Surgical Management of Gallbladder Cancer: Simple Versus Extended Cholecystectomy and the Role of Adjuvant Therapy. Ann Surg. 2017;266:625-631. [PMID: 28692469 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000002385]

Adjuvant Therapy Use for Patients With Inadequately Resected T1b-T3 Gallbladder Cancer

INTRODUCTION

Up to 90% of patients undergo inadequate resection for incidentally diagnosed T1b-T3 gallbladder cancer (GBC). We evaluated whether adjuvant therapies (ATs) are associated with prolonged overall survival (OS) for patients undergoing inadequate resection of T1b-T3 GBC.

METHODS

Patients who underwent inadequate resection, defined as simple cholecystectomy, for T1b-T3, Nx-N2, and M0 GBC were identified from the National Cancer Database (2004-2016). Patient characteristics, variables associated with AT use, and OS were described using the chi-square test, multivariable logistical regression, Kaplan-Meier, and Cox proportional hazard models.

RESULTS

Of 1386 patients who met inclusion criteria, most received no AT (64%), 20% received chemotherapy (CT), and 16% received chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Patients who received no AT were generally older (51% ≥ 75 y) and had no comorbidities (65% Charlson Comorbidity Index 0). Among those who received AT, CRT rather than CT, tended to be employed for patients who were older (≥75 y) or had more comorbidities (Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥1). Patients with advanced disease (T3, positive lymph nodes, or positive margins) were more likely to receive CRT. For T1b-T3 GBC, any AT was associated with prolonged median OS compared to no AT (22 months versus 15 mo, P < 0.01). Relative to no AT, CT (hazard ratio 0.76, 95% confidence interval 0.67-0.92) and CRT (0.59, 95% confidence interval 0.49-0.72) were associated with decreased risk of death.

CONCLUSIONS

AT was associated with prolonged OS for patients with inadequately resected T1b-T3 GBC. CRT may have a role in treatment for patients with high-risk disease following inadequate resection of T1b-T3 GBC.

Incidental gallbladder cancer detected during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: conversion to extensive resection is a feasible choice

Background

Re-resection is recommended for patients with incidental gallbladder carcinoma (iGBC) at T1b stage and above. It is unclear whether continuation of laparoscopic re-resection (CLR) for patients with intraoperatively detected iGBC (IDiGBC) is more beneficial to short- and long-term clinical outcomes than with conversion to radical extensive-resection (RER).

Methods

This single-centre, retrospective cohort study of patients with iGBC was conducted between June 2006 and August 2021. Patients who underwent immediate reresection for T1b or higher ID-iGBC were enrolled. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to match the two groups (CLR and RER) of patients, and differences in clinical outcomes before and after matching were analyzed.

Result

A total of 102 patients with ID-iGBC were included in this study. 58 patients underwent CLR, and 44 underwent RER. After 1:1 propensity score matching, 56 patients were matched to all baselines. Patients in the RER group had a lower total postoperative complication rate, lower pulmonary infection rate, and shorter operation time than those in the CLR group did. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the overall survival rate of patients who underwent CLR was significantly lower than that of patients who underwent RER. Multivariate analysis showed that CLR, advanced T stage, lymph node positivity, and the occurrence of postoperative ascites were adverse prognostic factors for the overall survival of patients.

Conclusion

Patients with ID-iGBC who underwent RER had fewer perioperative complications and a better prognosis than those who underwent CLR. For patients with ID-iGBC, conversion to radical extensive-resection appears to be a better choice.

New trends in diagnosis and management of gallbladder carcinoma

Gallbladder (GB) carcinoma, although relatively rare, is the most common biliary tree cholangiocarcinoma with aggressiveness and poor prognosis. It is closely associated with cholelithiasis and long-standing large (> 3 cm) gallstones in up to 90% of cases. The other main predisposing factors for GB carcinoma include molecular factors such as mutated genes, GB wall calcification (porcelain) or mainly mucosal microcalcifications, and GB polyps ≥ 1 cm in size. Diagnosis is made by ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), and, more precisely, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Preoperative staging is of great importance in decision-making regarding therapeutic management. Preoperative staging is based on MRI findings, the leading technique for liver metastasis imaging, enhanced three-phase CT angiography, or magnetic resonance angiography for major vessel assessment. It is also necessary to use positron emission tomography (PET)-CT or 18F-FDG PET-MRI to more accurately detect metastases and any other occult deposits with active metabolic uptake. Staging laparoscopy may detect dissemination not otherwise found in 20%-28.6% of cases. Multimodality treatment is needed, including surgical resection, targeted therapy by biological agents according to molecular testing gene mapping, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and immunotherapy. It is of great importance to understand the updated guidelines and current treatment options. The extent of surgical intervention depends on the disease stage, ranging from simple cholecystectomy (T1a) to extended resections and including extended cholecystectomy (T1b), with wide lymph node resection in every case or IV-V segmentectomy (T2), hepatic trisegmentectomy or major hepatectomy accompanied by hepaticojejunostomy Roux-Y, and adjacent organ resection if necessary (T3). Laparoscopic or robotic surgery shows fewer postoperative complications and equivalent oncological outcomes when compared to open surgery, but much attention must be paid to avoiding injuries. In addition to surgery, novel targeted treatment along with immunotherapy and recent improvements in radiotherapy and chemotherapy (neoadjuvant-adjuvant capecitabine, cisplatin, gemcitabine) have yielded promising results even in inoperable cases calling for palliation (T4). Thus, individualized treatment must be applied.

Development and External Validation of a Model to Predict Overall Survival in Patients With Resected Gallbladder Cancer

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to develop and validate a clinical prediction model to predict overall survival in patients with nonmetastatic, resected gallbladder cancer (GBC).

BACKGROUND

Although several tools are available, no optimal method has been identified to assess survival in patients with resected GBC.

METHODS

Data from a Dutch, nation-wide cohort of patients with resected GBC was used to develop a prediction model for overall survival. The model was internally validated and a cohort of Australian GBC patients who underwent resection was used for external validation. The performance of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system and the present model were compared.

RESULTS

In total, 446 patients were included; 380 patients in the development cohort and 66 patients in the validation cohort. In the development cohort median survival was 22 months (median follow-up 75 months). Age, T/N classification, resection margin, differentiation grade, and vascular invasion were independent predictors of survival. The externally validated C-index was 0.75 (95%CI: 0.69-0.80), implying good discriminatory capacity. The discriminative ability of the present model after internal validation was superior to the ability of the AJCC staging system (Harrell C-index 0.71, [95%CI: 0.69-0.72) vs. 0.59 (95% CI: 0.57-0.60)].

CONCLUSION

The proposed model for the prediction of overall survival in patients with resected GBC demonstrates good discriminatory capacity, reasonable calibration and outperforms the authoritative AJCC staging system. This model can be a useful tool for physicians and patients to obtain information about survival after resection and is available from https:// gallbladderresearch.shinyapps.io/Predict_GBC_survival/.

Development and validation of a nomogram prediction model based on albumin-to-alkaline phosphatase ratio for predicting the prognosis of gallbladder carcinoma

Gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) is a rare biliary tract cancer with a high recurrence rate and a poor prognosis. Albumin-alkaline phosphatase ratio (AAPR) has been demonstrated to be a prognostic predictor for several cancers, but its predictive value for GBC patients remains unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate the predictive role of AAPR in GBC patients and to develop a novel nomogram prediction model for GBC patients. We retrospectively collected data from 80 patients who underwent surgery at the Hospital of 81st Group Army PLA as a training cohort. Data were collected from 70 patients with the same diagnosis who underwent surgery at the First Affiliated Hospital of Hebei North University as an external verification cohort. The optimal cut-off value of AAPR was determined using X-tile software. A nomogram for the overall survival (OS) based on multivariate Cox regression analysis was developed and validated using calibration curves, Harrell's concordance index, the receiver operating characteristic curves, and decisive curve analyses. The optimal cut-off value of AAPR was .20. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses demonstrated that BMI (p = .043), R0 resection (p = .001), TNM stage (p = .005), and AAPR (p = .017) were independent risk factors for GBC patients. In terms of consistency, discrimination, and net benefit, the nomogram incorporating these four independent risk factors performed admirably. AAPR is an independent predictor of GBC patients undergoing surgery, and a novel nomogram prediction model based on AAPR showed superior predictive ability.

Evaluation of abnormal gallbladder imaging findings: Surgical management and pathologic correlations in early-stage gallbladder cancer

Gallbladder cancer is a rare but potentially fatal disease. It is often asymptomatic in early stages and is frequently found incidentally or during the workup for benign biliary disease. We present two patients who each had suspicious gallbladder imaging findings and highlight their differences on radiologic and pathologic examination.

Circulating miR-141 as a potential biomarker for diagnosis, prognosis and therapeutic targets in gallbladder cancer

MicroRNA-141(miR-141) has been reported to play vital roles in the regulation of carcinogenesis and cancer progression. However, the biological function of miR-141 in GBC has received less attention. The aim of this study was to estimate the potential value of the expression level of miR-141 as a diagnostic and prognostic blood-based biomarker in gallbladder cancer (GBC) patients. Meanwhile, to explore its biological role in GBC cells. RT-PCR was employed to confirm the expression of miR-141 in ten paired tissue samples (10 GBC tissues and 10 adjacent normal gallbladder tissues), GBC cell lines and peripheral blood specimens from 98 GBC patients and 60 healthy controls. MTT assay was used to evaluate the GBC cells proliferation and flow cytometry was used to detect the cell apoptosis. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and the area under the curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the value of miR-141 plasma levels for GBC diagnosis. Finally, clinicopathological and survival data of all GBC patients were collected and analyzed. Here, we confirmed that the expression of miR-141 were upregulated in primary gallbladder cancer cells and tissues compared with human gallbladder epithelial cells and adjacent normal tissues (P < 0.0001). Meanwhile, we found that downregulated expression of miR-141 by miR-141 inhibitor could induce apoptosis and inhibit proliferation of GBC cells. Additionally, elevated plasma miR-141 expression was also detected in the peripheral blood of GBC patients compared with healthy controls (P < 0.0001). The AUC value of miR-141 for GBC diagnosis was 0.894 (95% CI 0.843–0.945), which was more valuable than those including carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) (0.713, 95% CI 0.633–0.793), carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125) (0.837, 95% CI 0.776–0.899) and carbohydrate antigen 19–9 (CA19-9) (0.869, 95% CI 0.813–0.924). The high expression level of miR-141 in plasma was significantly associated with tumor invasion (P = 0.008), lymph node metastasis (P < 0.0001) and advanced pathologic tumor/node/metastasis (pTNM) stage (P = 0.009). More importantly, high plasma miR-141 expression was an independent prognostic factor for predicting poorer long-term survival in GBC patients. Elevated expression of circulating miR-141 in peripheral blood might be a potential novel biomarker for diagnosis and prognosis of GBC patients. Downregulated expression of miR-141 could inhibit proliferation and induce apoptosis of GBC cells, that provide a potential therapeutic target for GBC.

The Role of Keratin17 in Human Tumours

Keratins are a group of proteins that can constitute intermediate fibers. It is a component of the cytoskeleton and plays an important role in cell protection and structural support. Keratin 17, a Type I keratin, is a multifunctional protein that regulates a variety of biological processes, including cell growth, proliferation, migration, apoptosis and signal transduction. Abnormal expression of KRT17 is associated with a variety of diseases, such as skin diseases. In recent years, studies have shown that KRT17 is abnormally expressed in a variety of malignant tumours, such as lung cancer, cervical cancer, oral squamous cell carcinoma and sarcoma. These abnormal expressions are related to the occurrence, development and prognosis of malignant tumors. In this review, we summarized the expression patterns of KRT17 in a variety of malignant tumours, the role of KRT17 in the development and prognosis of different malignant tumors and its molecular mechanisms. We also discuss the potential clinical application of KRT17 as a valuable therapeutic target.

Cáncer de vesícula biliar, una visión actual

Introducción. El diagnóstico de cáncer de vesícula biliar se realiza generalmente de forma incidental durante el estudio de las piezas quirúrgicas o cuando la enfermedad está avanzada y se expresa por su diseminación. Muy pocas veces se diagnostica de forma preoperatoria. Corresponde a la neoplasia más común de las vías biliares y su incidencia varía de acuerdo a la región geográfica. La región andina en Latinoamérica presenta una de las mayores incidencias a nivel mundial. Métodos. Se realizó una revisión narrativa de la literatura, para presentar una información actualizada en lo referente a los factores de riesgo (incluyendo las alteraciones genéticas y moleculares), al diagnóstico y al tratamiento de esta patología. Basados en los datos actuales, presentamos algunas recomendaciones dirigidas al diagnóstico temprano, que permita un manejo más adecuado de nuestros pacientes. Resultados. Se han implicado nuevos factores de riesgo relacionados con la etiología del cáncer de vesícula biliar, como la obesidad, factores genéticos y moleculares. A pesar de la disponibilidad de los métodos diagnósticos imagenológicos, no ha ocurrido una importante variación porcentual en cuanto al estadio al momento del diagnóstico. Conclusiones. El manejo quirúrgico del cáncer de vesícula biliar está indicado en los estadios más tempranos de la enfermedad y es importante evaluar las opciones terapéuticas en pacientes con enfermedad avanzada. Se considera de suma importancia el estudio anatomopatológico de la pieza quirúrgica y la revisión del informe por parte del cirujano

Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Adjuvant Chemotherapy vs. No Chemotherapy for Patients with Carcinoma of Gallbladder Undergoing Curative Resection

BACKGROUND

Gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) has a dismal prognosis even after curative resection. The objective of the study was to evaluate the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with GBC undergoing curative resection in a randomized control trial (RCT).

METHODS

A single-center open-labeled prospective RCT was done from January 2012 to June 2018. R0 curative resected GBC patients were randomized in 1:1 to either surveillance alone (control group) or adjuvant chemotherapy (gemcitabine and cisplatin (GemCis group)) for 6 cycles. The primary outcome was disease-free survival (DFS), and the secondary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and toxicity profile.

RESULTS

On the evaluation of 362 patients with GBC, 50 patients were enrolled in each control or GemCis group. Per protocol (PP), it comprised 96 patients. The demographic and clinical profile was similar between the two groups except in the lower nodal stage where patients were higher in the control group (p = 0.01). Recurrences were similar between groups (control 44% vs GemCis 56%; p = 0.23). On the intention to treat (ITT), analyses of median DFS (not reached vs. 24 months, p = 0.14) and OS (not reached vs. 31 months, p = 0.10) were similar between groups. On PP, analyses of median DFS (not reached vs. 24 months, p = 0.16) and OS (not reached vs. 31 months, p = 0.09) were similar between groups. The common toxicity profile was hematological followed by gastrointestinal symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant GemCis therapy for 6 cycles does not improve DFS or OS than R0 surgery alone patients with GBC.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT02778308 ( https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ).

Bi-segmentectomy versus wedge hepatic resection in extended cholecystectomy for T2 and T3 gallbladder cancer: A matched case-control study

Backgrounds/Aims

Extended cholecystectomy (EC) is the mainstay of treatment in most patients with potentially curable gallbladder cancer (GBC). The optimum extent of hepatic resection in EC is debatable.

Methods

This retrospective study was conducted on patients with GBC who received EC from May 2009 to February 2019. Based on the extent of hepatic resection, patients were divided into ECB (EC involving bi-segmentectomy s4b&5) and ECW (EC involving wedge hepatic resection) groups. Patients with T1 GBC, T4 GBC, and benign diseases were excluded. Post-exclusion, both groups were matched for T and N stage. Matched groups were then compared.

Results

Out of a total of 161 patients who received EC, 86 patients had ECB and 75 patients had ECW. After exclusion and matching, both ECB and ECW groups had 35 patients. Their demographic and clinical profiles were comparable. Surgical blood loss (p = 0.005) and postoperative complication rate (p = 0.035) were significantly less in the ECB group. For ECB vs. ECW, mean recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 58.2 months vs. 42.3 months (p = 0.264) and overall survival (OS) was 61.5 months vs. 43.4 months (p = 0.161). On univariate analysis, higher T and N stages were associated with poor prognosis. On multivariate analysis, higher T stage, N stage, and American Society of Anaesthesiologists grade were associated with poor RFS and OS.

Conclusions

The survival after ECB for T2 and T3 GBC was not significantly superior to that after ECW. However, surgical blood loss and postoperative complications were lower following ECB.

Influence of adjuvant therapy on pattern of failure and survival in curatively resected gallbladder carcinoma

Purpose

The study was done to evaluate the role of adjuvant therapy in curatively resected Stage II and III gallbladder carcinoma (GBC).

Materials and Methods

This was a retrospective analysis of patients of GBC registered between 2008 and 2017 in outpatient department of a tertiary cancer hospital in India. Patients who had any of the following adjuvant treatment after radical surgery: (a) external beam radiotherapy (RT) alone, (b) chemotherapy (CT) alone, and (c) RT with CT (CRT) were considered for the study.

Results

A total of fifty patients could meet the selection criteria. It was seen that seven patients were treated with RT, 20 with CT, and 23 with CRT. Median follow-up for patients who were alive was 26.7 months. Nineteen patients had locoregional failure while eight had distant failure. Patients treated with CRT had a significantly better mean overall survival compared to those treated with RT or CT (44.0 months, 12.5 months, and 15.1 months, respectively; P = 0.003). Similarly, mean disease-free survival was superior in CRT arm compared to RT and CT arms (43.6 months, 9.6 months, and 12.4 months, respectively; P = 0.002).

Conclusions

Adjuvant CRT had better survival outcome compared to patients treated with either RT or CT with Stage II and III disease after curative cholecystectomy.

Factors that Minimize Curative Resection for Gallbladder Adenocarcinoma: an Analysis of Clinical Decision-Making and Survival

BACKGROUND

Gallbladder adenocarcinoma has a poor prognosis as it is often diagnosed incidentally, and patients have a high risk for residual and occult metastatic disease. Expert guidelines recommend definitive surgery for ≥T1b tumors; however, surgical management is inconsistent. This study evaluates the factors that affect the completion of radical resection with portal lymphadenectomy and its impact on survival.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients who underwent surgery for gallbladder cancer from 2008 to 2017 at an academic institution was performed. Patients were analyzed based on whether they underwent definitive surgical resection. Patient factors and clinical decision-making were analyzed; overall survival was compared using Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

Seventy-five patients with ≥T1b tumors were identified, of who 32 (42.7%) underwent definitive resection. Fifty-four (72%) patients had gallbladder cancer identified as an incidental diagnosis following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Among patients who did not undergo definitive resection, the underlying factors were varied. Only 24 (55.8%) patients in the non-definitive resection group were seen by surgical oncology. Among patients who underwent re-operation for definitive resection, 12 (38.7%) were upstaged on final pathology. Of the 43 patients who did not undergo definitive resection, 4 (9.3%) had metastatic disease identified during attempted re-resection. Patients who underwent definitive resection had a significantly longer median overall survival compared to those who did not (4.3 v. 1.9 years, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing definitive resection have a significantly improved survival, including as part of a re-operative strategy. Universal referral to a surgical specialist is a modifiable factor resulting in increased definitive resection rates.

Clinical Outcomes Between a Minimally Invasive and Open Extended Cholecystectomy for T2 Gallbladder Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

Background: Although a minimally invasive extended cholecystectomy (MIEC) for T2 gallbladder cancer (T2 GBC) has been performed in many experienced centers, no oncologic comparison with open extended cholecystectomy (OEC) has yet been reported. Methods: T2 GBC patients who underwent MIEC (n = 60) or OEC (n = 135) were enrolled. We used propensity score matching (PSM) using pre- and intraoperative variables. Short- and long-term outcomes were then compared before and after PSM. Results: Before PSM, OEC patients more frequently showed completion of surgery after a simple cholecystectomy (standardized mean difference [SMD] = -0.551), and lymph node enlargement on preoperative computed tomography (SMD = -0.471). PSM was used to select 56 patients from each of the 2 patient groups. MIEC patients showed comparable complication rate (7.1% versus 12.5%, P = .365) and shorter hospital stay (5.7 days versus 9.8 days, P < .001). The median follow-up period was 26.2 months, and 5-year overall survival (OS) rate (96.8% versus 91.1%, P = .464) and 5-year recurrence free survival (RFS) (54.7% versus 44.4%, P = .580) outcomes were still comparable between MIEC and OEC groups. Conclusion: MIEC have advantages such as early recovery and comparable short-term outcomes compared with OEC. MIEC showed comparable OS and RFS outcomes compared with OEC. MIEC is a safe option without oncological compromise for T2 GBC.

Gallbladder cancer who is really cured?

BACKGROUND

Although gallbladder cancer (GBCA) is characterized by a dismal prognosis, there is a proportion of patients who are cured. The aim of this study was to analyze the profile of these patients.

METHODS

A database was queried for patients who underwent curative resection with a follow-up of at least 5 years. Patients were prospectively treated and registered by the same surgical team. A multivariate regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with long-term survival.

RESULTS

From 1988 to 2013, 461 patients were evaluated and 112 who underwent resection were analyzed. Among the patients, five year survival was 57% while lymph node and liver compromise were the only independent factors associated with survival. On the other hand, the elapsed time between the cholecystectomy and the resection, the differentiation grade and the level of wall invasion did not have an independent effect on the prognosis.

CONCLUSION

Despite its poor prognosis, a subset of patients can be cured of GBCA. R0 resection of patients without lymph and liver infiltration are key to GBCA survival.

Incidental Gallbladder Cancer on Cholecystectomy: Strategy for Re-resection of Presumed Benign Diseases from a Retrospective Multicenter Study by the Yokohama Clinical Oncology Group

BACKGROUND/AIM

Current expert consensus recommends re-resection for incidental gallbladder cancer (IGBC) of pT1b-3. This study examined whether this consensus was reasonably applicable to patients with IGBC in one Japanese region.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a multicenter, retrospective analysis of cholecystectomies for presumed benign diseases between January 2000 and December 2009.

RESULTS

IGBC was diagnosed in 70 (1.0%) out of 6,775 patients undergoing cholecystectomy. Five-year disease-specific cumulative survival was 100% in 19 patients with pT1a, 80.0% in five with pT1b, 49.5% in 33 with pT2, and 23.1% in 13 with pT3. Re-resection was not performed for the 24 patients with pT1a/1b disease, whereas 24 out of 46 patients with pT2/3 underwent re-resection. Regardless of re-resection, independent factors associated with a poor prognosis on multivariate analysis were grade 2 or poorer disease and bile spillage at prior cholecystectomy. In the 24 patients with pT2/3 re-resection, 11 patients without either of these two factors had significantly better 5-year disease-specific cumulative survival than the 13 patients with one or two independent factors associated with a poor prognosis (72.7% vs. 30.8%, p=0.009).

CONCLUSION

This Japanese regional study suggests that indication of re-resection for IGBC should not be determined by pT-factor alone and that much more attention should be paid to pathological and intraoperative findings at prior cholecystectomy.

FGFR inhibitors in elderly patients with advanced biliary tract cancer: an unsolved issue

Background: Despite recent advances in the understanding of the molecular landscape of biliary tract cancer (BTC), advanced disease continues to carry a poor prognosis, and the benefit from systemic treatments remains modest. However, BTCs have emerged as malignancies harboring specific potentially druggable aberrations, and thus, several molecularly targeted treatments have been recently tested. Among these, fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitors have shown interesting results in previously treated BTC patients with advanced diseaseAreas covered: In this review, we aimed to provide an overview of available evidence on FGFR inhibitors in elderly patients with metastatic BTC, especially focusing on subgroup analyses of recently published trials exploring this novel therapeutic approach in these aggressive malignancies.Expert opinion: The FGFR1, FGFR2, and FGFR3 inhibitor pemigatinib has been recently approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in metastatic BTCs harboring FGFR2 fusion or other rearrangement. However, few data are available regarding the use of FGFR inhibitors in elderly BTCs, a patient population that remains seriously under-represented in clinical trials.

Pitfalls, challenges, and updates in adjuvant systemic treatment for resected biliary tract cancer

Introduction: Unfortunately, potentially curative surgical resection is possible in approximately the 25% of biliary tract cancer (BTC) patients at diagnosis, and even following radical surgery, relapse rates remain high. Thus, the role of adjuvant systemic treatment has been widely explored in this setting over the last decades, with the hope of lowering recurrence rates and improving outcomes of BTC patients.Areas covered: In this review, we provide an overview of available evidence regarding adjuvant systemic therapy in resected BTC, critically discussing the pros and cons of recently published clinical trials such as the BILCAP, the BCAT, and the PRODIGE-12/ACCORD-18 phase III studies.Expert opinion: Although the BILCAP trial has established adjuvant capecitabine for 6 months following radical resection as a novel standard of care, the role of adjuvant systemic chemotherapy is the object of debate and controversy in the BTC medical community. Although most of the international guidelines on BTC management have not yet been updated, the recently published ASCO guidelines support the use of capecitabine in this setting. Several phase I to III clinical trials are currently evaluating the role of novel therapeutic approaches in patients with resected BTC, and the results of these studies are highly awaited.

IDH inhibitors in advanced cholangiocarcinoma: Another arrow in the quiver?

Cholangiocarcinomas (CCAs) are a heterogenous group of hepatobiliary tumors with poor prognosis and limited therapeutic options. In the last decade, the advent of genomic profiling has led to the identification of several putative actionable aberrations in CCAs, and genomic characterization is playing an increasing role in the management of these malignancies. Thus, a wide number of targetable mutations are currently under investigation, and early studies on this approach in CCAs have been recently presented or published. Among these, isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutations have been reported in approximately 15-20% of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) patients, while these aberrations are considered to be less frequent in perihilar CCA (pCCA), distal CCA (dCCA), and gallbladder cancer. Of note, the recent findings of the ClarIDHy phase III trial add to mounting evidence showing the potential advantages of molecularly targeted therapies in CCA, on the basis of a benefit in previously treated IDH1-mutant patients receiving ivosidenib versus placebo. However, although the results of this trial showed a statistically significant improvement in progression-free survival and overall survival for IDH-mutant CCAs treated with ivosidenib, several questions regarding the real impact of IDH inhibitors in this setting remain open. In this review, we will provide an overview on the biological rationale behind the use of IDH inhibitors in CCA patients and current clinical implications of these molecularly targeted agents. The recently published results of the ClarIDHy - as well as ongoing clinical trials in this setting - are highlighted and critically discussed.

Pemigatinib: Hot topics behind the first approval of a targeted therapy in cholangiocarcinoma

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) includes a heterogeneous group of malignancies with limited treatment options. Despite recent advances in medical oncology, the prognosis of CCA patients with metastatic disease remains poor, with a median overall survival of less than a year. In the last decade, notable efforts have been made by the CCA medical community in an attempt to improve clinical outcomes of patients, with the development of molecularly targeted therapies in this setting. Among these treatments, the fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) 2 inhibitor pemigatinib has received accelerated approval in April 2020 by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in CCA patients harboring FGFR2 gene fusions or other rearrangements, on the basis of the results of the FIGHT-202 trial, and thus, representing the first molecularly targeted therapy to be approved for the treatment of CCA. However, several issues remain, including the emergence of polyclonal mutations determining resistance to pemigatinib, the identification of biomarkers predictive of response, and the knowledge gaps regarding the role of other FGFR gene aberrations. This review aims to provide an overview of recent development of pemigatinib, especially focusing on the results of the pivotal FIGHT-202 trial, the approval of this FGFR inhibitor, and the future challenges concerning the use of FGFR-directed treatments in CCA patients.

Gallbladder carcinoma outcomes in an Australian tertiary referral hospital

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to examine the presentation, treatment, and long-term outcomes of patients with gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) managed in a surgical unit of an Australian tertiary referral hospital of a 19-year period.

METHODS

A retrospective review of prospectively collected data of patients with GBC managed in the Royal North Shore Upper GI Surgical department from October 1999 to March 2018.

RESULTS

A total of 104 patients with GBC were identified: 36 patients underwent palliative treatment, 61 patients with gallbladder adenocarcinoma underwent resection with curative intent. Seven patients were excluded. 'Simple cholecystectomy' was undertaken in eight patients, 'standard radical cholecystectomy' in 37 and 'extended radical resection' in 16. The median survival in these patients was 35 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 21.29-55.10), with a median follow up of 60 months (95% CI 38.18-78.39). This compares with an overall median survival of only 4.00 months (95% CI 2.79-6.24) in patients who did not undergo a potentially curative resection. Independent predictors of poor long-term survival included an elevated preoperative serum tumour marker, advanced tumour stage (T3/T4) or node positive disease (N1/N2).

CONCLUSION

The biology and stage of GBC at presentation are major factors in determining patient outcome. There is a need for better pre- and post-operative predictors to improve risk stratification, and these are likely to be in the form of molecular markers. Although the focus of surgery should be to ensure an R0 resection, patients with advanced stage disease need to be carefully selected for surgical intervention, and ideally should be managed by a multidisciplinary team in a specialist centre.

Adjuvant systemic treatment in resected biliary tract cancer: State of the art, controversies, and future directions

Biliary tract cancer (BTC) includes a heterogeneous group of aggressive malignancies comprising gallbladder cancer (GBC), ampulla of Vater cancer (AVC), intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA), and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (eCCA). Unfortunately, potentially curative resection is possible in approximately the 25% of presenting patients, and relapse rates are high, with a notable proportion of BTCs experiencing disease recurrence. Recent years have seen the publication of several prospective clinical trials evaluating the role of adjuvant systemic treatments, and among these, the phase III BILCAP study provided evidence supporting the use of capecitabine after radical surgery in BTC patients; in fact, although the study failed to meet its primary endpoint, the capecitabine arm showed improved clinical outcomes in terms of overall survival (pre-planned sensitivity analysis in the intention-to-treat population and in the per-protocol analysis) and relapse-free survival. However, the BILCAP has been widely criticized, with several authors that have not accepted adjuvant capecitabine as novel standard of care. In this review, we summarize current state of the art regarding adjuvant systemic treatment in BTC, highlighting advantages and disadvantages of recent clinical trials, and suggesting new research directions in this setting.

First-line Chemotherapy in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer Ten Years After the ABC-02 Trial: "And Yet It Moves!"

Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) include a heterogeneous group of highly aggressive hepatobiliary malignancies, representing the 3% of all gastrointestinal cancers and the second most frequent type of primary liver cancer after hepatocellular carcinoma. Ten years after the publication of the phase III, randomized, ABC-02 trial, the combination of cisplatin plus gemcitabine remains the standard first-line treatment for patients with advanced BTC. In the last decade, a large number of attempts has been made to improve the efficacy of the reference doublet by using novel drugs or adding a third agent to cisplatin-gemcitabine. Unfortunately, despite the addition of different cytotoxic drugs failed to improve clinical outcomes in several studies, recently published clinical trials have provided interesting results, and other first-line chemotherapy options are currently under investigation in randomized phase III studies. Moreover, recent years have witnessed the parallel emergence of molecularly targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors, with these novel agents having the potential to revolutionize the therapeutic algorithm of advanced BTC. In this review, we will provide an overview on first-line therapeutic opportunities currently available in the management of advanced BTCs, especially focusing on recently published data and ongoing clinical trials in this setting.

Undertreatment of Gallbladder Cancer: A Nationwide Analysis

BACKGROUND

Gallbladder cancer has a high mortality rate and an increasing incidence. The current National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines recommend resection for all T1b and higher-stage cancers. This study aimed to evaluate re-resection rates and the associated survival impact for patients with gallbladder cancer.

METHODS

Patients with gallbladder adenocarcinoma who underwent resection were identified from the National Cancer Database (2004-2015). Re-resection was defined as definitive surgery within 180 days after the first operation. Propensity scores were created for the odds of a patient having a re-resection. Patients were matched 1:2. Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard methods.

RESULTS

The study identified 6175 patients, and 466 of these patients (7.6%) underwent re-resection. Re-resection was associated with younger median age (65 vs 72 years; p < 0.0001), private insurance (41.6% vs 27.1%; p < 0.0001), academic centers (50.4% vs 29.7%; p < 0.0001), and treatment location in the Northeast (22.8% vs 20.4%; p = 0.0011). Compared with no re-resection, re-resection was associated with pT stage (pT2: 47.6% vs 42.8%; p = 0.0139) and pN stage (pN1-2: 28.1% vs 20.7%; p < 0.0001), negative margins on final pathology (90.1% vs 72.6%; p < 0.0001), and receipt of chemotherapy (53.7% vs 35.8%; p < 0.0001). The patients who underwent re-resection demonstrated significantly longer overall survival (OS) than the patients who did not undergo re-resection (median OS, 44.0 vs 23.0 months; p < 0.0001). After propensity score-matching, re-resection remained associated with superior survival (median OS, 44.0 vs 31.0 months; p = 0.0004).

CONCLUSIONS

Re-resection for gallbladder cancer is associated with improved survival but remains underused, particularly for early-stage disease.

Site-specific metastases of gallbladder adenocarcinoma and their prognostic value for survival: a SEER-based study

Background

Gallbladder cancer is a rare but highly malignant cancer, which often progresses to a metastatic stage when diagnosed because of its asymptomatic manifestation. In this study, we intended to analyze the prognostic value of metastatic gallbladder adenocarcinoma (GBA) with site-specific metastases.

Methods

Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, GBA patients diagnosed with metastases between 2010 and 2016 were selected to identify the prognosis according to the isolated metastatic sites, including liver, lung, bone, brain and distant lymph nodes (DL). Kaplan–Meier methods were used for survival comparisons and multivariable Cox regression models were constructed to find out independent factors that associated with survival.

Results

Data from 1526 eligible patients were extracted from the SEER database. Among the patients, 788 (51.6%) had isolated liver metastases, 80 (5.2%) had isolated distant nodal involvement, 45 (2.9%) had isolated lung metastases, 21 (1.4%) had isolated bone metastases, 2 (0.1%) had isolated brain metastases and 590 (38.7%) had multiple metastases. No significant survival difference was shown between patients with single or multisite metastases (P > 0.05). Patients with isolated lung or DL metastases had significant better survival outcomes than those with isolated bone metastases (P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that performing surgery at primary site, receiving chemotherapy were associated with better OS and CSS for patients with isolated liver or DL metastases.

Conclusions

The study showed that different metastatic sites affect survival outcomes in metastatic GBA patients. Highly selected subset of patients with liver or DL metastases might benefit from surgery at primary site.

Safety and feasibility of pure laparoscopic extended cholecystectomy: comparison with the open technique in a propensity analysis at a single center

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to validate the safety and feasibility of pure laparoscopic extended cholecystectomy (LEC) by comparing the outcome with that of open extended cholecystectomy (OEC). Moreover, on the basis of our experience, we also aimed to investigate the learning curve of pure LEC.

METHODS

This single-center study enrolled patients who were diagnosed primary gallbladder cancer with pathologically confirmed and underwent R0 resection with curative intent between January 2016 and December 2019. A total of 31 patients who underwent OEC and 17 patients who underwent LEC were selected. Propensity score matching analysis was performed in a 1:1 ratio using the nearest-neighbor matching method, and clinical information was retrospectively collected from medical records and analyzed.

RESULTS

The postoperative hospital stay was statistically shorter in the LEC group (7 days) than in the OEC group (12 days). The overall surgical complication rate did not differ between the two groups. The 1- and 3-year disease-free survival rates were 82.4% and 82.4% in the OEC group and 94.2% and 71.5% in the LEC group, respectively (P = 0.94). Considering the correlation between the number of cumulative cases and the operation time and between the number of cumulative cases and the number of retrieved lymph nodes in the LEC group, as the cases were accumulated, both the operation time and the number of retrieved lymph nodes had a statistically significant correlation with the number of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

LEC showed a significant advantage in terms of achieving shorter postoperative hospital stay and similar results to OEC with respect to overall complications and pathological outcomes. The present results confirm that laparoscopy can be considered a safe treatment for primary gallbladder cancer in selected patients.

Laparoscopic versus open extended cholecystectomy with bi-segmentectomy (s4b and s5) in patients with gallbladder cancer

Introduction:

The outcome of laparoscopic extended cholecystectomy (EC) with wedge hepatic resection (LECW) in patients with gallbladder cancer (GBC) has been compared with that of open EC with wedge hepatic resection (OECW), but studies comparing laparoscopic EC with bi-segmentectomy (LECB) with open EC with bi-segmentectomy (OECB) are lacking.

Patients and Methods:

This retrospective study comprised of 68 patients with GBC who were offered either LECB or OECB from July 2011 to July 2018. Patients were divided into laparoscopic group (LG) and open group (OG), and appropriate statistical methods were used for comparison.

Results:

Out of the total 68 patients, 30 patients were in LG and 38 patients were in OG. Demographic, clinical and biochemical characteristics were similar except significantly higher number of male patients in OG (P = 0.01). In LG versus OG, the mean operation time was 286 versus 274 min (P = 0.565), mean blood loss was 158 versus 219 ml (P = 0.006) and mean hospital stay was 6.4 versus 9 days (P = 0.0001). The complication rate was 16.6% in LG and 31.5% in OG, but this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.259). The median number of lymph nodes was 12 in both LG and OG (P = 0.62). Distribution of patients among American Joint Committee on Cancer stages I to IV was similar in both the groups (P = 0.5). Fifty percent of the patients in both the groups received adjuvant treatment (P = 1). In LG versus OG, the recurrence rate was 20% versus 28.9% (P = 0.4), mean recurrence-free survival was 48 months versus 44 months (P = 0.35) and overall survival was 51 months versus 46 months (P = 0.45). In LG versus OG, 1, 3 and 5-year survival was 96% versus 94%, 79% versus 72% and 79% versus 62% (P = 0.45). The median follow-up was statistically significantly shorter (24 vs. 36 months) in LG versus OG (P = 0.0001).

Conclusions:

The oncological outcome and survival after LECB in patients with resectable GBC is not inferior to that after OECB. Laparoscopic approach has a potential to improve perioperative outcome in patients with GBC.

A Comparison Between the Prognosis of Simultaneous and Salvage Radical Resection in Incidental Gallbladder Cancer

Purpose

Incidental gallbladder cancer (IGBC) is defined as gallbladder cancer (GBC) that is accidentally discovered during cholecystectomy to treat benign lesions. We aimed to compare the prognosis of IGBC patients who underwent simultaneous radical resection (SIR) vs salvage radical resection (SAR).

Patients and Methods

We retrospectively reviewed data for IGBC patients admitted to Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital from January 2000 to May 2016. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan–Meier (univariate) and COX regression (multivariate) analyses.

Results

Eighty-four patients with IGBC underwent radical resection; 43/84 underwent SIR, and 41/84 underwent SAR. Compared with SIR, the SAR group was more likely to receive comprehensive preoperative radiographic evaluation, port-site excision, and have more lymph nodes excised (all P < 0.05). Kaplan–Meier analysis indicated that the prognosis in the SAR group was better than that in SIR (overall survival: P = 0.050, recurrence-free survival: P = 0.028). Regression analysis indicated that the type of radical resection (SIR/SAR) was not an independent prognostic factor (overall survival: P = 0.737, recurrence-free survival: P = 0.957).

Conclusion

Patients undergoing SAR had non-inferior survival compared with SIR. It is possible that patients in SAR underwent preoperative radiographical evaluations more comprehensively and the surgical operations were more well performed.

S-adenosylmethionine induces apoptosis and cycle arrest of gallbladder carcinoma cells by suppression of JAK2/STAT3 pathways

S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) is a naturally occurring physiologic molecule found ubiquitously in all mammalian cells and an essential compound in many metabolic pathways. It has been reported to possess many pharmacological properties including cancer-preventive and anticancer effects. However, the precise molecular mechanism involved in its anticancer effect is not yet clear. The present study is conducted to investigate the anticancer activity and the underlying mechanisms of SAM on human gallbladder cancer cells (GBC-SD and SGC-996) in vitro and in vivo. Cells were dealt with SAM and subjected to cell viability, colony formation, Hoechst staining, apoptosis, cycle arrest, western blot, and xenograft tumorigenicity assay. Experimental results showed that SAM could significantly inhibit the growth and proliferation and induce the apoptosis as well as cell cycle arrest in G0/G1 phase of GBC-SD and SGC-996 cells in a dose-dependent manner in vitro. The expression levels of p-JAK2, p-STAT3, Mcl-1, and Bcl-XL were significantly downregulated. In addition, inhibition of the JAK2/STAT3 pathway significantly enhanced the anti-apoptotic effect of SAM, suggesting the key roles of JAK2/STAT3 in the process. More importantly, our in vivo studies demonstrated that administration of SAM could significantly decrease the tumor weight and volume and immunohistochemistry analysis proved the downregulation of p-JAK2 and p-STAT3 in tumor tissues following SAM treatment, consistent with our in vitro results. In summary, our findings indicated that SAM can inhibit cell proliferation and induce apoptosis as well as cycle arrest of GBC cells by suppression of JAK2/STAT3 pathways and the dramatic effects of SAM hinting that SAM might be a useful therapeutic option for patients suffering from gallbladder cancer.

Long noncoding RNA PVT1 promoted gallbladder cancer proliferation by epigenetically suppressing miR-18b-5p via DNA methylation

Gallbladder cancer (GBC) accounts for 85-90% malignancies of the biliary tree worldwide. Considerable evidence has demonstrated that dysregulation of lncRNAs is involved in the progression of cancer. LncRNA PVT1 has been reported to play important roles in various cancers, but its role in gallbladder cancer remains unknown. In the present study, we found that PVT1 was upregulated in GBC tissues and cells, and its upregulation was related with poor prognosis in GBC patients. PVT1 promoted GBC cells proliferation in vitro and in vivo. Mechanistically, PVT1 recruited DNMT1 via EZH2 to the miR-18b-5p DNA promoter and suppressed the transcription of miR-18b-5p through DNA methylation. Moreover, HIF1A was proved to be the downstream target gene of miR-18b-5p and PVT1 regulated GBC cells proliferation via HIF1A. In conclusion, our studies clarified the PVT1/miR-18b-5p/HIF1A regulation axis and indicated that PVT1 could be a potential therapeutic target for GBC.

Surgical treatment of gallbladder cancer: An eight-year experience in a single center

BACKGROUND

Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is the most common biliary malignancy and has the worst prognosis, but aggressive surgeries [e.g., resection of the extrahepatic bile duct (EHBD), major hepatectomy and lymph node (LN) dissection] may improve long-term survival. GBC may be suspected preoperatively, identified intraoperatively, or discovered incidentally on histopathology.

AIM

To present our data together with a discussion of the therapeutic strategies for GBC.

METHODS

We retrospectively investigated nineteen GBC patients who underwent surgical treatment.

RESULTS

Nearly all symptomatic patients had poor outcomes, while suspicious or incidental GBCs at early stages showed excellent outcomes without the need for two-stage surgery. Lymph nodes around the cystic duct were reliable sentinel nodes in suspicious/incidental GBCs. Intentional LN dissection and EHBD resection prevented metastases or recurrence in early-stage GBCs but not in advanced GBCs with metastatic LNs or invasion of the nerve plexus. All patients with positive surgical margins (e.g., the biliary cut surface) showed poor outcomes. Hepatectomies were performed in sixteen patients, nearly all of which were minor hepatectomies. Metastases were observed in the left-sided liver but not in the caudate lobe. We may need to reconsider the indications for major hepatectomy, minimizing its use except when it is required to accomplish negative bile duct margins. Only a few patients received neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemoradiation. There were significant differences in overall and disease-free survival between patients with stages ≤ IIB and ≥ IIIA disease. The median overall survival and disease-free survival were 1.66 and 0.79 years, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Outcomes for GBC patients remain unacceptable, and improved therapeutic strategies, including neoadjuvant chemotherapy, optimal surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy, should be considered for patients with advanced GBCs.

A Novel Staging System to Forecast the Cancer-Specific Survival of Patients With Resected Gallbladder Cancer

Objective: Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is one of the most aggressive malignant tumors, and there is no effective and convenient method for predicting cancer-specific survival (CSS). We aim to develop a novel nomogram staging system based on the positive lymph node ratio (pLNR) for GBC patients.

Methods:A total of 1,356 patients enrolled in the study. We evaluated the prognostic value of the pLNR and built a prognostic nomogram staging system based on the pLNR in the training cohort. The concordance index and calibration plots were used to evaluate model discrimination. The predictive accuracy and clinical value of the nomograms were measured by decision curve analysis (DCA). The CSS nomogram was further validated in an internal validation cohort.

Results:The pLNR was an independent prognostic factor for CSS based on Cox regression analyses. A prognostic nomogram that combined T classification, pLNR, M classification, histologic grade, live metastasis, and tumor size was formulated with a c-index of 0.763 (95% CI, 0.728–0.798), while the c-indexes for the staging system of AJCC 8th, 7th, and 6th for CSS prediction were 0.718, 0.718, and 0.717, respectively. The calibration curves showed perfect agreement. The DCA showed that the nomogram provided substantial clinical value. The nomogram (the AUCs for 1, 3, and 5 years were 0.693, 0.716, and 0.726, respectively,) showed high prognostic accuracy.

Conclusion:We have developed a formulated nomogram staging system based on the pLNR that allows more accurate individualized predictions of CSS for resected GBC patients than the AJCC staging systems.

Prediction Efficacy for Clinical Outcome of Prognostic Nutritional Index in Patients with Resectable Biliary Tract Cancer Depends on Sex and Obstructive Jaundice Status

BACKGROUND

The Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI), a marker of nutritional status and systemic inflammation, is a proven prognostic biomarker in some cancers. The predictive value of PNI in biliary tract cancer (BTC) has not been established.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between the PNI and outcomes of resectable BTC.

METHODS

In total, 430 patients with stage I-III resectable BTC [gallbladder cancer (GBC), n = 212; cholangiocarcinoma (CHO), n = 218] who had attended Fudan University Zhongshan Hospital were enrolled. The relationship between the PNI and clinical outcomes was evaluated both in the whole cohort and in selected subgroups.

RESULTS

Eligible patients were classified into PNI-low (PNI < 45) and PNI-high (PNI ≥ 45) groups. The PNI-low group had significantly worse overall survival (OS) in both the whole cohort (p = 0.002) and in the GBC subgroup (p = 0.001), but had similar OS as the PNI-high group in the CHO subgroup (p = 0.328). Multivariate analysis revealed that low PNI is an independent risk factor for worse survival in GBC (hazard ratio 1.623, 95% confidence interval 1.063-2.480, p = 0.026). PNI was found to predict clinical outcome in women (p < 0.001) and patients without obstructive jaundice (p = 0.017) with GBC, but was not a prognostic factor in any subgroup with CHO. The estimated area under the time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve was significantly greater when TNM stage was combined with PNI in women with GBC.

CONCLUSIONS

PNI is an independent predictor of OS in GBC, but not in CHO. It has no prognostic value in men with GBC or patients with obstructive jaundice.

Incidental finding of adenocarcinoma in a gallbladder lumen with no wall involvement

Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is a rare disease characterized by its aggressiveness. Resection with free tumour margins is the sole curative treatment and, in incidental findings, surgical reapproach is recommended for segmentectomy IVb and V or wedge resection of the gallbladder fossa and lymphadenectomy. Here we report a case of gallbladder adenocarcinoma as an incidental finding in a fragment in its lumen with no wall involvement evidentiated. The patient was reoperated for resection of the gallbladder bed with hepatic hilum and cystic duct lymphadenectomy, later evidentiated as free of residual disease. The normality of the bile ducts evidenced by imaging studies, in addition to signs of chronic cholecystitis corroborate to GBC diagnosis. We suspect that the fragment was detached gallbladder polypoid neoplastic lesion. Despite the lack of clinical manifestations, the fast surgical interventions and the histopathological analysis of the material was probably a prognostic determinant for the patient.

Effect of lymphadenectomy in curative gallbladder cancer treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Only a small fraction of resectable gallbladder cancer (GBC) patients receive a thorough lymphadenectomy. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the effect of lymphadenectomy on survival in GBC surgery.

METHODS

On May 19, 2019, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched for English or German articles published since 2002. Studies assessing the effect of lymphadenectomy on survival in GBC surgery were included. Fixed effect and random effects models were used to summarise the hazard ratio (HR).

RESULTS

Of the 530 identified articles, 18 observational studies (27,570 patients, 10 population-based, 8 cohort studies) were reviewed. In the meta-analysis, lymphadenectomy did not show a significant benefit for T1a tumours (n = 495; HR, 1.37; 95%CI, 0.65-2.86; P = 0.41). Lymphadenectomy showed a significant survival benefit in T1b (n = 1618; HR, 0.69; 95%CI, 0.50-0.94; P = 0.02) and T2 (n = 6204; HR, 0.68; 95%CI, 0.56-0.83; P < 0.01) tumours. Lymphadenectomy improved survival in the 2 studies assessing T3 tumours (n = 1961). A conclusive analysis was not possible for T4 tumours due to a low case load. Among patients undergoing lymphadenectomy, improved survival was observed in patients with a higher number of resected lymph nodes (HR, 0.57; 95%CI, 0.45-0.71; P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Regional lymphadenectomy improves survival in T1b to T3 GBC. A minimum of 6 retrieved lymph nodes are necessary for adequate staging, indicating a thorough lymphadenectomy. Patients with T1a tumours should be evaluated for lymphadenectomy, especially if lymph node metastases are suspected.

FOXK1 Promotes Proliferation and Metastasis of Gallbladder Cancer by Activating AKT/mTOR Signaling Pathway

Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is one of the most lethal malignancies worldwide, with extremely poor prognosis. Recently, forkhead box k1 (FOXK1), a member of the FOX transcription factor family, has been reported to be correlated with tumor progression in multiple malignancies. However, the role of FOXK1 in GBC has not been elucidated. In this study, we demonstrated that the expression level of FOXK1 was elevated in human GBC tissues and associated with increased liver metastasis, poor histological differentiation, advanced TNM stage, and shorter overall survival. Knockdown of FOXK1 expression inhibited GBC cells proliferation and metastasis. Consistently, overexpression of FOXK1 promoted GBC cells progression. Mechanical investigations verified that knockdown of FOXK1 could lead to G1/S cell cycle arrest through downregulating CDK4, CDK6, cyclin D1, and cyclin E1. And FOXK1 could regulate the expression of epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) related proteins E-cad, N-cad, and Vimentin. Moreover, we found that FOXK1 could regulate the activation of Akt/mTOR signaling pathway. In addition, AKT special inhibitor MK-2206 could abolish the proliferation and metastasis discrepancy between FOXK1 overexpression GBC cells and control cells, which suggested the tumorpromoting effect of FOXK1 may be partially related with the activations of Akt/mTOR signaling pathway. Collectively, our results suggested that FOXK1 promotes GBC cells progression and represent a novel prognostic biomarker and potential therapeutic target in GBC.

Systematic Selective Sampling of Cholecystectomy Specimens Is Adequate to Detect Incidental Gallbladder Adenocarcinoma

Many gallbladder adenocarcinomas (ACs) are detected incidentally in routine cholecystectomy specimens, yet sampling practices vary when intestinal metaplasia (IM) or dysplasia are found via routine sampling. Our practice has been to submit 5 additional sections when IM is found, but cases with dysplasia are entirely submitted. We sought to determine an appropriate sampling protocol when encountering these findings. We retrospectively identified cholecystectomy specimens with these features over a 26-month period, yielding 48 of 4059 (1%) cases. Four pathologists independently classified the (2 longitudinal and 1 cystic duct margin) original sections into 1 of 3 categories (IM, low-grade dysplasia [LGD] or high-grade dysplasia [HGD]); initial findings were correlated with final diagnoses. Sixteen (33%) cases had additional findings upon further sampling, including LGD (n=10) or HGD (n=4) and AC (n=2). HGD always accompanied malignancy. We prospectively analyzed 39 of 3133 (1%) additional cholecystectomy specimens, initially submitting the same routine sections. We submitted 5 random sections from cases with IM. Cases with LGD were first examined with 1 additional section per centimeter. All remaining tissue was submitted in all of these cases and separately reviewed. Cases with HGD were entirely submitted as both test cases with HGD in initial sections ultimately showed carcinoma. This protocol detected all cases of HGD and AC. Patients with clear cystic duct margins did not experience neoplastic progression, even if dysplasia was present elsewhere. We conclude gallbladders with HGD should be entirely submitted, LGD may be representatively sampled, and routine sampling is adequate for IM.

Validation of the 8th Edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System for Gallbladder Cancer and Implications for the Follow-up of Patients without Node Dissection

PURPOSE

The 8th edition of gallbladder cancer staging in the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system changed the T and N categories.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In order to validate the new staging system, a total of 348 surgically resected gallbladder cancers were grouped based on the 8th edition of the T and N categories and compared with patients' survival.

RESULTS

Significant differences were noted between T1b-T2a (p=0.003) and T2b-T3 (p < 0.001) tumors, but not between Tis-T1a, T1a-T1b, and T2a-T2b tumors. However, significant survival differences were observed both by the overall and pair-wise (T1-T2, T2-T3) comparisons (all, p < 0.001) without dividing T1/T2 subcategories. When cases with ≥ 6 examined lymph nodes were evaluated, significant survival differences were observed among the entire comparison (p < 0.001) and pair-wise comparisons of N0-N1 (p=0.001) and N1-N2 (p=0.039) lesions. When cases without nodal dissection (NX) were additionally compared, significant survival differences were observed between patients with N0-NX (p=0.001) and NX-N1 (p < 0.001) lesions.

CONCLUSION

The T category in the 8th edition of the AJCC staging system did not completely stratify the prognosis of patients with gallbladder cancer. Modification by eliminating T subcategories can better stratify the prognosis. In contrast, the N category clearly determines patients' survival with ≥ 6 examined lymph nodes. The survival time in patients of gallbladder cancers without nodal dissection is between N0 and N1 cases. Therefore, close postoperative followed up is recommended for those patients.

Prognostic Impact of Lymph Node Excision in T1 and T2 Gallbladder Cancer: a Population-Based and Propensity Score-Matched SEER Analysis

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to assess the effect of lymphadenectomy on survival in T1/T2 gallbladder cancer (GBC).

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, patients undergoing surgery for T1/T2 GBC from 2004 to 2014 were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. The effect of lymph node excision (LNE) on survival was assessed using Cox regression and propensity score methods.

RESULTS

A total of 2112 patients were identified: 11.4% had T1a, 18.5% T1b, and 70.1% had T2 tumors. Mean follow-up was 31.3 months. In 48.8% of patients, LNE was performed with a mean of 3.6 ± 4.3 nodes retrieved. Cancer-specific 5-year survival for T1 and T2 stages combined was 49.6% (95% confidence interval (CI), 45.9-53.6%) without LNE compared to 56.2% (95% CI, 52.4-60.4%) if LNE was performed (hazard ratio (HR), 0.75; 95%CI, 0.64-0.86, P < 0.001). Propensity score analyses for both stages combined confirmed this survival benefit with an HR of 0.67 (95% CI, 0.55-0.80) for the LNE group (P < 0.001). Stratified for tumor stages, LNE had no significant effect on cancer-specific survival in T1a (HR, 1.80 (95% CI, 0.76-4.26), P = 0.185) or T1b tumors (HR, 0.95 (95% CI, 0.57-1.58), P = 0.844), whereas it persistently revealed an advantage for patients with T2 tumors (HR 0.68 (95% CI, 0.55-0.83, P < 0.001). No correlation between the number of retrieved lymph nodes and the N+ rate was found (P = 0.134).

CONCLUSIONS

LNE is associated with improved survival in T2 GBC. No significant survival benefit was observed in T1a and T1b tumors. The retrieval of even a few lymph nodes reliably predicts the nodal status, which might assist in patient selection for re-resection in T1 GBC.

Cystic duct cancer: Should it be deemed as a type of gallbladder cancer?

BACKGROUND

According to the latest American Joint Committee on Cancer and Union for International Cancer Control manuals, cystic duct cancer (CC) is categorized as a type of gallbladder cancer (GC), which has the worst prognosis among all types of biliary cancers. We hypothesized that this categorization could be verified by using taxonomic methods.

AIM

To investigate the categorization of CC based on population-level data.

METHODS

Cases of biliary cancers were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results 18 registries database. Together with routinely used statistical methods, three taxonomic methods, including Fisher’s discriminant, binary logistics and artificial neuron network (ANN) models, were used to clarify the categorizing problem of CC.

RESULTS

The T staging system of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma [a type of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (EC)] better discriminated CC prognosis than that of GC. After adjusting other covariates, the hazard ratio of CC tended to be closer to that of EC, although not reaching statistical significance. To differentiate EC from GC, three taxonomic models were built and all showed good accuracies. The ANN model had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.902. Using the three models, the majority (75.0%-77.8%) of CC cases were categorized as EC.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggested that CC should be categorized as a type of EC, not GC. Aggressive surgical attitude might be considered in CC cases, to see whether long-term prognosis could be immensely improved like the situation in EC.

Remarkable Response of Metastatic Gallbladder Carcinoma to Apatinib After Failed Multiline Chemotherapies: A Case Report and Literature Review

Gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) is a relatively rare and aggressive malignant tumor with a poor prognosis. A systematic review of current clinical studies illustrates an extreme paucity of second-line therapeutic options following the failure of standard-of-care cisplatin-gemcitabine chemotherapy. The efficacy of apatinib, an highly potent and selective oral inhibitor of VEGFR-2 tyrosine kinase, for refractory advanced GBC has not yet been clarified. Herein, we report a case of advanced GBC that presented a durable partial response to apatinib used as monotherapy after the failure of multiline chemotherapies including S-1 monotherapy, capecitabine monotherapy, gemcitabine plus capecitabine, and irinotecan plus oxaliplatin. The patient achieved an efficacy of partial response within 2 months. By September 23, 2019, the duration of treatment had extended for almost 1 year with a satisfactory quality of life, and the administration of apatinib was continued. Dose reduction of apatinib occurred at week four due to grade 2 hypertension and hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR). No fatigue, proteinuria, mucositis, or thrombocytopenia occurred. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case of a successful use of apatinib monotherapy for heavily pretreated GBC. Further prospective studies are warranted to confirm the efficacy and safety of apatinib in GBC.

Role of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Resected T2N0 Gall Bladder Cancer

BACKGROUND

Management of operable gall bladder cancer (GBC) is closely related to its tumor (T) and nodal (N) status. The magnitude of benefit with adjuvant chemotherapy in completely resected, node negative T2 cancers is not completely defined.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed with pathological T2N0 (stage II, 7th edition AJCC) GBCs from January 2011 to June 2016 was evaluated for adverse risk factors, adjuvant treatment received, recurrence-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS). Survival analysis was done using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression tools.

RESULTS

Of the 88 patients included, 30 received adjuvant chemotherapy while 58 were observed. The OS and RFS in the entire cohort were 82.9% and 62.7%, respectively, at a median follow-up of 44.18 months. The OS and RFS in the chemotherapy group were 85.1% and 76.4% while it was 81.4% and 55.5% in the observation group (p = 0.50). Recurrent disease was seen in 30.7%.The presence of lymphovascular invasion predicted inferior RFS (p = 0.031).

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant chemotherapy may reduce distant failure rates but did not improve OS in completely resected T2N0 GBC patients in this study. LVI predicted inferior RFS in T2N0 patients. An evaluation of adverse prognostic factors would help design personalized treatment strategies for this select cohort of T2N0 GBC.

A systematic review of the effectiveness of adjuvant therapy for patients with gallbladder cancer

BACKGROUND

Equipoise exists regarding the benefit of adjuvant therapy (AT) in patients with gallbladder cancer (GBC). The aim of this study was to critically review the available evidence for the effectiveness of AT in patients with GBC following surgery with curative intent.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed. Relevant studies were identified from Trip Database, BIREME-BVS, SciELO, Cochrane Central Register, WoS, MEDLINE, EMBASE and SCOPUS. Adjuvant therapies considered included chemotherapy, chemoradiotherapy, and radiotherapy. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Subgorup analysis of patients with positive lymph node disease (PLND), positive surgical margin (PSM), or advanced stage (AS) were performed.

RESULTS

748 related articles were identified; 27 met the selection criteria (3 systematic reviews and 24 observational studies). Evidence provided was moderate, poor and very poor for chemotherapy, chemoradiotherapy, and radiotherapy. Existing evidence is not robust, but suggests certain benefits with AT in improving OS, especially in patients with PLND, PSM and AS.

CONCLUSION

Results do not provide strong evidence that AT is effective in patients who undergo resection for GBC. Subgroups of PLND and PSM may have a survival advantage. Future studies with appropriate internal validity and adequate number of patients are required to better answer this question.

Cholesterol depletion sensitizes gallbladder cancer to cisplatin by impairing DNA damage response

Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is the common malignancy of the bile tract system with extremely poor clinical outcomes, owing to its metastatic property and intrinsic resistance to the first-line drugs. Although it is well-established that cholesterol abnormity contributes to gallstone formation, a leading risk factor for GBC, the link of cholesterol homeostasis with GBC has not been investigated. The present study systematically examined the genes implicated in cholesterol homeostasis, and revealed altered gene expressions of de novo cholesterol biosynthesis and sterol sulfonation (SULT2B1), reduced bile acid synthesis (CYP7B1 and CYP39A1) and impaired sterol efflux (ABCA1, ABCG5, LCAT, and CETP) in GBC tissues. Suppression of cholesterol biosynthesis by lovastatin inhibited GBC cell proliferation possibly through attenuating the DNA repair process. Further investigation revealed lovastatin sensitized GBC cells to cisplatin-induced apoptosis and suppressed the activation of CHK1, CHK2, and H2AX during DNA damage response. By using chemically distinct statins, HMGCR depletion or supplementing mevalonate, the product of HMGCR, we showed the inhibitory effects on DNA repair process of lovastatin were due to the blockage of the mevalonate pathway. Subcutaneous xenograft mice model suggested lovastatin promoted the therapeutic efficacy of cisplatin, and significantly prolonged the survival times of tumor-bearing mice. Moreover, HMGCR ablation repressed tumor growth in vivo, which can be rescued partially by restored expression of HMGCR, suggesting the on-target effects of lovastatin. Therefore, our study provides the clinical relevance of cholesterol homeostasis with GBC progression, and highlights a novel intervention of combined use of lovastatin and cisplatin for GBC.

Estimating survival benefit of adjuvant therapy based on a Bayesian network prediction model in curatively resected advanced gallbladder adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

The factors affecting the prognosis and role of adjuvant therapy in advanced gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) after curative resection remain unclear.

AIM

To provide a survival prediction model to patients with GBC as well as to identify the role of adjuvant therapy.

METHODS

Patients with curatively resected advanced gallbladder adenocarcinoma (T3 and T4) were selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database between 2004 and 2015. A survival prediction model based on Bayesian network (BN) was constructed using the tree-augmented naïve Bayes algorithm, and composite importance measures were applied to rank the influence of factors on survival. The dataset was divided into a training dataset to establish the BN model and a testing dataset to test the model randomly at a ratio of 7:3. The confusion matrix and receiver operating characteristic curve were used to evaluate the model accuracy.

RESULTS

A total of 818 patients met the inclusion criteria. The median survival time was 9.0 mo. The accuracy of BN model was 69.67%, and the area under the curve value for the testing dataset was 77.72%. Adjuvant radiation, adjuvant chemotherapy (CTx), T stage, scope of regional lymph node surgery, and radiation sequence were ranked as the top five prognostic factors. A survival prediction table was established based on T stage, N stage, adjuvant radiotherapy (XRT), and CTx. The distribution of the survival time (>9.0 mo) was affected by different treatments with the order of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (cXRT) > adjuvant radiation > adjuvant chemotherapy > surgery alone. For patients with node-positive disease, the larger benefit predicted by the model is adjuvant chemoradiotherapy. The survival analysis showed that there was a significant difference among the different adjuvant therapy groups (log rank, surgery alone vs CTx, P < 0.001; surgery alone vs XRT, P = 0.014; surgery alone vs cXRT, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The BN-based survival prediction model can be used as a decision-making support tool for advanced GBC patients. Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy is expected to improve the survival significantly for patients with node-positive disease.

MBD1 promotes the malignant behavior of gallbladder cancer cells and induces chemotherapeutic resistance to gemcitabine

Background

Methyl-CpG binding domain protein 1 (MBD1), which couples DNA methylation to transcriptional repression, has been implicated in transcriptional regulation, heterochromatin formation, genomic stability, cell cycle progression and development. It has also been proven that MBD1 is involved in tumor development and progression. However, whether MBD1 is involved in tumorigenesis, especially in gallbladder cancer, is totally unknown.

Methods

Human GBC-SD and SGC996 cells were used to perform experiments. Invasion, wound healing and colony formation assays were performed to evaluate cell viability. A CCK-8 assay was performed to assess gallbladder cancer cell viability after gemcitabine treatment. Western blot analysis was used to evaluate changes in protein expression. Human gallbladder cancer tissues and adjacent nontumor tissues were subjected to immunohistochemical staining to detect protein expression.

Results

We found that MBD1 expression was significantly upregulated in gallbladder cancer tissues compared with that in surrounding normal tissues according to immunohistochemical analysis of 84 surgically resected gallbladder cancer specimens. These data also indicated that higher MBD1 expression was correlated with lymph node metastasis and poor survival in gallbladder cancer patients. Overexpression and deletion in vitro validated MBD1 as a potent oncogene promoting malignant behaviors in gallbladder cancer cells, including invasion, proliferation and migration, as well as epithelial–mesenchymal transition. Studies have demonstrated that epithelial–mesenchymal transition is common in gallbladder cancer, and it is well known that drug resistance and epithelial–mesenchymal transition are very closely correlated. Herein, our data show that targeting MBD1 restored gallbladder cancer cell sensitivity to gemcitabine chemotherapy.

Conclusions

Taken together, the results of our study revealed a novel function of MBD1 in gallbladder cancer tumor development and progression through participation in the gallbladder cancer epithelial–mesenchymal transition program, which is involved in resistance to gemcitabine chemotherapy. Thus, MBD1 may be a potential therapeutic target for gallbladder cancer.