Patients' Perspective on Carpal Tunnel Release with WALANT or Intravenous Regional Anesthesia

Cost analysis of carpal tunnel release with local anesthesia vs sedation. A survey of the Argentinian Association of Hand Surgery

Purpose

To compare the costs of carpal tunnel release (CTR) performed in a minor procedure room using wide awake local anesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT), local anesthesia with a tourniquet (AL-T) and CTR in a conventional operating room (OR) with sedation. Additionally, we aimed to assess the anesthetic preferences of the Argentine Association of Hand and Upper Limb Reconstructive Surgery (AACM) members regarding CTR.

Material and methods

This cross-sectional, single-center study involved analyzing specific hospital costs associated with each anesthesia technique in both surgical settings. A report was obtained from the OR chief of our institution. Additionally, an anonymous survey was conducted among certified and main AACM members, gathering data on: (1) practice location, (2) preferred anesthesia type for CTR and reasons for not using WALANT/AL-T regularly, (3) years of practice, (4) preferred CTR surgical technique, and (5) willingness to change anesthesia preference if offered differential fees.

Results

Performing CTR with WALANT and AL-T in a procedure room resulted in cost savings of 64 % and 65 %, respectively, compared to sedation in a conventional OR. The average duration for CTR, including cleaning and turnover time, was 34 min (±3) for WALANT, 33 min (±4) for AL-T, and 55 min (±8) for sedation in a conventional operating room.Out of 226 AACM members, 95 (42 %) responded to the survey. Among them, 42 % practiced in Buenos Aires (CABA), and only 35 % preferred using local anesthesia for CTR (16 % WALANT, 19 % AL-T). Nearly half (49 %) had over 16 years of experience. All respondents favored open or mini-approach techniques for CTR. Those who did not use WALANT or AL-T cited discomfort with patient interaction and perceived lack of benefits as reasons. However, 31 % indicated they would change their anesthesia preference if offered differential fees.

Conclusions

CTR with WALANT or AL-T in a procedure room reduces costs by over 65 % compared to sedation in a conventional OR. Despite cost benefits, sedation remains the predominant practice in Argentina, hindered by a lack of consensus and institutional incentives.

Prospective evaluation of a novel device for ultrasound-guided percutaneous treatment of carpal tunnel and trigger finger disease. Efficacy and safety of sono-instruments®

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of percutaneous release procedures under sonography using Sono-Instruments® in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) and trigger finger (TF).

METHODS

Prospective study involving 30 patients, divided into two groups (15 CTS, and 15 TF). The primary outcomes were surgical performance-related outcomes (visibility, ease of use, satisfaction, duration) using Sono-Instruments® and patient-related outcomes (pain, activity limitations, time to return to work, functional scores). Secondary outcomes included complications. Patients were followed for two months post-operatively.

RESULTS

In the CTS group, the average age of the patients was 58.7 years. The percutaneous release of the transverse carpal ligament was effectively completed in all cases, with excellent device performance and no adverse events. At one week, all patients could wash their hands, 80% could perform activities of daily living, and 80% of those working had returned to their activities. At two months, all patients had resumed all activities. Pillar pain was still present in 53.3%. In the TF group, the patients had an average age of 57.9 years. The percutaneous release of the A1 annular pulley was successful in all cases, with excellent device performance and no adverse events. At one week, all patients could wash their hands, 93.3% could do all activities of daily living, and 75% of those working were back to their professional activities. At two months, all patients were back to all activities of daily living and work. The DASH score was significantly improved at two months, compared to preoperative, for both groups (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous sono-guided release using Sono-Instruments® is safe and efficient, and associated with quick functional recovery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Management of Scaphoid Pseudoarthrosis Surgery with Wide-Awake Local Anesthesia No Tourniquet (WALANT) Versus Axillary Block Anesthesia: Comparison of Patient Satisfaction

Objectives: We aimed to compare clinical and functional results of treatment of scaphoid pseudoarthrosis between patients undergoing wide-awake local anesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) versus axillary block anesthesia. Methods: The patients diagnosed with scaphoid non-union who underwent pseudoarthoris surgery were divided into WALANT group (n  =  12) and axial block group (n  =  11). Visual analog scores (VAS) were measured by calling the patients via phone on postoperative days 1, 2, 3, and 7. The VASs were also measured on the 14th day during patient check-ups. At the end of 12 months, Michigan Hand Questionnaire was used to assess clinical recovery. Bone union rate and surgery time were also investigated. Radiological and clinical examinations were compared between the groups. Results: Eleven patients (91.7%) in the WALANT group and 10 patients (90.9%) in the axillary block group achieved bone union (P  =  .94). Although there was no significant difference in preoperative VAS score between the groups, the WALANT group had significantly lower VAS score of the first 3 days postoperatively. However, there was no significant difference in VAS score between the groups on the seventh and 14th day postoperatively. There was no significant difference between the groups regarding Michigan score, time to surgery, time to union and operation time. Conclusion: The scaphoid pseudoarthrosis surgery can be done safely with WALANT technique which has significant lower VAS score on the first 3 days postoperatively.

Possible Bupivacaine Induced Hepatitis Following Wide Awake, Local Anesthesia, No Tourniquet Carpal Tunnel Surgery: A Case Report

In this case report, we present a novel occurrence of acute hepatitis 2 weeks after local bupivacaine injection for wide awake, local anesthesia, no tourniquet carpal tunnel release. Laboratory and biopsy analysis confirmed cholestatic, drug-induced hepatitis that was successfully managed with conservative treatment. With a paucity of potential bupivacaine-induced hepatitis cases reported within the literature, the importance of broad differential diagnosis, meticulous medication reconciliation, and consideration of this rare complication should not be understated by the astute hand surgeon.

Does Addition of a Longer Acting Local Anesthetic Improve Postoperative Pain After Carpal Tunnel Release? A Randomized Controlled Trial

PURPOSE

Carpal tunnel release (CTR) is a simple and effective treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome in patients who have failed nonsurgical management. This surgery is often performed in the ambulatory clinic under local anesthesia, with lidocaine, a short-acting agent. Few studies have investigated the use of longer acting agents, such as bupivacaine, for outpatient CTR. Therefore, the aim of our study was to compare the postoperative pain experience after CTR with the use of either our standard lidocaine solution (control) or a mixture consisting of lidocaine and bupivacaine in equal amounts (intervention).

METHODS

Patients undergoing CTR were randomized into control or intervention groups. Postoperative pain severity and numbness were recorded at several timepoints within the first 72 hours. The timing and quantity of postoperative analgesic use (acetaminophen and/or ibuprofen) was also documented. Both patients and assessor were blinded to allocation.

RESULTS

Our study cohort included 139 patients: 67 in the control group and 72 in the intervention group. Postoperative pain scores were significantly lower in the intervention group at 6 hours (2.3 vs 3.2) and 8 hours (2.9 vs 3.9). Additionally, patients in the intervention group reported longer time to first analgesic use than those in the control group (5.2 hours vs 3.7 hours). A greater proportion of patients in the intervention group reported postoperative numbness at nearly all time points, compared to the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study shows that a mixture of bupivacaine and lidocaine improves early postoperative pain but causes prolonged finger numbness when compared to lidocaine alone. As both medications are effective and feasible for outpatient CTR, surgeon and patient preference should guide local anesthetic choice.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Ib.

Spinal Anesthesia for Awake Spine Surgery: A Paradigm Shift for Enhanced Recovery after Surgery

Awake surgery has been applied for various surgical procedures with positive outcomes; however, in neurosurgery, the technique has traditionally been reserved for cranial surgery. Awake surgery for the spine (ASFS) is an alternative to general anesthesia (GA). As early studies report promising results, ASFS is progressively gaining more interest from spine surgeons. The history defining the range of adverse events facing patients undergoing GA has been well described. Adverse reactions resulting from GA can include postoperative nausea and vomiting, hemodynamic instability and cardiac complications, acute kidney injury or renal insufficiency, atelectasis, pulmonary emboli, postoperative cognitive dysfunction, or malignant hyperthermia and other direct drug reactions. For this reason, many high-risk populations who have typically been poor candidates under classifications for GA could benefit from the many advantages of ASFS. This narrative review will discuss the significant historical components related to ASFS, pertinent mechanisms of action, protocol overview, and the current trajectory of spine surgery with ASFS.

Evaluating patient satisfaction with WALANT for hand surgery: a comprehensive questionnaire-based study

INTRODUCTION

There has been an increase in the popularity of the wide-awake local anesthesia no-tourniquet (WALANT) procedure for various upper limb surgeries. The present study aims to conduct a comprehensive analysis of the satisfaction levels of 106 patients, considering factors such as age, gender, comorbidities, and the specific procedures they underwent.

METHOD

The present study was a retrospective cohort study conducted to analyze the overall satisfaction of a cohort of 106 patients who underwent various surgical procedures of the hand between 2018 and 2023. The satisfaction was assessed with a questionnaire comprising 13 questions/statements adjusted to a standard Swiss grading system (from 1 = I strongly agree to 6 = I strongly disagree).

RESULTS

Overall satisfaction with WALANT was high, with most patients expressing positive experiences. Patients with hypertension reported similar satisfaction levels compared to those without, while diabetic patients experienced significantly higher anxiety levels during the procedure (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

WALANT exhibits versatility as an anesthesia choice, demonstrating efficacy in both routine and complex hand surgeries. Our survey-based study reveals a high satisfaction level across diverse procedures. When assessing the correlation between WALANT satisfaction and patient comorbidities, hypertension displayed no significant impact, while diabetic patients reported heightened anxiety. Importantly, patient satisfaction remained consistently high even within the subgroup with comorbidities. Our results underscore WALANT's reliability in upper limb surgery, showcasing its usefulness and positive outcomes across a broad range of patients and surgical procedures.

Clinically Important Pharmacologic Considerations for Wide-Awake Local Anesthesia No Tourniquet Hand Surgery

SUMMARY

Understanding the clinically important pharmacokinetics (what the body does to the drug) and pharmacodynamics (what the drug does to the body) of medications used in surgery will help surgeons use them more safely and effectively. The goal of this article is to provide an overview of these considerations for the 2 medications used in wide-awake local anesthesia with no tourniquet upper extremity surgery (ie, lidocaine and epinephrine) to establish a better understanding of lidocaine and epinephrine in tumescent local anesthesia, as well as adverse reactions and how to manage them.

The Influence of Mental Health Diagnoses on Patient Experiences and Outcomes in Patients Undergoing WALANT Hand Surgery

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to gauge whether patients with preexisting mental health conditions have desirable outcomes when undergoing wide-awake local anesthesia with no tourniquet (WALANT) hand surgery.

Methods

A retrospective review of 133 patients who underwent WALANT surgery by 2 senior authors from August 2019 to October 2020 was performed. Patients were administered a 10-question postoperative survey detailing perioperative pain, experience, and satisfaction concerning their procedure. Analysis was performed for patient responses to the questionnaire, demographics, comorbidities, and patient-reported outcomes using the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE).

Results

There were 61 patients identified as having a preexisting psychiatric diagnosis compared to 70 patients without who underwent WALANT surgery. Comparing psychiatric diagnosis and nonpsychiatric diagnosis cohorts, there was no significant difference in preoperative anxiety (3.75 vs 3.30), pain during procedure (0.67 vs 0.56), or pain after surgery (4.89 vs 4.26). There was a significantly higher pain score with preoperative injection in the psychiatric diagnosis cohort (4.07 vs 2.93). When asked if they would have a WALANT procedure again, 95.1% of patients in the psychiatric diagnosis cohort and 98.6% of patients in the nonpsychiatric diagnosis group said they would. There was no significant difference in average preoperative SANE scores (59.67 [no psych diagnosis] vs 61.70 [psych diagnosis]) or postoperative SANE scores (82.82 [no psych diagnosis] vs 81.06 [psych diagnosis]) between the two cohorts.

Conclusions

WALANT surgery was nearly as well tolerated in patients with a preexisting mental health diagnosis when compared to those without a preexisting diagnosis.

Clinical Relevance

Surgeons who are currently or potentially performing WALANT surgery should not rule out patients as eligible candidates because of a prior diagnosis of a mental health condition.

Complications and side effects of Wide-Awake Local Anaesthesia No Tourniquet (WALANT) in upper limb surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Wide-Awake Local Anaesthesia No Tourniquet (WALANT), a groundbreaking anaesthetic technique resurging in practice, warrants a comprehensive safety analysis for informed adoption. Our study aimed to identify complications/side effects of WALANT upper limb procedures through a systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

This PROSPERO-registered study was performed with strict adherence to PRISMA guidelines. Embase, OVIDMedline, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Scopus databases were searched until February 2023. Inclusion criteria involved English articles, reporting complications/side effects in primary WALANT upper limb surgeries. Outcomes included all complications and side effects, data on the anaesthetic mixture, publication year/location, study type, and procedures performed. The meta-analysis employed the Freeman-Tukey Double Arcsine Transformation, computed I2 statistics, and utilized common or random effects models for pooled analysis.

RESULTS

2002 studies were identified; 79 studies met the inclusion criteria representing 15,595 WALANT patients. A total of 301 patients had complications, and the meta-analysis using a random effects model provided a complication rate of 1.7% (95% CI: 0.93-2.7%). The most reported complications were superficial infection (41%, n = 123/300), other/specified (12%, n = 37/300), and recurrent disease (6.7%, n = 20/300). A decade-by-decade analysis revealed no statistically significant difference in complication rates spanning the last three decades (p = 0.42). Adding sodium bicarbonate to the anaesthetic solution significantly reduced postoperative complications (p = 0.025).

CONCLUSION

WALANT has a low overall complication rate of 1.7%, with no significant temporal variation and a significant reduction in complications when sodium bicarbonate is added to the anaesthetic solution. Our findings support the safety of WALANT in upper limb procedures.

REGISTRATION

PROSPERO: CRD42023404018.

A Review of 1228 In-Office Hand Surgery Procedures With Wide Awake Local Anesthesia No Tourniquet (WALANT) at a Single Private Practice

BACKGROUND

This study examined the complication rate of Wide Awake Local Anesthesia No Tourniquet (WALANT) technique in the clinic setting with field sterility at a single private practice. We hypothesized that WALANT is safe and effective with a low complication rate.

METHODS

This retrospective chart review included 1228 patients who underwent in-office WALANT hand procedures at a single private practice between 2015 and 2022. Patients were divided into groups based on type of procedure: carpal tunnel release, A1 pulley release, first dorsal compartment release, extensor tendon repair, mass excision, foreign body removal, and needle aponeurotomy. Patient demographics and complications were recorded; statistical comparisons of cohort demographics and risk factors for complications were completed, and P < .05 was considered significant for all statistical comparisons.

RESULTS

The overall complication rate for all procedures was 2.77% for 1228 patients including A1 pulley release (n = 962, 2.7%), mass excision (n = 137, 3.7%), extensor tendon repair (n = 23, 4.3%), and first dorsal compartment release (n = 22, 8.3%). Carpal tunnel release, foreign body removal, and needle aponeurotomy groups experienced no complications. No adverse events (e.g. vasovagal reactions, digital ischemia, local anesthetic toxicity, inadequate vasoconstriction) were observed in any group. Patients with known autoimmune disorders and those who were currently smoking had a statistically significant higher complication rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Office-based WALANT procedures with field sterility are safe and effective for treating common hand maladies and have a similar complication profile when compared to historical controls from the standard operating room in an ambulatory center or hospital.

Factors Influencing Patient Preference for Anesthesia in Ambulatory Hand Surgery

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to identify factors that influence preoperative patient preferences toward anesthesia in patients in a hand and upper extremity clinic.

METHODS

A survey was administered to consecutive patients in a hand and upper extremity orthopedic clinic at an urban tertiary academic institution. The survey addressed presenting clinical complaint, anesthesia preference for minor soft tissue hand and wrist procedures, factors influencing anesthesia preference, and patient history of anesthesia and surgical treatment. The primary outcome measure was anesthesia preference: local-only or local with sedation.

RESULTS

Surveys were completed by 219 patients over a 1-month period with a mean patient age of 55 years. Most patients presented with a hand/wrist complaint (56%). One hundred fifty-two patients (71%) preferred local anesthesia with sedation and 61 patients (29%) preferred local-only anesthesia. Patients who preferred local-only anesthesia reported being more likely to be influenced by surgeon preference and cost, and also were more likely to have had prior experience with local-only anesthesia. In contrast, patients who preferred local anesthesia with sedation were more likely to be concerned about pain or were nervous about surgery. Prior surgical experience did not influence preference for anesthesia.

CONCLUSION

Patient preferences for local-only anesthesia versus local anesthesia with sedation for ambulatory hand surgery are mixed, with most patients preferring sedation. Understanding patient preferences for anesthesia can better inform preoperative discussions and shared decision-making in anesthesia choice.

Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures Under Wide-Awake Local Anesthesia: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this systematic review was to analyze the available literature on fixation of distal radius fractures (DRFs) under wide-awake local anesthesia no-tourniquet (WALANT), and to examine postoperative pain scores and functional outcomes, operative data including operative time and blood loss, and the frequency of adverse events.

METHODS

Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and SCOPUS were searched from inception until May 2022 for relevant studies. Studies were screened in duplicate, and data on pain scores, functional outcomes, and adverse events were recorded. Due to methodological and statistical heterogeneity, the results are presented in a descriptive fashion.

RESULTS

Ten studies were included comprising 456 patients with closed, unilateral DRFs, of whom 226 underwent fixation under WALANT. These patients had a mean age of 52.8 ± 8.3 years, were 48% female, and had a mean follow-up time of 11.6 months (range: 6-24). Operative time for WALANT patients averaged 60.4 ± 6.5 minutes, with mean postoperative pain scores of 1.4 ± 0.6 on a 10-point scale. Studies that compared WALANT to general anesthesia found shorter hospital stays with most WALANT patients being sent home the same day, decreased postoperative pain scores, and decreased costs to the healthcare system. No adverse events were reported for WALANT patients.

CONCLUSIONS

A growing body of literature reports that for closed, unilateral DRF, surgical fixation under WALANT is a safe and effective option. It allows patients to have surgery sooner, with improved pain scores and good functional outcomes, with a very low incidence of adverse events.

A prospective, comparative study of the analgesic effect between the WALANT technique and local anesthesia associated with sedation for hand surgery

PURPOSE

The primary objective of this study was to compare the WALANT (wide awake, local anesthesia, no tourniquet) technique with local anesthesia associated with sedation in relation to pain intensity for minor hand surgical procedures. The secondary objective was to evaluate the need for analgesic complementation.

METHODS

A prospective, randomized, comparative, and clinical study was carried out. The sample size in each group was determined after statistical evaluation of the results of a pilot project. The participants were allocated to one of two groups; those in group 1 were submitted to the WALANT technique, and those in group 2, to local anesthesia associated with sedation, for elective surgery. The surgical procedures were carpal tunnel syndrome, De Quervain's tenosynovitis, synovial cyst, finger cyst, and trigger finger. Pain intensity, need for complementation and evolution to complex regional pain syndrome were evaluated.

RESULTS

There was no difference between groups in pain intensity after WALANT and need for intraoperative complementation. There was no significant difference in the amount of opioid applied postoperatively between the groups. There was no difference between groups regarding comfort during surgery. There was no difference in adverse effects and complications between the groups. Hematoma was the most frequent adverse event. No severe adverse events were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The WALANT technique promoted an analgesic effect similar to that of local anesthesia associated with sedation, without increasing adverse effects.

Wide Awake Local Anesthesia No Tourniquet Technique in Hand Surgery: The Patient Experience

BACKGROUND

We attempted to evaluate patient satisfaction and overall experience during wide awake, local anesthesia, with no tourniquet (WALANT) hand surgery and quantify surgery-related outcomes.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of patient demographics, comorbidities, and patient reported outcomes via Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) scores collected pre- and postoperatively of patients undergoing WALANT surgery by the 2 participating senior authors. A solution of 1% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine was used by 1 surgeon, while the other used a 1:1 ratio of 1% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and 0.5% bupivacaine for local anesthetic injection. Patients were administered a postoperative survey to assess patient experience, including anxiety and pain levels, and overall satisfaction in the perioperative period.

RESULTS

Overall, 97.7% of patients indicated that they would undergo a WALANT-style surgery if indicated in the future, 70.5% ate the day of surgery, and a total of 39.1% of patients reported driving to and from surgery. Postoperative SANE scores increased as compared with preoperative scores across all patients. The use of combination 1% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and 0.5% bupivacaine was associated with lower intraoperative and postoperative visual analog scale pain scores.

CONCLUSIONS

WALANT hand surgery was generally well tolerated with excellent surgical outcomes. Patients reported ease of preparation for surgery, faster recovery, and lack of anesthetic side effects as the main benefits of wide-awake surgery. Combination use of lidocaine and bupivacaine may be better than lidocaine alone with respect to pain control in the initial recovery period.

Wide Awake Local Anesthesia No Tourniquet Surgery of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Patients' Experience and Recall Bias in a Day-Care Setting

Background and Objective: Wide-Awake Local Anesthesia No Tourniquet (WALANT) is a technique of local anesthesia commonly used in the surgical treatment of a wide variety of conditions affecting the upper extremity, including Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS). The recent retrospective studies investigated patient experiences in a wide variety of hand disorder-related cases. The aim of our study is to evaluate patient satisfaction regarding open surgical treatment for CTS using the WALANT technique. Material and Methods: we enrolled 82 patients with CTS without medical record of surgical treatment for CTS. For WALANT, a hand surgeon used a combination of 1:200,000 epinephrine, 1% lidocaine, and 1 mL 8.4% sodium bicarbonate solution without tourniquet application and sedating the patient. All patients were treated in a day-care setting. For assessment of patient experience, Lalonde's questionnaire was adapted. Participants completed survey twice: one month and six months after the surgical treatment was performed. Results: the median pre-operative pain score for all patients was 4 (range 0-8) after one month and 3 (range 1-8) after six months. The median intraoperative pain score for all patients was 1 (range 0-8) after one month and 1 (range 1-7) after six months. The median post-operative pain score for all patients was 3 (range 0-9) after one month and 1 (range 0-8) after six months. More than half (61% after one month and 73% after six months) of the patients responded by stating that their real experience of WALANT was better than their initial expectations. An absolute majority of patients (95% after one month and 90% after six months) would recommend WALANT treatment to their relatives. Conclusions: overall, patient satisfaction with treatment for CTS using WALANT is high. Furthermore, complications related to the performed treatment and persistent post-operative pain could be associated with more reliable patient recall of this healthcare intervention. A longer period of time between intervention and assessment of patient experience could possibly be a reason for recall bias.

Comparison between wide-awake local anaesthesia no tourniquet surgery and traditional local anaesthesia surgery for limb operations

Background: In traditional local anaesthesia surgeries, tourniquets are used to reduce blood loss. However, it may induce tourniquet pain. If a long tourniquet time is anticipated, regional or general anaesthesia may be required. Wide-awake local anaesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) surgery suggests blood loss can be controlled by the use of adrenaline instead of a tourniquet. This study aims to investigate the difference in patient's pain perception, satisfaction and hemostasis control between two groups of patients, the WALANT group, who underwent WALANT surgery, and the traditional group, who underwent traditional local anaesthesia with tourniquet surgery. Methods: This was a prospective cohort study of patients who underwent common orthopaedic local anaesthesia surgeries in a regional hospital between January 2020 and December 2020. Operations were performed by two groups of surgeons: WALANT group and traditional group. Data were collected via questionnaires which included patients’ demographics, diagnosis and operation type, surgeon experience, dosage and type of local anaesthesia use, tourniquet use, operation time, hemostasis status, difficulty of operation, patient's pain perception (pain during LA injection, wound site pain during operation, tourniquet pain, post-operative pain) and satisfaction. The data were analysed by Mann–Whitney U test with SPSS. Results: A total of 143 questionnaires were collected. The WALANT group suffered from less wound site pain during operation ( p = 0.008), less tourniquet pain ( p < 0.001) and less post-operative pain ( p < 0.001). WALANT group had a longer operation time ( p = 0.002). Both the traditional group and WALANT group were commented to have good haemostasis with a median score of 1 and 2, respectively, although the difference in hemostasis control value was significant ( p < 0.001). Conclusion: WALANT surgery was safe and could achieve similar hemostasis with no limitation of tourniquet time and could significantly reduce post-operative pain compared with traditional local anaesthesia with tourniquet use. Level of evidence: Level II.

The Efficacy of Wide-Awake Local Anesthesia No Tourniquet (WALANT) in Common Plastic Surgery Operations Performed on the Upper Limbs: A Case-Control Study

BACKGROUND

The wide-awake local anesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) technique is commonly used in elective hand surgery, whereas its application in plastic surgery is still limited. The aim of the study is to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of WALANT in common plastic surgery operations performed on the upper limbs.

METHODS

Patients who underwent those operations under WALANT were matched and compared with patients who had general or regional anesthesia without infiltration of a local anesthetic solution. All operations were performed by the same surgeon. Data from 98 operations were collected and analyzed for the total operation time, operation theatre time and complication and patient satisfaction rates.

RESULTS

All operations under WALANT, mainly skin tumor excision and flap repair or skin grafting and burn escharectomy with or without skin grafting, were completed successfully. No statistical difference in total operation time and complication rates was revealed. Statistical significance favoring WALANT was identified regarding the mean operation theatre time and patient satisfaction.

CONCLUSIONS

WALANT is an effective method for common plastic surgery operations performed on the upper limbs that is associated with better operation theatre occupancy and high patient satisfaction rates.

How to start an awake spine program: Protocol and illustrative cases

Surgical techniques and technology are steadily improving, thereby expanding the pool of patients amenable for spine surgery. The growing and aging population in the United States further contributes to the increase in spine surgery cases. Traditionally, spine surgery is performed under general anesthesia. However, awake spinal surgery has recently gained traction due to evidence of decreased perioperative risks, postoperative opioid consumption, and costs, specifically in lumbar spine procedures. Despite the potential for improving outcomes, awake spine surgery has received resistance and has yet to become adopted at many healthcare systems. We aim to provide the fundamental steps in facilitating the initiation of awake spine surgery programs. We also present case reports of two patients who underwent awake spine surgery and reported improved clinical outcomes.

•

Starting an Awake Spine program is feasible and may improve clinical outcomes.

•

Awake Spine Surgery is associated with reduced cardiopulmonary complications and opioid consumption.

•

Awake Spine Surgery is effective at reducing LOS, HAC, and cost of surgery.

•

Awake Spine Surgery increases the pool of patients eligible for spinal procedures.

Optimization of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Using WALANT Method

As surgical management of carpal tunnel release (CTR) becomes ever more common, extensive research has emerged to optimize the contextualization of this procedure. In particular, CTR under the wide-awake, local-anesthesia, no-tourniquet (WALANT) technique has emerged as a cost-effective, safe, and straightforward option for the millions who undergo this procedure worldwide. CTR under WALANT is associated with considerable cost savings and workflow efficiencies; it can be safely and effectively executed in an outpatient clinic under field sterility with less use of resources and production of waste, and it has consistently demonstrated standard or better post-operative pain control and satisfaction among patients. In this review of the literature, we describe the current findings on CTR using the WALANT technique.

WALANT: A Discussion of Indications, Impact, and Educational Requirements

Wide-awake, local anesthesia, no tourniquet (WALANT) is a technique that removes the requirement for operations to be performed with a tourniquet, general/regional anesthesia, sedation or an anesthetist. We reviewed the WALANT literature with respect to the diverse indications and impact of WALANT to discuss the importance of future surgical curriculum integration. With appropriate patient selection, WALANT may be used effectively in upper and lower limb surgery; it is also a useful option for patients who are unsuitable for general/regional anesthesia. There is a growing body of evidence supporting the use of WALANT in more complex operations in both upper and lower limb surgery. WALANT is a safe, effective, and simple technique associated with equivalent or superior patient pain scores among other numerous clinical and cost benefits. Cost benefits derive from reduced requirements for theater/anesthetic personnel, space, equipment, time, and inpatient stay. The lack of a requirement for general anesthesia reduces aerosol generating procedures, for example, intubation/high-flow oxygen, hence patients and staff also benefit from the reduced potential for infection transmission. WALANT provides a relatively, but not entirely, bloodless surgical field. Training requirements include the surgical indications, volume calculations, infiltration technique, appropriate perioperative patient/team member communication, and specifics of each operation that need to be considered, for example, checking of active tendon glide versus venting of flexor tendon pulleys. WALANT offers significant clinical, economic, and operative safety advantages when compared with general/regional anesthesia. Key challenges include careful patient selection and the comprehensive training of future surgeons to perform the technique safely.

Combined distal median nerve block and local anesthesia with lidocaine:epinephrine for carpal tunnel release

Aim

Evaluating patient comfort during full awake local anesthesia in carpal tunnel release surgery, without tourniquet use, by using epinephrine to obtain a completely dry surgical field.

Methods

We included into the study 41 patients who underwent carpal tunnel syndrome surgery under full awake combined anesthesia, using a 9-point questionnaire. Pain and anxiety in all patients were evaluated through a Wang-Baker 0–5 scale. The injection solution consisted of 0.1cc of epinephrine and 10cc of 1% lidocaine (1:100.000); 5cc were used for local cutaneous anesthesia, and 5cc were used for distal median nerve block. All patients underwent a classic, open carpal tunnel release.

Results

Anxiety scores during anesthesia and the post-operative period did not show a statistically significant difference (p > 0.01), with keeping their levels at low perception scores (average score of 1.68 ± 0.38 CI 95%, with a modal value of 2, compared to an average of 0.78 ± 0.29 CI 95% with a modal value of 0). Similar results were obtained for pain scores during anesthesia (1.73 ± 0.48 CI 95% with a most frequent modal score of 1). Our results also showed that the effects of combined anesthesia in carpal tunnel release surgery persisted well into the 6-hour post-operative moment, pain scores remaining low, statistically significant similar to recorded values during the anesthesia moment (p > 0.01), at an average of 2.29 ± 0.5 CI 95% with a modal value of 1. No serious complications were recorded.

Conclusion

Combined distal median nerve block and local anesthesia with epinephrine:lidocaine provides a comfortable option for patients, with minimal risks of complications.

Current Evidence Involving WALANT Surgery

Wide-awake local anesthesia no-tourniquet (WALANT) surgery is an attractive option for hand surgeons, particularly during resource-scarce periods, as it eliminates dependence on main operating rooms or hospital-based procedures. The limited prepping or draping used for WALANT field sterility is as effective, if not more effective, than standard sterile prepping or draping. Patient anxiety surrounding WALANT surgery is similar to or less than that of general or local anesthesia with or without tourniquet. Patients use the same or lower amounts of postoperative narcotics after WALANT as compared to after the other anesthetic methods. Wide-awake local anesthesia no-tourniquet surgery saves significant costs for the same surgeries when performed under general or local anesthesia with or without tourniquet. There are very few complications associated with the WALANT method of anesthesia; rare case reports include vasovagal syncope and cardiac arrhythmia due to inadvertent intravascular injection of epinephrine.

[Implementation of the wide awake local anesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) type of anesthesia in hand surgery]

Wide awake local anesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) refers to an anesthesia technique with low bleeding and complication rates, which enables interventions on the hand in an awake patient without the use of a tourniquet. Bleeding control is achieved through addition of vasoconstrictors to the infiltration solution. Since the motor function of the extremity is not affected, it offers the additional possibility of intraoperative active function testing. The WALANT procedure constitutes an established, effective, easily learnt and resource-sparing technique. The spectrum of surgical possibilities with WALANT is wide and covers nearly all elective and many emergency procedures. Due to multiple advantages in contrast to other regional and general anesthesia procedures, WALANT features an increasing spectrum of surgical applications and practitioners. It is therefore of interest for hand surgeons working both in hospitals and private practices.

Comparing Minor Hand Procedures Performed with or without the Use of a Tourniquet: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Background

Carpal tunnel syndrome and trigger finger are two of the most common conditions treated by the hand surgeon. During these procedures, a tourniquet is often used to minimize bleeding and improve visualization of the operative field. However, it may be associated with pain and discomfort. To date, there are few prospective studies investigating the safety and patient-centered outcomes of tourniquet-free minor hand procedures.

Methods

This is a randomized controlled trial comparing patients undergoing open carpal tunnel or trigger finger release with or without the use of a tourniquet. Perioperative subjective patient experience was investigated for both techniques. This was measured based on a numerical rating scale for pain, anxiety, and overall satisfaction. In addition, this was an equivalence trial in terms of operative time, bleeding scores, and perioperative complication rates.

Results

A total of 67 patients were recruited. Both groups were similar with respect to distribution of age, sex, handedness, anti-platelet use, and tobacco use. Median scores for operative time, anxiety, and overall satisfaction were comparable between the 2 groups. With regard to patient discomfort, median scores were significantly higher in the tourniquet group when compared with the no tourniquet group (3.58 versus 1.68, respectively, P = 0.02). Bleeding scores for the tourniquet group were significantly lower than for the no tourniquet group (1.14 versus 1.90, respectively, P = 0.001).

Conclusions

The application of wide awake local anesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) in minor hand surgery procedures has been shown to decrease tourniquet-associated discomfort, improving perioperative patient experience. Additionally, it demonstrated the noninferiority of the tourniquet-free technique with respect to operative time and the rate of perioperative complications.

The effect of wide-awake anesthesia, intravenous regional anesthesia, and infraclavicular brachial plexus block on cost and clinical scores of patients undergoing hand surgery

The aim of our study was to compare the clinical results and costs of wide-awake local anesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT), intravenous regional anesthesia (IVRA), and infraclavicular brachial plexus block (IC-BPB). The patients were divided into WALANT, IVRA, IC-BPB groups, each with 50 patients. Demographic information, induction time, use of sedation, number of patients who were converted to general anesthesia, time in postanesthesia care unit (PACU), amount of bleeding during surgery, presence of tourniquet pain, hand motor function during surgery, time to onset of postanesthesia pain, discharge time, complications, and anesthesia costs were compared. Sedation was given to 12 IC-BPB patients, 9 IVRA patients and 5 WALANT patients. Of these patients, 6 undergoing IC-BPB, 5 undergoing IVRA and 4 undergoing WALANT were converted to general anesthesia (p = 0.80). PACU time and anesthesia costs were the least in the WALANT group, followed by the IVRA group (p < 0.001, p < 0.001). Intraoperative active voluntary movements were best preserved in the WALANT group; however, bleeding was highest in the WALANT group (p < 0.001, p < 0.001). Tourniquet pain was the higher in the IVRA groups, while postoperative pain in the surgical area developed the fastest in this same group (p = 0.029, p < 0.001). Time to discharge was similar in WALANT and IVRA groups, and the longest in the IC-BPB (p < 0.001) group. There was no difference among the groups in terms of patient satisfaction (p = 0.085, p = 0.242 for the first and second survey question). In the current study, WALANT appears to be a suitable alternative to IVRA and IC-BPB methods, with better preservation of active intraoperative movement, lower cost, and shorter time spent in PACU at the expense of higher bleeding.

Development of a Low-Resource Operating Room and a Wide-Awake Orthopedic Surgery Program During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Introduction. The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in significant medication, supply and equipment, and provider shortages, limiting the resources available for provision of surgical care. In response to mandates restricting surgery to high-acuity procedures during this period, our institution developed a multidisciplinary Low-Resource Operating Room (LROR) Taskforce in April 2020. This study describes our institutional experience developing an LROR to maintain access to urgent surgical procedures during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods. A delineation of available resources and resource replacement strategies was conducted, and a final institution-wide plan for operationalizing the LROR was formed. Specialty-specific subgroups then convened to determine best practices and opportunities for LROR utilization. Orthopedic surgery performed in the LROR using wide-awake local anesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) is presented as a use case. Results. Overall, 19 limited resources were identified, spanning across the domains of physical space, drugs, devices and equipment, and personnel. Based on the assessment, the decision to proceed with creation of an LROR was made. Sixteen urgent orthopedic surgeries were successfully performed using WALANT without conversion to general anesthesia. Conclusion. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, a LROR was successfully designed and operationalized. The process for development of a LROR and recommended strategies for operating in a resource-constrained environment may serve as a model for other institutions and facilitate rapid implementation of this care model should the need arise in future pandemic or disaster situations.

Wide-awake Local Anesthesia with No Tourniquet: An Updated Review

The wide-awake local anesthesia with no tourniquet (WALANT) technique has become popularized for various hand/upper extremity procedures. Before surgery, patients receive local anesthetic, consisting of lidocaine with epinephrine, and remain awake for the entire procedure. The purpose of this review was to investigate the advantages, diverse application, outcomes, cost benefits, use in challenging environments, patient considerations, and contraindications associated with WALANT.

METHODS

A comprehensive review of the literature on the WALANT technique was conducted. Search terms included: WALANT, wide-awake surgery, no tourniquet, local anesthesia, hand, wrist, cost, and safety.

RESULTS

The WALANT technique has proven to be successful for common procedures such as flexor tendon repair, tendon transfer, trigger finger releases, Depuytren disease, and simple bony procedures. Recently, the use of WALANT has expanded to more extensive soft-tissue repair, fracture management, and bony manipulation. Advantages include negating preoperative evaluation and testing for anesthesia clearance, eliminating risk of monitored anesthesia care, removal of anesthesia providers and ancillary staff, significant cost savings, and less waste produced. Intraoperative evaluations can be performed through active patient participation, and postoperative recovery and monitoring time are reduced. WALANT is associated with high patient satisfaction rates and low infection rates.

CONCLUSIONS

The WALANT technique has proven to be valuable to both patients and providers, optimizing patient satisfaction and providing substantial healthcare savings. As its application continues to grow, current literature suggests positive outcomes.

Total trapeziometacarpal joint arthroplasty using wide awake local anaesthetic no tourniquet

We conducted a descriptive study of 50 consecutive cases of total trapeziometacarpal joint arthroplasty by one surgeon using wide awake local anaesthetic no tourniquet to assess the usefulness and reliability of the anaesthesia, any adverse effects and patient acceptance. No difference was found when comparing the duration of surgery with 50 cases of total trapeziometacarpal joint arthroplasty inserted in a bloodless field under general or regional anaesthesia by the same surgeon. Wide awake local anaesthetic no tourniquet was found to be useful in providing adequate anaesthesia and haemostasis, and to be reliable and safe with no adverse effects. Patient satisfaction was high with 100% willing to repeat. Overall, wide awake local anaesthetic no tourniquet was a satisfactory method of anaesthesia for trapeziometacarpal joint arthroplasty with the potential for significant benefits to both patient and surgeon compared with traditional general anaesthesia and regional block.Level of evidence: II.

WALANT versus intravenous regional anesthesia for carpal tunnel syndrome: a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

There are several anesthetic techniques for surgical treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Results from this surgery using the "wide awake local anesthesia no tourniquet" (WALANT) technique have been described. However, there is no conclusive evidence regarding the effectiveness of the WALANT technique, compared with the usual techniques.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of the WALANT technique, compared with intravenous regional anesthesia (IVRA; Bier's block), for surgical treatment of CTS.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Randomized clinical trial, conducted at Hospital Alvorada Moema and the Discipline of Hand Surgery, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo (SP), Brazil.

METHODS

Seventy-eight patients were included. The primary outcome was measurement of perioperative pain through a visual analogue scale (VAS). The secondary outcomes were the Boston Questionnaire score, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) score, need for use of analgesics, operating room times, remission of paresthesia, failures and complications.

RESULTS

The WALANT technique (n = 40) proved to be superior to IVRA (n = 38), especially for controlling intraoperative pain (0.11 versus 3.7 cm; P < 0.001) and postoperative pain (0.6 versus 3.9 cm; P < 0.001). Patients spent more time in the operating room in the IVRA group (59.5 versus 46 minutes; P < 0.01) and needed to use more analgesics (10.8 versus 5.7 dipyrone tablets; P = 0.02). Five IVRA procedures failed (5 versus 0; P = 0.06).

CONCLUSIONS

The WALANT technique is more effective than IVRA for CTS surgery.

Maintaining Access to Orthopaedic Surgery During Periods of Operating Room Resource Constraint: Expanded Use of Wide-Awake Surgery During the COVID-19 Pandemic

INTRODUCTION

Wide-awake local anesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) presents a nonstandard anesthetic approach initially described for use in hand surgery that has gained interest and utilization across a variety of orthopaedic procedures. In response to operating room resource constraints imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic, our orthopaedic service rapidly adopted and expanded its use of WALANT.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 16 consecutive cases performed by 7 surgeons was conducted. Patient demographics, surgical details, and perioperative outcomes were assessed. The primary end point was WALANT failure, defined as intraoperative conversion to general anesthesia.

RESULTS

No instances of WALANT failure requiring conversion to general anesthesia occurred. In recovery, one patient (6%) required narcotics for pain control, and the average postoperative pain numeric rating scale was 0.6. The maximum pain score experienced was 4 in the patient requiring postoperative narcotics. The average time in recovery was 42 minutes and ranged from 8 to 118 minutes.

CONCLUSION

The WALANT technique was safely and effectively used in 16 cases across multiple orthopaedic subspecialties, including three procedures not previously described in the literature. WALANT techniques hold promise for use in future disaster scenarios and should be evaluated for potential incorporation into routine orthopaedic surgical care.