Complications in postbariatric body contouring: strategies for assessment and prevention

Influence of Tranexamic Acid in Body Contouring Surgery: Significant Changes on Complication Rates after Abdominoplasty

BACKGROUND

Complications after abdominoplasty remain an unsolved issue in body contouring surgery. The antifibrinolytic drug tranexamic acid (TXA) has gained increasing recognition as a valuable pharmacologic agent within plastic surgery. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of intravenously administered TXA on complications and patient safety after abdominoplasty.

METHODS

Within this retrospective single-center study, patients who underwent abdominoplasty and received intravenous TXA were selected and compared to randomly selected patients who underwent abdominoplasty without administration of TXA. The patient population was divided into two study groups (TXA vs no TXA). Demographic and surgical data as well as complications were evaluated and compared. Appropriate statistical analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven female and 3 male patients with a median age of 38 years and a mean BMI of 25.6 ± 3.3 kg/m2 were included in the study. Except smoking history, demographic data showed no statistically significant differences between both groups. The most common complication was seroma formation (n = 16; 23.9%), and its occurrence was statistically significantly lower in the TXA group (p = 0.023). Furthermore, postoperative seroma aspiration was performed in statistically significant lower numbers in the TXA group (p < 0.05). No thromboembolic events or seizures were observed.

DISCUSSION

The outcomes of this study showed that the intravenous administration of TXA leads to a significant reduction of seroma formation and postoperative seroma aspiration after abdominoplasty. Simultaneously, no adverse thromboembolic events were detected. Hence we would recommend administration of TXA in body contouring surgery to decrease the incidence of seroma formation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

SESQ, a patient-reported outcome instrument addressing excess skin; report on the updated version and the validation process

Excess skin after weight loss is perceived as a major problem for the majority of the bariatric patients, between 68 and 90% desire additional reconstructive surgery. However, only about 20% of the patients actually have the possibility to undergo these procedures. Reliable and valid patient-reported outcome instruments, PROM, are required in order to consider the patients' perspective of excess skin when discussing reconstructive surgery. The aim of this study was to present the updated version of Sahlgrenska Excess Skin Questionnaire, SESQ and to report on the validation process. The material for the process to evaluate internal consistency and known group validity was based on four different studies conducted at the Department of Plastic Surgery at Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Sweden. Internal consistency was high in all four groups examined; the normal population, the obese patients, the post-bariatric patients and the post-abdominoplasty patients. Values for Cronbach's alpha were >0.86 in all groups, and the highest value was seen in the obese patients (0.92). Furthermore, regarding known group validity, there were strong significant differences between the answers from the normal population in comparison with most of the other studies. In conclusion, patients thought that the questions in SESQ were easy to understand, that they covered all appropriate aspects of excess skin and the patients did not think that SESQ overlooked any questions or aspects concerning excess skin. SESQ is a valid questionnaire addressing excess skin in post-bariatric patients. The updated version of the SESQ is both accurate and user-friendly.

De-epithelialized Dermal Flap to Reduce Sacral Wound Healing Complications After Lower Body Lift Procedure

BACKGROUND

Lower or circumferential body lift procedures in the massive-weight-loss population have been associated with significant complication rates. Particularly, the sacral area is at risk of wound-healing problems due to high wound tension or shear forces.

OBJECTIVES

The authors introduced a de-epithelialized dermal flap to reinforce the sacral area.

METHODS

Within this retrospective study, outcomes of 40 consecutive patients who underwent lower body lift between 2017 and 2021 were analyzed. The patient population was divided into 2 study groups (sacral flap vs no flap) including 20 patients each. Demographic and surgical data as well as complications were evaluated and compared. Appropriate statistical analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven female and 3 male patients with a median age of 36.5 years (range, 23-54 years) and a mean weight loss of 46.3 ± 12 kg participated in the study. The most common complication was sacral wound dehiscence (n = 7, 17.5%), and its occurrence was statistically significantly lower in the sacral flap group (P = 0.037). The odd ratios for complications when executing the sacral flap procedure were reduced to 0.306 (95% confidence interval = 0.075 to 1.246) and 0.261 (95% confidence interval = 0.055 to 1.250) for the uncorrected and corrected logistic regressions, respectively. In addition, findings showed a significantly shorter hospital stay as well as statistical trends towards a lower occurrence of overall complications in the sacral flap group. Concerning the remaining data, no statistically significant differences between study groups were detected.

CONCLUSIONS

The presented de-epithelialized dermal flap leads to a significant reduction of sacral wound-healing complications and a shorter hospital stay for patients. This surgical technique is easily reproduceable, rapid, and effective; therefore, we would recommend it for each circumferential or lower body lift procedure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4

Complications of Body Contouring Surgery in Postbariatric Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Obesity is a major global health problem. With an increasing number of bariatric surgeries, the need for body-contouring procedures has grown. These procedures are associated with multiple complications because of various patient characteristics and risk factors.

OBJECTIVES

In this study, we performed a systematic literature review of all the complications of postbariatric body contouring surgeries, as well as a meta-analysis to estimate the effects of body mass index (BMI) and the weight of the tissue resected during body contouring on the development of complications.

METHODS

We conducted a literature search of the PubMed and Cochrane databases in September 2020, using the MeSH terms plastic surgery, weight loss, and complications. Studies were included if they involved more than 35 postbariatric patients and reported postoperative complication rates and types.

RESULTS

In total, 561 articles were initially identified, and 25 studies were included after the final review. The overall weighted rate of postbariatric body contouring surgical complications in all studies was 31.5%. The most frequent complication from all regions of body contouring was seroma (weighted rate 12.7-13.9%). Regarding risk factors, analysis indicated that a BMI < 30 kg/m² and low mean weight of resected tissue were associated with fewer complications.

CONCLUSION

Body contouring procedures are relatively safe. Although complications after contouring are common, most either resolve spontaneously or require minimal intervention. In body contouring after bariatric surgery, there is a 37% increased risk of developing complications if the BMI is ≥ 30 kg/[Formula: see text] before body contouring. A higher weight of resected tissue appears to be linked to a greater risk of complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

The Edmonton Obesity Staging System Predicts Postoperative Complications After Abdominoplasty

BACKGROUND

This study investigates the relationship between Edmonton Obesity Staging System (EOSS) and the occurrence of postoperative complications after abdominoplasty in massive weight loss patients.

METHODS

A single-institution retrospective review of patients undergoing abdominoplasty between 2009 and 2019 after massive weight loss. Demographic data, laboratory findings, known risk factors for postoperative complications, as well as data on major and minor complications were extracted from the patient charts. Logistic regression models were used to investigate the relationship between the variables.

RESULTS

Four hundred and five patients were included in the study. The prevalence of EOSS stages was: 0 (no comorbidities, N = 151, 37%), 1 (mild conditions, N = 40, 10%), 2 (moderate conditions, N = 149, 36%) and 3 (severe conditions, N = 70, 17%). Regression analysis showed that, controlling for body mass index (BMI), BMI Δ (maximal BMI - BMI at presentation), bariatric surgery, volume of resected tissue, and duration of surgery, EOSS stage significantly associated with the occurrence of postoperative complications. Compared with EOSS stage 0, EOSS stages 2 and 3 patients were associated with significantly more minor and major complications, respectively. The volume of resected tissue, BMI Δ, and age were associated with the occurrence of major complications. A regression model of comorbidities comprising the EOSS revealed a significant association of variables diabetes mellitus and hypertension with the occurrence of postoperative complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Edmonton Obesity Staging System is a robust predictor of postoperative complications in abdominoplasty.

Body Contouring in Massive Weight Loss Patients Receiving Venous Thromboembolism Chemoprophylaxis: A Systematic Review

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) events are the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in plastic surgery. Currently, there is no consensus regarding the use of VTE chemoprophylaxis in the context of the risk for bleeding following specific body contouring procedures. Furthermore, there is increasing popularity of these procedures in the massive weight loss (MWL) patient population, who may be at higher risk due to multiple risk factors. The purpose of this study was to stratify the incidence of VTE and bleeding events among individual, specific body contouring procedures in MWL patients receiving chemoprophylaxis.

Methods

A systematic review was designed according to PRISMA guidelines. We screened all articles published between 1988 and 2018 reporting chemoprophylaxis status, VTE, and bleeding events in MWL patients undergoing body contouring procedures.

Results

Thirty-one publications were reviewed. The VTE incidence for any procedure was too low to reach significance. Overall, hematoma incidence in single-procedure patients (8.7%) was significantly higher than concomitant-procedure patients (4.2%, P < 0.01). However, when stratified into operative and nonoperative hematomas, no significant difference between single- and concomitant-procedure groups overall was demonstrated for either category. Individually, only thighplasty patients had a higher rate of operative hematomas when undergoing thighplasty alone (5.3%) compared with thighplasty with concomitant procedures (0.6%, P < 0.05).

Conclusions

Overall, MWL patients undergoing single body contouring procedures (among abdominoplasty, belt lipectomy, thighplasty) were found to have a higher risk of hematoma compared with those undergoing combined contouring procedures. However, stratified hematoma data revealed no differences in overall risk between single- and multiple-procedure operations.

Abdominoplasty in the Massive Weight Loss Patient: Are Aesthetic Goals and Safety Mutually Exclusive?

Background

The goals of abdominoplasty in massive weight loss (MWL) patients are often functional, with a greater emphasis on safety than on aesthetic rejuvenation. As important as functional improvements and safety are, however, there may be room for increasing the aesthetic potential of abdominoplasties in these patients.

Objectives

To determine the safety of the pursuit of aesthetic goals for abdominoplasty in MWL patients.

Methods

This is a retrospective study examining 910 consecutive female patients consisting of 3 groups: postpartum (n = 718), dietary MWL (n = 65), and bariatric MWL (n = 127). All patients were approached with a well-defined set of aesthetic goals which were pursued as needed and as feasible.

Results

The utilization of aesthetic abdominoplasty components was similar in all groups, supporting the assertion that the groups were subjected to a similar aesthetic emphasis. Logistic regression showed that a history of bariatric MWL was an independent risk factor for multiple complications (odds ratio 2.738, P = 0.014) and that elevated body mass index (BMI), smoking, diabetes, and age were likewise independent risk factors for complications. Propensity score-matched case-control pairs showed that bariatric MWL patients were more likely than dietary MWL patients to experience multiple complications (9.52% vs 0%, P = 0.031).

Conclusions

Bariatric MWL patients but not dietary weight loss patients seem to have a higher risk than postpartum patients. Other comorbidities (elevated BMI, smoking, diabetes, and age) seem to be more important predictors of complications than MWL status. Select MWL patients can likely be approached with an emphasis on aesthetic goals, without increasing risks as compared with the postpartum population.

Level of Evidence: 2

The Impact of the Weight of Removed Tissue on the Development of Postoperative Complications in Patients Undergoing Abdominoplasty after Gastric Bypass

BACKGROUND

Patients who undergo Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) have significant weight loss, and abdominoplasty is an effective corrective surgery for removing excess skin. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the weight of removed tissue on the development of postoperative complications in patients undergoing abdominoplasty without lipoaspiration after gastric bypass at the Federal District North Wing Regional Hospital, Brasília, Brazil.

METHODS

Data were analyzed from a prospective registry of patients who underwent abdominoplasty without lipoaspiration after gastric bypass from January 2011 to December 2018. The variables examined included body mass index (BMI) before RYGB and before plastic surgery, weight loss, weight of the excised abdominal flap, comorbidities, and medical complications. Analysis of the role of the weight of the removed tissue after abdominoplasty was performed to assess outcome measures.

RESULTS

One hundred sixty-three patients were included. The mean age of the patients was 42 years. Their BMI at the time of abdominoplasty was 27.49 kg/m², and the average weight loss before abdominoplasty was 47.13 kg. The preweight loss BMI was 45.27 kg/m², and the ∆BMI was 17.78 kg/m². The overall complication rate was 29.4%. An amount of removed tissue from the abdomen ≥ 2000 g significantly increased the rates of postoperative complications (46.7% vs. 19.4%; p = 0.002; OR = 3.13).

CONCLUSIONS

Removal of ≥ 2000 g of tissue from the abdomen led to significantly more complications in patients who underwent abdominoplasty after gastric bypass. In addition, this group of patients was significantly associated with the presence of higher anthropometric variable values (BMI, weight loss, max BMI, and ∆BMI) and not associated with the presence of comorbidities.

Panniculectomy at the time of bariatric surgery: a propensity score-matched analysis of outcomes in the MBSAQIP database

BACKGROUND

Body contouring in the postbariatric surgery patient improves quality of life and daily function.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the risk profile of panniculectomy when performed in select patients at the time of bariatric surgery.

SETTING

Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) participating centers.

METHODS

We examined the MBSAQIP database (2016-2017), in which data on 379,544 bariatric surgeries are reported. Concurrent panniculectomy procedures were identified by Current Procedural Technology (CPT) codes. Patient characteristics and in-hospital as well as 30-day complications were compared between the body contouring group and propensity score-matched bariatric surgery controls.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-four patients met inclusion criteria and were matched to 248 controls. An infra-umbilical panniculectomy was performed in the majority of patients (n = 94, 75.8%). Most patients received an open rather than laparoscopic bariatric surgery (n = 87, 70.2%). There were no statistically significant differences between 30-day mortality (1.9%), wound complications (11.5%), readmission (12.5%) and reoperation (5.8%) between the 2 groups (P > .05). Wound complications occurred in 11.5% of patients and were associated with prolonged hospital stay (odds ratio 4.65, 95% confidence interval 1.99-10.86, P < .001) and a body mass index (BMI) > 50 (odds ratio 3.19, 95% confidence interval 1.02-9.96, P = .046).

CONCLUSION

In select patients, panniculectomy at the time of bariatric surgery was not associated with increased in-hospital or 30-day adverse outcomes compared with matched bariatric surgery controls. This procedure may be performed in select patients, with awareness that revision surgery may be needed once weight loss stabilizes.

Panniculectomy: Practical Pearls and Pitfalls

Panniculectomy is an increasingly common operation, given the current obesity epidemic and the increasing prevalence of bariatric surgery. At first glance, it could be considered a technically simple operation; however, this procedure can be fraught with complications, given the patient population and high demands placed on compromised abdominal tissue. Sufficient attention must be given to the nuances of patient optimization and surgical planning to maximize safe and ideal outcomes. We highlight our practical tips when performing standard or massive panniculectomy for preoperative optimization, intraoperative techniques, and postoperative management to reduce complication and maximize outcomes of this procedure from a surgeon's and a patient's perspective.

Abdominoplasty After Massive Weight Loss

After massive weight loss (MWL), patients present with deformities that are more severe and often different than those observed in standard cosmetic abdominoplasty. The first step is careful consideration of the special factors involved in preoperative screening of patients with MWL presenting for body contouring surgery. Once these patient factors are optimized and surgery is considered, careful analysis of anatomic deformities should ensue. Technical variations of standard abdominoplasty are often required. With proper attention to safe screening, analysis of the anatomic deformities, and application of relevant techniques, plastic surgeons can have a positive impact on the lives of these patients.

Influence of Massive Weight Loss on the Perception of Facial Age: The Facial Age Perceptions Cohort

BACKGROUND

Knowledge is scarce about the role of massive weight loss in facial age perception. The aim of this study was to verify whether there is a change in the perception of facial age when comparing people with morbid obesity before surgery and 1 year after the procedure.

METHODS

Patients with morbid obesity have been analyzed, through a prospective cohort, before and 1 year after undergoing bariatric surgery. Seven plastic surgeons estimated the age of each subject.

RESULTS

Seventy patients participated. Five patients were excluded because of the exclusion criteria. There was no drop-off among the subjects participating in this cohort. Before surgery, the mean facial age perception was 40.8 years; after surgery, mean facial age perception was 43.7 years (95 percent CI, 0.58 to 2.95; p = 0.004). Men older than 40 years, with a preoperative body mass index between 40 and 49.9 kg/m, weight greater than 127.65 kg before surgery, and percentage of excess weight lost greater than 75.13 percent demonstrated greater perceived facial aging.

CONCLUSION

Massive weight loss appears to produce facial aging.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, IV.

Quality of life and predictive factors for complications in patients undergoing abdominoplasty after gastric bypass: A retrospective cohort

BACKGROUND

Obesity is a major health risk factor associated with medical complications, such as cardiovascular disease, that may compromise outcomes. Furthermore, obesity may lead to difficulties in daily life, altering the quality of life and generating psychological disorders such as devalued self-image and depression.

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluated the quality of life and predictive factors of postoperative complications in patients who underwent abdominoplasty after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

SETTING

Bariatric and postbariatric center, North Wing Regional Hospital, Brasília, Brazil.

METHODS

Data were analyzed from a prospective registry of postbariatric patients who underwent abdominoplasty from January 2011 to December 2016. Variables examined included age, sex, body mass index (BMI), complications, and comorbidities. Multivariate analyses were performed to assess outcome measures. The quality-of-life assessment was measured with the Moorehead-Ardelt quality-of-life questionnaire.

RESULTS

One hundred and seven postbariatric patients were included. The mean age of the patients was 41 years. BMI at the time of abdominoplasty (current BMI) was 27.6 ± 3.7 kg/m², and the average weight loss before abdominoplasty was 47.7 ± 17.3 kg. Pre-weight loss BMI (max BMI) was 45.5 ± 7.6 kg/m², and ∆BMI was 18.6 ± 9.3 kg/m². The overall rate of complications was 23.4%. Among the studied factors in the multivariate analysis, amount of removed tissue in the abdomen >2000 g, ∆BMI >20 kg/m², and age >40 years significantly increased the rates of postoperative complications. In our study, abdominoplasty improved the quality of life of patients (mean quality-of-life scores, 2.1 ± 0.9).

CONCLUSION

The amount of removed tissue in the abdomen, ∆BMI >20 kg/m², and age >40 years led to significantly more complications in patients undergoing abdominoplasty after gastroplasty. In addition, this study demonstrated that abdominoplasty should be proposed to patients with massive weight loss to improve quality of life.

Abdominal Contouring and Combining Procedures

The abdomen is the most common area of concern among patients with massive weight loss (MWL). Abdominal contouring techniques in the MWL population include panniculectomy, standard abdominoplasty, fleur-de-lis abdominoplasty, reverse abdominoplasty and various combinations of these techniques as part of circumferential procedures such as, circumferential abdominoplasty, and lower body lift. The authors believe that the optimal surgical approach to the abdomen is an integration of the patient aesthetic preferences and the surgeon assessment and experience. The authors recommend to limit total body reconstruction of MWL patients to 2 stages, and include the abdominal area in the first stage.

Safety in Body Contouring to Avoid Complications

Body contouring after weight loss is becoming more prevalent. An appropriate systematic approach that starts from the first consultation needs to focus on residual comorbidities and weight of the patient. A thorough discussion about potential outcomes manages expectations. Preoperative optimization with smoking, herbal cessation, and nutritional assessment is mandatory. Planned staged approach minimizes lengthy procedures associated with increased postoperative morbidity. In the operating room, appropriate ambient temperature, positioning of the patient, and continuous discussion between surgeon and anesthesiologist prevent further complications. Careful transition to postoperative care with early ambulation and use of compressive garments add to an approach to minimize postoperative complications.

What Is the Impact of Comorbidities on the Risk for Postoperative Body-Contouring Surgery Complications in Postbariatric Patients?

BACKGROUND

There is an increasing number of patients presenting after massive weight loss for plastic surgery, and many of these patients have residual diseases that may compromise outcomes. This study aims to evaluate the impact of comorbidities on the development of postoperative complications in postbariatric patients undergoing plastic surgery procedures at the Federal District North Wing Regional Hospital, Brasília, Brazil.

METHODS

Descriptive, analytical, and prospective study was performed on patients who underwent plastic surgery following RYGB from January 2011 to December 2016. Measures included BMI (body mass index) before RYGB and before plastic surgery, medical complications and comorbidities.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-nine patients (130 female, 9 male) with a mean age of 41 years underwent 233 separate operations. The average BMI at the time of plastic surgery was 27.44 kg/m². The average weight loss was 47.02 kg, and the mean pre-weight-loss BMI (max BMI) was 45.17 kg/m². The most important pre-plastic comorbidities were arterial hypertension (11.5%), degenerative arthropathy (5.4%), diabetes mellitus (5.0%), and metabolic syndrome (4.3%). Of the 139 patients operated upon, 76.97% underwent abdominoplasty followed by mammoplasty (42.46%). The overall rate of complications was 26.65%. Initially, on univariate regression analyses, comorbidities influenced the development of postoperative complications. However, after multiple logistic regression, the most important comorbidities failed to predict an increased risk of complications.

CONCLUSION

In this group of patients, with these anthropometric and clinical profiles, the most important comorbidities (diabetes, arterial hypertension, and metabolic syndrome) failed to influence the incidence of postoperative complications in postbariatric patients after plastic surgery.

Aquacel Surgical Dressing after Thigh Lift: A Case-Control Study

The postoperative dressing in patients undergoing thigh lift is often difficult, not very resistant to movement, and uncomfortable for the patient, and often exposes surgical site to infection, maceration, or delay in wound healing.

The Impact of Protein Nutritional Supplementation for Massive Weight Loss Patients Undergoing Abdominoplasty

BACKGROUND

As more patients undergo bariatric surgery to assist with weight loss, the demand for post-bariatric body contouring surgery, to address both functional and aesthetic concerns, is increasing. However, high wound healing complication rates remain a significant problem for these patients. One theory is that chronic malnourishment and hypoproteinemia may contribute significantly to these wound healing complications.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of pretreatment protein nutritional supplementation on wound healing in post-bariatric surgery massive weight loss patients undergoing abdominoplasty. Our hypothesis was that protein supplementation would decrease wound healing complications.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of 23 post-bariatric surgery patients undergoing abdominoplasty who received pretreatment protein nutritional supplementation. This group was compared with a historical control group of 23 post-bariatric surgery patients who underwent abdominoplasty in the period immediately before the implementation of the protein supplementation protocol. Patient demographics and procedural characteristics were similar for the two groups.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients were identified who had undergone abdominoplasty, half of whom were prescribed the protein supplementation protocol. Overall wound healing complication rates were significantly lower in the protein-supplemented group (0.0% vs. 21.8%, p = 0.04). There was no significant difference between the protein supplementation and historical control groups in regards to total complication rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Pretreatment protein supplementation is a simple intervention that can significantly decrease wound healing complications in post-bariatric surgery massive weight loss patients undergoing abdominoplasty. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 4: Therapeutic.

Post-Bariatric Body Contouring

BACKGROUND

The "epidemic" of obesity has recently been accompanied by a new "epidemic" of massive weight loss. The demand for post-bariatric contouring is rising and, as such, it is extremely important for plastic surgeons to be well versed in the treatment of these patients. Unfortunately, the problem is not solely surgical.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this article is to understand the nutritional and psychological complications that can occur in patients following massive weight loss, to understand the anatomic deformities in massive weight loss as a means to correct those deformities surgically, and to understand the complications from post-bariatric contouring procedures in an effort to avoid them.

METHODS

This article discusses the nutritional and psychological considerations in the massive weight loss patient, anatomical considerations in this patient group, and the surgical techniques designed to address these anatomic concerns. Important pertinent studies are reviewed and discussed.

RESULTS

Anatomical changes are encountered in each region of the body: there are surgical options available to correct them, although potential complications are associated with these surgical procedures. These surgical options are reviewed as well as the risk and benefits associated with them.

CONCLUSIONS

There are many problems that need to be addressed in the massive weight loss patient prior to embarking on surgical treatment. Additionally, surgery on massive weight loss patients has unique considerations that distinguish these operations from those performed on the non-bariatric population.

Plastic surgery after bariatric surgery

BACKGROUND

Massive weight loss after bariatric surgery often results in excess skin, which can lead to stigma due to appearance and pronounced physical and psychological impairments. This review considers the evidence base for post-bariatric plastic surgery and the treatment options that are available.

METHOD

The article is based on a literature search in PubMed with the keywords «bariatric surgery» AND «plastic surgery», in addition to the authors' experience with a large number of patients.

RESULTS

Body contouring surgery after massive weight loss is offered primarily for the treatment of troublesome skin conditions. The surgery can help to improve quality of life and functional status. However, there is little scientific evidence regarding indications for surgery, choice of surgical techniques and risk of complications, and the surgeon's own opinions and clinical experience often play a major role. Many plastic surgeons limit body contouring surgery to those with BMI < 28 kg/m². However, most patients who have undergone bariatric surgery have BMI ≥ 30 kg/m², and requests for body contouring surgery for these individuals are often denied, except when there are compelling medical grounds.

INTERPRETATION

Plastic surgery can lead to improved functioning and increased quality of life. The evidence base with respect to indications, treatment methods and outcomes should be strengthened through well-planned prospective studies and a patient registry. There is a particular need for documentation of treatment outcomes in the large group of patients with BMI ≥ 30 kg/m².

Body contouring

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. List patient selection factors for body lift surgery. 2. Describe operative approaches for brachioplasty, upper body lift, abdominoplasty, lower body lift, and thigh lift. 3. Identify complications and pitfalls related to body lifting and describe how to avoid them.

SUMMARY

The author discusses the preoperative assessment, surgical treatment plan, postoperative management, outcomes, and possible complications for a comprehensive spectrum of body-contouring surgical procedures. Preoperative planning includes medical history and physical examination, along with an open discussion with the patient. Surgical procedures for brachioplasty, upper back lift, abdominoplasty, lower back lift, gluteal augmentation and thigh lift are discussed. Postoperative management pearls are shared, as well as pitfalls to be avoided.