Should the portal vein be routinely resected during pancreaticoduodenectomy for adenocarcinoma? Ann Surg. 2013;257:726-730. [PMID: 22968078 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0b013e318269d23c]

Recurrence scoring system predicting early recurrence for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma undergoing pancreatectomy and portomesenteric vein resection

BACKGROUND

Pancreatectomy with concomitant portomesenteric vein resection (PVR) enables patients with portomesenteric vein (PV) involvement to achieve radical resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, however, early recurrence (ER) is frequently observed.

AIM

To predict ER and identify patients at high risk of ER for individualized therapy.

METHODS

Totally 238 patients undergoing pancreatectomy and PVR were retrospectively enrolled and were allocated to the training or validating cohort. Univariate Cox and LASSO regression analyses were performed to construct serum recurrence score (SRS) based on 26 serum-derived parameters. Uni- and multivariate Cox regression analyses of SRS and 18 clinicopathological variables were performed to establish a Nomogram. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to evaluate the predictive accuracy. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test.

RESULTS

Independent serum-derived recurrence-relevant factors of LASSO regression model, including postoperative carbohydrate antigen 19-9, postoperative carcinoembryonic antigen, postoperative carbohydrate antigen 125, preoperative albumin (ALB), preoperative platelet to ALB ratio, and postoperative platelets to lymphocytes ratio, were used to construct SRS [area under the curve (AUC): 0.855, 95%CI: 0.786–0.924]. Independent risk factors of recurrence, including SRS [hazard ratio (HR): 1.688, 95%CI: 1.075-2.652], pain (HR: 1.653, 95%CI: 1.052-2.598), perineural invasion (HR: 2.070, 95%CI: 0.827-5.182), and PV invasion (HR: 1.603, 95%CI: 1.063-2.417), were used to establish the recurrence nomogram (AUC: 0.869, 95%CI: 0.803-0.934). Patients with either SRS > 0.53 or recurrence nomogram score > 4.23 were considered at high risk for ER, and had poor long-term outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The recurrence scoring system unique for pancreatectomy and PVR, will help clinicians in predicting recurrence efficiently and identifying patients at high risk of ER for individualized therapy.

Developments in pancreatic cancer surgery

Pancreatic cancer surgery, with one of the worst prognoses in oncology, is a challenge to the surgical community. Centralization of pancreatic surgery has led to the foundation of high-volume centers, thereby greatly facilitating the successful performance of more radical approaches. This review spotlights on recent advances in surgical approaches to pancreatic cancer and the risks and benefits of vascular reconstruction to improve resectability. Surgery being the only modality to achieve cure, multivisceral and vascular resections are being incorporated to improve dismal operability rates of < 10%. Great leaps have been made in neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment, as targeted and specific chemotherapeutic agents are being continually added. The concept of borderline and locally advanced pancreatic tumors and the use of neoadjuvant chemorad has extended the indications of oncological resection in such tumors. Venous resections are being routinely performed so as to facilitate en bloc removal of tumors, while arterial resections, owing to the increased morbidity and mortality, are offered to highly selective cases. New techniques like the triangle operation and periarterial divestment have opened new viable surgical options. Although laparoscopic approach is time consuming, it offers reduced operative blood loss and a shortened hospital stay at specialized centers. Robotic surgery may produce better results in patients needing vascular resection and reconstruction, but the expenses involved and limited availability are major deterrents. Advanced techniques of surgical resection and vessel reconstruction provide a repository for curative-intent surgery in borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

Peritoneal patch in vascular reconstruction during pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer: a single Centre experience

BACKGROUND

Concomitant venous resection during pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for pancreatic adenocarcinoma with mesenterico-portal vein involvement is increasingly performed to achieve oncological resection. This study aims to report a single centre experience in peritoneal patch (PP) as autologous graft for vascular reconstruction (VR) during PD.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent PD + VR with PP between December 2019 and September 2020 was performed, using a prospective collected database. Postoperative outcome and pathological margins were evaluated. Venous patency was assessed by computed tomography at day 7 and week 12 post surgery.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients underwent PD + VR with PP reconstruction for pancreatic cancer, including one total pancreatectomy. VR consisted of lateral (n = 14) or tubular (n = 1) patch. The median PP length was 30 mm [26.3-33.8] and venous clamping time 30 min [27.5-39.0]. Computed tomography showed a patent VR in 93.3% and 53.3% after 7 days and 12 weeks, respectively; venous patency loss was always asymptomatic. The only postoperative VR-related complication was one mesenteric venous thrombosis. Five other patients experienced VR-unrelated complications: septic shock (n = 3), biliary fistula (n = 1) and post-traumatic subdural hematoma (n = 1). Mortality was nihil. At pathology, R0 resection (≥1 mm) was observed in 40.0% (6/15), venous margin was free in 46.7% (7/15), and venous wall was involved in 40.0% (6/15).

CONCLUSIONS

Use of PP as venous substitute during PD + VR is safe and feasible with an acceptable postoperative morbidity, and a decreased but asymptomatic venous patency after 12 weeks which should question the role of anticoagulation therapy.

Neoadjuvant Treatment Strategies in Resectable Pancreatic Cancer

Simple Summary

Only 10–20% of patients with newly diagnosed resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma have potentially resectable disease. Upfront surgery is the gold standard, but it is rarely curative. After surgical extirpation of tumors, up to 80% of patients will develop cancer recurrence, and the initial relapse is metastatic in 50–70% of these patients. Adjuvant chemotherapy offers the best strategy to date to improve overall survival but faces real challenges; some patients will experience rapid disease progression within 3 months of surgery and patients who do not receive all planned cycles of chemotherapy have unfavourable oncological outcomes. The neoadjuvant approach is therefore logical but requires further investigation. This approach shows favourable trends regarding disease-free survival and overall survival but, in the absence of rigorous published phase III trials, is not validated to date. Here, we intend to provide a comprehensive analysis of the literature to provide direction for future studies.

Abstract

Complete surgical resection is the cornerstone of curative therapy for resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Upfront surgery is the gold standard, but it is rarely curative. Neoadjuvant treatment is a logical option, as it may overcome some of the limitations of adjuvant therapy and has already shown some encouraging results. The main concern regarding neoadjuvant therapy is the risk of disease progression during chemotherapy, meaning the opportunity to undergo the intended curative surgery is missed. We reviewed all recent literature in the following areas: major surveys, retrospective studies, meta-analyses, and randomized trials. We then selected the ongoing trials that we believe are of interest in this field and report here the results of a comprehensive review of the literature. Meta-analyses and randomized trials suggest that neoadjuvant treatment has a positive effect. However, no study to date can be considered practice changing. We considered design, endpoints, inclusion criteria and results of available randomized trials. Neoadjuvant treatment appears to be at least a feasible strategy for patients with resectable pancreatic cancer.

Surgical Treatment of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

Simple Summary

Surgery is the only potential cure for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and should always be combined with adjuvant chemotherapy or other multimodal treatment. Besides the advances in such multimodal approaches, there has been substantial progress in surgical techniques to especially address advanced resections. These techniques include specific operative steps, such as ‘artery first’ or ‘uncinate first’ approaches as well as techniques that allow safe vascular resection and reconstruction to achieve radical tumor removal. Most recently, also minimally-invasive and robotic approaches have been adopted for pancreatic cancer surgery; however, there is no high-level evidence on these evolving techniques especially with regards to long-term results compared to conventional surgical techniques.

Abstract

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) represents an aggressive tumor of the digestive system with still low five-year survival of less than 10%. Although there are improvements for multimodal therapy of PDAC, surgery still remains the effective way to treat the disease. Combined with adjuvant and/or neoadjuvant treatment, pancreatic surgery is able to enhance the five-year survival up to around 20%. However, pancreatic resection is always associated with a high risk of complications and regarded as one of the most complex fields in abdominal surgery. This review gives a summary on the surgical treatment for PDAC based on the current literature with a special focus on resection techniques.

Surgical Treatment of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) represents an aggressive tumor of the digestive system with still low five-year survival of less than 10%. Although there are improvements for multimodal therapy of PDAC, surgery still remains the effective way to treat the disease. Combined with adjuvant and/or neoadjuvant treatment, pancreatic surgery is able to enhance the five-year survival up to around 20%. However, pancreatic resection is always associated with a high risk of complications and regarded as one of the most complex fields in abdominal surgery. This review gives a summary on the surgical treatment for PDAC based on the current literature with a special focus on resection techniques.

Clinical impact of preoperative tumour contact with superior mesenteric-portal vein in patients with resectable pancreatic head cancer

INTRODUCTION

The NCCN classification of resectability in pancreatic head cancer does not consider preoperative radiological tumour ≤ 180° contact with portal vein/superior mesenteric vein (PV/SMV) as a negative prognostic feature. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether this factor is associated with higher rate of incomplete resection and poorer survival.

METHODS

All patients considered for pancreatic resection between 2012 and 2017 at two Spanish referral centres were included. Patients with borderline and locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) according to NCCN classification were excluded. Preoperative CT scans were reviewed by dedicated radiologists to identify radiologic tumour contact with PV/SMV.

RESULTS

Out of 302, 71 patients were finally included in this study. Twenty-two (31%) patients showed tumour-PV/SMV contact (group 1) and 49 (69%) did not show any contact (group 2). Patients in group 1 showed a statistically significantly higher rate of R1 and R1-direct margins compared with group 2 (95 vs 28% and 77 vs 10%) and lower median survival (24 vs 41 months, p = 0.02). Preoperative contact with PV/SMV, lymph node metastases, R1-direct margin and NO adjuvant chemotherapy were significantly associated with disease-specific survival at multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative radiological tumour contact with PV/SMV in patients with NCCN resectable PDAC is associated with high rate of pathologic positive margins following surgery and poorer survival.

What Should Guide the Performance of Venous Resection During Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma with Venous Contact?

Complete surgical resection, most often associated with perioperative chemotherapy, is the only way to offer a chance of cure for patients with pancreatic cancer. One of the most important factors in determining survival outcome that can be influenced by the surgeon is the R0 resection. However, the proximity of mesenteric vessels in cephalic pancreatic tumors, especially the mesenterico-portal venous axis, results in an increased risk of vein involvement and/or the presence of malignant cells in the venous bed margin. A concomitant venous resection can be performed to decrease the risk of a positive margin. Given the additional technical difficulty that this implies, many surgeons seek a path between the tumor and the vein, hoping for the absence of tumor infiltration into the perivascular tissue on pathologic analysis, particularly in cases with administration of neoadjuvant therapy. The definition of optimal surgical margin remains a subject of debate, but at least 1 mm is an independent predictor of survival after pancreatic cancer surgical resection. Although preoperative radiologic assessment is essential for accurate planning of a pancreatic resection, intraoperative decision-making with regard to resection of the mesenterico-portal vein in tumors with a venous contact remains unclear and variable. Although venous histologic involvement and perivascular infiltration are not accurately predictable preoperatively, clinicians must examine the existing criteria and normograms to guide their surgical management according to the integration of new imaging techniques, preoperative chemotherapy use, tumor biology and molecular histopathology, and surgical techniques.

Surgical management and pathological assessment of pancreatoduodenectomy with venous resection: an international survey among surgeons and pathologists

BACKGROUND

The aim of this survey was to gain insights in the current surgical management and pathological assessment of pancreatoduodenectomy with portal-superior mesenteric vein resection (VR).

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed to identify international expert surgeons (N = 150) and pathologists (N = 40) who published relevant studies between 2009 and 2019. These experts and Dutch surgeons (N = 17) and pathologists (N = 20) were approached to complete an online survey.

RESULTS

Overall, 76 (46%) surgeons and 37 (62%) pathologists completed the survey. Most surgeons (71%) estimated that preoperative imaging corresponded correctly with intraoperative findings of venous involvement in 50-75% of patients. An increased complication risk following VR was expected by 55% of surgeons, mainly after Type 4 (segmental resection-venous conduit anastomosis). Most surgeons (61%) preferred Type 3 (segmental resection-primary anastomosis). Most surgeons (75%) always perform the VR themselves. Standard postoperative imaging for patency control was performed by 54% of surgeons and 39% adjusted thromboprophylaxis following VR. Most pathologists (76%) always assessed tumor infiltration in the resected vein and only 54% of pathologists always assess the resection margins of the vein itself. Variation in assessment of tumor infiltration depth was observed.

CONCLUSION

This international survey showed variation in the surgical management and pathological assessment of pancreatoduodenectomy with venous involvement. This highlights the lack of evidence and emphasizes the need for research on imaging modalities to improve patient selection for VR, surgical techniques, postoperative management and standardization of the pathological assessment.

Fifty Years of Surgery for Pancreatic Cancer

The surgical treatment of pancreatic cancer (PDAC) has seen sweeping changes during the past 5 decades. Up to the middle of the 20th century resection rates were below 5%, but the numbers of curative resections for PDAC are now continuously increasing due to improved neoadjuvant treatment concepts as well as progress in surgical techniques and perioperative management. During the same period, mortality rates after pancreatic surgery have decreased considerably and are now less than 5%. One of the most important cornerstones of reduced mortality has been the concentration of PDAC surgery in specialized centers. In addition, the management of postoperative complications has improved greatly as a result of optimized interdisciplinary teamwork. Adjuvant chemotherapy has become the reference treatment in resected PDAC, achieving significantly prolonged survival. Moreover, the concept of borderline resectable PDAC has emerged to characterize tumors with increased risk for tumor-positive resection margins or worse outcome. The best treatment strategy for borderline resectable PDAC is currently under debate, whereas neoadjuvant therapy has become established as a beneficial treatment option for patients with locally advanced PDAC, enabling conversion surgery in up to 60% of cases. This review article summarizes the principal changes in PDAC surgery during the past 50 years.

Vascular Resection for Pancreatic Cancer: 2019 French Recommendations Based on a Literature Review From 2008 to 6-2019

Introduction: Vascular resection remains a subject of debate in the management of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC). These French recommendations were drafted on behalf of the French National Institute of Cancer (INCA-2019).

Material and Methods: A systematic literature search, with PubMed, Medline® (OvidSP), EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, was performed for abstracts published in English from January 2008 to June 2019, and identified systematic reviews/metaanalyses, retrospective analyses and case series dedicated to vascular resections in the setting of PDAC. All selected articles were graded for level of evidence and strength of recommendation was given according to the GRADE system.

Results: Neoadjuvant treatment should be performed rather than direct surgery in borderline and locally advanced non-metastatic PDAC with venous and/or arterial infiltration (T4 stage). Patients who respond or those with stable disease and good performance status should undergo surgical exploration to assess resectability because cross-sectional imaging often fails to identify the extent of the remaining viable tumor. Combining vascular resection with pancreatectomy in these cases increases the feasibility of curative resection which is still the only option to improve long-term survival. Venous resection (VR) is recommended if resection is possible in the presence of limited lateral or circumferential involvement but without venous occlusion and in the absence of arterial contact with the celiac axis (CA; cephalic tumors) or the superior mesenteric artery (SMA; all tumor locations) (Grade B). The patients should be in good general condition because mortality and morbidity are higher than following pancreatectomy without VR (Grade B). In case of planned VR, neoadjuvant treatment is recommended since it improves both rate of R0 resections and survival compared to upfront surgery (Grade B). Due to their complexity and specificities, arterial resection (AR; mainly the hepatic artery (HA) or the CA) must be discussed in selected patients, in multidisciplinary team meetings in tertiary referral centers, according to the tumor location and the type of arterial extension. In case of invasion of a short segment of the common HA, resection with arterial reconstruction may be proposed after neoadjuvant therapy. In case of SMA invasion, neoadjuvant therapy may be followed by laparotomy with dissection and biopsy of peri-arterial tissues. A pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) with SMA-resection is not recommended if the frozen section examination is positive (Grade C). In case of distal PDAC with invasion of the CA, a distal pancreatectomy with CA-resection without arterial reconstruction may be proposed after neoadjuvant therapy and radiologic embolization of the CA branches (expert opinion).

Conclusion: For PDAC with vascular involvement, neoadjuvant treatment followed by pancreatectomy with venous resection or even arterial resection can be proposed as a curative option in selected patients with selected vascular involvement.

Mesenterico-portal vein invasion should be an important factor in TNM staging for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Proposed modification of the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system

BACKGROUND

The 8^th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) excludes extrapancreatic extension from the assessment of T stage and restages tumors with mesenterico-portal vein (MPV) invasion into T1-3 diseases according to tumor size. However, MPV invasion is believed to be correlated with a poor prognosis.

AIM

To analyze whether the inclusion of MPV invasion can further improve the 8^th edition of the AJCC staging system for PDAC.

METHODS

This study retrospectively included 8^th edition AJCC T1-3N0-2M0 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy/total pancreatectomy from two cohorts and analyzed survival outcomes. In the first cohort, a total of 7539 patients in the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database was included, and in the second cohort, 689 patients from the West China Hospital database were enrolled.

RESULTS

Cox regression analysis showed that MPV invasion is an independent prognostic factor in both databases. In the MPV- group, all pairwise comparisons between the survival functions of patients with different stages were significant except for the comparison between patients with stage IIA and those with stage IIB. However, in the MPV+ group, pairwise comparisons between the survival functions of patients with stage IA, stage IB, stage IIA, stage IIB, and stage III were not significant. T1-3N0 patients in the MPV+ group were compared with the T1N0, T2N0, and T3N0 subgroups of the MPV- group; only the survival of MPV-T3N0 and MPV+T1-3N0 patients had no significant difference. Further comparisons of patients with stage IIA and subgroups of stage IIB showed (1) no significant difference between the survival of T2N1 and T3N0 patients; (2) a longer survival of T1N1 patients that was shorter than the survival of T2N0 patients; and (3) and a shorter survival of T3N1 patients that was similar to that of T1-3N2 patients.

CONCLUSION

The modified 8^th edition of the AJCC staging system for PDAC proposed in this study, which includes the factor of MPV invasion, provides improvements in predicting prognosis, especially in MPV+ patients.

Pancreatoduodenectomy with portal vein resection favors the survival time of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A propensity score matching analysis

Portal vein (PV) involvement is common in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). To the best of our knowledge, pancreatectomy combined with PV resection (PVR) is the only radical therapy for patients with PV involvement. However, there remains a debate on whether patients with PV involvement could benefit from PVR or not. The present study aimed to compare the survival outcomes between patients receiving pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) with PVR and those receiving PD alone. A total of 377 patients with PDAC were enrolled, 138 patients with PV involvement were placed in the PVR group, while the other 239 patients were in the non-PVR group. To reduce selection bias and estimate the causal effect, 123 pairs of propensity score matched (PSM) patients were selected and compared for the survival outcomes. Before PSM, the survival of patients in the PVR group was worse compared with those in the non-PVR group (mean survival, 25.1 vs. 29.3 months; P=0.038). After balancing the baseline characteristics using the PSM method, the significant survival difference between the two groups was insignificant (mean survival, 25.9 vs. 31.2 months; P=0.364). Tumor stage, body mass index, serum albumin, R1 resection, lymph node metastasis, carbohydrate antigen (CA)125 and CA19-9 were significant independent prognostic factors. The incidence of serious postoperative complications was similar between the two groups. PVR is safe and effective for patients with PDAC. Patients with PV involvement could achieve the similar survival outcome as patients without PV involvement, through radical resection combined with PVR, without increasing the risk of serious complications.

The impact of extent of pancreatic and venous resection on survival for patients with pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer may require extended resections in order to achieve tumor-free margins, especially in the case of up-front resections, but it is important to know the limits of surgical therapy in this disease. This study aimed to investigate the impact of extent of pancreatic and venous resection on short- and long-term outcomes in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

METHODS

This was a retrospective study from a prospectively maintained database of pancreatic resections for PDAC. Short- and long-term outcomes were analyzed in patients having borderline resectable PDAC submitted to up-front total pancreatectomy (TP) or pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) with simultaneous portal vein (PV) and/or superior mesenteric vein (SMV) resection. Venous resections were carried out as tangential venous resection (TVR) or segmental venous resection (SVR). Patients were divided into 4 groups: (1) PD + TVR, (2) PD + SVR, (3) TP + TVR, (4) TP + SVR. Uni- and multivariate Cox regression analysis were performed to identify factors associated with survival.

RESULTS

Ninety-nine patients were submitted to simultaneous pancreatic and venous resection for PDAC. Among them, 25 were submitted to PD + TVR (25.3%), 12 to PD + SVR (12.1%), 23 to TP + TVR (23.2%), and 39 to TP + SVR (39.4%). Overall, major morbidity (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ IIIA) was 26.3%. Thirty- and 90-day mortality were 3% and 11.1%, respectively. There were no significant differences among groups in terms of short-term outcomes. Median overall survival of patients submitted to PD + TVR was significantly higher than those to TP+SVR (29.5 vs 7.9 months, P = 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified TP (HR = 2.11; 95% CI: 1.31-3.44; P = 0.002) and SVR (HR = 2.01; 95% CI: 1.27-3.15; P = 0.003) as the only independent prognostic factors for overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Up-front TP associated to SVR was predictive of worse survival in borderline resectable PDAC. Perioperative treatments in high-risk surgical groups may improve such poor outcomes.

Venous resection during pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer: a systematic review

Pancreatic cancer is one of the most aggressive and lethal malignancies with a dismal prognosis and survival. The curative effects of venous resection (VR) in pancreatic cancer remain controversial. A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library. The overall postoperative complications, perioperative mortality, histopathology, and long-term survival were compared between patients undergoing pancreatectomy combined with (VR+ group) or without (VR- group) VR. Forty-one studies were included in the systematic review. Pancreatectomy combined with VR required longer operation time and led to increased perioperative blood loss, whereas postoperative complications were similar. Patients in the VR+ group showed larger tumors and reduced R0 rates. Regarding long-term survival, patients with VR+ seemed to have impaired 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival. Based on our results, VR in pancreatic cancer is a safe and feasible procedure. Given the fact that patients have miserable outcomes and survival in the palliative setting alone, extended resection including VR is required for the purpose of achieving radical resection.

Effect of clinical status on survival in patients with borderline or locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Objective

To determine the effect of clinical status (weight variation and performance status [PS]) at diagnosis and during induction treatment on resectability and overall survival (OS) rates in patients with borderline resectable (BRPC) or locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC).

Methods

From 2005 to 2017, 454 consecutive patients were diagnosed with LAPC or BRPC. We evaluated the PS (0–1 or 2–3), body mass index at diagnosis, and weight loss (WL) > 5% at initial staging and after induction treatment and separated continuous weight loss (CWL) from weight stabilization.

Results

A total of 294 patients (64.8%) presented with WL, and 57 patients (12.6%) presented with a PS of 2–3. At restaging, 60 patients (13.2%) presented with CWL. Independent factors that poorly influenced the OS were a PS of 2–3 at diagnosis (P < .01), CWL at restaging (P < .01), and absence of resection (P < .01). Factors independently impeding resection were LAPC (P < .01), PS > 1 at diagnosis (P < .01), and CWL (P = .01). In total, 142 patients (31.3%) underwent pancreatectomy. Independent factors that poorly influenced the OS in the resected group were PS > 0 at diagnosis (P = .01) and obesity (P < .01). For the 312 unresected cancer patients (68.7%), CWL (P < .01) was identified as an independent factor that poorly influenced the OS.

Conclusion

Clinical parameters that are easy to measure and monitor are independent factors of poor prognosis. The variation of weight during the induction treatment, more than WL at diagnosis, significantly precluded resection and was an independent factor of shorter OS in unresected patients.

Can post-hoc video review of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy predict portal/superior mesenteric vein margin status in pancreatic adenocarcinoma?

BACKGROUND

Achieving margin negative resection is a significant determinant of outcome in pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDA). However, because of the fibrotic nature of PDA, it can be difficult to discriminate fibrosis from active disease intra-operatively. We sought to determine if post-hoc video review of robotic pancreatico-duodenectomy (RPD) could predict the portal/superior mesenteric vein (PV/SMV) margin status on final pathology.

METHODS

Experienced pancreatic surgeons, blinded to patient and operative variables, reviewed the PV/SMV margin for available RPD videos of consecutive PDA patients from 9/2012 through 6/2017.

RESULTS

107 RPD videos were reviewed. Of 76 patients (71%) predicted to have a negative vein margin on video review, 20 patients (26%) had a pathologic positive margin. 25 of 31 patients (81%) predicted to have positive margin on video review were positive on pathology. The specificity of video prediction was 90.3% with a sensitivity of 55.6% and an accuracy of 75.7%.

CONCLUSION

Post-hoc video review prediction is unable to reliably predict a positive (R1) margin at the portal vein/SMV, suggesting that intra-operative clinical assessment may be suboptimal in determining the need for more extensive resections.

Feasibility of resecting the portal vein only when necessary during pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer

Background

Whether the portal/superior mesenteric vein (PV) should be resected during pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) based on preoperative CT or intraoperative findings is controversial.

Methods

This was a retrospective study with data of patients who had undergone pancreatoduodenectomy for PDAC between 2002 and 2016 in a tertiary referral centre. Based on the extent of contact between the PV and tumour on CT, patients were categorized into: group 1, no contact; group 2, contact 180° or less; group 3, contact greater than 180°. Extent of pathological PV invasion (pPV) (no invasion, pv0; invasion to tunica adventitia, pv1; invasion to media, pv2; invasion to intima, pv3) was compared with patient survival. To assess the feasibility of performing PV resection (PVR) based on intraoperative findings, the prognosis of patients in groups 1 and 2 with pv0 and no PVR (PVR(−)pv0) was compared with that of patients who had PVR (PVR(+)pv0), selected using propensity score matching.

Results

Groups 1, 2 and 3 comprised 230, 232 and 38 patients respectively, and PVR was performed in 10·9, 73·3 and 95 per cent of them (P < 0·001). Extent of pPV differed significantly (P < 0·001). The positive predictive value of radiological tumour contact with PV in predicting positive pPV was 42·6 per cent. In 64 patients with PVR(−)pv0 and 64 matched patients with PVR(+)pv0, the R0 resection rate (66 versus 73 per cent respectively; P = 0·337) and survival (median 32·4 versus 32·1 months; P = 0·780) were not significantly different.

Conclusion

PVR is needed only when the tumour is in clear contact with the PV and cannot be detached during surgery.

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma with histologically proven portal vein infiltration: what is the outcome?

OBJECTIVES

Technical feasibility and safety of portal vein (PV) and superior mesenteric vein (SMV) resection during pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for cancer has been confirmed, but oncological benefits remain unclear. The present study aimed to explore the long-term outcomes of PD with PV/SMV resection and proven histologically invasion.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 95 consecutive PD were performed between January 2008 and August 2013, and 29 patients underwent PV/SMV resection with histologically proven venous tumor infiltration. Patients were matched 1 : 1 to controls who did not undergo venous resection, based on demographic and tumor characteristics.

RESULTS

Disease-free survival (DFS) of the PV/SMV invasion group and control group was 9.5 and 7.6 months, respectively (P=0.51). Median survival and survival at 1, 3, and 5 years were 12.9 months, 59, 17, and 10%, respectively, in case of PV/SMV invasion compared with 20.3 months, 72, 31, and 10%, respectively in control group (P=0.13). Patients with complete transmural infiltration presented nonsignificantly shorter DFS (9.0 months) compared with those with partial venous wall infiltration (18.4 months, P=0.78).

CONCLUSION

Histologically proven portal venous invasion in patients undergoing PD for adenocarcinoma seemed not to have an effect on both DFS and overall long-term survival.

Pancreaticoduodenectomy with combined superior mesenteric vein resection without reconstruction is possible: A case report and review of the literature

We report the case of a 56-year-old woman with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA) discovered during an episode of febrile jaundice. A computed tomography (CT) scan showed a mass in the head of the pancreas with circumferential infiltration of the superior mesenteric vein (SMV) and dilatation of the biliary and pancreatic ducts without metastases. The patient benefited from neoadjuvant chemotherapy (FOLFIRINOX) followed by radio-chemotherapy (45 Gy) and chemotherapy (LV5FU2). The revaluation CT revealed SMV thrombosis without portal vein (PV) thrombosis. There was no contact of the tumor with the PV. Pancreatoduodenectomy with combined resection of the SMV was performed with no reconstruction of this venous axis after confirmation of adequate PV, splenic, and left gastric venous flow and the absence of bowel ischemia. The pathological diagnosis was pT4N1R0 PA. There were no bowel angina issues during the follow-up period. At 15 mo after surgery, the patient died of metastatic recurrence.

Radiological assessment of local resectability status in patients with pancreatic cancer: Interreader agreement and reader performance in two different classification systems

OBJECTIVES

To assess the interreader agreement and reader performance in the evaluation of patients with pancreatic cancer (PC) in two classification systems of local resectability status prior to initiation of therapy, namely the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and Karolinska classification system (KCS).

METHODS

In this ethics review board-approved retrospective study, six radiologists independently evaluated pancreatic CT-examinations of 30 patients randomly selected from a tertiary referral centre's multidisciplinary tumour board database. Based on well-defined criteria of tumour-vessel relationship, each patient was assigned to one of three NCCN and six KCS categories. We assessed the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and compared the percentages of correct tumour classification of the six readers in both systems (Chi-square test; a P-value <0.05 was considered significant). The standard of reference was a consensus evaluation of CT-examinations by three readers not involved in the image analysis.

RESULTS

The ICC for NCCN and KCS was 0.82 and 0.84, respectively (very strong agreement). The percentages of correct tumour classification at NCCN and KCS were 53-83% and 30-57%, respectively, with no statistically significant differences in the overall reader comparison per classification system. In pair-wise comparison between readers for NCCN/KCS, there were statistically significant differences between reader 5 vs. readers 4 (P = 0.012) and 3 (P = 0.045)/ reader 5 vs. reader 4 (P = 0.037).

CONCLUSION

Interreader agreement in both PC classification systems is very strong. NCCN may be advantageous in terms of reader performance compared to KCS.

Routine portal vein resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma shows no benefit in overall survival

BACKGROUND

Extended pancreatic resections including resections of the portal (PV) may nowadays be performed safely. Limitations in distinguishing tumor involvement from inflammatory adhesions however lead to portal vein resections (PVR) without evidence of tumor infiltration in the final histopathological examination. The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of these "false negative" resections on operative outcome and long-term survival.

METHODS

40 patients who underwent pancreatic resection with PVR for pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA) without tumor infiltration of the PV (PVR-group) were identified. In a 1:3 match these patients were compared to 120 patients after standard pancreatic resection without PVR (SPR-group) with regard to operative outcome and overall survival.

RESULTS

Survival analysis revealed that median survival was significantly shorter in the PVR group (311 days) as compared to the SPR group (558 days), (p = 0.0011, hazard ratio 1.98, 95% CI: 1.31-2.98). Also postoperative complications ≥ Clavien III occurred significantly more often in the PVR group (37.5% vs. 20.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

Radical resection affords the best chance for long-term survival in patients with PA. Based on the results of this study a routine resection of the PV as recently proposed may however not be recommended.

Superior mesenteric artery margin in pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma

The aim of this study is trying to describe more details of superior mesenteric artery margin in pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, to evaluate biological and prognostic implications of tumor budding in this margin, and to provide more evidence for evaluation of R0 surgery in pancreaticoduodenectomy. 46 patients in 5-years period are included in this study. Immunochemistry and immunofluorescence are used to analyze tumor budding and epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Superior mesenteric artery margin might be described from four aspects including location, gross appearance, microscopic appearance and tumor budding. We find that 1mm rule for R1 surgery is more appropriate to predict prognosis (P = 0.009) than 0mm rule (P = 0.141). Expression of cytokeratin in tumor budding is significantly lower than primary tumor (P = 0.001), and it suggests that tumor budding may participate the procedure of epithelial-mesenchymal transition. High-grade tumor budding and decreasing cytokeratin of tumor budding correlate with distant metastasis and has negative influence on prognosis. So superior mesenteric artery margin might be not only an area that tumor cells may invade, but also a pathway for distant metastasis. It is necessary to evaluate superior mesenteric artery margin in pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer.

Splenic vein reconstruction is unnecessary in pancreatoduodenectomy combined with resection of the superior mesenteric vein-portal vein confluence according to short-term outcomes

BACKGROUND

Superior mesenteric vein-portal vein confluence resection combined with pancreatoduodenectomy (SMPVrPD) is occasionally required for resection of pancreatic head tumors. It remains unclear whether such situations require splenic vein (SV) reconstruction for decompression of left-sided portal hypertension (LSPH).

METHODS

The data from 93 of 104 patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) for pancreatic head malignancies were reviewed. Surgical outcomes in three groups-standard PD (control group), PD combined with vascular resection and SV preservation (SVp group), and SMPVrPD with SV resection (SVr group)-were compared. The influence of division and preservation of the two natural confluences (left gastric vein-portal vein and/or inferior mesenteric vein-SV confluences) on portal hemodynamics were evaluated using three-dimensional computed tomographic portography.

RESULTS

No mortality occurred. The morbidity rates were not significantly different among the three groups (18/43, 8/21, and 7/29, respectively; p = 0.306). In the SVr group, three patients had gastric remnant venous congestion, and three had esophageal varices without hemorrhagic potential. No patients had splenomegaly, or severe or prolonged thrombocytopenia. These LSPH-associated findings were less frequently observed when the two confluences were preserved.

CONCLUSIONS

SMPVrPD without SV reconstruction can be safely conducted. Additionally, preservation of these two confluences may reduce the risk of LSPH.

Resectable pancreatic head adenocarcinoma: Is R0 resection an illusion? Genetic evaluation of venous resection margin affirmed unrecognized disease

PURPOSE

To assess the K-ras gene mutation in the histologically negative venous margin of a pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) specimen and its impact on survival.

METHOD

From 2007 to 2010, 22 patients underwent R0 PD for resecable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. All specimens were stained and the portal vein (PV) bed was identified by blue ink; a 2mm³ sample (including the blue ink) was cut from a microscopic free-tumor block. DNA was extracted and assessed by quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction to detect the K-ras gene mutation. Twelve specimens (55%) (kras+ group) were identified with a K-ras mutation in the venous margin resection, and 10 specimens (kras- group) did not have K-ras mutation detected in the venous margin resection.

RESULTS

The two groups were comparable. Overall 3years survival of patients of kras+ group versus patients of kras- group was 0 and 17% (P=0.03), respectively. Median survival time of patients of kras+ group versus patients of kras- group was 16months vs 25months (P=0.04; 95% confidence interval [1,11-1,88]), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Genetic evaluation of venous resection margin affirmed unrecognized disease with strong impact on survival in more than 50% of patients with histologically R0 resection.

Trends in indications, complications and outcomes for venous resection during pancreatoduodenectomy

Background

Pancreatoduodenectomy with superior mesenteric–portal vein resection has become a common procedure in pancreatic surgery. The aim of this study was to compare standard pancreatoduodenectomy with pancreatoduodenectomy plus venous resection at a high-volume centre, and to examine trends in management and outcome over a decade for the latter procedure.

Methods

This retrospective observational study included all patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy with or without venous resection at Oslo University Hospital between January 2006 and December 2015. Trends were evaluated by assessing preoperative clinical and radiological characteristics, as well as perioperative outcomes in three time intervals (early, intermediate and late).

Results

A total of 784 patients had a pancreatoduodenectomy, of whom 127 (16·2 per cent) underwent venous resection. Venous resection resulted in a longer operating time (median 422 versus 312 min; P = 0·001) and greater estimated blood loss (EBL) (median 700 versus 500 ml; P = 0·004) than standard pancreatoduodenectomy. The rate of severe complications was significantly higher for pancreatoduodenectomy with venous resection (37·0 versus 26·3 per cent; P = 0·014). The overall burden of complications, evaluated using the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI), did not differ (median score 8·7 versus 8·7; P = 0·175). Trends in venous resection over time showed a significant reduction in EBL (median 1050 versus 375 ml; P = 0·001) and duration of hospital stay (median 14 versus 9 days; P = 0·011) between the early and late periods. However, despite an improvement in the intermediate period, severe complication rates returned to baseline in the late period (18 of 43 versus 9 of 42 versus 20 of 42 patients in early, intermediate and late periods respectively; P = 0·032), as did CCI scores (median 20·9 versus 0 versus 20·9; P = 0·041).

Conclusion

Despite an initial improvement in severe complications for venous resection during pancreatoduodenectomy, this was not maintained over time. Every fourth patient with venous resection needed relaparotomy, most frequently for bleeding.

Superior Mesenteric-Portal Vein Resection in Patients With Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Is Safe and May Increase Survival

Extension of pancreatic adenocarcinoma into adjacent vasculature often necessitates resection of the portal vein (PV) and or superior mesenteric vein (SMV) during pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Our study describes the surgical technique and results of PV/SMV resection in pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients. Between January 2008 and October 2013, 252 patients underwent PD for pancreatic malignancy. A total of 42 PV/SMV resections were performed (28 men, 14 women). Patients were categorized into 2 groups according to the degree of invasion into the portal vein wall: Group A (n = 16), extended compression of the portal vein wall by the surrounding carcinoma without true invasion, and Group B (n = 26), true invasion including intramural and transmural invasion. Morbidity of the 42 patients was 35%; there was no operative mortality, and overall 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 60%, 21%, and 12%, respectively. No differences in tumor size, margin positivity, nodal positivity, or survival rates were observed between groups. Resection of the PV/SMV is safe and does not increase morbidity or mortality. Tumor involvement of the PV/SMV is not associated with histopathologic signs that are predictive of a poor prognosis. The “artery first” approach should be considered as a means to facilitate safe venous resection and reconstruction.

Pancreatoduodenectomy with venous or arterial resection: a NSQIP propensity score analysis

INTRODUCTION

Vascular resection during pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) is being performed more frequently. Our aim was to analyze the outcomes of PD with and without vascular resection in a large, multicenter cohort.

METHODS

Patient data were gathered from 43 institutions as part of the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) Pancreatectomy Demonstration Project. Over a 14-month period, 1414 patients underwent PD without (82.2%) or with major venous (PD + V; 13.7%) or arterial (PD + A; 4.0%) vascular resection.

RESULTS

Postoperative morbidity and mortality following PD + A (51.0% and 3.6%) was comparable to PD + V (46.9% and 3.6%) and PD (44.3 and 1.5%, p = 0.50 and 0.43). A propensity score matched analysis revealed that vascular resection was associated with significant increases (p ≤ 0.05) in operative time (7:37 vs 6:11), need for blood transfusion (42.2% vs 18.1%), deep venous thromboembolism (6.9% vs 0.9%), postoperative septic shock (6.9% vs 1.7%), and length of stay (12.2 vs 10 days) while overall morbidity (45.7% vs 46.6) and mortality (1.0% vs 0%) were comparable.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to PD alone, PD + VR was associated with increased operative time, perioperative transfusions, deep venous thrombosis, septic shock, as well as length of stay, but overall morbidity and mortality were not increased.

Posterior Superior Mesenteric Artery First Dissection Versus Classical Approach in Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Outcomes of a Case-Matched Study

OBJECTIVES

Posterior superior mesenteric artery (SMA) first dissection in pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) may allow for early assessment of resectability and aberrant anatomy. Study objectives were to compare resection margins, perioperative outcomes, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients undergoing a posterior SMA first dissection PD to a classical technique PD.

METHODS

Patients (n = 77) who underwent a posterior SMA first PD for adenocarcinoma were case matched for patient and tumor characteristics with patients undergoing a classical approach PD from 2006 to 2014 (n = 177).

RESULTS

The SMA first patients had an improved negative resection margin rate (27 [35.1%] vs 14 [18.2%], P = 0.042) and a higher lymph node yield (median 28 [22-34] vs 21 [17-27], P < 0.001) compared with the classical approach group. No difference was demonstrated in serious complications or 30-day mortality between the SMA first and classical approach patients (Clavien-Dindo 3/4 16 [20.8%] vs 11 [14.3%], P = 0.336; 30-day mortality 3 [3.9%] vs 3 [3.9%], P = 1.00 respectively). Median DFS and OS was similar in SMA first compared with classical approach patients (DFS, 1.6 vs 1.1 years, P = 0.122; OS, 2.5 vs 1.5 years, P = 0.220 respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

A posterior SMA first approach is a comparably safe technique that may improve oncological results in PD compared with classical approach dissection.

Histopathological tumor invasion of the mesenterico-portal vein is characterized by aggressive biology and stromal fibroblast activation

BACKGROUND

Mesenterico-portal vein resection (PVR) during pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic head cancer was established in the 1990s and can be considered a routine procedure in specialized centers today. True histopathologic portal vein invasion is predictive of poor prognosis. The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between mesenterico-portal venous tumor infiltration (PVI) and features of aggressive tumor biology.

METHODS

Patients receiving PVR for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Immunohistochemical staining of tumor tissue was performed for the markers of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) E-Cadherin, Vimentin and beta-Catenin. Morphology of cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) was assessed as inactive or activated. Statistical calculations were performed with MedCalc software.

RESULTS

In total, 41 patients could be included. Median overall survival was 25 months. PVI was found in 17 patients (41%) and was significantly associated with loss of membranous E-Cadherin in tumor buds (p = 0.020), increased Vimentin expression (p = 0.03), activated CAF morphology (p = 0.046) and margin positive resection (p = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that PVI is associated with aggressive tumor biology and disseminated growth less amenable to margin-negative resection.

Treatment Strategy for Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer With Radiographic Artery Involvement

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated whether neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgical resection improves the clinical outcome for patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer with radiologic artery involvement (BRPC-A).

METHODS

We reviewed 143 BRPC-A patients from among 330 pancreatic cancer patients, including 111 potentially resectable pancreatic cancer patients and 76 borderline resectable pancreatic cancer with portal/superior mesenteric vein involvement patients, who underwent surgery at Wakayama Medical University Hospital. We compared the clinicopathological factors of 40 BRPC-A patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery and those of 103 BRPC-A patients treated with upfront surgery.

RESULTS

The R0 rate and progression-free survival of BRPC-A patients who received neoadjuvant therapy and subsequent surgical resection were significantly better compared to those who received upfront surgery (R0: P = 0.041; progression-free survival: P = 0.033), but overall survival was not significantly different. A multivariate analysis showed that intraoperative transfusion (P = 0.007), moderately or poorly differentiated pathological adenocarcinoma (P = 0.019), and failure to complete postoperative adjuvant therapy (P < 0.001) independently predicted a poor prognosis for BRPC-A patients who underwent surgical resection.

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant treatment followed by surgery might provide clinical benefits for BRPC-A patients; however, the establishment of the most appropriate neoadjuvant therapy is needed by further studies.

Safety and efficacy of cryopreserved homologous veins for venous reconstruction in pancreatoduodenectomy

BACKGROUND

There are several techniques for reconstructing the portal vein-superior mesenteric vein during pancreatoduodenectomy. The aim of the present study was to present our results with portal vein-superior mesenteric vein reconstruction using cryopreserved homologous veins during pancreatoduodenectomy for patients with pancreatic head cancer.

METHODS

Patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic head cancer were reviewed retrospectively. In patients with portal vein-superior mesenteric vein resection, the detailed method of reconstruction and clinical outcomes were reviewed. Clinical characteristics, patient survival, and portal vein-superior mesenteric vein patency were compared between those with and without homologous vein grafts. Factors affecting the patency of reconstructed veins were assessed by univariate analysis.

RESULTS

Among 144 patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy, portal vein-superior mesenteric vein resection was performed in 36 patients (25%); 18 (50%) underwent reconstruction with homologous veins, and the other 18 (50%) underwent reconstruction without homologous veins. The extent of portal vein-superior mesenteric vein involvement, operative time, duration of clamping of portal vein-superior mesenteric vein, intraoperative blood loss, and length of the venous resection were greater (P ≤ .013 each) in those with homologous vein grafts. There was no significant difference in postoperative morbidity/mortality, patient survival, or portal vein-superior mesenteric vein patency. The 1- and 2-year overall patency of portal vein-superior mesenteric vein was 76% and 71%, respectively, while the 2-year patencies were 67% and 67% in those with homologous veins and 87% and 73% in those without homologous veins without difference between the groups. Circumferential resection and pathologic portal vein-superior mesenteric vein involvement were associated with the patency of the reconstructed vein (P = .002 and P = .028, resp).

CONCLUSION

Use of homologous venous grafts for portal vein-superior mesenteric vein reconstruction are feasible alternatives during pancreatoduodenectomy for advanced pancreatic head cancer.

Comparison of patency rates and clinical impact of different reconstruction methods following portal/superior mesenteric vein resection during pancreatectomy

INTRODUCTION

Few studies have compared patency rates of the different methods of venous reconstruction (VR) during a pancreatectomy. This study aimed to evaluate the patency rates and the clinical impact of various reconstruction methods.

METHODS

For the meta-analysis, databases were systematically searched to identify studies reporting the outcomes of patients who underwent PVR/SMVR. For the retrospective study, clinical data were retrospectively analyzed from patients who underwent a pancreatectomy and VR between Feb. 2009 and Oct. 2015. Patency was assessed by CT and/or ultrasound.

RESULTS

For the meta-analysis, the long-term patency rates of the primary repair group and the autologous graft group were significantly higher than that of the synthetic graft group. For the retrospective study, the reconstruction consisted of primary repair in 62 cases (89.8%) and synthetic grafting in 7 cases (10.1%). Synthetic grafting was more likely to cause acute thrombosis compared with primary repair for PVR/SMVR (85.7% versus 16.7%). Acute thrombosis was associated with decreased median survival (12 versus 6 months) and increased hazard of death. Late thrombosis and stenosis were not associated with survival or serious clinical impact. Median survival for the primary repair group and the synthetic grafting group was 12 and 7 months, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Primary repair following PVR/SMVR is preferred and can be achieved in most situations. Stenosis should be noted when with risk factors (long segmental and tension), but it produced little clinical impact. Synthetic grafting was associated with a higher thrombosis rate. Acute thrombosis is associated with increased mortality and decreased survival.

Impact of Portal Vein Involvement from Pancreatic Cancer on Metastatic Pattern After Surgical Resection

BACKGROUND

The present study aims to evaluate the long-term outcome and metastatic pattern of patients who underwent resection of a pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) with portal or superior mesenteric vein (PV/SMV) resection.

METHODS

Patients who underwent a partial pancreatoduodenectomy or total pancreatectomy for PDAC between 2005 and 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. Three subgroups were generated, depending on PV/SMV resection (P⁺) and pathohistological PV/SMV tumor infiltration (I⁺): P⁺I⁺, P⁺I^-, and P^-I^-. Statistical analysis was performed using the R software package.

RESULTS

The study cohort included 179 patients, 113 of whom underwent simultaneous PV/SMV resection. Thirty-six patients (31.9 %) had pathohistological tumor infiltration of the PV/SMV (P⁺I⁺), and were matched with 66 cases without PV/SMV infiltration (P^-I^-). The study revealed differences in overall median survival (11.9 [P⁺I⁺] vs. 16.1 [P⁺I^-] vs. 20.1 [P^-I^-] months; p = 0.01). Multivariate survival analysis identified true invasion of the PV/SMV as the only significant, negative prognostic factor (p = 0.01). Whereas the incidence of local recurrence was comparable (p = 0.96), the proportion of patients with distant metastasis showed significant differences (75 % [P⁺I⁺] vs. 45.8 % [P⁺I^-] vs. 54.7 % [P^-I^-], p = 0.01). Furthermore, the median time to progression was significantly shorter if the PV/SMV was involved (7.4 months [P⁺I⁺] vs. 10.9 months [P⁺I^-] vs. 11.6 months [P^-I^-]). Initial liver metastases occurred in 33 % of the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

True invasion of the PV/SMV is an independent risk factor for overall survival, and is associated with a higher incidence of distant metastasis and shorter progressive-free survival. Radical vascular resection cannot compensate for aggressive tumor biology.

Perioperative treatment options in resectable pancreatic cancer - how to improve long-term survival

Surgery remains the only chance of cure for pancreatic cancer, but only 15%-25% of patients present with resectable disease at the time of primary diagnosis. Important goals in clinical research must therefore be to allow early detection with suitable diagnostic procedures, to further broaden operation techniques and to determine the most effective perioperative treatment of either chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy. More extensive operations involving extended pancreatectomy, portal vein resection and pancreatic resection in resectable pancreatic cancer with limited liver metastasis, performed in specialized centers seem to be the surgical procedures with a possible impact on survival. After many years of stagnation in pharmacological clinical research on advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDAC) - since the approval of gemcitabine in 1997 - more effective cytotoxic substances (nab-paclitaxel) and combinations (FOLFIRINOX) are now available for perioperative treatment. Additionally, therapies with a broader mechanism of action are emerging (stroma depletion, immunotherapy, anti-inflammation), raising hopes for more effective adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatment concepts, especially in the context of "borderline resectability". Only multidisciplinary approaches including radiology, surgery, medical and radiation oncology as the backbones of the treatment of potentially resectable PDAC may be able to further improve the rate of cure in the future.

Current standards and new innovative approaches for treatment of pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma remains a devastating disease with a 5-year survival rate not exceeding 6%. Treatment of this disease remains a major challenge. This article reviews the state-of-the-art in the management of this disease and the new innovative approaches that may help to accelerate progress in treating its victims. After careful pre-therapeutic evaluation, only 15-20% of patients diagnosed with a pancreatic cancer (PC) are eligible for upfront radical surgery. After R0 or R1 resection in such patients, evidence suggests a significantly positive impact on survival of adjuvant chemotherapy comprising 6 months of gemcitabine or fluorouracil/folinic acid. Delayed adjuvant chemoradiation is considered as an option in cases of positive margins. Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) is defined as a tumour involving the mesenteric vasculature to a limited extend. Resection of these tumours is technically feasible, yet runs the high risk of a R1 resection. Neoadjuvant treatment probably offers the best chance of achieving successful R0 resection and long-term survival, but the best treatment options should be determined in prospective randomised studies. Gemcitabine has for 15 years been the only validated therapy for advanced PC. Following decades of negative phase III studies, increasing evidence now suggests that further significant improvements to overall survival can be achieved via either Folfirinox or gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel regimens. Progress in systemic therapy may improve the chances of resection in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) or locally advanced PC. This requires first enhancing knowledge of the genetic events driving carcinogenesis, which may then be translated into clinical studies.

Increased morbidity and mortality of a concomitant colectomy during a pancreaticoduodenectomy: an NSQIP propensity-score matched analysis

BACKGROUND

Select patients with peri-ampullary cancers require concomitant colon resection (CR) during a pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for margin-negative resections. This study analysed the impact of concomitant CR on major morbidity (MM) and mortality.

METHODS

National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) patients undergoing PD for peri-ampullary cancers were identified from 2005 to 2012. A 4 : 1 propensity-score matched analysis isolated the impact of CR upon PD. Risk factors for 30-day MM and mortality were analysed to determine post-operative sequelae of PD+CR.

RESULTS

From 10 965 PD and 159 PD+CR patients, 624 and 156, respectively, were selected for 4 : 1 matched analysis. PD+CR resulted in a higher MM and mortality (50.0% and 9.0%) versus PD alone (28.8% and 2.9%, respectively, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified risk factors for MM after PD: concomitant CR [odds ratio (OR)-3.19, P < 0.001], smoking (OR-1.92, P = 0.005), a lack of functional independence (OR-3.29, P = 0.018), cardiac disease (OR-2.39, P = 0.011), decreased albumin (per g/dl, OR-1.38, P = 0.033) and a longer operative time (versus median time, OR-1.56, P = 0.029). Independent predictors of mortality included concomitant CR (OR-3.16, P = 0.010), ventilator dependence (OR-13.87, P < 0.001) and septic shock (OR-6.02, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

CR was an independent predictor of MM and mortality after a PD. Patients requiring PD+CR should be identified pre-operatively, maximally optimized and referred to experienced surgeons at expert centres.

Artery first approach to pancreatoduodenectomy: current status

BACKGROUND

The need for an early determination of resectability and before an irreversible step is taken during pancreatoduodenectomy promoted the development of an 'artery first approach' (AFA). The aim of this study was to review the current evidence related to this approach, with particular reference to margins and survival.

METHODS

An electronic search was performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE and PubMed databases from 1960 to 2015 using both subject headings (MeSH) and truncated word searches to identify all published related articles to this topic.

RESULTS

Six different AFAs have been published. Four studies evaluated the impact of AFA on perioperative outcomes and survival. Three studies showed no difference in the perioperative outcomes, margin status, lymph node yield and survival while one study showed improved margin status and survival comparing AFA with standard resection.

CONCLUSION

The current evidence regarding the benefits of AFA in relation to decreasing margin positivity or increasing survival is sparse. Further larger studies and randomized controlled trails are needed to ascertain the benefits of AFA.

Pancreatic cancer: current management and treatment strategies

The 5-year survival of patients with pancreatic cancer is poor and, despite oncological advances over the past two decades, has not significantly improved. However, there have been several surgical and oncological advances which have improved morbidity and mortality in surgery and more efficacious chemotherapy regimens, resulting in a better patient experience and an increase in survival by a number of months. Most patients have a tumour at the head of the pancreas and those with resectable disease undergo a pancreaticoduodenectomy, which can be performed laparoscopically. Those who have a pancreatic resection have an increased survival in comparison with those receiving oncological treatment only; however, only a quarter of patients have resectable disease at diagnosis. Some centres are now performing venous resections and/or arterial resections in order to increase the number of patients eligible for curative surgery. Innovative techniques using ablation technologies to downstage tumours for resection are also being investigated. After surgery, all patients should be offered adjuvant gemcitabine-based chemotherapy. Those with locally advanced tumours not suitable for surgery should be offered FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy, after which the tumour may be suitable for surgical resection. The use of radiotherapy in this group of patients is controversial but offered by a few centres. Patients with metastatic disease at diagnosis should also be offered FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy, which can improve survival by a few months. As our knowledge of the tumour biology of pancreatic cancer progresses, a number of new agents targeting specific genes and proteins are under investigation and there is hope that median survival will continue to improve over the next decade.

State of the art of robotic pancreatic surgery

More than a decade has passed since robotic technology was adopted for abdominal surgery, and virtually every gastrointestinal operation has since been shown to be feasible, safe, and reproducible using the robotic approach. Robotic pancreatic surgery had been left behind at the beginning, because they were technically challenging, requiring not only being very familiar with the robotic technology but also having a perfect knowledge of the anatomical variations, very frequent in this area. Nonetheless in the last few years many authors have approached the robot for pancreatic surgery with very promising results in terms of surgical and oncological outcomes. The aim of this article is to review the literature on robotic pancreatic surgery and to define the state of the art use of the robotic approach for pancreatic disease.