Porcine cytomegalovirus infection is associated with early rejection of kidney grafts in a pig to baboon xenotransplantation model

International Xenotransplantation Association (IXA) Position Paper on Infectious Disease Considerations in Xenotransplantation

Clinical xenotransplantation has the potential to address shortages of human organs for patients with end-stage organ failure. Advances in genetic engineering, immunosuppressive regimens, and infectious disease diagnostics have improved prospects for clinical xenotransplantation. Management of the infectious risks posed by clinical xenotransplantation requires biosecure breeding and validated methods for microbiological surveillance of source animals and recipients. Novel infection control protocols may complement biosafety requirements. Infectious risks in xenotransplantation include both known human pathogens common to immunosuppressed organ recipients and from porcine organisms or xenozoonoses for which the clinical manifestations are less well defined and for which microbial assays and therapies are more limited. Some pig-specific organisms do not infect human cells but have systemic manifestations when active within the xenograft. The human risk posed by porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERV) is uncertain. There are no documented transmissions of PERV in humans and swine are available with inactivated genomic PERV loci. Metagenomic sequencing will complement more traditional diagnostic tools in the detection of any unknown pathogens in xenotransplantation recipients. Such data are required for the development of protocols for donor and recipient microbiological surveillance, infection control, and antimicrobial therapies that will enhance the safety of clinical xenotransplantation.

International Xenotransplantation Association (IXA) Position Paper on Kidney Xenotransplantation

Porcine kidney xenotransplantation for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) has reached the stage of clinical testing following major advances in donor pig genetic modifications and effective immunosuppressive strategies through decades of rigorous translational research. Reports of pig kidney xenograft survival beyond 1 year post-transplant in nonhuman primate (NHP) models justify optimism for its potential as an alternative to allotransplantation. In the United States, experimental transplantations of genetically engineered (GE) porcine kidneys into brain-dead subjects and a small number of ESRD patients have shown no evidence of hyperacute rejection and adequate pig kidney function for up to several months. Here we discuss pre-clinical/clinical results, infectious disease, ethical, and regulatory considerations, and propose evidence-based recommendations. For initial clinical trials in kidney xenotransplantation, we make the following recommendations: (i) transplantation with organs from a triple knockout (TKO) donor pig, preferably with added human transgenes, (ii) an immunosuppressive regimen with induction therapy to deplete T (and possibly B) cells, and maintenance therapy based on a cluster of differentiation (CD)40/CD154 co-stimulation pathway blockade, (iii) the patient should be fully acceptable as a candidate for allotransplantation but should be unlikely ever to receive an allograft. Patients aged 60-69 years (extendable to 40-75 years, if one of the criteria mentioned below is present), of blood group B or O, and with diabetes are most at risk in this regard. Other patients who could be considered are (i) those who have lost two or more previous kidney allografts from recurrent disease in the graft, (ii) those with broad human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-reactivity but no evidence of anti-pig antibodies, including swine leukocyte antigen (SLA), and (iii) those with failing vascular access. Clinical pilot studies in carefully and highly selected patients with no alternative therapy will provide the foundation upon which to base subsequent formal expanded clinical trials.

Xenotransplantation: future frontiers and challenges

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Recent advancements in genetic engineering have propelled the field of xenotransplantation from preclinical models to early compassionate use cases. As first-in-human clinical trials (FIHCTs) approach, we examine recent developments, ethical and regulatory challenges, immunological considerations, and the clinical infrastructure necessary for successful xenotransplantation trials.

RECENT FINDINGS

Expanded access transplants of pig hearts, kidneys, and livers have identified key challenges. Heart xenotransplants revealed risks of antibody-mediated rejection and zoonotic infections, while kidney xenotransplants suggest that patient selection, rather than immune rejection, may have caused failures. While there has been a report of auxiliary liver transplantation conducted abroad, profound thrombocytopenia poses an obstacle. As FIHCTs draw near, critical clinical challenges include determining the optimal donor genetic constructs and immunosuppressive regimens. Enrollment criteria and patient selection pose additional complexity, alongside ethical concerns such as lifelong zoonosis monitoring. Only a limited number of centers have the expertise needed to conduct these complex trials.

SUMMARY

Xenotransplantation holds great promise as a solution to organ shortages, but success in FIHCTs will require careful design, multidisciplinary collaboration, and strong infrastructure. Addressing immunologic, ethical, and patient selection challenges will be critical. With proper preparation, xenotransplantation could transform organ transplantation.

Surveillance and prevention of infection in clinical xenotransplantation

SUMMARYXenotransplantation, the transplantation of living organs, tissues, or cells between species, carries the potential to address the global shortage of human organs for patients with end-stage organ failure. Recent advances in genetic engineering have improved prospects for clinical xenotransplantation by reducing immune and inflammatory responses to grafts, controlling coagulation on endothelial surfaces, and modifying viral risks, including the porcine endogenous retrovirus (PERV). Management of infectious risks posed by clinical xenotransplantation requires meticulous attention to the biosecure breeding and microbiological surveillance of source animals and recipients and consideration of novel infection control requirements. Infectious risks in xenotransplantation stem from both known human pathogens in immunosuppressed transplant recipients and from porcine organisms for which the clinical manifestations, microbial assays, and therapies are generally limited. Both known and unknown zoonoses may be transmitted from pigs to humans. Some pig-specific pathogens do not infect human cells but have systemic manifestations when active within the xenograft, including porcine cytomegalovirus/porcine roseolovirus (PCMV/PRV), which contributes to graft rejection and consumptive coagulopathy. The role of porcine endogenous retrovirus (PERV) in humans remains uncertain despite the absence of documented transmissions and the availability of swine with inactivated genomic PERV. New technologies, such as metagenomic sequencing and multi-omics approaches, will be essential for detection of novel infections and for understanding interactions between the xenograft, the host's immune system, and potential pathogens. These approaches will allow development of infection control protocols, pathogen surveillance requirements, and tailored antimicrobial therapies to enhance the safety and success of clinical xenotransplantation.

International Xenotransplantation Association (IXA) Position Paper on Infectious Disease Considerations in Xenotransplantation

Clinical xenotransplantation has the potential to address shortages of human organs for patients with end-stage organ failure. Advances in genetic engineering, immunosuppressive regimens, and infectious disease diagnostics have improved prospects for clinical xenotransplantation. Management of the infectious risks posed by clinical xenotransplantation requires biosecure breeding and validated methods for microbiological surveillance of source animals and recipients. Novel infection control protocols may complement biosafety requirements. Infectious risks in xenotransplantation include both known human pathogens common to immunosuppressed organ recipients and from porcine organisms or xenozoonoses for which the clinical manifestations are less well defined and for which microbial assays and therapies are more limited. Some pig-specific organisms do not infect human cells but have systemic manifestations when active within the xenograft. The human risk posed by porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERV) is uncertain. There are no documented transmissions of PERV in humans and swine are available with inactivated genomic PERV loci. Metagenomic sequencing will complement more traditional diagnostic tools in the detection of any unknown pathogens in xenotransplantation recipients. Such data are required for the development of protocols for donor and recipient microbiological surveillance, infection control, and antimicrobial therapies that will enhance the safety of clinical xenotransplantation.

International Xenotransplantation Association (IXA) Position Paper on Kidney Xenotransplantation

Porcine kidney xenotransplantation for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) has reached the stage of clinical testing following major advances in donor pig genetic modifications and effective immunosuppressive strategies through decades of rigorous translational research. Reports of pig kidney xenograft survival beyond 1 year posttranplant in nonhuman primate (NHP) models justify optimism for its potential as an alternative to allotransplantation. In the United States, experimental transplantations of genetically engineered (GE) porcine kidneys into brain-dead subjects and a small number of ESRD patients have shown no evidence of hyperacute rejection and adequate pig kidney function for up to several months. Here we discuss pre-clinical/clinical results, infectious disease, ethical, and regulatory considerations, and propose evidence-based recommendations. For initial clinical trials in kidney xenotransplantation, we make the following recommendations: (i) transplantation with organs from a triple knockout (TKO) donor pig, preferably with added human transgenes, (ii) an immunosuppressive regimen with induction therapy to deplete T (and possibly B) cells, and maintenance therapy based on a cluster of differentiation (CD)40/CD154 co-stimulation pathway blockade, (iii) the patient should be fully acceptable as a candidate for allotransplantation but should be unlikely ever to receive an allograft. Patients aged 60-69 years (extendable to 40-75 years, if one of the criteria mentioned below is present), of blood group B or O, and with diabetes are most at risk in this regard. Other patients who could be considered are (i) those who have lost two or more previous kidney allografts from recurrent disease in the graft, (ii) those with broad human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-reactivity but no evidence of anti-pig antibodies, including swine leukocyte antigen (SLA), and (iii) those with failing vascular access. Clinical pilot studies in carefully and highly selected patients with no alternative therapy will provide the foundation upon which to base subsequent formal expanded clinical trials.

The Evolution of Immunosuppressive Therapy in Pig-to-Nonhuman Primate Organ Transplantation

An overview is provided of the evolution of strategies towards xenotransplantation during the past almost 40 years, focusing on advances in gene-editing of the organ-source pigs, pre-transplant treatment of the recipient, immunosuppressive protocols, and adjunctive therapy. Despite initial challenges, including hyperacute rejection resulting from natural (preformed) antibody binding and complement activation, significant progress has been made through gene editing of the organ-source pigs and refinement of immunosuppressive regimens. Major steps were the identification and deletion of expression of the three known glycan xenoantigens on pig vascular endothelial cells, the transgenic expression of human "protective" proteins, e.g., complement-regulatory, coagulation-regulatory, and anti-inflammatory proteins, and the administration of an immunosuppressive regimen based on blockade of the CD40/CD154 T cell co-stimulation pathway. Efforts to address systemic inflammation followed. The synergy between gene editing and judicious immunomodulation appears to largely prevent graft rejection and is associated with a relatively good safety profile. Though there remains an incidence of severe or persistent proteinuria (nephrotic syndrome) in a minority of cases. This progress offers renewed hope for patients in need of life-saving organ transplants.

Genetically engineered pig heart transplantation in non-human primates

BACKGROUND

Improvement in gene modifications of donor pigs has led to the prevention of early cardiac xenograft rejection and significantly prolonged cardiac xenograft survival in both heterotopic and orthotopic preclinical non-human primate (NHP) models. This progress formed the basis for FDA approval for compassionate use transplants in two patients.

METHODS

Based on our earlier report of 9-month survival of seven gene-edited (7-GE) hearts transplanted (life-supporting orthotopic) in baboons, we transplanted 10 gene-edited pig hearts into baboons (n = 4) using non-ischemic continuous perfusion preservation (NICP) and immunosuppression regimen based on co-stimulation blockade by anti-CD40 monoclonal antibody. This pivotal study expands on the 7-GE backbone, with 3 additional gene edits, using 10-GE pigs as donors to baboon recipients.

RESULTS

10 GE cardiac xenografts provide life-supporting function up to 225 days (mean 128 ± 36 days) in a non-human primate model. Undetectable or latent porcine cytomegalovirus (PCMV) does not influence cardiac xenograft survival in this study but still needs more exploration with a larger cohort. Xenograft histology demonstrates adipose (Fat) deposition (n = 1), chronic vasculopathy (n = 1), micro and macro thrombosis, and acute cellular rejection (n = 1).

CONCLUSIONS

These data demonstrate that 10 GE cardiac xenografts have variable cardiac xenograft survival in NHP due to perhaps presence of 4th antigen and require further study. However, these 10GE organs may be suitable for clinical cardiac xenotransplantation and have already been utilized in two human cases.

Oral fluid testing can be used to monitor xenotransplant donor herds for porcine cytomegalovirus/roseolovirus status

A major concern of xenotransplantation is that donor organs may be a source of pathogens. One pathogen in particular, porcine cytomegalovirus (PCMV), a porcine roseolovirus (PRV), is thought to result in donor organ failure in an immunosuppressed state. Porcine cytomegalovirus is difficult to detect in organ donor swine because of its ability to establish latency. Establishment of an antemortem testing protocol to monitor and maintain PCMV/PRV negative herd status decreases the risk of inadvertently using an organ harboring the virus. Oral fluid has become a common sample for detecting a number of porcine pathogens. A real-time PCR assay was adapted to include an internal control for inhibition and results from antemortem samples (blood, oral fluid) were compared to postmortem spleen from pigs in a known positive herd. When using both oral fluid and blood to test pigs over 12 months of age 13/20 animals with positive spleens tested real-time PCR positive. Animals younger than 12 months of age were tested individually and in group housing with all pigs positive by oral fluid and/or blood. PCMV/PRV testing of oral fluid in young animals and a combination of blood and oral fluid in older animals can be used to verify that a herd has been kept PCMV/PRV free, as in the high biosecurity facility of the National Swine Resource and Research Center.

Pig-to-human kidney xenotransplants using genetically modified minipigs

This study develops an observational model to assess kidney function recovery and xenogeneic immune responses in kidney xenotransplants, focusing on gene editing and immunosuppression. Two brain-dead patients undergo single kidney xenotransplantation, with kidneys donated by minipigs genetically modified to include triple-gene knockouts (GGTA1, β4GalNT2, CMAH) and human gene transfers (hCD55 or hCD55/hTBM). Renal xenograft functions are fully restored; however, immunosuppression without CD40-CD154 pathway blockade is ineffective in preventing acute rejection by day 12. This rejection manifests as both T cell-mediated rejection and antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), confirmed by natural killer (NK) cell and macrophage infiltration in sequential xenograft biopsies. Despite donor pigs being pathogen free before transplantation, xenografts and recipient organs test positive for porcine cytomegalovirus/porcine roseolovirus (PCMV/PRV) by the end of the observation period, indicating reactivation and contributing to significant immunopathological changes. This study underscores the critical need for extended clinical observation and comprehensive evaluation using deceased human models to advance xenograft success.

Progress in Orthotopic Pig Heart Transplantation in Nonhuman Primates

Xenotransplantation of porcine hearts has become a promising alternative to human allotransplantation, where organ demand still greatly surpasses organ availability. Before entering the clinic, however, feasibility of cardiac xenotransplantation needs to be proven, ideally in the life supporting orthotopic pig-to-nonhuman primate xenotransplantation model. In this review, we shortly outline the last three decades of research and then discuss in detail its most recent advances. These include the genetic modifications of donor pigs to overcome hyperacute rejection and coagulation dysregulation, new organ preservation methods to prevent perioperative xenograft dysfunction, experimental immunosuppressive and immunomodulatory therapies to inhibit the adaptive immune system and systemic inflammation in the recipient, growth control concepts to avoid detrimental overgrowth of the porcine hearts in nonhuman primates, and lastly, the avoidance of porcine cytomegalovirus infections in donor pigs. With these strategies, consistent survival of 6-9 months was achieved in the orthotopic xenotransplantation model, thereby fulfilling the prerequisites for the initiation of a clinical trial.

Application of Methods Detecting Xenotransplantation-Relevant Viruses for Screening German Slaughterhouse Pigs

Detection methods have been developed to prevent transmission of zoonotic or xenozoonotic porcine viruses after transplantation of pig organs or cells to the recipient (xenotransplantation). Eleven xenotransplantation-relevant viruses, including porcine cytomegalovirus, porcine roseolovirus (PCMV/PRV), porcine lymphotropic herpesviruses -1, -2, -3 (PLHV-1, 2, 3), porcine parvovirus (PPV), porcine circovirus 2, 3, 4 (PCV2, 3, 4), hepatitis E virus genotype 3 (HEV3), porcine endogenous retrovirus-C (PERV-C), and recombinant PERV-A/C have been selected. In the past, several pig breeds, minipigs, and genetically modified pigs generated for xenotransplantation had been analyzed using these methods. Here, spleen, liver, and blood samples from 10 German slaughterhouse pigs were screened using both PCR-based and immunological assays. Five viruses: PCMV/PRV, PLHV-1, PLHV-3, and PERV-C, were found in all animals, and PCV3 in one animal. Some animals were latently infected with PCMV/PRV, as only virus-specific antibodies were detected. Others were also PCR positive in the spleen and/or liver, indicative of an ongoing infection. These results provide important information on the viruses that infect German slaughterhouse pigs, and together with the results of previous studies, they reveal that the methods and test strategies efficiently work under field conditions.

Infectious Diseases and Clinical Xenotransplantation

Xenotransplantation, transplantation into humans of vascularized organs or viable cells from nonhuman species, is a potential solution to shortages of transplantable human organs. Among challenges to application of clinical xenotransplantation are unknown risks of transmission of animal microbes to immunosuppressed recipients or the community. Experience in allotransplantation and in preclinical models suggests that viral infections are the greatest concern. Worldwide, the distribution of swine pathogens is heterogeneous and cannot be fully controlled by international agricultural regulations. It is possible to screen source animals for potential human pathogens before procuring organs in a manner not possible within the time available for surveillance testing in allotransplantation. Infection control measures require microbiological assays for surveillance of source animals and xenograft recipients and research into zoonotic potential of porcine organisms. Available data suggest that infectious risks of xenotransplantation are manageable and that clinical trials can advance with appropriate protocols for microbiological monitoring of source animals and recipients.

Limited availability of methods for the detection of xenotransplantation-relevant viruses in veterinary laboratories

BACKGROUND

The German Xenotransplantation Consortium is in the process to prepare a clinical trial application (CTA) on xenotransplantation of genetically modified pig hearts. In the CTA documents to the central and national regulatory authorities, that is, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the Paul Ehrlich Institute (PEI), respectively, it is required to list the potential zoonotic or xenozoonotic porcine microorganisms including porcine viruses as well as to describe methods of detection in order to prevent their transmission. The donor animals should be tested using highly sensitive detection systems. I would like to define a detection system as the complex including the actual detection methods, either PCR-based, cell-based, or immunological methods and their sensitivity, as well as sample generation, sample preparation, sample origin, time of sampling, and the necessary negative and positive controls. Lessons learned from the identification of porcine cytomegalovirus/porcine roseolovirus (PCMV/PRV) in the xenotransplanted heart in the recipient in the Baltimore study underline how important such systems are. The question is whether veterinary laboratories can supply such assays.

METHODS

A total of 35 veterinary laboratories in Germany were surveyed for their ability to test for selected xenotransplantation-relevant viruses, including PCMV/PRV, hepatitis E virus, and porcine endogenous retrovirus-C (PERV-C). As comparison, data from Swiss laboratories and a laboratory in the USA were analyzed. Furthermore, we assessed which viruses were screened for in clinical and preclinical trials performed until now and during screening of pig populations.

RESULTS

Of the nine laboratories that provided viral diagnostics, none of these included all potential viruses of concern, indeed, the most important assays confirmed in recent human trials, antibody detection of PCMV/PRV and screening for PERV-C were not available at all. The situation was similar in Swiss and US laboratories. Different viruses have been tested for in first clinical and preclinical trials performed in various countries.

CONCLUSION

Based on these results it is necessary to establish special virological laboratories able to test for all xenotransplantation-relevant viruses using validated assays, optimally in the xenotransplantation centers.

Pigs in Transplantation Research and Their Potential as Sources of Organs in Clinical Xenotransplantation

The pig has long been used as a research animal and has now gained importance as a potential source of organs for clinical xenotransplantation. When an organ from a wild-type (i. e., genetically unmodified) pig is transplanted into an immunosuppressed nonhuman primate, a vigorous host immune response causes hyperacute rejection (within minutes or hours). This response has been largely overcome by 1) extensive gene editing of the organ-source pig and 2) the administration to the recipient of novel immunosuppressive therapy based on blockade of the CD40/CD154 T cell costimulation pathway. Gene editing has consisted of 1) deletion of expression of the 3 known carbohydrate xenoantigens against which humans have natural (preformed) antibodies and 2) the introduction of human 'protective' genes. The combination of gene editing and novel immunosuppressive therapy has extended life-supporting pig kidney graft survival to greater than 1 y and of pig heart survival to up to 9 mo. This review briefly describes the techniques of gene editing, the potential risks of transfer of porcine endogenous retroviruses with the organ, and the need for breeding and housing of donor pigs under biosecure conditions.

Heart of the matter-infection and xenotransplantation

In this clinicopathological conference, invited experts discussed a previously published case of a patient with nonischemic cardiomyopathy who underwent heart transplantation from a genetically modified pig source animal. His complex course included detection of porcine cytomegalovirus by plasma microbial cell-free DNA and eventual xenograft failure. The objectives of the session included discussion of selection of immunosuppressive regimens and prophylactic antimicrobials for human xenograft recipients, description of infectious disease risk assessment and mitigation in potential xenograft donors and understanding of screening and therapeutic strategies for potential xenograft-related infections.

Determination of the Copy Number of Porcine Endogenous Retroviruses (PERV) in Auckland Island Pigs Repeatedly Used for Clinical Xenotransplantation and Elimination of PERV-C

Auckland Island pigs represent an inbred population of feral pigs isolated on the sub-Antarctic island for over 100 years. The animals have been maintained under pathogen-free conditions in New Zealand; they are well characterized virologically and have been used as donor sources in first clinical trials of porcine neonatal islet cell transplantation for the treatment of human diabetes patients. The animals do not carry any of the xenotransplantation-relevant viruses, and in the first clinical trials, no porcine viruses, including porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERVs) were transmitted to the human recipients. PERVs pose a special risk in xenotransplantation, since they are part of the pig genome. When the copy number of PERVs in these animals was analyzed using droplet digital PCR and primers binding to a conserved region of the polymerase gene (PERVpol), a copy number typical for Western pigs was found. This confirms previous phylogenetic analyses of microsatellites as well as mitochondrial analyses showing a closer relationship to European pigs than to Chinese pigs. When kidney cells from very young piglets were analyzed, only around 20 PERVpol copies were detected. Using these cells as donors in somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT), animals were born showing PERVpol copy numbers between 35 and 56. These data indicate that Auckland Island pigs have a similar copy number in comparison with other Western pig breeds and that the copy number is higher in adult animals compared with cells from young piglets. Most importantly, PERV-C-free animals were selected and the absence of an additional eight porcine viruses was demonstrated.

American Society of Transplant Surgeons-American Society of Transplantation report of FDA meeting on regulatory expectations for xenotransplantation products

In June 2022, the US Food and Drug Administration Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research held the 73rd meeting of the Cellular, Tissue, and Gene Therapies Advisory Committee for public discussion of regulatory expectations for xenotransplantation products. The members of a joint American Society of Transplant Surgeons/American Society of Transplantation committee on xenotransplantation compiled a meeting summary focusing on 7 topics believed to be key by the committee: (1) preclinical evidence supporting progression to a clinical trial, (2) porcine kidney function, (3) ethical aspects, (4) design of initial clinical trials, (5) infectious disease issues, (6) industry perspectives, and (7) regulatory oversight.

PCR and peptide based PCMV detection in pig - development and application of a combined testing procedure differentiating newly from latent infected pigs

Porcine cytomegalovirus (PCMV) is widely distributed in pigs and difficult to detect due to latency. PCMV infection of source pigs was associated with early graft failure after cardiac and renal xenotransplantation into nonhuman primates. Importantly, PCMV infection of the first genetically modified pig heart into a human may have contributed to the reduced survival of the patient. Sensitive and reliable assays for detection of latent PCMV infection are thus indispensable. Here, we report the development of five peptide-induced rabbit antisera specific for PCMV glycoprotein B (gB) and their validation for detection of PCMV in infected pig fallopian tube (PFT) cells by immunofluorescence and electron microscopy (EM). The anti-gB antibodies were also used for detection by Western blot analysis of PCMV purified from the supernatant of infected PFT cells. Sera of infected versus non-infected pigs have been compared. In parallel, PCMV viral load in blood samples of the animals was quantified by a novel highly sensitive nested-PCR and qPCR assay. A combination of four partly overlapping peptides from the gB C-terminus was used to establish a diagnostic ELISA for PCMV gB specific pig antibodies which is able to differentiate infected from non-infected animals and to quantify maternal antibodies in neonates. The combination of a highly sensitive nested PCR for direct virus detection with a sensitive peptide-based ELISA detecting anti-PCMV gB-antibodies, supplemented by Western blot analysis and/or immunohistochemistry for virus detection will reliably differentiate pigs with active infection, latently infected pigs, and non-infected pigs. It may significantly improve the virologic safety of xenotransplantation.

Historical Review and Future of Cardiac Xenotransplantation

Along with the development of immunosuppressive drugs, major advances on xenotransplantation were achieved by understanding the immunobiology of xenograft rejection. Most importantly, three predominant carbohydrate antigens on porcine endothelial cells were key elements provoking hyperacute rejection: α1,3-galactose, SDa blood group antigen, and N-glycolylneuraminic acid. Preformed antibodies binding to the porcine major xenoantigen causes complement activation and endothelial cell activation, leading to xenograft injury and intravascular thrombosis. Recent advances in genetic engineering enabled knock-outs of these major xenoantigens, thus producing xenografts with less hyperacute rejection rates. Another milestone in the history of xenotransplantation was the development of co-stimulation blockaded strategy. Unlike allotransplantation, xenotransplantation requires blockade of CD40-CD40L pathway to prevent T-cell dependent B-cell activation and antibody production. In 2010s, advanced genetic engineering of xenograft by inducing the expression of multiple human transgenes became available. So-called 'multi-gene' xenografts expressing human transgenes such as thrombomodulin and endothelial protein C receptor were introduced, which resulted in the reduction of thrombotic events and improvement of xenograft survival. Still, there are many limitations to clinical translation of cardiac xenotransplantation. Along with technical challenges, zoonotic infection and physiological discordances are major obstacles. Social barriers including healthcare costs also need to be addressed. Although there are several remaining obstacles to overcome, xenotransplantation would surely become the novel option for millions of patients with end-stage heart failure who have limited options to traditional therapeutics.

The case for the therapeutic use of mechanistic/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors in xenotransplantation

The mechanistic/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) is one of the systems that are necessary to maintain cell homeostasis, such as survival, proliferation, and differentiation. mTOR inhibitors (mTOR-Is) are utilized as immunosuppressants and anti-cancer drugs. In organ allotransplantation, current regimens infrequently include an mTOR-I, which are positioned more commonly as alternative immunosuppressants. In clinical allotransplantation, long-term efficacy has been established, but there is a significant incidence of adverse events, for example, inhibition of wound healing, buccal ulceration, anemia, hyperglycemia, dyslipidemia, and thrombocytopenia, some of which are dose-dependent. mTOR-Is have properties that may be especially beneficial in xenotransplantation. These include suppression of T cell proliferation, increases in the number of T regulatory cells, inhibition of pig graft growth, and anti-inflammatory, anti-viral, and anti-cancer effects. We here review the potential benefits and risks of mTOR-Is in xenotransplantation and suggest that the benefits exceed the adverse effects.

Infection and clinical xenotransplantation: Guidance from the Infectious Disease Community of Practice of the American Society of Transplantation

This guidance was developed to summarize current approaches to the potential transmission of swine-derived organisms to xenograft recipients, health care providers, or the public in clinical xenotransplantation. Limited specific data are available on the zoonotic potential of pig pathogens. It is anticipated that the risk of zoonotic infection in xenograft recipients will be determined by organisms present in source animals and relate to the nature and intensity of the immunosuppression used to maintain xenograft function. Based on experience in allotransplantation and with preclinical models, viral infections are of greatest concern, including porcine cytomegalovirus, porcine lymphotropic herpesvirus, and porcine endogenous retroviruses. Sensitive and specific microbiological assays are required for routine microbiological surveillance of source animals and xenograft recipients. Archiving of blood samples from recipients, contacts, and hospital staff may provide a basis for microbiological investigations if infectious syndromes develop. Carefully implemented infection control practices are required to prevent zoonotic pathogen exposures by clinical care providers. Informed consent practices for recipients and their close contacts must convey the lack of specific data for infectious risk assessment. Available data suggest that infectious risks of xenotransplantation are manageable and that clinical trials can advance with carefully developed protocols for pretransplant assessment, syndrome evaluation, and microbiological monitoring.

Future of Lung Transplantation: Xenotransplantation and Bioengineering Lungs

Xenotransplantation promises to alleviate the issue of donor organ shortages and to decrease waiting times for transplantation. Recent advances in genetic engineering have allowed for the creation of pigs with up to 16 genetic modifications. Several combinations of genetic modifications have been associated with extended graft survival and life-supporting function in experimental heart and kidney xenotransplants. Lung xenotransplantation carries specific challenges related to the large surface area of the lung vascular bed, its innate immune system's intrinsic hyperreactivity to perceived 'danger', and its anatomic vulnerability to airway flooding after even localized loss of alveolocapillary barrier function. This article discusses the current status of lung xenotransplantation, and challenges related to immunology, physiology, anatomy, and infection. Tissue engineering as a feasible alternative to develop a viable lung replacement solution is discussed.

Detection of porcine cytomegalovirus, a roseolovirus, in pig ovaries and follicular fluid: implications for somatic cells nuclear transfer, cloning and xenotransplantation

BACKGROUND

Porcine cytomegalovirus (PCMV) is a porcine roseolovirus (PCMV/PRV) which is widely distributed in pigs. Transmission of PCMV/PRV in preclinical xenotransplantations was shown to significantly reduce the survival time of the pig transplants in non-human primates. PCMV/PRV was also transmitted in the first transplantation of a pig heart into a human patient. To analyze how PCMV/PRV could be introduced into pig breeds, especially considering cloned transgenic pigs, and subsequently spread in breeding facilities, we screened ovaries and derived materials which are used to perform somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT).

METHODS

DNA was isolated from ovarian tissues, follicular fluids, oocytes with cumulus cells, denuded oocytes and parthenotes. A real-time PCR with PCMV/PRV-specific primers and a probe was performed to detect PCMV/PRV. Furthermore, a Western blot assay using a recombinant fragment of the gB protein of PCMV/PRV was performed to screen for virus-specific antibodies in the follicular fluids.

RESULTS

PCMV/PRV was found by real-time PCR in ovarian tissues, in the follicular fluid and in oocytes. In parthenotes the virus could not be detected, most-likely due to the low amount of DNA used. By Western blot assay specific antibodies against PCMV/PRV were found in 19 of 20 analyzed follicular fluids.

CONCLUSION

PCMV/PRV was found in ovarian tissues, in the follicular fluids and also in denuded oocytes, indicating that the virus is present in the animals of which the oocytes were taken from. Despite several washing steps of the denuded oocytes, which are subsequently used for microinjection or SCNT, the virus could still be detected. Therefore, the virus could infect oocytes during genetic modifications or stay attached to the surface of the oocytes, potentially infecting SCNT recipient animals.

Presence of porcine cytomegalovirus, a porcine roseolovirus, in wild boars in Italy and Germany

Porcine cytomegalovirus (PCMV), a porcine roseolovirus (PRV) that is closely related to human herpesviruses 6 and 7, is commonly found in commercial pigs. PCMV/PRV is important in xenotransplantation, because in preclinical trials in which pig organs were transplanted into non-human primates, transmission of PCMV/PRV was shown to be associated with significantly reduced survival of the xenotransplants. PCMV/PRV was also transmitted in the first transplantation of a pig heart into a human patient worldwide and apparently contributed to the death of the patient. The prevalence of PCMV/PRV in wild boars is largely unknown. In this study, we screened wild boars from several areas of northern Italy and Germany to test for the presence of PCMV/PRV using PCR-based and Western blot assays. By Western blot analysis, 54% and 82% of Italian and German wild boars, respectively, were found to be PCMV/PRV positive, while 36% and 60%, respectively, tested positive by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). These data indicate that the virus is common in German and Italian wild boars and that the Western blot assay detected a PCMV/PRV infection more often than did real-time PCR. The data also indicate that pigs raised for xenotransplantation should be protected from contact with materials from wild boars and commercial pigs.

How, where and when to screen for porcine cytomegalovirus (PCMV) in donor pigs for xenotransplantation

Porcine cytomegalovirus (PCMV), that is actually a porcine roseolovirus (PRV), is a common herpesvirus in domestic pigs and wild boars. In xenotransplantation, PCMV/PRV has been shown to significantly reduce the survival time of pig kidneys and hearts in preclinical trials with different non-human primates. Furthermore, PCMV/PRV has been transmitted in the first pig to human heart xenotransplantation and contributed to the death of the patient. Although transmitted to the recipient, there is no evidence that PCMV/PRV can infect primate cells including human cells. PCMV/PRV is closely related to the human herpesviruses 6 and 7, and only distantly related to the human CMV (HCMV). Antiviral drugs used for the treatment of HCMV are less effective against PCMV/PRV. However, there are well described strategies to eliminate the virus from pig facilities. In order to detect the virus and to eliminate it, highly sensitive detection methods and the knowledge of how, where and when to screen the donor pigs is required. Here, a comparative testing of organs from pigs of different ages using polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based and immunological methods was performed. Testing young piglets, PCMV/PRV was detected effectively by PCR in blood, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, tonsils and heart. In adult animals, detection by PCR was not successful in most cases, because the virus load was below the detection limit or the virus was in its latent stage. Therefore, detection of antibodies against selected recombinant proteins corresponding to epitopes detected by nearly all infected animals in a Western blot assay is advantageous. By contrast, immunological testing is not beneficial in young animals as piglets might have PCMV/PRV-specific antibodies obtained from their infected mother via the colostrum. Using a thoughtful combination of PCR-based and immunological methods, detection of PCMV/PRV in donor pigs for xenotransplantation is feasible and a controlled elimination of the virus by early weaning or other methods is possible.

Developing pig-to-human organ transplants

Recent advances raise hope for a promising solution to the transplant organ shortage.

Porcine cytomegalovirus/porcine roseolovirus (PCMV/PRV): A threat for xenotransplantation?

The potential for a donor-derived transmission of porcine cytomegalovirus/porcine roseolovirus (PCMV/PRV) to the recipient has been recognized since pigs were considered candidate donors for xenotransplantation. This review gives a short description of the viral properties and summarizes the current evidence of the effects of PCMV/PRV transmission in preclinical xenotransplantation. Despite evidence that PCMV/PRV does not infect human and non-human primate cells, activation in the transplanted organ and detrimental systemic complications have been described. As PCMV/PRV is a herpesvirus able to establish latency, the importance of adequate screening of donor pigs is emphasized, as no efficient treatment is available. Furthermore, easy and successful ways of elimination of PCMV/PRV from pig herds are indicated.

Virus Safety of Xenotransplantation

The practice of xenotransplantation using pig islet cells or organs is under development to alleviate the shortage of human donor islet cells or organs for the treatment of diabetes or organ failure. Multiple genetically modified pigs were generated to prevent rejection. Xenotransplantation may be associated with the transmission of potentially zoonotic porcine viruses. In order to prevent this, we developed highly sensitive PCR-based, immunologicals and other methods for the detection of numerous xenotransplantation-relevant viruses. These methods were used for the screening of donor pigs and xenotransplant recipients. Of special interest are the porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERVs) that are integrated in the genome of all pigs, which are able to infect human cells, and that cannot be eliminated by methods that other viruses can. We showed, using droplet digital PCR, that the number of PERV proviruses is different in different pigs (usually around 60). Furthermore, the copy number is different in different organs of a single pig, indicating that PERVs are active in the living animals. We showed that in the first clinical trials treating diabetic patients with pig islet cells, no porcine viruses were transmitted. However, in preclinical trials transplanting pig hearts orthotopically into baboons, porcine cytomegalovirus (PCMV), a porcine roseolovirus (PCMV/PRV), and porcine circovirus 3 (PCV3), but no PERVs, were transmitted. PCMV/PRV transmission resulted in a significant reduction of the survival time of the xenotransplant. PCMV/PRV was also transmitted in the first pig heart transplantation to a human patient and possibly contributed to the death of the patient. Transmission means that the virus was detected in the recipient, however it remains unclear whether it can infect primate cells, including human cells. We showed previously that PCMV/PRV can be eliminated from donor pigs by early weaning. PERVs were also not transmitted by inoculation of human cell-adapted PERV into small animals, rhesus monkey, baboons and cynomolgus monkeys, even when pharmaceutical immunosuppression was applied. Since PERVs were not transmitted in clinical, preclinical, or infection experiments, it remains unclear whether they should be inactivated in the pig genome by CRISPR/Cas. In summary, by using our sensitive methods, the safety of xenotransplantation can be ensured.

The immunobiology and clinical use of genetically engineered porcine hearts for cardiac xenotransplantation

A summary of the scientific rationale of the advancements that led to the first genetically modified pig-to-human cardiac xenotransplantation is lacking in a complex and rapidly evolving field. Here, we aim to aid the general readership in the understanding of the gradual progression of cardiac (xeno)transplantation research, the immunobiology of cardiac xenotransplantation (including the latest immunosuppression, cardiac preservation and genetic engineering required for successful transplantation) and the regulatory landscape related to the clinical application of cardiac xenotransplantation for people with end-stage heart failure. Finally, we provide an overview of the outcomes and lessons learned from the first genetically modified pig-to-human cardiac heart xenotransplantation.

The first clinical pig heart transplant: Was IVIg or pig cytomegalovirus detrimental to the outcome?

The clinical course of the first patient to receive a gene-edited pig heart transplant was recently reported by the University of Maryland team. Although the pig heart functioned well for >40 days, serum anti-pig antibodies then increased, and the patient sadly died after 60 days. Because of his debilitated pre-transplant state, the patient never thrived despite excellent graft function for several weeks, and the cause of his demise continues to be uncertain. A few days before an increase in anti-pig antibodies was observed, the patient had received intravenous human immunoglobulin (IVIg), and whether this played a role in his cardiac deterioration has been discussed. Furthermore, mcfDNA testing indicated an increase in pig cytomegalovirus (CMV), and its possible role in the development of cardiac dysfunction has also been considered. On the basis of the limited data provided in the publication and on our previous investigations into whether IVIg contains anti-TKO pig antibodies and therefore might be deleterious to TKO pig organ xenografts, we suggest that the steady rise in anti-pig antibody titer was more consistent with the failure of the immunosuppressive regimen to prevent elicited anti-TKO pig antibody production, rather than from the passive transfusion of IVIg or the presence of pig CMV in the graft. Although the outcome of the Maryland experience was disappointing, valuable lessons were learned. Our attention was drawn to the potential risks of heart transplantation in a "deconditioned" patient, the administration of IVIg, the transmission of pig CMV, and of the difficulties in interpreting myocardial biopsy findings.

Risk of pathogenic virus transmission by somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT): implications for xenotransplantation

Using somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) for the generation of cloned and transgenic animals bears the risk of transmission of viruses, either by the oocyte or by the introduced donor cell. There is evidence that the zona pellucida (ZP) surrounding the oocyte prevents virus infection, however, virus infections despite intact ZP were reported. Furthermore, the protective ZP has to be penetrated in order to place the somatic cell in the oocyte's perivitelline space during SCNT. Transmission of viruses represents also a severe problem during in vitro fertilization (IVF). Genetically modified and IVF-produced pigs serve as an important biomedical model for numerous diseases and it is important to evaluate whether infections of the model animals can falsify the research data. Of special significance is this topic in the case of xenotransplantation using genetically modified pigs as donor animals, because transmission of porcine viruses may be harmful for the human recipient. This was repeatedly demonstrated in preclinical pig to non-human primate trials. Therefore, donor pigs, oocytes used for SCNT and genetically modified donor cells should be screened for potentially zoonotic viruses when creating genetically modified pigs designed for xenotransplantation.

Virological and Parasitological Characterization of Mini-LEWE Minipigs Using Improved Screening Methods and an Overview of Data on Various Minipig Breeds

Minipigs play an important role in biomedical research and have also been used as donor animals in xenotransplantation. To serve as a donor in xenotransplantation, the animals must be free of potential zoonotic viruses, bacteria and parasites. Porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERVs) are integrated in the genome of all pigs and cannot be eliminated as most of the other pig viruses can. PERV-A and PERV-B infect human cells in cell culture and are integrated in all pigs, whereas PERV-C infects only pig cells and it is found in many, but not all pigs. Minipigs are known for a high prevalence of recombinant PERV-A/C viruses able to infect human cells (Denner and Schuurman, Viruses, 2021;13:1869). Here, Mini-LEWE minipigs are screened for the first time for pig viruses including PERV. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from 10 animals were screened using PCR-based methods (PCR, RT-PCR, and real-time PCR). In comparison with our previous screening assays, numerous improvements were introduced, e.g., the usage of gene blocks as a PCR standard and foreign RNA to control reverse transcription in RT-PCR. Using these improved detection methods, Mini-LEWE pigs were found to be negative for porcine cytomegalovirus (PCMV), porcine lymphotropic herpesviruses (PLHV-1, -2 and -3), porcine circoviruses (PCV1, 2, 3 and 4), porcine parvovirus (PPV) and hepatitis E virus (HEV). All animals carried PERV-A, PERV-B and PERV-C in their genome. PERV-A/C was not found. In contrast to all other minipig breeds (Göttingen minipigs, Aachen minipigs, Yucatan micropig, Massachusetts General Hospital miniature pigs), Mini-LEWE minipigs have less viruses and no PERV-A/C. Parasitological screening showed that none of the Mini-LEWE minipigs harbored ecto- and gastrointestinal parasites, but at least one animal tested positive for anti-Toxoplasma gondii antibodies.

Pathways to Clinical Cardiac Xenotransplantation

Heart transplantation is the only long-lasting lifesaving option for patients with terminal cardiac failure. The number of available human organs is however far below the actual need, resulting in substantial mortality of patients while waiting for a human heart. Mechanical assist devices are used to support cardiac function but are associated with a high risk of severe complications and poor quality of life for the patients. Consistent success in orthotopic transplantation of genetically modified pig hearts into baboons indicates that cardiac xenotransplantation may become a clinically applicable option for heart failure patients who cannot get a human heart transplant. In this overview, we project potential paths to clinical cardiac xenotransplantation, including the choice of genetically modified source pigs; associated requirements of microbiological, including virological, safety; optimized matching of source pig and recipient; and specific treatments of the donor heart after explantation and of the recipients. Moreover, selection of patients and the regulatory framework will be discussed.

Expression of human CD47 in pig glomeruli prevents proteinuria and prolongs graft survival following pig-to-baboon xenotransplantation

BACKGROUND

Nephrotic syndrome is a common complication of pig-to-baboon kidney xenotransplantation (KXTx) that adversely affects outcomes. We have reported that upregulation of CD80 and down-regulation of SMPDL-3b in glomeruli have an important role in the development of proteinuria following pig-to-baboon KXTx. Recently we found induced expression of human CD47 (hCD47) on endothelial cells and podocytes isolated from hCD47 transgenic (Tg) swine markedly reduced phagocytosis by baboon and human macrophages. These observations led us to hypothesize that transplanting hCD47 Tg porcine kidneys could overcome the incompatibility of the porcine CD47-baboon SIRPα interspecies ligand-receptor interaction and prevent the development of proteinuria following KXTx.

METHODS

Ten baboons received pig kidneys with vascularized thymic grafts (n = 8) or intra-bone bone marrow transplants (n = 2). Baboons were divided into three groups (A, B, and C) based on the transgenic expression of hCD47 in GalT-KO pigs. Baboons in Group A received kidney grafts with expression of hCD47 restricted to glomerular cells (n = 2). Baboons in Group B received kidney grafts with high expression of hCD47 on both glomerular and tubular cells of the kidneys (n = 4). Baboons in Group C received kidney grafts with low/no glomerular expression of hCD47, and high expression of hCD47 on renal tubular cells (n = 4).

RESULTS

Consistent with this hypothesis, GalT-KO/hCD47 kidney grafts with high expression of hCD47 on glomerular cells developed minimal proteinuria. However, high hCD47 expression in all renal cells including renal tubular cells induced an apparent destructive inflammatory response associated with upregulated thrombospondin-1. This response could be avoided by a short course of weekly anti-IL6R antibody administration, resulting in prolonged survival without proteinuria (mean 170.5 days from 47.8 days).

CONCLUSION

Data showed that transgenic expression of hCD47 on glomerular cells in the GalT-KO donor kidneys can prevent xenograft nephropathy, a significant barrier for therapeutic applications of xenotransplantation. The ability to prevent nephrotic syndrome following KXTx overcomes a critical barrier for future clinical applications of KXTx.

What Therapeutic Regimen Will Be Optimal for Initial Clinical Trials of Pig Organ Transplantation?

We discuss what therapeutic regimen might be acceptable/successful in the first clinical trial of genetically engineered pig kidney or heart transplantation. As regimens based on a calcineurin inhibitor or CTLA4-Ig have proved unsuccessful, the regimen we administer to baboons is based on induction therapy with antithymocyte globulin, an anti-CD20 mAb (Rituximab), and cobra venom factor, with maintenance therapy based on blockade of the CD40/CD154 costimulation pathway (with an anti-CD40 mAb), with rapamycin, and a corticosteroid. An anti-inflammatory agent (etanercept) is administered for the first 2 wk, and adjuvant therapy includes prophylaxis against thrombotic complications, anemia, cytomegalovirus, and pneumocystis. Using this regimen, although antibody-mediated rejection certainly can occur, we have documented no definite evidence of an adaptive immune response to the pig xenograft. This regimen could also form the basis for the first clinical trial, except that cobra venom factor will be replaced by a clinically approved agent, for example, a C1-esterase inhibitor. However, none of the agents that block the CD40/CD154 pathway are yet approved for clinical use, and so this hurdle remains to be overcome. The role of anti-inflammatory agents remains unproven. The major difference between this suggested regimen and those used in allotransplantation is the replacement of a calcineurin inhibitor with a costimulation blockade agent, but this does not appear to increase the complications of the regimen.

Porcine Lymphotropic Herpesviruses (PLHVs) and Xenotranplantation

Porcine lymphotropic herpesviruses -1, -2 and -3 (PLHV-1, PLHV-2 and PLHV-3) are gammaherpesviruses which are widespread in pigs. They are closely related to the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and Kaposi sarcoma herpesvirus, both of which cause severe diseases in humans. PLHVs are also related to bovine and ovine gammaherpesviruses, which are apathogenic in the natural host, but cause severe diseases after transmission into other species. Until now, no association between PLHVs and any pig diseases had been described. However, PLHV-1 causes a post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) after experimental transplantations in minipigs. This disorder is similar to human PTLD, a serious complication of solid human organ transplantation linked to EBV. Xenotransplantation using pig cells, tissues and organs is under development in order to alleviate the shortage of human transplants. Meanwhile, remarkable survival times of pig xenotransplants in non-human primates have been achieved. In these preclinical trials, another pig herpesvirus, the porcine cytomegalovirus (PCMV), a roseolovirus, was shown to significantly reduce the survival time of pig xenotransplants in baboons and other non-human primates. Although PLHV-1 was found in genetically modified donor pigs used in preclinical xenotransplantation, it was, in contrast to PCMV, not transmitted to the recipient. Nevertheless, it seems important to use PLHV-free donor pigs in order to achieve safe xenotransplantation.

The origin of porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERVs)

Porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERVs) are integrated in the genome of all pigs, and they produce viral particles that are able to infect human cells and therefore pose a special risk for xenotransplantation. In contrast to other pig microorganisms that also pose a risk, such as porcine cytomegalovirus and hepatitis E virus, PERVs cannot be eliminated from pigs by vaccines, antiviral drugs, early weaning, or embryo transfer. Since PERVs are relevant for xenotransplantation, their biology and origin are of great interest. Recent studies have shown that PERVs are the result of a transspecies transmission of precursor retroviruses from different animals and further evolution in the pig genome. PERVs acquired different long terminal repeats (LTRs), and recombination took place. In parallel, it has been shown that the activity of the LTRs and recombination in the envelope are important for the transmissibility and pathogenesis of PERVs. Transspecies transmission of retroviruses is common, a well-known example being the transmission of precursor retroviruses from non-human primates to humans, resulting in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Here, recent findings concerning the origin of PERVs, their LTRs, and recombination events that occurred during evolution are reviewed and compared with other findings regarding transspecies transmission of retroviruses.