A Prospective Evaluation of Systemic Biomarkers and Cognitive Function Associated with Carotid Revascularization

Cognitive effects of carotid revascularization in octogenarians

BACKGROUND

Cognitive impairment is the epitome of cerebrovascular diseases, causing a significant economic burden on our health care system. Growing evidence has indicated the benefits of carotid interventions in patients with severe carotid atherosclerosis. However, the neurocognitive outcome of carotid revascularization in octogenarians is not clearly understood. We aim to evaluate postintervention cognitive changes in seniors older than 80 years.

METHODS

We prospectively recruited 170 patients undergoing carotid interventions. Neurocognitive testing was performed preoperatively and at 1, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Episodic memory was assessed with Rey's Auditory Verbal Learning Test. Other executive functions and language measures were also evaluated at individual time points. Raw test scores were converted to z-scores or scaled scores adjusted for age and education. The sample was divided into 2 groups based on age: octogenarian (≥80 years) and nonoctogenarian (<80 years old). Postoperative cognitive scores were compared to baseline within each subcohort.

RESULTS

A total of 23 subjects (13%) were octogenarians, and 147 (87%) were younger than 80 years. Younger patients demonstrated significant cognitive improvements up to 12 months postop compared to the baseline. However, octogenarians exhibited a lack of improvement in verbal memory, measures of executive function, and language at all 3 postintervention time points.

CONCLUSION

Carotid interventions improve cognitive functions in younger patients with carotid occlusive atherosclerosis. However, no cognitive benefits were seen in male seniors older than 80 years. Further investigations are warranted to better understand the postinterventional cognitive changes in octogenarians.

Does Carotid Intervention Improve Cognitive Function?

Carotid artery disease has been linked to baseline cognitive impairment, even in asymptomatic patients. Therefore, there has been a persistent interest in investigating the impact of carotid revascularization on cognitive functions, but the results have been heterogeneous. Our recent prospective evaluation showed improved cognitive scores across multiple cognitive measures following carotid intervention. Herein, we summarize the studies published to date, identify the potential contributors to the inconsistency of post-interventional cognitive outcomes, and explore further opportunities in cognitive evaluations.

A systematic review of cognitive function after carotid endarterectomy in asymptomatic patients

OBJECTIVE

Asymptomatic carotid stenosis has been associated with a progressive decline in neurocognitive function. However, the effect of carotid endarterectomy on this process is poorly understood. We aimed to evaluate pre and post-operative cognitive function changes in asymptomatic patients after carotid endarterectomy METHODS: A systematic review of the existing reports in PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochran databases was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis statement recommendations. All original retrospective or prospective studies (including cohort, cross-sectional, case-control, pilot studies, etc.) and clinical trials that compared pre and post-operative neurocognitive function in asymptomatic patients with carotid stenosis after CEA, which were published from January 2000 to April 2021 were identified and considered eligible for inclusion in the study.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies (502 CEAs) comparing cognitive function changes before and after CEA were identified. In seven studies with a total number of 272 patients, a mean age range of 67.3 ± 4.8 to 76.35 years old and after follow-up ranging between 1 and 12 months, overall cognitive function improved after CEA. However, in six studies with a total sample of 230, a mean age range of 68.6 ± 6.9 to 74.4±6.1 years, and follow-up ranged from 24 hours to 3 years, showed no change or decline in overall cognitive function after procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

The lack of standardization of specific cognitive tests and cognitive function assessment timing after CEA does not allow for definite conclusions to be made. However, improving the brain perfusion with combination of CEA and statin therapy may be a protective strategy against cognitive function decline.

Cognitive Functions in Patients after Carotid Artery Revascularization-A Narrative Review

Carotid revascularization may lead to improved cognitive function beyond stroke prevention. This article summarizes the conclusions from available studies on the effects of carotid reperfusion procedures on cognitive function. The papers cited used different neuropsychological tests for cognitive assessment, resulting in different methodologies and the results obtained were not always convergent. However, most studies reported an improvement in neurocognitive abilities after both vascular interventions, but a more precise assessment of the specific benefits is still awaited. Clinical determinants to predict the effects of these treatments on cognitive function are still being sought, but results are not yet satisfactory. In view of these studies, carotid stenosis seems to be an independent risk factor for cognitive deterioration, and the main mechanisms responsible are embolism and cerebral hypoperfusion. The aim of this study is to order the knowledge about the effects of carotid artery stenting (CAS) and endarterectomy (CEA) on neurocognitive functions and to verify the usefulness of using these treatments.

The mid-term effects of carotid endarterectomy on cognition and regional neural activity analyzed with the amplitude of low frequency fluctuations technique

Purpose

The study aims to evaluate the mid-term effects of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) on cognition and resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) using the Amplitude of Low Frequency Fluctuations (ALFF) technique.

Methods

In this observational study, patients eligible for CEA were prospectively included. On the same day, within 1 week of the CEA procedure performed and 12 months after the CEA procedure, all patients underwent (i) an MRI examination for rs-fMRI analysis and (ii) a cognitive evaluation using the Italian version of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) corrected for age and schooling. Pre-CEA and post-CEA MMSE scores were evaluated using paired sample t-tests, adopting a p-value < 0.05 as statistical threshold. The ALFF technique was used for analyzing the differences between pre-CEA and post-CEA rs-fMRI scans in terms of regional neural activation. This was accomplished by applying non-parametric statistics based on randomization/permutation for cluster-level inferences, adopting a cluster-mass p-value corrected for false discovery < 0.05 for cluster threshold, and a p-uncorrected < 0.01 for the voxel threshold.

Results

Twenty asymptomatic patients were enrolled. The mean MMSE score resulted improved following CEA procedure (p-value = 0.001). The ALFF analysis identified a single cluster of 6260 voxels of increased regional neural activity following CEA, and no cluster of reduced activity. The majority of voxels covered the right precentral gyrus, the right middle frontal gyrus, and the anterior division of the cingulate gyrus.

Conclusion

Mid-term cognitive improvements observed after CEA are associated to increased regional neural activity of several cerebral regions.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00234-021-02815-7.

Carotid artery stenosis and inflammatory biomarkers: the role of inflammation-induced immunological responses affecting the vascular systems

The death, disability and economic cost of stroke are enormous. Indeed, among the 16 million people worldwide who suffer a stroke' annually, nearly six million die, and another five million are left permanently disabled making prevention of stroke one of the most important priorities in healthcare. Currently carotid artery stenosis (CS) or narrowing of the common carotid artery (CCA) or internal carotid artery (ICA) due to atherosclerotic plaque, accounts for 20-30% of all ischemic strokes. Atherosclerosis is now regarded as a chronic inflammatory disease in response to vascular compromise especially from hypertension. This has long been known to lead to inflammation and atherosclerotic plaque formation in the blood vessels. This mini-review aims to highlight the role of inflammation and neuro-immunological processes in carotid artery disease. Various cellular elements of inflammation and advanced imaging techniques have been identified as potential markers of plaque progression. Therapies related to decreasing and modulating immune-responsive inflammation in the carotid vessels have been shown to translate into decreased occurrence of acute neurologic events and improvement of clinical outcomes.

Progression in Vascular Cognitive Impairment: Pathogenesis, Neuroimaging Evaluation, and Treatment

Vascular cognitive impairment (VCI) defines an entire spectrum of neurologic disorders from mild cognitive impairment to dementia caused by cerebral vascular disease. The pathogenesis of VCI includes ischemic factors (e.g., large vessel occlusion and small vessel dysfunction); hemorrhagic factors (e.g., intracerebral hemorrhage and subarachnoid hemorrhage); and other factors (combined with Alzheimer's disease). Clinical evaluations of VCI mainly refer to neuropsychological testing and imaging assessments, including structural and functional neuroimaging, with different advantages. At present, the main treatment for VCI focuses on neurological protection, cerebral blood flow reconstruction, and neurological rehabilitation, such as pharmacological treatment, revascularization, and cognitive training. In this review, we discuss the pathogenesis, neuroimaging evaluation, and treatment of VCI.