Efficacy and safety of pentoxifylline combination therapy in major depressive disorder: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial

Efficacy of Pentoxifylline for the Treatment of Bipolar I/II Patients with Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Proof-of-Concept, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Immune dysregulation can play a role in depression pathophysiology, and immunological antagonists can improve depressive symptoms in treatment-resistant bipolar depression (TRD) patients according to studies.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the anti-depressant effects of the anti-inflammatory drug, pentoxifylline (PTX) in TRD bipolar I/II adult subjects.

METHODS

This 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial of 60 participants was conducted at Hawler Psychiatric Hospital and Private Clinic in Erbil, Iraq. Participants were confirmed as being qualified for bipolar I/II depression based on DSM-5 criteria. Data were analyzed using modified intent-to-treat analysis.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the two groups in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression-17 (HAM-D-17) scores (χ2=1.9, P =.48) or a significant time × treatment interaction (χ2=7.1, P=.54). Nevertheless, a significant effect of time was observed with both groups' reduction in HAM-D-17 scores from the start to the endpoint (χ2= 2.11, P=.002). Besides, a significant time × treatment × CRP interaction was found (χ2=3.1, P=0.016), where there was more reduction in HAM-D-17 score in PTX-treated subjects with CRP> 7.1mg/L. The response rate difference between PTX and the placebo group did not reach a significance level (χ2=0.84, p=0.43). Furthermore, serum concentrations of TNF-α, CRP, and IL-6 significantly reduced at week 12 in the PTX group (P=.007,.04, and <.001, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The current proof of concept study found that in terms of overall anti-depressant effectiveness in bipolar patients with TRD, PTX is not superior to placebo. However, it may improve depressive mood in a subpopulation of subjects with a higher pretreatment inflammatory profile.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05324735.

Pentoxifylline as a Novel Add-on Therapy for Major Depressive Disorder in Adult Patients: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Evidence indicates an association between immune dysregulation and major depressive disorder (MDD). Pentoxifylline (PTX), a phosphodiesterase inhibitor, has been shown to reduce pro-inflammatory activities. The aim of this study was to evaluate changes in depressive symptoms and pro-inflammatory markers after administration of PTX as an adjunctive agent to citalopram in patients with MDD.

METHODS

One hundred patients were randomly assigned to either citalopram (20 mg/day) plus placebo (twice daily) (n=50) or citalopram (20 mg/day) plus PTX (400 mg) (twice daily) (n=50). The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-17 (HAM-D-17) scores at baseline, weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 and serum levels of interleukin1-β (IL-1-β), tumor necrosis factor-α, C-reactive protein, IL-6, serotonin, IL-10, and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) at baseline and week 12 were evaluated.

RESULTS

HAM-D-17 score in the PTX group significantly reduced in comparison to the control group after weeks 4, 6, 8,10, and 12 ((LSMD): - 2.193, p=0.021; - 2.597, p=0.036; - 2.916, p=0.019; - 4.336, p=0.005; and - 4.087, p=0.008, respectively). Patients who received PTX had a better response (83%) and remission rate (79%) compared to the placebo group (49% and 40%, p=0.006 and p=0.01, respectively). Moreover, the reduction in serum concentrations of pro-inflammatory factors and increase in serotonin and BDNF in the PTX group was significantly greater than in the placebo group (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

These findings support the safety and efficacy of PTX as an adjunctive antidepressant agent with anti-inflammatory effects in patients with MDD.

Phosphodiesterase inhibitors in psychiatric disorders

RATIONALE

Challenges in drug development for psychiatric disorders have left much room for the introduction of novel treatments with better therapeutic efficacies and indices. As a result, intense research has focused on identifying new targets for developing such pharmacotherapies. One of these targets may be the phosphodiesterase (PDE) class of enzymes, which play important roles in intracellular signaling. Due to their critical roles in cellular pathways, these enzymes affect diverse neurobiological functions from learning and memory formation to neuroinflammation.

OBJECTIVES

In this paper, we reviewed studies on the use of PDE inhibitors (PDEIs) in preclinical models and clinical trials of psychiatric disorders including depression, anxiety, schizophrenia, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), bipolar disorder (BP), sexual dysfunction, and feeding disorders.

RESULTS

PDEIs are able to improve symptoms of psychiatric disorders in preclinical models through activating the cAMP-PKA-CREB and cGMP-PKG pathways, attenuating neuroinflammation and oxidative stress, and stimulating neural plasticity. The most promising therapeutic candidates to emerge from these preclinical studies are PDE2 and PDE4 inhibitors for depression and anxiety and PDE1 and PDE10 inhibitors for schizophrenia. Furthermore, PDE3 and 4 inhibitors have shown promising results in clinical trials in patients with depression and schizophrenia.

CONCLUSIONS

Larger and better designed clinical studies of PDEIs in schizophrenia, depression, and anxiety are warranted to facilitate their translation into the clinic. Regarding the other conditions discussed in this review (most notably PTSD and BP), better characterization of the effects of PDEIs in preclinical models is required before clinical studies.

Phosphodiesterase inhibitor and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor combination therapy versus monotherapy for the treatment of major depressive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Selective serotonin reuptakeinhibitors (SSRIs) are the gold standard treatment for major depressive disorder (MDD). However, the use of phosphodiesterase (PDE) inhibitors in the treatment of MDD remains unclear. Our study aims to compare the effect of PDE inhibitor combination therapy to SSRI monotherapy for the treatment of MDD.

METHODS

We performed a comprehensive literature search using PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases, for studies that assess the impact of PDE inhibitor therapy on MDD patients. The primary outcome of our study was treatment response rate at the end of study time. Pooled odds ratio (OR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the random-effects model. A P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

A total of four randomized control trials (RCTs), including 270 patients with MDD, were included in the analysis. Follow-up periods ranged from 6 to 12 weeks. The PDE inhibitor group was associated with a significantly higher treatment response rate (OR, 4.77; 95% CI, 2.05-11.12; P = 0.0003).

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analysis demonstrated that MDD patients receiving PDE inhibitor combination therapy had a higher treatment response rate than MDD patients receiving SSRI monotherapy. Further large-scale RCTs with long-term follow-ups are necessary to validate our findings.

Characterisation of medication side effects in patients with mostly resistant depression in a real-world setting

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to identify factors associated with side effects of psychotropic drugs in a real-world setting enriched with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) patients.

METHODS

A total of 1410 depressed patients were treated in a naturalistic setting. Side effects were measured with the Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser Side Effect Rating Scale (UKU); the total score and UKU subscales were considered. Clinical-demographic variables were tested for association with side effects in univariate and then multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Total, psychic and neurological side effects were associated with depressive symptom severity, while autonomic side effects were higher in those with somatic comorbidities and other side effects were lower in patients receiving trazodone. In multivariate analyses, depressive symptom severity was associated with psychic and total side effects, while generalised anxiety disorder (GAD) with neurological side effects and somatic comorbidities remained associated with autonomic side effects. Trazodone was associated with lower side effects and with augmentation treatments. Augmentation therapies showed opposite effects depending on response status, i.e. increased or decreased the risk of side effects in responders and non-responders/resistant patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Psychic side effects may be difficult to distinguish from depressive symptoms and factors associated with different types of side effects are heterogeneous and likely interacting.

Evidence for Anti-inflammatory Effects of Adalimumab in Treatment of Patients With Major Depressive Disorder: A Pilot, Randomized, Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Literature has suggested that major depressive disorder (MDD) is accompanied by higher concentrations of inflammatory biomarkers, which could sabotage response to conventional treatments.

AIMS

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of adalimumab adjunct to sertraline in adults with MDD and increased levels of systemic inflammation.

METHODS

In a 6-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 36 patients with MDD and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein ≥3 mg/L were equally assigned to receive sertraline plus either adalimumab or placebo. Participants were assessed using the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) at baseline, week 3, and week 6. Moreover, serum concentrations of inflammatory biomarkers were measured at baseline and trial end point. Finally, patients were assessed for any adverse event during the trial.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients in each group completed the trial course. All baseline characteristics of participants were similar between the groups. Adalimumab adjunct to sertraline resulted in a greater improvement in HAM-D score compared with placebo over the trial period ( P < 0.001). Participants receiving adalimumab significantly experienced greater response to treatment (≥50% reduction in the HAM-D score) than those receiving placebo ( P = 0.042). Furthermore, after 6 weeks of adalimumab combination therapy with sertraline, inflammatory biomarkers significantly decreased ( P ≤ 0.001), whereas no significant alteration was found in the placebo group. No serious adverse event was documented in the treatment arms.

CONCLUSIONS

Adalimumab adjunctive therapy remarkably improves depressive symptoms of patients with MDD. Further investigations with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods are required to confirm the findings.

Effects of Dexamethasone and Pentoxifylline on Mania-like and Depression-like Behaviors in Rats

Several studies support the notion that inflammation plays a role in the pathophysiology and treatment approaches of psychiatric illnesses, particularly mood disorders. Congruently, classic anti-inflammatory drugs were found efficacious in randomized clinical trials of patients with mood disorders. Moreover, accumulating data indicate that psychotropic drugs exhibit some anti-inflammatory effects. This study was undertaken to examine the efficacy of dexamethasone (a potent corticosteroid) and pentoxifylline (a methylxanthine drug with proven anti-tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitory activity) in behavioral models in rats, which were treated intraperitoneally with either dexamethasone or pentoxifylline for two weeks and then subjected to a battery of behavioral tests. Treatment with pentoxifylline, but not dexamethasone, was associated with antidepressant-like and anti-manic-like effects. The beneficial behavioral effects of pentoxifylline were accompanied by a prominent reduction in pro-inflammatory mediator levels in the brain. For the first time, the current work proves the efficacy of pentoxifylline against both mania-like and depressive-like behaviors. These results suggest that pentoxifylline may be a promising therapeutic intervention for patients with mood disorders. Taking into account the excellent tolerability profile of pentoxifylline in humans, it is warranted to conduct randomized clinical trials to investigate its therapeutic efficacy in patients with psychiatric disorders.

A Potential Role of Ethosuximide and Pentoxifylline in Relieving Abdominal Pain in Irritable Bowel Syndrome Patients Treated with Mebeverine: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial

Background and Purpose

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is defined as an association of chronic abdominal pain with bowel habit abnormalities, without clear organic dysfunction. T-type calcium channels and low-grade mucosal inflammation are linked to abdominal pain; however, medical treatments for IBS abdominal pain are largely ineffective. In this study, we investigated if pentoxifylline (PTX) and ethosuximide could potentially alleviate abdominal pain in patients with IBS treated with mebeverine.

Methods

We recruited 150 patients from Tanta University Hospital to this randomized, prospective, and double blinded study. Patients were randomly allocated to three groups (n = 50). Group 1 (mebeverine) received 135 mg mebeverine three times/day (t.i.d). Group 2 (ethosuximide group) received 135 mg mebeverine t.i.d plus 250 mg ethosuximide twice daily (b.i.d) and group 3 (PTX group) received 135 mg mebeverine t.i.d plus 400 mg PTX b.i.d. Patients were assessed by a gastroenterologist at baseline and 6 months after therapy. Serum interleukin-8 (IL-8), IL-6, tumor necrosis-α (TNF-α), fecal myeloperoxidase, and fecal neutrophil gelatinase associated lipocalin (NGAL) levels were measured before and after therapy. The numeric pain rating scale (NRS) was also assessed before and after therapy.

Primary Outcomes

Reduced NRS scores and abdominal pain relief.

Secondary Outcomes

Decreased inflammatory biomarkers.

Results

After 6 months, groups 2 and 3 showed a significantly greater reduction in serum IL-8, IL-6, TNF-α, fecal myeloperoxidase, and fecal NGAL levels when compared to group 1 after therapy. Both groups 2 and 3 showed significant reductions in NRS scores when compared to the group 1.

Conclusion

Ethosuximide and PTX may be promising, novel adjunct drugs to antispasmodics for relieving abdominal pain in patients with IBS.

Trial Registration

Identifier: NCT04217733.

Cilostazol as an adjunctive treatment in major depressive disorder: a pilot randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Cilostazol, a phosphodiesterase-3 inhibitor, has been reported to improve depressive-like behavior in experimental studies of depression. We investigated the safety and efficacy of cilostazol combination therapy with sertraline in treating patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) in a 6-week, parallel, randomized controlled trial.

METHOD

Among patients referred to the outpatient clinic of a tertiary hospital, those with a diagnosis of MDD with moderate to severe severity (a score of >19 on the Hamilton depression rating scale (HAM-D)) were enrolled. A total of 54 MDD patients aged 18-65 years were randomly assigned to either the cilostazol (100 mg daily) or the placebo group. Both groups received sertraline 100 mg per day similarly. Changes in HAM-D at weeks 2, 4, and 6 were the primary outcome. Participants and outcome assessors were blinded.

RESULTS

At week 6, patients in the cilostazol group had significantly lower HAM-D score (p value= 0.015). General linear model repeated-measure analysis showed significant effect for treatment in improving MDD severity (p value <0.001). The remission rate at the study endpoint and number of responders at week 4 were significantly higher in the cilostazol group (p value= 0.047, p value= 0.032, respectively). The cilostazol group demonstrated a significantly shorter time to response. No significant difference was observed in treatment response at the study endpoint, and there were no serious adverse effects.

CONCLUSION

Our study supports safety and efficacy of cilostazol in treating MDD patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This trial was registered at the Iranian registry of clinical trials (IRCT: www.irct.ir ; registration number: IRCT20090117001556N130).

Pentoxifylline, a nonselective phosphodiesterase inhibitor, in adjunctive therapy in patients with irritable bowel syndrome treated with mebeverine

BACKGROUND

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a functional gastrointestinal condition marked by chronic bowel pain or discomfort, as well as changes in abdominal motility. Despite its worldwide prevalence and clinical impact, the cause of IBS is unknown. Inflammation could play a fundamental role in the development of IBS. The aim of this study was to examine whether pentoxifylline, a competitive nonselective phosphodiesterase inhibitor, is useful in alleviating abdominal pain in IBS patients treated with mebeverine.

METHODS

A randomized, controlled, and prospective clinical study that included 50 outpatients who met the inclusion criteria for IBS. Patients are allocated randomly into two groups (n = 25). Group 1 (mebeverine group) received mebeverine 135 mg three times daily (t.i.d) for three months. Group 2 (pentoxifylline group) received mebeverine 135 mg t.i.d and pentoxifylline 400 mg two times daily for three months. Patients were assessed by a gastroenterologist at baseline and three months after the medication had been started. The serum levels of interleukin-6, interleukin-8 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha, fecal Neutrophil Gelatinase Associated Lipocalin (NGAL), and fecal myeloperoxidase were measured at the start and after three months of therapy. The Numeric Pain Rating scale (NRS) was assessed at baseline and after therapy.

RESULTS

the pentoxifylline group showed a significant decrease in the level of measured biomarkers and a significant decrease in NRS.

CONCLUSION

Pentoxifylline could be a promising adjuvant anti-inflammatory drug in the treatment of abdominal pain in IBS patients treated with mebeverine.

Pentoxifylline for treatment of major depression after percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Near one-fifth of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) develop major depressive disorder (MDD), an independent risk factor of mortality in these patients. We investigated the efficacy of oral pentoxifylline in treating MDD in CAD patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in a 6-week trial.

METHODS

We only included patients with mild to moderate MDD (having a score between 14 and 17 on the Hamilton depression rating scale (HAM-D)). Sixty-four CAD patients undergoing PCI or CABG aged 40-60 years were randomly assigned to either the pentoxifylline (800 mg daily) or the placebo group. The outcome was assessed with the HAM-D at weeks 2, 4, and 6.

RESULTS

Patients receiving pentoxifylline had greater improvement in HAM-D scores from baseline at each follow-up than patients receiving placebo (p-value = 0.036 at week 2, p-value < 0.001 at week 4, and p-value < 0.001 at week 6). We found a significant effect for treatment, time, and time×treatment interaction in depression improvement (p-value < 0.001). Rate of remission, treatment response, and adverse effects did not differ between the two groups.

DISCUSSION

Our study supports the safety and efficacy of pentoxifylline in treatment of MDD in CAD patients. However, further investigations are required to confirm the generalizability of our results since the results need to be interpreted cautiously because of the imitated range of disease severity for inclusion. This trial was registered with the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (www.irct.ir; No. IRCT20090117001556N132).