1
|
Zuo C, Yang X, Wu X, Fan R, Liu J, Xiang H, Li Y, Zhao X, Liu X, Liu Y. Medication non-adherence and self-inflicted violence behaviors among 185,800 patients with schizophrenia in the community: a 12-year cohort study. BMC Med 2024; 22:136. [PMID: 38523268 PMCID: PMC10962179 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-024-03354-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2023] [Accepted: 03/13/2024] [Indexed: 03/26/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the importance of medication adherence in treatment effectiveness, little is known about the association between medication non-adherence and self-inflicted violence behaviors. We aimed to assess whether medication non-adherence increased the risk of self-inflicted violence behaviors among schizophrenics in communities (hypothesis 1) and whether the dose-response relationship existed (hypothesis 2). METHODS This 12-year cohort study in western China recruited 292,667 community-dwelling schizophrenics. The proportion of regular medication (PRM) was calculated by dividing the time of "regular adherence" by the total time of antipsychotic treatment during follow-up period as an indicator of medication adherence. For hypothesis 1, medication adherence was designated as a binary variable with a threshold of 0.8 (PRM); for hypothesis 2, medication adherence was specified as five-category and continuous variables, respectively. Inverse probability weighting and mixed effects Cox proportional hazards models were conducted for confounders control and survival analyses. RESULTS One hundred eighty-five thousand eight hundred participants were eligible for the final analyses, with a mean age of 47.49 years (SD 14.55 years), of whom 53.6% were female. For hypothesis 1, the medication non-adherence group (PRM < 0.8) had a lower risk of suicide (HR, 0.527, 95% CI, 0.447-0.620), an increased risk of NSSI (HR, 1.229, 95% CI, 1.088-1.388), and non-significant risk of attempted suicide compared with adherence group (PRM ≥ 0.8). For hypothesis 2, the lowest medication adherence (PRM < 0.2) was associated with increased risks of suicide attempt (HR, 1.614, 95% CI, 1.412-1.845), NSSI (HR, 1.873, 95% CI, 1.649-2.126), and a decreased risk of suicide (HR, 0.593, 95% CI, 0.490-0.719). The other non-adherence groups had lower risks for all three self-inflicted violence behaviors. The associations between medication adherence in continuous-variable and three outcomes were consistent with the categorical medication adherence results. CONCLUSIONS Almost no medication taken as prescribed was associated with an increased risk of suicide attempt and NSSI. However, medication adherence did not appear to prevent completed suicide. Besides, patients with moderate adherence had a lower incidence of suicide attempt and NSSI. These findings highlight the need for a more detailed portrayal of medication adherence and the need to be vigilant for suicide intent in schizophrenics with good medication adherence who may be overlooked previously.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chuanlong Zuo
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, West China School of Public Health and West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, No.17, Section 3, Renmin South Road, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, China
| | - Xianmei Yang
- Sichuan Mental Health Center, The Third Hospital of Mianyang, No. 190, Jiannan East Road, Mianyang, Sichuan, 621000, China
| | - Xiangrui Wu
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, West China School of Public Health and West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, No.17, Section 3, Renmin South Road, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, China
| | - Ruoxin Fan
- Sichuan Mental Health Center, The Third Hospital of Mianyang, No. 190, Jiannan East Road, Mianyang, Sichuan, 621000, China
| | - Jun Liu
- Sichuan Mental Health Center, The Third Hospital of Mianyang, No. 190, Jiannan East Road, Mianyang, Sichuan, 621000, China
| | - Hu Xiang
- Sichuan Mental Health Center, The Third Hospital of Mianyang, No. 190, Jiannan East Road, Mianyang, Sichuan, 621000, China
| | - Yang Li
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, West China School of Public Health and West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, No.17, Section 3, Renmin South Road, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, China
| | - Xing Zhao
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, West China School of Public Health and West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, No.17, Section 3, Renmin South Road, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, China
| | - Xiang Liu
- Department of Health Behavior and Social Medicine, West China School of Public Health and West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, No.17, Section 3, Renmin South Road, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, China.
| | - Yuanyuan Liu
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, West China School of Public Health and West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, No.17, Section 3, Renmin South Road, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Giebel C, Gabbay M, Shrestha N, Saldarriaga G, Reilly S, White R, Liu G, Allen D, Zuluaga MI. Community-based mental health interventions in low- and middle-income countries: a qualitative study with international experts. Int J Equity Health 2024; 23:19. [PMID: 38308294 PMCID: PMC10835969 DOI: 10.1186/s12939-024-02106-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2023] [Accepted: 01/13/2024] [Indexed: 02/04/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mental health services are scarce in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), and designing and implementing effective interventions can be difficult. The aim of this international study was to explore the key lessons for developing, implementing, and evaluating community-based mental health and well-being interventions in LMICs, with an additional focus on older adults. METHODS Research and clinical experts in developing and implementing psychosocial community-based interventions in LMICs were interviewed remotely between October 2021 and January 2022. Participants were recruited via existing global health networks and via published literature searches. Participants were asked about their experiences of developing and implementing interventions, and about key barriers and facilitators during the process. Interviews lasted up to 45 min, and data were analysed using combined inductive and deductive thematic analysis. RESULTS Sixteen global mental health experts participated. Five themes with different sub-themes were generated: Mechanisms and contexts; Barriers; Facilitators; Public and stakeholder involvement; Looking through an ageing lens. The development and delivery of mental health interventions in LMICs are facilitated through integration into existing health infrastructures and working with existing job roles as delivery agents. Public and stakeholder involvement are crucial at all stages of development through to implementation to focus on meeting local needs and sustaining participant motivation. Logistical barriers of transport, resources, and location need to be addressed, emphasising local sustainability. CONCLUSIONS This study provides important insights for how the development, implementation, and evaluation of community-based mental health and well-being interventions in LMICs can be optimised, and can complement general guidance into complex interventions developments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clarissa Giebel
- Department of Primary Care & Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration North West Coast (ARC NWC), Liverpool, UK.
| | - Mark Gabbay
- Department of Primary Care & Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration North West Coast (ARC NWC), Liverpool, UK
| | - Nipun Shrestha
- Trials Centre, NHMRC Clinical, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Siobhan Reilly
- Centre for Applied Dementia Studies, Faculty of Health Studies, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK
| | - Ross White
- School of Psychology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Ginger Liu
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration North West Coast (ARC NWC), Liverpool, UK
| | - Dawn Allen
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration North West Coast (ARC NWC), Liverpool, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Szlamka Z, Ahmed I, Genovesi E, Kinfe M, Hoekstra RA, Hanlon C. Conceptualising the empowerment of caregivers raising children with developmental disabilities in Ethiopia: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:1420. [PMID: 38102602 PMCID: PMC10722818 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-10428-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2023] [Accepted: 12/04/2023] [Indexed: 12/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Caregivers of children with developmental disabilities (DDs) in Ethiopia experience stigma and exclusion. Due to limited existing services and substantial barriers to accessing care, they often lack support. Caregiver empowerment could help address injustices that hinder their capacity to support their child as they would like. The aim of this study was to explore the meaning and potential role of empowerment for caregivers raising a child with a DD and how empowerment was situated in relation to other priorities in service development. METHODS This was a qualitative phenomenological study. Semi-structured interviews were conducted in Amharic and English with caregivers of children with a DD (n = 15), clinicians (n = 11), community-based health extension workers (n = 5), representatives of non-governmental organisations working with families with DDs (n = 17), and representatives of local authorities in health, education, and social care (n = 15). Data were analysed thematically. RESULTS Three main themes were developed: "Barriers to exercising caregivers' agency"; "Whose decision is it to initiate empowerment?"; and "Supporting caregivers through support groups". Caregiver capacity to do what they thought was best for their child was undermined by poverty, a sense of hopelessness, experience of domestic abuse and multiple burdens experienced by those who were single mothers. Caregivers were nonetheless active in seeking to bring about change for their children. Caregivers and professionals considered support groups to be instrumental in facilitating empowerment. Participants reflected that caregiver-focused interventions could contribute to increasing caregivers' capacity to exercise their agency. A tension existed between a focus on individualistic notions of empowerment from some professionals compared to a focus on recognising expertise by experience identified as vital by caregivers. Power dynamics in the context of external funding of empowerment programmes could paradoxically disempower. CONCLUSION Caregivers of children with DDs in Ethiopia are disempowered through poverty, stigma, and poor access to information and resources. Shifting power to caregivers and increasing their access to opportunities should be done on their own terms and in response to their prioritised needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zsofia Szlamka
- Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
- Care Policy and Evaluation Centre, London School of Economics and Political Science, Houghton Street, London, WC2A 2AE, UK.
| | - Ikram Ahmed
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, WHO Collaborating Centre for Mental Health Research and Capacity-Building, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Elisa Genovesi
- Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Mersha Kinfe
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, WHO Collaborating Centre for Mental Health Research and Capacity-Building, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Rosa A Hoekstra
- Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Charlotte Hanlon
- Department of Health Service and Population Research, Institute of Psychiatry, Centre for Global Mental Health, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, WHO Collaborating Centre for Mental Health Research and Capacity-Building, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
- Centre for Innovative Drug Development and Therapeutic Trials for Africa, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jakobsson CE, Genovesi E, Afolayan A, Bella-Awusah T, Omobowale O, Buyanga M, Kakuma R, Ryan GK. Co-producing research on psychosis: a scoping review on barriers, facilitators and outcomes. Int J Ment Health Syst 2023; 17:25. [PMID: 37644476 PMCID: PMC10466887 DOI: 10.1186/s13033-023-00594-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2022] [Accepted: 07/31/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Co-production is a collaborative approach to service user involvement in which users and researchers share power and responsibility in the research process. Although previous reviews have investigated co-production in mental health research, these do not typically focus on psychosis or severe mental health conditions. Meanwhile, people with psychosis may be under-represented in co-production efforts. This scoping review aims to explore the peer-reviewed literature to better understand the processes and terminology employed, as well as the barriers, facilitators, and outcomes of co-production in psychosis research. METHODS Three databases were searched (MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO) using terms and headings related to psychosis and co-production. All titles, abstracts and full texts were independently double-screened. Disagreements were resolved by consensus. Original research articles reporting on processes and methods of co-production involving adults with psychosis as well as barriers, facilitators, and/or outcomes of co-production were included. Data was extracted using a standardised template and synthesised narratively. Joanna Briggs Institute and the AGREE Reporting Checklist were used for quality assessment. RESULTS The search returned 1243 references. Fifteen studies were included: five qualitative, two cross-sectional, and eight descriptive studies. Most studies took place in the UK, and all reported user involvement in the research process; however, the amount and methods of involvement varied greatly. Although all studies were required to satisfy INVOLVE (2018) principles of co-production to be included, seven were missing several of the key features of co-production and often used different terms to describe their collaborative approaches. Commonly reported outcomes included improvements in mutual engagement as well as depth of understanding and exploration. Key barriers were power differentials between researchers and service users and stigma. Key facilitators were stakeholder buy-in and effective communication. CONCLUSIONS The methodology, terminology and quality of the studies varied considerably; meanwhile, over-representation of UK studies suggests there may be even more heterogeneity in the global literature not captured by our review. This study makes recommendations for encouraging co-production and improving the reporting of co-produced research, while also identifying several limitations that could be improved upon for a more comprehensive review of the literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C E Jakobsson
- Department of Psychiatry, Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Eastbourne, England, UK.
| | - E Genovesi
- Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, England, UK
| | - A Afolayan
- Centre for Child and Adolescent Mental Health, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria
| | - T Bella-Awusah
- Department of Psychiatry & Centre for Child and Adolescent Mental Health, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria
| | - O Omobowale
- Department of Community Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria
| | - M Buyanga
- SUCCEED Africa, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe
| | - R Kakuma
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Centre for Global Mental Health, London, England, UK.
| | - G K Ryan
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Centre for Global Mental Health, London, England, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Considerations for supporting meaningful stakeholder engagement in global mental health research. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci 2022; 31:e54. [PMID: 35856261 PMCID: PMC9305728 DOI: 10.1017/s204579602200035x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
The need to ensure that research evidence is adopted by health systems and is informed by lived experience expertise has been increasingly recognised in mental health research. In the field of global mental health (GMH), though some progress has been made, the meaningful engagement of key stakeholders in research remains low. This editorial outlines recommendations to support the meaningful engagement of policy makers and people with lived or living experience of mental illness in GMH research. Recommendations include: increasing funding structures that are designed to support meaningful engagement; urging institutions to consider administrative structures that support engagement with lower resourced partners; promoting capacity development opportunities and resources to support researchers to promote meaningful engagement; developing research governance structures that include key stakeholders; and, taking steps to ensure the needs of diverse stakeholders are met through their engagement in research. Examples of good practice from these areas are provided. Though not an exhaustive list of recommendations, this editorial represents a call to the GMH research community to take a deliberate and proactive approach to prioritising meaningful stakeholder engagement in GMH research with the ultimate goal of improving accessible and appropriate mental health care.
Collapse
|
6
|
Abayneh S, Lempp H, Kohrt BA, Alem A, Hanlon C. Using participatory action research to pilot a model of service user and caregiver involvement in mental health system strengthening in Ethiopian primary healthcare: a case study. Int J Ment Health Syst 2022; 16:33. [PMID: 35818056 PMCID: PMC9275138 DOI: 10.1186/s13033-022-00545-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2022] [Accepted: 06/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Little is known about actual involvement or how to achieve service user and caregiver in mental health systems strengthening in low-and middle-income countries. This study describes the processes and explores involvement experiences of participants in a pilot study of a new model of service user involvement in mental health system strengthening in a rural district in southern Ethiopia. Methods We applied a case study design using participatory action research (PAR). The PAR process comprised of three stages, each with iterative activities of plan, act, observe and reflect. Two stakeholder groups, a Research Advisory Group (RAG) and Research Participant Group (RPG), were established and collaborated in the PAR process. Data collection involved process documentation of meetings and activities: attendances, workshop minutes, discussion outputs, reflective notes, participatory observation of sessions, and in-depth interviews with 12 RPG members. We analyzed the process data descriptively. Thematic analysis was used for qualitative data. Triangulation and synthesis of findings was carried out to develop the case study. Results The stakeholder groups identified their top research priorities, developed an intervention and action plan and made a public presentation of preliminary findings. Key mechanisms used for inclusive participation included capacity building and bringing together diverse stakeholders, anchoring the study in established strong community involvement structures, and making use of participatory strategies and activities during the PAR process. Four themes were developed about experiences of involvement in PAR: (i) expectations and motivation, (ii) experiences of the dynamics of the PAR process, (iii) perceived impacts of involvement in the PAR process, and (iv) implementation challenges and future directions. Conclusions This case study demonstrated the feasibility and acceptability of implementing a complex model of service-user involvement in mental health system strengthening in a resource constrained setting. More needs to be done to embed service-user involvement into routines of the primary healthcare system, alongside sustained support and strengthening multi-stakeholder collaboration at multiple levels. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13033-022-00545-8.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sisay Abayneh
- College of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Addis Ababa University, WHO Collaborating Centre in Mental Health Research and Capacity Building, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. .,Madda Walabu University College of Education and Behavoural Studies, Bale Robe, Ethiopia.
| | - Heidi Lempp
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, Weston Education Centre, King's College London, 10, Cutcombe Rd, London, SE5 9RJ, UK
| | - Brandon A Kohrt
- Department of Psychiatry, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Atalay Alem
- College of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Addis Ababa University, WHO Collaborating Centre in Mental Health Research and Capacity Building, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Charlotte Hanlon
- College of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Addis Ababa University, WHO Collaborating Centre in Mental Health Research and Capacity Building, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.,Centre for Global Mental Health, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, 16 De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK.,Centre for Innovative Drug Development and Therapeutic Trials for Africa (CDT-Africa), College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abayneh S, Lempp H, Rai S, Girma E, Getachew M, Alem A, Kohrt BA, Hanlon C. Empowerment training to support service user involvement in mental health system strengthening in rural Ethiopia: a mixed-methods pilot study. BMC Health Serv Res 2022; 22:880. [PMID: 35799252 PMCID: PMC9264546 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08290-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2022] [Accepted: 07/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Increased service user involvement is recommended to improve weak mental health systems in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs). However, involvement is rarely implemented and interventions to support involvement are sparse. In this study we evaluated the acceptability, feasibility and perceived outcomes of an empowerment and training program for service users and health professionals to facilitate service user involvement in mental health system strengthening in rural Ethiopia. Methods REducing Stigma among HealthcAreProvidErs (RESHAPE) is a training curriculum for service users, their caregivers and aspirational health workers, which uses PhotoVoice methodology, to prepare them in participation of mental health systems strengthening in LMICs. We delivered the RESHAPE training augmented with empowerment content developed in Ethiopia. The interactive face-to-face training was delivered to service users and caregivers (over 10 days), and health professionals (1 day) separately. The study was an uncontrolled, convergent mixed-methods design. The quantitative data consisted of process data, satisfaction questionnaire, and a retrospective pre-test survey. Qualitative data included exit and follow-up in-depth interviews with the service users. Descriptive statistics were performed for quantitative data, and qualitative data were thematically analysed. The findings were integrated through triangulation for convergent themes following analysis. Results Twelve service users, 12 caregivers and 18 health professionals were enrolled, and completed the training. Participants valued the content and delivery process; the standard of the training program met their expectations and participation led to positive gains in understanding about mental illness, stigma, service-user involvement and human rights. The qualitative findings identified positive impacts, including increased self-confidence, sense of empowerment, social - and perceived therapeutic benefits. Conclusions We found that the RESHAPE training with added content for Ethiopia, delivered using the PhotoVoice methodology, is feasible, acceptable and of value to develop and implement training programmes which can empower service users to be involved in mental health system strengthening in this setting. Further study to assess the impact on health systems strengthening is warranted. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-08290-x.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sisay Abayneh
- College of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, WHO Collaborating Centre in Mental Health Research and Capacity Building, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. .,Madda Walabu University College of Education and Behavoural Studies, Robe, Ethiopia.
| | - Heidi Lempp
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, Weston Education Centre 10, Cutcombe Rd., London, SE5 9RJ, UK
| | - Sauharda Rai
- Department of Psychiatry, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Eshetu Girma
- Depatment of Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Medhanit Getachew
- Centre for Innovative Drug Development and Therapeutic Trials for Africa (CDT-Africa), College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Atalay Alem
- College of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, WHO Collaborating Centre in Mental Health Research and Capacity Building, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Brandon A Kohrt
- Department of Psychiatry, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Charlotte Hanlon
- College of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, WHO Collaborating Centre in Mental Health Research and Capacity Building, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.,Centre for Innovative Drug Development and Therapeutic Trials for Africa (CDT-Africa), College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.,Centre for Global Mental Health, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, 16 De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Johnson S, Dalton‐Locke C, Baker J, Hanlon C, Salisbury TT, Fossey M, Newbigging K, Carr SE, Hensel J, Carrà G, Hepp U, Caneo C, Needle JJ, Lloyd‐Evans B. Acute psychiatric care: approaches to increasing the range of services and improving access and quality of care. World Psychiatry 2022; 21:220-236. [PMID: 35524608 PMCID: PMC9077627 DOI: 10.1002/wps.20962] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Acute services for mental health crises are very important to service users and their supporters, and consume a substantial share of mental health resources in many countries. However, acute care is often unpopular and sometimes coercive, and the evidence on which models are best for patient experience and outcomes remains surprisingly limited, in part reflecting challenges in conducting studies with people in crisis. Evidence on best ap-proaches to initial assessment and immediate management is particularly lacking, but some innovative models involving extended assessment, brief interventions, and diversifying settings and strategies for providing support are potentially helpful. Acute wards continue to be central in the intensive treatment phase following a crisis, but new approaches need to be developed, evaluated and implemented to reducing coercion, addressing trauma, diversifying treatments and the inpatient workforce, and making decision-making and care collaborative. Intensive home treatment services, acute day units, and community crisis services have supporting evidence in diverting some service users from hospital admission: a greater understanding of how best to implement them in a wide range of contexts and what works best for which service users would be valuable. Approaches to crisis management in the voluntary sector are more flexible and informal: such services have potential to complement and provide valuable learning for statutory sector services, especially for groups who tend to be underserved or disengaged. Such approaches often involve staff with personal experience of mental health crises, who have important potential roles in improving quality of acute care across sectors. Large gaps exist in many low- and middle-income countries, fuelled by poor access to quality mental health care. Responses need to build on a foundation of existing community responses and contextually relevant evidence. The necessity of moving outside formal systems in low-resource settings may lead to wider learning from locally embedded strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonia Johnson
- Division of PsychiatryUniversity College LondonLondonUK,Camden and Islington NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
| | | | - John Baker
- School of Healthcare, University of LeedsLeedsUK
| | - Charlotte Hanlon
- Centre for Global Mental Health, Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College LondonLondonUK,Department of PsychiatrySchool of Medicine, and Centre for Innovative Drug Development and Therapeutic Trials for Africa, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa UniversityAddis AbabaEthiopia
| | - Tatiana Taylor Salisbury
- Centre for Global Mental Health, Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College LondonLondonUK
| | - Matt Fossey
- Faculty of Health, Education, Medicine and Social CareAnglia Ruskin UniversityChelmsfordUK
| | - Karen Newbigging
- Department of PsychiatryUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK,Institute for Mental Health, University of BirminghamBirminghamUK
| | - Sarah E. Carr
- Health Service and Population Research DepartmentInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College LondonLondonUK
| | - Jennifer Hensel
- Department of PsychiatryUniversity of ManitobaWinnipegMBCanada
| | - Giuseppe Carrà
- Department of Medicine and SurgeryUniversity of Milano BicoccaMilanItaly
| | - Urs Hepp
- Integrated Psychiatric Services Winterthur, Zürcher UnterlandWinterthurSwitzerland
| | - Constanza Caneo
- Departamento de Psiquiatría, Facultad de MedicinaPontificia Universidad Católica de ChileSantiagoChile
| | - Justin J. Needle
- Centre for Health Services Research, School of Health Sciences, City, University of LondonLondonUK
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ertl V, Groß M, Mwaka SO, Neuner F. Treating alcohol use disorder in the absence of specialized services - evaluation of the moving inpatient Treatment Camp approach in Uganda. BMC Psychiatry 2021; 21:601. [PMID: 34852824 PMCID: PMC8638348 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-021-03593-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2021] [Accepted: 11/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The gap between service need and service provision for alcohol-related disorders is highest in resource-poor countries. However, in some of these contexts, local initiatives have developed pragmatic interventions that can be carried out with limited specialized personnel. In an uncontrolled treatment study, we aimed to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, safety, costs and potential effects of an innovative locally developed community-based program (the Treatment Camp) that is based on an inpatient clinic that moves from community to community. METHODS Out of 32 treatment-seeking individuals 25 took part in the one-week Treatment Camp that included detoxification and counseling components. Re-assessments took place 5 and 12 months after their participation. We explored the course of a wide range of alcohol-related indicators, using the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) as primary outcome complemented by a timeline follow-back approach and the Obsessive Compulsive Drinking Scale. Additionally, we assessed impaired functioning, alcohol-related stigmatization, symptoms of common mental health disorders and indicators of family functioning as reported by participants' wives and children. RESULTS All alcohol-related measures decreased significantly after the Treatment Camp and remained stable up to the 12-month-assessment with high effect sizes ranging from 0.89 to 3.49 (Hedges's g). Although 92% of the participants had lapsed at least once during the follow-up period, 67% classified below the usually applied AUDIT cutoff for hazardous drinking (≥ 8) and no one qualified for the dependent range (≥ 20) one year after treatment. Most secondary outcomes including impaired functioning, alcohol-related stigmatization, symptoms of depression and indicators of family functioning followed the same trajectory. CONCLUSIONS We found the Treatment Camp approach to be acceptable, feasible, safe and affordable (approx. 111 USD/patient) and we could obtain preliminary evidence of its efficacy. Due to its creative combination of inpatient treatment and monitoring by medical personnel with local mobility, the Treatment Camp appears to be more accessible and inclusive than other promising interventions for alcohol dependent individuals in resource-poor contexts. Effects of the approach seem to extend to interactions within families, including a reduction of dysfunctional and violent interactions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Verena Ertl
- Clinical Psychology and Biopsychology, Department of Psychology, Catholic University Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, Ostenstraße 25, 85072, Eichstätt, Germany.
- vivo international (www.vivo.org), Konstanz, Germany.
| | - Melissa Groß
- vivo international (www.vivo.org), Konstanz, Germany
- Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Department of Psychology, Bielefeld University, Universitätsstraße 25, 33615, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Samuel Okidi Mwaka
- Program for Prevention, Awareness, Counseling and Treatment of Alcoholism (PACTA; www.pactaguluganda.org.ug), Plot 1 Burcoro Road, Wiaworanga, Gulu, Uganda
| | - Frank Neuner
- vivo international (www.vivo.org), Konstanz, Germany
- Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Department of Psychology, Bielefeld University, Universitätsstraße 25, 33615, Bielefeld, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kola L, Kohrt BA, Hanlon C, Naslund JA, Sikander S, Balaji M, Benjet C, Cheung EYL, Eaton J, Gonsalves P, Hailemariam M, Luitel NP, Machado DB, Misganaw E, Omigbodun O, Roberts T, Salisbury TT, Shidhaye R, Sunkel C, Ugo V, van Rensburg AJ, Gureje O, Pathare S, Saxena S, Thornicroft G, Patel V. COVID-19 mental health impact and responses in low-income and middle-income countries: reimagining global mental health. Lancet Psychiatry 2021; 8:535-550. [PMID: 33639109 PMCID: PMC9764935 DOI: 10.1016/s2215-0366(21)00025-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 346] [Impact Index Per Article: 115.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2020] [Revised: 01/11/2021] [Accepted: 01/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Most of the global population live in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs), which have historically received a small fraction of global resources for mental health. The COVID-19 pandemic has spread rapidly in many of these countries. This Review examines the mental health implications of the COVID-19 pandemic in LMICs in four parts. First, we review the emerging literature on the impact of the pandemic on mental health, which shows high rates of psychological distress and early warning signs of an increase in mental health disorders. Second, we assess the responses in different countries, noting the swift and diverse responses to address mental health in some countries, particularly through the development of national COVID-19 response plans for mental health services, implementation of WHO guidance, and deployment of digital platforms, signifying a welcome recognition of the salience of mental health. Third, we consider the opportunity that the pandemic presents to reimagine global mental health, especially through shifting the balance of power from high-income countries to LMICs and from narrow biomedical approaches to community-oriented psychosocial perspectives, in setting priorities for interventions and research. Finally, we present a vision for the concept of building back better the mental health systems in LMICs with a focus on key strategies; notably, fully integrating mental health in plans for universal health coverage, enhancing access to psychosocial interventions through task sharing, leveraging digital technologies for various mental health tasks, eliminating coercion in mental health care, and addressing the needs of neglected populations, such as children and people with substance use disorders. Our recommendations are relevant for the mental health of populations and functioning of health systems in not only LMICs but also high-income countries impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, with wide disparities in quality of and access to mental health care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lola Kola
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Mental Health, Neurosciences and Drug and Alcohol Abuse, Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria; BRiTE Center, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
| | - Brandon A Kohrt
- Division of Global Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Charlotte Hanlon
- Centre for Global Mental Health, Department of Health Service and Population Research, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Department of Psychiatry, WHO Collaborating Centre for Mental Health Research and Capacity-Building, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - John A Naslund
- Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Siham Sikander
- Global Health Department, Health Services Academy, Islamabad, Pakistan; Department of Primary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | | | - Corina Benjet
- Division of Epidemiology and Psychosocial Research, National Institute of Psychiatry Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Eliza Yee Lai Cheung
- The Reference Centre for Psychosocial Support, International Federation of the Red Cross and Red Crescent, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China; The Red Cross of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of China, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China
| | - Julian Eaton
- CBM Global and Centre for Global Mental Health, London, UK
| | - Pattie Gonsalves
- Wellcome-DBT India Alliance, Sangath, New Delhi, India; School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK
| | - Maji Hailemariam
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
| | | | - Daiane B Machado
- Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Centre for Data and Knowledge Integration for Health, CIDACS-FIOCRUZ, Bahia, Brazil
| | - Eleni Misganaw
- Mental Health Service Users Association Ethiopia, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia; Global Mental Health Peer Network, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Olayinka Omigbodun
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Mental Health, Neurosciences and Drug and Alcohol Abuse, Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria; Centre for Child and Adolescent Mental Health, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria
| | - Tessa Roberts
- Centre for Society and Mental Health, Department of Health Service and Population Research, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Tatiana Taylor Salisbury
- Centre for Global Mental Health, Department of Health Service and Population Research, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Mental Health, Department of Health Service and Population Research, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | | | - Charlene Sunkel
- Global Mental Health Peer Network, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Victor Ugo
- Mentally Aware Nigeria Initiative, Lagos, Nigeria; United for Global Mental Health, London, UK
| | - André Janse van Rensburg
- Centre for Rural Health, College of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa; Centre for Health Systems Research and Development, Faculty of Humanities, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa
| | - Oye Gureje
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Mental Health, Neurosciences and Drug and Alcohol Abuse, Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria
| | - Soumitra Pathare
- Centre for Mental Health Law and Policy, Indian Law Society, Pune, India
| | - Shekhar Saxena
- Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Graham Thornicroft
- Centre for Global Mental Health, Department of Health Service and Population Research, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Centre for Implementation Science, Department of Health Service and Population Research, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Vikram Patel
- Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Wellcome-DBT India Alliance, Sangath, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ling R, Sit HF, Balaji S, Lam AI, Latkin CA, Tucker JD, Hall BJ. Crowdsourcing to design a marketing package to promote a WHO digital mental health intervention among Chinese young adults. Internet Interv 2021; 25:100397. [PMID: 34036050 PMCID: PMC8138601 DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2021.100397] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2020] [Revised: 03/09/2021] [Accepted: 04/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Digital mental health is an emerging field that can leverage technology and mobile apps to deliver mental health treatment to populations in areas with limited mental health services. Despite widespread availability of these apps, uptake remains low. Enhanced marketing is necessary to increase public engagement. There is growing recognition that mental health intervention beneficiaries should be engaged in all phases of treatment development, adaptation, and delivery. Crowdsourcing - consulting the public to solve problems and sharing the solutions - can foster community-informed ideas for public health, but has yet been applied to digital mental health marketing. OBJECTIVE With the goal of engaging potential intervention beneficiaries in digital mental health dissemination, the current project implemented a digital mental health crowdsourcing designathon for Chinese college students in Macao SAR, China and evaluated the feasibility of the contest and the products. The contest asked participants to design marketing packages for Step-by-Step, a scalable WHO digital mental health intervention focusing on depression. METHODS Designathon participants, recruited from a global health class, were sorted into teams with balanced areas of expertise. Two judging panels - one of experts in relevant fields and another of Chinese college students - evaluated the marketing packages and selected finalists. The designathon was held in-person over four days and involved debriefing, workshops, a contest, and an awards ceremony. A parallel mixed-methods approach was applied, including qualitative feedback from judges and participants alongside quantitative data on participant satisfaction and depressive symptoms to enrich our understanding of the event. Additionally, based on judges' feedback given to participants, the communication packages of the contest were ranked. RESULTS 49 participants (8 teams of 6-7 members each) were involved in the designathon. Using a cutoff score of 10 on the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), 11.4% of participants had moderate or higher depressive symptoms. All teams successfully produced complete digital mental health marketing packages. Four finalists' packages were selected quantitatively with judges' scores and the top finalist's package was described by judges' comments as simple, thoughtful, and appealing, although not informative enough. Participants were overall satisfied with the designathon, but some mentioned that time was insufficient and that organization/instruction clarity could have been improved. CONCLUSIONS The designathon is a novel, feasible strategy to collect crowd input for the dissemination of a mental health intervention. Compared with traditional communication strategies, this bottom-up approach included and engaged potential intervention beneficiaries to take an active role in creating digital mental health marketing communication. Future contests should allow participants more time and reconsider aspects of event organization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rui Ling
- Global and Community Mental Health Research Group, New York University (Shanghai), Shanghai, People's Republic of China,Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Hao Fong Sit
- Global and Community Mental Health Research Group, New York University (Shanghai), Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - Suvasini Balaji
- Global and Community Mental Health Research Group, New York University (Shanghai), Shanghai, People's Republic of China,Program in Public Health Studies, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Carl A. Latkin
- Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Joseph D. Tucker
- UNC Project China, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA,Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Brian J. Hall
- Global and Community Mental Health Research Group, New York University (Shanghai), Shanghai, People's Republic of China,Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA,Corresponding author at: Global and Community Mental Health Research Group, New York University (Shanghai), 1555 Century Ave, Pudong, Shanghai 200122, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Murphy J, Qureshi O, Endale T, Esponda GM, Pathare S, Eaton J, De Silva M, Ryan G. Barriers and drivers to stakeholder engagement in global mental health projects. Int J Ment Health Syst 2021; 15:30. [PMID: 33812375 PMCID: PMC8019163 DOI: 10.1186/s13033-021-00458-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2020] [Accepted: 03/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Engagement with diverse stakeholders, including policy makers, care providers and service users and communities, is essential for successful implementation of global mental health interventions. Despite being a fundamental factor in the implementation process, evidence about challenges and drivers to stakeholder engagement is limited in the global mental health literature. Methods We conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews with 29 recipients of Grand Challenges Canada Global Mental Health funding to assess barriers and drivers to global mental health implementation across a portfolio of projects. We used framework analysis to identify key themes related to implementation barriers and drivers. This paper reports on barriers and drivers to stakeholder engagement, with results related to capacity development and service delivery reported elsewhere in this journal. Results Barriers and drivers to stakeholder engagement were identified across four themes: (1) Contextual Considerations, (2) Resources, (3) Participation, Uptake and Empowerment, and (4) Stigma. While complex contextual challenges create barriers, mechanisms such as formative research can facilitate a deeper contextual understanding that supports effective implementation planning. Limited financial and human resources and competing priorities can lead to substantial challenges. Investing in and leveraging existing local resources and expertise can help to mitigate these barriers. The challenge of achieving active participation from stakeholders and diverging expectations about the nature of participation were identified as barriers, while providing opportunities for meaningful participation and empowerment acted as drivers. Stigma at the institutional, community and individual level was also identified as a substantial barrier to engagement. Conclusion The findings of this study are relevant to implementers in global mental health. They also have implications for global mental health funding agencies and policy organizations, who can support improved stakeholder engagement by investing in high-quality formative research, supporting capacity building for policy engagement, investing in longer-term funding schemes to support sustainable partnerships and scale-up, thus fostering successful engagement and supporting effective implementation of global mental health innovations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jill Murphy
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, 2255 Westbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 2A1, Canada.
| | - Onaiza Qureshi
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel St, Bloomsbury, London, WC1E 7HT, UK
| | - Tarik Endale
- Department of Counseling and Clinical Psychology, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Georgina Miguel Esponda
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, 16 De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK
| | - Soumitra Pathare
- Centre for Mental Health Law and Policy, Indian Law Society, Pune, 411004, India
| | - Julian Eaton
- Centre for Global Mental Health, Department of Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel St, Bloomsbury, London, WC1E 7HT, UK
| | - Mary De Silva
- Wellcome Trust, 215 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BE, UK
| | - Grace Ryan
- Centre for Global Mental Health, Department of Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel St, Bloomsbury, London, WC1E 7HT, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Qureshi O, Endale T, Ryan G, Miguel-Esponda G, Iyer SN, Eaton J, De Silva M, Murphy J. Barriers and drivers to service delivery in global mental health projects. Int J Ment Health Syst 2021; 15:14. [PMID: 33487170 PMCID: PMC7827991 DOI: 10.1186/s13033-020-00427-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2020] [Accepted: 12/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Research in global mental health (GMH) has previously documented how contextual factors like political instability, poverty and poorly-funded health infrastructure continue to compromise effective and equitable mental health service delivery. There is a need to develop more feasible and evidence-based solutions through implementation research. This paper, one in a series pertaining to implementation in GMH projects worldwide, focuses on implementation factors influencing mental health service delivery. METHODS This is a qualitative study carried out as part of a Theory of Change-driven evaluation of Grand Challenges Canada's (GCC's) Global Mental Health portfolio. Purposive sampling was used to recruit twenty-nine GCC grantees for interviews. A semi-structured interview schedule was used to guide the interviews which were recorded and subsequently transcribed. Transcripts were double-coded and analyzed in NVivo 11 using framework analysis. This paper reports results related to detection and treatment of mental illness, mental health promotion and prevention of mental illness. RESULTS Key barriers included: lack of appropriate human resources and expertise for service delivery; lack of culturally appropriate screening tools and interventions; and difficulties integrating services with the existing mental health system. Formative research was a key driver facilitating the cultural adaptation of mental health detection, treatment, promotion and preventative approaches. Recruiting local providers and utilizing mHealth for improving screening, monitoring and data management were also found to be successful approaches in reducing workforce burden, improving sustainability, mental health literacy, participant engagement and uptake. CONCLUSIONS The study identifies a number of key barriers to and drivers of successful service delivery from the perspective of grantees implementing GMH projects. Findings highlight several opportunities to mitigate common challenges, providing recommendations for strengthening systems- and project-level approaches for delivering mental health services. Further, more inclusive research is required to inform guidance around service delivery for successful implementation, better utilization of funding and improving mental health outcomes among vulnerable populations in low-resource settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Onaiza Qureshi
- Global Mental Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel St, Bloomsbury, London, WC1E 7HT UK
| | - Tarik Endale
- Department of Counseling and Clinical Psychology, Teachers College, Colombia University, 525 W 120th St, New York, NY 10027 USA
| | - Grace Ryan
- Centre for Global Mental Health, Department of Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel St, Bloomsbury, London, WC1E 7HT UK
| | - Georgina Miguel-Esponda
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, 16 De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF UK
| | - Srividya N. Iyer
- Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, 845 Sherbrooke St W, Montreal, QC H3A 0G4 Canada
- Douglas Research Centre, 6875 Boulevard LaSalle, Montreal, QC H4H 1R3 Canada
| | - Julian Eaton
- Centre for Global Mental Health, Department of Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel St, Bloomsbury, London, WC1E 7HT UK
- CBM UK, 8 Oakington Business Park, Dry Drayton Rd, Oakington, CB24 3DQ UK
| | - Mary De Silva
- Health of Population Health, Wellcome Trust, 215 Euston Rd, Bloomsbury, London, NW1 2BE UK
| | - Jill Murphy
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, 2255 Westbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 2A1 Canada
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kleintjes S, den Hollander DH, Pillay SR, Kramers-Olen A. Strengthening the National Health Insurance Bill for mental health needs: response from the Psychological Society of South Africa. SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY 2020. [DOI: 10.1177/0081246320954317] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
This article summarizes the findings of a consultation process initiated at the 25th congress of the Psychological Society of South Africa in September 2019 to submit a response to the national public participation process on the National Health Insurance Bill, 2019. While the Psychological Society of South Africa supports the overall purpose of the Bill, to provide universal health coverage in South Africa, this article critically discusses eight core concerns related to the Bill, including the need to: (1) integrate mental health more effectively into the National Health Insurance Bill; (2) ensure equitable access to health services for all people; (3) improve human resources for mental health; (4) clarify accreditation standards and contractual conditions for service providers; (5) improve utilization of private practitioners within an integrated health system; (6) include mental health expertise in the advisory structures of the National Health Insurance Bill; (7) set out a robust accountability framework within the National Health Insurance Bill; and (8) include mental health indicators in the National Health Insurance information system. Taken together, this article contributes to the ongoing deliberations about strengthening the National Health Insurance system to ensure that it is responsive to mental health care needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sharon Kleintjes
- Division of Intellectual Disability, Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of Cape Town, South Africa
| | | | - Suntosh R Pillay
- King Dinuzulu Hospital Complex, South Africa
- Department of Psychiatry, Nelson R Mandela School of Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
| | - Anne Kramers-Olen
- Fort Napier Hospital, South Africa
- Department of Behavioural Medicine, Nelson R Mandela School of Medicine, South Africa
- University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Abayneh S, Lempp H, Alem A, Kohrt BA, Fekadu A, Hanlon C. Developing a Theory of Change model of service user and caregiver involvement in mental health system strengthening in primary health care in rural Ethiopia. Int J Ment Health Syst 2020; 14:51. [PMID: 32760440 PMCID: PMC7379363 DOI: 10.1186/s13033-020-00383-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2019] [Accepted: 07/18/2020] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The involvement of service users and caregivers is recommended as a strategy to strengthen health systems and scale up quality mental healthcare equitably, particularly in low-and-middle-income countries. Service user and caregiver involvement is complex, and its meaningful implementation seems to be a worldwide challenge. Theory of Change (ToC) has been recommended to guide the development, implementation and evaluation of such complex interventions. This paper aims to describe a ToC model for service user and caregiver involvement in a primary mental health care in rural Ethiopia. METHODS The ToC was developed in two workshops conducted in (i) Addis Ababa with purposively selected psychiatrists (n = 4) and multidisciplinary researchers (n = 3), and (ii) a rural district in south-central Ethiopia (Sodo), with community stakeholders (n = 24). Information from the workshops (provisional ToC maps, minutes, audio recordings), and inputs from a previous qualitative study were triangulated to develop the detailed ToC map. This ToC map was further refined with written feedback and further consultative meetings with the research team (n = 6) and community stakeholders (n = 35). RESULTS The experiential knowledge and professional expertise of ToC participants combined to produce a ToC map that incorporated key components (community, health organisation, service user and caregiver), necessary interventions, preconditions, assumptions and indicators towards the long-term outcomes. The participatory nature of ToC by itself raised awareness of the possibilities for servicer user and caregiver involvement, promoted co-working and stimulated immediate commitments to mobilise support for a grass roots service user organization. CONCLUSIONS The ToC workshops provided an opportunity to co-produce a ToC for service user and caregiver involvement in mental health system strengthening linked to the planned model for scale-up of mental health care in Ethiopia. The next steps will be to pilot a multi-faceted intervention based on the ToC and link locally generated evidence to published evidence and theories to refine the ToC for broader transferability to other mental health settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sisay Abayneh
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, WHO Collaborating Centre in Mental Health Research and Capacity Building, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Heidi Lempp
- Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King’s College London, Weston Education Centre 10, Cutcombe Rd, London, SE5 9RJ UK
| | - Atalay Alem
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, WHO Collaborating Centre in Mental Health Research and Capacity Building, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Brandon A. Kohrt
- Department of Psychiatry, George Washington University, Washington, DC USA
| | - Abebaw Fekadu
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, WHO Collaborating Centre in Mental Health Research and Capacity Building, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
- College of Health Sciences, Centre for Innovative Drug Development and Therapeutic Trials for Africa (CDT-Africa), Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
- Department of Global Health & Infection, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK
| | - Charlotte Hanlon
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, WHO Collaborating Centre in Mental Health Research and Capacity Building, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
- College of Health Sciences, Centre for Innovative Drug Development and Therapeutic Trials for Africa (CDT-Africa), Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
- Centre for Global Mental Health, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, 16 De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ryan GK, Kamuhiirwa M, Mugisha J, Baillie D, Hall C, Newman C, Nkurunungi E, Rathod SD, Devries KM, De Silva MJ, Mpango R. Peer support for frequent users of inpatient mental health care in Uganda: protocol of a quasi-experimental study. BMC Psychiatry 2019; 19:374. [PMID: 31783827 PMCID: PMC6883561 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-019-2360-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2019] [Accepted: 11/15/2019] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Reducing readmissions among frequent users of psychiatric inpatient care could result in substantial cost savings to under-resourced mental health systems. Studies from high-income countries indicate that formal peer support can be an effective intervention for the reduction of readmissions among frequent users. Although in recent years formal peer support programmes have been established in mental health services in a few low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), they have not been rigorously evaluated. METHODS This protocol describes a quasi-experimental difference-in-differences study conducted as part of a broader evaluation of the Brain Gain II peer support programme based at Butabika National Referral Hospital in Kampala, Uganda. The primary objective is to investigate whether frequent users of psychiatric inpatient care who have access to a peer support worker (PSW+) experience a greater reduction in rehospitalisation rates and number of days spent in hospital compared to those who do not have access to a peer support worker (PSW-). Frequent users, defined as adults diagnosed with either a mental disorder or epilepsy who have had three or more inpatient stays at Butabika over the previous 24 months, are referred to Brain Gain II by hospital staff on five inpatient wards. Frequent users who normally reside in a district where peer support workers currently operate (Kampala, Jinja, Wakiso and Mukono) are eligible for formal peer support and enter the PSW+ group. Participants in the PSW+ group are expected to receive at least one inpatient visit by a trained peer support worker before hospital discharge and three to six additional visits after discharge. Frequent users from other districts enter the PSW- group and receive standard care. Participants' admissions data are extracted from hospital records at point of referral and six months following referral. DISCUSSION To the best of our knowledge, this will be the first quasi-experimental study of formal peer support in a LMIC and the first to assess change in readmissions, an outcome of particular relevance to policy-makers seeking cost-effective alternatives to institutionalised mental health care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grace K. Ryan
- Department of Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, WC1E 7HT, London, UK
| | | | - James Mugisha
- Butabika National Referral Hospital, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Dave Baillie
- East London National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Cerdic Hall
- Camden and Islington National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Carter Newman
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA USA
| | | | - Sujit D. Rathod
- Department of Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, WC1E 7HT, London, UK
| | - Karen M. Devries
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|