Lung Transplantation as a Therapeutic Option in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Lung Transplantation in the United States for COVID-19 Related Lung Disease During the Pandemic

PURPOSE

Lung transplantation (LTx) is a potential intervention for end-stage COVID-19 lung disease. Current literature is sparse regarding the outcomes of LTx for COVID-19 related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and pulmonary fibrosis (PF). This study aims to characterize outcomes and patterns of LTx for COVID-19 related lung disease throughout the pandemic.

METHODS

Patients who underwent LTx during the pandemic for COVID-19 related lung disease were retrospectively identified using the UNOS registry. Demographics, as well as outcomes measures and nationwide patterns of care were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 510 adult cases of LTx for COVID-19 (259 ARDS, 251 PF) were compared to 4,031 without COVID-19 (3,994 PF, 37 ARDS). Patients who received LTx for COVID-19 ARDS did not differ in 2-year survival when compared to those with COVID-19 PF (81.9% vs 77.2%, p = 0.4428). Compared to non-COVID-19 etiologies, COVID-19 ARDS patients had higher rates of stroke (2.3% vs 0%, p = 0.0005), lower rates of graft failure (12.8% vs 36.1%, p = 0.0003) and post-transplant ECMO (29.6% vs 41.7%, p = 0.0002), and improved 2-year survival following LTx (81.9% vs 61.7%, p = 0.0064). No difference in 2-year survival following LTx was observed between patients with COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 PF (77.2% vs 71.8%, p = 0.34). Rates of LTx spiked with variant emergence and declined with rounds of vaccination.

CONCLUSION

Our results are consistent with early reports of survival outcomes following LTx for COVID-19 ARDS and PF while providing an increased layer of granularity. LTx may be considered as a safe and effective intervention for COVID-19 lung disease.

Lung transplant outcomes after acute respiratory distress syndrome requiring extracorporeal life support: Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic

OBJECTIVE

Lung transplant for acute respiratory distress syndrome in patients supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was rare before 2020, but was rapidly adopted to rescue patients with COVID-19 with lung failure. This study aims to compare the outcomes of patients who underwent lung transplant for COVID-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome and non-COVID acute respiratory distress syndrome, and to assess the impact of type and duration of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support on survival.

METHODS

Using the United Network for Organ Sharing database, we identified 311 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome who underwent lung transplant from 2007 to 2022 and performed a retrospective analysis of the patients who required extracorporeal membrane oxygenation preoperatively, stratified by COVID-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome and non-COVID acute respiratory distress syndrome listing diagnoses. The primary outcome was 1-year survival. Secondary outcomes included the effect of type and duration of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation on survival.

RESULTS

During the study period, 236 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome and preoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation underwent lung transplant; 181 patients had a listing diagnosis of COVID-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (77%), and 55 patients had a listing diagnosis of non-COVID acute respiratory distress syndrome (23%). Patients with COVID-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome were older, were more likely to be female, had higher body mass index, and spent longer on the waitlist (all P < .02) than patients with non-COVID acute respiratory distress syndrome. The 2 groups had similar 1-year survival (85.8% vs 81.1%, P = .2) with no differences in postoperative complications. Patients with COVID-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome required longer times on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation pretransplant (P = .02), but duration of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support was not a predictor of 1-year survival (P = .2).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite prolonged periods of pretransplant extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support, selected patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome can undergo lung transplant safely with acceptable short-term outcomes. Appropriate selection criteria and long-term implications require further analysis.

Lung transplantation for COVID-2019 respiratory failure in the United States: Outcomes 1-year posttransplant and the impact of preoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support

OBJECTIVE

Patients with end-stage respiratory failure after severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection may benefit from lung transplant; however, data on transplant outcomes and the impact of prolonged circulatory support before transplant in these patients are limited.

METHODS

We assessed survival, postoperative complications, and the impact of pretransplant extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in patients undergoing lung transplant in the United States from August 2020 through March 2022 using records validated by United Network for Organ Sharing experts and extracted from the United Network for Organ Sharing database.

RESULTS

In 305 patients with COVID-19-related respiratory failure and validated data, survival for up to 1-year posttransplant did not differ between 188 patients with COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome and 117 patients with post-COVID-19 pulmonary fibrosis (P = .8). Pretransplant ECMO support (median 66 days) was required in 191 patients (63%), and venovenous ECMO was used in 91.2% of patients. One-, 6-, and 12-month survival was not significantly different between patients requiring ECMO and patients without ECMO (95.8% vs 99.1%, 93.1% vs 96.4%, 84.8% vs 90.9%, P = .2) In addition, 1-year survival was similar in recipients requiring ECMO for COVID-19 lung failure and recipients requiring ECMO for non-COVID-19 restrictive lung failure (84.8% vs 78.0%, P = .1).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that lung transplant in patients with COVID-19 respiratory failure yields acceptable 1-year outcomes. Despite an often more complex postoperative course, prolonged ECMO pretransplant in well-selected patients was associated with adequate clinical and functional status.

Physical Rehabilitation Before and After Lung Transplantation for COVID-19 ARDS: A Case Report

Purpose

To describe the functional trajectory and physical rehabilitation of an individual who underwent lung transplantation for COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).

Client Description

A previously healthy 60-year-old man admitted to critical care pre-transplantation and followed six months post-transplant.

Intervention

Physical rehabilitation in the critical care, acute ward and in-patient rehabilitation settings.

Measures and Outcome

Despite a successful surgery, a long and complex acute care admission contributed to a slow and variable functional recovery. Significant functional limitations and physical frailty were present in the early post-transplant period.

Implications

Little is known of the effects of COVID-19 superimposed upon lung transplantation on muscle function, exercise capacity, and physical activity. Future research should include case series to further understand the functional deficits and trajectory of recovery in this emerging clinical population. Standard core outcome measures should be identified for this population to enable synthesis of findings and inform short- and long-term rehabilitation strategies.

Single-Center Experience With Lung Transplant Evaluation Referrals of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Patients During the COVID-19 Pandemic: How Do You Make Up For Lost Time?

Transfer of select, medically refractory acute respiratory distress syndrome patients to lung transplant centers requires extensive resources. Here, we report 270 consecutive lung transplant patient referrals to our center for medically refractory ARDS from June 2021 to April 2022, following the implementation of clinical care pathways for intake of these patients. Eighty-seven of 270 patients (32.2%) met screening criteria and were evaluated for transfer within a median of 12 days, during which 38 of 87 patients (43.7%) died and 12 of 87 patients (13.8%) transferred elsewhere. Thirty-seven of 87 patients (42.5%) were accepted for transfer of which 16 of 37 patients (43.2%) successfully transferred to our center with a median transfer waiting period of 12 days. Because of resource constraints, 21 of 37 accepted patients (56.8%) could not be transferred of which 9 of 21 patients (42.9%) died while waiting. Nine of 16 transferred patients (56.2%) eventually underwent lung transplantation with over 80% 6-month survival. ARDS patients referred for transplantation have high risk of mortality and, therefore, require well-described pathways for evaluation and transfer.

The Lung Transplant Candidate, Indications, Timing, and Selection Criteria

Lung transplantation can be lifesaving for patients with advanced lung disease. Demographics are evolving with recipients now sicker but determining candidacy remains predicated on one's underlying lung disease prognosis, along with the likelihood of posttransplant success. Determining optimal timing can be challenging, and most programs favor initiating the process early and proactively to allow time for patient education, informed decision-making, and preparation. A comprehensive, multidisciplinary evaluation is used to elucidate disease progrnosis and identify risk factors for poor posttransplant outcomes. Candidacy criteria vary significantly by center, and close communication between referring and transplant providers is necessary to improve access to transplant and outcomes.

Hospitalized patients with irreversible lung injury from COVID-19 have higher morbidity but similar 1-year survival after lung transplant compared to hospitalized patients transplanted for restrictive lung disease

BACKGROUND

Hospitalized lung transplant (LT) recipients (LTRs) have higher post-LT morbidity and mortality than those who are well enough to wait for transplant at home. Outcomes after LT for COVID-19-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (CARDS) may be even worse; thus, we compared post-LT outcomes between hospitalized LTRs transplanted for CARDS and those transplanted for restrictive lung disease (RLD).

METHODS

Between 2014 and 2021, hospitalized LTRs ≥18 years old with CARDS or RLD were included. Primary and secondary outcomes were 1-year post-LT survival and postoperative morbidity. For each patient in the CARDS group, an analysis of 1-to-1 matched patients from the RLD group was performed using logistic regression modeling.

RESULTS

Of 764 LTRs, 163 (21.3%) were hospitalized at the time of LT; 132 met the inclusion criteria: 11 (8.3%) were transplanted for CARDS and 121 (91.7%) for RLD. LTRs with CARDS were younger with longer pre-LT hospitalization stays and higher rates of pretransplant mechanical ventilation, dialysis, and ECMO as a bridge to transplant. A propensity-matched analysis demonstrated comparable rates of intrathoracic adhesions, posttransplant duration of mechanical ventilation, PGD3 at 72 hours, and delayed chest closure. Compared to LTRs with RLD, those with CARDS had significantly longer posttransplant hospital stays and a higher prevalence of ACR ≥A2 and DSA >2000 MFI, but comparable 1-year survival rates.

CONCLUSION

Even with careful selection, LT for patients with CARDS was associated with significant morbidity; however, 1-year survival of recipients with CARDS was comparable to that of matched hospitalized recipients with RLD.

Early Outcomes of COVID-19 Lung Transplantation Recipients in Korea: A Single-Center Study

Background

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been found to cause life-threatening respiratory failure, which can progress to irreversible lung damage. Lung transplantation can be a life-saving treatment in patients with terminal lung disease (e.g., acute respiratory distress syndrome caused by infection). This study aimed to present the clinical course and results after initial lung transplantation in patients with severe COVID-19 who did not recover even with optimal medical care.

Methods

From August 2019 to February 2022, this study enrolled 10 patients with COVID-19 (5 men; median age, 55.7 years) who underwent lung transplantation at a single center in Korea. All patients' characteristics, clinical pathway, overall survival, complications, and operative data were collected and analyzed.

Results

Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or an oxygenator in a right ventricular assist device circuit was applied to 90% of the patients, and the median length of extracorporeal life support before operation was 48.5 days. There were no cases of mortality after a median follow-up of 372.8 days (interquartile range, 262.25-489 days). The major complications included the requirement for postoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support in 2 cases (20%), re-transplantation in 1 case (10%), and re-exploration due to bleeding in 2 cases (20%). During the follow-up period, 3 out of 10 patients died.

Conclusion

Excellent early outcomes were observed for patients who underwent lung transplantation. Thus, lung transplantation can be an effective and feasible treatment for patients with end-stage lung disease caused by COVID-19.

Critical Care of the Lung Transplant Patient

Lung transplantation is a therapeutic option for end-stage lung disease that improves survival and quality of life. Prelung transplant admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) for bridge to transplant with mechanical ventilation and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is common. Primary graft dysfunction is an important immediate complication of lung transplantation with short- and long-term morbidity and mortality. Later transplant-related causes of respiratory failure necessitating ICU admission include acute cellular rejection, atypical infections, and chronic lung allograft dysfunction. Lung transplantation for COVID-19-related ARDS is increasingly common..

How COVID-19 Affects Lung Transplantation: A Comprehensive Review

Lung transplant (LuTx) recipients are at a higher risk of developing serious illnesses from COVID-19, and thus, we have closely reviewed the consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic on lung transplantation. In most transplant centers, the overall LuTx activity significantly declined and led to a specific period of restricting lung transplantation to urgent cases. Moreover, several transplant centers reported difficulties due to the shortage of ICU capacities. The fear of donor-derived transmission generated extensive screening programs. Nevertheless, reasonable concerns about the unnecessary losses of viable organs were also raised. The overall donor shortage resulted in increased waiting-list mortality, and COVID-19-associated ARDS became an indication of lung transplantation. The impact of specific immunosuppressive agents on the severity of COVID-19 varied. Corticosteroid discontinuation was not found to be beneficial for LuTx patients. Tacrolimus concentrations were reported to increase during the SARS-CoV-2 infection, and in combination with remdesivir, tacrolimus may clinically impact renal functions. Monoclonal antibodies were shown to reduce the risk of hospitalization in SOT recipients. However, understanding the pharmacological interactions between the anti-COVID-19 drugs and the immunosuppressive drugs requires further research.

Lung Transplantation for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

In this review, we discuss the outcomes of patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). We discuss evidence that suggests that a significant proportion of patients with ARDS develop end-stage lung disease and die of pulmonary complications. In carefully selected patients with permanent lung damage, lung transplant can be a life-saving treatment.

Clinical relevance of lung transplantation for COVID-19 ARDS: a nationwide study

BACKGROUND

Although the number of lung transplantations (LTx) performed worldwide for COVID-19 induced acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is still low, there is general agreement that this treatment can save a subgroup of most severly ill patients with irreversible lung damage. However, the true proportion of patients eligible for LTx, the overall outcome and the impact of LTx to the pandemic are unknown.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed using a nationwide registry of hospitalised patients with confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-Cov-2) infection admitted between January 1, 2020 and May 30, 2021 in Austria. Patients referred to one of the two Austrian LTx centers were analyzed and grouped into patients accepted and rejected for LTx. Detailed outcome analysis was performed for all patients who received a LTx for post-COVID-19 ARDS and compared to patients who underwent LTx for other indications.

RESULTS

Between January 1, 2020 and May 30, 2021, 39.485 patients were hospitalised for COVID-19 in Austria. 2323 required mechanical ventilation, 183 received extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support. 106 patients with severe COVID-19 ARDS were referred for LTx. Of these, 19 (18%) underwent LTx. 30-day mortality after LTx was 0% for COVID-19 ARDS transplant recipients. With a median follow-up of 134 (47-450) days, 14/19 patients are alive.

CONCLUSIONS

Early referral of ECMO patients to a LTx center is pivotal in order to select patients eligible for LTx. Transplantation offers excellent midterm outcomes and should be incorporated in the treatment algorithm of post-COVID-19 ARDS.

Lung transplantation for severe COVID-19-related ARDS

Background:

Lung transplantation (LT) is the gold standard for various end-stage chronic lung diseases and could be a salvage therapeutic option in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). However, LT is uncertain in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related ARDS who failed to recover despite optimal management including extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). This study aims to describe the pooled experience of LT for patients with severe COVID-19-related ARDS in Korea.

Methods:

A nationwide multicenter retrospective observational study was performed with consecutive LT for severe COVID-19-related ARDS in South Korea (June 2020–June 2021). Data were collected and compared with other LTs after bridging with ECMO from the Korean Organ Transplantation Registry.

Results:

Eleven patients with COVID-19-related ARDS underwent LT. The median age was 60.0 years [interquartile range (IQR), 57.5–62.5; six males]. All patients were supported with venovenous ECMO at LT listing and received rehabilitation before LT. Patients were transplanted at a median of 49 (IQR, 32–66) days after ECMO cannulation. Primary graft dysfunction within 72 h of LT developed in two (18.2%). One patient expired 4 days after LT due to sepsis and one patient underwent retransplantation for graft failure. After a median follow-up of 322 (IQR, 299–397) days, 10 patients are alive and recovering well. Compared with other LTs after bridging with ECMO (n = 27), post-transplant outcomes were similar between the two groups.

Conclusions:

LT in patients with unresolving COVID-19-related ARDS were effective with reasonable short-term outcome.

Lung transplantation for acute respiratory distress syndrome: A multicenter experience

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a rapidly progressive lung disease with a high mortality rate. Although lung transplantation (LTx) is a well-established treatment for a variety of chronic pulmonary diseases, LTx for acute lung failure (due to ARDS) remains controversial. We reviewed posttransplant outcome of ARDS patients from three high-volume European transplant centers. Demographics and clinical data were collected and analyzed. Viral infection was the main reason for ARDS (n = 7/13, 53.8%). All patients were admitted to ICU and required mechanical ventilation, 11/13 were supported with ECMO at the time of listing. They were granted a median LAS of 76 (IQR 50-85) and waited for a median of 3 days (IQR 1.5-14). Postoperatively, median length of mechanical ventilation was 33 days (IQR 17-52.5), median length of ICU and hospital stay were 39 days (IQR 19.5-58.5) and 54 days (IQR 43.5-127). Prolongation of peripheral postoperative ECMO was required in 7/13 (53.8%) patients with a median duration of 2 days (IQR 2-7). 30-day mortality was 7.7%, 1 and 5-year survival rates were calculated as 71.6% and 54.2%, respectively. Given the lack of alternative treatment options, the herein presented results support the concept of offering live-saving LTx to carefully selected ARDS patients.

Recovering from a pandemic: pulmonary fibrosis after SARS-CoV-2 infection

Acute manifestations of SARS-CoV-2 infection continue to impact the lives of many across the world. Post-acute sequelae of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) may affect 10–30% of survivors of COVID-19, and post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC)-pulmonary fibrosis is a long-term outcome associated with major morbidity. Data from prior coronavirus outbreaks (severe acute respiratory syndrome and Middle East respiratory syndrome) suggest that pulmonary fibrosis will contribute to long-term respiratory morbidity, suggesting that PASC-pulmonary fibrosis should be thoroughly screened for through pulmonary function testing and cross-sectional imaging. As data accumulates on the unique pathobiologic mechanisms underlying critical COVID-19, a focus on corollaries to the subacute and chronic profibrotic phenotype must be sought as well. Key aspects of acute COVID-19 pathobiology that may account for increased rates of pulmonary fibrosis include monocyte/macrophage–T-cell circuits, profibrotic RNA transcriptomics, protracted elevated levels of inflammatory cytokines, and duration of illness and ventilation. Mechanistic understanding of PASC-pulmonary fibrosis will be central in determining therapeutic options and will ultimately play a role in transplant considerations. Well-designed cohort studies and prospective clinical registries are needed. Clinicians, researchers and healthcare systems must actively address this complication of PASC to minimise disability, maximise quality of life and confront a post-COVID-19 global health crisis.

A complication of COVID-19, PASC-pulmonary fibrosis, has the potential to become a global respiratory health crisis. Dedicated surveillance, mechanistic understanding and clinical and research efforts are needed to confront this emerging sequela of COVID-19.https://bit.ly/3GEyB04

Lung transplantation for acute respiratory distress syndrome - a retrospective European Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

The published experience of lung transplantation (LTX) in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is limited. The aim of this study was to investigate the contemporary results of LTX attempts in ARDS in major European centers.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective multicenter cohort study of all patients listed for LTX between 2011 and 2019. We surveyed 68 centers in 22 European countries. All patients admitted to the waitlist for lung transplantation with a diagnosis of "ARDS//pneumonia" were included. Patients without extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) or mechanical ventilation were excluded. Patients were followed until October 1st 2020 or death. Multivariable analysis for 1-year survival after listing and lung transplantation were performed.

RESULTS

Forty-eight centers (74%) with a total transplant activity of 12 438 lung transplants during the 9-year period gave feedback. Forty patients with a median age of 35 years were identified. Patients were listed for LTX in 18 different centers in 10 countries. Thirty-one-patients underwent LTX (0·25% of all indications) and 9 patients died on the waitlist. Ninety percent of transplanted patients were on ECMO in combination with mechanical ventilation before LTX. On multivariable analysis, transplantation during 2015 until 2019 was independently associated with better 1-year survival after LTX (odds ratio 10.493, 95% CI 1.977, 55.705, p=0.006). Sixteen survivors out of 23 patients with known status (70%) returned to work after LTX.

CONCLUSION

LTX in highly selected ARDS patients is feasible and outcome has improved in the modern era. The selection process remains ethically and technically challenging.

Consensus document for the selection of lung transplant candidates: An update from the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation

Tens of thousands of patients with advanced lung diseases may be eligible to be considered as potential candidates for lung transplant around the world each year. The timing of referral, evaluation, determination of candidacy, and listing of candidates continues to pose challenges and even ethical dilemmas. To address these challenges, the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation appointed an international group of members to review the literature, to consider recent advances in the management of advanced lung diseases, and to update prior consensus documents on the selection of lung transplant candidates. The purpose of this updated consensus document is to assist providers throughout the world who are caring for patients with pulmonary disease to identify potential candidates for lung transplant, to optimize the timing of the referral of these patients to lung transplant centers, and to provide transplant centers with a framework for evaluating and selecting candidates. In addition to addressing general considerations and providing disease specific recommendations for referral and listing, this updated consensus document includes an ethical framework, a recognition of the variability in acceptance of risk between transplant centers, and establishes a system to account for how a combination of risk factors may be taken into consideration in candidate selection for lung transplantation.

Experience of International Air Transportation and Subsequent Lung Transplant in a Patient with COVID-19-associated Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: a Case Report

We report an inspiring case of a 55-year-old Korean female diagnosed with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in Mexico. The patient was assessed for lung transplant as a salvage therapy for treatment-refractory ARDS following no signs of clinical improvement for > 7 weeks, despite best treatment. The patient was transported from Mexico to Korea by air ambulance under venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support. She was successfully bridged to lung transplant on day 88, 49 days after the initiation of ECMO support. ECMO was successfully weaned at the end of operation, and no bleeding or primary graft dysfunction was observed within the first 72 hours. The patient was liberated from mechanical ventilation on postoperative day 9 and transferred to the general ward 5 days later. Despite the high doses of immunosuppressants, there was no evidence of viral reactivation after transplant. At 3 months post-transplantation, she was discharged to home without complication. Our experience suggests that successful lung transplant for COVID-19-associated ARDS is feasible even in a patient with prolonged pre-transplant ECMO support. Lung transplant may be considered a salvage therapy for COVID-19-associated ARDS that does not respond to conventional treatments.

Early outcomes after lung transplantation for severe COVID-19: a series of the first consecutive cases from four countries

BACKGROUND

Lung transplantation is a life-saving treatment for patients with end-stage lung disease; however, it is infrequently considered for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) attributable to infectious causes. We aimed to describe the course of disease and early post-transplantation outcomes in critically ill patients with COVID-19 who failed to show lung recovery despite optimal medical management and were deemed to be at imminent risk of dying due to pulmonary complications.

METHODS

We established a multi-institutional case series that included the first consecutive transplants for severe COVID-19-associated ARDS known to us in the USA, Italy, Austria, and India. De-identified data from participating centres-including information relating to patient demographics and pre-COVID-19 characteristics, pretransplantation disease course, perioperative challenges, pathology of explanted lungs, and post-transplantation outcomes-were collected by Northwestern University (Chicago, IL, USA) and analysed.

FINDINGS

Between May 1 and Sept 30, 2020, 12 patients with COVID-19-associated ARDS underwent bilateral lung transplantation at six high-volume transplant centres in the USA (eight recipients at three centres), Italy (two recipients at one centre), Austria (one recipient), and India (one recipient). The median age of recipients was 48 years (IQR 41-51); three of the 12 patients were female. Chest imaging before transplantation showed severe lung damage that did not improve despite prolonged mechanical ventilation and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. The lung transplant procedure was technically challenging, with severe pleural adhesions, hilar lymphadenopathy, and increased intraoperative transfusion requirements. Pathology of the explanted lungs showed extensive, ongoing acute lung injury with features of lung fibrosis. There was no recurrence of SARS-CoV-2 in the allografts. All patients with COVID-19 could be weaned off extracorporeal support and showed short-term survival similar to that of transplant recipients without COVID-19.

INTERPRETATION

The findings from our report show that lung transplantation is the only option for survival in some patients with severe, unresolving COVID-19-associated ARDS, and that the procedure can be done successfully, with good early post-transplantation outcomes, in carefully selected patients.

FUNDING

National Institutes of Health. VIDEO ABSTRACT.

Post-acute COVID-19 syndrome

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the pathogen responsible for the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, which has resulted in global healthcare crises and strained health resources. As the population of patients recovering from COVID-19 grows, it is paramount to establish an understanding of the healthcare issues surrounding them. COVID-19 is now recognized as a multi-organ disease with a broad spectrum of manifestations. Similarly to post-acute viral syndromes described in survivors of other virulent coronavirus epidemics, there are increasing reports of persistent and prolonged effects after acute COVID-19. Patient advocacy groups, many members of which identify themselves as long haulers, have helped contribute to the recognition of post-acute COVID-19, a syndrome characterized by persistent symptoms and/or delayed or long-term complications beyond 4 weeks from the onset of symptoms. Here, we provide a comprehensive review of the current literature on post-acute COVID-19, its pathophysiology and its organ-specific sequelae. Finally, we discuss relevant considerations for the multidisciplinary care of COVID-19 survivors and propose a framework for the identification of those at high risk for post-acute COVID-19 and their coordinated management through dedicated COVID-19 clinics.

Long-term Respiratory Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation and Prognosis: A Retrospective Analysis

The duration of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) treatments increases, however, data presented from prolonged support is limited. We retrospectively analyzed all patients during a 4-year period undergoing respiratory ECMO for duration of therapy, demographics, therapy-associated parameters, and outcome according to ECMO duration (<28 days and ≥28 days = long-term ECMO). Out of 55 patients undergoing ECMO for ARDS or during bridging to lung transplantation, 18 were on ECMO for ≥28 days (33%). In the long-term group, median ECMO run time was 40 days (interquartile range 34-54 days). Hospital survival was not significantly different between the groups (54% in short-term and 50% in long-term ECMO patients). There was a significantly higher proportion of patients suffering from malignancy in the group of long-term nonsurvivors. Recovery occurred after more than 40 days on ECMO in 3 patients. The longest ECMO run time in a hospital survivor was 65 days. Duration of ECMO support alone was no prognostic factor and should not represent a basis for decision-making. In patients suffering from malignancy, long-term ECMO support seems to be a factor of adverse prognosis, if not futile.

Lung transplantation for the treatment of irreversible acute respiratory distress syndrome

BACKGROUND

Despite advances in critical care for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), some survivors in the acute phase are unable to wean from extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) or mechanical ventilation. To date, little is known regarding whether lung transplantation confers a survival benefit for irreversible ARDS.

METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted using the United Network for Organ Sharing database (May 2005-December 2018). Patients with restrictive lung disease were divided into two groups: patients with and without ARDS. Propensity score matching identified recipients without ARDS for the control group.

RESULTS

A total of 63 patients with ARDS were waitlisted for lung transplantation, while 39 received a lung transplant after a median waitlist duration of 8 days. Seventy-eight patients were matched as controls. In the ARDS group, the median age was 30 years, and the median lung allocation score was 88.4. Among the 39 recipients, 30 (76.9%) received ECMO support prior to transplantation. Lung transplantation for ARDS and restrictive lung disease showed similar 90-day (87.2% vs. 88.5%, p = .80), 1-year (82.1% vs. 85.9%, p = .52), and 3-year (69.2% vs. 65.4%, p = .94) survival rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Lung transplantation provides acceptable outcomes in selected patients with irreversible ARDS.

A 92 Days Run of Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

Background Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) is an established life-saving procedure for severe acute respiratory failure due to various causes. In general, the duration of ECMO ranges from 1 to 2 weeks, with withdrawal recommended if no improvement is noted. We report a case of respiratory failure due to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) following influenza A infection, supported with a long ECMO run and the lessons learned from this experience.

Case Report A 40-year-old female weighing 120 kg with pneumonia following H1N1 influenza was transferred to our hospital on mechanical ventilation for worsening respiratory distress. On admission, she presented with bilateral diffuse infiltrates on chest X-ray and severe hypoxemia with a partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood/fraction of inspired oxygen concentration ratio (PaO2/FiO2) of 85 at FiO2 of 0.8 on endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation. Acinetobacter Baumannii was isolated from respiratory secretions; antibiotics were revised as per sensitivity. Her respiratory status further deteriorated over next 96 hours in spite of maximally optimized mechanical ventilation. VV-ECMO was established on 4th day of mechanical ventilation in our hospital. Thereafter, she underwent a prolonged ECMO run with respiratory improvement starting to show some promise only by 86th day of ECMO. Weaning process was initiated gradually. However, on 88th day of ECMO the patient had an episode of seizure followed by low Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score (3T/15). The patient did not recover from the cerebral insult and based on clinical neurological examination including apnea test, brain death was determined within next 48 hours and the ECMO was called off.

Conclusions Prolonged ECMO therapy poses many challenges and might be considered if the primary cause of respiratory failure necessitating ECMO is expected to resolve or a feasibility of lung transplantation is contemplated. Good team dynamics and appropriate counselling to the family are of utmost importance managing the patients on prolonged ECMO.

Urgently listed lung transplant patients have outcomes similar to those of electively listed patients

OBJECTIVES

To (1) determine outcomes after urgent listing compared with elective listing for lung transplant and (2) compare in-hospital morbidity and mortality, survival, and allograft function in these 2 groups.

METHODS

From January 2006 to September 2017, 201 patients were urgently and 1423 electively listed. Among urgently listed patients, 130 subsequently underwent primary lung transplant as did 995 electively listed patients. Competing-risks analysis for death and transplant after listing and weighted balancing score matching (76 pairs) were used to compare in-hospital morbidity and survival. Mixed-effect longitudinal modeling was used to compare allograft function to 8 years post-transplant.

RESULTS

At 1 month, mortality was 26% in urgently listed patients, and 58% were transplanted. Risk factors for death included older age, higher bilirubin, and transfer from an outside hospital. At transplantation, urgently listed transplant patients were younger (53 ± 13 vs 55 ± 12 years), had more ventilator and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support (32/25% vs 20/2.0%), more restrictive lung disease (95/73% vs 509/51%), and a higher lung allocation score (82 ± 13 vs 47 ± 17). In-hospital morbidity and mortality, time-related survival, and longitudinal allograft function were similar between matched groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Urgent listing more often than not leads to transplantation. Although urgently listed patients are sicker overall, after transplant their perioperative morbidity and mortality, overall survival, and allograft function are similar to those of electively listed patients. Appropriate patient selection and aggressive supportive care allow urgently listed lung transplant patients to achieve these similar post-transplant outcomes.

The acute respiratory distress syndrome: pathophysiology, current clinical practice, and emerging therapies

INTRODUCTION

More than fifty years after the first description of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) by Ashbaugh and colleagues, no specific treatment of the underlying pathophysiological processes is available. The current therapeutic regime is comprised of supportive measures such as lung protective ventilation, restrictive fluid management, paralyzing drugs, and prone positioning. Although vast improvements have been made in ARDS-treatment during the last five decades, mortality among patients with severe ARDS remains at an unacceptable rate of 45%. Areas covered: This article reviews the evolution of the currently used definition, established pathophysiological mechanism, highlights the current best clinical practice to treat ARDS, gives a brief outlook on cutting edge trends in ARDS research and closes with an expert opinion on the subject. Expert commentary: Individualizing the provided measures to specific genotypes is the key challenge in ARDS research today. The ongoing digital revolution will help to individualize ARDS-treatment and will therefore presumably improve survival and quality of life.