The role of lymphadenectomy in esophageal cancer. Ann Surg. 2009;250:206-209. [PMID: 19638911 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0b013e3181b16cd1]

The Impact of D2 Versus D1 Lymphadenectomy in Siewert II Gastroesophageal Junction (GEJ) Cancer

BACKGROUND

Although multiple treatment options exist for gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer, surgery remains the mainstay for potential cure. Extended nodal dissection with a D2 lymphadenectomy (LAD) remains controversial for Siewert II GEJ cancer. Although D2 LAD may lead to a greater lymph node harvest, its effect on survival remains elusive. The authors hypothesized that additional D2 dissection in Siewert II GEJ cancer does not lead to increased survival.

METHODS

This study reviewed Siewert II patients who received a D1 or D2 LAD in addition to minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) after receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiation or perioperative chemotherapy (2012-2022). The patients were followed for up to 5 years. The outcomes measured were survival, number of nodes sampled, and operative time. The association between D1 or D2 LAD and overall survival was analyzed with Kaplan-Meier methods and a multivariable Cox regression model.

RESULTS

Among 155 patients, 74 % underwent D1 and 26 % underwent D2 LAD. The patients with D2 had more than 15 lymph nodes harvested more frequently than those who had D1 (83 % vs 48 %; p < 0.001), with no difference in positive nodes (2.8 ± 5.2 vs 2.1 ± 4.2; p = 0.4). The patients with D2 LAD had a longer median operative time than those who with D1 LAD (362 vs 244 min; p < 0.001). In Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox regression models, overall survival did not differ significantly between the patients undergoing D2 and those who had D1 (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.52; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.25-1.00; p = 0.067).

CONCLUSIONS

Little consensus exists regarding the optimal lymph node harvest for GEJ cancers. In Siewert II cancer, D2 LAD may not be mandatory and may lead to increased operative morbidity with no significant difference in survival.

Survival benefit of surgery for second primary esophageal cancer following gastrointestinal cancer: a population-based study

BACKGROUND

The incidence of second primary malignancy is increasing. However, although there is some information on second primary esophageal cancer (SPEC) itself, there is no study or guideline on the use of surgery for SPEC after gastrointestinal cancer (SPEC-GC). Thus, this study aimed to gather evidence for the benefits of surgery by analyzing a national cohort and determining the prognostic factors and clinical treatment decisions for SPEC-GC.

METHODS

Data for patients with SPEC-GC were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2000 and 2019. The prognostic factors of SPEC-GC were investigated by stepwise Cox proportional hazards regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses for overall survival and cancer-specific survival.

RESULTS

A total of 8308 patients with SPEC were selected, including 582 patients with SPEC-GC. Multivariate analysis revealed that surgery, year of diagnosis, scope of regional lymph node surgery, tumor differentiation grade, SEER historic stage, and triple therapy were significant predictors of survival outcomes (P < .05). Surgery seemed to improve the prognosis of patients with SPEC-GC significantly compared with no surgery and chemoradiotherapy (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgery should be considered as the main treatment for SPEC-GC. Surgery, year of diagnosis, scope of regional lymph node surgery, tumor differentiation grade, SEER historic stage, and triple therapy were found to be independent prognostic factors for these patients. These factors should be considered in the clinical diagnosis and treatment of SPEC-GC.

Single-cell transcriptomics provide insight into metastasis-related subsets of breast cancer

Breast cancer metastasis is a complex, multi-step process, with high cellular heterogeneity between primary and metastatic breast cancer, and more complex interactions between metastatic cancer cells and other cells in the tumor microenvironment. High-resolution single-cell transcriptome sequencing technology can visualize the heterogeneity of malignant and non-malignant cells in the tumor microenvironment in real time, especially combined with spatial transcriptome analysis, which can directly compare changes between different stages of metastatic samples. Therefore, this study takes single-cell analysis as the first perspective to deeply explore special or rare cell subpopulations related to breast cancer metastasis, systematically summarizes their functions, molecular features, and corresponding treatment strategies, which will contribute to accurately identify, understand, and target tumor metastasis-related driving events, provide a research basis for the mechanistic study of breast cancer metastasis, and provide new clues for its personalized precision treatment.

Short-term and long-term effects of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury after robotic esophagectomy

BACKGROUND

Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) was reported to have superiority in upper mediastinal lymph nodes dissection than traditional approach, but related injuries to recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLNI) cannot be avoided. Considering that there is no study centering on RLNI during robotic manipulation, this study aimed to investigate the impact of RLNI on the short-term and long-term outcomes after RAMIE.

METHODS

Patients with esophageal cancer (EC) who underwent RAMIE from June 2015 to July 2019 were collated from a prospectively maintained database. Short-term and long-term outcomes of RLNI were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 409 patients were included with the incidence of RLNI being 18.6% (76/409). A higher rate of postoperative pulmonary complications including pneumonia (P < 0.001) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) (P = 0.041) was associated with RLNI, requiring more interventions for bronchoscopy airway suction (P < 0.001), tracheal reintubation (P = 0.013) and tracheostomy (P < 0.001). Patients with RLNI had a prolonged length of hospitalization and intensive care unit (ICU) stay (P < 0.001). With the median follow-up time of 48.7 (interquartile range [IQR]:27.6-60.9) months, recurrence in regional lymph nodes at mediastinum did not differ between groups (P = 0.351). Similarly, the Kaplan-Meier curves revealed no significant divergency for overall survival after RLNI (P = 0.452).

CONCLUSIONS

RLNI after robotic esophagectomy is a serious morbidity associated with an increased rate of pulmonary complications, prolonged length of hospitalization with limited influence on long-term prognosis.

Impact of Lymph Node Dissection on Survival After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: From the Results of NEOCRTEC5010, a Randomized Multicenter Study

OBJECTIVE

To clarify whether systemic LND influences the safety of surgery and the survival of patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Prognostic impact of systemic lymphadenectomy during surgery after nCRT for ESCC is still uncertain and requires clarification.

METHODS

This is a secondary analysis of NEOCRTEC5010 trial which compared nCRT followed by surgery versus surgery alone for locally advanced ESCC. Relationship between number of LND and perioperative, recurrence, and survival outcomes were analyzed in the nCRT group.

RESULTS

Three-year overall survival was significantly better in the nCRT group than the S group (75.2% vs 61.5%; P = 0.011). In the nCRT group, greater number of LND was associated with significantly better overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.358; P < 0.001) and disease-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.415; P = 0.001), but without any negative impact on postoperative complications. Less LND (<20 vs ≥20) was significantly associated with increased local recurrence (18.8% vs 5.2%, P = 0.004) and total recurrence rates (41.2% vs 25.8%, P = 0.027). Compared to patients with persistent nodal disease, significantly better survival was seen in patients with complete response and with LND ≥20, but not in those with LND <20.

CONCLUSIONS

Systemic LND does not increase surgical risks after nCRT in ESCC patients. And it is associated with better survival and local diseasecontrol. Therefore, systemic lymphadenectomy should still be considered as an integrated part of surgery after nCRT for ESCC.

Application of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring (IONM) of the Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve during Esophagectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy (RLNP) is a common and severe complication of esophagectomy in esophageal cancer (EC). Several studies explored the application of intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) in esophagectomy to prevent RLNP. The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the value of IONM in esophagectomy for EC.

METHODS

an electronic of the literature using Google Scholar, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science (data up to October 2022) was conducted and screened to compare IONM-assisted and conventional non-IONM-assisted esophagectomy. RLNP, the number of mediastinal lymph nodes (LN) dissected, aspiration, pneumonia, chylothorax, anastomotic leakage, the number of total LN dissected, postoperative hospital stay and total operation time were evaluated using Review Manager 5.4.1.

RESULT

ten studies were ultimately included, with a total of 949 patients from one randomized controlled trial and nine retrospective case-control studies in the meta-analysis. The present study demonstrated that IONM reduced the incidence of RLNP(Odds Ratio (OR) 0.37, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.26-0.52) and pneumonia (OR 0.58, 95%CI 0.41-0.82) and was associated with more mediastinal LN dissected (Weighted Mean Difference (WMD) 4.75, 95%CI 3.02-6.48) and total mediastinal LN dissected (WMD 5.47, 95%CI 0.39-10.56). In addition, IONM does not increase the incidence of aspiration (OR 0.4, 95%CI 0.07-2.51), chylothorax (OR 0.55, 95%CI 0.17-1.76), and anastomotic leakage (OR 0.78, 95%CI 0.48-1.27) and does not increase the total operative time (WMD -12.33, 95%CI -33.94-9.28) or postoperative hospital stay (WMD -2.07 95%CI -6.61-2.46) after esophagectomy.

CONCLUSION

IONM showed advantages for preventing RLNP and pneumonia and was associated with more mediastinal and total LN dissected in esophagectomy. IONM should be recommended for esophagectomy.

Clinical significance and outcomes of bilateral and unilateral recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph node dissection in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A large-scale retrospective cohort study

Background

The survival benefits of recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph node dissection (RLNLD) in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) are still under debate, and the prognostic value of unilateral RLNLD has been rarely studied. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to investigate the clinical significance and outcomes of RLNLD in ESCC in a large‐scale cohort study, to shed light on the outcomes of unilateral RLNLD, and to identify the factors that affect the prognostic outcome of RLNLD.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 1153 patients with thoracic ESCC who underwent right thoracotomy with lymphadenectomy. The impact of RLNLD on disease‐free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method and Cox proportional hazard models. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was performed to adjust for differences in baseline variables in pairwise comparisons. Subgroup analysis of survival and postoperative complications was conducted for selective RLNLD.

Results

RLN lymph node (LN) metastasis was independently associated with tumor location and most other LN station metastases. RLNLD was an independent prognostic factor for DFS and OS. Both patients who underwent unilateral and bilateral RLNLD had significantly better DFS and OS than the non‐RLNLD patients. Furthermore, pairwise comparisons with IPTW confirmed these results, and we found that patients who underwent bilateral RLNLD had better survival than those who underwent unilateral RLNLD. However, subgroup analysis showed that there was no survival benefit and higher morbidity after bilateral RLNLD for patients with cancer in the lower thoracic esophagus, and elderly and female patients.

Conclusion

RLN LN metastasis is very frequent in ESCC, and both unilateral and bilateral RLNLD have considerable survival benefits. Selective RLNLD with better survival and lower morbidity was recommend for some defined subgroups.

Prognostic impact of lymph node harvest for patients with node-negative esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a large-scale multicenter study

Background

We examined the association between the number of resected lymph nodes and survival to determine the optimal lymphadenectomy for thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients with negative lymph node.

Methods

We included 1,836 patients from Chinese three high-volumed hospitals with corresponding clinicopathological characters such as gender, age, tumor location, tumor grade and TNM stage of patients. The median follow-up of included patients was 45.7 months (range, 1.03-117.3 months). X-Tile plot was used to identify the lowest number of lymphadenectomy. The multivariate model's construction was in use of parameters with clinical significance for survival and a nomogram based on clinical variable with P<0.05 in Cox regression analysis. Both two models were validated using a cohort extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 18 registries database between 1975 and 2016 (n=951).

Results

More lymphadenectomy numbers were significantly associated with better survival in patients both in training cohort [hazard ratio (HR) =0.980; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.971-0.988; P<0.001] and validation cohort (HR =0.980; 95% CI: 0.968-0.991; P=0.001). Cut-off point analysis determined the lowest number of 9 for thoracic ESCC patients in N0 stage through training cohort (C-index: 0.623; sensitivity: 80.7%; 1 - specificity: 72.5%) when compared with 10 in validation cohort (C-index: 0.643; sensitivity: 78.2%; 1 - specificity: 63.0%). The cut-off points of 9 were examined in training cohort and validated in the divided cohort from validation cohort (all P<0.05). Meanwhile, nomograms for both cohorts were constructed and the calibration curves for both cohorts agreed well with the actual observations in terms of predicting 3- and 5-year survival, respectively.

Conclusions

Larger number for lymphadenectomy was associated with better survival in thoracic ESCC patients in N0 stage. Nine was what we got as the lowest number for lymphadenectomy in pN0 ESCC patients through this study, and our result should be confirmed further.

Comprehensive analysis of prognostic value of lymph node classifications in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a large real-world multicenter study

Background:

We aim to assess the prognostic ability of three common lymph node–based staging algorithms, namely, the number of positive lymph nodes (pN), the lymph node ratio (LNR), and log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

Methods:

A total of 3902 ESCC patients treated at 10 Chinese institutions between 2003 and 2013 were included, along with 2465 patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The prognostic ability of the aforementioned algorithms was evaluated using time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (tdROC) curves, R², Harrell’s concordance index (C-index), and the likelihood ratio chi-square score. The primary outcomes included cancer-specific survival (CSS), overall survival (OS), and CSS with a competing risk of death by non-ESCC causes.

Results:

LODDS had better prognostic performance than pN or LNR in both continuous and stratified patterns. In the multicenter cohort, the multivariate analysis showed that the model based on LODDS classification was superior to the others in predictive accuracy and discriminatory capacity. Two nomograms integrating LODDS classification and other clinicopathological risk factors associated with OS as well as cancer-specific mortality were constructed and validated in the SEER database. Finally, a novel TN_LODDS classification which incorporates the LODDS classification was built and categorized patients in to three new stages.

Conclusion:

Among the three lymph node–based staging algorithms, LODDS demonstrated the highest discriminative capacity and prognostic accuracy for ESCC patients. The nomograms and novel TN_LODDS classification based on LODDS classification could serve as precise evaluation tools to assist clinicians in estimating the survival time of individual patients and improving clinical outcomes postoperatively in the future.

Learning curve for minimally invasive oesophagectomy of oesophageal cancer and survival analysis

PURPOSE

Minimally invasive oesophagectomy is a technically demanding procedure, and the learning curve for this procedure should be explored. A survival analysis should also be performed.

METHODS

A total of 214 consecutive patients who underwent minimally invasive oesophagectomy were retrospectively reviewed. To evaluate the development of thoracoscopic-laparoscopic oesophagectomy and compare mature minimally invasive oesophagectomy and open oesophagectomy, we comprehensively studied the clinical and surgical parameters. The cumulative sum (CUSUM) plot was used to evaluate the learning curve for systemic lymphadenectomy. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was performed to explore the clinical factors affecting survival.

RESULTS

The bleeding volume, operation time, and postoperative mortality within 3 months significantly decreased after 20 patients. The rise point for node dissection was visually determined to occur at patient 57 in the CUSUM plots. Patients who underwent mature thoracoscopic-laparoscopic oesophagectomy had better surgical data and short-term benefits than patients who underwent an open procedure. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis showed that the maximum diameter of the tumour cross-sectional area and the number of positive nodes significantly influenced survival.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that thoracoscopic-laparoscopic oesophagectomy has short-term benefits. There was no evidence that it was associated with a significantly better prognosis for patients with oesophageal cancer. ClinicalTrials Gov ID: NCT04217239; January 2, 2020 retrospectively registered.

Dataset for the reporting of carcinoma of the esophagus in resection specimens: recommendations from the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

A standardized data set for esophageal carcinoma pathology reporting was developed based on the approach of the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR) for the purpose of improving cancer patient outcomes and international benchmarking in cancer management.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The ICCR convened a multidisciplinary international expert panel to identify the best evidence-based clinical and pathological parameters for inclusion in the data set for esophageal carcinoma. The data set incorporated the current edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Tumours of the Digestive System, and Tumour-Node-Metastasis staging systems.

RESULTS

The scope of the data set encompassed resection specimens of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction with tumor epicenter ≤20 mm into the proximal stomach. Core reporting elements included information on neoadjuvant therapy, operative procedure used, tumor focality, tumor site, tumor dimensions, distance of tumor to resection margins, histological tumor type, presence and type of dysplasia, tumor grade, extent of invasion in the esophagus, lymphovascular invasion, response to neoadjuvant therapy, status of resection margin, ancillary studies, lymph node status, distant metastases, and pathological staging. Additional non-core elements considered useful to report included clinical information, specimen dimensions, macroscopic appearance of tumor, and coexistent pathology.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first international peer-reviewed structured reporting data set for surgically resected specimens of the esophagus. The ICCR carcinoma of the esophagus data set is recommended for routine use globally and is a valuable tool to support standardized reporting, to benefit patient care by providing diagnostic and prognostic best-practice parameters.

Examined lymph node count is not associated with prognosis in elderly patients with pN0 thoracic esophageal cancer

The purpose of this study was to determine whether the number of lymph nodes dissected predicts prognosis in surgically treated elderly patients with pN0 thoracic esophageal cancer. We searched the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database and identified the records of younger (<75 years) and older (≥75 years) patients with pN0 thoracic esophageal cancer between 1998 and 2015. The patient characteristics, tumor data, and postoperative variables were analyzed in this study. The Kaplan-Meier method and a Cox proportional hazard model were used to compare overall and cause-specific survival. Data from 1,792 esophageal cancer patients (older: n = 295; younger: n = 1497) were included. The survival analysis showed that the overall and cause-specific survival in the patients with ≥15 examined lymph nodes (eLNs) was significantly superior to that in the patients with 1 to 14 eLNs (P < .001); however, the difference disappeared in the older patients. After stratification by the tumor location, histology, pT classification, and differentiation between the younger and older cohorts to analyze the association between eLNs and survival, we found that the differences remained significant in most subgroups in the younger cohort. There were no differences in any subgroups of older patients. This study replicated the previously identified finding that long-term survival in patients with extensive lymphadenectomy was significantly superior to that in patients with less extensive lymphadenectomy. However, less extensive lymphadenectomy may be an acceptable treatment modality for elderly patients with pN0 thoracic esophageal cancer.

Optimal Range of Lymphadenectomy in Pathological Stage T1 and T2 Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Lymph node metastasis is a primary contributor to tumor progression in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), and the optimal extent of lymphadenectomy during esophagectomy remains controversial. This study aimed to investigate the appropriate number of lymph nodes to be dissected in pT1-2Nany stage ESCC to achieve the best prognosis and avoid missing positive lymph nodes (PLNs).

METHODS

A total of 497 patients with pT1 to pT2 esophageal cancer from two institutions were retrospectively analyzed and their surgical and pathological records were critically reviewed. Stepwise analyses were conducted by calculating a serial of hazard ratios and odd ratios to determine the optimal range of lymphadenectomy for overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

The best survival outcome can be obtained when the number of lymph node examined (NLNE) is 10-18 in pT1N0 ESCC, while the NLNE should exceed 24 in pT2N0 diseases. In patients with pT1-2Nany and pT2Nany ESCC, resection of 15-25 and 24-37 lymph nodes, respectively, could provide significant added value for identifying positive nodal metastasis. When the NLNE exceeds this appropriate range, resection of extra lymph node is not helpful to improve the probability of finding PLNs.

CONCLUSIONS

For ESCC patients undergoing radical esophagectomy, the optimal extent of lymphadenectomy is 15-25 for pT1Nany disease and 24-37 for pT2Nany disease.

The Prognostic Value of the Number of Negative Lymph Nodes Combined with Positive Lymph Nodes in Esophageal Cancer Patients: A Propensity-Matched Analysis

BACKGROUND

Currently, the number of negative lymph nodes (NLNs) has been paid increasing attention and is considered a prognostic indicator in diverse cancers. Therefore, it is necessary to explore the association between number of NLNs and prognosis in esophageal cancer (EC) patients.

METHODS

Our data were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results 18 database. The X-tile plot was used to determine the optimal cut-off value of the number of NLNs, and propensity score matching (PSM) was performed according to the results of the X-tile plot.

RESULTS

A total of 4777 patients were eligible, and 882 pairs of patients were included after PSM. The result of the X-tile plot revealed an optimal cut-off value of three NLNs. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed better EC-specific survival (ECSS) in patients with more than three NLNs (hazard ratio [HR] 0.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59-0.77; p < 0.001) compared with patients with three or fewer NLNs. A subgroup analysis revealed better ECSS in patients with more than three NLNs with one to two (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.46-0.71; p < 0.001) or three to six (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.50-0.92; p = 0.012) positive lymph nodes (PLNs).

CONCLUSIONS

More than three NLNs is associated with better survival in EC patients, especially when the number of PLNs is one to two or three to six. We confirm that the combination of the number of NLNs and number of PLNs can provide better prognostic guidance for EC.

Effect of lymph node examined count on accurate staging and survival of resected esophageal cancer

Background

We examined the association between numbers of lymph nodes examined (LNEs) and accurate staging and survival to determine the optimal LNE count during esophagectomy using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) cancer registry and the Department of Thoracic Surgery of a single institution (SI).

Methods

A total of 7356 EC patients met our inclusion criteria from the SEER database and 1275 patients from SI. We applied multivariate models to investigate the relationship between the LNE count and LN metastasis and cancer‐specific survival (CSS). Odds ratios (ORs) and hazard ratios (HRs) generated by the multivariate models were fitted with Locally Weighted Scatterplot Smoothing, and the structural breakpoints were determined by the Chow test.

Results

Higher numbers of LNEs were linked to a higher proportion of LN metastasis and better CSS in both cohorts. Cut‐point analysis determined a threshold of LNEs of 12 for adenocarcinoma and 14 for esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC) considering accurate staging, and 15 for adenocarcinoma and 14 for ESCC considering OS. The cut‐points for CSS were examined in the SEER database and validated in the divided cohort from SI (all P < 0.05).

Conclusion

A greater number of LNEs are significantly associated with more accurate N staging and better survival in EC patients. We recommend 15 and 14 as the threshold LNE counts for adenocarcinoma and ESCC patients, respectively.

Morbidity in open versus minimally invasive hybrid esophagectomy (MIOMIE): Long-term results of a randomized controlled clinical study

Background

The minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for esophageal cancer was introduced assuming a reduction of morbidity and operation time. After implementation of MIE at our institution, a randomized controlled trial was designed.

Methods

This is a prospective randomized controlled study comparing open (OE) and laparoscopic gastric tube (MIE) formation in Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. Primary endpoints were morbidity and 30-day mortality. Secondary endpoints included the duration of intensive care unit stay, length of hospital stay, operative time as well as relapse-free and overall survival.

Results

Twenty patients (76.9%) were male, median age was 63 years (40-77). Median operation time was 290 (215-385) minutes in OE and 292.5 (200-450) minutes in MIE group, p = 0.421. Major complications occurred in 4 (33.3%) patients in the OE group and in 6 (35.7%) patients in the MIE group. Anastomotic leakage was seen in 2 (16.6%) and 3 (21.4%) patients, respectively (OR 1.364; CI = 0.188-9.912; p = 0.759). Due to an alarming number of consecutive anastomotic leakages, the trial was stopped after inclusion of 26 patients. Median follow-up was 41.5 (1-62.6) months. 5‑year survival rate was 50%. Thirty-eight percent developed recurrence of disease in the study period. There was no significant difference in overall and relapse-free survival regarding the type of surgery.

Conclusion

This study shows that hybrid MIE is a feasible alternative for esophageal resection. Morbidity, mortality, and oncological long-term results were equal in both groups, but the interpretation has to be done carefully due to premature termination of the trial. Interrupting a trial because of patient benefit should not be a reason to discard results but rather to improve technical aspects and strive for novel studies.

Efficacy comparison of transcervical video-assisted mediastinoscopic lymphadenectomy combined with left transthoracic esophagectomy versus right transthoracic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer treatment

Background

This study aimed to propose a new surgical strategy, i.e., the transcervical video-assisted mediastinoscopic lymphadenectomy (VAMLA) with esophagectomy via the left transthoracic approach for patients with esophageal cancer (EC), and to compare the outcomes with those of esophagectomy via the right thoracic approach.

Methods

From December 2014 to March 2016, 49 cases were enrolled in this non-randomized concurrent control study. Twenty-eight patients with EC who underwent transcervical VAMLA with esophagectomy via the left transthoracic approach were assigned into the study group, while 21 EC patients undergoing esophagectomy via the right transthoracic approach during the same period were enrolled into the control group. Operative outcomes including operative time, the numbers of removed lymph nodes, intraoperative blood loss, the length of hospital stay, and postoperative complications in both groups were evaluated and compared.

Results

There were no significant differences in the baseline profiles between the two groups, and all patients in the two groups successfully underwent the surgery. There was a significant difference between transcervical VAMLA with esophagectomy via the left thoracic approach and esophagectomy via the right thoracic approach with regard to the number of all dissected lymph nodes [(29.0 ± 8.7) vs. (17.8 ± 8.1), p < 0.05], dissected superior mediastinal lymph nodes [(11.2 ± 5.0) vs. (3.7 ± 2.9), p < 0.05], and dissected in the recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph nodes [(5.6 ± 3.5) vs. (2.3 ± 2.1), p < 0.05]. No significant differences were observed in the operative time, intraoperative blood loss, length of postoperative hospital stay, number of dissected abdominal lymph nodes, postoperative pulmonary complications (pneumonia and atelectasis), anastomotic fistula, chylothorax, and vocal cord paralysis (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

Transcervical VAMLA combined with esophagectomy via the left thoracic approach appears technically feasible and safe and shows advantages in the number of dissected superior mediastinal lymph nodes, suggesting that it may serve as a new treatment option for patients with esophageal carcinoma.

Surgical Treatment of High-Grade Dysplasia and Early Esophageal Cancer

BACKGROUND

The treatment of early-stage esophageal cancer and high-grade dysplasia of the esophagus has changed significantly in recent years. Many early tumors that were traditionally treated with esophagectomy can now be resected with endoscopic therapy alone. These new endoscopic modalities can offer similar survival outcomes without the associated morbidity of a major operation. However, a number of these cases may still require surgical intervention as the best treatment option.

METHODS

The current scientific literature, national and international guidelines were reviewed for recommendations regarding optimal treatment of early esophageal malignancy.

RESULTS

The primary advantage of surgery over endoscopic treatment lies in the reduced risk of recurrence as well as the ability to assess harvested lymph nodes for regional disease. We recommend that esophageal tumors that have invaded into the submucosa (T1b) or beyond should be treated with an esophagectomy. In addition, dysplastic lesions and cancers that demonstrate poorly differentiated pathology or lymphovascular or perineural invasion should be surgically resected. Finally, large tumors, multifocal lesions, tumors within a long segment of Barrett's esophagus, tumors adjacent to a hiatal hernia, tumors that cannot be resected enbloc with endoscopic techniques should also be treated with an esophagectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

When performed at high-volume centers in experienced hands, esophagectomy can have consistently good outcomes for high-grade dysplasia and early esophageal cancers, and should be considered as a treatment option.

Quality and outcomes of synchronous two-team Ivor-Lewis oesophagectomy: Revisiting a variant technique

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

In 1975, a modification of popular two-stage Ivor-Lewis oesophagectomy was published with synchronous resection in chest and abdomen. As data on this technique are rare and inconsistent, we aimed to investigate safety, feasibility, and outcome of this approach.

METHODS

Outcome of 201 patients undergoing synchronous oesophagectomy from 2000 to 2013 was analysed retrospectively. Two groups (early: 2000-2006; late: 2007-2013) were analysed to allow comparison of outcome over time.

RESULTS

Patients in the later period had fewer respiratory comorbidities (P = 0.010), median blood loss decreased significantly over time while lymph node yield increased (P < 0.001). Overall complications occurred in 58.9 (early) versus 51.7% (late) of patients (P = 0.320), anastomotic leaks in 14.3 versus 6.7% (P = 0.112), respiratory complications in 48.2 versus 34.8% (P = 0.063). Thirty-day/90-day mortality was 2.7% versus 3.4, respectively, 8.1% versus 6.8% (P ≤ 0.793). Long-term survival was better in the later cohort (P = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data of 201 patients over a period of 14 years suggests that this technique is a quick, feasible, safe, and reasonable alternative to standard two-stage Ivor-Lewis oesophagectomy. Quality of this approach and ultimate outcomes have improved over time, with similar complication rates/outcomes to literature accepted standards for two-stage approach, especially in the later time period. J. Surg. Oncol. 2016;114:719-724. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph node dissection may not be suitable for all early stage esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients: an 8-year experience

BACKGROUND

Recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) injury is one of the most frequent postoperative complications of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) radical resection. This study aims to develop a novel scoring system to predict recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph node (RLNLN) metastases in early ESCC and explore the indications for precise RLN lymphadenectomy.

METHODS

Early stage ESCC patients from 2006 to 2014 were analyzed. Patient and pathologic characteristics were compared between patients with RLNLN metastases and those without. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to establish a scoring system that estimates the risks of RLNLN metastases. The indications for RLNLN dissection were validated by survival rate, postoperative complications, and metastases rate.

RESULTS

A total of 311 cases selected from 1,466 ESCC patients were divided into the dissection group and the control group. Age, tumor length, macroscopic tumor type, T stage, tumor location and tumor differentiation were independent predictors of RLNLN metastases. The weighted scoring system included age (+2 for <56 years), tumor length (+2 for over 4.45 cm), tumor location (+4 for upper thoracic, +2 for mid-thoracic) and macroscopic tumor type (+1 for advanced type). The total number of points estimated the probability of RLNLN metastases [low-risk (0-2 point), 0%; moderate-risk (3-4 points), 9.8%; and high-risk (>4 points), 43.4%]. Besides, the dissection group had more complications and similar survival rate when compared with the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

We developed a novel scoring system that accurately estimated the risk of RLNLN metastases in early ESCC patients. RLN lymphadenectomy may be safely omitted for the patients in the low-risk subgroup.

Optimal surgical approach for esophageal cancer in the era of minimally invasive esophagectomy and neoadjuvant therapy

The optimal surgical technique for the potentially curative treatment of patients with esophageal cancer is still under debate. The transhiatal esophagectomy (THE) with limited lymphadenectomy mainly focuses on a decrease of postoperative morbidity and mortality by preventing a formal thoracotomy. The transthoracic esophagectomy (TTE) with extended two-field lymphadenectomy attempts to improve the radicality of the resection and thus to increase locoregional tumor control, but is associated with increased postoperative morbidity. The recent introduction of different minimally invasive techniques probably decreases postoperative morbidity following TTE, with reduction of especially pulmonary complications, but high-quality evidence is still limited. It is widely agreed that extended lymphadenectomy as performed during TTE provides the benefit of more accurate staging, but its effect on improvement of survival is still debated. The literature on this topic is contradictory and the choice of surgical approach is primarily driven by personal opinions and institutional preferences. Moreover, the available evidence is mainly based on patients who underwent surgery alone without neoadjuvant therapy. Results of recent studies suggest that neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy abolishes any possibly positive effect of extended lymphadenectomy as performed during TTE on survival, but this effect should be confirmed in future research. This review gives an overview and reflects the authors' personal view on the role of TTE and THE in the treatment of potentially curative treatment of patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer in the era of minimally invasive esophagectomy and neoadjuvant treatment and outlines future research perspectives.

Lymph node dissection improved survival in patients with metastatic thoracic esophageal cancer: An analysis of 220 patients from the SEER database

BACKGROUND

To assess the clinical value of lymph node dissection and lymph node status in patients with metastatic thoracic esophageal cancer (MTEC).

METHODS

The Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database was used to identify patients with MTEC who had undergone esophagectomy from 2004 to 2012. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazard regression were used to identify factors significantly associated with overall survival.

RESULTS

A total 220 eligible patients were identified, 162 (73.6%) of which underwent lymph node dissection. The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year overall survival rates were 55.0%, 17.9%, and 9.2%, respectively; the median survival time was 13 months. Lymph node dissection was an independent prognostic factor of overall survival (hazard ratio: 0.527, 95% confidence interval: 0.377-0.736, p < 0.001). Patients who had undergone lymph node dissection had better overall survival than those who did not (1-year, 62.8% vs. 33.7%; 3-year, 21.4% vs. 7.9%). In patients who had undergone lymph node dissection, multivariate analysis determined that nodal stage was an independent prognostic factor. However, the extent of lymph node dissection was not associated with overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Lymph node dissection improves survival in patients with MTEC who undergo esophagectomy, and the current lymph node staging can be used as a prognostic factor in patients with MTEC.

Esophageal cancer: anatomic particularities, staging, and imaging techniques

Cancer of the esophagus is a tumor with aggressive behavior that is usually diagnosed in advanced stages. The absence of serosa allows it to spread quickly to neighboring mediastinal structures, and an extensive lymphatic drainage network facilitates tumor spread even in early stages. The current TNM classification, harmonized with the classification for gastric cancer, provides new definitions for the anatomic classification, adds non-anatomic characteristics of the tumor, and includes tumors of the gastroesophageal junction. Combining endoscopic ultrasound, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging provides greater accuracy in determining the initial clinical stage, and these imaging techniques play an essential role in the selection, planning, and evaluation of treatment. In this article, we review some particularities that explain the behavior of this tumor and we describe the current TNM staging system; furthermore, we discuss the different imaging tests available for its evaluation and include a diagnostic algorithm.

Prognostic nomogram integrated systemic inflammation score for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma undergoing radical esophagectomy

Growing evidence indicates that nomogram combined with the biomarkers of systemic inflammation response could provide more accurate prediction than conventional staging systems in tumors. This study aimed to establish an effective prognostic nomogram for resectable thoracic esophageal squamouscell carcinoma (ESCC) based on the clinicopathological parameters and inflammation-based prognostic scores. We retrospectively investigated 916 ESCC patients who underwent radical esophagectomy. The predictive accuracy and discriminative ability of the nomogram were determined by concordance index (C-index) and calibration curve, and compared with the 6^th and 7^th AJCC TNM classifications. The neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (NLR), C-reactive protein albumin (CRP/Alb) ratio, histological grade, T stage and modified N stage were integrated in the nomogram. The C-index of the nomogram for predicting the survival was 0.72, which showed better predictive ability of OS than the 6^th or 7^th TNM stages in the primary cohort (P < 0.001). The calibration curve showed high consistency between the nomogram and actual observation. The decision curve analysis showed more potential of clinical application of the prediction models compared with TNM staging system. Moreover, our findings were supported by the validation cohort. The proposed nomogram showed more accurate prognostic prediction for patients with ESCC after radical esophagectomy.

Three-dimensional vs two-dimensional video assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy for patients with esophageal cancer

AIM: To define the benefits of three-dimensional video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy (3D-VATE) over 2D-VATE for esophageal cancer.

METHODS: A total of 93 patients with esophageal cancer including 45 patients receiving 3D-VATE and 48 receiving 2D-VATE were evaluated. Data related to patient and cancer characteristics, operating time, intraoperative bleeding, morbidity and mortality, postoperative inflammatory markers, Numerical Rating Scale for postoperative pain, Constant-Murley rating system for shoulder recovery and oxygenation index (OI) were collected. All medical records were retrieved from a prospectively maintained oncological database at our institution. A retrospective study was performed to compare the short-term surgical outcomes between the two groups.

RESULTS: No significant differences were found between the two groups in either morbidity or mortality (P = 0.328). An enhanced surgical recovery was noted in the 3D group as indicated by shortened thoracoscopic operation time (3D vs 2D: 68 ± 13.79 min vs 83 ± 13 min, P < 0.01), minor intraoperative blood loss (3D vs 2D: 68.2 ± 10.7 mL vs 89.8 ± 10.4 mL, P < 0.01), earlier chest tube removal (3D vs 2D: 2.67 ± 1.01 vs 3.75 ± 1.15 d, P < 0.01), shorter length of hospital stay (3D vs 2D: 9.07 ± 2.00 vs 10.85 ± 3.40 d, P < 0.01), lower in-hospital expenses (3D vs 2D: 74968.4 ± 9637.8 vs 86211.1 ± 8519.7 RMB, P < 0.01), lower pain intensity (P < 0.01) and faster recovery of the left shoulder function (P < 0.01). Better preservation of the pulmonary function was also found in the 3D group as the decline of the OI post operation was significantly lower than that of the 2D group (P < 0.01). Changes of postoperative inflammatory markers, including procalcitonin [postoperative days (PODs) 4 and 7: P < 0.01], peripheral granulocytes (PODs 1, 4 and 7: P < 0.01) and hypersensitive C-reactive protein (POD 4: P < 0.01) in 3D-VATE patients were less than those in the 2D group. Moreover, utilization of the 3D technique extended the dissection of the thoracic lymph nodes (P < 0.01), with better exposure of nodes in the left recurrent laryngeal nerve (P = 0.031).

CONCLUSION: 3D-VATE could be a more viable technique over 2D-VATE in terms of short-term outcomes for patients with esophageal cancer.

Significance of lymph node metastasis in cancer dissemination of head and neck cancer

Lymph node metastasis (LNM) in many solid cancers is a well-known prognostic factor; however, it has been debated whether regional LNM simply reflects tumor aggressiveness or is a source for further tumor dissemination. Similarly, the metastatic process in head and neck cancer (HNC) has not been fully evaluated. Thus, we aimed to investigate the relative significance of LNM in metastatic cascade of HNC using functional imaging of HNC patients and molecular imaging in in vivo models. First, we analyzed ¹⁸Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET) parameters of 117 patients with oral cancer. The primary tumor and nodal PET parameters were measured separately, and survival analyses were conducted on the basis of clinical and PET variables to identify significant prognostic factors. In multivariate analyses, we found that only the metastatic node PET values were significant. Next, we compared the relative frequency of lung metastasis in primary ear tumors versus lymph node (LN) tumors, and we tested the rate of lung metastasis in another animal model, in which each animal had both primary and LN tumors that were expressing different colors. As a result, LN tumors showed higher frequencies of lung metastasis compared to orthotopic primary tumors. In color-matched comparisons, the relative contribution to lung metastasis was higher in LN tumors than in primary tumors, although both primary and LN tumors caused lung metastases. In summary, tumors growing in the LN microenvironment spread to systemic sites more commonly than primary tumors in HNC, suggesting that the adequate management of LNM can reduce further systemic metastasis.

Lymph node retrieval during esophagectomy with and without neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: prognostic and therapeutic impact on survival

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to examine the association between total number of resected nodes and survival in patients after esophagectomy with and without nCRT.

BACKGROUND

Most studies concerning the potentially positive effect of extended lymphadenectomy on survival have been performed in patients who underwent surgery alone. As nCRT is known to frequently "sterilize" regional nodes, it is unclear whether extended lymphadenectomy after nCRT is still useful.

METHODS

Patients from the randomized CROSS-trial who completed the entire protocol (ie, surgery alone or chemoradiotherapy + surgery) were included. With Cox regression models, we compared the impact of number of resected nodes as well as resected positive nodes on survival in both groups.

RESULTS

One hundred sixty-one patients underwent surgery alone, and 159 patients received multimodality treatment. The median (interquartile range) number of resected nodes was 18 (12-27) and 14 (9-21), with 2 (1-6) and 0 (0-1) resected positive nodes, respectively. Persistent lymph node positivity after nCRT had a greater negative prognostic impact on survival as compared with lymph node positivity after surgery alone. The total number of resected nodes was significantly associated with survival for patients in the surgery-alone arm (hazard ratio per 10 additionally resected nodes, 0.76; P=0.007), but not in the multimodality arm (hazard ratio 1.00; P=0.98).

CONCLUSIONS

The number of resected nodes had a prognostic impact on survival in patients after surgery alone, but its therapeutic value is still controversial. After nCRT, the number of resected nodes was not associated with survival. These data question the indication for maximization of lymphadenectomy after nCRT.

Effect of bilateral supraclavicular postoperative radiotherapy in middle and lower thoracic esophageal carcinoma

AIM: To evaluate whether postoperative radiotherapy is an alternative to neck lymph node surgery and if it provides a survival benefit for those receiving two-field, chest and abdomen, lymphadenectomy.

METHODS: A total of 530 cases with middle and lower thoracic esophageal carcinoma in our hospital from January 2008 to April 2009 were selected and analyzed, of which 219 cases received right chest, upper abdominal incision Ivor-Lewis surgery and simultaneously underwent mediastinal and abdominal two-field lymphadenectomy. If regional lymph node metastasis occurred within the recurrent laryngeal nerve, the patients would receive bilateral supraclavicular radiotherapy (DT = 5000cGy) to be adopted at postoperative 4-5 wk (Group A) or cervical lymphadenectomy at postoperative 3-4 wk (Group B). If there were no regional lymph node metastases within the recurrent laryngeal nerve, the patients only underwent two-field, chest and abdomen, lymphadenectomy (Group C).

RESULTS: In 219 cases who underwent two-field lymphadenectomy, 91 cases were diagnosed with regional lymph node metastasis within the recurrent laryngeal nerve. Of them, 48 cases received cervical radiotherapy, and 43 cases underwent staging lymphadenectomy; 128 patients were not given the follow-up treatment of cervical radiotherapy because there was no regional lymph node metastasis within the recurrent laryngeal nerve. Five-year survival rates in group A and B were 47% and 50%, respectively, with no statistical difference between them, and the rate in group C was 58%.

CONCLUSION: For patients with middle and lower thoracic esophageal carcinoma combined with lymph node metastasis within the recurrent laryngeal nerve, cervical radiotherapy can be a substitute for surgery and provide benefit.

A personal perspective on controversies in the surgical management of oesophageal cancer

Significant disagreement and debate persist regarding several aspects of the optimal surgical management of oesophageal cancer. We address some of these issues based on our consecutive series of 165 patients undergoing oesophageal resection (reported in full elsewhere) and the available literature. The areas considered are controversial but we argue in favour of a 'traditional' two-stage open approach (Ivor-Lewis), leaving the pylorus alone, making no attempt to perform a radical lymphadenectomy and fashioning a hand sewn anastomosis.

Does recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph node metastasis really affect the prognosis in node-positive patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the middle thoracic esophagus?

Background

Recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) lymph node metastasis used to be shown a predictor for poor prognosis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prognostic impact of RLN node metastasis and the number of metastatic lymph nodes in node-positive patients with squamous cell carcinoma of middle thoracic esophagus.

Methods

A cohort of 235 patients who underwent curative surgery for squamous cell carcinoma of middle thoracic esophagus was investigated. The prognostic impact was evaluated by univariate and multivariate analyses.

Results

Lymph node metastasis was found in 133 patients. Among them, 81 had metastatic RLN nodes, and 52 had at least one positive node but no RLN nodal involvement. The most significant difference in survival was detected between patients with metastatic lymph nodes below and above a cutoff value of six (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that the number of metastatic lymph nodes was a significant factor associated with overall survival (P < 0.001), but RLN lymph node metastasis was not (P = 0.865).

Conclusions

RLN Lymph node metastasis is not, but the number of metastatic nodes is a prognostic predictor in node-positive patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the middle thoracic esophagus.

Role of right upper mediastinal lymph node metastasis in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after tri-incisional esophagectomies

BACKGROUND

Whereas standard (infracarinal) mediastinal lymphadenectomy refers to the clearance of lymph nodes in the middle and lower posterior mediastinum, extension along right side of trachea and upper mediastinum is termed extended lymphadenectomy. The benefit of an extended versus standard lymphadenectomy in esophageal cancer is unclear.

METHODS

The clinicopathologic data of 391 patients undergoing tri-incisional esophagectomy (McKeown type) for squamous cell carcinoma between 1995 and 2007 were analyzed retrospectively. There were 136 and 255 patients in the infracarinal and extended mediastinal lymphadenectomy groups, respectively. The outcome of these two groups and the clinical importance of right upper mediastinum lymph node metastases (LNM) were investigated.

RESULTS

Both groups were comparable in clinicopathologic characteristics except tumor length (infracarinal vs extended group, 4.6 vs 5.2 cm, P = .023) and lymph node status. The 5-year overall survival rates were 29.7% and 27.3%, in the infracarinal and extended groups, respectively (P = .065). In the extended group, the factors correlated to right upper mediastinal LNM included neck LNM (hazard ratio [HR] 2.621, P = .029), abdominal LNM (HR 2.218, P = .016), and tumor locating in the upper/middle third of esophagus (HR 2.781, P = .014). The independent prognostic factors for overall survival included right upper mediastinal LNM (HR 1.964, P < .001), lower mediastinal LNM (HR 1.391, P = .039), and abdominal LNM (HR 1.538, P = .006).

CONCLUSION

The procedure of right upper mediastinum lymphadenectomy is not associated with better survival in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients; the presence of upper mediastinum LNM predicted poor prognosis.

[Lymph node dissection: what for? From esophagus to rectum: surgical and lymph node related prognostic factors]

Surgery has still a key role in curative treatment of digestive carcinomas, and for almost all localisations, lymph node status is a major prognostic factor. As far as oesophageal and gastric cancer are concerned, there is not yet any internationally standardized approach. Occidental guidelines recommend more limited lymph node dissections than Asiatic ones. Lymph node numbers requested during surgery of such cancers remain high, at least 23 lymph nodes for oesophageal cancer, and 25 for a D2 or D1.5 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer. Generalisation of neo-adjuvant and adjuvant treatments has not yet modified these standards. On the other hand, rectal cancer surgery is well standardized since the global adoption of Total Mesorectal Excision (TME) for the late eighties. Development of mini-invasive techniques (laparoscopy and robot-assisted surgery) enabled an important decrease of surgery related morbidity as well as an enhanced post-operative recovery. However, rectal cancer surgery still has an important morbidity. Development of neo-adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy as well as in-depth knowledge of risk factor of lymph node invasion opened up the path for transanal full thickness resection without lymphadenectomy. The goal of such an approach is to avoid TME's morbidity without risking local recurrence rate increase. As a consequence, this technique might need to be completed with a TME case histological factors are not favorable.

Number of negative lymph nodes is associated with survival in thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients undergoing three-field lymphadenectomy

BACKGROUND

The number of negative lymph nodes (NLNs) can be used for predicting clinical outcomes for patients with esophageal carcinoma as it is believed to reflect the extent of lymphadenectomy. However, when patients are treated with the same surgical procedure, its prognostic value is not clear.

METHODS

We reviewed the records of 332 patients with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who underwent three-field lymphadenectomy (3FLND) and had at least 15 lymph nodes removed. We used Kaplan-Meier estimates to compute overall survival (OS), the log-rank tests to assess the equality of survival rates, and Cox regression analyses to evaluate the association between survival and NLN count after adjusting for potential confounders.

RESULTS

At a median follow-up interval of 36 months, the median OS was 47 months and the 5-year survival rate was 47.0 %. NLN count was independently associated with OS, and higher numbers of NLNs were linked to better OS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.970; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.955-0.986); the effect did not change after we stratified patients into node-negative (HR 0.966; 95 % CI 0.933-1.000) and node-positive (HR 0.973; 95 % CI 0.955-0.991) groups.

CONCLUSION

The NLN count is an important independent prognostic factor for patients with thoracic ESCC treated with 3FLND.

Impact of thoracic recurrent laryngeal node dissection: 508 patients with tri-incisional esophagectomy

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the feasibility and safety of recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) lymph node (LN) dissection, this study compared the postoperative complications and survival between modern two-field lymphadenectomy (MTL) and modified standard two-field lymphadenectomy (MSTL) by using the propensity score matching method.

METHODS

After generating propensity scores given the covariates of age, sex, tumor length, tumor location, tumor grade, and clinical stage, 254 patients with MTL were matched to 254 MSTL patients using the nearest available score matching. The LNs resected during MSTL were paraesophageal and preparatracheal LNs in the upper mediastinum, in addition to those resected during standard two-field lymphadenectomy.

RESULTS

RLN LNs were those most commonly affected by nodal metastasis in our series (26 %). Metastasis in RLN LNs was found in around 35, 25, and 20 % of patients with cancer in the upper, middle, and lower thoracic esophagus, respectively. LN metastasis was confined to the RLN region in 49 patients. Even 35 % of patients with pT1 tumors had positive RLN LNs. MTL increased the mean number of resected LNs when compared to MSTL (29 vs.15; p < 0.001). Recurrence was more frequent in those assigned MSTL than those assigned MTL (p < 0.001). The 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rate for MTL were 50.7 and 42 % compared to 35.3 and 28.2 % for MSTL (both p < 0.001), respectively. Postoperative complications were more frequent following MTL when compared to the MSTL. However, no statistically significant difference in postoperative complications was observed between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Adding the removal of RLN LNs might improve OS and DFS with acceptable morbidity for patients with ESCC.

Recurrence risk model for esophageal cancer after radical surgery

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to construct a risk assessment model which was tested by disease-free survival (DFS) of esophageal cancer after radical surgery.

METHODS

A total of 164 consecutive esophageal cancer patients who had undergone radical surgery between January 2005 and December 2006 were retrospectively analyzed. The cutpoint of value at risk (VaR) was inferred by stem-and-leaf plot, as well as by independent-samples t-test for recurrence-free time, further confirmed by crosstab chi-square test, univariate analysis and Cox regression analysis for DFS.

RESULTS

The cutpoint of VaR was 0.3 on the basis of our model. The rate of recurrence was 30.3% (30/99) and 52.3% (34/65) in VaR <0.3 and VaR ≥0.3 (chi-square test, (χ) (2) =7.984, P=0.005), respectively. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year DFS of esophageal cancer after radical surgery was 70.4%, 48.7%, and 45.3%, respectively in VaR ≥0.3, whereas 91.5%, 75.8%, and 67.3%, respectively in VaR <0.3 (Log-rank test, (χ) (2) =9.59, P=0.0020), and further confirmed by Cox regression analysis [hazard ratio =2.10, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.2649-3.4751; P=0.0041].

CONCLUSIONS

The model could be applied for integrated assessment of recurrence risk after radical surgery for esophageal cancer.

Explore the radiotherapeutic clinical target volume delineation for thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma from the pattern of lymphatic metastases

INTRODUCTION

Esophageal carcinoma is characterized by a high frequency of lymph node metastasis (LNM). It is difficult to accurately define the radiotherapeutic clinical target volume in patients with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), because the LNM rate and the included node level varied greatly among previous studies. This study aimed to determine which node level should be included for radiotherapy by analyzing LNM rate in thoracic ESCC patients.

METHODS

The clinicopathological factors related to LNM were analyzed using the χ test. The sites with LNM rate higher than 15%, an empirical cutoff value, were considered as high-risk areas and were included in clinical target volume of thoracic ESCC patients for radiotherapy.

RESULTS

This study included 1893 thoracic ESCC patients treated at Shandong Cancer Hospital, Jinan, China. The rates of LNM in patients with upper thoracic tumors were 14.6% cervical, 29.3% upper mediastinal, 8.5% middle mediastinal, 9.8% lower mediastinal, and 7.3% abdominal, respectively. The rates of LNM in patients with middle thoracic tumors were 4.3%, 5.0%, 32.9%, 2.5%, and 14.9%, respectively. The rates of LNM in patients with lower thoracic tumors were 2%, 2.2% 15.4%, 38.1%, and 27.5%, respectively. Independent prognostic factors for LNM included length of tumor, histologic differentiation, and depth of tumor invasion (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Irradiation of the selective regional lymph node and the correlated lymphatic drainage regions should be performed according to the clinicopathological factors. For the large, deeply invasive longer tumors and poorly differentiated thoracic ESCC, the irradiation field should be enlarged appropriately.

Management of advanced-stage operable esophageal cancer

The incidence of esophageal cancer is increasing in the developed world, with a relative increase in adenocarcinoma compared with squamous cell carcinoma. The distensible nature of the esophagus results in delayed development of symptoms associated with esophageal cancer; hence many patients have locally advanced or metastatic cancer at the time of initial presentation. Although resection remains the treatment of choice for early-stage esophageal cancer, the best treatment strategy for locally advanced esophageal cancer is debatable and, consequently, varies at different centers. This article discusses the published literature on various available therapeutic options for the treatment of locally advanced esophageal cancer.

Prognostic significance of solitary lymph node metastasis in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of middle thoracic esophagus

Background

The aim of this study is to compare clinical outcomes between patients with solitary lymph node metastasis and node-negative (N0) patients in squamous cell carcinoma of the middle thoracic esophagus.

Methods

A series of 135 patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the middle thoracic esophagus were retrospectively investigated. There were 33 patients with solitary lymph node metastasis and 102 N0 patients. Skip metastasis in 33 patients with solitary lymph node metastasis was defined according to three criteria: Japanese Society for Esophageal Disease (JSED), American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC), and the anatomical compartment.

Results

In 33 patients with solitary lymph node metastasis, skip metastasis was shown in 13, 23, and 8 patients according JSED, AJCC and anatomical compartment respectively. The 5-year survival rates for N0 patients and patients with solitary lymph node metastasis were 58% and 32% respectively (P =0.008). Multivariate analysis revealed that skip metastasis was not an independent prognostic factor.

Conclusions

For patients with middle thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, solitary lymph node metastasis has a negative impact on survival compared with N0 disease; skip metastasis, however, is comparable to N0 diseases in predicting prognosis.

Significant variation of resected meso-esophageal tissue volume in two-stage subtotal esophagectomy specimens: a retrospective morphometric study

BACKGROUND

Differences in the extent and quality of surgical resection for esophageal cancer may influence the pathological staging and patient outcome. There are no data in the literature qualitatively and/or quantitatively characterizing esophagectomy specimens.

METHODS

Macroscopic images of 161 esophagectomy specimens were analyzed retrospectively. The extent of resection was qualitatively classified as "muscularis propria," "intra-meso-esophageal," or "meso-esophageal." The volume of meso-esophageal tissue was quantified morphometrically. The number of muscle defects per specimen was counted. Results were related to clinicopathological variables, including survival.

RESULTS

Sixty-two (39%) specimens were classified as "muscularis propria," 65 (40%) as "intra-meso-esophageal," and 34 (21%) as "meso-esophageal." The morphometrically measured meso-esophageal tissue volume was different between the three types (P < 0.001). The specimen type was related to the total number of lymph nodes (P = 0.02), number of metastatic lymph nodes (P = 0.024), and depth of tumor invasion (P = 0.013), but not related to extramural tumor volume, circumferential resection margin status, or the surgeon performing the resection. The number of muscle defects per specimen was similar in all resection types. The resection specimen classification was related to survival in patients treated by surgery alone (P = 0.027).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to quantify and classify the volume of tissue resected during esophagectomy. Our study shows significant variation of the resected tissue volume impacting pathological tumor staging. This variation was not associated with individual surgeon performance. A prospective, multicenter study is needed to validate our results and to investigate the potential biological mechanisms influencing the resectable volume of meso-esophageal tissue in cancer patients.

The use of a tailored surgical technique for minimally invasive esophagectomy

OBJECTIVE

Uncertainty exists among surgeons as to whether minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is a comparable operation to open esophagectomy (OE). The surgical technique and oncologic dissection should not be degraded when using a minimally invasive approach.

METHODS

We reviewed a single hospital's experience with both OE and MIE. From 2000 to 2010, 257 patients underwent esophagectomy by 1 of 3 surgical techniques: transhiatal, Ivor Lewis, or 3-hole.

RESULTS

Of the 257 patients (median age, 67 years; range, 58-74), 92 underwent MIE. Both groups were comparable in terms of gender, age, comorbidities, surgical technique, and induction chemotherapy and radiotherapy. The overall median follow-up was 29.5 months (range, 9.9-61.5). The MIE group had a significantly shorter operative time (MIE vs OE, 330 vs 365 minutes, P = .04), length of stay (MIE vs OE, 9 vs 12 days, P < .01), intensive care unit admission rate (MIE vs OE, 55% vs 81%, P < .01), intensive care unit length of stay (MIE vs OE, 1 vs 2 days, P < .01), and estimated blood loss (MIE vs OE, 100 vs 400 mL, P < .01). More lymph nodes were harvested in the MIE group than in the OE group (17 vs 11 nodes, P < .01). There were insignificant differences in 30-day mortality (MIE vs OE, 2.2% vs 3.0%; P = .93) and overall survival (P = .19), as well as in the rates of all complications, except pneumonia (MIE vs OE, 2% vs 13%; P = .01).

CONCLUSIONS

A thoracic surgeon can safely tailor the MIE to a patient's anatomy and oncologic demands while maintaining equivalent survival.

An attempt at validation of the Seventh edition of the classification by the International Union Against Cancer for esophageal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The aim of our study was to investigate the ability of the Seventh edition of the classification by the International Union Against Cancer (UICC) to identify patients at higher risk and to predict the overall survival in patients with esophageal carcinoma.

METHODS

Demographic and clinical data of 605 patients, who underwent esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma between 1992 and 2009, were analyzed. Tumor stage and grade were classified according to the sixth and seventh editions of the UICC classification.

RESULTS

Tumor depth (T), lymph node affection (N), and metastasis (M) status according to the seventh edition of the UICC classification showed significant differences in survival of each single status. Kaplan-Meier analysis of overall survival by the seventh edition of the UICC classification showed poor discrimination between stages Ib and IIa (p=0.098), stages IIIa and IIIb (p=0.672), and stages IIIc and IV (p=0.799). Further, the estimated median survival time between stages IIa and IIb was discordant.

CONCLUSIONS

The seventh edition of the UICC TNM classification cannot satisfactorily distinguish among different risk groups of patients with resected esophageal carcinoma. The new subgroups do not unify the different TNM stages with similar survival. We strongly propose that the next revision of the UICC classification should reduce the stages to groups with similar survival, without defining complex subgroups.

Oesophageal cancer: how radical should surgery be?

INTRODUCTION

Oesophagectomy for carcinoma can be viewed as comprising two components: resection of the oesophagus and resection of the enveloping lymphatics. Controversy exists regarding how extensive these two components should be.

METHODS

Through a literature overview, the aim of this educational article is to provide surgeons with arguments to understand which operation is the most oncologically sound according to patient and tumour parameters.

RESULTS

Non-randomised comparative studies evaluating radical lymphadenectomy have reported controversial survival benefit. Independent association found between the number of surgically removed lymph nodes and overall survival is an indirect evidence supporting radical lymphadenectomy. The only phase III trial comparing non-radical transhiatal oesophagectomy with transthoracic oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal adenocarcinoma found 5-year survival rates of 29% vs. 39%, respectively. Although not statistically significant due to underpowered study, specialists would consider less of an increase in survival to be clinically relevant. For squamous OC, the first small randomised controlled trial comparing 2-field lymphadenectomy to 3-field lymphadenectomy did not found significant 5-year survival difference (48% vs. 66%) and the second one comparing 2-field lymphadenectomy to lymph node sampling identified a survival benefit favoring radical resection (36% vs. 25%).

CONCLUSION

Radical transthoracic oesophagectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy appears to offer an optimal balance between benefits and risks to a majority of OC patients, especially in the growing area of neoadjuvant treatments. Non-radical resection should be probably reserved for patients with a poor general status whereas 3-field lymphadenectomy may be reserved to selected patients with loco-regional disease in experienced hands, surely for patients with upper OC.

Thoracic recurrent laryngeal lymph node metastases predict cervical node metastases and benefit from three-field dissection in selected patients with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph nodes (RLN LNs) are considered sentinel nodes for cervical LN metastases of esophageal cancer. Surgery is the treatment of choice, but whether three-field lymph node dissection (3FL), which includes cervical LN dissection, or 2FL, which does not, should be performed is controversial.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed medical records of 200 patients with esophageal cancer who underwent 3FL from January 2000 to August 2010, focusing on LN status. We also compared survival rates between these patients and those who underwent 2FL.

RESULTS

The rate of cervical LN metastases did not differ significantly between RLN LN+ (for metastasis) and RLN LN- 3FL groups. However, in a subgroup of patients with middle/lower thoracic esophageal tumors, cervical LN metastases were significantly more common in patients with positive rather than negative RLN LNs. Survival did not differ after 3FL versus 2FL in general. However, 3FL was associated with longer survival than 2FL in patients with RLN LN positivity and either lower thoracic esophageal tumors or more than four abdominal/thoracic LN metastases.

CONCLUSIONS

Metastasis to RLN LNs is a reliable indicator of cervical LN metastasis in middle/lower thoracic esophageal cancer, while 3FL offers survival benefit over 2FL in certain patient subgroups.