Complications associated with immunotherapy for brain metastases

Assessment of eligibility criteria in renal cell carcinoma trials evaluating systemic therapy

OBJECTIVES

To characterise the restrictiveness of eligibility criteria in contemporary renal cell carcinoma (RCC) trials, using recommendations from the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)-Friends of Cancer Research (FCR) initiative.

METHODS

vPhase I-III trials assessing systemic therapies in patients with RCC starting between 30 June 2012 and 30 June 2022 were identified. Eligibility criteria regarding brain metastases, prior or concurrent malignancies, hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection were identified and stratified into three groups: exclusion, conditional inclusion, and not reported. Descriptive statistics were used to determine the frequency of eligibility criteria. Fisher's exact test or chi-square test were used to calculate their associations with certain trial characteristics.

RESULTS

A total of 423 RCC trials were initially identified of which 112 (26.5%) had sufficient accessible information. Exclusion of patients with HIV infection, HBV/HCV infection, brain metastases, and prior or concurrent malignancies were reported in 74.1%, 53.6%, 33.0%, and 8.0% of trials, respectively. In the context of HIV and HBV/HCV infection, patients were largely excluded from trials evaluating immunotherapy (94.4% and 77.8%, respectively). In addition, brain metastases were excluded in trials assessing targeted therapy (36.4%), combined therapy (33.3%), and immunotherapy (22.2%). Exclusion of patients with prior or concurrent malignancies was less frequently reported, accounting for 9.1%, 8.3%, and 5.6% targeted therapy, combined therapy and immunotherapy trials, respectively.

CONCLUSION

A substantial proportion of RCC trials utilise restrictive eligibility criteria, excluding patients with fairly prevalent comorbidities. Implementing the ASCO-FCR recommendations will ensure resulting data are more inclusive and aligned with patient populations in the real-world.

Automated identification and quantification of metastatic brain tumors and perilesional edema based on a deep learning neural network

PURPOSE

This paper presents a deep learning model for use in the automated segmentation of metastatic brain tumors and associated perilesional edema.

METHODS

The model was trained using Gamma Knife surgical data (90 MRI sets from 46 patients), including the initial treatment plan and follow-up images (T1-weighted contrast-enhanced (T1cWI) and T2-weighted images (T2WI)) manually annotated by neurosurgeons to indicate the target tumor and edema regions. A mask region-based convolutional neural network was used to extract brain parenchyma, after which the DeepMedic 3D convolutional neural network was in the segmentation of tumors and edemas.

RESULTS

Five-fold cross-validation demonstrated the efficacy of the brain parenchyma extraction model, achieving a Dice similarity coefficient of 96.4%. The segmentation models used for metastatic tumors and brain edema achieved Dice similarity coefficients of 71.6% and 85.1%, respectively. This study also presents an intuitive graphical user interface to facilitate the use of these models in clinical analysis.

CONCLUSION

This paper introduces a deep learning model for the automated segmentation and quantification of brain metastatic tumors and perilesional edema trained using only T1cWI and T2WI. This technique could facilitate further research on metastatic tumors and perilesional edema as well as other intracranial lesions.

The Impact of Immune Checkpoint Inhibition on the Risk of Radiation Necrosis Following Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Metastatic Brain Cancer

Purpose/objective Forty percent of cancer patients develop brain metastases (BM) and are often treated with stereotactic radiation (SRS/SRT). Checkpoint inhibitor (CI) use is suspected of increasing the risk of radiation necrosis (RN). Our aim is to determine whether treatment with CI is associated with an increased risk of RN in BM patients treated with SRS/SRT. Methods We retrospectively identified the medical records of BM patients treated with SRS/SRT between 1/2017 and 12/2021 using an institutional database. RN was defined by MRI imaging read by neuroradiologists and/or surgical pathology. V12GY of patients with and without RN was compared using the Mann-Whitney test. The chi-square test was used to see if RN was associated with CI use, histology, particular CI agent used, > 1 course SRS/SRT, SRS/SRT dose, chemotherapy, whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT), age, or sex. Results Two hundred and fifty-nine patients treated with 455 courses of SRS/SRT were analyzed. The most common primary histologies were lung 56% (N=146), breast 14% (N= 37), melanoma 9% (N=24), and renal cancer 7% (N=18). A total of 53.8% (N = no. of patients) were treated with CI. The overall rate of any RN was 21.8% (N=27) in the CI group compared to 14.8% (N=141) in the non-CI group (p=0.174). Mean V12Gy was 15.525 cc and 9.419 cc in patients with and without RN (p=0.02768). Mean number of SRS/SRT courses was 2 and 1.53 for patients with and without RN, and >1 course of SRS/SRT was a predictor of RN (p <0.01). Other features analyzed were not significant. Conclusion RN was higher in the BM patients treated with SRS/SRT receiving CI compared to non-CI patients (21.8%, N=27, versus 14.6%, N= 16), but failed to reach statistical significance. V12Gy and > 1 course of SRS/SRT was associated with RN. Caution should be taken in treating patients with SRS/SRT and CI there might be an increased risk of RN.

An Overview of Systemic Targeted Therapy in Renal Cell Carcinoma, with a Focus on Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma and Brain Metastases

The most commonly diagnosed malignancy of the urinary system is represented by renal cell carcinoma. Various subvariants of RCC were described, with a clear-cell type prevailing in about 85% of all RCC tumors. Patients with metastases from renal cell carcinoma did not have many effective therapies until the end of the 1980s, as long as hormonal therapy and chemotherapy were the only options available. The outcomes were unsatisfactory due to the poor effectiveness of the available therapeutic options, but then interferon-alpha and interleukin-2 showed treatment effectiveness, providing benefits but only for less than half of the patients. However, it was not until 2004 that targeted therapies emerged, prolonging the survival rate. Currently, new technologies and strategies are being developed to improve the actual efficacy of available treatments and their prognostic aspects. This article summarizes the mechanisms of action, importance, benefits, adverse events of special interest, and efficacy of immunotherapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma, with a focus on brain metastases.

TME-targeted approaches of brain metastases and its clinical therapeutic evidence

The tumor microenvironment (TME), which includes both cellular and non-cellular elements, is now recognized as one of the major regulators of the development of primary tumors, the metastasis of which occurs to specific organs, and the response to therapy. Development of immunotherapy and targeted therapies have increased knowledge of cancer-related inflammation Since the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier (BCB) limit immune cells from entering from the periphery, it has long been considered an immunological refuge. Thus, tumor cells that make their way "to the brain were believed to be protected from the body's normal mechanisms of monitoring and eliminating them. In this process, the microenvironment and tumor cells at different stages interact and depend on each other to form the basis of the evolution of tumor brain metastases. This paper focuses on the pathogenesis, microenvironmental changes, and new treatment methods of different types of brain metastases. Through the systematic review and summary from macro to micro, the occurrence and development rules and key driving factors of the disease are revealed, and the clinical precision medicine of brain metastases is comprehensively promoted. Recent research has shed light on the potential of TME-targeted and potential treatments for treating Brain metastases, and we'll use that knowledge to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of these approaches.

Effect of Immunotherapy and Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Sequencing on Local Control and Survival in Patients With Spine Metastases

Purpose

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is commonly used to treat spinal metastases in combination with immunotherapy (IT). The optimal sequencing of these modalities is unclear. This study aimed to investigate whether sequencing of IT and SBRT was associated with differences in local control (LC), overall survival (OS), and toxicity when treating spine metastases.

Methods and Materials

All patients at our institution who received spine SBRT from 2010 to 2019 with systemic therapy data available were reviewed retrospectively. The primary endpoint was LC. Secondary endpoints were toxicity (fracture and radiation myelitis) and OS. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to determine whether IT sequencing (before versus after SBRT) and use of IT were associated with LC or OS.

Results

A total of 191 lesions in 128 patients met inclusion criteria with 50 (26%) lesions in 33 (26%) patients who received IT. Fourteen (11%) patients with 24 (13%) lesions received the first IT dose before SBRT, whereas 19 (15%) patients with 26 (14%) lesions received the first dose after SBRT. LC did not differ between lesions treated with IT before SBRT versus after SBRT (1 year 73% versus 81%, log rank = 0.275, P = .600). Fracture risk was not associated with IT timing (χ² = 0.137, P = .934) or receipt of IT (χ² = 0.508, P = .476), and no radiation myelitis events occurred. Median OS was 31.8 versus 6.6 months for the IT after SBRT versus IT before SBRT cohorts, respectively (log rank = 13.193, P < .001). On Cox univariate analysis and multivariate analysis, receipt of IT before SBRT and Karnofsky performance status <80 were associated with worse OS. IT treatment versus none was not associated with any difference in LC (log rank = 1.063, P = .303) or OS (log rank = 1.736, P = .188).

Conclusions

Sequencing of IT and SBRT was not associated with any difference in LC or toxicity, but delivering IT after SBRT versus before SBRT was associated with improved OS.

Lenvatinib or anti-VEGF in combination with anti-PD-1 differentially augments antitumor activity in melanoma

Targeting tumor-associated blood vessels to increase immune infiltration may enhance treatment effectiveness, yet limited data exist regarding anti-angiogenesis effects on the tumor microenvironment (TME). We hypothesized that dual targeting of angiogenesis with immune checkpoints would improve both intracranial and extracranial disease. We used subcutaneous and left ventricle melanoma models to evaluate anti-PD-1/anti-VEGF and anti-PD-1/lenvatinib (pan-VEGFR inhibitor) combinations. Cytokine/chemokine profiling and flow cytometry were performed to assess signaling and immune-infiltrating populations. An in vitro blood-brain barrier (BBB) model was utilized to study intracranial treatment effects on endothelial integrity and leukocyte transmigration. Anti-PD-1 with either anti-VEGF or lenvatinib improved survival and decreased tumor growth in systemic melanoma murine models; treatment increased Th1 cytokine/chemokine signaling. Lenvatinib decreased tumor-associated macrophages but increased plasmacytoid DCs early in treatment; this effect was not evident with anti-VEGF. Both lenvatinib and anti-VEGF resulted in decreased intratumoral blood vessels. Although anti-VEGF promoted endothelial stabilization in an in vitro BBB model, while lenvatinib did not, both regimens enabled leukocyte transmigration. The combined targeting of PD-1 and VEGF or its receptors promotes enhanced melanoma antitumor activity, yet their effects on the TME are quite different. These studies provide insights into dual anti-PD-1 and anti-angiogenesis combinations.

First-line immune-checkpoint inhibitor treatment in extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer: A classical and network meta-analysis

Background

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) has a poor prognosis. For the last 30 years, first-line systemic treatment has remained unaltered. After the integration of ımmunotherapy, a new first-line gold standard, atezolizumab in combination with carboplatin plus etoposide, was approved in extensive-disease SCLC (ED-SCLC) in 2019.

Materials and Methods

First-line randomized controlled studies that investigated anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/PD-1 ligand-1 (PD-L1) and anti-T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) agents in combination with platinum plus etoposide (EP) were scoured. A total of six studies (two - anti-CTLA-4 and four - anti-PD1/PD-L1) were included and classic and network meta-analyses (NMAs) were performed.

Results

Fixed model for overall survival (OAS) in the PD-1- or PD-L1-treated subgroup yielded a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.746 with a 95% confidence interval (CI) =0.662-0.840 and in the CTLA-4-treated subgroup a HR of 0.941 with a 95% CI = 0.816-1.084 for the immune therapy + chemotherapy versus chemotherapy comparison (CTLA-4-based versus PD-1- or PD-L1-based groups' comparison of OAS effect Q = 6.05, df = 1, P = 0.014). NMA showed that all chemotherapy + immunotherapy combinations were equally potent and more efficient than PE in terms of OAS and progression-free survival (PFS). Rank probability plots demonstrated nivolumab + EP as the most probable effective treatment modality in terms of OAS and PFS.

Conclusion

The usage of anti-PD1/PD-L1 immunotherapy agents results in significant OAS advantage, and anti-PD1/PD-L1 agents are superior to anti-CTLA-4 approach in combination with platinum plus etoposide regimen in ED-SCLC.

The role of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with intracranial metastatic disease

Intracranial metastatic disease (IMD) complicates the course of nearly 2-4% of patients with systemic cancer. The prevalence of IMD has been increasing over the past few decades. Historically, definitive treatment for brain metastases (BM) has been limited to radiation therapy or surgical resection. Chemotherapies have not typically proven valuable in the treatment of IMD, with the exception of highly chemotherapy-sensitive lesions. Recent data have supported a role for systemic targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the treatment of select patients with IMD. There remains, however, a clear clinical need for further investigation to delineate the role of ICIs in patients with BM. In this review, we outline and describe recent and current efforts to identify the efficacy of ICI therapy in patients with IMD.

The Strategies and Mechanisms of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Brain Metastases in NSCLC

Brain metastases are more and more common among patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). TKI therapy could provide ideal outcomes for patients harboring epidermal growth factor receptor or ALK mutations. For wild-type patients, however, survival is poor because there are few effective treatments other than radiotherapy. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have changed the management of advanced NSCLC. However, the exclusion of patients with active brain metastasis (BM) from most ICI trials precludes the generalization of results. Accordingly, a variety of appropriate real-world studies and clinical trials are being developed to evaluate tumor response. Increasingly encouraging results have suggested that ICIs could be active in the central nervous system (CNS) in select patients with high PD-L1 expression and low CNS disease burden. With the extensive use of ICIs in NSCLC patients with BM, many important questions have emerged concerning issues such as the clinical response to a single ICI, use of ICIs combined with chemotherapy or radiation, the biological mechanism and appropriate sequencing of local and systemic therapy combinations, and safety and toxicity. The present review summarizes the advances in systemic ICIs for the treatment of NSCLC patients with BM, discusses factors associated with efficacy and toxicity, and explores future directions.

Emerging Studies of Melanoma Brain Metastasis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Among solid tumors, melanoma has the highest propensity for brain dissemination. Although newer treatment approaches have resulted in excellent control or elimination of brain metastasis in many patients, they remain the cause of significant morbidity and mortality. Here, we review recent preclinical and clinical studies to detail current understanding of the incidence, prognosis, biological characteristics, and treatments for melanoma brain metastases.

RECENT FINDINGS

Clinical trials tailored to this patient population have demonstrated prolonged disease control with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Emerging clinical challenges include radiation necrosis and perilesional edema, phenomena that are rarely seen in other organs. Recent preclinical studies have resulted in improved understanding of the tumor microenvironment in the brain, providing insights into additional treatment approaches. The biological basis of brain tumor homing and survival within the central nervous system remain understudied. Additional preclinical and clinical studies will enhance our ability to prevent and treat brain metastases.

Current Advances in Immunotherapy for Glioblastoma Multiforme and Future Prospects

Glioblastoma is the most frequent and malignant type of brain tumor. It has a reputation for being resistant to current treatments, and the prognosis is still bleak. Immunotherapies have transformed the treatment of a variety of cancers, and they provide great hope for glioblastoma, although they have yet to be successful. The justification for immune targeting of glioblastoma and the obstacles that come with treating these immunosuppressive tumors are reviewed in this paper. Cancer vaccines, oncolytic viruses (OVs), checkpoint blockade medications, adoptive cell transfer (ACT), chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cells, and nanomedicine-based immunotherapies are among the novel immune-targeting therapies researched in glioblastoma. Key clinical trial outcomes and current trials for each method are presented from a clinical standpoint. Finally, constraints, whether biological or due to trial design, are discussed, along with solutions for overcoming them. In glioblastoma, proof of efficacy for immunotherapy approaches has yet to be demonstrated, but our rapidly growing understanding of the disease’s biology and immune microenvironment, as well as the emergence of novel promising combinatorial approaches, may allow researchers to finally meet the medical need for patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM).

Neurological Adverse Events Induced by Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Current Perspectives and New Development

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the treatment of multiple malignancies, especially in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). With the extensive application of ICIs in clinical practice, clinicians have to manage their toxicities, which are often termed immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Several ICIs, such as nivolumab, pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, and durvalumab, have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to treat advanced NSCLC, accompanied by a broad spectrum of toxicity reactions. However, ICIs-associated neurological toxicities, regarding polyneuropathy, Bell palsy, encephalopathy, and myasthenia gravis, as uncommon emerging toxicities have not been well recognized, present a challenge for clinicians to improve awareness of supervision, recognition, and management before death from them. Herein, we have summarized the incidence, diagnosis, clinical manifestations, potential mechanisms, treatments, and outcomes of ICIs-related neurotoxicity and optimized the management approach for NSCLC patients. Prompt recognition and proper management are indispensable to reduce the morbidity of these patients with immune-related neurological toxicities.

Overcoming delivery barriers in immunotherapy for glioblastoma

Glioblastoma is one of the deadliest forms of primary adult tumors, with median survival of 14.6 months post-diagnosis despite aggressive standard of care treatment. This grim prognosis for glioblastoma patients has changed little in the past two decades, necessitating novel treatment modalities. One potential treatment modality is cancer immunotherapy, which has shown remarkable progress in slowing disease progression or even potentially curing certain solid tumors. However, the transport barriers posed by the blood-brain barrier and the immune privileged status of the central nervous system pose drug delivery obstacles that are unique to brain tumors. In this review, we provide an overview of the various physiological, immunological, and drug delivery barriers that must be overcome for effective glioblastoma treatment. We discuss chemical modification strategies to enable nanomedicines to bypass the blood-brain barrier and reach intracranial tumors. Finally, we highlight recent advances in biomaterial-based strategies for cancer immunotherapy that can be adapted to glioblastoma treatment.

Radiologic and Clinical Outcomes of Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Intraventricular Metastases

OBJECTIVE

The optimal management of intraventricular metastases remains debatable. The aim of this study is to define the safety and efficacy of Gamma-Knife radiosurgery in the treatment of intraventricular metastases.

METHODS

This retrospective, single-center study involved patients that were treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for intraventricular metastases. The study end points included SRS-related toxicity, local and distal intracranial tumor control, as well as the incidence of post-treatment hydrocephalus and leptomeningeal dissemination. Factors associated with radiologic and clinical outcomes were also analyzed.

RESULTS

The cohort included 17 consecutive patients who underwent stereotactic radiosurgery for treatment of 41 intracranial metastases, of which 23 were primary intraventricular (intraventricular metastasis). Median overall survival from primary tumor diagnosis and from SRS treatment were 28 and 5 months, respectively. With a median radiological follow-up of 3 (interquartile range 3) months, 7 patients (41.18%) experienced overall intracranial disease progression, whereas 7 (27.27%) intraventricular metastases progressed radiologically. Four (23.53%) and 3 (17.65%) patients developed hydrocephalus and leptomeningeal dissemination post-SRS, respectively. Four patients (23.53%) died due to intracranial disease progression.

CONCLUSIONS

SRS offers a reasonable chance of local tumor control for patients with intraventricular brain metastasis. However, the risk of hydrocephalus and leptomeningeal spread of disease is not inconsequential and merits close follow-up for patients with brain metastasis involving the ventricular system.

Incidence and characteristics of metastatic intracranial lesions in stage III and IV melanoma: a single institute retrospective analysis

INTRODUCTION

The study aimed to describe the brain metastases (BM) incidence, at diagnosis and follow-up, in patients initially presenting with stage III or IV melanoma and characterize their metastatic brain lesions. We also sought to describe the association of common genetic mutations and immunotherapy with BM development in advanced melanoma.

METHODS

Using our institution's tumor registry, we identified patients with initial diagnoses of stage III and stage IV melanoma. In this cohort, we obtained BM incidence at diagnosis and follow-up, characterized the metastatic brain lesions and primary tumor's genetic profile.

RESULTS

During the follow-up period, 22.9% of patients with an initial diagnosis of stage III developed BM. In this cohort, the median time for BM occurrence was 20 months; [95% CI (14-29)]. Likewise, 37.7% of patients with Stage IV melanoma presented with BM at the time of diagnosis, and 22.7% of remaining patients developed BM at follow-up over a median duration of 6 months [95% CI (4-11)]. Therefore, suggesting an overall incidence of 51.9% in stage IV melanoma. Next, we observed that the incidence of BM development during the follow-up period significantly decreased from 2012 to 2017 (p < 0.001). Lastly, we found a significantly higher frequency of mutational BRAF in the primary tumor of patients with BM (68.7% vs. 31.2%; p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

While the overall incidence of BM remains high, the decreasing incidence of BM over the follow-up period is promising. Similar BM incidence in patients with an initial diagnosis of stage III or stage IV warrants appropriate imaging surveillance regimen for stage III patients.

Immunotherapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients with Brain Metastases: Clinical Challenges and Future Directions

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized the treatment landscape for patients with non-small cell lung cancers. Existing treatment paradigms for brain metastases in lung cancer patients leave patients with adverse neurocognitive function, poor quality of life, and dismal prognosis, thus highlighting the need to develop more effective systemic therapies. Although data are limited, emerging knowledge suggests promising activity and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in brain metastases in non-small cell lung cancer patients. This review aims to summarize the current data, highlight the challenges of incorporating immune checkpoint inhibitors in treating these patients, and identify areas for future research.

Correlation Between 18F-FDG Uptake and Immune Cell Infiltration in Metastatic Brain Lesions

Background

The purpose of this study was to investigate the correlation between ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake and infiltrating immune cells in metastatic brain lesions.

Methods

This retrospective study included 34 patients with metastatic brain lesions who underwent brain ¹⁸F-FDG positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) followed by surgery. ¹⁸F-FDG uptake ratio was calculated by dividing the standardized uptake value (SUV) of the metastatic brain lesion by the contralateral normal white matter uptake value. We investigated the clinicopathological characteristics of the patients and analyzed the correlation between ¹⁸F-FDG uptake and infiltration of various immune cells. In addition, we evaluated immune-expression levels of glucose transporter 1 (GLUT1), hexokinase 2 (HK2), and Ki-67 in metastatic brain lesions.

Results

The degree of ¹⁸F-FDG uptake of metastatic brain lesions was not significantly correlated with clinical parameters. There was no significant relationship between the ¹⁸F-FDG uptake and degree of immune cell infiltration in brain metastasis. Furthermore, other markers, such as GLUT1, HK2, and Ki-67, were not correlated with degree of ¹⁸F-FDG uptake. In metastatic brain lesions that originated from breast cancer, a higher degree of ¹⁸F-FDG uptake was observed in those with high expression of CD68.

Conclusions

In metastatic brain lesions, the degree of ¹⁸F-FDG uptake was not significantly associated with infiltration of immune cells. The ¹⁸F-FDG uptake of metastatic brain lesions from breast cancer, however, might be associated with macrophage activity.

Challenging Hurdles of Current Targeting in Glioblastoma: A Focus on Immunotherapeutic Strategies

Glioblastoma is the most frequent primary neoplasm of the central nervous system and still suffers from very poor therapeutic impact. No clear improvements over current standard of care have been made in the last decade. For other cancers, but also for brain metastasis, which harbors a very distinct biology from glioblastoma, immunotherapy has already proven its efficacy. Efforts have been pursued to allow glioblastoma patients to benefit from these new approaches, but the road is still long for broad application. Here, we aim to review key glioblastoma immune related characteristics, current immunotherapeutic strategies being explored, their potential caveats, and future directions.

Clinical Significance of PDCD4 in Melanoma by Subcellular Expression and in Tumor-Associated Immune Cells

Simple Summary

While targeting programmed cell death (PDCD) 1 is a central treatment against melanoma, little is known about the related protein PDCD4. We defined differences in melanoma PDCD4 subcellular localization (either total cellular or nuclear-only) during oncogenesis, evaluated its presence on tumor-infiltrating immune cells, and determined its impact on survival. High PDCD4 expression resulted in improved survival in patients with primary and intracranial but not extracranial metastatic melanoma. High PDCD4 levels in surrounding tumor tissue were also associated with increased infiltrating immune cells. PDCD4 may be a potentially useful biomarker in melanoma to help guide our understanding of patient prognosis. Methods to increase PDCD4 in those with melanoma brain metastases may also help improve disease response.

Abstract

Little is known about the subcellular localization and function of programmed cell death 4 (PDCD4) in melanoma. Our past studies suggest PDCD4 interacts with Pleckstrin Homology Domain Containing A5 (PLEKHA5) to influence melanoma brain metastasis outcomes, as high intracranial PDCD4 expression leads to improved survival. We aimed to define the subcellular distribution of PDCD4 in melanoma and in the tumor microenvironment during neoplastic progression and its impact on clinical outcomes. We analyzed multiple tissue microarrays with well-annotated clinicopathological variables using quantitative immunofluorescence and evaluated single-cell RNA-sequencing on a brain metastasis sample to characterize PDCD4+ immune cell subsets. We demonstrate differences in PDCD4 expression during neoplastic progression, with high tumor and stromal PDCD4 levels associated with improved survival in primary melanomas and in intracranial metastases, but not in extracranial metastatic disease. While the expression of PDCD4 is well-documented on CD8+ T cells and natural killer cells, we show that it is also found on B cells and mast cells. PDCD4 expression in the tumor microenvironment is associated with increased immune cell infiltration. Further studies are needed to define the interaction of PDCD4 and PLEKHA5 and to evaluate the utility of this pathway as a therapeutic target in melanoma brain metastasis.

Brain metastasis models: What should we aim to achieve better treatments?

Brain metastasis is emerging as a unique entity in oncology based on its particular biology and, consequently, the pharmacological approaches that should be considered. We discuss the current state of modelling this specific progression of cancer and how these experimental models have been used to test multiple pharmacologic strategies over the years. In spite of pre-clinical evidences demonstrating brain metastasis vulnerabilities, many clinical trials have excluded patients with brain metastasis. Fortunately, this trend is getting to an end given the increasing importance of secondary brain tumors in the clinic and a better knowledge of the underlying biology. We discuss emerging trends and unsolved issues that will shape how we will study experimental brain metastasis in the years to come.

Regional Responses in Radiation-Induced Normal Tissue Damage

Normal tissue side effects remain a major concern in radiotherapy. The improved precision of radiation dose delivery of recent technological developments in radiotherapy has the potential to reduce the radiation dose to organ regions that contribute the most to the development of side effects. This review discusses the contribution of regional variation in radiation responses in several organs. In the brain, various regions were found to contribute to radiation-induced neurocognitive dysfunction. In the parotid gland, the region containing the major ducts was found to be critical in hyposalivation. The heart and lung were each found to exhibit regional responses while also mutually affecting each other's response to radiation. Sub-structures critical for the development of side effects were identified in the pancreas and bladder. The presence of these regional responses is based on a non-uniform distribution of target cells or sub-structures critical for organ function. These characteristics are common to most organs in the body and we therefore hypothesize that regional responses in radiation-induced normal tissue damage may be a shared occurrence. Further investigations will offer new opportunities to reduce normal tissue side effects of radiotherapy using modern and high-precision technologies.

Single- and Multifraction Stereotactic Radiosurgery Dose/Volume Tolerances of the Brain

PURPOSE

As part of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine Working Group on Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy investigating normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) after hypofractionated radiation therapy, data from published reports (PubMed indexed 1995-2018) were pooled to identify dosimetric and clinical predictors of radiation-induced brain toxicity after single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (fSRS).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Eligible studies provided NTCPs for the endpoints of radionecrosis, edema, or symptoms after cranial SRS/fSRS and quantitative dose-volume metrics. Studies of patients with only glioma, meningioma, vestibular schwannoma, or brainstem targets were excluded. The data summary and analyses focused on arteriovenous malformations (AVM) and brain metastases.

RESULTS

Data from 51 reports are summarized. There was wide variability in reported rates of radionecrosis. Available data for SRS/fSRS for brain metastases were more amenable to NTCP modeling than AVM data. In the setting of brain metastases, SRS/fSRS-associated radionecrosis can be difficult to differentiate from tumor progression. For single-fraction SRS to brain metastases, tissue volumes (including target volumes) receiving 12 Gy (V12) of 5 cm³, 10 cm³, or >15 cm³ were associated with risks of symptomatic radionecrosis of approximately 10%, 15%, and 20%, respectively. SRS for AVM was associated with modestly lower rates of symptomatic radionecrosis for equivalent V12. For brain metastases, brain plus target volume V20 (3-fractions) or V24 (5-fractions) <20 cm³ was associated with <10% risk of any necrosis or edema, and <4% risk of radionecrosis requiring resection.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of radionecrosis after SRS and fSRS can be modeled as a function of dose and volume treated. The use of fSRS appears to reduce risks of radionecrosis for larger treatment volumes relative to SRS. More standardized dosimetric and toxicity reporting is needed to facilitate future pooled analyses that can refine predictive models of brain toxicity risks.

Management of brain metastases according to molecular subtypes

The incidence of brain metastases has markedly increased in the past 20 years owing to progress in the treatment of malignant solid tumours, earlier diagnosis by MRI and an ageing population. Although local therapies remain the mainstay of treatment for many patients with brain metastases, a growing number of systemic options are now available and/or are under active investigation. HER2-targeted therapies (lapatinib, neratinib, tucatinib and trastuzumab emtansine), alone or in combination, yield a number of intracranial responses in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer brain metastases. New inhibitors are being investigated in brain metastases from ER-positive or triple-negative breast cancer. Several generations of EGFR and ALK inhibitors have shown activity on brain metastases from EGFR and ALK mutant non-small-cell lung cancer. Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) hold promise in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer without druggable mutations and in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. The survival of patients with brain metastases from melanoma has substantially improved after the advent of BRAF inhibitors and ICIs (ipilimumab, nivolumab and pembrolizumab). The combination of targeted agents or ICIs with stereotactic radiosurgery could further improve the response rates and survival but the risk of radiation necrosis should be monitored. Advanced neuroimaging and liquid biopsy will hopefully improve response evaluation.