1
|
Lefaucheur JP, Moro E, Shirota Y, Ugawa Y, Grippe T, Chen R, Benninger DH, Jabbari B, Attaripour S, Hallett M, Paulus W. Clinical neurophysiology in the treatment of movement disorders: IFCN handbook chapter. Clin Neurophysiol 2024; 164:57-99. [PMID: 38852434 PMCID: PMC11418354 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2024.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2023] [Revised: 03/02/2024] [Accepted: 05/15/2024] [Indexed: 06/11/2024]
Abstract
In this review, different aspects of the use of clinical neurophysiology techniques for the treatment of movement disorders are addressed. First of all, these techniques can be used to guide neuromodulation techniques or to perform therapeutic neuromodulation as such. Neuromodulation includes invasive techniques based on the surgical implantation of electrodes and a pulse generator, such as deep brain stimulation (DBS) or spinal cord stimulation (SCS) on the one hand, and non-invasive techniques aimed at modulating or even lesioning neural structures by transcranial application. Movement disorders are one of the main areas of indication for the various neuromodulation techniques. This review focuses on the following techniques: DBS, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), low-intensity transcranial electrical stimulation, including transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS), and focused ultrasound (FUS), including high-intensity magnetic resonance-guided FUS (MRgFUS), and pulsed mode low-intensity transcranial FUS stimulation (TUS). The main clinical conditions in which neuromodulation has proven its efficacy are Parkinson's disease, dystonia, and essential tremor, mainly using DBS or MRgFUS. There is also some evidence for Tourette syndrome (DBS), Huntington's disease (DBS), cerebellar ataxia (tDCS), and axial signs (SCS) and depression (rTMS) in PD. The development of non-invasive transcranial neuromodulation techniques is limited by the short-term clinical impact of these techniques, especially rTMS, in the context of very chronic diseases. However, at-home use (tDCS) or current advances in the design of closed-loop stimulation (tACS) may open new perspectives for the application of these techniques in patients, favored by their easier use and lower rate of adverse effects compared to invasive or lesioning methods. Finally, this review summarizes the evidence for keeping the use of electromyography to optimize the identification of muscles to be treated with botulinum toxin injection, which is indicated and widely performed for the treatment of various movement disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean-Pascal Lefaucheur
- Clinical Neurophysiology Unit, Henri Mondor University Hospital, AP-HP, Créteil, France; EA 4391, ENT Team, Paris-Est Créteil University, Créteil, France.
| | - Elena Moro
- Grenoble Alpes University, Division of Neurology, CHU of Grenoble, Grenoble Institute of Neuroscience, Grenoble, France
| | - Yuichiro Shirota
- Department of Neurology, Division of Neuroscience, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoshikazu Ugawa
- Department of Human Neurophysiology, School of Medicine, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Talyta Grippe
- Division of Neurology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Neuroscience Graduate Program, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil; Krembil Brain Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Robert Chen
- Division of Neurology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Krembil Brain Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - David H Benninger
- Service of Neurology, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Bahman Jabbari
- Department of Neurology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Sanaz Attaripour
- Department of Neurology, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Mark Hallett
- Human Motor Control Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Walter Paulus
- Department of Neurology, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cash RFH, Zalesky A. Personalized and Circuit-Based Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: Evidence, Controversies, and Opportunities. Biol Psychiatry 2024; 95:510-522. [PMID: 38040047 DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2023.11.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2023] [Revised: 11/13/2023] [Accepted: 11/18/2023] [Indexed: 12/03/2023]
Abstract
The development of neuroimaging methodologies to map brain connectivity has transformed our understanding of psychiatric disorders, the distributed effects of brain stimulation, and how transcranial magnetic stimulation can be best employed to target and ameliorate psychiatric symptoms. In parallel, neuroimaging research has revealed that higher-order brain regions such as the prefrontal cortex, which represent the most common therapeutic brain stimulation targets for psychiatric disorders, show some of the highest levels of interindividual variation in brain connectivity. These findings provide the rationale for personalized target site selection based on person-specific brain network architecture. Recent advances have made it possible to determine reproducible personalized targets with millimeter precision in clinically tractable acquisition times. These advances enable the potential advantages of spatially personalized transcranial magnetic stimulation targeting to be evaluated and translated to basic and clinical applications. In this review, we outline the motivation for target site personalization, preliminary support (mostly in depression), convergent evidence from other brain stimulation modalities, and generalizability beyond depression and the prefrontal cortex. We end by detailing methodological recommendations, controversies, and notable alternatives. Overall, while this research area appears highly promising, the value of personalized targeting remains unclear, and dedicated large prospective randomized clinical trials using validated methodology are critical.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robin F H Cash
- Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre and Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
| | - Andrew Zalesky
- Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre and Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wilkins KB, Melbourne JA, Akella P, Bronte-Stewart HM. Unraveling the complexities of programming neural adaptive deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease. Front Hum Neurosci 2023; 17:1310393. [PMID: 38094147 PMCID: PMC10716917 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1310393] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2023] [Accepted: 11/09/2023] [Indexed: 02/01/2024] Open
Abstract
Over the past three decades, deep brain stimulation (DBS) for Parkinson's disease (PD) has been applied in a continuous open loop fashion, unresponsive to changes in a given patient's state or symptoms over the course of a day. Advances in recent neurostimulator technology enable the possibility for closed loop adaptive DBS (aDBS) for PD as a treatment option in the near future in which stimulation adjusts in a demand-based manner. Although aDBS offers great clinical potential for treatment of motor symptoms, it also brings with it the need for better understanding how to implement it in order to maximize its benefits. In this perspective, we outline considerations for programing several key parameters for aDBS based on our experience across several aDBS-capable research neurostimulators. At its core, aDBS hinges on successful identification of relevant biomarkers that can be measured reliably in real-time working in cohesion with a control policy that governs stimulation adaption. However, auxiliary parameters such as the window in which stimulation is allowed to adapt, as well as the rate it changes, can be just as impactful on performance and vary depending on the control policy and patient. A standardize protocol for programming aDBS will be crucial to ensuring its effective application in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin B. Wilkins
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Jillian A. Melbourne
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Pranav Akella
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Helen M. Bronte-Stewart
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hacker ML, Rajamani N, Neudorfer C, Hollunder B, Oxenford S, Li N, Sternberg AL, Davis TL, Konrad PE, Horn A, Charles D. Connectivity Profile for Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation in Early Stage Parkinson Disease. Ann Neurol 2023; 94:271-284. [PMID: 37177857 PMCID: PMC10846105 DOI: 10.1002/ana.26674] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2023] [Revised: 04/18/2023] [Accepted: 05/09/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study was undertaken to describe relationships between electrode localization and motor outcomes from the subthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation (DBS) in early stage Parkinson disease (PD) pilot clinical trial. METHODS To determine anatomical and network correlates associated with motor outcomes for subjects randomized to early DBS (n = 14), voxelwise sweet spot mapping and structural connectivity analyses were carried out using outcomes of motor progression (Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale Part III [UPDRS-III] 7-day OFF scores [∆baseline➔24 months, MedOFF/StimOFF]) and symptomatic motor improvement (UPDRS-III ON scores [%∆baseline➔24 months, MedON/StimON]). RESULTS Sweet spot mapping revealed a location associated with slower motor progression in the dorsolateral STN (anterior/posterior commissure coordinates: 11.07 ± 0.82mm lateral, 1.83 ± 0.61mm posterior, 3.53 ± 0.38mm inferior to the midcommissural point; Montreal Neurological Institute coordinates: +11.25, -13.56, -7.44mm). Modulating fiber tracts from supplementary motor area (SMA) and primary motor cortex (M1) to the STN correlated with slower motor progression across STN DBS subjects, whereas fiber tracts originating from pre-SMA and cerebellum were negatively associated with motor progression. Robustness of the fiber tract model was demonstrated in leave-one-patient-out (R = 0.56, p = 0.02), 5-fold (R = 0.50, p = 0.03), and 10-fold (R = 0.53, p = 0.03) cross-validation paradigms. The sweet spot and fiber tracts associated with motor progression revealed strong similarities to symptomatic motor improvement sweet spot and connectivity in this early stage PD cohort. INTERPRETATION These results suggest that stimulating the dorsolateral region of the STN receiving input from M1 and SMA (but not pre-SMA) is associated with slower motor progression across subjects receiving STN DBS in early stage PD. This finding is hypothesis-generating and must be prospectively tested in a larger study. ANN NEUROL 2023;94:271-284.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mallory L Hacker
- Department of Neurology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Nanditha Rajamani
- Movement Disorder and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Department of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Free University of Berlin and Humboldt University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Clemens Neudorfer
- Center for Brain Circuit Therapeutics, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Barbara Hollunder
- Movement Disorder and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Department of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Free University of Berlin and Humboldt University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Einstein Center for Neurosciences Berlin, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Berlin School of Mind and Brain, Humboldt University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Simon Oxenford
- Movement Disorder and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Department of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Free University of Berlin and Humboldt University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ningfei Li
- Movement Disorder and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Department of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Free University of Berlin and Humboldt University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Alice L Sternberg
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Thomas L Davis
- Department of Neurology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Peter E Konrad
- Department of Neurosurgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA
| | - Andreas Horn
- Movement Disorder and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Department of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Free University of Berlin and Humboldt University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Center for Brain Circuit Therapeutics, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery and Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - David Charles
- Department of Neurology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Vu J, Bhusal B, Rosenow J, Pilitsis J, Golestanirad L. Optimizing the trajectory of deep brain stimulation leads reduces RF heating during MRI at 3 T: Characteristics and clinical translation. ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY. IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY. ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE 2023; 2023:1-5. [PMID: 38083480 PMCID: PMC10838567 DOI: 10.1109/embc40787.2023.10340979] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2023]
Abstract
Radiofrequency (RF) induced tissue heating around deep brain stimulation (DBS) leads is a well-known safety risk during magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), hindering routine protocols for patients. Known factors that contribute to variations in the magnitude of RF heating across patients include the implanted lead's trajectory and its orientation with respect to the MRI electric fields. Currently, there are no consistent requirements for surgically implanting the extracranial portion of the DBS lead. Recent studies have shown that incorporating concentric loops in the extracranial trajectory of the lead can reduce RF heating, but the optimal positioning of the loop is unknown. In this study, we evaluated RF heating of 77 unique lead trajectories to determine how different characteristics of the trajectory affect RF heating during MRI at 3 T. We performed phantom experiments with commercial DBS systems from two manufacturers to determine how consistently modifying the lead trajectory mitigates RF heating. We also presented the first surgical implementation of these modified trajectories in patients. Low-heating trajectories included small concentric loops near the surgical burr hole which were readily implemented during the surgical procedure; these trajectories generated nearly a 2-fold reduction in RF heating compared to unmodified trajectories.Clinical Relevance- Surgically modifying the DBS lead trajectory can be a cost-effective strategy for reducing RF-induced heating during MRI at 3 T.
Collapse
|
6
|
Neumann WJ, Horn A, Kühn AA. Insights and opportunities for deep brain stimulation as a brain circuit intervention. Trends Neurosci 2023; 46:472-487. [PMID: 37105806 DOI: 10.1016/j.tins.2023.03.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2022] [Revised: 03/13/2023] [Accepted: 03/17/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023]
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective treatment and has provided unique insights into the dynamic circuit architecture of brain disorders. This Review illustrates our current understanding of the pathophysiology of movement disorders and their underlying brain circuits that are modulated with DBS. It proposes principles of pathological network synchronization patterns like beta activity (13-35 Hz) in Parkinson's disease. We describe alterations from microscale including local synaptic activity via modulation of mesoscale hypersynchronization to changes in whole-brain macroscale connectivity. Finally, an outlook on advances for clinical innovations in next-generation neurotechnology is provided: from preoperative connectomic targeting to feedback controlled closed-loop adaptive DBS as individualized network-specific brain circuit interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wolf-Julian Neumann
- Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Einstein Center for Neurosciences Berlin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Andreas Horn
- Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Einstein Center for Neurosciences Berlin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Center for Brain Circuit Therapeutics, Department of Neurology, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; MGH Neurosurgery & Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery at MGH Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Andrea A Kühn
- Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Einstein Center for Neurosciences Berlin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany; NeuroCure Clinical Research Centre, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Berlin School of Mind and Brain, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany; DZNE, German Center for Degenerative Diseases, Berlin, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lead-DBS v3.0: Mapping deep brain stimulation effects to local anatomy and global networks. Neuroimage 2023; 268:119862. [PMID: 36610682 PMCID: PMC10144063 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.119862] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 34.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2022] [Revised: 12/22/2022] [Accepted: 01/03/2023] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Following its introduction in 2014 and with support of a broad international community, the open-source toolbox Lead-DBS has evolved into a comprehensive neuroimaging platform dedicated to localizing, reconstructing, and visualizing electrodes implanted in the human brain, in the context of deep brain stimulation (DBS) and epilepsy monitoring. Expanding clinical indications for DBS, increasing availability of related research tools, and a growing community of clinician-scientist researchers, however, have led to an ongoing need to maintain, update, and standardize the codebase of Lead-DBS. Major development efforts of the platform in recent years have now yielded an end-to-end solution for DBS-based neuroimaging analysis allowing comprehensive image preprocessing, lead localization, stimulation volume modeling, and statistical analysis within a single tool. The aim of the present manuscript is to introduce fundamental additions to the Lead-DBS pipeline including a deformation warpfield editor and novel algorithms for electrode localization. Furthermore, we introduce a total of three comprehensive tools to map DBS effects to local, tract- and brain network-levels. These updates are demonstrated using a single patient example (for subject-level analysis), as well as a retrospective cohort of 51 Parkinson's disease patients who underwent DBS of the subthalamic nucleus (for group-level analysis). Their applicability is further demonstrated by comparing the various methodological choices and the amount of explained variance in clinical outcomes across analysis streams. Finally, based on an increasing need to standardize folder and file naming specifications across research groups in neuroscience, we introduce the brain imaging data structure (BIDS) derivative standard for Lead-DBS. Thus, this multi-institutional collaborative effort represents an important stage in the evolution of a comprehensive, open-source pipeline for DBS imaging and connectomics.
Collapse
|
8
|
Ríos AS, Oxenford S, Neudorfer C, Butenko K, Li N, Rajamani N, Boutet A, Elias GJB, Germann J, Loh A, Deeb W, Wang F, Setsompop K, Salvato B, Almeida LBD, Foote KD, Amaral R, Rosenberg PB, Tang-Wai DF, Wolk DA, Burke AD, Salloway S, Sabbagh MN, Chakravarty MM, Smith GS, Lyketsos CG, Okun MS, Anderson WS, Mari Z, Ponce FA, Lozano AM, Horn A. Optimal deep brain stimulation sites and networks for stimulation of the fornix in Alzheimer's disease. Nat Commun 2022; 13:7707. [PMID: 36517479 PMCID: PMC9751139 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-34510-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2021] [Accepted: 10/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) to the fornix is an investigational treatment for patients with mild Alzheimer's Disease. Outcomes from randomized clinical trials have shown that cognitive function improved in some patients but deteriorated in others. This could be explained by variance in electrode placement leading to differential engagement of neural circuits. To investigate this, we performed a post-hoc analysis on a multi-center cohort of 46 patients with DBS to the fornix (NCT00658125, NCT01608061). Using normative structural and functional connectivity data, we found that stimulation of the circuit of Papez and stria terminalis robustly associated with cognitive improvement (R = 0.53, p < 0.001). On a local level, the optimal stimulation site resided at the direct interface between these structures (R = 0.48, p < 0.001). Finally, modulating specific distributed brain networks related to memory accounted for optimal outcomes (R = 0.48, p < 0.001). Findings were robust to multiple cross-validation designs and may define an optimal network target that could refine DBS surgery and programming.
Collapse
Grants
- P30 AG066507 NIA NIH HHS
- R01 NS127892 NINDS NIH HHS
- R01 MH113929 NIMH NIH HHS
- R01 MH130666 NIMH NIH HHS
- P30 AG072979 NIA NIH HHS
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation)
- Received grants and personal fees from Medtronic and Boston Scientific, grants from Abbott/St. Jude, and Functional Neuromodulation outside the submitted work.
- Received grants from Functional Neuromodulation during conduct of this study, grants and personal fees from Avid/Lily, and Merck, personal fees from Jannsen, GE Healthcare, Biogen and Neuronix outside the submitted work.
- Receives personal fees from Elsai, Lilly, Roche Novartis and Biogen outside the submitted work.
- Received personal fees from Allergan, Biogen, Roche-Genentech, Cortexyme, Bracket, Sanofi, and other type of support from Brain Health Inc and uMethod Health outside of the submitted work.
- Received grants from Functional Neuromodulation Inc. during conduct of this study, from Avanir and Eli Lily and NFL Benefits Office outside of the submitted work.
- Received grants from NIH, Tourette Association of America Grant, Parkinson’s Alliance, Smallwood Foundation, and personal fees from Parkinson’s Foundation Medical Director, Books4Patients, American Academy of Neurology, Peerview, WebMD/Medscape, Mededicus, Movement Disorders Society, Taylor and Francis, Demos, Robert Rose and non-financial support from Medtronic outside of the submitted work.
- Received grants from Medtronic and Functional Neuromodulation during conduct of this study, personal fees from Medtronic, St. Jude, Boston Scientific, and Functional Neuromodulation outside of submitted work
- Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (German Centre for Air and Space Travel)
- National Institutes of Health (R01 13478451, 1R01NS127892-01 & 2R01 MH113929) New Venture Fund (FFOR Seed Grant).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Sofía Ríos
- Movement Disorder and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Simón Oxenford
- Movement Disorder and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Clemens Neudorfer
- Movement Disorder and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Konstantin Butenko
- Movement Disorder and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ningfei Li
- Movement Disorder and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Nanditha Rajamani
- Movement Disorder and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Alexandre Boutet
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5T2S8, Canada
- Krembil Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5T2S8, Canada
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5T1W7, Canada
| | - Gavin J B Elias
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5T2S8, Canada
- Krembil Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5T2S8, Canada
| | - Jurgen Germann
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5T2S8, Canada
- Krembil Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5T2S8, Canada
| | - Aaron Loh
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5T2S8, Canada
- Krembil Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5T2S8, Canada
| | - Wissam Deeb
- UMass Chan Medical School, Department of Neurology, Worcester, MA, 01655, USA
- UMass Memorial Health, Department of Neurology, Worcester, MA, 01655, USA
| | - Fuyixue Wang
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA
- Harvard-MIT Health Sciences and Technology, MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Kawin Setsompop
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA
- Harvard-MIT Health Sciences and Technology, MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Bryan Salvato
- University of Florida Health Jacksonville, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Leonardo Brito de Almeida
- Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Kelly D Foote
- Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Robert Amaral
- Cerebral Imaging Centre, Douglas Research Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Paul B Rosenberg
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences and Richman Family Precision Medicine Center of Excellence, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - David F Tang-Wai
- Krembil Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5T2S8, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Division of Neurology, University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5T2S8, Canada
| | - David A Wolk
- Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Stephen Salloway
- Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior and Neurology, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
- Memory & Aging Program, Butler Hospital, Providence, USA
| | | | - M Mallar Chakravarty
- Cerebral Imaging Centre, Douglas Research Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Biological and Biomedical Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Gwenn S Smith
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences and Richman Family Precision Medicine Center of Excellence, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Constantine G Lyketsos
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences and Richman Family Precision Medicine Center of Excellence, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Michael S Okun
- Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | | | - Zoltan Mari
- Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Cleveland Clinic Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health, Las Vegas, NV, USA
| | | | - Andres M Lozano
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5T2S8, Canada
- Krembil Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5T2S8, Canada
| | - Andreas Horn
- Movement Disorder and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
- Center for Brain Circuit Therapeutics, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
- Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lofredi R, Auernig CG, Ewert S, Irmen F, Steiner LA, Scheller U, van Wijk BCM, Oxenford S, Kühn AA, Horn A. Interrater reliability of deep brain stimulation electrode localizations. Neuroimage 2022; 262:119552. [PMID: 35981644 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2022] [Revised: 07/15/2022] [Accepted: 08/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Lead-DBS is an open-source, semi-automatized and widely applied software tool facilitating precise localization of deep brain stimulation electrodes both in native as well as in standardized stereotactic space. While automatized preprocessing steps within the toolbox have been tested and validated in previous studies, the interrater reliability in manual refinements of electrode localizations using the tool has not been objectified so far. Here, we investigate the variance introduced in this processing step by different raters when localizing electrodes based on postoperative CT or MRI. Furthermore, we compare the performance of novel trainees that received a structured training and more experienced raters with an expert user. We show that all users yield similar results with an average difference in localizations ranging between 0.52-0.75 mm with 0.07-0.12 mm increases in variability when using postoperative MRI and following normalization to standard space. Our findings may pave the way toward formal training for using Lead-DBS and demonstrate its reliability and ease-of-use for imaging research in the field of deep brain stimulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roxanne Lofredi
- Department of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany.
| | - Cem-Georg Auernig
- Department of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Siobhan Ewert
- Department of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Friederike Irmen
- Department of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Leon A Steiner
- Department of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany
| | - Ute Scheller
- Department of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Department of Neurology, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Bernadette C M van Wijk
- Department of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Department of Human Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Neurology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Simon Oxenford
- Department of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Andrea A Kühn
- Department of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience, Humboldt-Universität, Berlin, Germany; NeuroCure, Exzellenzcluster, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; DZNE, German center for neurodegenerative diseases, Berlin, Germany; Berlin School of Mind and Brain, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
| | - Andreas Horn
- Department of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Center for Brain Circuit Therapeutics Department of Neurology Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School; MGH Neurosurgery & Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery (CNTR) at MGH Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Nuzov NB, Bhusal B, Henry KR, Jiang F, Rosenow J, Elahi B, Golestanirad L. True location of deep brain stimulation electrodes differs from what is seen on postoperative magnetic resonance images: An anthropomorphic phantom study. ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY. IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY. ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE 2022; 2022:1863-1866. [PMID: 36086639 PMCID: PMC10848148 DOI: 10.1109/embc48229.2022.9871619] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established yet growing treatment for a range of neurological and psychiatric disorders. Over the last decade, numerous studies have underscored the effect of electrode placement on the clinical outcome of DBS. As a result, imaging is now extensively used for DBS electrode localization, even though the accuracy of different modalities in determining the true coordinates of DBS electrodes is less explored. Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a gold standard method for DBS electrode localization, however, the geometrical distortion induced by the lead's artifact could limit the accuracy. In this work, we investigated to what degree the difference between the true location of the lead's tip and the location of the tip estimated from the MRI artifact varies depending on the MRI sequence parameters, acquisition plane, phase encoding direction, and the implant"s extracranial trajectory. Clinical Relevance- Results will help researchers and clinicians to estimate the true location of DBS leads and contacts from postoperative MRI scans.
Collapse
|
11
|
Oxenford S, Roediger J, Neudorfer C, Milosevic L, Güttler C, Spindler P, Vajkoczy P, Neumann WJ, Kühn A, Horn A. Lead-OR: A multimodal platform for deep brain stimulation surgery. eLife 2022; 11:e72929. [PMID: 35594135 PMCID: PMC9177150 DOI: 10.7554/elife.72929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2021] [Accepted: 05/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Deep brain stimulation (DBS) electrode implant trajectories are stereotactically defined using preoperative neuroimaging. To validate the correct trajectory, microelectrode recordings (MERs) or local field potential recordings can be used to extend neuroanatomical information (defined by MRI) with neurophysiological activity patterns recorded from micro- and macroelectrodes probing the surgical target site. Currently, these two sources of information (imaging vs. electrophysiology) are analyzed separately, while means to fuse both data streams have not been introduced. Methods Here, we present a tool that integrates resources from stereotactic planning, neuroimaging, MER, and high-resolution atlas data to create a real-time visualization of the implant trajectory. We validate the tool based on a retrospective cohort of DBS patients (N = 52) offline and present single-use cases of the real-time platform. Results We establish an open-source software tool for multimodal data visualization and analysis during DBS surgery. We show a general correspondence between features derived from neuroimaging and electrophysiological recordings and present examples that demonstrate the functionality of the tool. Conclusions This novel software platform for multimodal data visualization and analysis bears translational potential to improve accuracy of DBS surgery. The toolbox is made openly available and is extendable to integrate with additional software packages. Funding Deutsche Forschungsgesellschaft (410169619, 424778381), Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DynaSti), National Institutes of Health (2R01 MH113929), and Foundation for OCD Research (FFOR).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simón Oxenford
- Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité — Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu BerlinBerlinGermany
| | - Jan Roediger
- Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité — Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu BerlinBerlinGermany
- Charité — Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Einstein Center for Neurosciences BerlinBerlinGermany
| | - Clemens Neudorfer
- Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité — Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu BerlinBerlinGermany
- Center for Brain Circuit Therapeutics Department of Neurology, Brigham & Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUnited States
- MGH Neurosurgery & Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery (CNTR) at MGH Neurology Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUnited States
| | - Luka Milosevic
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of TorontoTorontoCanada
- Krembil Brain Institute, University Health NetworkTorontoCanada
| | - Christopher Güttler
- Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité — Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu BerlinBerlinGermany
| | - Philipp Spindler
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité — Universitätsmedizin BerlinBerlinGermany
| | - Peter Vajkoczy
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité — Universitätsmedizin BerlinBerlinGermany
| | - Wolf-Julian Neumann
- Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité — Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu BerlinBerlinGermany
| | - Andrea Kühn
- Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité — Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu BerlinBerlinGermany
| | - Andreas Horn
- Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité — Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu BerlinBerlinGermany
- Center for Brain Circuit Therapeutics Department of Neurology, Brigham & Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUnited States
- MGH Neurosurgery & Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery (CNTR) at MGH Neurology Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUnited States
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Meier JM, Perdikis D, Blickensdörfer A, Stefanovski L, Liu Q, Maith O, Dinkelbach HÜ, Baladron J, Hamker FH, Ritter P. Virtual deep brain stimulation: Multiscale co-simulation of a spiking basal ganglia model and a whole-brain mean-field model with the virtual brain. Exp Neurol 2022; 354:114111. [DOI: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2022.114111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2021] [Revised: 04/04/2022] [Accepted: 05/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
|
13
|
Castillo-Barnes D, Jimenez-Mesa C, Martinez-Murcia FJ, Salas-Gonzalez D, Ramírez J, Górriz JM. Quantifying Differences Between Affine and Nonlinear Spatial Normalization of FP-CIT Spect Images. Int J Neural Syst 2022; 32:2250019. [PMID: 35313792 DOI: 10.1142/s0129065722500198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Spatial normalization helps us to compare quantitatively two or more input brain scans. Although using an affine normalization approach preserves the anatomical structures, the neuroimaging field is more common to find works that make use of nonlinear transformations. The main reason is that they facilitate a voxel-wise comparison, not only when studying functional images but also when comparing MRI scans given that they fit better to a reference template. However, the amount of bias introduced by the nonlinear transformations can potentially alter the final outcome of a diagnosis especially when studying functional scans for neurological disorders like Parkinson's Disease. In this context, we have tried to quantify the bias introduced by the affine and the nonlinear spatial registration of FP-CIT SPECT volumes of healthy control subjects and patients with PD. For that purpose, we calculated the deformation fields of each participant and applied these deformation fields to a 3D-grid. As the space between the edges of small cubes comprising the grid change, we can quantify which parts from the brain have been enlarged, compressed or just remain the same. When the nonlinear approach is applied, scans from PD patients show a region near their striatum very similar in shape to that of healthy subjects. This artificially increases the interclass separation between patients with PD and healthy subjects as the local intensity is decreased in the latter region, and leads machine learning systems to biased results due to the artificial information introduced by these deformations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diego Castillo-Barnes
- Department of Signal Theory, Telematics and Communications, University of Granada, Periodista Daniel Saucedo Aranda, 18071 Granada, Spain
| | - Carmen Jimenez-Mesa
- Department of Signal Theory, Telematics and Communications, University of Granada, Periodista Daniel Saucedo Aranda, 18071 Granada, Spain
| | - Francisco J Martinez-Murcia
- Department of Signal Theory, Telematics and Communications, University of Granada, Periodista Daniel Saucedo Aranda, 18071 Granada, Spain
| | - Diego Salas-Gonzalez
- Department of Signal Theory, Telematics and Communications, University of Granada, Periodista Daniel Saucedo Aranda, 18071 Granada, Spain
| | - Javier Ramírez
- Department of Signal Theory, Telematics and Communications, University of Granada, Periodista Daniel Saucedo Aranda, 18071 Granada, Spain
| | - Juan M Górriz
- Department of Signal Theory, Telematics and Communications, University of Granada, Periodista Daniel Saucedo Aranda, 18071 Granada, Spain.,Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Herchel Smith Buidling for Brain & Mind Sciences, Forvie Site Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 0SZ, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Hollunder B, Rajamani N, Siddiqi SH, Finke C, Kühn AA, Mayberg HS, Fox MD, Neudorfer C, Horn A. Toward personalized medicine in connectomic deep brain stimulation. Prog Neurobiol 2022; 210:102211. [PMID: 34958874 DOI: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2021.102211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2021] [Revised: 12/15/2021] [Accepted: 12/22/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
At the group-level, deep brain stimulation leads to significant therapeutic benefit in a multitude of neurological and neuropsychiatric disorders. At the single-patient level, however, symptoms may sometimes persist despite "optimal" electrode placement at established treatment coordinates. This may be partly explained by limitations of disease-centric strategies that are unable to account for heterogeneous phenotypes and comorbidities observed in clinical practice. Instead, tailoring electrode placement and programming to individual patients' symptom profiles may increase the fraction of top-responding patients. Here, we propose a three-step, circuit-based framework with the aim of developing patient-specific treatment targets that address the unique symptom constellation prevalent in each patient. First, we describe how a symptom network target library could be established by mapping beneficial or undesirable DBS effects to distinct circuits based on (retrospective) group-level data. Second, we suggest ways of matching the resulting symptom networks to circuits defined in the individual patient (template matching). Third, we introduce network blending as a strategy to calculate optimal stimulation targets and parameters by selecting and weighting a set of symptom-specific networks based on the symptom profile and subjective priorities of the individual patient. We integrate the approach with published literature and conclude by discussing limitations and future challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara Hollunder
- Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Einstein Center for Neurosciences Berlin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Berlin School of Mind and Brain, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Nanditha Rajamani
- Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Shan H Siddiqi
- Center for Brain Circuit Therapeutics, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Carsten Finke
- Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Einstein Center for Neurosciences Berlin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Berlin School of Mind and Brain, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Andrea A Kühn
- Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Einstein Center for Neurosciences Berlin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Berlin School of Mind and Brain, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany; NeuroCure Cluster of Excellence, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Helen S Mayberg
- Nash Family Center for Advanced Circuit Therapeutics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Michael D Fox
- Center for Brain Circuit Therapeutics, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Clemens Neudorfer
- Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Center for Brain Circuit Therapeutics, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Andreas Horn
- Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Einstein Center for Neurosciences Berlin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Center for Brain Circuit Therapeutics, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Tödt I, Al-Fatly B, Granert O, Kühn AA, Krack P, Rau J, Timmermann L, Schnitzler A, Paschen S, Helmers AK, Hartmann A, Bardinet E, Schuepbach M, Barbe MT, Dembek TA, Fraix V, Kübler D, Brefel-Courbon C, Gharabaghi A, Wojtecki L, Pinsker MO, Thobois S, Damier P, Witjas T, Houeto JL, Schade-Brittinger C, Vidailhet M, Horn A, Deuschl G. The Contribution of Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation to the Improvement in Motor Functions and Quality of Life. Mov Disord 2022; 37:291-301. [PMID: 35112384 DOI: 10.1002/mds.28952] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2021] [Revised: 01/17/2022] [Accepted: 01/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) effectively treats motor symptoms and quality of life (QoL) of advanced and fluctuating early Parkinson's disease. Little is known about the relation between electrode position and changes in symptom control and ultimately QoL. OBJECTIVES The relation between the stimulated part of the STN and clinical outcomes, including the motor score of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) and the quality-of-life questionnaire, was assessed in a subcohort of the EARLYSTIM study. METHODS Sixty-nine patients from the EARLYSTIM cohort who underwent DBS, with a comprehensive clinical characterization before and 24 months after surgery, were included. Intercorrelations of clinical outcome changes, correlation between the affected functional parts of the STN, and changes in clinical outcomes were investigated. We further calculated sweet spots for different clinical parameters. RESULTS Improvements in the UPDRS III and Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) correlated positively with the extent of the overlap with the sensorimotor STN. The sweet spots for the UPDRS III (x = 11.6, y = -13.1, z = -6.3) and the PDQ-39 differed (x = 14.8, y = -12.4, z = -4.3) ~3.8 mm. CONCLUSIONS The main influence of DBS on QoL is likely mediated through the sensory-motor basal ganglia loop. The PDQ sweet spot is located in a posteroventral spatial location in the STN territory. For aspects of QoL, however, there was also evidence of improvement through stimulation of the other STN subnuclei. More research is necessary to customize the DBS target to individual symptoms of each patient. © 2022 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Inken Tödt
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Schleswig Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Bassam Al-Fatly
- Department of Neurology, Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Section, Charité Medicine University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Oliver Granert
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Schleswig Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Andrea A Kühn
- Department of Neurology, Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Section, Charité Medicine University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Paul Krack
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Bern and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Joern Rau
- Coordinating Center for Clinical Trials, Philipps-University, Marburg, Germany
| | - Lars Timmermann
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Giessen and Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Alfons Schnitzler
- Department of Neurology, Institute of Clinical Neuroscience and Medical Psychology, Heinrich-Heine University Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Steffen Paschen
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Schleswig Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Ann-Kristin Helmers
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Schleswig Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Andreas Hartmann
- Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Center d'Investigation Clinique 9503, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière, Paris, France.,Département de Neurologie, Université Pierre et Marie Curie-Paris 6 et INSERM, Paris, France
| | - Eric Bardinet
- Department of Neurology, NS-PARK/F-CRIN, University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon, France.,Center de Neuroimagerie de Recherche, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle (ICM), Paris, France
| | - Michael Schuepbach
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Bern and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.,Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Center d'Investigation Clinique 9503, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière, Paris, France.,Département de Neurologie, Université Pierre et Marie Curie-Paris 6 et INSERM, Paris, France.,Institute of Neurology, Konolfingen, Switzerland
| | - Michael T Barbe
- Department of Neurology, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine, Cologne, Germany
| | - Till A Dembek
- Department of Neurology, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine, Cologne, Germany
| | - Valerie Fraix
- Université Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, U1216, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble Institut Neurosciences, Grenoble, France.,Neurology Department, Grenoble University Hospital, Grenoble, France
| | - Dorothee Kübler
- Department of Neurology, Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Section, Charité Medicine University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Alireza Gharabaghi
- Department of Neurosurgery and Neurotechnology Institute for Neuromodulation and Neurotechnology, University Hospital and University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Lars Wojtecki
- Department of Neurology and Neurorehabilitation, Hospital zum Heiligen Geist GmbH & Co.KG Academic Teaching Hospital of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf Von-Broichhausen-Allee 1, Kempen, Germany
| | - Marcus O Pinsker
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Stephane Thobois
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Neurologique Pierre Wertheimer, Service de Neurologie C, Center Expert Parkinson, Bron, France.,Université Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Faculté de Médecine Lyon Sud Charles Mérieux, Oullins, France
| | | | - Tatiana Witjas
- Department of Neurology, Timone University Hospital UMR 7289, CNRS Marseille, Marseille, France
| | - Jean-Luc Houeto
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Neurologique Pierre Wertheimer, Service de Neurologie C, Center Expert Parkinson, Bron, France
| | | | - Marie Vidailhet
- Department of Neurology, Sorbonne Université, ICM UMR1127, INSERM &1127, CNRS 7225, Salpêtriere University Hospital AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Andreas Horn
- Department of Neurology, Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Section, Charité Medicine University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Günther Deuschl
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Schleswig Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Andree A, Li N, Butenko K, Kober M, Chen JZ, Higuchi T, Fauser M, Storch A, Ip CW, Kühn AA, Horn A, van Rienen U. Deep brain stimulation electrode modeling in rats. Exp Neurol 2022; 350:113978. [PMID: 35026227 DOI: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2022.113978] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2021] [Revised: 11/13/2021] [Accepted: 01/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) is an efficacious treatment option for an increasing range of brain disorders. To enhance our knowledge about the mechanisms of action of DBS and to probe novel targets, basic research in animal models with DBS is an essential research base. Beyond nonhuman primate, pig, and mouse models, the rat is a widely used animal model for probing DBS effects in basic research. Reconstructing DBS electrode placement after surgery is crucial to associate observed effects with modulating a specific target structure. Post-mortem histology is a commonly used method for reconstructing the electrode location. In humans, however, neuroimaging-based electrode localizations have become established. For this reason, we adapt the open-source software pipeline Lead-DBS for DBS electrode localizations from humans to the rat model. We validate our localization results by inter-rater concordance and a comparison with the conventional histological method. Finally, using the open-source software pipeline OSS-DBS, we demonstrate the subject-specific simulation of the VTA and the activation of axon models aligned to pathways representing neuronal fibers, also known as the pathway activation model. Both activation models yield a characterization of the impact of DBS on the target area. Our results suggest that the proposed neuroimaging-based method can precisely localize DBS electrode placements that are essentially rater-independent and yield results comparable to the histological gold standard. The advantages of neuroimaging-based electrode localizations are the possibility of acquiring them in vivo and combining electrode reconstructions with advanced imaging metrics, such as those obtained from diffusion or functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). This paper introduces a freely available open-source pipeline for DBS electrode reconstructions in rats. The presented initial validation results are promising.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Andree
- Institute of General Electrical Engineering, University of Rostock, Albert-Einstein-Straße 2, 18059 Rostock, Germany.
| | - Ningfei Li
- Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany; Berlin Institute of Health, Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Unit, Department for Neurology, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
| | - Konstantin Butenko
- Institute of General Electrical Engineering, University of Rostock, Albert-Einstein-Straße 2, 18059 Rostock, Germany.
| | - Maria Kober
- Department of Neurology, Rostock University Medical Center, Gehlsheimer Straße 20, 18147 Rostock, Germany.
| | - Jia Zhi Chen
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Straße 11, 97080 Würzburg, Germany.
| | - Takahiro Higuchi
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Comprehensive Heart Failure Center, University Hospital of Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Straße 6, 97080 Würzburg, Germany.
| | - Mareike Fauser
- Department of Neurology, Rostock University Medical Center, Gehlsheimer Straße 20, 18147 Rostock, Germany.
| | - Alexander Storch
- Department of Neurology, Rostock University Medical Center, Gehlsheimer Straße 20, 18147 Rostock, Germany; German Centre for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Rostock/Greifswald, Gehlsheimer, Straße 20, 18147 Rostock, Germany; Department Ageing of Individuals and Society, University of Rostock, Gehlsheimer Straße 20, 18147 Rostock, Germany.
| | - Chi Wang Ip
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Straße 11, 97080 Würzburg, Germany.
| | - Andrea A Kühn
- Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany; Berlin Institute of Health, Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Unit, Department for Neurology, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
| | - Andreas Horn
- Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany; Berlin Institute of Health, Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Unit, Department for Neurology, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
| | - Ursula van Rienen
- Institute of General Electrical Engineering, University of Rostock, Albert-Einstein-Straße 2, 18059 Rostock, Germany; Department Ageing of Individuals and Society, University of Rostock, Gehlsheimer Straße 20, 18147 Rostock, Germany; Department Life, Light & Matter, University of Rostock, Albert-Einstein-Straße 25, 18059 Rostock, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Roediger J, Dembek TA, Wenzel G, Butenko K, Kühn AA, Horn A. StimFit-A Data-Driven Algorithm for Automated Deep Brain Stimulation Programming. Mov Disord 2021; 37:574-584. [PMID: 34837245 DOI: 10.1002/mds.28878] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2021] [Revised: 10/07/2021] [Accepted: 11/04/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Finding the optimal deep brain stimulation (DBS) parameters from a multitude of possible combinations by trial and error is time consuming and requires highly trained medical personnel. OBJECTIVE We developed an automated algorithm to identify optimal stimulation settings in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients treated with subthalamic nucleus (STN) DBS based on imaging-derived metrics. METHODS Electrode locations and monopolar review data of 612 stimulation settings acquired from 31 PD patients were used to train a predictive model for therapeutic and adverse stimulation effects. Model performance was then evaluated within the training cohort using cross-validation and on an independent cohort of 19 patients. We inverted the model by applying a brute-force approach to determine the optimal stimulation sites in the target region. Finally, an optimization algorithm was established to identify optimal stimulation parameters. Suggested stimulation parameters were compared to the ones applied in clinical practice. RESULTS Predicted motor outcome correlated with observed outcome (R = 0.57, P < 10-10 ) across patients within the training cohort. In the test cohort, the model explained 28% of the variance in motor outcome differences between settings. The stimulation site for maximum motor improvement was located at the dorsolateral border of the STN. When compared to two empirical settings, model-based suggestions more closely matched the setting with superior motor improvement. CONCLUSION We developed and validated a data-driven model that can suggest stimulation parameters leading to optimal motor improvement while minimizing the risk of stimulation-induced side effects. This approach might provide guidance for DBS programming in the future. © 2021 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Roediger
- Movement Disorder and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, Berlin, 10117, Germany.,Einstein Center for Neurosciences Berlin, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, Berlin, 10117, Germany
| | - Till A Dembek
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Gregor Wenzel
- Movement Disorder and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, Berlin, 10117, Germany
| | - Konstantin Butenko
- Institute of General Electrical Engineering, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Andrea A Kühn
- Movement Disorder and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, Berlin, 10117, Germany.,Berlin School of Mind and Brain, Charité University Medicine, Berlin, Germany.,NeuroCure Clinical Research Centre, Charité University Medicine, Berlin, Germany.,DZNE, German Center for Degenerative Diseases, Berlin, Germany
| | - Andreas Horn
- Movement Disorder and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, Berlin, 10117, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Using Brain Imaging to Improve Spatial Targeting of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Depression. Biol Psychiatry 2021; 90:689-700. [PMID: 32800379 DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2020.05.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 136] [Impact Index Per Article: 45.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2019] [Revised: 05/29/2020] [Accepted: 05/29/2020] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is an effective treatment for depression but is limited in that the optimal therapeutic target remains unknown. Early TMS trials lacked a focal target and thus positioned the TMS coil over the prefrontal cortex using scalp measurements. Over time, it became clear that this method leads to variation in the stimulation site and that this could contribute to heterogeneity in antidepressant response. Newer methods allow for precise positioning of the TMS coil over a specific brain location, but leveraging these precise methods requires a more precise therapeutic target. We review how neuroimaging is being used to identify a more focal therapeutic target for depression. We highlight recent studies showing that more effective TMS targets in the frontal cortex are functionally connected to deep limbic regions such as the subgenual cingulate cortex. We review how connectivity might be used to identify an optimal TMS target for use in all patients and potentially even a personalized target for each individual patient. We address the clinical implications of this emerging field and highlight critical questions for future research.
Collapse
|
19
|
Wehmeyer L, Schüller T, Kiess J, Heiden P, Visser-Vandewalle V, Baldermann JC, Andrade P. Target-Specific Effects of Deep Brain Stimulation for Tourette Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Neurol 2021; 12:769275. [PMID: 34744993 PMCID: PMC8563609 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.769275] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2021] [Accepted: 09/21/2021] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Extended research has pointed to the efficacy of deep brain stimulation (DBS) in treatment of patients with treatment-refractory Tourette syndrome (TS). The four most commonly used DBS targets for TS include the centromedian nucleus-nucleus ventrooralis internus (CM-Voi) and the centromedian nucleus-parafascicular (CM-Pf) complexes of the thalamus, and the posteroventrolateral (pvIGPi) and the anteromedial portion of the globus pallidus internus (amGPi). Differences and commonalities between those targets need to be compared systematically. Objective: Therefore, we evaluated whether DBS is effective in reducing TS symptoms and target-specific differences. Methods: A PubMed literature search was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. Eligible literature was used to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis. Results: In total, 65 studies with 376 patients were included. Overall, Yale Global Tic Severity Scale (YGTSS) scores were reduced by more than 50 in 69% of the patients. DBS also resulted in significant reductions of secondary outcome measures, including the total YGTSS, modified Rush Video-Based Tic Rating Scale (mRVRS), Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (YBOCS), and Becks Depression Inventory (BDI). All targets resulted in significant reductions of YGTSS scores and, with the exception of the CM-Pf, also in reduced YBOCS scores. Interestingly, DBS of pallidal targets showed increased YGTSS and YBOCS reductions compared to thalamic targets. Also, the meta-analysis including six randomized controlled and double-blinded trials demonstrated clinical efficacy of DBS for TS, that remained significant for GPi but not thalamic stimulation in two separate meta-analyses. Conclusion: We conclude that DBS is a clinically effective treatment option for patients with treatment-refractory TS, with all targets showing comparable improvement rates. Future research might focus on personalized and symptom-specific target selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Wehmeyer
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany,*Correspondence: Laura Wehmeyer
| | - Thomas Schüller
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Jana Kiess
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Petra Heiden
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Veerle Visser-Vandewalle
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Juan Carlos Baldermann
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany,Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Neurology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Pablo Andrade
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Sobesky L, Goede L, Odekerken VJJ, Wang Q, Li N, Neudorfer C, Rajamani N, Al-Fatly B, Reich M, Volkmann J, de Bie RMA, Kühn AA, Horn A. Subthalamic and pallidal deep brain stimulation: are we modulating the same network? Brain 2021; 145:251-262. [PMID: 34453827 DOI: 10.1093/brain/awab258] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2021] [Revised: 04/05/2021] [Accepted: 06/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
The subthalamic nucleus and internal pallidum are main target sites for deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease. Multiple trials that investigated subthalamic versus pallidal stimulation were unable to settle on a definitive optimal target between the two. One reason could be that the effect is mediated via a common functional network. To test this hypothesis, we calculated connectivity profiles seeding from deep brain stimulation electrodes in 94 patients that underwent subthalamic and 28 patients with pallidal treatment based on a normative connectome atlas calculated from 1,000 healthy subjects. In each cohort, we calculated connectivity profiles that were associated with optimal clinical improvements. The two maps showed striking similarity and were able to cross-predict outcomes in the respective other cohort (R = 0.37 at p < 0.001; R = 0.34 at p = 0.032). Next, we calculated an agreement map which retained regions common to both target sites. Crucially, this map was able to explain an additional amount of variance in clinical improvements of either cohort when compared to the maps calculated on the two cohorts alone. Finally, we tested profiles and predictive utility of connectivity maps calculated from different motor symptom subscores with a specific focus on bradykinesia and rigidity. While our study is based on retrospective data and indirect connectivity metrics, it may deliver empirical data to support the hypothesis of a largely overlapping network associated with effective deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease irrespective of the specific target.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leon Sobesky
- Movement Disorder and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité Campus Mitte, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin 10117, Germany
| | - Lukas Goede
- Movement Disorder and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité Campus Mitte, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin 10117, Germany
| | - Vincent J J Odekerken
- Department of Neurology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Qiang Wang
- Movement Disorder and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité Campus Mitte, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin 10117, Germany
| | - Ningfei Li
- Movement Disorder and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité Campus Mitte, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin 10117, Germany
| | - Clemens Neudorfer
- Movement Disorder and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité Campus Mitte, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin 10117, Germany
| | - Nanditha Rajamani
- Movement Disorder and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité Campus Mitte, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin 10117, Germany
| | - Bassam Al-Fatly
- Movement Disorder and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité Campus Mitte, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin 10117, Germany
| | - Martin Reich
- Department of Neurology, University Clinic of Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080 Würzburg, Germany
| | - Jens Volkmann
- Department of Neurology, University Clinic of Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080 Würzburg, Germany
| | - Rob M A de Bie
- Department of Neurology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Andrea A Kühn
- Movement Disorder and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité Campus Mitte, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin 10117, Germany
| | - Andreas Horn
- Movement Disorder and Neuromodulation Unit, Department of Neurology, Charité Campus Mitte, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin 10117, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Therapies to Restore Consciousness in Patients with Severe Brain Injuries: A Gap Analysis and Future Directions. Neurocrit Care 2021; 35:68-85. [PMID: 34236624 PMCID: PMC8266715 DOI: 10.1007/s12028-021-01227-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2021] [Accepted: 03/04/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Background/Objective For patients with disorders of consciousness (DoC) and their families, the search for new therapies has been a source of hope and frustration. Almost all clinical trials in patients with DoC have been limited by small sample sizes, lack of placebo groups, and use of heterogeneous outcome measures. As a result, few therapies have strong evidence to support their use; amantadine is the only therapy recommended by current clinical guidelines, specifically for patients with DoC caused by severe traumatic brain injury. To foster and advance development of consciousness-promoting therapies for patients with DoC, the Curing Coma Campaign convened a Coma Science Work Group to perform a gap analysis. Methods We consider five classes of therapies: (1) pharmacologic; (2) electromagnetic; (3) mechanical; (4) sensory; and (5) regenerative. For each class of therapy, we summarize the state of the science, identify gaps in knowledge, and suggest future directions for therapy development. Results Knowledge gaps in all five therapeutic classes can be attributed to the lack of: (1) a unifying conceptual framework for evaluating therapeutic mechanisms of action; (2) large-scale randomized controlled trials; and (3) pharmacodynamic biomarkers that measure subclinical therapeutic effects in early-phase trials. To address these gaps, we propose a precision medicine approach in which clinical trials selectively enroll patients based upon their physiological receptivity to targeted therapies, and therapeutic effects are measured by complementary behavioral, neuroimaging, and electrophysiologic endpoints. Conclusions This personalized approach can be realized through rigorous clinical trial design and international collaboration, both of which will be essential for advancing the development of new therapies and ultimately improving the lives of patients with DoC. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12028-021-01227-y.
Collapse
|
22
|
Wenzel GR, Roediger J, Brücke C, Marcelino ALDA, Gülke E, Pötter-Nerger M, Scholtes H, Wynants K, Juárez Paz LM, Kühn AA. CLOVER-DBS: Algorithm-Guided Deep Brain Stimulation-Programming Based on External Sensor Feedback Evaluated in a Prospective, Randomized, Crossover, Double-Blind, Two-Center Study. JOURNAL OF PARKINSONS DISEASE 2021; 11:1887-1899. [PMID: 34151855 DOI: 10.3233/jpd-202480] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recent technological advances in deep brain stimulation (DBS) (e.g., directional leads, multiple independent current sources) lead to increasing DBS-optimization burden. Techniques to streamline and facilitate programming could leverage these innovations. OBJECTIVE We evaluated clinical effectiveness of algorithm-guided DBS-programming based on wearable-sensor-feedback compared to standard-of-care DBS-settings in a prospective, randomized, crossover, double-blind study in two German DBS centers. METHODS For 23 Parkinson's disease patients with clinically effective DBS, new algorithm-guided DBS-settings were determined and compared to previously established standard-of-care DBS-settings using UPDRS-III and motion-sensor-assessment. Clinical and imaging data with lead-localizations were analyzed to evaluate characteristics of algorithm-derived programming compared to standard-of-care. Six different versions of the algorithm were evaluated during the study and 10 subjects programmed with uniform algorithm-version were analyzed as a subgroup. RESULTS Algorithm-guided and standard-of-care DBS-settings effectively reduced motor symptoms compared to off-stimulation-state. UPDRS-III scores were reduced significantly more with standard-of-care settings as compared to algorithm-guided programming with heterogenous algorithm versions in the entire cohort. A subgroup with the latest algorithm version showed no significant differences in UPDRS-III achieved by the two programming-methods. Comparing active contacts in standard-of-care and algorithm-guided DBS-settings, contacts in the latter had larger location variability and were farther away from a literature-based optimal stimulation target. CONCLUSION Algorithm-guided programming may be a reasonable approach to replace monopolar review, enable less trained health-professionals to achieve satisfactory DBS-programming results, or potentially reduce time needed for programming. Larger studies and further improvements of algorithm-guided programming are needed to confirm these results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregor R Wenzel
- Department of Neurology, Movement disorders & Neuromodulation section, Charité -University Medicine Berlin, Germany
| | - Jan Roediger
- Department of Neurology, Movement disorders & Neuromodulation section, Charité -University Medicine Berlin, Germany.,Einstein Center for Neurosciences Berlin, Charité -University Medicine Berlin, Germany
| | - Christof Brücke
- Department of Neurology, Movement disorders & Neuromodulation section, Charité -University Medicine Berlin, Germany
| | - Ana Luísa de A Marcelino
- Department of Neurology, Movement disorders & Neuromodulation section, Charité -University Medicine Berlin, Germany
| | - Eileen Gülke
- Department of Neurology, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | - Andrea A Kühn
- Department of Neurology, Movement disorders & Neuromodulation section, Charité -University Medicine Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Xu SS, Malpas CB, Bulluss KJ, McDermott HJ, Kalincik T, Thevathasan W. Lesser-Known Aspects of Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease: Programming Sessions, Hardware Surgeries, Residential Care Admissions, and Deaths. Neuromodulation 2021; 25:836-845. [PMID: 34114293 DOI: 10.1111/ner.13466] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2020] [Revised: 04/22/2021] [Accepted: 05/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The long-term treatment burden, duration of community living, and survival of patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) after deep brain stimulation (DBS) implantation are unclear. This study aims to determine the frequency of programming, repeat hardware surgeries (of the intracranial electrode, implantable pulse generator [IPG], and extension-cable), and the timings of residential care and death in patients with PD treated with DBS. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this cross-sectional, population-based study, individual-level data were collected from the Australian government covering a 15-year period (2002-2016) on 1849 patients with PD followed from DBS implantation. RESULTS The mean DBS implantation age was 62.6 years and mean follow-up 5.0 years. Mean annual programming rates were 6.9 in the first year and 2.8 in subsequent years. 51.4% of patients required repeat hardware surgery. 11.3% of patients had repeat intracranial electrode surgery (including an overall 1.1% of patients who were completely explanted). 47.6% of patients had repeat IPG/extension-cable surgery including for presumed battery depletion. 6.2% of patients had early repeat IPG/extension-cable surgery (within one year of any previous such surgery). Thirty-day postoperative mortality was 0.3% after initial DBS implantation and 0.6% after any repeat hardware surgery. 25.3% of patients were admitted into residential care and 17.4% died. The median interval to residential care and death was 10.2 years and 11.4 years, respectively. Age more than 65 years was associated with fewer repeat hardware surgeries for presumed complications (any repeat surgery of electrodes, extension-cables, and early IPG surgery) and greater rates of residential care admission and death. CONCLUSIONS Data from a large cohort of patients with PD treated with DBS found that the median life span after surgery is ten years. Repeat hardware surgery, including of the intracranial electrodes, is common. These findings support development of technologies to reduce therapy burden such as enhanced surgical navigation, hardware miniaturization, and improved battery efficiency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- San San Xu
- Bionics Institute, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Department of Medical Bionics, The University of Melbourne, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Department of Neurology, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia
| | - Charles B Malpas
- CORe, Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.,Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.,MS Centre, Department of Neurology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Kristian J Bulluss
- Bionics Institute, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Department of Neurosurgery, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Fitzroy, and Department of Neurosurgery, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia
| | - Hugh J McDermott
- Bionics Institute, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Department of Medical Bionics, The University of Melbourne, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Tomas Kalincik
- CORe, Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.,MS Centre, Department of Neurology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Wesley Thevathasan
- Bionics Institute, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Department of Neurology, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia.,Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.,Department of Neurology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Kazemivalipour E, Bhusal B, Vu J, Lin S, Nguyen BT, Kirsch J, Nowac E, Pilitsis J, Rosenow J, Atalar E, Golestanirad L. Vertical open-bore MRI scanners generate significantly less radiofrequency heating around implanted leads: A study of deep brain stimulation implants in 1.2T OASIS scanners versus 1.5T horizontal systems. Magn Reson Med 2021; 86:1560-1572. [PMID: 33961301 DOI: 10.1002/mrm.28818] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2021] [Revised: 04/05/2021] [Accepted: 04/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Patients with active implants such as deep brain stimulation (DBS) devices are often denied access to MRI due to safety concerns associated with the radiofrequency (RF) heating of their electrodes. The majority of studies on RF heating of conductive implants have been performed in horizontal close-bore MRI scanners. Vertical MRI scanners which have a 90° rotated transmit coil generate fundamentally different electric and magnetic field distributions, yet very little is known about RF heating of implants in this class of scanners. We performed numerical simulations as well as phantom experiments to compare RF heating of DBS implants in a 1.2T vertical scanner (OASIS, Hitachi) compared to a 1.5T horizontal scanner (Aera, Siemens). METHODS Simulations were performed on 90 lead models created from post-operative CT images of patients with DBS implants. Experiments were performed with wires and commercial DBS devices implanted in an anthropomorphic phantom. RESULTS We found significant reduction of 0.1 g-averaged specific absorption rate (30-fold, P < 1 × 10-5 ) and RF heating (9-fold, P < .026) in the 1.2T vertical scanner compared to the 1.5T conventional scanner. CONCLUSION Vertical MRI scanners appear to generate lower RF heating around DBS leads, providing potentially heightened safety or the flexibility to use sequences with higher power levels than on conventional systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ehsan Kazemivalipour
- Department of Radiology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.,Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Bilkent University, Ankara, Turkey.,National Magnetic Resonance Research Center (UMRAM), Bilkent University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Bhumi Bhusal
- Department of Radiology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Jasmine Vu
- Department of Radiology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.,Department of Biomedical Engineering, McCormick School of Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA
| | - Stella Lin
- Department of Radiology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Bach Thanh Nguyen
- Department of Radiology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - John Kirsch
- A. A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Elizabeth Nowac
- Department of Neurosurgery, Albany Medical Center, Albany, New York, USA
| | - Julie Pilitsis
- Illinois Bone and Joint Institute (IBJI), Wilmette, Illinois, USA
| | - Joshua Rosenow
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Ergin Atalar
- Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Bilkent University, Ankara, Turkey.,National Magnetic Resonance Research Center (UMRAM), Bilkent University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Laleh Golestanirad
- Department of Radiology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.,Department of Biomedical Engineering, McCormick School of Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Davidson B, Tam F, Yang B, Meng Y, Hamani C, Graham SJ, Lipsman N. Three-Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Patients With Deep Brain Stimulators: Results From a Phantom Study and a Pilot Study in Patients. Neurosurgery 2021; 88:349-355. [PMID: 33045736 DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyaa439] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2020] [Accepted: 07/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a standard of care treatment for multiple neurologic disorders. Although 3-tesla (3T) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has become the gold-standard modality for structural and functional imaging, most centers refrain from 3T imaging in patients with DBS devices in place because of safety concerns. 3T MRI could be used not only for structural imaging, but also for functional MRI to study the effects of DBS on neurocircuitry and optimize programming. OBJECTIVE To use an anthropomorphic phantom design to perform temperature and voltage safety testing on an activated DBS device during 3T imaging. METHODS An anthropomorphic 3D-printed human phantom was constructed and used to perform temperature and voltage testing on a DBS device during 3T MRI. Based on the phantom assessment, a cohort study was conducted in which 6 human patients underwent MRI with their DBS device in an activated (ON) state. RESULTS During the phantom study, temperature rises were under 2°C during all sequences, with the DBS in both the deactivated and activated states. Radiofrequency pulses from the MRI appeared to modulate the electrical discharge from the DBS, resulting in slight fluctuations of voltage amplitude. Six human subjects underwent MRI with their DBS in an activated state without any serious adverse events. One patient experienced stimulation-related side effects during T1-MPRAGE scanning with the DBS in an ON state because of radiofrequency-induced modulation of voltage amplitude. CONCLUSION Following careful phantom-based safety testing, 3T structural and functional MRI can be safely performed in subjects with activated deep brain stimulators.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Davidson
- Division of Neurosurgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,Harquail Centre for Neuromodulation, Hurvitz Brain Sciences Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada.,Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada
| | - Fred Tam
- Physical Sciences Platform, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada
| | - Benson Yang
- Physical Sciences Platform, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada
| | - Ying Meng
- Division of Neurosurgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,Harquail Centre for Neuromodulation, Hurvitz Brain Sciences Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada.,Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada
| | - Clement Hamani
- Division of Neurosurgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,Harquail Centre for Neuromodulation, Hurvitz Brain Sciences Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada.,Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada
| | - Simon J Graham
- Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada.,Physical Sciences Platform, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada.,Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Nir Lipsman
- Division of Neurosurgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,Harquail Centre for Neuromodulation, Hurvitz Brain Sciences Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada.,Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
John KD, Wylie SA, Dawant BM, Rodriguez WJ, Phibbs FT, Bradley EB, Neimat JS, van Wouwe NC. Deep brain stimulation effects on verbal fluency dissociated by target and active contact location. Ann Clin Transl Neurol 2021; 8:613-622. [PMID: 33596331 PMCID: PMC7951101 DOI: 10.1002/acn3.51304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2020] [Revised: 12/17/2020] [Accepted: 12/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Deep brain stimulation (DBS) improves motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease (PD), but it can also disrupt verbal fluency with significant costs to quality of life. The current study investigated how variability of bilateral active electrode coordinates along the superior/inferior, anterior/posterior, and lateral/medial axes in the subthalamic nucleus (STN) or the globus pallidus interna (GPi) contribute to changes in verbal fluency. We predicted that electrode location in the left hemisphere would be linked to changes in fluency, especially in the STN. METHODS Forty PD participants treated with bilateral DBS targeting STN (n = 23) or GPi (n = 17) completed verbal fluency testing in their optimally treated state before and after DBS therapy. Normalized atlas coordinates from left and right active electrode positions along superior/inferior, anterior/posterior, and lateral/medial axes were used to predict changes in fluency postoperatively, separately for patients with STN and GPi targets. RESULTS Consistent with prior studies, fluency significantly declined pre- to postsurgery (in both DBS targets). In STN-DBS patients, electrode position along the inferior to superior axis in the left STN was a significant predictor of fluency changes; relatively more superior left active electrode was associated with the largest fluency declines in STN. Electrode coordinates in right STN or GPi (left or right) did not predict fluency changes. INTERPRETATION We discuss these findings in light of putative mechanisms and potential clinical impact.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin D. John
- Department of Neurological SurgeryUniversity of LouisvilleLouisvilleKYUSA
| | - Scott A. Wylie
- Department of Neurological SurgeryUniversity of LouisvilleLouisvilleKYUSA
| | - Benoit M. Dawant
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer ScienceVanderbilt UniversityNashvilleTNUSA
| | - William J. Rodriguez
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer ScienceVanderbilt UniversityNashvilleTNUSA
| | - Fenna T. Phibbs
- Department of NeurologyVanderbilt University Medical CenterNashvilleTNUSA
| | - Elise B. Bradley
- Department of NeurologyVanderbilt University Medical CenterNashvilleTNUSA
| | - Joseph S. Neimat
- Department of Neurological SurgeryUniversity of LouisvilleLouisvilleKYUSA
| | - Nelleke C. van Wouwe
- Department of Neurological SurgeryUniversity of LouisvilleLouisvilleKYUSA
- Department of NeurologyVanderbilt University Medical CenterNashvilleTNUSA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Cash RFH, Cocchi L, Lv J, Wu Y, Fitzgerald PB, Zalesky A. Personalized connectivity-guided DLPFC-TMS for depression: Advancing computational feasibility, precision and reproducibility. Hum Brain Mapp 2021; 42:4155-4172. [PMID: 33544411 PMCID: PMC8357003 DOI: 10.1002/hbm.25330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 82] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2020] [Revised: 11/16/2020] [Accepted: 12/13/2020] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) is an established treatment for refractory depression, however, therapeutic outcomes vary. Mounting evidence suggests that clinical response relates to functional connectivity with the subgenual cingulate cortex (SGC) at the precise DLPFC stimulation site. Critically, SGC-related network architecture shows considerable interindividual variation across the spatial extent of the DLPFC, indicating that connectivity-based target personalization could potentially be necessary to improve treatment outcomes. However, to date accurate personalization has not appeared feasible, with recent work indicating that the intraindividual reproducibility of optimal targets is limited to 3.5 cm. Here we developed reliable and accurate methodologies to compute individualized connectivity-guided stimulation targets. In resting-state functional MRI scans acquired across 1,000 healthy adults, we demonstrate that, using this approach, personalized targets can be reliably and robustly pinpointed, with a median accuracy of ~2 mm between scans repeated across separate days. These targets remained highly stable, even after 1 year, with a median intraindividual distance between coordinates of only 2.7 mm. Interindividual spatial variation in personalized targets exceeded intraindividual variation by a factor of up to 6.85, suggesting that personalized targets did not trivially converge to a group-average site. Moreover, personalized targets were heritable, suggesting that connectivity-guided rTMS personalization is stable over time and under genetic control. This computational framework provides capacity for personalized connectivity-guided TMS targets to be robustly computed with high precision and has the flexibly to advance research in other basic research and clinical applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robin F H Cash
- Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Luca Cocchi
- Clinical Brain Networks Group, QIMR Berghofer, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Jinglei Lv
- Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,School of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Yumeng Wu
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Paul B Fitzgerald
- Epworth Centre for Innovation and Mental Health, Epworth Healthcare and the Monash University Central Clinical School, Camberwell, Victoria, Australia
| | - Andrew Zalesky
- Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Lai Y, Song Y, Huang P, Wang T, Wang L, Pan Y, Sun Q, Sun B, Zhang C, Li D. Subthalamic Stimulation for Camptocormia in Parkinson's Disease: Association of Volume of Tissue Activated and Structural Connectivity with Clinical Effectiveness. JOURNAL OF PARKINSONS DISEASE 2021; 11:199-210. [PMID: 33325395 PMCID: PMC7990421 DOI: 10.3233/jpd-202259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN-DBS) has been reported to be effective for camptocormia in Parkinson's disease (PD). However, the association between clinical effectiveness and the stimulated volumes or structural connectivity remains unexplored. OBJECTIVE To investigate the effectiveness of STN-DBS for treating camptocormia in PD and its association with volumes of tissue activated (VTA) and structural connectivity. METHODS We reviewed video recordings of patients who had undergone STN-DBS. The total and upper camptocormia (TCC and UCC) angles were measured to quantify changes in camptocormia. The Movement Disorders Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale III (MDS-UPDRS III) was used to assess motor symptoms. Pre- and postoperative brain images were collected for modeling volume of VTA and structural connectivity using Lead-DBS software. RESULTS Participants included 36 patients with PD (8 with TCC-camptocormia and 2 with UCC-camptocormia) treated with bilateral STN-DBS. After surgery, patients showed a significant improvement in postural alignment at follow-up (mean follow-up duration: 6.0±2.2 months). In the entire sample, higher structural connectivity to the right supplementary motor area (SMA) and right lateral premotor cortex along the dorsal plane (PMd) was associated with larger postsurgical improvements in axial signs and TCC angles after stimulation was turned on. In patients diagnosed with camptocormia, larger improvement in camptocormia angles after STN-DBS was associated with a larger VTA overlap with STN (R = 0.75, p = 0.032). CONCLUSION This study suggests that both VTA overlap with STN and structural connectivity to cortical motor regions are associated with the effectiveness of STN-DBS for managing camptocormia in PD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yijie Lai
- Department of Neurosurgery, Center for Functional Neurosurgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Yunhai Song
- Department of Neurosurgery, Center for Functional Neurosurgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.,Department of Neurosurgery, Shanghai Children's Medical Center Affiliated to the Medical School of Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Peng Huang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Center for Functional Neurosurgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Tao Wang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Center for Functional Neurosurgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Linbin Wang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Center for Functional Neurosurgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Yixin Pan
- Department of Neurosurgery, Center for Functional Neurosurgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Qingfang Sun
- Department of Neurosurgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Bomin Sun
- Department of Neurosurgery, Center for Functional Neurosurgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Chencheng Zhang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Center for Functional Neurosurgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Dianyou Li
- Department of Neurosurgery, Center for Functional Neurosurgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Aubignat M, Lefranc M, Tir M, Krystkowiak P. Deep brain stimulation programming in Parkinson's disease: Introduction of current issues and perspectives. Rev Neurol (Paris) 2020; 176:770-779. [DOI: 10.1016/j.neurol.2020.02.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2019] [Revised: 01/28/2020] [Accepted: 02/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
|
30
|
Krauss JK, Lipsman N, Aziz T, Boutet A, Brown P, Chang JW, Davidson B, Grill WM, Hariz MI, Horn A, Schulder M, Mammis A, Tass PA, Volkmann J, Lozano AM. Technology of deep brain stimulation: current status and future directions. Nat Rev Neurol 2020; 17:75-87. [PMID: 33244188 DOI: 10.1038/s41582-020-00426-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 304] [Impact Index Per Article: 76.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/08/2020] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a neurosurgical procedure that allows targeted circuit-based neuromodulation. DBS is a standard of care in Parkinson disease, essential tremor and dystonia, and is also under active investigation for other conditions linked to pathological circuitry, including major depressive disorder and Alzheimer disease. Modern DBS systems, borrowed from the cardiac field, consist of an intracranial electrode, an extension wire and a pulse generator, and have evolved slowly over the past two decades. Advances in engineering and imaging along with an improved understanding of brain disorders are poised to reshape how DBS is viewed and delivered to patients. Breakthroughs in electrode and battery designs, stimulation paradigms, closed-loop and on-demand stimulation, and sensing technologies are expected to enhance the efficacy and tolerability of DBS. In this Review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the technical development of DBS, from its origins to its future. Understanding the evolution of DBS technology helps put the currently available systems in perspective and allows us to predict the next major technological advances and hurdles in the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joachim K Krauss
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Nir Lipsman
- Department of Neurosurgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Tipu Aziz
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Alexandre Boutet
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Peter Brown
- Medical Research Council Brain Network Dynamics Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Jin Woo Chang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Benjamin Davidson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Warren M Grill
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Marwan I Hariz
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Umea, Umea, Sweden
| | - Andreas Horn
- Department of Neurology, Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Section, Charité Medicine University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Michael Schulder
- Department of Neurosurgery, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, New York, NY, USA
| | - Antonios Mammis
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA
| | - Peter A Tass
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Jens Volkmann
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.,Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Andres M Lozano
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Isaacs BR, Mulder MJ, Groot JM, van Berendonk N, Lute N, Bazin PL, Forstmann BU, Alkemade A. 3 versus 7 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging for parcellations of subcortical brain structures in clinical settings. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0236208. [PMID: 33232325 PMCID: PMC7685480 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2020] [Accepted: 11/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
7 Tesla (7T) magnetic resonance imaging holds great promise for improved visualization of the human brain for clinical purposes. To assess whether 7T is superior regarding localization procedures of small brain structures, we compared manual parcellations of the red nucleus, subthalamic nucleus, substantia nigra, globus pallidus interna and externa. These parcellations were created on a commonly used clinical anisotropic clinical 3T with an optimized isotropic (o)3T and standard 7T scan. The clinical 3T MRI scans did not allow delineation of an anatomically plausible structure due to its limited spatial resolution. o3T and 7T parcellations were directly compared. We found that 7T outperformed the o3T MRI as reflected by higher Dice scores, which were used as a measurement of interrater agreement for manual parcellations on quantitative susceptibility maps. This increase in agreement was associated with higher contrast to noise ratios for smaller structures, but not for the larger globus pallidus segments. Additionally, control-analyses were performed to account for potential biases in manual parcellations by assessing semi-automatic parcellations. These results showed a higher consistency for structure volumes for 7T compared to optimized 3T which illustrates the importance of the use of isotropic voxels for 3D visualization of the surgical target area. Together these results indicate that 7T outperforms c3T as well as o3T given the constraints of a clinical setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bethany R. Isaacs
- University of Amsterdam, Integrative Model-Based Cognitive Neuroscience Research Unit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Experimental Neurosurgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Martijn J. Mulder
- University of Amsterdam, Integrative Model-Based Cognitive Neuroscience Research Unit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Psychology and Social Sciences, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Josephine M. Groot
- University of Amsterdam, Integrative Model-Based Cognitive Neuroscience Research Unit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nikita van Berendonk
- University of Amsterdam, Integrative Model-Based Cognitive Neuroscience Research Unit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nicky Lute
- University of Amsterdam, Integrative Model-Based Cognitive Neuroscience Research Unit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Clinical Neuropsychology, Vrije University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pierre-Louis Bazin
- University of Amsterdam, Integrative Model-Based Cognitive Neuroscience Research Unit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Max Planck Institute for Human, Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Birte U. Forstmann
- University of Amsterdam, Integrative Model-Based Cognitive Neuroscience Research Unit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anneke Alkemade
- University of Amsterdam, Integrative Model-Based Cognitive Neuroscience Research Unit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Davidson B, Lipsman N, Meng Y, Rabin JS, Giacobbe P, Hamani C. The Use of Tractography-Based Targeting in Deep Brain Stimulation for Psychiatric Indications. Front Hum Neurosci 2020; 14:588423. [PMID: 33304258 PMCID: PMC7701283 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.588423] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2020] [Accepted: 10/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) has been investigated as a treatment option for patients with refractory psychiatric illness. Over the past two decades, neuroimaging developments have helped to advance the field, particularly the use of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and tractographic reconstruction of white-matter pathways. In this article, we review translational considerations and how DTI and tractography have been used to improve targeting during DBS surgery for depression, obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Davidson
- Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Harquail Centre for Neuromodulation, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Division of Neurosurgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Nir Lipsman
- Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Harquail Centre for Neuromodulation, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Division of Neurosurgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ying Meng
- Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Harquail Centre for Neuromodulation, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Division of Neurosurgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jennifer S. Rabin
- Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Harquail Centre for Neuromodulation, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Peter Giacobbe
- Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Harquail Centre for Neuromodulation, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Clement Hamani
- Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Harquail Centre for Neuromodulation, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Division of Neurosurgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Tafazoli S, MacDowell CJ, Che Z, Letai KC, Steinhardt CR, Buschman TJ. Learning to control the brain through adaptive closed-loop patterned stimulation. J Neural Eng 2020; 17:056007. [PMID: 32927437 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/abb860] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Stimulation of neural activity is an important scientific and clinical tool, causally testing hypotheses and treating neurodegenerative and neuropsychiatric diseases. However, current stimulation approaches cannot flexibly control the pattern of activity in populations of neurons. To address this, we developed a model-free, adaptive, closed-loop stimulation (ACLS) system that learns to use multi-site electrical stimulation to control the pattern of activity of a population of neurons. APPROACH The ACLS system combined multi-electrode electrophysiological recordings with multi-site electrical stimulation to simultaneously record the activity of a population of 5-15 multiunit neurons and deliver spatially-patterned electrical stimulation across 4-16 sites. Using a closed-loop learning system, ACLS iteratively updated the pattern of stimulation to reduce the difference between the observed neural response and a specific target pattern of firing rates in the recorded multiunits. MAIN RESULTS In silico and in vivo experiments showed ACLS learns to produce specific patterns of neural activity (in ∼15 min) and was robust to noise and drift in neural responses. In visual cortex of awake mice, ACLS learned electrical stimulation patterns that produced responses similar to the natural response evoked by visual stimuli. Similar to how repetition of a visual stimulus causes an adaptation in the neural response, the response to electrical stimulation was adapted when it was preceded by the associated visual stimulus. SIGNIFICANCE Our results show an ACLS system that can learn, in real-time, to generate specific patterns of neural activity. This work provides a framework for using model-free closed-loop learning to control neural activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sina Tafazoli
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08540, United States of America. Lead contact and corresponding author
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Gonzalez-Escamilla G, Muthuraman M, Ciolac D, Coenen VA, Schnitzler A, Groppa S. Neuroimaging and electrophysiology meet invasive neurostimulation for causal interrogations and modulations of brain states. Neuroimage 2020; 220:117144. [DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2020] [Revised: 06/22/2020] [Accepted: 07/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
|
35
|
Normative vs. patient-specific brain connectivity in deep brain stimulation. Neuroimage 2020; 224:117307. [PMID: 32861787 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2020] [Revised: 08/17/2020] [Accepted: 08/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Brain connectivity profiles seeding from deep brain stimulation (DBS) electrodes have emerged as informative tools to estimate outcome variability across DBS patients. Given the limitations of acquiring and processing patient-specific diffusion-weighted imaging data, a number of studies have employed normative atlases of the human connectome. To date, it remains unclear whether patient-specific connectivity information would strengthen the accuracy of such analyses. Here, we compared similarities and differences between patient-specific, disease-matched and normative structural connectivity data and their ability to predict clinical improvement. Data from 33 patients suffering from Parkinson's Disease who underwent surgery at three different centers were retrospectively collected. Stimulation-dependent connectivity profiles seeding from active contacts were estimated using three modalities, namely patient-specific diffusion-MRI data, age- and disease-matched or normative group connectome data (acquired in healthy young subjects). Based on these profiles, models of optimal connectivity were calculated and used to estimate clinical improvement in out of sample data. All three modalities resulted in highly similar optimal connectivity profiles that could largely reproduce findings from prior research based on this present novel multi-center cohort. In a data-driven approach that estimated optimal whole-brain connectivity profiles, out-of-sample predictions of clinical improvements were calculated. Using either patient-specific connectivity (R = 0.43 at p = 0.001), an age- and disease-matched group connectome (R = 0.25, p = 0.048) and a normative connectome based on healthy/young subjects (R = 0.31 at p = 0.028), significant predictions could be made. Our results of patient-specific connectivity and normative connectomes lead to similar main conclusions about which brain areas are associated with clinical improvement. Still, although results were not significantly different, they hint at the fact that patient-specific connectivity may bear the potential of explaining slightly more variance than group connectomes. Furthermore, use of normative connectomes involves datasets with high signal-to-noise acquired on specialized MRI hardware, while clinical datasets as the ones used here may not exactly match their quality. Our findings support the role of DBS electrode connectivity profiles as a promising method to investigate DBS effects and to potentially guide DBS programming.
Collapse
|
36
|
Bertino S, Basile GA, Bramanti A, Anastasi GP, Quartarone A, Milardi D, Cacciola A. Spatially coherent and topographically organized pathways of the human globus pallidus. Hum Brain Mapp 2020; 41:4641-4661. [PMID: 32757349 PMCID: PMC7555102 DOI: 10.1002/hbm.25147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2020] [Revised: 06/29/2020] [Accepted: 07/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Internal and external segments of globus pallidus (GP) exert different functions in basal ganglia circuitry, despite their main connectional systems share the same topographical organization, delineating limbic, associative, and sensorimotor territories. The identification of internal GP sensorimotor territory has therapeutic implications in functional neurosurgery settings. This study is aimed at assessing the spatial coherence of striatopallidal, subthalamopallidal, and pallidothalamic pathways by using tractography‐derived connectivity‐based parcellation (CBP) on high quality diffusion MRI data of 100 unrelated healthy subjects from the Human Connectome Project. A two‐stage hypothesis‐driven CBP approach has been carried out on the internal and external GP. Dice coefficient between functionally homologous pairs of pallidal maps has been computed. In addition, reproducibility of parcellation according to different pathways of interest has been investigated, as well as spatial relations between connectivity maps and existing optimal stimulation points for dystonic patients. The spatial organization of connectivity clusters revealed anterior limbic, intermediate associative and posterior sensorimotor maps within both internal and external GP. Dice coefficients showed high degree of coherence between functionally similar maps derived from the different bundles of interest. Sensorimotor maps derived from the subthalamopallidal pathway resulted to be the nearest to known optimal pallidal stimulation sites for dystonic patients. Our findings suggest that functionally homologous afferent and efferent connections may share similar spatial territory within the GP and that subcortical pallidal connectional systems may have distinct implications in the treatment of movement disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salvatore Bertino
- Brain Mapping Lab, Department of Biomedical, Dental Sciences and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Gianpaolo Antonio Basile
- Brain Mapping Lab, Department of Biomedical, Dental Sciences and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | | | - Giuseppe Pio Anastasi
- Brain Mapping Lab, Department of Biomedical, Dental Sciences and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Angelo Quartarone
- Brain Mapping Lab, Department of Biomedical, Dental Sciences and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Demetrio Milardi
- Brain Mapping Lab, Department of Biomedical, Dental Sciences and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.,IRCCS Centro Neurolesi "Bonino Pulejo", Messina, Italy
| | - Alberto Cacciola
- Brain Mapping Lab, Department of Biomedical, Dental Sciences and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Horn A, Wenzel G, Irmen F, Huebl J, Li N, Neumann WJ, Krause P, Bohner G, Scheel M, Kühn AA. Deep brain stimulation induced normalization of the human functional connectome in Parkinson's disease. Brain 2020; 142:3129-3143. [PMID: 31412106 DOI: 10.1093/brain/awz239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 89] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2019] [Revised: 05/12/2019] [Accepted: 06/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Neuroimaging has seen a paradigm shift away from a formal description of local activity patterns towards studying distributed brain networks. The recently defined framework of the 'human connectome' enables global analysis of parts of the brain and their interconnections. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an invasive therapy for patients with severe movement disorders aiming to retune abnormal brain network activity by local high frequency stimulation of the basal ganglia. Beyond clinical utility, DBS represents a powerful research platform to study functional connectomics and the modulation of distributed brain networks in the human brain. We acquired resting-state functional MRI in 20 patients with Parkinson's disease with subthalamic DBS switched on and off. An age-matched control cohort of 15 subjects was acquired from an open data repository. DBS lead placement in the subthalamic nucleus was localized using a state-of-the art pipeline that involved brain shift correction, multispectral image registration and use of a precise subcortical atlas. Based on a realistic 3D model of the electrode and surrounding anatomy, the amount of local impact of DBS was estimated using a finite element method approach. On a global level, average connectivity increases and decreases throughout the brain were estimated by contrasting on and off DBS scans on a voxel-wise graph comprising eight thousand nodes. Local impact of DBS on the motor subthalamic nucleus explained half the variance in global connectivity increases within the motor network (R = 0.711, P < 0.001). Moreover, local impact of DBS on the motor subthalamic nucleus could explain the degree to how much voxel-wise average brain connectivity normalized towards healthy controls (R = 0.713, P < 0.001). Finally, a network-based statistics analysis revealed that DBS attenuated specific couplings known to be pathological in Parkinson's disease. Namely, coupling between motor thalamus and motor cortex was increased while striatal coupling with cerebellum, external pallidum and subthalamic nucleus was decreased by DBS. Our results show that resting state functional MRI may be acquired in DBS on and off conditions on clinical MRI hardware and that data are useful to gain additional insight into how DBS modulates the functional connectome of the human brain. We demonstrate that effective DBS increases overall connectivity in the motor network, normalizes the network profile towards healthy controls and specifically strengthens thalamo-cortical connectivity while reducing striatal control over basal ganglia and cerebellar structures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Horn
- Department of Neurology, Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Section, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Gregor Wenzel
- Department of Neurology, Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Section, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Friederike Irmen
- Department of Neurology, Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Section, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin School of Mind and Brain, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Julius Huebl
- Department of Neurology, Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Section, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ningfei Li
- Department of Neurology, Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Section, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Wolf-Julian Neumann
- Department of Neurology, Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Section, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Department of Neuroradiology, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Patricia Krause
- Department of Neurology, Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Section, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Georg Bohner
- Department of Neuroradiology, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Michael Scheel
- Department of Neuroradiology, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Andrea A Kühn
- Department of Neurology, Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Section, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin School of Mind and Brain, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Exzellenzcluster NeuroCure, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Treu S, Strange B, Oxenford S, Neumann WJ, Kühn A, Li N, Horn A. Deep brain stimulation: Imaging on a group level. Neuroimage 2020; 219:117018. [PMID: 32505698 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2020] [Revised: 05/07/2020] [Accepted: 06/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) is an established treatment option for movement disorders and is under investigation for treatment in a growing number of other brain diseases. It has been shown that exact electrode placement crucially affects the efficacy of DBS and this should be considered when investigating novel indications or DBS targets. To measure clinical improvement as a function of electrode placement, neuroscientific methodology and specialized software tools are needed. Such tools should have the goal to make electrode placement comparable across patients and DBS centers, and include statistical analysis options to validate and define optimal targets. Moreover, to allow for comparability across different centers, these need to be performed within an algorithmically and anatomically standardized and openly available group space. With the publication of Lead-DBS software in 2014, an open-source tool was introduced that allowed for precise electrode reconstructions based on pre- and postoperative neuroimaging data. Here, we introduce Lead Group, implemented within the Lead-DBS environment and specifically designed to meet aforementioned demands. In the present article, we showcase the various processing streams of Lead Group in a retrospective cohort of 51 patients suffering from Parkinson's disease, who were implanted with DBS electrodes to the subthalamic nucleus (STN). Specifically, we demonstrate various ways to visualize placement of all electrodes in the group and map clinical improvement values to subcortical space. We do so by using active coordinates and volumes of tissue activated, showing converging evidence of an optimal DBS target in the dorsolateral STN. Second, we relate DBS outcome to the impact of each electrode on local structures by measuring overlap of stimulation volumes with the STN. Finally, we explore the software functions for connectomic mapping, which may be used to relate DBS outcomes to connectivity estimates with remote brain areas. The manuscript is accompanied by a walkthrough tutorial which allows users to reproduce all main results presented here. All data and code needed to reproduce results are openly available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Svenja Treu
- Laboratory for Clinical Neuroscience, Centre for Biomedical Technology, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Spain; Movement Disorders & Neuromodulation Unit, Department for Neurology, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Germany.
| | - Bryan Strange
- Laboratory for Clinical Neuroscience, Centre for Biomedical Technology, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Spain
| | - Simon Oxenford
- Movement Disorders & Neuromodulation Unit, Department for Neurology, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Germany
| | - Wolf-Julian Neumann
- Movement Disorders & Neuromodulation Unit, Department for Neurology, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Germany
| | - Andrea Kühn
- Movement Disorders & Neuromodulation Unit, Department for Neurology, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Germany; Berlin School of Mind and Brain, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Exzellenzcluster NeuroCure, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ningfei Li
- Movement Disorders & Neuromodulation Unit, Department for Neurology, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Germany
| | - Andreas Horn
- Movement Disorders & Neuromodulation Unit, Department for Neurology, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Wong JK, Hess CW, Almeida L, Middlebrooks EH, Christou EA, Patrick EE, Shukla AW, Foote KD, Okun MS. Deep brain stimulation in essential tremor: targets, technology, and a comprehensive review of clinical outcomes. Expert Rev Neurother 2020; 20:319-331. [PMID: 32116065 DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2020.1737017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: Essential tremor (ET) is a common movement disorder with an estimated prevalence of 0.9% worldwide. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established therapy for medication refractory and debilitating tremor. With the arrival of next generation technology, the implementation and delivery of DBS has been rapidly evolving. This review will highlight the current applications and constraints for DBS in ET.Areas covered: The mechanism of action, targets for neuromodulation, next generation guidance techniques, symptom-specific applications, and long-term efficacy will be reviewed.Expert opinion: The posterior subthalamic area and zona incerta are alternative targets to thalamic DBS in ET. However, they may be associated with additional stimulation-induced side effects. Novel stimulation paradigms and segmented electrodes provide innovative approaches to DBS programming and stimulation-induced side effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua K Wong
- Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Christopher W Hess
- Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Leonardo Almeida
- Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | | | - Evangelos A Christou
- Department of Applied Physiology and Kinesiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Erin E Patrick
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Aparna Wagle Shukla
- Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Kelly D Foote
- Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Michael S Okun
- Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Greene DJ, Marek S, Gordon EM, Siegel JS, Gratton C, Laumann TO, Gilmore AW, Berg JJ, Nguyen AL, Dierker D, Van AN, Ortega M, Newbold DJ, Hampton JM, Nielsen AN, McDermott KB, Roland JL, Norris SA, Nelson SM, Snyder AZ, Schlaggar BL, Petersen SE, Dosenbach NUF. Integrative and Network-Specific Connectivity of the Basal Ganglia and Thalamus Defined in Individuals. Neuron 2020; 105:742-758.e6. [PMID: 31836321 PMCID: PMC7035165 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2019.11.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 121] [Impact Index Per Article: 30.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2019] [Revised: 08/28/2019] [Accepted: 11/07/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
The basal ganglia, thalamus, and cerebral cortex form an interconnected network implicated in many neurological and psychiatric illnesses. A better understanding of cortico-subcortical circuits in individuals will aid in development of personalized treatments. Using precision functional mapping-individual-specific analysis of highly sampled human participants-we investigated individual-specific functional connectivity between subcortical structures and cortical functional networks. This approach revealed distinct subcortical zones of network specificity and multi-network integration. Integration zones were systematic, with convergence of cingulo-opercular control and somatomotor networks in the ventral intermediate thalamus (motor integration zones), dorsal attention and visual networks in the pulvinar, and default mode and multiple control networks in the caudate nucleus. The motor integration zones were present in every individual and correspond to consistently successful sites of deep brain stimulation (DBS; essential tremor). Individually variable subcortical zones correspond to DBS sites with less consistent treatment effects, highlighting the importance of PFM for neurosurgery, neurology, and psychiatry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deanna J Greene
- Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA; Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
| | - Scott Marek
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
| | - Evan M Gordon
- VISN17 Center of Excellence for Research on Returning War Veterans, Waco, TX, USA; Center for Vital Longevity, School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, University of Texas at Dallas, Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Baylor University, Waco, TX, USA
| | - Joshua S Siegel
- Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Caterina Gratton
- Department of Psychology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA; Department of Neurology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA
| | - Timothy O Laumann
- Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Adrian W Gilmore
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jeffrey J Berg
- Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Annie L Nguyen
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Donna Dierker
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Andrew N Van
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Mario Ortega
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Dillan J Newbold
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Jacqueline M Hampton
- Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Ashley N Nielsen
- Institute for Innovations in Developmental Sciences, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Kathleen B McDermott
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA; Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Jarod L Roland
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Scott A Norris
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Steven M Nelson
- VISN17 Center of Excellence for Research on Returning War Veterans, Waco, TX, USA; Center for Vital Longevity, School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, University of Texas at Dallas, Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Baylor University, Waco, TX, USA
| | - Abraham Z Snyder
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA; Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Bradley L Schlaggar
- Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Steven E Petersen
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA; Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA; Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Neuroscience, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Nico U F Dosenbach
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA; Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA; Program in Occupational Therapy, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Golestanirad L, Kazemivalipour E, Lampman D, Habara H, Atalar E, Rosenow J, Pilitsis J, Kirsch J. RF heating of deep brain stimulation implants in open-bore vertical MRI systems: A simulation study with realistic device configurations. Magn Reson Med 2019; 83:2284-2292. [PMID: 31677308 DOI: 10.1002/mrm.28049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2019] [Revised: 10/02/2019] [Accepted: 10/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Patients with deep brain stimulation (DBS) implants benefit highly from MRI, however, access to MRI is restricted for these patients because of safety hazards associated with RF heating of the implant. To date, all MRI studies on RF heating of medical implants have been performed in horizontal closed-bore systems. Vertical MRI scanners have a fundamentally different distribution of electric and magnetic fields and are now available at 1.2T, capable of high-resolution structural and functional MRI. This work presents the first simulation study of RF heating of DBS implants in high-field vertical scanners. METHODS We performed finite element electromagnetic simulations to calculate specific absorption rate (SAR) at tips of DBS leads during MRI in a commercially available 1.2T vertical coil compared to a 1.5T horizontal scanner. Both isolated leads and fully implanted systems were included. RESULTS We found 10- to 30-fold reduction in SAR implication at tips of isolated DBS leads, and up to 19-fold SAR reduction at tips of leads in fully implanted systems in vertical coils compared to horizontal birdcage coils. CONCLUSIONS If confirmed in larger patient cohorts and verified experimentally, this result can open the door to plethora of structural and functional MRI applications to guide, interpret, and advance DBS therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laleh Golestanirad
- Department of Radiology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.,Department of Biomedical Engineering, McCormick School of Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois
| | - Ehsan Kazemivalipour
- Department of Radiology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.,Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Bilkent University, Ankara, Turkey.,National Magnetic Resonance Research Center (UMRAM), Bilkent University, Ankara, Turkey
| | | | - Hideta Habara
- Hitachi, Ltd. Healthcare Business Unit, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ergin Atalar
- Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Bilkent University, Ankara, Turkey.,National Magnetic Resonance Research Center (UMRAM), Bilkent University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Joshua Rosenow
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Julie Pilitsis
- Department of Neurosurgery, Albany Medical Center, Albany, New York
| | - John Kirsch
- A.A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Neuroimaging Technological Advancements for Targeting in Functional Neurosurgery. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 2019; 19:42. [DOI: 10.1007/s11910-019-0961-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
|