1
|
Yan L, Wu X, Liu L, Wang F, Hu X. A balance of unsafe care incidents and interactive cooperative care: A constructivist grounded theory study of safe care ecosystem for older inpatients. J Clin Nurs 2024; 33:3247-3258. [PMID: 38764238 DOI: 10.1111/jocn.17183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2023] [Revised: 03/21/2024] [Accepted: 04/07/2024] [Indexed: 05/21/2024]
Abstract
AIMS To explore older inpatients and their caregivers' care experience and how this relates to the gerontology care practice. BACKGROUND Research interest in the conceptualization of safe care for older inpatients was growing, and these studies were predominantly reported from a single or healthcare perspective. There is a shortage of literature on how patients and their caregivers conceptualise safe care. DESIGN Constructivist grounded theory. METHODS Stage 1 included semi-structured interviews with inpatients. Stage 2 included semi-structured interviews with caregivers and six field notes. Purposive and theoretical sampling were used to recruit 61 participants across six healthcare institutions. Data analysis included initial coding, focused coding, and theoretical coding using constant comparative, field notes and memo writing. RESULTS The substantive theory to emerge from the data was A balance of unsafe care incidents and interactive cooperative care. This core concept was informed by four categories: unsafe care incidents, interactive cooperative care, person-centred care, contextual conditions, and one care outcome. The relationships between these categories constituted a balance in which patient-centred care was the core, unsafe care incidents were the barriers, interactive cooperative care was the facilitator, and the result of the balance was the care outcome. The balance constituted a safe care ecosystem under the interaction of contextual conditions. CONCLUSIONS Interactive cooperative care is vital in enabling care stakeholders to reduce unsafe care incidents, which facilitates them in achieving safe care and further constructing a healthy care ecosystem. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE This theory identifies barriers and facilitators encountered by care stakeholders to cope with everyday problems and guides them in developing personalised care plans to ensure patient safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lupei Yan
- Innovation Center of Nursing Research and Nursing Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, West China Hospital, Sichuan University/West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Xiaorong Wu
- Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Li Liu
- Innovation Center of Nursing Research and Nursing Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, West China Hospital, Sichuan University/West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Fang Wang
- Innovation Center of Nursing Research and Nursing Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, West China Hospital, Sichuan University/West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Xiuying Hu
- Innovation Center of Nursing Research and Nursing Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, West China Hospital, Sichuan University/West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Miller S, Stockwell DC. Patient Harm Events and Associated Cost Outcomes Reported to a Patient Safety Organization. J Patient Saf 2024:01209203-990000000-00240. [PMID: 39038074 DOI: 10.1097/pts.0000000000001254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/24/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aims of the study were to describe inpatient harm events detected via an automatic electronic trigger system (ETS) and to consider their financial consequences. METHODS Over a 27-month period, inpatient harm events were identified and documented in 1 healthcare system with 37 acute care facilities. Patients who experienced harm (all harm or preventable harm only) were compared with similar patients who did not. Clinical, financial, and demographic data were used to identify labor-adjusted direct variable costs (DVC) and potential differences in length of stay (LOS) associated with all-harm, preventable-harm, and nonharmed cohorts. Age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index, case mix index, diagnosis-related groups, major diagnostic category, sex, age, location, diagnosis, adverse event category and subcategory, preventability, and harm severity were used to compare cohorts. Total harm events reported via the ETS and the health system's voluntary event reporting system were compared. RESULTS Nearly 93,000 encounters for all-harm (n = 25,665) and nonharmed cohorts (n = 67,217) were compared by random sampling of diagnosis-related group-matched all-harm and nonharmed groups to ensure similar clinical conditions, as measured by Charlson Comorbidity Index and case mix index. Sampling (2 groups, n = 100 and n = 200) showed that increased LOS was associated with harm; yet other clinical comparators were similar across groups. the preventable-harm subcohort had longer LOS (10.7 versus 5.9 days) and higher DVC ($13,442 versus $8024) than the nonharmed cohort. Identification of harm events was nearly 6-fold higher with the ETS than with the voluntary event reporting system. CONCLUSIONS Patients with preventable harm had increased LOS that was associated with higher DVC per preventable-harm encounter in a large US healthcare system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susanne Miller
- From the Pascal Metrics PSO, Washington, District of Columbia
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Groves PS, Farag A, Perkhounkova Y, Sabin JA, Witry MJ, Wright B. Nurse judgements of hospitalized patients' safety concerns are affected by patient, nurse and event characteristics: A factorial survey experiment. J Clin Nurs 2024. [PMID: 39008405 DOI: 10.1111/jocn.17372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2024] [Revised: 05/29/2024] [Accepted: 07/04/2024] [Indexed: 07/17/2024]
Abstract
AIM To test the influences of patient, safety event and nurse characteristics on nurse judgements of credibility, importance and intent to report patients' safety concerns. DESIGN Factorial survey experiment. METHODS A total of 240 nurses were recruited and completed an online survey including demographic information and responses to eight factorial vignettes consisting of unique combinations of eight patient and event factors. Hierarchical multivariate analysis was used to test influences of vignette factors and nurse characteristics on nurse judgements. RESULTS The intraclass coefficients for nurse judgements suggest that the variation among nurses exceeded the influence of contextual vignette factors. Several significant sources of nurse variation were identified, including race/ethnicity, suggesting a complex relationship between nurses' characteristics and their potential biases, and the influence of personal and patient factors on nurses' judgements, including the decision to report safety concerns. CONCLUSION Nurses are key players in the system to manage patient safety concerns. Variation among nurses and how they respond to scenarios of patient safety concerns highlight the need for nurse-level intervention. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND PATIENT CARE Complex factors influence nurses' judgement, interpretation and reporting of patients' safety concerns. IMPACT Understanding nurse judgement regarding patient-expressed safety concerns is critical for designing processes and systems that promote reporting. Multiple event and patient characteristics (type of event and apparent harm, and patient gender, race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and communication approach) as well as participant characteristics (race/ethnicity, gender, years of experience and primary hospital area) impacted participants' judgements of credibility, degree of concern and intent to report. These findings will help guide patient safety nurse education and training. REPORTING METHOD STROBE guidelines. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION Members of the public, including patient advocates, were involved in content validation of the vignette scenarios, norming photographs used in the factorial survey and testing the survey functionality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Amany Farag
- College of Nursing, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | | | - Janice A Sabin
- School of Medicine, Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Matthew J Witry
- College of Pharmacy, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Brad Wright
- Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sauro KM, Smith C, Ibadin S, Thomas A, Ganshorn H, Bakunda L, Bajgain B, Bisch SP, Nelson G. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Guidelines and Hospital Length of Stay, Readmission, Complications, and Mortality: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e2417310. [PMID: 38888922 PMCID: PMC11195621 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.17310] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2024] [Accepted: 04/17/2024] [Indexed: 06/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance A comprehensive review of the evidence exploring the outcomes of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) guidelines has not been completed. Objective To evaluate if ERAS guidelines are associated with improved hospital length of stay, hospital readmission, complications, and mortality compared with usual surgical care, and to understand differences in estimates based on study and patient factors. Data Sources MEDLINE, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Cochrane Central were searched from inception until June 2021. Study Selection Titles, abstracts, and full-text articles were screened by 2 independent reviewers. Eligible studies were randomized clinical trials that examined ERAS-guided surgery compared with a control group and reported on at least 1 of the outcomes. Data Extraction and Synthesis Data were abstracted in duplicate using a standardized data abstraction form. The study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Risk of bias was assessed in duplicate using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to pool estimates for each outcome, and meta-regression identified sources of heterogeneity within each outcome. Main Outcome and Measures The primary outcomes were hospital length of stay, hospital readmission within 30 days of index discharge, 30-day postoperative complications, and 30-day postoperative mortality. Results Of the 12 047 references identified, 1493 full texts were screened for eligibility, 495 were included in the systematic review, and 74 RCTs with 9076 participants were included in the meta-analysis. Included studies presented data from 21 countries and 9 ERAS-guided surgical procedures with 15 (20.3%) having a low risk of bias. The mean (SD) Reporting on ERAS Compliance, Outcomes, and Elements Research checklist score was 13.5 (2.3). Hospital length of stay decreased by 1.88 days (95% CI, 0.95-2.81 days; I2 = 86.5%; P < .001) and the risk of complications decreased (risk ratio, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.59-0.87; I2 = 78.6%; P < .001) in the ERAS group. Risk of readmission and mortality were not significant. Conclusions and Relevance In this meta-analysis, ERAS guidelines were associated with decreased hospital length of stay and complications. Future studies should aim to improve implementation of ERAS and increase the reach of the guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khara M. Sauro
- Department of Community Health Sciences and O’Brien Institute of Public Health, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Surgery, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Oncology and Charbonneau Cancer Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Christine Smith
- Department of Community Health Sciences and O’Brien Institute of Public Health, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Seremi Ibadin
- Department of Community Health Sciences and O’Brien Institute of Public Health, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Abigail Thomas
- Department of Community Health Sciences and O’Brien Institute of Public Health, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Heather Ganshorn
- Libraries and Cultural Resources, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Linda Bakunda
- Department of Community Health Sciences and O’Brien Institute of Public Health, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Bishnu Bajgain
- Department of Community Health Sciences and O’Brien Institute of Public Health, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Steven P. Bisch
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Gregg Nelson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Ariadne Labs, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Nibbelink CW, Dunn Lopez K, Reeves JJ, Horman S, El-Kareh RE. Nurse and Physician Perceptions and Decision Making During Interdisciplinary Communication: Factors That Influence Communication Channel Selection. Comput Inform Nurs 2024; 42:267-276. [PMID: 38335993 DOI: 10.1097/cin.0000000000001108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/12/2024]
Abstract
Errors in decision making and communication play a key role in poor patient outcomes. Safe patient care requires effective decision making during interdisciplinary communication through communication channels. Research on factors that influence nurse and physician decision making during interdisciplinary communication is limited. Understanding influences on nurse and physician decision making during communication channel selection is needed to support effective communication and improved patient outcomes. The purpose of the study was to explore nurse and physician perceptions of and decision-making processes for selecting interruptive or noninterruptive interdisciplinary communication channels in medical-surgical and intermediate acute care settings. Twenty-six participants (10 RNs, 10 resident physicians, and six attending physicians) participated in semistructured interviews in two acute care metropolitan hospitals for this qualitative descriptive study. The Practice Primed Decision Model guided interview question development and early data analysis. Findings include a core category, Development of Trust in the Communication Process, supported by three main themes: (1) Understanding of Patient Status Drives Communication Decision Making; (2) Previous Interdisciplinary Communication Experience Guides Channel Selection; and (3) Perceived Usefulness Influences Communication Channel Selection. Findings from this study provide support for future design and research of communication channels within the EHR and clinical decision support systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine W Nibbelink
- Author Affiliations: Hahn School of Nursing and Health Science, University of San Diego (Dr Nibbelink), CA; College of Nursing, The University of Iowa (Dr Dunn Lopez), Iowa City; University of California, San Diego; Department of Surgery (Dr Reeves), Division of Hospital Medicine (Dr Horman), and Clinical Professor, School of Medicine (Dr El-Kareh), La Jolla
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ravindran S, Matharoo M, Rutter MD, Ashrafian H, Darzi A, Healey C, Thomas-Gibson S. Patient safety incidents in endoscopy: a human factors analysis of nonprocedural significant harm incidents from the National Reporting and Learning System (NRLS). Endoscopy 2024; 56:89-99. [PMID: 37722604 DOI: 10.1055/a-2177-4130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite advances in understanding and reducing the risk of endoscopic procedures, there is little consideration of the safety of the wider endoscopy service. Patient safety incidents (PSIs) still occur. We sought to identify nonprocedural PSIs (nPSIs) and their causative factors from a human factors perspective and generate ideas for safety improvement. METHODS Endoscopy-specific PSI reports were extracted from the National Reporting and Learning System (NRLS). A retrospective, cross-sectional human factors analysis of data was performed. Two independent researchers coded data using a hybrid thematic analysis approach. The Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS) was used to code contributory factors. Analysis informed creation of driver diagrams and key recommendations for safety improvement in endoscopy. RESULTS From 2017 to 2019, 1181 endoscopy-specific PSIs of significant harm were reported across England and Wales, with 539 (45.6%) being nPSIs. Five categories accounted for over 80% of all incidents, with "follow-up and surveillance" being the largest (23.4% of all nPSIs). From the free-text incident reports, 487 human factors codes were identified. Decision-based errors were the most common act prior to PSI occurrence. Other frequent preconditions to incidents were focused on environmental factors, particularly overwhelmed resources, patient factors, and ineffective team communication. Lack of staffing, standard operating procedures, effective systems, and clinical pathways were also contributory. Seven key recommendations for improving safety have been made in response to our findings. CONCLUSIONS This was the first national-level human factors analysis of endoscopy-specific PSIs. This work will inform safety improvement strategies and should empower individual services to review their approach to safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Srivathsan Ravindran
- Joint Advisory Group on Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Royal College of Physicians, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
- Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
- Wolfson Unit for Endoscopy, St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Manmeet Matharoo
- Wolfson Unit for Endoscopy, St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Matthew David Rutter
- Joint Advisory Group on Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Royal College of Physicians, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
- Gastroenterology, University Hospital of North Tees, Stockton-on-Tees, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Hutan Ashrafian
- Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
- Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Ara Darzi
- Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
- Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Chris Healey
- Gastroenterology, Airedale NHS Foundation Trust, Keighley, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Siwan Thomas-Gibson
- Wolfson Unit for Endoscopy, St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
- Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Blum SFU, Hoffmann RT. Avoiding adverse events in interventional radiology - a systematic review on the instruments. CVIR Endovasc 2024; 7:2. [PMID: 38170413 PMCID: PMC10764660 DOI: 10.1186/s42155-023-00413-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2023] [Accepted: 12/05/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Avoiding AEs is a pivotal fundament for high patient safety in an efficient interventional radiology (IR) department. Although IR procedures are considered to have a lower risk than their surgical alternatives, they account for one third of all radiological adverse events (AEs) and in general, the number of AEs is increasing. Thus, measures to prevent AEs in IR are of interest. METHODS A systematic literature search was conducted via handsearch and Ovid. A structured data extraction was performed with all included studies and their quality of evidence was evaluated. Finally, data were aggregated for further statistical analysis. RESULTS After screening 1,899 records, 25 full-text publications were screened for eligibility. Nine studies were included in the review. Of those, four studies investigated in simulator training, one in team training, three in checklists, and one in team time-out. Eight were monocenter studies, and five were conducted in a non-clinical context. Study quality was low. Aggregation and analysis of data was only possible for the studies about checklists with an overall reduction of the median error per procedure from 0.35 to 0.06, observed in a total of 20,399 and 58,963 procedures, respectively. CONCLUSION The evidence on the instruments to avoid AEs in IR is low. Further research should be conducted to elaborate the most powerful safety tools to improve patient outcomes in IR by avoiding AEs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophia Freya Ulrike Blum
- Institute and Polyclinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, Dresden, 01307, Germany.
- Quality and Medical Risk Management, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, Dresden, 01307, Germany.
| | - Ralf-Thorsten Hoffmann
- Institute and Polyclinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, Dresden, 01307, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hill AJ, Jones DB, Woodworth L. Physician-patient race-match reduces patient mortality. JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS 2023; 92:102821. [PMID: 37871470 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2023.102821] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2023] [Revised: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 09/23/2023] [Indexed: 10/25/2023]
Abstract
This paper assesses the impacts of physician-patient race-match, especially Black patients paired with Black physicians, on patient mortality. We draw on administrative data from Florida, linking hospital encounters from mid-2011 through 2014 to information from the Florida Physician Workforce Survey. Focusing on uninsured patients experiencing unscheduled hospital admissions who are conditionally randomly assigned to physicians, we find that physician-patient race-match for Black patients reduces the likelihood of within-hospital mortality by 0.28 percentage points, a 27 % reduction relative to the overall mortality rate. An alternative identification strategy relying on instrumental variables provides a similar finding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew J Hill
- Montana State University, Department of Agricultural Economics and Economics, P.O. Box 172920, Bozeman, MT 59717, United States of America.
| | - Daniel B Jones
- University of Pittsburgh, Graduate School of Public and International Affairs, 230 S. Bouquet St., Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States of America
| | - Lindsey Woodworth
- University of South Carolina, Darla Moore School of Business, Department of Economics, 1014 Greene St., Columbia, SC 29208, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Litvinova O, Matin FB, Matin M, Zima-Kulisiewicz B, Tomasik C, Siddiquea BN, Stoyanov J, Atanasov AG, Willschke H. Patient safety discourse in a pandemic: a Twitter hashtag analysis study on #PatientSafety. Front Public Health 2023; 11:1268730. [PMID: 38035302 PMCID: PMC10687459 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1268730] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2023] [Accepted: 10/27/2023] [Indexed: 12/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The digitalization of medicine is becoming a transformative force in modern healthcare systems. This study aims to investigate discussions regarding patient safety, as well as summarize perceived approaches to mitigating risks of adverse events expressed through the #PatientSafety Twitter hashtag during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods This research is grounded in the analysis of data extracted from Twitter under the hashtag #PatientSafety between December 1, 2019 and February 1, 2023. Symplur Signals, which represents a tool offering a method to monitor tweets containing hashtags registered with the Symplur Healthcare Hashtag Project, was used for analyzing the tweets shared in the study period. For text analytics of the relevant data, we further used the word cloud generator MonkeyLearn, and VOSviewer. Results The analysis encompasses 358'809 tweets that were shared by 90'079 Twitter users, generating a total of 1'183'384'757 impressions. Physicians contributed to 18.65% of all tweets, followed by other healthcare professionals (14.31%), and health-focused individuals (10.91%). Geographically, more than a third of tweets (60.90%) were published in the United States. Canada and India followed in second and third positions, respectively. Blocks of trending terms of greater interest to the global Twitter community within the hashtag #PatientSafety were determined to be: "Patient," "Practical doctors," and "Health Care Safety Management." The findings demonstrate the engagement of the Twitter community with COVID-19 and problems related to the training, experience of doctors and patients during a pandemic, communication, the vaccine safety and effectiveness, and potential use of off-label drugs. Noteworthy, in the field of pharmacovigilance, Twitter has the possibility of identifying adverse reactions associated with the use of drugs, including vaccines. The issue of medical errors has been also discussed by Twitter users using the hashtag #PatientSafety. Conclusion It is clear that various stakeholders, including students, medical practitioners, health organizations, pharmaceutical companies, and regulatory bodies, leverage Twitter to rapidly exchange medical information, data on the disease symptoms, and the drug effects. Consequently, there is a need to further integrate Twitter-derived data into the operational routines of healthcare organizations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olena Litvinova
- Department of Management and Quality Assurance in Pharmacy, National University of Pharmacy of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine, Kharkiv, Ukraine
- Ludwig Boltzmann Institute Digital Health and Patient Safety, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Farhan Bin Matin
- Department of Pharmacy, East West University, Aftabnagar, Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - Maima Matin
- Institute of Genetics and Animal Biotechnology of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Jastrzebiec, Poland
| | - Bogumila Zima-Kulisiewicz
- Institute of Genetics and Animal Biotechnology of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Jastrzebiec, Poland
| | - Cyprian Tomasik
- Institute of Genetics and Animal Biotechnology of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Jastrzebiec, Poland
| | - Bodrun Naher Siddiquea
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | | | - Atanas G. Atanasov
- Ludwig Boltzmann Institute Digital Health and Patient Safety, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Institute of Genetics and Animal Biotechnology of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Jastrzebiec, Poland
| | - Harald Willschke
- Ludwig Boltzmann Institute Digital Health and Patient Safety, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Medicine, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Groves PS, Bunch JL, Kuehnle F. Increasing a patient's sense of security in the hospital: A theory of trust and nursing action. Nurs Inq 2023; 30:e12569. [PMID: 37282711 DOI: 10.1111/nin.12569] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2022] [Revised: 05/24/2023] [Accepted: 05/27/2023] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
Having a decreased sense of security leads to unnecessary suffering and distress for patients. Establishing trust is critical for nurses to promote a patient's sense of security, consistent with trauma-informed care. Research regarding nursing action, trust, and sense of security is wide-ranging but fragmented. We used theory synthesis to organize the disparate existing knowledge into a testable middle-range theory encompassing these concepts in hospitals. The resulting model illustrates how individuals are admitted to the hospital with some predisposition to trust or mistrust the healthcare system and/or personnel. Patients encounter circumstances increasing their emotional and/or physical vulnerability to harm, leading to experiences of fear and anxiety. Without intervention, fear and anxiety lead to a decreased sense of security, increased distress, and suffering. Nurse action can ameliorate these effects by increasing a hospitalized person's sense of security or by promoting the development of interpersonal trust, also leading to an increased sense of security. Increased sense of security results in diminished anxiety and fear, and increased hopefulness, confidence, calm, sense of value, and sense of control. The consequences of a decreased sense of security are harmful to patients and nurses should know that they can intervene in ways that both increase interpersonal trust and sense of security.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jacinda L Bunch
- College of Nursing, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Francis Kuehnle
- College of Nursing, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Suclupe S, Efrain Pantoja Bustillos P, Bracchiglione J, Requeijo C, Salas-Gama K, Solà I, Merchán-Galvis A, Uya Muntaña J, Robleda G, Martinez-Zapata MJ. Effectiveness of nonpharmacological interventions to prevent adverse events in the intensive care unit: A review of systematic reviews. Aust Crit Care 2023; 36:902-914. [PMID: 36572576 DOI: 10.1016/j.aucc.2022.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2022] [Revised: 11/09/2022] [Accepted: 11/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Different types of interventions have been assessed for the prevention of adverse events. However, determining which patient-safety practice is most effective can be challenging when there is no systematised evidence synthesis. An overview following the best methodological standards can provide the best reliable integrative evidence. OBJECTIVES The objective of this study was to provide an overview of effectiveness nonpharmacological interventions aimed at preventing adverse events in the intensive care unit. METHODS A review of systematic reviews (SRs) was conducted according to the Cochrane Handbook and PRISMA recommendations. PubMed, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library were searched for SRs published until March 2022. Two reviewers independently assessed the study's quality, using AMSTAR-2, and extracted data on intervention characteristics and effect on prevention of adverse events. RESULTS Thirty-seven SRs were included, and 27 nonpharmacological interventions were identified to prevent 11 adverse events. Most of the reviews had critically low methodological quality. Among all the identified interventions, subglottic secretion drainage, semirecumbent position, and kinetic bed therapy were effective in preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia; the use of earplugs, early mobilisation, family participation, and music in reducing delirium; physical rehabilitation in improving muscle strength; use of respiratory support in preventing reintubation; the use of a computerised physician order entry system in reducing risk of medication errors; and the use of heated water humidifier was effective in reducing artificial airway occlusion. CONCLUSIONS Some nonpharmacological interventions reduced adverse events in the intensive care setting. These findings should be interpreted carefully due to the low methodological quality. SRs on preventing adverse events in the intensive care unit should adhere to quality assessment tools so that best evidence can be used in decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefanie Suclupe
- Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain; Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Spain.
| | | | - Javier Bracchiglione
- Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain; Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Spain; Interdisciplinary Centre for Health Studies (CIESAL), Universidad de Valparaíso, Chile
| | - Carolina Requeijo
- Epidemiology and Public Health Department, Hospital de La Santa Creu I Sant Pau, Institut de Recerca IIB Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Karla Salas-Gama
- Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain; Vall D'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ivan Solà
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Spain; Epidemiology and Public Health Department, Hospital de La Santa Creu I Sant Pau, Institut de Recerca IIB Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain; CIBER of Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Spain
| | - Angela Merchán-Galvis
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Spain; Department of Social Medicine and Family Health, Universidad Del Cauca, Colombia
| | - Jaume Uya Muntaña
- Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge, Instituto Català de Salut, Nursing Research Group, Bellvitge Institute for Biomedical Research, Spain
| | - Gemma Robleda
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Spain; Nursing School of Barcelona, Campus Docent Sant Joan de Déu-Private Foundation, University of Barcelona, Spain
| | - Maria Jose Martinez-Zapata
- Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain; Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Spain; CIBER of Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Spain
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
van Dijk MD, van Beeck EF, Huis A, van der Gun BT, Polinder S, van Eijsden RA, Burdorf A, Vos MC, Erasmus V. Effects of a management team training intervention on the compliance with a surgical site infection bundle: a before-after study in operating theatres in the Netherlands. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e073137. [PMID: 37085301 PMCID: PMC10124304 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/23/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of a quality improvement (QI) team training intervention, by measuring the intervention fidelity and the compliance with a surgical site infection (SSI) bundle in the operating theatre (OT). DESIGN Multicentre before-after study. SETTING This study was performed in four Dutch hospitals. INTERVENTION The QI team training intervention consisted of four sessions per hospital and stimulated participants to set culture norms and targets, identify barriers, and formulate management activities to improve compliance with four standard operating procedures (SOPs) of a SSI bundle in the OT. Participants were executive board members, top-level managers, leading clinicians and support staff. The four SOPs were: (1) reducing door movements; (2) preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis prescribing; (3) preoperative shaving; and (4) postoperative normothermia. Poisson and logistic regression analyses were performed to analyse the effect of the intervention on compliance with the individual SOPs (primary outcome measure) and on the influence of medical specialty, time of day the procedure took place and time in the OT (secondary outcome measures). RESULTS Not all management layers were successfully involved during all sessions in the hospitals. Top-level managers were best represented in all hospitals, leading clinicians the least. The number of implemented improvement activities was low, ranging between 2 and 14. The team training intervention we developed was not associated with improvements in the compliance with the four SOP of the SSI bundle. Medical specialty, time of day, and time in OT were associated with median number of door movements, and preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis administration. CONCLUSION This study showed that after the QI team training intervention the overall compliance with the four SOPs did not improve. Minimal involvement of leading clinicians and a low number of self-initiated activities after the team training were important barriers for compliance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manon D van Dijk
- Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ed F van Beeck
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anita Huis
- Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Bernardina Tf van der Gun
- Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Suzanne Polinder
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rianne Am van Eijsden
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Alex Burdorf
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Margreet C Vos
- Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Vicki Erasmus
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Dillner P, Eggenschwiler LC, Rutjes AWS, Berg L, Musy SN, Simon M, Moffa G, Förberg U, Unbeck M. Incidence and characteristics of adverse events in paediatric inpatient care: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Qual Saf 2023; 32:133-149. [PMID: 36572528 PMCID: PMC9985739 DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2022-015298] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2022] [Accepted: 11/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adverse events (AEs) cause suffering for hospitalised children, a fragile patient group where the delivery of adequate timely care is of great importance. OBJECTIVE To report the incidence and characteristics of AEs, in paediatric inpatient care, as detected with the Global Trigger Tool (GTT), the Trigger Tool (TT) or the Harvard Medical Practice Study (HMPS) method. METHOD MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science and Google Scholar were searched from inception to June 2021, without language restrictions. Studies using manual record review were included if paediatric data were reported separately. We excluded studies reporting: AEs for a specific disease/diagnosis/treatment/procedure, or deceased patients; study protocols with no AE outcomes; conference abstracts, editorials and systematic reviews; clinical incident reports as the primary data source; and studies focusing on specific AEs only. Methodological risk of bias was assessed using a tool based on the Quality Assessment Tool for Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2. Primary outcome was the percentage of admissions with ≥1 AEs. All statistical analyses were stratified by record review methodology (GTT/TT or HMPS) and by type of population. Meta-analyses, applying random-effects models, were carried out. The variability of the pooled estimates was characterised by 95% prediction intervals (PIs). RESULTS We included 32 studies from 44 publications, conducted in 15 countries totalling 33 873 paediatric admissions. The total number of AEs identified was 8577. The most common types of AEs were nosocomial infections (range, 6.8%-59.6%) for the general care population and pulmonary-related (10.5%-36.7%) for intensive care. The reported incidence rates were highly heterogeneous. The PIs for the primary outcome were 3.8%-53.8% and 6.9%-91.6% for GTT/TT studies (general and intensive care population). The equivalent PI was 0.3%-33.7% for HMPS studies (general care). The PIs for preventable AEs were 7.4%-96.2% and 4.5%-98.9% for GTT/TT studies (general and intensive care population) and 10.4%-91.8% for HMPS studies (general care). The quality assessment indicated several methodological concerns regarding the included studies. CONCLUSION The reported incidence of AEs is highly variable in paediatric inpatient care research, and it is not possible to estimate a reliable single rate. Poor reporting standards and methodological differences hinder the comparison of study results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pernilla Dillner
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden .,Division of Pediatrics, Astrid Lindgren Children's Hospital, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Luisa C Eggenschwiler
- Institute of Nursing Science, Department Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Anne W S Rutjes
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences SMECHIMAI, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.,Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Lena Berg
- School of Health and Welfare, Dalarna University, Falun, Sweden.,Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Sarah N Musy
- Institute of Nursing Science, Department Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Michael Simon
- Institute of Nursing Science, Department Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Giusi Moffa
- Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Ulrika Förberg
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,School of Health and Welfare, Dalarna University, Falun, Sweden
| | - Maria Unbeck
- School of Health and Welfare, Dalarna University, Falun, Sweden.,Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Groves PS, Bunch JL, Hanrahan KM, Sabadosa KA, Sharp B, Williams JK. Patient Voices in Hospital Safety during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Clin Nurs Res 2023; 32:105-114. [PMID: 36250248 PMCID: PMC9577816 DOI: 10.1177/10547738221129711] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Hospitalized patients and their families may be reluctant to express safety concerns. We aimed to describe safety and quality concerns experienced by hospitalized patients and families and factors and outcomes surrounding decisions about voicing concerns, including those related to the COVID-19 pandemic. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 19 discharged inpatients or family members in a qualitative descriptive design. Some participants reported concern about staff competency or knowledge, communication and coordination, potential treatment errors, or care environment. Factors influencing feeling safe included healthcare team member characteristics, communication and coordination, and safe care expectations. Reasoning for voicing concerns often included personal characteristics. Reasons for not voicing concerns included feeling no action was needed or the concern was low priority. Outcomes for voicing a concern were categorized as resolved, disregarded, and unknown. These findings support the vital importance of open safety communication and trustworthy response to patients and family members who voice concerns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patricia S. Groves
- University of Iowa, IA, USA,Patricia S. Groves, College of Nursing, University of Iowa, 50 Newton Road, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
| | | | - Kirsten M. Hanrahan
- University of Iowa, IA, USA,University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | | | - Brittaney Sharp
- University of Iowa, IA, USA,University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Kannukene A, Orrego C, Lember M, Uusküla A, Põlluste K. Estonian adverse events study for multimorbid patients using Estonian Trigger Tool (MUPETT-MUltimorbid Patients-Estonian Trigger Tool). Development of Estonian trigger tool for multimorbid patients. A study protocol for mixed-methods study. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0280200. [PMID: 36928658 PMCID: PMC10019657 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2022] [Accepted: 12/21/2022] [Indexed: 03/18/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION It is widely recognized that providing healthcare may produce harm to the patient. Different approaches have been developed to measure the burden of adverse events (AEs) to plan and measure the effects of interventions. One of the most widely used instruments is the Trigger Tool, which has previously been modified to be used on various settings and translated into many languages. Multimorbidity complicates care and may increase the number of AEs patients experience. Currently there is no instrument designed to measure AEs in multimorbid patients. In Estonia, there is currently no validated instrument to measure the burden of AEs. AIMS The aim of this study will be evaluating the characteristics and ocurrence of AEs in multimorbid patients in hospitalised internal medicine patients of Estonia, and describes the development of a trigger tool for this purpose. METHODS AND ANALYSIS We will search for the evidence on measuring AEs in the population of multimorbid patients focusing on trigger tools, and synthesize the data. Data collection of the triggers from the literature will be followed by translating triggers from English to Estonian. An expert multidisciplinary panel will select the suitable triggers for this population. Trigger tool will be pre-tested to assess agreement among professionals and usability of the tool. Validation will be done using 90 medical records. A cross-sectional study in internal medicine departments of two Estonian tertiary care hospitals will be performed to identify the frequency and characteristics of AEs in 960 medical records. We will also provide preventability potential and influencing factors. DISSEMINATION Results will be disseminated to healthcare providers and stakeholders at national and international conferences, and as a doctoral medical thesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela Kannukene
- Department of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
- * E-mail:
| | - Carola Orrego
- Avedis Donabedian Research Institute (FAD), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Margus Lember
- Department of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
- Clinic of Internal Medicine, Tartu University Hospital, Tartu, Estonia
| | - Anneli Uusküla
- Department of Medicine, Institute of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
- Clinic of Dermatology, Tartu Univeristy Hospital, Tartu, Estonia
| | - Kaja Põlluste
- Department of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kaneko RMU, Monteiro I, Lopes MHBDM. Form for planning and elaborating high fidelity simulation scenarios: A validation study. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0274239. [PMID: 36170273 PMCID: PMC9518865 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2022] [Accepted: 08/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Every human being has the right to safe, dignified and harm-free care in health institutions. High fidelity simulation has been used in teaching for the training and continuing education of health professionals to promote quality, safe and humanized patient care. Elaborating scenarios is an important phase to provide a simulation-based experience, and is relevant in the teaching-learning process. The objective of this study was to validate the content and applicability of the High Fidelity Simulation Scenario Planning and Development Form and its Operational Manual. The form could be used to development of scenarios to medicine, nursing, physiotherapy and as well as other specialties in the healthcare. This was a methodological validation study of the form and its manual content by experts in simulation and its feasibility, conducted in two phases: Phase 1: eight experts were selected using the “snowball” sampling technique to validate the content measured by the content validity index; Phase 2 (test): the form and its operational manual validated by the experts were made available to 28 participants in order to elaborate scenarios for the feasibility assessment and participation in the focus group. All items in the form and in the operational manual reached a content validity index above 0.80. The total content validity index was 0.98. The evaluation of the usability of the instruments carried out by the participants reached a percentage above 96.43% in all alternatives except for the item “It was easy to use the form to build your scenario” (75%). Eight participants were present in the focus group. Focus group discussions were categorized into completeness, practicality and usefulness according to comments and suggestions. The form and its operational manual proved to be valid instruments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Inês Monteiro
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Stockwell DC, Sharek P. Diagnosing diagnostic errors: it's time to evolve the patient safety research paradigm. BMJ Qual Saf 2022; 31:701-703. [PMID: 35508375 DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2021-014517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- David C Stockwell
- Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA .,Chief Medical Officer, Johns Hopkins Children's Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Paul Sharek
- General Pediatrics and Hospital Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.,Vice President, Chief Quality and Safety Officer, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Sauro KM, Baker GR, Tomlinson G, Parshuram C. The role of hospital characteristics in patient safety: a protocol for a national cohort study. CMAJ Open 2021; 9:E1041-E1047. [PMID: 34815259 PMCID: PMC8612653 DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20200266] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Substantial expenditures on health care safety programs have been justified by their goal of reducing health care associated-harm (adverse events), but adverse event rates have not changed over the past 4 decades. The objective of this study is to describe hospital-level factors that are relevant to safety in Canadian hospitals and the impact of these factors on hospital adverse events. METHODS This is a protocol for a national cohort study to describe the association between hospital-level factors and adverse events. We will survey at least 90 (35%) Canadian hospitals to describe 4 safety-relevant domains, chosen based on the literature and expert consultation, namely patient safety culture, safety strategies, staffing, and volume and capacity. We will retrospectively identify hospital adverse events from a national data source. We will evaluate organization-level factors using established scales and a survey, codesigned by the study team and hospital leaders. Hospital leaders, clinical unit leaders and front-line staff will complete the surveys once a year for 3 years, with an anticipated start date of winter 2022. We will use national health administrative data to estimate the rate and type of hospital adverse events corresponding to each 1-year survey period. INTERPRETATION Analysis of data from this project will describe hospital organizational factors that are relevant to safety and help identify organizational initiatives that improve hospital patient safety. In addition to biyearly reports to the leaders of the participating hospitals, we have a multifaceted and tailored dissemination strategy that includes integrating the knowledge users into the study team to increase the likelihood that our study will lead to improved hospital patient safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khara M Sauro
- Department of Community Health Science and O'Brien Institute for Public Health (Sauro); Department of Oncology and Arnie Charbonneau Cancer Institute (Sauro), Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Baker, Tomlinson, Parshuram), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.
| | - G Ross Baker
- Department of Community Health Science and O'Brien Institute for Public Health (Sauro); Department of Oncology and Arnie Charbonneau Cancer Institute (Sauro), Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Baker, Tomlinson, Parshuram), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - George Tomlinson
- Department of Community Health Science and O'Brien Institute for Public Health (Sauro); Department of Oncology and Arnie Charbonneau Cancer Institute (Sauro), Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Baker, Tomlinson, Parshuram), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| | - Christopher Parshuram
- Department of Community Health Science and O'Brien Institute for Public Health (Sauro); Department of Oncology and Arnie Charbonneau Cancer Institute (Sauro), Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Baker, Tomlinson, Parshuram), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont
| |
Collapse
|