Targeted Muscle Reinnervation Treats Neuroma and Phantom Pain in Major Limb Amputees: A Randomized Clinical Trial

The neuroma map: A systematic review of the anatomic distribution, etiologies, and surgical treatment of painful traumatic neuromas

BACKGROUND

This study analyzed all reported cases of painful traumatic neuromas to better understand their anatomic distribution, etiologies, and surgical treatment.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science were searched in October 2023 for articles describing painful traumatic neuromas.

RESULTS

In total, 414 articles reporting 5,562 neuromas were included and categorized into head/neck, trunk, upper extremity, lower extremity, and autonomic nerves. Distribution was as follows: Head/neck: 83 articles reported on 393 neuromas (93.2% iatrogenic) most frequently involving the lingual (44.4%), cervical plexus (15.0%), great auricular (8.6%), inferior/superior alveolar (8.3%), and occipital (7.2%) nerves. Trunk: 47 articles reported on 552 neuromas (92.9% iatrogenic) most commonly involving the intercostal (40.0%), ilioinguinal (18.2%) and genitofemoral (16.2%) nerves. Upper extremity: 160 articles reported on 2082 neuromas (42.2% after amputation) most frequently involving the digital (47.0%), superficial radial (18.3%), and median (7.0%) nerves. Lower extremity: 128 articles reported on 2,531 neuromas (53.0% after amputation) most commonly involving the sural (17.9%), superficial peroneal (17.3%), and saphenous (16.0%) nerves. Autonomic nerves: 17 articles reported on 53 neuromas (100% iatrogenic) most frequently involving the biliary tract (64.2%) and vagus nerve (18.9%). Compared with the extremities, neuromas in the head/neck and trunk had significantly longer symptom duration before surgical treatment and the nerve end was significantly less frequently reconstructed after neuroma excision.

CONCLUSION

Painful neuromas are predominantly reported in the extremities yet may occur throughout the body primarily after iatrogenic injury. Knowledge of their anatomic distribution from head to toe will encourage awareness to avoid injury and expedite diagnosis to prevent treatment delay.

Economic Cost-Benefit Analysis of Nerve Implanted into Muscle versus Targeted Muscle Reinnervation versus Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface, for Treatment of the Painful Neuroma

BACKGROUND

 This study investigated the relative cost utility of three techniques for the management of symptomatic neuromas after neuroma excision: (1) implantation of nerve into muscle, (2) targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR), and (3) regenerative peripheral nerve interface (RPNI).

METHODS

 The costs associated with each procedure were determined using Common Procedural Terminology codes in combination with data from the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services Physician and Facility 2020 Fee Schedules. The relative utility of the three procedures investigated was determined using changes in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) and Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain scores as reported per procedure. The relative utility of each procedure was reported in terms of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), as is standard in the literature.

RESULTS

 The least expensive option for the surgical treatment of painful neuromas was nerve implantation into an adjacent muscle. In contrast, for the treatment of four neuromas, as is common postamputation, TMR without a microscope was found to cost $50,061.55 per QALY gained, TMR with a microscope was found to cost $51,996.80 per QALY gained, and RPNI was found to cost $14,069.28 per QALY gained. While RPNI was more expensive than nerve implantation into muscle, it was still below the standard willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000 per QALY, while TMR was not.

CONCLUSION

 Evaluation of costs and utilities associated with the various surgical options for the management of painful neuromas suggest that nerve implantation into muscle is the least expensive option with the best improvement in QALY, while demonstrating comparable outcomes to TMR and RPNI with regard to pain symptoms.

Current and Future Directions for Upper Extremity Amputations: Comparisons Between Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface and Targeted Muscle Reinnervation Surgeries

Upper extremity amputation can lead to significant functional morbidity. The main goals after amputation are to minimize pain and maintain or improve functional status while optimizing the quality of life. Postamputation pain is common and can be addressed with regenerative peripheral nerve interface surgery or targeted muscle reinnervation surgery. Both modalities are effective in treating residual limb pain and phantom limb pain, as well as improving prosthetic use. Differences in surgical technique between the 2 approaches need to be weighed when deciding what strategy may be most appropriate for the patient.

Targeted muscle reinnervation at the time of amputation to prevent the development of neuropathic pain

INTRODUCTION

Targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) is an established modality for the surgical management of neuropathic pain. Although the preventive effect of primary (acute) TMR at the time of amputation has been demonstrated previously, it remains unclear how many and which patients benefit most. Therefore, this study investigated the proportion of patients achieving sustained pain prophylaxis following amputation, as well as factors associated with its efficacy.

METHODS

Primary patients who underwent TMR with a minimum follow-up of 6 months between 2018 and 2023 were enrolled. Pain outcomes (numeric rating scale [NRS], 0-10), comorbidities, and surgical factors were collected from chart review. Patients achieving sustained pain prophylaxis (NRS of ≤3 for ≥3 months until final follow-up) were identified. Multilevel mixed-effect models and multivariable regression were used to visualize pain courses and identify associated factors.

RESULTS

Seventy-five patients who underwent primary TMR were included (median follow-up: 2.0 years), of whom 57.3% achieved sustained pain prophylaxis whereas 26.7% reported pain disappearance. Distal amputation levels (p = 0.036), a lower Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (p = 0.001), and the absence of psychiatric comorbidities (p = 0.039) were associated with pain prophylaxis.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that more than half of all patients undergoing primary TMR achieved sustained pain prophylaxis, and approximately a quarter of patients achieved sustained pain disappearance. Several factors associated with these favorable outcomes are described. These results will aid in preoperative counseling, managing patient expectations, and selecting patients who may benefit most from primary TMR surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV - Therapeutic.

Managing Major Peripheral Nerves in Forearm-Level Amputations With TMR and RPNI: What's the Best Recipe?

BACKGROUND

Targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) and regenerative peripheral nerve interface (RPNI) prevent symptomatic neuroma formation in amputees. Forearm-level amputations present multiple muscular targets, making it challenging to determine the ideal treatment. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the best TMR targets, role of RPNI, and appropriate patient-selection criteria in forearm-level amputations. We hypothesized that deep and distal TMR targets would best prevent symptomatic neuromas, RPNI would prove a success adjunct, and patients with poorly controlled diabetes would not develop symptomatic neuromas regardless of nerve management.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified forearm-level amputations performed between 2017 and 2022. Patients with TMR by outside providers, follow-up <6 months, or insufficient documentation were excluded. Demographics, surgical nerve management, and postoperative complications were collected. The primary outcome was development of a painful neuroma determined by the Eberlin criteria. Patients undergoing TMR were divided a priori into two groups, superficial and proximal versus deep and distal TMR targets, and were compared.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients met inclusion criteria, and 16 developed a symptomatic neuroma. No patients with a deep or distal TMR target developed a symptomatic neuroma. One nerve out of 12 treated with RPNI developed a symptomatic neuroma. No patient with poorly controlled diabetes developed a symptomatic neuroma, despite no advanced nerve management.

CONCLUSIONS

In a case series of forearm amputations, deep and distal TMR targets prevented symptomatic neuroma formation more than superficial and proximal targets. Regenerative peripheral nerve interface is a useful adjunct for neuroma control, especially for the radial sensory nerve. Patients with poorly controlled diabetes may not require advanced nerve management.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV retrospective case series.

[Fillet flap transfer as alternative to conventional lower limb amputation]

BACKGROUND

The fitting of a prosthesis after lower limb amputation is associated with several challenges. Skeletal stump-prosthesis interfaces and selective nerve transfer can partially overcome these but are also associated with new impairments that emphasize the necessity of innovative approaches. The concept of so-called spare part surgery with the use of fillet flaps could play an important role in this respect.

OBJECTIVE

An overview of the classical prosthesis-associated discomforts, advantages and disadvantages of treatment strategies and presentation of alternative surgical concepts.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A selective literature search was carried out considering the experiences of the authors and perspectives with respect to the advantages and disadvantages of the surgical treatment options. Furthermore, a clinical case is presented.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

The transfer of the sole of the foot as a fillet flap to the weight-bearing region of the amputation stump offers a number of benefits, such as creating a fully weight-bearing stump, prevention of neuralgia, preserved sensation and conservation of the body image. As long as the calcaneal region is not impaired, this technique can be performed in amputations below as well as above the knee. The question of whether parts of the bone should be included in the transfer must be individually evaluated for each patient. This approach enables optimization of the residual limb stump for the subsequent fitting of a prosthesis for the patient.

Integrating Complementary Therapies in Managing Phantom Limb Pain: A Case Review

OBJECTIVES

This paper describes phantom limb pain (PLP), its impact on patients, and the various treatment options, including pharmacologic and complementary therapies. It investigates the efficacy of incorporating complementary and alternative therapies, both invasive and noninvasive, for amputees who have not achieved satisfactory results with pharmacologic treatments and suffer from adverse drug events. Furthermore, with the predicted increase in limb amputations, it is crucial for nurses, as frontline providers, to understand PLP, be prepared to manage persistent pain and associated psychological and functional issues and educate patients and families about alternative treatment options.

APPROACH

The review includes recent studies on pharmacologic interventions for PLP, case reports, and randomized clinical trials on non-pharmacologic complementary therapies, covering both invasive and noninvasive modalities. Studies from 2013 to 2022 were identified using the PubMed search engine with terms such as "Amputation," "phantom limb pain," "invasive therapies," and "non-invasive therapies."

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

The pathogenesis of PLP remains unclear, complicating the identification of causes and the selection of targeted therapies for each patient. Uncontrolled PLP can severely impact the quality of life, causing psychological distress and loss of productivity. Traditional pharmacologic therapy often requires supplementation with other options due to PLP's refractory nature. A comprehensive, multimodal treatment plan, including non-pharmacologic therapies, can enhance rehabilitation and reduce complications. Incorporating these therapies can decrease reliance on medications, particularly opioids, and mitigate side effects. Although many potential PLP treatments exist, further clinical studies are needed to determine their effectiveness and establish protocols for optimizing patient outcomes.

Imaging the Nerve "Allograft to Muscle Target" Technique in Neuroma Management

Neuroma management has gained significant attention in the peripheral nerve literature in the past decade. Alongside techniques such as targeted muscle reinnervation and regenerative peripheral nerve interface, another technique known as the "allograft to nowhere" has emerged. This approach involves the placement of an extended allograft at the end of a nerve, creating a regrowth zone in cases where muscle or nerve targets are not available. Although technique and outcomes research has been performed regarding the above techniques, there is a lack of imaging studies to examine postoperative outcomes. The authors present a case of recurrent neuroma management using a combined nerve allograft to nowhere + muscle target, supported by postoperative imaging.

Mesenchymal Stem Cell Engagement Modulates Neuroma Microenviroment in Rats and Humans and Prevents Postamputation Pain

Postamputation pain is currently managed unsatisfactorily with neuron-targeted pharmacological and interventional therapies. Non-neuronal pain mechanisms have emerged as crucial factors in the development and persistence of postamputation pain. Consequently, these mechanisms offer exciting prospects as innovative therapeutic targets. We examined the hypothesis that engaging mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) would foster local neuroimmune interactions, leading to a potential reduction in postamputation pain. We utilized an ex vivo neuroma model from a phantom limb pain patient to uncover that the oligodeoxynucleotide IMT504 engaged human primary MSCs to promote an anti-inflammatory microenvironment. Reverse translation experiments recapitulated these effects. Thus, in an in vivo rat model, IMT504 exhibited strong efficacy in preventing autotomy (self-mutilation) behaviors. This effect was linked to a substantial accumulation of MSCs in the neuroma and associated dorsal root ganglia and the establishment of an anti-inflammatory phenotype in these compartments. Centrally, this intervention reduced glial reactivity in the dorsal horn spinal cord, demonstrating diminished nociceptive activity. Accordingly, the exogenous systemic administration of MSCs phenocopied the behavioral effects of IMT504. Our findings underscore the mechanistic relevance of MSCs and the translational therapeutic potential of IMT504 to engage non-neuronal cells for the prevention of postamputation pain. PERSPECTIVE: The present study suggests that IMT504-dependent recruitment of endogenous MSCs within severely injured nerves may prevent post-amputation pain by modifying the inflammatory scenario at relevant sites in the pain pathway. Reinforcing data in rat and human tissues supports the potential therapeutic value of IMT504 in patients suffering postamputation pain.

Active nerve management for above the knee amputation: A comparison of through the wound versus posterior approach

Targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) and regenerative peripheral nerve interface (RPNI) are used to prevent or treat neuromas in amputees. TMR for above-the-knee amputation (AKA) is most commonly performed through a posterior incision rather than the stump wound because recipient motor nerves are primarily located in the proximal third of the thigh. When preventative TMR is performed with concurrent AKA, a posterior approach requires intraoperative repositioning and an additional incision. The purpose of this study was to evaluate feasibility of TMR and operative times for nerve management performed through the wound compared to a posterior approach in AKA patients to guide surgical decision-making. Patients who underwent AKA with TMR between 2018-2023 were reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups: TMR performed through the wound (Group I) and TMR performed through a posterior approach (Group II). If a nerve was unable to undergo coaptation for TMR due to the lack of suitable donor motor nerves, RPNI was performed. Eighteen patients underwent AKA with nerve management were included from Group I (8 patients) and Group II (10 patients). TMR coaptations performed on distinct nerves was 1.5 ± 0.5 in Group I compared to 2.6 ± 0.5 in Group II (p = 0.001). Operative time for Group I was 200.7 ± 33.4 min compared to 326.5 ± 37.1 min in Group II (p = 0.001). TMR performed through the wound following AKA requires less operative time than a posterior approach. However, since recipient motor nerves are not consistently found near the stump, RPNI may be required with TMR whereas the posterior approach allows for more TMR coaptations.

Integrating Upper-Limb Prostheses with the Human Body: Technology Advances, Readiness, and Roles in Human-Prosthesis Interaction

Significant advances in bionic prosthetics have occurred in the past two decades. The field's rapid expansion has yielded many exciting technologies that can enhance the physical, functional, and cognitive integration of a prosthetic limb with a human. We review advances in the engineering of prosthetic devices and their interfaces with the human nervous system, as well as various surgical techniques for altering human neuromusculoskeletal systems for seamless human-prosthesis integration. We discuss significant advancements in research and clinical translation, focusing on upper limbprosthetics since they heavily rely on user intent for daily operation, although many discussed technologies have been extended to lower limb prostheses as well. In addition, our review emphasizes the roles of advanced prosthetics technologies in complex interactions with humans and the technology readiness levels (TRLs) of individual research advances. Finally, we discuss current gaps and controversies in the field and point out future research directions, guided by TRLs.

Acute versus non-acute targeted muscle reinnervation for pain control following major limb amputation: A comparative study

BACKGROUND

Targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) has been shown to reduce phantom limb pain (PLP) and residual limb pain (RLP) after major limb amputation. However, the effect of the timing of surgery on pain control and quality of life outcomes is controversial. We conducted a retrospective study to compare the outcomes of acute TMR for pain prevention with non-acute TMR for the treatment of established pain.

METHODS

All patients treated with TMR in our institution between January 2018 and December 2021 were evaluated at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months post-operatively. Pain intensity and quality of life outcomes were assessed using the Brief Pain Inventory (Pain Severity and Pain Interference scales) and Pain Catastrophizing Scale. Outcomes were compared between acute and non-acute TMR using the Wilcoxon ranked-sum test or Fisher's exact test as appropriate. Multilevel mixed-effects linear regression was used to account for repeat measures and potential pain confounders.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients with 38 major limb amputations were included. Acute TMR patients reported significantly lower RLP and PLP scores, pain interference and pain catastrophisation at all time points (p < 0.05). Acute TMR was significantly associated with lower pain severity and pain interference in a linear mixed-effects model accounting for patient age, gender, amputation indication, amputation site, time post-TMR and repeated surveys (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the complication rate (p = 0.51).

CONCLUSION

Acute TMR was associated with clinically and statistically significant pain outcomes that were better than that in non-acute TMR. This suggests that TMR should be performed with preventative intent, when possible, as part of a multidisciplinary approach to pain management, rather than deferred until the development of chronic pain.

Creation of a biological sensorimotor interface for bionic reconstruction

Neuromuscular control of bionic arms has constantly improved over the past years, however, restoration of sensation remains elusive. Previous approaches to reestablish sensory feedback include tactile, electrical, and peripheral nerve stimulation, however, they cannot recreate natural, intuitive sensations. Here, we establish an experimental biological sensorimotor interface and demonstrate its potential use in neuroprosthetics. We transfer a mixed nerve to a skeletal muscle combined with glabrous dermal skin transplantation, thus forming a bi-directional communication unit in a rat model. Morphological analyses indicate reinnervation of the skin, mechanoreceptors, NMJs, and muscle spindles. Furthermore, sequential retrograde labeling reveals specific sensory reinnervation at the level of the dorsal root ganglia. Electrophysiological recordings show reproducible afferent signals upon tactile stimulation and tendon manipulation. The results demonstrate the possibility of surgically creating an interface for both decoding efferent motor control, as well as encoding afferent tactile and proprioceptive feedback, and may indicate the way forward regarding clinical translation of biological communication pathways for neuroprosthetic applications.

Optimizing Surgical Outcomes and the Role of Preventive Surgery: A Scoping Review

BACKGROUND

 Plastic and reconstructive surgeons are often presented with reconstructive challenges as a sequela of complications in high-risk surgical patients, ranging from exposure of hardware, lymphedema, and chronic pain after amputation. These complications can result in significant morbidity, recovery time, resource utilization, and cost. Given the prevalence of surgical complications managed by plastic and reconstructive surgeons, developing novel preventative techniques to mitigate surgical risk is paramount.

METHODS

 Herein, we aim to understand efforts supporting the nascent field of Preventive Surgery, including (1) enhanced risk stratification, (2) advancements in postoperative care. Through an emphasis on four surgical cohorts who may benefit from preventive surgery, two of which are at high risk of morbidity from wound-related complications (patients undergoing sternotomy and spine procedures) and two at high risk of other morbidities, including lymphedema and neuropathic pain, we aim to provide a comprehensive and improved understanding of preventive surgery. Additionally, the role of risk analysis for these procedures and the relationship between microsurgery and prophylaxis is emphasized.

RESULTS

 (1) medical optimization and prehabilitation, (2) surgical mitigation techniques.

CONCLUSION

 Reconstructive surgeons are ideally placed to lead efforts in the creation and validation of accurate risk assessment tools and to support algorithmic approaches to surgical risk mitigation. Through a paradigm shift, including universal promotion of the concept of "Preventive Surgery," major improvements in surgical outcomes may be achieved.

Phantom limb syndrome: from pathogenesis to treatment. A narrative review

Phantom Limb Syndrome (PLS) can be defined as the disabling or painful sensation of the presence of a body part that is no longer present after its amputation. Anatomical changes involved in Phantom Limb Syndrome, occurring at peripheral, spinal and brain levels and include the formation of neuromas and scars, dorsal horn sensitization and plasticity, short-term and long-term modifications at molecular and topographical levels. The molecular reorganization processes of Phantom Limb Syndrome include NMDA receptors hyperactivation in the dorsal horn of the spinal column leading to inflammatory mechanisms both at a peripheral and central level. At the brain level, a central role has been recognized for sodium channels, BDNF and adenosine triphosphate receptors. In the paper we discuss current available pharmacological options with a final overview on non-pharmacological options in the pipeline.

Targeted muscle reinnervation in bionic upper limb reconstruction: current status and future directions

Selective nerve transfers are used in the setting of upper limb amputation to improve myoelectric prosthesis control. This surgical concept is referred to as targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) and describes the rerouting of the major nerves of the arm onto the motor branches of the residual limb musculature. Aside from providing additional myosignals for prosthetic control, TMR can treat and prevent neuroma pain and possibly also phantom limb pain. This article reviews the history and current applications of TMR in upper limb amputation, with a focus on practical considerations. It further explores and identifies technological innovations to improve the man-machine interface in amputation care, particularly regarding implantable interfaces, such as muscle electrodes and osseointegration. Finally, future clinical directions and possible scientific avenues in this field are presented and critically discussed.

Feasibility of Nerve Transfer to Palmaris Longus in Forearm-Level TMR: Anatomic Study and Clinical Series

BACKGROUND

Targeted muscle re-innervation (TMR) is increasingly being used for treatment of postamputation pain and myoelectric prosthesis (MYP) control. Palmaris longus (PL) is a potential target following transradial amputation. The purpose of this study was to determine the branching pattern of the median nerve (MN) as it pertains to the PL motor branch entry point (MEP) and to present clinical results of patients who had PL used as a target.

METHODS

Eight cadaveric arms were dissected and branching patterns of the MN were documented. Additionally, we reviewed adult patients from a prospectively collected database who underwent TMR using PL. We recorded patient-reported outcomes and signal strength generated by the PL.

RESULTS

The average distance from the medial epicondyle to PL MEP was 53 mm. All palmaris motor branches passed through a chiasm within the flexor digitorum superficialis muscle belly, which was a mean of 18 mm away from the MN proper. Patients with long-term follow-up reported an average Pain visual analog scale of 3.3 and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand of 46.2. All but one patient were using an MYP, and all generated at least 10 mV of signal from the PL, which is ample signal for surface electrode detection and MYP control. There were no postoperative neuromas and only one patient-reported postoperative phantom limb pain.

CONCLUSIONS

Palmaris longus is a suitable target for TMR. Our objective measurements and anatomic relationships may help surgeons consistently find the PL's motor branch. Our series of patients reveal sufficient signal strength and acceptable clinical outcomes following TMR using the PL.

Social Deprivation is Associated with Increased Pain in Patients Presenting with Neuropathic Pain

Background

Neuropathic pain following nerve injury can be debilitating and negatively impact quality of life. Targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) is an efficacious technique for the management of neuropathic pain. However, this technique may be unequally available for many geographical locations. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the association between Area Deprivation Index (ADI) and preoperative pain in patients undergoing TMR for treatment of neuropathic pain.

Methods

Patients who underwent TMR for neuropathic pain in the lower and upper extremities were prospectively enrolled at our tertiary care clinic. A chart review was conducted to obtain socioeconomic, surgery, and comorbidity parameters. Preoperative pain scores (0-10 pain score index), and the ADI, reflecting deprivation status on a 0-100 scale, were collected.

Results

A total of 162 patients from 13 different states were included, of which 119 were amputees (74%). The median ADI was 25 (IQR: 16-41) and the median preoperative pain score was 6 (IQR: 5-8). A higher ADI was independently associated with higher preoperative pain. The time interval from nerve injury to TMR was not associated with ADI.

Conclusions

Patients undergoing surgical treatment of neuropathic pain from more socially deprived settings have increased pain experience upon initial evaluation, despite having similar time from nerve injury or amputation to TMR. These findings highlight the importance of identifying patients presenting from socially deprived settings, as this may impact their physical and mental health along with their coping mechanisms, resulting in increased pain.

Neuroma Analysis in Humans: Standardizing Sample Collection and Documentation

INTRODUCTION

The biology of symptomatic neuromas is poorly understood, particularly the factors causing pain in human neuromas. Pain presence varies among and within individuals, with some having painful and nonpainful neuromas. To bridge these knowledge gaps, our group developed a protocol for assessing neuroma pain and collecting tissue for molecular analysis. This manuscript outlines our workflow and challenges and aims to inspire other centers to share their experiences with these tissues.

METHODS

For every included patient and collected nerve or bone tissue specimens, we perform a detailed chart review and a multifaceted analysis of pain and pain perception immediately before surgery. We collect patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) on pain, function, and mental well-being outcomes at preoperative assessment and at the 6-month follow-up postoperatively. Before surgery, the patient is assessed once again to obtain an immediate preoperative pain status and identify potential differences in pain intensity of different neuromas. Intraoperatively, specimens are obtained and their gross anatomical features are recorded, after which they are stored in paraformaldehyde or frozen for later sample analyses. Postoperatively, patients are contacted to obtain additional postoperative PROMs.

RESULTS

A total of 220 specimens of nerve tissue have been successfully obtained from 83 limbs, comprising 95 specimens of neuromas and 125 specimens of nerves located proximal to the neuromas or from controls.

CONCLUSIONS

Our approach outlines the methods combining specimen collection and examination, including both macroscopic and molecular biological features, with PROMs, encompassing physical and psychological aspects, along with clinical metadata obtained through clinical teams and chart review.

The nonsalvageable tibia: amputation and prosthetics

Mangled extremities are a challenging problem for the orthopaedic surgeon. The decision for salvage versus amputation is multifactorial. Several work groups have attempted to create scoring systems to guide treatment, but each case must be regarded individually. As surgical technique and prosthetics continue to improve, amputations should be seen as a viable reconstructive option, rather than failure. This article reviews scoring systems for the mangled extremity, outcomes on salvage versus amputation, amputation surgical technique, and prosthetic options.

[Bionic Surgery Meets Bionic Reconstruction - First In-human use of Robotic Microsurgery in Targeted Muscle Reinnervation]

Robotic microsurgery is an emerging field in reconstructive surgery, which provides benefits such as improved precision, optimal ergonomics, and reduced tremors. However, only a few robotic platforms are available for performing microsurgical procedures, and successful nerve coaptation is still a challenge. Targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) is an innovative reconstructive procedure that rewires multiple nerves to remnant stump muscles, thereby reducing neuroma and phantom limb pain and improving the control of bionic prostheses. The precision of surgical techniques is critical in reducing axonal sprouting around the coaptation site to minimise the potential for neuroma formation. This study reports the first use of a microsurgical robotic platform for multiple nerve transfers in a patient undergoing TMR for bionic extremity reconstruction. The Symani robotic platform, combined with external microscope magnification, was successfully used, and precise handling of nerve tissue and coaptation was easily feasible even in anatomically challenging environments. While the precision and stability offered by robotic assistance may be especially useful for nerve surgery, the high economic costs of robotic microsurgery remain a major challenge for current healthcare systems. In conclusion, this study demonstrated the feasibility of using a robotic microsurgical platform for nerve surgery and transfers, where precise handling of tissue is crucial and limited space is available. Future studies will explore the full potential of robotic microsurgery in the future.

Targeted Muscle Reinnervation: Factors Predisposing to Successful Pain Score Reduction

BACKGROUND

Targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) has demonstrated efficacy in reducing neuroma and chronic pain. In this article, we investigated postoperative outcomes in our patient cohort, with a focus on the role of nonmodifiable factors such as patient age and gender.

METHODS

Patients who had extremity TMR from April 2018 to October 2022 were reviewed. Outcomes of interest included patient age, gender, cause and type of amputation, delayed versus immediate TMR, as well as postoperative improvement in pain as assessed by numerical rating score (NRS).

RESULTS

A total of 40 patients underwent TMR on 47 limbs. Mean age was 46.2 ± 17.0 years. Delayed TMR (27, 57.4%) was most commonly performed, followed by immediate and delayed-immediate at 11 (23.4%) and 9 (19.1%), respectively. Amputation level was most commonly above-knee in 20 (42.6%) patients, followed by below-knee (12, 25.5%), transhumeral (8, 17.0%), transradial (6, 12.8%), and shoulder (1, 2.1%). The median time interval between amputation and TMR was 12 months. The median preoperative NRS assessing residual limb pain (RLP) for patients who underwent delayed TMR was 10. The median postoperative NRS assessing RLP for all patients was 0 (interquartile range25-75: 0-5) and significantly improved compared with preoperative NRS (P < 0.001). At the last follow-up for limbs that had delayed and delayed-immediate TMR (n = 36), 33 (91.7%) limbs had more than 50% resolution of RLP. There was a significant difference in median postoperative NRS by gender (4 in men and 0 in women) (P < 0.05). Postoperative median NRS also favored younger patients (0, <50 years compared with 4.5, >50 years) (P < 0.05). Multiple linear regression analysis showed that, of different variables analyzed, only male gender and older age were predictive of poorer postoperative outcomes.

CONCLUSION

TMR showed high efficacy in our cohort, with improved short-term outcomes in women and younger patients.

Surgical Treatment of Neuropathic Chronic Postherniorrhaphy Inguinal Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background/Objectives: Neuropathic chronic postherniorrhaphy inguinal pain (CPIP) is a serious adverse outcome following inguinal hernia repair surgery. The optimal surgical treatment for neuropathic CPIP remains controversial in the current literature. This systematic review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of various surgical techniques utilized to manage neuropathic CPIP. Methods: The electronic databases Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Central, and Google Scholar were searched. Inclusion criteria were defined to select studies reporting on the efficacy of surgical interventions in patients with neuropathic CPIP. The primary outcome was postoperative pain relief, as determined by postoperative numerical or nonnumerical pain scores. Results: Ten studies met the inclusion criteria. Three surgical techniques were identified: selective neurectomy, triple neurectomy, and targeted muscle reinnervation. Proportions of good postoperative results of the surgical techniques ranged between 46 and 88 percent. Overall, the surgical treatment of neuropathic CPIP achieved a good postoperative result in 68 percent (95% CI, 49 to 82%) of neuropathic CPIP patients (n = 244), with targeted muscle reinnervation yielding the highest proportion of good postoperative results. Conclusions: The surgical treatment of neuropathic CPIP is generally considered safe and has demonstrated effective pain relief across various surgical techniques. Targeted muscle reinnervation exhibits considerable potential for surpassing current success rates in inguinal hernia repair surgery.

Targeted Muscle Reinnervation and Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interfaces Versus Standard Management in the Treatment of Limb Amputation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Introduction: Painful neuromas are a common postoperative complication of limb amputation often treated with secondary reinnervation. Surgical reinnervation include Targeted Muscle Reinnervation (TMR) and Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface (RPNI), and can be primary and secondary. The aim of this review is to assess the effects of primary TMR/RPNI at the time of limb amputation on the incidence and intensity of post-operative neuroma and pain. Methods: This review was registered a priori on PROSPERO (CRD42021264360). A search of the following databases was performed in June 2021: Medline, EMBASE, and CENTRAL. Unpublished trials were searched using clinicaltrials.gov. All randomized and non-randomized studies assessing amputation with a reinnervation strategy (TMR, RPNI) were included. Outcomes evaluated included the incidences of painful neuroma, phantom limb pain (PLP), residual limb pain (RLP), as well as severity of pain, and Pain intensity, behavior, and interference (PROMIS). Results: Eleven studies were included in this systematic review, and five observational studies for quantitative synthesis. Observational study evidence suggests that TMR/RPNI results in a statistically significant reduction in incidence, pain scores and PROMIS scores of PLP and RLP. Decreased incidence of neuromas favored primary TMR/RPNI, but this did not achieve statistical significance (p = 0.07). Included studies had moderate to critical risk of bias. Conclusion: The observational data suggests that primary TMR/RPNI reduces incidence, pain scores and PROMIS scores of PLP and RLP. Going forward, randomized trials are warranted to evaluate this research question, particularly to improve the certainty of evidence.

Technical Trick: Cryoneurolysis for Subacute Pain Mitigation in Patients With Limb Loss

SUMMARY

Pain after amputation is often managed by target muscle reinnervation (TMR) with the added benefit that TMR also provides improved myoelectric terminal device control. However, as TMR takes several months for the recipient muscles to reliably reinnervate, this technique does not address pain within the subacute postoperative period during which pain chronification, sensitization, and opioid dependence and misuse may occur. Cryoneurolysis, described herein, uses focused, extreme temperatures to essentially "freeze" the nerve, blocking nociception, and improving pain in treated nerves potentially reducing the chances of pain chronification, sensitization, and substance dependence or abuse.

The effectiveness of targeted muscle reinnervation in reducing pain and improving quality of life for patients following lower limb amputation

BACKGROUND

Globally, over 1 million lower limb amputations are performed annually, with approximately 75% of patients experiencing significant pain, profoundly impacting their quality of life and functional capabilities. Targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) has emerged as a surgical solution involving the rerouting of amputated nerves to specific muscle targets. Originally introduced to enhance signal amplification for myoelectric prosthesis control, TMR has expanded its applications to include neuroma management and pain relief. However, the literature assessing patient outcomes is lacking, specifically for lower limb amputees. This systematic review aims to assess the effectiveness of TMR in reducing pain and enhancing functional outcomes for patients who have undergone lower limb amputation.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed by examining relevant studies between 2010 and 2023, focusing on pain reduction, functional outcomes and patient-reported quality of life measures.

RESULTS

In total, 20 studies were eligible encompassing a total of 778 extremities, of which 75.06% (n = 584) were lower limb amputees. Average age was 46.66 years and patients were predominantly male (n = 70.67%). Seven studies (35%) reported functional outcomes. Patients who underwent primary TMR exhibited lower average patient-reported outcome measurement information system (PROMIS) scores for phantom limb pain (PLP) and residual limb pain (RLP). Secondary TMR led to improvements in PLP, RLP and general limb pain as indicated by average numeric rating scale and PROMIS scores.

CONCLUSION

The systematic review underscores TMR's potential benefits in alleviating pain, fostering post-amputation rehabilitation and enhancing overall well-being for lower limb amputees.

Cryoanalgesia: Review with Respect to Peripheral Nerve

BACKGROUND

 Cryoanalgesia is a tool being used by interventional radiology to treat chronic pain. Within a certain cold temperature range, peripheral nerve function is interrupted and recovers, without neuroma formation. Cryoanalgesia has most often been applied to the intercostal nerve. Cryoanalgesia has applications to peripheral nerve surgery, yet is poorly understood by reconstructive microsurgeons.

METHODS

 Histopathology of nerve injury was reviewed to understand cold applied to peripheral nerve. Literature review was performed utilizing the PubMed and MEDLINE databases to identify comparative studies of the efficacy of intraoperative cryoanalgesia versus thoracic epidural anesthesia following thoracotomy. Data were analyzed using Fisher's exact and analysis of variance tests. A similar approach was used for pudendal cryoanalgesia.

RESULTS

 Application of inclusion and exclusion criteria resulted in 16 comparative clinical studies of intercostal nerve for this review. For thoracotomy, nine studies compared cryoanalgesia with pharmaceutical analgesia, with seven demonstrating significant reduction in postoperative opioid use or postoperative acute pain scores. In these nine studies, there was no association between the number of nerves treated and the reduction in acute postoperative pain. One study compared cryoanalgesia with local anesthetic and demonstrated a significant reduction in acute pain with cryoanalgesia. Three studies compared cryoanalgesia with epidural analgesia and demonstrated no significant difference in postoperative pain or postoperative opioid use. Interventional radiology targets pudendal nerves using computed tomography imaging with positive outcomes for the patient with pain of pudendal nerve origin.

CONCLUSION

 Cryoanalgesia is a term used for the treatment of peripheral nerve problems that would benefit from a proverbial reset of peripheral nerve function. It does not ablate the nerve. Intraoperative cryoanalgesia to intercostal nerves is a safe and effective means of postoperative analgesia following thoracotomy. For pudendal nerve injury, where an intrapelvic surgical approach may be difficult, cryoanalgesia may provide sufficient clinical relief, thereby preserving pudendal nerve function.

Surgical treatment of painful neuroma in amputated and non-amputated patients: does the level of neurotomy affect clinical outcomes?

PURPOSE

To compare the outcomes of distal neurotomy (DN) versus proximal neurotomy (PN) for the surgical management of painful neuromas in amputees and non-amputees, whether used in passive or active treatment.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted on patients who underwent surgery for painful traumatic neuromas between 2019 and 2022. DN with neuroma excision was performed at the level of the injury or amputation. PN was performed using a separate proximal approach without neuroma excision. Outcomes included a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) score and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores, as well as patients' subjective assessments.

RESULTS

A total of 33 patients were included: 17 amputees and 16 non-amputees. They totalized 43 neuromas treated by DN in 21 cases and PN in 22 cases. At the median follow-up time of 13 months, there were significant decreases in all NRS and PROMIS scores in the whole series. The decrease in limb pain scores was not significantly different between groups, except for the decrease in pain interference and patient satisfaction which were higher in the DN group. Sub-group analyses found the same significant differences in amputees. Targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) was associated with a higher decrease in PROMIS scores.

CONCLUSION

DN seemed to give better results in amputees but there were confusing factors related to associated lesions. In other situations, the non-inferiority of PN was demonstrated. PN could be of interest for treating neuromas of superficial sensory nerves, for avoiding direct revision of a well-fitted stump and in conjunction with TMR.

Strategies for Treating Traumatic Neuromas with Tissue-Engineered Materials

Neuroma, a pathological response to peripheral nerve injury, refers to the abnormal growth of nerve tissue characterized by disorganized axonal proliferation. Commonly occurring after nerve injuries, surgeries, or amputations, this condition leads to the formation of painful nodular structures. Traditional treatment options include surgical excision and pharmacological management, aiming to alleviate symptoms. However, these approaches often offer temporary relief without addressing the underlying regenerative challenges, necessitating the exploration of advanced strategies such as tissue-engineered materials for more comprehensive and effective solutions. In this study, we discussed the etiology, molecular mechanisms, and histological morphology of traumatic neuromas after peripheral nerve injury. Subsequently, we summarized and analyzed current nonsurgical and surgical treatment options, along with their advantages and disadvantages. Additionally, we emphasized recent advancements in treating traumatic neuromas with tissue-engineered material strategies. By integrating biomaterials, growth factors, cell-based approaches, and electrical stimulation, tissue engineering offers a comprehensive solution surpassing mere symptomatic relief, striving for the structural and functional restoration of damaged nerves. In conclusion, the utilization of tissue-engineered materials has the potential to significantly reduce the risk of neuroma recurrence after surgical treatment.

Experience with ultrasound neurography for postoperative evaluation of targeted muscle reinnervation

Targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) was originally developed as a means for increasing intuitive prosthesis control, though later found to play a role in phantom limb pain and neuroma prevention. There is a paucity of literature describing the clinical course of patients with poor TMR surgical outcomes and the value of imaging in the postoperative recovery period. This report will illustrate the potential utility of ultrasound neurography to accurately differentiate TMR surgical outcomes in two patients that received upper extremity amputation and subsequent reconstruction with TMR. Ultrasound evaluation of TMR sites in patient 1 confirmed successful reinnervation, evident by nerve fascicle continuity and eventual integration of the transferred nerve into the target muscle. Conversely, the ultrasound of patient 2 showed discontinuity of the nerve fascicles, neuroma formation, and muscle atrophy in all three sites of nerve transfer, suggesting an unsuccessful procedure and poor functional recovery. Ultrasound neurography is uniquely able to capture the longitudinal trajectory of rerouted nerves to confirm continuity and eventual reinnervation into muscle. Therefore, the application of ultrasound in a postoperative setting can correctly identify instances of failed TMR before this information would become available through clinical evaluation. Early identification of poor TMR outcomes may benefit future patients by fostering the discovery of failure mechanisms and aiding in further surgical planning to improve functional outcomes.

Perspectives on the Novel Multifunctional Nerve Guidance Conduits: From Specific Regenerative Procedures to Motor Function Rebuilding

Peripheral nerve injury potentially destroys the quality of life by inducing functional movement disorders and sensory capacity loss, which results in severe disability and substantial psychological, social, and financial burdens. Autologous nerve grafting has been commonly used as treatment in the clinic; however, its rare donor availability limits its application. A series of artificial nerve guidance conduits (NGCs) with advanced architectures are also proposed to promote injured peripheral nerve regeneration, which is a complicated process from axon sprouting to targeted muscle reinnervation. Therefore, exploring the interactions between sophisticated NGC complexes and versatile cells during each process including axon sprouting, Schwann cell dedifferentiation, nerve myelination, and muscle reinnervation is necessary. This review highlights the contribution of functional NGCs and the influence of microscale biomaterial architecture on biological processes of nerve repair. Progressive NGCs with chemical molecule induction, heterogenous topographical morphology, electroactive, anisotropic assembly microstructure, and self-powered electroactive and magnetic-sensitive NGCs are also collected, and they are expected to be pioneering features in future multifunctional and effective NGCs.

Social media analysis of pain outcomes following targeted muscle reinnervation

AIM

Targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) was developed to improve myoelectric prosthesis control for amputees; however, it has become an area of interest in pain modulation. Evidences indicate that this procedure alleviates chronic pain in amputees. The primary objective of this study was to use social media analysis to understand patients' post-operative pain, satisfaction, and recovery time after TMR.

METHODS

Data were collected from one Facebook group via posts and comments referencing TMR. Posts published between January 1, 2020, and March 24, 2023 were analyzed. Data collected included pain prior to surgery, pain in immediate post-op period, and change in pain after surgery.

RESULTS

Forty-three individuals commented on their TMR experience. Among them, 31 had favorable surgical outcomes, 7 felt that the surgery worsened their pain or there was no significant change in their pain levels, and 5 commented during the initial post-operative period. Twenty-four patients described their pain in the immediate post-operative period and all patients said that the post-operative pain was worse than chronic pain. Among the 28 authors who commented on overall reduction in chronic pain, 24 reported that TMR reduced their pain, whereas 4 reported no change or worsened pain.

CONCLUSIONS

The number of patients (24) who reported improvement in chronic pain aligns with the results in current literature suggesting that TMR is a viable treatment option for pain management. With the current medical management of similar conditions, up to 80% of patients remain unsatisfied with pain management. This analysis supports the evidence that TMR is an effective treatment for patients experiencing post-amputation pain.

Combined Targeted Muscle Reinnervation With Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interfaces Decreases Long-Term Narcotic Use in Amputees: A Case Control Study

PURPOSE

Combined targeted muscle reinnervation with regenerative peripheral nerve interfaces ("TMRpni") is a recently described nerve management strategy that leverages beneficial elements of targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) and regenerative peripheral nerve interface (RPNI) techniques. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of TMRpni on long-term opioid consumption after amputation. We hypothesize that TMRpni decreases chronic opioid consumption in amputees.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study of all patients who underwent TMRpni between 2019 and 2021. These patients were age-matched at a 1:1 ratio with a control group of patients who underwent amputation without TMRpni. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS Version 28.0.

RESULTS

Thirty-one age-matched pairs of patients in the TMRpni and control groups were included. At 30 days after surgery, there was no significant difference in number of patients who required an additional refill of their opioid prescriptions (45% vs 55%, P = 0.45) or patients who continued to actively use opioids (36% vs 42%, P = 0.60). However, at 90 days after surgery, there was a significantly lower number of patients from the TMRpni group who reported continued opioid use compared with the control group (10% vs 32%, P = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that TMRpni may translate to decreased rates of chronic opiate use. Continued study is indicated to optimize TMRpni techniques and patient selection and to determine its long-term efficacy.

Management of Superficial and Deep Peroneal Nerve Neuromas with Targeted Muscle Reinnervation in Nonamputees: Operative Technique and Early Outcomes

Background

Targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR), a surgical technique developed by the senior authors that coapts proximal ends of nerves to distal motor nerves of adjacent muscles, has demonstrated efficacy in the treatment and prevention of neuroma pain. The objective of this study is to describe the surgical technique for TMR of the superficial peroneal nerve (SPN) and deep peroneal nerve (DPN) in nonamputee patients and provide data on postoperative functional outcomes.

Methods

A single-institution retrospective chart review was performed between March 2018 and April 2021. Patients were de-identified and included if they were nonamputees receiving TMR for pain in the peroneal nerve distribution. Data extracted included demographic information, symptoms before operation, relevant nerve coaptation, peri-, and postoperative complications, and long-term functional outcomes.

Results

Of the 19 patients reviewed, 11 patients underwent TMR of the SPN alone: eight had complete resolution of their symptoms; two indicated partial improvement in pain; and one patient had no improvement. Four patients underwent TMR of the DPN alone: two patients had complete resolution of their pain, and two patients had partial improvement with pain. Four patients underwent TMR of both the SPN/DPN: two patients had complete resolution of their symptoms, and two patients were noted to have significant improvement but had persistent pain from prior foot operations. Average follow-up time was 260 days.

Conclusions

TMR is a successful technique in the management of SPN and DPN neuroma pain. Our technique revealed excellent clinical outcomes, no procedure-specific complications, and improved subjective pain reports.

Pain in the Context of Sensory Deafferentation

Pain that accompanies deafferentation is one of the most mysterious and misunderstood medical conditions. Prevalence rates for the assorted conditions vary considerably but the most reliable estimates are greater than 50% for strokes involving the somatosensory system, brachial plexus avulsions, spinal cord injury, and limb amputation, with controversy surrounding the mechanistic contributions of deafferentation to ensuing neuropathic pain syndromes. Deafferentation pain has also been described for loss of other body parts (e.g., eyes and breasts) and may contribute to between 10% and upwards of 30% of neuropathic symptoms in peripheral neuropathies. There is no pathognomonic test or sign to identify deafferentation pain, and part of the controversy surrounding it stems from the prodigious challenges in differentiating cause and effect. For example, it is unknown whether cortical reorganization causes pain or is a byproduct of pathoanatomical changes accompanying injury, including pain. Similarly, ascertaining whether deafferentation contributes to neuropathic pain, or whether concomitant injury to nerve fibers transmitting pain and touch sensation leads to a deafferentation-like phenotype can be clinically difficult, although a detailed neurologic examination, functional imaging, and psychophysical tests may provide clues. Due in part to the concurrent morbidities, the physical, psychologic, and by extension socioeconomic costs of disorders associated with deafferentation are higher than for other chronic pain conditions. Treatment is symptom-based, with evidence supporting first-line antineuropathic medications such as gabapentinoids and antidepressants. Studies examining noninvasive neuromodulation and virtual reality have yielded mixed results.

Similar rates of reoperation for neuroma after transtibial amputations with and without targeted muscle reinnervation

Objective

To compare the rates of revision surgery for symptomatic neuromas in patients undergoing primary transtibial amputations with and without targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR).

Design

Retrospective cohort study.

Setting

Level I trauma hospital and tertiary military medical center.

Patients/Participants

Adult patients undergoing transtibial amputations with and without TMR.

Intervention

Transtibial amputation with targeted muscle reinnervation.

Main Outcome Measurements

Reoperation for symptomatic neuroma.

Results

During the study period, there were 112 primary transtibial amputations performed, 29 with TMR and 83 without TMR. Over the same period, there were 51 revision transtibial amputations performed, including 23 (21%) in the patients undergoing primary transtibial amputation at the study institution. The most common indications for revision surgery were wound breakdown/dehiscence (42%, n = 25), followed by symptomatic neuroma 18% (n = 9/51) and infection/osteomyelitis (17%, n = 10) as the most common indications. However, of the patients undergoing primary amputation at the study's institution, there was no difference in reoperation rates for neuroma when comparing the TMR group (3.6%, n = 1/28) and no TMR group (4.0%, n = 3/75) (P = 0.97).

Conclusions

Symptomatic neuroma is one of the most common reasons for revision amputation; however, this study was unable to demonstrate a difference in revision surgery rates for neuroma for patients undergoing primary transtibial amputation with or without targeted muscle reinnervation.

Level of Evidence

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Three Useful Tips and Tricks for Intraoperative Nerve Stimulation

Disposable handheld nerve stimulators are widely used in peripheral nerve surgery. Such devices stimulate a motor nerve or the motor component of a mixed nerve by applying electrical current to the proximal region, targeting the main nerve trunk. This stimulation then travels along the motor nerve, reaching the distal end to control the corresponding muscle(s). In this study, the authors demonstrate three useful tips and tricks for handheld nerve stimulation during targeted muscle reinnervation and peripheral nerve surgery. The three tips are (1) identification of proximal muscle contraction by retrograde electrical stimulation of a distal sensory nerve; (2) graded stimulation for identifying motor nerves within fibrotic scarred tissue beds or parallel to the major motor/mixed nerve of interest; and (3) proximal stimulation for validation of adequate post-targeted muscle reinnervation coaptation(s).

Impact of Timing of Targeted Muscle Reinnervation on Pain and Opioid Intake Following Major Limb Amputation

BACKGROUND

Targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) has been shown to play an important role in managing neuromas. However, the impact of the timing of TMR on pain visual analogue scale (VAS) scores or patient opioid use has not been thoroughly explored. We hypothesized that TMR performed acutely would lead to lower VAS scores and decreased opioid intake.

METHODS

Prospectively collected data from an amputation registry at a single institution were utilized to identify patients who underwent TMR. Acute TMR was defined as TMR performed within 1 month of the major limb amputation. Primary outcomes included VAS pain scores and patient-reported opioid consumption.

RESULTS

In all, 25 patients (26 limbs) were identified in the acute group, and 18 patients (18 limbs) were identified in the delayed group. At intermediate follow-up (between 4 and 8 months postoperatively) and at final follow-up, the average pain VAS score in the delayed TMR group was significantly higher than that in the acute group (5.2 vs. 1.9 at intermediate P = .01 and 6.2 vs. 1.9 at final P = .002). In all, 84% of the amputees overall were not consuming opioid medications at the time of final follow-up (79% acute, 88% delayed, P = .72). There were no statistically significant differences in opioid consumption between the acute and delayed group at intermediate follow-up (P = .35) or at final follow-up (P = .68).

CONCLUSIONS

TMR is an effective procedure to reduce pain following major limb amputation. Patients with TMR performed acutely had significantly lower VAS pain scores at both intermediate and final follow-up than patients with TMR performed in a delayed setting.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic II.

Biology and pathophysiology of symptomatic neuromas

ABSTRACT

Neuromas are a substantial cause of morbidity and reduction in quality of life. This is not only caused by a disruption in motor and sensory function from the underlying nerve injury but also by the debilitating effects of neuropathic pain resulting from symptomatic neuromas. A wide range of surgical and therapeutic modalities have been introduced to mitigate this pain. Nevertheless, no single treatment option has been successful in completely resolving the associated constellation of symptoms. While certain novel surgical techniques have shown promising results in reducing neuroma-derived and phantom limb pain, their effectiveness and the exact mechanism behind their pain-relieving capacities have not yet been defined. Furthermore, surgery has inherent risks, may not be suitable for many patients, and may yet still fail to relieve pain. Therefore, there remains a great clinical need for additional therapeutic modalities to further improve treatment for patients with devastating injuries that lead to symptomatic neuromas. However, the molecular mechanisms and genetic contributions behind the regulatory programs that drive neuroma formation-as well as the resulting neuropathic pain-remain incompletely understood. Here, we review the histopathological features of symptomatic neuromas, our current understanding of the mechanisms that favor neuroma formation, and the putative contributory signals and regulatory programs that facilitate somatic pain, including neurotrophic factors, neuroinflammatory peptides, cytokines, along with transient receptor potential, and ionotropic channels that suggest possible approaches and innovations to identify novel clinical therapeutics.

Volume loss during muscle reinnervation surgery is correlated with reduced CMAP amplitude but not reduced force output in a rat hindlimb model

Introduction: Muscle reinnervation (MR) surgery offers rehabilitative benefits to amputees by taking severely damaged nerves and providing them with new denervated muscle targets (DMTs). However, the influence of physical changes to muscle tissue during MR surgery on long-term functional outcomes remains understudied. Methods: Our rat hindlimb model of MR surgery utilizes vascularized, directly neurotized DMTs made from the lateral gastrocnemius (LG), which we employed to assess the impact of muscle tissue size on reinnervation outcomes, specifically pairing the DMT with the transected peroneal nerve. We conducted MR surgery with both DMTs at full volume and DMTs with partial volume loss of 500 mg at the time of surgery (n = 6 per group) and measured functional outcomes after 100 days of reinnervation. Compound motor action potentials (CMAPs) and isometric tetanic force production was recorded from reinnervated DMTs and compared to contralateral naïve LG muscles as positive controls. Results: Reinnervated DMTs consistently exhibited lower mass than positive controls, while DMTs with partial volume loss showed no significant mass reduction compared to full volume DMTs (p = 0.872). CMAP amplitudes were lower on average in reinnervated DMTs, but a broad linear correlation also exists between muscle mass and maximum CMAP amplitude irrespective of surgical group (R2 = 0.495). Surprisingly, neither MR group, with or without volume loss, demonstrated decreased force compared to positive controls. The average force output of reinnervated DMTs, as a fraction of the contralateral LG's force output, approached 100% for both MR groups, a notable deviation from the 9.6% (±6.3%) force output observed in our negative control group at 7 days post-surgery. Tissue histology analysis revealed few significant differences except for a marked decrease in average muscle fiber area of reinnervated DMTs with volume loss compared to positive controls (p = 0.001). Discussion: The results from our rat model of MR suggests that tissue electrophysiology (CMAPs) and kinesiology (force production) may recover on different time scales, with volumetric muscle loss at the time of MR surgery not significantly reducing functional outcome measurements for the DMTs after 100 days of reinnervation.

Approaches to neuropathic amputation-related pain: narrative review of surgical, interventional, and medical treatments

BACKGROUND/IMPORTANCE

Neuropathic amputation-related pain can consist of phantom limb pain (PLP), residual limb pain (RLP), or a combination of both pathologies. Estimated of lifetime prevalence of pain and after amputation ranges between 8% and 72%.

OBJECTIVE

This narrative review aims to summarize the surgical and non-surgical treatment options for amputation-related neuropathic pain to aid in developing optimized multidisciplinary and multimodal treatment plans that leverage multidisciplinary care.

EVIDENCE REVIEW

A search of the English literature using the following keywords was performed: PLP, amputation pain, RLP. Abstract and full-text articles were evaluated for surgical treatments, medical management, regional anesthesia, peripheral block, neuromodulation, spinal cord stimulation, dorsal root ganglia, and peripheral nerve stimulation.

FINDINGS

The evidence supporting most if not all interventions for PLP are inconclusive and lack high certainty. Targeted muscle reinnervation and regional peripheral nerve interface are the leading surgical treatment options for reducing neuroma formation and reducing PLP. Non-surgical options include pharmaceutical therapy, regional interventional techniques and behavioral therapies that can benefit certain patients. There is a growing evidence that neuromodulation at the spinal cord or the dorsal root ganglia and/or peripheral nerves can be an adjuvant therapy for PLP.

CONCLUSIONS

Multimodal approaches combining pharmacotherapy, surgery and invasive neuromodulation procedures would appear to be the most promising strategy for preventive and treating PLP and RLP. Future efforts should focus on cross-disciplinary education to increase awareness of treatment options exploring best practices for preventing pain at the time of amputation and enhancing treatment of chronic postamputation pain.

[Prosthetic Fitting Concepts after Major Amputation in the Upper Limb - an Overview of Current Possibilities]

BACKGROUND

The upper extremity and particularly the hands are crucial for patients in interacting with their environment, therefore amputations or severe damage with loss of hand function significantly impact their quality of life. In cases where biological reconstruction is not feasible or does not lead to sufficient success, bionic reconstruction plays a key role in patient care. Classical myoelectric prostheses are controlled using two signals derived from surface electrodes in the area of the stump muscles. Prosthesis control, especially in high amputations, is then limited and cumbersome. The surgical technique of Targeted Muscle Reinnervation (TMR) offers an innovative solution: The major arm nerves that have lost their target organs due to amputation are rerouted to muscles in the stump area. This enables the establishment of cognitive control signals that allow significantly improved prosthesis control.

PATIENTS/MATERIALS AND METHODS

A selective literature review on TMR and bionic reconstruction was conducted, incorporating relevant articles and discussing them considering the clinical experience of our research group. Additionally, a clinical case is presented.

RESULTS

Bionic reconstruction combined with Targeted Muscle Reinnervation enables intuitive prosthetic control with simultaneous movement of various prosthetic degrees of freedom and the treatment of neuroma and phantom limb pain. Long-term success requires a high level of patient compliance and intensive signal training during the prosthetic rehabilitation phase. Despite technological advances, challenges persist, especially in enhancing signal transmission and integrating natural sensory feedback into bionic prostheses.

CONCLUSION

TMR surgery represents a significant advancement in the bionic care of amputees. Employing selective nerve transfers for signal multiplication and amplification, opens up possibilities for improving myoelectric prosthesis function and thus enhancing patient care. Advances in the area of external prosthetic components, improvements in the skeletal connection due to osseointegration and more fluid signal transmission using wireless, fully implanted electrode systems will lead to significant progress in bionic reconstruction, both in terms of precision of movement and embodiment.

Management of Neuropathic Pain with Neurectomy Combined with Dermal Sensory Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface (DS-RPNI)

Neuropathic pain affects a large percentage of the U.S. population and leads to tremendous morbidity. Numerous nonsurgical and surgical treatments have been utilized to try and manage neuropathic pain with varying degrees of success. Recent research investigating ways to improve prosthetic control have identified new mechanisms for preventing neuromas in both motor and sensory nerves with free muscle and dermal grafts, respectively. These procedures have been used to treat chronic neuropathic pain in nonamputees, as well, in order to reduce failure rates found with traditional neurectomy procedures. Herein, we focus our attention on Dermal Sensory-Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interfaces (DS-RPNI, free dermal grafts) which can be used to physiologically "cap" sensory nerves following neurectomy and have been shown to significantly decrease neuropathic pain.

Pain and Functional Outcomes following Targeted Muscle Reinnervation: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

It is estimated that by 2050, a total of 3.6 million patients will be living with an amputation in the United States. The objective of this systematic review is to evaluate the effect of targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) on pain and physical functioning in amputees.

METHODS

A literature search was performed on PubMed, Embase, and MEDLINE up to November 28, 2021. Clinical studies assessing the outcomes of TMR (pain, prosthesis control, life quality, limb function, and disability) were included.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine articles were included. The total number of patients who underwent TMR was 449, and 716 were controls. Mean follow-up was 25 months. A total of 309 (66%) lower-limb and 159 (34%) upper-limb amputations took place in the TMR group, the most common being below-knee amputations (39%). The control group included a total of 557 (84%) lower-limb and 108 (16%) upper-limb amputations; the greatest proportion being below-knee amputations in this group as well (54%). Trauma was the most common indication for amputation. Phantom limb pain scores were lower by 10.2 points for intensity ( P = 0.01), 4.67 points for behavior ( P = 0.01), and 8.9 points for interference ( P = 0.09). Similarly, residual limb pain measures were lower for cases for intensity, behavior, and interference, but they failed to reach significance. Neuroma symptoms occurred less frequently, and functional and prosthesis control outcomes improved following TMR.

CONCLUSION

The literature evidence suggests that TMR is a promising therapy for improving pain, prosthesis use, and functional outcomes after limb amputation.

Primary Targeted Muscle Reinnervation in Above-Knee Amputations in Patients with Unsalvageable Limbs from Limb-Threatening Ischemia or Infection

BACKGROUND

 Amputees frequently suffer from chronic pain in both their residual limbs (RLP) and phantom limbs (PLP) following their amputation. Targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) is a nerve transfer technique that has been demonstrated to improve pain secondarily and at time of amputation. The goal of this study is to report on the efficacy of primary TMR at time of above-knee level amputations in the setting of limb-threatening ischemia or infection.

METHODS

 This is a retrospective review of a single-surgeon experience with TMR in patients undergoing through- or above-knee level amputations from January 2018 to June 2021. Patient charts were reviewed for the comorbidities in the Charlson Comorbidity Index. Postoperative notes were assayed for presence and absence of RLP and PLP, overall pain severity, chronic narcotic use, ambulatory status, and complications. A control group of patients undergoing lower limb amputation who did not receive TMR from January 2014 to December 2017 was used for comparison.

RESULTS

 Forty-one patients with through- or above-knee level amputations and primary TMR were included in this study. The tibial and common peroneal nerves were transferred in all cases to motor branches to the gastrocnemius, semimembranosus, semitendinosus, and biceps femoris. Fifty-eight patients with through- or above-knee level amputations without TMR were included for comparison. The TMR group had significantly less overall pain (41.5 vs. 67.2%, p = 0.01), RLP (26.8 vs. 44.8%, p = 0.04), and PLP (19.5 vs. 43.1%, p = 0.02). There were no significant differences in complication rates.

CONCLUSION

 TMR can safely and effectively be performed at time of a through- and above-knee level amputation and improves pain outcomes.

TMR Using a Free Rectus Flap after Transhumeral Amputation

Targeted muscle reinnervation offers an approach to regain use of the affected extremity through electronic prosthesis while limiting phantom pain and neuroma limb production or pain. In this case report, we present the first reported case of leveraging the rectus flap for targeted muscle reinnervation. The case herein is of a 28-year-old woman who sustained a severe right upper extremity crush injury while being involved in a vehicular roll-over collision requiring right transhumeral amputation. Plastic surgery, orthopedic surgery, and vascular surgery were consulted to manage the right upper extremity injury.

Targeted muscle reinnervation: A narrative review of a novel tool for the management of neuropathic pathology in major lower extremity amputations

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this narrative review is to provide the vascular surgery community with updated recommendations and information regarding the use of Targeted Muscle Reinnervation (TMR) for both the prevention and treatment of chronic pain and phantom limb pain occurring in patients after undergoing lower extremity amputation for peripheral artery disease.

METHODS

Current available literature discussing TMR is reviewed and included in the article in order to provide a succinct overview on the indications, clinical applications, and surgical technique for TMR. Additionally, early studies showing favorable long-term results after TMR are discussed. Patient consent for publication was obtained for this investigation.

RESULTS

TMR has been demonstrated to be an effective means of both treating and preventing neuroma-related symptoms including chronic pain and phantom limb pain. It has been proven to be technically feasible, and can help patients to have improved utilization of prostheses for ambulation, which can conceivably lead to a reduction in mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

TMR is an important tool to consider for any patient undergoing lower extremity amputation for a vascular-related indication. A vascular-plastic surgeon dual team approach is an effective means to prevent and reduce neuromas and associated chronic pain in this patient population.

Neuromuscular implants: Interfacing with skeletal muscle for improved clinical translation of prosthetic limbs

After an amputation, advanced prosthetic limbs can be used to interface with the nervous system and restore motor function. Despite numerous breakthroughs in the field, many of the recent research advancements have not been widely integrated into clinical practice. This review highlights recent innovations in neuromuscular implants-specifically those that interface with skeletal muscle-which could improve the clinical translation of prosthetic technologies. Skeletal muscle provides a physiologic gateway to harness and amplify signals from the nervous system. Recent surgical advancements in muscle reinnervation surgeries leverage the "bio-amplification" capabilities of muscle, enabling more intuitive control over a greater number of degrees of freedom in prosthetic limbs than previously achieved. We anticipate that state-of-the-art implantable neuromuscular interfaces that integrate well with skeletal muscle and novel surgical interventions will provide a long-term solution for controlling advanced prostheses. Flexible electrodes are expected to play a crucial role in reducing foreign body responses and improving the longevity of the interface. Additionally, innovations in device miniaturization and ongoing exploration of shape memory polymers could simplify surgical procedures for implanting such interfaces. Once implanted, wireless strategies for powering and transferring data from the interface can eliminate bulky external wires, reduce infection risk, and enhance day-to-day usability. By outlining the current limitations of neuromuscular interfaces along with potential future directions, this review aims to guide continued research efforts and future collaborations between engineers and specialists in the field of neuromuscular and musculoskeletal medicine.

Secondary Trigger Point Deactivation Surgery for Nerve Compression Headaches: A Scoping Review

Background

Primary trigger point deactivation surgery has been successful in reducing or eliminating nerve compression headaches between 79% and 90% of the time. The aim of this review article was to discuss the factors that contribute to index trigger point deactivation surgery failure, the importance of reevaluating trigger points following failure, and the options for secondary surgery.

Methods

A literature search was performed using a combination of keywords involving "chronic headache" and "nerve deactivation surgery," in databases until February 2023.

Results

Data of 1071 patients were evaluated and included (11 articles). The failure rate after index trigger point deactivation surgery occurs is approximately 12%, primarily due to incomplete primary trigger point deactivation. Secondary trigger points may not appear until the primary trigger is eliminated, which occurs in 17.8% of patients. Reevaluation of previously diagnosed trigger points as well as uncovered trigger points and additional preoperative testing is indicated to help determine candidacy for further surgical deactivation. To address scarring that could contribute to failure, corticosteroid injection, acellular dermal matrix, adipofascial fat, or expanded polytetrafluoroethylene sleeves have been described with beneficial effects. For neuroma management, regenerative peripheral nerve interface, targeted muscle reinnervation, a combination of both, relocation nerve grafting, or nerve capping have also been described. Neurectomy can be performed when patients prefer anesthesia and/or paresthesia over current pain symptoms.

Conclusion

Secondary trigger point deactivation surgery is indicated when there is suspicion of incomplete deactivation, internal scarring, neuroma, or newly-diagnosed trigger points.