1
|
Vu MM, Franko JJ, Buzadzhi A, Prey B, Rusev M, Lavery M, Rashidi L. Ambulatory Robotic Colectomy: Factors Affecting and Affected by Postoperative Opioid Use. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2024; 34:163-170. [PMID: 38363851 DOI: 10.1097/sle.0000000000001263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2023] [Accepted: 10/04/2023] [Indexed: 02/18/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The ongoing opioid crisis demands an investigation into the factors driving postoperative opioid use. Ambulatory robotic colectomies are an emerging concept in colorectal surgery, but concerns persist surrounding adequate pain control for these patients who are discharged very early. We sought to identify key factors affecting recovery room opioid use (ROU) and additional outpatient opioid prescriptions (AOP) after ambulatory robotic colectomies. METHODS This was a single-institution retrospective review of ambulatory robotic colon resections performed between 2019 and 2022. Patients were included if they discharged on the same day (SDD) or postoperative day 1 (POD1). Outcomes of interest included ROU [measured in parenteral morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs)], AOP (written between PODs 2 to 7), postoperative emergency department presentations, and readmissions. RESULTS Two hundred nineteen cases were examined, 48 of which underwent SDD. The mean ROU was 29.4 MME, and 8.7% of patients required AOP. Between SDD and POD1 patients, there were no differences in postoperative emergency department presentations, readmissions, recovery opioid use, or additional outpatient opioid scripts. Older age was associated with a lower ROU (-0.54 MME for each additional year). Older age, a higher body mass index, and right-sided colectomies were also more likely to use zero ROU. Readmissions were strongly associated with lower ROU. Among SDD patients, lower ROU was also associated with higher rates of AOP. CONCLUSION Ambulatory robotic colectomies and SDD can be performed with low opioid use and readmission rates. Notably, we found an association between low ROU and more readmission, and, in some cases, higher AOP. This suggests that adequate pain control during the postoperative recovery phase is a crucial component of reducing these negative outcomes.
Collapse
|
2
|
van der Veen A, Ramaekers M, Marsman M, Brenkman HJF, Seesing MFJ, Luyer MDP, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, Stoot JHMB, Tegels JJW, Wijnhoven BPL, de Steur WO, Kouwenhoven EA, Wassenaar EB, Draaisma WA, Gisbertz SS, van der Peet DL, May AM, Ruurda JP, van Hillegersberg R. Pain and Opioid Consumption After Laparoscopic Versus Open Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of a Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial (LOGICA-Trial). J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 27:2057-2067. [PMID: 37464143 PMCID: PMC10579125 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-023-05728-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2022] [Accepted: 05/01/2023] [Indexed: 07/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic gastrectomy could reduce pain and opioid consumption, compared to open gastrectomy. However, it is difficult to judge the clinical relevance of this reduction, since these outcomes are reported in few randomized trials and in limited detail. METHODS This secondary analysis of a multicenter randomized trial compared laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for resectable gastric adenocarcinoma (cT1-4aN0-3bM0). Postoperative pain was analyzed by opioid consumption in oral morphine equivalents (OME, mg/day) at postoperative day (POD) 1-5, WHO analgesic steps, and Numeric Rating Scales (NRS, 0-10) at POD 1-10 and discharge. Regression and mixed model analyses were performed, with and without correction for epidural analgesia. RESULTS Between 2015 and 2018, 115 patients in the laparoscopic group and 110 in the open group underwent surgery. Some 16 patients (14%) in the laparoscopic group and 73 patients (66%) in the open group received epidural analgesia. At POD 1-3, mean opioid consumption was 131, 118, and 53 mg OME lower in the laparoscopic group, compared to the open group, respectively (all p < 0.001). After correcting for epidural analgesia, these differences remained significant at POD 1-2 (47 mg OME, p = 0.002 and 69 mg OME, p < 0.001, respectively). At discharge, 27% of patients in the laparoscopic group and 43% patients in the open group used oral opioids (p = 0.006). Mean highest daily pain scores were between 2 and 4 at all PODs, < 2 at discharge, and did not relevantly differ between treatment arms. CONCLUSION In this multicenter randomized trial, postoperative pain was comparable between laparoscopic and open gastrectomy. After laparoscopic gastrectomy, this was generally achieved without epidural analgesia and with fewer opioids. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT02248519.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arjen van der Veen
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100 G04.228, 3508 GA, Utrecht, Netherlands.
| | - Mark Ramaekers
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands
| | - Marije Marsman
- Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Hylke J F Brenkman
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100 G04.228, 3508 GA, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Maarten F J Seesing
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100 G04.228, 3508 GA, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Misha D P Luyer
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands
| | | | - Jan H M B Stoot
- Department of Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen and Sittard-Geleen, Netherlands
| | - Juul J W Tegels
- Department of Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen and Sittard-Geleen, Netherlands
| | - Bas P L Wijnhoven
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Wobbe O de Steur
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | | | | | - Werner A Draaisma
- Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, Netherlands
| | - Suzanne S Gisbertz
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Donald L van der Peet
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Anne M May
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Jelle P Ruurda
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100 G04.228, 3508 GA, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Richard van Hillegersberg
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100 G04.228, 3508 GA, Utrecht, Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Baamer RM, Humes DJ, Toh LS, Knaggs RD, Lobo DN. Predictors of persistent postoperative opioid use following colectomy: a population-based cohort study from England. Anaesthesia 2023; 78:1081-1092. [PMID: 37265223 PMCID: PMC10953341 DOI: 10.1111/anae.16055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/29/2023] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
This retrospective cohort study on adults undergoing colectomy from 2010 to 2019 used linked primary (Clinical Practice Research Datalink), and secondary (Hospital Episode Statistics) care data to determine the prevalence of persistent postoperative opioid use following colectomy, stratified by pre-admission opioid exposure, and identify associated predictors. Based on pre-admission opioid exposure, patients were categorised as opioid-naïve, currently exposed (opioid prescription 0-6 months before admission) and previously exposed (opioid prescription within 7-12 months before admission). Persistent postoperative opioid use was defined as requiring an opioid prescription within 90 days of discharge, along with one or more opioid prescriptions 91-180 days after hospital discharge. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to obtain odds ratios for predictors of persistent postoperative opioid use. Among the 93,262 patients, 15,081 (16.2%) were issued at least one opioid prescription within 90 days of discharge. Of these, 6791 (45.0%) were opioid-naïve, 7528 (49.9%) were currently exposed and 762 (5.0%) were previously exposed. From the whole cohort, 7540 (8.1%) developed persistent postoperative opioid use. Patients with pre-operative opioid exposure had the highest persistent use: 5317 (40.4%) from the currently exposed group; 305 (9.8%) from the previously exposed group; and 1918 (2.5%) from the opioid-naïve group. The odds of developing persistent opioid use were higher among individuals who used long-acting opioid formulations in the 180 days before colectomy than those who used short-acting formulations (odds ratio 3.41 (95%CI 3.07-3.77)). Predictors of persistent opioid use included: previous opioid exposure; high deprivation index; multiple comorbidities; use of long-acting opioids; white race; and open surgery. Minimally invasive surgical approaches were associated with lower odds of persistent opioid use and may represent a modifiable risk factor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R. M. Baamer
- Division of Pharmacy Practice and Policy, School of PharmacyUniversity of NottinghamNottinghamUK
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of PharmacyKing Abdulaziz UniversityJeddahSaudi Arabia
| | - D. J. Humes
- Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre and National Institute for Health Research Nottingham Biomedical Research CentreNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical CentreNottinghamUK
| | - L. S. Toh
- Division of Pharmacy Practice and Policy, School of PharmacyUniversity of NottinghamNottinghamUK
| | - R. D. Knaggs
- Division of Pharmacy Practice and Policy, School of PharmacyUniversity of NottinghamNottinghamUK
- Pain Centre Versus ArthritisUniversity of NottinghamNottinghamUK
| | - D. N. Lobo
- Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre and National Institute for Health Research Nottingham Biomedical Research CentreNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical CentreNottinghamUK
- David Greenfield Metabolic Physiology Unit, MRC Versus Arthritis Centre for Musculoskeletal Ageing ResearchSchool of Life SciencesUniversity of Nottingham, Queen's Medical CentreNottinghamUK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Check DK, Avecilla RAV, Mills C, Dinan MA, Kamal AH, Murphy B, Rezk S, Winn A, Oeffinger KC. Opioid Prescribing and Use Among Cancer Survivors: A Mapping Review of Observational and Intervention Studies. J Pain Symptom Manage 2022; 63:e397-e417. [PMID: 34748896 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.10.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2021] [Revised: 10/22/2021] [Accepted: 10/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Recent years show a sharp increase in research on opioid use among cancer survivors, but evidence syntheses are lacking, leaving knowledge gaps. Corresponding research needs are unclear. OBJECTIVES To provide an evidence synthesis. METHODS We searched PubMed and Embase, identifying articles related to cancer, and opioid prescribing/use published through September 2020. We screened resulting titles/abstracts. Relevant studies underwent full-text review. Inclusion criteria were quantitative examination of and primary focus on opioid prescribing or use, and explicit inclusion of cancer survivors. Exclusion criteria included end-of-life opioid use and opioid use as a secondary or downstream outcome (for intervention studies). We extracted information on the opioid-related outcome(s) examined (including definitions and terminology used), study design, and methods. RESULTS Research returned 16,591 articles; 296 were included. Only 22 of 296 studies evaluated an intervention. There were 105 studies evaluating outcomes indicative of potentially high-risk, nonrecommended, or avoidable opioid use, e.g., continuous use-described as chronic use, prolonged use, and persistent use (n = 17); use after completion of curative-intent treatment-described as chronic opioid use, long-term opioid use, persistent opioid use, prolonged opioid use, continued opioid use, late opioid use, post-treatment opioid use (n = 27); use of opioids concurrent with other potentially high-risk medications (n = 13), and opioid misuse (n = 14). CONCLUSIONS We found lack of consistency in the measurement of and terms used to describe similar opioid use outcomes, and a lack of interventional research targeting well-documented patterns of potentially nonrecommended, potentially avoidable, or potentially high-risk opioid prescribing or use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Devon K Check
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine (D.K.C.), Durham, North Carolina; Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Cente (D.K.C., R.A.A., C.M., A.H.K., K.C.O.), Durham, North Carolina.
| | - Renee A V Avecilla
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Cente (D.K.C., R.A.A., C.M., A.H.K., K.C.O.), Durham, North Carolina
| | - Coleman Mills
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Cente (D.K.C., R.A.A., C.M., A.H.K., K.C.O.), Durham, North Carolina
| | - Michaela A Dinan
- Department of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health (M.A.D.), New Haven, Connecticut; Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy and Effectiveness Research (COPPER) Center, Yale Cancer Center (M.A.D.), New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Arif H Kamal
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Cente (D.K.C., R.A.A., C.M., A.H.K., K.C.O.), Durham, North Carolina; Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center (A.H.K.), Durham, North Carolina
| | - Beverly Murphy
- Duke University Medical Center Library & Archives, Duke University School of Medicine (B.M.), Durham, North Carolina
| | - Salma Rezk
- Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy (S.R.), Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Aaron Winn
- School of Pharmacy, Medical College of Wisconsin (A.W.), Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Kevin C Oeffinger
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Cente (D.K.C., R.A.A., C.M., A.H.K., K.C.O.), Durham, North Carolina; Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine (K.C.O.), Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|