Improving Neonatal Follow-up: A Quality Improvement Study Analyzing In-hospital Interventions and Long-term Show Rates

Assessing Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) Graduates Across Varied Settings: A Study on the Feasibility of the Baby Moves App

We assessed the feasibility of obtaining parent-collected General Movement Assessment videos using the Baby Moves app. Among 261 participants from 4 Chicago NICUs, 70% submitted videos. Families living in higher areas of childhood opportunity used the app more than those from areas of lower opportunity.

HOPE and DREAM: A Two-Clinic NICU Follow-up Model

OBJECTIVE

The natural extension of inpatient-focused neonatal neurocritical care (NNCC) programs is the evaluation of long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes in the same patient population.

CLINICAL DESIGN

A dedicated and collaborative team of neonatologists, neonatal neurologists, neuropsychologists, neurosurgeons, physical medicine and rehabilitation physicians, and psychologists are necessary to provide personalized medicine, developmental assessments, and parental education for NNCC graduates. To achieve this goal, we devised a two-clinic follow-up model at Children's Wisconsin: HOPE (Healthy Outcomes Post-ICU Engagement) and DREAM: Developmentally Ready: Engagement for Achievement of Milestones) clinics. Those infants with significant neurologic diagnoses attend DREAM clinic, while all other high-risk neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) infants are seen in the HOPE clinic.

CONCLUSION

These clinic models allow for a targeted approach to post-NICU care, which has improved family engagement and perceptions of value.

KEY POINTS

· Infants with neurologic compromise are a specialized population with increasing survival.. · Interdisciplinary NICU follow-up brings together previously separated outpatient service lines.. · Our novel clinic model allows for specialized developmental assessments..

[Formula: see text] Optimizing neurodevelopmental outcomes following fetal diagnosis of congenital heart disease: a call for primary prevention neuropsychology

Critical congenital heart disease (CHD) presents a lasting threat to quality of life through its adverse impact on neurodevelopmental and psychosocial outcomes. As recognition of this threat has increased, so too has an appreciation for the role of pediatric neuropsychologists in supporting families affected by CHD. But there is more to offer these families than traditional neuropsychological services, which tend to focus on secondary/tertiary forms of prevention. Now that many children with CHD are diagnosed prenatally, it may be possible to begin mitigating CHD-related risks and promoting positive outcomes earlier than ever before. Through primary prevention-oriented fetal neuropsychological consultation, as well as close collaboration with allied specialists, pediatric neuropsychology has an opportunity to re-envision its typical borders and more familiar practice models; to forge early and enduring partnerships with families; and to help promote the best possible neurodevelopmental trajectories, beginning before children are even born. In this conceptual review, we survey and integrate evidence from developmental science, developmental origins of health and disease, maternal-fetal medicine, and cardiac neurodevelopmental literatures, along with current practice norms, arriving ultimately at two central conclusions: 1) there is an important role to fill on multidisciplinary teams for the pediatric neuropsychologist in fetal cardiac care and 2) role expansion (e.g., through valuing broader-based training, flexing more generalist skills) can likely improve neuropsychological outcomes earlier than has been standard for pediatric neuropsychologists. Such a reimagining of our practice may be considered primary prevention neuropsychology. Implications for care in various settings and pragmatic barriers to implementation are discussed.

Outcomes to 5 years of outborn versus inborn infants <32 weeks in Western Australia: a cohort study of infants born between 2005 and 2018

OBJECTIVE

We compared mortality and morbidity of inborn versus outborn very preterm infants <32 weeks' gestation in Western Australia (WA) between 2005 and 2018.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

PATIENTS

Infants <32 weeks' gestation who were born in WA.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Mortality was assessed as death before discharge home from the tertiary neonatal intensive care unit. Short-term morbidities included combined brain injury (intracranial haemorrhage grade ≥3 and cystic periventricular leukomalacia) and other major neonatal outcomes. Developmental assessments at age 2, 3 and 5 years were evaluated. We performed multivariable logistic regression analysis of outborn status on outcomes, controlling for gestational age, birth weight z-score, sex and multiple birth.

RESULTS

A total of 4974 infants were born in WA between 22 and 32 weeks' gestation between 2005 and 2018 of which 4237 (89.6%) were inborn and 443 (10.4%) were outborn. Overall mortality to discharge was higher in outborn infants (20.5% (91/443) vs 7.4% (314/4237); adjusted OR (aOR) 2.44, 95% CI 1.60 to 3.70, p<0.001). Outborn infants had higher rates of combined brain injury than those inborn (10.7% (41/384) vs 6.0% (246/4115); aOR 1.98, 95% CI 1.37 to 2.86), p<0.001). No difference in up to 5-year developmental measures was detected. Follow-up data were available for 65% of outborn and 79% of inborn infants.

CONCLUSIONS

Outborn preterm infants <32 weeks in WA had increased odds of mortality and combined brain injury than those inborn. Developmental outcomes up to 5 years were similar between groups. Loss to follow-up may have impacted the long-term comparison.

Neonatal Intensive Care Unit to Home Discharge Communication: A Quality Improvement Project

Neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) graduates require complex services after discharge. The NICU discharge process at Children's Hospital at Montefiore-Weiler, Bronx, NY (CHAM-Weiler) lacked a system for routine primary care provider (PCP) notification. Here, we describe a quality improvement project to improve communication with PCPs to ensure communication of critical information and plans.

Methods

We assembled a multidisciplinary team and collected baseline data on discharge communication frequency and quality. We used quality improvement tools to implement a higher-quality system. The outcome measure was the successful delivery of a standardized notification and discharge summary to a PCP. We collected qualitative data through multidisciplinary meetings and direct feedback. The balancing measures comprised additional time spent during the discharge process and relaying erroneous information. We used a run chart to track progress and drive change.

Results

Baseline data indicated that 67% of PCPs did not receive notifications before discharge, and when PCPs did receive notifications, the discharge plans were unclear. PCP feedback led to proactive electronic communication and a standardized notification. The key driver diagram allowed the team to design interventions that led to sustainable change. After multiple Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles, delivery of electronic PCP notifications occurred more than 90% of the time. Surveys of pediatricians who received notifications indicated that the notifications were highly valued and aided in the transition of care for these at-risk patients.

Conclusion

A multidisciplinary team, including community pediatricians, was key to improving the rate of PCP notification of NICU discharge to more than 90% and transmitting higher-quality information.

High-Risk Infant Follow-Up After NICU Discharge: Current Care Models and Future Considerations

Preterm infants are at heightened risk for chronic health problems and developmental delays compared with term-born peers. High-risk infant follow-up programs provide surveillance and support for problems that may emerge during infancy and early childhood. Although considered standard of care, program structure, content, and timing are highly variable. Families face challenges accessing recommended follow-up services. Here, the authors review common models of high-risk infant follow-up, describe novel approaches, and outline considerations for improving the quality, value, and equity of follow-up care.

Telemedicine Improves Rate of Successful First Visit to NICU Follow-up Clinic

OBJECTIVES

NICU graduates require ongoing surveillance in follow-up clinics because of the risk of lower cognitive, motor, and academic performance. We hypothesized that multiple programmatic changes, including availability of telemedicine consultation before hospital discharge, would improve NICU follow-up clinic attendance rates.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, we included infants who survived and were premature (≤29 6/7 weeks/<1500 g) or had brain injury (grade III/IV intraventricular hemorrhage, stroke or seizure, hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy). We compared rates of follow-up for the early cohort (January 2018-June 2019; no telemedicine) with the late cohort (May 2020-May 2021; telemedicine available); and performed a mediation analysis to assess other programmatic changes for the late cohort including improved documentation to parents and primary care provider regarding NICU follow-up.

RESULTS

The rate of successful 12-month follow-up improved from 26% (early cohort) to 61% (late cohort) (P < .001). After controlling for maternal insurance, the odds of attending a 12-month follow-up visit were 3.7 times higher for infants in the late cohort, for whom telemedicine was available (confidence interval, 1.8-7.9). Approximately 37% of this effect was mediated by including information for NICU follow-up in the discharge documentation for parents (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Telemedicine consultation before NICU discharge, in addition to improving communication regarding the timing and importance of NICU follow-up, was effective at improving the rate of attendance to NICU follow-up clinics.

Disparities and Early Engagement Associated with the 18- to 36-Month High-Risk Infant Follow-Up Visit among Very Low Birthweight Infants in California

OBJECTIVE

To determine follow-up rates for the high-risk infant follow-up (HRIF) visit at 18-36 months among infants with very low birthweights and identify factors associated with completion.

STUDY DESIGN

We completed a retrospective cohort study using linked California Perinatal Quality of Care Collaborative neonatal intensive care unit, California Perinatal Quality of Care Collaborative California Children's Services HRIF, and Vital Statistics Birth Cohort databases. We identified maternal, sociodemographic, neonatal, clinical, and HRIF program level factors associated with the 18- to 36-month follow-up using multivariable Poisson regression.

RESULTS

From 2010 to 2015, among 19 284 infants with very low birthweight expected to attend at least 1 visit at 18-36 months, 10 249 (53%) attended. On multivariable analysis, factors independently associated with attendance at an 18- to 36-month visit included estimated gestational age (relative risk [RR], 1.21; 95% CI, 1.15-1.26; <26 weeks vs ≥31 weeks), maternal education (RR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.06-1.12; college degree or more vs high school), distance from clinic (RR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.89-0.97; fourth quartile vs first quartile), and Black non-Hispanic race vs White race (RR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.84-0.92). However, completion of an initial HRIF visit within the first 12 months was the factor most strongly associated with completion of an 18- to 36-month visit (RR, 6.47; 95% CI, 5.91-7.08).

CONCLUSIONS

In a California very low birthweight cohort, maternal education, race, and distance from the clinic were associated with sustained HRIF participation, but attendance at a visit by 12 months was the most significantly associated factor. These findings highlight the importance of early engagement with all families to ensure equitable follow-through for children born preterm.

PICU Survivorship: Factors Affecting Feasibility and Cohort Retention in a Long-Term Outcomes Study

Our understanding of longitudinal outcomes of Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) survivors is limited by the heterogeneity of follow-up intervals, populations, and outcomes assessed. We sought to demonstrate (1) the feasibility of longitudinal multidimensional outcome assessment and (2) methods to promote cohort retention. The objective of this presented study was to provide details of follow-up methodology in a PICU survivor cohort and not to present the outcomes at long-term follow-up for this cohort. We enrolled 152 children aged 0 to 17 years admitted to the PICU in a prospective longitudinal cohort study. We examined resource utilization, family impact of critical illness, and neurodevelopment using the PICU Outcomes Portfolio (POP) Survey which included a study-specific survey and validated tools: 1. Functional Status Scale, 2. Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory Computer Adaptive Test, 3. Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory, 4. Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire, and 5. Vanderbilt Assessment Scales for Attention Deficit-Hyperactivity Disorder. POP Survey completion rates were 89%, 78%, and 84% at 1, 3, and 6 months. Follow-up rates at 1, 2, and 3 years were 80%, 55%, and 43%. Implementing a longitudinal multidimensional outcome portfolio for PICU survivors is feasible within an urban, tertiary-care, academic hospital. Our attrition after one year demonstrates the long-term follow-up challenges in this population. Our findings inform ongoing efforts to implement core outcome sets after pediatric critical illness.

The AIMS home-video method: parental experiences and appraisal for use in neonatal follow-up clinics

Background

In The Netherlands, prematurely born infants and their parents are offered regular developmental check-ups in a hospital setting. In line with providing healthcare at distance, the use of video footage showing the infant’s behavior and movements, taken by parents at home and assessed by professionals online, might be a fruitful future practice. The focus of this study was to gain insight into parental experiences with the Alberta Infant Motor Scale home-video method and their appraisal of its applicability for use in an outpatient neonatal follow-up clinic.

Method

A qualitative descriptive study among parents of healthy extremely or very premature infants (GA 26.2–31.5 weeks) participating in a longitudinal study of motor development between 3–18 months corrected age. Ten semi-structured interviews were conducted and transcribed verbatim. Data was analyzed independently. Inductive content analysis was performed following the process of the AIMS home-video method.

Results

Parents appraised the AIMS home-video method as manageable and fun to do. Instructions, instruction film, and checklists were clear. Transferring the video footage from their phone to their computer and uploading it to the web portal was sometimes time-consuming. Parents gained a better awareness of their infant’s motor development and found the provided feedback a confirmation of what they already thought about their infant’s development and was reassuring that their child was doing well. First-time parents seemed more uncertain and had a greater need for information about (motor) development, but on the other hand, also had confidence in their child.

All parents thought that home-videos can be an addition to follow-up visits, but cannot replace (all) visits. It may be an opportunity to reduce the frequency of hospital visits, while still having their infant monitored.

Conclusion

Parents appraised the AIMS home-video method positively and are of the opinion that home-videos can be of added value in monitoring infants at risk in neonatal follow-up additional to hospital visits. In future research a user-friendly application and/or platform to exchange video footage safely between parents and professionals should be developed with all possible stakeholders involved and implementation should be explored.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12887-022-03398-9.

Connecting to Early Intervention Services After Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Discharge in a Medicaid Sample

OBJECTIVE

To describe caregiver perspectives regarding connecting to early intervention (EI) services after neonatal intensive care unit discharge in a Medicaid sample.

METHODS

Open-ended semistructured interviews and focus groups were conducted with English- or Spanish-speaking families enrolled in Medicaid in an urban high-risk infant follow-up clinic at a safety-net center, which serves preterm and high-risk term infants. We generated salient themes using inductive-deductive thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Thirty-two participants completed the study. The infant's median (interquartile range) birth weight was 1365 (969, 2800) grams; 50% were Hispanic; 31% reported living in a neighborhood with fourth quartile economic hardship. Eighty-one percent were classified as having chronic complex disease per the Pediatric Medical Complexity Algorithm and 63% had a diagnosis of developmental delay. A conceptual model was constructed and the analysis revealed major themes describing families' challenges and ideas to facilitate connection to EI. We identified subthemes related to the person in environment: health care environment/support and socio-economic resources, parent perspectives and built environment; provider level factors such as appointment scheduling, staff limitations, and parent suggestions to improve health care and service navigation, which included improved information sharing, the importance of patient advocates, video resources, early referrals to EI facilitated by the discharging hospital and system workarounds.

CONCLUSIONS

The results from this study may provide a granular roadmap for providers to help facilitate referrals to EI services. We identified several ideas such as using advocates and providing transitional resources, including online media, that might improve the connection to EI services.

The Autism Detection in Early Childhood Tool: Level 2 autism spectrum disorder screening in a NICU Follow-up program

OBJECTIVE

Children born preterm are at increased risk for autism spectrum disorder (ASD). However, early diagnosis of ASD is challenging because conventional screening Level 1 tools are less reliable in this population. We sought to determine whether the Autism Detection in Early Childhood (ADEC) and Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) could accurately identify children at risk for ASD in a NICU Follow-up setting and thus facilitate referral for formal ASD evaluation.

METHOD

Children aged 18-36 months were recruited from a NICU Follow-up program. All children received presumptive diagnoses based on DSM-5 criteria and were screened for ASD risk with the ADEC and CBCL. Children scoring in the "at risk" range on either tool were referred for a full diagnostic ASD evaluation.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine patients (median birth weight 1140 g; median gestational age 28 weeks) were included with 18 designated "at risk" for ASD. Nine (13 %) scored "at risk" on the ADEC and 12 (17 %) on the CBCL. Thirteen children underwent diagnostic ASD evaluation with 9 receiving a formal diagnosis of ASD. The ADEC demonstrated the best performance (sensitivity 89 %, specificity 98 %). The CBCL was less sensitive (sensitivity 50 %, specificity 90 %). Requiring elevated scores on both the CBCL and ADEC was specific but not sensitive (sensitivity 33 %, specificity 100 %).

CONCLUSION

The ADEC performed well in identifying children at risk for ASD within this high-risk NICU cohort, adding benefit as an autism-specific screening tool over the CBCL alone.

Quality improvement approaches to reduce racial/ethnic disparities in the neonatal intensive care unit

Inequities in neonatal care quality and outcomes persist. Current models of neonatal quality improvement (QI) typically involve implementation of standardized approaches to clinical care that seek to provide consistent care to all infants and their families, which may neglect to account for the unique needs of diverse patient populations. Current approaches often fail to track outcome and process measures by important social disparity metrics, such as race/ethnicity and primary language. Despite these shortcomings, use of a QI structure has tremendous potential to address disparities in neonatal care. Crucial components of a QI approach to achieve health equity include: (1) Identifying equity goals from the inception of a project; (2) Inclusion of diverse family members on multidisciplinary teams; (3) Tracking outcome and process measures according to disparity metrics; and (4) Conducting interventions that preferentially address barriers of high-risk social groups. Hospital-system commitment to diversity and inclusion in the healthcare work force, recognition of the impact of unconscious provider bias and advocacy in the greater public health setting are needed to address underlying social inequities that impact neonatal care quality.