New-Generation Low-Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Hip Arthroplasty Implants Using Slice Encoding for Metal Artifact Correction: First In Vitro Experience at 0.55 T and Comparison With 1.5 T

Modern acceleration in musculoskeletal MRI: applications, implications, and challenges

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is crucial for accurately diagnosing a wide spectrum of musculoskeletal conditions due to its superior soft tissue contrast resolution. However, the long acquisition times of traditional two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) fast and turbo spin-echo (TSE) pulse sequences can limit patient access and comfort. Recent technical advancements have introduced acceleration techniques that significantly reduce MRI times for musculoskeletal examinations. Key acceleration methods include parallel imaging (PI), simultaneous multi-slice acquisition (SMS), and compressed sensing (CS), enabling up to eightfold faster scans while maintaining image quality, resolution, and safety standards. These innovations now allow for 3- to 6-fold accelerated clinical musculoskeletal MRI exams, reducing scan times to 4 to 6 min for joints and spine imaging. Evolving deep learning-based image reconstruction promises even faster scans without compromising quality. Current research indicates that combining acceleration techniques, deep learning image reconstruction, and superresolution algorithms will eventually facilitate tenfold accelerated musculoskeletal MRI in routine clinical practice. Such rapid MRI protocols can drastically reduce scan times by 80-90% compared to conventional methods. Implementing these rapid imaging protocols does impact workflow, indirect costs, and workload for MRI technologists and radiologists, which requires careful management. However, the shift from conventional to accelerated, deep learning-based MRI enhances the value of musculoskeletal MRI by improving patient access and comfort and promoting sustainable imaging practices. This article offers a comprehensive overview of the technical aspects, benefits, and challenges of modern accelerated musculoskeletal MRI, guiding radiologists and researchers in this evolving field.

Comprehensive assessment of nonuniform image quality: Application to imaging near metal

PURPOSE

Comprehensive assessment of image quality requires accounting for spatial variations in (i) intensity artifact, (ii) geometric distortion, (iii) signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and (iv) spatial resolution, among other factors. This work presents an ensemble of methods to meet this need, from phantom design to image analysis, and applies it to the scenario of imaging near metal.

METHODS

A modular phantom design employing a gyroid lattice is developed to enable the co-registered volumetric quantitation of image quality near a metallic hip implant. A method for measuring spatial resolution by means of local point spread function (PSF) estimation is presented and the relative fitness of gyroid and cubic lattices is examined. Intensity artifact, geometric distortion, and SNR maps are also computed. Results are demonstrated with 2D-FSE and MAVRIC-SL scan protocols on a 3T MRI scanner.

RESULTS

The spatial resolution method demonstrates a worst-case error of 0.17 pixels for measuring in-plane blurring up to 3 pixels (full width at half maximum). The gyroid outperforms a cubic lattice design for the local PSF estimation task. The phantom supports four configurations toggling the presence/absence of both metal and structure with good spatial correspondence for co-registered analysis of the four quality factors. The marginal scan time to evaluate one scan protocol amounts to five repetitions. The phantom design can be fabricated in 2 days at negligible material cost.

CONCLUSION

The phantom and associated analysis methods can elucidate complex image quality trade-offs involving intensity artifact, geometric distortion, SNR, and spatial resolution. The ensemble of methods is suitable for benchmarking imaging performance near metal.

Diagnosing periprosthetic hip joint infection with new-generation 0.55T MRI

PURPOSE

To assess the accuracy of 0.55 T MRI in diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in patients with symptomatic total hip arthroplasty (THA).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

0.55 T MRI of patients with THA PJI (Group A) and noninfected THA (Group B), including aseptic loosening (Group C, subgroup of B) performed between May 2021 and July 2023 were analysed retrospectively. Two musculoskeletal fellowship-trained radiologists independently identified MRI bone and soft tissue changes including: marrow oedema, periosteal reaction, osteolysis, joint effusion, capsule oedema and thickening, fluid collections, muscle oedema, bursitis, inguinal adenopathy, and muscle tears. The diagnostic performance of MRI discriminators of PJI was evaluated using Fisher's exact test (p < 0.05) and interrater reliability was determined. 61 MRI scans from 60 THA patients (34 female, median age 68, range 41-93 years) in Group A (n = 9; female 4; median age 69, range 56-82 years), B (n = 51; 30; 67.5, 41-93 years), and C (10; 6; 67; 41-82 years) were included.

RESULTS

Capsule oedema (sensitivity 89 %, specificity 92 %,), intramuscular oedema (89 %, 82 %) and joint effusion (89 %, 73 %) were the best performing discriminators for PJI diagnosis (p ≤ 0.001), when viewed individually and had combined 70 % sensitivity and 100 % specificity for PJI diagnosis in parallel testing. For the differentiation between PJI and aseptic loosening, intramuscular oedema (89 %, 80 %) and capsule oedema (89 %, 80 %) were significant discriminators (p ≤ 0.001) with combined 64 % sensitivity and 96 % specificity for PJI.

CONCLUSIONS

New generation 0.55 T MRI may aid in the detection of PJI in symptomatic patients. Oedema of the joint capsule, adjacent muscles as well as joint effusion were indicative of the presence of PJI.

Deep Learning Reconstructed New-Generation 0.55 T MRI of the Knee-A Prospective Comparison With Conventional 3 T MRI

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare deep learning reconstructed (DLR) 0.55 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) quality, identification, and grading of structural anomalies and reader confidence levels with conventional 3 T knee MRI in patients with knee pain following trauma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective study of 26 symptomatic patients (5 women) includes 52 paired DLR 0.55 T and conventional 3 T MRI examinations obtained in 1 setting. A novel, commercially available DLR algorithm was employed for 0.55 T image reconstruction. Four board-certified radiologists reviewed all images independently and graded image quality, noted structural anomalies and their respective reporting confidence levels for the presence or absence, as well as grading of bone, cartilage, meniscus, ligament, and tendon lesions. Image quality and reader confidence levels were compared (P < 0.05, significant), and MRI findings were correlated between 0.55 T and 3 T MRI using Cohen kappa (κ).

RESULTS

In reader's consensus, good image quality was found for DLR 0.55 T MRI and 3 T MRI (3.8 vs 4.1/5 points, P = 0.06). There was near-perfect agreement between 0.55 T DLR and 3 T MRI regarding the identification of structural anomalies for all readers (each κ ≥ 0.80). Substantial to near-perfection agreement between 0.55 T and 3 T MRI was reported for grading of cartilage (κ = 0.65-0.86) and meniscus lesions (κ = 0.71-1.0). High confidence levels were found for all readers for DLR 0.55 T and 3 T MRI, with 3 readers showing higher confidence levels for reporting cartilage lesions on 3 T MRI.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, new-generation 0.55 T DLR MRI provides good image quality, comparable to conventional 3 T MRI, and allows for reliable identification of internal derangement of the knee with high reader confidence.

Comparing Metal Artifact Severity and Ability to Assess Near-Metal Anatomy Between 0.55 T and 1.5 T MRI in Patients with Metallic Spinal Implants-A Scanner Comparison Study

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To compare image quality and metal artifact severity at 0.55 T and 1.5 T MRI in patients with spinal implants following posterior fusion surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

50 consecutive patients (mean age: 69 ± 12 years) who underwent 0.55 T and 1.5 T MRI following posterior fusion surgery of the lumbar or thoracolumbar spine were included. Examinations used metal artifact reduction protocols from clinical routine. Images were rated by two fellowship-trained musculoskeletal radiologists for image quality, ability to assess the spinal canal and the neural foramina, and artifact severity on 5-point Likert scales. Additionally, differences in artifact severity and visibility of near-metal anatomy among implant sizes (1-level vs. 2-level vs. >2-levels) were evaluated.

RESULTS

Signal/contrast (mean: 4.0 ± 0.3 [0.55 T] vs. 4.4 ± 0.6 [1.5 T]; p < .001) and resolution (3.8 ± 0.5 vs. 4.2 ± 0.7; p < .001) were rated lower at 0.55 T. The ability to assess the spinal canal (4.4 ± 0.5 vs. 4.2 ± 0.9; p = .69) and the neural foramina (3.8 ± 0.5 vs. 3.8 ± 0.9; p = .19) were however rated equally good with excellent interrater agreement (range: 0.84-0.94). Susceptibility artifacts were rated milder at 0.55 T (1.8 ± 0.5 vs. 3.0 ± 0.6; p < .001). For implant size-based subgroups, the visibility of near-metal anatomy decreased with implant length at 1.5 T, but remained unchanged at 0.55 T. In consequence, the spinal canal and neural foramina could be better assessed at 0.55 T in patients with multi-level implants (4.4 ± 0.5 vs. 3.6 ± 1.1; p < .001).

CONCLUSION

Metal artifacts of spinal implants are substantially less pronounced at 0.55 T MRI. When examining patients with multi-level posterior fusion, this translates into a superior ability to assess near-metal anatomy, where 1.5 T MRI reaches diagnostic limitations.

Initial experience with a next-generation low-field MRI scanner: Potential for breast imaging?

PURPOSE

Broader clinical adoption of breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) faces challenges such as limited availability and high procedural costs. Low-field technology has shown promise in addressing these challenges. We report our initial experience using a next-generation scanner for low-field breast MRI at 0.55T.

METHODS

This initial cases series was part of an institutional review board-approved prospective study using a 0.55T scanner (MAGNETOM Free.Max, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen/Germany: height < 2 m, weight < 3.2 tons, no quench pipe) equipped with a seven-channel breast coil (Noras, Höchberg/Germany). A multiparametric breast MRI protocol consisting of dynamic T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and diffusion-weighted sequences was optimized for 0.55T. Two radiologists with 12 and 20 years of experience in breast MRI evaluated the examinations.

RESULTS

Twelve participants (mean age: 55.3 years, range: 36-78 years) were examined. The image quality was diagnostic in all examinations and not impaired by relevant artifacts. Typical imaging phenotypes were visualized. The scan time for a complete, non-abbreviated breast MRI protocol ranged from 10:30 to 18:40 min.

CONCLUSION

This initial case series suggests that low-field breast MRI is feasible at diagnostic image quality within an acceptable examination time.

Abdominal MRI on a Commercial 0.55T System: Initial Evaluation and Comparison to Higher Field Strengths

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

This study aims to assess the quality of abdominal MR images acquired on a commercial 0.55T scanner and compare these images with those acquired on conventional 1.5T/3T scanners in both healthy subjects and patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifteen healthy subjects and 52 patients underwent abdominal Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 0.55T. Images were also collected in healthy subjects at 1.5T, and comparison 1.5/3T images identified for 28 of the 52 patients. Image quality was rated by two radiologists on a 4-point Likert scale. Readers were asked whether they could answer the clinical question for patient studies. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to test for significant differences in image ratings and acquisition times, and inter-reader reliability was computed.

RESULTS

The overall image quality of all sequences at 0.55T were rated as acceptable in healthy subjects. Sequences were modified to improve signal-to-noise ratio and reduce artifacts and deployed for clinical use; 52 patients were enrolled in this study. Radiologists were able to answer the clinical question in 52 (reader 1) and 46 (reader 2) of the patient cases. Average image quality was considered to be diagnostic (>3) for all sequences except arterial phase FS 3D T1w gradient echo (GRE) and 3D magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for one reader. In comparison to higher field images, significantly lower scores were given to 0.55T IP 2D GRE and arterial phase FS 3D T1w GRE, and significantly higher scores to diffusion-weighted echo planar imaging at 0.55T; other sequences were equivalent. The average scan time at 0.55T was 54 ± 10 minutes vs 36 ± 11 minutes at higher field strengths (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Diagnostic-quality abdominal MR images can be obtained on a commercial 0.55T scanner at a longer overall acquisition time compared to higher field systems, although some sequences may benefit from additional optimization.

New clinical opportunities of low-field MRI: heart, lung, body, and musculoskeletal

Contemporary whole-body low-field MRI scanners (< 1 T) present new and exciting opportunities for improved body imaging. The fundamental reason is that the reduced off-resonance and reduced SAR provide substantially increased flexibility in the design of MRI pulse sequences. Promising body applications include lung parenchyma imaging, imaging adjacent to metallic implants, cardiac imaging, and dynamic imaging in general. The lower cost of such systems may make MRI favorable for screening high-risk populations and population health research, and the more open configurations allowed may prove favorable for obese subjects and for pregnant women. This article summarizes promising body applications for contemporary whole-body low-field MRI systems, with a focus on new platforms developed within the past 5 years. This is an active area of research, and one can expect many improvements as MRI physicists fully explore the landscape of pulse sequences that are feasible, and as clinicians apply these to patient populations.

How AI May Transform Musculoskeletal Imaging

While musculoskeletal imaging volumes are increasing, there is a relative shortage of subspecialized musculoskeletal radiologists to interpret the studies. Will artificial intelligence (AI) be the solution? For AI to be the solution, the wide implementation of AI-supported data acquisition methods in clinical practice requires establishing trusted and reliable results. This implementation will demand close collaboration between core AI researchers and clinical radiologists. Upon successful clinical implementation, a wide variety of AI-based tools can improve the musculoskeletal radiologist's workflow by triaging imaging examinations, helping with image interpretation, and decreasing the reporting time. Additional AI applications may also be helpful for business, education, and research purposes if successfully integrated into the daily practice of musculoskeletal radiology. The question is not whether AI will replace radiologists, but rather how musculoskeletal radiologists can take advantage of AI to enhance their expert capabilities.

Low-Field-Strength Body MRI: Challenges and Opportunities at 0.55 T

Advances in MRI technology have led to the development of low-field-strength (hereafter, "low-field") (0.55 T) MRI systems with lower weight, fewer shielding requirements, and lower cost than those of traditional (1.5-3 T) systems. The trade-offs of lower signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) at 0.55 T are partially offset by patient safety and potential comfort advantages (eg, lower specific absorption rate and a more cost-effective larger bore diameter) and physical advantages (eg, decreased T2* decay, shorter T1 relaxation times). Image reconstruction advances leveraging developing technologies (such as deep learning-based denoising) can be paired with traditional techniques (such as increasing the number of signal averages) to improve SNR. The overall image quality produced by low-field MRI systems, although perhaps somewhat inferior to 1.5-3 T MRI systems in terms of SNR, is nevertheless diagnostic for a broad variety of body imaging applications. Effective low-field body MRI requires (a) an understanding of the trade-offs resulting from lower field strengths, (b) an approach to modifying routine sequences to overcome SNR challenges, and (c) a workflow for carefully selecting appropriate patients. The authors describe the rationale, opportunities, and challenges of low-field body MRI; discuss important considerations for low-field imaging with common body MRI sequences; and delineate a variety of use cases for low-field body MRI. The authors also include lessons learned from their preliminary experience with a new low-field MRI system at a tertiary care center. Finally, they explore the future of low-field MRI, summarizing current limitations and potential future developments that may enhance the clinical adoption of this technology. ©RSNA, 2023 Supplemental material is available for this article. Quiz questions for this article are available through the Online Learning Center. See the invited commentary by Venkatesh in this issue.

Low-field MRI: A report on the 2022 ISMRM workshop

In March 2022, the first ISMRM Workshop on Low-Field MRI was held virtually. The goals of this workshop were to discuss recent low field MRI technology including hardware and software developments, novel methodology, new contrast mechanisms, as well as the clinical translation and dissemination of these systems. The virtual Workshop was attended by 368 registrants from 24 countries, and included 34 invited talks, 100 abstract presentations, 2 panel discussions, and 2 live scanner demonstrations. Here, we report on the scientific content of the Workshop and identify the key themes that emerged. The subject matter of the Workshop reflected the ongoing developments of low-field MRI as an accessible imaging modality that may expand the usage of MRI through cost reduction, portability, and ease of installation. Many talks in this Workshop addressed the use of computational power, efficient acquisitions, and contemporary hardware to overcome the SNR limitations associated with low field strength. Participants discussed the selection of appropriate clinical applications that leverage the unique capabilities of low-field MRI within traditional radiology practices, other point-of-care settings, and the broader community. The notion of "image quality" versus "information content" was also discussed, as images from low-field portable systems that are purpose-built for clinical decision-making may not replicate the current standard of clinical imaging. Speakers also described technical challenges and infrastructure challenges related to portability and widespread dissemination, and speculated about future directions for the field to improve the technology and establish clinical value.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Total Ankle Arthroplasty: State-of-The-Art Assessment of Implant-Related Pain and Dysfunction

Total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) is an effective alternative for treating patients with end-stage ankle degeneration, improving mobility, and providing pain relief. Implant survivorship is constantly improving; however, complications occur. Many causes of pain and dysfunction after total ankle arthroplasty can be diagnosed accurately with clinical examination, laboratory, radiography, and computer tomography. However, when there are no or inconclusive imaging findings, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is highly accurate in identifying and characterizing bone resorption, osteolysis, infection, osseous stress reactions, nondisplaced fractures, polyethylene damage, nerve injuries and neuropathies, as well as tendon and ligament tears. Multiple vendors offer effective, clinically available MRI techniques for metal artifact reduction MRI of total ankle arthroplasty. This article reviews the MRI appearances of common TAA implant systems, clinically available techniques and protocols for metal artifact reduction MRI of TAA implants, and the MRI appearances of a broad spectrum of TAA-related complications.

MRI Advancements in Musculoskeletal Clinical and Research Practice

Over the past decades, MRI has become increasingly important for diagnosing and longitudinally monitoring musculoskeletal disorders, with ongoing hardware and software improvements aiming to optimize image quality and speed. However, surging demand for musculoskeletal MRI and increased interest to provide more personalized care will necessitate a stronger emphasis on efficiency and specificity. Ongoing hardware developments include more powerful gradients, improvements in wide-bore magnet designs to maintain field homogeneity, and high-channel phased-array coils. There is also interest in low-field-strength magnets with inherently lower magnetic footprints and operational costs to accommodate global demand in middle- and low-income countries. Previous approaches to decrease acquisition times by means of conventional acceleration techniques (eg, parallel imaging or compressed sensing) are now largely overshadowed by deep learning reconstruction algorithms. It is expected that greater emphasis will be placed on improving synthetic MRI and MR fingerprinting approaches to shorten overall acquisition times while also addressing the demand of personalized care by simultaneously capturing microstructural information to provide greater detail of disease severity. Authors also anticipate increased research emphasis on metal artifact reduction techniques, bone imaging, and MR neurography to meet clinical needs.

Metal Artifact Reduction MRI in the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Hip Joint Infection

A 54-year-old woman presented with progressive right hip pain after hip arthroplasty 9 years earlier. The emerging role of metal artifact reduction MRI in the noninvasive diagnosis of infectious synovitis as the surrogate marker for periprosthetic hip joint infection and differentiation from other synovitis types is discussed.

Visual and quantitative assessment of hip implant-related metal artifacts at low field MRI: a phantom study comparing a 0.55-T system with 1.5-T and 3-T systems

BACKGROUND

To investigate hip implant-related metal artifacts on a 0.55-T system compared with 1.5-T and 3-T systems.

METHODS

Total hip arthroplasty made of three different alloys were evaluated in a water phantom at 0.55, 1.5, and 3 T using routine protocols. Visually assessment (VA) was performed by three readers using a Likert scale from 0 (no artifacts) to 6 (extremely severe artifacts). Quantitative assessment (QA) was performed using the coefficient of variation (CoV) and the fraction of voxels within a threshold of the mean signal intensity compared to an automatically defined region of interest (FVwT). Agreement was evaluated using intra/inter-class correlation coefficient (ICC).

RESULTS

Interreader agreement of VA was strong-to-moderate (ICC 0.74-0.82). At all field strengths (0.55-T/1.5-T/3-T), artifacts were assigned a lower score for titanium (Ti) alloys (2.44/2.9/2.7) than for stainless steel (Fe-Cr) (4.1/3.9/5.1) and cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr) alloys (4.1/4.1/5.2) (p < 0.001 for both). Artifacts were lower for 0.55-T and 1.5-T than for 3-T systems, for all implants (p ≤ 0.049). A strong VA-to-QA correlation was found (r = 0.81; p < 0.001); CoV was lower for Ti alloys than for Fe-Cr and Co-Cr alloys at all field strengths. The FVwT showed a negative correlation with VA (-0.68 < r < -0.84; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Artifact intensity was lowest for Ti alloys at 0.55 T. For other alloys, it was similar at 0.55 T and 1.5 T, higher at 3 T. Despite an inferior gradient system and a larger bore width, the 0.55-T system showed the same artifact intensity of the 1.5-T system.

Modern Low-Field MRI of the Musculoskeletal System: Practice Considerations, Opportunities, and Challenges

ABSTRACT

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides essential information for diagnosing and treating musculoskeletal disorders. Although most musculoskeletal MRI examinations are performed at 1.5 and 3.0 T, modern low-field MRI systems offer new opportunities for affordable MRI worldwide. In 2021, a 0.55 T modern low-field, whole-body MRI system with an 80-cm-wide bore was introduced for clinical use in the United States and Europe. Compared with current higher-field-strength MRI systems, the 0.55 T MRI system has a lower total ownership cost, including purchase price, installation, and maintenance. Although signal-to-noise ratios scale with field strength, modern signal transmission and receiver chains improve signal yield compared with older low-field magnetic resonance scanner generations. Advanced radiofrequency coils permit short echo spacing and overall compacter echo trains than previously possible. Deep learning-based advanced image reconstruction algorithms provide substantial improvements in perceived signal-to-noise ratios, contrast, and spatial resolution. Musculoskeletal tissue contrast evolutions behave differently at 0.55 T, which requires careful consideration when designing pulse sequences. Similar to other field strengths, parallel imaging and simultaneous multislice acquisition techniques are vital for efficient musculoskeletal MRI acquisitions. Pliable receiver coils with a more cost-effective design offer a path to more affordable surface coils and improve image quality. Whereas fat suppression is inherently more challenging at lower field strengths, chemical shift selective fat suppression is reliable and homogeneous with modern low-field MRI technology. Dixon-based gradient echo pulse sequences provide efficient and reliable multicontrast options, including postcontrast MRI. Metal artifact reduction MRI benefits substantially from the lower field strength, including slice encoding for metal artifact correction for effective metal artifact reduction of high-susceptibility metallic implants. Wide-bore scanner designs offer exciting opportunities for interventional MRI. This review provides an overview of the economical aspects, signal and image quality considerations, technological components and coils, musculoskeletal tissue relaxation times, and image contrast of modern low-field MRI and discusses the mainstream and new applications, challenges, and opportunities of musculoskeletal MRI.

Low-field MRI: Clinical promise and challenges

Modern MRI scanners have trended toward higher field strengths to maximize signal and resolution while minimizing scan time. However, high-field devices remain expensive to install and operate, making them scarce outside of high-income countries and major population centers. Low-field strength scanners have drawn renewed academic, industry, and philanthropic interest due to advantages that could dramatically increase imaging access, including lower cost and portability. Nevertheless, low-field MRI still faces inherent limitations in image quality that come with decreased signal. In this article, we review advantages and disadvantages of low-field MRI scanners, describe hardware and software innovations that accentuate advantages and mitigate disadvantages, and consider clinical applications for a new generation of low-field devices. In our review, we explore how these devices are being or could be used for high acuity brain imaging, outpatient neuroimaging, MRI-guided procedures, pediatric imaging, and musculoskeletal imaging. Challenges for their successful clinical translation include selecting and validating appropriate use cases, integrating with standards of care in high resource settings, expanding options with actionable information in low resource settings, and facilitating health care providers and clinical practice in new ways. By embracing both the promise and challenges of low-field MRI, clinicians and researchers have an opportunity to transform medical care for patients around the world. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 6.

Emerging Technology in Musculoskeletal MRI and CT

This article provides a focused overview of emerging technology in musculoskeletal MRI and CT. These technological advances have primarily focused on decreasing examination times, obtaining higher quality images, providing more convenient and economical imaging alternatives, and improving patient safety through lower radiation doses. New MRI acceleration methods using deep learning and novel reconstruction algorithms can reduce scanning times while maintaining high image quality. New synthetic techniques are now available that provide multiple tissue contrasts from a limited amount of MRI and CT data. Modern low-field-strength MRI scanners can provide a more convenient and economical imaging alternative in clinical practice, while clinical 7.0-T scanners have the potential to maximize image quality. Three-dimensional MRI curved planar reformation and cinematic rendering can provide improved methods for image representation. Photon-counting detector CT can provide lower radiation doses, higher spatial resolution, greater tissue contrast, and reduced noise in comparison with currently used energy-integrating detector CT scanners. Technological advances have also been made in challenging areas of musculoskeletal imaging, including MR neurography, imaging around metal, and dual-energy CT. While the preliminary results of these emerging technologies have been encouraging, whether they result in higher diagnostic performance requires further investigation.

Artificial Intelligence-Driven Ultra-Fast Superresolution MRI: 10-Fold Accelerated Musculoskeletal Turbo Spin Echo MRI Within Reach

ABSTRACT

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the keystone of modern musculoskeletal imaging; however, long pulse sequence acquisition times may restrict patient tolerability and access. Advances in MRI scanners, coil technology, and innovative pulse sequence acceleration methods enable 4-fold turbo spin echo pulse sequence acceleration in clinical practice; however, at this speed, conventional image reconstruction approaches the signal-to-noise limits of temporal, spatial, and contrast resolution. Novel deep learning image reconstruction methods can minimize signal-to-noise interdependencies to better advantage than conventional image reconstruction, leading to unparalleled gains in image speed and quality when combined with parallel imaging and simultaneous multislice acquisition. The enormous potential of deep learning-based image reconstruction promises to facilitate the 10-fold acceleration of the turbo spin echo pulse sequence, equating to a total acquisition time of 2-3 minutes for entire MRI examinations of joints without sacrificing spatial resolution or image quality. Current investigations aim for a better understanding of stability and failure modes of image reconstruction networks, validation of network reconstruction performance with external data sets, determination of diagnostic performances with independent reference standards, establishing generalizability to other centers, scanners, field strengths, coils, and anatomy, and building publicly available benchmark data sets to compare methods and foster innovation and collaboration between the clinical and image processing community. In this article, we review basic concepts of deep learning-based acquisition and image reconstruction techniques for accelerating and improving the quality of musculoskeletal MRI, commercially available and developing deep learning-based MRI solutions, superresolution, denoising, generative adversarial networks, and combined strategies for deep learning-driven ultra-fast superresolution musculoskeletal MRI. This article aims to equip radiologists and imaging scientists with the necessary practical knowledge and enthusiasm to meet this exciting new era of musculoskeletal MRI.

A flexible MRI coil based on a cable conductor and applied to knee imaging

Flexible radiofrequency coils for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have garnered attention in research and industrial communities because they provide improved accessibility and performance and can accommodate a range of anatomic postures. Most recent flexible coil developments involve customized conductors or substrate materials and/or target applications at 3 T or above. In contrast, we set out to design a flexible coil based on an off-the-shelf conductor that is suitable for operation at 0.55 T (23.55 MHz). Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) degradation can occur in such an environment because the resistance of the coil conductor can be significant with respect to the sample. We found that resonating a commercially available RG-223 coaxial cable shield with a lumped capacitor while the inner conductor remained electrically floating gave rise to a highly effective "cable coil." A 10-cm diameter cable coil was flexible enough to wrap around the knee, an application that can benefit from flexible coils, and had similar conductor loss and SNR as a standard-of-reference rigid copper coil. A two-channel cable coil array also provided good SNR robustness against geometric variability, outperforming a two-channel coaxial coil array by 26 and 16% when the elements were overlapped by 20-40% or gapped by 30-50%, respectively. A 6-channel cable coil array was constructed for 0.55 T knee imaging. Incidental cartilage and bone pathologies were clearly delineated in T1- and T2-weighted turbo spin echo images acquired in 3-4 min with the proposed coil, suggesting that clinical quality knee imaging is feasible in an acceptable examination timeframe. Correcting for T1, the SNR measured with the cable coil was approximately threefold lower than that measured with a 1.5 T state-of-the-art 18-channel coil, which is expected given the threefold difference in main magnetic field strength. This result suggests that the 0.55 T cable coil conductor loss does not deleteriously impact SNR, which might be anticipated at low field.