Geriatric traumatic brain injury-What we know and what we don't

Association between clinical factors and mortality in older adult trauma patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This study reviews and meta-analysis factors affecting mortality in older adult trauma patients, addressing previously unidentified heterogeneity and risk burden.

METHODS

Databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane and Scopus) were searched for studies from January 1, 2000, to April 30, 2024. Inclusion criteria were patients aged ≥65 years with trauma, assessing survival or death outcomes. Two authors independently screened and extracted data using the PRISMA checklist; disagreements were resolved by a third author.

RESULTS

Eighteen retrospective studies were included (425,355 patients), showing an overall mortality rate of 9.6 ​%. Falls were the predominant cause of injury. Demographic mortality risk factors included advanced age, frailty, male sex, and comorbidities (blood/bleeding disorders, liver disease, cancer, kidney disease, and lung disease). Injury risk factors were identified as contributing to the outcome, including low systolic blood pressure, Glasgow Coma Scale, Injury Severity Score, Revised Trauma Score, and surgical intervention.

CONCLUSION

Trauma significantly elevates the mortality rate in older adults, with advanced age, gender, comorbidities, injury severity, frailty, and surgical intervention being key factors.

Mental and Physical Health Comorbidities in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Non-TBI Controls Comparison

OBJECTIVE

To examine whether aging with a TBI was associated with a greater burden of health-related comorbidities compared with a non-TBI control cohort and examine the associations between comorbidity burden, emotional outcomes, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) after TBI across ages.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional.

SETTING

Research center or telephone.

PARTICIPANTS

The study included 559 participants (NTBI=291, NControls=268). Participants with TBI were recruited during inpatient rehabilitation and had sustained a moderate-severe TBI 1-33 years previously. Non-TBI controls were a convenience sample recruited through advertisements in the community.

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The number of cardiovascular, general physical health, and mental health comorbidities was compared between cohorts and age strata using Poisson regression. The relationships between comorbidities, age, emotional outcomes (Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale-7, Patient Health Questionnaire-9), and HRQoL (PROMIS Global Health Measure) were examined with linear regression. Distinct subgroups of comorbidities were identified using latent class analysis. Associations between comorbidity classes with demographic and outcome variables were evaluated using multinomial logistic and linear regressions, respectively.

RESULTS

TBI participants had a significantly higher comorbidity burden than controls, primarily driven by elevated rates of mental health disorders (RR=2.71, 95% confidence interval [1.37, 5.35]). Cardiovascular and physical health comorbidities were not elevated in the TBI group compared with controls. Both cohorts had 3 similar comorbidity subgroups, suggesting consistent patterns of co-occurring health conditions regardless of TBI exposure. Physical and mental health comorbidities were associated with elevated depression and anxiety symptoms and diminished HRQoL after TBI compared with controls.

CONCLUSION

TBI was associated with greater mental, but not physical, health comorbidities in the decades after injury. However, physical and mental health comorbidities significantly affected emotional and HRQoL status after TBI, underscoring a greater need for long-term support for individuals with TBI coping with both physical and mental health comorbidities.

Epidemiology and Post-Discharge Resource Utilization of Isolated Traumatic Brain Injury in Geriatric Patients

Benchmark data on traumatic brain injury (TBI) are potentially confounded by morbidity and rehabilitation needs associated with coincident extracranial injuries. Using data on isolated head injuries from 13 trauma centers in Georgia over 3 years, we studied the epidemiology and natural history of isolated TBI in geriatric vs non-geriatric patients in order to identify potential areas for quality improvement. We identified 8 512 patients, 3 895 of whom were geriatric. Geriatric patients had higher baseline comorbidity burden, mostly presented after ground level falls, had higher mortality despite equivalent ICU admission rates, and had higher rates of post-discharge resource utilization than non-geriatric counterparts. Geriatric patients are more likely to require post-discharge services and/or facility placement, regardless of pre-injury functional status. These data highlight the importance of streamlined protocols that place an early focus on post-discharge needs and goals of care, informed by cohort-specific prognosis data.

Profound prospective assessment of radiological and functional outcome 6 months after TBI in elderly

BACKGROUND

Recovery after traumatic brain injury (TBI) in older adults is usually affected by the presence of comorbidities, leading to more severe sequelae in this age group than in younger patients. However, there are only few reports that prospectively perform in-depth assessment of outcome following TBI in elderly.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims at documenting structural brain characteristics and functional outcome and quality of life in elderly patients 6 months after TBI and comparing these data with healthy volunteers undergoing the same assessments.

METHODS

Thirteen TBI patients ≥ 65 years old, admitted to the University Hospitals Leuven (Belgium), between 2019 and 2022 due to TBI, including all injury severities, and a group of 13 healthy volunteers with similar demographic characteristics were prospectively included in the study. At admission, demographic, injury, and CT scan data were collected in our database. Six months after the accident, a brain MRI scan and standardized assessments of frailty, sleep quality, cognitive function, motor function, and quality of life were conducted.

RESULTS

A total of 13 patients and 13 volunteers were included in the study, with a median age of 74 and 73 years, respectively. Nine out of the 13 patients presented with a mild TBI. The patient group had a significantly higher level of frailty than the control group, presenting a mean Reported Edmonton Frailty Scale score of 5.8 (SD 2.7) vs 0.7 (SD 1.1) (p < 0.01). No statistically significant differences were found between patient and control brain volumes, fluid attenuated inversion recovery white matter hyperintensity volumes, number of lesions and blackholes, and fractional anisotropy values. Patients demonstrated a significantly higher median reaction time in the One Touch Stockings of Cambridge (22.3 s vs 17.6, p = 0.03) and Reaction Time (0.5 s vs 0.4 s, p < 0.01) subtests in the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery. Furthermore, patients had a lower mean score on the first Box and Blocks test with the right hand (46.6 vs 61.7, p < 0.01) and a significantly higher mean score in the Timed-Up & Go test (13.1 s vs 6.2 s, p = 0.02) and Timed Up & Go with cognitive dual task (16.0 s vs 10.2 s, p < 0.01). Substantially lower QOLIBRI total score (60.4 vs 85.4, p < 0.01) and QOLIBRI-OS total score (53.8 vs 88.5, p < 0.01) were also observed in the patients' group.

CONCLUSION

In this prospective study, TBI patients ≥ 65 years old when compared with elder controls showed slightly worse cognitive performance and poorer motor function, higher fall risk, but a substantially reduced QoL at 6 months FU, as well as significantly higher frailty, even when the TBI is classified as mild. No statistically significant differences were found in structural brain characteristics on MRI. Future studies with larger sample sizes are needed to refine the impact of TBI versus frailty on function and QoL in elderly.

Comparing rates of skull fractures in female versus male geriatric patients who sustain head injuries

BACKGROUND

Head trauma is the leading cause of serious injury in the older adult population with skull fractures as a serious reported outcome. This study aims to evaluate the role of sex in the risk of skull fracture in patients over the age of 65.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study was conducted at two level-one trauma centers, serving a population of 360,000 geriatric residents. Over a year-long period, consecutive patients aged 65 years and older who presented with blunt head injury were included. Patients who did not receive head CT imaging were excluded. The primary outcome was rate of skull fracture due to the acute trauma, compared by sex. Additional factors examined included patient race/ethnicity and mechanism of injury.

RESULTS

Among 5402 patients enrolled, 3010 (56%) were female and 2392 (44%) were male. 4612 (85%) of the head injuries sustained were due to falls, and 4536 (90%) of all subjects were Caucasian. Overall, 199 patients (3.7%) sustained skull fractures. Males had a significantly greater rate of skull fracture when compared to females (4.6% vs 3.0%, OR 1.5, 95% CI: 1.2-2.1, p = 0.002). This trend was also seen across race/ethnicity and mechanism of injury.

CONCLUSIONS

Older males were found to have a higher rate of skull fractures compared to females after sustaining blunt head trauma, mostly due to falls.

In-depth assessment of quality of life and real life impact of mild traumatic brain injury in elderly by means of a focus group study

Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) in the elderly population leads to more severe consequences than in young patients. However, the impact that TBI has on elderly patients' Quality of Life (QoL) has not been thoroughly investigated and is still unclear. Therefore, the main objective of this study is to qualitatively investigate changes in QoL after mild TBI in elderly patients. A focus group interview was conducted with 6 mild TBI patients, with a median age of 74 years old, admitted to the University Hospitals Leuven (UZ Leuven) between 2016 and 2022. The data analysis was performed following the guide provided by Dierckx de Casterlé et al. in 2012, using Nvivo software. Three themes emerged from the analysis: functional disturbances and symptoms, daily life after TBI, and life quality, feelings and satisfaction. The most reported factors that deteriorated QoL 1-5 years post-TBI in our cohort were the lack of support from partners and families, changes in self-perception and social life, tiredness, balance disturbances, headache, cognitive deterioration, changes in physical health, senses' disturbances, changes in sexual life, sleep problems, speech disturbances and dependence for daily life activities. No symptoms of depression or feelings of shame were reported. The acceptance of the situation and hope for improvement were shown to be the most important coping mechanisms for these patients. In conclusion, mild TBI in elderly patients frequently leads to changes in self-perception, daily life activities and social life 1-5 years after the injury, which could contribute to a loss of independence and QoL deterioration. The acceptance of the situation and a good support network seem to be protective factors for these patients' well-being after TBI.

Prediction of Mortality in Geriatric Traumatic Brain Injury Patients Using Machine Learning Algorithms

Background: The number of geriatric traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients is increasing every year due to the population’s aging in most of the developed countries. Unfortunately, there is no widely recognized tool for specifically evaluating the prognosis of geriatric TBI patients. We designed this study to compare the prognostic value of different machine learning algorithm-based predictive models for geriatric TBI. Methods: TBI patients aged ≥65 from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-III (MIMIC-III) database were eligible for this study. To develop and validate machine learning algorithm-based prognostic models, included patients were divided into a training set and a testing set, with a ratio of 7:3. The predictive value of different machine learning based models was evaluated by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and F score. Results: A total of 1123 geriatric TBI patients were included, with a mortality of 24.8%. Non-survivors had higher age (82.2 vs. 80.7, p = 0.010) and lower Glasgow Coma Scale (14 vs. 7, p < 0.001) than survivors. The rate of mechanical ventilation was significantly higher (67.6% vs. 25.9%, p < 0.001) in non-survivors while the rate of neurosurgical operation did not differ between survivors and non-survivors (24.3% vs. 23.0%, p = 0.735). Among different machine learning algorithms, Adaboost (AUC: 0.799) and Random Forest (AUC: 0.795) performed slightly better than the logistic regression (AUC: 0.792) on predicting mortality in geriatric TBI patients in the testing set. Conclusion: Adaboost, Random Forest and logistic regression all performed well in predicting mortality of geriatric TBI patients. Prognostication tools utilizing these algorithms are helpful for physicians to evaluate the risk of poor outcomes in geriatric TBI patients and adopt personalized therapeutic options for them.

Delirium in Head Trauma: Looking for a Culprit

Head trauma and delirium are two common conditions in the elderly population. They both carry a heavy burden in terms of mortality and morbidity and are associated with one another through several environmental and clinical factors, such as comorbidities, age, and sex. One factor that may play a role in both these conditions is inflammation, which might also represent a link between them. In particular, head trauma can cause both systemic and neuroinflammation, while delirium appears to be precipitated by inflammatory conditions, while also involving a number of inflammatory pathways in its pathogenesis. Interleukin 6 and tumor necrosis factor α are only two of the main actors in this crosstalk, which also involves microglia and immune cells. An indirect proof is that anti-inflammatory drugs have proven effective in reducing post-traumatic delirium, thus demonstrating the importance of inflammation in the pathophysiology of this disease. In this paper, we have revised the available literature exploring the links between inflammation, head trauma and delirium and we will discuss the mechanisms of this relationship, paying particular attention to the possible future implications.

Injuries associated with hypotension after trauma: Is it always haemorrhage?

Introduction

Restricted fluid replacement strategy is one part of damage control resuscitation for patients with trauma haemorrhage. However, not all patients presenting with physiological symptoms suggestive of haemorrhage are bleeding. This descriptive study aims to compare demographics and injuries in adult and older trauma patients presenting to the Emergency Department with hypotension versus normotension.

Methods

This was a retrospective, descriptive data analysis from a UK trauma registry. The records from one major trauma centre were analysed between 2014–2019, and every hypotensive (systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg) trauma patient investigated for injuries associated with hypotension. The hypotensive threshold for older patients was also adjusted to 110 mmHg for sub-cohort analysis.

Results

6245 trauma patients were included, of which 255 (4.1%) arrived hypotensive at the Emergency Department. Significant blood loss was identified in 32.2% of those cases. In 27.1%, multiple potential associations obscured the underlying mechanism for the hypotension but were more commonly associated with hypotension than with normotension. Over a third (37.5%) were ≥65 years old. Neurological injuries occurred more frequently in both older hypotensive groups than younger patients.

Conclusions

This study sought to compare injuries of adult and older trauma patients to aid trauma teams with decision making. In severely injured hypotensive patients, significant blood loss was the principal association with hypotension. However, several factors can mimic bleeding in the hypotensive trauma patient, which should be carefully considered. A prospective study is needed to clarify the characteristics and causes of bleeding mimics.

Developing a National Trauma Research Action Plan: Results from the Neurotrauma Research Panel Delphi Survey

BACKGROUND

In 2016, the National Academies of Science, Engineering and Medicine called for the development of a National Trauma Research Action Plan. The Department of Defense funded the Coalition for National Trauma Research to generate a comprehensive research agenda spanning the continuum of trauma and burn care. Given the public health burden of injuries to the central nervous system, neurotrauma was one of 11 panels formed to address this recommendation with a gap analysis and generation of high-priority research questions.

METHODS

We recruited interdisciplinary experts to identify gaps in the neurotrauma literature, generate research questions, and prioritize those questions using a consensus-driven Delphi survey approach. We conducted four Delphi rounds in which participants generated key research questions and then prioritized the importance of the questions on a 9-point Likert scale. Consensus was defined as 60% or greater of panelists agreeing on the priority category. We then coded research questions using an National Trauma Research Action Plan taxonomy of 118 research concepts, which were consistent across all 11 panels.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight neurotrauma experts generated 675 research questions. Of these, 364 (53.9%) reached consensus, and 56 were determined to be high priority (15.4%), 303 were deemed to be medium priority (83.2%), and 5 were low priority (1.4%). The research topics were stratified into three groups-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI), mild TBI (mTBI), and spinal cord injury. The number of high-priority questions for each subtopic was 46 for severe TBI (19.7%), 3 for mTBI (4.3%) and 7 for SCI (11.7%).

CONCLUSION

This Delphi gap analysis of neurotrauma research identified 56 high-priority research questions. There are clear areas of focus for severe TBI, mTBI, and spinal cord injury that will help guide investigators in future neurotrauma research. Funding agencies should consider these gaps when they prioritize future research.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic Test or Criteria, Level IV.

Age Moderates the Effect of Injury Severity on Functional Trajectories in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Study Using the NIDILRR Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems National Dataset

Age is a risk factor for a host of poor outcomes following traumatic brain injury (TBI), with some evidence suggesting that age is also a source of excess disability. We tested the extent to which age moderates the effect of injury severity on functional trajectories over 15 years post injury. Data from 11,442 participants from the 2020 National Institute of Disability and Independent Living Rehabiitation Research (NIDILRR) Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems (TBIMS) National Dataset were analyzed using linear mixed effects models. Injury severity was operationally defined using a composite of Glasgow Coma Scale scores, structural imaging findings, and the number of days with post-trauma amnesia. Functioning was measured using the Glasgow Outcomes Scale-Extended. Age at injury was the hypothesized moderator. Race, ethnicity, sex, education, and marital status served as covariates. The results showed a significant confounder-adjusted effect of injury severity and age of injury on the linear slope in functioning. The age effect was strongest for those with mild TBI. Thus, the effects of injury severity on functional trajectory were found to be moderated by age. To optimize outcomes, TBI rehabilitation should be developed specifically for older patients. Age should also be a major focus in TBI research.

A Scoping Review of Cognitive Assessment in Adults With Acute Traumatic Brain Injury

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to describe and synthesize the current research regarding the prevailing cognitive domains impacted by acute traumatic brain injury (TBI) in adults. Standardized and nonstandardized assessments of cognitive function and comorbidities influencing cognitive function during the initial stages of recovery are presented to help guide clinical assessment.

METHOD

A scoping review, guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses framework, was used to explore four electronic databases. Searches identified peer-reviewed empirical literature addressing aspects of cognitive domains impacted after TBI, cognitive assessment, and comorbidities impacting assessment in adults after acute TBI.

RESULTS

A total of 1,072 records were identified and reduced to 75 studies based on inclusion criteria. The cognitive domains most impacted in acute TBI were memory and executive function. The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) was the most frequently used tool to assess cognitive abilities, despite it being a measurement of consciousness, not of cognition. Psychological changes were the most commonly noted comorbidity impacting cognitive assessment.

CONCLUSIONS

Assessment of cognition after acute TBI requires a multifaceted approach that considers the typical profile of cognitive impairment, as well as patient-specific factors influencing cognitive abilities following initial brain injury. The present results support the generally held view that memory and executive function deficits are common cognitive difficulties associated with acute TBI in adults. The GCS remains the most widely used tool to assess function, though numerous tools are available that specifically address cognitive domains. Acute medical comorbidities common within this stage of injury are highlighted, as well as gaps of clinical knowledge that remain.

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.18372086.

Comprehensive comparison between geriatric and nongeriatric patients with trauma

The incidence of geriatric trauma is increasing due to the growing elderly population. Healthcare providers require a global perspective to differentiate critical factors that might alter patients' prognosis.We retrospectively reviewed all adult patients admitted to a trauma center during a 4-year period. We identified 655 adult trauma patients aged from 18 to 64 (nongeriatric group) and 273 trauma patients ≥65 years (geriatric group). Clinical data were collected and compared between the 2 groups.The geriatric group had a higher incidence of trauma and higher Injury Severity Scores than did the nongeriatric group. Fewer geriatric patients underwent surgical treatment (all patients: geriatric vs nongeriatric: 65.9% vs 70.7%; patients with severe trauma: geriatric vs nongeriatric: 27.6% vs 44.5%). Regarding prognosis, the geriatric group exhibited higher mortality rate and less need for long-term care (geriatric vs nongeriatric: mortality: 5.5% vs 1.8%; long-term care: 2.2% vs 5.0%).We observed that geriatric patients had higher trauma incidence and higher trauma mortality rate. Aging is a definite predictor of poor outcomes for trauma patients. Limited physiological reserves and preference for less aggressive treatment might be the main reasons for poor outcomes in elderly individuals.

Factors Affecting Neurosurgeons' Decisions to Forgo Life-Sustaining Treatments After Traumatic Brain Injury

BACKGROUND

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a multifaceted condition that causes mortality and disability worldwide. Limited data are available on the factors associated with the decision for the withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment (WLST) for patients with TBI. In the present study, we aimed to determine the risk factors and attitudes affecting neurosurgeons when deciding on WLST for patients with TBI using a multicenter survey.

METHODS

An online questionnaire was applied worldwide and shared using social media platforms and electronic mail to ∼5000 neurosurgeons. The social media group "Neurosurgery Cocktail" was used to post a link to the questionnaire. In addition, randomly chosen neurosurgery clinics around the world were sent the survey via electronic mail.

RESULTS

Of the participants, 17.22% had decided on WLST after TBI for >26 patients. Neurosurgeons with more WLST decisions were older, had had more clinical experience and intensive care unit (ICU) training, and were better prepared to involve the family members of TBI patients in their decision-making compared with those with fewer WLST decisions. The respondents stated that the patient's family, ICU consultants, and themselves played the most influential role in the WLST decisions, with the hospital administration, social workers, spiritual caregivers, and nurses having lesser roles. The current and presenting Glasgow coma scale scores, pupillary response, advanced patient age, candidates for a vegetative state, and impaired neurological function were significant factors associated with the WLST decision.

CONCLUSIONS

To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first to evaluate neurosurgeons concerning their opinions and behaviors regarding WLST decisions after TBI. Increased patient age, Glasgow coma scale score, pupillary response, the presence of comorbidities, candidacy for a vegetative state, and impaired neurological function were the main factors contributing to the decision for WLST. We also found that the family, ICU consultants, and the attending neurosurgeon had the most effective roles in the decisions regarding WLST.

Predicting outcomes after trauma: Prognostic model development based on admission features through machine learning

In an overcrowded emergency department (ED), trauma surgeons and emergency physicians need an accurate prognostic predictor for critical decision-making involving patients with severe trauma. We aimed to develope a machine learning-based early prognostic model based on admission features and initial ED management.We only recruited patients with severe trauma (defined as an injury severity score >15) as the study cohort and excluded children (defined as patients <16 years old) from a 4-years database (Chi-Mei Medical Center, from January 2015, to December 2018) recording the clinical features of all admitted trauma patients. We considered only patient features that could be determined within the first 2 hours after arrival to the ED. These variables included Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score; heart rate; respiratory rate; mean arterial pressure (MAP); prehospital cardiac arrest; abbreviated injury scales (AIS) of head and neck, thorax, and abdomen; and ED interventions (tracheal intubation/tracheostomy, blood product transfusion, thoracostomy, and cardiopulmonary resuscitation). The endpoint for prognostic analyses was mortality within 7 days of admission.We divided the study cohort into the early death group (149 patients who died within 7 days of admission) and non-early death group (2083 patients who survived at >7 days of admission). The extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) machine learning model provided mortality prediction with higher accuracy (94.0%), higher sensitivity (98.0%), moderate specificity (54.8%), higher positive predict value (PPV) (95.4%), and moderate negative predictive value (NPV) (74.2%).We developed a machine learning-based prognostic model that showed high accuracy, high sensitivity, and high PPV for predicting the mortality of patients with severe trauma.

Midlevel Providers Focusing on Geriatrics Improve Care and Outcomes of Fall-Related Injuries Among the Elderly

BACKGROUND

A rural level 1 trauma center underwent a consolidation to level III status in a new trauma network system. A dedicated group of midlevel practitioners emphasizing early mobilization, a geriatric care model, and fall prevention replaced surgical residents in the level 3 center. We hypothesized that outcomes of elderly fall-related injuries may be enhanced with midlevel providers using a geriatric-focused care model.

METHODS

An IRB-approved trauma registry review of patients over 65 years of age with a fall-related injury admitted to a rural trauma center 1 year prior to and 1 year following a trauma center consolidation from level 1 to level III designation evaluated demographics, anticoagulant use, comorbidities, and clinical outcomes. Statistical analysis included t-test and regression analysis.

RESULTS

327 patients injured by falls were seen over a 2-year study period. The number of patients admitted with a fall-related injury and the injury severity were similar over the study period. Increasing age and anticoagulant use increased length of stay and mortality (both with P < .05). Mortality rates and patient level of independence on discharge were improved in the later period involving midlevel practitioners (both with P < .05).

DISCUSSION

Trauma centers and trauma system networks face increasing challenges to provide resources and providers of care for patients injured by falls, especially for the growing elderly population. Midlevel providers focusing on geriatric clinical issues and goals may enhance care and outcomes of elderly fall-related injuries.

A retrospective cohort study of 27,049 polytraumatized patients age 60 and above: identifying changes over 16 years

Aim

In this study, we establish an overview of changes we observed in demographics of older severe trauma patients from 2002 to 2017.

Findings

Trauma mechanism, as well as injury pattern, changed over time. We found length of stay and mortality decreased despite an increase in patient age.

Message

We ascribe this observation mainly to increased use of diagnostic tools and improved treatment algorithms and underline the importance of the implementation of specialized geriatric trauma centers allowing interdisciplinary care.

Purpose

The number of severely injured patients exceeding the age of 60 has shown a steep increase within the last decades. These patients present with numerous co-morbidities, polypharmacy, and increased frailty requiring an adjusted treatment approach. In this study, we establish an overview of changes we observed in demographics of older severe trauma patients from 2002 to 2017.

Methods

A descriptive analysis of the data from the TraumaRegister DGU^® (TR-DGU) was performed. Patients admitted to a level one trauma center in Germany, Austria and Switzerland between 2002 and 2017, aged 60 years or older and with an injury severity score (ISS) over 15 were included. Patients were stratified into subgroups based on the admission: 2002–2005 (1), 2006–2009 (2), 2010–2013 (3) and 2014–2017 (4). Trauma and patient characteristics, diagnostics, treatment and outcome were compared.

Results

In total 27,049 patients with an average age of 73.9 years met the inclusion criteria. The majority were males (64%), and the mean ISS was 27.4. The proportion of patients 60 years or older [(23% (1) to 40% (4)] rose considerably over time. Trauma mechanisms changed over time and more specifically low falls (< 3 m) rose from 17.6% (1) to 40.1% (4). Altered injury patterns were also identified. Length-of-stay decreased from 28.9 (1) to 19.5 days (4) and the length-of-stay on ICU decreased from 17.1 (1) to 12.7 days (4). Mortality decreased from 40.5% (1) to 31.8% (4).

Conclusion

Length of stay and mortality decreased despite an increase in patient age. We ascribe this observation mainly to increased use of diagnostic tools, improved treatment algorithms, and the implementation of specialized trauma centers for older patients allowing interdisciplinary care.

Factors associated with receipt of intracranial pressure monitoring in older adults with traumatic brain injury

BACKGROUND

The Brain Trauma Foundation (BTF) Guidelines for the Management of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) include intracranial pressure monitoring (ICPM), yet very little is known about ICPM in older adults. Our objectives were to characterize the utilization of ICPM in older adults and identify factors associated with ICPM in those who met the BTF guidelines.

METHODS

We analyzed data from the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Geriatric TBI Study, a registry study conducted among individuals with isolated, CT-confirmed TBI across 45 trauma centers. The analysis was restricted to those aged ≥60. Independent factors associated with ICPM for those who did and did not meet the BTF guidelines were identified using logistic regression.

RESULTS

Our sample was composed of 2303 patients, of whom 66 (2.9%) underwent ICPM. Relative to Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 13 to 15, GCS score of 9 to 12 (OR 10.2; 95% CI 4.3 to 24.4) and GCS score of <9 (OR 15.0; 95% CI 7.2 to 31.1), intraventricular hemorrhage (OR 2.4; 95% CI 1.2 to 4.83), skull fractures (OR 3.6; 95% CI 2.0 to 6.6), CT worsening (OR 3.3; 95% CI 1.8 to 5.9), and neurosurgical interventions (OR 3.8; 95% CI 2.1 to 7.0) were significantly associated with ICPM. Restricting to those who met the BTF guidelines, only 43 of 240 (18%) underwent ICPM. Factors independently associated with ICPM included intraparenchymal hemorrhage (OR 2.2; 95% CI 1.0 to 4.7), skull fractures (OR 3.9; 95% CI 1.9 to 8.2), and neurosurgical interventions (OR 3.5; 95% CI 1.7 to 7.2).

DISCUSSION

Worsening GCS, intraparenchymal/intraventricular hemorrhage, and skull fractures were associated with ICPM among older adults with TBI, yet utilization of ICPM remains low, especially among those meeting the BTF guidelines, and potential benefits remain unclear. This study highlights the need for better understanding of factors that influence compliance with BTF guidelines and the risks versus benefits of ICPM in this population.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic and epidemiological, level III.

A Population-Based Study of Pre-Existing Health Conditions in Traumatic Brain Injury

Health factors impacting both the occurrence of, and recovery from traumatic brain injury (TBI) vary in complexity, and present genuine challenges to researchers and healthcare professionals seeking to characterize injury consequences and determine prognosis. However, attempts to clarify causal links between injury characteristics and clinical outcomes (including mortality) often compel researchers to exclude pre-existing health conditions (PECs) in their samples, including psychiatric history, medication usage, and other comorbid conditions. In this pre-registered population-based study (total starting n = 939,123 patients), we examined trends in PEC incidence over 22 years in the state of Pennsylvania (1997-2019) in individuals sustaining TBI (n = 169,452) and individuals with orthopedic injury (n = 87,637). The goal was to determine how PECs interact with age and injury severity to influence short-term outcomes. A further goal was to determine whether number of PECs, or specific PEC clusters contributed to worse outcomes within the TBI cohort, compared with orthopedic injury alone. Primary findings indicate that PECs significantly influenced mortality within the TBI cohort; patients having four or more PECs were associated with approximately a two times greater likelihood of dying in acute care (odds ratio [OR] 1.9). Additionally, cluster analyses revealed four distinct PEC clusters that are age and TBI severity dependent. Overall, the likelihood of zero PECs hovers at ∼25%, which is critical to consider in TBI outcomes work and could potentially contribute to the challenges facing intervention science with regard to reproducibility of findings.

Redefining geriatric trauma: 55 is the new 65

INTRODUCTION

As the prevalence of geriatric trauma patients has increased, protocols are being developed to address the unique requirements of this demographic. However, categorical definitions for geriatric patients vary, potentially creating confusion concerning which patients should be cared for according to geriatric-specific standards. The aim of this study was to identify data-driven cut points for mortality based on age to support implementation of age-driven guidelines.

METHODS

Adults aged 18 to 100 years with blunt or penetrating injury were selected from 95 hospitals' trauma registries. Change point analysis techniques were used to detect inflection points in the proportion of deaths at each age. Based on these calculated points, patients were allocated into age groups, and their characteristics and outcomes were compared. Logistic regression was used to estimate risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality controlling for sex, race, Injury Severity Score, Glasgow Coma Scale, and number of comorbidities.

RESULTS

A total of 255,099 patients were identified (female, 45.7%; mean age, 59.3 years; mean Injury Severity Score, 8.69; blunt injury, 92.6%). Statistically significant increases in mortality rate were noted at ages 55, 77, and 82 years. Compared with the referent group (age, <55 years), adjusted odds ratios (AORs) showed increases in mortality if age 55 to 76 years (AOR, 2.42), age 77 to 81 years (AOR, 4.70), or age 82 years or older (AOR, 6.43). National Trauma Data Standard-defined comorbidities significantly increased once age surpassed 55 years, as the rate more than doubled for each of the older age categories (p < 0.001). As age increased, each group was more likely to be female, have dementia, sustain a ground level fall, and be discharged to a skilled nursing facility (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This large multicenter analysis established a clinically and statistically significant increase in mortality at ages 55, 77, and 82 years. This research strongly suggests that trauma patients older than 55 years be considered for inclusion in geriatric trauma protocols. The other age inflection points identified (77 and 82 years) may also warrant additional specialized care considerations.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Epidemiological study, level III; Care management, level IV.

Antiplatelet and anticoagulant agents have minimal impact on traumatic brain injury incidence, surgery, and mortality in geriatric ground level falls: A multi-institutional analysis of 33,710 patients

BACKGROUND

Falls are the leading cause of traumatic brain injury (TBI) and TBI-related deaths for older persons (age, ≥65 years). Antiplatelet and/or anticoagulant therapy (antithrombotics [ATs]) is generally felt to increase this risk, but the literature is inconsistent. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of AT use on the rate, severity, and outcomes of TBI in older patients following ground level falls.

METHODS

Ground level fall patients from 90 hospitals' trauma registries were selected. Patients were excluded if younger than 65 years or had an Abbreviated Injury Scale score of >2 in a region other than head. Electronic medical record data for preinjury AT therapy were obtained. Patients were grouped by regimen for no AT, single, or multiple agents. Groups were compared on rates of diagnosed TBI, TBI surgery, and mortality.

RESULTS

There were 33,710 patients (35% male; mean age, 80.5 years; mean Glasgow Coma Scale, 14.6), with 47.6% on single or combination AT therapy. The proportion of patients with TBI diagnoses did not differ between those on no AT (21.25%) versus AT (21.61%; p = 0.418). Apixaban (15.7%; p < 0.001) and rivaroxaban (13.19%; p = 0.011) were associated with lower rates of TBI, and acetylsalicylic acid-clopidogrel was associated with a higher TBI rate (24.34%; p = 0.002) versus no AT. acetylsalicylic acid-clopidogrel was associated with a higher cranial surgery rate (2.9%; p = 0.006) versus no AT (1.96%), but surgery rates were similar for all other regimens. No regimen was associated with higher mortality.

CONCLUSION

In this large multicenter study, the intake of ATs in older patients with ground level falls was associated with inconsistent effects on risk of TBI and no significant increases in mortality, indicating that AT use may have negligible impact on patient clinical management. A large, confirmatory, prospective study is needed because the commonly held belief that ATs uniformly increase the risk of traumatic intracranial bleeding and mortality is not supported.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic/care management, level II.

Cognitive-communication difficulties following traumatic brain injury sustained in older adulthood: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Older adults are a peak incidence group for traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, empirical evidence on TBI in older adults is often limited to extrapolated findings from studies involving younger adults. While cognitive-communication deficits are an established consequence of TBI with substantial impact on social outcome for younger adults, little is known about the nature of cognitive-communication changes experienced by older adults following a new-onset TBI. In order to inform evidence-based service delivery and support older adults who sustain TBI, it is important to understand how these difficulties manifest in older adults.

AIMS

To review the empirical literature to determine the nature and breadth of research that has addressed the influence of older age on cognitive-communication outcomes following TBI sustained in older adulthood.

METHODS & PROCEDURES

A scoping review framework was used. Five electronic databases (Medline, PsycINFO, Embase, CINAHL and Scopus) were searched to locate peer-reviewed studies addressing cognitive-communication following TBI sustained at ≥ 55 years. Given the absence of dedicated investigations within the search yield, studies were included where at least 30% of participants were aged ≥ 55 years at injury, and age was a stated focus of the investigation.

OUTCOMES & RESULTS

A total of 2468 unique records were identified and reduced to 225 after title and abstract screening. Full-text review revealed only three studies that met the criteria. Collectively these studies included adults aged 55-93 years at injury. Two studies focused on age as a predictor for acute cognitive-communication difficulty, and one on the impact of age on facial emotion recognition in the chronic stages of injury. None of the studies had a dedicated focus on cognitive-communication outcomes for older adults who sustained a TBI within the defined period of older adulthood.

CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS

This scoping review produced limited results and insufficient evidence to inform rehabilitation for older adults. Indeed, very little is known about cognitive-communication outcomes for older adults who sustain a TBI. This review highlights the need, in the context of an ageing population, for research within this area to be prioritized. What this paper adds What is already known on the subject Empirical evidence to support the management of post-TBI cognitive-communication difficulties in adults predominantly stems from studies with young adults. However, the broader TBI literature suggests that outcome for older adults requires specific consideration due to its distinct nature and occurrence during a stage of life when there is the potential for subtle change to the processes of cognition and communication as part of typical ageing. What this paper adds to existing knowledge This scoping review identifies that research related to cognitive-communication outcomes for older adults who have sustained a TBI is very much in its infancy. Overarching statements about post-TBI cognitive-communication outcomes for older adults cannot be drawn, nor can it be determined if outcomes for older adults differ from younger adults. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? The lack of research in this area means that tangible guidance cannot be provided to clinicians working with older adults following TBI to support evidence-based practice for cognitive-communication. This scoping review strongly supports the need for further research in this area.

Mortality and Outcome in Elderly Patients Undergoing Emergent or Elective Cranial Surgery

OBJECTIVE

Due to the aging population, the number of elderly patients in need of cranial surgery for various neurosurgical pathologies is growing. We sought to compare mortality and outcome of elderly patients undergoing cranial surgery with a younger population.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of adult patients undergoing craniotomy or craniectomy for various indications. Patients were allocated to 4 age groups (<65 years, 65-74 years, 75-84 years, ≥85 years; groups 1-4, respectively). Primary outcome was 30-day mortality rate, whereas secondary outcome measurements were clinical outcome measured by the modified Rankin Scale score, morbidity (bleeding, infection, and thromboembolic complications), length of stay (LOS), and discharge location.

RESULTS

We included 838 consecutive patients. Overall, 30-day mortality was 5.0% (n = 42), showing significant difference between the groups (2.8%, 7.3%, 7.5%, and 22.7% groups 1-4, respectively; P < 0.001). Mortality remained statistically significantly different between the groups also after stratification for elective or emergent surgery. Cumulative 30-day mortality-free rate was significantly different between the groups as well (log rank test χ² = 24.58, P < 0.001). Elderly patients showed significantly greater rates of bleeding (P = 0.003), longer LOS (P < 0.001), more discharges to rehabilitation facilities (P = 0.008), and a trend toward worst modified Rankin Scale score at follow-up (P = 0.08). After multivariate regression analysis, age (≥75 years) and lower preoperative Glasgow Coma Scale score (<14) were significantly associated with greater mortality rates, whereas postoperative thrombosis prophylaxis was a protective factor for mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing craniotomy or craniectomy, advanced age seems to be associated with greater mortality and bleeding rates, longer LOS, and more discharge to rehabilitation facilities.

Geriatric Trauma - A Rising Tide. Assessing Patient Safety Challenges in a Vulnerable Population Using Norwegian Trauma Registry Data and Focus Group Interviews: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study

BACKGROUND

Elderly trauma patients constitute a vulnerable group, with a substantial risk of morbidity and mortality even after low-energy falls. As the world's elderly population continues to increase, the number of elderly trauma patients is expected to increase. Limited data are available about the possible patient safety challenges that elderly trauma patients face. The outcomes and characteristics of the Norwegian geriatric trauma population are not described on a national level.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this project is to investigate whether patient safety challenges exist for geriatric trauma patients in Norway. An important objective of the study is to identify risk areas that will facilitate further work to safeguard and promote quality and safety in the Norwegian trauma system.

METHODS

This is a population-based mixed methods project divided into 4 parts: 3 quantitative retrospective cohort studies and 1 qualitative interview study. The quantitative studies will compare adult (aged 16-64 years) and elderly (aged ≥65 years) trauma patients captured in the Norwegian Trauma Registry (NTR) with a date of injury from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2018. Descriptive statistics and relevant statistical methods to compare groups will be applied. The qualitative study will comprise focus group interviews with doctors responsible for trauma care, and data will be analyzed using a thematic analysis to identify important themes.

RESULTS

The project received funding in January 2019 and was approved by the Oslo University Hospital data protection officer (No. 19/16593). Registry data have been extracted for 33,344 patients, and the analysis of these data has begun. Focus group interviews will be conducted from spring 2020. Results from this project are expected to be ready for publication from fall 2020.

CONCLUSIONS

By combining data from the NTR with interviews with doctors responsible for treatment and transfer of elderly trauma patients, we will provide increased knowledge about trauma in Norwegian geriatric patients on a national level that will form the basis for further research aiming at developing interventions that hopefully will make the trauma system better equipped to manage the rising tide of geriatric trauma.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)

PRR1-10.2196/15722.

The Increasing Age of TBI Patients at a Single Level 1 Trauma Center and the Discordance Between GCS and CT Rotterdam Scores in the Elderly

Introduction: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is frequently encountered in geriatric patients, but there is a paucity of data describing TBI in the elderly. Here, we show the age of patients with TBI is increasing at our medical center and discuss the relationship between age and injury severity with patient outcomes. Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of 3,179 adult patients with TBI treated at the University of California, Davis Level 1 Trauma Center between 2009 and 2016. Age, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), and CT Rotterdam Scores were recorded. Age was analyzed as both a continuous and categorical variable (18-34, 35-50, 51-65, >65 years-old). Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale was obtained at 3 and 6 months and dichotomized into favorable and unfavorable outcomes. Multivariable general linear regression models, chi-square, logistic regression analyses and ANOVA were used for statistical analyses; a p < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: The mean age of patients was 52.2 ± 21.9 years with a male predominance (69%). There was a significant trend (p = 0.002) toward an increase in mean age each year, increasing by 4.4 years (p = 0.008) over the course of the analysis. Older patients had a higher mean GCS compared to younger patients with the same CT Rotterdam Score (p = 0.027), this becoming more pronounced with worse CT Rotterdam Scores. The >65 group had a 4-fold increased risk for unfavorable outcome when compared to the 18-34 group, this effect being most pronounced after mild TBI. Conclusions: The mean age of TBI patients is increasing at our trauma center. The largest disparity in outcomes across age was seen in patients with a mild GCS and low CT Rotterdam Scores, suggesting that these markers of injury severity may underestimate the severity of injury in the elderly population. This information highlights the need for clinical trials and validation of outcome markers in geriatric TBI.

Operative versus non-operative treatment of traumatic brain injuries in patients 80 years of age or older

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) in older adults is an increasing issue in modern medicine. Nevertheless, it remains unclear which patients presenting with TBI and 80 years of age or older benefit from an operative treatment. The aim of this study was to explore the effect of an operative treatment in isolated TBI patients ≥ 80 years of age. Data were derived from the TraumaRegister DGU^® from 2002 to 2016. Inclusion criteria were ≥ 80 years of age, an Abbreviated Injury Scale_Head (AIS) ≥ 3, and an AIS_Non-Head ≤ 1. The cohort was split in operatively and non-operatively treated patients, and outcome was assessed at discharge using the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS). A favorable outcome was defined as a GOS of 4 or 5. A total of 1.693 patients (431 operatively and 1.262 non-operatively treated patients) were analyzed. Mortality rate was 54.4% (687 patients) in the non-operative group and 49.4% in the operative group. Simultaneously, there were more patients discharged with a GOS 2 (persistent vegetative state) in the operative group (7.9%, 34 patients) than in the non-operative group (1.0%, 13 patients). An analysis of the operatively treated patients showed an association between a higher mortality risk and brainstem hemorrhage (p = 0.04), fixed pupils (p = 0.001), initial intubation (p = 0.03), and an AIS_Head of 5/6 (p = 0.03). Patients 80 years of age or older seem to benefit from an operative treatment regarding mortality rate. However, there has been a higher rate of a poor neurological outcome particularly with regard to persistent vegetative state in the operative treatment group at discharge.