A Comparison of the Effectiveness of Triamcinolone and Radiation Therapy for Ear Keloids after Surgical Excision: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Efficacy and Safety of Excision Combination Therapies for Earlobe Keloids: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Different combinations of excision and adjuvant therapies have been applied to improve outcomes for earlobe keloids, though evidence in this field is still lacking.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to systematically investigate efficacy and safety of these treatments.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library to find all relevant studies. Meta-analysis of recurrence rates (RRs) and adverse event rates with 95% confidence intervals, and individual participants data (IPD) were calculated for each intervention when possible. Otherwise, narrative syntheses were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 85 articles, covering 23 treatments for earlobe keloids, were included, indicating a preference for multiple combination therapy. The estimated RRs for 6 interventions (i.e., excision monotherapy, combinations of excision with imiquimod, pressure therapy, radiotherapy, steroids, and steroids with pressure therapy) appeared to be comparable. Electron radiotherapy was found to have potential advantages over X-ray treatment, contributing to the observed heterogeneity. Further meta-analysis using IPD revealed that both combination therapies of excision plus steroid therapy (p=0.003) and excision plus radiotherapy (p=0.003) yielded better recurrence-free survival compared to excision alone. The median recurrence-free interval for combination therapy was 10 months. Adverse event rates were similar among different intervention groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that combining excision with radiotherapy or perioperative steroid therapy has the potential to improve prognosis of earlobe keloids without increasing the risk of adverse events. Overall evaluation of patients' conditions and further studies with sufficient follow-up are warranted for clinical practice.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Presentation, Management, and Outcomes of Pathologic Scars Within a Pediatric Otolaryngology Practice

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to review the spectrum of scarring that may present to an urban, pediatric otolaryngology practice and determine if associations exist between race, scar location, treatment modality, and outcomes following interventions for scarring.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study among 115 pediatric patients with 138 unique keloids or hypertrophic scars (HTS), and 141 children presenting for tonsillectomy at Tufts Medical Center. Age at presentation and sex assigned at birth were collected for both populations. For those presenting for pathologic scars, income quintile, self-identified race/ethnicity, anatomical location, treatment number and type, and clinical outcome were also analyzed. Multivariate analyses calculated adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals to assess associations between scar subsite, intervention type, and persistence after treatment.

RESULTS

Compared to individuals presenting for tonsillectomy, a disproportionate percentage of patients presenting for scarring identified as Black (26.6% vs. 13.5%) or Asian (17.4% vs. 7.1%, p = 0.016) or were male (61.7% vs. 49.7%, p = 0.053). Individuals identifying as Black or Asian were more likely to present with ear lobe and neck scars, respectively (50.0% vs. 45.5%, p = <0.001). Ear scars were significantly more likely to receive excision at initial treatment (aOR = 5.86 [1.43-23.96]) compared to other subsites, and were more likely to require >1 treatment (aOR = 5.91 [1.53-22.75]).

CONCLUSION

Among pediatric patients presenting with keloids or HTS, children who identified as Black or Asian were more likely to present with ear and neck scars, respectively. Ear scars were frequently treated with excision and appear more likely to require adjuvant treatments and multiple interventions.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Laryngoscope, 134:3127-3135, 2024.

Post-Excision Soft X-Ray Radiotherapy for Keloids: Experience in a Tertiary Referral Center

INTRODUCTION

Keloid is an abnormal proliferation of scar tissue that grows beyond the original margins of the injury. Even after complete resection, recurrences are common and pose a poorly understood challenge in dermatology. There is lack of large prospective clinical trials; thus, treatment recommendations are based on retrospective analyses and small cohort studies. Superficial radiotherapy is recommended in recurrent keloids; however, the successful treatment rates vary greatly. The aim of this study was to evaluate the keloid recurrence rate after post-excision soft X-ray radiotherapy and the associated factors.

METHODS

We reviewed retrospective data of all patients, treated with adjuvant post-excision soft X-ray radiotherapy with 12 Gy in 6 sessions at the tertiary referral center, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland, between 2005 and 2018. We analyzed individual keloids as separate cases. Successful treatment was defined as no sign of recurrence within 2 years.

RESULTS

Of the 200 identified patients, 90 met the inclusion criteria and were included in the final analysis. In 90 patients, 104 cases of treated keloids were analyzed. Keloids were mainly located on the trunk (49%) and were mostly caused by previous surgery (52.2%). 50% of the keloids did not relapse within 2 years after therapy. A significant factor leading to recurrence was the presence of previous therapy, with prior topical therapies, such as steroid injections or 5-fluorouracil, leading to most relapses. 69.2% of keloid cases who relapsed were pretreated. Soft X-ray radiotherapy was well tolerated, with posttreatment hyperpigmentation noted in 34% of patients, particularly in patients with non-Caucasian origin (61.3%).

CONCLUSION

Treatment of refractory keloids is difficult. Post-excision radiotherapy is an established adjuvant treatment option; nevertheless, recurrence rates are high, especially in pretreated keloids. Prospective studies determining the exact dosage and fraction of post-excisional radiotherapy are needed to determine the optimal radiation parameters.

Compression Therapy for Keloid Scars: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background

Keloid scars have a multitude of treatments with varying success rates. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to study the different types of compression therapies used following surgical excision and their recurrence rates.

Methods

A literature search was conducted using the following databases: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Reviews. The following keywords were used in the search: "keloid" and "compression." The following inclusion criteria were used: (1) identifying lesion must be a keloid and (2) use of any type of compression therapy for keloid scar.

Results

A total of 27 articles were included in the final analysis, grouped into three treatment modalities for comparison. The three treatment modalities are (1) surgical excision and compression earring, (2) surgical excision and silicone gel sheeting, and (3) surgical excision, compression earring, and silicone gel sheeting. Based on our analysis, combination treatment with compression earring device and silicone gel sheeting had the lowest recurrence rate when compared with compression earring device or silicone gel alone, but the difference in recurrence rates between the three treatment modalities was not statistically significant.

Conclusions

There were too few studies included in each treatment modality with even fewer sample sizes, and there is a need for a greater number of studies with increased sample size to evaluate which therapy is the most efficacious in preventing keloid recurrence following surgical excision.

A Cross-Sectional Evaluation of Publication Bias in the Plastic Surgery Literature

BACKGROUND

Publication bias (PB) is the preferential publishing of studies with statistically significant results. PB can skew findings of systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses (MAs), with potential consequences for patient care and health policy. This study aims to determine the extent to which SRs and MAs in the plastic surgery literature evaluate and report PB.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study assessed PB reporting and analysis from plastic surgery studies published between January 1, 2015, and June 19, 2020. Full texts of SRs and MAs were assessed by two reviewers for PB assessment methodology and analysis. Post hoc assessment of studies that did not originally analyze PB was performed using Egger regression, Duval, Tweedie trim-and-fill, and Copas selection models.

RESULTS

There were 549 studies evaluated, of which 531 full texts were included. PB was discussed by 183 studies (34.5%), and formally assessed by 97 studies (18.3%). Among SRs and MAs that formally assessed PB, PB was present in 24 studies (10.7%), not present in 52 (23.1%), and inconclusive in eight (3.6%); 141 studies (62.7%) did not report the results of their PB assessment. Funnel plots were the most common assessment method [ n = 88 (39.1%)], and 60 studies (68.2%) published funnel plots. The post hoc assessment revealed PB in 17 of 20 studies (85.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

PB is inadequately reported and analyzed among studies in the plastic surgery literature. Most studies that assessed PB found PB, as did post hoc analysis of nonreporting studies. Increased assessment and reporting of PB among SRs and MAs would improve the quality of evidence in plastic surgery.

Surgery and superficial x-ray radiotherapy for keloids of the preauricular and contralateral ear lobe: Case report

The combined approach of surgical resection along with superficial x-ray radiotherapy emerges as a superior treatment option for individuals with keloids, which hold huge potential for enhancing aesthetic outcomes and preventing keloid recurrence.

A Working Classification and a Simple Effective Management Protocol for Ear Keloids

BACKGROUND

The unpredictable behavior of scars in the ear makes it a nightmare in planning the management protocol for ear keloids. To understand and classify the ear keloid, a simple working classification based on the anatomical location has been proposed. Low recurrence rate should be the primary determinant in choosing a management protocol. The scar control protocol includes complete excision of the keloid, taking care not to extend to normal skin which was followed by a round-the-clock 24×7 management protocol for 6 months to 1 year.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study presents a prospective analysis of 71 patients with 106 ear keloids who underwent surgery in our clinic between 2007 and 2022. The management included complete excision, postoperative adjuvant therapy in the form of self-managed scar stabilization with bi-digital, bi-dimensional, bi-directional massage and corticosteroid therapy if warranted. Complete keloid excision with primary reconstruction was followed up to 1 year, and recurrence rates were tracked during this period.

RESULTS

Of the 71 patients, 91.54% were women. All lesions (n = 106) were treated by complete excision. The average age was between 15 and 30 years. The overall recurrence rate was 5.6%.

CONCLUSION

With our classification and protocol, we were able to achieve a consistent recurrence free state in 94.4% of patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these evidence-based medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Laser Combined with Radiotherapy for Keloid Treatment: A Novel and Efficient Comprehensive Therapy with a Lower Recurrence Rate

BACKGROUND

Keloids are a fibroproliferative skin disorder with a high recurrence rate. Combined therapies are often used in clinical treatment, but, in addition to the relatively high risk of relapse and complexity of the treatment process, side effects remain unknown for combination therapies.

METHODS

A total of 99 patients with keloids in 131 positions were included in this retrospective study. Fractional CO 2 laser therapy was first applied with energy ranging from 360 to 1008 mJ; then, 6-Mev, 900-cGy electron beam irradiation was applied twice. The first pass was initiated within 24 hours after the laser therapy, and the second pass was performed on the seventh day after laser therapy. The Patient and Observer Scar Scale evaluated the lesions before the treatment and at 6, 12, and 18 months after treatment. At each follow-up visit, the patients filled out a questionnaire on recurrence, side effects, and satisfaction.

RESULTS

The authors found a significant decrease in total Patient and Observer Scar Scale score [29 (23, 39) versus 61.2 ± 13.4; P < 0.001] at the 18-month follow-up compared with the baseline value (before the therapy). A total of 12.1% of the patients had recurrences during the 18-month follow-up period (11.1% partial recurrence and 1.0% complete recurrence). The total satisfaction rate was 97.0%. No severe adverse effects were observed during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

Laser combined with radiotherapy is a new comprehensive therapy comprising ablative lasers and radiotherapy for keloids. It had excellent clinical efficacy, low recurrence rate, and no serious adverse effects.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, IV.

Hypertrophic Scars and Keloids: Advances in Treatment and Review of Established Therapies

Hypertrophic scars and keloids can have significant detrimental effects on patients both psychosocially and functionally. A careful identification of patient risk factors and a comprehensive management plan are necessary to optimize outcomes. Patients with a history of dystrophic scarring should avoid unnecessary procedures and enhance the wound-healing process using various preventive strategies. As there is no single, fully efficacious treatment modality, prevention remains the best approach in reducing aberrant scar formation. When prevention therapies fail, keloids have been shown to be respond to a variety of therapies including topical and injectable corticosteroids, 5-fluorouracil, radiotherapy, lasers, and surgical excision, all with varying efficacies. As such, management should be tailored to the individual patient's risk factors with the use of combination therapies to reduce recurrence rates. Still, keloid and hypertrophic scar therapies are widely diverse with novel treatment modalities providing alternatives for recurring lesions. Laser-assisted drug delivery, skin priming, and novel topical therapies may provide alternative options for the management of hypertrophic scars and keloids.

The Efficacy of Combination Therapy Involving Excision Followed by Intralesional 5-Fluorouracil and Betamethasone, and Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Keloids: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Background

Combined therapy for keloids is currently recommended. Surgery is one of the main options, but the measures to prevent recurrence after excision are still being explored.

Objective

The randomized controlled study aimed at evaluating the efficacy of excision followed by intralesional low concentrations of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)(12.5 mg/mL) and betamethasone.

Methods

Sixty patients were randomly assigned to three groups. Patients in group A had excision followed by 5-FU and betamethasone intralesional injections, group B had 5-FU and betamethasone intralesional injections, and group C had excision followed by radiotherapy. Efficacy parameters were assessed from 8 to 12 months, including improvement on the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) and the Patient and Observer Scar Scale (POSAS), as well as side effects and recurrence. Trial registration number: ChiCTR2100046025.

Results

After 4 months' treatment, the improvement of the VSS and POSAS scores in group A was not different from that in group C (P > 0.05) but was superior to that in group B (P < 0.05); the pain and pruritus of the three groups were relieved more than 50%. After 8 to 12 months' follow-up, there was no statistical difference in the incidence of side effects and recurrence among the groups (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

Excision followed by intralesional low concentrations of 5-FU (12.5mg/mL) with betamethasone is a safe and sustainable treatment for keloid, with no significant difference from excision followed by radiotherapy.

Ear Keloids Treated with Postoperative Electrons: A Case Series

Introduction Multiple modalities exist for treating keloids ranging from surgical, medical, chemotherapeutic, and radiation therapy. Different techniques of radiation therapy have been used to treat keloids as an adjuvant to surgical excision. With this case series, we report our experience of using electron beam radiation therapy in this setting.

Materials and Methods We retrospectively analyzed 16 ear keloids treated in 10 patients from January 2013 to October 2015 with surgical excision followed by electron beam to a dose of 10 Gy in two fractions over two consecutive days in immediate postoperative period. Patients were evaluated for recurrent lesions, cosmesis, and adverse effects.

Results With a median follow-up of 78 months (range: 67–100 months), recurrent lesion was seen in five cases; a local control rate of 68.75% was seen. Median recurrence-free period was 67 months (range: 12–100 months). Acceptable cosmesis was seen in all cases and no acute or chronic adverse effects were seen.

Conclusion The large follow-up period in our series establishes the role of electron beam radiation therapy in attaining long-term control in keloid patients. The lower total dose with higher dose per fraction used in our patients has acceptable control along with good cosmesis and absent adverse effects.

Optimizing surgical outcome of auricular keloid with a novel multimodal approach

Various treatments are available for auricular keloids, but none has an absolute advantage. A practical and safe therapy to optimize the surgical outcome for auricular keloids is needed. We adopted a multimodal treatment of surgical enucleation, core fillet flap reconstruction, intraoperative corticosteroid injection, and immediate postoperative radiotherapy. There were no routine intralesional corticosteroid injections during follow-up. Keloid recurrences, complications, and risk factors for recurrences were analyzed. The outcome was compared with other published literatures. 45 auricular keloids were included in this study. 85.7% were female with an average age of 27.1 ± 7.5 years, and averaged size was 1.8 × 1.2 ± 0.9 × 0.6 cm. 71.1% were located at ear helix with 28.9% at the ear lobe. Nine keloids were classified as Chang-Park classification type I, 30 for type II, two for type III, and four for IV. The average radiation dosage was 1578.6 cGy. The recurrence rate was 6.7% at an average 24.1-month follow-up. There were no complications of surgery, radiotherapy, and intralesional corticosteroid injection. Our recurrence rate was lower than those in mono-adjuvant therapies of intraoperative corticosteroid injection or radiotherapy. This one-session multimodal approach optimizes treating auricular keloids with a low recurrence rate and minimal post-radiation and long-term corticosteroid injection-related complications.

Effect of the combination of photobiomodulation therapy and the intralesional administration of corticoid in the preoperative and postoperative periods of keloid surgery: A randomized, controlled, double-blind trial protocol study

Keloid scars are characterized by the excessive proliferation of fibroblasts and an imbalance between the production and degradation of collagen, leading to its buildup in the dermis. There is no “gold standard” treatment for this condition, and the recurrence is frequent after surgical procedures removal. In vitro studies have demonstrated that photobiomodulation (PBM) using the blue wavelength reduces the proliferation speed and the number of fibroblasts as well as the expression of TGF-β. There are no protocols studied and established for the treatment of keloids with blue LED. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to determine the effects of the combination of PBM with blue light and the intralesional administration of the corticoid triamcinolone hexacetonide on the quality of the remaining scar by Vancouver Scar Scale in the postoperative period of keloid surgery. A randomized, controlled, double-blind, clinical trial will be conducted involving two groups: 1) Sham (n = 29): intralesional administration of corticoid (IAC) and sham PBM in the preoperative and postoperative periods of keloid removal surgery; and 2) active PBM combined with IAC (n = 29) in the preoperative and postoperative periods of keloid removal surgery. Transcutaneous PBM will be performed on the keloid region in the preoperative period and on the remaining scar in the postoperative period using blue LED (470 nm, 400 mW, 4J per point on 10 linear points). The patients will answer two questionnaires: one for the assessment of quality of life (Qualifibro-UNIFESP) and one for the assessment of satisfaction with the scar (PSAQ). The team of five plastic surgeons will answer the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS). All questionnaires will be administered one, three, six, and twelve months postoperatively. The keloids will be molded in silicone prior to the onset of treatment and prior to excision to assess pre-treatment and post-treatment size. The same will be performed for the remaining scar at one, three, six, and twelve months postoperatively. The removed keloid will be submitted to histopathological analysis for the determination of the quantity of fibroblasts, the organization and distribution of collagen (picrosirius staining), and the genic expression of TGF-β (qPCR). All data will be submitted to statistical analysis.

Trial registration: This study is registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT04824612).

Concomitant therapy of surgical shave excision and intralesional injections for ear keloids: Early results from a retrospective cohort study

Introduction

Keloids are hypertrophic scars that commonly arise in the ear region. The authors’ objectives were to (1) evaluate effectiveness of surgical shave excision followed by intralesional triamcinolone acetonide and onabotulinumtoxinA injections; and (2) evaluate safety and patient satisfaction.

Methods and Materials

This study was a retrospective chart review of patients who received treatment of extralesional surgical shave excision followed by intralesional triamcinolone acetonide and onabotulinumtoxinA injections to treat ear keloids at a single outpatient dermatology clinic. A prospective patient questionnaire was administered to the same patient population to collect recurrence and patient satisfaction.

Results

A total of 45 patients were included, consisting of 84.4% females (n = 38) and 15.6% males (n = 7) with a mean age of 25.5 years. Through retrospective chart review, early recurrence was seen in 6.7% of patients (n = 3), and via the prospective patient questionnaire, 11.1% of patients noted early keloid recurrence (n = 5). Of the patients who expressed their level of satisfaction in-clinic, 96.0% (n = 24) reported being satisfied or very satisfied and 4.0% (n = 1) were dissatisfied. Satisfaction was also assessed through the prospective patient questionnaire; of those who consented to the questionnaire, 100.0% (n = 24) were satisfied or very satisfied. Only 20.0% (n = 9) of all patients reported experiencing side effects, consisting of pruritus (11.1%; n = 5), tenderness (4.4%; n = 2), pain (2.2%; n = 1), and mild atrophy (2.2%; n = 1).

Conclusion

Extralesional surgical shave excision followed by intralesional triamcinolone acetonide and onabotulinumtoxinA injections may represent a promising treatment option for ear keloids.

Evidence Level: 3 retrospective cohort study.

Lay Summary

Keloids are a type of raised scar, which can be painful and itchy for patients. Keloids can occur on various part of the body, including on the ear. They are challenging to treat and tend to come back. There are many treatment options, however, there is not one universal best treatment for keloids on the ear. We hoped to discover if shave excision followed by intralesional triamcinolone acetonide and onabotulinumtoxinA injections is effective at treating keloids on the ear. In order to answer this we completed a chart review of clinic patients, who have already completed the following combination treatment for keloids on the ear. The keloids were treated first by physically removing the bulk of the keloid with a scalpel, which is called shave excision. After the removal, triamcinolone acetonide and onabotulinumtoxinA were injected directly into the keloid. The rate of patient satisfaction and the rate of the keloid returning were collected during in-clinic visits and an optional post-clinic patient questionnaire. The treatment effectiveness and side effects experienced were reported during in-clinic visits. This indicated that with the low rate of side effects, high patient satisfaction, and low rate of keloid return, this treatment combination should be considered as an option for keloids on the ear. However, since this review was completed at one clinic with a small population of patients, it is not fully known if this treatment combination will work for all patients.

Predictive Factors of Keloid Formation in Congenital Foot Syndactyly

Keloid formation after syndactyly division is a stressful situation for patients. In our experience, digital enlargement may be involved in keloid formation following syndactyly divisions. Therefore, we aimed to identify predictive factors and reference values for keloid formation.

Keloids: Does Patients' Sex Influence the Presentation and Recurrence post-excision?

 .

Keloid scars. Modern aspects of diagnosis and treatment

Cicatricial skin hypertrophy includes keloids and hypertrophic scars. Keloid scarring is thought to result from an imbalance between increased synthesis of collagen and extracellular matrix and decreased degradation of these products. Current knowledge of keloid pathophysiology prompts clinicians to investigate new methods for the diagnosis and treatment of keloids, as well as their prevention.

Optimizing Surgical Procedures of Auricular Keloids According to Their Anatomic Morphological Features

BACKGROUND

Aesthetic surgical reconstruction of auricular keloids is still a conundrum. This study introduces our experiences in analyzing the anatomic morphological features of auricular keloids, and devising optimized surgical procedures accordingly.

METHODS

A total of 129 ears with auricular keloids were classified and operated. All patients were followed up for at least 12 months.

RESULTS

According to their anatomic positions, auricular keloids were divided into 3 Groups (A, B, and C). The morphological features of keloids were further interpreted according to Chang-Park classification of earlobe keloids. The authors optimized surgical procedures according to the anatomic morphological features from a range of surgical techniques. The recurrence rate of Group C was statistically higher than Group A and B. There was no significant difference in recurrence rate between keloids treated with "primary suture" and "filleted flaps."

CONCLUSIONS

According to the anatomic positions and morphological features of auricular keloids, we could conveniently devise optimized surgical strategies to obtain aesthetic reconstruction of auricular keloids.

Triple treatment in ear keloids: Comparison of post-excisional intralesional steroid and platelet-rich plasma treatment

PURPOSE

Ear keloids lead to psychological problems in the patient by causing complaints, such as itching and swelling. It is highly resistant to treatment, and recurrences are frequent. In the present study, the purpose was to investigate the treatment success of the intralesional steroid and PRP combination in addition to surgical excision in ear keloids. The 5-year recurrence rates and adverse effects of both treatments were also compared in this respect.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this study, 60 patients between the ages of 16 and 65 who were followed up between 2015 and 2020 due to ear keloids were evaluated retrospectively. Patients were divided into 3 different groups (n = 20) as (A-B-C). There were patients who had only intralesional steroid injections due to ear keloids in Group A, patients who had intraoperative/postoperative steroid injections combined with surgical excision were in Group B, and patients who had intraoperative/postoperative steroid+intraoperative Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) injections combined with surgical excision were in Group C.

RESULTS

It was found that the 5-year recurrence rate was the lowest in Group C (Surgical Excision+PRP + TAC). The 5-year recurrence rate of Group C was significantly lower when compared with other groups (p < 0.05). When the 5-year recurrence rate of Group A (TAC) and B (Surgical Excision+TAC) was compared, the recurrence rate of Group B was significantly lower (p < 0.05). When the adverse effects were compared, no significant differences were detected between two Groups (A-B) in terms of Skin Atrophy and Telangiectasia. Significant differences were detected between patients in Group C and other groups (p < 0.05). No significant differences were detected between Group B and C (p = 0.832).

CONCLUSION

The combination of surgical excision with Intralesional TAC and PRP treatment in patients with ear keloids should be considered as a highly successful multimodal treatment in terms of low recurrence and adverse effects.

What Do We Know About Treating Recalcitrant Auricular Keloids? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background:

Recalcitrant auricular keloids are keloids that have recurred after any previous treatment. They have been shown to have an increased likelihood of recurrence. There is no consensus on how best to treat recalcitrant auricular keloids. Here, we perform the first systematic review and meta-analysis investigating the evidence for treating recalcitrant auricular keloids.

Methods:

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and EBM Reviews using specific keywords. Prespecified inclusion and exclusion criteria were used to assess article eligibility. Data were extracted for number of recalcitrant keloids, treatment modality, recurrence, and minimum follow-up time. Included articles were stratified by treatment and assigned a level of evidence (LOE) based on the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine guidelines. A meta-analysis was performed to estimate recurrence rates with 95% confidence intervals for each treatment modality.

Results:

A total of 887 unique articles were identified and 13 included. Eleven were LOE III and 2 were LOE IV. Recurrence rates were found to be 9% (95% CI: 3%-25%) for excision with adjuvant brachytherapy, 14% (95% CI: 12%-17%) for excision with adjuvant compression therapy, 17% (95% CI: 3%-56%) for excision with adjuvant external beam radiation, and 18% (95% CI: 4%-53%) for excision with adjuvant steroid injections. No statistical significant difference was found.

Conclusions:

Data for treatment of auricular keloids are heterogeneous with few high-quality studies. Excision with adjuvant brachytherapy has the lowest recurrence rate in our analysis. Narrow confidence intervals reported here for brachytherapy and compression therapy may help surgeons more confidently recommend either of these treatment modalities to patients.

A selective small-molecule inhibitor of c-Met suppresses keloid fibroblast growth in vitro and in a mouse model

Keloids, tumor-like lesions that result from excessive scar formation, have no definitive treatment modality. Activation of c-mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor (c-Met) promotes cell proliferation and survival. Selective c-Met inhibitors, such as PHA-665752, may attenuate the activity of keloid fibroblasts and reduce keloid formation. Here, we aimed to evaluate the effect of PHA-665752, a second-generation selective small-molecule inhibitor of c-Met, on human keloid fibroblasts in vitro and in a mouse model. We performed in vitro cytotoxicity assays, scratch tests, western blotting, and immunofluorescence on human keloid fibroblasts. We also injected human fibroblasts into severe combined immunodeficient mice and measured the degree of nodule formation and skin histologic characteristics. We found that keloid fibroblast migration was inhibited by PHA-665752. Inhibitor treatment was also associated with lower expression of members of the hepatocyte growth factor/c-Met pathway, and lower fibroblast activity and collagen synthesis. In the in vivo experiments, PHA-665752-treated mice had lower nodule volumes and weights, accompanied by less inflammatory cell infiltration and collagen deposition, than those in control mice. These findings showed that although an in vivo model may not accurately represent the pathophysiology of human keloid development, PHA-665752 suppressed keloid fibroblast activity by inhibiting the c-Met-related tyrosine kinase pathway.

Keloid Scars: An Updated Review of Combination Therapies

Keloid scars are a common yet poorly understood complication of wound healing that can cause a diminished quality of life. Currently, there is little agreement amongst the medical community regarding the best treatment modality for keloids. For this reason, we have created an updated review of the most successful combination therapies for keloid scars and compared their efficacy based on rates of recurrence following treatment. Additionally, these combination therapies have been compared with intralesional triamcinolone acetonide corticosteroid (TAC), which is considered the mainstay monotherapy for keloids. All combination therapies included in our review were shown to produce superior outcomes than TAC monotherapy. We have also found that certain combination therapies are known to produce superior results when used in specific anatomic locations. Intralesional TAC plus intralesional cryotherapy appeared to have the most promising results for non-auricular keloids, and the authors suggest considering this as a first-line treatment. Additionally, the use of surgical excision plus compression therapy achieved superior results for auricular keloids and should be considered first-line for keloids in these locations.

Chest keloids: effect of surgical excision and adjuvant radiotherapy on recurrence, a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Chest keloids are a difficult sub-group of scars to treat, likely secondary to the high wound tension in the area that promotes excessive fibroblast proliferation and collagen deposition. Excision and adjuvant radiotherapy has been demonstrated as an efficacious treatment for keloids in general, but no meta-analysis exists to support the claims for chest keloids. This study aims to identify the rate of recurrence after surgical resection and radiotherapy on patients with chest keloids.

METHODS

A search was performed using Embase, MEDLINE, Pubmed and Cochrane database on 22 December 2018 for terms 'radiotherapy', 'keloid' and 'chest'. Papers included met a prospectively designed inclusion criteria assessed by multiple investigators.

RESULTS

Twelve studies, including 1 randomized controlled trial, were included for a total of 400 patients with a chest keloid scar managed with surgical excision and adjuvant radiotherapy. Overall pooled-estimate of recurrence rate was 22% (95% CI 12-32%). Meta-regression did not demonstrate a significant effect for method of wound closure, type of radiotherapy, radiotherapy dose (BED₁₀ ) and study type.

CONCLUSION

Excision and adjuvant radiotherapy represents an effective method of treatment for chest keloids, however sufficient prospective data, including randomized controlled trials, did not yet exist to support these findings. Further studies with sufficient sub-group analysis for keloid location are required to add to the pool of literature that can be added to this meta-analysis.

Outcome of recurrent auricular keloid treatment with a combination of surgical excision and perioperative corticosteroid injection

Background:

Auricular keloids that occur after ear piercing or other traumas can challenge surgeons as recurrence is frequent; there has been no consensus about the best management protocol. Surgical excision combined with perioperative corticosteroid injections is frequently used as first-line therapy, but recurrent auricular keloids are usually shifted to a combination of radiotherapy and surgical excision.

Objectives:

The objective is to evaluate the rate of recurrence when recurrent auricular keloids are treated with surgical excision with perioperative corticosteroid injections.

Materials and Methods:

Between February 2017 and January 2020, 41 patients (52 auricles) with recurrent auricular keloids were treated by extralesional keloid excision combined with five corticosteroid steroid injections (two preoperative, one intraoperative, and two postoperative doses). Recurrence was recorded if the surgical scar showed hypertrophy or started to rise above the level of the margins.

Results:

The mean postoperative follow-up was 13.04 months (ranging from 6 to 24 months). Recurrence was recorded in five auricles (9.6%) during the follow-up period.

Conclusion:

Perioperative corticosteroid injections combined with surgical excision of auricular keloids are still a valid option in recurrent cases, and it is a useful choice when radiotherapy facilities are limited.

Outcomes of Surgical Excision and High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy for Earlobe Keloids

BACKGROUND

Radiotherapy as an adjuvant therapy to surgical resection has shown variable rates of recurrence treating earlobe keloids. The purpose of this study was to describe our experience with surgical excision followed by high-dose-rate brachytherapy and present our outcomes after 24 months of follow-up.

METHODS

Retrospective chart of 14 patients with 14 earlobe keloids treated with surgical excision followed by high-dose-rate brachytherapy, between January 2015 and May 2016 were enrolled. Database included demographics, Fitzpatrick skin type, laterality, lesion size, and follow-up visits information. Outcomes were assessed in terms of keloid recurrence rates, complications, and patient subjective aesthetical result satisfaction after 24 months of follow-up.

RESULTS

All procedures were completed without complications. Three patients experienced keloid recurrence after 6 (14.28%) and 12 months (7.14%). Three patients experienced mild signs of self-limited post-radiation dermatitis. Self-assessment of aesthetical result was considered "very good" in 71.43% of patients.

CONCLUSION

Surgical excision followed by high-dose-rate brachytherapy is secure and effective to treat earlobe keloids, and can be considered a first line combined treatment. Larger clinical trials comparing different irradiation protocols are still needed.

Single Institution Experience of Postoperative Electron Beam Radiation Therapy in the Treatment of Keloids

Purpose

Surgical excision followed by postoperative radiation therapy is an accepted modality to prevent keloid recurrence. Our practice has been to use electron beam radiation postoperatively to prevent recurrence, and we share our experience with this method in this study.

Methods and Materials

Twenty-two patients with 40 keloids treated postoperatively with electron beam radiation at our institution from 2014 to 2019 were analyzed retrospectively. Electron beam radiation was used for treatment in all cases, and radiation was initiated within 24 hours of surgery. A dose of 20 Gy in 5 fractions was delivered to the postoperative scar in 95% of the sites, and 8 Gy to 10 Gy in a single fraction was delivered to the remaining 5%. The patients were followed up, and recurrences were documented.

Results

At a mean follow-up of 35 months (range, 7-66 months), local control and cosmesis were achieved in 90% (36 of 40) of the treated sites with electron beam radiation therapy delivered at a dose of 20 Gy in 5 fractions. All recurrent keloids were located on the anterior chest wall over the sternum. There was no difference in outcome based on age, sex, or keloid length.

Conclusions

Electron beam radiation therapy is a feasible, convenient, and safe modality for postoperative treatment of keloids. It achieves excellent local control with no grade 3 or higher toxicities.

Keloids: a review of therapeutic management

Keloid scar formation arises from a disorganized fibroproliferative collagen response that extends beyond the original wound margins because of excessive production of extracellular matrix (ECM). Despite treatment options for keloid scars including medical and surgical therapies, such as intralesional steroid injection and surgical excision, the recurrence rate remains high. Herein we consolidate recently published narrative reviews, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses to provide an overview of updated treatment recommendations for keloidal scar formation. PubMed search engine was used to access the MEDLINE database to investigate updates regarding keloid incidence and treatment. More than 100 articles were reviewed. Keloid management remains a multimodal approach. There continues to be no gold standard of treatment that provides a consistently low recurrence rate; however, the increasing number of available treatments and synergistic combinations of these treatments (i.e., laser-based devices in combination with intralesional steroids, or 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in combination with steroid therapy) is showing favorable results. Future studies could target the efficacy of novel treatment modalities (i.e., autologous fat grafting or stem cell-based therapies) for keloid management. This review article provides updated treatment guidelines for keloids and discusses insight into management to assist patient-focused, evidence-based clinical decision making.

Experience Treating Earlobe Keloids with Laser Diode 980nm Excision Followed by Triamcinolone Infiltration

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Lasers have a favorable synergistic effect when combined with other modalities of treatment against keloids. Different types of lasers have been used with triamcinolone infiltration, resulting in promising success rates. The purpose of this study is to describe our first experience treating earlobe keloids with 980 nm laser diode excision followed by triamcinolone infiltration and present our outcomes after 24 months of follow-up.

STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective chart review of 11 patients with 14 earlobe keloids treated with excision using a 980 nm laser diode followed by triamcinolone acetonide infiltration, between January 2015 and May 2016. Database included demographics, Fitzpatrick skin type, laterality, lesion size, and postoperative visits information. Outcomes were assessed in terms of keloid recurrence rates, complications, and patient subjective aesthetical result satisfaction after 24 months of follow-up.

RESULTS

All procedures were technically completed, and follow-up accomplished without attrition. One (7.14%) patient experienced keloid recurrence after the third month. Four (28.57%) patients experienced early wound dehiscence, successfully treated with debridement and re-suture. Self-assessment of aesthetical result was considered "very good" in 64.28% of patients.

CONCLUSION

Surgical excision with 980 nm laser diode followed by triamcinolone infiltration is well-tolerated and shows favorable results treating earlobe keloids, and can be considered a first-line treatment. Comparison between different types of lasers and control groups in large clinical trials is warranted in order to obtain strong clinical evidence for clear indications and recommendations. Lasers Surg. Med. © 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Keloids: Which Types Can Be Excised without Risk of Recurrence? A New Clinical Classification

A surgical team from Interplast-Germany removed 387 keloids in 302 patients during 4 visits to Goma, Democratic Republic of the Congo, from 2015-2018. Preoperative and postoperative photographs and a thorough anamnesis of keloids were done for all patients. In addition, 18 selected biopsies from 4 types of keloids were histologically examined in Germany.

Methods

Treatment options were tested and keloid recurrence rates were compared with data from questionnaires, photographs, and histology.

Results

Keloids were classified accordingly as follows: (1) fresh nodular (continuously growing) keloids had a 30% recurrence rate after surgery: no common adjuvant therapy but triamcinolone acetonide (TAC) injections on onset, only; (a) earlobe keloids had the lowest recurrence rate after complete excision with negative resection margins; (2) superficial spreading (or butterfly) keloids were treated with TAC injections only; (3) mature (nongrowing or burned-out) keloids had also a low recurrence rate of 4.5%, which were then treated with TAC on onset, only; and (4) multiple keloids comprise various types in different stages.

Conclusions

According to this classification, about 50% of keloids may be removed surgically without risk of recurrence in the examined patient population in Africa, where only TAC injections, but no radiation, are available. Adjuvant TAC or radiation should be started at the onset of recurrence and not generally.

Risk factors of recurrence after postoperative electron beam radiation therapy for keloid: Comparison of long-term local control rate

Aim

To investigate the new risk factors for keloid recurrence after postoperative electron beam radiotherapy (RT) and evaluate the effectiveness of tranilast in combination with electron beam RT by comparing the local control rate.

Background

Identifying patients at high risk of recurrence after postoperative RT for keloids remains a challenge. Besides, no study examined the effectiveness of tranilast in combination with RT after surgery for the prevention of keloids recurrence.

Materials and Methods

This study included 75 lesions in 59 consecutive patients who had undergone postoperative RT at our institute. The follow-up period and prescription of tranilast were examined beside several potential risk factors, such as multiple lesions, size, and shape.

Results

The median follow-up was 72 months (range, 6-147 months). Twenty-one lesions in 17 patients recurred in a median of 12 months after treatment (range, 1-60 months). Local control rates of all 75 lesions were estimated as 93%, 78%, 70%, and 68% at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years. Multiple lesions constituted a significant risk of recurrence (P = 0.03). A larger long axis was significantly related to the recurrence (P < 0.01). Irregular shape was associated with a significantly worse local control rate (P = 0.02). There was no significant difference in the local control rate between patients receiving tranilast and those who did not (P = 0.52).

Conclusions

Multiple lesions and irregular shape were risk factors of keloid recurrence after postoperative electron beam RT. The effectiveness of tranilast was not demonstrated in the study.

Combined surgical excision and electron external beam radiation improves the treatment of keloids: A descriptive study

Keloids are firm, fibrous nodules that form on an individual's skin and are associated with difficult symptoms as well as high recurrence rates. This study aims to improve the surgical techniques that reduce local tension after surgical excision of keloids as well as applying adjuvant radiotherapy to suppress scar formation. A total of 58 patients aged between 21 and 76 years received surgical incision of keloid and immediate postoperation low-dose radiotherapy. All patient follow-ups were performed at the out-patient department. Any sign of a keloid at the incision site was defined as treatment failure or keloid recurrence, regardless of the size. At a median follow-up of 22 months, the overall recurrence for all lesions was 8.6%, which is improved compared with previous study. In addition, all incisions performed during surgeries were healed and no signs of necrosis or the development of ulcers was observed. Our study suggests that this combined therapy provides excellent local control of keloids and shows promise for future therapy.

Auricular keloid management in Asian skin: Clinical outcome of intralesional excision and postoperative triamcinolone acetonide intralesional injection

BACKGROUND

Various options such as surgical excision, steroid injection, cryotherapy, pressure dressing, and radiation therapy are available for the treatment of auricular keloids. In particular, auricular keloid therapy using surgical excision is important because recurrence rates are low compared with keloids occurring in other parts of the body.

AIMS

We aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of intralesional excision followed by postoperative triamcinolone acetonide intralesional injection (TA ILI) as auricular keloid treatments.

METHODS

We conducted a surgery records and chart review of patients who underwent auricular keloid treatment with intralesional excision and TA ILI. Reduction in height and volume was assessed by two blinded dermatologists. We also analyzed the recurrence rate over a 2-year period and evaluated patient satisfaction using an 11-point questionnaire (0-10).

RESULTS

Eighteen Korean patients (2 males and 16 females) with a mean age of 26.5 years and a total of 20 lesions were evaluated. Lesion types by descending frequency were lobular (n = 10, 50%), anterior/posterior button (n = 3, 15%), wrap-around (n = 3, 15%), dumbbell (n = 2, 10%), and sessile (n = 2, 10%). The total recurrence rate was 5% (1/20) within the 24-month follow-up period. Significant reduction (> 50%) in height and volume was achieved in 95% of patients. No serious or persistent adverse events were reported during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSION

We confirmed that TA ILI after intralesional excision can be effective for auricular keloid management. A low recurrence rate similar to that of postoperative radiation therapy was obtained with an effective surgical procedure and minimal postoperative treatment.

[Complications of cosmetic piercings and tattoos in the head and neck region]

Piercings and tattoos have gained popularity across all cultural environments during the past century, and one in ten Europeans are now pierced. While tattoos are often restricted to the rest of the body, piercings are common at facial sites such as ears, nose, lips, and tongue. Complications following piercings are not uncommon. Infections can rapidly spread across the auricular cartilage and require antibiotic and often surgical treatment. Mild trauma (i.e., piercing the earlobe) can lead to excessive scar formation due to fibroblast proliferation. Keloids have a particularly high rate of recurrence and are therefore difficult to treat. Due to recent developments in the field of permanent makeup, tattooing techniques are also increasingly applied in the head and neck region. Here, complications such as infection or allergic reactions can occur. Topical medication or laser procedures are the usual therapeutic options.

Managing keloid scars: From radiation therapy to actual and potential drug deliveries

The aetiology of keloids is becoming clearer, but many questions remain, including about the most optimal treatment. Current therapies include surgical excision, radiotherapy, and various pharmaceutical drugs. However, none of these drugs are keloid-specific. Moreover, all current interventions are associated with high recurrence rates. Here, we review the pharmaceutical interventions that are currently available. All are based on the fact that keloids are an expanding solid mass with intense chronic inflammation at its advancing edges. Consequently, current pharmaceuticals aim to reduce the mass and/or symptoms of keloids, similar to surgery and radiotherapy. They include chemotherapies, immunotherapies, volume-reducing therapies, and anti-inflammatory therapies. We also describe new advances in keloid pharmaceuticals. They include drugs that were designed to treat systemic diseases such as hypertension or breast cancer but were found to also treat keloids. Furthermore, recent progress in genetic, epigenetic, and stem cell therapies suggests that they could become useful in the keloid field. This review of pharmaceutical advances will hopefully promote additional research and the development of effective and specific pharmaceuticals for keloids.

A multimodal therapeutic approach improves the clinical outcome of auricular keloid patients

OBJECTIVE

We retrospectively studied the efficacy of personalized therapy with surgical resection plus prophylactic management of postsurgical auricular keloids by intralesional injection of betamethasone and local pressure therapy using magnets in patients with auricular keloids.

METHODS

Surgical excision was performed in all patients, and surgical techniques including fusiform excision of the keloid scar, core excision of the keloid scar followed by flap repair, and scar graft were chosen.

RESULTS

A total of 85 patients with 98 auricular keloids were eligible. Seventy-two (74%) patients had primary auricular keloids, and 13 patients had recurrent keloids after surgical excision. Keloids, were located in the helix in 28 (32.9%) cases, in the earlobe in 45 (52.9%) cases, and in the entire auricle in 12 (14.1%) cases. The size of auricular keloids ranged from 10 to 35 mm. Surgical resection was uneventful in all cases. Twenty-one (21.4%) patients received fusiform excision, 47 (47.9%) patients underwent core excision and flap repair, and 30 (30.6%) patients received skin grafts. The patients were followed up for median duration of 1 year (range: 12-24 months). The cure rate was 87.2%, and the recurrence rate was 12.8%.

CONCLUSION

A personalized surgical approach based on the characteristics of auricular keloids in each patient and a multimodal therapeutic regimen including surgical excision, glucocorticoid blockade, and intralesional injection of glucocorticoids and pressure therapy improve the cure rate and reduce the recurrence rate of auricular keloids.

Radiation Therapy in Keloids Treatment: History, Strategy, Effectiveness, and Complication

Objective:

Radiation therapy combined with surgical excision was considered as one of the most effective treatment plans for keloid lesions. However, there was no unanimity found over present literatures regarding the issue on optimized treatment strategy for keloids. We here provide a comprehensive review over this issue and emphasize on the influencing factors.

Data Sources:

The data analyzed in this review were searched from articles included in PubMed and EMBASE databases.

Study Selection:

The original articles and critical reviews discussing the application of radiation therapy in keloids treatment were selected for this review.

Results:

The application of radiation therapy has transitioned from simple superficial X-ray irradiation to brachytherapy. Furthermore, several factors including radiation type, dose, fraction, interval, and complications were reviewed, and the results revealed that these factors were significant toward clinical outcome at various levels.

Conclusions:

Both past and present evidence support the idea that combination therapy of radiation and surgical therapy is safe and feasible. However, the optimization of treatment strategy was based on different radiation types and should take dose, fractions, interval, and complications into consideration, which will then decrease the rate of recurrence and increase the level of satisfaction.

Optimal High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy Fractionation Scheme After Keloid Excision: A Retrospective Multicenter Comparison of Recurrence Rates and Complications

PURPOSE

To determine the optimal brachytherapy dose and fractionation scheme for keloid treatment.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patient cohorts from 3 centers treated with keloid excision followed by 2 × 9 Gy, 3 × 6 Gy, or 2 × 6 Gy high-dose-rate brachytherapy were retrospectively compared regarding recurrence (after at least 12 months' follow-up) and complications (after at least 1 month's follow-up), using logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 238 keloids were treated. An overall full recurrence rate of 8.3% was found. After correction for confounders (sex, skin color, keloid location, keloid duration) no statistically significant differences in recurrence rates could be discerned between fractionation schemes. There were 12.8% major and 45.6% minor complication rates. Lower radiation dose resulted in significantly fewer complications (odds ratio 0.35, P=.015).

CONCLUSIONS

After excision of resistant keloids, high-dose-rate brachytherapy with a biological equivalent dose of approximately 20 Gy is recommended, on the basis of low recurrence and complication rates.

TIEG1 Represses Smad7-Mediated Activation of TGF-β1/Smad Signaling in Keloid Pathogenesis

Transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β)/Smad signaling plays a key role in excessive fibrosis and keloid formations. Smad7 is a negative feedback regulator that prevents activation of TGF-β/Smad signaling. However, the regulatory mechanism for Smad7 in the keloid pathogenic process remains elusive. Here, we show that expression of TIEG1 is markedly higher in keloid fibroblasts, whereas protein, mRNA, and promoter activity levels of Smad7 are decreased. When TIEG1 was knocked down with small interfering RNA, both the promoter activity and protein expression of Smad7 were increased, whereas collagen production and the proliferation, migration, and invasion of keloid fibroblasts were decreased. In contrast, TIEG1 overexpression led to a decrease in Smad7 expression and Smad7 promoter activity. Upon TGF-β1 stimulation, TIEG1 promoted Smad2 phosphorylation by down-regulating Smad7. Luciferase reporter assays and chromatin immunoprecipitation assays further showed that TIEG1 can directly bind a GC-box/Sp1 site located between nucleotides -1392 and -1382 in the Smad7 promoter to repress Smad7 promoter activity. Taken together, these findings show that TIEG1 is highly expressed in human keloids and that it directly binds and represses Smad7 promoter-mediated activation of TGF-β/Smad2 signaling, thus providing clues for development of TIEG1 blocking strategies for therapy or prophylaxis of keloids.

Massive ear keloids: Natural history, evaluation of risk factors and recommendation for preventive measures - A retrospective case series

Keloid disorder (KD) is an inherited wound healing ailment, frequently seen among Africans /African Americans and Asians.  Genetics of this disorder continues to be obscure and poorly understood.  Clinical manifestation of KD is quite variable and very diverse, spanning from individuals with one or very few small keloidal lesions, to those with numerous and very large lesions covering large portion of their skin. Ears are common locations for development of keloids.  Ear piercing is by far the leading triggering factor for ear keloid formation in genetically predisposed individuals. Although there are numerous publications about ear and earlobe keloids, there is a void in medical literature about massive ear keloids.  This paper focuses on the natural history of massive ear keloids and risk factors that lead to formation of these life-changing and debilitating tumors and recommendations for prevention.

Cutaneous basal cell carcinoma arising within a keloid scar: a case report

Basal cell carcinomas (BCCs) are one of the most frequent cutaneous malignancies. The majority of BCCs are reported to occur on the auricular helix and periauricular region due to ultraviolet light exposure. Despite the frequency of BCCs, those that develop within scar tissue are rare, and the phenomenon of keloid BCCs has rarely been reported in the literature. Keloid collagen within BCCs is associated with morphoeiform characteristics, ulceration, or necrosis. Extensive keloid collagen is often seen in BCCs of the ear region, a site prone to keloid scarring. This article presents a rare case of a secondary tumor (BCC) which arose on top of a primary tumor (keloid scar) on the right auricle region in a healthy 23-year-old female after an ear piercing 2 years prior. To our knowledge, the tumor described in this case, in contrast to keloidal BCCs, has never been reported in the literature.