Selecting an appropriate alcohol pharmacotherapy: review of recent findings

Repurposing drugs for treatment of alcohol use disorder

Repurposing drugs for the treatment of alcohol dependence involves the use of drugs that were initially developed for other conditions, but have shown promise in reducing alcohol use or preventing relapse. This approach can offer a more cost-effective and time-efficient alternative to developing new drugs from scratch. Currently approved medications for alcohol use disorder (AUD) include acamprosate, disulfiram, naltrexone, nalmefene, baclofen, and sodium oxybate. Acamprosate was developed specifically for AUD, while disulfiram's alcohol-deterrent effects were discovered incidentally. Naltrexone and nalmefene were originally approved for opioids but found secondary applications in AUD. Baclofen and sodium oxybate were repurposed from neurological conditions. Other drugs show promise. Topiramate and zonisamide, anticonvulsants, demonstrate efficacy in reducing alcohol consumption. Another anticonvulsant, gabapentin has been disappointing overall, except in cases involving alcohol withdrawal symptoms. Varenicline, a nicotinic receptor agonist, benefits individuals with less severe AUD or concurrent nicotine use. Ondansetron, a 5-HT3 antagonist, has potential for early-onset AUD, especially when combined with naltrexone. Antipsychotic drugs like aripiprazole and quetiapine have limited efficacy. Further investigation is needed for potential repurposing of α1 adrenergic receptor antagonists prazosin and doxazosin, glucocorticoid receptor antagonist mifepristone, the phosphodiesterase inhibitor Ibudilast, the cysteine prodrug N-acetylcysteine, and the OX1R and OX2R blocker Suvorexant. This review supports repurposing drugs as an effective strategy for expanding treatment options for AUD.

Patient Perspectives on Pharmacotherapy of Alcohol Dependence

INTRODUCTION

Pharmacotherapy with drugs like naltrexone or acamprosate is a well-evaluated element in the treatment of alcohol dependence (AD). However, in many countries, these medications are rarely administered. The objective of the present study was to identify from patients' perspective factors that prevent the initiation and compliance with pharmacological treatment of AD.

METHODS

Patients from inpatient alcohol withdrawal treatment underwent a standardized interview. Questions included socio-demographic data, history of AD, treatment history, knowledge and personal experience regarding pharmacotherapy of AD, and personal views about the causes of AD.

RESULTS

Three hundred patients (mean age 47.3 years, 27.7% female, mean duration of AD 8.9 years, 67% with a history of previous inpatient withdrawal treatment) were included. The majority of patients (58.7%) already knew drugs for the pharmacotherapy of AD. Thirty percent had ever used such medications, most often acamprosate. Except for disulfiram, pharmacotherapy of AD had lasted only a few weeks, on average. Medication usually had been applied without additional psychotherapy. No severe side effects were reported. Patients had often stopped pharmacotherapy on their own, when assuming they had reached stable abstinence. Openness to start pharmacotherapy for AD was currently stated by 67% of the total sample. In multiple logistic regression, openness was predicted by having a concept of AD as a medical disease and by a shorter duration of AD.

DISCUSSION

To improve the administration of pharmacotherapy for AD implementation strategies should be systematically developed and evaluated with a focus on the concept of AD as a medical disease.

Medications for the Treatment of Alcohol Dependence-Current State of Knowledge and Future Perspectives from a Public Health Perspective

No single effective therapy for alcohol abuse has been found, despite it being a serious sociological and economic problem for hundreds of years. It seems difficult to find a single drug as a panacea for the alcohol problem due to the complexity of the pathophysiology of alcohol dependence. The purpose of this narrative review is to review existing and potentially future pharmaceuticals for the treatment of alcohol dependence in the most affordable way possible. Psychotherapy is the mainstay of treatment for alcoholism, while few drugs approved by legislators are available in the augmentation of this treatment, such as acamprosate, disulfiram, and naltrexone, approved by the FDA, and nalmefene by the EMA. There are recent reports in the literature on the possibility of using baclofen, topiramate, varenicline, and gabapentin in the treatment of alcohol dependence. Moreover, the results of recent clinical trials using psychoactive substances such as psilocybin and MDMA appear to be a breakthrough in the modern treatment of alcohol abuse. Despite this initial optimism, a lot of scientific effort is still needed before new pharmacological methods supporting the treatment of alcohol dependence syndrome will be widely available.

Cyclic Nucleotide Phosphodiesterases in Alcohol Use Disorders: Involving Gut Microbiota

Alcohol abuse is 1 of the most significant public health problems in the world. Chronic, excessive alcohol consumption not only causes alcohol use disorder (AUD) but also changes the gut and lung microbiota, including bacterial and nonbacterial types. Both types of microbiota can release toxins, further damaging the gastrointestinal and respiratory tracts; causing inflammation; and impairing the functions of the liver, lung, and brain, which in turn deteriorate AUD. Phosphodiesterases (PDEs) are critical in the control of intracellular cyclic nucleotides, including cyclic adenosine monophosphate and cyclic guanosine monophosphate. Inhibition of certain host PDEs reduces alcohol consumption and attenuates alcohol-related impairment. These PDEs are also expressed in the microbiota and may play a role in controlling microbiota-associated inflammation. Here, we summarize the influences of alcohol on gut/lung bacterial and nonbacterial microbiota as well as on the gut-liver/brain/lung axis. We then discuss the relationship between gut and lung microbiota-mediated PDE signaling and AUD consequences in addition to highlighting PDEs as potential targets for treatment of AUD.

Incidence and Progression of Alcohol-Associated Liver Disease After Medical Therapy for Alcohol Use Disorder

IMPORTANCE

Alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD) is one of the most devastating complications of alcohol use disorder (AUD), an increasingly prevalent condition. Medical addiction therapy for AUD may play a role in protecting against the development and progression of ALD.

OBJECTIVE

To ascertain whether medical addiction therapy was associated with an altered risk of developing ALD in patients with AUD.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This retrospective cohort study used the Mass General Brigham Biobank, an ongoing research initiative that had recruited 127 480 patients between its start in 2010 and August 17, 2021, when data for the present study were retrieved. The mean follow-up duration from AUD diagnosis was 9.2 years. International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision diagnosis codes were used to identify ALD and AUD diagnoses.

EXPOSURES

Medical addiction therapy was defined as the documented use of disulfiram, acamprosate, naltrexone, gabapentin, topiramate, or baclofen. Patients were considered to be treated if they initiated medical addiction therapy before the relevant outcome.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) for the development of ALD and hepatic decompensation were calculated and adjusted for multiple risk factors.

RESULTS

The cohort comprised 9635 patients with AUD, of whom 5821 were male individuals (60.4%), and the mean (SD) age was 54.8 (16.5) years. A total of 1135 patients (11.8%) had ALD and 3906 patients (40.5%) were treated with medical addiction therapy. In multivariable analyses, medical addiction therapy for AUD was associated with decreased incidence of ALD (aOR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.31-0.43; P < .001). This association was evident for naltrexone (aOR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.46-0.95; P = .03), gabapentin (aOR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.30-0.43; P < .001), topiramate (aOR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.32-0.66; P < .001), and baclofen (aOR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.36-0.88; P = .01). In addition, pharmacotherapy for AUD was associated with lower incidence of hepatic decompensation in patients with cirrhosis (aOR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.23-0.53, P < .001), including naltrexone (aOR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.10-0.64; P = .005) and gabapentin (aOR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.23-0.56; P < .001). This association persisted even when medical addiction therapy was initiated only after the diagnosis of cirrhosis (aOR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.23-0.71; P = .002).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Results of this study showed that receipt of medical addiction therapy for AUD was associated with reduced incidence and progression of ALD. The associations of individual pharmacotherapy with the outcomes of ALD and hepatic decompensation varied widely.

Substance abuse and neurotransmission

The number of people who suffer from a substance abuse disorder has continued to rise over the last decade; particularly, the number of drug-related overdose deaths has sharply increased during the COVID-19 pandemic. Converging lines of clinical observations, supported by imaging and neuropsychological performance testing, have demonstrated that substance abuse-induced dysregulation of neurotransmissions in the brain is critical for development and expression of the addictive properties of abused substances. Recent scientific advances have allowed for better understanding of the neurobiological processes that mediates drugs of abuse and addiction. This chapter presents the past classic concepts and the recent advances in our knowledge about how cocaine, amphetamines, opioids, alcohol, and nicotine alter multiple neurotransmitter systems, which contribute to the behaviors associated with each drug. Additionally, we discuss the interactive effects of HIV-1 or COVID-19 and substance abuse on neurotransmission and neurobiological pathways. Finally, we introduce therapeutic strategies for development of pharmacotherapies for substance abuse disorders.

Use of pharmacotherapy for alcohol use disorder in Manitoba, Canada: A whole-population cohort study

OBJECTIVE

Update the evidence on use of pharmacotherapy for alcohol use disorder in a Canadian population.

METHODS

Using whole-population administrative data from Manitoba, Canada, we identified all residents age 12+ who were first diagnosed with alcohol use disorder between April 1, 1996 and March 31, 2015, and compared characteristics of those who filled a prescription for naltrexone, acamprosate or disulfiram at least once during that period to those who did not fill a prescription for an alcohol use disorder medication.

RESULTS

Only 1.3% of individuals with alcohol use disorder received pharmacotherapy (62.3% of prescriptions were for naltrexone, 39.4% for acamprosate, 7.5% for disulfiram). Most prescriptions came from family physicians in urban alcohol use disorder (53.6%) and psychiatrists (22.3%). Individuals were more likely to fill a prescription for alcohol use disorder medication if they lived in an urban vs rural environment (OR 2.25; 95% CI 1.83-2.77) or had a mood/anxiety disorder diagnosis vs no diagnosis (OR 2.40, 95% CI 1.98-2.90) in the five years before being diagnosed with alcohol use disorder.

CONCLUSION

Despite established evidence for the effectiveness of pharmacotherapy for alcohol use disorder, these medications continue to be profoundly underutilized in Canada.

Real-world effectiveness of pharmacological treatments of alcohol use disorders in a Swedish nation-wide cohort of 125 556 patients

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Pharmacotherapy for alcohol use disorder (AUD) is recommendable, but under-used, possibly due to deficient knowledge of medications. This study aimed to investigate the real-world effectiveness of approved pharmacological treatments (disulfiram, acamprosate, naltrexone and nalmefene) of AUD.

DESIGN

A nation-wide, register-based cohort study.

SETTING

Sweden.

PARTICIPANTS

All residents aged 16-64 years living in Sweden with registered first-time treatment contact due to AUD from July 2006 to December 2016 (n = 125 556, 62.5% men) were identified from nation-wide registers.

MEASUREMENTS

The main outcome was hospitalization due to AUD. The secondary outcomes were hospitalization due to any cause, alcohol-related somatic causes, as well as work disability (sickness absence or disability pension), and death. Mortality was analysed with between-individual analysis using a traditional multivariate-adjusted Cox hazards regression model. Recurrent outcomes, such as hospitalization-based events and work disability, were analysed with within-individual analyses to eliminate selection bias.

FINDINGS

Naltrexone combined with acamprosate [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.74; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.61-0.89], combined with disulfiram (HR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.60-0.96) and as monotherapy (HR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.81-0.97) was associated with a significantly lower risk of AUD-hospitalization compared with no use of AUD medication. Similar results were found for risk of hospitalization due to any cause. Benzodiazepine use and acamprosate monotherapy were associated with an increased risk of AUD-hospitalization (HR = 1.18, 95% CI = 1.14-1.22 and HR = 1.10, 95% CI = 1.04-1.17, respectively). No statistically significant effects were found for work disability or mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Naltrexone as monotherapy and when combined with disulfiram and acamprosate appears to be associated with lower risk of hospitalization due to any and alcohol-related causes, compared with no use of alcohol use disorder (AUD) medication. Acamprosate monotherapy and benzodiazepine use appear to be associated with increased risk of AUD-associated hospitalization.

Administration of a putative pro-dopamine regulator, a neuronutrient, mitigates alcohol intake in alcohol-preferring rats

BACKGROUND

Excessive alcohol intake is a serious but preventable public health problem in the United States and worldwide. Alcohol and other substance use disorders occur co-morbid with more generalized reward deficiency disorders, characterized by a reduction in dopamine (DA) signaling within the reward pathway, and classically associated with increased impulsivity, risk taking and subsequent drug seeking behavior. It is postulated that increasing dopamine availability and thus restoring DA homeostasis in the mesocorticolimbic system could reduce the motivation to seek and consume ethanol. Here, we treated animals with a neuro-nutrient, KB220Z also known as Synaptamine, designed to augment DA signaling.

METHOD

KB220Z was administered to genetically alcohol-preferring (P) adult male and female rats by oral gavage (PO), intraperioneally (IP), or subcutaneously (SQ) for 4 consecutive days at a 3.4 mL/Kg rat equivalent dose and compared to saline (SQ, IP) or water (PO) controls. Subsequent to treatment, lever pressing and consumption of 10 % ethanol or control 3% sucrose during operant responding was assessed using a drinking in the dark multiple scheduled access (DIDMSA) binge drinking protocol. Locomotor and elevated zero maze activity, and DRD2 mRNA expression via in situ hybridization (ISH) were assessed independently following 4 days of a SQ regimen of KB220Z.

RESULTS

KB220Z administered via IP and SQ markedly and immediately reduced binge drinking of 10 % ethanol in both male and female rats whereas PO administration took at least 3 days to decrease lever pressing for ethanol in both male and female rats. There was no effect of SQ KB220Z on 3% sucrose drinking. Elevated activity in the open field was significantly decreased, and time spent in the open arm of the EZM was moderately reduced. The regimen of SQ KB220Z did not impact the number of DRD2 punctae in neurons of the NAc, but the NAc shell expressed more DRD2 mRNA/cell than NAc core independent of KB220Z.

CONCLUSION

KB220Z attenuates ethanol drinking and other RDS behaviors in P rats possibly by acting on the dopaminergic system, but not by effecting an increase in NAc DRD2 mRNA expression.