Early administration of sivelestat, the neutrophil elastase inhibitor, in adults for acute lung injury following gastric aspiration. Shock. 2011;36:223-227. [PMID: 21617577 DOI: 10.1097/SHK.0b013e318225acc3]

Neutrophil-Derived Proteases in Lung Inflammation: Old Players and New Prospects

Neutrophil-derived proteases are critical to the pathology of many inflammatory lung diseases, both chronic and acute. These abundant enzymes play roles in key neutrophil functions, such as neutrophil extracellular trap formation and reactive oxygen species release. They may also be released, inducing tissue damage and loss of tissue function. Historically, the neutrophil serine proteases (NSPs) have been the main subject of neutrophil protease research. Despite highly promising cell-based and animal model work, clinical trials involving the inhibition of NSPs have shown mixed results in lung disease patients. As such, the cutting edge of neutrophil-derived protease research has shifted to proteases that have had little-to-no research in neutrophils to date. These include the cysteine and serine cathepsins, the metzincins and the calpains, among others. This review aims to outline the previous work carried out on NSPs, including the shortcomings of some of the inhibitor-orientated clinical trials. Our growing understanding of other proteases involved in neutrophil function and neutrophilic lung inflammation will then be discussed. Additionally, the potential of targeting these more obscure neutrophil proteases will be highlighted, as they may represent new targets for inhibitor-based treatments of neutrophil-mediated lung inflammation.

Effects of intravenous sivelestat sodium on prevention of acute respiratory distress syndrome in patients with sepsis: study protocol for a double-blind multicentre randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Sepsis is one of the most common risk factors for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Neutrophil elastase (NE) is believed to be an important mediator of ARDS. When sepsis occurs, a large number of inflammatory factors are activated and released, which makes neutrophils migrate into the lung, eventually leading to the occurrence of ARDS. Sivelestat sodium is an NE inhibitor that can inhibit the inflammatory reaction during systemic inflammatory response syndrome and alleviate lung injury. Therefore, we hypothesise that intravenous sivelestat sodium may prevent the occurrence of ARDS in patients with sepsis.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is a prospective, investigator-initiated, double-blind, adaptive, multicentre, randomised, controlled clinical trial with an adaptive 'sample size re-estimation' design. Patients meeting the inclusion criteria who were transferred into the intensive care unit will be randomly assigned to receive sivelestat sodium or placebo for up to 7 days. The primary outcome is the development of ARDS within 7 days after randomisation. A total of 238 patients will be recruited based on a 15% decrease in the incidence of ARDS in the intervention group in this study. A predefined interim analysis will be performed to ensure that the calculation is reasonable after reaching 50% (120) of the planned sample size.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of ZhongDa Hospital affiliated to Southeast University (identifier: Clinical Ethical Approval No. 2021ZDSYLL153-P03). Results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals and presented at relevant conferences and meetings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04973670.

Effect of Sivelestat in the Treatment of Acute Lung Injury and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

The efficacy of neutrophil elastase inhibitor sivelestat in the treatment of acute lung injury (ALI) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) remains controversial. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines assess the effect of sivelestat on ALI/ARDS patients, different studies were included.

Methods

Electronic databases, National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wan fang data, VIP, PubMed, Embase, Springer, Ovid and the Cochrane Library were searched using the following key words: ("Sivelestat" OR "Elaspol") AND ("ARDS" OR "adult respiratory distress syndrome" OR "acute lung injury"). All databases published from January 2000 to August 2022. The treatment group was treated with sivelestat and the control group was given normal saline. The outcome measurements include the mortality of 28-30 days, mechanical ventilation time, ventilation free days, intensive care unit (ICU) stays, oxygenation index (PaO2/FiO2) on day 3, the incidence of adverse events. The literature search was conducted independently by 2 researchers using standardized methods. We used the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool to assess the quality of the included studies. Mean difference (MD), Standardized mean difference (SMD) and relative risk (RR) were calculated using random effects model or fixed effects model. All statistical analyses were performed using RevMan software 5.4.

Results

A total of 2050 patients were enrolled in 15 studies, including 1069 patients in treatment group and 981 patients in the control group. The results of the meta-analysis showed that: compared with the control group, sivelestat can reduce the mortality of 28-30 days (RR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.66-0.98, p = 0.03) and the incidence of adverse events (RR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.85-0.98, p = 0.01), shortened mechanical ventilation time (SMD = - 0.32, 95% CI = - 0.60 to - 0.04, p = 0.02) and ICU stays (SMD = - 0.72, 95% CI = - 0.92 to - 0.52, p < 0.00001), increased the ventilation free days (MD = 3.57, 95% CI = 3.42-3.73, p < 0.00001) and improve oxygenation index (PaO2/FiO2) on day 3 (SMD = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.39-1.36, p = 0.0004).

Conclusions

Sivelestat can not only reduce the mortality of ALI/ARDS patients within 28-30 days and the incidence of adverse events, shorten the mechanical ventilation time and ICU stays, increase ventilation free days, but also improve the oxygenation index of patients on days 3, which has a good effect on the treatment of ALI/ARDS. These findings need to be verified in large-scale trials.

Nanomedicine for acute respiratory distress syndrome: The latest application, targeting strategy, and rational design

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is characterized by the severe inflammation and destruction of the lung air-blood barrier, leading to irreversible and substantial respiratory function damage. Patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have been encountered with a high risk of ARDS, underscoring the urgency for exploiting effective therapy. However, proper medications for ARDS are still lacking due to poor pharmacokinetics, non-specific side effects, inability to surmount pulmonary barrier, and inadequate management of heterogeneity. The increased lung permeability in the pathological environment of ARDS may contribute to nanoparticle-mediated passive targeting delivery. Nanomedicine has demonstrated unique advantages in solving the dilemma of ARDS drug therapy, which can address the shortcomings and limitations of traditional anti-inflammatory or antioxidant drug treatment. Through passive, active, or physicochemical targeting, nanocarriers can interact with lung epithelium/endothelium and inflammatory cells to reverse abnormal changes and restore homeostasis of the pulmonary environment, thereby showing good therapeutic activity and reduced toxicity. This article reviews the latest applications of nanomedicine in pre-clinical ARDS therapy, highlights the strategies for targeted treatment of lung inflammation, presents the innovative drug delivery systems, and provides inspiration for strengthening the therapeutic effect of nanomedicine-based treatment.

Detection of sivelestat and its metabolite in small volumes of plasma from Chinese ALI/ARDS patients with SIRS via high-throughput UPLC-MS/MS: A pharmacokinetic study

In this study, we developed a sensitive and efficient analytical approach combining a 96-well plate-based protein precipitation strategy with ultra-performance liquid chromatography electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) in order to assess the pharmacokinetic (PK) properties of sivelestat and its metabolite XW-IMP-A in samples of plasma from ALI/ARDS patients with SIRS. The samples were separated via gradient elution with a C18 column (Phenomenex Kinetex, C18, 2.6 μm, 100 Å, 50 × 2.1 mm) using 0.1 % formic acid aqueous solution (A) and acetonitrile-methanol (1:1, V:V) (B) as a mobile phase at a 0.6 mL/min flow rate. UPLC-MS/MS spectra were generated in positive ion mode, and multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) was used to detect the following transitions: m/z 435.1 → 360.0 for sivelestat, m/z 469.0 → 394.0 for sivelestat-IS, m/z 351.0 → 276.0 for XW-IMP-A, and m/z 384.9 → 310.0 for XW-IMP-A-IS. This assay was run for 2.5 min in total, and achieved lowest limit of quantitation values of 2.0 ng/mL and 0.5 ng/mL for sivelestat and XW-IMP-A, respectively, while remaining highly linear from 2-500 ng/mL for sivelestat (r² ≥ 0.9900) and from 0.5-125 ng/mL for XW-IMP-A (r² ≥ 0.9900). These validated data were consistent with US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) acceptance criteria. In addition, this method was successfully applied to the steady-state PK evaluation of ALI/ARDS patients with SIRS.

Effect of a selective neutrophil elastase inhibitor on mortality and ventilator-free days in patients with increased extravascular lung water: a post hoc analysis of the PiCCO Pulmonary Edema Study

BACKGROUND

Neutrophil elastase plays an important role in the development and progression of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Although the selective elastase inhibitor, sivelestat, is widely used in Japan for treating ARDS patients, its effectiveness remains controversial. The aim of the current study was to investigate the effects of sivelestat in ARDS patients with evidence of increased extravascular lung water by re-analyzing a large multicenter study database.

METHODS

A post hoc analysis of the PiCCO Pulmonary Edema Study was conducted. This multicenter prospective cohort study included 23 institutions in Japan. Adult mechanically ventilated ARDS patients with an extravascular lung water index of >10 mL/kg were included and propensity score analyses were performed. The endpoints were 28-day mortality and ventilator-free days (VFDs).

RESULTS

Patients were categorized into sivelestat (n = 87) and control (n = 77) groups, from which 329 inverse probability-weighted group patients (162 vs. 167) were generated. The overall 28-day mortality was 31.1% (51/164). There was no significant difference in 28-day mortality between the study groups (sivelestat vs. control; unmatched: 29.9% vs. 32.5%; difference, -2.6%, 95% confidence interval (CI), -16.8 to 14.2; inverse probability-weighted: 24.7% vs. 29.5%, difference, -4.8%, 95% CI, -14.4 to 9.6). Although administration of sivelestat did not alter the number of ventilator-free days (VFDs) in the unmatched (9.6 vs. 9.7 days; difference, 0.1, 95% CI, -3.0 to 3.1), the inverse probability-weighted analysis identified significantly more VFDs in the sivelestat group than in the control group (10.7 vs. 8.4 days, difference, -2.3, 95% CI, -4.4 to -0.2).

CONCLUSIONS

Although sivelestat did not significantly affect 28-day mortality, this treatment may have the potential to increase VFDs in ARDS patients with increased extravascular lung water. Prospective randomized controlled studies are required to confirm the results of the current study.

Clinical utility of the neutrophil elastase inhibitor sivelestat for the treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome

Acute respiratory distress syndrome is a serious condition that can arise following direct or indirect lung injury. It is heterogeneous and has a high mortality rate. Supportive care is the mainstay of treatment and there is no definitive pharmacological treatment as yet. Sivelestat is a neutrophil elastase inhibitor approved in Japan and the Republic of Korea for acute lung injury, including acute respiratory distress syndrome in patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome. The aim of this review is to examine the clinical utility of sivelestat in different disease states, using data from nonclinical and clinical studies. In nonclinical studies, sivelestat appears to show benefit in acute lung injury without inhibiting the host immune defense in cases of infection. Clinical studies do not yet provide a clear consensus. Phase III and IV Japanese studies have shown improvements in pulmonary function, length of intensive care unit stay, and mechanical ventilation, but a non-Japanese multicenter study did not demonstrate sivelestat to have an effect on ventilator-free days or 28-day all-cause mortality. Evidence of improvement in various parameters, including duration of stay in intensive care, mechanical ventilation, the ratio of partial pressure of arterial oxygen and fraction of inspired oxygen (PaO₂/F_IO₂ ratio) ratio, and lung injury scores, has been shown in patients with sepsis or gastric aspiration, and following the surgical treatment of esophageal cancer. To date, there are no particular concerns regarding adverse events, and the available data do not suggest that sivelestat might worsen infections. One study has analyzed cost-effectiveness, finding that sivelestat may reduce costs compared with standard care. The currently available evidence suggests that sivelestat may show some benefit in the treatment of acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome, although large, randomized controlled trials are needed in specific pathophysiological conditions to explore these potential benefits.

Potential effects of medicinal plants and secondary metabolites on acute lung injury

Acute lung injury (ALI) is a life-threatening syndrome that causes high morbidity and mortality worldwide. ALI is characterized by increased permeability of the alveolar-capillary membrane, edema, uncontrolled neutrophils migration to the lung, and diffuse alveolar damage, leading to acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. Although corticosteroids remain the mainstay of ALI treatment, they cause significant side effects. Agents of natural origin, such as medicinal plants and their secondary metabolites, mainly those with very few side effects, could be excellent alternatives for ALI treatment. Several studies, including our own, have demonstrated that plant extracts and/or secondary metabolites isolated from them reduce most ALI phenotypes in experimental animal models, including neutrophil recruitment to the lung, the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines, edema, and vascular permeability. In this review, we summarized these studies and described the anti-inflammatory activity of various plant extracts, such as Ginkgo biloba and Punica granatum, and such secondary metabolites as epigallocatechin-3-gallate and ellagic acid. In addition, we highlight the medical potential of these extracts and plant-derived compounds for treating of ALI.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease-induced aspiration injury following lung transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Chronic allograft failure remains the leading cause of late mortality following lung transplantation. Considerable evidence demonstrates a relationship between gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) induced allograft injury and bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome; however, the mechanism of injury, identification of at-risk patients, and treatment options remain to be elucidated.

RECENT FINDINGS

The recent findings in this area help delineate the inflammatory pathways associated with GERD-induced lung injury. They also demonstrate that clinically useful markers of aspiration-induced injury may be available via studying bronchoalveolar fluid or even induced sputum. Simple acid neutralization is not adequate to protect these patients from aspiration injury. In fact, there are no convincing data to indicate that medical therapies provide adequate treatment. In contradistinction, surgical fundoplication is associated with decreased levels of inflammatory cytokines and markers of aspiration in bronchoalveolar fluid, as well as improvements in pulmonary function in these patients.

SUMMARY

Recent findings support ubiquitous testing for GERD or aspiration in patients with end-stage lung disease both pretransplant and posttransplant and demonstrate that fundoplication can safely and effectively protect these patients from the on-going injury of GERD-induced pulmonary injury.

Combined effects of a neutrophil elastase inhibitor (sivelestat sodium) and a free radical scavenger (edaravone) on lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury in rats

OBJECTIVE AND DESIGN

The present study aimed to investigate the combined effects of a neutrophil elastase inhibitor, sivelestat sodium, with a free radical scavenger, edaravone, on lipolysaccharide (LPS)-induced acute lung injury (ALI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Adult male Sprague-Dawley rats were anesthetized and instilled intratracheally with 2 mg/kg LPS. Sivelestat sodium (10 mg/kg, i.p.) and/or edaravone (8 mg/kg, i.p.) were administered 1 h after LPS instillation. The severity of pulmonary injuries was evaluated 12 h after inducing acute lung injury.

RESULTS

In lung tissues, either sivelestat or edaravone treatment alone showed significant protective effects against neutrophil infiltration and tissue injury, as demonstrated by myeloperoxidase activity and histopathological analysis. Sivelestat or edaravone treatment also attenuated the LPS-induced production of pro-inflammatory cytokines interleukin (IL)-6 and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) in rat lungs. However, the LPS-induced elevation of malondialdehyde levels in rat lungs was reduced only by edaravone, but not by sivelestat. In addition, combined treatment with both sivelestat and edaravone demonstrated additive protective effects on LPS-induced lung injury, compared with single treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination of sivelestat and edaravone shows promise as a new treatment option for ALI/acute respiratory distress syndrome patients.

Sivelestat mitigates severe acute pancreatitis in rats

AIM: To evaluate the therapeutic effect of sivelestat on severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) in a rat model by measuring the levels of serum neutrophil elastase (NE) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) and examining pancreatic pathological changes.

METHODS: SAP was induced in rats by retrograde injection of 5% sodium taurocholate into the biliopancreatic duct. Sivelestat was instilled continuously with an infusion pump in rats in the treatment group. Pancreatic pathological changes were evaluated by HE staining. The levels of serum NE and IL-6 were measured by ELISA. The level of serum amylase was measured using a biochemical analyzer.

RESULTS: The level of serum amylase was higher and pancreatic pathological changes were obvious in SAP rats compared to control rats. The levels of serum amylase, NE and IL-6 at various time points were significantly lower in treated rats than in SAP rats (3 h: 5636.22 ± 713.57 vs 5835.75 ± 681.52, 16.99 ± 3.28 vs 22.93 ± 4.74, 181.86 ± 36.56 vs 281.82 ± 30.79; 6 h: 5743.44 ± 624.93 vs 6253.66 ± 533.99, 23.63 ± 4.47 vs 31.81 ± 4.69, 184.15 ± 28.56 vs 319.39 ± 21.73; 12 h: 7098.93 ± 698.42 vs 8420.74 ± 779.72, 24.46 ± 5.02 vs 39.21 ± 6.23, 192.52 ± 37.65 vs 354.21 ± 23.72, all P < 0.05). The score of pancreatic pathological changes was significantly lower in treated rats than in SAP rats (P < 0.05). Serum levels of NE and IL-6 had a positive correlation with the score of pancreatic pathology.

CONCLUSION: Sivelestat could reduce serum levels of IL-6 and NE, mitigate pancreatic injury, and inhibit inflammatory reaction in rats with SAP.