1
|
Coemans M, Tran TH, Döhler B, Massie AB, Verbeke G, Segev DL, Gentry SE, Naesens M. A competing risks model to estimate the risk of graft failure and patient death after kidney transplantation using continuous donor-recipient age combinations. Am J Transplant 2025; 25:355-367. [PMID: 39111667 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2024.07.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2024] [Revised: 07/26/2024] [Accepted: 07/26/2024] [Indexed: 09/08/2024]
Abstract
Graft failure and recipient death with functioning graft are important competing outcomes after kidney transplantation. Risk prediction models typically censor for the competing outcome thereby overestimating the cumulative incidence. The magnitude of this overestimation is not well described in real-world transplant data. This retrospective cohort study analyzed data from the European Collaborative Transplant Study (n = 125 250) and from the American Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (n = 190 258). Separate cause-specific hazard models using donor and recipient age as continuous predictors were developed for graft failure and recipient death. The hazard of graft failure increased quadratically with increasing donor age and decreased decaying with increasing recipient age. The hazard of recipient death increased linearly with increasing donor and recipient age. The cumulative incidence overestimation due to competing risk-censoring was largest in high-risk populations for both outcomes (old donors/recipients), sometimes amounting to 8.4 and 18.8 percentage points for graft failure and recipient death, respectively. In our illustrative model for posttransplant risk prediction, the absolute risk of graft failure and death is overestimated when censoring for the competing event, mainly in older donors and recipients. Prediction models for absolute risks should treat graft failure and death as competing events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maarten Coemans
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Public Health & Primary Care, Leuven Biostatistics and Statistical Bioinformatics Centre (L-Biostat), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Thuong Hien Tran
- Department of Transplantation Immunology, Institute of Immunology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Bernd Döhler
- Department of Transplantation Immunology, Institute of Immunology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Allan B Massie
- Department of Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA; Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Geert Verbeke
- Interuniversity Institute for Biostatistics and Statistical Bioinformatics (I-Biostat), Universiteit Hasselt and KU Leuven, Hasselt and Leuven, Belgium
| | - Dorry L Segev
- Department of Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA; Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Sommer E Gentry
- Department of Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA; Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Maarten Naesens
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Litjens NHR, van der List ACJ, Klepper M, Reijerkerk D, Prevoo F, Betjes MGH. Older age is associated with a distinct and marked reduction of functionality of both alloreactive CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. Front Immunol 2024; 15:1406716. [PMID: 39044836 PMCID: PMC11263037 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1406716] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2024] [Accepted: 06/24/2024] [Indexed: 07/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Older recipient age is associated with a significant decreased risk for rejection after kidney transplantation which is incompletely understood. Methods In a longitudinal study, circulating alloreactive T cells were assessed of young (≤45 years) and older (≥55 years) stable kidney transplant recipients. Alloreactive T-cells were identified by CD137-expression and phenotype, cytokine producing and proliferative capacity, were evaluated using multiparameter flowcytometry. Results The results show that before transplantation frequencies of alloreactive CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells in older KT-recipients are significantly higher and shifted towards an effector memory-phenotype. However, the frequency of polyfunctional (≥2 pro-inflammatory cytokines) CD4+ T-cells was significantly lower and less IL2 was produced. The frequency of polyfunctional alloreactive CD4+ T-cells and proliferation of alloreactive T-cells donor-specifically declined after transplantation reaching a nadir at 12 months after transplantation, irrespective of age. A striking difference was observed for the proliferative response of alloreactive CD8+ T-cells. This was not only lower in older compared to younger recipients but could also not be restored by exogenous IL2 or IL15 in the majority of older recipients while the response to polyclonal stimulation was unaffected. Conclusion In conclusion, older age is associated with a distinct and marked reduction of functionality of both alloreactive CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells.
Collapse
|
3
|
Betjes MGH, Kho MML, Roodnat J, de Weerd AE. Transplant Candidates of 70+ Years Have Superior Survival If Receiving Pre-Emptively a Living Donor Kidney. J Clin Med 2024; 13:1853. [PMID: 38610618 PMCID: PMC11012907 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13071853] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2024] [Revised: 03/13/2024] [Accepted: 03/21/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: The number of kidney transplant recipients over 70 years of age is increasing but detailed data on patient and graft survival in the modern era of immune suppression are few. Methods: A single-center cohort of patients of 70 years and older (n = 349) at time of kidney transplantation from 2010-2020 were followed until January 2023. Results: The median age was 73 years with a median follow-up of 4.3 years. Fifty percent of recipients of a living donor kidney (LDK, n = 143) received their graft pre-emptively. Cumulative death-censored graft survival was excellent in the LDK group and reached 98% at 5 years vs. 85% in the deceased donor kidney (DDK) group. Primary non-function (38%) and rejection (43%) were the major causes of graft loss in the first year after DDK transplantation. Rejection-related graft loss was 4.6% during follow-up. Median recipient survival was superior in the subgroup of pre-emptively transplanted LDK patients compared to non-pre-emptively LDK transplanted patients (11.1 versus 6.2 years). Non-pre-emptively transplanted patients had a significantly increased incidence of infection (HR 3.81, 1.46-9.96) and cardiovascular-related causes of death (HR 3.35, 1.16-9.71). Pre-emptive transplantation was also associated with a significantly improved graft survival in the DDK recipients but this result was confounded by significantly better HLA matching and younger donor age in this group. Conclusions: Pre-emptive LDK transplantation in patients of 70 years or older confers superior graft and recipient survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michiel G. H. Betjes
- Rotterdam Transplantation Institute, Department of Nephrology & Transplantation, Erasmus Medical Center, 3015GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (M.M.L.K.); (J.R.); (A.E.d.W.)
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jallah BP, Kuypers DRJ. Impact of Immunosenescence in Older Kidney Transplant Recipients: Associated Clinical Outcomes and Possible Risk Stratification for Immunosuppression Reduction. Drugs Aging 2024; 41:219-238. [PMID: 38386164 DOI: 10.1007/s40266-024-01100-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/13/2024] [Indexed: 02/23/2024]
Abstract
The number of older individuals receiving a kidney transplant as replacement therapy has significantly increased in the past decades and this increase is expected to continue. Older patients have a lower rate of acute rejection but an increased incidence of death with a functioning graft. Several factors, including an increased incidence of infections, post-transplant malignancy and cardiovascular comorbidity and mortality, contribute to this increased risk. Notwithstanding, kidney transplantation is still the best form of kidney replacement therapy in all patients with chronic kidney disease, including in older individuals. The best form of immunosuppression and the optimal dose of these medications in older recipients remains a topic of discussion. Pharmacological studies have usually excluded older patients and when included, patients were highly selected and their numbers insignificant to draw a reasonable conclusion. The reduced incidence of acute rejection in older recipients has largely been attributed to immunosenescence. Immunosenescence refers to the aging of the innate and adaptive immunity, accumulating in phenotypic and functional changes. These changes influences the response of the immune system to new challenges. In older individuals, immunosenescence is associated with increased susceptibility to infectious pathogens, a decreased response after vaccinations, increased risk of malignancies and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Chronic kidney disease is associated with premature immunosenescent changes, and these are independent of aging. The immunosenescent state is associated with low-grade sterile inflammation termed inflammaging. This chronic low-grade inflammation triggers a compensatory immunosuppressive state to avoid further tissue damage, leaving older individuals with chronic kidney disease in an immune-impaired state before kidney transplantation. Immunosuppression after transplantation may further enhance progression of this immunosenescent state. This review covers the role of immunosenescence in older kidney transplant recipients and it details present knowledge of the changes in chronic kidney disease and after transplantation. The impact of immunosuppression on the progression and complications of an immunosenescent state are discussed, and the future direction of a possible clinical implementation of immunosenescence to individualize/reduce immunosuppression in older recipients is laid out.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Borefore P Jallah
- Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, University Hospital Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Dirk R J Kuypers
- Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, University Hospital Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kim HJ, Min E, Yim SH, Choi MC, Kim HW, Yang J, Kim BS, Huh KH, Kim MS, Lee J. Clinical relevance of the living kidney donor profile index in Korean kidney transplant recipients. Clin Transplant 2024; 38:e15178. [PMID: 37922208 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.15178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2023] [Revised: 10/04/2023] [Accepted: 10/23/2023] [Indexed: 11/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Living Kidney Donor Profile Index (LKDPI) was developed in the United States to predict graft outcomes based on donor characteristics. However, there are significant differences in donor demographics, access to transplantation, proportion of ABO incompatibility, and posttransplant mortality in Asian countries compared with the United States. METHODS We evaluated the clinical relevance of the LKDPI score in a Korean kidney transplant cohort by analyzing 1860 patients who underwent kidney transplantation between 2000 and 2019. Patients were divided into three groups according to LKDPI score: <0, 1-19.9, and ≥20. RESULTS During a median follow-up of 119 months, 232 recipients (12.5%) experienced death-censored graft loss, and 98 recipients (5.3%) died. High LKDPI scores were significantly associated with increased risk of death-censored graft loss independent of recipient characteristics (LKDPI 1-19.9: HR 1.389, 95% CI 1.036-1.863; LKDPI ≥20: HR 2.121, 95% CI 1.50-2.998). High LKDPI score was also significantly associated with increased risk of biopsy-proven acute rejection and impaired graft renal function. By contrast, overall patient survival rates were comparable among the LKDPI groups. CONCLUSION High LKDPI scores were associated with an increased risk of death-censored graft loss, biopsy-proven acute rejection, and impaired graft renal function among a Korean kidney transplant cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyun Jeong Kim
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Eunki Min
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Seung Hyuk Yim
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Mun Chae Choi
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyung Woo Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jaeseok Yang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Beom Seok Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- The Research Institute for Transplantation, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Kyu Ha Huh
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- The Research Institute for Transplantation, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Myoug Soo Kim
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- The Research Institute for Transplantation, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Juhan Lee
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- The Research Institute for Transplantation, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Betjes MGH, Kal-van Gestel J, Roodnat JI, de Weerd AE. The Incidence of Antibody-Mediated Rejection Is Age-Related, Plateaus Late After Kidney Transplantation, and Contributes Little to Graft Loss in the Older Recipients. Transpl Int 2023; 36:11751. [PMID: 38188697 PMCID: PMC10768842 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2023.11751] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2023] [Accepted: 11/27/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2024]
Abstract
It is not known whether antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) is age-related, whether it plateaus late after transplantation, and to what extent it contributes to graft loss in older recipients. Patients transplanted between 2010 and 2015 (n = 1,054) in a single center had regular follow-up until January 2023. Recipients were divided into age groups at transplantation: 18-39 years ("young"), 40-55 years ("middle age"), and >55 years ("elderly"). Ten years after transplantation the cumulative % of recipients with ABMR was 17% in young, 15% in middle age, and 12% in elderly recipients (p < 0.001). The cumulative incidence of ABMR increased over time and plateaued 8-10 years after transplantation. In the elderly, with a median follow-up of 7.5 years, on average 30% of the recipients with ABMR died with a functional graft and ABMR contributed only 4% to overall graft loss in this group. These results were cross-validated in a cohort of recipients with >15 years follow-up. Multivariate cox-regression analysis showed that increasing recipient age was independently associated with decreasing risk for ABMR. In conclusion, the cumulative risk for ABMR is age-dependent, plateaus late after transplantation, and contributes little to overall graft loss in older recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michiel G. H. Betjes
- Rotterdam Transplantation Institute, Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pittman J, Abbott J, Cavazzoni E, Pleass H, Brännstrom M, Rogers N, Deans R. Deceased donor availability for uterus transplantation in Australia. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2023; 63:780-785. [PMID: 37395604 DOI: 10.1111/ajo.13722] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2023] [Accepted: 06/01/2023] [Indexed: 07/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Uterus transplantation is an emerging treatment option for uterine factor infertility. Most uterus transplantation research programs use living donors, although this comes with considerable surgical and psychological risks and not all women desiring uterus transplantation will have an available living donor. A deceased donor program eliminates donor risks; however, the availability of deceased uterus donors is currently unknown in Australia. AIMS To establish the feasibility of a deceased donor uterus transplantation program in Australia and consider expanded inclusion criteria for this model. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective review of the New South Wales (NSW) Organ and Tissue Donation Service database was undertaken to identify potential deceased uterus donors, with comparison to the broad deceased donor inclusion criteria from three international uterus transplantation trials including female, brain-dead, multi-organ donation, no major abdominal surgery, and <60 years of age. RESULTS Between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2022, 648 deceased donors were available in NSW. Of these, 43% (279/648) were female and 67% of the women (187/279) were also multi-organ donors. When the brain-dead donor-only and age criteria (<60 years) were applied, a total of 107 deceased donors met the available criteria for uterus transplantation, with an average of 21 deceased donors per year in NSW. CONCLUSIONS There appears to be adequate deceased donor organ availability to establish a deceased uterus transplantation program in NSW, Australia. Should interest in uterus transplantation increase, including criteria such as older and nulliparous donors could increase organ availability for a uterus transplantation program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jana Pittman
- School of Clinical Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- The Royal Hospital for Women, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jason Abbott
- School of Clinical Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- The Royal Hospital for Women, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Elena Cavazzoni
- The Children's Hospital Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Henry Pleass
- Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Mats Brännstrom
- Departments of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | | | - Rebecca Deans
- School of Clinical Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- The Royal Hospital for Women, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Feng I, Kurlansky PA, Ning Y, Sun J, Naka Y, Topkara VK, Latif F, Sayer G, Uriel NY, Takeda K. Do age and functional dependence affect outcomes of simultaneous heart-kidney transplantation? JTCVS OPEN 2023; 15:262-289. [PMID: 37808044 PMCID: PMC10556940 DOI: 10.1016/j.xjon.2023.05.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2023] [Revised: 04/26/2023] [Accepted: 05/18/2023] [Indexed: 10/10/2023]
Abstract
Objective This study assessed characteristics and outcomes of younger (18-65) versus older (>65) recipients of simultaneous heart-kidney (SHK) transplantation with varying functional dependence. Methods This study retrospectively analyzed 1398 patients from the United Network for Organ Sharing database who received SHK between 2010 and 2021. Patients who were <18 year old, underwent transplant of additional organs simultaneously, or had previous heart transplant were excluded. The primary end point was all-cause mortality, and secondary end points included adverse events and cause of death. Outcomes were also evaluated by propensity score-matched comparison. Results The number of annual SHK transplantation in the United States has significantly increased among both age groups over the past 2 decades (P < .0001). After propensity score matching of recipients aged 18 to 65 years (n = 1162) versus age >65 years (n = 236), baseline characteristics were similar and well-balanced between the 2 cohorts. Between matched cohorts, older recipients did not have increased posttransplant mortality compared with younger recipients (90-day survival, P = .85; 7-year survival, P = .61). Multivariable Cox regression analysis found that age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.039 [0.975-1.106], P = .2415) and pretransplant functional status with interaction term for age (some assistance, HR, 0.965 [0.902-1.033], P = .3079; total assistance, HR, 0.976 [0.914-1.041], P = .4610) were not significant risk factors for 7-year post-SHK transplantation mortality. Conclusions Older and more functionally dependent recipients in this study did not have increased post-SHK transplantation mortality. These findings have important implications for organ allocation among elderly patients, as they support the need for thorough assessment of SHK candidates in terms of comorbidities, rather than exclusion solely based on age and functional dependence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iris Feng
- Division of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Paul A. Kurlansky
- Division of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
- Department of Surgery, Center of Innovation and Outcomes Research, Columbia University, New York, NY
| | - Yuming Ning
- Department of Surgery, Center of Innovation and Outcomes Research, Columbia University, New York, NY
| | - Jocelyn Sun
- Department of Surgery, Center of Innovation and Outcomes Research, Columbia University, New York, NY
| | - Yoshifumi Naka
- Division of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Veli K. Topkara
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Farhana Latif
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Gabriel Sayer
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Nir Y. Uriel
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Koji Takeda
- Division of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
de Fijter J, Dreyer G, Mallat M, Budde K, Pratschke J, Klempnauer J, Zeier M, Arns W, Hugo C, Rump LC, Hauser I, Schenker P, Schiffer M, Grimm MO, Kliem V, Olbricht CJ, Pisarski P, Banas B, Suwelack B, Hakenberg O, Berlakovich G, Schneeberger S, van de Wetering J, Berger S, Bemelman F, Kuypers D, Heidt S, Rahmel A, Claas F, Peeters P, Oberbauer R, Heemann U, Krämer BK. A paired-kidney allocation study found superior survival with HLA-DR compatible kidney transplants in the Eurotransplant Senior Program. Kidney Int 2023; 104:552-561. [PMID: 37343659 DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2023.05.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2022] [Revised: 03/27/2023] [Accepted: 05/04/2023] [Indexed: 06/23/2023]
Abstract
The Eurotransplant Senior Program (ESP) has expedited the chance for elderly patients with kidney failure to receive a timely transplant. This current study evaluated survival parameters of kidneys donated after brain death with or without matching for HLA-DR antigens. This cohort study evaluated the period within ESP with paired allocation of 675 kidneys from donors 65 years and older to transplant candidates 65 years and older, the first kidney to 341 patients within the Eurotransplant Senior DR-compatible Program and 334 contralateral kidneys without (ESP) HLA-DR antigen matching. We used Kaplan-Meier estimates and competing risk analysis to assess all cause mortality and kidney graft failure, respectively. The log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards regression were used for comparisons. Within ESP, matching for HLA-DR antigens was associated with a significantly lower five-year risk of mortality (hazard ratio 0.71; 95% confidence interval 0.53-0.95) and significantly lower cause-specific hazards for kidney graft failure and return to dialysis at one year (0.55; 0.35-0.87) and five years (0.73; 0.53-0.99) post-transplant. Allocation based on HLA-DR matching resulted in longer cold ischemia (mean difference 1.00 hours; 95% confidence interval: 0.32-1.68) and kidney offers with a significantly shorter median dialysis vintage of 2.4 versus 4.1 yrs. in ESP without matching. Thus, our allocation based on HLA-DR matching improved five-year patient and kidney allograft survival. Hence, our paired allocation study suggests a superior outcome of HLA-DR matching in the context of old-for-old kidney transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johan de Fijter
- Department of Nephrology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
| | - Geertje Dreyer
- Department of Nephrology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Marko Mallat
- Department of Nephrology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Klemens Budde
- Department of Nephrology, Internal Intensive Care Medicine, Campus Charité Mitte, Berlin, Germany
| | - Johann Pratschke
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jürgen Klempnauer
- Integrated Research and Treatment Centre Transplantation, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Martin Zeier
- Department of Nephrology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Arns
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Cologne Merheim Medical Center, Cologne, Germany
| | - Christian Hugo
- Clinic for Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | - Lars-Christian Rump
- Department of Internal Medicine/Nephrology, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Ingeborg Hauser
- Department of Nephrology, Goethe University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
| | - Peter Schenker
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Mario Schiffer
- Department of Nephrology, Erlangen University Hospital, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | - Volker Kliem
- Department of Internal Medicine and Nephrology, Kidney Transplant Center, Nephrological Center of Lower Saxony, Klinikum Hann, Münden, Germany
| | | | - Przemyslaw Pisarski
- Department of Surgery, Section of Transplant Surgery, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Bernhard Banas
- Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Barbara Suwelack
- Department of Internal Medicine, Nephrology and Rheumatology, University Hospital of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | | | - Gabriela Berlakovich
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria
| | - Stefan Schneeberger
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | | | - Stefan Berger
- Department of Nephrology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Frederike Bemelman
- Department of Nephrology, Division of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Dirk Kuypers
- Department of Nephrology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Sebastiaan Heidt
- Eurotransplant Reference Laboratory, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Axel Rahmel
- Eurotransplant International Foundation, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Frans Claas
- Eurotransplant Reference Laboratory, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Patrick Peeters
- Department of Nephrology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Rainer Oberbauer
- Department of Nephrology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Uwe Heemann
- Department of Nephrology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Bernhard K Krämer
- V-th Department of Medicine (Nephrology), University Medical Center Mannheim/University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Maenosono R. Sex difference and immunosenescence affect transplantation outcomes. FRONTIERS IN TRANSPLANTATION 2023; 2:1235740. [PMID: 38993850 PMCID: PMC11235384 DOI: 10.3389/frtra.2023.1235740] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2023] [Accepted: 08/09/2023] [Indexed: 07/13/2024]
Abstract
Kidney transplantation is a well-established alternative to renal replacement therapy. Although the number of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) is increasing, the availability of kidney for transplantation is still insufficient to meet the needs. As age increases, the prevalence of ESRD increases; thus, the population of aged donors and recipients occupies large proportion. Accumulated senescent cells secrete pro-inflammatory factors and induce senescence. Additionally, it is gradually becoming clear that biological sex differences can influence aging and cause differences in senescence. Here, we review whether age-related sex differences affect organ transplant outcomes and what should be done in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryoichi Maenosono
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Takatsuki, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Betjes MGH, De Weerd A. Lowering maintenance immune suppression in elderly kidney transplant recipients; connecting the immunological and clinical dots. Front Med (Lausanne) 2023; 10:1215167. [PMID: 37502354 PMCID: PMC10368955 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1215167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2023] [Accepted: 06/09/2023] [Indexed: 07/29/2023] Open
Abstract
The management of long-term immune suppressive medication in kidney transplant recipients is a poorly explored field in the area of transplant medicine. In particular, older recipients are at an increased risk for side effects and have an exponentially increased risk of infection-related death. In contrast, an aged immune system decreases the risk of acute T-cell-mediated rejection in older recipients. Recent advances in alloimmunity research have shown a rapid and substantial decline in polyfunctional, high-risk CD4+ T cells post-transplantation. This lowers the direct alloreactivity responsible for T-cell-mediated rejection, also known as donor-specific hyporesponsiveness. Chronic antibody-mediated rejection (c-aABMR) is the most frequent cause of kidney graft loss in the long term. However, in older adults, c-aABMR as a cause of graft loss is outnumbered by death with a functioning graft. In addition, DSA development and a diagnosis of c-aABMR plateau ~10 years after transplantation, resulting in a very low risk for rejection thereafter. The intensity of immune suppression regimes could likely be reduced accordingly, but trials in this area are scarce. Tacrolimus monotherapy for 1 year after transplantation seems feasible in older kidney transplant recipients with standard immunological risk, showing the expected benefits of fewer infections and better vaccination responses.
Collapse
|
12
|
McGovern KE, Sonar SA, Watanabe M, Coplen CP, Bradshaw CM, Nikolich JŽ. The aging of the immune system and its implications for transplantation. GeroScience 2023:10.1007/s11357-022-00720-2. [PMID: 36626019 PMCID: PMC9838392 DOI: 10.1007/s11357-022-00720-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2022] [Accepted: 12/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
By the last third of life, most mammals, including humans, exhibit a decline in immune cell numbers, immune organ structure, and immune defense of the organism, commonly known as immunosenescence. This decline leads to clinical manifestations of increased susceptibility to infections, particularly those caused by emerging and reemerging microorganisms, which can reach staggering levels-infection with SARS-CoV-2 has been 270-fold more lethal to older adults over 80 years of age, compared to their 18-39-year-old counterparts. However, while this would be expected to be beneficial to situations where hyporeactivity of the immune system may be desirable, this is not always the case. Here, we discuss the cellular and molecular underpinnings of immunosenescence as they pertain to outcomes of solid organ and hematopoietic transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn E McGovern
- Department of Immunobiology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 85724, USA
- Arizona Center On Aging, The University of Arizona, University of Arizona College of Medicine-Tucson, Tucson, AZ, 85724, USA
- BIO5 Institute, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Sandip A Sonar
- Department of Immunobiology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 85724, USA
- Arizona Center On Aging, The University of Arizona, University of Arizona College of Medicine-Tucson, Tucson, AZ, 85724, USA
| | - Makiko Watanabe
- Department of Immunobiology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 85724, USA
- Arizona Center On Aging, The University of Arizona, University of Arizona College of Medicine-Tucson, Tucson, AZ, 85724, USA
| | - Christopher P Coplen
- Department of Immunobiology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 85724, USA
- Arizona Center On Aging, The University of Arizona, University of Arizona College of Medicine-Tucson, Tucson, AZ, 85724, USA
| | - Christine M Bradshaw
- Department of Immunobiology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 85724, USA
- Arizona Center On Aging, The University of Arizona, University of Arizona College of Medicine-Tucson, Tucson, AZ, 85724, USA
| | - Janko Ž Nikolich
- Department of Immunobiology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 85724, USA.
- Arizona Center On Aging, The University of Arizona, University of Arizona College of Medicine-Tucson, Tucson, AZ, 85724, USA.
- BIO5 Institute, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
- The Aegis Consortium for Pandemic-free Future, University of Arizona Health Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, 85719, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Chi M, Tian Z, Ma K, Li Y, Wang L, Nasser MI, Liu C. The diseased kidney: aging and senescent immunology. IMMUNITY & AGEING 2022; 19:58. [PMCID: PMC9666969 DOI: 10.1186/s12979-022-00313-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2022] [Accepted: 10/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
AbstractImmunosenescence is the deterioration of the innate and adaptive immune systems associated with aging and is primarily characterized by a reduction in T cell production and accumulation of atypical subsets. Age-related immunological dysfunction leads to impaired immune protection and persistent low-grade chronic inflammation, resulting in a decreased vaccination response and increased vulnerability to infection, cancer, cardiovascular disease, and autoimmune disease in the elderly. As the elderly constitute a growing proportion of the population with renal disease, immunosenescence is a normal aging process that is prevalent among older people. In addition, immunosenescence seems to be more pronounced in patients with kidney diseases than in healthy controls, as shown by severe chronic inflammation, accumulation of immune cells with the senescent phenotype (CD28− T cells, CD14+CD16+ monocytes), and proinflammatory cytokine production. Immunosenescence inhibits immunological clearance and renal tissue regeneration, thereby increasing the risk of permanent renal damage, infection, and cardiovascular events in patients with kidney disease, lowering the prognosis, and even influencing the efficacy of renal replacement treatment. Biological drugs (senomorphics and senolytics) target the aging immune system and exert renoprotective effects. This review aims to emphasize the features of immunosenescence and its influence on kidney diseases and immunotherapy, highlighting the future directions of kidney disease treatment using senescence-focused techniques.
Collapse
|
14
|
Matsunaga T, Roesel MJ, Schroeter A, Xiao Y, Zhou H, Tullius SG. Preserving and rejuvenating old organs for transplantation: novel treatments including the potential of senolytics. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2022; 27:481-487. [PMID: 35950886 PMCID: PMC9490781 DOI: 10.1097/mot.0000000000001019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Older donors have the potential to close the gap between demand and supply in solid organs transplantation. Utilizing older organs, at the same time, has been associated with worse short- and long-term outcomes. Here, we introduce potential mechanisms on how treatments during machine perfusion (MP) may safely improve the utilization of older organs. RECENT FINDINGS Consequences of ischemia reperfusion injury (IRI), a process of acute, sterile inflammation leading to organ injury are more prominent in older organs. Of relevance, organ age and IRI seem to act synergistically, leading to an increase of damage associated molecular patterns that trigger innate and adaptive immune responses. While cold storage has traditionally been considered the standard of care in organ preservation, accumulating data support that both hypothermic and normothermic MP improve organ quality, particularly in older organs. Furthermore, MP provides the opportunity to assess the quality of organs while adding therapeutic agents. Experimental data have already demonstrated the potential of applying treatments during MP. New experimental show that the depletion of senescent cells that accumulate in old organs improves organ quality and transplant outcomes. SUMMARY As the importance of expanding the donor pool is increasing, MP and novel treatments bear the potential to assess and regenerate older organs, narrowing the gap between demand and supply.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomohisa Matsunaga
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Urology, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Takatsuki, Osaka, Japan
| | - Maximilian J. Roesel
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Institute of Medical Immunology, Charite Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Andreas Schroeter
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Regenerative Medicine and Experimental Surgery, Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Lower Saxony, Germany
| | - Yao Xiao
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Hao Zhou
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Stefan G. Tullius
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Betjes MGH, Peereboom ETM, Otten HG, Spierings E. The number of donor HLA-derived T cell epitopes available for indirect antigen presentation determines the risk for vascular rejection after kidney transplantation. Front Immunol 2022; 13:973968. [PMID: 36110856 PMCID: PMC9468767 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.973968] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2022] [Accepted: 08/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The role of the indirect T-cell recognition pathway of allorecognition in acute T cell-mediated rejection (aTCMR) is not well defined. The amount of theoretical T-cell epitopes available for indirect allorecognition can be quantified for donor-recipient combinations by the Predicted Indirectly ReCognizable HLA Epitopes algorithm (PIRCHE-II). The PIRCHE-II score was calculated for 688 donor kidney-recipient combinations and associated with the incidence of first-time diagnosed cases of TCMR. A diagnosis of TCMR was made in 182 cases; 121 cases of tubulo-interstitial rejection cases (79 cases of borderline TCMR, 42 cases of TCMR IA-B) and 61 cases of vascular TCMR (TCMR II-III). The PIRCHE-II score for donor HLA-DR/DQ (PIRCHE-II DR/DQ) was highly associated with vascular rejection. At one year after transplantation, the cumulative percentage of recipients with a vascular rejection was 12.7%, 8.6% and 2.1% within respectively the high, medium and low tertile of the PIRCHE-II DR/DQ score (p<0.001). In a multivariate regression analysis this association remained significant (p<0.001 for PIRCHE-II DR/DQ tertiles). The impact of a high PIRCHE-II DR/DQ score was mitigated by older recipient age and a living donor kidney. In conclusion, indirect antigen presentation of donor HLA-peptides may significantly contribute to the risk for acute vascular rejection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michiel G. H. Betjes
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Nephrology and Transplantation, Erasmus Medical Center (MC), University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
- *Correspondence: Michiel G. H. Betjes,
| | - Emma T. M. Peereboom
- Center for Translational Immunology, University Medical Center, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Henny G. Otten
- Center for Translational Immunology, University Medical Center, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Eric Spierings
- Center for Translational Immunology, University Medical Center, Utrecht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Comparison of early and late Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia in kidney transplant patients: the Korean Organ Transplantation Registry (KOTRY) Study. Sci Rep 2022; 12:10682. [PMID: 35739203 PMCID: PMC9226063 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-14580-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2022] [Accepted: 06/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Late Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) is not rare in the era of universal prophylaxis after kidney transplantation. We aimed to determine the nationwide status of PJP prophylaxis in Korea and compare the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of early and late PJP using data from the Korean Organ Transplantation Registry (KOTRY), a nationwide Korean transplant cohort. We conducted a retrospective analysis using data of 4,839 kidney transplant patients from KOTRY between 2014 and 2018, excluding patients who received multi-organ transplantation or were under 18 years old. Cox regression analysis was performed to determine risk factors for early and late PJP. A total of 50 patients developed PJP. The number of patients who developed PJP was same between onset before 6 months and onsets after 6 months. There were no differences in the rate, duration, or dose of PJP prophylaxis between early and late PJP. Desensitization, higher tacrolimus dose at discharge, and acute rejection were associated with early PJP. In late PJP, old age as well as acute rejection were significant risk factors. In conclusion late PJP is as common and risky as early PJP and requires individualized risk-based prophylaxis, such as prolonged prophylaxis for old patients with a history of rejection.
Collapse
|
17
|
Roesel MJ, Sharma NS, Schroeter A, Matsunaga T, Xiao Y, Zhou H, Tullius SG. Primary Graft Dysfunction: The Role of Aging in Lung Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury. Front Immunol 2022; 13:891564. [PMID: 35686120 PMCID: PMC9170999 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.891564] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2022] [Accepted: 04/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Transplant centers around the world have been using extended criteria donors to remedy the ongoing demand for lung transplantation. With a rapidly aging population, older donors are increasingly considered. Donor age, at the same time has been linked to higher rates of lung ischemia reperfusion injury (IRI). This process of acute, sterile inflammation occurring upon reperfusion is a key driver of primary graft dysfunction (PGD) leading to inferior short- and long-term survival. Understanding and improving the condition of older lungs is thus critical to optimize outcomes. Notably, ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) seems to have the potential of reconditioning ischemic lungs through ex-vivo perfusing and ventilation. Here, we aim to delineate mechanisms driving lung IRI and review both experimental and clinical data on the effects of aging in augmenting the consequences of IRI and PGD in lung transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maximilian J Roesel
- Division of Transplant Surgery and Transplant Surgery Research Laboratory, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.,Institute of Medical Immunology, Charité Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Nirmal S Sharma
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.,Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Andreas Schroeter
- Division of Transplant Surgery and Transplant Surgery Research Laboratory, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.,Regenerative Medicine and Experimental Surgery, Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Tomohisa Matsunaga
- Division of Transplant Surgery and Transplant Surgery Research Laboratory, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.,Department of Urology, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yao Xiao
- Division of Transplant Surgery and Transplant Surgery Research Laboratory, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Hao Zhou
- Division of Transplant Surgery and Transplant Surgery Research Laboratory, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Stefan G Tullius
- Division of Transplant Surgery and Transplant Surgery Research Laboratory, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Betjes MGH, Roelen DL, van Agteren M, Kal-van Gestel J. Causes of Kidney Graft Failure in a Cohort of Recipients With a Very Long-Time Follow-Up After Transplantation. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 9:842419. [PMID: 35733857 PMCID: PMC9207199 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.842419] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2021] [Accepted: 05/05/2022] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Biopsy-proven causes of graft loss many years after kidney transplantation are scarcely documented. Methods Patients transplanted between 1995 and 2005 (n = 737) in a single center were followed on a regular basis until 2021. The recipients were divided according to age at transplantation into 3 groups; 18–39 years (young), 40–55 years (middle age), and older than 55 years (elderly). For cause biopsies of renal transplants were clustered into the categories, rejection, IFTA, return original disease, and diagnosis of de novo kidney disease. Results Rejection was the main cause of graft failure censored for death at every time period after transplantation. The incidence of T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) became rare 6 years after transplantation while the cumulative incidence of antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) increased over time (1.1% per year). ABMR was not diagnosed anymore beyond 15 years of follow-up in recipients without pre-transplant donor-specific antibodies (DSA). An episode of TCMR was associated with an increased incidence of ABMR diagnosis in the short-term but did not increase the overall incidence of AMBR not in the long-term. Death as a cause of graft failure was an important competitive risk factor long after transplantation and resulted in a significantly lower frequency of rejection-related graft loss in the elderly group (11 vs. 23% in the young group at 15 year follow-up). Conclusion Rejection is a major cause of graft loss but recipient’s age, time after transplantation, and the presence of DSA before transplantation determine the relative contribution to overall graft loss and the type of rejection involved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michiel G. H. Betjes
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam Transplantation Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
- *Correspondence: Michiel G. H. Betjes, ; orcid.org/0000-0001-9435-6208
| | - Dave L. Roelen
- Department of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Madelon van Agteren
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam Transplantation Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Judith Kal-van Gestel
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam Transplantation Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Beyond Graft Survivl: A National Cohort Study Quantifying the Impact of Increasing Kidney Donor Profile Index on Recipient Outcomes 1 Year Post-transplantation. Transplant Direct 2022; 8:e1308. [PMID: 35474655 PMCID: PMC9029898 DOI: 10.1097/txd.0000000000001308] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2022] [Accepted: 01/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background. The reporting of a locally validated kidney donor profile index (KDPI) began in Australia in 2016. Across diverse populations, KDPI has demonstrated utility in predicting allograft survival and function. A metric that incorporates both elements may provide a more comprehensive picture of suboptimal recipient outcomes. Methods. A retrospective cohort study of adult kidney transplant recipients in Australia (January 2009 to December 2014) was conducted. Conventional recipient outcomes and a composite measure of suboptimal outcome (1-y allograft failure or estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] <30 mL/min) were evaluated across KDPI intervals (KDPI quintiles and 5-point increments in the KDPI 81–100 cohort). The impact of increasing KDPI on allograft function (1-y eGFR) and a suboptimal outcome was explored using multivariable regression models, adjusting for potential confounding factors. Results. In 2923 donor kidneys eligible for analysis, median KDPI was 54 (interquartile range [IQR], 31–77), and Kidney Donor Risk Index was 1.39 (IQR, 1.03–1.67). The median 1-y eGFR was 52.74 mL/min (IQR, 40.79–66.41 mL/min). Compared with the first quintile reference group, progressive reductions in eGFR were observed with increasing KDPI and were maximal in the fifth quintile (adjusted β-coefficient: −27.43 mL/min; 95% confidence interval, –29.44 to –25.42; P < 0.001). A suboptimal outcome was observed in 359 recipients (12.3%). The adjusted odds for this outcome increased across quintiles from a baseline of odds ratio of 1.00 (first quintile) to odds ratio of 11.68 (95% confidence interval, 6.33-21.54, P < 0.001) in the fifth quintile cohort. Conclusions. Increases in donor KDPI were associated with higher probabilities of a suboptimal outcome and poorer baseline allograft function, particularly in the KDPI > 80 cohort. These findings may inform pretransplant discussions with potential recipients of high-KDPI allografts.
Collapse
|
20
|
Time to Move on: HLA Matching Should Be Reconsidered in Modern Deceased Donor Kidney Allocation. Transplant Direct 2022; 8:e1295. [PMID: 35368986 PMCID: PMC8966965 DOI: 10.1097/txd.0000000000001295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2021] [Accepted: 12/20/2021] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
HLA matching has been the cornerstone of deceased donor kidney allocation policies worldwide but can lead to racial inequity. Although HLA matching has been shown to improve clinical outcomes, the long-term impacts of nonallogenic factors are being increasingly recognized. This has led some transplant programs to include points for nonallogenic factors, for example, age. Our study looks at long-term graft and patient outcomes based on allocation cohorts rather than individual number of HLA mismatches.
Collapse
|
21
|
Beerli N, Denhaerynck K, Binet I, Dahdal S, Dickenmann M, Golshayan D, Hadaya K, Huynh-Do U, Schnyder A, De Geest SM, Mauthner O. Age at Time of Kidney Transplantation as a Predictor for Mortality, Graft Loss and Self-Rated Health Status: Results From the Swiss Transplant Cohort Study. Transpl Int 2022; 35:10076. [PMID: 35185365 PMCID: PMC8842256 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2021.10076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2021] [Accepted: 12/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/04/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: The effect of age on health outcomes in kidney transplantation remains inconclusive. This study aimed to analyze the relationship between age at time of kidney transplantation with mortality, graft loss and self-rated health status in adult kidney transplant recipients. Methods: This study used data from the Swiss Transplant Cohort Study and included prospective data of kidney transplant recipients between 2008 and 2017. Time-to-event analysis was performed using Cox’ regression analysis, and -in the case of graft loss- competing risk analysis. A random-intercept regression model was applied to analyse self-rated health status. Results: We included 2,366 kidney transplant recipients. Age at transplantation linearly predicted mortality. It was also predictive for graft loss, though nonlinearly, showing that recipients aged between 35 and 55 years presented with the lowest risk of experiencing graft loss. No relationship of age with self-rated health status was detected. Conclusion: Higher mortality in older recipients complies with data from the general population. The non-linear relationship between age and graft loss and the higher scored self-rated health status at all follow-up time-points compared to the pre-transplant status -regardless of age- highlight that age alone might not be an accurate measure for risk prediction and clinical decision making in kidney transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadine Beerli
- Institute of Nursing Science, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- University Department of Geriatric Medicine Felix Platter, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Kris Denhaerynck
- Institute of Nursing Science, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Isabelle Binet
- Clinic of Nephrology and Transplantation Medicine, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Suzan Dahdal
- University Clinic for Nephrology and Hypertension, University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Michael Dickenmann
- Department for Transplantation-Immunology and Nephrology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Delaviz Golshayan
- Transplantation Centre and Transplantation Immunopathology Laboratory, University Hospital Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Karine Hadaya
- Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Uyen Huynh-Do
- University Clinic for Nephrology and Hypertension, University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Aurelia Schnyder
- Clinic of Nephrology and Transplantation Medicine, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Sabina M. De Geest
- Institute of Nursing Science, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Academic Centre for Nursing and Midwifery, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Oliver Mauthner
- Institute of Nursing Science, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- University Department of Geriatric Medicine Felix Platter, Basel, Switzerland
- *Correspondence: Oliver Mauthner,
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Stratta RJ, Harriman D, Gurram V, Gurung K, Sharda B. Dual kidney transplants from adult marginal donors: Review and perspective. Clin Transplant 2021; 36:e14566. [PMID: 34936135 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2021] [Revised: 10/08/2021] [Accepted: 12/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
The practice of dual kidney transplantation (DKT) from adult marginal deceased donors (MDDs) dates back to the mid-1990s with initial pioneering experiences reported by the Stanford and Maryland groups, at which time the primary indication was estimated insufficient nephron mass from older donors. Multiple subsequent studies of short and long-term success have been reported focusing on three major aspects of DKT: Identifying appropriate selection criteria and developing scoring systems based on pre- and post-donation factors; refining technical aspects; and analyzing mid-term outcomes. The number of adult DKTs performed in the United States has declined in the past decade and only about 60 are performed annually. For adult deceased donor kidneys meeting double allocation criteria, >60% are ultimately not transplanted. Deceased donors with limited renal functional capacity represent a large proportion of potential kidneys doomed to either discard or non-recovery. However, DKT may reduce organ discard and optimize the use of kidneys from MDDs. In an attempt to promote utilization of MDD kidneys, the United Network for Organ Sharing introduced new allocation guidelines pursuant to DKT in 2019. The purpose of this review is to chronicle the history of DKT and identify opportunities to improve utilization of MDD kidneys through DKT. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert J Stratta
- Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation, Wake Forest School of Medicine, One Medical Center Blvd., Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, United States
| | - David Harriman
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V5Z1M9, Canada
| | - Venkat Gurram
- Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation, Wake Forest School of Medicine, One Medical Center Blvd., Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, United States
| | - Komal Gurung
- Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation, Wake Forest School of Medicine, One Medical Center Blvd., Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, United States
| | - Berjesh Sharda
- Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation, Wake Forest School of Medicine, One Medical Center Blvd., Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, United States
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Fedulkina VA, Vatazin AV, Kildyushevskiy AV, Zulkarnayev AB, Gubina DV, Fedulkina MP. Immunosenescence as a reason of individualizing immunosuppressive therapy in kidney transplantation. RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTOLOGY AND ARTIFICIAL ORGANS 2021. [DOI: 10.15825/1995-1191-2021-3-171-179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Transplantation in elderly patients is obviously more challenging due to existing underlying diseases, changes in pharmacokinetics of immunosuppressive drugs, polypragmasy, and transformation of immunoreactivity (immunosenescence). Our review presents data on modification of adaptive and innate immunity during aging. It also considers the possibility of both reduced and adapted immunosuppressive therapy in elderly renal transplant recipients in achieving an optimal balance between efficacy and complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - A. V. Vatazin
- Vladimirsky Moscow Regional Research Clinical Institute
| | | | | | - D. V. Gubina
- Vladimirsky Moscow Regional Research Clinical Institute
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Doucet BP, Cho Y, Campbell SB, Johnson DW, Hawley CM, Teixeira-Pinto ARM, Isbel NM. Kidney Transplant Outcomes in elderly Recipients: An Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant (ANZDATA) Registry Study. Transplant Proc 2021; 53:1915-1926. [PMID: 34275599 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2021.06.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2021] [Accepted: 06/14/2021] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is an increase in elderly patients receiving kidney transplant internationally. This study describes elderly kidney transplant recipient outcomes in Australia and New Zealand. METHODS The study included all adult first kidney transplant recipients in Australia and New Zealand from 2000 to 2015. Survival and graft outcomes were compared between elderly (≥70 years) and younger (18-69 years) recipients using Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS Overall, 10651 kidney transplant recipients were included, of which 279 (2.6%) were elderly adults. The proportion of elderly recipients increased from 0.6 to 4.4% from 2000 to 2015. Compared with younger recipients, elderly recipients were more likely to receive kidneys from deceased donors, elderly donors, and expanded criteria donors. Elderly recipients experienced poorer patient survival with 1- and 5-year survival ranging from 96% to 97% and 79% to 81%, respectively, compared with 97% to 99% and 90% 95% in younger recipients, respectively. Elderly recipients experienced comparable rates of delayed graft function and, in living donor kidney recipients, lower rates of acute rejection. CONCLUSIONS Kidney transplantation in the elderly population is increasing. Although elderly recipients had inferior survival and graft outcomes, elderly recipients generally received poorer quality kidneys. The outcomes achieved in this cohort of elderly adults are encouraging, and improving elderly recipient outcomes should be an important focus for research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian Percy Doucet
- Department of Nephrology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia; School of Clinical Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
| | - Yeoungjee Cho
- Department of Nephrology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia; Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Australasian Kidney Trials Network, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Scott Bryan Campbell
- Department of Nephrology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia; Centre for Kidney Disease Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - David Wayne Johnson
- Department of Nephrology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia; Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Centre for Kidney Disease Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Carmel Mary Hawley
- Department of Nephrology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia; Australasian Kidney Trials Network, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Centre for Kidney Disease Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Armando Rogerió Martins Teixeira-Pinto
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Nicole Maree Isbel
- Department of Nephrology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia; Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Centre for Kidney Disease Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Pils V, Terlecki-Zaniewicz L, Schosserer M, Grillari J, Lämmermann I. The role of lipid-based signalling in wound healing and senescence. Mech Ageing Dev 2021; 198:111527. [PMID: 34174292 DOI: 10.1016/j.mad.2021.111527] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2021] [Revised: 05/28/2021] [Accepted: 06/17/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Lipid-based signalling modulates several cellular processes and intercellular communication during wound healing and tissue regeneration. Bioactive lipids include but are not limited to the diverse group of eicosanoids, phospholipids, and extracellular vesicles and mediate the attraction of immune cells, initiation of inflammatory responses, and their resolution. In aged individuals, wound healing and tissue regeneration are greatly impaired, resulting in a delayed healing process and non-healing wounds. Senescent cells accumulate with age in vivo, preferably at sites implicated in age-associated pathologies and their elimination was shown to alleviate many age-associated diseases and disorders. In contrast to these findings, the transient presence of senescent cells in the process of wound healing exerts beneficial effects and limits fibrosis. Hence, clearance of senescent cells during wound healing was repeatedly shown to delay wound closure in vivo. Recent findings established a dysregulated synthesis of eicosanoids, phospholipids and extracellular vesicles as part of the senescent phenotype. This intriguing connection between cellular senescence, lipid-based signalling, and the process of wound healing and tissue regeneration prompts us to compile the current knowledge in this review and propose future directions for investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vera Pils
- Christian Doppler Laboratory for the Biotechnology of Skin Aging, Institute of Molecular Biotechnology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria
| | - Lucia Terlecki-Zaniewicz
- Christian Doppler Laboratory for the Biotechnology of Skin Aging, Institute of Molecular Biotechnology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria
| | - Markus Schosserer
- Christian Doppler Laboratory for Skin Multimodal Imaging of Aging and Senescence - SKINMAGINE, Institute of Molecular Biotechnology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria; Austrian Cluster for Tissue Regeneration, Austria
| | - Johannes Grillari
- Christian Doppler Laboratory for the Biotechnology of Skin Aging, Institute of Molecular Biotechnology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria; Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology, AUVA Research Center, Linz and Vienna, Austria; Austrian Cluster for Tissue Regeneration, Austria
| | - Ingo Lämmermann
- Christian Doppler Laboratory for the Biotechnology of Skin Aging, Institute of Molecular Biotechnology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Pre-transplant donor-reactive IL-21 producing T cells as a tool to identify an increased risk for acute rejection. Sci Rep 2021; 11:12445. [PMID: 34127739 PMCID: PMC8203783 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-91967-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2021] [Accepted: 05/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Pre-transplant screening focuses on the detection of anti-HLA alloantibodies. Previous studies have shown that IFN-γ and IL-21 producing T cells are associated with the development of acute rejection (AR). The aim of this study, was to assess whether pre-transplant donor-reactive T cells and/or B cells are associated with increased rejection risk. Samples from 114 kidney transplant recipients (transplanted between 2010 and 2013) were obtained pre-transplantation. The number of donor-reactive IFN-γ and IL-21 producing cells was analyzed by ELISPOT assay. The presence of donor specific antibodies (DSA) was also determined before transplantation. Numbers of donor-reactive IFN-γ producing cells were similar in patients with or without AR whereas those of IL-21 producing cells were higher in patients with AR (p = 0.03). Significantly more patients with AR [6/30(20%)] had detectable DSA compared to patients without AR [5/84(5.9%), p = 0.03]. Multivariate logistic regression showed that donor age (OR 1.06), pre-transplant DSA (OR 5.61) and positive IL-21 ELISPOT assay (OR 2.77) were independent predictors of an increased risk for the development of AR. Aside from an advanced donor-age and pre-transplant DSA, also pre-transplant donor-reactive IL-21 producing cells are associated with the development of AR after transplantation.
Collapse
|
27
|
de Boer SE, Sanders JSF, Bemelman FJ, Betjes MGH, Burgerhof JGM, Hilbrands L, Kuypers D, van Munster BC, Nurmohamed SA, de Vries APJ, van Zuilen AD, Hesselink DA, Berger SP. Rationale and design of the OPTIMIZE trial: OPen label multicenter randomized trial comparing standard IMmunosuppression with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil with a low exposure tacrolimus regimen In combination with everolimus in de novo renal transplantation in Elderly patients. BMC Nephrol 2021; 22:208. [PMID: 34078323 PMCID: PMC8172178 DOI: 10.1186/s12882-021-02409-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2021] [Accepted: 05/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In 2019, more than 30 % of all newly transplanted kidney transplant recipients in The Netherlands were above 65 years of age. Elderly patients are less prone to rejection, and death censored graft loss is less frequent compared to younger recipients. Elderly recipients do have increased rates of malignancy and infection-related mortality. Poor kidney transplant function in elderly recipients may be related to both pre-existing (i.e. donor-derived) kidney damage and increased susceptibility to nephrotoxicity of calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) in kidneys from older donors. Hence, it is pivotal to shift the focus from prevention of rejection to preservation of graft function and prevention of over-immunosuppression in the elderly. The OPTIMIZE study will test the hypothesis that reduced CNI exposure in combination with everolimus will lead to better kidney transplant function, a reduced incidence of complications and improved health-related quality of life for kidney transplant recipients aged 65 years and older, compared to standard immunosuppression. METHODS This open label, randomized, multicenter clinical trial will include 374 elderly kidney transplant recipients (≥ 65 years) and consists of two strata. Stratum A includes elderly recipients of a kidney from an elderly deceased donor and stratum B includes elderly recipients of a kidney from a living donor or from a deceased donor < 65 years. In each stratum, subjects will be randomized to a standard, tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive regimen with mycophenolate mofetil and glucocorticoids or an adapted immunosuppressive regimen with reduced CNI exposure in combination with everolimus and glucocorticoids. The primary endpoint is 'successful transplantation', defined as survival with a functioning graft and an eGFR ≥ 30 ml/min per 1.73 m2 in stratum A and ≥ 45 ml/min per 1.73 m2 in stratum B, after 2 years, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The OPTIMIZE study will help to determine the optimal immunosuppressive regimen after kidney transplantation for elderly patients and the cost-effectiveness of this regimen. It will also provide deeper insight into immunosenescence and both subjective and objective outcomes after kidney transplantation in elderly recipients. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03797196 , registered January 9th, 2019. EudraCT: 2018-003194-10, registered March 19th, 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S E de Boer
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | - J S F Sanders
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - F J Bemelman
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Amsterdam Universal Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M G H Betjes
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology & Transplantation, Erasmus MC, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J G M Burgerhof
- Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - L Hilbrands
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - D Kuypers
- Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - B C van Munster
- Department of Internal Medicine, Divison of Geriatrics, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - S A Nurmohamed
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Amsterdam Universal Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A P J de Vries
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology; and Leiden Transplant Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - A D van Zuilen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - D A Hesselink
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology & Transplantation, Erasmus MC, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S P Berger
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Iske J, Matsunaga T, Zhou H, Tullius SG. Donor and Recipient Age-Mismatches: The Potential of Transferring Senescence. Front Immunol 2021; 12:671479. [PMID: 33995411 PMCID: PMC8113632 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.671479] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2021] [Accepted: 04/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
In transplantation, donor and recipients frequently differ in age. Senescent cells accumulate in donor organs with aging and have the potential to promote senescence in adjacent cells when transferred into recipient animals. Characteristically, senescent cells secrete a myriad of pro-inflammatory, soluble molecules as part of their distinct secretory phenotype that have been shown to drive senescence and age-related co-morbidities. Preliminary own data show that the transplantation of old organs limits the physical reserve of recipient animals. Here, we review how organ age may affect transplant recipients and discuss the potential of accelerated aging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasper Iske
- Division of Transplant Surgery & Transplant Surgery Research Laboratory, Brigham and Women´s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Tomohisa Matsunaga
- Division of Transplant Surgery & Transplant Surgery Research Laboratory, Brigham and Women´s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.,Department of Urology, Osaka Medical College, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hao Zhou
- Division of Transplant Surgery & Transplant Surgery Research Laboratory, Brigham and Women´s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Stefan G Tullius
- Division of Transplant Surgery & Transplant Surgery Research Laboratory, Brigham and Women´s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Gurung K, Alejo J, Rogers J, Farney AC, Orlando G, Jay C, Reeves-Daniel A, Mena-Gutierrez A, Sakhovskaya N, Doares W, Kaczmorski S, Gautreaux MD, Stratta RJ. Recipient age and outcomes following simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation in the new millennium: Single-center experience and review of the literature. Clin Transplant 2021; 35:e14302. [PMID: 33783874 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14302] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2021] [Revised: 03/23/2021] [Accepted: 03/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
The influence of recipient age on outcomes following simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPKT) in the modern era is uncertain. METHODS We retrospectively studied 255 patients undergoing SPKT from 11/01 to 8/20. Recipients were stratified according to age group: age <30 years (n = 16); age 30-39 years (n = 91); age 40-49 years (n = 86) and age ≥50 years (n = 62 [24.3%], including 9 patients ≥60 years of age). RESULTS Three-month and one-year outcomes were comparable. The eight-year patient survival rate was lowest in the oldest age group (47.6% vs 78% in the 3 younger groups combined, p < .001). However, eight-year kidney and pancreas graft survival rates were comparable in the youngest and oldest age groups combined (36.5% and 32.7%, respectively), but inferior to those in the middle 2 groups combined (62% and 50%, respectively, both p < .05). Death-censored kidney and pancreas graft survival rates increased from youngest to oldest recipient age category because of a higher incidence of death with functioning grafts (22.6% in oldest group compared to 8.3% in the 3 younger groups combined, p = .005). CONCLUSIONS Recipient age did not appear to significantly influence early outcomes following SPKT. Late outcomes are similar in younger and older recipients, but inferior to the middle 2 age groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Komal Gurung
- Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Jennifer Alejo
- Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Jeffrey Rogers
- Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Alan C Farney
- Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Giuseppe Orlando
- Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Colleen Jay
- Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Amber Reeves-Daniel
- Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Alejandra Mena-Gutierrez
- Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Natalia Sakhovskaya
- Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - William Doares
- Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Scott Kaczmorski
- Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Michael D Gautreaux
- Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Robert J Stratta
- Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline on the Evaluation and Management of Candidates for Kidney Transplantation. Transplantation 2021; 104:S11-S103. [PMID: 32301874 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000003136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 314] [Impact Index Per Article: 78.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
The 2020 Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Clinical Practice Guideline on the Evaluation and Management of Candidates for Kidney Transplantation is intended to assist health care professionals worldwide who evaluate and manage potential candidates for deceased or living donor kidney transplantation. This guideline addresses general candidacy issues such as access to transplantation, patient demographic and health status factors, and immunological and psychosocial assessment. The roles of various risk factors and comorbid conditions governing an individual's suitability for transplantation such as adherence, tobacco use, diabetes, obesity, perioperative issues, causes of kidney failure, infections, malignancy, pulmonary disease, cardiac and peripheral arterial disease, neurologic disease, gastrointestinal and liver disease, hematologic disease, and bone and mineral disorder are also addressed. This guideline provides recommendations for evaluation of individual aspects of a candidate's profile such that each risk factor and comorbidity are considered separately. The goal is to assist the clinical team to assimilate all data relevant to an individual, consider this within their local health context, and make an overall judgment on candidacy for transplantation. The guideline development process followed the Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Guideline recommendations are primarily based on systematic reviews of relevant studies and our assessment of the quality of that evidence, and the strengths of recommendations are provided. Limitations of the evidence are discussed with differences from previous guidelines noted and suggestions for future research are also provided.
Collapse
|
31
|
Use of Culture to Reach Metabolically Adequate Beta-cell Dose by Combining Donor Islet Cell Isolates for Transplantation in Type 1 Diabetes Patients. Transplantation 2021; 104:e295-e302. [PMID: 32433237 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000003321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical islet transplantation is generally conducted within 72 hours after isolating sufficient beta-cell mass. A preparation that does not meet the sufficient dose can be cultured until this is reached after combination with subsequent ones. This retrospective study examines whether metabolic outcome is influenced by culture duration. METHODS Forty type 1 diabetes recipients of intraportal islet cell grafts under antithymocyte globulin induction and mycophenolate mofetil-tacrolimus maintenance immunosuppression were analyzed. One subgroup (n = 10) was transplanted with preparations cultured for ≥96 hours; in the other subgroup (n = 30) grafts contained similar beta-cell numbers but included isolates that were cultured for a shorter duration. Both subgroups were compared by numbers with plasma C-peptide ≥0.5 ng/mL, low glycemic variability associated with C-peptide ≥1.0 ng/mL, and with insulin independence. RESULTS The subgroup with all cells cultured ≥96 hours exhibited longer C-peptide ≥0.5 ng/mL (103 versus 48 mo; P = 0.006), and more patients with low glycemic variability and C-peptide ≥1.0 ng/mL, at month 12 (9/10 versus 12/30; P = 0.005) and 24 (7/10 versus 6/30; P = 0.007). In addition, 9/10 became insulin-independent versus 15/30 (P = 0.03). Grafts with all cells cultured ≥96 hours did not contain more beta cells but a higher endocrine purity (49% versus 36%; P = 0.03). In multivariate analysis, longer culture duration and older recipient age were independently associated with longer graft function. CONCLUSIONS Human islet isolates with insufficient beta-cell mass for implantation within 72 hours can be cultured for 96 hours and longer to combine multiple preparations in order to reach the desired beta-cell dose and therefore result in a better metabolic benefit.
Collapse
|
32
|
Ong PW, Kee T, Ho QY. Impact of tacrolimus versus cyclosporine on one-year renal transplant outcomes: A single-centre retrospective cohort study. PROCEEDINGS OF SINGAPORE HEALTHCARE 2020. [DOI: 10.1177/2010105820957370] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Background:Calcineurin inhibitors are the cornerstone of maintenance immunosuppression after kidney transplant. While studies on predominantly Caucasian populations recommend tacrolimus over cyclosporine, the effects on Singapore’s local population remain unclear.Objectives:This study aimed to compare the impact of tacrolimus against cyclosporine on post-transplant outcomes in our local kidney transplant population.Methods:A single-centre retrospective chart review was conducted on ABO- and human leucocyte antigen (HLA)-compatible kidney transplantations between 1 January 2011 and 15 August 2018. Patients who received basiliximab induction, prednisolone, mycophenolate and either tacrolimus or cyclosporine were included and followed up for at least one year. Recipients of transplantations at other institutions or other immunosuppressive regimens were excluded. Patient and graft outcomes and adverse effects were collected.Results:Overall, 120 patients on tacrolimus and 49 on cyclosporine were included. Patients on tacrolimus were older. This group had more deceased donor transplants, a higher proportion with donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) present and more HLA mismatches. There were no differences in patient and graft survival, graft function and acute rejections at one year, despite adjusting for age, transplant type, presence of DSAs and total HLA mismatches. The tacrolimus group had more infectious admissions (odds ratio=0.27, 95% confidence interval 0.098–0.73, p=0.01) after adjusting for age, transplant type, HLA mismatches, presence of DSAs and acute rejections, with increased severity and more opportunistic infections. More patients on cyclosporine required a change to alternative immunosuppressants (p=0.003).Conclusion:Our study demonstrated comparable short-term post-transplant outcomes between cyclosporine and tacrolimus. Tacrolimus appears more tolerable but may be associated with infection risks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pei Wen Ong
- Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
| | - Terence Kee
- Department of Renal Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Quan Yao Ho
- Department of Renal Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
New-Onset Gout as an Independent Risk Factor for Returning to Dialysis After Kidney Transplantation. Transplant Direct 2020; 6:e634. [PMID: 33225059 PMCID: PMC7673774 DOI: 10.1097/txd.0000000000001081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2020] [Accepted: 09/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background. The causal relationship between gout and renal transplant outcomes is difficult to assess due to multiple interacting covariates. This study sought to estimate the independent effect of new-onset gout on renal transplant outcomes using a methodology that accounted for these interactions. Methods. This study analyzed data on patients in the US Renal Data System (USRDS) who received a primary kidney transplant between 2008 and 2015. The exposure was new-onset gout, and the primary endpoint was returning to dialysis >12 months postindex date (transplant date). A marginal structural model (MSM) was fitted to determine the relative risk of new-onset gout on return to dialysis. Results. 18 525 kidney transplant recipients in the USRDS met study eligibility. One thousand three hundred ninety-nine (7.6%) patients developed new-onset gout, and 1420 (7.7%) returned to dialysis >12 months postindex. Adjusting for baseline and time-varying confounders via the MSM showed new-onset gout was associated with a 51% increased risk of return to (RR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.03-2.20). Conclusions. This finding suggests that new onset gout after kidney transplantation could be a harbinger for poor renal outcomes, and to our knowledge is the first study of kidney transplant outcomes using a technique that accounted for the dynamic relationship between renal dysfunction and gout.
Collapse
|
34
|
Fang Y, Gong AY, Haller ST, Dworkin LD, Liu Z, Gong R. The ageing kidney: Molecular mechanisms and clinical implications. Ageing Res Rev 2020; 63:101151. [PMID: 32835891 PMCID: PMC7595250 DOI: 10.1016/j.arr.2020.101151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 89] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2020] [Revised: 08/07/2020] [Accepted: 08/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
As human life expectancy keeps increasing, ageing populations present a growing challenge for clinical practices. Human ageing is associated with molecular, structural, and functional changes in a variety of organ systems, including the kidney. During the ageing process, the kidney experiences progressive functional decline as well as macroscopic and microscopic histological alterations, which are accentuated by systemic comorbidities like hypertension and diabetes mellitus, or by preexisting or underlying kidney diseases. Although ageing per se does not cause kidney injury, physiologic changes associated with normal ageing processes are likely to impair the reparative capacity of the kidney and thus predispose older people to acute kidney disease, chronic kidney disease and other renal diseases. Mechanistically, cell senescence plays a key role in renal ageing, involving a number of cellular signaling mechanisms, many of which may be harnessed as international targets for slowing or even reversing kidney ageing. This review summarizes the clinical characteristics of renal ageing, highlights the latest progresses in deciphering the role of cell senescence in renal ageing, and envisages potential interventional strategies and novel therapeutic targets for preventing or improving renal ageing in the hope of maintaining long-term kidney health and function across the life course.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yudong Fang
- Department of Nephrology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China; Division of Nephrology, University of Toledo College of Medicine, Toledo, Ohio, USA
| | - Athena Y Gong
- Division of Nephrology, University of Toledo College of Medicine, Toledo, Ohio, USA
| | - Steven T Haller
- Division of Cardiology, University of Toledo College of Medicine, Toledo, Ohio, USA
| | - Lance D Dworkin
- Department of Medicine, University of Toledo College of Medicine, Toledo, Ohio, USA
| | - Zhangsuo Liu
- Department of Nephrology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
| | - Rujun Gong
- Division of Nephrology, University of Toledo College of Medicine, Toledo, Ohio, USA; Department of Medicine, University of Toledo College of Medicine, Toledo, Ohio, USA; Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Toledo College of Medicine, Toledo, Ohio, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Pippias M, Jager KJ, Åsberg A, Berger SP, Finne P, Heaf JG, Kerschbaum J, Lempinen M, Magaz Á, Massy ZA, Stel VS. Young deceased donor kidneys show a survival benefit over older donor kidneys in transplant recipients aged 20-50 years: a study by the ERA-EDTA Registry. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2020; 35:534-543. [PMID: 30203080 DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfy268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2018] [Accepted: 07/04/2018] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Updated survival outcomes of young recipients receiving young or old deceased donor kidneys are required when considering accepting a deceased donor kidney. METHODS We examined outcomes in 6448 European kidney allografts donated from younger (≥20-<50 years) and older (≥50-<70 years) deceased donors when transplanted into very young (≥20-<35 years) or young (≥35-<50 years) adult recipients. Outcomes of first kidney transplantations during 2000-13 and followed-up to 2015 were determined via competing risk, restricted mean survival and Cox regression methods. RESULTS The 10-year cumulative incidence of graft failure was lowest in very young {22.0% [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 19.1-24.9]} and young [15.3% (95% CI 13.7-16.9)] recipients of younger donor kidneys and highest in very young [36.7% (95% CI 31.9-41.5)] and young [29.2% (95% CI 25.1-33.2)] recipients of older donor kidneys. At the 10-year follow-up, younger donor kidneys had a 1 year (very young) or 9 months (young) longer mean graft survival time compared with older donor kidneys. Graft failure risk in younger donor kidneys was 45% [very young adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 0.55 (95% CI 0.44-0.68)] and 40% [young aHR 0.60 (95% CI 0.53-0.67)] lower compared with older donor kidneys. A 1-year increase in donor age resulted in a 2% [very young aHR 1.02 (95% CI 1.00-1.04)] or 1% [young aHR 1.01 (95% CI 1.00-1.01)] increase in the 10-year risk of death. CONCLUSIONS Younger donor kidneys show survival benefits over older donor kidneys in adult recipients ages 20-50 years. Updated survival outcomes from older deceased donors are necessary due to advances in transplantation medicine and the increasing role these donors play in organ transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Pippias
- ERA-EDTA Registry, Department of Medical Informatics, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Kitty J Jager
- ERA-EDTA Registry, Department of Medical Informatics, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Anders Åsberg
- Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital-Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Stefan P Berger
- Division of Nephrology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Patrik Finne
- Abdominal Center Nephrology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.,Finnish Registry for Kidney Diseases, Helsinki, Finland
| | - James G Heaf
- Department of Medicine, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark
| | - Julia Kerschbaum
- Department of Internal Medicine IV (Nephrology and Hypertension), Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Marko Lempinen
- Department of Transplantation and Liver Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Ángela Magaz
- Unidad de Información sobre Pacientes Renales de la Comunidad Autónoma del País Vasco (UNIPAR), Basque Country, Spain
| | - Ziad A Massy
- Division of Nephrology, Ambroise Pare University Hospital, APHP, University of Paris Ouest-Versailles-St-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ), Boulogne-Billancourt/Paris, France.,Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale (INSERM) U1018, Team 5, CESP UVSQ, University Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Vianda S Stel
- ERA-EDTA Registry, Department of Medical Informatics, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Wiebe C, Rush DN, Gibson IW, Pochinco D, Birk PE, Goldberg A, Blydt‐Hansen T, Karpinski M, Shaw J, Ho J, Nickerson PW. Evidence for the alloimmune basis and prognostic significance of Borderline T cell-mediated rejection. Am J Transplant 2020; 20:2499-2508. [PMID: 32185878 PMCID: PMC7496654 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.15860] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2020] [Revised: 03/05/2020] [Accepted: 03/07/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Prognostic biomarkers of T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) have not been adequately studied in the modern era. We evaluated 803 renal transplant recipients and correlated HLA-DR/DQ molecular mismatch alloimmune risk categories (low, intermediate, high) with the severity, frequency, and persistence of TCMR. Allograft survival was reduced in recipients with Banff Borderline (hazard ratio [HR] 2.4, P = .003) and Banff ≥ IA TCMR (HR 4.3, P < .0001) including a subset who never developed de novo donor-specific antibodies (P = .002). HLA-DR/DQ molecular mismatch alloimmune risk categories were multivariate correlates of Banff Borderline and Banff ≥ IA TCMR and correlated with the severity and frequency of rejection episodes. Recipient age, HLA-DR/DQ molecular mismatch category, and cyclosporin vs tacrolimus immunosuppression were independent correlates of Banff Borderline and Banff ≥ IA TCMR. In the subset treated with tacrolimus (720/803) recipient age, HLA-DR/DQ molecular mismatch category, and tacrolimus coefficient of variation were independent correlates of TCMR. The correlation of HLA-DR/DQ molecular mismatch category with TCMR, including Borderline, provides evidence for their alloimmune basis. HLA-DR/DQ molecular mismatch may represent a precise prognostic biomarker that can be applied to tailor immunosuppression or design clinical trials based on individual patient risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chris Wiebe
- Department of MedicineUniversity of ManitobaWinnipegCanada
- Shared Health Services ManitobaWinnipegCanada
- Department of ImmunologyUniversity of ManitobaWinnipegCanada
| | - David N. Rush
- Department of MedicineUniversity of ManitobaWinnipegCanada
| | - Ian W. Gibson
- Shared Health Services ManitobaWinnipegCanada
- Department of PathologyUniversity of ManitobaWinnipegCanada
| | | | - Patricia E. Birk
- Department of Pediatrics and Child HealthUniversity of ManitobaWinnipegCanada
| | - Aviva Goldberg
- Department of Pediatrics and Child HealthUniversity of ManitobaWinnipegCanada
| | - Tom Blydt‐Hansen
- Department of PediatricsUniversity of British ColumbiaWinnipegCanada
| | | | - Jamie Shaw
- Department of MedicineUniversity of ManitobaWinnipegCanada
| | - Julie Ho
- Department of MedicineUniversity of ManitobaWinnipegCanada
- Department of ImmunologyUniversity of ManitobaWinnipegCanada
| | - Peter W. Nickerson
- Department of MedicineUniversity of ManitobaWinnipegCanada
- Shared Health Services ManitobaWinnipegCanada
- Department of ImmunologyUniversity of ManitobaWinnipegCanada
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Mehdorn AS, Reuter S, Suwelack B, Schütte-Nütgen K, Becker F, Senninger N, Palmes D, Vogel T, Bahde R. Comparison of kidney allograft survival in the Eurotransplant senior program after changing the allocation criteria in 2010-A single center experience. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0235680. [PMID: 32702005 PMCID: PMC7377418 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235680] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2020] [Accepted: 06/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Aims The European Senior Program (ESP) aims to avoid waiting list competition between younger and elderly patients applying for renal transplantation. By listing patients ≥65 years on a separate waiting list and locally allocating of grafts ≥65 years exclusively to this cohort, waiting and cold ischemia times are predicted to be shortened, potentially resulting in improved kidney transplantation outcomes. This study compared a historic cohort of renal transplant recipients being simultaneously listed on the general and the ESP waiting lists with a collective exclusively listed on the ESP list in terms of surrogates of the transplantation outcome. Methods Total 151 eligible patients ≥ 65 years from Münster transplant Center, Germany, between 1999 and 2014 were included. Graft function, graft and patient survival were compared using surrogate markers of short- and long-term graft function. Patients were grouped according to their time of transplantation. Results Recipients and donors in the newESP (nESP) cohort were significantly older (69.6 ± 3.5 years vs 67.1 ± 2 years, p<0.05; 72.0 ± 5.0 years vs 70.3 ± 5.0 years, p = 0.039), had significantly shorter dialysis vintage (19.6 ± 21.7 months vs 60.2 ± 28.1 months, p<0.001) and suffered from significantly more comorbidities (2.2 ± 0.9 vs 1.8 ± 0.8, p = 0.009) than the historic cohort (HC). Five-year death-censored graft survival was better than in the HC, but 5-year graft and patient survival were better in the ESP cohort. After 2005, cold ischemia time between groups was comparable. nESP grafts showed more primary function and significantly better long-term graft function 18 months after transplantation and onwards. Conclusion nESP recipients received significantly older grafts, but experienced significantly shorter time on dialysis. Cold ischemia times were comparable, but graft function in the nESP cohort was significantly better in the long term.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne-Sophie Mehdorn
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Münster University Hospital, Münster, Germany
| | - Stefan Reuter
- Department of Medicine D, Division of General Internal Medicine, Nephrology and Rheumatology, Münster University Hospital, Münster, Germany
- * E-mail:
| | - Barbara Suwelack
- Department of Medicine D, Division of General Internal Medicine, Nephrology and Rheumatology, Münster University Hospital, Münster, Germany
| | - Katharina Schütte-Nütgen
- Department of Medicine D, Division of General Internal Medicine, Nephrology and Rheumatology, Münster University Hospital, Münster, Germany
| | - Felix Becker
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Münster University Hospital, Münster, Germany
| | - Norbert Senninger
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Münster University Hospital, Münster, Germany
| | - Daniel Palmes
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Münster University Hospital, Münster, Germany
| | - Thomas Vogel
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Münster University Hospital, Münster, Germany
| | - Ralf Bahde
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Münster University Hospital, Münster, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Lechiancole A, Vendramin I, Sponga S, Guzzi G, Ferrara V, Nalli C, Di Nora C, Bortolotti U, Livi U. Donor-recipient age interaction and the impact on clinical results after heart transplantation. Clin Transplant 2020; 34:e14043. [PMID: 32654188 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2020] [Revised: 06/17/2020] [Accepted: 07/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
To evaluate the impact of donor-recipient age matching on clinical outcomes after heart transplantation, a total of 509 patients (January 1990-December 2018, mean follow-up 111 ± 80 months) were stratified into 4 groups (young-R/young-D, young-R/old-D, old-R/young-D, old-R/old-D) according to the recipient (young-R < 60, old-R ≥ 60 years) and the donor (young-D < 50, old-D ≥ 50 years) age. No difference was found among 30-day mortality (P = .11) and postoperative complications between groups. Both unadjusted and adjusted survival was significantly higher for group young-R/young-D than that of other groups, in which survival was similar [adjusted HR for mortality of 2.0(1.2-3.4), 2.1(1.4-3.8) and 2.5(1.6-4.1) for groups old-R/young-D, young-R/old-D, old-R/old-D, respectively]. Compared to other groups, the incidence of grade ≥ 2 CAV was significantly lower in old-R/young-D group [adjusted HR 0.4(0.2-0.7)]. Among young recipients, the rate of acute grade ≥ 2 rejection episodes was higher in those receiving an old donor graft (P = .04). Old recipient groups were more affected by neoplasms and severe renal failure than young recipient groups (P < .01). Employment of hearts from donors ≥50 years of age adversely affects survival in recipients <60 years of age but does not influence outcomes in older recipients. Also, donor and recipient ages seem to have opposite effects on incidence of rejections and CAV of high grade.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Igor Vendramin
- Cardiothoracic Department, University Hospital of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Sandro Sponga
- Cardiothoracic Department, University Hospital of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Giorgio Guzzi
- Cardiothoracic Department, University Hospital of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Veronica Ferrara
- Cardiothoracic Department, University Hospital of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Chiara Nalli
- Cardiothoracic Department, University Hospital of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Concetta Di Nora
- Cardiothoracic Department, University Hospital of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Uberto Bortolotti
- Cardiothoracic Department, University Hospital of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Ugolino Livi
- Cardiothoracic Department, University Hospital of Udine, Udine, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Gerbase-DeLima M, de Marco R, Monteiro F, Tedesco-Silva H, Medina-Pestana JO, Mine KL. Impact of Combinations of Donor and Recipient Ages and Other Factors on Kidney Graft Outcomes. Front Immunol 2020; 11:954. [PMID: 32528472 PMCID: PMC7256929 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00954] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2020] [Accepted: 04/23/2020] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
As the availability of kidneys for transplantation continues to be outpaced by its growing demand, there has been an increasing utilization of older deceased donors in the last decades. Considering that definition of factors that influence deceased donor kidney transplant outcomes is important for allocation policies, as well as for individualization of post-transplant care, the purpose of this study was determine the risks for death censored graft survival and for patient survival conferred by older age of the donor in the context of the age of the recipient and of risk factors for graft and/or patient survival. The investigation was conducted in a single-center cohort of 5,359 consecutive first kidney transplants with adult deceased donors performed on non-prioritized adult recipients from January 1, 2002, to December 31, 2017. Death censored graft survival and patient survival were lower in older donors, whereas graft survival was higher and patient survival was lower in old recipients. The analyses of combinations of donor and recipient ages showed that death censored graft survival was lower in younger recipients in transplants from 18 to 59-year old donors, with standard or extended criteria, but no difference in graft survival was observed between younger and older recipients when the donor was ≥ 60-year old. Patient survival was higher in younger recipients in transplants with younger or older donors. Two to six HLA-A,B,DR mismatches, when compared to 0-1 MM, conferred risk for death-censored graft survival only in transplants from younger donors to younger recipients. Pre-transplant diabetes conferred risk for patient survival only in 50–59-year old recipients, irrespectively, of the age of the donor. Time on dialysis ≥ 10 years was a risk factor for patient survival in transplants with all donor-recipient age combinations, except in recipients with ≥ 60 years that received a kidney from an 18–49-year old donor. In conclusion, the results obtained in this study underline the importance of analyzing the impact of the age of the donor taking into consideration different scenarios.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Gerbase-DeLima
- Instituto de Imunogenética, Associação Fundo de Incentivo à Pesquisa, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Renato de Marco
- Instituto de Imunogenética, Associação Fundo de Incentivo à Pesquisa, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | | | - José O Medina-Pestana
- Hospital do Rim, Fundação Oswaldo Ramos, São Paulo, Brazil.,Departamento de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Karina L Mine
- Instituto de Imunogenética, Associação Fundo de Incentivo à Pesquisa, São Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Abstract
Organ transplantation as an option to overcome end-stage diseases is common in countries with advanced healthcare systems and is increasingly provided in emerging and developing countries. A review of the literature points to sex- and gender-based inequity in the field with differences reported at each step of the transplant process, including access to a transplantation waiting list, access to transplantation once waitlisted, as well as outcome after transplantation. In this review, we summarize the data regarding sex- and gender-based disparity in adult and pediatric kidney, liver, lung, heart, and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and argue that there are not only biological but also psychological and socioeconomic issues that contribute to disparity in the outcome, as well as an inequitable access to transplantation for women and girls. Because the demand for organs has always exceeded the supply, the transplant community has long recognized the need to ensure equity and efficiency of the organ allocation system. In the spirit of equity and equality, the authors call for recognition of these inequities and the development of policies that have the potential to ensure that girls and women have equitable access to transplantation.
Collapse
|
41
|
Süsal C, Kumru G, Döhler B, Morath C, Baas M, Lutz J, Unterrainer C, Arns W, Aubert O, Bara C, Beiras-Fernandez A, Böhmig GA, Bösmüller C, Diekmann F, Dutkowski P, Hauser I, Legendre C, Lozanovski VJ, Mehrabi A, Melk A, Minor T, Mueller TF, Pisarski P, Rostaing L, Schemmer P, Schneeberger S, Schwenger V, Sommerer C, Tönshoff B, Viebahn R, Viklicky O, Weimer R, Weiss KH, Zeier M, Živčić-Ćosić S, Heemann U. Should kidney allografts from old donors be allocated only to old recipients? Transpl Int 2020; 33:849-857. [PMID: 32337766 DOI: 10.1111/tri.13628] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2019] [Revised: 11/06/2019] [Accepted: 04/22/2020] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
In several deceased donor kidney allocation systems, organs from elderly donors are allocated primarily to elderly recipients. The Eurotransplant Senior Program (ESP) was implemented in 1999, and since then, especially in Europe, the use of organs from elderly donors has steadily increased. The proportion of ≥60-year-old donors reported to the Collaborative Transplant Study (CTS) by European centers has doubled, from 21% in 2000-2001 to 42% in 2016-2017. Therefore, in the era of organ shortage it is a matter of debate whether kidney organs from elderly donors should only be allocated to elderly recipients or whether <65-year-old recipients can also benefit from these generally as "marginal" categorized organs. To discuss this issue, a European Consensus Meeting was organized by the CTS on April 12, 2018, in Heidelberg, in which 36 experts participated. Based on available evidence, it was unanimously concluded that kidney organs from 65- to 74-year-old donors can also be allocated to 55- to 64-year-old recipients, especially if these organs are from donors with no history of hypertension, no increased creatinine, no cerebrovascular death, and no other reasons for defining a marginal donor, such as diabetes or cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caner Süsal
- Institute of Immunology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Gizem Kumru
- Institute of Immunology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Bernd Döhler
- Institute of Immunology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christian Morath
- Division of Nephrology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Marije Baas
- Department of Nephrology, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Jens Lutz
- Division of Nephrology and Infectious Diseases, Medical Clinic, Gemeinschaftsklinikum Mittelrhein, Koblenz, Germany
| | | | - Wolfgang Arns
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Cologne Merheim Medical Center, Cologne, Germany
| | - Olivier Aubert
- Service de Transplantation Rénale et Unité de Soins Intensifs, AP-HP, Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France
| | - Christoph Bara
- Division of Thoracic Transplantation and Cardiovascular Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Andres Beiras-Fernandez
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital of Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
| | - Georg A Böhmig
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Claudia Bösmüller
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Fritz Diekmann
- Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, ICNU, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Philipp Dutkowski
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Swiss HPB and Transplantation Center, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Ingeborg Hauser
- Department of Nephrology, Medinizische Klinik III, UKF, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Christophe Legendre
- Service de Transplantation Rénale et Unité de Soins Intensifs, AP-HP, Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France
| | - Vladimir J Lozanovski
- Department of General and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Arianeb Mehrabi
- Department of General and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Anette Melk
- Department of Pediatric Kidney, Liver and Metabolic Diseases, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Thomas Minor
- Department of Surgical Research, Clinic for General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Germany
| | - Thomas F Mueller
- Division of Nephrology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Przemyslaw Pisarski
- Department for General and Visceral Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Lionel Rostaing
- Service de Néphrologie, Dialyse, Aphérèses et Transplantation, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| | - Peter Schemmer
- Department of Surgery, General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Stefan Schneeberger
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Vedat Schwenger
- Department of Nephrology and Autoimmune Diseases, Transplantation Center, Klinikum Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Claudia Sommerer
- Division of Nephrology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Burkhard Tönshoff
- Department of Pediatrics I, University Children's Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Richard Viebahn
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Ondrej Viklicky
- Department of Nephrology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Rolf Weimer
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Giessen, Giessen, Germany
| | - Karl-Heinz Weiss
- Department of Internal Medicine IV, Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Martin Zeier
- Division of Nephrology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stela Živčić-Ćosić
- Department of Nephrology, Dialysis and Kidney Transplantation, Faculty of Medicine, Clinical Hospital Center Rijeka, University of Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia
| | - Uwe Heemann
- Department of Nephrology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Impact of the elderly donor on an abdominal organ transplantation program. Eur Surg 2020. [DOI: 10.1007/s10353-020-00637-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|
43
|
Camilleri B, Pararajasingam R, Buttigieg J, Halawa A. Immunosuppression strategies in elderly renal transplant recipients. Transplant Rev (Orlando) 2020; 34:100529. [DOI: 10.1016/j.trre.2020.100529] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2019] [Revised: 11/09/2019] [Accepted: 12/18/2019] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
|
44
|
Renal transplantation in the elderly: Outcomes and recommendations. Transplant Rev (Orlando) 2020; 34:100530. [DOI: 10.1016/j.trre.2020.100530] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2019] [Revised: 11/09/2019] [Accepted: 12/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
|
45
|
Dreyer GJ, de Fijter JW. Transplanting the Elderly: Mandatory Age- and Minimal Histocompatibility Matching. Front Immunol 2020; 11:359. [PMID: 32226428 PMCID: PMC7080649 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00359] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2019] [Accepted: 02/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Worldwide over 40% of patients receiving renal replacement therapy (RRT) are aged 65 years or older, a number that is still increasing. Renal transplantation is the preferred RRT, providing substantial survival benefit over those remaining on dialysis, including the elderly. Only 3% of patients aged 65 years or older accepted on the waiting list actually received a kidney transplant offer within the Eurotransplant allocation region. To increase the chance for elderly to receive a timely kidney transplant, the Eurotransplant Senior Program was introduced. The ESP supports local allocation of older kidneys to older donors in order to decrease cold ischemia time, while disregarding former exchange principles based on matching for HLA antigens. As a consequence, more elderly received a kidney transplant and a relative higher incidence of acute rejection resulted in additional courses of high steroids and/or depleting antibody therapy. Since death with a functioning graft due to infections is the dominant reason of graft loss in elderly, more intense clinical immunosuppression to prevent or treat acute rejection is not a very attractive option. Therefore in elderly kidney transplant candidates, we advocate reintroduction of minimal histocompatibility criteria (i.e., HLA-DR matching) followed by age-matching with mandatory local/regional allocation to also facilitate short cold ischemia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Geertje J Dreyer
- Department of Internal Medicine (Nephrology), Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Johan W de Fijter
- Department of Internal Medicine (Nephrology), Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Some Aspects of Aging Are Advantageous: Elderly Organ Recipients May Get Away With Less Immunosuppression. Transplantation 2020. [DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000002805] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
47
|
High numbers of differentiated CD28null CD8+ T cells are associated with a lowered risk for late rejection and graft loss after kidney transplantation. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0228096. [PMID: 32023273 PMCID: PMC7001918 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2019] [Accepted: 01/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The hypothesis was tested that parameters of an aged T-cell compartment associate with the risk for late rejection after kidney transplantation. Methods Recipients of a kidney transplant in the period 2007–2013 were (N = 365) were included. T cells were characterized prior to transplantation by flow cytometry as naive (CD45RO-CCR7+), central-memory (CD45RO+CCR7+), effector-memory (CD45RO-CCR7-) or terminally differentiated CD8+ Temra (CD45RO-/CCR7-/CD28-) cells. T cell telomere length and thymic output were assessed prior to transplantation in 202 recipients. Follow-up was until December 2018. The date of the first time of biopsy-proven late rejection (>6 months after transplantation) was used to calculate the rejection-free survival time. Results Fifty cases of biopsy-proven rejection were recorded. Thymic output and T cell telomere length did not associate with late rejection-free survival. However, the percentage and absolute numbers of CD8+Temra and CD28null CD8+ T cells were significantly lower in patients with late rejection. Specifically, in the highest tertile of percentages of CD28null CD8+ T cells, the cumulative incidence of late rejection at 5 and 10 years was only 5% and 8% compared to 16% and 20% in the middle to lowest tertile (p = 0.002). Multivariate proportional hazard analysis showed that percentage and absolute number of CD28null CD8+ T cells remained significantly associated with late rejection and rejection-related graft loss. Conclusion High numbers of differentiated CD28null CD8+ T cells decrease the risk for late rejection and rejection-related graft loss after kidney transplantation.
Collapse
|
48
|
Noble J, Jouve T, Malvezzi P, Süsal C, Rostaing L. Transplantation of Marginal Organs: Immunological Aspects and Therapeutic Perspectives in Kidney Transplantation. Front Immunol 2020; 10:3142. [PMID: 32082306 PMCID: PMC7005052 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.03142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2019] [Accepted: 12/24/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Recent data from the World Population Prospects projects that, by 2050, nearly all regions in the world will have a quarter or more of the population aged 60 and above. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) has a high global prevalence (~13%) worldwide, and the prevalence of chronic kidney disease and end-stage kidney disease increase with age. Kidney transplantation remains the best therapeutic option for end-stage kidney disease, offering a survival benefit in comparison with dialysis maintenance for most patients. This review focuses on immunological aspects of kidney transplantation in older patients and marginal donors, i.e., 60 years or older deceased kidney donors or 50–59 years old deceased kidney donors with comorbidities. Clinical outcomes of kidney recipients in terms of renal and patient survival are more than acceptable even for patients over 70. In this population, the first cause of graft loss is death with a functional graft. However, the inherent issues of these transplantations are the acceptance or refusal of frail kidney from an old donor and the increased immunogenicity of these organs in balance with potential frail and immunosenescent recipients. Finally, the immunosuppressive regimen itself is a challenge for the future of the transplant, to prevent adverse effects such as nephrotoxicity and higher risk of infections or cancer in a population already at risk. Belatacept may have a good place in the immunosuppressive strategy to improve efficacy and the safety posttransplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johan Noble
- Service de Néphrologie, Hémodialyse, Aphéréses et Transplantation Rénale, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Grenoble-Alpes, Grenoble, France.,Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| | - Thomas Jouve
- Service de Néphrologie, Hémodialyse, Aphéréses et Transplantation Rénale, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Grenoble-Alpes, Grenoble, France.,Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| | - Paolo Malvezzi
- Service de Néphrologie, Hémodialyse, Aphéréses et Transplantation Rénale, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Grenoble-Alpes, Grenoble, France
| | - Caner Süsal
- Collaborative Transplant Study, Institute of Immunology, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Lionel Rostaing
- Service de Néphrologie, Hémodialyse, Aphéréses et Transplantation Rénale, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Grenoble-Alpes, Grenoble, France.,Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Quast LS, Grzella S, Lengenfeld T, Pillokeit N, Hummels M, Zgoura P, Westhoff TH, Viebahn R, Schenker P. Outcome of Kidney Transplantation Using Organs From Brain-dead Donors Older Than 75 Years. Transplant Proc 2019; 52:119-126. [PMID: 31901319 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2019.11.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2019] [Revised: 10/23/2019] [Accepted: 11/10/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE We investigated whether older donor kidneys aged >75 years have acceptable long-term function and if recipients can benefit sufficiently from the transplantation. METHODS This single-center study retrospectively analyzed patient data from 217 deceased donor kidney transplants performed between 1998 and 2014 as part of the Eurotransplant Senior Program, where the organ donors were ≥65 years old. Depending on donor age, the groups "older donors" (OD; n = 161) and "very old donors" (VOD; n = 56) received transplants from donors aged 65 to 75 years and >75 years, respectively. Donor and recipient clinical characteristics, delayed graft function, estimated glomerular filtration rate, 1-year rejection rate, patient and graft survival, and postoperative complications were investigated. RESULTS Comparing VOD group vs OD group, the 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year graft survival rates were 80.4% vs 76.4%, 62.5% vs 65.8%, and 42.6% vs 57.3%, respectively. Patient survival rates after 1, 3, and 5 years were 89.3% vs 88.2%, 71.4% vs 78.2%, and 57.5% vs 71.8%, respectively. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups (graft survival P = .107; patient survival P = .126). Kidney graft function after 1, 2, and 3 years was significantly better in the OD group than in the VOD group. No differences were found regarding postoperative complications, rejection rate, and delayed graft function. CONCLUSION The utilization of selected kidney-grafts from donors >75 years resulted in acceptable outcomes after kidney transplantation and could expand the donor pool. In contrast to the high mortality rate during dialysis, recipients in both groups benefited from transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louisa Sarah Quast
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Sascha Grzella
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Thorsten Lengenfeld
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Nina Pillokeit
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Marielle Hummels
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Panagiota Zgoura
- Medical Department I, University Hospital Marienhospital Herne, Ruhr-University Bochum, Herne, Germany
| | - Timm H Westhoff
- Medical Department I, University Hospital Marienhospital Herne, Ruhr-University Bochum, Herne, Germany
| | - Richard Viebahn
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Peter Schenker
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Schaenman J, Castellon L, Liang EC, Nanayakkara D, Abdalla B, Sarkisian C, Goldwater D. The Frailty Risk Score predicts length of stay and need for rehospitalization after kidney transplantation in a retrospective cohort: a pilot study. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2019; 5:144. [PMID: 31890257 PMCID: PMC6905019 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-019-0534-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2019] [Accepted: 11/22/2019] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Frailty is a widely used measure in older patients as a predictor of poor outcomes after hospitalization and surgery. There is a growing body of data in kidney transplantation suggesting frailty can predict adverse outcomes. There is interest in using chart review measures of frailty and multimorbidity, as they may be equally predictive as physical measurement. This approach holds promise for patient evaluation, identifying candidates for prehabilitation, and targeting resources towards those anticipated to have an increased rate of clinical challenges after kidney transplantation. Frail patients who are often older may place a large resource and economic burden on transplant programs. Methods We applied a previously published chart review–based approach in a retrospective, pilot study to calculate the Frailty Risk Score (FRS) utilizing a cohort of kidney transplant patients. We reviewed concurrent comorbidities using the Charlson comorbidity (CM) score to determine the feasibility and utility of applying this approach in transplant patients to predict post-transplant outcomes such as length of hospitalization and the need for rehospitalization. Results Sixty kidney transplant recipients were evaluated by chart review, 23 characterized as older (> = 60) and 37 younger (ages 30–59). Median FRS score was 3 (range 1–7). Higher FRS was significantly associated with increased patient age (high FRS 19% in younger patients, 43% in older patients). Increased CM score was also associated with increased patient age. Patients with a high FRS stayed in the hospital for an average of 8 days, compared with 5.7 days for a low FRS. Patients with high FRS were readmitted an average of 2.9 times compared with an average of 1.1 for those with a low FRS. FRS score remained significant for predicting outcomes after adjustment for patient age. Conclusion Elevated FRS prior to transplantation was associated with increased hospital stay and the need for readmission in kidney transplant recipients. This analysis demonstrates the potential strength of chart review in evaluating frailty prior to transplantation, permitting risk stratification and targeting of resources for rehabilitation and close post-transplant monitoring. Frail patients may benefit from targeted “prehabilitation” to attenuate the associated adverse clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna Schaenman
- 1Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA USA
| | - Loren Castellon
- 2Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York City, New York USA
| | - Emily C Liang
- 1Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA USA
| | - Deepa Nanayakkara
- 1Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA USA
| | - Basmah Abdalla
- 3Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA USA
| | - Catherine Sarkisian
- 4Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA USA
| | - Deena Goldwater
- 4Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA USA
| |
Collapse
|