Evidence-Based Medicine: Nonsyndromic Craniosynostosis

Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Individuals with Non-Syndromic Craniosynostosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

It is not yet understood whether, and to what extent, craniosynostosis impacts the development of Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). This PRISMA compliant and PROSPERO pre-registered (ID: CRD42023458640) systematic review and meta-analysis examines the association of single-suture, non-syndromic craniosynostosis with ADHD and inattention/hyperactivity symptoms. Data from 17 independent studies (Nparticipants = 2,389; Mage = 7.3 years) were analyzed, taking into consideration suture location, surgical status, age, and measures administered, where feasible. Few differences were found between cases and controls, but some studies reported high symptom levels. Additional research is required utilizing larger sample sizes and more comprehensive assessment of ADHD.

Parental satisfaction with hospital care for children with non-syndromic craniosynostosis: A mixed-method study

PURPOSE

The study aims to investigate factors influencing parents' satisfaction with hospital care for children with craniosynostosis during hospitalization for surgery.

DESIGN AND METHODS

A mixed-methods study with a convergent, parallel design was used. Ninety-five parents responded to the Swedish Pyramid Questionnaire for Treatment, a 25-item questionnaire with six quality domains. In addition, 20 parents were interviewed about their experiences. Frequencies were calculated, and content analysis was used to analyze free-text comments and transcribed interviews.

RESULTS

Parents' assessment of the overall quality of care was high (mean 87%, range 10-100%). They were most satisfied in the domain staff attitudes and less satisfied with information routines and participation. Content analysis of the interviews gave two overarching themes: Factors that parents experienced as facilitating good quality of care and Factors that parents experienced as impeding good quality of care.

CONCLUSIONS

Parents were generally satisfied with the care provided, and interviews captured parents´ views on important factors. Staff attitudes affected parents' perception of quality of care.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

Clear information and dialogue as well as making parents feel they are part of their child's team can result in higher satisfaction, and allowing families to stay together in the hospital can ease the hospitalization experience. Using a theoretical model can help in suggesting relevant caring actions based on parents' reported care experiences.

The effect of continuous positive airway pressure on obstructive sleep apnea in children with syndromic craniosynostosis

BACKGROUND

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is common in children with syndromic craniosynostosis (SC). However, objective data on the treatment of OSA in children with SC remain inadequate. This study aimed to explore the efficacy of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in the management of OSA in children with SC.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed in children with SC and OSA diagnosed by polysomnography (PSG), which was defined as an apnea hypopnea index (AHI) ≥ 1. Patients were included if they were treated with CPAP and had baseline PSG and follow-up sleep studies. Clinical and demographic data were collected from all enrolled subjects.

RESULTS

A total of 45 children with SC and OSA were identified, with an average age of 6.8 ± 4.7 years. Among them, 36 cases had moderate to severe OSA (22 with severe OSA) and received CPAP therapy followed by post-treatment sleep studies. Notably, there was a significant reduction in the AHI observed after CPAP treatment (3.0 [IQR: 1.7, 4.6] versus 38.6 [IQR: 18.2, 53.3] events/h; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

CPAP is effective and acceptable in treating severe OSA in children with SC.

Surgical Treatment of Anterior Plagiocephaly With Limited Calvarial Osteotomy

OBJECTIVE

Anterior plagiocephaly is a condition in which the unicoronal suture is prematurely fused and the skull shape will change due to asymmetric growth.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study describing the unilateral limited frontal osteotomy for remodeling deformed areas in the frontal and orbital bone and its pros and cons.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients were included in the study, with a mean age of 16.8 (±11.7) months. Mean intraoperative bleeding was 78.1 (±23.6) mL. One (3.57%) patient developed postoperative bleeding, around 200 mL. After 12 months, all patients (100%) had grade I Whitaker.

CONCLUSION

The described technique is safe and may have promising short-term outcomes for the correction of anterior plagiocephaly.

Nonsyndromic Craniofacial Disorders

We describe the investigation and management of select pediatric craniofacial disorders their recent advances. Positional plagiocephaly: The incidence of positional plagiocephaly has increased since the institution of the "safe to sleep" campaign to reduce sudden infant death syndrome. Positional plagiocephaly may be associated with underlying developmental delay. Nonsyndromic craniosynostosis: Treatment of nonsyndromic craniosynostosis depends on the age of the patient and the suture involved. Pediatric skull lesions: Management of skull lesions depends on histologic diagnosis. Some benign skull lesions are managed conservatively, whereas erosive and malignant lesions may require surgical excision, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or multimodality treatment.

Minor Suture Fusion is Associated With Chiari Malformation in Nonsyndromic Craniosynostosis

Here, we focused on the association between minor suture fusion and Chiari malformation (CM) occurrence in nonsyndromic craniosynostosis (NSC), and evaluated how the minor suture affects the posterior cranial fossa by measuring the posterior fossa deflection angle (PFA). In this retrospective study, the clinical records of 137 patients who underwent surgery for NSC at Aichi Children's Health and Medical Center between April 2010 and May 2022 were analyzed. Clinical data from Aichi Developmental Disability Center Central Hospital was collected for 23 patients as the external validation set. Among the 137 patients, 123 were diagnosed with NSC and the remaining 14 with syndromic craniosynostosis. Of the 123 NSC patients, 23 patients presented with CM. Multivariate analysis showed that occipito-mastoid fusion was the only significant risk factor for CM ( P =0.0218). Within the NSC group, CM patients had a significantly increased PFA (6.33±8.10 deg) compared with those without CM (2.76±3.29 deg, P =0.0487). Nonsyndromic craniosynostosis patients with occipito-mastoid suture fusion had a significantly increased PFA (6.50±7.60 deg) compared with those without occipito-mastoid fusion (2.60±3.23 deg, P =0.0164). In the validation cohort, occipito-mastoid suture fusion was validated as an independent risk factor for CM in univariate analysis. Minor suture fusion may cause CM associated with NSC. Chiari malformation could develop due to an increased PFA due to minor suture fusion, which causes growth disturbance in the affected side and compensatory dilation in the contralateral side within the posterior cranial fossa.

Can Craniosynostosis be Diagnosed on Physical Examination? A Retrospective Review

Craniosynostosis is a developmental craniofacial defect in which one or more sutures of the skull fuse together prematurely. Uncorrected craniosynostosis may have serious complications including elevated intracranial pressure, developmental delay, and blindness. Proper diagnosis of craniosynostosis requires a physical examination of the head with assessment for symmetry and palpation of sutures for prominence. Often, if craniosynostosis is suspected, computed tomography (CT) imaging will be obtained. Recent literature has posited that this is unnecessary. This study aims to address whether physical examination alone is sufficient for the diagnosis and treatment planning of single suture craniosynostosis. Between 2015 and 2022, the Divisions of Pediatric Neurosurgery and Pediatric Plastic Surgery at UTHealth Houston evaluated 140 children under 36 months of age with suspected craniosynostosis by physical examination and subsequently ordered CT imaging for preoperative planning. Twenty-three patients received a clinical diagnosis of multi-sutural or syndromic craniosynostosis that was confirmed by CT. One hundred seventeen patients were diagnosed with single suture craniosynostosis on clinical examination and follow-up CT confirmed suture fusion in 109 (93.2%) patients and identified intracranial anomalies in 7 (6.0%) patients. These patients underwent surgical correction. Eight (6.8%) patients showed no evidence of craniosynostosis on CT imaging. Treatment for patients without fused sutures included molding helmets and observation alone. This evidence suggests that physical examination alone may be inadequate to accurately diagnose single suture synostosis, and surgery without preoperative CT evaluation could lead to unindicated procedures.

Ethical Considerations in Surgery for Single-suture Craniosynostosis

Singe-suture craniosynostosis (SSC) describes the premature fusion of one cranial suture, which restricts cranial growth and consequently results in unaffected regions presenting a compensatory expansion. Surgery can redistribute intracranial volume, reduce the risk of elevated intracranial pressure, and improve head shape, potentially leading to improved neurocognitive function and social acceptance. However, there is limited evidence that surgery for SSC improves neurocognitive function and social acceptance. Given the inherent surgical risks and uncertainty of outcomes, the conditions under which this surgery should be allowed remain uncertain. Here, we discuss ethical questions regarding the permissibility of surgery, value of neurocognitive function and social acceptance, research ethics associated with SSC, patient autonomy and parental roles, and the process of recommending surgery and obtaining consent. Because surgery for SSC has become a routine procedure, its practice now presents a relatively low risk of complications. Furthermore, having acquired an understanding of the risks associated with this surgery, such knowledge fulfils the principle of non-maleficence although not beneficence. Thus, we advocate that surgery should only be offered within Institutional Review Board-approved research projects. In these situations, decisions concerning enrollment in scientific research involves health care providers and parents or guardians of the child, with the former acting as gate-keepers upon recognition of a lack of coping skills on the part of the parent or guardian in dealing with unforeseen outcomes. To minimize associated surgical risks and maximize its benefits, there exists a moral obligation to refer patients only to highly specialized centers.

Three-Dimensional Assessment of Frontal Bossing and Temporal Pinching in Patients with Sagittal Craniosynostosis Using Curvature Analysis

BACKGROUND

Sagittal craniosynostosis results in varying degrees of frontal bossing and bilateral temporal pinching. This study assessed the three-dimensional changes in these regions using curvature analysis and volumetric analysis before and 1 year after extended sagittal strip craniectomy (ESC) with postoperative helmet therapy.

METHODS

A retrospective review of three-dimensional photographs of 50 subjects treated with ESC with postoperative helmet therapy and 50 age-matched controls was performed. Images were collected preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively. Forehead convexity and temple concavity were quantified. Computed tomographic scans of subjects with and without sagittal synostosis were analyzed to assess the percentage of total intracranial volume (ICV) in the anterior cranial fossa before and after ESC with postoperative helmet therapy.

RESULTS

Forehead convexity in the ESC with postoperative helmet therapy group preoperatively (24.49 ± 3.16 m -1 ) was significantly greater than controls (22.48 ± 3.84 m -1 ; P = 0.005). Forehead convexity significantly decreased after ESC with postoperative helmet therapy (18.79 ± 2.43 m -1 ; P < 0.001) and did not differ from controls (19.67 ± 3.08 m -1 ; P = 0.115). The ESC group had more concave temples preoperatively (-10.27 ± 4.37 m -1 ) as compared with controls (-6.99 ± 3.55 m -1 ; P < 0.001). Temple concavity significantly decreased after ESC (-4.82 ± 3.17 m -1 ; P < 0.001) and did not differ from controls (-5.64 ± 3.27 m -1 ; P = 0.075). In the ESC group, the percentage ICV in the anterior cranial fossa decreased from 22.03% to 18.99% after surgery, whereas the anterior volume in controls was stable (17.74% to 16.81%).

CONCLUSIONS

The ESC group had significantly greater forehead convexity, temple concavity and anterior cranial fossa volume compared with controls. One year after ESC with postoperative helmet therapy, forehead convexity, temple concavity, and percentage ICV in the anterior fossa were comparable to controls.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, IV.

Academic Achievement in School-Aged Children with Single Suture Craniosynostosis Over Time

Introduction: Children with single suture craniosynostosis (SSC) are at risk for neurocognitive problems. The reported magnitude of differences between children with SSC and their normative peers on standardized tests of academic and intellectual ability are small. Evaluation of real-world academic outcomes of these children and its impact on educational resources have not been conducted. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of academic outcomes of children with SSC was conducted using the data from Ontario's Education Quality and Accountability Office (EQAO) standardized provincial reading, writing and mathematics tests. The need for special education was identified by documentation of the child's need for an Identification, Placement, and Review Committee (IPRC). Results: Of 296 eligible children, 42 participated in the study. Half of the children had sagittal synostosis, while the remaining were 10 (24%) unicoronal, 9 (21%) metopic, and 2 (5%) lambdoid synostosis. Thirty-six (86%) underwent operative management. The EQAO scores of operated children with SSC met the provincial academic standards on the Grade 3 and 6 EQAO scores across the 3 academic subjects. Converted grade-matched EQAO scores decreased in reading and writing over time, while math improved. Of the 21 patients with special education data, one child required an IPRC in Grade 3, while an additional four (24%) required an IPRC in Grade 6. Conclusions: Operated children with SSC had average academic performance, however, their needs appeared to change over time. Future studies are needed to evaluate academic difficulties and special education needs as these children progress through grade school.

Infants With Trigonocephaly Treated With Fronto-Orbital Remodelling and Endocortical Positioning of Resorbable Plates-A Retrospective Cohort Study Including 101 Patients

PURPOSE

Fronto-orbital remodeling is the gold standard for surgical treatment of metopic synostosis in many craniofacial centers. For fixation, resorbable materials are widely used. Because of swelling during resorption, the positioning of the plates can be relevant. Therefore, the goal of this study was to investigate whether there are limitations to endocortical positioning of resorbable plates.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, all patients with metopic craniosynostosis resulting in trigonocephaly, who were treated with a standardized fronto-orbital remodeling and endocortical positioning of resorbable plates, between February 2012 and December 2019 were included. The endpoint of this study was the postoperative complications that can be attributed to the material used.

RESULTS

A total of 101 patients, who were treated at our unit, could be included with a male predominance, 81 (80.2%) boys versus 20 (19.8%) girls. Surgery was performed at a median age of 9 months (±2.56). No complications were seen related to resorbable plates. All patients of our study population were categorized as Whitaker classification I and II.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that the risk level in using endocortical resorbable plates positioned on the inner surface of the bone is low. From an aesthetic point of view, we could not detect any disadvantage.

Evaluation of Complications and Outcomes in Craniosynostosis by Age of Operation: Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatric

Considerable controversy exists around the optimal age on which to operate for craniosynostosis. This study aims to use data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatric to assess the impact of operative age on hospital stay and outcomes. After excluding patients who underwent endoscopic cranial vault remodeling, a total of 3292 patients met inclusion criteria in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatric between 2012 and 2019. Median age at surgery was 300 days (interquartile range: 204-494). Patients between 0 and 6 months underwent the highest proportion of complex cranial vault remodeling, Current Procedural Terminology 61,558 ( n =44, 7.7%) and Current Procedural Terminology 61,559 ( n =317, 55.1%). White blood cell counts peaked in the 12 to 18 months group, and were lowest in the 24± months group. Hematocrit was lowest in the 0 to 6 months group and rose steadily to the 24± months group; the inverse pattern was found in platelet concentration, which was highest in the youngest patients and lowest in the oldest. Prothrombin time, international normalized ratio, and partial thromboplastin time were relatively consistent across all age groups. Younger patients had significantly shorter operating room times, which increased with patient age ( P <0.001). Younger patients also had significantly shorter length of stay ( P =0.009), though length of stay peaked between 12 and 18 months. There was a significantly lower rate of surgical site infection in younger patients, which occurred in 0.7% of patients 0 to 12 months and 1.0 to 3.0% in patients over 12 to 24± months. There was no significant difference in the average number of transfusions required in any age group ( P =0.961).

Longitudinal Assessment of Neurodevelopment in Patients With Nonsyndromic Single-Suture Craniosynostosis: A Retrospective Review of 66 Cases

The neurodevelopmental consequences of nonsyndromic single-suture (NSS) craniosynostosis are the subject of continued debate. Although the predictive validity of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Third Edition) (BSID-III) have been questioned, this neurodevelopmental testing battery continues to be widely utilized among multidisciplinary craniofacial teams. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the neurodevelopmental functioning of patients with NSS craniosynostosis before and after surgical correction and the impact of surgical correction on neurodevelopmental trajectory based on BSID-III testing. All patients with NSS craniosynostosis who underwent cranial vault remodeling between 2009 and 2020 were considered for inclusion. Patients who failed to complete BSID-III testing within 2 months of surgery preoperatively and 2 years of surgery postoperatively were excluded. A total of 66 patients met criteria for the study. On language testing, both the preoperative mean score (P=0.007) and postoperative mean score (P=0.003) were significantly lower than the population norm. Furthermore, on motor testing, both the preoperative mean score (P=0.005) and postoperative mean score (P=0.001) were significantly lower than the population norm. Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Third Edition) testing revealed no significant change between preoperative and postoperative neurodevelopmental functioning. Overall, this study suggests that patients with NSS craniosynostosis experience modest delays in language and motor development, which are present before and after cranial vault remodeling. In addition, this study provides evidence that cranial vault remodeling does not significantly impact the neurodevelopmental trajectory. Multicenter st udies and refined neurodevelopmental testing methods are necessary to definitively establish the neurodevelopmental implications of NSS craniosynostosis.

Assessing Long-Term Neurodevelopment among Children with Non-Syndromic Single Suture Craniosynostosis

Background:

Single suture craniosynostosis (SSC) is a disorder, affecting brain growth. Reviewing literature reveals controversialists of papers in this field.

Methods:

This prospective study was conducted from 2014 to 2016. All the individuals, aged 2 to 16 years, whose medical records files were complete, with SSC from 1999 to 2013 were included. All patients had undergone cranial vault remodeling at Mofid Hospital, Tehran, Iran. Wechsler questionnaires, WPPSI-III and WISC-IV, were completed for each child based on his/her age.

Results:

Seventy children were included, with the mean age of 6.7 (±2.9) years. Forty-six (65.7%) children were boys while 24 (34.3%) were girls. Mean FSIQ for all of children was 95.5 (±13.2). Mean verbal IQ, performance IQ, verbal comprehension, perceptual reasoning, processing speed, and working memory are 93.4 (±14.1), 96.1 (±13.3), 97.5 (±13.9), 102.2 (±12.5), 94.5 (±9.8), and 97.5 (±12.9), respectively. There was statistically significant difference between FSIQ of children with SSC and that of unaffected children (P-value<0.05). There was significant difference between verbal IQ of children with SSC and that of unaffected ones (P-value< 0.007). There was significant difference between in processing speed between affected children and unaffected children (P-value<0.012).

Conclusion:

Children, aged 2 to 6 years, with SSC had a significantly lower Verbal IQ, and children, aged 6 to 16 years, with SSC had a significantly lower processing speed than their healthy counterparts. Though FSIQ of children with SSC falls within normal range, it is a little lower than healthy peers.

Multidisciplinary Care Considerations for Patients with Craniosynostosis

Infants and children with craniosynostosis require multidisciplinary care, and this is best accomplished when care is provided on a craniofacial team. Most patients with craniosynostosis will have non-syndromic presentations; however, longitudinal care remains critical to ensure appropriate growth and development throughout childhood. In patients with syndromic craniosynostoses, coordinated longitudinal care becomes even more paramount because of the high level of complexity across many different specialties or disciplines. Care delivery that includes perspective and expertise from multiple disciplines is important to help patients reach their full potential and optimal outcomes.

Update in Management of Craniosynostosis

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Understand the craniofacial dysmorphology of craniosynostosis, and the variation of each type. 2. Identify the functional concerns and learn the rationale behind timing of operative intervention. 3. Approach each dysmorphology critically and identify the operative intervention needed to improve form and function 4. Understand and address the specific issues related to syndromic craniosynostosis and be able to delineate management plan.

SUMMARY

Craniosynostosis is a condition in which premature fusion of one or more cranial sutures lead to abnormal head shape and growth restriction of the brain. Nonsyndromic craniosynostosis occurs in isolation, and usually involves a single suture, whereas syndromic craniosynostosis may involve multiple sutures and is associated with extracraniofacial findings. Although surgical management can be similar, the treatment plan must take into consideration issues specific to the syndromes. This article aims to provide a concise overview of the authors' current understanding regarding the presentation, treatment principle, surgical option, and debates in craniosynostosis.

High risk factors for craniosynostosis during pregnancy: A case-control study

Background

Craniosynostosis is a birth defect involving premature cranial sutures’ fusion with an increasing prevalence and unknown underlying causes in nearly 80% of cases. The current study investigates a series of high-risk factors associated with a non-syndromic craniosynostosis.

Methods

Ninety-seven (97) children were included in the retrospective case-control study, 62 controls and 35 with craniosynostosis. A questionnaire with 143 questions was used in face-to-face interviews. After univariate analyses, stepwise multivariate logistic regression analysis was implemented.

Results

In craniosynostosis group, 3 out of 4 were male subjects and 2 out of 3 born with caesarian section. History for central nervous system abnormalities in their younger siblings, low birth weight, extended use of mobile phone from the parents and medications’ use differed significantly between craniosynostosis and control group. After adjustment for all factors, only maternal medication use (aOR 6,1 [2.1 – 19], CI 95%) and oral progesterone intake (aOR 4 [1.2 – 14], CI 95%) were significantly associated with an increased risk in craniosynostosis group.

Conclusion

The maternal medications’ use and particular oral progesterone intake is associated with an increased risk for non-syndromic craniosynostosis. However, due to the study’s limitations, further research is warranted.

Challenging the Norm: Is Routine Use of Cranial CT in Evaluation of Craniosynostosis Necessary?

BACKGROUND

Cranial CT is routinely taught to be the gold standard for diagnosis of craniosynostosis and used by craniofacial teams for suspected nonsyndromic single suture craniosynostosis. Given the risks associated with infant CTs, do these scans provide significantly enhanced diagnostic accuracy compared to the physical exam when performed by an experienced clinical provider?

METHOD

A retrospective chart review was performed for children who underwent corrective surgery for nonsyndromic, single-suture craniosynostosis over an 11 year period by a single craniofacial team. Ages at presentation and surgery, preoperative clinical diagnosis and imaging, co-existing radiographic findings, and correlation with the intraoperative diagnosis were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 138 patients were included in this study. The mean age was 4.2 months at initial craniofacial evaluation, and 8.0 months at time of surgery. Twenty-seven patients received imaging prior to our clinic. Of those, 21 had plain radiography and 6 had CT scans. Of the remaining 111 patients referred without imaging, craniosynostosis was clinically diagnosed in 102 (92%), whereas 9 (8%) had an unclear clinical diagnosis. Of these 9, 1 (1%) was diagnosed clinically at follow-up exam, and the remaining 8 (7%) were diagnosed using radiography (3 CT scans, 5 plain radiographs). In all patients, the preoperative diagnosis was confirmed during intraoperative assessment.

CONCLUSIONS

Cranial CT was not needed by experienced craniofacial providers in 93% of nonsyndromic, single-suture craniosynostosis. Imaging obtained before craniofacial clinic referral may have been unnecessary. These findings question the classic teaching that preoperative cranial CT is the gold standard for diagnosis in infants with nonsyndromic, single-suture craniosynostosis.

Does Coronal Suturectomies and Occipital Barrel Staves Make a Difference in Early Reconstruction for Sagittal Craniosynostosis?

BACKGROUND

Various surgical methods are used for early treatment of nonsyndromic sagittal craniosynostosis. The craniofacial centers in Uppsala and Helsinki fundamentally both use the H-Craniectomy: Renier's technique. However, the Helsinki group systematically adds coronal suturectomies to prevent secondary coronal synostosis and posterior barrel staves to address posterior bulleting. The effects of these additions in early treatment of sagittal craniosynostosis are currently unknown.

METHODS

Thirty-six patients from Uppsala and 27 patients from Helsinki were included in the study. Clinical data and computed tomography scans were retrieved for all patients.

RESULTS

The Helsinki patients had a smaller preoperative Cranial index (CI) (65 vs 72) and a smaller preoperative width (10.1 vs 11.2). There was no difference in postoperative CI, corresponding to a difference in change in CI. Regression analysis indicated that the larger change in CI in the Helsinki group was mainly due to a lower preoperative CI allowing for a larger normalization. The Helsinki patients had less growth in length (1.5 vs 2.1 cm) and more growth in width (2.3 vs 1.9 cm). There were no differences in head circumference or surgical complications. Secondary coronal synostosis was present in 43% of the Uppsala group at 3 years of age, while calvarial defects located at sites of previous coronal suturectomies and posterior barrel staving were seen in the Helsinki group 1 year postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Lower preoperative CI appears to be the main factor in determining the amount of normalization in CI. Prophylactic coronal suturectomies do not seem to benefit preservation of coronal growth function since the modification correlates to less sagittal growth and more growth in width.

Weighing In on the Controversy: Preoperative Imaging in Unicoronal Craniosynostosis Leads to Strategic Changes in Surgical Care

BACKGROUND

Clinical findings in children with unilateral coronal craniosynostosis are characteristic, and therefore clinicians have questioned the need for confirmatory imaging. Preoperative computed tomographic imaging is a powerful tool for diagnosing associated anomalies that can alter treatment management and surgical planning. The authors' aim was to determine whether and how routine preoperative imaging affected treatment management in unilateral coronal craniosynostosis patients within their institution.

METHODS

A retrospective, single-center review of all patients who underwent cranial vault remodeling for unilateral coronal craniosynostosis between 2006 and 2014 was performed. Patient data included demographics, age at computed tomographic scan, age at surgery, results of the radiographic evaluation, and modification of treatment following radiologic examination.

RESULTS

Of 194 patients diagnosed with single-suture craniosynostosis, 29 were diagnosed with unilateral coronal craniosynostosis. Additional radiographic anomalies were found in 19 unilateral coronal craniosynostosis patients (65.5 percent). These included severe deviation of the anterior superior sagittal sinus [n = 12 (41.4 percent)], Chiari I malformation [n = 1 (3.4 percent)], and benign external hydrocephalus [n = 2 (6.9 percent)]. The radiographic anomalies resulted in a change in management for 48.3 percent of patients. Specifically, alteration in frontal craniotomy design occurred in 12 patients (41.4 percent), and two patients (6.9 percent) required further radiographic studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Although clinical findings in children with unilateral coronal craniosynostosis are prototypical, preoperative computed tomographic imaging is still of great consequence and continues to play an important role in surgical management. Preoperative imaging enabled surgeons to alter surgical management and avoid inadvertent complications such as damage to a deviated superior sagittal sinus. Imaging findings of Chiari malformation and hydrocephalus also permitted judicious follow-up.

CLINICAL QUESTIONS/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, IV.

Polycystin-1 modulates RUNX2 activation and osteocalcin gene expression via ERK signalling in a human craniosynostosis cell model

Craniosynostosis refers to the premature fusion of one or more cranial sutures leading to skull shape deformities and brain growth restriction. Among the many factors that contribute to abnormal suture fusion, mechanical forces seem to play a major role. Nevertheless, the underlying mechanobiology-related mechanisms of craniosynostosis still remain unknown. Understanding how aberrant mechanosensation and mechanotransduction drive premature suture fusion will offer important insights into the pathophysiology of craniosynostosis and result in the development of new therapies, which can be used to intervene at an early stage and prevent premature suture fusion. Herein, we provide evidence for the first time on the role of polycystin-1 (PC1), a key protein in cellular mechanosensitivity, in craniosynostosis, using primary cranial suture cells isolated from patients with trigonocephaly and dolichocephaly, two common types of craniosynostosis. Initially, we showed that PC1 is expressed at the mRNA and protein level in both trigonocephaly and dolichocephaly cranial suture cells. Followingly, by utilizing an antibody against the mechanosensing extracellular N-terminal domain of PC1, we demonstrated that PC1 regulates runt-related transcription factor 2 (RUNX2) activation and osteocalcin gene expression via extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) signalling in our human craniosynostosis cell model. Altogether, our study reveals a novel mechanotransduction signalling axis, PC1-ERK-RUNX2, which affects osteoblastic differentiation in cranial suture cells from trigonocephaly and dolichocephaly patients.

Postnatal Sagittal Craniosynostosis: A Novel Presentation and Considerations in Diagnosis and Management

ABSTRACT

Sagittal craniosynostosis results in scaphocephaly from abnormal fusion of the sagittal suture. Traditionally, craniosynostosis presents at birth and is diagnosed within the first year of life. We report a patient with development of sagittal craniosynostosis after birth, which we term postnatal sagittal craniosynostosis (PSC). This is a rare occurrence in which management considerations are critical but are not well discussed. A 3-year old boy presented with concerns of a metopic ridge. Work-up revealed metopic ridging and an open sagittal suture. The patient later developed signs of increased intracranial pressure (ICP) and repeat CT scan 14 months later identified a newly fused sagittal suture. The patient underwent open posterior cranial vault expansion, resulting in resolution of symptoms. PSC is a rare condition and should be considered in otherwise unexplained increases in ICP among pediatric patients. Open posterior cranial vault expansion represents a safe and effective method to treat this condition.

Planning and Osteotomy Designs in the Correction of Single-Suture Craniosynostosis

BACKGROUND

Craniosynostosis is among the abnormalities that are more commonly encountered by craniofacial surgeons. Although the overall concepts for cranial vault remodeling are relatively simple, osteotomy designs and methods for calvarial rearrangement are highly varied. In this work, we present a summary of the known designs for correction of single-suture craniosynostosis.

METHODS

A review of the literature was performed of the more frequently used osteotomy designs for single-suture craniosynostosis, as well as their reported results and outcomes. Also reviewed are some of the current available approaches for the diagnosis and surgical planning for single-suture craniosynostosis.

RESULTS

There remains a diversity of techniques available for the reconstruction of each fused cranial suture. Certain osteotomy designs are reported in the literature and are used by craniofacial surgeons more frequently. Each has its own benefits and disadvantages, and there is a growing body of outcome data available to guide surgical decision-making. Regarding diagnosis and surgical planning, computed tomography with 3-dimensional reconstruction remains the diagnostic standard of care, and efforts are ongoing to develop and implement new diagnostic modalities like Black Bone MRI to reduce radiation exposure.

CONCLUSIONS

There has been ongoing evolution of the surgical techniques available to reconstruct single-suture craniosynostosis, leading to ever-improving patient outcomes.

Secondary Coronal Synostosis After Early Surgery for Sagittal Craniosynostosis: Implications for Cranial Growth

ABSTRACT

Secondary Coronal Synostosis (SCS) in patients operated for non-syndromic Sagittal Craniosynostosis is a postoperative phenomenon with unclear implications. The aim of this study was to investigate whether SCS is a negative or a benign occurrence in the postoperative course. The authors hypothesized that SCS is related to reduced cranial growth and intracranial hypertension. Thirty-one patients operated for SC at an early age with the H-craniectomy technique were included in the study. Associations between SCS and cranial shape, growth, and signs of intracranial hypertension were analyzed. Intracranial volume distribution was assessed by measuring partial intracranial volumes defined by skull base landmarks. A total of 12/31 patients developed SCS during the postoperative course. The presence of SCS was associated with a higher prevalence of gyral impressions and a larger normalization of Cranial Index due to less growth in the anteroposterior plane. The SCS group had a smaller postoperative intracranial volume due to less posterior intracranial volume as well as less growth in head circumference. Whether this is a growth restriction caused by the SCS or a secondary effect of less primary brain growth remains to be determined. However, the correlation between SCS, less cranial growth and gyral impressions does imply that SCS should be taken into consideration during clinical follow-up as a potentially adverse event.

Cognitive, behavioral and psychological functioning of children and adults with conservatively managed metopic synostosis

Children diagnosed with metopic synostosis (MS) commonly experience poor neuropsychological outcomes, with research suggesting that children whose MS is managed conservatively (without surgery) potentially having worse outcomes than their operated peers. However, studies of children whose MS was managed conservatively are scarce. This study therefore examined the cognitive, behavioral, and psychological functioning of children/adults with conservatively managed MS (N = 38) and compares their outcomes to individually matched healthy controls (N = 38) of the same age and sex (matched-pairs design) from the general community. Age-appropriate, validated assessments measuring general cognition, verbal and visuospatial ability, attention and working memory, executive functioning, behavior, depression, anxiety, and satisfaction with appearance were utilized. Group differences were estimated using linear regression for (a) the overall sample and (b) by broad developmental stages: 2&3 yrs; ≥6-≤17. Moderate to large negative effects (g = -0.38 to -1.30) were evident before controlling for socio-economic status (SES), with the MS group performing significantly worse on 8 out of the 10 cognitive domains (general cognition, visuospatial ability, working memory, information processing, executive functioning: semantic & initial letter verbal fluency, switching, inhibition+switching). However, only initial letter verbal fluency (g = -0.99) and switching (g = -1.19) remained significant after adjusting for SES. The MS group displayed more behavioral problems, although this was not significant. Depression, anxiety, and satisfaction with appearance did not differ between the groups. Regular monitoring of cognitive functioning, particularly executive functioning, should be undertaken for those with conservatively managed MS.

Outcome Measures Reported in Published Clinical Research Studies in Craniosynostosis: A Systematic Review

CONTEXT

The fair comparison of treatment interventions for craniosynostosis across different studies is expected to be impaired by incomplete reporting and the use of inconsistent outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

This review assessed the outcomes currently reported in studies of craniosynostosis, and whether these outcomes are formally defined and prespecified in the study methods.

DATA SOURCES, SEARCH TERMS, AND STUDY SELECTION

Studies were sourced via an electronic, multi-database literature search for "craniosynostosis." All primary, interventional research studies published from 2011 to 2015 were reviewed.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two independent researchers assessed each study for inclusion and performed the data extraction. For each study, data were extracted on the individual outcomes reported, and whether these outcomes were defined and prespecified in the methods.

DATA SYNTHESIS AND RESULTS

Of 1027 studies screened, 240 were included and proceeded to data extraction. These studies included 18,365 patients.2192 separate outcomes were reported. Of these, 851 outcomes (38.8%) were clearly defined, 1394 (63.6%) were prespecified in the study methods."Clinical and functional" was the most commonly reported outcome theme (900 outcomes, 41.1%), and "patient-reported" outcomes the least (7 outcomes, 0.3%)."Duration of surgery" was the most commonly reported single outcome (reported 80 times). "Cranial index" was the most variably defined outcome (18 different definitions used).

CONCLUSION

The outcomes reported following treatment interventions for craniosynostosis are incompletely and variably defined. Improving definitions for these outcomes may aid comparison of different management strategies and improve craniosynostosis care. Suboptimal prespecification of these outcomes in the study methods implied that outcome reporting bias cannot be excluded.

Test-retest validation of a cranial deformity index in unilateral coronal craniosynostosis

Unilateral coronal craniosynostosis (UCS) affects many infants resulting in abnormalities affecting the forehead and orbits. As a result, the deformity caused by UCS is very noticeable and there are several surgical treatment options available to normalize the head shape. However, there is a lack of consistently used outcome measures, resulting in difficulty assessing surgical outcomes and on-going debate over optimal treatments. Current techniques to quantify deformity in UCS are cumbersome, provide limited information, or are based on subjective assessments. In this study, a cranial deformity index was developed to quantify abnormality at the frontal bones for UCS that is accessible, user-friendly, and generates objective surface distance measurements. The cranial deformity index is defined as the Euclidean distance at the point of the largest deviation between the deformed skull compared to a reference skull. In addition, the index was successfully used to quantify post-operative changes in a single case of UCS that underwent corrective surgery. The reproducibility of the index was assessed using test-retest reliability and was demonstrated to be highly reproducible (ICC = 0.93). A user-friendly measurement index that is based on open-source software may be a valuable tool for surgical teams. In addition, this information can augment the consultation experience for patients and their families.

Skeletal Deformity in Patients With Unilateral Coronal Craniosynostosis: Perceptions of the General Public

Study Design

A two-alternative forced choice design was used to gather perceptual data regarding unicoronal synostosis (UCS).

Objective

Cranial vault remodeling aims at improving the aesthetic appearance of infants with UCS by reshaping the forehead and reducing the potential for psychosocial discrimination. People's perception of craniofacial deformity plays a role in the stigma of deformity. The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between objective skull deformity in UCS patients and laypersons' perception of skull normality.

Methods

Forty layperson skull raters were recruited from the general public. Skull raters were asked to categorize 45 infant skull images as normal or abnormal. Twenty-one of the images were UCS skulls, and 24 were normal skulls. Skulls were displayed briefly on a computer to simulate a first impression scenario and generate a perceptual response. A χ ² analysis and mixed-effects regression model were used to analyze the response data.

Results

Members of the general public were good at distinguishing between skull groups, χ ² (1) = 281.97, P < .001. In addition, skull raters' responses were predicted by the severity of deformity in the UCS skulls (b = -0.10, z = -2.6, P = .010, CI: -0.18, -0.02). A skull with a deformity value of 2.8 mm (CI: 1.8, 4.1) was equally likely to be rated normal or abnormal.

Conclusions

This is the first study to investigate the relationship between objective skull deformity in UCS and public perception. Laypersons were good at distinguishing the difference between normal and UCS skulls, and their perceptions of normality were predicted by the degree of skull deformity.

Operative Time as the Predominant Risk Factor for Transfusion Requirements in Nonsyndromic Craniosynostosis Repair

Background:

Despite recent advances in surgical, anesthetic, and safety protocols in the management of nonsyndromic craniosynostosis (NSC), significant rates of intraoperative blood loss continue to be reported by multiple centers. The purpose of the current study was to examine our center’s experience with the surgical correction of NSC in an effort to determine independent risk factors of transfusion requirements.

Methods:

A retrospective cohort study of patients with NSC undergoing surgical correction at the Montreal Children’s Hospital was carried out. Baseline characteristics and perioperative complications were compared between patients receiving and not receiving transfusions and between those receiving a transfusion in excess or <25 cc/kg. Logistic regression analysis was carried out to determine independent predictors of transfusion requirements.

Results:

A total of 100 patients met our inclusion criteria with a mean transfusion requirement of 29.6 cc/kg. Eighty-seven patients (87%) required a transfusion, and 45 patients (45%) required a significant (>25 cc/kg) intraoperative transfusion. Regression analysis revealed that increasing length of surgery was the main determinant for intraoperative (P = 0.008; odds ratio, 18.48; 95% CI, 2.14–159.36) and significant (>25 cc/kg) intraoperative (P = 0.004; odds ratio, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.23–3.07) transfusions.

Conclusions:

Our findings suggest increasing operative time as the predominant risk factor for intraoperative transfusion requirements. We encourage craniofacial surgeons to consider techniques to streamline the delivery of their selected procedure, in an effort to reduce operative time while minimizing the need for transfusion.

Head-compliant microstrip split ring resonator for non-invasive healing monitoring after craniosynostosis-based surgery

A soft and highly directive, proximity-coupled split-ring resonator fabricated with a liquid alloy, copper and polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) is presented. The same was designed for sensing osteogenesis of calvarial bone. As dielectric properties of bone grafts in ossifying calvarial defects should change during the osteogenesis process, devices like this could monitor the gradual transformation of the defect into bone by differentiating changes in the dielectric properties as shifts in the resonance frequency. Computational Software Technology (CST) Microwave Studio®-based simulation results on computational head models were in good agreement with laboratory results on head phantom models, which also included the comparison with an in-vivo measurement on the human head. A discussion based on an inductive reasoning regarding dynamics’ considerations is provided as well. Since the skin elasticity of newborn children is high, stretching and crumpling could be significant. In addition, due to typical head curvatures in newborn children, bending should not be a significant issue, and can provide higher energy focus in the defect area and improve conformability. The present concept could support the development of soft, cheap and portable follow-up monitoring systems to use in outpatient hospital and home care settings for post-operative monitoring of bone healing after reconstructive surgical procedures.

Low-Cost Desktop-Based Three-Dimensional-Printed Patient-Specific Craniofacial Models in Surgical Counseling, Consent Taking, and Education of Parent of Craniosynostosis Patients: A Comparison With Conventional Visual Explanation Modalities

BACKGROUND

Craniosynostosis is a complex craniofacial deformity. Surgical decision, if needed, is always hard on the parent and requires the use of multimodalities of explanation. To the authors' knowledge, there have been no studies tackling family counseling about the deformity and surgical decision-making process with the use of low-cost patient-specific three-dimensional (3D)-printed models.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study investigating the utility of patient-specific 3D-printed models using a desktop-based 3D printer. Questionnaire was constructed and validated screening the demographics, knowledge, expectation, and surgical decision-making process supplied using Likert. Data were collected consecutively from each parent first after explanation with conventional 3D computed tomography (CT) images, and then repeated after the 3D-printed model has been presented.

RESULTS

Fourteen parents were screened. Majority of parents considered the pathology to have a potential effect of child's functional and aesthetic outcomes. After using the 3D-printed models, the participants had a clear vision and needed not to read any more about the condition (P = 0.05, P = 0.019, respectively). Agreement for surgical management was in favor of the 3D-printed models compared with CT images (P = 0.028). Explanation with CT images yielded higher mean score in knowledge about potential complications compared with 3D models (P value = 0.007). For the 3D models, average printing time was 26 hours, and a mean cost of 5.2$.

CONCLUSION

The utility of desktop 3D printing is an affordable modality to provide adequate information about craniosynostosis and can assist surgical decision-making. Knowledge and adaptation of such cheap technology represents a great skill aiding clinical practice.

Correction of Sagittal Synostosis Using Three-Dimensional Planning and Maltese Cross Geometry

There are several approaches to correct sagittal synostosis. Regardless of technique, the goals are to (1) release the fused suture and (2) impart a normocephalic head shape with resultant functional and aesthetic benefits. This article and video detail the authors' preferred technique for the treatment of sagittal synostosis. This novel method involves three-dimensional planning and an open approach to focus on immediate correction of the anteroposterior, mediolateral, and vertex dimensions, using vault remodeling, pedicled osseous ("Maltese") crosses, and corset pericranial flaps.

Craniofacial malformations and their association with brain development: the importance of a multidisciplinary approach for treatment

The craniofacial complex develops mainly in the first trimester of pregnancy, but its final shaping and the development of the teeth extend into the second and third trimesters. It is intimately connected with the development of the brain because of the crucial role the cranial neural crest cells play and the fact that many signals which control craniofacial development originate in the brain and vice versa. As a result, malformations of one organ may affect the development of the other. Similarly, there are developmental connections between the craniofacial complex and the teeth. Craniofacial anomalies are either isolated, resulting from abnormal development of the first two embryonic pharyngeal arches, or part of multiple malformation syndromes affecting many other organs. They may stem from gene mutations, chromosomal aberrations or from environmental causes induced by teratogens. The craniofacial morphologic changes are generally cosmetic, but they often interfere with important functions such as chewing, swallowing and respiration. In addition, they may cause hearing or visual impairment. In this review we discussed only a small number of craniofacial malformations and barely touched upon related anomalies of dentition. Following a brief description of the craniofacial development, we discussed oral clefts, craniofacial microsomia, teratogens that may interfere with craniofacial development resulting in different malformations, the genetically determined craniosynostoses syndromes and few other relatively common syndromes that, in addition to the craniofacial complex, also affect other organs. The understanding of these malformations is important in dentistry as dentists play an integral role in their diagnosis and multidisciplinary treatment.

Identification and Management of Cranial Anomalies in Perinatology

Neonatal skull and head shape anomalies are rare. The most common cranial malformations encountered include craniosynostosis, deformational plagiocephaly, cutis aplasia, and encephalocele. Improved prenatal imaging can diagnose morphologic changes as early as the second trimester. Prenatal identification also provides perinatologists and neonatologists with valuable information that helps to optimize care during and after delivery. Cranial anomalies require a multidisciplinary team approach and occasionally a lifetime of care. Today, care begins with the perinatologist as many cranial anomalies can be identified in utero with recent advances in prenatal testing.

Craniosynostosis affects the majority of mucopolysaccharidosis patients and can contribute to increased intracranial pressure

BACKGROUND

The mucopolysaccharidoses are multisystem lysosomal storage diseases characterized by extensive skeletal deformities, including skull abnormalities. The objective of this study was to determine the incidence of craniosynostosis in the different mucopolysaccharidosis (MPS) types and its clinical consequences.

METHODS

In a prospective cohort study spanning 10 years, skull imaging and clinical evaluations were performed in 47 MPS patients (type I, II, VI, and VII). A total of 215 radiographs of the skull were analyzed. The presence and type of craniosynostosis, the sutures involved, progression over time, skull shape, head circumference, fundoscopy, and ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) placement data were evaluated.

RESULTS

Craniosynostosis of at least one suture was present in 77% of all 47 MPS patients (≤ 6 years of age in 40% of all patients). In 32% of all MPS patients, premature closure of all sutures was seen (≤ 6 years of age in 13% of all patients). All patients with early closure had a more severe MPS phenotype, both in the neuronopathic (MPS I, II) and non-neuronopathic (MPS VI) patient groups. Because of symptomatic increased intracranial pressure (ICP), a VPS was placed in six patients, with craniosynostosis as a likely or certain causative factor for the increased pressure in four patients. One patient underwent cranial vault expansion because of severe craniosynostosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Craniosynostosis occurs in the majority of MPS patients. Since the clinical consequences can be severe and surgical intervention is possible, skull growth and signs and symptoms of increased ICP should be monitored in both neuronopathic and non-neuronopathic patients with MPS.

Non-syndromic craniosynostosis in children: Scoping review

Background

Craniosynostosis (CS) is a complex condition consisting of the early fusion of one or more cranial sutures in the intrauterine stage. The affected infant exhibits abnormal head shape at time of birth or shortly thereafter. It can be observed in normal individuals (non-syndromic CS or NSCS) or as a part of a multisystem syndrome. The purposes of the present article were to carry out a scoping review on Non-Syndromic CS and to discuss the most important findings retrieved.

Material and Methods

The steps of this scoping review were as follows: first, to pose a research question; second, to identify relevant studies to answer the research question; third, to select and retrieve the studies; fourth, to chart the critical data, and finally, to collate, summarize, and report the results from the most important articles. Relevant articles published over a 20-year period were identified and retrieved from five Internet databases: PubMed; EMBASE; Cochrane Library; Google Scholar, and EBSCO.

Results

Fourteen articles were finally included in the present scoping review. The following four most important clinical issues are discussed: (i) normal cranial development, clinical manifestations, and pathogenesis of NCSC; (ii) clinical evaluation of NCSC; (iii) treatment and post-surgical follow-up; and (iv) additional considerations.

Conclusions

NSCS may be present with associated head shapes. Multiple early surgical reconstructive options are currently available for the disorder. Pediatric Dentistry practitioners must be familiarized with this condition and form part of a multi-approach health team as those responsible for the opportune oral health care of the affected child.

Key words:Craniosynostosis, cranial development, children, scoping review, dental management.

Cognitive, behavioral and psychological functioning in children with metopic synostosis: a meta-analysis examining the impact of surgical status

Neurodevelopmental delays are known to occur in children with metopic synostosis, but it is presently unclear whether the cognitive, behavioral and psychological outcomes of children with metopic synostosis differ to those of their healthy peers. This meta-analysis consolidated data from 17 studies (published prior to August 2017) that examined the cognitive, behavioral and psychological outcomes of children (n = 666; aged ≤19 yrs) with metopic synostosis. Hedges'g (g_w) effect sizes compared the outcomes of samples with metopic synostosis (unoperated, operated) to healthy controls or normative data and, where available, the prevalence of problems/disorders was calculated. Children with unoperated metopic synostosis performed significantly worse than their healthy peers on measures of: general cognition (g_w = -.38), motor functioning, (g_w = -.81), and verbal (g_w = -.82) and visuospatial (g_w = -.92) abilities. Children with operated metopic synostosis performed significantly worse on measures of motor functioning (g_w = -.45), visuospatial skills (g_w = -.32), attention (g_w = -.50), executive functioning (g_w = -.36), arithmetic ability (g_w = -.37), and behavior (g_w = -.34). Cognitive, behavioral, and psychological problems were prevalent, but variable. Overall, the cognitive, behavioral, and psychological outcomes of children with metopic synostosis are generally worse than their healthy peers, regardless of surgical status. However, research is sparse, samples small, controls are rarely recruited, and the severity of metopic synostosis often not stated. Nevertheless, the findings suggest that children with metopic synostosis are likely to experience a variety of negative outcomes and should therefore receive ongoing monitoring and support.