline primarily focus on major ethical practice interventions (i.e. advance directives, advance care planning, and shared decision making), decision making regarding resuscitation, education, and research. These areas are tightly related to the application of the principles of bioethics in the practice of resuscitation and end-of-life care.

Socioeconomic disparities in Rapid ambulance response for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in a public emergency medical service system: A nationwide observational study

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to examine whether county socioeconomic status (SES) is associated with emergency medical service (EMS) response time and dual dispatch response of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients using county property tax per capita in Korea.

METHODS

All EMS-treated adults who suffered OHCAs were enrolled between 2015 and 2017, excluding cases witnessed by EMS providers. The main exposure was property tax per capita in the county where the OHCA occurred. The primary outcome was response time interval, with a secondary outcome of dual dispatch response. Negative binomial regression analysis to calculate incidence rate ratio (IRR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was conducted for EMS response time. A multivariable logistic regression analysis for response time interval (<8 min) and dual dispatch response was also conducted.

RESULTS

A total of 71,326 patients in 228 counties were enrolled. Compared to the lowest SES quartile, OHCA patients in the highest SES quartile had shorter median (interquartile range [IQR]) response time intervals (9.5 [5.9] minutes vs. 7.6 [4.2] minutes, IRR [95% CI] 0.95 [0.94-0.96], respectively). The AOR (95% CI) for response time within 8 min was 1.07 (1.01-1.13) for the highest SES quartile compared to the lowest SES quartile. Those in the highest SES quartile also had higher rates of dual dispatch response compared to those in the lowest quantile (50.9% vs 26.6%; AOR [95% CI]: 2.16 [2.03-2.30]).

CONCLUSION

In OHCA patients, those in a lower SES are associated with longer response times and lower dual dispatch response.

Does second EMS unit response time affect outcomes of OHCA in multi-tiered system? A nationwide observational study

OBJECTIVES

The time dependence of a multi-tier response for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the time-dependent effect of EMS response type in a multi-tiered system on the clinical outcomes of OHCA.

METHODS

Adult EMS-treated OHCA of presumed cardiac etiology who were not witnessed by EMS between January 2015 and December 2017 were included. The main exposure was EMS response type: single-tier response, early multi-tier response (0-18 min from call to second EMS arrival), and late multi-tier response (19 min from call to second EMS arrival). The primary outcome was good neurologic recovery at the time of discharge from the hospital. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed, adjusting for patient-community and prehospital variables.

RESULTS

Among 54,436 patients, 29,995 patients (55.1%), 21,552 patients (39.6%), and 2889 patients (5.3%) were treated by single-tiered EMS, early multi-tiered EMS, and late multi-tiered EMS, respectively. Good neurological recovery and survival to discharge were more frequent in the early multi-tiered response group (6.4% and 9.7%) than in the single-tiered response group (4.8% and 7.5%) or late multi-tiered response group (3.1% and 5.8%). Compared to the single-tiered response group, the early multi-tiered response group was more likely to have good neurological recovery (adjusted OR, 95% CI: 1.15 [1.06-1.26]), but the late multi-tiered response group was less likely to have good neurological recovery (adjusted OR, 95% CI: 0.76 [0.61-0.96]).

CONCLUSION

In our basic to intermediate-tiered EMS system, early multi-tier response was associated with improved survival and good neurological recovery.