Long-term Assessment of NSAID Prescriptions and Potential Nephrotoxicity Risk in Adult Kidney Transplant Recipients

Assessing the Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice of Orthopedicians for Pain Management by Multimodal Approach: A Prospective, Cross-Sectional, and Observational Survey

BACKGROUND

The routine use of multimodal analgesic modality results in lower pain scores with minimum side effects and opioid utilization.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 A prospective, cross-sectional, observational study was conducted among orthopedicians practicing across India to assess the professional opinions on using analgesics to manage orthopedic pain effectively.

RESULTS

 A total of 530 orthopedicians participated in this survey. Over 50% of the participants responded that tramadol with or without paracetamol was the choice of therapy for acute pain. Nearly 50% of the participants mentioned that multimodal interventions can sometimes help to manage pain. A total of 55.6% of participants mentioned that using Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs was the most common in their clinical practice, while 25.7% of participants mentioned that they used tramadol more commonly in their clinical practice. As per clinical efficacy ranking, the combination of tramadol plus paracetamol (44.3%) was ranked first among analgesic combinations, followed by aceclofenac plus paracetamol (40.0%). The severity of pain (62.6%) followed by age (60.6%) and duration of therapy (52.6%) were the most common factors that should be considered while prescribing tramadol plus paracetamol combination. Gastrointestinal and renal are reported as the most common safety concerns encountered with analgesics.

CONCLUSION

 The combination of tramadol and paracetamol was identified as the most preferred choice of analgesics for prolonged orthopedic pain management.

Perioperative management of kidney transplantation in China: A national survey in 2021

Perioperative anaesthesia management has an important significance for kidney transplantation; however, the related consensus remains limited. An electronic survey with 44 questions was developed and sent to the chief anaesthesiologist at 115 non-military medical centres performing kidney transplantation in China through WeChat. A response rate of 81.7% was achieved from 94 of 115 non-military medical centres, where 94.4% of kidney transplants (10404 /11026) were completed in 2021. The result showed an overview of perioperative practice for kidney transplantations in China, identify the heterogeneity, and provide evidence for improving perioperative management of kidney transplantation. Some controversial therapy, such as hydroxyethyl starch, are still widely used, while some recommended methods are not widely available. More efforts on fluid management, hemodynamical monitoring, perioperative anaesthetics, and postoperative pain control are needed to improve the outcomes. Evidence-based guidelines for standardizing clinical practice are needed.

Use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in renal transplant patients: A retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Renal transplants are often prescribed non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for analgesic purposes.

OBJECTIVE

Considering the dearth of data, we carried out the present study to evaluate the use of various NSAIDs and the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) in transplant patients.

METHODS

A retrospective study amongst renal transplant patients prescribed at least one dose of NSAID was carried between January and December 2020 at the Department of Nephrology, Salmaniya Medical Complex, Kingdom of Bahrain. The patients' demographic details, serum creatinine values, and drug-related details were obtained. The Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria were used for defining AKI.

RESULTS

Eighty-seven patients were included. Forty-three patients were prescribed diclofenac, 60 received ibuprofen, six received indomethacin, 10 were administered mefenamic acid, and 11 received naproxen. Due to multiple courses of NSAID prescription, a total of 70 prescriptions were identified for diclofenac, 80 for ibuprofen, six for indomethacin, 11 for mefenamic acid, and 16 for naproxen. No significant differences were observed in the absolute (p = 0.08) and percent changes in serum creatinine (p = 0.1) between the NSAIDs. Twenty-eight (15.2%) courses of NSAID therapy met the KDIGO criteria for AKI. Age (OR: 1.1, 95% CI: 1.007, 1.2; p = 0.02), concomitant everolimus (OR: 483, 95% CI: 4.3, 54407; p = 0.01), and mycophenolate + cyclosporine + azathioprine (OR: 63.4E+006, 95% CI: 203.2157 to 19.8E+012; p = 0.005) administration were observed with significant risk of NSAID-induced AKI.

CONCLUSION

We observed possible NSAID-induced AKI to an extent of around 15.2% in our renal transplant patients. No significant differences were observed in the incidence of AKI between various NSAIDs and none of them had either graft failure or death.

A drug utilization and drug interaction study in renal transplant patients: Implications for an urgent need for drug deprescribing

BACKGROUND: Renal transplant patients receive several drugs concomitantly. OBJECTIVE: Limited literature exists evaluating the drug use in this population that is at high risk for drug-induced acute kidney injury and complications due to under-or over-dosage of immunosuppressant drugs due to drug–drug interactions. METHODS: A retrospective observational study was carried out in 269 renal transplant patients in whom either oral or parenteral drugs were evaluated. World Health Organization (WHO) indicators of drug utilization such as the average number of drugs prescribed, daily defined dose, and proportion of drugs listed as WHO essential drugs were evaluated. Details on the drugs with nephrotoxic potential were obtained. Drug–drug interactions were assessed concerning the severity (major, moderate, and minor) as well as type (pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and toxicity). RESULTS: One-hundred and ninety-eight drugs were administered to the study participants. The median (range) total number of drugs received by the study participants was 23 (6–55). The proportion of drugs listed in the WHO essential drug database was 57.1 (16.7–100)%. Forty-six drugs with potential nephrotoxicity and seven drugs that were contra-indicated in patients with chronic renal disease/end-stage renal disease were administered to the study participants. The mean (SD) numbers of drug interactions observed amongst the study participants were 18.4 (10.1). Age (β: 0.2, 95% CI: 0.1, 0.3) and duration of renal transplantation (β: −0.3, 95% CI: −0.5, −0.1) were the significant predictors of drug burden. A total of 645 drug interactions were identified amongst the study participants (major – 240; moderate – 270; and minor – 135) of which the majority were pharmacokinetic followed by toxicity risk. Age was significantly associated with the risk of potential drug interaction (OR: 2.6, 95% CI: 1.8, 12.4; p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Drug treatment in renal transplant patients poses a significant burden in terms of nephrotoxicity potential and drug–drug interactions. A dedicated ambulatory clinical pharmacy service monitoring the drug use coupled with drug deprescribing strategies are the need of the hour in this population.

Acute kidney injury associated with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are ones of the commonly prescribed drugs worldwide. They primarily inhibit cyclooxygenase (COX) enzyme which is responsible for conversion of phospholipids to various prostaglandins (PGs). Disruption in PGs production affects the kidneys in several ways, including vasoconstriction that may result in ischemic acute kidney injury (AKI) in at-risk patients. They also impair salt and water excretion, leading to edema and hypertension. Other complications include hyperkalemia, hyponatremia, nephrotic syndrome, acute interstitial nephritis and chronic kidney disease progression. AKI from NSAIDs is usually reversible with favorable prognosis after discontinuation of NSAIDs. Avoidance of NSAIDs exposure is extremely important, especially among high-risk patients.

Clausena Harmandiana root extract attenuated cognitive impairments via reducing amyloid accumulation and neuroinflammation in Aβ1-42-induced rats

BACKGROUND

Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathogenesis is associated with amyloid-β (Aβ)-induced neuroinflammation. In AD, the activation of microglia caused by Aβ accumulation is followed by the synthesis and release of pro-inflammatory cytokines, including interleukin-1β (IL-1β) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNFα), and ultimately leads to cognitive impairments. Clausena harmandiana (CH) is a medicinal plant in the Rutaceae family and has been used in folk medicine to relieve illnesses such as stomachache and headache, and as a health tonic. Interestingly, CH root extract (CHRE) has several anti-inflammatory and other pharmacological activities, but there are no studies in AD-like animal models.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to evaluate the effects of CHRE on cognitive impairments, increased Aβ_1-42 protein levels, and neuroinflammation in Aβ_1-42-induced rats.

METHODS

Forty-eight adult male Sprague-Dawley rats (250-300 g) were randomly divided into 6 groups (n = 8) of the sham control, V + Aβ, CB + Aβ CHRE125 + Aβ, CHRE250 + Aβ, and CHRE500 + Aβ. Sodium carboxymethylcellulose, Celebrex (10 mg/kg BW) and CHRE (125, 250, and 500 mg/kg BW) were given orally or without any treatment for 35 days. On day 21, aggregated Aβ_1-42 at a concentration of 1 μg/μl were injected into both lateral ventricles (1 μl/side) of all treated rats, while sterilized normal saline were injected to untreated rats. Ten days later, the novel object recognition test was performed to assess their recognition memory. At the end of the test period, an overdose of thiopental sodium (120 mg/kg BW) and transcardial perfusion with 0.9% normal saline solution were used to euthanize all rats. Then Aβ_1-42 protein levels and the expression of inflammatory markers (CD11b-positive microglia, IL-1β, and TNFα) were investigated in the cerebral cortex and hippocampus.

RESULTS

Pretreatment with CHRE at all doses could attenuate short- and long-term impairments in recognition memory. Additionally, CHRE also inhibited the increase of Aβ_1-42 protein levels and the expression of inflammatory markers in both brain regions as well as receiving Celebrex.

CONCLUSIONS

This suggests that preventive treatment of CHRE might be a potential therapy against cognitive impairments via reducing Aβ_1-42 protein levels and neuroinflammation caused by Aβ_1-42.

Analgesic use and associated adverse events in patients with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Treating pain in the context of chronic kidney disease (CKD) is challenging because of altered pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, with an increased risk of toxicity and drug adverse events in this population. The aims of this systematic review and meta-analysis were to assess the prevalence of analgesic use and establish the risk of analgesics-related adverse events, in patients with CKD.

METHODS

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. Medline, Embase, CINAHL, and CENTRAL were searched until January 2021. Random-effects meta-analyses and meta-regression were conducted to pool and summarise prevalence data and measures of association between analgesic use and adverse events.

RESULTS

Sixty-two studies relevant to the prevalence of analgesic use and 33 to analgesic-related adverse events were included, combining data on 2.3 and 3 million individuals, respectively. Pooled analyses found that 41% (95% confidence interval [CI], 35-48) of the CKD population regularly use analgesia. The annual period prevalence was estimated at 50% for opioids and 21% for nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID). Overall, 20% and 7% of patients with CKD are on chronic opioid or NSAID therapy, respectively. Opioid use was associated with an increased risk of death (1.61; 95% CI, 1.12-2.31; n= 7, I²= 91%), hospitalisation (1.38; 95% CI, 1.32-1.45; n=2, I²=0%), and fractures (1.51; 95% CI, 1.16-1.96; n=3, I²=54%).

CONCLUSION

High levels of analgesic consumption and related serious adverse outcomes were found in patients with CKD. Consideration needs to be given to how these patients are assessed and managed in order to minimise harms and improve outcomes.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

CRD42019156491 (PROSPERO).

NSAID prescriptions in kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Guidelines recommend that non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) be avoided in kidney transplant recipients due to potential nephrotoxicity. It is unclear whether physicians are following these recommendations.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult kidney transplant recipients from 2008 to 2017 in Alberta, Canada. We determined the frequency and prescriber of NSAID prescriptions, the proportion with serum creatinine and potassium testing post-fill, and the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI, serum creatinine increase of ≥ 50% or ≥ 26.5 μmol/L from baseline) and hyperkalemia (potassium ≥ 5.5 mmol/L) within 14 and 30 days.

RESULTS

Of the 1730 kidney transplant recipients, 189 (11%) had at least one NSAID prescription over a median follow-up of 5 years (IQR 2-9) (280 unique prescriptions). The majority were prescribed by family physicians (67%). Approximately 25% and 50% of prescriptions had serum creatinine and potassium testing within 14 and 30 days, respectively. Of those with lab measurements within 14 days, 13% of prescriptions were associated with AKI and 5% had hyperkalemia.

CONCLUSIONS

Contrary to guidelines, one in 10 kidney transplant recipients are prescribed an NSAID, and most do not get follow-up testing of graft function and hyperkalemia. These findings call for improved education of patients and primary care providers.

Evaluation of an opioid restrictive pain management initiative in adult kidney transplant recipients

PURPOSE

Evidence to guide opioid utilization following kidney transplantation is lacking. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the implementation of an opioid restrictive post-operative pain management protocol in adult kidney transplant recipients.

METHODS

We analyzed patients who underwent kidney transplant between 1/1/2017 to 8/15/2018. A standardized, opioid restrictive pain management protocol was implemented in February 2018. The primary outcome was quantity of opioid tablets prescribed at discharge. Secondary outcomes included amount of opioid prescribed within first 30 days, number of patient calls for pain, and opioid prescription in electronic medical record (EMR) at 90 days and 1 year.

RESULTS

After implementation, significantly fewer opioid tablets were prescribed at discharge (4 vs. 60 tablets, p < .001) and less oral morphine milligram equivalence (OME) were prescribed within 30 days of transplant (38 vs. 300, p < .001). In cohort 2, fewer patients received more than one opioid prescription, more patients received truncal block and only 5 patients received patient controlled analgesia compared to all in cohort 1.

CONCLUSION

A standardized, patient-centered pain management strategy after kidney transplantation reduced opioid prescribing without increasing readmissions or clinic calls. This data may be used to inform guidelines for appropriate OME prescribing at discharge after kidney transplantation.

Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) before and after Kidney Transplantation: Causes, Medical Approach, and Implications for the Long-Term Outcomes

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common finding in kidney donors and recipients. AKI in kidney donor, which increases the risk of delayed graft function (DGF), may not by itself jeopardize the short- and long-term outcome of transplantation. However, some forms of AKI may induce graft rejection, fibrosis, and eventually graft dysfunction. Therefore, various strategies have been proposed to identify conditions at highest risk of AKI-induced DGF, that can be treated by targeting the donor, the recipient, or even the graft itself with the use of perfusion machines. AKI that occurs early post-transplant after a period of initial recovery of graft function may reflect serious and often occult systemic complications that may require prompt intervention to prevent graft loss. AKI that develops long after transplantation is often related to nephrotoxic drug reactions. In symptomatic patients, AKI is usually associated with various systemic medical complications and could represent a risk of mortality. Electronic systems have been developed to alert transplant physicians that AKI has occurred in a transplant recipient during long-term outpatient follow-up. Herein, we will review most recent understandings of pathophysiology, diagnosis, therapeutic approach, and short- and long-term consequences of AKI occurring in both the donor and in the kidney transplant recipient.

Practice Advisory on the Appropriate Use of NSAIDs in Primary Care

Cyclo-oxygenase (COX)-2 selective and nonselective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are important in managing acute and chronic pain secondary to inflammation. As a greater understanding of the risks of gastrointestinal (GI), cardiovascular (CV) and renal events with NSAIDs use has emerged, guidelines have evolved to reflect differences in risks among NSAIDs. Updated guidelines have yet to reflect new evidence from recent trials which showed similar CV event rates with celecoxib compared to naproxen and ibuprofen, and significantly better GI tolerability for celecoxib. This practice advisory paper aims to present consensus statements and associated guidance regarding appropriate NSAID use based on a review of current evidence by a multidisciplinary group of expert clinicians. This paper is especially intended to guide primary care practitioners within Asia in the appropriate use of NSAIDs in primary care. Following a literature review, group members used a modified Delphi consensus process to determine agreement with selected recommendations. Agreement with a statement by 75% of total voting members was defined a priori as consensus. For low GI risk patients, any nonselective NSAID plus proton pump inhibitor (PPI) or celecoxib alone is acceptable treatment when CV risk is low; for high CV risk patients, low-dose celecoxib or naproxen plus PPI is appropriate. For high GI risk patients, celecoxib plus PPI is acceptable for low CV risk patients; low-dose celecoxib plus PPI is appropriate for high CV risk patients, with the alternative to avoid NSAIDs and consider opioids instead. Appropriate NSAID prescription assumes that the patient has normal renal function at commencement, with ongoing monitoring recommended. In conclusion, appropriate NSAID use requires consideration of all risks.

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) and Transplantation: Pharmacotherapeutic Management of Immunosuppression Regimen

The 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) was first detected in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China, in late 2019. Since then, COVID-19 has spread to more than 200 countries in the world, and a global pandemic has been declared by the World Health Organization (WHO). At present, no vaccines or therapeutic regimens with proven efficacy are available for the management of COVID-19. Hydroxychloroquine/chloroquine, lopinavir/ritonavir, ribavirin, interferons, umifenovir, remdesivir, and interleukin antagonists, such as tocilizumab, have been recommended as potential treatment options in COVID-19. Transplant patients receiving immunosuppressant medications are at the highest risk of severe illness from COVID-19. At the same time, with regard to receiving polypharmacy and immunosuppressants, treatment options should be chosen with more attention in this population. Considering drug-drug interactions and adverse effects of medications used for the treatment of COVID-19, such as QT prolongation, the dose reduction of some immunosuppressants or avoidance is recommended in transplant recipients with COVID-19. Thus, this narrative review describes clinically important considerations about the treatment of COVID-19 and immunosuppressive regimens regarding modifications, side effects, and interactions in adult kidney or liver allograft recipients.

NSAIDs in CKD: Are They Safe?

The management of pain in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is challenging for many reasons. These patients have increased susceptibility to adverse drug effects due to altered drug metabolism and excretion, and there are limited safety data for use in this population despite a high pain burden. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have long been regarded as dangerous for use in patients with CKD because of their risk for nephrotoxicity and thus alternative classes of analgesics, including opioids, have become more commonly used for pain control in this population. Given the well-established risks that opioids and other analgesics pose, further characterization of the risk posed by NSAIDs in patients with CKD is warranted. NSAID use has been associated with acute kidney injury, progressive loss of glomerular filtration rate in CKD, electrolyte derangements, and hypervolemia with worsening of heart failure and hypertension. The risk for these nephrotoxicity syndromes is modified by many comorbid conditions, risk factors, and characteristics of use, and in patients with CKD, the risk differs between levels of glomerular filtration rate. In this review, we offer recommendations for the cautious use of NSAIDs in the CKD population after careful consideration of these risk factors on an individualized basis.

Leflunomide increased the renal exposure of acyclovir by inhibiting OAT1/3 and MRP2

Rheumatoid arthritis patients can be prescribed a combination of immunosuppressive drug leflunomide (LEF) and the antiviral drug acyclovir to reduce the high risk of infection. Acyclovir is a substrate of organic anion transporter (OAT) 1/3 and multidrug resistance-associated protein (MRP) 2. Considering the extraordinarily long half-life of LEF's active metabolite teriflunomide (TER) and the kidney injury risk of acyclovir, it is necessary to elucidate the potential impact of LEF on the disposition of acyclovir. Here we used a specific MRP inhibitor MK571 and probenecid (OAT1/3 and MRP2 inhibitor) to assess the effects of MRP2 and OAT1/3 on the pharmacokinetics and tissue distribution of acyclovir in rats. We showed that LEF and probenecid, but not MK571 significantly increased the plasma concentration of acyclovir. However, kidney and liver exposures of acyclovir were increased when coadministered with LEF, probenecid or MK571. The kidney/plasma ratio of acyclovir was increased to approximately 2-fold by LEF or probenecid, whereas it was increased to as much as 14.5-fold by MK571. Consistently, these drugs markedly decreased the urinary excretion of acyclovir. TER (0.5-100 μmol/L) dose-dependently increased the accumulation of acyclovir in MRP2-MDCK cells with an IC₅₀ value of 4.91 μmol/L. TER (5 μmol/L) significantly inhibited the uptake of acyclovir in hOAT1/3-HEK293 cells. These results suggest that LEF/TER increased the kidney accumulation of acyclovir by inhibiting the efflux transporter MRP2, which increased its kidney/plasma ratio and renal injury risk. However, the inhibitory effects of LEF/TER on OAT1/3 reduced the tubular cells' uptake of acyclovir and increased the plasma concentration.

Influence of opioid prescribing standards on drug use among patients with long-term opioid use: a longitudinal cohort study

BACKGROUND

In mid-2016, the College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia (CPSBC) issued prescribing standards and guidelines relating to opioid drugs. We evaluated the impact of these regulatory standards and guidelines on prescription drug use among patients in the province with long-term opioid use.

METHODS

We conducted a cohort study with monthly repeated measures using administrative health data in British Columbia. Patients with long-term prescription opioid use were followed for a 12-month prepolicy period and 10-month postpolicy period, and were compared with a historical control cohort. We excluded patients with a history of long-term care, palliative care or cancer. We estimated changes in use of opioids, high-dose opioids (> 90 mg of morphine equivalents/d), opioids with sedatives/hypnotics, and opioid discontinuation.

RESULTS

The study population included 68 113 patients in the policy cohort and 68 429 patients in the historical control cohort. Following the introduction of the standards and guidelines, the average monthly use of opioids declined (adjusted difference -57 mg of morphine equivalents, 95% confidence interval [CI] -74 to -39) and discontinuation of opioids increased (odds ratio [OR] 1.24, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.32). Among patients prescribed high-dose opioids, switching to lower-dose opioids increased (OR 1.88, 95% CI 1.63 to 2.17), but discontinuation did not change significantly (OR 1.21, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.59).

INTERPRETATION

The CPSBC's regulatory standards and guidelines were associated with modestly reduced opioid use and increased switching from high-dose to lower-dose opioids among patients with long-term use of prescribed opioids. Assessment of the potential impacts on health outcomes will be necessary for understanding the implications of the standards and guidelines.