1
|
DeFilippis EM, Sweigart B, Khush KK, Shah P, Agbor-Enoh S, Valantine HA, Vest AR. Sex-specific patterns of donor-derived cell-free DNA in heart transplant rejection: An analysis from the Genomic Research Alliance for Transplantation (GRAfT). J Heart Lung Transplant 2024; 43:1135-1141. [PMID: 38460620 PMCID: PMC11144097 DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2024.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2023] [Revised: 01/22/2024] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 03/11/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Noninvasive methods for surveillance of acute rejection are increasingly used in heart transplantation (HT), including donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA). As other cardiac biomarkers differ by sex, we hypothesized that there may be sex-specific differences in the performance of dd-cfDNA for the detection of acute rejection. The purpose of the current study was to examine patterns of dd-cfDNA seen in quiescence and acute rejection in male and female transplant recipients. METHODS Patients enrolled in the Genomic Research Alliance for Transplantation who were ≥18 years at the time of HT were included. Rejection was defined by endomyocardial biopsy with acute cellular rejection (ACR) grade ≥2R and/or antibody-mediated rejection ≥ pAMR 1. dd-cfDNA was quantitated using shotgun sequencing. Median dd-cfDNA levels were compared between sexes during quiescence and rejection. The performance of dd-cfDNA by sex was assessed using area under the receiver operator characteristic (AUROC) curve. Allograft injury was defined as dd-cfDNA ≥0.25%. RESULTS One hundred fifty-one unique patients (49 female, 32%) were included in the analysis with 1,119 available dd-cfDNA measurements. Baseline characteristics including demographics and comorbidities were not significantly different between sexes. During quiescence, there were no significant sex differences in median dd-cfDNA level (0.04% [IQR 0.00, 0.16] in females vs 0.03% [IQR 0.00, 0.12] in males, p = 0.22). There were no significant sex differences in median dd-cfDNA for ACR (0.33% [0.21, 0.36] in females vs 0.32% [0.21, 1.10] in males, p = 0.57). Overall, median dd-cfDNA levels were higher in antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) than ACR but did not significantly differ by sex (0.50% [IQR 0.18, 0.82] in females vs 0.63% [IQR 0.32, 1.95] in males, p = 0.51). Elevated dd-cfDNA detected ACR/AMR with an AUROC of 0.83 in females and 0.89 in males, p-value for comparison = 0.16. CONCLUSIONS There were no significant sex differences in dd-cfDNA levels during quiescence and rejection. Performance characteristics were similar, suggesting similar diagnostic thresholds can be used in men and women for rejection surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ersilia M DeFilippis
- Division of Cardiology, Center for Advanced Cardiac Care, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Benjamin Sweigart
- Tufts Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Kiran K Khush
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Palak Shah
- Heart Failure, Mechanical Circulatory Support and Transplant, Inova Schar Heart and Vascular, Falls Church, Virginia
| | - Sean Agbor-Enoh
- Division of Intramural Research, National Heart Lung and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Hannah A Valantine
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Amanda R Vest
- Division of Cardiology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cusi V, Vaida F, Wettersten N, Rodgers N, Tada Y, Gerding B, Urey MA, Greenberg B, Adler ED, Kim PJ. Incidence of Acute Rejection Compared With Endomyocardial Biopsy Complications for Heart Transplant Patients in the Contemporary Era. Transplantation 2024; 108:1220-1227. [PMID: 38098137 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004882] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The reference standard of detecting acute rejection (AR) in adult heart transplant (HTx) patients is an endomyocardial biopsy (EMB). The majority of EMBs are performed in asymptomatic patients. However, the incidence of treated AR compared with EMB complications has not been compared in the contemporary era (2010-current). METHODS The authors retrospectively analyzed 2769 EMBs obtained in 326 consecutive HTx patients between August 2019 and August 2022. Variables included surveillance versus for-cause indication, recipient and donor characteristics, EMB procedural data and pathological grades, treatment for AR, and clinical outcomes. RESULTS The overall EMB complications rate was 1.6%. EMBs performed within 1 mo after HTx compared with after 1 mo from HTx showed significantly increased complications (OR, 12.74, P < 0.001). The treated AR rate was 14.2% in the for-cause EMBs and 1.2% in the surveillance EMBs. We found the incidence of AR versus EMB complications was significantly lower in the surveillance compared with the for-cause EMB group (OR, 0.05, P < 0.001). We also found the incidence of EMB complications was higher than treated AR in surveillance EMBs. CONCLUSIONS The yield of surveillance EMBs has declined in the contemporary era, with a higher incidence of EMB complications compared with detected AR. The risk of EMB complications was highest within 1 mo after HTx. Surveillance EMB protocols in the contemporary era may need to be reevaluated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Florin Vaida
- Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, UC San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Nicholas Wettersten
- Cardiology Section, Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dhillon M, Kobashigawa JA, Kittleson M, Jain R, Patel N, Singer-Englar T, Zhang X, Hakimi M, Aintablian T, Vescio R, Dilibero D, Kransdorf E, Czer L, Nikolova AP, Patel JK. Does bortezomib influence pre-transplant desensitization therapy or benefit post-heart transplant outcomes for highly sensitized patients? Clin Transplant 2024; 38:e15165. [PMID: 37837612 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.15165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2023] [Revised: 09/19/2023] [Accepted: 10/03/2023] [Indexed: 10/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of bortezomib which is a proteasome inhibitor has been demonstrated to be efficacious in small number of patients as a desensitization strategy in heart transplant. We reviewed our single center's experience using Bortezomib along with plasmapheresis as desensitization therapy for highly sensitized patients to assess pre- and post-transplant outcomes. METHOD We assessed 43 highly sensitized patients awaiting HTx (defined as cPRA > 50%) between 2010 and 2021 who underwent desensitization therapy with bortezomib. Only those patients who subsequently underwent HTx were included in this study. Enrolled patients received up to four doses of bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2 ) over 2 weeks in conjunction with plasmapheresis. The efficacy of PP/BTZ was assessed by comparing the calculated panel reactive antibodies to HLA class I or class II antigens. Post-transplant outcomes including overall survival and incidence of rejection were compared to those of non-sensitized patients (PRA < 10%, n = 649) from the same center. RESULTS The average cPRA prior to PP/BTZ was 94.5%. Post-PP/BTZ there was no statistically significant decline in mean cPRA, class I cPRA, or class II cPRA, though the average percentage decrease in class I cPRA (8.7 ± 17.0%) was higher than the change in class II cPRA (4.4 ± 13.3%). Resulted were also replicated with C1q-binding antibodies showing more effect on I class compared to class II (15.0 ± 37.4% vs. 6.8 ± 33.6%) as well as with 1:8 dilutional assay (14.0 ± 23.0% vs. 9.1 ± 34.9%). Additionally, PP/BTZ treated patients and the control group of non-sensitized patients had similar overall 1 year survival (95.4 vs. 92.5%) but patients with PP/BTZ had increased incidence of AMR (79.1% vs. 97.1%, p = < .001), any treated rejection (62.8% vs. 86.7%, p = < .001) and de novo DSA development (81.4% vs. 92.5%, p = .007). Major side effects of PP/BTZ included thrombocytopenia (42%), infection requiring antibiotics (28%), and neuropathy (12%). CONCLUSION The use of bortezomib in highly sensitized patients does not significantly lower circulating antibodies prior to heart transplantation. However, its use may improve the chances of obtaining an immuno-compatible donor heart and contribute to acceptable post-transplant outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manvir Dhillon
- Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | | | | | - Rashmi Jain
- Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Nikhil Patel
- Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | | | - Xiaohai Zhang
- Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Matthew Hakimi
- Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | | | - Robert Vescio
- Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | | | - Evan Kransdorf
- Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Lawrence Czer
- Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cusi V, Vaida F, Wettersten N, Rodgers N, Tada Y, Gerding B, Greenberg B, Urey MA, Adler E, Kim PJ. Benefit versus Risk of Endomyocardial Biopsy for Heart Transplant Patients in the Contemporary Era. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2023:2023.05.19.23290196. [PMID: 37293037 PMCID: PMC10246074 DOI: 10.1101/2023.05.19.23290196] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Background The reference standard of detecting acute rejection (AR) in adult heart transplant (HTx) patients is an endomyocardial biopsy (EMB). The majority of EMBs are performed in asymptomatic patients. However, the benefit of diagnosing and treating AR compared to the risk of EMB complications has not been compared in the contemporary era (2010-current). Methods The authors retrospectively analyzed 2,769 EMB obtained in 326 consecutive HTx patients between August 2019 and August 2022. Variables included surveillance versus for cause indication, recipient and donor characteristics, EMB procedural data and pathologic grades, treatment for AR, and clinical outcomes. Results The overall EMB complication rate was 1.6%. EMBs performed within 1 month after HTx compared to after 1 month from HTx showed significantly increased complications (OR = 12.74, p < 0.001). The treated AR rate was 14.2% in the for cause EMBs and 1.2% in the surveillance EMBs. We found the benefit/risk ratio was significantly lower in the surveillance compared to the for cause EMB group (OR = 0.05, p < 0.001). We also found the benefit to be lower than risk in surveillance EMBs. Conclusions The yield of surveillance EMBs has declined, while for cause EMBs continued to demonstrate a high benefit/risk ratio. The risk of EMB complications was highest within 1 month after HTx. Surveillance EMB protocols in the contemporary era may need to be re-evaluated.
Collapse
|
5
|
Velleca A, Shullo MA, Dhital K, Azeka E, Colvin M, DePasquale E, Farrero M, García-Guereta L, Jamero G, Khush K, Lavee J, Pouch S, Patel J, Michaud CJ, Shullo M, Schubert S, Angelini A, Carlos L, Mirabet S, Patel J, Pham M, Urschel S, Kim KH, Miyamoto S, Chih S, Daly K, Grossi P, Jennings D, Kim IC, Lim HS, Miller T, Potena L, Velleca A, Eisen H, Bellumkonda L, Danziger-Isakov L, Dobbels F, Harkess M, Kim D, Lyster H, Peled Y, Reinhardt Z. The International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) Guidelines for the Care of Heart Transplant Recipients. J Heart Lung Transplant 2022; 42:e1-e141. [PMID: 37080658 DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2022.10.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 117] [Impact Index Per Article: 58.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
|
6
|
Velleca A, Shullo MA, Dhital K, Azeka E, Colvin M, DePasquale E, Farrero M, García-Guereta L, Jamero G, Khush K, Lavee J, Pouch S, Patel J, Michaud CJ, Shullo M, Schubert S, Angelini A, Carlos L, Mirabet S, Patel J, Pham M, Urschel S, Kim KH, Miyamoto S, Chih S, Daly K, Grossi P, Jennings D, Kim IC, Lim HS, Miller T, Potena L, Velleca A, Eisen H, Bellumkonda L, Danziger-Isakov L, Dobbels F, Harkess M, Kim D, Lyster H, Peled Y, Reinhardt Z. The International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) Guidelines for the Care of Heart Transplant Recipients. J Heart Lung Transplant 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2022.09.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
|
7
|
Richmann DP, Gurijala N, Mandell JG, Doshi A, Hamman K, Rossi C, Rosenberg AZ, Cross R, Kanter J, Berger JT, Olivieri L. Native T1 mapping detects both acute clinical rejection and graft dysfunction in pediatric heart transplant patients. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2022; 24:51. [PMID: 36192743 PMCID: PMC9531384 DOI: 10.1186/s12968-022-00875-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2022] [Accepted: 07/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is emerging as an important tool for cardiac allograft assessment. Native T1 mapping may add value in identifying rejection and in assessing graft dysfunction and myocardial fibrosis burden. We hypothesized that CMR native T1 values and features of textural analysis of T1 maps would identify acute rejection, and in a secondary analysis, correlate with markers of graft dysfunction, and with fibrosis percentage from endomyocardial biopsy (EMB). METHODS Fifty cases with simultaneous EMB, right heart catheterization, and 1.5 T CMR with breath-held T1 mapping via modified Look-Locker inversion recovery (MOLLI) in 8 short-axis slices and subsequent quantification of mean and peak native T1 values, were performed on 24 pediatric subjects. A single mid-ventricular slice was used for image texture analysis using nine gray-level co-occurrence matrix features. Digital quantification of Masson trichrome stained EMB samples established degree of fibrosis. Markers of graft dysfunction, including serum brain natriuretic peptide levels and hemodynamic measurements from echocardiography, catheterization, and CMR were collated. Subjects were divided into three groups based on degree of rejection: acute rejection requiring new therapy, mild rejection requiring increased ongoing therapy, and no rejection with no change in treatment. Statistical analysis included student's t-test and linear regression. RESULTS Peak and mean T1 values were significantly associated with acute rejection, with a monotonic trend observed with increased grade of rejection. Texture analysis demonstrated greater spatial heterogeneity in T1 values, as demonstrated by energy, entropy, and variance, in cases requiring treatment. Interestingly, 2 subjects who required increased therapy despite low grade EMB results had abnormal peak T1 values. Peak T1 values also correlated with increased BNP, right-sided filling pressures, and capillary wedge pressures. There was no difference in histopathological fibrosis percentage among the 3 groups; histopathological fibrosis did not correlate with T1 values or markers of graft dysfunction. CONCLUSION In pediatric heart transplant patients, native T1 values identify acute rejection requiring treatment and may identify graft dysfunction. CMR shows promise as an important tool for evaluation of cardiac grafts in children, with T1 imaging outperforming biopsy findings in the assessment of rejection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nyshidha Gurijala
- George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, D.C., USA
| | | | - Ashish Doshi
- Johns Hopkins University Children's Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Karin Hamman
- Children's National Hospital, Washington, D.C., USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
A Review of Biomarkers of Cardiac Allograft Rejection: Toward an Integrated Diagnosis of Rejection. Biomolecules 2022; 12:biom12081135. [PMID: 36009029 PMCID: PMC9405997 DOI: 10.3390/biom12081135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2022] [Revised: 08/10/2022] [Accepted: 08/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite major advances in immunosuppression, allograft rejection remains an important complication after heart transplantation, and it is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The gold standard invasive strategy to monitor and diagnose cardiac allograft rejection, based on the pathologic evaluation of endomyocardial biopsies, suffers from many limitations including the low prevalence of rejection, sample bias, high inter-observer variability, and international working formulations based on arbitrary cut-offs that simplify the landscape of rejection. The development of innovative diagnostic and prognostic strategies—integrating conventional histology, molecular profiling of allograft biopsy, and the discovery of new tissue or circulating biomarkers—is one of the major challenges of translational medicine in solid organ transplantation, and particularly in heart transplantation. Major advances in the field of biomarkers of rejection have paved the way for a paradigm shift in the monitoring and diagnosis of cardiac allograft rejection. We review the recent developments in the field, including non-invasive biomarkers to minimize the number of protocol endomyocardial biopsies and tissue biomarkers as companion tools of pathology to refine the diagnosis of cardiac rejection. Finally, we discuss the potential role of these biomarkers to provide an integrated bio-histomolecular diagnosis of cardiac allograft rejection.
Collapse
|
9
|
Power A, Baez Hernandez N, Dipchand AI. Rejection surveillance in pediatric heart transplant recipients: Critical reflection on the role of frequent and long-term routine surveillance endomyocardial biopsies and comprehensive review of non-invasive rejection screening tools. Pediatr Transplant 2022; 26:e14214. [PMID: 35178843 DOI: 10.1111/petr.14214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2021] [Revised: 11/25/2021] [Accepted: 11/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite significant medical advances in the field of pediatric heart transplantation (HT), acute rejection remains an important cause of morbidity and mortality. Endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) remains the gold-standard method for diagnosing rejection but is an invasive, expensive, and stressful process. Given the potential adverse consequences of rejection, routine post-transplant rejection surveillance protocols incorporating EMB are widely employed to detect asymptomatic rejection. Each center employs their own specific routine rejection surveillance protocol, with no consensus on the optimal approach and with high inter-center variability. The utility of high-frequency and long-term routine surveillance biopsies (RSB) in pediatric HT has been called into question. METHODS Sources for this comprehensive review were primarily identified through searches in biomedical databases including MEDLINE and Embase. RESULTS The available literature suggests that the diagnostic yield of RSB is low beyond the first year post-HT and that a reduction in RSB intensity from high-frequency to low-frequency can be done safely with no impact on early and mid-term survival. Though there are emerging non-invasive methods of detecting asymptomatic rejection, the evidence is not yet strong enough for any test to replace EMB. CONCLUSION Overall, pediatric HT centers in North America should likely be doing fewer RSB than are currently performed. Risk factors for rejection should be considered when designing the optimal rejection surveillance strategy. Noninvasive testing including emerging biomarkers may have a complementary role to aid in safely reducing the need for RSB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alyssa Power
- Department of Pediatrics, UT Southwestern Medical Center and Children's Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Nathanya Baez Hernandez
- Department of Pediatrics, UT Southwestern Medical Center and Children's Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Anne I Dipchand
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Toronto, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Husain N, Watanabe K, Berhane H, Gupta A, Markl M, Rigsby CK, Robinson JD. Multi-parametric cardiovascular magnetic resonance with regadenoson stress perfusion is safe following pediatric heart transplantation and identifies history of rejection and cardiac allograft vasculopathy. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2021; 23:135. [PMID: 34809650 PMCID: PMC8607604 DOI: 10.1186/s12968-021-00803-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2021] [Accepted: 08/10/2021] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The progressive risk of graft failure in pediatric heart transplantation (PHT) necessitates close surveillance for rejection and coronary allograft vasculopathy (CAV). The current gold standard of surveillance via invasive coronary angiography is costly, imperfect and associated with complications. Our goal was to assess the safety and feasibility of a comprehensive multi-parametric CMR protocol with regadenoson stress perfusion in PHT and evaluate for associations with clinical history of rejection and CAV. METHODS We performed a retrospective review of 26 PHT recipients who underwent stress CMR with tissue characterization and compared with 18 age-matched healthy controls. CMR protocol included myocardial T2, T1 and extracellular volume (ECV) mapping, late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), qualitative and semi-quantitative stress perfusion (myocardial perfusion reserve index; MPRI) and strain imaging. Clinical, demographics, rejection score and CAV history were recorded and correlated with CMR parameters. RESULTS Mean age at transplant was 9.3 ± 5.5 years and median duration since transplant was 5.1 years (IQR 7.5 years). One patient had active rejection at the time of CMR, 11/26 (42%) had CAV 1 and 1/26 (4%) had CAV 2. Biventricular volumes were smaller and cardiac output higher in PHT vs. healthy controls. Global T1 (1053 ± 42 ms vs 986 ± 42 ms; p < 0.001) and ECV (26.5 ± 4.0% vs 24.0 ± 2.7%; p = 0.017) were higher in PHT compared to helathy controls. Significant relationships between changes in myocardial tissue structure and function were noted in PHT: increased T2 correlated with reduced LVEF (r = - 0.57, p = 0.005), reduced global circumferential strain (r = - 0.73, p < 0.001) and reduced global longitudinal strain (r = - 0.49, p = 0.03). In addition, significant relationships were noted between higher rejection score and global T1 (r = 0.38, p = 0.05), T2 (r = 0.39, p = 0.058) and ECV (r = 0.68, p < 0.001). The presence of even low-grade CAV was associated with higher global T1, global ECV and maximum segmental T2. No major side effects were noted with stress testing. MPRI was analyzed with good interobserver reliability and was lower in PHT compared to healthy controls (0.69 ± - 0.21 vs 0.94 ± 0.22; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION In a PHT population with low incidence of rejection or high-grade CAV, CMR demonstrates important differences in myocardial structure, function and perfusion compared to age-matched healthy controls. Regadenoson stress perfusion CMR could be safely and reliably performed. Increasing T2 values were associated with worsening left ventricular function and increasing T1/ECV values were associated with rejection history and low-grade CAV. These findings warrant larger prospective studies to further define the role of CMR in PHT graft surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nazia Husain
- Department of Cardiology, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, USA
| | - Kae Watanabe
- Department of Cardiology, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, USA
| | - Haben Berhane
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, McCormick School of Engineering, Northwestern University, Chicago, USA
| | - Aditi Gupta
- Lincoln Medical and Mental Health Center, Bronx, NY USA
| | - Michael Markl
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, McCormick School of Engineering, Northwestern University, Chicago, USA
- Department of Radiology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, USA
| | - Cynthia K. Rigsby
- Department of Pediatrics, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, USA
- Department of Radiology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, USA
- Department of Medical Imaging, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, USA
| | - Joshua D. Robinson
- Department of Cardiology, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, USA
- Department of Radiology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Bracamonte-Baran W, Gilotra NA, Won T, Rodriguez KM, Talor MV, Oh BC, Griffin J, Wittstein I, Sharma K, Skinner J, Johns RA, Russell SD, Anders RA, Zhu Q, Halushka MK, Brandacher G, Čiháková D. Endothelial Stromal PD-L1 (Programmed Death Ligand 1) Modulates CD8 + T-Cell Infiltration After Heart Transplantation. Circ Heart Fail 2021; 14:e007982. [PMID: 34555935 PMCID: PMC8550427 DOI: 10.1161/circheartfailure.120.007982] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The role of checkpoint axes in transplantation has been partially addressed in animal models but not in humans. Occurrence of fulminant myocarditis with allorejection-like immunologic features in patients under anti-PD1 (programmed death cell protein 1) treatment suggests a key role of the PD1/PD-L1 (programmed death ligand 1) axis in cardiac immune homeostasis. METHODS We cross-sectionally studied 23 heart transplant patients undergoing surveillance endomyocardial biopsy. Endomyocardial tissue and peripheral blood mononuclear cells were analyzed by flow cytometry. Multivariate logistic regression analyses including demographic, clinical, and hemodynamic parameters were performed. Murine models were used to evaluate the impact of PD-L1 endothelial graft expression in allorejection. RESULTS We found that myeloid cells dominate the composition of the graft leukocyte compartment in most patients, with variable T-cell frequencies. The CD (cluster of differentiation) 4:CD8 T-cell ratios were between 0 and 1.5. The proportion of PD-L1 expressing cells in graft endothelial cells, fibroblasts, and myeloid leukocytes ranged from negligible up to 60%. We found a significant inverse logarithmic correlation between the proportion of PD-L1+HLA (human leukocyte antigen)-DR+ endothelial cells and CD8+ T cells (slope, -18.3 [95% CI, -35.3 to -1.3]; P=0.030). PD-L1 expression and leukocyte patterns were independent of demographic, clinical, and hemodynamic parameters. We confirmed the importance of endothelial PD-L1 expression in a murine allogeneic heart transplantation model, in which Tie2Crepdl1fl/fl grafts lacking PD-L1 in endothelial cells were rejected significantly faster than controls. CONCLUSIONS Loss of graft endothelial PD-L1 expression may play a role in regulating CD8+ T-cell infiltration in human heart transplantation. Murine model results suggest that loss of graft endothelial PD-L1 may facilitate alloresponses and rejection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William Bracamonte-Baran
- Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA
- Department of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center – Permian Basin, Odessa, TX, 79763, USA
| | - Nisha A Gilotra
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA
| | - Taejoon Won
- Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA
| | - Katrina M Rodriguez
- Department of Mental Health, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA
| | - Monica V Talor
- Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA
| | - Byoung C Oh
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation (VCA) Laboratory, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA
| | - Jan Griffin
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA
- Current Address: Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY
| | - Ilan Wittstein
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA
| | - Kavita Sharma
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA
| | - John Skinner
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Division of Adult Anesthesia, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA
| | - Roger A Johns
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Division of Adult Anesthesia, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA
| | - Stuart D Russell
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA
- Current Address: Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Robert A Anders
- Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA
| | - Qingfeng Zhu
- Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA
| | - Marc K Halushka
- Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA
| | - Gerald Brandacher
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation (VCA) Laboratory, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA
| | - Daniela Čiháková
- Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA
- W. Harry Feinstone Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Duong SQ, Zhang Y, Hall M, Hollander SA, Thurm CW, Bernstein D, Feingold B, Godown J, Almond C. Impact of institutional routine surveillance endomyocardial biopsy frequency in the first year on rejection and graft survival in pediatric heart transplantation. Pediatr Transplant 2021; 25:e14035. [PMID: 34003559 DOI: 10.1111/petr.14035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2020] [Revised: 04/11/2021] [Accepted: 04/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Routine surveillance biopsy (RSB) is performed to detect asymptomatic acute rejection (AR) after heart transplantation (HT). Variation in pediatric RSB across institutions is high. We examined center-based variation in RSB and its relationship to graft loss, AR, coronary artery vasculopathy (CAV), and cost of care during the first year post-HT. METHODS We linked the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) and Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR, 2002-2016), including all primary-HT aged 0-21 years. We characterized centers by RSB frequency (defined as median biopsies performed among recipients aged ≥12 months without rejection in the first year). We adjusted for potential confounders and center effects with mixed-effects regression analysis. RESULTS We analyzed 2867 patients at 29 centers. After adjusting for patient and center differences, increasing RSB frequency was associated with diagnosed AR (OR 1.15 p = 0.004), a trend toward treated AR (OR 1.09 p = 0.083), and higher hospital-based cost (US$390 315 vs. $313 248, p < 0.001) but no difference in graft survival (HR 1.00, p = 0.970) or CAV (SHR 1.04, p = 0.757) over median follow-up 3.9 years. Center RSB-frequency threshold of ≥2/year was associated with increased unadjusted rates of treated AR, but no association was found at thresholds greater than this. CONCLUSION Center RSB frequency is positively associated with increased diagnosis of AR at 1 year post-HT. Graft survival and CAV appear similar at medium-term follow-up. We speculate that higher frequency RSB centers may have increased detection of clinically less important AR, though further study of the relationship between center RSB frequency and differences in treated AR is necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Son Q Duong
- Pediatrics (Cardiology), Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Yulin Zhang
- Pediatrics (Cardiology), Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Matt Hall
- Children's Hospital Association, Lenexa, Kansas, USA
| | - Seth A Hollander
- Pediatrics (Cardiology), Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Cary W Thurm
- Children's Hospital Association, Lenexa, Kansas, USA
| | - Daniel Bernstein
- Pediatrics (Cardiology), Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Brian Feingold
- Pediatrics (Cardiology) and Clinical Translational Science, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Justin Godown
- Pediatrics (Cardiology), Monroe Carell Jr. Children's Hospital at Vanderbilt, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Christopher Almond
- Pediatrics (Cardiology), Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
Despite the overall success of heart transplantation as a definitive treatment for endstage heart failure, cardiac allograft rejection remains an important cause of morbidity and mortality. Endomyocardial biopsy has been the standard of care for rejection monitoring, but is associated with several diagnostic limitations and serious procedural complications. The use of molecular diagnostics has emerged over the past decade as a tool to potentially circumvent some of these limitations. We present an update on novel molecular approaches to detecting transplant rejection, focusing on 4 categories: microarray technology, gene expression profiling, cell-free DNA and microRNA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lillian Benck
- Department of Cardiology, Cedars-Sinai Smidt Heart Institute
| | - Takuma Sato
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine
| | - Jon Kobashigawa
- Department of Cardiology, Cedars-Sinai Smidt Heart Institute
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Myocardial Vascular Function Assessed by Dynamic Oxygenation-sensitive Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Long-term Following Cardiac Transplantation. Transplantation 2021; 105:1347-1355. [PMID: 32804801 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000003419] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Coronary vascular function is related to adverse outcomes following cardiac transplantation (CTx) in patients with or without cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV). The noninvasive assessment of the myocardial vascular response using oxygenation-sensitive cardiac magnetic resonance (OS-CMR has not been investigated in stable long-term CTx recipients). METHODS CTx patients were prospectively recruited to complete a CMR study with a breathing maneuver of hyperventilation followed by a voluntary apnea. Changes in OS-sensitive signal intensity reflecting the myocardial oxygenation response were monitored and expressed as % change in response to these breathing maneuvers. Myocardial injury was further investigated with T2-weighted imaging, native and postcontrast T1 measurements, extracellular volume measurements, and late gadolinium enhancement. RESULTS Forty-six CTx patients with (n = 23) and without (n = 23) CAV, along with 25 healthy controls (HC), were enrolled. The OS response was significantly attenuated in CTx compared with HC at the 30-second time-point into the breath-hold (2.63% ± 4.16% versus 6.40% ± 5.96%; P = 0.010). Compared with HC, OS response was lower in CTx without CAV (2.62% ± 4.60%; P < 0.05), while this response was further attenuated in patients with severe CAV (grades 2-3, -2.24% ± 3.65%). An inverse correlation was observed between OS-CMR, ventricular volumes, and diffuse fibrosis measured by extracellular volume mapping. CONCLUSIONS In heart transplant patients, myocardial oxygenation is impaired even in the absence of CAV suggesting microvascular dysfunction. These abnormalities can be identified by oxygenation-sensitive CMR using simple breathing maneuvers.
Collapse
|
15
|
Seferović PM, Tsutsui H, McNamara DM, Ristić AD, Basso C, Bozkurt B, Cooper LT, Filippatos G, Ide T, Inomata T, Klingel K, Linhart A, Lyon AR, Mehra MR, Polovina M, Milinković I, Nakamura K, Anker SD, Veljić I, Ohtani T, Okumura T, Thum T, Tschöpe C, Rosano G, Coats AJS, Starling RC. Heart Failure Association of the ESC, Heart Failure Society of America and Japanese Heart Failure Society Position statement on endomyocardial biopsy. Eur J Heart Fail 2021; 23:854-871. [PMID: 34010472 DOI: 10.1002/ejhf.2190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 107] [Impact Index Per Article: 35.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2020] [Revised: 03/23/2021] [Accepted: 04/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) is an invasive procedure, globally most often used for the monitoring of heart transplant (HTx) rejection. In addition, EMB can have an important complementary role to the clinical assessment in establishing the diagnosis of diverse cardiac disorders, including myocarditis, cardiomyopathies, drug-related cardiotoxicity, amyloidosis, other infiltrative and storage disorders, and cardiac tumours. Improvements in EMB equipment and the development of new techniques for the analysis of EMB samples have significantly improved diagnostic precision of EMB. The present document is the result of the Trilateral Cooperation Project between the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology, the Heart Failure Society of America, and the Japanese Heart Failure Society. It represents an expert consensus aiming to provide a comprehensive, up-to-date perspective on EMB, with a focus on the following main issues: (i) an overview of the practical approach to EMB, (ii) an update on indications for EMB, (iii) a revised plan for HTx rejection surveillance, (iv) the impact of multimodality imaging on EMB, and (v) the current clinical practice in the worldwide use of EMB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Hiroyuki Tsutsui
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Dennis M McNamara
- Heart and Vascur Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Arsen D Ristić
- Department of Cardiology, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Cristina Basso
- Cardiovascular Pathology Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Biykem Bozkurt
- Winters Center for Heart Failure, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Leslie T Cooper
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Gerasimos Filippatos
- Attikon University Hospital, Department of Cardiology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Athens, Greece
| | - Tomomi Ide
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Takayuki Inomata
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kitasato University Kitasato Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Karin Klingel
- Cardiopathology, Institute for Pathology, University Hospital, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Aleš Linhart
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Alexander R Lyon
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College and Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK
| | - Mandeep R Mehra
- Heart and Vascular Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Marija Polovina
- Department of Cardiology, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Ivan Milinković
- Department of Cardiology, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Kazufumi Nakamura
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Stefan D Anker
- Department of Cardiology (CVK); and Berlin Institute of Health Center for Regenerative Therapies (BCRT), German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK) partner site Berlin; Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ivana Veljić
- Department of Cardiology, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Tomohito Ohtani
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Takahiro Okumura
- Department of Cardiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Thomas Thum
- Institute of Molecular and Translational Therapeutic Strategies, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.,Fraunhofer Institute for Toxicology and Experimental Medicine, Hannover, Germany
| | - Carsten Tschöpe
- Berlin Institute of Health (BIH) and Berlin-Brandenburg Center for Regenerative Therapies (BCRT), Department of Cardiology, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charite University, Berlin, Germany
| | - Giuseppe Rosano
- Department of Medical Sciences, IRCCS San Raffaele, Rome, Italy.,Cardiology Clinical Academic Group, St George's Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Andrew J S Coats
- Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.,University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Seferović PM, Tsutsui H, Mcnamara DM, Ristić AD, Basso C, Bozkurt B, Cooper LT, Filippatos G, Ide T, Inomata T, Klingel K, Linhart A, Lyon AR, Mehra MR, Polovina M, Milinković I, Nakamura K, Anker SD, Veljić I, Ohtani T, Okumura T, Thum T, Tschöpe C, Rosano G, Coats AJS, Starling RC. Heart Failure Association, Heart Failure Society of America, and Japanese Heart Failure Society Position Statement on Endomyocardial Biopsy. J Card Fail 2021; 27:727-743. [PMID: 34022400 DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2021.04.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) is an invasive procedure, globally most often used for the monitoring of heart transplant rejection. In addition, EMB can have an important complementary role to the clinical assessment in establishing the diagnosis of diverse cardiac disorders, including myocarditis, cardiomyopathies, drug-related cardiotoxicity, amyloidosis, other infiltrative and storage disorders, and cardiac tumors. Improvements in EMB equipment and the development of new techniques for the analysis of EMB samples has significantly improved the diagnostic precision of EMB. The present document is the result of the Trilateral Cooperation Project between the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology, Heart Failure Society of America, and the Japanese Heart Failure Society. It represents an expert consensus aiming to provide a comprehensive, up-to-date perspective on EMB, with a focus on the following main issues: (1) an overview of the practical approach to EMB, (2) an update on indications for EMB, (3) a revised plan for heart transplant rejection surveillance, (4) the impact of multimodality imaging on EMB, and (5) the current clinical practice in the worldwide use of EMB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Hiroyuki Tsutsui
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Dennis M Mcnamara
- Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Arsen D Ristić
- Department of Cardiology, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia; Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Cristina Basso
- Cardiovascular Pathology Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Biykem Bozkurt
- Winters Center for Heart Failure, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Leslie T Cooper
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Gerasimos Filippatos
- Attikon University Hospital, Department of Cardiology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Athens, Greece
| | - Tomomi Ide
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Takayuki Inomata
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kitasato University Kitasato Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Karin Klingel
- Cardiopathology, Institute for Pathology, University Hospital, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Aleš Linhart
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Alexander R Lyon
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College and Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK
| | - Mandeep R Mehra
- Heart and Vascular Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Marija Polovina
- Department of Cardiology, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia; Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Ivan Milinković
- Department of Cardiology, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia; Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Kazufumi Nakamura
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Stefan D Anker
- Department of Cardiology (CVK); and Berlin Institute of Health Center for Regenerative Therapies (BCRT); German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK) partner site Berlin; Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany
| | - Ivana Veljić
- Department of Cardiology, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Tomohito Ohtani
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Takahiro Okumura
- Department of Cardiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Thomas Thum
- Institute of Molecular and Translational Therapeutic Strategies, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany; Fraunhofer Institute for Toxicology and Experimental Medicine, Hannover, Germany
| | - Carsten Tschöpe
- Berlin Institute of Health (BIH) and Berlin-Brandenburg Center for Regenerative Therapies (BCRT), Department of Cardiology, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charite University, Berlin, Germany
| | - Giuseppe Rosano
- Department of Medical Sciences, IRCCS San Raffaele, Rome, Italy, and Cardiology Clinical Academic Group, St George's Hospitals NHS Trust
| | - Andrew J S Coats
- Monash University, Australia, and University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Oh KT, Mustehsan MH, Goldstein DJ, Saeed O, Jorde UP, Patel SR. Protocol endomyocardial biopsy beyond 6 months-It is time to move on. Am J Transplant 2021; 21:825-829. [PMID: 32515104 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2020] [Revised: 05/29/2020] [Accepted: 05/30/2020] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
The optimal duration and frequency of routine surveillance endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) have been questioned in the current era of heart transplantation (HT), where the advances in immunosuppression and donor selection strategies have led to a decline in acute allograft rejection. We investigated the utility of routine EMB beyond 6 months post-HT. A single-center retrospective review was performed on 2963 EMBs from 220 HT recipients over 10 years. Each EMB was categorized into protocol or symptom-triggered biopsy and reviewed for rejection. Heart transplant recipients with ≥2 known risk factors for rejection were designated as an elevated risk group. The majority of rejections occurred within 3 months following HT. The yield of routine protocol EMBs was significantly lower than symptom-triggered EMBs, not only during the first 6 months post-HT (1.6% vs. 33.3%, P < .0001), but more so during the 6-12 months (0.1% vs 83.0%, P < .0001). A similar pattern was observed in heart transplant recipients at both elevated and standard risk for rejection. In conclusion, EMB was found to be a low-yield screening modality for rejection beyond 6 months post-HT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyung T Oh
- Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Mohammed H Mustehsan
- Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Daniel J Goldstein
- Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Omar Saeed
- Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Ulrich P Jorde
- Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Snehal R Patel
- Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Bronx, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
[Pathology of heart transplantation: Where are we now?]. Ann Pathol 2021; 41:38-49. [PMID: 33413972 DOI: 10.1016/j.annpat.2020.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2020] [Revised: 12/03/2020] [Accepted: 12/04/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Pathology is still the gold standard for the diagnosis of rejection in heart transplantation. During the last decade, molecular pathology has emerged as a powerful tool for the understanding of the processes implicated in allograft rejection. Transcriptomic analysis of the allograft may also help the pathologist for diagnosis and accurate classification of rejection. This review will describe the recent advances and perspectives of molecular pathology in the field of heart transplantation.
Collapse
|
19
|
Sinphurmsukskul S, Ariyachaipanich A, Siwamogsatham S, Thammanatsakul K, Puwanant S, Benjacholamas V, Ongcharit P. Endomyocardial Biopsy and Prevalence of Acute Cellular Rejection in Heart Transplantation. Transplant Proc 2020; 53:318-323. [PMID: 33041079 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2020.08.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2020] [Revised: 07/29/2020] [Accepted: 08/12/2020] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Percutaneous endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) remains the criterion standard method for surveillance of allograft rejection after heart transplant (HT). However, data regarding utility of EMBs and prevalence of acute cellular rejection (ACR) in Asian populations are still limited. We aimed to report our experience in the use of EMBs and prevalence of ACR in HT recipients. METHODS We retrospectively evaluated all EMBs from consecutive HT recipients between January 2008 and December 2018. EMB pathology results were according to International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation 2004 revision of biopsy grading. We also divided patients into previous era and current era group (underwent HT before and after 2015) to compare prevalence of ACR and survival outcome. RESULTS A total of 832 EMBs from 81 HT recipients were included. Pathologic reports revealed ACR grade 1R 22.8%, 2R 4.2%, and 3R 0.6%. At patient level, at least 1 episode of ACR grade 1R, 2R, and 3R were found in 70.6%, 24.7%, and 3.5% of the patients, respectively. When compared between era, frequency of EMB during the first year after HT in current era was significantly higher (9.74 ± 3.38 vs 4.93 ± 3.29, P < .001), but lower frequency of rejection grade ≥ 2R were found (2.3% vs 8.1%, P < .001). However, 1-year survival was not statistically different (76% in previous era vs 80% in current era, P = .37). CONCLUSIONS From our study, prevalence of grade ≥ 2R rejection was approximately 5%, which is comparable with previous studies. Further studies are needed to evaluate proper interval and number of EMBs in HT recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Supanee Sinphurmsukskul
- Excellent Center for Organ Transplantation, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand.
| | - Aekarach Ariyachaipanich
- Excellent Center for Organ Transplantation, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Sarawut Siwamogsatham
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Kanokwan Thammanatsakul
- Excellent Center for Organ Transplantation, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Sarinya Puwanant
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Vichai Benjacholamas
- Cardiac Center, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Pathum Wan, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Pat Ongcharit
- Cardiac Center, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Pathum Wan, Bangkok, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Golbus JR, Konerman MC, Aaronson KD. Utility of routine evaluations for rejection in patients greater than 2 years after heart transplantation. ESC Heart Fail 2020; 7:1809-1816. [PMID: 32489007 PMCID: PMC7373902 DOI: 10.1002/ehf2.12745] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2019] [Revised: 02/26/2020] [Accepted: 04/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS Guidelines support routine surveillance testing for rejection for at least 5 years after heart transplant (HT). In patients greater than 2 years post-HT, we examined which clinical characteristics predict continuation of routine surveillance studies, outcomes following discontinuation of routine surveillance, and the cost-effectiveness of different surveillance strategies. METHODS AND RESULTS We retrospectively identified subjects older than 18 who underwent a first HT at our centre from 2007 to 2016 and who survived ≥760 days (n = 217) post-HT. The clinical context surrounding all endomyocardial biopsies (EMBs) and gene expression profiles (GEPs) was reviewed to determine if studies were performed routinely or were triggered by a change in clinical status. Subjects were categorized as following a test-based surveillance (n = 159) or a signs/symptoms surveillance (n = 53) strategy based on treating cardiologist intent to continue routine studies after the second post-transplant year. A Markov model was constructed to compare two test-based surveillance strategies to a baseline strategy of discontinuing routine studies. One thousand twenty studies were performed; 835 were routine. Significant rejection was absent in 99.0% of routine EMBs and 99.8% of routine GEPs. The treating cardiologist's practice duration, patient age, and immunosuppressive regimen predicted surveillance strategy. There were no differences in outcomes between groups. Routine surveillance EMBs cost more and were marginally less effective than a strategy of discontinuing routine studies after 2 years; surveillance GEPs had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $1.67 million/quality-adjusted life-year. CONCLUSIONS Acute asymptomatic rejection is rare after the second post-transplant year. Obtaining surveillance studies beyond the second post-transplant year is not cost-effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica R Golbus
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Matthew C Konerman
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Keith D Aaronson
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Dandel M, Hetzer R. Impact of rejection-related immune responses on the initiation and progression of cardiac allograft vasculopathy. Am Heart J 2020; 222:46-63. [PMID: 32018202 DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2019.12.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2019] [Accepted: 12/22/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
|
22
|
The Zabrze'18 protocol is a feasible option to reduce the number of endomyocardial biopsies after heart transplantation. ADVANCES IN INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY 2019; 15:368-370. [PMID: 31592260 PMCID: PMC6777182 DOI: 10.5114/aic.2019.87895] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2019] [Accepted: 04/08/2019] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
|
23
|
Berhane H, Ruh A, Husain N, Robinson JD, Rigsby CK, Markl M. Myocardial velocity, intra-, and interventricular dyssynchrony evaluated by tissue phase mapping in pediatric heart transplant recipients. J Magn Reson Imaging 2019; 51:1212-1222. [PMID: 31515865 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.26916] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2019] [Accepted: 08/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) is the standard method for detecting allograft rejection in pediatric heart transplants (Htx). As EMB is invasive and carries a risk of complications, there is a need for a noninvasive alternative for allograft monitoring. PURPOSE To quantify left and right ventricular (LV & RV) peak velocities, velocity twist, and intra-/interventricular dyssynchrony using tissue phase mapping (TPM) in pediatric Htx compared with controls, and to explore the relationship between global cardiac function parameters and the number of rejection episodes to these velocities and intra-/interventricular dyssynchrony. STUDY TYPE Prospective. SUBJECTS Twenty Htx patients (age: 16.0 ± 3.1 years, 11 males) and 18 age- and sex-matched controls (age: 15.5 ± 4.3 years, nine males). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE 5T; 2D balanced cine steady-state free-precession (bSSFP), TPM (2D cine phase contrast with three-directional velocity encoding). ASSESSMENT LV and RV circumferential, radial, and long-axis velocity-time curves, global and segmental peak velocities were measured using TPM. Short-axis bSSFP images were used to measure global LV and RV function parameters. STATISTICAL TESTS A normality test (Lilliefors test) was performed on all data. For comparisons, a t-test was used for normally distributed data or a Wilcoxon rank-sum test otherwise. Correlations were determined by a Pearson correlation. RESULTS Htx patients had significantly reduced LV (P < 0.05-0.001) and RV (P < 0.05-0.001) systolic and diastolic global and segmental long-axis velocities, reduced RV diastolic peak twist (P < 0.01), and presented with higher interventricular dyssynchrony for long-axis and circumferential motions (P < 0.05-0.001). LV diastolic long-axis dyssynchrony (r = 0.48, P = 0.03) and RV diastolic peak twist (r = -0.64, P = 0.004) significantly correlated with the total number of rejection episodes. DATA CONCLUSION TPM detected differences in biventricular myocardial velocities in pediatric Htx patients compared with controls and indicated a relationship between Htx myocardial velocities and rejection history. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 2 Technical Efficacy Stage: 3 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;51:1212-1222.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haben Berhane
- Department of Medical Imaging, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Alexander Ruh
- Department of Radiology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Nazia Husain
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Joshua D Robinson
- Department of Radiology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Cynthia K Rigsby
- Department of Medical Imaging, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.,Department of Radiology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Michael Markl
- Department of Radiology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.,Department of Biomedical Engineering, McCormick School of Engineering, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Peng DM, Ding VY, Hollander SA, Khalapyan T, Dykes JC, Rosenthal DN, Almond CS, Sakarovitch C, Desai M, McElhinney DB. Long-term surveillance biopsy: Is it necessary after pediatric heart transplant? Pediatr Transplant 2019; 23:e13330. [PMID: 30506612 PMCID: PMC8063536 DOI: 10.1111/petr.13330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2018] [Revised: 10/15/2018] [Accepted: 11/02/2018] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Due to limited and conflicting data in pediatric patients, long-term routine surveillance endomyocardial biopsy (RSB) in pediatric heart transplant (HT) remains controversial. We sought to characterize the rate of positive RSB and determine factors associated with RSB-detected rejection. Records of patients transplanted at a single institution from 1995 to 2015 with >2 year of post-HT biopsy data were reviewed for RSB-detected rejections occurring >2 year post-HT. We illustrated the trajectory of significant rejections (ISHLT Grade ≥3A/2R) among total RSB performed over time and used multivariable logistic regression to model the association between time and risk of rejection. We estimated Kaplan-Meier freedom from rejection rates by patient characteristics and used the log-rank test to assess differences in rejection probabilities. We identified the best-fitting Cox proportional hazards regression model. In 140 patients, 86% did not have any episodes of significant RSB-detected rejection >2 year post-HT. The overall empirical rate of RSB-detected rejection >2 year post-HT was 2.9/100 patient-years. The percentage of rejection among 815 RSB was 2.6% and remained stable over time. Years since transplant remained unassociated with rejection risk after adjusting for patient characteristics (OR = 0.98; 95% CI 0.78-1.23; P = 0.86). Older age at HT was the only factor that remained significantly associated with risk of RSB-detected rejection under multivariable Cox analysis (P = 0.008). Most pediatric patients did not have RSB-detected rejection beyond 2 years post-HT, and the majority of those who did were older at time of HT. Indiscriminate long-term RSB in pediatric heart transplant should be reconsidered given the low rate of detected rejection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David M. Peng
- Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California,Betty Irene Moore Children’s Heart Center, Palo Alto, California
| | - Victoria Y. Ding
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - Seth A. Hollander
- Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California,Betty Irene Moore Children’s Heart Center, Palo Alto, California
| | - Tigran Khalapyan
- Clinical and Translational Research Program, Palo Alto, California
| | - John C. Dykes
- Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California,Betty Irene Moore Children’s Heart Center, Palo Alto, California
| | - David N. Rosenthal
- Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California,Betty Irene Moore Children’s Heart Center, Palo Alto, California
| | - Christopher S. Almond
- Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California,Betty Irene Moore Children’s Heart Center, Palo Alto, California,Clinical and Translational Research Program, Palo Alto, California
| | - Charlotte Sakarovitch
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - Manisha Desai
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - Doff B. McElhinney
- Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California,Betty Irene Moore Children’s Heart Center, Palo Alto, California,Clinical and Translational Research Program, Palo Alto, California,Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Zinn MD, Wallendorf MJ, Simpson KE, Osborne AD, Kirklin JK, Canter CE. Impact of routine surveillance biopsy intensity on the diagnosis of moderate to severe cellular rejection and survival after pediatric heart transplantation. Pediatr Transplant 2018; 22:e13131. [PMID: 29377465 PMCID: PMC5903932 DOI: 10.1111/petr.13131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/21/2017] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Data are lacking on RSB intensity and outcomes after pediatric heart transplantation. PHTS centers received a survey on RSB practices from 2005 to present. PHTS data were obtained for 2010-2013 and integrated with center-matched survey responses for analysis. Survey response rate was 82.6% (38/46). Centers were classified as low-, moderate-, and high-intensity programs based on RSB frequency (0-more than 8 RSB/y). RSB intensity decreased with increasing time from HT. Age at HT impacted RSB intensity mostly in year 1, with little to no impact in later years. Most centers have not replaced RSB with non-invasive methods, but many added ECHO and biomarker monitoring. Higher RSB intensity was not associated with decreased 4-year mortality (P=.63) or earlier detection of moderate to severe (ISHLT grade 2R/3R) cellular rejection (RSBMSR) in the first year (P=.87). First-year RSBMSR incidence did not differ with intensity or age at HT. Significant variability exists in RSB intensity, but with no impact on timing and incidence of RSBMSR or 4-year mortality. Reduction in RSB frequency may be safe in certain patients after pediatric HT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew D. Zinn
- Division of Cardiology; Department of Pediatrics; The University of Pittsburgh Medical Center; Pittsburgh PA USA
- Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC; Pittsburgh PA USA
| | - Michael J. Wallendorf
- Division of Biostatistics; Washington University School of Medicine; St. Louis MO USA
| | - Kathleen E. Simpson
- Saint Louis Children's Hospital; St. Louis MO USA
- Division of Cardiology; Department of Pediatrics; Washington University School of Medicine; St. Louis MO USA
| | - Ashley D. Osborne
- Division of Cardiology; Department of Pediatrics; Washington University School of Medicine; St. Louis MO USA
| | - James K. Kirklin
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery; Department of Surgery; The University of Alabama at Birmingham; Birmingham AL USA
| | - Charles E. Canter
- Saint Louis Children's Hospital; St. Louis MO USA
- Division of Cardiology; Department of Pediatrics; Washington University School of Medicine; St. Louis MO USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Lower frequency routine surveillance endomyocardial biopsies after heart transplantation. PLoS One 2017; 12:e0182880. [PMID: 28841655 PMCID: PMC5571958 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182880] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2017] [Accepted: 07/26/2017] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
In heart transplantation (HTx) patients, routine surveillance endomyocardial biopsies (rsEMB) are recommended for the detection of early cardiac allograft rejection. However, there is no consensus on the optimal frequency of rsEMB. Frequent rsEMB have shown a low diagnostic yield in the new era of potent immunosuppressive regimen. Efficacy and safety of lower frequency rsEMB have not been investigated so far. In this retrospective, single centre, observational study we evaluated 282 patients transplanted between 2004 and 2014. 218 of these patients were investigated by rsEMB and symptom-triggered EMB (stEMB). We evaluated EMB results, complications, risk factors for rejection, survival 1 and 5 years as well as incidence of cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) 3 years after HTx. A mean of 7.1 ± 2.5 rsEMB were conducted per patient within the first year after HTx identifying 7 patients with asymptomatic and 9 patients with symptomatic acute rejection requiring glucocorticoide pulse therapy. Despite this relatively low frequency of rsEMB, only 6 unscheduled stEMB were required in the first year after HTx leading to 2 additional treatments. In 6 deaths among all 282 patients (2.1%), acute rejection could not be ruled out as a potential underlying cause. Overall survival at 1 year was 78.7% and 5-year survival was 74%. Incidence of CAV was 17% at 3-year follow-up. Morbidity and mortality of lower frequency rsEMB are comparable with data from the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) registry. Consensus is needed on the optimal frequency of EMB.
Collapse
|
27
|
Kransdorf EP, Kobashigawa JA. Novel molecular approaches to the detection of heart transplant rejection. Per Med 2017; 14:293-297. [DOI: 10.2217/pme-2017-0024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
28
|
Molecular Imaging of the Transplanted Heart: A Mechanistic Approach to Graft Survival. CURRENT CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING REPORTS 2017. [DOI: 10.1007/s12410-017-9422-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
|
29
|
Loupy A, Duong Van Huyen JP, Hidalgo L, Reeve J, Racapé M, Aubert O, Venner JM, Falmuski K, Bories MC, Beuscart T, Guillemain R, François A, Pattier S, Toquet C, Gay A, Rouvier P, Varnous S, Leprince P, Empana JP, Lefaucheur C, Bruneval P, Jouven X, Halloran PF. Gene Expression Profiling for the Identification and Classification of Antibody-Mediated Heart Rejection. Circulation 2017; 135:917-935. [PMID: 28148598 DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.116.022907] [Citation(s) in RCA: 130] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2016] [Accepted: 01/23/2017] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) contributes to heart allograft loss. However, an important knowledge gap remains in terms of the pathophysiology of AMR and how detection of immune activity, injury degree, and stage could be improved by intragraft gene expression profiling. METHODS We prospectively monitored 617 heart transplant recipients referred from 4 French transplant centers (January 1, 2006-January 1, 2011) for AMR. We compared patients with AMR (n=55) with a matched control group of 55 patients without AMR. We characterized all patients using histopathology (ISHLT [International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation] 2013 grades), immunostaining, and circulating anti-HLA donor-specific antibodies at the time of biopsy, together with systematic gene expression assessments of the allograft tissue, using microarrays. Effector cells were evaluated with in vitro human cell cultures. We studied a validation cohort of 98 heart recipients transplanted in Edmonton, AB, Canada, including 27 cases of AMR and 71 controls. RESULTS A total of 240 heart transplant endomyocardial biopsies were assessed. AMR showed a distinct pattern of injury characterized by endothelial activation with microcirculatory inflammation by monocytes/macrophages and natural killer (NK) cells. We also observed selective changes in endothelial/angiogenesis and NK cell transcripts, including CD16A signaling and interferon-γ-inducible genes. The AMR-selective gene sets accurately discriminated patients with AMR from those without and included NK transcripts (area under the curve=0.87), endothelial activation transcripts (area under the curve=0.80), macrophage transcripts (area under the curve=0.86), and interferon-γ transcripts (area under the curve=0.84; P<0.0001 for all comparisons). These 4 gene sets showed increased expression with increasing pathological AMR (pAMR) International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation grade (P<0.001) and association with donor-specific antibody levels. The unsupervised principal components analysis demonstrated a high proportion of molecularly inactive pAMR1(I+), and there was significant molecular overlap between pAMR1(H+) and full-blown pAMR2/3 cases. Endothelial activation transcripts, interferon-γ, and NK transcripts showed association with chronic allograft vasculopathy. The molecular architecture and selective AMR transcripts, together with gene set discrimination capacity for AMR identified in the discovery set, were reproduced in the validation cohort. CONCLUSIONS Tissue-based measurements of specific pathogenesis-based transcripts reflecting NK burden, endothelial activation, macrophage burden, and interferon-γ effects accurately classify AMR and correlate with degree of injury and disease activity. This study illustrates the clinical potential of a tissue-based analysis of gene transcripts to refine diagnosis of heart transplant rejection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandre Loupy
- From Paris Descartes University and Hôpital Necker, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, France (A.L., J.P.D.V.H., M.R.); Paris Translational Research Centre for Organ Transplantation, INSERM, UMR-S970, France (A.L., J.P.D.V.H., O.A., T.B., J.P.E., C.L., P.B., X.J.); Pathology Department, Necker Hospital, Paris, France (J.P.D.V.H.); Alberta Transplant Applied Genomics Centre; University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada (L.H., J.R., J.M.V., K.F., P.F.H.); Cardiology Department and Intensive Care (M.C.B.), Cardiology and Heart Transplant Department (R.G., X.J.), and Pathology Department (P.B.), Georges Pompidou Hospital, Paris, France; Pathology (P.R.) and Cardiac Surgery Departments (S.V., P.L.), La Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, Paris; Pathology (C.T.) and Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Departments (S.P), Laennec Hospital, Nantes; Pathology (A.F.) and Cardiovascular Surgery Departments (A.G), Charles Nicolle Hospital, Rouen, France.
| | - Jean Paul Duong Van Huyen
- From Paris Descartes University and Hôpital Necker, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, France (A.L., J.P.D.V.H., M.R.); Paris Translational Research Centre for Organ Transplantation, INSERM, UMR-S970, France (A.L., J.P.D.V.H., O.A., T.B., J.P.E., C.L., P.B., X.J.); Pathology Department, Necker Hospital, Paris, France (J.P.D.V.H.); Alberta Transplant Applied Genomics Centre; University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada (L.H., J.R., J.M.V., K.F., P.F.H.); Cardiology Department and Intensive Care (M.C.B.), Cardiology and Heart Transplant Department (R.G., X.J.), and Pathology Department (P.B.), Georges Pompidou Hospital, Paris, France; Pathology (P.R.) and Cardiac Surgery Departments (S.V., P.L.), La Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, Paris; Pathology (C.T.) and Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Departments (S.P), Laennec Hospital, Nantes; Pathology (A.F.) and Cardiovascular Surgery Departments (A.G), Charles Nicolle Hospital, Rouen, France
| | - Luis Hidalgo
- From Paris Descartes University and Hôpital Necker, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, France (A.L., J.P.D.V.H., M.R.); Paris Translational Research Centre for Organ Transplantation, INSERM, UMR-S970, France (A.L., J.P.D.V.H., O.A., T.B., J.P.E., C.L., P.B., X.J.); Pathology Department, Necker Hospital, Paris, France (J.P.D.V.H.); Alberta Transplant Applied Genomics Centre; University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada (L.H., J.R., J.M.V., K.F., P.F.H.); Cardiology Department and Intensive Care (M.C.B.), Cardiology and Heart Transplant Department (R.G., X.J.), and Pathology Department (P.B.), Georges Pompidou Hospital, Paris, France; Pathology (P.R.) and Cardiac Surgery Departments (S.V., P.L.), La Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, Paris; Pathology (C.T.) and Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Departments (S.P), Laennec Hospital, Nantes; Pathology (A.F.) and Cardiovascular Surgery Departments (A.G), Charles Nicolle Hospital, Rouen, France
| | - Jeff Reeve
- From Paris Descartes University and Hôpital Necker, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, France (A.L., J.P.D.V.H., M.R.); Paris Translational Research Centre for Organ Transplantation, INSERM, UMR-S970, France (A.L., J.P.D.V.H., O.A., T.B., J.P.E., C.L., P.B., X.J.); Pathology Department, Necker Hospital, Paris, France (J.P.D.V.H.); Alberta Transplant Applied Genomics Centre; University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada (L.H., J.R., J.M.V., K.F., P.F.H.); Cardiology Department and Intensive Care (M.C.B.), Cardiology and Heart Transplant Department (R.G., X.J.), and Pathology Department (P.B.), Georges Pompidou Hospital, Paris, France; Pathology (P.R.) and Cardiac Surgery Departments (S.V., P.L.), La Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, Paris; Pathology (C.T.) and Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Departments (S.P), Laennec Hospital, Nantes; Pathology (A.F.) and Cardiovascular Surgery Departments (A.G), Charles Nicolle Hospital, Rouen, France
| | - Maud Racapé
- From Paris Descartes University and Hôpital Necker, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, France (A.L., J.P.D.V.H., M.R.); Paris Translational Research Centre for Organ Transplantation, INSERM, UMR-S970, France (A.L., J.P.D.V.H., O.A., T.B., J.P.E., C.L., P.B., X.J.); Pathology Department, Necker Hospital, Paris, France (J.P.D.V.H.); Alberta Transplant Applied Genomics Centre; University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada (L.H., J.R., J.M.V., K.F., P.F.H.); Cardiology Department and Intensive Care (M.C.B.), Cardiology and Heart Transplant Department (R.G., X.J.), and Pathology Department (P.B.), Georges Pompidou Hospital, Paris, France; Pathology (P.R.) and Cardiac Surgery Departments (S.V., P.L.), La Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, Paris; Pathology (C.T.) and Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Departments (S.P), Laennec Hospital, Nantes; Pathology (A.F.) and Cardiovascular Surgery Departments (A.G), Charles Nicolle Hospital, Rouen, France
| | - Olivier Aubert
- From Paris Descartes University and Hôpital Necker, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, France (A.L., J.P.D.V.H., M.R.); Paris Translational Research Centre for Organ Transplantation, INSERM, UMR-S970, France (A.L., J.P.D.V.H., O.A., T.B., J.P.E., C.L., P.B., X.J.); Pathology Department, Necker Hospital, Paris, France (J.P.D.V.H.); Alberta Transplant Applied Genomics Centre; University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada (L.H., J.R., J.M.V., K.F., P.F.H.); Cardiology Department and Intensive Care (M.C.B.), Cardiology and Heart Transplant Department (R.G., X.J.), and Pathology Department (P.B.), Georges Pompidou Hospital, Paris, France; Pathology (P.R.) and Cardiac Surgery Departments (S.V., P.L.), La Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, Paris; Pathology (C.T.) and Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Departments (S.P), Laennec Hospital, Nantes; Pathology (A.F.) and Cardiovascular Surgery Departments (A.G), Charles Nicolle Hospital, Rouen, France
| | - Jeffery M Venner
- From Paris Descartes University and Hôpital Necker, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, France (A.L., J.P.D.V.H., M.R.); Paris Translational Research Centre for Organ Transplantation, INSERM, UMR-S970, France (A.L., J.P.D.V.H., O.A., T.B., J.P.E., C.L., P.B., X.J.); Pathology Department, Necker Hospital, Paris, France (J.P.D.V.H.); Alberta Transplant Applied Genomics Centre; University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada (L.H., J.R., J.M.V., K.F., P.F.H.); Cardiology Department and Intensive Care (M.C.B.), Cardiology and Heart Transplant Department (R.G., X.J.), and Pathology Department (P.B.), Georges Pompidou Hospital, Paris, France; Pathology (P.R.) and Cardiac Surgery Departments (S.V., P.L.), La Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, Paris; Pathology (C.T.) and Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Departments (S.P), Laennec Hospital, Nantes; Pathology (A.F.) and Cardiovascular Surgery Departments (A.G), Charles Nicolle Hospital, Rouen, France
| | - Konrad Falmuski
- From Paris Descartes University and Hôpital Necker, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, France (A.L., J.P.D.V.H., M.R.); Paris Translational Research Centre for Organ Transplantation, INSERM, UMR-S970, France (A.L., J.P.D.V.H., O.A., T.B., J.P.E., C.L., P.B., X.J.); Pathology Department, Necker Hospital, Paris, France (J.P.D.V.H.); Alberta Transplant Applied Genomics Centre; University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada (L.H., J.R., J.M.V., K.F., P.F.H.); Cardiology Department and Intensive Care (M.C.B.), Cardiology and Heart Transplant Department (R.G., X.J.), and Pathology Department (P.B.), Georges Pompidou Hospital, Paris, France; Pathology (P.R.) and Cardiac Surgery Departments (S.V., P.L.), La Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, Paris; Pathology (C.T.) and Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Departments (S.P), Laennec Hospital, Nantes; Pathology (A.F.) and Cardiovascular Surgery Departments (A.G), Charles Nicolle Hospital, Rouen, France
| | - Marie Cécile Bories
- From Paris Descartes University and Hôpital Necker, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, France (A.L., J.P.D.V.H., M.R.); Paris Translational Research Centre for Organ Transplantation, INSERM, UMR-S970, France (A.L., J.P.D.V.H., O.A., T.B., J.P.E., C.L., P.B., X.J.); Pathology Department, Necker Hospital, Paris, France (J.P.D.V.H.); Alberta Transplant Applied Genomics Centre; University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada (L.H., J.R., J.M.V., K.F., P.F.H.); Cardiology Department and Intensive Care (M.C.B.), Cardiology and Heart Transplant Department (R.G., X.J.), and Pathology Department (P.B.), Georges Pompidou Hospital, Paris, France; Pathology (P.R.) and Cardiac Surgery Departments (S.V., P.L.), La Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, Paris; Pathology (C.T.) and Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Departments (S.P), Laennec Hospital, Nantes; Pathology (A.F.) and Cardiovascular Surgery Departments (A.G), Charles Nicolle Hospital, Rouen, France
| | - Thibaut Beuscart
- From Paris Descartes University and Hôpital Necker, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, France (A.L., J.P.D.V.H., M.R.); Paris Translational Research Centre for Organ Transplantation, INSERM, UMR-S970, France (A.L., J.P.D.V.H., O.A., T.B., J.P.E., C.L., P.B., X.J.); Pathology Department, Necker Hospital, Paris, France (J.P.D.V.H.); Alberta Transplant Applied Genomics Centre; University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada (L.H., J.R., J.M.V., K.F., P.F.H.); Cardiology Department and Intensive Care (M.C.B.), Cardiology and Heart Transplant Department (R.G., X.J.), and Pathology Department (P.B.), Georges Pompidou Hospital, Paris, France; Pathology (P.R.) and Cardiac Surgery Departments (S.V., P.L.), La Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, Paris; Pathology (C.T.) and Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Departments (S.P), Laennec Hospital, Nantes; Pathology (A.F.) and Cardiovascular Surgery Departments (A.G), Charles Nicolle Hospital, Rouen, France
| | - Romain Guillemain
- From Paris Descartes University and Hôpital Necker, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, France (A.L., J.P.D.V.H., M.R.); Paris Translational Research Centre for Organ Transplantation, INSERM, UMR-S970, France (A.L., J.P.D.V.H., O.A., T.B., J.P.E., C.L., P.B., X.J.); Pathology Department, Necker Hospital, Paris, France (J.P.D.V.H.); Alberta Transplant Applied Genomics Centre; University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada (L.H., J.R., J.M.V., K.F., P.F.H.); Cardiology Department and Intensive Care (M.C.B.), Cardiology and Heart Transplant Department (R.G., X.J.), and Pathology Department (P.B.), Georges Pompidou Hospital, Paris, France; Pathology (P.R.) and Cardiac Surgery Departments (S.V., P.L.), La Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, Paris; Pathology (C.T.) and Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Departments (S.P), Laennec Hospital, Nantes; Pathology (A.F.) and Cardiovascular Surgery Departments (A.G), Charles Nicolle Hospital, Rouen, France
| | - Arnaud François
- From Paris Descartes University and Hôpital Necker, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, France (A.L., J.P.D.V.H., M.R.); Paris Translational Research Centre for Organ Transplantation, INSERM, UMR-S970, France (A.L., J.P.D.V.H., O.A., T.B., J.P.E., C.L., P.B., X.J.); Pathology Department, Necker Hospital, Paris, France (J.P.D.V.H.); Alberta Transplant Applied Genomics Centre; University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada (L.H., J.R., J.M.V., K.F., P.F.H.); Cardiology Department and Intensive Care (M.C.B.), Cardiology and Heart Transplant Department (R.G., X.J.), and Pathology Department (P.B.), Georges Pompidou Hospital, Paris, France; Pathology (P.R.) and Cardiac Surgery Departments (S.V., P.L.), La Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, Paris; Pathology (C.T.) and Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Departments (S.P), Laennec Hospital, Nantes; Pathology (A.F.) and Cardiovascular Surgery Departments (A.G), Charles Nicolle Hospital, Rouen, France
| | - Sabine Pattier
- From Paris Descartes University and Hôpital Necker, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, France (A.L., J.P.D.V.H., M.R.); Paris Translational Research Centre for Organ Transplantation, INSERM, UMR-S970, France (A.L., J.P.D.V.H., O.A., T.B., J.P.E., C.L., P.B., X.J.); Pathology Department, Necker Hospital, Paris, France (J.P.D.V.H.); Alberta Transplant Applied Genomics Centre; University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada (L.H., J.R., J.M.V., K.F., P.F.H.); Cardiology Department and Intensive Care (M.C.B.), Cardiology and Heart Transplant Department (R.G., X.J.), and Pathology Department (P.B.), Georges Pompidou Hospital, Paris, France; Pathology (P.R.) and Cardiac Surgery Departments (S.V., P.L.), La Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, Paris; Pathology (C.T.) and Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Departments (S.P), Laennec Hospital, Nantes; Pathology (A.F.) and Cardiovascular Surgery Departments (A.G), Charles Nicolle Hospital, Rouen, France
| | - Claire Toquet
- From Paris Descartes University and Hôpital Necker, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, France (A.L., J.P.D.V.H., M.R.); Paris Translational Research Centre for Organ Transplantation, INSERM, UMR-S970, France (A.L., J.P.D.V.H., O.A., T.B., J.P.E., C.L., P.B., X.J.); Pathology Department, Necker Hospital, Paris, France (J.P.D.V.H.); Alberta Transplant Applied Genomics Centre; University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada (L.H., J.R., J.M.V., K.F., P.F.H.); Cardiology Department and Intensive Care (M.C.B.), Cardiology and Heart Transplant Department (R.G., X.J.), and Pathology Department (P.B.), Georges Pompidou Hospital, Paris, France; Pathology (P.R.) and Cardiac Surgery Departments (S.V., P.L.), La Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, Paris; Pathology (C.T.) and Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Departments (S.P), Laennec Hospital, Nantes; Pathology (A.F.) and Cardiovascular Surgery Departments (A.G), Charles Nicolle Hospital, Rouen, France
| | - Arnaud Gay
- From Paris Descartes University and Hôpital Necker, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, France (A.L., J.P.D.V.H., M.R.); Paris Translational Research Centre for Organ Transplantation, INSERM, UMR-S970, France (A.L., J.P.D.V.H., O.A., T.B., J.P.E., C.L., P.B., X.J.); Pathology Department, Necker Hospital, Paris, France (J.P.D.V.H.); Alberta Transplant Applied Genomics Centre; University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada (L.H., J.R., J.M.V., K.F., P.F.H.); Cardiology Department and Intensive Care (M.C.B.), Cardiology and Heart Transplant Department (R.G., X.J.), and Pathology Department (P.B.), Georges Pompidou Hospital, Paris, France; Pathology (P.R.) and Cardiac Surgery Departments (S.V., P.L.), La Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, Paris; Pathology (C.T.) and Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Departments (S.P), Laennec Hospital, Nantes; Pathology (A.F.) and Cardiovascular Surgery Departments (A.G), Charles Nicolle Hospital, Rouen, France
| | - Philippe Rouvier
- From Paris Descartes University and Hôpital Necker, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, France (A.L., J.P.D.V.H., M.R.); Paris Translational Research Centre for Organ Transplantation, INSERM, UMR-S970, France (A.L., J.P.D.V.H., O.A., T.B., J.P.E., C.L., P.B., X.J.); Pathology Department, Necker Hospital, Paris, France (J.P.D.V.H.); Alberta Transplant Applied Genomics Centre; University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada (L.H., J.R., J.M.V., K.F., P.F.H.); Cardiology Department and Intensive Care (M.C.B.), Cardiology and Heart Transplant Department (R.G., X.J.), and Pathology Department (P.B.), Georges Pompidou Hospital, Paris, France; Pathology (P.R.) and Cardiac Surgery Departments (S.V., P.L.), La Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, Paris; Pathology (C.T.) and Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Departments (S.P), Laennec Hospital, Nantes; Pathology (A.F.) and Cardiovascular Surgery Departments (A.G), Charles Nicolle Hospital, Rouen, France
| | - Shaida Varnous
- From Paris Descartes University and Hôpital Necker, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, France (A.L., J.P.D.V.H., M.R.); Paris Translational Research Centre for Organ Transplantation, INSERM, UMR-S970, France (A.L., J.P.D.V.H., O.A., T.B., J.P.E., C.L., P.B., X.J.); Pathology Department, Necker Hospital, Paris, France (J.P.D.V.H.); Alberta Transplant Applied Genomics Centre; University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada (L.H., J.R., J.M.V., K.F., P.F.H.); Cardiology Department and Intensive Care (M.C.B.), Cardiology and Heart Transplant Department (R.G., X.J.), and Pathology Department (P.B.), Georges Pompidou Hospital, Paris, France; Pathology (P.R.) and Cardiac Surgery Departments (S.V., P.L.), La Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, Paris; Pathology (C.T.) and Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Departments (S.P), Laennec Hospital, Nantes; Pathology (A.F.) and Cardiovascular Surgery Departments (A.G), Charles Nicolle Hospital, Rouen, France
| | - Pascal Leprince
- From Paris Descartes University and Hôpital Necker, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, France (A.L., J.P.D.V.H., M.R.); Paris Translational Research Centre for Organ Transplantation, INSERM, UMR-S970, France (A.L., J.P.D.V.H., O.A., T.B., J.P.E., C.L., P.B., X.J.); Pathology Department, Necker Hospital, Paris, France (J.P.D.V.H.); Alberta Transplant Applied Genomics Centre; University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada (L.H., J.R., J.M.V., K.F., P.F.H.); Cardiology Department and Intensive Care (M.C.B.), Cardiology and Heart Transplant Department (R.G., X.J.), and Pathology Department (P.B.), Georges Pompidou Hospital, Paris, France; Pathology (P.R.) and Cardiac Surgery Departments (S.V., P.L.), La Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, Paris; Pathology (C.T.) and Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Departments (S.P), Laennec Hospital, Nantes; Pathology (A.F.) and Cardiovascular Surgery Departments (A.G), Charles Nicolle Hospital, Rouen, France
| | - Jean Philippe Empana
- From Paris Descartes University and Hôpital Necker, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, France (A.L., J.P.D.V.H., M.R.); Paris Translational Research Centre for Organ Transplantation, INSERM, UMR-S970, France (A.L., J.P.D.V.H., O.A., T.B., J.P.E., C.L., P.B., X.J.); Pathology Department, Necker Hospital, Paris, France (J.P.D.V.H.); Alberta Transplant Applied Genomics Centre; University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada (L.H., J.R., J.M.V., K.F., P.F.H.); Cardiology Department and Intensive Care (M.C.B.), Cardiology and Heart Transplant Department (R.G., X.J.), and Pathology Department (P.B.), Georges Pompidou Hospital, Paris, France; Pathology (P.R.) and Cardiac Surgery Departments (S.V., P.L.), La Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, Paris; Pathology (C.T.) and Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Departments (S.P), Laennec Hospital, Nantes; Pathology (A.F.) and Cardiovascular Surgery Departments (A.G), Charles Nicolle Hospital, Rouen, France
| | - Carmen Lefaucheur
- From Paris Descartes University and Hôpital Necker, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, France (A.L., J.P.D.V.H., M.R.); Paris Translational Research Centre for Organ Transplantation, INSERM, UMR-S970, France (A.L., J.P.D.V.H., O.A., T.B., J.P.E., C.L., P.B., X.J.); Pathology Department, Necker Hospital, Paris, France (J.P.D.V.H.); Alberta Transplant Applied Genomics Centre; University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada (L.H., J.R., J.M.V., K.F., P.F.H.); Cardiology Department and Intensive Care (M.C.B.), Cardiology and Heart Transplant Department (R.G., X.J.), and Pathology Department (P.B.), Georges Pompidou Hospital, Paris, France; Pathology (P.R.) and Cardiac Surgery Departments (S.V., P.L.), La Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, Paris; Pathology (C.T.) and Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Departments (S.P), Laennec Hospital, Nantes; Pathology (A.F.) and Cardiovascular Surgery Departments (A.G), Charles Nicolle Hospital, Rouen, France
| | - Patrick Bruneval
- From Paris Descartes University and Hôpital Necker, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, France (A.L., J.P.D.V.H., M.R.); Paris Translational Research Centre for Organ Transplantation, INSERM, UMR-S970, France (A.L., J.P.D.V.H., O.A., T.B., J.P.E., C.L., P.B., X.J.); Pathology Department, Necker Hospital, Paris, France (J.P.D.V.H.); Alberta Transplant Applied Genomics Centre; University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada (L.H., J.R., J.M.V., K.F., P.F.H.); Cardiology Department and Intensive Care (M.C.B.), Cardiology and Heart Transplant Department (R.G., X.J.), and Pathology Department (P.B.), Georges Pompidou Hospital, Paris, France; Pathology (P.R.) and Cardiac Surgery Departments (S.V., P.L.), La Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, Paris; Pathology (C.T.) and Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Departments (S.P), Laennec Hospital, Nantes; Pathology (A.F.) and Cardiovascular Surgery Departments (A.G), Charles Nicolle Hospital, Rouen, France
| | - Xavier Jouven
- From Paris Descartes University and Hôpital Necker, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, France (A.L., J.P.D.V.H., M.R.); Paris Translational Research Centre for Organ Transplantation, INSERM, UMR-S970, France (A.L., J.P.D.V.H., O.A., T.B., J.P.E., C.L., P.B., X.J.); Pathology Department, Necker Hospital, Paris, France (J.P.D.V.H.); Alberta Transplant Applied Genomics Centre; University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada (L.H., J.R., J.M.V., K.F., P.F.H.); Cardiology Department and Intensive Care (M.C.B.), Cardiology and Heart Transplant Department (R.G., X.J.), and Pathology Department (P.B.), Georges Pompidou Hospital, Paris, France; Pathology (P.R.) and Cardiac Surgery Departments (S.V., P.L.), La Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, Paris; Pathology (C.T.) and Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Departments (S.P), Laennec Hospital, Nantes; Pathology (A.F.) and Cardiovascular Surgery Departments (A.G), Charles Nicolle Hospital, Rouen, France
| | - Philip F Halloran
- From Paris Descartes University and Hôpital Necker, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, France (A.L., J.P.D.V.H., M.R.); Paris Translational Research Centre for Organ Transplantation, INSERM, UMR-S970, France (A.L., J.P.D.V.H., O.A., T.B., J.P.E., C.L., P.B., X.J.); Pathology Department, Necker Hospital, Paris, France (J.P.D.V.H.); Alberta Transplant Applied Genomics Centre; University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada (L.H., J.R., J.M.V., K.F., P.F.H.); Cardiology Department and Intensive Care (M.C.B.), Cardiology and Heart Transplant Department (R.G., X.J.), and Pathology Department (P.B.), Georges Pompidou Hospital, Paris, France; Pathology (P.R.) and Cardiac Surgery Departments (S.V., P.L.), La Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, Paris; Pathology (C.T.) and Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Departments (S.P), Laennec Hospital, Nantes; Pathology (A.F.) and Cardiovascular Surgery Departments (A.G), Charles Nicolle Hospital, Rouen, France
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Clinical potential of DNA methylation in organ transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant 2016; 35:843-50. [DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2016.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2015] [Revised: 02/18/2016] [Accepted: 02/26/2016] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
|