Strategies to prevent BK virus infection in kidney transplant recipients. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2016;29:353-358. [PMID: 27257795 DOI: 10.1097/qco.0000000000000278]

IVIg therapy in the management of BK virus infections in pediatric kidney transplant patients

BK virus-associated nephropathy (BKPyVAN) induces kidney allograft dysfunction. Although decreasing immunosuppression is the standard for managing BK virus (BKPyV) infection, this strategy is not always effective. The use of polyvalent immunoglobulins (IVIg) may be of interest in this setting. We performed a retrospective single-center evaluation of the management of BKPyV infection in pediatric kidney transplant patients. Among the 171 patients who underwent transplantation between January 2010 and December 2019, 54 patients were excluded (combined transplant n = 15, follow-up in another center n = 35, early postoperative graft loss n= 4). Thus, 117 patients (120 transplants) were included. Overall, 34 (28%) and 15 (13%) transplant recipients displayed positive BKPyV viruria and viremia, respectively. Three had biopsy-confirmed BKPyVAN. The pre-transplant prevalence of CAKUT and HLA antibodies was higher among BKPyV-positive patients compared to non-infected patients. After the detection of BKPyV replication and/or BKPyVAN, the immunosuppressive regimen was modified in 13 (87%) patients: either by decreasing or changing the calcineurin inhibitors (n = 13) and/or switching from mycophenolate mofetil to mTor inhibitors (n = 10). Starting IVIg therapy was based on graft dysfunction or an increase in the viral load despite reduced immunosuppressive regimen. Seven of 15(46%) patients received IVIg. These patients had a higher viral load (5.4 [5.0-6.8]log vs. 3.5 [3.3-3.8]log). In total, 13 of 15 (86%) achieved viral load reduction, five of seven after IVIg therapy. As long as specific antivirals are not available for the management of BKPyV infections in pediatric kidney transplant patients, polyvalent IVIg may be discussed for the management of severe BKPyV viremia, in combination with decreased immunosuppression.

The impact of pre-graft serology on the risk of BKPyV infection post-renal transplantation

OBJECTIVES

BK polyomavirus associated nephropathy, is a troublesome disease induced by BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) infection in immunocompromised renal graft recipients with no effective available treatment, making immunosuppression reduction the only management option. Thus, pre-graft predictive BKPyV replication markers are needed for high-risk viremia patient identification.

METHODS

we conducted a retrospective study to assess the correlation between the BKPyV pre-transplant serostatus and post-transplant BKPyV infection incidence. Sera from 329 recipients and 222 matched donors were tested for anti-BKV antibodies against BKPyV serotypes I and IV by a VLPs-based IgG ELISA, and BKPyV DNA load was monitored for at least 1 year post transplantation.

RESULTS

80 recipients were viruric and 59 recipients were viremic post transplantation. In the post-transplant period, the probability of developing viremia for serotype I was increasing from 4.3% for the D-/R + group to 12.1% for the D+/R + group and climbing to 37.5% for the D+/R- group (p < 0.05). When calculating the recipient mean titers for serotypes I and IV, we observed a clear difference in the proportions of viremia passing from 50% for mean titers < 400 to 13.5% for titers ≥ 400 (p < 0.001) with also a higher proportion of presumptive nephropathy (50% vs 23.1%, p < 0.05). In univariate analysis this parameter has an odds ratio of 6.41 for the risk of developing post-transplant BKPyV viremia (95% CI: 3.16-13.07; p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Both donor and recipient BKPyV seropositivity determination before transplantation and antibody titer may serve as a predictive tool to manage clinical BKPyV infection by identification of patients at high risk.

Analysis of risk factors influencing the BK polyomavirus replication in patients with ESRD waiting for kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

Since the pre-transplant status affects the renal transplantation success and ultimately the survival rate, identifying the probable risk factors that increase the chance of BK virus replication in end-stage renal disease patients can be included in proposing proper surveillance guidelines during pre and post-transplantation.

METHODS

A descriptive cross-sectional study was performed by collecting plasma samples from 192 ESRD patients undergoing hemodialysis for at least 3 months. Quantitative Real-time PCR assay was used to detect and measure the BK viral load. Demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients who had BK viremia were documented.

RESULTS

14 (7.3%) out of our 192 participants had BK virus viremia (95%CI 4.2%-11.6%). Demographic characteristics including etiology of ESRD and underlying diseases, mean duration and frequency of dialysis, co-infection with HBV and HCV did not affect the virus replication, since the difference between patients with BK virus viremia and BK virus negative individuals was not statistically significant. However, the statistical significance of the mean age of men with BKV and without BK virus viremia was found (OR: 3.42, P = 0.02 95%CI 0.86-13.61). Also, multiple regression analyses of some other parameters revealed that old age, high body mass index and male gender can be predictive factors of BK virus viremia in ESRD patients.

CONCLUSION

Based on our findings, elderly male had higher chance of being exposed to BK virus viremia. Some other demographic characteristics such as a high BMI, old age and gender (male) can increase the risk of BK viremia in patients with ESRD prior to kidney transplantation.

BK polyomavirus genotypes in renal transplant recipients in the United States: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

In the United States, increasing ethnic diversity has been apparent. However, the epidemiology and trends of BKV genotypes remain unclear. This meta-analysis was conducted with the aim to assess the prevalence of BKV genotypes among kidney transplant (KTx) recipients in the United States.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature review was conducted through October 2018 utilizing MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Database to identify studies that reported the prevalence of BKV subtypes and/or subgroups in KTx recipients in the United States. Pooled prevalence rates were combined using random effects, generic inverse variance method. The protocol for this study is registered with PROSPERO (no. CRD42019134582).

RESULTS

A total of eight observational studies with a total of 193 samples (urine, blood, and kidney tissues) from 188 BKV-infected KTX recipients were enrolled. Overall, the pooled estimated prevalence rates of BKV subtypes were 72.2% (95% confidence of interval [CI]: 62.7-80.0%) for subtype I, 6.8% (95% CI: 2.5-16.9%) for subtype II, 8.3% (95% CI: 4.4-15.1%) for subtype III, and 16.1% (95% CI: 10.4-24.2%) for subtype IV, respectively. While metaregression analysis demonstrated a significant positive correlation between year of study and the prevalence of BKV subtype I (slopes = +0.1023, P = .01), there were no significant correlations between year of study and percentages of BKV subtype II-IV (P > .05). Among KTx recipients with BKV subtype I, the pooled estimated percentages of BKV subgroups were 22.4% (95% CI: 13.7-34.5%) for subgroup Ia, 30.6% (95% CI: 17.7-47.5%) for subgroup Ib1, 47.7% (95% CI: 35.8-59.9%) for subgroup Ib2, and 4.1% (95% CI:1.2-13.3%) for subgroup Ic, respectively.

CONCLUSION

BKV subtype I is the most prevalent subtype among KTx recipients in the United States and its prevalence seems to increasing overtime. Subgroup Ib2 is the most common subgroup among BKV subtype I.

BK polyoma virus nephropathy in hematopoietic cell transplant recipients

Background:

The epidemiology of BK polyoma virus nephropathy in hematopoietic cell transplant recipients is poorly characterized. Kidney dysfunction after hematopoietic cell transplant is often attributed to treatment toxicities and kidney biopsies are rarely performed.

Methods:

We reviewed pathology-confirmed BK polyoma virus nephropathy cases in adult and pediatric patients who had undergone a hematopoietic cell transplant between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2017 at our institution. Plasma and urine BK polyoma virus was assessed by a quantitative polymerase chain reaction assay and were obtained at the clinician discretion. Glomerular filtration rate was estimated by the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation. BK polyoma virus nephropathy was scored by the Banff Working Group Proposal.

Results:

Eight (7 adult and 1 pediatric) cases of BK polyoma virus nephropathy were identified among 685 hematopoietic cell transplant recipients, 14 of whom had undergone a kidney biopsy. Five patients (62.5%) had received a CD34+-selected peripheral blood hematopoietic cell transplant; two had received a cord blood allograft and one an unmodified peripheral blood hematopoietic cell transplant. Two patients developed acute graft-versus-host disease grade II. Early post–hematopoietic cell transplant BK polyoma viruria was documented with onset at a median of 54 days (range, 6–91) post–hematopoietic cell transplant and median urine BK polyoma viral load was 9.6 log10 copies/mL (range, 8.6–10.0). BK polyoma virus nephropathy was diagnosed at a median of 267 days after hematopoietic cell transplant (range, 133–637). At BK polyoma virus nephropathy diagnosis, all patients had decreased renal function with glomerular filtration rate (median 29 mL/min/1.73 m2; range, 9–98 ) and creatinine (median 2.4 mg/dL; range, 0.8–7.5) ; median plasma BK polyoma viral load was 6.3 log10 copies/mL (range, 5.5–7.1) and median CD4+ lymphocyte count was 82 cell/mcL (range, 21–172).

Conclusions:

We report eight biopsy-proven BK polyoma virus nephropathies in hematopoietic cell transplant recipients from a single center. BK polyoma virus nephropathy should be considered in hematopoietic cell transplant recipients with worsening kidney function and high BK polyoma viremia.

The detection of BKPyV genotypes II and IV after renal transplantation as a simple tool for risk assessment for PyVAN and transplant outcome already at early stages of BKPyV reactivation

BACKGROUND

After reactivation the BK-polyomavirus (BKPyV) associated nephropathy (PyVAN) is observed in 1-10% of renal transplant recipients, of which up to 80% undergo graft failure. BKPyV reactivation after renal transplantation was associated with donor-derived serotypes against which the recipient has no immunological protection. However, PyVAN risk assessment seroactivity testing is a time-consuming and cost intensive process.

OBJECTIVES

Since BKPyV serotypes can be attributed to distinct genotypes I to IV, in the present study we retrospectively analyzed whether a simple PCR-based BKPyV genotyping assay might be a fast and inexpensive method to assess the risk for PyVAN and transplant outcome already at early stages of BKPyV reactivation.

STUDY DESIGN

56 patients who were renal transplanted and tested positive for BKPyV viremia were included into the study. The BKPyV-VP1-coding sequences were PCR-amplified, sequenced, and subjected to genotyping. For group specific analysis patients were grouped in genotype I (n = 46) and a second group including genotype II and IV (n = 10) and associated with their clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

The most abundant genotype I was detected in 46 of 56 (82%) patients, however, in the genotype II and IV group PyVAN was twice as frequent as compared to the genotype I group 24 months after transplantation (8 of 10 (80%) vs. 17 of 46 (37%); p = 0.001). Accordingly, graft failure was significantly more frequent in the genotype II and IV group (3 of 10 (30%) vs. 2 of 46 (4%); p = 0.007).

CONCLUSION

PCR-based BKPyV genotyping might represent a fast and inexpensive method to assess the risk for PyVAN and transplant outcome already at early stages of BKPyV reactivation even if matched samples of the donor are not available.

De novo donor-specific antibody following BK nephropathy: The incidence and association with antibody-mediated rejection

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The risk of de novo donor-specific antibody (dnDSA) development following BK viremia (BKV) or nephropathy (BKN) after kidney transplant remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the relationships among dnDSA, BKV (BK blood PCR > 15 000 copies), BKN, antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), and allograft loss.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of 904 solitary kidney transplant recipients transplanted between 10/2007 and 5/2014. Cox proportional hazards regression with time-dependent covariates were used to assess the relationships among BKN, isolated BKV, dnDSA, and the subsequent risk of AMR and allograft loss.

RESULTS

In multivariate analysis, we observed that BKN, but not BKV was a risk factor for dnDSA (HR, 3.18, P = .008). Of the patients with BK nephropathy, 14.0% (6/43) developed dnDSA, which occurred within 14 months of BK diagnosis. DnDSA in this setting remains a risk factor for subsequent AMR (HR 4.75, P = .0001) and allograft loss (HR 2.63, P = .018).

CONCLUSIONS

BKN is an independent risk factor for development of dnDSA. Improved understanding of the characteristics of patients with BKN who are at highest risk for development of dnDSA would be valuable to customize immunosuppression reduction in this population.

BK virus as a mediator of graft dysfunction following kidney transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

BK virus is a significant risk factor for kidney allograft dysfunction and loss among renal transplant recipients. Currently, there is no proven effective treatment except for the reduction of immunosuppression. In this review, we discuss diagnostic challenges and current treatment options for BK in kidney transplant recipients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Antiviral and antibiotic therapies have been employed for BK viraemia with variable efficacy. In addition, novel therapeutic regimens such as adoptive transfer of targeted T cells have been described as possible treatment options for recipients with BK nephropathy. BK can also be seen in the native kidneys of pancreas, heart, lung and liver transplant recipients, suggesting that BK screening measures should be employed to other solid organ transplant recipients.

SUMMARY

Early screening for BK combined with reduction of immunosuppression remains the mainstay of treatment for BK viraemia. New therapeutic advances demonstrate promise in vitro; however, the in-vivo efficacy will be demonstrated by future studies.

BK Polyomavirus: Clinical Aspects, Immune Regulation, and Emerging Therapies

BK polyomavirus (BKV) causes frequent infections during childhood and establishes persistent infections within renal tubular cells and the uroepithelium, with minimal clinical implications. However, reactivation of BKV in immunocompromised individuals following renal or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation may cause serious complications, including BKV-associated nephropathy (BKVAN), ureteric stenosis, or hemorrhagic cystitis. Implementation of more potent immunosuppression and increased posttransplant surveillance has resulted in a higher incidence of BKVAN. Antiviral immunity plays a crucial role in controlling BKV replication, and our increasing knowledge about host-virus interactions has led to the development of improved diagnostic tools and clinical management strategies. Currently, there are no effective antiviral agents for BKV infection, and the mainstay of managing reactivation is reduction of immunosuppression. Development of immune-based therapies to combat BKV may provide new and exciting opportunities for the successful treatment of BKV-associated complications.

Graft loss among renal-transplant recipients with early reduction of immunosuppression for BK viremia

AIM

To review the incidence of graft loss and acute rejection among renal transplant recipients with early reduction of immunosuppression for BK viremia.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of consecutive de-novo kidney-only transplants from January 2009 to December 2012 to evaluate the incidence of Polyoma-virus associated nephropathy (PyVAN). Recipient plasma was screened for BKV DNA via quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) at months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 post-transplant and on worsening graft function. Immunosuppression was reduced at ≥ 3-log copies/mL. Those with viremia of ≥ 4-log copies/mL (presumptive PyVAN) underwent renal transplant biopsy. Presumptive PyVAN (PP) and definitive PyVAN (DP; biopsy-proven) were treated by immunosuppression reduction (IR) only.

RESULTS

Among 319 kidney transplant recipients, the median age was 53 years (range 19-83), 65.8% were male, and 58.9% were white. Biopsy-proven acute rejection was found in 18.5% within 0-168 wk. Death-censored graft loss occurred in 5.3% (n = 17) and graft loss attributable to PyVAN was 0.6% (n = 2). Forty-seven patients were diagnosed with PP (14.7%) and 18 (5.6%) with DP. Graft loss among participants with PyVAN (8.5%) and those without (4.8%) was not significantly different. Deceased donor kidney transplantation (OR = 2.3, 95%CI = 1.1-4.6) and AR (OR = 2.3, 95%CI = 1.2-4.7) were associated with PyVAN in the multivariate analysis. BK viremia between 3 and 4-log copies/mL occurred in 27 patients, all of whom underwent IR. Of these, 16 (59%) never developed PyVAN while 11 (41%) developed PyVAN (4 DP, 7 PP) within a range of 11-39 wk.

CONCLUSION

Instituting an early reduction of immunosuppression, in the absence of adjunctive antivirals, is effective at preventing PyVAN and may be associated with a lower incidence of graft-loss without a reciprocal increase in the incidence of acute rejection.

Neutralizing Antibody-Mediated Response and Risk of BK Virus-Associated Nephropathy

BK virus-associated nephropathy (BKVAN) causes renal allograft dysfunction. The current management of BKVAN relies on pre-emptive adaptation of immunosuppression according to viral load monitoring. However, this empiric strategy is not always successful. Therefore, pretransplant predictive markers are needed. In a prospective longitudinal study, we enrolled 168 kidney transplant recipients and 69 matched donors. To assess the value of BKV genotype-specific neutralizing antibody (NAb) titers as a predictive marker for BKV replication, we measured BKV DNA load and NAb titers at transplant and followed patients for 24 months. After transplant, 52 (31%) patients displayed BKV replication: 24 (46%) patients were viruric and 28 (54%) patients were viremic, including 13 with biopsy-confirmed BKVAN. At any time, patients with high NAb titers against the replicating strain had a lower risk of developing BKV viremia (hazard ratio [HR], 0.44; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.26 to 0.73; P=0.002). Each log₁₀ increase in NAb titer decreased the risk of developing viremia by 56%. Replicating strains were consistent with donor transmission in 95% of cases of early BKV replication. Genotype mismatch between recipients' neutralization profiles before transplant and their subsequently replicating strain significantly increased the risk of developing viremia (HR, 2.27; 95% CI, 1.06 to 4.88; P=0.04). A NAb titer against the donor's strain <4 log₁₀ before transplant significantly associated with BKV replication after transplant (HR, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.06 to 3.45; P=0.03). BKV genotype-specific NAb titers may be a meaningful predictive marker that allows patient stratification by BKV disease risk before and after transplant.

BK polyomavirus: a review of the virology, pathogenesis, clinical and laboratory features, and treatment

BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) is a non-enveloped, circular dsDNA virus with a genome of approximately 5100 base pairs. It can be divided into four major genotypes, but the effects of different genotypes on clinical disease are uncertain. Primary BKPyV infection is generally acquired asymptomatically in childhood. It establishes low-level persistence in many tissues, particularly the genitourinary tract. Reactivation can lead to severe disease including BKPyV-associated nephropathy confirmed by renal biopsy, hemorrhagic cystitis and meningoencephalitis. Nucleic acid amplification testing of blood and urine is the main diagnostic and prognostic test for BKPyV infection. The treatment of BKPyV infection has concentrated on reduction in immunosuppressive therapy. Recent studies suggest that antiviral drugs have demonstrated only modest benefit, but adoptive T-cell therapies offer potential advances.